Skip to main content

Full text of "The Victoria history of the county of Northampton"

See other formats


iversity  of  Cj 
Southern  Re^ 
Library  Facil 


RARY 

;rsity  of 

IFORNIA 

DIEGO 


Oversize 


Sni^ood 


Zhc  Dictovia  Ibistor^  of  the 
(Tounties  of  Enolanb 

EDITED  BY  WILLIAM   PAGE,  F.S.A. 


A   HISTORY  OF 
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 

VOLUME    HI 


THE 

VICTORIA  HISTORY 

OF  THE  COUNTIES 
OF  ENGLAND 

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


PUBLISHED  FOR 

THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  LONDON 
INSTITUTE  OF  HISTORICAL  RESEARCH 

REPRINTED  FROM  THE  ORIGINAL  EDITION  OF  1930 

BY 

DAWSONS   OF   PALL  MALL 

FOLKESTONE  &  LONDON 
1970 


Published  by 

The  St.  Catherine  Press 

in  1930 

Reprinted  for  the  University  of  London 

Institute  of  Historical  Research 

by 

Dawsons  of  Pall  Mall 

Cannon  House 

Folkestone,  Kent,  England 

1970 

ISBN  o  J129  04S1  4 


Primed  III  drear  Ilriiaiii 
by  I'hololuhoxraphy 

Untuin  liroihcn  Umitcd 
WokiiiK  and  London 


INSCRIBED 

TO  THE   MEMORY   OF 

HER      LATE      MAJESTY 

QUEEN  VICTORIA 

WHO       GRACIOUSLY       GAVE 

THE     TITLE      TO     AND 

ACCEPTED     THE 

DEDICATION   OF 

THIS    HISTORY 


% 


THE 

VICTORIA  HISTORY 

OF  THE  COUNTY  OF 

NORTHAMPTON 


Edited  by  WILLIAM  PAGE,  F.S.A. 

VOLUME  THREE 


PUBLISHED  FOR 

THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  LONDON 
INSTITUTE  OF  HISTORICAL  RESEARCH 

REPRINTED  BY 

DAWSONS  OF  PALL  MALL 

FOLKESTONE  &  LONDON 


CONTENTS  OF  VOLUME  THREE 


Dedication 
Contents     . 
List  of  Illustrations 
List  of  Maps 
Editorial  Note    . 
Topography 


PACE 
V 

ix 
xi 

XV 


Northampton  Borough 

Polebrook  Hundred 
Introduction 
Barnwell  St.  Andrew 
Benefield 
Hemington 
Luddington 
Oundle 

Polebrook 

Thurning 
Warmington 

Navisford  Hundred 
Introduction 
Clapton 
Pilton 

Stoke  Doyle 
Thorpe  Achurch   . 
Thrapston 


General  descriptions  and  manorial  descents  compiled  under 
the  superintendence  of  William  Pace,  F.S.A.  ;  Architectural 
descriptions,  except  where  otherwise  stated,  by  F.  H.  Cheet- 
HAM,  F.S.A.  ;  Heraldic  drawings  and  blazon  by  the  Rev.  E.  E. 
DoRLiNC,  M.A.,  F.S..^.  ;  Charities  from  information  supplied 
by  J.  R.  Smith,  of  the  Charity  Commission 

By  Helen  M.  Cam,  M.A.  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by 
F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 
M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A I 


By  John  Brownbill,  M.A. 

By  Charlotte  M.  Calthrop,  Class.Trip. 


Bv  John  Brownbill,  M.A.  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by 
F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 
M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A 

By  Charlotte  M.  Calthrop,  Class.  Trip.  ;  Architectural 
descriptions  by  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A.,  D.Litt., 
F.S.A.,  and  F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.  .... 


68 

71 
76 

80 
83 

85 

lOI 


By  John  Brownbill,  M.A.       .......      109 

„  „  „  ,,  ;  Arcliitectural  descriptions  by 
F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 
M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A 113 


By  Catherine   M.  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist.  123 

ji  >f  II  II  II  II  II       II        II        II  **5 

•I  11  II  11  )}  II  II        II       II        II 

Architectural  descriptions  by  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 

M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.,  and  F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.  .         .  129 

By  Catherine  M.  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist.  132 

II  II  II        II  II         II         II        II      II        II  *35 


Architectural  descriptions  by  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 
M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.,  and  F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.  .     139 


IX 


CONTENTS  OF  VOLUME  THREE 


Topography  (continued) 

Navisford  Hundred  {continued) 


By  Maud  E.  Simkins  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by  Prof. 
A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.,  and  F.  H. 
Cheetham,  F.S.A.    ........ 


By  Helen  Douglas  Irvine,  M.A.       ..... 

„       „  ,,  „  „  ;  Description  of  Lyveden 

Old  and  New  Buildings  by  J.  A.  Gotch,  M.A.,  F.S.A.     . 

By  Charlotte  M.  Caltiirop,  Class.  Trip. 

By  Catherine  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist.  . 


Titchmarsh  .  .     By  Catherine  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of   Mod.  Hist. 

Wadenhoe  .  .       „  „  „  „  „  „         „        „         „ 

Huxloe  Hundred 

Introduction  .  .        „  „  „  „  „  „         „        „         „ 

Addington,  Great 

Addington,  Little 
Aldwinkle  All  Saints 
Aldwinkle  St.  Peter 

Barnwell  All  Saints 
Barton  Seagrave 
Burton  Latimer 
Cranford  St.  Andrew 
Cranford  St.  John 
Denford 

Finedon 

Grafton  Underwood 

Irthlingborough 

Islip 

Kettering  .         .     By  F.  W.  Bull,  F.S.A.  and   William  Pace,  F.S.A.  ;    Architec- 

tural descriptions   by   F.   H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof. 
A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.  . 

Lilford-with-Wigsthorpe     By  Maud   E.   Simkins  ;    Description   of   Lilford  Hall  by  J.   A. 

Gotch,  M.A.,  F.S.A 


Architectural  descriptions  by  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson, 
M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.,  and  F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A. 

By  Catherine  Jamison,  Oxford.  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist. 


By  Helen  Douglas  Irvine,  M.A. 
By  Maud  E.  Simkins 


Lowrick 

Slipton 
Sudborough 

Twywell 
Warkton 

Woodford 


By  Maud  E.  Simkins  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by  F.  H. 
Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A., 
D.Litt.,  F.S.A.  ;  Description  of  Drayton  House  by  Prof.  A. 
Hamilton  Thompson       ....... 


Bv  Maud  E.  Simkins 


„         „  „  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by  Prof.  A. 

Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A.,  and  F.  H. 
Cheetham,  F.S.A.    ........ 

By  Catherine  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist. 

By  Maup  F..  Simkins  ;  Architectural  descriptions  by  F.  H. 
Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and  Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A., 
D.Litt.,  F.S.A 

By  Caihkrine  Jamison,  Oxford  Hon.  School  of  Mod.  Hist.  ; 
Architectural  descriptions  by  F.  H.  Cheetham,  F.S.A.,  and 
Prof.  A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  M.A.,  D.Litt.,  F.S.A. 


Borough  of  Higham  Ferrers   By  Charlotte  M.  Calthrop,  Class.  Trip. 
Higham  Park  .  .       „  „  „  „  „         „ 


142 
149 

'53 

«55 
160 
164 

168 

'73 
176 
180 
186 
189 

192 
196 
203 
207 
215 

218 
227 


231 
243 

24s 
248 

252 

25s 
263 
279 


LIST    OF    ILLUSTRATIONS 


PACE 

JTontisfitci 

jull-page  plate  Jacing        8 

13 

Jull-page  plate  facing       18 

20 

full-page  plate  facing       30 

.      3* 


,  plate  facing       34 


Northampton  Pastures.         ...... 

„  Plan  of  Borough  1610  (based  on  Speed's  map) 

„  The  Swan  Hotel      ..... 

„  Plan  of  Borough  1746       .... 

„  The  Bell  Inn 

,,  Plan  of  Borough  1810       .... 

„  Castle  Plan 

„  „      Wall  (demolished) 
Old  Town  Hall 

„  The  County  Hall 36 

„  The  Town  Hall 37 

„  The  Hazelrigg  Mansion,  now  the  Ladies'  Club   .......       38 

„  Dr.  Danver's  House          ...........       39 

„  St.  Peter's  Church  Plan 4I 

.,  ,.       >.  .,       Capital 42 

„  „       „             „        from  the  North-west           -^ 

„  „       „            ,,        The  Interior,  looking  East  J 


} 


,  plate  facing      42 


H 

..        .1              .1         Capital 

. 

43 

» 

Church  of  the  Holy  Sepulchre  Plan           .... 

. 

44 

» 

,,         „           „           „              from  the  South-east             ~» 
„         „           „           „              The  Interior :  Tlie  Round  J 

.  plate  facing 

46 

» 

All  Saints'  Church  :  The  Interior,  looking  East    . 

Jull-page  plate  facing 

48 

n 

„       ,,          „           from  the  South-east     .... 

.  platefacing 

49 

IF 

»       »           II           Plan 

. 

49 

>l 

St.  Giles' Church  Plan 

. 

52 

ft 

„       „         „         from  the  South-cast           .... 

platefacing 

52 

I* 

The  Interior  looking  East 

•              i»      II 

53 

n 

St.  John's  Hospital  :   The  Master's  House  (now  desiroved)  . 

II      II 

58 

u 

.1      1.              »          Pl^n 

. 

59 

i> 

St.  Thomas'  Hospital  (now  destroyed)        .... 

platefacing 

60 

Barnwell  St. 

Andrew  Castle  Plan  ........ 

. 

70 

»          II 

.1      in  '729 

platefacing 

70 

»          » 

>>             II               ........ 

72 

»          II 

„         Latham  Almshouses      ...... 

platefacing 

72 

»i          11 

„         Church  from  the  South-west                      ■» 

n             11 

„            „        The  Interior  ;  The  North  Aisle  J 

•               II         II 

/4 

n             11 

„           „       The  South  Porch 

. 

75 

XI 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 

plate  facing  84 

86 

}flaU  facing  86 


\. flate  facing       88 


PACE 

Luddington  Church  from  the  South 

„  „       The  Interior,  looking  East . 

Oundle  :  The  WTiite  Lion  Hotel 86 

,,  before  1852 

„  New  Street  in  1876 

The  Talbot  Hotel 87 

„  Laxton's  School 88 

„  St.  Os}th's  Lane 

in  1710 

„         The  Market  Place 9° 

„         Paine's  Almshouses 93 

Church  Plan 96 

„  „       The  Interior,  looking  East f  late  facing       96 

Polebrook  Church  Plan 106 

„  „         The  Interior  :   View  across  the  Nave  -> 

>        .         .         .         .  plate  facing     106 

„  „  „         „  looking  East  J 

„  „         from  the  West 

„  „          Wall  Arcade  of  North  Chapel 

Thurning  Rectory        ..............     no 

„  Church  Plan 112 

„  „        Interior,  looking  South-east          ......          .  plate  facing     112 

Warmington  Church  from  the  South-east 

116 


V ,.    .,     107 


}■ 


}.  plate  facing     120 


„  „       The  Pulpit 

»                »       Plan 120 

„  „        West  Doorway 

„  ,,       The  Interior,  looking  Eas 

Pilton :  Old  Manor  House „      „  130 

„  Church  from  the  South    .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .,,,,131 

Stoke  Doyle  Church  :   Monument  to  Sir  Edward  Ward »  '34 

Thorpe  Achurch  Church  Plan        .  .  .  .  .  ■  .  .  .  .  .  .138 

„             „               „         from  the  North-east .  plate  facing  138 

Thrapston  Church  from  the  North ,       „  142 

Titchmarsh  Church  Plan      .............  146 

„  „        from  the  West 

„  „       The  Interior, 

Wadenhoe  Church  Plan 151 

„               „       The  Font 152 

„  „       from  the  South-west  "» 

™     ,        .       ,     ,.       P    ,f p/d/^^n«^     152 

„  „        I  he  Interior,  lookmg  J'.ast  J 

xii 


est  ^ 

>   .  .  .  .  .  .  .  plate  facing     1 46 

r,  looking  East     J 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 


Great  Addington  Church  from  the  South 

„  „  „       The  Interior,  looking  Ea 

Little  Addington  Church  Doorway 

»  »  •>       Plan 

„  „  „       from  the  South 
Aldwinkle  All  Saints  :  Dryden's  Birthplace 

„  „  „        Church  Plan 

„  „  „             „      from  the  South-east 

„  St.  Peter  :  Lyveden  New  Building  Plan 

i>  »»  >»               >»           »>          >» 

*«  ji  f«  »>  V/lu  If 


J 


} 


} 


„         „        „         Church  from  the  South-west. 

, „       The  Interior,  looking  North-east 

Barnwell  All  Saints :   Old  Church 
Barton  Seagrave  Church  Plan 
„  „  „       from  the  North-west 

„  „  „       The  Interior  of  South  Chancel 

„  „  „       Tympanum  of  North  Doorway  .  • 

Burton  Latimer  Hall    ....... 

„  „        Church  Plan  ..... 

„  „  „      from  the  South.         .         -^ 

„  „  „       The  Interior,  looking  East  J 

Cranford  St.  Andrew  Church  from  the  South  .  ^ 

„  „  „  „       The  Interior,  looking  East    J 

Cranford  St.  John  Church  from  the  South 
„  „       „  „       The  Interior 

f>  »       »>  i»       rlan 

Denford  Church  from  the  South-east 

„  „      The  Interior,  looking  East 

»  »      Plan  • 

Finedon  :   Church  Porch 
„  „       Plan 

„  „       from  the  West 

»  ,,       The  Organ        .  .  -v 

,,  „       The  Interior,  looking  East  J 

Grafton  Underwood  Church  Plan 

„  „  „       from  the  East  .         "\ 

„  „  „       The  Interior,  looking  East  J 

Irthlingborough  •    The  Market  Cross     .... 

xiii 


South       .  .    -> 

rior,  looking  East  J 


plate  facing     158 


.  160 

.  162 

plate  facing  162 

.  .  164 

.  166 

plate  facing  166 

.  168 

plate  facing  168 

,,       „  '72 

.,       „  '73 

..       ..  "74 


.         .  178 

plate  facing  178 

.,       .,  179 

.  180 


.      184 

plate  facing     1 84 


.,       „  190 

.  191 

plate Jacing  194 

»      ..  '95 

•  19s 

•  «97 
.  200 

plate  facing  200 

201 


205 
platefacing     206 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS 

PACI 

Irthlingborough  Church  Plan         .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .         .  .  .210 

„  „       Tower  -»  ,       ,     . 

™,      T        •       1     L-       17  )»  •  •  •  •  •  p'tiif  facing     210 

„  „        1  he  Interior,  looking  tast      J  t       j       a 

Islip  Church  from  the  South-east 

„         „       The  Interior,  looking  Eas 


V ,.      .,        2>6 

ast  J 


Kettering  :  Old  House,  Hazelwood  Lane 

218 


} 


„  Sawyer  Almshouses 

„  Church   Plan      .............     222 

„  „         from  the  South                        -\ 

„  „         The  Interior,  looking  East      j          '          '          "          '          '          •  r      J    '  S 

„  „         Porch 223 

Lilford  Church  Ruin             .............     230 

Lowick  :   Drayton  House  in  1729  .........  flate facing     232 


} 


,,  233 

„                »           „       Plan  (adapted  from  plan  lent  by  Mr.  J.  A.  Gotch)      .          .       „       „  234 

»                „          »       Gates 236 

„         Church  Plan            .............  240 

„                 „      from  the  South-west   .........  flal^f^cir.g  240 

„                „     Screen  to  South  Chapel        ........„„  241 

Sudborough  :  Anglo-Saxon  Cross  ............  246 

„                Church  from  the  South-east      ........„„  247 

Twj'well  Church  from  the  South  ............  250 

„              „       Easter  Sepulchre ,       „  251 

»               ,.       Plan 251 


Warkton  Church  :   Monument  to  John  Duke  of  Montagu,  d.  1749 
„  „  „         „  Mary  Duchess  of  Montagu,  d.  I 

»  ..  »         »  Mary        „         „         „  d.  1775 


»749        ^  latefacin 

„  Mary  Duchess  of  Montagu,  d.  1751  J     '         '         •  f      J       S     "54 


Woodford  Church  from  the  South-east 


d.  177s  -, 
„  Buccleuch,  d.  1827  / ^^^ 

„  „  The  Interior,  looking  East  J 

,,  .,  Plan 259 

Higham  Ferrers :  The  College  in  1729  .........  f,LiU  facing  262 

„  „  The  Square       ...........  264 

n  ,,  College  Plan       ...........  265 

„  „  The  Bede  House  ~i 

> f  late  facing    266 

„  „  The  College  J 

„  „  Borough  Seal  .          ..........                270 

„  „  View  of  Church  Tower  and  Stliool 

„  „  The  School  and  Cross 

„  „  Church  Plan     ...........                274 

„  „  „       from  the  North-east        .          .          .          .          .   ^ 

ff  „  „       Interior  showing  Screen  of  Chancel  ironi  Chapel  /    ' 

»  »  .,       Font 276 

.\iv 


>  .....  l-hitf  facing     270 


LIST     OF     MAPS 

PAGE 

Index  Map  to  the  Hundred  of  Polebrook         ..........       68 

„  Navisford         .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .123 


»»  IF  l» 


•>     »     ••        »  »  Huiloe ijj 


XV 


EDITORIAL  NOTE 

Since  the  publication  of  the  second  volume  of  the  Victoria  History  oj 
the  County  oj  Northampton  nearly  a  quarter  of  a  century  has  elapsed. 
The  war  and  post-war  difficulties  put  a  stop  to  historical  research  and 
caused  the  History  to  fall  into  abeyance  for  many  years.  The  two  local 
editors,  the  Rev.  R.  M.  Serjeantson,  a  scholar  and  a  clergyman  beloved 
by  all  who  knew  him,  and  Sir  William  Ryland  D.  Adkins,  an  enthusiastic 
supporter  of  historical  research,  have  both  passed  away.  It  was  not  until 
1925  that  the  late  Mr.  James  Manfield,  in  order  to  resuscitate  the  History 
of  Northamptonshire,  undertook  to  guarantee  the  cost  of  the  publication 
of  this  volume.  Mr.  Manlield  died  before  the  work  on  the  History  had 
been  begun,  and  his  widow  and  executors  have  generously  carried  out 
his  intention.  It  is  hoped  that  this  volume  may  prove  a  suitable  memorial 
of  his  appreciation  of  local  history  and  a  fitting  tribute  to  his  liberality. 

The  Editor  desires  to  express  his  thanks  to  the  many  helpers  who 
have  added  so  much  to  the  completeness  and  accuracy  of  the  work:  To 
the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  for  giving  access  to  his  valuable  collections  of 
early  deeds,  which  has  assisted  in  elucidating  the  descents  of  many 
manors.  To  Miss  Joan  Wake,  for  her  untiring  help  in  overcoming 
difficulties  and  in  obtaining  local  information.  To  Mr.  J.  A.  Gotch, 
Mr.  L.  M.  Gotch,  Professor  A.  Hamilton  Thompson,  Mr.  H.  F.  Traylen, 
Major  Christopher  A.  Markham,  Mr.  W.  Talbot  Brown,  Mr.  G.  D. 
Hardinge-Tyler,  Mr.  Leslie  T.  Moore,  and  the  Ven.  Archdeacon  A.  I. 
Greaves  for  the  loan  of  plans  and  information  regarding  architectural 
details.  To  the  executors  of  the  late  Rev.  R.  M.  Serjeantson  for  the 
use  of  the  valuable  notes  relating  to  the  manors  and  churches  collected 
by  Mr.  Serjeantson.  To  Mr.  W.  R.  Kew,  the  town  clerk  of  North- 
ampton ;  Mr.  Reginald  W.  Brown,  librarian  of  the  Public  Library, 
Northampton  ;  Mr.  W.  T.  Mellows,  the  town  clerk  of  Peterborough  ; 
Messrs.  Nicholl  Manisty  and  Co.,  solicitors  to  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  ; 
Mr.  Hubert  Elliot,  his  agent  ;  and  Mr.  L.  M.  Hewlett,  for  information 
relating  to  the  history  of  Northampton  and  manorial  descents. 

The  Editor  also  wishes  to  acknowledge  the  assistance  he  has  received 
fron.  those  who  have  supplied  him  with  local  information  and  help  with 
regard  to  illustrations  :  The  Right  Rev.  Mgr.  Canon  J.  H.  Ashmole, 
Mr.  T.  W.  Buckley,  Mr.  G.  H.  Capron,  Mr.  George  E.  Cove,  the  late 
Mr.  E.  J.  H.  Felce,  Mr.  J.  T.  Foskett,  Canon  H.  K.  Fry,  the  Rev.  H.  B. 
Gottwaltz,  the  late  Mrs.  Mary  C.  Hall,  the  Rev.  A.  S.  Hazel,  the  Rev. 
C.  H.  L.  Hopper,  Mrs.  G.  Ward  Hunt,  Captain  Ward  Hunt,  R.N.,  the 

xvii 


EDITORIAL  NOTE 

late  Rev.  W.  J.  B.  Kerr,  Mr.  H.  M.  King,  Canon  W.  Smalley  Law,  the 
Rev.  C.  B.  Lucas,  Canon  A.  M.  Luckock,  Mr.  Joseph  Simpson,  Mr.  H.J. 
Smith,  Mr.  J.  Stanyon,  Messrs.  John  Taylor  and  Co.,  Mr.  Beeby 
Thompson,  and  the  Rev.  C.  R.  C.  Wakefield. 

The  following  have  kindly  read  proofs  and  made  corrections  and 
suggestions  regarding  them  :  Mr.  G.  E.  Abbott,  the  Rev.  A.  G. 
Bagshaw,  the  Rev.  W.  W.  Baillie,  the  Rev.  L.  Seymour  Clark,  the  Rev. 
W.  St.  G.  Coldwell,  the  Rev.  H.  A.  Curtis,  the  Rev.  G.  M.  Davidson, 
the  Rev.  A.  C.  Dicker,  the  Rev.  H.  E.  FitzHerbert,  the  Rev.  J.  P.  Flood, 
the  Rev.  C.  G.  Hodgson,  the  Rev.  H.  C.  Holmes,  the  Rev.  D.  A.  Jones, 
Mr.  C.  E.  Lamb,  the  Rev.  F.  H.  Lang,  the  Rev.  F.  H.  La  Trobe,  the 
Rev.  L.  H.  Lethbridge,  the  Rev.  P.  Lidster,  the  Rev.  D.  H.  Meggy, 
the  Rev.  J.  E.  Newby,  the  Rev.  C.  Reeder,  the  Rev.  W.  H.  T.  Russell, 
Mr.  C.  H.  M.  D.  Scott,  the  Rev.  W.  V.  Tunks,  and  the  Rev.  R.  C. 
Thursfield. 


xviu 


A    HISTORY   OF 
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


TOPOGRAPHY 


THE   BOROUGH    OF   NORTHAMPTON 


Ham  tune  (x  cent.) ;  Nor9hamtune,  Northan- 
tone  (xi  cent.)  ;  Norhthamtune,  Norhanthon, 
Norhantuna,  Norhantona  (xii  cent.) ;  Norhamptone 
(town  seal)  (liii  cent.). 

Northampton,  the  county  town,  lies  mainly  to 
the  north  and  east  of  the  River  Nene,  the  oldest 
part  of  the  town  being  on  a  hill  which  rises  from  194  ft. 
above  sea  level  at  the  west  bridge  near  Castle  station 
to  294  ft.  at  the  prison  near  the  site  of  the  old  north 
gate.  The  road  from  London  and  Old  Stratford, 
joined  south  of  the  river  by  the 
road  from  Oxford  and  Tow- 
cester,  runs  due  north  through 
the  town  towards  Market 
Harborough  and  Leicester, 
and  is  intersected  at  right 
angles  in  the  middle  of  the 
town,  at  All  Saints'  Church, 
by  the  road  from  Davcntry  to 
Little  Billing.  From  here  also, 
roads  run  to  Kettering  and  to 
Wellingborough,  and  it  is  in 
this  direction  that  the  chief 
expansion  in  the  igih  and 
20th  centuries  has  taken  place. 
West  of  the  river  lie  the 
suburbs  of  Duston  and  Dallington,  extending  from 
the  medieval  suburb  of  St.  Jamas'  End;  to  the  south 
of  the  river,  and  west  and  east  of  the  London  Road 
lie  the  rapidly  expanding  suburbs  of  Far  Cotton  and 
Hardingstone,  beyond  the  medieval  suburb  of  St. 
Leonard's  End.  To  the  north,  along  the  Market  Har- 
borougii  ro'.d,  the  municip.ility  now  includes  Kings- 
thorpe,  an  independent  royal  manor  in  the  Middle 
Ages,  and  outside  the  parliamentary  boundary  until 
1918.  The  remains  of  the  town  fields  are  seen  in  the 
Race  Course,  once  Northampton  Heath,  between  the 
Kettering  and  Market  Harborough  roads,  where  the 
freemen  had  grazing  rights  down  to  1882,  and  in 
Cow  Meadow,  Calvesholme  and  Midsummer  Meadow, 
lying  along  the  river  to  the  south  of  the  town. 

The  first  plans  for  a  railway,  deposited  in  1830, 
show  the  line  passing  through  Ashton,  Roade  and 
Ellsworth,  avoiding  Northampton.  In  1831  the 
Corporation  of  Northampton,  who  owned  an  estate 
at  Bugbrooke,  took  up  the  same  attitude  as  other 
local  landowners  in  opposing  the  project  for  a  railway. 


Borough     or     North- 

AMPTOhf.         Gulfs      OH      a 

mount  i-ert  a  castle  with 
three  tmoers  supported  by 
two  leopards  rampant  or. 


Later,  however,  they  were  acting  with  a  committee 
of  inhabitants  of  the  town  in  pressing  for  the  line  to 
be  brought  as  near  to  Northampton  as  possible. 
Stephenson  reported  against  the  route  through  the 
town.  The  bill  for  the  railway  was  thrown  out  in  1832, 
it  was  thought  by  the  opposition  of  the  landowners,  but 
a  subsequent  bill  received  the  Royal  assent  on  6  May 
1833.  The  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway 
now  runs  from  London  through  Northampton  to 
Rugby  and  the  north  ;  lines  run  also  to  Leicester, 
Kettering,  Peterborough,  Market  Harborough  and 
Bedford.  The  station  in  Cotton  End,  known  as 
Bridge  Street,  was  opened  in  1845,  the  Castle  Station 
in  1859,  the  latter  being  enlarged  in  1 881  so  as  to 
become  the  chief  station.  The  station  in  St.  John's 
Street  was  opened  in  1872.  The  Grand  Junction 
Canal  joins  the  Nene  at  Northampton,  this  branch 
having  been  completed  in  1815.  Tram  lines  were 
first  laid  down  in  the  town  in  1881  and  were  electrifie.1 
in  1903.  An  early  omnibus  service  was  run  to  Welling- 
borough, and  since  1919  motor  omnibus  services 
have  run  to  the  villages  round  the  town  and  bring 
in  thousands  of  both  buyers  and  sellers  to  the 
market. 

The  earliest  reference  to  Northampton  in  writing 
occur.s  in  914,  and  though  the  archasological  evidence 
clearly  indicates  occupation  of  the  castle  site  in  the 
Romano-British  and  Anglo-Saxon  periods,^  no  settle- 
ment of  any  importance  seems  to  have  existed 
at  Northampton  before  the  time  of  the  Danish  con- 
quest. The  Danes  appear  to  have  made  it  a  centre 
for  military  and  administrative  purposes  during  the 
thirty  years  of  their  undisturbed  occupation  (877-91 2)  ; 
by  918  ^  it  had  a  jarl  and  an  army  dependent  upon  it, 
whose  territory  extended  to  the  Welland.^  Thus, 
after  its  reconquest  by  Edward  in  918  it  naturally 
became  the  centre  of  one  of  the  new  shires  organised 
in  the  district  recovered  from  the  Danes,  and  in  940  it 
successfully  resisted  the  invading  forces  of  Anlaf 
Guthfrithson,  the  Danish  ruler  of  Northumbria.* 
As  in  the  case  of  other  Danish  towns,  however, 
the  military  centre  seems  to  have  rapidly  become 
a  trading  centre,  for  in  loio  it  is  described  as  a 
'  port,'  and  in  spite  of  the  burning  in  that  year 
by  Thorkil's  Danes*  and  the  ravages  of  Edwin's 
and  Morcar's  forces  in  1065,*  it  possessed  about 
316  houses  in    1086,  and  ranked  between  Warwick 


'  ^tioe.  Arch.  Sot.  Rep.  1882,  pp.  243- 
251.  On  the  evidence  here  given,  the 
caitle-roound  itielf  cannot  be  pre- 
Norman  ;  V.C.H.  Ncrihantt.  i,  219. 


'  Accepting  the  chronology  of  W.  J. 
Corbett,  Camb.  Med.  Hist,  iii,  364. 

•  Angl.  Sax.  Chron.  s.a.  921.  (Parker 
MS.) 


'  Simeon  of  Durham,  Opera  [Rolls  Ser.], 
ii,  93  [s.a.  939). 
'  Angl.  Sax.  Chron.  (Laud.  MS.) 
•  Angl.  Sax.  Chron. (Cott.  MS.Tib.  B  iv.). 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


and  Leicester  in  size7  It  may  have  possessed  three 
churches,  for  Anglo-Saxon  sculptured  stones  have 
been  found  both  at  St.  Sepulchre's  and  St.  Peter's 
churches,*  and  the  early  reference  to  All  Saints'  fair* 
suggests  that  ihis  church  also  may  be  pre-Norman. 

In  Domesdayi"  Northampton  has  the  marks  of  an 
old  county  borough.  It  is  extra-hundredal,  being 
rated  in  the  Northants  Geld  Roll**  at  a  quarter  of  a 
hundred.  It  is  characterised  by  heterogeneity  of 
tenure,  containing  87  royal  burgesses  holding  their 
burgages  of  the  King,  whilst  some  219  other  houses 
belong  to  34  different  lords.  Of  these  lords,  24 
hold  other  lands  of  the  King  in  the  county,  and  the 
21  houses  of  Swain  the  son  of  Azur  are  explicitly 
said  to  pertain  to  liis  rural  manor  of  Stoke  Bruerne. 
To  the  old  borough,  which  held  60  royal  burgesses 
under  Edward  the  Confessor,  a  new  borough  contain- 
ing 40  royal  burgesses  had  been  added.  Unlike  the 
majority  of  county  boroughs,  Northampton  appears 
to  have  no  mint  ;*^  on  the  other  hand,  it  is  unique 
among  Domesday  boroughs  in  ha\'ing  its  farm  assessed 
at  a  fixed  sum  {£30  'os.  od.),  payable  by  the  burgesses 
to  the  sheriff.  There  is  mention  of  a  '  Durandus 
prepositus,'  *^  who  may  well  have  been  the  town 
reeve  and  have  acted  in  this  matter  as  the  sheriff's 
subordinate.  The  '  portland  '  mentioned  on  folio 
219b  seems  on  a  balance  of  evidence  to  belong  rather 
to  the  carucated  Stamford  than  to  the  hidated 
Northampton.**  There  is  no  mention  of  a  castle  ; 
its  creation  was  to  be  the  work  of  the  first  Norman 
earl,  and  the  Countess  Judith,  lady  of  16  houses, 
had  not  yet  given  place  to  her  daughter's  husband. 
The  other  chief  tenants  were  the  Bishop  of  Coutances 
(23  houses),  the  Count  of  Mortain  (37  houses),  and 
William  Peverel  (32  houses).  The  '  waste '  con- 
dition of  35J-  houses  is  probably  attributable  to  the 
raid  of  1065. 

With  the  Norman  Conquest  Northampton  became 
a  town  of  national  importance.  Its  geographical 
situation,  '  in  the  middle  of  the  kingdom,'  as  Geoffrey 
Ic  Scrope  said  in  his  opening  speech  at  the  Eyre  of 
Northampton  in  1329,*''  made  it  a  valuable  strategical 
point  for  a  government  wliich  was  determined  to 
control  the  north  and  west  as  well  as  the  south  and 
cast,  and  even  before  the  line  of  Scnlis  earls  had 
died  out,  the  castle  built  by  the  first  of  them  had 


been  taken  over  as  a  royal  residence  and  fortress.*' 
The  neighbourhood  of  the  royal  hunting  lodges 
of  Silverstone  and  Kings  Cliffe  and  the  royal  palace 
of  Geddington  accounts,  no  doubt,  for  a  large  number 
of  brief  royal  visits,*'  but  its  general  convenience  as  a 
meeting  place  is  attested  by  the  number  of  political, 
social,  ecclesiastical  and  mihtary  events  that  occurred 
here.  Among  the  long  series  of  councils  and  parlia- 
ments held  at  Northampton,  from  the  time  of  Henry  I 
to  that  of  Richard  II,  may  be  mentioned  the  council 
of  1 1  31,  at  which  the  barons  of  Henry  I  swore  fealty  to 
Maud;'*  that  of  1 164  at  which  Becket  was  condemned 
by  the  King's  court  and  appealed  to  the  Pope  ;*' 
that  of  1 1 76,  at  which  the  assize  of  Northampton 
was  pubUshed  j^"  that  of  121 1,  in  which  John  and  the 
Legate  Pandulf  had  their  famous  deb.tte  ;^'**  that  of 
1232,  in  which  the  lands  of  the  Earl  of  Chester 
were  partitioned  ;^*  that  of  1318,  at  which  Edward  II 
and  Thomas  of  Lancaster  came  to  terms  for  the  time 
being  ;'^  the  parliament  of  1328,  at  which  peace 
was  made  with  Scotland  and  the  statute  of  Northamp- 
ton was  passed;^'  and  the  parliament  of  1380, 
at  which  the  imposition  of  the  Poll  Tax  was  decided 
on.**  The  importance  of  the  fairs  of  Northampton 
is  noticed  below,  and  the  town  was  also  a  favourite 
centre  for  tournaments  from  the  time  of  Henry  III 
to  Edward  III.**  Many  church  councils  and  chapters 
were  held  here,**  and  at  least  three  crusades  launched. 
In  February  1214,  according  to  the  chronicle  of  St. 
Andrew's  priory,  300  persons  of  both  sexes  took  the 
cross  here  ;*'  in  November  1 239,  Richard  of  Cornwall 
and  nobles  too  many  to  enumerate,  swore  on  the  altar 
of  All  Saints'  that  they  would  lead  their  troops  that 
year  to  the  Holy  Land  ;*'  in  June  1268  the  two  sons 
of  Henry  III,  with  120  other  knights  and  many  others, 
took  the  cross  at  Northampton.** 

To  its  geographical  position  is  due  the  part  played 
by  Northampton  in  the  various  civil  wars.  It  com- 
manded one  of  the  main  roads  from  London  to  the 
North,  and  was  a  good  base  for  movements  against 
the  west  or  south-west.  In  1173  it  was  one  of  the 
strongliolds  that  held  out  for  Henry  II,  and  next 
year  Wilham  of  Scotland  made  his  submission  there.** 
In  1215  the  first  move  of  the  insurgent  barons  was  to 
besiege  Northampton,'*  and  the  castle  was  one  of 
four  which  were  to  be  given  into  their  hands  as  a 


'  y.C.H.  Kcribanis.  i,  276. 

•  Cox  and  Scrjcantson,  Hut.  of  Ch.  oj 
the  Holy  Sepulchre^  \orthantpt.  p.  30; 
R.  M.  Serjeantton,  Hitt.  of  Ch.  of  St. 
I'elrr,  h'oitbampl.  p.   12. 

•  See  hfloWj  under  Fairs. 

'"  y.C.II.  Northants.  i,  301. 

"  Ellis,  Gen.  introd.  to  Dohiejday^  i,  186. 

*'  W.  H.  Stevenson  suggested  that  coins 
minted  here  may  have  been  credited  to 
Southampton,  whose  Saxon  name  was 
identical  in  form.  A'ng.  Hut.  Met:  xiv, 
59&. 

'*  Gilbert,  son  of  Durand,  acted  as 
reeve  in  1189-90  (Pipe  Roll),  and  put  hit 
name  to  the  first  toHTi  cuttumal.  Bntcson, 
Soto.  Cuttowi,  i,  xli. 

'*  I'.C.II.  Korthaitls.  i,  2-S.  It  should 
be  observed,  however,  that  carucates  arc 
found  at  Northampton  in  1274  R'^t. 
nund.  ii,  I. 

*'  Enii.  Iliit.  Rex.  xxxix,  250.  A  similar 
exprcsiion, Tfin^ujm  tnrefjit  medio^'it  used 
in  ijjS  at  a  Provincial  Chapter  of  the 
Benedictines  (Wilkint,  Conrilm.  ii,  6x8). 


'*  liy  1133.  R.  M.  Serjeantson.  The 
Castle  of  iVo/  thampt.  p.  2. 

*'  For  John's  30  visits  see  Rot.  Lttt. 
Pat.  I.  (Rcc.  Com.),  Itinerary  of  King 
John.  For  Henry  Ill's  constant  visits 
see  below  under  'I'he  Castle  ;  Edward  II 
was  here  in  1307,  I33'>,  1310,  1311,  1317, 
1318.     (Chart.  R.) 

*'  William  of  .Malmcsbury,  Histona 
Novelt.i.  (Rolls  Ser.)  (f/i-iM /<''g«ra),  ii.  534. 

'•  Ciron.  Rog.  de  Hovedoii  (Rolls  Ser.), 
i,  224-8. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  89. 

'""  .innal  .Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.),  1,209-219, 
not  in  1210,  as  stated  V.C.H.  Northants. 
ii,  9. 

^*  Bracton^t  Notebook^  case  1273. 

"  Pari  R.  i,  453. 

'•  Ibid,  ii,  28. 

"  Ibid.  iii.  88. 

*'  'I'uurnaments  arranged  to  be  held  at 
Northampton  were  forbidden  in  1218, 
1219,  1227,  1228,  1233,  1234,  T237,  1241, 
1247.  1249.  [Sec  Cal  Pal.  and  Matthew 
Paris,   Chron.   Maj.  (Rolls   Ser.),  iv,  88, 


647  ;  v,  54].  For  tournament  of  1265  see 
below ;  fur  that  at  which  Geoffrey  le 
Scrope  was  knighted  under  Edward  II 
sec  Harris  Nicolas,  Scrope  and  Grosvenor 
Rotlj  i,  142,  144;  for  one  in  1342,  Muri- 
muth  (R.S.J,  p.  124. 

"  At  least  46  iicncdictinc  chapters 
were  held  here,  and  20  chapters  of 
Augustinian  canons.  See  below  under 
St.  Andrew's  Priory  and  St.  James' 
.\bbey.  The  lirst  general  chapter  of 
the  Cistercian  order  in  England  met 
here  (between  1400  and  1104),  and 
Dominican  chapters  were  licld  here  in 
1231,  1271,  1272,  12S4,  1312,  1362. 
(/r*i^'.  Hist.  Rev.  xliv,  386.  Serjeantsony 
The  RIack  Fnars  of  Not  thampt.) 

"  Corpus  Christ!  Coll.  Camb.  MS. 
281  (2)  s.a.  1214. 

"  Matthew  Paris,  Chron.  Maj.  (Rolls 
Ser.),  iii,  620. 

"  Annal  Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.),  iv,  217. 

"  Chron.  Rog.  de  Hoveden  (Rolls  Ser.), 
ii,  54. 

"  ll'aliei  of  Coventry  (Rolls  Scr.),ii,  ZI9. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


pledge  for  keeping  Magna  Carta.**  It  served  as  a  base 
in  the  siege  of  Bedford  in  1224.**  Its  pivot.,1  position 
comes  out  most  strikingly  in  the  campaigns  of  1264-6. 
The  Royalist  forces  mustered  by  Henry  at  Oxford, 
at  the  end  of  Marcli  1264,  marched  against  Noriiiamp- 
ton,  which  was  held  by  the  younger  Simon  de  Montfort 
and  '  a  great  multitude  '*•  of  knights  and  squires. 
In  the  Cow  Meadow  adjoining  the  town  William 
Marshall,  keeper  of  the  peace,  and  Walter  Hyldeburn, 
assembled  the  community  of  the  county  and  addressed 
them,  on  behalf  of  the  Earl  of  Leicester,  on  the 
iniquities  of  the  King's  party. *^-^  The  Prior  of  St. 
Andrew's,  a  Frenchman,  whose  priory  occupied 
the  north-west  angle  of  the  town  fortifications, 
facilitated  the  entry  of  the  King's  troops  through 
a  breach  in  the  garden  wall,''  and  the  town  was 
taken  and  sacked  ruthlessly  by  the  Royalists,  who, 
according  to  Wykes,  reduced  a  most  flourishing 
town  to  a  most  wretched  state. ^  Fifty-five  kniglits, 
including  Sir  Hugh  Gobion  and  Sir  Baldwin  Wake, 
were  taken  prisoners*'  and  sent  to  various  castles 
for  safe  keeping,  and  at  a  later  date  to  have  been  against 
the  King  at  Northampton  was  the  measure  of  a  man's 
disloyalty.'*  The  story  of  the  King's  threat  to  hang 
the  students  of  the  ephemeral  university  of  Northamp- 
ton* for  their  resistance  to  him  occurs  only  in  a  14th 
century  chronicle.*"'  The  town  was,  however,  deprived 
of  its  mayor  and  committed  to  the  keeping  of  a  royal 
(ujloi,*^  Ralph  de  Hotot,  who  was  to  keep  in  touch 
with  the  constable  of  the  castle.  In  the  autumn 
that  followed  Lewes,  when  the  King's  government 
was  controlled  by  Leicester,  the  levies  were  assembled 
at  Northampton,**  and  a  tournament  was  planned  here 
by  the  younger  de  Montforts  for  Easter  1265,  which 
was  cancelled  because  of  Gilbert  de  Clare's  refusal 
to  come.**  Later,  when  the  younger  Simon  was 
marching  from  the  south  to  join  his  father  in  the  west, 
he  went  out  of  his  way  to  go  through  Northampton, 
counting,  it  would  seem,  on  the  warm  support  of  the 
town.**  Again,  after  Evesham,  Henry  and  his  son 
made  Northampton  the  rendezvous  for  the  troops 
going  against  the  isle  of  Axholm,**  and  held  a  council 
here  at  Christmas,  at  which  the  younger  Simon 
surrendered  himself.*'  Northampton  was  also  the 
King's  headquarters  from  April  to  June  1266.*' 
With  the  town  held  in  turn  by  the  rival  parties, 
it  is  not  surprising  that  the  Jews  took  refuge 
in  a  body  in  the  castle,**  and  that  the  priory 
suffered  both  from  want  and  from  failure  to  maintain 
order.** 

Eklward  I  made  little  use  of  Northampton  as  com- 
pared with  his  father,  though  four  parliaments 
were  held  there  by  Edward  II,  and  both  parliaments 


and  assemblies  of  merchants'*  by  Edward  III.  The 
parliament  of  1380,  however,  some  of  whose  sessions 
were  held  in  St.  Andrew's  Priory,"  was  the  last 
to  meet  here,  and  in  the  15th  century  Northampton 
ceases  to  be  a  centre  of  national  importance.  Its 
strategic  significance  was  illustrated  again  in  1460. 
In  June  of  that  year  Warwick  had  landed  from  France 
and  been  welcomed  enthusiastically  by  London. 
The  forces  of  Henry  VI  moved  from  Coventry  and 
took  up  a  position  at  Northampton  to  cut  off  London 
from  the  nortli.  On  July  10  they  were  routed  by  the 
forces  of  Warwick  and  March,  marching  from  London 
through  Towcester,  in  the  meadows  south-east  of  the 
town,  between  the  river  and  Delapre  Abbey.  Henry  VI 
was  taken  prisoner,  and  his  queen  fled  to  Scotland. 
We  are  told  that  the  flight  was  watched  by  the  Arch- 
bishop of  Canterbury  from  the  hill  of  the  Headless 
Cross,  which  indicates  that  the  Eleanor  Cross  on  the 
London  Road  outside  the  abbey  grounds  had  already 
had  its  top  broken  oflt.^^  Not  till  1642  was  North- 
ampton to  be  as  prominent  again  in  national 
politics. 

Between  the  record  of  Domesday  Book  and  the 
first  royal  grant  to  the  borough,  almost  exactly  a 
hundred  years  elapsed.  In  11 85  the  burgesses  of 
Northampton  made  a  fine  of  200  marks  to  hold  their 
town  in  chief,**  and  it  is  probably  to  this  grant  by 
Henry  II  that  John's  charter  refers.'*  The  consti- 
tutional history  of  the  intervening  period  is  largely 
conjectural,  but  for  some  of  the  time,  at  least,  it  must 
have  been  bound  up  with  that  of  the  earls  of  North- 
ampton.'' No  earl  is  mentioned  in  Domesday  ;  it 
is  supposed  that  Simon  de  Senlis  became  earl  after 
his  marriage  with  Waltheof's  daughter  Maud  about 
1089,  and  died  on  his  return  from  the  Holy  Land 
some  time  between  nil  and  1 113."  He  was  the 
founder  of  the  Cluniac  priory  of  St.  Andrew's,  the 
builder  of  the  first  castle,  the  Norman  churches  of  the 
Holy  Sepulchre  and  All  Saints,  and,  according  to 
tradition,  of  the  town  wall.  In  1 1 13  his  widow  married 
David  of  Scotland,''''  who  probably  acted  as  guardian 
to  his  stepson,  the  second  Simon,  the  founder  of 
Delapre  Abbey.  By  August  1138  Simon  II  had  been 
rewarded  with  the  earldom  for  his  loyalty  to  Stephen, 
whom  David  was  opposing.'*  In  1153,  when 
Simon  II  died,  his  son,  Simon  III,  the  builder  of 
St.  Peter's  Church,  was  under  age,  and  he  only  held 
the  earldom  from  1 159  to  1183  or  1 184,  when  he  died 
without  heirs.'*  Various  charters  of  the  Senlis  earls 
are  preserved  in  the  cartulary  of  St.  Andrew's  priory. 
One  of  the  charters  of  Simon  I  is  addressed  to  '  his 
reeve  of  Northampton,'  and  those  of  Simon  II  are 
addressed  to '  his  reeves  and  burgesses  of  Northampton 


"  Matthew  Parii,  Cbron.  Maj.  (Rolls 
Str.),  ii,  603.  It  JCtmi  likely  that  it  never 
wai  handed  over  in  fact.  A  royal  garrison 
was  holding  it  in  October  1215.  Mem. 
Iii!lt.  ie  Covtniria  fRolls  Ser.),  ii,  226. 

"  y.C.f/.  Bidt.  iii,  10. 

»  C.C.C.C.  MS.  281  (2)  s.a.  1264. 

"•  Hunter,  Rol.  Seltcti,  194. 

"  Anncl.  Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.),  iii,  229-30. 

••  Ibid,  iv,  145. 

•'  W.  Rishanger.  Chronica  (Rolls  Ser.), 
p.  21. 

•'  Cat.  Pat.  1258-66,  pp.  311,  314,  316, 
3'8,3»3>472,  555;  1266-72,  pp.  66,  248. 

••  I'.C.H.  fiprthanls.  ii,  15-17. 

"  Walter  of  Hcmingburgh,  Ctroniccn 
Eng.  Hist.  Soc),  i,  311. 


•'  Cal.  Pat.  1258-66,  p.  315  (26  April 
1264). 

"  Annal.  Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.),  iii,  234. 

"  Ibid,  iv,  162. 

"  Ibid.  170. 

*'  Cal.  Pat.  1258-66,  pp.  520,  549. 

"  Corpus  Christi  Coll.  Camb.  MS. 
2?i  (2)  t.a.  1265. 

*'  Cal  Pal.  1258-66,  pp.  581,  595,  664. 

•*  Ibid.  p.  330-1. 

*•  Ibid.  p.  403. 

»  Cal.  Clase.  1333-37,  P-  ^77  i   P-  5'7- 

5'  Pari.  R.  iii,  88. 

*'  Sorthanti.  Nat.  Hist.  Soc.  March 
19C7;  R.  M.  Serjeantson,  The  Battle  of 
Northampton. 

'•  Pipe  R    31  Hen.  II. 


"  Rot.  Carl.  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  45-6. 
The  grant  to  the  burgesses  of  Lancaster 
in  1199  refers  to  all  llie  liberties  which 
the  burgesses  of  Northampton  had  on  the 
day  that  King  Henry  died.  Rot.  Cart. 
(Rec.  Com-.),  p.  26. 

*'  R.  ]M.  Serjeantson,  Origin  and  //is- 
lory  of  the  de  Senlis  Family  [Assoc.  Arch. 
Soc.  Rep.  xxxi,  504  8.) 

*•  \Vm.  Tarrer,  //onors  and  Knights* 
Fees^  ii,  296. 

"  Diet.  .\ai.  Biog.  This  is  probably 
the  date  at  which  the  castle  became 
royal. 

"  Dugdale,.'/Bg/.  A/on.  v,  3^6;  Round, 
Geoff,  de  MandevilU,  28  ?. 

"  Diet.  Sat.  Biog. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


and  to  all  his  ministers  of  Northampton.'*'  These 
formulae  are  lacking  from  the  charters  of  Simon  III. 
They  indicate,  as  Dr.  Tait  has  shown,*"*  that  for 
part  of  the  nth  and  12th  centuries  Northampton 
was  a  mesne  borough,  dependent,  like  Leicester,  upon 
its  earl,  and  not  directly  upon  the  King.  Granted  by 
Rufus  to  Simon  I  with  the  earldom,  the  town  was 
retained  b}  Henry  I  on  his  death,  and  was  being  farmed 
by  the  Crown  in  11 30.*'  Stephen  restored  it  to 
Simon  II  with  the  earldom,  but  Henry  II  resumed  it 
in  1154,^''  and  it  was  farmed  by  a  royal  official — 
from  1 170  onwards,  by  the  sherifE^^'' — up  to  1185. 
The  death  of  Simon  III  may  have  made  the  King 
the  readier  to  grant  the  burgesses'  request  in  tliat 
year  to  farm  the  borough  themselves,  though  the 
concession  was  terminable.  This  farm  had  risen  from 
the  ^30  los.  od.  of  Domesday  to  ;^loo  in  11 30,  and 
from  1 185  onwards  it  was  £120  down  to  the  15th 
century.*'-  The  right  to  pay  the  farm  directly  at  the 
Exchequer  logically  involved  the  right  to  elect  reeves 
or  prepositos,  and  this  right  is  expressly  granted  in  the 
first  charter  extant,  that  of  18  November  11 89,  which 
is  preserved  in  the  town  archives  at  Northampton.*^ 
From  1 185  to  1197  the  names  of  the  two  town  reeves 
are  to  be  found  on  the  Pipe  Roll  ;**  after  that  year  the 
formula  runs  '  the  burgesses  of  Northampton,'  giving 
no  names. 

Besides  the  grant  of  the  Jirma  burgi  in  fee-farm, 
which  made  the  concession  of  Henry  II  a  permanency, 
and  the  licence  to  choose  their  own  reeve  freely  every 
year,  the  privileges  granted  to  the  burgesses  of 
Northampton  in  1 189  included  the  ratification  of 
established  customs,  the  tenurial  privileges  of 
warranty  of  lands,  freedom  from  scotale  and  such 
exactions,  freedom  from  billeting  ;  the  jurisdictional 
privileges  of  freedom  from  external  pleas,  freedom 
from  the  duel,  and  preservation  of  established- judicial 
customs,  a  weekly  court  of  husting  to  be  held  in  the 
town,  and  exemption  from  miskenning  ;  also  freedom 
from  the  murder  fine  and  from  arbitrary  amercements ; 
the  commercial  privileges  of  freedom  from  toll 
throughout  England,  and  the  right  of  retaliation  on 
any  borough  which  infringed  this  custom.  The 
privileges  granted  to  Northampton  were  explicitly 
modelled  on  those  of  London.  It  falls  into  that 
group  of  boroughs,  others  of  which  were  Norwich, 
Lincoln  and  Oxford,  which  looked  to  London  for 
forms  and  precedents,*^  and  on  several  occasions  it 
definitely  and  consciously  copied  London  customs,** 
if  in  some  other  respects,  as  will  be  shown,  it 
had  affinities  with  its  neighbour,  the  mesne 
borough  of  Leicester.  The  clause  confirming 
ancient  custom,  grants  to  the  burgesses  '  all  other 
liberties  and  free  customs  which  our  citizens  of  London 


have  had  or  have  .  .  .  according  to  the  liberties  of  the 
city  of  London  and  the  laws  of  the  borough  of  North- 
ampton.' *'  This  last  phrase  is  almost  certainly  to  be 
associated  with  the  oldest  town  custumal,  wliich,  as 
Miss  Bateson  has  shown,**  belongs  to  much  the  same 
date  as  the  charter  of  Richard  I.  The  town  custumals 
throw  so  much  hght  on  the  constitutional  history 
of  the  borough  th.it  it  will  be  well  to  describe  them 
here.  The  Liber  Custumarum  preserved  at  Northamp- 
ton, and  printed  in  the  '  Records  of  the  Borough,' 
is  the  last  of  four  versions  of  the  town  customs. 
The  two  oldest  are  in  Latin  and  are  preserved  in  a 
14th  century  manuscript  in  the  Bodleian  Library .*• 
The  first,  containing  24.  clauses,  is  headed  by  a  hst 
of  the  forty  burgesses  who  authorised  the  custumal 
and  swore  to  preserve  it.'"  Nine  of  these  appear 
on  the  Pipe  Rolls  as  accounting  for  the  farm  of  the 
borough  between  1 184  and  1196,  and  it  seems  certain 
that  the  custumal  was  drawn  up  in  connection  with  the 
grant  of  the  firma  burgi,  between  1 185  and  II90. 
The  second  custumal,  containing  42  clauses,  is  headed 
by  a  list  of  24  burgesses,  most  of  whom  can  be 
identified  as  having  flourished  1228-1264.  Two  of 
the  clauses  of  this  custumal  are  dated  and  belong 
to  1 25 1  and  1260  ;  it  may  thus  be  assigned  to  round 
about  1260.  The  next  version  is  French,  and  is  in  a 
manuscript  now  at  the  British  IVIuseum,'^  but  be- 
longing to  the  town  of  Northampton  as  late  as  1769, 
and  uniform  in  binding  with  the  Liber  Custumarum, 
still  in  the  possession  of  the  corporation.  It  contains 
58  articles,  the  first  56  adapted  from  those  of  the 
two  earlier  custumals,  the  two  last  new.  The  latest 
is  dated  7  October  1 341.  From  this  French  version 
was  made  an  English  translation,  seemingly  about 
1461,'^  supplemented  by  further  regulations  and 
ordinances,  enrolled  from  time  to  time,  as  they  were 
carried  in  the  town  assembly  or  council,  the  whole 
forming  the  Liber  Custumarum,  now  preserved  at 
Northampton,  the  latest  entry  in  which  is  dated 
II  October  1549.'* 

The  first  custumal  (c.  1 190)  refers  to  bailiffs 
who  take  distresses  on  behalf  of  the  King,''*  to  reeves 
or  preposiii  who  intervene  with  an  apparently  higher 
authority  and  can  give  a  man  entry,  together  with  the 
bailiff,'*  and  to  the  probi  homines  de  placitis — the 
suitors  of  a  court  at  which  transfers  of  land  take  place 
for  which  the  witness  of  these  suitors  is  sufficient 
warrant.'*  There  is  no  reference  to  a  mayor;  the 
reeves  seem  to  be  the  highest  officials.  Nor  is  there 
any  reference  to  a  mayor  in  John's  charter.  Of  this 
charter,  granted  to  the  town  in  .April  1200,  there  are 
two  versions  differing  from  each  other  at  the  precise 
point  where  both  differ  from  Richard's  charter. 
This  is  witli  regard  to  the  election  of  officials.  The 


"  Cott.  MS.  \'c»p.  E  xvi! ;  fo.  6  pre- 
Jecto  suo  de  Nortbampl.  ;  omnibus  prtpositit 
suit  et  burgemibui  Northampt.  ;  Ricardo 
Grimbaud  el  G.  de  liloueuite  el  omnibus 
suit  miniitris  de  Norlhampt.  The  charters 
of  the  Scottlih  King!  in  this  MS.  never 
deicribe  them  ai  Earli  of  Northampi. 

"•  En^L  II, St.  Rev.  \\\\,  33;. 

*'  Pipe  R.  31  Hen.  I. 

"»  The  exact  moment  when  the  change 
occurs  ii  recorded  in  the  Pipe  Roll  Ac- 
count at  Michaelmai,  ■■;;.  Red  Ilk.  of 
/A«£Ari-A»y.  (RolliSer,),  ii,  6^5.  I  owe  thi> 
reference  to  the  lindneii  of  Dr.  Tait. 


•"'  /?b;;.  Hisl.  Rev.  xlii,  352. 

"  Pipe  R.  31  Ilcn.  II. 

"  See  Records  oj  the  Boro.  of  Norlhtimpi., 
ed.  Markham  and  Cox  (cilcd  henceforth 
ai  Roio  Rec),  frontispiece,  for  facsimile 
of  charter. 

"  Ibid,  i,  21-23. 

"  Gross,  Gild  Merchant,  i,  254.  North- 
ampton itself  served  as  a  model  to 
Grimsby  and  Lancaster. 

"*  E.g.  Dowbell  in  1391  (lioio  Rec.  i, 
252),  orphans'  custody  in  1599  (ibid,  i, 
124);  common  council  in  1649  (ibid,  ii, 
21). 


"  Secundum  Ubcriatcs  Londoniarum  et 
leges  burgi  .Worhanitonte. 

"*  Bateson,  Borough  Customs,  I,  xli. 

«•  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),  98.  fo.  158, 
el  se(]. 

'"  hit  sunt  suhscripti  qui  providerunt 
leges  Norbampton'  et  iuriiveruni  eas  obser- 
vnndits. 

"  Add.  MS.  34308. 

'!  Boro.  Rec.  i,  208-236. 

"  Ibid,  i,  341. 

"  CI.  19. 

"  CL  .3. 

"CI.  1,4,  16. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


,  version  on  the  charter  roll"  provides  that  two  bur- 
gesses were  to  be  elected  by  the  common  counsel 
of  the  vill  and  presented  to  the  sheriff,  who  should 
select  one  of  them  and  present  him  to  the  cliief 
justice  at  Westminster  at  the  time  of  rendering  his 
account,  to  be  prepositus  of  the  town.  The  version 
of  the  Cartae  Antiquae'^  prondes  that  the  two  bur- 
gesses elected  should  be  presented  to  the  chief  justice 
at  Westminster  and  should  serve  as  prepositi.  Both 
versions  say  that  the  officials  so  elected  should  only 
be  removable  by  the  common  counsel  of  the  town, 
and  provide  also  for  the  election  of  four  coroners"  to 
keep  the  pleas  of  the  Crown  and  to  see  that  the  reeves 
treat  rich  and  poor  alike  justly.  There  is  some  diffi- 
culty in  deciding  between  the  merits  of  the  two 
charters.**  On  the  whole,  the  version  of  the  Cartae 
Antiquae  seems  the  more  likely  to  be  correct.'"*  Its 
form  was  followed  by  Henry  the  third's  charter  of 
1227,"  which  merely  adds  that  the  two  prepositi  shall 
be  presented  to  the  chief  justice  by  the  letters  patent 
of  the  vill,  and  this  procedure  was  presumably  fol- 
lowed down  to  the  charter  of  1299,  though  the  early 
Exchequer  rolls  do  not  record  the  presentations. 

The  prepositi  of  1227  are  certainly  the  bailiffs  of  a 
later  date;  indeed,  as  early  as  1222  the  Exchequer 
addresses  a  writ  to  '  the  mayor  and  bailiffs '  of 
Northampton.*'^  Two  prepositi,  as  we  have  seen, 
appear  on  the  Pipe  Roll  accounting  for  the  farm  as 
early  in  1 185.  This  is  an  additional  reason  for  pre- 
ferring the  version  of  the  Cartae  Antiquae.  Dr.  Cox 
assigns  the  first  mayor  to  the  reign  of  Richard  I,  but 
there  appears  to  be  no  evidence  for  the  existence  of  a 
mayor,  so-called,  save  the  handwriting  of  certain  un- 
dated deeds.*'  As  late  as  1 21 2  John  addressed  to  the 
reeve  and  good  men  of  Northampton  a  command  to 
lead  the  armed  forces  of  the  town,  which  is  directed  in 
the  cases  of  London  and  Lincoln  to  the  mayors  of 
those  cities.*'  But  three  years  later  an  unequivocally 
dated  document  mentions  what  may  well  be  the  elec- 
tion of  the  first  mayor  of  Northampton.  On  17  Feb- 
ruary 1 215  John,  then  at  Silverstone,  addressed  a  writ 
to  his  pood  men  {probi  homines)  of  Northampton  : 
'  Know  that  we  have  received  William  Thilly  to  be 
your  mayor.     We  therefore  command  you  to  be  in- 


tendent  to  him  as  your  mayor,  and  to  cause  to  be 
elected  twelve  of  tlie  better  and  more  discreet  of  your 
town  to  expedite  with  him  your  affairs  in  your  town.'*' 
From  this  date  onwards  commands  directed  to  the 
mayor,  coupled  sometimes  with  the  reeves  or  bailiffs 
and  sometimes  with  the  good  men  of  the  town,  occur 
upon  the  Close  and  Patent  Rolls,**  though  the  reeves 
are  addressed  by  tliem selves  on  matters  connected 
with  the  Exchequer,*"  and  under  Henry  III  the  title 
of  bailiff  soon  displaces  that  of  reeve  altogether  in  the 
royal  commands  whether  on  judicial  or  on  financial 
matters.** 

Wilham  Tilly,  the  first  mayor  of  Northampton,  is 
also  mentioned  in  a  letter  of  Faukes  de  Brcaute  to 
Hubert  de  Burgh,  which  must  fall  between  1215  and 
1 224.*'  He  held  land  in  Flore  :  *"  he,  or  a  relation  of 
the  same  name,  is  mentioned  in  the  1260  custumal  as 
one  of  the  burgesses  appointed  for  levying  a  duty  on 
the  sale  of  cloths  to  foreign  merchant s,*!  and  his  name 
occurs  in  several  early  town  deeds.''-  He  probably 
held  office  for  many  years,  as  was  usual  among  his 
successors  in  the  13th  century."^  The  next  mayors 
mentioned  by  name  are  Robert  de  Leycester,  who 
occurs  in  a  lawsuit  in  I229,''*  and  Robert  le  Especer, 
who  accounts  at  the  Exchequer  in  1231.''  Six  other 
mayors  are  named,  from  1249  to  1272,**  and  six  from 
1273  to  1299.*'  Under  the  charter  of  1299,  now 
preserved  at  Northampton,**  the  burgesses  were  to 
present  the  mayor-elect  at  the  Exchequer  every 
year  within  the  octave  of  Michaelmas,  that  he  might 
there  take  the  oath  pertaining  to  his  office.  From 
1299  onwards  the  name  of  the  mayor  is  enrolled  on 
the  Michaelmas  Presentationes  of  the  Memoranda  Roll 
in  the  Exchequer,  often  accompanied  by  the  names 
of  the  burgesses  who  signed  the  letters  patent  pre- 
senting him.'*  The  same  names  recur  from  year  to 
year,  and  are  clearly  those  of  the  leading  burgesses — 
the  mayor's  colleagues  and  councillors.  In  1478 
Edward  IV  granted  by  letters  patent  that  the  mayor 
might  henceforth  be  sworn  in  before  the  town  re- 
corder at  Northampton,  without  coming  up  to  West- 
minster.^ The  re-election  of  the  mayor,  usual  in  the 
14th  century,  was  restricted  in  the  isth.  In  1437, 
during  the  fourth  mayoralty  of  John  Sprygy,  it  was 


"  Printed  Stubbs'  Select  Charters 
306-7  J   Rot.  Cart.  p.  45-6. 

'•  Coriae  Aniiquae  G.  15;  Doro.  Rec.  i, 
30-31. 

'•  In  1329  the  burgesses  said  that  this 
unusually  large  number  bad  been  granted 
them  for  the  convenience  of  merchants 
{pur  tie  de  mercbaunlr>j^  presumably  that 
they  might  scn'e  in  rotation.  F.gerton 
MS.  (B.M.)  2811,  fo.  250.  The  same 
number  had,  however,  been  granted  to 
Lincoln,  Gloucester,  and  Ipswich  in  the 
lame  year.  Ballard,  Borough  CbarierSjij  247. 

■•"  The  copy  on  the  Cariae  Autiquae 
roll  follows  on  a  charter  dated  1206,  so  it 
cannot  be  strictly  contemporary.  It  is 
dated  at  Windsor  17  April,  and  that  on 
ihc  Charter  Roll  at  Westminster  20.\pril. 
None  of  the  three  witnesses  to  the  C.A. 
version  appears  on  the  Charter  Roll,  which 
gives  only  one  witness.  The  version  on 
the  Charter  Roll  has  Salopcibir'  written 
for  Northampton  at  one  point,  and  then 
corrected ;  the  charter,  as  far  as  the 
dection  of  officials  it  concerned,  is  identical 
with  one  to  Shrewsbury,  dated  20  April, 
entered  next  but  one  on  the  roll.  See 
Rat.  Carl.  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  46. 


'"•This  is  the  opinion  of  Dr.  Tait. 
It  seems  probable  that  the  Chancery 
clerk  assimilated  the  date  and  this 
clause  of  the  Northampton  Charter  to 
that  of  Shrewsbury,  which  he  was  about 
to  copy.  The  retention  of  permission 
to  elect  otie  reeve  from  the  charter  of 
Ii3<)  may  have  contributed  to  the 
confusion. 

"  Chart.  R.  11  Hen.  Ill,  Part  1,  m.  17. 

•«  Mem.  R.  (K.R.)  5,  m.  4. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii.  548.  All  the  deeds 
which  I  have  examined  bearing  the  name 
of  William  Tilly  appear  to  belong  to  the 
itth  century. 

'^  Rot.  Lin.  Cliius  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
123b. 

"  Ibid,  i,  188.  If  John  meant  by  this 
^rant  to  secure  the  loyalty  of  the  towns- 
men he  failed,  for  in  April  they  attacked 
the  royal  garrison  in  the  castle,  which  later 
burnt  half  the  town  in  revenge.  Mem. 
Willi,  de  Cuvenlrie  (Rolls  Scr.),  ii,  219. 

••  Rol.  Lilt.  Claus.  i,  227b,  233b,  367, 

383    43>- 
"Ibid,  i,  loob,  112,  152,  155,1222. 
"Ibid.  1,517,  550, 567,  586. 
••  And.  Cotresp.  (P.R.O.)  vol    i,  66. 


">  Kol.  Liu.  Claus.  (Rec.  Com.),  i,  511b. 

•'  CI.  38  (fo.  162  v    ). 

"  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press 
c.  7 ;  Harl.  Ch.  85,  c.  1  ;  Anct.  D. 
(P.R.O.)  B  2484;  Cott.  MS.  Tib.  E.V. 
147,  fo.  16. 

•'  e.g.  Robert  le  Spiccr,  thrice ; 
Robert,  son  of  Henry,  five  times  ;  Pente- 
cost dc  Kershalton,  four  times. 

"  liractoii's  Kolehook. 

"  Mem.  R.  (K..R.)  ii,  Adveiilus  Vice- 
comitum  Mich. 

•'  Roger,  son  of  Theobald,  1249-50 
(deed  at  Lichborough) ;  Benedict  Dod. 
(Pat.) ;  William  Gaugy  {Rol.  Hund.)  j 
Thomas  Ken  (Mem.  R.) ;  John  le  Specer 
{Rol.  Hund.)  ;  William,  son  of  Thomas. 

•'  William  le  Pessoner  {Rot.  llutid.) ; 
John  de  Staunford  (Add.  Ch.) ;  Robert, 
son  of  H-T.ry  (Corporation  Deeds) ; 
John  le  Mcgre  (Add.  Ch.) ;  Philip  de 
Horton  (.'  rize  R.)  ;  and  Peter  de  Ley- 
ccstrc  (Anc  D.). 

•'  Boro.  Rec.  i,  57. 

••  One  such  presentation  is  printed  by 
Madox,  Firma  Burgi,  p.  153,  and  gives 
the  usual  formula. 

'  Boro.  Rec.  i,  93. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


ordained  that  henceforth  no  mayor  who  had  held  office 
for  a  whole  year  should  be  re-elected  till  seven  years 
had  passed.2  In  1558  the  assembly  confirmed  this, 
adding  that  none  should  be  chosen  mayor  oftener  than 
thrice,^  whilst  in  1570  this  was  reduced  to  twice.'' 
The  election  of  the  mayors,  to  be  held  before  Michael- 
mas under  the  charter  of  1299,  took  place  about  St. 
Matthew's  Day  (21  September)  in  the  14th  century,* 
about  St.  Giles'  Day  (l  September)  in  the  l6th,"  and 
was  directed  in  1618  to  be  held  within  ten  days  of  the 
first  of  August.'  The  mayor-elect  was  known  as  '  the 
mayor's  joint  '  till  Michaelmas,  when  he  assumed 
office.* 

The  charters  of  1200  and  of  1227  had  stated  that 
the  bailiffs,  if  well  conducted,  were  only  to  be  remov- 
able by  the  common  council  of  the  town.  All  the 
evidence  indicates  that  they  were  elected  annually 
and  served  for  a  year  only,  rarely  being  re-elected. 
They  were  the  chief  administrative  officials,  sharing 
the  judicial  duties  of  the  mayor,*  and  acted  within  the 
borough  as  the  sheriff  did  outside,  with  additional 
duties,  as  the  custumals  show,  in  connection  with  the 
industrial  regulations.  As  the  officials  who  executed 
the  king's  writs,  before  1257  by  custom  and  after  1257 
by  charter,  they  were  the  king's  bailiflfs  and  are  some- 
times so  described.^*  They  were  personally  respon- 
sible for  the  payment  of  the  fee  farm  of  the  town  at 
the  Exchequer,  and  the  office,  like  the  sheriff's,  thus 
entailed  financial  risks.  '  Every  year  the  men  of  the 
town  who  are  bailiffs  are  impoverished  and  made 
beggars  by  reason  of  the  aforesaid  farm,'  says  the 
petition  of  1334.'^ 

The  13th  century  custumal  refers  to  the  mayor's 
clerk  as  issuing  the  mayor's  summons,'^  but  the  earhest 
mention  of  a  clerk  by  name  is  in  connection  with  the 
records.  Ralph  Barun  witnesses  deeds  as  clerk  under 
the  first  and  third  mayors,'^  and  John,  son  of  Eustace, 
who  had  the  customs  of  Northampton  recorded  for 
the  information  of  those  who  should  come  after,  is 
described  in  this  second  custumal  as  clerk  of  North- 
ampton,''* and  witnessed  a  deed  as  such  in  the 
mayoralty  of  John  le  Especer.'*  The  town  farm  is 
occasionally  paid  in  at  the  Exchequer  by  a  clerk. '^  In 
the  I4ih  century  the  town  clerk  is  called  the  clericus 
memorandornni,"  which  indicates  his  duty  of  keeping 
the  records  of  pleas  and  enrolments,  and  in  1419  John 
Laucndon  is  called  the  <  ommon  clerk.'" 

The  letters  close  of  17  February  1 21 5  had  com- 
manded   the   '  good   men  '   to   elect   twelve   of   their 


number  to  assist  the  mayor  in  the  government  of  the 
town.  This  was  not  then  a  general  custom  in  English 
boroughs,  in  spite  of  the  statement  in  the  Little 
Domesday  of  Ipswich  regarding  the  election  of 
12  portmen  there  in  1200.  But  if  the  number  of 
the  mayor's  advisers  was  twelve  in  the  first  half  of  the 
13th  century,  by  the  second  half  we  already  seem  to 
trace  the  Twenty  Four  who  were  sharing  the  work  of 
government  with  him  in  the  later  middle  ages. 
Leicester,  which  offers  both  parallels  and  contrasts  to 
Northampton,  had  by  1225  set  up  its  body  of  24  sworn 
men  or  jurats  who  were  bound  to  come  at  the 
summons  of  the  alderman  to  give  him  help  and  counsel 
in  the  affairs  of  the  town.^"  The  second  Northampton 
custumal  (c.  1260)  is  headed  with  the  names  of  24 
jurati  who  passed  the  regulations,^'  and  whose  consent 
is  later  mentioned  as  necessary  if  a  stranger  wishes  to 
set  up  his  stall  in  the  market.^^  In  spite  of  the  gaps 
in  the  records,  ten  out  of  the  twenty-four  can  be 
identified  as  having  held  office  as  baihff  or  mayor 
before  1255.  Moreover,  the  first  regulation  that 
follows  provides  for  a  2s.  :;merccment  of  those  who 
fail  to  come  at  the  mayor's  summons.  It  would  seem 
that  these  are  the  Twenty  Four  who  in  the  14th 
century  act  as  the  mayor's  colleagues  in  official 
transactions.^*  In  1401  they  are  described  as  the 
Twenty  Four  sworn  of  the  Mayor's  council^*  and  in 
1415  as  the  Twenty  Four  comburgtnses  ;**  in  1473  they 
are  called  his  Twenty  Four.^*  The  form  of  the  oath 
taken  by  the  Twenty  Four  suggests  that  it  was  re- 
administered  each  year.^'  In  1442,  at  a  busting  held 
in  the  council  house  at  the  Guildhall,  it  was  agreed 
by  the  Mayor  and  several  of  the  Twenty  Four  that 
heavy  penalties  should  be  imposed  on  those  sworn 
'  as  well  to  the  mayor's  counsel  as  to  the  secret  counsel 
{secreUtm  consilium)  of  the  town  of  Northampton  ' 
who  divulged  discussions  held  therein.^*  There  is  no 
other  reference  to  any  privy  council,  and  the  resolution 
probably  refers  to  emergencies  when  there  was  a 
special  need  of  secrecy.  It  was  re-enacted  in  1557 
with  altered  penalties.^*  In  1 53 1  two  mercers  of  the 
town  were  said  to  be  '  for  ever  put  out  of  the  Court 
and  CounccU  of  the  seid  toun  of  Norhampton,  and 
never  to  be  sommoned  ne  takyn  for  any  of  the  Com- 
pany of  the  xxiiij"  Comburgessesof  the  same  toun  .  .  . 
and  never  have  place  ne  seit  within  the  Court  of  the 
same  toun  whereas  other  tlie  xxiiij"  Comburgesses 
do  alvveise  sirt,  that  is  to  sey  within  the  barris  comynly 
called  the  Chequer  of  the  seid  Court.''"'     This,  hke 


'  lioro.  Rer.  i,  275-6. 

•  Ibid,  ii,  30. 

•  Ibid  ii,  31.  This  new  order  was 
transgressed  in  1575,  and  frequently  later. 

'  See  the  dates  of  the  letters  patent  of 
the  town  enrolled  on  the  Memoranda 
Roll  under  Preieittattonfi. 

'  BoTO.  Rr(.  i,  122. 

'  Ibid.  i.  128. 

■  Ibid,  ii,  33,  35,  548- 

•  Sec  below,  under  'I'own  Courts. 
"  E.g.  Assize  R.  619,  m.  75. 

"  Vori.  R.  ii,  85. 

"  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.)  <)S,  fo.  160. 

'•  And.  D.  (I'.R.O.)  B  2484 ;  Add. 
Ch.  22353,  34251. 

"  Bateson,  Horough  Cuilomi,  I.,  xli. 

"  Add.  Ch.  22347, 

"  Mem.  R.  (K.R.)  14,  17,  18,  20, 
under  Adventus  yicicomttum, 

"  William  de  Burgo,  Add.  Ch.  22355. 

'•  Add.  Ch.  732  (l).     Other  town  clerks 


mentioned  are  William  dc  Flore  (c. 
1292),  William  de  Bray  (1319),  Honorius 
Saucee  (1351),  John  Molyncr  (1358), 
William  Lichebarwc  (1406),  Lawrence 
Qucnton  (1408),  and  John  Towcestcr 
(1460-69). 

"Gross,  Gild  Merchanl,  ii,  116;  cf. 
Dr.  Tait  in  Eng.  Hist.  Re-.,  xliv, 
183. 

"*  Bateson,  Rriords  of  the  Borough  of 
LeiceiUr^  1,  xxxi,  34. 

**  Conitdcraciottfi  facte  per  xxihj  jurafoi 
Northampton.    Douce  MS.  98,  fo.  iCo. 

"  Ibid,  fo,  160  vo.  (CI.  11). 

"  Sec  Bridges,  liiit.  of  Northauts.  i, 
364,  Robert  le  Spicer  motor  North'  et 
fjusdern  a-A'jm^  iurgcfijcj  (135K)  ;  and  the 
petition  of  Richard  Sidrnicsu'ortli  in 
1393,  mentioning  "  the  24  chief  men." 
V.CJi.  Northants.  ii,  29. 

•*  Rvro  Rfi.  i,  241;,  xxtitj  tie  coniilto  suo 
iiirati. 


26  Ibid  i,  243. 

'*  Ibid  i,  405.  Dr.  Cox  suggests  that 
the  mayor's  council  numbered  twelve  in 
1341,  judging  from  the  list  of  names  on 
Jioro  Rcc.  i,  235.  The  French  original, 
however,  gives  only  eleven  names; 
Adam  fiz  Adam  (iarlckmongcrc  is  only 
one  person.  Tiie  number  of  leading 
burgesses  mentioned  in  official  trans- 
actions varies  from  the  sixteen  addressed 
by  Henry  III  in  1264,  to  the  ten,  six,  four 
or  two  who  sign  the  letters  patent 
presented  annually  at  the  Kxchcquer. 
The  burgesses  mentioned  can,  however, 
be  .ilw.'iys  shown  to  be  ex-mayors  or 
cx-bailifTs. 

"'  "  Vc  shall  gefe  good  and  trew 
councrll  to  your  mcirc  all  this  yere 
ensuyng,"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  393. 

"  Ibid,  i,  276-8. 

''"*  Ibid,  ii,  20. 

'"  Ibid  i,  425. 


BOROUGH   OF  NORTHAMPTON 


another  expulsion  in  1 544,  is  authorised  by  the  mayor 
and  ex-mayors,  who  bind  themselves  not  to  recall  the 
expelled  but  by  the  consent  of  all  the  mayors  and  ex- 
mayors.  By  this  time,  then,  an  inner  ring  existed  in 
the  town  government,  and  though  the  act  of  1489, 
hereafter  to  be  mentioned,  had  sanctioned  the  privi- 
leges of  the  ex-mayors,  it  seems  unhkcly  that  it  created 
them.  The  '  twenty  four  co-burgesses  '  of  the  16th 
century  town  assembly  books  become  from  1595 
onwards  '  the  bailifT^  and  ex-bailifls,'  of  varying 
numbers,  who  wore  distinctive  gowns,  and  still 
occasionally  acted  with  the  mayor  and  aldermen  apart 
from  the  rest  of  the  assembly  up  to  1835,*'  but  iiad 
resigned  the  control  of  town  policy  to  '  the  mayor's 
brethren  ' — soon  to  be  called  the  aldermen.  In  the 
15th  century,  however,  the  mayor's  council  seems  to 
have  had  considerable  powers  as  the  efTective  town 
executive.  A  number  of  ordinances  for  the  crafts 
were  issued  by  its  authority,  after  consultation  with 
the  craft  concerned.^*  The  wardens  and  sciiclurs  of 
the  crafts  reported  before  the  mayor  and  his  council  ;** 
they  had  some  standing  in  the  Court  of  Husting, 
which  is  said  on  one  occasion  to  have  been  regularly 
summoned  by  the  mayor,  the  coroner  and  the  Twenty 
Four.**  They  acted  with  the  mayor  in  exercising 
patronage  and  in  assigning  guardians  to  minors  in 
the  mayor's  custody.**  The  council  met  like  the 
husting  on  Mondays,  at  the  Guildhall.''  In  fact,  in 
the  15th  century,  the  mayor's  council,  like  the  king's, 
was  a  body  exercising  legislative,  administrative  and 
judicial  functions,  and  effectively  directing  the 
supposedly  popular  assembly  which  met  from  time  to 
time  at  St.  Giles'. 

In  addition  to  the  officials  already  mentioned  the 
13th  century  custumal  mentions  a  mayor's  Serjeant, 
or  executive  official,  to  whom  the  15th  century  records 
add  four  baihfTs'  Serjeants,*'  later  to  be  known  as 
serjeants-at-mace.  In  the  15th  century  also  appear 
the  two  chamberlains  who  have  custody  with  the 
mayor  of  the  common  chest  and  of  the  town  property** 
and  pay  the  mayor  his  allowance  of  twenty  marks. 

As  at  Exeter  and  Norwich,  whose  constitutions 
were  likewise  modelled  on  that  of  London,  there  is 
no  trace  of  the  existence  of  a  merchant  gild  ;  the 
prepositura  or  provostry  regulate  all  industrial  matters. 
Freemen  were,  however,  sharply  distinguished  from 
other  residents.  The  second  custumal  (r.  1260) 
provided  that  every  native  merchant  who  wished  to 
enter  the  freedom  must  pay  5s.  4d.,  whoever  he  was,*' 
and  this  rate  held  good  till  1341,  vvhen  it  was  reduced 
to  6d.  for  sons  of  townsmen  at  lot  and  scot  of  the 
town.''"  It  is  probable  that  freemen  and  prdn  homines 
were  the  same  ;  sons  of  probi  homines  had  to  pay  only 
a  halfpenny  to  be  enrolled  in  a  tithing,  where  strangers 


had  to  pay  5d."     In  view  of  the  high  payment  for 
the  freedom,  one  clause  of  the  13th  century  custumal 
is  of  special  interest  :    '  That  no  commune  be  made 
henceforth  by  which    the    government  {prepositura) 
may  lose  its  rights.     If  anyone  be  convicted  of  this 
he  shall  incur  the  amercement  of  the  town  of  40s. 
without  remission.'*-     There  is  other  evidence  of  the 
existence  of  an  aristocracy  envied  by  their  less  well-to- 
do  fellow-townsmen.     The  only  original  return  extant 
to  the  inquest  of  1274-5**  is  described  as  being  made 
by  the  lesser   folk  of   the   town,"  and  it  complains 
bitterly    that    the    wealtjiicr    burgesses    escape    the 
burdens  of  citizenship.     '  Divers   burgesses   holding 
many  and  great  rents  in  the  town   refuse  to  make 
common   cause  with  the  community  in  tallages  and 
other  things,  with  the  result  that  a  large  number  of 
craftsmen  {menestralli)  have  left  the  town  because  they 
are  too  grievously  tallaged.'**    Some  of  the  exemptions 
from  tallage  to  which  the  jurors  refer  arc  enrolled  upon 
the  Patent  Roll.**     They  complain  further  that  when 
poor  townsmen  are  put  on  assizes  and  have  to  go  to 
London  and  elsewhere  on  the  business  of  the  town, 
it  is  at  their  own  charges,  whilst  the  rich  men,  if  they 
have  to  do  business  abroad  on  behalf  of  the  town, 
have  all  their  expenses  allowed  them  and  the  poor  have 
to  pay  for  it.*'    This  kind  of  complaint  was  arising  from 
many   towns   in   the    13th   century,**   notably   from 
Oxford,*'  and  it  has  recently  been  suggested  that  it 
forms   part  of   the  wave  of  anti-aristocratic  feeling 
expressed    in     1259    by    the    communitas    bachelerie 
Ane^Iiac.^     There  is  no  record  in  Northampton  of  the 
proclaiming  of  a  commune  as  at  London  in  1262-3*' 
or  at  Bury  St.  Edmunds  in  1264,*-  but  we  are  told  that 
the   bad   example  of   the  bachelarii  of   those  towns 
infected   others,**   and   it   would   seem   that   such   a 
demonstration  was  apprehended  by  the  drafters  of 
the  second  custumal.     The  ruthless  sacking  of  the 
town   by  the  royahsts  in   1 264  suggests  that  if  the 
priory   was   for    the    King,    the    townsfolk,    like   the 
scholars,  were  for  the  barons,  and  tiie  attribute  of 
Northampton  in  the  medieval  Ust  of  towns  preserved 
in  the  same  manuscript  with  the  custumal  echoes  the 
term  associated  with  turbulent   democracy — -'  Bache- 
lerie  de  Norhampton.'**   Already  in  the  13th  century 
it  looks  as  if  the  town  government  was  in  the  hands  of 
an  ohgarchy,  closed  by  custom,  if  not  by  ordinance. 

Freedom  in  Northampton  was  probably  the 
equivalent  of  membership  of  the  gild  merchant  in 
towns  where  such  existed  ;  its  essence  lay  in  the  right 
to  '  marchaundizen  '  in  the  town  itself,  and  to  claim 
the  town's  chartered  privileges  of  exemption  from 
toll  and  custom  elsewhere.**  In  1396  it  was  ordered 
that  no  freeman  need  pay  stallage,  unless  he  had  more 
than  one  stall  in  the  market.**     A  petition  of   1433 


"  Boro.  Re,,  ii,  19. 

>•  Ibid  i,  237,  245,  269,  273,  265,  294, 
•:o9  (1401-1467). 

"  Ibid,  i,  238.  "  Ibid,  i,  260. 

•»  Ibid  i,  242. 

••  Ibid  i,  260-276  passim. 

"  Ibid,  i,  244,  250,  257. 

■•Ibid  i.,  250,  251,  255-7. 

••  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.)  98,  io.  160 
Clause  2).  The  same  fee  is  payable  for 
purchase  of  a  stall.  No  stranger  can  hn\c 
a  stall  but  by  consent  of  the  24  jurau^ 
fo.  160  »»■  (Clause  11). 

*•  B<iro.  Rec.  i,  235. 

"  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.)  98,  fo.  160  v° 
(claus«  12). 


'*  Ibid.  (o.  161  (clause  20). 

'•  Rot.  Uund.  ii,  1-5.  There  are  three 
returns  at  Lincoln,  made  by  the  gicatcr 
the  lesser  and  the  '  secondary  '  burgesses, 
Ro:  llund.  i,  309,  315,  322. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  5. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  3. 

•*  Cal.  Pal.  1258-66,  pp.  532,  603. 

"  Rii.  Uund.  ii,  5. 

•'  York,  Carlisle,  Bristol,  Lincoln,  King's 
Lynn,  Norwich  ;  see  F.  F.  Jacob,  Studies  m 
Baronial  R/jorm,  p.  136,  n.5.  Stamford, 
Grimsby,  Gloucester,  Winchester;  see 
Eng.  Hill.  Rev.  v,  644-7. 

••  Cal.  Inq.  Misc.  i,  no.  238. 

"Jacob,  pp.  127,  134. 


**  hiber  dr  Ant.   Leg.    (Camden   Soc. 

P-  55- 

"  Engl.  Hist.  Rrv.  xxiv,  313-7. 

"  Annal.  .Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.)  iv,  138. 

"  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),  98,  fo.  194  v° 
(printed  Fngl.  Hist.  Rn;.  xvi,  502).  It  is 
possible,  however,  that  the  expression  has 
a  purely  economic  significance.  See 
below,  on  Trades  of  the  Town. 

"  See  Boro.  Rrc.  i,  378-So  for  letters  of 
exemption  from  toll,  according  to  the 
privileges  of  the  borough,  to  be  presented 
by  Northampton  merchants  when  trading 
elsewhere. 

*"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  262. 


A  HISTORY   OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


shows  that  non-residents  held  the  freedom  as  well  as 
residents."  Certain  judicial  privileges  of  freemen  are 
mentioned  ;  the  right  to  wage  a  single-handed  law,'* 
and  exemption  for  the  first  year  from  service  on 
juries. ''  Further  regulations  are  found  on  the 
assembly  books  when  these  begin.  All  members  of 
crafts  could  be  made  free  of  the  borough  by  paying 
zos.***  From  1606  there  are  lists  of  freemen  from  year 
to  year,  as  they  were  enrolled,  down  to  1833,*!  and  from 
these  it  would  appear  that  the  fee  for  a  freeman's  son 
was  3s.  4d.,  for  an  apprentice  who  had  fulfilled  his 
term  ids.,  and  for  an  outsider  ^5,  in  1606.  The  fee  for 
outsiders  was  raised  later.  The  freedom  was  granted 
free  to  various  deserving  persons,  and  outsiders 
marrying  freemen's  widows  were  admitted  at  a 
reduced  fee.  In  1835*^  the  commissioners  found  that 
freedom  could  be  acquired  in  five  ways  :  by  birth — 
fee  ^l  23.  ;  by  marriage — fee  ^^8  ^s.  ;  by  apprentice- 
ship— iee  £1  15s.  6d.  ;  by  purchase — feej^i5  4S.  ;  and 
by  gift.  The  freeman's  oath,  of  loyalty  to  the  King, 
obedience  to  the  mayor,  contribution  to  town  charges, 
and  keeping  of  the  peace,  is  given  in  a  1 6th  century 
form  in  the  iii^r  Ca/;wOTrtrH?H.''  The  assembly  books 
of  1568  give  examples  of  the  enforcement  of  these 
duties  on  persons  who  had  failed  to  keep  their  oaths 
'  taken  at  the  time  of  their  admission  to  the  freedom 
of  the  town.'**  A  17th  century  version  of  the  oath 
in  the  British  Museum  custumal  adds  the  words 
'  You  shall  take  no  apprentice  for  any  less  term  than 
seven  years,  by  indenture,  which  indenture  you  shall 
cause  to  be  made  by  the  town  clerk  .  .  .  and  enrolled 
at  the  next  court  of  hustings  after  his  binding.''^ 
This  clause  was  cut  out  of  the  freeman's  oath  by  a 
resolution  of  the  assembly  on  2  May  1778.  From  1660 
to  1733  freemen,  whether  resident  or  not,  had  the 
parliamentary  vote  ;  after  1733  only  residents  could 
vote.  Up  to  1796  the  freemen  still  had  the  monopoly 
of  trade,  but  the  privilege  was  dropped  in  the  new 
charter  of  that  year.  In  1835  ^^^  town  clerk  estimated 
the  number  of  freemen  at  about  400.** 

The  town  assembly,  consisting  presumably  of  the 
whole  body  of  freemen  or  probi  homines,  was  held  from 
very  early  limes,  according  to  Henry  Lee,*'  in  the 
churchyard  of  St.  Giles  for  the  election  of  the  town 
officials,  and  in  St.  Giles'  churcji,  according  to  the 
Liber  Cusliimarum,  for  the  passing  of  municipal  legisla- 
tion.*® It  was  apparently  summoned  by  the  mayor, 
and  met  on  any  day  of  the  week  except  Saturday,  the 
market  day,  and  only  rarely  on  Monday,  the  meeting 
day.  As  at  Leicester  and  Chester,*'  the  meeting 
about  St.  Denys'  day  seems  to  have  been  especially 
important  for  craft  business.™  In  the  14th  century 
the  assembly  is  described  as  a  congregation,  consisting 
of  the  mayor,  the  Twenty  Four,  and  the  whole  com- 
monalty of  the  town.'*     In  the  15th  century  it  is  also 


called  a  colloquium  generate  and  a  comyn  semble.''*  In  one 
case  it  is  said  that  the  mayor  and  the  Twenty-Four 
made  certain  provisions  and  ordinances  at  the  special 
petition  of  the  commonalty,'*  and  it  seems  probable 
that  the  '  commonalty  '  did  not  retain  much  initiative. 
On  another  occasion  the  commonalty  confirms  in 
December  an  ordinance  made  by  the  mayor  in  Septem- 
ber.'* Important  craft  ordinances  were  passed  by 
the  mayor  and  his  council  without  reference  to  the 
assembly.'* 

The  assembly  was  to  lose  its  popular  character  on 
the  pretext  of  its  disorderly  conduct,  but  there  is 
evidence  of  disputes  within  the  town  government 
itself  at  an  earlier  date.  In  the  eyre  of  1329  complaint 
was  made  that  WilUam  de  Tekne  (mayor  1309-10  and 
1 3 14-15)'*  and  Wilham  de  Burgo,  the  town  clerk, 
had  by  colour  of  their  office  levied  sums  of  money 
from  certain  ex-baiUffs,  broken  into  the  common 
chest,  taken  the  common  seal  and  sealed  with  it  the 
quittances  which  they  gave  to  the  bailiffs,  thus  de- 
frauding the  whole  community.  The  jury,  however, 
acquitted  the  accused,  saying  that  they  had  opened 
the  chest  by  the  consent  of  the  whole  town  because 
of  important  affairs  touching  the  welfare  of  the  whole 
community,  and  had  not  converted  any  of  the  town 
funds  to  their  own  use."  Again  in  1326  or  1327  a 
number  of  burgesses,  some  of  whom  were  later  mayors 
of  the  town,  making  a  confederacy  with  a  convicted 
clerk  and  a  man  in  process  of  being  outlawed,  attacked 
the  mayor,VValter  de  PateshuU,  who  was  also  a  coroner, 
dragged  him  by  the  hair  of  his  head  out  of  his  house, 
and  made  him,  in  full  court  of  Northampton,  forswear 
the  office  of  coroner  henceforth.'*  Public  opinion 
seems  to  have  been  on  the  side  of  the  rioters,  for 
though  the  deed  was  not  denied,  their  substantial 
fellow  burgess  John  de  Longue  lalle"  stood  pledge 
for  five  of  the  offenders  and  a  royal  pardon  was  forth- 
coming for  another.*" 

The  medieval  phase  in  the  borough's  constitutional 
history  ends  not  so  much  with  the  incorporation  of 
the  town  by  the  charter  of  14  March  1459,  by  the 
name  of  the  mayor,  bailiffs  and  burgesses  of  Northamp- 
ton,*' as  with  the  passing  of  the  act  of  1489.  This  act 
was  almost  certainly  the  result  of  the  concerted  action 
of  Leicester  and  Northampton.  There  is  much 
to  make  such  joint  action  natural.  There  are  several 
later  instances  of  the  one  borough  seeking  the  other's 
advice.**  Commercial  intercourse  was  close  ;  pay- 
ments for  entering  tlic  Leicester  gild  merchant  were 
made  in  Northampton  fair,  and  Northampton  mer- 
chants traded  at  Leicester.*'  Leicester,  like  North- 
ampton, had  24  jurari  originally  elective  ;**  it  had  a 
weekly  portman  moot  with  competence  similar  to 
the  Northampton  husting  ;  its  common  hall  corre- 
sponded to    the    Northampton  assembly.**     By  the 


•'  Boro.   Rrc.  i,  274.      ••  Ibid,  i,  136. 

"  Ibifl.  i,  263. 

•"  Assembly  Book,  13  Oct.    1559. 

*'  Boro.  Rtc,  ii,  314-20. 

"  Pari.  Papert  1835,  vol.  xxv,  p.  1968. 

"  lioro.  Rr:.  i,  352. 
'  Ibid,  ii,  313. 

"  Add  MS.   34308,  fo.    1 2d. 

*'  Part.  Papm,  1835,  vol.  xxv,  p.  1969. 

"Top.  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.)  Northanli, 
C9.  ColJcctioni  of  Henry  Lcc.  Town 
Clerk  of  Northampton  1662-171;,  p.  94. 
Cited  henceforth  ai  I.ee,  Coll. 

••  Boro.  Rtc.  i,  237,  247,  249,  261,  etc. 


"  Batcson,  Rec.  Boro.  0/  Leics.  i,  xxx. 

"•  Boro.  Rec.  i,  235,  290,  307. 

"  Ibid,  i,  26ij  etc. 

"  Ibid.  i.  300,  291. 

'»  Ibid,  i,  275  (1437). 

"  Ibid,  i,  264.  '»  Ibid,  i,  269. 

''Mem.  R.  (K.  R.)  83,  m.  79  d;  88, 
m.   169. 

"  Ai»ize   R.   63;,   m.   66  d. 

'*  Ibid.  m.  68  d. 

"  Mayor  in  1333,  1334,  1340. 

•*•  Various  other  riots  in  the  town  are 
mentioned  about  this  date  :  in  March  1314 
an  attempt  to  disturb  the  holding  of  an 

8 


AsBizc  of  Novel  Disseisin,  [Cal.  Pat. 
'3'3"'7>P' '4')  1  in  Jan.  1328  a  free  fight 
between  the  townsmen  and  Mortimcr'i 
Welshmen  {Cat.  Pat.  1327-30,  p.  423, 
Assize  R.  631;,  m.  66d.) ;  in  March  1332 
resist.'incc  to  Justices  of  oyer  and  terminer, 
headed  by  the  mayor  and  bailiffs  (Cal. 
Pat.  1330-34,  p.  291). 

•'  Boro.  Rec.  i,  85-8. 

"  Bateson,  Rec.  0/  Boro.  of  Leics.  it  , 
•34,438,47'-     Boro.  Rec.  W,  \c)i. 

"  Bateson,  Rec.  of  Boro.  of  Ltict.  i, 
zxix,  2;o. 

"  Ibid,  i,  40-42.         "  Ibid,  it,  xlvi. 


- 

PLAN 

/ 

OLD   NORTHAMPTON. 

/ 

/        1 

r 

— 

y 

•••' 

\ 

r 
/ 

y.\/    , 

\ 
\ 

\ 

r'^. 

\/ 

\ 

\ 

A 

\ 
\ 

A 

\ 

1 

\ 

V 

^- — -^ 

y 

/ 

i 

'/. 

Plan   of  Northampton   Based  on   Speed's  Map  (i6io) 

{ReprciJiiceJ  by  f>er minion  of  the  Toivn  Clerk  qJ  Northampton^ 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


14th  century  its  twenty-four  jurati  had  become  a 
close  body,  the  last  election  having  occurred  in  1273," 
and  in  the  15th  century  they  also  were  called  the  com- 
burgesses.  In  1466  and  1467  orders  were  carried 
excluding  the  common  folk  of  Leicester  who  were  not 
gildsmcn  from  meetings  of  the  common  hall, 
especially  at  the  time  of  the  election  of  the  mayor." 
As  in  the  county  courts,  it  would  seem  that  the  un- 
enfranchised were  crowding  in  and  claiming  an  equal 
share  in  elections  with  those  worthy  and  substantial 
burgesses  who  had  for  the  last  two  hundred  years 
been  effectively  controlling  the  town  government. 
The  corporations  of  Northampton  and  Leicester  fell 
back  on  Parliament  to  support  their  vested  interests, 
and  in  response  to  their  petition  or  petitions  two  acts 
were  passed  in  the  Parliament  of  Jan.-Feb.  1489, 
which  created  in  each  town  a  body  of  48  burgesses 
who  were  henceforth  to  exercise  the  powers  possessed 
till  then  by  the  assembly  at  Northampton  and  the 
common  hall  at  Leicester.  The  wording  of  the  two 
acts  was  not  identical,  but  their  interpretation  was 
very  similar.  The  act  for  Northampton  opens  '  For- 
asmoche  as  of  late  greate  divisions,  dissentions  and 
discordcs  have  growen  and  been  had  as  well  in  the 
Townes  and  Boroughcs  of  Northampton  and  Leycester 
as  in  other  dyvers  Townes  .  .  .  amongst  the  Inhabit- 
auntes  of  the  same,  for  the  election  and  choyse  of 
Mayres,  Bailies  and  other  Officers  within  the  same,  by 
reason  that  such  multytude  of  the  said  Inhabitauntcs, 
beyng  of  iytil  substaunce  and  haveour,  and  of  no 
sadnes,  discretion,  wisdome  ne  reason,  whiche  oft  in 
nombre  exced  in  their  Assembles  other  that  been 
approved,  discrete,  sadde  and  well  disposed  persones, 
haTC  by  .  .  .  their  Bandys,  Confederacy s,  Exclama- 
cions  and  Hedynesse,  used  in  the  seid  Assembles, 
caused  great  trobles,  divisions  and  discordes  among 
theym  selfe,  as  well  in  the  seid  EUections,  as  in  Asses- 
syng  of  other  lawf  ull  Charges  ana  Imposicions  amongst 
theym,  to  the  subversion  of  the  gode  Rule,  Govern- 
aunce,  and  old  Politilj  demenyng  of  the  seid  Burghes, 
and  oft  tymes  to  the  greate  breach  of  the  Kyngs  Peace 
within  the  same,  to  the  fere,  drede  and  manyfold 
perills  that  thereby  may  ensue'**  .  .  .  and  provides 
that  henceforth  the  Mayor  and  his  brethren  the 
ex-Mayors  shall  nominate  48  persons  who  have  not 
hitherto  been  mayors  or  bailiffs  who  shall,  in  conjunc- 
tion with  the  mayor,  the  ex-mayors  and  the  ex-bailiffs, 
henceforth  yearly  elect  the  mayors  and  baiUffs  for  the 
town.  The  Mayor  and  ex-mayors  shall  have  power  to 
change  the  personnel  of  the  48  at  will,  and  shall  also 
appoint  all  other  town  officials,  the  mayor  having  a 
casting  vote  if  the  votes  are  equal.**  The  council 
of  the  borough  followed  up  this  act  by  an  order  as  to 
the  procedure  to  be  followed  in  holding  the  elections 
of  mayors  and  bailiffs.  '  Fyrst  the  day  of  the  seide 
eJeccion  acustomed  all  tho  that  have  voyces  in  the 
same  eleccions  to  mete  at  all  halowe  Chirche  att  a 
convenient  houre  bi  fore  none  and  ther  to  here  a 
masse  of  the  holy  goste.     And  at  the  ende  of  the  same 


to  departe  and  goo  to  the  Gylde  halde  And  ther  to 
take  every  man  ther  setes  be  the  Assigment  of  the 
Meire  and  of  his  brethern  As  schall  Accorde  with 
thcire  discrecions  And  then  the  Joyntes  to  be  made 
-Accordyng  to  the  olde  Custome.  And  the  parsones 
named  in  the  Joyntes  severyally  to  be  settc  in  sondry 
papyrs.  And  then  the  same  papers  to  be  borne 
abowte  bi  the  town  Gierke  and  the  Comen  serieant  for 
the  tyme  beyng  to  every  of  the  parsones  thatt  shall 
geve  voyces.  As  stylly  as  maybe.  And  every  voyce 
to  be  entrcd  bi  the  seide  Clerk  to  the  names  of  the 
seide  parsones  to  Wliom  tliey  geve  their  voyces.  And 
whan  the  hole  voyces  be  gcven  and  passed  then  the 
seide  clerke  and  serieant  to  bryng  the  papers  to  the 
Meire  for  the  tyme  beyng.  And  to  his  brethern  that 
have  ben  meyres.  And  ther  bi  the  sight  of  the  more 
parte  of  the  seide  voyces  to  puplisshe  and  make  opyn 
the  persones  uppon  whom  the  eleccions  rest.  And 
thys  ordur  to  be  folowed  and  thus  done  withoute 
noyse  or  crye.'**'  The  council  also  issued  an  order 
early  in  1490  inflicting  penalties  on  those  who 
should  use  seditious  or  slanderous  words  against  the 
mayor,  his  brethren,  or  the  Twenty  Four,*i  clinching 
it  by  an  ordinance  in  1495-6  which  declared  disobedi- 
ence to  the  mayor  to  be  perjury  or  broach  of  the 
freeman's  oath,  and  gave  the  mayor,'  the  King's  chan- 
cellor '  for  his  year  in  Northampton,  power  to  deter- 
mine such  perjury  and  disobedience."'^  The  act  had 
probably  provoked  opposition  here  at  Leicester,  where 
the  commonalty  elected  a  rival  mayor  in  opposition 
to  that  chosen  by  the  Forty  Eight.'^ 

From  this  time  onwards  the  government  of  the 
town  was  in  the  hands  of  a  closed  body  ;  the  mayor 
and  ex,-mayors  (called  aldermen  from  1618),**  the 
Twenty  Four  (called  ex-bailiffs  from  1595),*^  and  the 
company  of  Forty  Eight,  who  made  up  with  the 
others  what  was  called  from  1599  the  common  council 
of  the  town.*'  An  oath,  pre-reformation  in  form,  to 
be  administered  to  the  aldermen,  indicates  that  they 
were  at  first  supposed  roughly  to  represent  the  five 
wards  of  the  town.''  The  charter  of  1599  further 
declared  that  the  Eight  and  Forty  should  hold  office 
for  life,  unless  removed  according  to  the  custom  of 
the  town,  and  that  the  baiUffs  could  only  be  elected 
from  among  the  number  of  the  Forty  Eight.**  This 
finally  closed  the  ring. 

Throughout  the  middle  ages  only  one  town  court 
is  named  :  the  court  of  husting  which  the  charter  of 
1189  provided  should  be  held  once  only  in  the  week. 
Whether  the  various  jurisdictions  acquired  by  the 
town  were  all  exercised  at  this  weekly  court,  or 
whether  other  sessions  were  held  with  other  names  it 
does  not  seem  possible  to  say.  The  charter  of  H89 
provided  that  no  burgess  should  plead  outside  the 
walls  save  in  pleas  of  foreign  tenures  ;  that  right 
should  be  done  concerning  lands  and  tenures  within 
the  city  according  to  its  own  customs  ;  and  that  pleas 
of  debt  within  the  town  should  be  held  there.  The 
first  custumal  {c.   1190)    is    mainly  concerned  with 


"•  Bitcion,  Rec.  oj  Boro.  0/  Leics.  i,  ii. 
xlv. 

•'  Ibid,  ii,  285-6. 

"Pari.  R.  vi,  431. 

••  The  letter!  patent  exemplifying  the 
act,  dated  28  March,  5  Hen.  VII,  are  en- 
rolled in  the  Brit.  Mui.  Cuitumal.  Add. 
MS.  34308  fo.  1 5  d-17. 

"  Ibid.  fo.  17. 


"  BoTO.  Rec.  i,  312-4. 
"  Ibid,  i,  338-9. 

•"  Bateson,   Rec.   oJ  Bora,   of  Leics.    ii, 
326-7. 
"  Boro.  Rfc.  i,  127. 
"  Ibid.  ii.  19. 
•'  Ibid,  i,  121. 
•'  '  Ye    ihall    iwere    that    ye   do    name 


persones  other  then  have  ben  meires  and 
bailliffs  of  this  borowe  parte  of  them  to  be 
dwcllyng  severalli  in  every  of  the  V. 
quarters  of  this  borough,  and  moste  con- 
venient nombre  of  them  to  be  appoynted 
dwellers  in  cvtry  of  the  seide  quarters.* 
Add.  MS  34308,  fo.  15. 
•'  Boro.  Rec.  i,  122. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


matters  of  land  tenure  ;  i6  out  of  its  24  chapters 
deal  with  customs  of  inheritance,  alienation  and  the 
rights  of  the  feudal  lord.  The  witness  of  the  '  men 
of  the  pleas  '  is  frequently  mentioned*  as  necessary  for 
transfers  of  land  in  the  town  court  (undoubtedly  the 
husting),  while  the  baihffs  and  coroners  seem  to  be 
needed  to  authorise  seisin.*  No  records  of  the  court 
survive,  but  a  large  number  of  deeds,  at  Northampton 
and  elsewhere,  register  transfers  of  land  that  took 
place  in  it,  and  illustrate  the  special  customs  of  the 
town.  If  a  kinsman  wished  to  assert  his  right  of  first 
purchase,  he  had  to  make  his  ofiEer  before  three  court 
days  had  passed,  after  the  feoffment  of  the  stranger.' 
In  one  early  13th  century  deed  the  court  in  which  the 
plea  of  land  had  been  held  is  called  the  porthimoth'  de 
Norhant'.*  No  other  instance  of  the  use  of  this  term 
at  Northampton  has  been  found  ;  at  Leicester  and 
Ipswich  the  court  at  which  transfers  of  land  took 
place  was  called  the  portmannmot.^  Both  baihffs  and 
prepositi  are  mentioned  in  connection  with  the  court,* 
and  John's  charter  appoints  coroners  to  see  that  the 
prepositi  do  justice.  At  the  end  of  the  12th  century, 
then,  the  weekly  court  was  a  court  of  record  for  land 
cases  and  a  court  for  the  collection  of  debts  and  prob- 
ably enforcement  of  contracts,'  at  which  the  prepositi 
presided,  royal  writs  were  pleaded,*  and  the  '  good 
men  of  the  pleas  '  made  the  judgments. 

The  charter  of  18  Jan.  1257  authorised  a  number  of 
jurisdictional  privileges,  some  of  which  had  certainly 
been  exercised  before  without  express  sanction.* 
In  consequence,  probably,  of  the  general  enquiry  into 
royal  rights  in  1255,  Thomas  Kin,  mayor  of  Northamp- 
ton, appeared  at  the  Exchequer  and  declared  that  the 
burgesses  of  Northampton  had  always  had  the  return 
of  writs,  and  the  sheriff  of  Northants  said  that  he  had 
found  the  town  in  possession  of  that  right.**  It  was 
this,  probably,  that  led  to  the  burgesses  purchasing 
their  new  Charter,  in  which,  in  common  with  some 
seventeen  other  boroughs  in  the  years  1255  to  1257,1* 
they  obtained  the  right  to  exclude  the  sheriff  from 
executing  summons  or  distresses  in  the  town  and  to 
serve  writs  and  summons  of  the  Exchequer  by  their 
own  officials.  Henceforth  the  baihffs  took  the  sheriff's 
place  in  the  borough,  and  he  could  only  intervene  if 
they  neglected  their  duties.  The  charter  also  granted 
that  burgesses  should  not  be  convicted  by  strangers  in 
any  trespass,  appeal  or  criminal  charge  brought  against 
them,  but  only  by  their  fellow-burgesses,  unless  con- 
cerning matters  touching  the  borough  community. 
Infangthef  was  also  granted.  Thus  the  town 
courts  now  had  jurisdiction  over  criminal  matters, 
excepting  only  those  pleas  of  the  crown  whicli  the 
coroners  kept  against  the  coming  of  the  justices  in 
eyre.  The  eyre  roll  of  1247  shows  that  even  before 
this  grant  thieves  who  admitted  their  crime  had  been 
hanged  by  the  judgment  of  the  town  court.*'     The 


eyre  roll  of  1285  mentions  a  case  of  appeal  for  defama- 
tion in  'he  court  of  Northampton.**  In  1274  the 
jurors  said  that  the  sheriff  had  never  held  his  tourn 
in  Northampton,  and  that  the  town  had  a  free  court 
with  gallows,  pillory,  tumbril,  assize  of  bread  and  ale 
and  all  other  liberties  belonging  the  crown  by  royal 
grant.**  Both  the  custumal  and  the  eyre  rolls  of 
1253  and  1285  show  that  the  frankpledge  system  was 
operative  in  the  borough.  The  mayor  and  baiUff 
must  have  held  what  was  later  called  a  court  lect,** 
whilst  the  rights  of  infangthef,  etc.,  would  constitute 
the  town  court  a  court  baron.  Both  these  names 
survived  into  the  19th  century  and  are  mentioned  in 
1835.  The  ordinary  business  of  the  town  court  is 
well  illustrated  by  a  cancelled  account  of  its  pleas  and 
perquisites  for  one  whole  year,**  which  shows  that 
payments  were  taken  for  trespass,  for  hamsoken,  for 
hue  unjustly  raised,  for  contempt  done  to  the  bailiffs 
and  their  Serjeants,  for  default,  for  false  claims  and 
for  claims  not  prosecuted,  for  licence  to  agree,  for 
unjust  detention  of  chattels,  for  entering  a  tithing, 
for  having  a  place  to  sell  bread  in,  and  for  selling  un- 
sealed or  baaly  baked  bread.  Judging  by  the  names 
of  the  townsmen,  the  date  of  this  estreat  is  between 
1285  and  1300  It  would  seem  to  be  the  accounts  of 
the  court  during  a  period  when  the  liberty  was  in  the 
king's  hands,  possibly  after  the  eyre  of  1285,  when  the 
borough  was  convicted  of  having  exceeded  its  rights 
of  infangthef  by  hanging  a  Dunstable  man.*'  In  1329 
a  custos  of  Northampton  was  appointed  for  similar 
reasons.  The  second  custumal,  with  its  frequent 
references  to  the  baihffs'  power  of  amercement,**  and 
its  numerous  mercantile  regulations,**  which  must 
have  been  enforced  in  the  town  courts,  belongs  to  the 
same  stage.  A  plea  of  1307  shows  that  the  bailiffs 
of  Northampton  had  no  jurisdiction  in  pleas  of  debt 
over  40s.'*  The  court  was  described  in  1315  as  '  the 
King's  court  of  Northampton.' '*  In  the  eyre  of  1329 
the  mayor  and  commonalty  claimed  jurisdiction  in  a 
case  of  dower  before  the  justices,  asserting  that  by 
their  charter  no  plea  of  tenements  within  Northamp- 
ton ought  to  be  held  except  before  tlie  mayor  and 
bailiffs  within  the  walls.  This  led  to  a  long  discussion 
as  to  the  jurisdiction  of  the  mayor,  who  soon  shifted 
his  ground,  asking  only  that  the  justices  should  sit 
within  the  walls  (as  they  had  done  in  1285)  and  not 
at  the  Castle.  Justice  Scrope  and  the  King's  Counsel, 
however,  pointed  out  that  the  charter  under  which 
jurisdiction  was  claimed  made  no  mention  of  a  mayor, 
and  asserted  that  the  town  had  no  mayor  in  the  reign 
of  Henry  III.  From  the  coroners'  roll,  also,  it  was 
clear  that  the  king's  lieges  had  been  arraigned  and 
put  to  death  for  felonies  committed  outside  the  town, 
the  franchise  of  infangthef  having  thus  been  executed. 
The  justice  also  condemned  the  irregularity  of  the 
coroners  keeping  a  joint  record,  when  each  of  the  four 


'  Bat«ton,  Boro.  Cmloms  (Seidell  Soc.), 
1,245,272-3;   ii,  63,  102. 

•  Ibid,  ii,  63-4. 

•  Ibid,  ii,  63.  Mill  Batcion  interpret! 
tbii  ai  referring  to  lix-monthly  '  great 
court!.'     Ibid,  ii,  p.  Ixuix. 

•Marl.   Chart.  86,  D.  45   (1231-330. 

'  Bateion,  Rtr.  »/  Hero,  of  Lcia.  i,  8  ; 

Bateion,   Boro.   Cutiemi  (Sclden   Soc),   i, 

•  Ibid.  I,  103,  292-3. 
'  Ibid,  i,  215. 


'  Harl.  Ch.  86,  D.  45. 

•  In  1221  the  Exchequer  w.i8  complain- 
ing that  the  burgemei  had  failed  to 
execute  Exchequer  writs  and  sumiuons, 
Mem.  R.  (K.  R),  4,  y,„is  Vic.  Norhanl. 

'"  M.ndox,  Firma  Burfi,  p.  159. 

"  Ballard  and  Taif,  Boro.  Charirn,  ii, 
15^-60,   171-3. 

"  Ajiiie  R.  614  B.  m.  48d. 

"  Ibid.  O19,  m.  75. 

'«  Rot.  l/unj.  ii,  2,  4. 

'•  The    petition    of    Richard    Stormei- 


worth  in  1303  refcri  to  indictment!  by  the 
'  Dosouns  '  (i.e.  tithing  men)  before  the 
m.iyor.     V.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  29. 

I' Ct.  R.  (P.  R.  O.),  I95'57;  printed 
Northanli  .V.  and  Q.  [New  Scr.),  vol.  v, 
pp.  203-11. 

"  Auiie  R.  6iq,  m.  7;. 

"Clause!  9,   14,   15,  21,  22. 

"  Thirty-three  of  it!  42  clauiei  are 
concerned   with   trade. 

••  Abbrtv.  Plac.  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  300. 

"  De  Bine.  R.  2o3    m.  62d. 


10 


BOROUGH   OF  NORTHAMPTON 


ought  to  have  had  his  own  roll.  For  these  various 
reasons  the  liberties  of  the  town  were  seized  into  the 
king's  hands,  and  the  officials  removed  from  their 
offices.  The  baihffs  and  two  of  the  coroners  were 
reappointed  and  sworn  in  as  the  king's  delegates,  but 
a  custos  was  appointed  in  place  of  the  mayor.**  From 
the  deeds  of  the  13th  and  14th  centuries  it  appears 
that  mayor,  bailiffs  and  coroners  were  present  at  the 
court,**  and  in  the  I5lh  century  the  Twenty  Four 
sometimes  at  least  took  part.**  The  pleas  at  which 
the  freemen  were  sworn  in  must  have  been  the  hust- 
ing.**  In  1557  the  assembly  ordered  that  the  mayor 
should  be  assisted  by  four  ex-mayors  and  six  ei- 
bailifTs  every  Monday  at  the  court  of  husting,  and  that 
members  of  the  Common  Council  might  also  be  called 
upon  to  attend  there.**  The  proceedings  were 
enrolled  by  the  town  clerk  on  the  Rotulus  Memoran- 
doTum,^^  destroyed  presumably  in  the  fire  of  1675, 
for  no  medieval  court  rolls  are  extant.  Some  legal 
formula  are  entered  in  the  Liber  Custumarum^* 

The  charter  of  Richard  II  of  14  June  1385  granted 
to  the  mayor  and  bailiffs  cognizance  of  all  pleas 
whatever  arising  within  the  town,  to  be  holden  before 
them  in  the  guild  hall  of  the  town  and  to  the  mayor 
the  right  to  keep  the  assize  of  bread,  wine  and  ale,  of 
measures  and  of  weights,  to  inquire  concerning  fore- 
staUers  and  regraters,  and  to  inflict  the  penalties  and 
take  the  profits  arising  from  this  jurisdiction.*'  This 
charter  again  must  have  sanctioned  existing  practices  ; 
the  mayor  had  the  assize  of  bread  and  ale  in  1274. 
The  procedure  and  scope  of  his  duties  as  clerk  of  the 
market  are  indicated  by  the  formula  in  the  Libfr 
Custumarum  and  the  charge  administered  to  the 
jurors.*  In  1621  the  mayor  was  said  to  fine  victuallers 
sitting  as  clerk  of  the  market,  at  court-leet,  as  well  as 
at  quarter-sessions.*^  The  charter  of  Henry  VI  of  1 1 
June  1445,  constituted  the  mayor  for  the  time  being 
the  King's  escheator  in  the  towm,  its  suburbs  and 
fields,  with  the  jurisdiction  belonging  to  the  office,'* 
and  his  charter  of  14  March  1459,  which  incorporated 
the  town,  appointed  the  mayor  Justice  of  the  Peace 
for  the  town.**  In  addition  to  these  jurisdictions  the 
mayor  had  the  duty  of  registering  recognizances  of 
detjt  under  the  Statute  Merchant,  probably  from 
1283  and  certainly  from  1 31 1.**  This  also  was  done 
in  the  court  of  Lusting.** 

As  elsewhere,  the  sessions  of  the  Justices  of  tlic 
Peace  absorbed  the  work  of  the  older  courts  of  North- 
ampton. Under  the  charter  of  1495  a  recorder  learned 
in  the  law  and  two  other  more  honest  and  learned 
coburgesses  were  to  be  elected  annually  to  sit  with 
the  mayor  as  justices  of  the  peace.**  The  charter  of 
1 599  provided  that  the  late  mayor  should  be  one  of  the 


two  burgesses."  By  the  charter  of  1796  the  bench 
was  enlarged  to  consist  of  mayor,  recorder,  deputy- 
recorder,  ex-mayor  and  three  other  aldermen,  as  the 
business  was  too  heavy  for  the  existing  number.*" 

Thus  down  to  1835  all  the  magistrates  were  elective, 
and  the  majority  were  members  of  the  corporation. 
The  magistrates'  sessions  had  absorbed  all  the 
criminal  business,  short  of  capital  offences,  and  the 
court-leet  and  court-baron  had  purely  formal  duties.** 
The  Northampton  justices'  abuse  of  their  judicial 
powers,  in  combination  with  the  town  baihffs'  bias 
in  impanelling  juries,  was  singled  out  for  condemna- 
tion in  the  general  report  of  the  Municipal  Com- 
missioners of  1835.*" 

The  court  of  husting,  still  of  importance  in  the 
16th  and  17th  centuries,'*'  had  dwindled  almost  to 
vanishing  point  by  the  19th  century.  It  sat  as  a 
'  court  of  record  '  once  in  three  weeks,  and  was  held 
before  the  mayor  and  two  bailiffs  and  the  town 
steward,  but  had  little  business — in  1830  fifteen 
actions,  in  1831  four,  and  in  1832  six.*"*  An  attempt  to 
have  a  court  of  Requests  estabhshed  in  1818-19  was 
defeated  in  the  House  of  Lords."**  Enrolments  of 
recognizances  are  extant  for  1 783-1 803. ■*•*  There  was 
also,  in  the  i6th  and  17th  centuries,  an  orphans' 
court,  reorganised,  if  not  originated  by  the  charter 
of  1599,'**  which  was  held  the  first  Thursday  of  Lent, 
at  which  the  mayor  and  chamberlains  inquired  into 
the  conduct  of  guardians  and  sureties."** 

A  special  inquest  was  held  at  Northampton  for 
inquiring  into  boundaries  or  party  walls.  A  similar 
inquest  was  used  in  London  from  the  12th  century 
onwards,"*'  and  in  some  other  boroughs  later,  but 
the  name  by  which  it  was  known  in  Northampton — 
Vernall's  inquest — appears  to  be  unique.  Its  origin 
can  be  traced  to  clause  11  of  the  earliest  custumal** 
(c.  1 190),  which  provides  for  the  holding  of  a  jury 
to  decide  disputes  over  walls,  gutters,  or  other 
boundaries.  Records  of  the  holding  of  such  inquests 
are  found  in  the  assembly  books  as  late  as  1724, 
and  the  inquest  was  annually  appointed  down  to 
1768,'*°  so  that  the  institution  has  a  history  of  some 
570  years.  The  special  local  name  has  never  been 
satisfactorily  explained,  in  the  absence  of  mediaeval 
forms  of  the  word.  It  is  possibly  to  be  associated  with 
the  form  veiours,  vayowres  or  aviewers,  as  used  for  the 
jury  that  surveyed  the  boundaries  in  Bristol  where, 
as  in  Northampton,  it  was  the  mayor's  duty  to 
adjudicate  as  to  boundaries  and  gutters  from  the 
13th  century  on.^"  The  corruption  would  be  no 
stranger  than  that  of  frith-borli  to  third  borough, 
the  Northampton  term  for  the  tithing  man. 

The  closing  of  the  corporation  at  Northampton, 


'*  For  reports  of  the  Eyre  of  North- 
ampt.  Ke  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.)  2811, 
fT.  248-50;  Add.  MS.  5924,  f.  7,  I2d; 
lee  alio  Assize  R.  635,  m.  71  d.  For 
appointment  of  custos^  Boro.  Rec.  i,  64. 
A  cusiot  had  alio  been  appointed  in  1227 
and  1264. 

"Add.  Ch.  22354-7,  etc. 

"  BoTo.  Rrc.  i,  309,  312. 

«»  Ibid,  i,  235. 

•*  Ibid,  ii,  20. 

"  Ibid,  i,  384.  Deed*  were  frequently 
enrolled  upon  it ;  ie«  B.M.  .Add.  Ch.  729, 
730,  22368,  22371. 

••  Ibid,  i,  382-191. 

"  Ibid,  i,  367. 


"  Ibid,  i,  373. 

>'  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  Add.  1 580-1625,  p. 
641. 

*'  Boro.  Rec.  i,  77.  The  escheator's 
oath,  from  the  Brit.  Mus.  cuitumal,  is 
printed  Boro.  Ree.  ii,  132. 

»  Ibid,  i,  85. 

•*  Ibid,   ii,    120-1. 

»  Ibid,  i,  382-3. 

>•  Boro.  Rec.  i,  104. 

"  Ibid,  i,   123. 

"Ibid,  i,  166;  Pari.  Papers  1833,  vol. 
xiii.  Minute*  of  Evidence,  1068. 

"Ibid.  1344. 

"Ibid.  1364-74,  1418;  ibid.  1835, 
vol.  jutiii,  40  ;   vol.  XXV,    1979-81. 

II 


♦'  Boro. 
"  Pari. 


Rec.  ii,  1 16,  1 18-9. 
ol. 


1970. 
Rec. 


Press     R. 


Papers    1833,    vol.    xiii,    344, 
p.  52. 

"  Ibid.  1835,  vol.  XXV, 

"  Northampt.    Corp. 
101. 

••  Boro.  Rec.  i,  124. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  119-20. 

"  Bateton,  Boro.  Customs  (Selden  Soc). 

'■  245-7- 

«'  Ibid,   i,  245. 

••  Boro.  Rec.  ii,   135-7. 

>«  Bickley,  Little  Red  Book  of  Bristol,  ii, 
134  ;  Bateton,  Boro.  Ci«(<>mj  (Selden  Soc), 
ii,  31. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


as  at  Leicester,*^  may  not  have  involved  any  real 
injustice  or  caused  any  serious  discontent  in  the 
15th  and  l6th  centuries.  In  the  course  of  the  17th 
and  1 8th  centuries,  however,  the  situation  was  com- 
pletely transformed,  and  this  was  due  as  much  to 
poUtical  as  to  social  developments.  Northampton 
has  been  called  the  Mecca  of  English  Nonconformists, 
and,  less  kindly,  '  a  nest  of  Puritans — malignant, 
refractory  spirits  who  disturb  the  peace  of  the 
church.'  ^^  From  the  time  when  the  students  and 
'  bachelery  '  of  Northampton  supported  Simon  de 
Montfort  against  the  King  and  the  prior  to  the  time 
when  the  borough  persisted  in  re-electing  Charles 
Bradlaugh,  in  the  face  of  a  House  of  Commons 
zealous  for  the  conventions  of  religion,  there  is  a 
recurring  tradition  of  defiance  of  authority.  The 
Lollardry  of  the  14th,  and  the  prophesyings  of  the 
l6th  century,  the  dissemination  of  Penry's  Marprelate 
Tracts,  stitched,  if  not  printed,  in  Northampton  ; 
the  obstinate  resistance  to  Laudian  reform  in  the 
17th  century,^*  are  followed  by  the  militant  puri- 
tanism  of  the  civil  wars  and  the  last  stand  of  the 
Leveller  Thompson  ;  **  the  pioneer  activities  of  Inde- 
pendent, Baptist,  Quaker,  Moravian  and  Wesleyan 
congregations,  with  their  meeting  houses  at  Castle 
Hill  and  College  Lane,  Doddridge's  Academy  and 
Ryland's  School ;  *^  the  iconoclastic  free-thought  of 
Thomas  Woolston  and  Charles  Bradlaugh  ;  and  the 
radicalism  of  Chartists  like  Gammage.  The  conser- 
vative influences  come  from  the  county  ;  it  was  not 
a  Northampton  parson  who  preached  the  doctrine 
of  '  ApostoUc  obedience  '  to  the  justices  of  Assize 
at  All  Saints'  in  1632  so  comprehensively  that  the 
Archbishop  refused  to  license  the  pubUcation  of  the 
sermon.  In  view  of  the  proverbial  relationship  of 
cobbhng  and  politics,  it  is  interesting  to  notice  that 
during  these  same  centuries  Northampton  comes  to 
take  the  first  place  in  the  shoemaking  industry  of 
England. 

The  irresolution  of  mayor  and  corporation  as  to 
their  attitude  on  Elizabeth's  death  is  vividly  thrown 
up  in  Sir  Thomas  Tresham's  account  of  his  ride  to 
Northampton  in  March  1603,  and  his  threefold 
proclamation  of  James  I  (regarded  as  a  potential 
patron  of  Papists)  outside  the  south  gate,  on  the 
steps  of  the  mayor's  house,  and  in  the  mayor's  own 
chamber.'*  After  these  initial  hesitations  the  town 
maintained  the  forms  of  loyalty  in  frequent  welcomes 
to  the  first  two  Stuarts  on  their  journeys  through 
Northampton  to  or  from  Holdenby  House,"  but  from 
1632  overt  acts  of  the  corporation  betray  a  growing 
opposition  to  royal  policy.  Troops  were  refused  in 
that  year,'*  shipmoney  in  1636,"'  and  the  fees  of  the 
king's  messengers  were  reduced  in  1640.**  In  March 
1641  the  Assembly  resolved  to  complain  to  Parha- 
ment  of  the   renewed   attempts   to   exact   coat   and 


conduct  money  from  the  town,  and  to  take  the  trained 
band?  out  of  the  hberties."    In  January  1642  a  peti- 
tion, signed  at  the  Swan  Inn,  Northampton,  against 
Papists   and   Bishops   went   up   to   the   Commons.'* 
From  the  outbreak  of  hostihties  Northampton  became 
one  of  the  more  important   Parliamentary  garrison 
towns,  and  the  town  government  used  every  effort 
to   strengthen  it.       Nicholas   Wharton,   one  of   the 
London  volunteers  in  Essex'  army,  who  entered  the 
town  in  August  1642,  describes  the  walls  as  '  miser- 
ably ruined,  though  the  country  abounds  in  mines  of 
stones  ' ;  *^  the  town,  with  the  assistance  at  first  of  the 
Earl  of  Manchester  and  later  of  the  Parliamentary 
committee    for   the   town   and   county  set   to  work 
to   organise    the   defences.'*      The    assembly   voted 
;^ioo  in  1642  and  another  j^i6o  in  1643,  for  improving 
the   fortifications ;     a   scheme   for   the   provision   of 
labour  by  the  five  wards  in  rotation  on  the  first  five 
days  of  the  week  was  worked  out.*'    Stores  were  laid 
up   against   a   possible   siege  ;    the   south   and   west 
bridges   were   turned   into   drawbridges,'*   and   out- 
lying houses  in  St.  Edmund's  end  pulled  down  to  make 
the  east  gate  safer."     Besides  occupying  the  castle, 
the  troops  were  billeted  on  the  townsmen,  who  further 
helped  the  forces  by  supplying  2,000  pairs  of  shoes 
to  Cromwell's  army.**     From  Northampton  Fairfax 
marched  out  to  Naseby  in  1645,  and  after  the  battle 
the    Northampton   churches    received   the   living   as 
prisoners,   and  their  churchyards   the  dead.*^     The 
Commonwealth    reduced    the    parhamentary    repre- 
sentation of  the  borough  to  one  member,  and  it  is 
possible  that  the  town  shared  the  dislike  of  the  county 
for    the    government    of    Major-General    Boteler," 
though  it  does  not  seem  to  have  joined  in  the  county's 
Humble   Address   to   General    Monk   on   liis   arrival 
at  Northampton  on  24  January  1660.''    Be  that  as  it 
may,  on   10  May   1660  Charles   II  was    proclaimed 
'  by  our  Mayor  and  Aldermen  in  their  scarlett,  and 
the  bayUflfs  and  Forty- Eight    burgesses   in    all   their 
formalities,  with  a  troop  of  Horse  and  three  Com- 
panies of  Foot,  and  Drums,  Trumpets  and  the  Town 
waitse.''^     In  spite  of  this  show  of  loyalty,  the  cor- 
poration was  drastically  purged  by  the  commissioners 
appointed  under  the  Corporation  .\ct  of  1662.     In 
September  of  that  year,  wliilst  the  town-walls  were 
being  demolished  under  the  supervision  of  the  Lord 
Lieutenant,    the    mayor-elect,    the    bailiffs-elect,    8 
aldermen,   14  ex-bailiffs  and    32   of  the  Forty  Eight 
were  turned  out,'*  and  the  town  had  to  pay  £200 
for  the  renewal  of  its  cliarter,'*  which  was  accompanied 
by  the   proviso   that   the   appointments  of   recorder 
and  town  clerk  were  to  be  confirmed  by  the  king, 
and  tliat  all  the  officials  must  take  the  oaths  of  allegi- 
ance and  supremacy.'-'     In  1672  there  wa*;  some  talk 
of  a  quo  warranto  against  the  town   for  the  refusal 
to  re-elect  Peterborough  as  recorder,'*  and  though  the 


*'  Bateion,  Rfc.  lioro.  of  Letci.  ii,  liv. 

•■  Cat.  S.  P.  Dom.  1638-9^  p.  588  (llum- 
phrry  Ramidcn  to  .Sir  John  Lambc). 

•■  y.C.U.  Northantt.  ii,  29,  43,  68  ff. 

••  Gardiner,  Commonweallh  and  Protec- 
lorali,  i,  54  ;  l.tc,  Coll,  p.  105.  Note  alio 
the  earlier  I.evellen  of  1607,  who  oppoied 
the  cncloiurei.  Serjeantion,  Hill,  of  Ch. 
af  All  Samtt^  pp.   149-50. 

"  V.C.II.  Norlhanu.  ii,  6S-74 

••  Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  Var.  Coll.  iii, 
I17-H3. 

"  Boro.  Rtc.  ii,  469-71. 


••  Cat.  S.  P.  Dom.  163 1-3,  p.  278. 

'•  lloro.  Rec.  ii,  435. 

"  Iliid.  ii,  33. 

*'  Ibid,  ii,  437.  For  the  town  tr,tined 
bands  see  ibid,  ii,  444-453,  and  Acts  of 
the  Prtty  Council  1595,  p.  392. 

•>  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1 64 1-3,  p.  279. 

•>  Ibid.  p.  385. 

"  Itiit.  MSS.  Com.  Rrp.  viii,  app.  2, 
P-  '.') 

"  lloro.   Rec.  ii,  438-9. 

"  Rridgci,  Uitt.  of  Noribanli.  i,  431. 
(from  T.  Duit). 

12 


•'  I.ec,  Coll.  p.  99. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1644,  p.  285. 

"  R.  M.  Serjenntson,  /list.  Cb.  of  All 
Saint!,  Northampl.  p.  152. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.   109. 

"  Broadsheet,  d.ited  24  J.m.  1659, 
*  The  Humble  Addrcs*  of  the  Gentlemen, 
Ministers  and  freeholders  of  the  county  of 
Northampton.' 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  III. 

'•Ibid.  113.  "Ibid. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1663-4,  p.  223. 

'*  Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  xii,  app.  7,  p.  9!. 


BOROUGH   OF   NORTHAMPTON 


king  did  not  then  insist,  in  1681  the  corporation  were 
forced  to  accept  him  in  place  of  the  father  of  their 
sitting  member,  a  prominent  ExcUisionist  Whig, 
whom  they  had  just  elected  to  the  office."  In  1683, 
following  the  example  of  a  number  of  other  boroughs 
who  had  been  cowed  by  the  fate  of  London,  North- 
ampton surrendered  its  charter  and  received  a  new 
one  which  nominated  the  town  officials  and  entire 
corporation  and  '  according  to  the  new  mode  of 
charters,''^  reserved  to  the  king  the  right  to  remove 
any  official  who  should  subsequentlv  be  elected." 
This  right  was  freely  exercised  by  James  II,  who,  be- 
tween February  and  September  1688,  removed  a  mayor, 
8  aldermen,  the  town  attorney,  16  ex-bailiffs,  the 
acting-bailifTs,  23  common  council  men,  and,  in 
September,  the  mayor-elect.*"  The  Earl  of  Peter- 
borough, the  recorder,  also  made  a  speech  to  the 
assembly,  desiring  them  not  to  promise  their  votes 
at  the  coming  parliamentary  election  till 
they  had  heard  from  him ;  '  but  the 
Prince  of  Orange  coming  in  a  short  time 
after,  there  was  an  end  put  to  that  re- 
quest,'"' and  the  mob  broke  into  the 
earl's  house  and  spoiled  his  chapel.'* 
From  1688  the  town  supported  the  Crown 
loyally.  In  1 745,  when  the  Duke  of 
Cumberland  was  preparing  to  make  a 
stand  outside  Northampton*^  against 
the  advancing  forces  of  Charles  Edward, 
the  recruiting  efforts  of  Halifax  were 
warmly  backed  up  by  Doddridge,  and 
one  of  the  pupils  of  his  academy  was 
standard-bearer  to  the  regiment  of  814 
volunteers  raised  in  Northampton.**  This 
temporary  rapprochement  of  church  and 
chapel  was  not,  however,  lasting  ;  the 
corporation  grew  steadily  more  exclusive 
in  its  Anglicanism  and  Toryism  ;  and 
as  the  Liberal  and  Nonconformist 
element  in  the  town  became  more 
wealthy  and  influential,  the  town  govern- 
ment grew  less  and  less  representative.  Of 
the  67  subscribers  to  the  loan  for  the  French  war  in 
1757,  more  than  half  were  members  of  the  Castle 
Hill  Church.**  '  We  term  it  a  Tory  Corporation,' 
said  a  leading  Northampton  dissenter,  giving  evidence 
before  the  Select  Committee  on  Municipal  Corpora- 
tions in  1833,''  and  in  1835  '  '^  ^^^  admitted  by  the 
mayor  that  he  had  never  known  an  instance  in  which 
a  person  opposed  to  the  politics  of  the  corporation 
had  been  elected  to  the  body.  .  .  .  Scarcely  any  of 
the  master-manufacturers  engaged  in  the  staple  trade 
of  the  town  are  members  of  the  established  church.  .  .  . 
Since  the  repeal  of  the  Test  and  Corporation  Acts  no 
dissenter  has  been  admitted  into  the  common  coun- 


cil.'*'    The  reform  of  the  borough  was  long  overdue 
in  1835. 

The  constitution  of  the  corporation  remained 
unchanged  in  substance  from  1489  to  1835.  .As  to 
its  working  we  have  evidence  lacking  for  the  medieval 
period.  The  records  of  the  town  assembly  (latterly 
small  enough  to  meet  in  the  Guildhall)""  are  extant 
from  1553  to  1835  ;*'  the  minutes  of  the  Mayor  and 
Aldermen's  Court  from  1694  to  1797  ;""  the  mayor's 
and  chamberlain's  accounts  from  1675  to  1835  ;°*  the 
minUiC-bo'iks  of  the  Committee  of  Accounts  from 
1800  to  1822,'-'-  and  tlie  Enrolments  of  Apprenticeship 
and  admission  of  freemen,  some  in  the  first  assembly 
book,  and  the  rest  separately  enrolled  from  1562  to 
1835.°^  There  is  also  a  good  deal  of  material  on  the 
parliamentary  representation  of  the  borough  from 
1732  to  1835."''  There  is  also  the  chronicle  of  Henry 
Lee,  town  clerk  from  1662  to  1715;"'    and  the  two 


Northampton  :  The  Swan  Hotel 

custumal  books,  at  Northampton  and  at  the  British 
Museum,  contain  oaths  of  office,  corrected  and  brought 
up  to  date  from  time  to  time,**  which  enable  us  to 
differentiate  the  functions  and  names  of  the  town 
officials. 

The  mayor  was  generally  chosen  from  among  the 
ex-bailiffs,  but  sometimes  {e.g.,  in  1702,  1762,  1817, 
1 8 19)  from  the  members  of  the  Forty  Eight.  In 
spite  of  a  resolution  of  1570  that  no  man  should  be 
mayor  more  than  twice,*'  there  are  numerous  in- 
stances of  mayors  serving  thrice,  and  T.  Cresswell 
served  four  limes  (1579,  1588,  1596,  1604).  The 
mayor's  allowance,  20  marks  in  the   1 6th,  as  in  the 


"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,   109. 

'•  Narcissui  Luttrell,  Diary,  i,  278. 

'•  Boro.  Rec.  i,  143-7. 

"  Ibid,   ii,  476-7. 

•'  I.ee,  Coll.  p.    128. 

•=  Hill.  \1SS.  Com.  Rep.  xii,  app.  7,  p. 
230. 

"  Lttteri  of  Cumbcrbnd  to  Wade  and 
Newcaitle,  4  Dec.  1745  (S.  P.  Dom.). 

••  Corresp.  and  Diary  of  Philip  Dodd- 
nd^e,  ed.  J.  D.  Humphreys  (1831),  iv, 
428-31,  436-9,  442-3. 

'»  Ibid. 


Minutes 


1 98 1. 


••  Pari.  Papers  1833,  vol.  xiii. 
of  Evidence,  1400. 

"  Ibid.  1835,  vol.  XXV,  pp.  1976, 
•'  lioro.  Rec.  i,  329. 
"  Vorthampt.    Corp.    Rec.     Press    N. 
2b,  3,  3a,  10,  5,  6. 

N.  8,  9.  4. 

Press  O. 


I-    30-47; 


•»  Ibid. 

Press 

N. 

8,9 

4- 

•'  Ibid 

Press 

H. 

1-28 

,  1-X> 

i7-i<)b. 

•'  Ibid. 

Press 

N. 

1 1. 

••Ibid 

Press 

0. 

13-1 

6a. 

"Ibid. 

Press    H.  ; 

Press 

Press  S. 

33-35. 

57 

-58. 

*'•'  *  Memorandums  oi  the  Antiquities  of 
the  Town  of  Morthampton  and  of  severall 
remarkable  things  acted  in  this  Kingdome 
of  England  Collected  by  Henry  Lee  in  the 
Eighty  Sixth  Year  of  his  Age  who  served 
the  Corporacion  of  Northampton  in  the 
office  of  Town-Clerkc  Fifty  and  Three 
Years  till  .August  1715.'  Top.  MS.  (Bodl. 
Lib.),  .Northants,  c.  9,  pp.  89-163,  cited 
as  I-ee,  Coll. 

••  The  prc-Rcformation  forms,  adjuring 
'  the  Saints '  and  '  the  holydome  '  are 
cancelled  •'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  31. 


13 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


14th  century,  varied  according  to  the  thrifty  or 
festive  tendencies  of  the  times,  but  rose  steadily 
in  the  l8th  century  from  ^30  in  1745  to  £105  in 
1801,  [J2.2.Q  in  1814,  and  ^^350  in  1829,  when  the 
tide  turned.-*  In  1835  it  was  ^^150.  No  doubt  the 
increase  was  partly  due  to  the  difficulty  of  inducing 
members  of  the  corporation  to  accept  an  office  which 
entailed  so  much  expenditure  on  '  treats  '  and 
'  feasts.''*  The  mayor  and  ex-mayors  or  aldermen 
had  much  the  same  functions  as  the  mayor  and  his 
council  had  had  before  1489.'*'  Under  the  charter  of 
1489  they  nominated  the  Forty  Eight,  and  thus  com- 
pletely controlled  the  personnel  of  the  corporation. ^ 
They  appointed  all  the  corporation  officials  that 
were  not  elected  by  the  assembly,  such  as  coroners, 
chamberlains,  constables,  Serjeants  and  beadles, 
searchers  and  tasters  for  the  trades,  collectors  of 
rents,  the  town  clerk  and  the  steward.  They  ad- 
ministered a  variety  of  charities,  and  their  preferen- 
tial treatment  of  candidates  of  their  own  poKtical 
colour  was  noted  severely  in  1835.^  Finally  they  de- 
cided when  the  assembly  should  be  summoned.  In 
the  17th  century  the  court  of  the  mayor  and  aldermen 
met  fortnightly  ;  in  the  1 8th  century  less  frequently, 
and  the  business  was  almost  entirely  confined  to  the 
fiUing  of  offices,  the  dealing  with  charity  property, 
and  the  calling  of  assemblies. 

The  two  baihffs,  elected  annually  from  the  com- 
pany of  the  Forty  Eight  by  the  whole  assemblv, 
became  members  for  fife  of  the  body  of  ex-haihffs, 
from  wliom  as  a  rule  the  mayor  was  chosen.  They 
received  as  their  allowance  the  rent  of  a  river  meadow 
known  as  the  Bailiffs'  Hook,  which  amounted  in 
1835  to  £31  a  year,  and  had  then  been  recently 
supplemented  by  a  grant  of  50  guineas.'  Their 
functions  had  come  to  be  almost  purely  administrative 
and  fiscal,  as  the  Court  of  Record  where  they  sat 
became  less  and  less  important.  They  were  still 
responsible  for  the  payment  of  the  fee  farm,  for  the 
arrangement  of  fairs  and  markets,  and  for  the  collec- 
tion of  tolls.  They  also  supervised  the  keeping  of 
watch  and  ward  and  the  upkeep  of  the  walls  till  1662.* 
They  impanelled  juries  and  executed  the  writs  of 
central  and  local  justices,  the  corporation  success- 
fully upholding  its  right  to  exclude  the  sheriff's  action 
in  this  matter.* 

The  Forty  Eight,  nominated  for  life  by  the  mayor 
and  aldermen  from  the  body  of  freemen,  served  as  a 
pool  from  wliich  the  baihffs  could  be  chosen.*  They 
could  be  displaced  by  a  vote  of  the  assembly.'  With 
the  mayor  and  aldermen,  the  baihffs  and  ex-baiUffs, 
they  made  up  the  common  council  or  assembly, 
which  elected  the  mayor,  the  recorder,  and  the 
bailiffs,  and  other  corporation  officials,'  admitted 
freemen,  leased  corporation  property,  and  passed 
ordinances  or  bye  laws,  though  this  form  of  activity 


practically  ceased  in  the  1 8th  century,  when  they  had 
come  to  take  very  little  thought  for  the  general  well- 
being  of  the  town.*  The  contrast  between  the  earlier 
and  later  Assembly  Books  well  reflects  the  narrowdng 
of  interests. 

Of  the  other  town  officials  the  Recorder  was  first  in 
dignity.  He  is  first  mentioned  in  1478  as  the  person 
before  whom,  with  the  coroners,  the  mayor  was  to 
be  sv/orn  in  at  Northampton,  instead  of  going  up 
to  the  Exchequer.'"  The  charter  of  1495  provided 
that  the  assembly  should  every  year  elect  a  discreet 
man  learned  in  the  law  as  Recorder,  to  serve  as  a 
justice  of  the  peace  for  the  borough,  and  be  one  of 
the  quorum  of  three,  with  power  to  hear  and  deter- 
mine all  felonies  and  trespasses  committed  within 
the  town.'*  The  office  was  as  a  rule  held  for  life, 
and  the  first  recorded  election  (in  1568),  was  made  by 
the  mayor  and  aldermen.*^  As  the  influence  of  the 
county  over  the  town  increased,  it  became  customary 
to  appoint  some  neighbouring  gentleman,  who  often 
served  as  knight  of  the  shire  or  member  for  the 
borough.  The  first  honorary  appointment  seems  to 
have  been  the  election  in  1642  of  the  Earl  of  Man- 
chester, a  member  of  the  family  of  Montagu  of 
Boughton,  '  for  various  favours  shown  by  him  to  the 
town,  and  especially  for  having  provided  for  its 
defence,'^*  and  thenceforward  the  work  of  the  office 
seems  to  have  been  done  by  a  deputy-recorder. 
In  1671,  the  assembly  elected  the  Earl  of  Peterborough 
as  Recorder,  but  the  next  year  the  new  mayor,  a 
county  gentleman,  induced  them  to  replace  him 
by  the  Earl  of  Northampton.^*  For  this  discourtesy 
to  a  royal  favourite  the  mayor  was  summoned  before 
the  Privy  Council,  and  rebuked  by  the  King,  who, 
however,  allowed  the  election  to  stand.'*  The  Earl  of 
Northampton  was  formally  re-elected  every  year  until 
his  death,  .ind  was  a  most  valuable  friend  to  North- 
ampton in  forwarding  tlie  Bill  for  the  rebuilding  of 
the  town  after  the  fire  of  1675.  When  the  earl  begged 
the  King  to  delay  the  prorogation  of  parhament  for 
half  an  hour  or  so  that  the  Bill  might  pass,  Charles 
observed  :  '  My  lord,  I  do  much  wonder  you  should 
be  so  kind  to  the  town  of  Northampton  which  in  the 
time  of  the  wars  were  so  unkind  to  my  lord  of  North- 
ampton, your  father.''"  The  earl  replied  :  '  If  it  may 
please  your  Majesty,  I  forgive  them,'  and  the  King 
said  :  '  My  lord,  if  you  forgive  them,  I  shall  do  the 
same.'"  On  Northampton's  death,  however,  the  town 
was  forced  to  accept  Peterborough  until  1688,  when 
the  recordership  became,  in  practice,  hereditary  in  the 
Compton  family,  till  the  death  of  the  last  Earl  of 
Northampton  in  1828.  The  position  then  ceased  to  be 
honorary,  and  a  working  lawyer  was  appointed.'*  The 
most  distinguished  of  tlie  deputy-recorders  of  North- 
ampton had  been  Spencer  Perceval,  who  held  the  office 
from  1787-1807,  gave  legal  opinion  and  advice  to  the 


•'  DtiTo.  Ret.  ii,  41-2. 

**  In  1694  eight  person!  in  succession 
were  elected  .is  maynr  and  paid  the  fine  of 
j^io  rather  than  serve.     Boro,  Rrr,  ii,  37. 

•••  For  the  mayor's  oath  see  Boro.  Rec. 
ii,  ;3i,or  Add.  MS.  Brit.  Mu«.  34308,(0. 
10  d. 

'  For  the  aldermen's  oath,  see  Add. 
MS.  3430S,  fo.  15. 

'Far!.  Paperi,  1835,  vol.  xxv.  p.  1978. 

•  Ibid.  p.   1967. 

*  For  the  bailiffs'  oath,  see  Boto.  Rec.  ii, 
533,  or  Add.  MS.  34308,  fo.  1 1  d. 


'Assembly  Books,  20  April  1612.  10 
May  1722. 

•  For  oath  of  Forty  Eight,  see  Add.  MS. 
14308,  fo.  20. 

'Assembly  Book,  2  May,   1778. 

•  The  distribution  of  patronage  between 
the  common  council  and  the  mayor  and 
aldermen  varied  from  time  to  time.  Sec 
Boro.  Rec.  ii,  49, 

•  Pari.  Paperi,  1835,  vol.  xxv,  pp.  1967, 


"■  Boro.  Rec.  i, 
"  Ibid,  i,  104. 


94. 


"  Ibid,  ii,  104. 

'=  //is(.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  viii,  app.  2, 
p.   59n. 

'•  I.ee,  Coll.  p.  118. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,   107. 

"  The  second  earl  was  killed  in  a 
skirmish  in  1643,  and  the  parliamen- 
tarians refused  to  give  up  his  body  to 
his  son. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  I2t. 

"  For  the  recorder's  oath,  see  Boro. 
Rec.  i,  392. 


H 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


town  on  several  important  occasions,  helped  to  secure 
the  new  charter  in  1796,  and  represented  the  borough 
in  Parliament  from  1796  till  his  assassination  in 
181 2. '•  His  statue  by  Chantrey,  erected  by  public 
subscription'"  and  placed  in  All  Saints'  in  1817,  was 
transferred  to  the  council  chamber  of  the  town  hall, 
where  it  now  stands,  in  1866. 

The  town  clerk,  common  clerk  or  mayor's  clerk 
acted  also  as  clerk  of  the  recognizinccs.^'  He  was 
appointed  as  a  rule  by  the  mayor  and  aldermen  and  in 
practice  held  the  otHce  for  life.  He  had  a  small 
stipend,  but  his  income  was  mainly  derived  from  fees. 
In  1652  it  was  put  on  record  that  he  should  have  no 
voice  in  matters  discussed  in  the  assembly  ;^*  his 
importance  as  a  permanent  official  is  well  illustrated 
by  the  story  told  by  Henry  Lee,  town  clerk  from 
1662-1688  and  from  1690-1715,  of  the  election  of  the 
mayor  in  1694.  Eight  members  of  the  corporation 
in  turn  had  been  elected  and  refused  to  serve.  '  It 
being  night,  .^nd  the  Mayor  and  .Aldermen  tired,  the 
Mayor  proposed  to  the  Aldermen  to  adjourn  the  Court 
to  the  next  day,  .And  then  I  informed  them  That  it 
was  against  the  Express  words  of  the  Charter.'  (If 
the  mayor  was  not  elected  at  one  sitting,  the  exist- 
ing mayor  had  to  serve  another  year.)  '  I  told  the 
present  Mayor  that  .  .  .  without  speedy  care  taken 
they  would  all  be  gon,  and  thereupon  he  starts  up 
from  his  Seat  in  the  Councell  Chamber  and  made 
hast  to  the  Hall  dorc  and  lockt  it  and  brought  in 
the  Keys  and  laid  them  before  him  upon  the  Table, 
and  said  :  "  Now  I  will  stay  here  till  to-morrow  this 
time,  but  I  will  choose  a  Mayor."  ...  It  happened 
to  be  a  wett  night,  and  after  nine  of  the  clock.'  ^ 

The  town  steward,  first  mentioned  in  the  15th 
century,**  acted  as  clerk  to  the  bailiffs  at  the  court  of 
record,  and  mayor's  clerk  at  the  court  leet.*^  He  was 
appointed  by  the  mayor  and  alderman  and  paid  by 
fees  only. 

The  coroners,  according  to  the  charter,  should  have 
been  chosen  by  the  assembly  ;  in  practice  the  mayor 
and  aldermen  often  appointed.  The  election  was 
annual,  and  it  was  usual  to  choose  aldermen  for  the 
office.** 

The  chamberlains,  elected  annually,  at  first  b_v  the 
assembly  and  later  by  the  mayor  and  aldermen,  acted 
as  the  town  treasurers.  They  kept  the  town  accounts 
and  had  one  of  the  keys  of  the  common  chest.*' 
During  the  17th  century  there  were  two,  a  senior 
and  a  junior  chamberlain,  each  holding  office  for 
two  years.  Their  accounts**  are  preser\ed  in  the 
corporation  archives  from  1 5  54  onwards,  with  gaps, 
and  are  of  great  value,  including  as  they  do  the  rental 
of  the  towrn  lands,  receipts  by  fines  and  grazing  fees, 
payments  to  town  officials  and  beneficiaries,  and  all 
kinds  of  occasional  expenditure.  The  increase  in  the 
amounts  spent  on  feasting  is  well  marked.  From 
1785  to  1835  the  town  chamberlain  wore  a  distinctive 


badge  of  '  a  respectable  silver  key  in  the  gothic  taste, 
double  gilt.'*»  By  1835  the  ch.imberlain's  functions 
had  become  largely  honorary,  and  the  real  work  of 
accounting  was  done  by  a  treasurer,  also  elected  by  the 
mayor  and  aldermen." 

The  Serjeants  of  the  mayor  and  baihfEs,  known,  from 
the  rods  of  office  they  carried,  as  mace-bearers  from 
the  14th  century*!  ^y^re  five  in  number,  one  for  each 
ward  of  the  town.  Four  were  reckoned  as  bailifTs' 
Serjeants  and  called  in  the  17th  and  l8th  centuries 
Serjeants  at  mace  ;  the  fifth  was  known  as  mayor's 
Serjeant  or  mace-bearer.  According  to  the  form  of 
their  oaths  in  the  town  custumal**  they  executed 
attachments  and  distresses  and  had  custody  of 
prisoners,  whilst  the  mayor's  Serjeant  also  assized 
measures  and  weights  and  levied  estreats.  They 
were  appointed  by  the  mayor  and  aldermen.  Besides 
the  fees  and  perquisites  of  their  office  the  bailififs' 
Serjeants  received  in  1833  a  salary  of  6  guineas  each, 
and  the  mace-bearer  ^t^?-*^  Four  small  maces,  one 
going  back  to  the  reign  of  James  I,  are  preserved  at 
Northampton,  together  with  the  great  mace  still  in 
use,  made  probably,  like  that  of  Leicester,  by  Thomas 
Maundy  of  London  under  the  Commonwealth.** 

The  duties  of  the  Serjeants  had  become  largely 
formal  by  1835  ;  their  police  duties  were  being 
performed  by  the  constables.  The  15th  century 
custumal  gives  the  constable's  oath  which  defines 
his  duties,  and  also  that  of  the  tithing  man  or  dozener,*^ 
whose  office,  at  that  period,  is  still  mainly  one  of 
presenting  at  the  leet.  In  the  17th  century  custumal 
a  later  form  of  the  sacramentum  decenurionim  in- 
cludes the  duty  of  apprehension  of  wandering  and 
idle  persons  of  different  kinds,**  and  can  be  taken  as 
defining  the  duties  of  the  third  borough  or  head 
borough  who  in  the  i6th  and  17th  centuries  assisted 
the  constable.  Each  ward  had  one  constable  and  two 
third  boroughs,  appointed  from  1581  to  1690  by  the 
assembly,  and  after  that  date  by  the  mayor  and 
aldermen.*'  In  1833  there  were  in  all  23  constables 
and  head  boroughs,  paid  according  to  the  work  done, 
by  piece  rates,  out  of  the  town  rates  by  authority  of 
the  magistrates.**  Among  other  minor  officials  of 
the  corporation  were  the  town  crier,  the  hallkeeper, 
and,  from  1584  to  1698  at  least,  the  town  waits  or 
musicians.*' 

The  government  of  the  close  corporation  appears  to 
have  been  on  the  whole  satisfactory  down  to  the 
Restoration.  From  that  date  the  town  records  give 
evidence  of  steady  deterioration.  Alongside  of  the 
growth  of  political  exclusiveness  went  the  tendency 
within  the  corporation  of  the  mayor  and  aldermen  to 
arrogate  to  themselves  more  power,  and  the  diminu- 
tion in  the  corporation  as  a  whole  of  the  sense  of 
responsibility  for  the  well-bting  of  all  the  town. 
The  borough  revenues  were  regarded  as  a  fund  entirely 
at  their  disposal,  and  any  fresh  needs  of  the  growing 


'•  Boro.  Rfc.  ii,  22,  206,  34g.  Ht  is  also 
supposed  to  have  used  his  influence  to 
secure  army  contracts  for  the  Northamp- 
ton shoe  makers. 

*•  The  corporation  subscribed  £10^, 
Assembly  Bk.,  5  June,  18 12. 

"  In  the  British  Museum  custumal  the 
town  clerk's  oath  covers  also  the  office  of 
*  Prothonotary  or  clerk  of  the  Recogniz- 
ances of  the  Statute  Merchant.'  lie  had 
a  seal  in  this  capacity,  reproduced  Boro. 
Rtc.  ii,  14a,  fig.  4. 


"  Ibid.  6(). 

"  Lee,  Coll.  pp.  130-1. 

'■*  Boro.  Rec.  i,  377.  The  steward's 
oath  is  given  Add.  MS.  34308,  fo.  11  d, 
printed  Boro.  Rrc.  ii,  533  ;  for  '  the  Mrs  ' 
read  '  thy  maystres.* 

'^  Boro.   Rec.  ii,   11 6-8;    Pari.   Papers, 

1835,  vol.  XXV,  p.    1968. 

*•  Ibid.  p.   1968.        For  coroners'  oath 
see  Boro.  Rec.  i,  392. 
"  Ibid..  256. 
=•  Ibid,  ii,  58-65. 

IS 


=•  Ibid.  66. 

"  Pari.  Papers,  183;,  vol.  xxv,  p.  1968. 
"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  244,  2?o. 
"Add.   MS.   34308,  ff.    13,    i;;    Boro. 
Rrc.  ii,  74,  78. 
"  Ibid.  78. 
»  Ibid.  74-85. 
»>  Ibid,  i,  397,  393- 
"Add.  MS.  34308,  fo.  12. 
"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,   139-142. 
"  Pari.  Papers,  1833,  vol.  xiii,  p.  50. 
"»  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  85-92. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


town  were  met  out  of  the  town  rates,  fixed  by  the 
magistrates  at  quarter  sessions  and  kept  distinct  from 
the  corporation  accounts.*"  As  early  as  1692  a  mayor 
is  commended  because  '  he  did  not  sell  the  town  land 
for  claret  as  others  did.'*i  The  corporation  became, 
in  fact,  little  more  than  a  dining  club  with  considerable 
powers  of  patronage. 

One  by-product  of  this  stagnation  was  the  difficulty 
found  in  filling  municipal  office  and  even  in  recruiting 
the  corporation  itself.  A  substantial  sum  was 
annually  derived  from  the  fines  cf  tho«e  who  refused 
office.  We  have  seen  that  in  1694  eight  mayors- 
designate  refused  to  serve.  This  brought  in  ^80. 
Similar  difficulties  occurred  in  171 1,  171 3,  1723,  and 
1730.*^  The  same  reluctance  to  serve  was  shown  by 
bailifls-elect.*'  The  records  of  the  mayor  and  alder- 
men's court  show  the  difficulty  of  filling  up  the  vacan- 
cies in  the  Forty  Eight  created  annually  by  the  election 
of  the  two  bailiffs.  The  first  instance  of  refusal  to  act  is 
recorded  in  1696,  and  from  that  time  complaints  were 
constant.**  On  7  August  1775,  for  instance,  13 
persons  who  were  elected  to  the  Forty  Eight  were 
displaced  because  of  their  refusal  to  take  the  oath  ; 
ten  of  them,  however,  were  immediately  re-elected 
with  six  others.  On  5  August  1776  twelve  were  simi- 
larly displaced  and  re-elected.**  The  assembly  in  its 
turn  was  endeavouring  to  compel  persons  to  become 
freemen  :  on  23  May  1 776,  for  instance,  it  was 
resolved  that  nine  persons  should  be  admitted  freemen 
at  j^^io  each,  and  prosecuted  if  they  refused.**  As  a 
result,  by  1 791  the  corporation  consisted  of  a  mayor, 
18  aldermen,  22  baiUlTs  and  19  Forty  Eight  men, 
whilst  29  persons  elected  to  the  Forty  Eight  were 
refusing  to  act.  Under  the  charter  of  1663  the  mayor 
and  aldermen  had  power  to  fine,  and  if  necessary 
imprison  and  distrain  freemen  who  refused  to  serve.*' 
Having  taken  legal  opinion,  in  1794  they  had  a 
mandamus  served  on  several  of  the  defaulters,  and  the 
case  was  brought  before  the  court  of  King's  Bench, 
with  unforeseen  consequences.  It  appeared  that  by 
the  Act  of  1489  the  mayor  must  be  elected  by  a 
majority  of  the  Forty  Eight,  not  being  ex-baiUfTs,  ana 
that  for  several  years  past  the  mayors  had  been 
elected  by  a  minority,  as  no  majority  existed.**  The 
corporation  had  thus  no  legal  warrant  for  its  existence, 
and  the  only  remedy  was  to  surrender  the  charter  of 
1663*'  and  petition  for  a  new  one.  The  townsmen 
seized  on  the  chance  of  asserting  their  rights  and  held 
a  meeting  on  i  June  1795  at  the  County  Ilall  (not 
being  allowed  the  use  of  the  Town  Hall)  and  a  counter- 
petition  organised  by  Edward  Bou\erie,  the  Whig 
member  for  the  borough,  was  signed  by  five  hundred 
persons,  praying  the  King  not  to  grant  a  charter 
without  reference  to  the  petitioners.'*'  The  attitude 
of  the  corporation  is  reflected  in  the  resolution  passed 
in  the  assembly  of  8  June.'* 

'That  it  is  the  opinion  of  this  Assembly  that  the 
peace  and  good  government   of  tliis   town   and   the 


interest  of  all  its  inhabitants  whether  free  or  not  free 
of  the  corporation  have  been  well  secured  under  the 
Ancient  Powers  and  Franchises  heretofore  and 
hitherto  exercised  by  the  Corporation. 

'  That  it  would  not  be  wise  to  depart  from  a  System 
which  has  been  found  upon  such  long  experience  to 
answer.  And  therefore  it  is  the  opinion  of  this 
Assembly  that  they  should  endeavour  to  procure  such 
a  Charter  only  as  shall  confirm  and  restore  the  ancient 
Rights  and  Franchises  of  the  Corporation  and  leave 
the  Government  and  the  Election  of  its  officers  under 
the  same  regulations  which  have  hitherto  prevailed.' 

Thanks  were  also  voted  to  Mr.  Charles  Smith  for 
his  '  manly  and  steady  conduct  in  resisting  the  unjust 
imputations  aimed  at  the  Corporation  '  at  the  late 
town  meeting. 

As  was  to  be  expected,  the  view  of  the  assembly 
rather  than  that  of  the  town  meeting  was  accepted 
by  the  central  government,  and  the  charter  of  2  April 
1796'^  differed  only  in  trifling  respects  from  that  of 
1663.  The  right  to  fine  freemen  for  refusal  of  office 
and  to  fine  members  of  the  corporation  for  non- 
attendance  at  assemblies  was  made  definite,  and  the 
clause  forbidding  any  but  freemen  to  trade  within  the 
town  was  dropped.  The  fresh  lease  of  life  given  to 
the  old  corporation  led  to  no  improvement  either  in 
zeal  or  in  public  spirit.  Quorums  were  difficult  to 
obtain,**  and  the  worst  instances  of  the  expenditure  of 
public  funds  on  entertainment,  of  the  exploitation  of 
charity  endowments  for  party  purposes,  and  of 
pohtical  bias  in  judicial  action  belong  to  the  period 
1796-1835.  A  proposal  from  one  of  its  own  members 
in  1831  to  reform  the  financial  procedure  of  the 
corporation  was  quashed  as  '  unusual,  improper  and 
prejudicial,'  **  and  the  appointment  of  a  special 
committee  to  audit  the  accounts  in  1833,  though 
it  produced  a  valuable  report,  was  in  the  nature  of  a 
deathbed  repentance.  The  epitaph  of  the  old 
regime  was  spoken  by  Cockburn  in  1835  :  '  It  seems 
impossible  to  justify  a  system  which  alienates  from 
the  municipal  government  the  affections  and  respect 
of  one  half  of  the  community  and  gives  rise  to  com- 
plaints of  so  serious  a  character.'**  In  November 
1835  the  close  corporation  of  the  last  three  and  a  half 
centuries  was  replaced  by  an  elective  body  of  one 
mayor,  6  aldermen,  and  18  councillors,  representing 
the  three  wards  into  which  the  town  was  newly 
divided. 

Under  the  Local  Government  Act  of  1888  (51  and  52 
Vict.  c.  41)  Northampton  became  a  county  borough 
in  that  year,  but  the  form  of  its  government  was 
unchanged  till  1898,  when,  owing  to  the  victories  of  th'- 
Progressive  party  in  the  municipal  elections  of  i8g7,** 
a  Boundaries  Committee  was  appointed  and  a  Pro- 
visional Order  obtained  from  the  Local  Government 
Board,  rcdividing  the  town  into  six  wards.  After 
further  enquiry,  the  area  of  the  town  was  enlarged  by 
the  act  of  30  July  1900*'  so  as  to  include  nine  wards. 


"  Pari.  Paperi,  1833,  vol.  xiii,  p.  50. 
•'  B<^o.  Rec.  ii,  38  (HaU'i  MS.). 
"  Ibid,  il,  39. 
"  Ibid.  55. 
"  Ibid.  21-2. 

"  Northampt.  Corp.  Rcc.  Prcii  N  4. 
*'  Anembly  Book,  Prcii  N.  10. 
"  Horo.  Rec.  i,  141. 
'•  Ibid,  ii,  14. 

"  The  town  wai  governed  under  thii 
charter,  and  not  chat  ol  1683,  at,  the  lur- 


rendcr  of  the  former  never  having  been 
enrolled,  the  latter  (which  had  provided 
for  a  company  of  forty  instead  of  forty- 
eight)  wai  declared  void  by  Sir  Kdw.ird 
Northey,  Attorney-General,  1701-1707, 
1710-1718.     Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants. 

i.  433- 

••  BoTo.  Ree.  ii,  24. 

"  Asiembly    Book,    Northampt.    Corp. 
Rec.  Prefi  N,  10. 

••  Btro.  Rtc.  i,  154-184. 

16 


'■'  Ibid,  ii,  25-6. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  27. 

"  Pari.  Papers,  1835,  vol.  xxv,  p. 
19S1. 

"  Northampt.  Mercury,  ^^ov.   1900, 

"  I..G.B.  Provisional  Orders  Con- 
firmation (no.  14)  Act,  1900,  63  and  64 
Vict,  dxxxiii  (Public  Act  of  a  local 
character).  Northampton  Workhouse 
serves  Hardingstone  Union. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


each  of  which  returned  three  councillors,  who  with 
nine  aldermen,  made  up  a  council  of  36  members. 
In  191 1  the  Northampton  Corporation  Act'*  was 
passed,  under  which  the  borough  was  divided  into 
twelve  wards,  and  from  1912  on  the  council  has 
consisted  of  the  time-honoured  number  of  48. 

The  first  recorded  representation  of  the  borough 
in  a  parliament  is  in  11  Edward  I,**  and,  except  under 
the  Commonwealth,  there  were  two  members  up  to 
1918.  The  carhest  writs  are  directed  to  the  mayor 
and  good  men,**  whilst  the  returns  for  Edward  II's 
reign  state  that  the  members  were  elected  by  the 
bailiffs,  by  the  mayor  and  bailiffs,  or  per  considera- 
tiomm  vilU.^'-  From  1 381  at  least,  the  elections 
appear  to  have  been  made  in  the  assembly  at  St. 
Giles'.**  A  comparison  of  the  list  of  m.iyors  and  bailiffs 
with  that  of  the  members  shows  that  the  same  group 
of  burgesses  performed  both  services."  In  1 381  the 
assembly  resolved  that  the  borough  should  always  be 
represented  in  Parliament  by  the  ex-mayor,  unless  he 
had  discharged  the  office  of  burgess  before  his 
mayoralty.**  From  1489  onwards  it  appears  that, 
as  the  parliamentary  elections  were  still  made  in  the 
assembly,**  voting  was  restricted  to  members  of  the 
corporation.  The  act  of  1489  did  not  mention  elec- 
tions to  parliament,  but  the  King's  letter  to  Leicester 
in  the  same  year  definitely  laid  it  down  that  only 
members  of  the  common  council  should  have  votes 
for  parliamentary  elections,**  and  it  is  possible  that 
the  two  acts,  so  nearly  identical  in  form,  were  inter- 
preted similarly.  The  members  were  chosen  from 
among  the  corporation  until  the  reign  of  Elizabeth, 
when  the  practice  begins  of  choosing  county  gentle- 
men to  represent  the  town.  From  1553,  the  recorder 
was  generally  chosen  as  one  member,  and  the  Yelver- 
tons  of  Easton  Maudit  established  a  strong  family 
interest,  whilst  the  Knightleys  of  Fawsley  were 
another  county  family  with  influence  in  the  borough. 
The  notorious  Peter  Wentworth  of  Lillingston  had  sat 
for  a  Cornish  borough  before  he  represented  North- 
ampton in  1586, 1589  and  1592.*'  In  1601  the  assembly 
books  record  that  Mr.  Henry  Hickman,  LL.D., 
and  Francis  Tate,  Esq.,  made  request  to  be  chosen 
burgesses  for  the  town  and  were  accepted  as  being  the 
first  a  resident  and  the  second  the  son  of  a  freeman, 
provided  they  paid  their  own  expenses.**  They 
were  both  made  honorary  freemen.  Aldermen  are 
still  chosen  as  members  after  this  date,  but  economy 
on  the  side  of  the  corporation  and  solicitation  from 
outside  soon  established  the  parliamentary  representa- 
tion of  the  borough  as  a  prize  to  be  competed  for 
among  the  county  gentry."  Henry  Lee  finds  it 
noteworthy  that  in  1640  Zouch  Tate  of  Delapre  was 
elected  burgess  '  without  his  making  any  interest  and 
without  his  knowledge  till  after  the  election.''" 

Under  the  Commonwealth  the  representation  of 
the  borough  was  reduced  to  one.  At  the  Restoration 
Northampton,  like  several  other  boroughs,'^  under- 


went a  peaceful  revolution  ;  the  parliamentary  vote 
ceased  to  be  the  monopoly  of  the  corporation.  There 
must  have  been  warning  signs,  for  both  at  Leicester 
and  Northampton  the  corporations  prepared  to 
resist  an  attack.  The  assembly  at  Northampton 
ordered  on  19  June  1660  '  That  this  town  do  unite 
with  any  other  corporation  of  the  neighbourhood  for 
the  maintenance  and  continuance  of  their  constancy 
in  the  choice  of  Burgesses  to  serve  in  Parhament  by 
the  mayor,  Baihffs  and  Burgesses. ''^  In  the  elections 
for  the  convention  two  returns  were  made  ;  the  one 
of  Francis  Harvey  and  Richard  Rainsford,  the  other 
of  Sir  John  Norwich  and  Richard  Rainsford.  The 
Committee  for  Privileges  reported  that  '  the  common- 
alty as  well  as  the  bailiffs,  aldermen  and  48  common 
councilmen  have  the  right  to  elect,'  and  that  therefore 
Rainsford  and  Norwich  were  elected.'^  Harvey,  the 
deputy-recorder,  was  the  corporation  candidate.  In 
the  elections  of  1661  there  was  again  a  double  return 
for  Northampton  :  the  sheriff  brought  an  indenture 
with  the  names  of  Sir  John  Norwich  and  Sir  James 
Langham  ;  the  mayor  returned  Langham  and  Harvey. 
The  return  of  the  mayor,  the  lawful  returning  officer, 
was  filed,  and  Langham  and  Harvey  were  temporarily 
allowed  to  sit,'*  but  after  investigation  the  Committee 
tor  Privileges  reported  that  the  mayor  had  used 
menaces  to  such  as  would  not  give  their  votes  to  Mr. 
Harvey,  had  made  infants  free  on  the  morning  of  the 
election  that  they  might  vote  as  he  pleased,  had  caused 
persons  to  be  put  by  who  would  not  vote  as  he  desired, 
had  released  Quakers  from  prison  and  put  halberts  in 
their  hands  to  keep  back  such  as  would  have  voted 
contrary  to  his  intentions,  had  adjourned  the  taking 
of  the  poll  into  the  Church  of  All  Saints  and  there 
behaved  himself  in  a  profane  and  indecent  manner, 
and  had  declared  beforehand  that  Mr.  Rainsford 
should  not  be  elected  because  he  had  given  a  charge  for 
the  Book  of  Common  Prayer.  On  account  of  these  ir- 
regularities the  election  was  declared  void  by  the 
Commons,  by  a  vote  of  185  to  127."  The  mayor  was 
brought  into  the  House  in  the  custody  of  the  Serjeant 
at  Arms,  and  making  a  humble  submission  on  his  knees, 
received  a  grave  reprehension.  Henry  Lee,  who  appears 
to  have  confounded  the  elections  of  1660  and  1661,'* 
says  that  there  were  five  candidates,  and  that  the  poll 
was  held  in  the  chancel  of  All  Saints,  by  reason  of  the 
great  rain  that  fell  that  day  so  that  it  could  not  be  taken 
at  the  Market  Cross.  '  The  election  of  burgesses,'  he 
adds,  '  was  then  ordered  to  be  made  in  the  town  by 
the  freemen  and  inhabitants  of  the  town,  and  has 
continued  a  popular  election  ever  since.'"  Never- 
theless more  disputed  returns  followed,  leading 
to  a  more  precise  definition  of  the  franchise.  The 
bye-election  ordered  on  13  June  1661  led  to  the  return 
of  Sir  Charles  Compton  and  Rainsford  ;  but  Compton 
died  soon  after  and  a  fresh  writ  was  issued  on  5  Dec. 
1661.™  This  time  Sir  J.  Langham  was  elected,  and 
the  rival  candidate,  Sir  W.  Dudley,  protested.     The 


••  1  and  ;  Gtorge  V,  cUiv  (Local  Act). 
»•  Patl.  WrtU  (Rec.  Com.),  i,  16. 
"Itid. 

"  Ibid.  I,  Ixxiii ;   II,  i,  ccxzxiv. 
"  Bno.  Rec.  i,  248. 
•>  Pari.  Writs,  II,  I,  cczzxii,  fl ;    Boro. 
Rtc.  ii,  549  S. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  249. 

•*  Ibid,  ii,  494-6. 

'•  Batcion,  Rec.  Boro.  of  Leics.  ii,  325. 

"  See  £»{.  Uist.  Rev.  zxxii,  38,  46; 


and  Acls  of  Privy  Council,  1578-80,  p.  218, 
for  Wentworth's  conventicles  at  LUlingi- 
ton,  attended  by  Northampton  townsmen. 

•'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  495. 

••  Note  Richard  Spencer's  account  of 
his  inteniew  with  the  mayor  and  cor- 
poration in  1625.  Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Rep. 
vol.  82  (Buccleugh  MSS.)  i,  258-9. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  93. 

"  Merewether  and  Stephens,  fjisl.  of 
Bore.  pp.   1763  ff. 

17 


"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  498. 

"  Commons  Journals,  viii,  70-71  (21 
June    1660). 

"  Ibid,  viii,  257  (22  May  1661). 

"  Ibid,  viii,  269-70  (13  June  1661). 

"  He  seems  to  have  misled  all  later 
writers ;  the  account  given  by  Dr.  Cox 
in  the  Boro.  Rec.  of  the  elections  1660- 
1664  is  quite  incorrect. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  11 1-2. 

'•  Commons  Journals,  viii,  326. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Committee  for  Privileges  reported  on  26  April  1662 
that  lawful  voters  had  been  prevented  from  voting,  but 
the  matter  was  too  intricate  for  them  to  determine  ; 
the  House  accepted  their  report  and  declared  the 
election  void.'^  The  new  bye-election  was  postponed 
for  nearly  a  year  by  the  rising  of  ParUament,  but  in 
February  1663  a  fresh  writ  was  issued*"  and  the 
election  took  place  on  7  March.*^  The  mayor 
attempted  to  hold  it  in  the  assembly,  but  two  of  the 
members  of  the  corporation  protested  and  left  the 
guildhall  with  many  others,  joining  the  '  popularity  ''^ 
in  the  market  square  which  was  shouting  '  A  Hatton  ! 
a  Hatton  !  '  The  rest  of  the  corporation  elected  Sir  W. 
Dudley  ;  Mr.  Hatton's  party  polled  at  the  Market 
Cross,  and  the  sheriff  received  two  indentures.  As  in 
duty  bound  he  returned  the  one  sealed  by  the  town 
clerk  (Henry  Lee  himself),  but  Hatton  appealed  to  the 
House  of  Commons,  and  the  Committee  for  Privileges, 
after  hearing  much  evidence,  reaffirmed  that  '  the 
voices  in  election  do  not  belong  to  the  Mayor,  Alder- 
men and  Forty-Eight  only,  and  that  .  .  .  Mr.  Hatton 
was  duly  elected.'  The  name  of  Dudley  was  erased 
from  the  indenture  by  the  Clerk  of  the  House  and  that 
of  Hatton  inserted.'^  In  1664  there  was  a  fresh  bye- 
election,  necessitated  by  Rainsford's  becoming  a 
Baron  of  the  Exchequer.**  Again  the  return  was 
disputed.  On  26  April**  the  Committee  of  Elections 
reported  that  counsel  on  both  sides  agreed  that 
whoever  had  the  majority  of  voices  of  inhabitants 
being  householders  and  not  receiving  alms  ought  to 
be  elected  ;  and  that  the  Committee  upheld  this 
and  were  of  opinion  that  the  sharing  of  the  charitable 
gift  at  Christmas  was  a  taking  of  alms.  On  this 
interpretation.  Sir  Henry  Yelverton  was  declared  duly 
elected,  and  Sir  John  Bernard  unseated.  It  would 
appear  that  the  process  of  corrupting  the  popular 
electors  had  already  begun. 

From  this  time  Northampton  enjoyed  what  Tennant 
in  1782*'  calls  the  cruel  privilege  of  a  very  popular 
franchise.  It  is  not  unHkcly  that  the  townsmen  owed 
their  enfranchisement  to  the  fact  that  their  pohtical 
sympathies  were  more  royalist  than  those  of  the 
corporation,  even  after  the  purging  of  1662,*'  for  in 
1665  the  mayor-elect  was  arrested  by  royal  command.** 
Very  soon,  however,  the  corporation  became  more 
Tory  than  the  town.  In  1678  the  Montagu  interest, 
strong  in  the  borough  since  the  reign  of  James  I,*' 
was  exerted  on  the  Exclusionist  side.  '  There  are 
four  that  stand,'  young  Perceval  reports  ;  '  Mr. 
Montagu  is  the  only  man  who  trcateth  .  .  .  the 
townsmen  themselves  say,  both  he  and  his  father  spend 
jf  100  per  week,  but  to  no  purpose,  for  whomsoever  the 
King  will  recommend  they  arc  resolved  to  choose,  and 
there  coming  a  letter  in  favour  of  Sir  W.  Temple,  he, 
it  is  thought,  will  be  the  man.'"*  Owing  to  the  Tory 
leanings  of  the  returning  officers,  Temple  was  re- 
turned, but  unseated  by  a  vote  of  the  House  '  with 


so  united  a  cry  as  made  it  very  legible  what  incUnation 
they  bear  to  the  patron  of  the  first.' *i  From  this 
time  on  the  Montagu  interest  dominates  the  borough 
representation,  and  as  the  recordership  had  become  a 
hereditary  perquisite  of  the  earls  of  Northampton, 
the  Compton  interest  was  equally  strong  and  for  a  long 
series  of  parliaments  the  borough  was  represented  by 
a  Compton  and  a  Montagu.  In  1733  the  assembly 
declared  '  We  think  we  have  in  some  measure  a  right 
to  be  represented  by  a  brother  of  the  earl  of  North- 
ampton.''"' But  on  this  occasion  the  corporation 
overreached  itself.  The  parliamentary  franchise  was 
held  to  belong  '  to  every  freeman,  whether  resident 
or  not,  and  every  householder,  whether  free  or  not,'  *' 
and  the  mayor,  for  the  purposes  of  the  election, 
admitted  396  gentlemen  of  the  county  to  be  freemen 
of  the  town,  on  payment  of  3  guineas  a  man  :'■'  but 
the  defeated  candidate  successfully  petitioned  against 
the  return  of  Colonel  Montagu,  elected  by  these  new 
votes.  In  1740  legal  opinion  taken  by  the  corporation 
upheld  the  ruling  that  only  resident  freemen  had  the 
parliamentary  vote.'*  In  1768  a  third  great  county 
interest  entered  the  field.  Earl  Spencer  put  forward 
the  Hon.  Thomas  Howe  against  the  Montagu  candi- 
date. Sir  G.  Osborn,  and  the  Compton  candidate.  Sir 
G.  B.  Rodney.  It  was  popularly  beheved  that 
^^400,000  was  spent  on  this  election  by  the  three 
patrons.'^  The  campaign  began  at  Michaelmas  1 767 
and  lasted  till  April  1768,  after  fourteen  days'  polling. 
The  mayor  and  corporation  used  all  their  influence 
against  the  Spencer  candidate,"  and  by  common 
agreement  the  oath  as  to  bribery  was  not  administered 
to  any  voter.  A  supporter  of  Hahfax,  rebutting  the 
charge  of  bribery,  wrote  :  '  I  have  never  heard  of  any 
other  expense  on  his  part  but  that  of  eating  and 
drinking.'*  .  .  .  How  can  it  be  avoided  when  an  old 
family  interest  is  to  be  defended  against  a  sudden  and 
unexpected  invasion  ?  In  such  a  case  one  cannot 
blame  what  is  done  for  self-defence.'  *'  Another  con- 
temporary says  :  '  Each  voter  that  would  had  twelve, 
fourteen  or  fifty  guineas,  some  j^ioo  to  ^£500.  The 
single  article  of  ribbands  cost  j^6,ooo.'^  Osborn  and 
Rodney  were  returned  ;  but  a  scrutiny  in  tlie  House 
of  Commons  in  1769  resulted  in  Howe's  being  declared 
elected,  and  Osborn  and  Rodney  tossed  for  the  other 
seat,  which  was  retained  by  Rodney.^  The  expenses 
of  the  scrutiny,  which  took  six  weeks,  during  which 
Lord  Spencer  kept  open  house  for  members  of 
Parliament,  led  to  the  Earl  of  Northampton's  leaving 
the  kingdom  after  cutting  down  the  tiees  and  selling 
the  furniture  at  Compton  VVinyates,  whilst  Halifax 
and  Spencer  were  also  seriously  crippled.  The 
Compton  and  Spencer  interests  held  the  field  after 
tliis  for  some  years.  From  1 796-1 812  Spencer 
Perceval,  deputy  iccorder  since  1787,  represented  the 
borough  (at  first  as  '  Lord  Northampton's  Man ')  *  and 
there  were  a  series  of  uncontested  elections.     In  1818 


'•  Commotit  Journals^  viii,  414, 
••  Ibid,  viii,  436. 

•'  Bcro.  Rcc.  ii,  498-9  (Hall'i  MS.). 
•"L«,  Coll.  p.  113. 
••  Commons  Jourtiah^  viii,  469. 
•*  Ibid,  viii,  535  (11  March  1663/4). 
"  Ibid,  viii,  550. 

"  Journey  from    Cbeiur   to  London, 
310. 

"  S«  above,  p.  12. 
"  BoTo.  Rec.  ii,  35. 
••  Jbid.  ii,  log. 


"  llisl.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  (Egmont  MS.), 
ii,  76. 

•'  Ibid.  Ormonde  MSS.  iv,  471. 

•"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  500. 

••  liridgo,  op.  cit.  i,  434. 

•*  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  500. 

••  Ibid,  ii,  501. 

••  Quarterly  /JiriVtc,  Jan.  1857,  p.  32 
(article  by  Rev.  T.  James). 

•'  Among  (he  corporation  records  is  a 
list  in  the  town  clerk's  handwriting  of 
members  of  the  Corporation  tn  the  interest 


of  Osborn  and  Rodney,  which  includes  the 
mayor,  9  .ildcrmon,  18  bailiffs  and  26 
common  council  men.     Bore  Rec.  ii,  506, 

**  The  voters  having  drunk  up  all 
llalila.x's  port  at  Ilurton,  refused  his 
claret,  and  went  over  in  a  body  to  Castle 
Ashby   to   sample   Northampton's   cellar. 

••  Hilt.  MSS.  Com.  Rrp.  10,  app.  i, 
p.  409. 

'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  506  (Hall's  MS.). 

'  llist.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  10,  app.  i,  p.  412. 

'  Boro.  Ric.  ii,  508. 


Pi  AN   OF  Northampton   in    1746 

{By   NMe  ami  Bullin) 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


the  understanding  that  each  party  returned  one 
candidate  was  terminated  *  and  another  tierce  contest 
took  place.  The  corporation  supported  the  Tory 
interest  energetically,  and  in  1826  went  so  far  as  to 
vote  j([i,ooo  out  of  the  borough  funds  towards  the 
expenses  of  a  candidate  in  the  ministerial  interest  :  an 
action  condemned  by  the  commissioners  of  1835,  but 
falling  far  short  of  the  party  excesses  of  the  Leicester 
corporation.'  In  1768  the  number  of  townsmen 
claiming  votes  was  1 170,  and  some  900  were  allowed  to 
poll.  In  1784  908  voted,  in  1790  893,*  and  in  1818 
1,287.'  T'^*^  number  of  electors  under  the  Reform 
Act  of  1832  was  2,497.*  The  last  notable  episode  in 
the  parUamentary  history  of  Northampton  was  con- 
nected with  Charles  Bradlaugh.  After  two  unsuccess- 
ful candidatures, he  was  elected  M.P.  for  Northampton 
in  1 880.  He  was  unseated  on  his  refusal  to  take  the 
oath  administered  to  members,  and  was  re-elected  by 
the  borough  four  times— in  1881,  1S82,  1884  and  1885. 
Finally,  in  1886,  he  was  allowed  to  sit,  and  he  remained 
one  of  the  burgesses  until  his  death  in  1891.^  By  the 
Representation  of  the  People  Act  in  191 8,  the  borough 
representation  was  reduced  from  two  to  one.  The 
borough  was  represented  by  Miss  Margaret  Bondfield 
in  the  parhament  of  1923-24. 

In  1086  the  sum  payable  to  the  sheriff  by  the 
burgesses  was  ^£30  los.  ;  in  11 30  the  sheriff  accounted 
for  ;£ioo  at  the  Exchequer;  and  in  1185  the  Jirma 
burgi  WIS  fixed  at  ;(^120.  The  burgesses  had  difficulty 
in  paying  this  and  they  appear  to  have  been  badly  in 
arrears  at  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of  Henry  III,  so 
that  in  1227  the  town  was  taken  into  the  king's  hand'" 
and  a  cuJtos  appointed. '*  In  1334  the  town  applied  in 
vain  for  a  reduction  of  the  farm,'^  but  in  1462 
Edward  IV  remitted  ^^20  of  it  for  the  next  twenty 
years,  a  period  extended  later.**  In  1484  Richard  III 
increased  the  relief  to  50  marks,**  but  Henry  VII 
reduced  it  again  to  ;£22.*'  Under  a  grant  of  1 5 14  the 
farm  was  permanently  fixed  at  ;^98,'*  as  it  is  to-day. 
It  has  been  assigned  from  time  to  time  to  different 
persons,  such  as  Robert  de  Crevequer  in  1301,"  and 
Roger  de  Beauchamp  in  1338.**  From  1351 
^66  13/.  4<i.  of  it  has  been  payable  to  the  Dean  and 
Chapter  of  Windsor,*'  and  the  remaining  £^l  6s.  Sd. 
is  paid  to  Mr.  George  Finch,  the  representative  of  the 
earl  of  Winchilsea  and  Nottingham.^" 

By  acquiring  the  Jirma  burgi,  the  burgesses  acquired 
the  right  of  collecting  the  burgage-rents  hitherto 
payable  to  the  king.  Early  deeds  frequently  describe 
tenements  held  de  pripositura  ville.  It  is  not  always 
clear  whether  the  rents  are  included  in  the  farm,  or 
whether  in  some  cases  the  baiUffs  are  collecting  them 
on  the  king's  behalf  and  accounting  for  them  separately 
at  the  Exchequer.  Thus  Hugh  Gobion  is  said  to 
hold  his  land  in  chief  of  the  king  by  the  service  of  2s. 
payable  yearly  at  the  Exchequer  by  the  hands  of  the 


prepositura  of  Northampton,^*  whilst  Richard  Gobion 
'  holds  his  land  of  the  King  in  chief  by  burgage, 
p.iying  15/.  41^.  to  the  prepositura  of  Northampton 
towards  the  faim  of  the  said  town.'^-  In  a  survey  of 
1 291  of  nine  iiouses  lately  held  by  Jews  in  Northamp- 
ton, three  are  said  to  be  held  de  prepositura'^^ — one  in 
the  Corn  Row,  one  in  the  Market  Place,  and  one  not 
specified.  The  rents  are  Sd.,  is.  and  8(/.,  and  in  two 
of  the  three  instances  payments  are  due  to  other 
persons  as  well.  In  1 361  Hawise  le  Botiller  {nee 
Gobion)  is  said  to  have  held  8  shops  in  Northampton, 
as  burgage  of  the  town,  rendering  to  the  king  iid. 
yearly  towards  the  farm  of  the  town.^''  The  petition 
of  1334  refers  to  rents  that  go  to  make  up  the  fee  farm 
of  the  town,^^  and  another  petition  in  which  North- 
ampton joined  with  four  otlier  towns  in  1376  shows 
that  several  burgesses  who  held  burgages  of  the  king 
had  so  wasted  their  land  that  the  rents  were  not  forth- 
coming for  the  payment  of  the  borough  farm.^'  In 
1467  the  rents  due  for  the  stalls  in  the  market  are 
described  as  the  king's,  and  also  as  the  property  of 
the  suitors  to  the  town  court,  and  they  were  collected 
by  the  biihffs,  '  fee  farmers  to  the  King  within  tlxis 
town.'^'  When  purpresturcs  were  presented,  it  was 
not  uncommon  for  the  encroacher  to  be  allowed  to 
keep  the  land  usurped,  paying  for  it  a  rent  to  the 
prepositura  in  aid  of  the  Jirma  burgi.^^  In  1 391  the 
mayor  and  chamberlains  are  expressly  given  power  to 
let  to  farm  all  waste  places,  for  rents  to  be  paid  to 
them  for  the  town.^'  Sixteen  such  holdings  were 
let  out  by  them  in  1439.^  Much  property  had  come 
into  the  hands  of  the  town  by  the  close  of  the  Middle 
Ages,  and  by  the  name  of  '  The  Chamber  lands  '  was 
confirmed  to  the  town  by  the  charter  of  1599.'* 

The  condition  of  the  town  of  North,;mpton  in 
1504  is  shown  by  a  rental^*'  in  which  the  town 
is  divided  into  streets  with  the  lanes  running  off 
on  either  side,  into  market  rows  and  districts.  Pro- 
bably the  most  important  area  was  '  Swinwel-strete,' 
now  Derngate,  which  was  apparently  the  residential 
quarter,  and  included  the  manor  of  Gobions  and  the 
Grange.  The  latter,  which  formerly  belonged  to 
Thomas  Latimer,  was  late  of  Thomas  Tresham, 
and  then  held  by  John  Chauncy.  It  included  land 
next  the  postern  called  Derngate  and  other  adjoining 
land.  Property  here  belonged  to  the  chapel  of  Blessed 
Mary  the  Virgin  in  All  Saints  Church,  and  to  the 
fraternity  of  Holy  Trinity.  There  were  inns  called 
'  le  Crown,'  '  le  BeU,'  '  le  Tabard,'  and  '  le  BuUe,' 
and  a  house  called  '  le  Blakhall.'  St.  Giles  Street, 
which  extended  to  the  town  wall,  was  mostly  in- 
habited by  tradesmen,  bakers  and  fullers  and  Adam 
'  le  Garlikemonger.'  In  Abingdon  (Habyngdon) 
Street,  leading  to  the  East  Gate,  was  a  quarry.  In 
St.  Sepulchre's  Lane,  now  probably  Church  Lane, 
was  a  house  formerly  of  Thomas  Tresham,  then  in  the 


*  Pari.  Papers,  1835,  vol.  xxv,  p.  1976. 

•  Ibid.  p.  1977  J  BoTo.  Rec.  ii,  511. 

*  Poll  Booki,  printed  at  Northampton 
in  ume  years. 

'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  509. 

'  Pari.  Paprri,  1835,  vol.  xiv,  p.  1965. 

•  Did.  Nat.  Biog. 

'»  Mem.  R.  (K.R.)  8,  -n.  i  d. 
"  Cat.  Pal.  1225-32,  p.  171. 
>•  Pari  R.  ii,  85. 

'•  Cat.  Pal.  1461-7,  p.  187  J   ibid.  1476- 
85,  p.  99. 

"  Ibid.  1476-85,  p.  434. 


"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  202. 

"Ibid,  i,  113. 

"  Cat.  Pal.  1292-1301,  p.  610. 

"  Ibid.  1338-40,  p.  17. 

"  Ibid.  1350-4,  p.  174. 

•"  Information  from  the  town  clerk. 

"  Cat.  Inq.  ii,  78.  The  grant  to  his 
father  merely  says  2S.  payable  at  the 
Exchequer.  Roi.  Carl.  p.  93. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  Ed.  I,  ptf.  loi,  no.  2. 

'*  Extents  and  Surveys,  143. 

»'  Col.  Fine,  1356-68,  p.  150. 

»  Pari.  R.  ii,  85. 

19 


"  Ibid,  ii,  348. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  308. 

•'  Assize  R.  635,  m  67  d. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  251. 

"  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C. 
48. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  \,  123. 

"»  Recently  discovered  in  the  Andrewr 
Collection  of  MSS.  of  Lt.  Col.  Packe, 
M.V.O.,who  has  presented  it  (1929)  to  the 
Mayor  and  Corporation  of  Northampton 
to  be  placed  with  the  Borough  Records,  of 
which  it  originally  formed  part. 


A   HISTORY   OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


hands  of  the  King.  There  were  five  tenements  around 
the  cross  of  Alnoth  {ad.  crucem  Alnoth  ?).  In  the 
Masters'  Street  {in  vico  Magistrorum)  were  various 
houses  which  had  been  acquired  by  the  College 
of  All  Saints,  and  in  the  tenure  of  the  College  ; 
near  by  were  Fullers'  Street  and  Weavers'  Street. 
In  the  South  Quarter  (the  south  part  of  Bridge  Street) 
and  the  parish  of  St.  Gregory  was  '  Stokkwell  Hall ' 
and  lands  of  the  fraternities  of  Corpus  Christi  and 
St.  Nicholas  in  the  Wall,  probably  connected  with 


■tsaaatjeSTj 


Northampton  :   The  Bell  Inn 

the  famous  rood  in  the  wall  in  St.  Gregory's  Church. 
Laundry  Street  was  probably  near  the  river.  The 
district  of  Bridge  Street  {in  lico  Pontii)  included  the 
holme  or  island  called  Barmerholme  (Baums  holem) 
belonging  to  Sir  John  Longville,  several  tenements  be- 
longing to  the  chapel  of  the  Blessed  Mary  and  the 
fraternity  of  the  Holy  Trinity,  and  land  at  the  South 
Gate  belonging  to  the  Hospital  of  St.  Thomas  the 
Martyr.  Under  Kingswell  Street  we  have  mention  of 
a  lane  called  '  Lewnyslane,'  an  inn  in  Bridge  Street 
called  '  the  Angel,'  '  Wolmongerstrete  '  and  an  ancient 
rent  from  a  tenement  in  '  le  Cowmede  '  where  there 
was  formerly  a  mill.  We  next  come  to  the  Market 
Place,  where  in  the  Glovers'  Row  there  were  17  shops, 
in  Mercers'  Row  9  shops  and  2  tenements,  the  Re- 
tailers' Row  {Rengum  kegratorum  Socorum  (sic))  14 
shops.  In  Butchers'  Row  there  were  on  the  north  side 
12  stalls  and  one  shop  and  on  the  south  side  14  stalls, 
many  of  which  belonged  to  religious  houses.  In 
Fishers'  Row  there  were  shops  and  stalls.  In  Barbers' 
Row  in  the  Old  Drapery  there  were  22  shops.  In 
Gold  Street,  the  lands  were  largely  in  the  hands  of 
religious  houses.  In  the  parish  of  the  Blessed  Mary 
next  the  Castle  there  was  a  mill  near  the  church  and  a 
tenement  belonging  to  the  fraternity  of  the  Blessed 
Katherine  in  the  church  of  St.  Mary,  and  land  outside 
the  West  Gate  belonging  to  the  fraternity  of  Corpus 
Christi.  In  tiie  parish  of  St.  Peter  there  was  waste 
land  about  the  town  wall  and  there  were  tenements 


around  the  castle  and  the  Friars  Preachers.  In  the 
North  Quarter  into  which  '  Berwardstrete  '  ran  was 
a  house  held  by  Peytmyn  the  Jew.  St.  Sepulchre's 
Street,  now  probably  Sheep  Street,  extended  to  the 
North  Gate.  Newland  in  the  parish  of  St.  Michael 
seems  to  have  extended  to  Bearward  Street.  There 
was  a  tenement  called  '  le  Grenetree  '  near  the  Friars 
Minor.  '  Le  Fawkon  '  and  an  inn  called  '  le  Hart  '  in 
the  tenure  of  William  Crawme,  notary,  were  in  Corn- 
mongers'  Row.  There  were  also  the  Row  where 
barley,  oats  and  drage  were  sold,  a 
Row  opposite  Bakers'  Row,  then 
called  Potters'  Hill,  Shoemakers'  Row, 
and  the  Tailory,  where  there  was  an 
inn  called  'le  Swan.' 

A  terrier  of  the  town  property  in  the 
year  1586  ^'^  shows  that  the  borough 
then  held  houses  and  lands  in  all  the 
five  wards  of  the  town,  including  a 
good  number  of  stables,  gardens  and 
orchards,  a  house  called  St.  George's 
Hall,^^  eight  shops  under  the  Town 
Hall,  as  well  as  arable  and  meadow  lands 
in  Milton,  Heyford,  Pitsford,  and 
Cotton,  and  a  house  in  Pitsford.  A 
good  many  of  these  plots  were  sold  by 
the  town  in  1621-2,  probably  in  order 
to  get  together  the  purchase-money 
for  Gobion's  manor,  which  was  ac- 
quired in  1622  at  the  cost  of  £i,iio?* 
The  first  mention  of  Gobions  at 
Northampton  seems  to  be  in  U30,  when  Hugh  Gobion 
paid  10  marks  for  a  duel.^  The  Gobion  family  held  a 
considerable  amount  of  property  throughout  the  Mid- 
land counties.  Hugh  Gobion  witnessed  a  charter  of 
Earl  Simon  II  to  St.  Andrews,"  and  a  Hugh  Gobion  was 
sheriff  of  Northantsin  1161.^'  On  the  death  of  Hugh 
Gobion  about  1 166  the  sheriff  seized  his  land,^*  and 
accounted  henceforth  for  100/.  a  year  from  the 
land  which  was  Hugh  Gobion's''  until  it  was 
recovered  by  his  grandson  in  1200.'"'  Hugh's  son 
Richard  granted  by  deed  to  St.  Andrew's  Priory 
a  shop,  paying  5/.  a  year,  '  which  is  set  up  at  All 
Saints  Fair  before  the  house  of  Hugh  my  father, 
next  the  market  place  towards  Northampton,'" 
This  Richard  had  seven  sons  and  six  daughters  and 
died  before  Il85.''2  Among  the  corporation  records 
are  deeds  by  which  William  dc  Vipont  granted  to 
Richard  Gobion,  second  son  of  the  last,  lands  in  Cotes 
and  beyond  the  South  Bridge  of  Northampton.''^  This 
is  the  '  Earl  Gobion  '  of  Northampton  tradition  who 
gave  goodly  commons  and  liberties  to  the  town.^'  His 
lands,  including  the  recovered  '  Grange,'  were  again 
seized  into  the  king's  hands  later,  as  he  joined  the 
baronial  faction  against  John,  but  in  1 217  he  was  re- 
stored to  favour.'"  He  acted  as  royal  Justice,  and  was 
the  patron  of  the  Franciscans  on  their  first  coming  to 
Northampton,  giving  them  shelter  on  his  land  outside 
the  East  Gate.**  His  son  Hugh  owed  i6j.  ^d.  for  relief, 
'according  to  the  custom  of  the  town  of  Northampton,' 


"  Northampt.  Corp.  Rcc.  PrcH  R.  ^^.  An 
abitract  ii  printed  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  153-165. 

"  For  account  of  St.  Georgc'i  Hall, 
KC  Bore.  Rrc.  ii,  181-6. 

'*  Northampt.  Corp.  Dccdi,  Prtii  C. 
101.  ••  Pipe  R.  31  lien.  I. 

••  Farrer,  Ilonon  and  Knighli'  Fen,  ii, 
Z98. 


"  Pipe  R.  7  Ilcn.  II. 

"  Ibid.  12  Ilcn.  II.     "Ibid.  13  lien.  II. 

*°  Ricardui  Gubiun  r.c.  de  40  M.  pro 
liabenda  leiiina  dc  103  lulidatii  terrc 
infra  burgum  et  extra  quod  dicitur  terra 
dc  Cr.ingia.  Pipe  R.  no.  45,  m.  2  d; 
of.  J<el.  Carl.  p.  93. 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Vetp.  E  «vii,  fo.  92. 

20 


*'  \V.  l''arrcr,  Honors  and  Knighls'  Fets, 
i,  R4. 

*'  Northampt.  Corp.  Dccdi,  C  11. 

"  I.ee,  Coll.  p.  94. 

•'  Clotc  R.  17  John,  mm.  11,  12  j  ibid. 
I  Hen.  Ill,  m  12. 

"  Ecclciton,  Dc  Advtnlu  fralrum  (cd. 
A.  G.  Little),  p.  19-30. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


in  1230.*'  This  Hugh  joined  the  barons  against 
Henry  HI,  was  taken  prisoner  in  the  siege  of  North- 
ampton in  1264,  and  was  disinherited  after  Evesham.^* 
He  recovered  his  lands  from  Robert  de  Turbervil,  lord 
of  Crickhowel,  for  a  payment  of  95  marks,'*'  in  1 267-70. 
A  deed  of  his  at  Northampton  locates  Gobion's  grange 
as  being  near  St.  Giles'  churchyard.'"  In  1275  his  son 
Richard  succeeded,"  and  the  tnquisitio  post  morUm  of 
the  latter  in  1 301  gives  a  list  of  49  houses  and  shops 
held  of  him  in  Northampton,  with  the  names  of  the 
tenants.^'-  Richard  left  two  daughters,  of  whom  the 
younger,  Elizabeth,  wife  of  Sir  Thomas  Paynell,  in- 
herited Gobion's  manor  in  Northampton,  together 
with  Knaptoft.  Her  son  took  the  name  of  Gobion,'^ 
but  his  successors  were  known  as  Paynells.  The  manor 
descended  to  Margaret  Paynell,  wife  of  Thomas  Kcn- 
nisman,  whose  daughter  Elizabeth  married  John 
Turpin,  who  died  in  1493,  when  13/.  ^d.  was  still 
payable  as  burgage  rent  to  the  mayor  and  corporation 
of  Northampton."''  From  lier  the  manor  descended 
to  George  Turpin,  who  in  1558  sold  the  manor  to 
Robert  Harrison  for  £\lo,''^  who  in  turn  sold  it  to 
the  mayor  and  corporation  of  Northampton  on  20 
April  1622. 

Among  the  town  muniments,  besides  the  title-deeds 
of  Gobion's  manor,  are  deeds  recording  the  acquisition 
of  Marvell's  Mill,  Millholme  and  Foot  meadow  in 
1656,^  and  records  of  various  sales  of  town  property, 
notably  of  lands  near  the  castle  to  Sir  R.  Haselrige  in 
1680."  In  the  17th  and  l8th  centuries  a  great  deal 
of  the  town  property  was  let  at  a  low  rent  on  long 
leases,  the  lessee  having,  however,  to  pay  a  heavy  fine 
for  renewal.^  In  the  l6th  century  the  borough  held 
on  lease  lands  to  the  west  of  the  town  formerly  held 
by  St.  James'  Abbey,  known  as  Duston  lordship, 
where  the  burgesses  exercised  common  rights  as  in 
the  town  fields.  The  borough  failed,  however,  to 
obtain  the  freehold  of  the  lordship  by  purchase.^' 

In  1835  the  property  of  the  borough,  including 
property  whose  origin  was  unknown,  Gobion's  manor, 
the  bailifT  lands,  land  acquired  more  recently,  the 
profits  of  the  butchers'  stalls  and  the  fees  on  the  old 
commons  brought  in  £\,'\^^  lis.  jd.  per  annum.*" 
In  addition  to  tliis  the  tolls  were  let  at  ^£200  a  year, 
and  the  trust  estates  and  charity  endowments  brought 
'°  jCi>3°i  odd."  With  the  administration  of 
these  charities  went  certain  rights  of  patronage  :  the 
corporation  appointed  the  warden  of  St.  Thomas' 
Hospital,**  the  headmaster  of  the  Free  Grammar 
School"  and  the  corporation  schools  and  the  Vicar  of 
AH  Saints'.  The  Assembly  Books  record  various 
resolutions  with  regard  10  the  management  of  St. 
Thomas'  Hospital,**  which  appears  to  have  been  well 


administered.  It  was  moved  in  1834  f^o™  ^^^  °ld 
building  at  the  bottom  of  Bridge  Street  (destroyed  in 
1874)*^  and  the  charity,  in  a  house  in  St.  Giles'  Street, 
still  supports  both  inmates  and  out  pensioners.*' 
The  advowson  of  All  Saints  was  sold  to  the  mayor  and 
corporation  by  Sir  Thomas  Littleton  and  his  wife  in 
1619  for  ;{^200,*'  and  remained  in  their  hands  till  1835 
when,  under  tlie  Municipal  Corporations  Act,  they 
had  to  sell  it.  Appointments  to  the  living  were  made 
by  trustees,  being  such  of  the  corporation  as  lived  in 
All  Saints'  parish.** 

In  1275  it  was  alleged  that  the  appointment  of  the 
master  of  the  hospital  of  St.  John  belonged  to  the 
borough,**  and  an  attempt  was  made  by  the  mayor 
and  corporation  to  get  control  of  the  nomination  in 
the  17th  century  in  vain."  The  bishop  of  Lincoln  was 
and  is  patron  of  the  hospital,"-  which  was  intended  for 
the  poor  of  the  county,  as  that  of  St.  Thomas  was  for 
the  townspeople.'- The  mayor  and  burgesses  also  had 
the  right,  probably  from  its  foundation,  of  presentation 
to  the  chapel  of  St.  Leonard  attached  to  the  Hospital 
of  St.  Leonard  without  Northampton."  In  1282 
they  asserted  that  the  wardenship  belonged  to  them  of 
the  right  and  in  the  name  of  the  lord  king.  Down  to 
1 294  the  prior  of  St.  Andrew's  and  the  Vicar  of  Hard- 
ingstone  had  to  sanction  the  chaplain's  appointment  ; 
after  that  the  mayor  and  burgesses  were  the  sole  patrons 
and  the  mayor  was  (x  officio  master  of  the  hospital.  In 
1473  he  and  the  Twenty  Four  calmly  reduced  the 
number  of  beneficiaries  to  one,  and  leased  the  hospital 
with  all  its  lands  and  appurtenances  to  John  Peck  of 
Kingsthorpe  for  life,  on  the  condition  that  he  should 
provide  the_  chaplain's  board  and  lodging,  keep  the 
buildings  in  repair,  and  maintain  one  man  or  woman 
leper  in  place  of  the  brothers  and  sisters  of  former 
times.'''  When  the  lessee  died  in  1505  the  assembly 
resolved  to  keep  the  management  of  the  hospital  in 
their  own  hands,  and  each  mayor  had  to  take  an  oath 
to  govern  the  hospital  truly.'*  Two  of  the  aldermen 
were  to  act  as  wardens,  with  a  bailiff  under  them  to 
le'vy  the  rents,  and  they  were  to  render  accounts  annu- 
ally. In  1546  St.  Leonard's  Hospital  was  said  to  have 
lands  worth  /^lo  15/.  <)d.  a  year,  and  to  be  held  by  the 
mayor  and  Twenty  Four  in  free  alms,  for  the  keeping 
of  one  leper  ;'*  and  in  1 547  it  was  taken  into  the  king's 
hands,  and  granted  out  again  to  F.  Samwell,  together 
with  the  chapel  of  Sc.  Katharine,  in  1549."  The 
mayor  and  corporation  protested  vigorously,  asserting 
in  a  petition  to  the  Chancellor  of  the  Court  of  Aug- 
mentations'* that  for  four  hundred  years  and  more 
they  had  been  lawfully  seised  of  the  hospital  and  chapel 
of  St.  Leonard's.  In  response  to  this  an  inquiry  was 
held  which  -vindicated  the  claims  of  the  corporation," 


"  Fine  R.  15  Hen.  HI,  m.  7, 

"  Annal.  ."if on.  (Rolli  Scr.),  iil,  229-30. 

••  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  C.  15; 
cf.  Cal.  Mi»c.  Inq.  I,  122. 

"  Ibid.  C  17. 

•'  Cal.  Iru}.  ii,  78. 

•'  Chan.  Inq.  Ed.  I,  ptf.  loi,  no.  2. 

'•  Northampt.  (Roll»  Sec.)  Corp.  Deeds, 
C.  i;  ;   cf.  Cal.  Miic.  Inq.  I,  122. 

"  Inq.  p.m..  Hen.  VII,  Ser.  ii,  vol.  9, 
no.  42. 

•*  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  C  61,  63, 
64.  The  manor  then  included  3  messuages 
with  orchards,  etc.,  600  acres  of  arable, 
200  of  meadow,  30  of  pasture,  200  of 
heath  or  moor  and  10  acres  of  woodland. 

••  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  C  106. 


"  Ibid.  C  109. 

••  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  166. 

••  Ibid,  ii,  229. 

'•  Pari.  Papers,  1835,  vol.  xxv  p. 
1971. 

•'  Ibid.  pp.  1971-5. 

•■  See  V.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  161. 

••  Ibid,  ii,  235-241. 

"  Boro.  Rcc.  ii,  3^r. 

••  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps.  x\i,  226. 

"  R.  M.  Serjeantson,  The  Hospital  oj 
St.  Thomas,  p.  7. 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Trin.  17  Jas.  I ;  R.  M. 
Serjeantson,  Hist,  of  Ch.  of  All  Saints, 
i^ortbampt.  p.    185. 

••  Lee,  Coll.  p.  129. 

••  Rot.  Hund.  ii,  3. 

21 


">  Northants.  Nat.  Hist.  Soc.  and  Field 
Club,  xvi,  229. 

"  Ibid,  xvii,  12-18. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  96. 

"  R.  M.  Serjeantson,  The  Leper  Hos- 
pitals of  Northampt.  reprinted  from 
Northants.  Nat.  Hist.  Soc.  xviii,  March 
1915,  supplements  the  account  in  V.C.H. 
Northants.  ii,  159-161. 

'*  Boro.  Rec.  i,  402-5. 

"  Add.  MS.  34308,  fo.  21  ;  V.C.H. 
Northanu.  ii,  160. 

"  Chantry  Certificates  for  Northants. 
1546,  R.  36,  no.  37. 

"  Pat.  2  Ed.  VI,  Pt.  2,  m.  25. 

"  Aug.  Off.  Proc.  bdle.  27,  no.  4. 

'•  Ibid.  Misc.  Bks.  132,  fo.  136. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


and  they  were  allowed,  on  payment  of  ^41  to  Samwell, 
to  keep  the  hospital  as  well  as  the  chapel  of  St.  Katha- 
rine, to  serve  as  a  chapel  of  ease  for  the  sick.  After 
tliis  the  rights  of  the  corporation  were  unchallenged. 
As  leprosy  died  out,  one  poor  man  or  woman  was  main- 
tained up  to  184.0,  when  the  last  beneficiary  died,  and 
the  considerable  endowments  of  the  hospital  were 
applied  to  the  reduction  of  the  rates.  An  investiga- 
tion by  the  Charity  Commissioners  was  hampered  by 
a  refusal  of  the  corporation  to  produce  the  records,  and 
in  1857  the  Attorney-General  filed  an  information  in 
Chancery  and  the  facts  were  made  public.  After  long 
discussion,  the  property  of  St.  Leonard's  was  assigned 
to  thesupportof  the  grammar  school  in  July  1864.  The 
lands  of  the  charity  are  described  in  det.iil  in  the  town 
terrier  of  1586.^ 

The  town  property  was  administered  by  the  mayor 
and  chamberlains,  who  had  power  from  the  14th 
century  to  let  out  lands  under  their  common  scal.*^ 
The  existence  of  a  common  seal  seems  to  be  implied  in 
the  reference  to  the  letters  patent  of  the  town  in  the 
charter  of  1227 — an  addition  to  the  charter  of  1200 
which  it  mostly  repeats.  In  1282  it  is  definitely  stated 
that  the  common  seal  has  been  attached  to  certain 
letters  patent,'^  and  there  is  at  the  Record  Office  one 
such  letter  patent  to  which  a  seal  was  formerly  at- 
tached.** The  oldest  known  common  seal  of  North- 
ampton appears  to  have  belonged  to  the  early  13th  cen- 
tury. It  was  circular,  i|  in.  in  diameter  and  bore  an 
embattled  tower  with  closed  portal,  the  walls  and 
battlements  charged  with  fourteen  irregular  quatre- 
foils.  Over  the  battlements  appears  the  head  of  a 
knight,  to  the  left,  holding  a  crossbow  and  a  banner- 
flag  ;  in  the  field  a  sprig  and  leaves  of  foliage.  The 
inscription  was  sicillum  :  commune  :  norhamptone.** 
The  mayor's  official  seal,  of  less  rude  design,  appears  to 
have  been  made  early  in  the  14th  century,^  and  is 
perhaps  to  be  associated  with  the  charter  of  1299.  It 
was  used  for  sealing  letters  accrediting  freemen  in  other 
towns  and  returns  of  writs  by  the  bailiffs,**  authenticat- 
ing exemplifications  of  deeds  enrolled  on  the  Town 
Memoranda  Rolls*'  and  adding  authority  to  private 
deeds  when  the  seals  of  the  parties  were  not  well 
known.**  It  was  circular,  l|  in.  in  diameter,  and  bore 
a  triple-towered  castle,  walls  masoned  and  embat- 
tled, doors  open,  supported  by  two  lions  passant 
guardant  of  England  ;  in  the  field  above,  a  reticulated 
pattern.  The  inscription  ran  :  •  s' maioritatis  ville 
NORHAMTONiE.**  Thcse  two  seals  were  in  use  down 
to  the  last  quarter  of  the  17th  century**  and  were  prob- 
ably destroyed  when  superseded.  The  common  seals 
of  1667  and  1796  are  in  the  keeping  of  the  corporation. 
That  of  1667  is  oval,  and  ^  in.  long,  and  bears  a 
circular  triple-towered  castle,  flanked  by  two  lions, 
with  the  inscription  northamptoni.k  19  caroli  2  r. 
ANCI.I.S.   The  common  seal  of  1796  is  also  oval  and  is 


ij  in.  long,  bearing  on  a  shield  the  town  arms  of  a 
castle  and  two  Uons.  The  inscription  runs  :  North- 
ampton charter  renewed  xxxvi  GEO.  III.  The  com- 
mon seal  now  in  use,  made  in  1879,  is  circular,  2}  in.  in 
diameter,  and  bears  on  a  shield  the  borough  arms,  with 
the  inscription,  castello  fortior  concordia. 

Impressions  are  extant  of  three  other  town  seals. 
There  were  two  seals  for  use  under  the  Statute  of 
Merchants  for  sealing  recognizances  ;  the  mayor's  seal 
and  the  clerk's  counterseal.  A  letter  from  the  burgesses 
in  1 3 19  to  the  Chancellor  reports  that  they  have  elected 
their  mayor  to  keep  the  great  seal  and  a  clerk,  their  com- 
burgess,  to  keep  the  small  one.^"-  In  1351  Edward  III 
appointed  one  of  his  yeomen  to  keep  the  smaller  seal, 
but  as  he  could  not  execute  the  office  in  person,  it  fell 
back  into  the  hands  of  the  Northampton  clerk.*'^  In 
1408  the  clerk  lost  the  smaller  seal,  and  the  mayor 
sent  him  up  to  the  Exchequer  to  get  it  renewed.*'  The 
inscription  on  the  mayor's  seal  (circular,  i|  in.)  is 
s'  REGIS  edwardi  AD  recogn'  dekitorum.  The  design 
is  like  that  for  London.  The  inscription  on  the  clerk's 
counterseal  is 

S  :  cl'ici  :  de  :  stat  :  m'cat  :  norhton, 
and  it  bears  a  representation  of  St.  Andrew  onhiscross.** 
The  cloth  seal,  of  which  a  cast  is  preser\ed  at  North- 
ampton,** was  used  for  stamping  Northampton  cloth 
which  had  paid  the  subsidy.  Only  three  other  instances 
of  a  cloth  seal  are  mentioned  in  the  British  Museum 
Catalogue  of  Seals,  whilst  there  are  seventeen  distinct 
examples  of  town  seals  under  the  Statute  Merchant.** 
The  Northampton  cloth  seal  is  an  inch  in  diameter, 
and  bears  a  king's  head  in  the  centre  and  round  it  the 
inscription,  s'  :  panorum  :  norhamton  :*' 

The  open  fields  lay  to  the  north  and  east  of  the 
town,  the  meadows  to  the  south  being  used  for 
pasture  after  haytime.  There  is  a  good  map  of  the 
lands  formerly  belonging  to  St.  Andrew's  Priory  in  the 
year  1632  ;  it  shows  a  North  Field,  a  Middle  Field,  and 
a  South  Field,  as  well  as  Monkspark,  Rushmill 
Meadows  and  the  Priory  Leaze,  and  the  town  lands, 
including  the  recently  acquired  Gobion's  manor,  are 
indicated  scattered  among  the  other  holdings.*' 
Among  the  borough  records  is  a  deed  of  1373  which 
mentions  lands  lying  in  the  North  Field  (Whetehul, 
Nether  Whetehul,  and  Bartholomew  furlong),  in  the 
East  Field  (Monkespark  furlong)  and  the  South  Field 
(Rrerewong  and  Mede  furlong)  as  well  as  the  Port- 
mede.**  There  are  constant  references  to  the  town 
meadows  and  pastures.  In  1 391  it  was  ordered  that  no 
freeman  should  graze  more  than  two  beasts  in  the 
common  pastures  without  payment.*  In  1553  the 
assembly  ordered  '  That  no  man  shall  keep  moor  for 
his  franchis  than  iij  bestes  upon  the  commons  in 
alle,  and  that  they  be  his  owne  .  .  .  upon  payne  of 
xld  .  .  .  Item  that  the  Cowe  medowe,  the  horse 
medowe  next  ytt  and   Rawlines  holme  shal  be  kept 


"  Printed  in  full  by  Strjcantion,  ut 
lupra,  pp.  42-4. 

•'  BoTO.  Rtc.  i,  251. 

"  Scrjcantion,  Lrpcr  Hcifilali  of 
NoTtbampt.  p.io. 

••  E«ch.  K.  R.  Rilli7/2. 

"*  Cal.  oj  Srali,  liril.  Mm.  ii,  p. 
141.  For  reproduction  lee  Boro.  Rtc.  ii, 
142. 

'»  It  it  afHxcd  to  a  deed  of  1337.  (Add. 
Cb.  729). 

••  Bofo.  Rtc.  i,  380,  3S4. 

"  e.g.  Add.  Ch.  732,  735,  22371. 


"  e.g.  Add.  Ch.  729,  730,  731,  22368. 

"  Cal.  oJ  Seals,  Brit.  Mus.  ii,  p.  141. 

»°  Add.  Ch.  6132  (1684)  bean  the 
common  seal.  For  an  ex.implc  of  the 
personal  seal  of  a  mayor  of  Northampt. 
lee  that  of  Robert  Fitr.  Ilcury,  mayor 
1279  and  4  timet  aftcrwardn,  reproduced 
in  Scrjcanlion,  Leper  Hospitals  of  North- 
ampt. p.  49,  from  Northampt.  Corp. 
Deedi,  C  23. 

•'  Anct.  Correip.  x«xv,  19S. 

"  Cat.  Pal.  1350-54,  p.  99. 

••  Anct.  Correip.  Ivii,  29. 

22 


••  Sec  Boro.  Rcc.  ii,  142  ;  Cat.  of  Seali 
Bril.  Mus.  i,  p.  145. 

"  It  is  in  the  collection  of  the  North- 
ants.  Arch.  Soc.  in  their  rooms  at  the 
I.adlci'  Club,  Northampt. 

••  Cal.  of  Seals  Brit.  Mus.  i,  p.  141. 

"  Sec  lioro.  Rec.  ii,  142. 

•'  A  copy  ii  in  the  public  library, 
Northampt.,  the  original,  made  by  Marcus 
Pierce,  being  in  Meiirs.  Markham'i  office, 
Guildhall  Road. 

••  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C,  42. 

'  Bofo.  Rec.  i,  253-4. 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


severall  from  the  purification  of  Saynt  Mary  the 
Virgin  untyll  the  invention  of  the  holy  crosse  in  May 
and  hkewise  from  the  assumption  of  our  lady  unto  saynt 
luke  day  the  evangeliste  upon  payne  of  xld.  every 
beast.'*  In  1556  the  right  of  common  was  re- 
stricted to  freemen  '  downlying  and  uprising  and 
dwelling  within  the  liberties  '  and  further  regulations 
enforcing  this  restriction  were  passed  in  1 599.  Rules 
were  laid  down  in  1582  for  the  times  for  throwing  open 
The  Cow  Meadow,  St.  George's  Leys,  Balms  Holme 
and  the  Foot  Meadow,  and  there  were  regulations  from 
time  to  time  as  to  the  branding  of  the  cattle,  the  turn- 
ing out  of  diseased  beasts  and  the  nuisances  caused  by 
curriers  or  fullers,  whilst  from  time  to  time  the  rates 
payable  for  depasturing  beasts  and  the  numbers  al- 
lowed gratis  to  each  freeman  were  altered.  The  freemen 
enjoyed  rights  of  common  during  '  the  open  tide  '  not 
only  in  the  lands  owned  by  the  corporation  but  in  those 
of  other  proprietors,  and  Henry  Lee  describes  a  dis- 
pute between  the  freemen  and  Mr.  Bryan,  the  owner 
of  Marvells  Mills  and  Millholm,  in  1648,  about  the 
date  on  which  Millholm  and  Footmeadow  were  thrown 
open.  The  freemen  declared  it  should  be  Midsummer 
day  ;  Bryan  claimed  as  right  the  nine  days'  grace  which 
custom  had  sanctioned.*  The  Chamberlain's  accounts 
frequently  mention  the  town  bull.*  They  show  that 
280  horses  and  103  cows  were  depastured  by  freemen 
on  the  town  commons  in  1692  and  233  horses  and  221 
cows  in  1698.  The  annual  branding  of  the  freemen's 
cattle  by  the  town  chamberlain  became  the  occasion  of 
a  public  holiday  and  a  town  feast.* 

In  1778,  in  spite  of  the  opposition  of  the  corpora- 
tion,* an  act  was  passed  for  enclosing  the  open  fields.' 
That  the  scheme  was  in  contemplation  as  far  back  as 
1752  appears  from  a  lease  in  that  year  of  a  farm  in 
Northampton  Fields  for  fifteen  years  '  if  the  open  fields 
remain  so  long  unenclosed.'*  The  fields  of  Harding- 
stone,  Kingsthorpe,  Moulton  and  Duston  had  been 
enclosed  between  1765  and  1776.  The  commissioners' 
award  under  the  act  of  1778,  dated  24  June  1779,  is  at 
the  County  Hall.  It  assigns  to  the  corporation  133 
acres  of  land  in  five  allotments,  and  to  the  freemen, 
at  the  special  request  of  the  corporation,*  87  a.  I  r. 
29  p.  on  the  raceground,  to  be  subject  to  a  horse- 
race to  be  held  between  20  Julv  and  20  October  every 
year.  Trustees  were  appointed  for  the  management  of 
the  new  commons  created  by  the  award.**  In  1870 
the  town  held  189  a.  o  r.  39  p.  of  commons,  including 
the  Freemen's  common  on  the  racecourse  (formerly  part 
of  Northampton  Heath),  where  every  freeman  could 
pasture  6  head  of  cattle  at  fixed  rates ;  the  Old  Com- 
mons, vested  in  the  corporation,  comprising  Mid- 
summer Meadow,  Cow  Meadow,  Calves  Holme, 
Baulms  Holm  and  Foot  Meadow  ;  and  the  New  Com- 
mons, also  vested  in  the  corporation.^'  Under  the 
Northampton  Corporation  Markets  and  Fairs  Act  of 
1870,**  the  freemen  were  given  certain  rights  in  the 
New  Commons  in  return  for  giving  up  their  rights  in 


a  portion  of  the  Cow  Meadow  for  the  building  of  the 
present  Cattle  Market  (1870-73).  In  1882,  under  the 
Northampton  Corporation  Act  of  that  year,**  the 
freemen's  rights  of  common  of  pasture  and  all  other 
rights  in  the  freemen's  commons  were  sold  to  the 
corporation  for  a  perpetual  annuity  of  £800,  to  be 
paid  yearly  to  the  Freemen's  trustees.**  This  marks 
the  end  of  the  common  pastures  of  the  town  as  such  ; 
the  racecourse  is  now  preserved  as  an  open  recreation 
ground  for  the  growing  popui.ition  of  the  northern 
part  of  the  town,  whilst  Cow  Meadow,  Calvc^holme 
and  Midsummer  Meadow  serve  that  purpose  in  the 
south.  The  laying  out  of  pleasure  walks  in  Cow 
Meadow  began  as  far  back  as  1703,  when  the  assembly 
authorised  the  expenditure  of  ^^30  in  planting  trees, 
making  walks  and  '  other  occasions  and  conveniences 
to  be  ornamentall  and  useful.'  The  discovery  of  a 
chalybeate  spring,  called  Vigo  Well  from  the  vkiory  of 
1702,  had  roused  the  hope  of  making  Northampton 
a  fashionable  watering  place.**  In  1784  a  new  walk 
was  laid  out  from  St.  Thomas  of  Canterbury's  well 
to  Vigo  well,  planted  with  trees  '  to  form  an  agreeable 
shelter  '  and  fenced  to  preserve  them  from  the  cattle.*' 
Sincel884further  park  lands  and  pleasure  grounds  have 
been  acquired  by  the  town,  which  owned,  by  1921, 
409  a.  3  r.  26  p.  for  these  purposes.  Of  these  Abington 
Park  was  acquired  in  1 895  and  1 903,  20  acres  being 
presented  to  the  corporation,  with  Abington  Hall 
by  Baroness  Wantage  in  1893,  and  the  rest  being  pur- 
chased by  the  town  ;  Victoria  Park  in  St.  James'  End 
was  acquired  partly  by  purchase,  partly  by  the  gift 
of  Earl  Spencer  in  1898  and  1910  ;  Far  Cotton  Recrea- 
tion Ground  and  Kingsthorpe  Recreation  Ground  by 
purchase  in  1912  and  1920,  and  Dallington  Park 
(22  a.  3  r.  28  p.)  by  the  gift  of  Messrs.  C.  E.  and  T.  D. 
Lewis,  in  1921.*' 

The  first  reference  to  a  fair  at  Northampton  is 
found  in  the  charter  of  Simon  II  granting  to  the 
monks  of  St.  Andrew's  priory  a  tenth  of  the  profits 
of  the  fair  held  on  All  Saints'  Day  in  the  church 
and  churchyard  of  All  Saints**  which  is  described 
(1180-11S3)  as  eccksia  de  foro  in  Northampton?-^  The 
fair  may  have  grown  out  of  the  church  wake,  and 
be  older  than  the  Conquest.  On  9  November  1235 
Henry  HI  by  letters  close  forbade  the  holding  of  either 
market  -^r  fair  in  the  church  or  churchyard  of  AH  Saints, 
and  ordered  them  to  be  held  henceforth  in  a  waste 
and  empty  place  to  the  north  of  the  church — the  pre- 
sent market  square.^*  The  inspiration  of  the  reforms 
undoubtedly  came  from  Robert  Grosseteste,  Arch- 
deacon of  Northampton  from  1221.^*  The  date  of 
this  and  many  other  letters  of  Henry  HI  which  con- 
cern the  fair  makes  it  clear  that  it  went  on  well  into 
the  second  half  of  November  in  the  13th  century,  and 
the  parliamentary  petition  of  1334^2  states  that  at  that 
time  it  lasted  from  All  Saints'  Day  (No-vember  l)  to 
St.  Andrew's  (November  30).  It  came  to  be  associated 
especially  with  the  feast  of  St.  Hugh  (November  17), 


»  Ben.  Rtc.  ii,  21 5  ;  Kc  following  pagei 
for  detailed  rcfcrcncei  to  regulations  here 
quoted. 

•  Lee,  Coll.  p.  106. 

•  BoTo.  Rec.  ii,  2Z2-3. 

•  Ibid,  ii,  223. 

•  See  A»»embly  Bookt  for  7  Feb.  1770; 
20  Sept.  and  14  Nov.  1776. 

'  iS  George  III,  c.  77  (T>rivau  Act). 

•  Norihanii.  .V.  and  Q.  i,  3  (1886). 


•  See  Assembly  Book,  18  Sept.  1778. 

'•  Ibid.  2  March  1778. 

"  Pari.  Papers,  1870,  vol.  55.  Return  of 
all  Boroughs  possessing  common  lands,  p.  22. 

"  33  and  34  Vict.  c.  45.     (Local  Act). 

"  4;  and  46  Vict.  c.  212.     (Local  Act). 

'•  Information  from  Mr.  A.  E.  Chick. 

"  Morton,  Natural  Hist,  of  Nortbants. 
(1712),  p.  279,  says  the  waters  are  good 
for  the  stone. 

23 


"  Boro.  Ree.  ii,  262-3. 

"  Information  from  Corporation  Tear 
Book,  p.  43. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Ve«p.  E  xvii,  fo.  6. 

"  Serjeantson,  Hist,  of  Cb.  of  All  Saints, 
Nortbampl.  p.  14. 

»  Cal.  Close,  1234-1237,  pp.  206-7. 

"  V.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  lo-ll. 

"  Pari.  R.  ii,  85. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


that  Bishop  of  Lincoln  who,  in  1 190,  had  braved  the 
fury  of  the  burgesses  of  Northampton  by  suppressing 
the  cult  of  a  pseudo  -victim  of  the  Jews  in  Alt  Saints' 
Church,^  and  had  been  canonised  in  1220. 

The  fair  of  Northampton  was  one  of  the  four  or  five 
great  fairs  from  which  purchases  were  systematically 
made  for  the  royal  household  in  the  reigns  of  John 
and  Henry  III.**  In  1208,  1212,  1213  and  1214,  for 
instance,  John  ordered  purchases  of  robes  and  horses 
to  be  made  there.*'  In  1218  two  royal  baiUfls  were 
appointed  to  '  keep  the  fair,'  and  look  out  for  the  royal 
interests  there.^'  Whatever  other  duties  these  terms 
may  cover,  the  two  men  were  empowered  to  make  prises 
of  wool,  cloth  and  hides  for  the  king's  use,  payment 
being  promised  later.  A  subsequent  order  directed 
that  the  wool  seized  at  the  fair  should  be  sold  at  rates 
fixed  by  the  mayor  and  reeves  of  Northampton.*^  In 
1231  William  de  Haverhill  and  William  the  king's 
tailor  were  ordered  to  buy  at  Northampton  fair  150 
robes  for  the  knights  of  the  king's  household,  100 
robes  for  his  clerks  and  Serjeants,  five  robes  for 
grooms  (garciones),  and  300  tunics  for  alms.*^  Other 
orders  for  the  purchase  of  cloth  at  the  fair  of  North- 
ampton occur  later.**  In  1240  the  King  and  Council 
arranged  that  all  the  King's  prises  from  merchants 
should  be  paid  for  at  four  terms  ;  the  Northampton 
purchases  being  paid  for  at  the  fair  of  St.  Ives,  the 
St.  Ives  purchases  at  Boston,  the  Boston  purchases  at 
Winchester,  and  the  Winchester  purchases  at  North- 
ampton.'*' In  spite  of  the  provision,  the  jurors  of 
1274-5  complained  that  Henry  III  owed  the  common- 
alty of  Northampton  ,{^4,000  and  ;£loo  for  cloth  bought 
at  the  fairs  of  Northampton  and  other  places.'^  Both 
the  king  and  burgesses  of  Northampton  were  also  in 
debt  to  Douai  merchants  for  cloth  sold  at  Northamp- 
ton,** and  there  is  an  account  of  an  uproar  raised  by 
merchants  of  Ypres  and  Douai  at  Northampton  Fair  in 
1254  when  the  King's  officials  enforced  the  Assize  of 
cloth.^  The  charter  of  1257  provided  that  no  foreign 
merchants  should  lodge  in  North.-jmpton  during  the 
fairs  without  the  licence  of  the  bailiffs.^  A  deed  of 
1 280  records  the  grant  by  Robert  of  Pitsford  of  a  house 
in  Abington  Street  to  a  burgess  of  Northampton  on 
condition  that  during  the  fairs  he  should  provide  a 
kitchen  and  stabhng  for  nine  horses  for  the  Burellers 
of  London.** 

In  1268  the  king  granted  a  yearly  fair  on  St.  James' 
day  (July  25)  to  the  abbot  and  monks  of  St.  James' 
without  Northampton,**  and  this  fair,  held  outside 
the  town  at  St.  James'  End  beyond  the  west  bridge, 
was  a  frequent  source  of  dispute  between  the  town  and 
the  abbey  till  the  dissolution  of  the  monasteries, 
when  the  expenses  and  the  profits  of  it  cancelled  out.*' 
After  that  date  it  became  a  town  fair,  but  it  continued 


to  be  held  in  '  le  fayre  yard,'  **  or  elsewhere  in  the 
Abbey  ground*'  till  about  1700.  Dr.  Cox  found 
references  to  a  fair  on  St.  George's  day  as  early  as  the 
reign  of  Edward  I.^"  In  1334,  the  town  petitioned 
for  a  fair  to  last  from  Whitsuntide  to  the  Gules  of 
August,  and  the  council  recommended  the  grant  of  an 
eight  days'  fair.*^  The  charter  of  1 337,  however, 
granted  a  fair  to  last  for  four  weeks  from  the  second 
Monday  after  Trinity.**  This  fair  is  not  mentioned 
in  the  charter  of  1495,  which  clearly  reflects  the  decline 
in  Northampton  trade  by  hmiting  the  duration  of 
the  spring  and  autumn  fairs  to  eight  days  each.** 
In  1566  there  were  still  only  two  fairs — St.  George's 
and  St.  Hugh's.**  The  charter  of  1599  sanctions  the 
holding  of  seven  fairs,  each  to  last  three  days,  on 
St.  George's  Day  (23  April),  St.  Hugh's  (17  November), 
the  Nativity  of  Our  Lady  (8  September),  the  Annun- 
ciation (25  March),  the  Conception  of  the  Virgin 
(8  December),  tlie  Assumption  (15  August),  and 
St.  James'  (25  July).**  When  Bridges  wrote  (before 
1724),  an  eighth  fair  had  been  added  on  9  February.** 
The  charter  of  1796  retained  these  eight  fairs,  but 
as  the  old  calendar  was  followed,  the  date  of  each  was 
put  forward  eleven  days.  A  new  fair  was  sanctioned 
for  19  June  (new  style.)*'  By  1 81 5  a  tenth  fair  had 
been  added,  on  the  first  Thursday  in  November,  wliich 
was  toll-free.**  In  1849  there  were  thirteen  fairs. 
In  addition  to  those  just  mentioned  there  were  fairs 
on  the  second  Tuesday  in  January  and  the  third 
Monday  in  March,  whilst  a  new  fair  called  the  Wool 
Fair,  on  i  July,  had  been  recently  estabhshed.** 
The  fair  on  19  September  was  known  as  the  Cheese 
Fair,  an  innovation  of  Mr.  Slowick  Carr,  Mayor  of 
Northampton  1750-51.**'  An  Act  of  1870  empowered 
the  corporation  of  Northampton  to  establish  markets 
and  fairs,*^  and  at  present  there  are  twelve  fairs,  the 
wool  fair  having  been  dropped.** 

The  charter  of  1 599  sanctioned  the  holding  of  a 
free  market  every  Wednesday,  Friday  and  Saturday 
by  the  burgesses  '  as  heretofore  accustomed.'  **  In 
1683  they  were  also  granted  a  cattle  market  for  the 
first  Thursday  in  every  month.**  In  1740  the  market 
day  was  Saturday  ;**  in  1849,  as  now,  Wednesday  and 
Saturday  were  the  market  d.ays.*'  Wednesday  is  the 
day  for  fat  stock,  Saturday  for  store  cattle.  The 
cattle  market,  opened  in  1873,  is  on  part  of  the  Cow 
Meadow,  and  extends  over  six  acres,  with  accommo- 
dation for  5,000  sheep,  5,000  beasts,  and  500  pigs. 
The  regulation  of  the  markets  was  in  the  hands  of  the 
mayor  as  clerk  of  the  markets  from  1385  by  charter, 
and  probably  before  that  date  by  custom.  The 
standard  weights  and  measures  belonging  to  the 
corporation,  including  a  bushel  and  gallon  dated  1601, 
are  preserved  in  the  Town  Museum.*' 


"  V.C.II.  Norlhanii.  ii,  12. 

•*  The  otheri  were  Boston,  Stamford , 
Wincheiter,  St.  Ivei,  Bury  St  Edmund'i. 
Rol.  Hund.  ii,  5. 

"Rot.   I.ilt.    Claus.  i,    100,    127,    154, 

'77- 

••  Cat.  Pal.  1216-2?,  178. 

«'  Rol.  I.ill.  Claus.  i,  3S3. 

'*  Cal.  Cloie,  1231-34,  p.  I.  Sec  alto 
Cal.  Liberait  R.  i,  3. 

"  Rol.   Ltlt.   Claus.  i,    580b  ;    Cal.  Pat. 

'i.n-47.  P-  »39i   ibid-   1247-58,  P-  37' i 
ibid.  tz66-7i,  pp.  393,  718. 

w  Cat.  Pal.  1232-47,  p.  239. 

•'  Rol.  Hund.  ii,  5. 


••  Cal.  Pal.  1232-47,  p.  393  ;  ibid. 
1266-72,  pp.  393,  717. 

"  Ibid.  1247-58,  p.  430. 

••  Boro.  Rec.  i,  47. 

"  Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.),  B.2465. 

"  Cal.  Chan,  ii,  100. 

"  Valor.  Eccl.  iv,  319. 

'•  Chan.  inq.  p.m.,  Charlci  I,  ccccxviii, 
68. 

••  Bridget,  op.  cit.  i,  501. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  187. 

«'  Pari.  R.  ii.  85. 

••  Chart.  R.  1 1,  Ed.  Ill,  m.  32,  no.  67. 

*'  Boro.  Rtc.  i,  107. 

•*  Ibid,  ii,  297. 

H 


"  Ibid,  i,  124. 

«•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  433. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  i,  177. 

*'  Hist,  of  Norlhampl.  181;,  p.  20. 

'•  G.  N.  Wet  ton,  Guide-book  to 
Norihampt.  p.  86.  The  fair  is  now  held  in 
the  Cattle  Market. 

'">  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  40. 

"  33  ,ind  34  Vict.  c.  45.     (Local  Act). 

"  Kelly,  County  Directory  (1924). 

"  Doro.  Rec.  i,  134. 

••  Ibid,  i,  146. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  433. 

"  Wctton,  op.  cit.,  p.  86. 

•'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  194-5. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


The  street  names  of  Northampton  are  a  fairly  clear 
indication  of  the  marketing  centres  of  the  medieval 
town.  Sheep  Street,  The  Horse  Market,  and  the 
Hog  Market  lie  in  the  north-western  quarter  ;  Corn 
Hill,^  Malt  Hill  and  Wood  Hill  north  and  east  of  the 
Market  Square  ;  Mercers  Row  to  the  south  and  the 
Drapery  to  the  west  of  it,  whilst  W'oolmonger  Street 
runs  to  the  south  west,  and  Gold  Street  (once  Gold- 
smiths' Street)  runs  west  from  tlie  centre  of  the  town. 
Henry  Lee  believed  that  the  original  market  square 
was  in  the  open  space  known  as  the  Mayorhold  or 
Marehold  where  the  first  Town  Hall  stood  ;'"'  but 
the  early  description  of  All  Saints' as  (/^/ero**  suggests 
that  in  the  1 2th  century  the  market  was  already  held 
where  it  is  to-day.  The  market  square  itself,  known 
as  the  Chequer  from  the  14th  century,  has  long  been 
held  one  of  the  chief  distinctions  of  Northampton. 
Morton  in  17 1 2  says  '  The  Market  Hill  is  lookt  upon 
as  the  finest  in  Europe  ;  a  fair,  spacious,  open  place.' " 
Pennant  calls  it  '  an  ornament  to  the  town  ;  few  can 
boast  the  hke,'  *^  and  the  Chartist  Gammage  calls  it 
'  one  of  the  prettiest  in  England.'  **  The  butchers' 
stalls  or  shambles  to  which  a  number  of  early  deeds 
refer**  were  probably  placed  here,  and  it  is  supposed 
that  the  rows  mentioned  in  early  deeds,  such  as 
wimplers'  row,  mercers'  row,  cobblers'  row,  cooks'  row 
and  malt  row'*  ran  along  the  west  side  of  the  square, 
where  to-day  a  line  of  shops  separates  the  Drapery 
from  the  market  place.  A  market  cross  is  mentioned 
in  14th  and  15th  century  deeds,  and  the  new  one, 
erected  in  1535,  a  fine  piece  of  Renaissance  work,  as 
described  by  Henry  Lee,**  was  destroyed  in  the  fire 
of  1675.  The  market  place  also  contained  the  great 
conduit,  erected  about  1481,  a  building  of  two  or 
three  stories,  with  a  l.all  above  the  conduit  which  was 
used  for  meetings  of  companies  that  had  constitu- 
tions for  regulating  trade,"  and  with  arches  below 
containing  shops  in  the  17th  and  a  bridewell  in  the 
1 8th  century.  These,  with  all  the  buildings  round  the 
market  square,  except  the  Town  Hall  and  Dr.  Danvers' 
House  in  its  north-east  corner,  were  destroyed  in  the 
fire  of  1675.'*  From  an  early  date  the  market  square 
has  been  the  centre  of  the  civic  no  less  than  the 
mercantile  life  of  the  borough,  and  has  witnessed  a 
series  of  notable  pubhc  meetings  such  as  the  holding 
of  the  forest  eyre  of  1637,**  the  disputed  election  '  by 
the  popularity  '  in  1663,'"  the  great  debate  between 
Fergus  O'Connor  and  Richard  Cobden  in  1844,'^ 
down  to  the  public  reception  of  the  present  King  and 
Queen  on  23  September  191 3. ''^ 

The  fair  and  market  days  were  the  only  occasions 
on  which  foreigners  were  allowed  to  sell  their  wares  in 


Northampton,  and  the  fair  and  market  tolls  made  an 
important  part  of  the  borough  revenues.  They  were 
levied  by  the  town  bailiffs  or  their  deputies  at  a  fixed 
scale  of  rates,  revised  from  time  to  time  in  the  assem- 
bly.'* Besides  the  market  tolls,  smaller  tolls  on  the 
sale  of  corn  and  wood  in  the  town  were  leviable,  and 
the  corn  toll  was  collected  in  kind  down  to  1775.'* 
The  position  of  Northampton  as  the  county  market 
town  is  well  illustrated  by  the  corn  riots  of  1693-4. 
In  November  1693  the  'mobile'  cut  sacks  of  corn 
and  threw  the  wagons  into  the  river  on  several  market 
days  in  succession,  whilst  many  came  to  the  market 
with  knives  in  their  girdles  to  force  the  sale  of  corn  at 
their  own  prices.'*  In  June  1694  again  loads  of  corn 
were  seized  and  the  mayor  and  his  brethren  defied 
and  knocked  about  ;  and  a  free  fight  took  place  in 
which  two  were  killed  and  some  sixty  wounded." 
The  occasion  of  the  riots  was  the  dearth  noted  by 
Lee,  together  with  the  sight  of  corn  being  sold  in 
large  quantities  out  of  the  town — presumably  for  the 
troops  over  sea."  The  market  for  beasts  and  sheep, 
of  little  or  no  importance  in  the  1 8th  century,  was 
revived  in  1802  by  the  mayor  of  that  time  and 
developed  steadily  thenceforward." 

Besides  the  tolls  on  sales,  traverse  tolls  were  col- 
lected, from  the  12th  century  if  not  earlier,  from 
beasts  and  burdens  passing  through  the  town.  In 
the  oldest  borough  custumal  (<-.  1 190)  it  is  said  that 
these  tolls  are  collected  at  certain  fixed  places." 
According  to  the  presentment  of  the  jurors  in  the 
eyre  of  1329,*"  they  hai  been  collected  since  1264, 
when  the  town  was  in  the  king's  hand,  at  points  along 
the  roads  leading  to  Northampton,  distant,  in  some 
cases,  as  much  as  fifteen  miles  from  the  town,  so  as  to 
prevent  strangers  evading  the  toll  by  going  round  the 
town  instead  of  through  it.  At  this  date  the  toll 
places  were  at  Slipton  on  the  Kettering  road,  at 
BiUing  Bridge  on  the  WeUingborough  road,  and  at 
Syresham  Cross  on  the  Brackley  Road.*^  In  the 
reign  of  Elizabeth  the  tolls  were  collected  at  the  en- 
trance to  the  town,  and  it  had  become  customary  for 
the  baihffs  to  lease  the  right  of  collecting  them  to 
private  persons.*^  In  1 765  the  market  tolls  and  traverse 
tolls  together  were  let  at  a  rent  of  ^^87  a  year.  The 
system  was  continued  to  1829,  the  rents  falhng  to 
70  guineas  in  1801  and  rising  to  ;^2I9  in  1829,  owing 
probably  to  stricter  exaction.  This  increased  strin- 
gency led  to  resistance,  and  finally  to  the  great  Toll 
Cause  of  Lancum  v.  Lovellin  1831,  when  the  corpora- 
tion incurred  expenses  of  over  j^2,ooo  in  defending 
its  rights  to  levy  the  tolls.*'  The  test  case  was 
fought  on  a  claim  for  lid.  toll  upon   oxen  bought  in 


"  The  Corn  Cbrpinge  is  mentioned  in 
1265  (Ca/.  Chart,  ii,  53)  and  the  Strau- 
tcbepingeia  1301  {Hiil.MSS.  Com.  Ref.  15, 

^fP-  ».  P-  73)- 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  91.  "  See  above. 

"  Morton,  Nat.  Hiit.  oj Nortbanu.  p.  23. 

•'  Jottnuy  from  Cbeiter  to  London  (1780), 
p.  306. 

••  R.  C.  Gammage,  Hiit.  oj  the  Chartist 
Movement,  1894,  p.  1 17.  The  iron  lamp 
in  the  middle  of  the  market  tquare  was 
given  in  1863  \>y  Capt.  Samuel  Isaacs  of 
the  Northants  RiSe  Volunteers. 

**  Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.),B.  2466, 2467,2484, 
e.g.  *  quoddam  schamellum  in  rengo 
schamellorum  camificum,'  cf.  '  Butchers 
Row,'  in  Anct.  D.  B.  3232 ;  '  Kytstalles,' 
Boro.  Ret.  ii,  283. 


••  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C.  I, 
C.  6  ;  Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.),  6444,  2549,  2764 ; 
Add  Ch.  6117. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  pp.  94-5.       •'  Ibid.  p.  132. 

"  Hartshorne,  Hist.  Mem.  of  Northampt. 
p.  234.  The  Riding,  a  small  street  in  this 
neighbourhood,  is  named  after  the  Riding 
School,  where  Methodism  was  first 
preached  in  Northampton  in   1766. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  431. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  113 

"  Gammage,  Hist,  of  Chartist  Move- 
ment, p.  254-5. 

"  Noriiamfl.  Independent,  2. 

"  Boro. /J«.ii,  188-90.  "Ibid.  191. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1693,  p.  397. 

"  Ibid.  Add.  1689-1695,  p.  262. 

"  Ibid.  p.  263  ;    1694-5,  p.  228. 

25 


"  Report  of  the  Trial  for  the  Northampt. 
Toll  Cause  (Northampt.  1833),  pp.  241-2. 
The  receipts  for  tolls  and  rents  at  the 
Cattle  Market  were  in  1914  ,{[2,923,  and  in 
1927  ^[4,462  and  for  the  General  Market 
in  1914  ,(|2,ioo  and  in  1927  ^[7,035. 

'•  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),  98,  £0. 
159  v- 

"  Assize  R.  635,  m.  51,  m.  70. 

"So  in  the  Liber  Custumarum  of  c. 
1460,  Boro.  Rec.  i,  222.  See  also  Rot. 
Hund.  ii,  2,  and  Assize  R.  619,  m.  75,  for 
private  persons  who  were  trying  in  1274 
and  1285  to  usurp  the  town's  right  of 
collecting  these  toUs. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  201-206. 

"  Pari.  Papers  1835,  vol.  xxv,  pp.  1971, 
■973- 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Northampton  market,  and  led.  traverse  toll  upon 
laden  waggons  going  through  the  town,  and  a  great 
body  of  legal  precedents  was  cited — and  misinter- 
preted— by  counsel  for  and  against  the  corporation.** 
Judgment  was  given  for  Lancum,  the  lessee  of  the 
corporation,  in  February  1832,  but  an  application  for 
a  new  trial  was  granted,  on  the  ground  of  the  rejection 
of  legal  evidence,  in  January  1833.*^  However,  the 
defendant,  an  old  countryman,  died  in  July  1833 
before  the  fresh  trial  could  be  held.*'  The  case 
revealed  a  good  deal  of  ill  feeling  between  the  corpora- 
tion and  the  agriculturists  of  the  surrounding  district, 
though  a  declaration  signed  by  244  farmers  and  graziers 
of  the  neighbouriiood  expressed  their  appreciation 
of  the  value  of  the  Northampton  fairs.*'  One  of 
the  first  acts  of  the  reformed  corporation  was 
to  discontinue  the  traverse  toUs,  as  contrary  to 
the  spirit  of  the  time  and  the  freedom  of  trade, 
in  i836.8« 

The  fact  that  leather  clippings  were 
TRADES  found  with  a  coin  of  Edward  the  Con- 
fessor at  the  bottom  of  a  well  covered  by 
the  Norman  earthworks  of  the  castle*'  has  been 
adduced  in  proof  of  the  existence  of  a  pre-Conquest 
leather  trade.  There  is,  however,  no  early  evidence 
of  any  outside  market  for  Northampton  leather  goods 
and  all  the  medieval  sources  suggest  that  textile 
industries  took  the  first  place  in  the  days  of  the 
town's  early  prosperity.  The  earliest  custumal 
(c.  1 1 90)  mentions  no  craft  but  that  of  the  weaver, 
who  is  classed  with  the  nurse  as  a  domestic  servant  not 
to  be  enticed  away  by  a  rival  employer.^  It  also  refers 
to  the  sale  of  wool,  thread,  fresh  hides,  honey,  tallow, 
cheese  and  flesh  by  the  burgesses  at  the  fair.  In  1202 
Northampton  was  one  of  eleven  towns  which  pur- 
chased the  right  to  buy  and  sell  dyed  cloth  as  they 
were  wont  to  do  under  King  Henry,  that  is,  without 
keeping  the  assize  of  1 197.'^  VVe  have  seen  that  the 
Northampton  fairs  were  noteworthy  for  the  sale  of 
cloth  and  of  furs  in  the  reigns  of  John  and  Henry  HI, 
and  the  petition  of  the  burgesses  to  Parhament  in 
1334  indicates  that  some  of  this  cloth  at  least  was 
home  made.  '  In  the  time  of  King  Henry  .  .  .  when 
the  staple  of  wool  was  at  divers  places  in  England  .  .  . 
there  were  at  Northampton  300  workers  of  cloths, 
who  paid  on  every  cloth  a  fixed  sum  towards  the 
farm  of  the  town,  as  well  as  a  fixed  rent  from  their 
houses  where  they  used  to  dweU  in  the  said  town, 
which  are  now  fallen  to  the  ground.'*^  The  13th  cen- 
tury custumal  contains  regulations  as  to  dyeing,  and 
regulations  as  to  the  weaving  of  cloth,  dated  1 251, 
which  bear  out  the  other  evidence  as  to  the  impor- 
tance of  the  trade. 

Clause  23.     Consideratum  est  quod  nullus  operarius 
pannorum  ponat  in  panno  suo,  sc.  imperiali,  brasil 


nee  tinctum  de  verme,  nee  in  albo  stragulato  scorthe 
neque  aiiam  falsam  tincturam.  .  .  . 

24.  Si  pannus  inueniatur  terra  tinctus,  et  proprius 
pannus  fuerit  tinctoris,  amittatur,  et  si  alienus  et 
ex  consensu  ipsius  fecerit,  similiter  amittatur.  Et 
sinon  de  consensu  ipsius  tinctor  abjuret  oificium 
suum  per  annum  et  diem.  .  .  . 

25.  Nullus  tinctor  menstruet  aliquem  pannum 
cake.  .  .  . 

26.  Nullus  operatur  pannos  nisi  pannus  sit  de 
rationabili  sequela  sc.  peior  ulna  in  panno  tincto  non 
valeat  minus  unum  denarium  ad  plus  et  imperiale 
unum  obolum. 

34.  Consideratur  quod  si  aUquis  textor  alicuius 
pannum  male  texerit  et  super  hoc  convictus  fuerit 
amittat  laborem  suum  (et)  duos  denarios  ad  commo- 
dum  ville. 

35.  Operatores  pannorum  qui  textores  sunt  non 
sedeant  super  utensiUa'^  ad  pannos  suos  proprios  nee 
aUenos  texandos.'*  .  .  . 

36.  Provisum  est  quod  quihbet  pannus  albus  sit  de 
triginta  et  triginta  porteriis  et  imperiale  de  viginti  et  sex 
et  viginti  septem.    Albus  stragulatus  eius  latitudinis.** 

These  regulations  indicate  advanced  development 
both  in  technique  and  in  organisation  ;  both  dyers 
and  weavers  are  represented  as  working  with  other 
men's  material.  Other  regulations  provide  that 
woaders  from  outside  the  town  may  only  bring  in 
woad  and  sell  it  by  Ucence  of  inspectors,^  and  forbid 
dyers  to  throw  their  waste  products  into  the  streets." 
Scarlet  Well  is  mentioned  as  early  as  1239,**  and  local 
tradition,  according  to  Morton,  asserted  that  London 
cloth  had  formerly  been  sent  to  Northampton  to  be 
dyed,"  and  that  cloth  miscoloured  at  Nottingham 
was  brought  to  a  good  scarlet  here.  ^  The  eyre  roll 
of  1247  records  the  death  of  a  dyer,  scalded  by  falHng 
into  a  vat  of  his  own  dye.^  The  Fullers'  Street  is 
mentioned  in  a  deed  of  1250-60,^  the  Drapery  1202- 
1220,*  the  VVimplers'  Row  as  early  as  1189-94.^ 
Northampton  burgesses  were  employed  as  experts  by 
Henry  III  to  buy  cloth  for  him  at  Ljmn  and  Stamford.* 
In  1274  the  jurors  giving  a  list  of  the  craftsmen 
{menestralli)  who  have  left  the  town  to  escape  the 
heavy  tallages,  mention  fullers,  weavers,  dyers, 
drapers,  glovers  and  skinners,'  and  mention  burgesses 
with  the  surnames  VVaydour  (or  woader)  Mercer, 
Comber,  Tinctor,  as  well  as  a  lituirius.  The  estreats 
of  the  town  court,  c.  1290,  mention  a  taverncr,  a 
carpenter,  a  baker,  a  fisher,  a  maltmongcre,  a  miller, 
a  knyfsmith,  a  carter,  a  peyntour,  a  skynnere,  a  woman 
maker  of  cords,  a  catour,  a  laver,  a  latoner,  a  tailor, 
and  a  plomer.*  Pentecost  de  Kershalton,  mayor  of 
Northampton  in  1297,  1301,  1302,  1304,  1307  and 
probably  some  other  years  also,  was  a  '  deyster.' ' 

The  petition  of  1334  testifies  to  a  decline  in  cloth 


"  Report  oj  the  Trial  of  tbt  Norlbampt. 
Toll  CauiCy  Lancum  v.  Lowell,  NorthampC. 
1833. 

•*  Ibid.  pp.  313-455.        "  Ibid.  p.  461. 

•'  lloro.  Kec.  ii,  2C7.         "  Ibid,  ii,  io8. 

••  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rcpl.  xv,  pt.  ii, 
p.  205. 

••  nate«on,  Boro.  CuiUmt  (S.S.)  i,  215. 

•'  Pipe  R.  48,  m.  II  d. 

•>  Pari.  R.  ii,  85. 

"  Thii  would  appear  to  forbid  the  uje 
o{  a  loom  in  which  the  warp  wai  kept 
light  by  meant  of  a  bar  on  which  the 
weaver  lat,  initcad  of  hit  uiual  teparate 


leat.  This  would  produce  an  uneven 
•train,  .nnd  »o  bad  cloth.  (Information 
from  Mr.  L.  F.  Salzman.) 

••  The  last  two  clauses  arc  dated  25 
March,  35  Henry  III. 

"  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),  98,  fl.  161  v, 
162. 

»•  Ibid.  fo.  162  V. ;  c.f.  Batcion,  Rec.  of 
Boro.  of  Lticei.  i,  250. 

•'  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),98,fo.  161  v. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  256. 

"  Morton,  Nat.  Hiit.  of  Northanit. 
(1712),  p.  270.  Not  as  stated  in  V.C.U. 
Nortbants.  ii,  336,  in  Morton's  own  time. 

26 


'  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  256. 

'  Assize  R,  614  B.  m.  48  d.  This  seemt 
to  be  the  meaning  of  '  cecidit  in  uno 
plurnbo  buUicnti  de  jalcis*  (weld  ?). 

'  Anct.  D.  (I'.R.O.)  A.  9876. 

•Cott.  MS.  Tib.  E.  5,fo.  181  b. 

•  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press 
Ci. 

•  Cat.  Pat.  1232-47,  pp.  300,  449. 
'  Rol.  Hund.  ii,  3. 

'  Northantt.  Notes  and  Queries  (New 
Ser.\  V,  203-211. 

•  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  549  ;  Memoranda  Rolls  ; 
Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C.  43. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


working  in  the  14th  century,  shared  by  Northampton 
with  Leicester,  Oxford,  Stamford  and  Nottingham.'" 
Nevertheless,  Northampton,  as  we  have  seen,  had  its 
own  seal  for  the  cloth  subsidy.  James  Hart,  writing 
in  1633,  speaks  of  the  ruins  of  great  buildings  once 
employed  in  the  clothing  trade,'*  but  the  only  building 
recorded  is  the  Wool  Hall,  and  14th  century  notices 
of  Northampton  refer  rather  to  the  wool  trade  than 
to  the  dotli  industry.  In  1274  six  burgesses  had  been 
presented  for  exporting  wool  to  foreign  parts,  contrary 
to  the  king's  prohibition,  one  being  responsible  for 
68  and  another  for  80  sacks. ^^  Northampton  sent  four 
of  its  merchants  to  the  merchants'  assembly  of  1337 
which  formed  the  syndicate  that  cornered  the  wool  of 
England  for  the  benefit  of  Edward  III,'*  ana  there  are 
other  indications  of  a  wool  trade  of  some  importance.'* 
But  in  its  «n3ol  trade  no  less  than  its  cloth  trade  it  was 
completely  outdistanced  by  other  towns  and  counties 
of  England.'* 

The  frequent  presence  of  the  king  and  court  must 
have  stimulated  various  other  crafts  besides  the 
textile.  In  1224,  when  besieging  Bedford,  Henry 
was  able  to  call  on  the  smiths  of  Northampton  for 
4,000  quarrels,  well  headed  and  feathered,  and  for 
150  good  pickaxes."  Two  cartloads  of  Gloucester 
iron  were  also  to  be  sent  from  Northampton  to 
Bedford  for  the  king's  works  there.  Hides,  both 
white  and  tanned,  were  demanded,  and  with  them  two 
saddlers  with  their  craftsmen  for  making  targes." 
The  trades  mentioned  in  1274  not  concerned  with  the 
clothing  or  leather  industries  were  mostly  victualling  ; 
vintners,  spicers,  mustarders,  fishmongers."  A  gold- 
smith is  mentioned  in  1233  ;  '*  a  tanner  and  a  parch- 
ment maker  in  1247.*'  In  1325  37  pairs  of  shoes  and 
two  of  boots  were  stolen  from  one  shop  ;2'  and  there 
were  a  Tanner's  Street,  a  Glovery,  a  Saddlery  and  a 
"  Cordwauria  "  near  All  Saints' in  1332.^  In  the 
eyre  roll  of  1329  there  is  mention  of  weavers,  skinners, 
barbers,  dyers,  tailors,  shearmen,  brewers,  taverners, 
garlic-mongers  (or  aillours),  masons,  cordwainers, 
cobblers,  curriers,  and  a  romonqeour?^ 

Amongst  the  economic  ingredients  of  medieval 
Northampton,  the  Jews  ought  not  to  be  overlooked. 
Jews  of  Northampton  occur  on  the  Pipe  Rolls  from 
1 1 70,**  and  there  was  an  anti-Semitic  riot  here  in  1190 
which  St.  Hugh  intervened  to  check.^  In  1 194 
Northampton  with  39  Jews  comes  fifth  on  the  hst  of 
English  towns  with  Jewries,  after  London  (112), 
Lincoln  (82),   Norwich  (42),  and  Gloucester  (40).** 


In  that  year  a  chest  was  set  up  at  Northampton,  as 
elsewhere,  for  the  deposit  of  Jewish  bonds  and  deeds, 
and  two  Jews  and  two  Christians  appointed  as  custo- 
dians. Henry  III  commanded  in  1237,  not  for  the 
first  time,  that  no  Jew  hould  live  in  Northampton- 
shire outside  the  king's  town  of  Northampton,*'  and 
showed  his  sense  of  responsibility  for  them  by  his 
command  to  the  leading  burgesses  in  June  1264  to 
protect  the  Jews  who  had  taken  refuge  in  the  castle 
during  the  disorders  of  the  spring.**  Some  of  the 
Jews  who  had  deposited  their  chattels  with  Christians 
for  safe-keeping  in  the  emergency  found  it  difficult  to 
recover  them  later.*'  The  Plea  Rolls  of  the  Jewish 
Exchequer  shew  us  the  Jews  of  Northampton  acting 
as  bankers  for  both  town  and  -ounty.  Burgesses 
like  Robert  son  of  Henry  or  Robert  of  Leicester 
borrowed  money  from  them  at  the  illegal  rate  of  \od. 
a  week  in  the  pound  ;^  knights  of  the  shire,  Uke 
Robert  de  Pavely  of  Paulers  Pury  or  Hugh  de 
Chanceaux  of  Upton,  pledged  their  manors  to  them." 
In  the  1 3th  century  the  Jewish  community  in  North- 
ampton must  have  been  shrinking  steadily.  A 
number  of  houses  once  possessed  by  Jews  in  North- 
ampton are  mentioned  as  being  granted  by  the  king 
to  other  persons,  such  as  to  the  Master  of  the  Temple 
in  1215,'*  the  earl  of  Winchester  in  1218,^  Philip 
Marc  in  1219,'*  Stephen  de  Scgrave  in  1229,**  and 
Robert  de  Mara  in  1248.3'  In  1277  the  Northampton 
Jews  were  charged  with  a  ritual  murder,*'  and  in  1278 
a  general  attack  on  them  for  clipping  and  forging  coin 
led  to  the  execution  and  forfeiture  of  many  Northamp- 
ton Jews.**  A  series  of  grants  of  houses  once  belong- 
ing to  Jews  are  enrolled  on  the  Charter  Roll  1280- 
1286.**  When  the  Jews  were  finally  expelled  in  1290 
the  inquest  into  their  houses,  rents  and  tenements 
showed  that  5  houses  were  held  in  Northampton  by  five 
separate  Jews,  and  the  community  of  the  Jews  held 
a  synagogue,  two  houses  near  its  entry,  two  houses 
outside  the  north  gate  and  a  burial  ground.*"  A  later 
document  suggests  that  the  synagogue  of  the  Jews, 
granted  to  the  Abbot  of  St.  James  in  1 291,*'  lay  in 
Silver  Street.**  Other  Jews'  houses  are  described  as 
Iving  in  the  Corn  Row,**  in  the  market  place,**  in 
Larttwychene,*^  in  Berewardstrete,**  in  the  Corne- 
chepyng,*'  whilst  Henry  Lee  describes  as  Jewish 
three  houses  standing  before  the  fire  of  1675,  one  near 
the  Red  Lion  in  the  Horsemarket,  one  near  the  Ram 
in  the  Sheepmarket,  and  one  in  Silver  Street.**  The 
Jewish  community  then  were   not   confined   to  one 


"  Etig.  Hist.  Rev.  xxxix,  22. 

"  Hart,  Diet  cj  the  Dneased,  p.  149. 

'•  Rot.  HunJ.  ii,  4. 

'*  Unwin,  Finance  and  Trade  under 
Edward  11  Jj  p.  189. 

'*  Woolmonger  Street  is  mentioned 
1329  (Aiiize  R.  635,  m.  67  d.)  A  bond  of 
I3i9i>  extant  for  the  delivery  of  a  half- 
tack  of  good  ewes*  wool  by  a  Northampton 
merchant  to  a  man  of  Ashby  St.  Ledgers. 
Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.)  A.  9616. 

'•  Eng.  Hilt.  Rev.  xxxix,  p.  34  ;  Pari.  R. 

».  ^75- 
"  Roi.  Litt.  Clam,  i,  612,  613,  615. 
"  Ibid,  i,  606. 
"  Rot.  Hund.  ii,  1-5. 
'•  Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.)  C.  2280. 
«•  Assize  R.  614  B.  m.  48. 
"  Ibid.  635,  m.  64. 
"Add.  Ch.  61 17. 
"  Assize  R.  635,  mm.  61-70. 
•*  Jacobs,  Jeui  oj Angevin  England,  p.  73 


"  y.C.H.  Nvrihanu.  ii,  11. 

"Jacobs,  op.  cit.  pp.  378  381.  In 
1255  the  relative  position  of  Northamp- 
ton was  a  good  deal  lower  ;  the  share  of 
the  Northampton  Jewry  in  the  tallage 
of  that  year  was  equal  to  that  of  Bedford 
and  Bristol,  and  below  those  of  Oxford, 
Worcester,  Winchester,  York  and  Canter- 
bury.    Cat.  Pat.  1247-58,  p.  443. 

•'  Cat.  Close,  1234-7,  p.  425. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1258-66,  p.  320-1.  The 
baronial  party  was  re  sponsible  for  massacres 
of  Jews  at  London  and  Canterbury  in 
April  1264.  Annal.  Mon.  (Rolls  Set.),  iii, 
230  ;  Liber  de  Ant.  Leg.  p.  62. 

»•  Rigg,  Cal.  PUa  R.  of  Exc.  oj  Jews, 

V-   '9'- 

••  Ibid.  pp.  34,  39. 

"Ibid.  pp.  114,  287;  Cal.  Pat. 
1266-72,  p.  534. 

"  Rot.  Litt.  Claui.  i,  196. 

"  Ibid,  i,  366. 

27 


»  Ibid,  i,  386. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1227-31,  p.  276. 

"  Ibid.  1247-51,  p.  130. 

>'  y.C.n.  Northanls.  ii,  13. 

"Annal.  Mon.  (Rolls  Ser.),  iii,  279; 
Cal.  Pat   1272-81,  p.  362. 

»•  Chart.  R.  73,  mm.  2,  3,  4  ;  7+  m-  4  i 
75  m.  2. 

'"  Extents  and  Surveys,  143,  1-2,  no.  40. 
See  Cal.  Pal.  1281-92,  p.  381,  for  safe 
conduct  oversea  to  a  Northampton  Jew 
mentioned  in  the  Extent. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1313-17,  p.  199. 

"  Cox  and  Serjeantson,  Hist,  of  Cb.  of 
Holy  Sepulchre,  Nortbampl.,  p.  126. 

"  Extents  and  Surreys,  143,  1-2,  no. 
40. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Chart.  R.  74,  m.  4. 

•'  Cal.  Pat.  1358-61,  p.  211. 

♦'  Lee,  Coll.  p.  95. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Jewry,    though    they    seem    to    hare    preferred    the 
northern  and  western  parts  of  the  town. 

There  is  no  clear  reference  to  any  craft  organisation 
till  the  1 5th  century,  though  the  13th  century  custumal 
refers  to  master  butchers,*'  and  the  expression 
bachelerie  de  Northampton  has  been  interpreted  to 
mean  associations  of  journeymen,^  the  economic 
equivalent  of  the  political  bachehria.  The  economic 
regulations  of  the  13th  century  custumal  show  the 
prepositura  as  the  authority  regulating  primarily 
conditions  of  buying  and  selUng,^^  but  also,  in  the  case 
of  weavers,  dyers  and  butchers,  the  quaUty  of  the 
goods  offered  for  sale.  The  butcher  pays  a  fee  to  the 
town,  '  as  he  used  to  do  to  his  peers,'  for  the  right  to 
become  a  master.^^  ^^^  when  in  the  15th  century 
the  town  records  begin,  it  is  noteworthy  that  the  town 
government  takes  the  initiative,  in  one  instance  at 
least,  in  forming  a  ciaft  gild,  and  keeps  throughout  a 
controlling  hand  on  the  regulations  of  the  crafts,  both 
assisting  in  drafting  the  rules,  swearing  in  the  wardens 
and  demanding  reports  from  them,  and  enrolling  the 
constitutions  in  the  town  records.  In  these  craft 
ordinances  the  textile  industries  are  still  prominent. 
In  1427  the  shearmen  are  commanded  to  organise 
themselves  under  two  wardens,  who  are  to  inspect  the 
quality  of  the  work  and  report  to  the  mayor.^'  The 
existence  of  turbulent  organisations  of  journeymen  is 
indicated  in  the  regulations  for  the  weavers'  craft  in 
1432,^  which  are  designed  to  put  an  end  to  '  many  and 
dyverse  unlittyng  contestes  and  debates  .  .  .  which  have 
long  tyme  regned  in  the  Crafte  of  Englisshe  wevers  of 
Norhampton  bitwene  the  Maistirs  and  the  jorneymen 
of  the  seide  crafte.'  The  ordinances  of  1432  refer 
to  old-estabhshed  customs  such  as  the  Easter  proces- 
sion to  St.  Mary  de  la  Pre  outside  the  town,  and  the 
'  customable  drinking  '  that  followed  the  offering  of 
wax  tapers  there,  and  further  illustrate  the  cleavage 
within  the  craft  by  the  prohibition  of  '  confederacyes, 
conventicles  and  gederyngs.'  Supplementary  regula- 
tions of  the  weavers'  craft  were  passed  in  1439,  1441, 
1448*'  and  1462,  when  a  six  years'  apprenticesliip 
was  provided  for,  and  a  supervision  of  the  hcensing  of 
new  weavers  by  the  warden  of  the  craft,  acting  with 
two  of  the  Twenty  Four  comburgesses.^'  In  151 1 
the  inspection  of  cloths  by  the  '  searchers  '  was  further 
regulated."  The  formation  of  the  Tailors'  Craft  Gild 
in  1444-5  '5  of  great  interest  :  the  industry  was  so 
important  to  the  town  as  a  whole  that  the  town 
government  took  the  initiative  and  compelled  the 
tailors  to  accept  a  constitution.  '  Full  many  gentil- 
men  and  other  people  of  oure  lorde  the  Kynge  for 
the  shapyng  of  theire  clothyng  and  of  their  servauntcs 
and  of  theire  lyvcreys  daylycomen  to  the  same  town. 
Ncverthcles  noo  Rule  ne  order  put  nc  is  in  the  said 
Crafte  bctwene  thartificers  and  mynystres  of  the 
scido  Crafte.  .  .  .  Wherefore  the  seide  gentilmen  .  .  . 
oft   tymes  for  unhable  shapyng  .  .  .  aren  .  .  .  dis- 


seived  to  her  prejudice  and  also  sclaunder  and  detri- 
ment I.O  the  saide  toun.  And  therefore  the  saide 
Maire  and  his  Comburgeis  by  the  comyn  Assent  of 
the  seide  toun  wyllen  in  the  saide  Crafte  ordynaunce 
and  good  Rule  be  putt.'^^  By  this  constitution 
overseers  were  set  up,  with  power  to  correct  and  to 
call  meetings  of  the  craft.  The  town  assembly  con- 
firmed the  regulations  for  tailors  and  woollen  drapers 
jointly  in  1588.^'  In  1452  the  fullers'  cr.ift  was 
organised  on  similar  Unes,*"  further  regulations  being 
added  in  1464,  15 1 1  and  1585.'!  In  hke  manner, 
constitutions  or  regulations  were  made  for  the  cor- 
visers  and  cordwainers  in  1401  and  1452,*^  the  shoe- 
makers in  1552,**  the  glovers  in  1594;**  the  whit- 
tawyers  and  tanners  in  1566  and  1582;**  the  bakers  in 
1467,  1518,  1545  and  1553;^  the  butchers  in  1505,' 
1558,  and  1568;*'  the  fishmongers  in  1467  and 
1574;*^  the  innkeepers  in  1383,  1568  and  1570;** 
the  brewers  in  1545,'"  the  carpenters  in  1430;"- 
the  slaters  in  1509  ;''^  whilst  in  1562  the  ironmongers' 
constitution  was  cancelled.'^  All  these  regulations  are 
duly  enrolled  in  the  Liher  Custumarum  or,  after  1553, 
the  Assembly  Books.  In  1574  a  number  of  unorganised 
trades — mercers,  haberdashers,  linendrapers,  grocers, 
apothecaries,  upholsterers,  salters  and  tryers  of  honey 
and  wax — were  ordered  to  meet  at  St.  Katharine's 
Hall  in  the  last  week  of  October  and  choose  themselves 
wardens,  with  various  other  regulations  to  bring  them 
into  line  with  the  other  tradesmen.'*  In  all  these 
constitutions,  drafted  by  the  mayor  and  the  craftsmen 
jointly,  the  craftsmen  elect  their  own  wardens  or 
searchers,  who  are  sworn  in  before  the  mayor  at  the 
guildhall  on  the  court  day.'*  Regular  fees  are  pay- 
able to  the  town  chamber  and  fines  for  breaches  of 
the  regulations  are  divided  between  the  craft  and  the 
town.  Many  of  the  crafts  with  constitutions  used 
to  meet,  as  we  have  seen,  in  the  hall  over  the  great 
Conduit  in  the  m.irket  place.  The  fullers  and  slaters 
used  to  meet  at  the  Black  Friars'  House,'*  the  shear- 
men and  the  shoemakers  at  the  White  Friars."  After 
the  Dissolution  the  shoemakers  used  to  meet  in 
St.  George's  Hall.'* 

Some  indication  of  the  comparative  importance  of 
different  trades  in  the  town  is  given  by  the  lists  of 
town  bailiffs  between  1386  and  1461,"  in  which  in 
many  instances,  their  crafts  are  named.  Nineteen 
bailiffs  were  mercers,  eleven  drapers,  eight  dyers, 
six  fullers,  six  hosiers,  two  weavers,  and  two  woolmen. 
There  were  eight  bakers  and  six  fishmongers  ;  five 
glovers  and  five  ironmongers.  Other  evidence  sug- 
gests that  Northampton  continued  to  be  of  some 
importance  as  a  clothing  centre.  There  are  frequent 
references  to  the  fullers  and  their  tenters  in  the  Assem- 
bly Books  from  1550  to  1630.**  The  Privy  Council 
notes  in  1577  that  merchants  of  Norwich,  London  and 
Northampton  are  in  the  liabit  of  buying  and  selling 
wool  at  Northampton,  driving  up  the  price,  to  the 


••  Douce  MS.  (Bodl.  Lib.),  98,  fo.  162 
(d.  27). 

"  Hiitory  Teacbtri'  Miuellany,  v,  31. 

•'  E.g.  :  purchaic  of  a  ttall  (d.  3,  11), 
freeman'i  iharc  in  bargain!  (cl.  4),  forc- 
italling  and  regrating  (cl.  5,  7,  9,  16,  21), 
wcighli  and  mcaiurci  (cl.  6,  13),  tale  of 
woad  (cl.  31,  39). 

••  Cuitumal  cl.  27. 

••  BoTO.  Rec.  i,  356-8. 

»• Ibid.  268-72. 

••  Ibid.  272-4.  "  Ibid.  298-9. 


"  Ibid.  331. 

•'  Ibid.  265  J  cf.  278-82. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  295.  •»  Ibid,  i,  290-4. 

"  Ibid.  302,  332;   ii,  288. 

"  Ibid.  245,  294. 

•■  Ibid,  ii,  293. 

•'  Ibid.  2S9.  "  Ibid.  295-7. 

"Ibid,  i,  309,  333,  380;  ii,  278. 

"  Ibid.  334;  ii,  280. 

••  Ibid.  307  ;   ii,  286. 

"  Ibid.  249  ;   ii,  295-7. 

">  Ibid.  352. 

28 


"  Ibid.  237. 

"  Ibid.  329.  "  Ibid,  ii,  290. 

'*  Ibid.  276-8. 

"  The  oaths  of  the  w.irdcns  and  scarch- 
cri  of  the  crafts  arc  enrolled  in  the  Liber 
Ciistumaruni,  Uoro,  lice,  i,  394-397, 
including  one  for  the  chandlers,  whose 
constitution  is  not  enrolled. 

'•  Boto.  Rcc.  i,  291,  330. 

"  Ibid,  i,  356;   ii,  183. 

'•Ibid,  ii,  181-5. 

'•  Ibid.  556-8.  •«  Ibid.  217-8. 


BOROUGH   OF  NORTHAMPTON 


great  decay  of  clothing  in  the  shire.'*  The  enrolments 
of  apprentices  on  the  town  records  show  the  tailors 
as  the  most  popular  industry  in  the  i6th  and  early 
17th  centuries,  and  the  clothing  trades  running  the 
leather  trades  close  for  the  fust  place  in  the  town. 
There  is  a  marked  revival  in  weaving  in  the  second  half 
of  the  1 8th  century,  and  though  the  shoemaking 
trade  is  by  now  weU  ahead,  the  poll  books  of  the 
elections  of  1768,  1784  and  1790  show  a  large  number 
of  woolcombers  and  weavers.  '  A  century  ago,'  says 
James,  writing  in  1857,  '  the  woolstaplers  of  North- 
ampton were  the  local  magnates,  the  weavers  of  serges, 
tammies  and  shallons  more  numerous  than  the  shoe- 
makers of  the  present  day.'*^  In  1768  the  weavers 
seem  to  have  congregated  about  the  Mayorhold  and 
St.  Giles',  and  the  woolcombers  in  Bridge  Street  and 
the  south  quarter  in  general,  where  it  may  be  pre- 
sumed the  fullers  would  also  be  found,  from  the 
proximity  of  the  Cow  Meadow,  where  their  tenters 
stood  in  the  l6th  and  17th  centuries.'* 

The  apprenticeship  statistics  cannot  be  regarded  as 
exhaustive,  but  they  give  some  indication  of  the  pro- 
portion in  which  the  different  industries  were  pursued 
in  Northampton  in  the  17th  and  1 8th  centuries,  and 
of  the  extent  to  which  the  town  population  was 
recruited  from  the  country.**  Of  the  great  advance 
of  the  shoemaking  industry  in  this  period  an  account 
has  been  given  in  the  previous  volume.**  In  1619  the 
complaint  of  the  nuisances  caused  by  tanners,  glovers, 
whittawyers  and  parchment  makers  washing  their 
hides  in  the  river  and  the  watercourses  of  the  Cow 
Meadow**  suggests  that  the  leather  trade  was  active, 
but  the  glovers  were  still,  apparently,  as  important 
as  the  shoemakers.  By  1662,  however,  Fuller  could 
say  '  This  town  stands  on  other  men's  legs,'  *'  and 
in  1689  the  shoemakers  of  Northampton,  petitioning 
against  a  bill  for  the  free  transport  of  unwrought 
leather  overseas,  asserted,  '  A  very  considerable  part 
of  the  trade  of  this  town  has  consisted,  time  out  of 
mind,  in  the  manufacture  of  boots  and  shoes,  great 
quantities  of  which  have  been  sent  abroad.'  **  The 
colonial  and  military  demand  for  Northampton  boots 
and  shoes  is  thus  of  old  standing,  and  war,  from  164.2 
onwards,  has  been  a  marked  stimulant  to  the  industry. 
In  1794.  the  town  was  producing  from  10,000  to  12,000 
pairs  a  week,  as  against  7,000  to  8,000  in  time  of  peace,*' 
and  its  achievements  in  the  war  of  1914-18  were  in 
accordance  with  previous  traditions.  During  the 
four  years  of  the  war  Northampton  supplied  the 
Allied  forces  with  23  million  pairs,  Northamptonshire 
contributing  another  24  million,  as  against  23  million 


from  the  rest  of  the  country.'*'  These  included 
infantry  boots  for  the  French,  Serbian,  Italian, 
Roumanian  and  American  forces,  Russian  Cossack 
boots,  Canadian  knee  boots,  ski  boots,  rope-soled 
boots  for  the  Tank  corps,  submarine  deck  boots, 
Flying  corps  boots,  highland  shoes,  mosquito  boots, 
seamen's  shoes,  and  liospiial  slippers,  as  well  as  the 
standard  B.5.  British  infantry  boot.**-  When  the 
period  of  Army  requisitioning  ended,  however,  the 
Northants  Journal  of  Commerce  observed  that  the  army 
boot  was  a  far  heavier  product  than  Northampton 
manufacturers  and  Northampton  operatives  cared 
to  handle,  as  they  preferred  a  higher  grade  boot.*^ 

In  the  17th  and  l8th  centuries  Northampton  was 
noted  as  a  centre  for  the  purchase  of  horses.  Baskervill 
refers  to  the  horse  fairs  in  1673,**  and  Morton  in  1712 
says  that  Northampton  is  famed  for  the  best  horses 
in  England.**  The  Earl  of  Moray  writes  of  a  friend 
in  1683  :  '  He  is  busy  getting  horses  :  he  is  resolved 
to  have  them  good  or  not  at  all,  and  if  he  get  them 
not  here  (in  London)  he  will  go  down  to  Northampton, 
where  the  best  are.'  **  The  horse  fairs  were  still  well 
attended  in  1815.  They  are  now  held  in  the  cattle 
market  on  the  Saturday  nearest  to  June  24. 

The  mills  of  Northampton,  tliough  not  mentioned 
in  Domesday  Book,  have  a  long  history.  Conches 
melne  or  the  mill  of  Conge"  is  mentioned  before 
1 135,  and  its  tithe  was  granted  to  St.  Andrew's  Priory 
by  Grimbold.**  In  1274  there  were  two  mills  of  that 
name  ■}  in  1539,  if  we  may  identify  the  Quengions 
mills  of  the  Court  of  Augmentations  with  the 
Congenes  mill  of  1320,2  there  were  five,  two  being 
used  for  grinding  '  meselyn  corn,'  one  a  '  colyn  ' 
mill  for  grinding  wheat,  and  the  other  two  being 
fulling  mills.*  Marvells  mill  is  apparently  identical 
v/ith  the  Merewyns  mill  of  1253,*  the  Merthensmylne 
of  the  Hundred  Rolls*  and  the  Mervyns  mylne 
of  the  Valor  Ecclesiasticus.'  It  also  was  held  by  St. 
Andrew's,'  like  St.  Andrew's  mill  north-west  of  the 
town  and  RushmiU*  to  the  south-east.  A  postern  in 
the  town  wall  and  a  causeway  seven  feet  wide  led  to 
it.*  After  the  Dissolution  it  was  acquired  by  the 
town,  and  a  windmill  was  erected  alongside  of  the 
water  mills.*'  The  mills  having  been  leased  to  a 
succession  of  tenants,**  were  employed  about  1740  for 
a  new  venture  in  cotton-spinning,  financed  by  Edward 
Cave,  the  founder  and  editor  of  the  Gentleman's 
Magazine  and  one  of  the  original  patrons  of  the 
Northampton  infirmary.  The  carding  and  roller- 
spinning  machinery  invented  by  Lewis  Paul,*^  which 
anticipated  Cartwright's  inventions,  was  set  up  in 


"  Acts   of  the   Privy    Council    1577-8, 

PP-  2+-5- 

"  Quarterly  Rtvieu,  Jan.  1857,  p.  30. 

"  Boro.  Rcc.  ii,  217-8  ;  Speed's  Map  of 
1610. 

•*  Compare  evidence  of  regitters  of 
St.  Gilei,  in  R.  M.  Serjeantjon,  Hist, 
of  Cb.  of  St.  Giles,  Nortbampt.  p. 
210-11. 

•»  r.C.H.  Nmbants.  ii,  317  fF. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  217. 

"  Morton  in  1712  (p.  23)  and  Lytoni 
in  1724  fiii,  513),  confinn  Fuller's  account 
ef  the  importance  of  the  hosiery  trade, 
which  is  not  reflected  in  the  apprentice- 
ship sutistics. 

••  Hitl.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  xii,  app.  6, 
p.  115.  The  petition  is  signed  by  four- 
teen shoemakers. 


'»  J.  Donaldjon,  A  I'ievi  of  the  State  of 
Agriculture  of  the  County  of  Northampt. 

'"  W.  H.  Holloway,  Northampt.  and 
the  Gieat  IV ar,  p.  205. 

•'  rbid.  pp.  207-8. 

"  Northants.  Journal  of  Commerce,  May 
1919,  p.  8. 

•'  Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  vol.  51,  p.  290. 

"  Nat.  Hist,  of  Northants.  p.  23. 

•'  Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  vol.  100,  p.  164, 
cf.  vol.  117,  p.  550. 

••  History  of  Northampt.  (by  John  Cole). 
publ.  by  Birdsall,  Northampt.  1815,  p.  49. 

•'  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  C.  14. 

••  MS.  Vesp.  E.  xvii,  fo.  18. 

'  Rot.  Huni.  ii,  i. 

•  Assize  R.  635,  m.  63  d. 

"  L.  and  P.  Hen.  Fill,  vol  xv,  p.  563. 
Of  the  two  Quengions  Mills  one  was  a 

29 


fulling  mill  and  the  other  a  gygg  mill. 
(Inf.  from  Mr.  Beeby  Thompson.) 

'Assize  R.  61;,  m.  14.  A  Mervln 
was  grandfather  of  a  donor  to  St.  I^eonard's 
Hospital,  whose  gift  is  dated  1190-4  by 
R.  M.  Serjcantson.  Lefer  Hospitals  of 
Northampton,  p.  4. 
»  Rot.  Hund.  ii,  3. 

•  Dugdalc,  Mon.  v,  193. 

'  Rot.  Fin.  15  Edw.  ITT,  m.  23. 

•  Ibid.  ;  also  Assize  R.  1187,  m.  14  d. 

•  Rot.  Hund.  ii,  3  ;  Assize  R.  615,  m.  14. 
This  causeway  was  uncovered  in  1889,  in 
course   of  excavations  at  the  gas  works. 

"  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  291.  "  Ibid.  292. 

"  See  appendix  to  G.  J.  French, 
Life  of  Crompton,  which  shows  that  Wyatt 
was  not,  as  stated  in  the  previous 
volume,  the  inventor. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


them  under  the  management  of  T.  Wyatt,  as  described 
in  the  previous  volume/^  and  for  a  while  Marvell's 
Mills  were  known  as  the  Cotton  Mills.  The  venture 
failed,  for  lack  of  capital  as  much  as  of  good  manage- 
ment. The  Nuns'  mills  to  the  south-east  of  the  town 
were  held  by  Delapre  Abbey .1*  After  the  shoemaking 
and  leather  curr^nng  industry,  the  town  is  to-day  noted 
for  its  flour  mills,  as  well  as  its  makings  and  breweries. 
There  are  also  iron-foundries  of  some  importance. 

The  Northampton  Chamber  of  Commerce  was 
founded  in  1917,  and  its  organ,  The  Northants  Journal 
of  Commerce,  began  to  appear  in  January  1919, 
announcing  as  its  aim  '  to  extend  the  fame  of  our 
members'  productions  in  every  market  throughout  the 
world.'  ^ 

The  parts  of  the  town  that  have 
DESCRIPTION  been  longest  inhabited  are  round 
the  castle  site  and  the  churches 
of  St.  Peter  and  the  Holy  Sepulchre.  The  convergence 
of  streets  on  the  Mayorhold,^'  together  with  the  name 
Newland  and  the  reference  to  the  waste  open  space 
by  All  Saints'  Church  in  1235  suggest  that  the  oldest 
town  lay  entirely  to  the  west  of  the  road  from  London 
to  Leicester.  Dr.  Cox  beUeved  that  the  wall  built 
by  Simon  de  Senhs  I  (1090-1111)  ran  south  of  St. 
Andrew's  Priory  and  west  of  St.  Giles'  Church,  and 
that  the  tower  which  was  still  standing  not  far  from 
the  Derngate  in  Lee's  time  was  a  survival  from  the 
Norman  wall,  whilst  the  line  of  wall  shown  on  Speed's 
map  in  1610  is  assigned  by  him  to  about  1301.^' 
Grants  of  murage  were  made  to  the  town  in  1224,'* 
1251,1*  and  1301,2*'  the  last  on  so  large  a  scale  as  to 
suggest  rebuilding  rather  than  repairing.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  action  of  the  prior  of  St.  Andrew's  in 
1264^1  seems  to  prove  that  the  priory  was  then  inside 
the  town  wall.  Further  repairs  of  the  wall  were 
authorised  in  1378,^  1400,2^  and  1549.^  The  wall 
ran  north  and  east  of  the  town  ;  to  the  west  and  south 
the  river  and  the  castle  fortifications  formed  adequate 
defences.  The  hne  of  the  later  wall  and  ditch  is  still 
clearly  traceable  from  its  north-west  corner  on  the 
river,  along  the  south  side  of  St.  George's  Street 
(North  Gate),  Campbell  Street,  the  Upper  and  Lower 
Mounts  (East  Gale),  York  Road,  Cheyne  Walk  (Dcrn 
Gate),  Cattle  Market  Road  (South  Gate),  Weston 
Street,  across  the  gas  works  (Marvell's  mill  postcrn)^^ 
and  so  up  to  the  West  Gate  near  the  castle,  on  Black 
Lion  Hill.  There  was  also  a  postern  between  the  East 
Gate  and  the  Dern  Gate,  near  St.  Giles'  Churchyard,^* 
and  another  called  the  Cow  Gate,*'  leading  from  Cow 
Lane  (now  Swan  Street)  into  Cow  Meadow.  The 
four  main  gates  stood  where  the  Market  Harborough, 
Kettering,  London  and  Daventry  roads  entered  the 
town. 


The  gates,^  and  the  East  Gate  in  particular,^'  are 
mentioned  in  John's  reign.  Those  mentioned  by  Lee 
in  the  17th  century  appear  from  his  description  to 
have  been  built  in  the  14th  century,  the  East  Gate 
being  very  handsome  and  adorned  with  coats  of  arms  ; 
the  other  three  main  gates  being  then  used  as  tene- 
ments for  the  poor.^  Sir  Thomas  Tresham  describes 
the  guard  kept  at  the  South  Gate,  with  partisans  and 
halberds,  on  the  morning  of  Lady  Day  1603,  when  he 
came  to  the  town  with  the  news  of  Queen  Ehzabeth's 
death.^i  The  wall,  or  a  part  of  it,  between  the  East 
and  North  Gates,  is  described  in  an  inquisition  ad 
quod  damnum  of  1278.  It  was  then  crenellated  and 
much  used  for  walking  purposes,  by  sick  burgesses 
when  they  vrished  to  take  the  air,  by  all  who  wanted 
to  take  short  cuts  to  avoid  the  muddy  lane  below  in 
winter,  and  by  the  night  watchmen  who  spied  through 
the  battlements  upon  malefactors  as  they  came  in 
and  out  of  the  town.^^  The  sheriff  notes  that  the 
opposition  to  blocking  up  the  battlements  and  the 
wall-walk  was  so  strong  in  the  town  that  he  chose  the 
jury  from  outside  the  borough,  from  Billing,  Bough- 
ton,  Mouhon,  Weston  and  Overstone,  but  their  verdict 
was  as  emphatic  as  the  townsmen  could  wish,  and 
nothing  was  done.  The  walls,  which  had  been  al- 
lowed to  fall  into  a  bad  condition  in  the  i6th  century, 
were  repaired  by  the  strenuous  labours  of  the  towns- 
men in  1642-3  ;'*  and  they  were  destroyed  by  royal 
order  in  1662.**  A  drawing  in  the  British  Museum 
by  a  foreign  artist  shows  them  as  they  were  in  1650, 
when  there  was,  apparently,  no  wall  between  the  East 
Gate  and  Marvell's  Mill  postern.^  The  town  ditch, 
mentioned  in  the  inquests  of  1274-5^*  and  the  town 
terrier  of  1586,*'  survived  the  walls  for  a  good  while  ; 
part  of  it,  near  St.  Andrew's  Mills,  was  still  visible  in 
1849,^  whilst  the  section  north  of  the  Cow  Meadow 
had  only  recently  been  filled  in.^ 

If  the  earliest  centre  of  the  town  was  indeed,  as 
the  evidence  indicates,  the  Mayorhold,  it  was  probably 
the  building  of  the  castle**  which  caused  the  centre 
of  gravity  to  shift  eastwards.  From  the  13th  century 
the  modern  market  square  is  the  commercial  and 
civic  heart  of  the  town  ;  and  a  scries  of  deeds  dealing 
with  the  transfer  of  house  properly,  shops  and  stalls 
suggest  the  growth  of  a  thriving  eastern  quarter. 
Early  in  the  14th  century,  however,  complaints  are 
heard  of  the  '  decay  '  of  the  town.  The  petition  of 
1334  speaks  of  houses  fallen  to  the  ground,  and  rents 
thus  lost  ;**  an  ordinance  of  about  1 390-1400  pro- 
vides for  the  letting  out  by  the  mayor  and  chamber- 
lains of  certain  waste  places  from  which  no  returns 
or  profits  have  accrued  for  some  lime  past.**  In  1484 
Richard  III,  in  remitting  fifty  marks  of  the  fee  farm, 
accepts  the  mayor's  account  of  the  town  as  in  great 


'•  y.C./f.  Northanli.  ii,  334-5. 

"  Another  mill  wai  later  known  ai  the 
Clack  Mill,  and  later  (till  at  Mulliner'i 
Mill.    Norihanii.  Nat  Iliit  Sor.  xv,  247-9. 

*•  Nortbantt.  Journal  of  Commerce^  no.!. 

"  Kingiwell  Street  led  directly  from  the 
South  hridge  to  the  Mayorhold. 

"  Boro,  lite,  ii,  515,  and  lee  map  at  end, 
which,  however,  repreirnti  the  wall  at 
continued  along  the  river  between  St. 
Andrew'i  and  the  cattle. 

"  Pal.  R.  'I  Hen.  HI,  pi.  2,  m.  8. 

'•  Ibid.  36  lien.  Ill,  m.  11. 

••  Ibid.  29  F.dw.  I,  m.  6. 

■*  Sec  above,  p.  3. 

••  Pal.  a.  I  Ric.  II,  pt.  i.  m.  31. 


"  Ibid.  2  Hen.  IV,  pt.  i,  m.  40. 

**  Acts  of  Prhy  Council,  1547-50,  p. 
391.  For  later  repairs  ordered  by  the  town 
aitembly,  tee  Poro.  Rrc.  ii,  428  ff. 

"  Pol.  {fund,  ii,  3. 

"  I'otjibly  the  '  foUcrna  de  Lurlcborn' 
of  Rol.  Ilund.  ii,  3. 

"  Rol.  Ilund.  ii,  3. 

"  Mem.  Wall,  de  Cotentria  (RoUl  Ser.), 
ii,  219. 

"  Chart.  R.  2  John,  m.  4. 

"  I.ee,  Coll.  p.  91. 

"  //«/.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  vol.  103,  pp. 
117-123. 

'*  Inq.  a.q.d.  6  Edw.  I,  file  iv,  no.  21. 

"  See  above,  p.   12. 

30 


"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  112. 

"  Add.  MS.  11564  fo.  49.  It  is  possible 
th.Tt  this  part  of  the  town  defences  never 
had  more  than  a  ditch  ;  but  the  existence 
of  the  west  gate  and  the  south-west  postern 
seems  to  imply  a  wall  here. 

'*  Rol.  Ilund.  ii,  3. 

"'  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C. 
107  ;  Poro.  Rec.  ii,  155. 

"  ("1.  N.  Wetton,  Guidebook  10  Norlb- 
ampl.  and  tis  Vutnily  (1849),  p.  29. 

•»  Ibid.  p.  62. 

'"  R.  M.  Scrjeantion,  Hist,  of  the  Cb. 
of  Si.  (hies,  Norlhampt.  p.  15. 

••  Pari.  R.  ii,  85. 

*■  Boro.  Rec.  i,  251. 


^: 


i.^Cfnt-Jjy 


.o^vJ?"  ''■ 


■.■■a— n"T"'  ■ '»"'•>■  , 


'  ^mted  b^  FKi'pt^  frvnaOiu^tttif  ty 


*  utaimpan^  tiu  ^ojuiU^  <<j!^land~i*^L/ 


Plan  of  Xorthamhton  in  iSio 

[From  Jehn   Bnit^n,  **■  Beautiei  of  Engla'ui  and  tVala") 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


desolation  and  ruin,  half  of  it  almost  desolate  and 
destroyed.''*  Conditions  were  presumably  made 
worse  by  the  fire  of  1 516,  which,  according  to  Henry 
Lee,  consumed  the  greatest  part  of  the  town.**  In 
1533,  Leland  noted  that  all  the  old  houses  in  North- 
ampton were  built  of  stone,  but  the  now  houses  of 
wood.  In  1535  an  Act  of  Parliament  empowered  the 
mayor  and  burgesses,  in  view  of  the  great  ruin  and 
decay  of  the  town,  to  take  into  their  hands  any  houses 
which  the  tenants  and  landlords  both  failed  to 
repair,  and  rebuild  them  themselves.  If  the  mayor 
and  burgesses  failed  to  do  so,  anyone  who  pleased 
might  rebuild  the  houses  and  so  acquire  possession 
of  them  and  the  land  on  which  they  stood.^*"  Again, 
in  1622,  the  mayor,  in  sending  up  to  the  Privy  Council 
the  corporation's  contribution  to  the  fund  in  aid  of 
the  palatinate,  explained  that  the  decay  of  the  town 
prevented  the  general  contribution  from  being  good.** 
Some  of  these  complaints  may  be  common  form  ; 
but  the  maps  of  Northampton  before  the  fire  of  1675 
show  large  vacant  spaces  within  the  walls,  especially 
in  the  S.E.  quarter  of  the  town.*'  There  seems  no 
reason  to  doubt  that  houses  fell  into  ruin  and  were 
not  rebuilt,  and  that  the  open  spaces  shown  in  Noble 
and  Buthn's  map  of  1746  represent  some  of  the  '  ruin 
and  desolation  '  described  in  1484.  The  terrier  of 
1586  describes  a  large  number  of  closes  and  orchards 
within  the  walls,  and  Northampton  was  long  after 
that  date  noted  for  its  cherries. 

The  returns  of  1274-5  suggest  that  one  cause  of 
this  '  decay  '  may  have  been  the  exodus  of  burghers 
who  settled  outside  the  borough  boundaries  to  escape 
the  burden  of  tallages  and  the  like.  From  an  early 
date  there  are  references  to  houses  in  the  suburbs, 
outside  the  walls,**  though  the  Portsoken  of  the 
Il8g  charter  is  probably  a  clerical  error.  To  the 
north  and  east,  where  the  town  fields  extended  to  the 
parishes  of  Kingsthorpe,  Abington  and  Weston, 
there  were  houses  outside  the  North  Gate  along  the 
Market  Harborough  road  round  the  churches  of  St. 
Bartholomew  and  St.  Lawrence  ;*'  whilst  outside  the 
east  gate  St.  Edmund's  End  grew  up  round  St. 
Edmund's  church,*"  and  Gobion's  homestead  is 
described  as  l)Tng  in  the  suburb  in  John's  reign," 
though  it  rendered  an  annual  rent  to  the  preposiiuram 
vilU.^  South  of  the  town,  between  the  walls  and 
the  river,  grew  up  the  south  quarter,  still  containing 
many  waste  places  in  1430  which  the  mayor  and  cham- 
berlain leased  to  sixteen  different  tenants  in  that 
year.**     Here  later  was  the  important  house  of  the 


Fermors  or  Farmers.  Besides  these  suburbs,  within 
the  liberties  but  outside  the  wall,  there  were  from  a 
very  early  date  important  suburbs  outside  the 
liberties.  Round  the  abbey  of  St.  James,^  founded 
about  HOC  on  the  west  side  of  the  river,  grew  up  St. 
James'  End,  in  the  parishes  of  Duston  and  DalUngton. 
The  earliest  reference  to  the  name  that  has  been 
traced  is  in  1 358,**  but  a  13th  century  cartulary  of 
the  abbey  which  mentions  various  streets  by  name 
shows  that  it  was  then  of  considerable  extent.*' 
South  of  the  river,  in  Hardingstone  parish,  Cotton 
End"  or  St.  Leonard's  End,  grew  up  along  the  London 
road  round  St.  Leonard's  Hospital  and  chapel.**  In 
1618,  by  the  charter  of  James  I  to  the  town,  St.  James' 
End,  Cotton  End  and  West  Cotton  were  included 
within  the  liberties,  but  this  extension  seems  only  to 
ha\e  lasted  a  few  years,  and  these  suburbs  passed  back 
to  the  county  until  1901.** 

On  20  September,  1675,  a  fire  broke  out  in  St. 
l\'Iary's  Street,  near  the  castle,  which,  driven  by  a 
strong  west  wind  across  to  St.  Giles'  Street  and  Dern- 
gate,  destroyed  more  than  half  the  town  in  24  hours. 
Corn  ricks  and  makings  in  the  Horsemarket,  thatched 
roofs  and  wooden  houses  everywhere,  oil  and  tallow 
in  College  Lane  and  timber  stacked  in  the  market 
place  for  building  the  new  County  Sessions  House,  all 
fed  the  blaze.  The  15th  century  market  cross,  the 
great  part  of  All  Saints'  Church  with  the  town  records 
stored  in  it,  and  some  600  houses  were  destroyed. 
The  town  hall  escaped,  though  the  staircase  in  front 
of  it  was  burnt,  but  most  of  the  buildings  round  the 
market  square  perished.  Only  one  house  in  the 
Drapery  survived,  and  Dr.  Danvers'  house  on  Market 
Hill,  which,  like  the  Hesilrige  Mansion  in  Marefair, 
now  the  Ladies'  Club,  is  still  standing.*"  The  trades- 
men of  the  town  had  just  restocked  their  shops  at 
Stourbridge  Fair,  and  the  general  loss  of  property 
was  estimated  at  ^150,000.  In  this  emergency  both 
town  and  county  acted  with  promptitude.  The 
town  Recorder,  the  Earl  of  Northampton,  sent  in 
supplies  at  once  ;  a  meeting  at  the  town  hall  '  princi- 
pally managed  by  him,'  led  to  the  opening  of  a  sub- 
scription list  and  the  setting  up  of  a  committee  ;  and 
by  his  help  an  .^ct  was  got  through  Parhament  before 
the  close  of  the  session  for  the  rebuilding  of  the  town. 
By  this  Act*^  a  special  court  of  record  was  constituted 
to  sit  at  the  guildhall  and  determine  all  disputes 
between  neighbours,  landlords,  tenants  and  occupiers 
as  to  boundaries  and  titles,  with  power  to  alter  the 
lay-out  of  the  town  if  it  should  seem  necessary,  and 


«>  BoTo.  Rec.  i,  9S. 

«•  Lee,  CoU.  p.  93. 

"  Stat.  27  Heniy  VIII,  cap.  i. 

«•  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1619-23,  p.  397. 

*'  See  especially  the  map  of  1633  show- 
ing the  property  once  St.  .Andrew's,  a 
copy  of  which  is  in  the  Public  Library, 
Northampt. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Hen.  III.  172/17,  19,  22, 

"Anct  D.  (P.R.O.)  C.  5147- 

"Ibid.  B.  2473. 

"  Feet  of  F.  i  John,  no.  2. 

•»  Cat.  Inq.  ii,  78. 

••  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  Press  C.  48. 

"  V.C.H.  Nortbanu.  ii,  127-30. 

••  Cal.  Pal.  1358-61,  p.  36.  {In  suburbio 
it  Northampton  vocato  U  Siint  James- 
tni.) 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Brit.  Mus.  Tib.  E  v,  fo.  16 
(e.g.  Harper  Street,  St.  James'  Street). 


•'  Northampt.  Corp.  Deeds,  C.  iq,  28, 
show  burgesses  holding  land  in  Cotes 
and  Coten  Without. 

"  V.C.H.  Norlbanis.  ii,   159-60. 

"  For  charter  (original  at  Northampton) 
KcRoro.Rec.  i,  126-7.  Borough  constables 
were  appointed  for  Cotton  End  and  St. 
James'  End  in  1618  and  1619,  and  no 
later.  (Ibid,  ii,  140).  The  county  magis- 
trates had  jurisdiction  in  Cotton  End  in 
1630.  Quarter  Sessions  Records  of  Co.  of 
Northampt.  i,  9,  60.  For  St.  James'  End 
(1657)  see  p.  214.  No  explanation  of 
this  cancellation  of  the  grant  has  been 
found.  Possibly  it  is  to  be  associated  with 
the  disgrace  (1620-21)  of  Sir  Henry 
Yelverton,  Attorney-General  and  Re- 
corder of  the  town,  at  whose  instance 
James  says  the  charter  was  granted.  The 
chief  charge  against  'Velverton  was  that  he 
bad  inserted  clauses  in  the  charter  to  the 

31 


city  of  London  which  the  King  had  not 
authorised.  The  record  of  his  trial  before 
the  Star  Chamber  throws  no  light  on  the 
Northampton  charter  (Star  Chamber 
Proc.  J.  I.  Bdle.  30,  File  5).  I  owe  this 
reference  to  the  kindness  of  Miss  W.  Taff  s. 
It  should  also  be  noted  that  the  Privy 
Council  memorandum  of  new  clauses 
in  the  charter  granted  to  the  town 
of  Northampton  (Letters  and  Papers 
Domestic,  James  I,  vol.  civ,  no.  83) 
contains  no  reference  to  St.  James'  End 
or  Cotton.  It  is  possible  that  the 
fate  of  London's  attempt  to  increase 
her  liberties  surreptitiously  caused 
Northampton  to  drop  her  acquisitions 
quietly. 

"  There  arc  also  groined  arches  remain- 
ing in  the  cellars  of  some  houses  in  College 
Street. 

"  27  Chat.  IL 


flit. 


Plan   of   NoKTiiAMrroN   Castle 
[Riproiucti  by  permiiiion  of  the  execuion  oj  ibe  hie  Rev.  R.  M.  Sfrjeantion) 


BOROUGH   OF   NORTHAMPTON 


to  prescribe  rules  for  rebuilding  and  enforce  obedience 
to  them.  The  records  of  tliis  court  arc  preserved  at 
Northampton  and  form  a  substantial  volume.  'They 
extend  from  April  1676  to  October  1685,  and 
deal  with  79  cases."  Briefs  and  pamphlets'^  brouglit 
in  generous  contributions  from  all  over  Kngland, 
from  individuals,  beginning  with  the  King,  from 
towns  and  from  the  two  universities,  amountins; 
in  all  to  ^25,000,  and  the  subscription  list  drawn 
up  by  Henry  Lee  the  town  clerk  is  still  to  be 
seen  in  All  Saints'  Church.*'  No  great  alterations 
were  made  in  the  town  plan  ;  the  definite  recommen- 
dations of  the  Act  for  widening  the  approaches  to  the 
market  square,  the  narrowness  of  which  had  much 
increased  the  loss  of  property,  were  for  the  most  part 
not  followed,  though  .Ml  Saints'  Church  was  shortened 
by  the  length  of  its  nave  and  more  space  was  thus 
secured  in  the  south-west  corner.  Eighteenth  cen- 
tury taste  entirely  appro\ed  the  style  of  the  rebuilding: 
Northampton,  '  nobl)  re-edified  after  the  fire,  is  now 
universally  owned  to  be  one  of  the  neatest  towns  in 
the  kingdom,'**  but  it  was  admitted  that  the  town 
arose  '  though  much  more  beautiful,  less  spacious.'*" 
The  great  increase  in  the  size  of  the  town  began  in 
the  second  half  of  the  i8th  century.  The  population 
rose  from  5,136  in  174.6*'  to  7,020  in  1801,  15,351 
in  1831,  32,813  in  1861,  87,021  in  1901  and  90,923 
in  1921.  The  increase  between  1801  and  1831,  which 
is  well  above  the  average  increase  over  all  England, 
is  attributable  to  the  stimulus  given  to  the  boot  trade 
by  the  Napoleonic  wars.  The  number  of  houses 
increased  from  2,086  in  1821  to  3,239  in  1831.**  The 
main  growth  of  the  town  in  the  19th  and  20th  cen- 
turies has  been  to  the  north-east,  in  the  direction  of 
Kingsthorpe,  Kingsley  and  Abington.  There  has 
«lso  been  a  considerable  extension  to  the  west  and 
south,  and  a  recent  survey  of  the  town*'  with  a  view 
to  its  future  development  advocates  the  formation  of 
a  garden  city  suburb  on  the  rising  ground  south  of 
the  river,  round  the  site  of  Dclapre  Abbey.  The 
second  Reform  Act  added  parts  of  Dallington,  Duston, 
Hardingstone  and  Kingsthorpe  to  the  Parliamentary 
borough,  but  the  municipal  boundaries  remained 
unchanged  till  1901,  when  they  were  extended  so  as 
to  include  half  Kingsthorpe,  the  whole  of  St.  J.imes' 
End  and  Far  Cotton,  with  the  exception  of  some 
small  agricultural  areas,  and  a  large  part  of  Abington, 
the  area  of  the  borough  being  thus  enlarged  from 
131 1  to  3,392  acres.'" 

In  the  early  middle  ages  the  borough  was,  like 
Leicester,  divided  into  four  quarters,  named  after  the 
four  points  of  the  compass.  These  are  mentioned  in 
the  rolls  of  the  eyre  of  1253."    To  these  a  fifth,  the 


Chequer  Ward,  round  the  market  place,  was  added. 
Dr.  Cox  thought  about  1300.''^  These  five  wards, 
supplemented  for  a  few  years  by  those  of  St.  James 
and  Cotton  End'*  in  1618,  lasted  down  to  1835. 
Under  the  Municipal  Corporations  Act  of  that  year 
the  town  was  divided  into  three  wards  ;  the  South 
\\'ard,  south  of  Gold  Street,  St.  Giles'  Street  and 
Billing  Road;  the  East  Ward,  c.Tst  of  the  Drapery, 
Sheep  Street  and  the  Kingsthorpe  Road,  and  the 
West  Ward,  west  of  the  same  line.'*  Each  ward  was 
represented  by  six  councillors  on  the  borough  council. 
With  the  increase  in  the  population,  the  East  and  West 
Wards  outstripped  the  South  Ward,  originally  the 
most  populous,  and  in  1897  the  East  Ward  contained 
6,898  \oters,  the  West  2,325,  and  the  South  1,380. 
In  1898,  by  an  order  of  the  Local  Government  Board, 
the  town  was  divided  into  six  nearly  equal  wards  : 
the  Castle  Ward,  the  North  Ward,  St.  Crispin's, 
St.  Edmund's,  St.  Michael's  and  the  South  \^'ard. 
Further,  after  a  two  days'  inquiry  at  Northampton 
Town  Hall  at  the  beginning  of  1900,  the  Local 
Government  Board  approved  a  scheme  for  the 
enlargement  of  the  municipal  borough  which  was 
embodied  in  an  Act  passed  on  30  July,  1900.'^  This 
Act"  added  to  the  six  wards  formed  in  l8q8  tlie  three 
new  wards  of  Far  Cotton,  Kingsthorpe  and  St.  James, 
each,  like  the  six  old  wards,  returning  three  councillors 
and  one  alderman.  In  191 2,  under  the  Northampton 
Corporation  Act,"  the  borough  was  divided  into 
twelve  wards,  of  which  Castle  and  St.  James'  Wards 
were  unchanged  from  those  of  1 90 1.  The  name  of 
Far  Cotton  Ward  was  changed  to  Delapre  Ward. 
Part  of  St,  Edmund's  Ward  was  added  to  South 
Ward.  Three  new  wards  were  added  :  Kingsley, 
carved  partly  out  of  the  old  Kingsthorpe  and  St. 
Edmund's  Wards  ;  Abington,  out  of  the  old  St. 
Edmund's  and  St.  Michael's  Wards  ;  St.  Lawrence's, 
out  of  the  old  Kingsthorpe,  North  and  St.  Crispin's 
Wards.  These  twelve  wards  each  return  three 
councillors  and  one  alderman.'* 

Corresponding  changes  took  place  in  the  civil 
parishes  of  the  town  in  1902  as  a  result  of  the  enlarge- 
ment of  the  borough.  In  1909  the  four  civil  parishes 
of  All  Saints,  St.  Giles,  St.  Peter  and  St.  Sepulchre 
were  consolidated  and  formed  into  the  civil  parish 
of  Northampton."  In  1914  the  civil  parishes  of 
Kingsthorpe,  Duston  St.  James  and  the  parts  of 
Dallington  and  Abington  within  the  municipal 
boundary  were  added  to  the  civil  parish  of  Northamp- 


ton 


80 


The  CASTLE  OF  NORTHAMPTON,  hke  most 
royal  castles,  was  outside  the  borough  liberties.  Ori- 
ginally built  by  earl  Simon  I,  from  the  time  that  it 


"  Northampt.  Corp.  Book),  Press  \,  2a. 
Inrolmenti  of  decrees  of  Court  of  Judica- 
ture appointed  1675. 

"  The  State  of  Northampton  from  tbt 
beginning  0/ tbi  Fire  .  .  .  to  Nofember  ^  . . . 
ntKB  recommended  to  all  uiell-diipoted  persons 
in  order  to  Christian  charity  and  speedy 
relief  for  the  said  distressed  people,  hy  a 
Country  minister.  London,  1675,  Nov.  22. 
Reprinted  in  Hartshomc,  Mem.  of  North- 
ampt.  pp.  224-257.  Sad  and  LamentabU 
metes  from  Northampton,  1675.  The  ac- 
count given  above  is  based  upon  these  and 
Henry  Lee's  narratives. 

**  Printed  Bar's.  Rec.  ii,  250-1. 

"  Morton,  Natural  History  of  North- 
ants.    (1712),   p.    23.     See   also   Pennant, 


Jouyney  from  Chester  to  London  (1782),  p. 
307  :  '  Much  of  the  beauty  i)f  the  town  is 
due  to  the  fire  of  1675  ' ;  and  Baskcrvillc  : 
'  Phtrni-x  like  risen  out  of  her  ashes  in  a 
far  more  noble  and  beauteous  form.' 
Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  >;iii,  app.  2,  p 
2S9. 

"Notes  to  Noble  and  Butlin's  m.ip 
of  I74fi. 

"  Pari.  Papers,  1826-27,  vol.  iii,  p.  63. 

"Pari.  Papers,  1835,  vol.  xxv,  p. 
1965. 

'■■'  County  Borough  of  Northampt.  Prc- 
pcsult  for  Development  and  Reconstruction. 
Published  by  authority  of  the  County 
Borough  of  Northampt.  1925. 

'"  63  and  64  Vict.  c.  clxxxiii. 

33 


"  .\ssize  R.  615,  m.  14. 

''-  lioro.  Rec.  ii,  517. 

"  Ibid.  II,  140.' 

"  Xorthamp.  Corp.  Rec.  Misc   Docts. 

45/>- 

'*  Northampt.  Mercury,  9  November 
1900. 

"  L.  G.  B.  Provisional  Orders  Con- 
firmation (No.  14)  Act,  63  and  64  Vict, 
c.  dx.xxiil.  (Public  .Act  of  a  local  cha- 
racter.) 

"  I  and  2  Georgii  V,  c.  Ixiv  (Local 
Act). 

"  Information  from  Mr.  H.  Hankinson. 
Town  Clerk. 

'"  I .  G.  n.  Order,  No.  53404. 

"»  Ibid.  No.  P.  1623. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


became  the  king's"  it  served  the  purposes  of  royal 
residence  and  stronghold  and  county  government  office 
and  prison.  The  jurors  of  1274-5  ^^'^  that  it 'belonged 
to  the  county,'*^  and  an  inquest  of  1 329  found  that 
its  constableship  was  by  old  custom  appurtenant  to 
the  county  and  jurisdiction  of  the  sheriff.*^  The  uses 
to  which  the  castle  was  put  are  illustrated  by  the  fact 
that  this  inquest  was  held  in  the  castle  hall  which  the 
sheriff  had  been  commanded  to  be  prepared  for  the 
sessions  of  the  justices  in  eyre,  who  sat  from  November 
1329  to  May  1330,**  the  mayor  having  been  ordered 
to  oversee  these  preparations.**  In  the  same  eyre  the 
mayor  protested  on  behalf  of  the  town  against  the 
burgesses  being  forced  to  plead  outside  the  liberties, 
but  was  unable  to  obtain  a  special  sessions  for  the 
borough  like  that  of  1285.^  The  castle  was  still 
outside  the  jurisdiction  of  the  borough  in  1655.  A 
Duston  Utigant  in  that  year  writes,  '  I  deUvered  writs 
to  the  undersheriff  to  arrest  G.  and  the  rest.  ...  He 
said  Northampton  was  a  pri\-ileged  place  and  he 
durst  not  serve  them.  They  durst  not  come  down 
to  the  castle  at  Easter  sessions  last,  for  they  had 
been  out  of  their  liberty  and  had  been  arrested.'*' 
When  the  castle  was  dismantled  in  1662,  Charles  II 
directed  that  as  much  should  remain  as  was  necessary 
for  the  shelter  of  the  justices  of  the  Bench,**  and 
Henry  Lee  could  remember  the  judge  of  Nisi  Prius 
sitting  at  the  castle  with  his  back  against  the  west  wall 
of  the  Chapel  of  St.  George.**  The  county  magis- 
trates sat  there  for  quarter  sessions  down  to  the 
Epiphany  term,  1671,'**  after  which  they  sat  in  the 
town,  presumably  in  the  temporary  building  erected 
for  the  use  of  the  Judges  on  Assize.*t  From  1670  to 
1675  the  town  and  county  authorities  were  wrangling 
as  to  whether  the  new  sessions  house  should  be  built 
in  the  town  or  on  the  castle  site.*^  .4ftcr  the  fire, 
however,  it  was  mutually  agreed  that  the  county 
sessions  house  should  be  built  in  the  town  '  as  an 
encouragement  to  rebuilding,''*  and  the  castle  ruins 
ceased  to  have  any  connection  with  the  government  of 
the  county. 

The  greater  part  of  the  site  of  the  castle  was  levelled 
in  1880  for  the  erection  of  the  London  and  North- 
Western  Railway  Company's  station  and  goods  shed, 
and  the  records  of  what  formerly  existed  are  so  frag- 
mentary tliat  it  is  difficult  to  reconstruct  the  original 
form  of  the  castle.  It  seems  to  have  been  of  the  '  motte ' 
and  bailey  type,  common  to  the  more  important  castles 
of  the  time.**  The  '  motte,'  upon  which  stood  the 
keep,  surrounded  by  a  moat,  was  apparently  on  the 
north-east  side  of  the  bailey  where  a  flat-topped 
conical  mound  called  Castle  Hill  was  still  a  play- 
ground for  children  in  the  middle  of  the  19th  century. 
This  mound,  under  which  a  skeleton  was  found  in 


1827,*^  was  approximately  bounded  by  Chalk  Lane, 
Castle  Street,  Phoenix  Street  and  Castle  Hill.  The 
bailey,  which  was  fortified  by  a  rampart  and  ditch, 
was  roughly  circular  in  shape  and  covered  about  3J 
acres.  It  is  now  traversed  by  St.  Andrew's  Road,  and 
a  little  to  the  east  of  the  point  where  this  road  would 
cross  the  southern  part  of  the  moat  was  the  southern 
entrance  to  the  bailey,  and  at  the  spot  where  it 
would  cross  the  northern  part  of  the  moat  was  the 
northern  or  principal  entrance.  The  jamb  of  the 
gateway  here  was  discovered  in  1883.  Outside  this 
entrance  were  some  earthworks,  which  it  is  thought 
covered  the  approach  to  the  gate  ;  they  may,  however, 
have  been  thrown  up  for  siege  purposes.  The  position 
of  the  curtain  wall  of  the  bailey  is  known  on  the  south 
and  west  sides,  and  photographs  exist  of  the  wall  and 
of  a  bastion  on  the  south  side.  On  the  west  side  of 
St.  Andrew's  Road  remains  of  buildings  have  been 
from  time  to  time  discovered  together  with  four 
wells,  and  remains  of  the  moat  still  exist  at  the  north- 
east of  the  bailey  in  the  garden  of  St  Peter's  Rectory, 
off  Fitzroy  Street.**  Building  accounts  of  the  12th 
century  refer  to  repairs  to  the  tower  or  keep  {turrtj) 
as  well  as  to  houses  in  the  castle  {castellum)P  The 
survey  of  1323,  moreover,  refers  to  'an  old  tower 
called  Fawkestour,'  wliich  seems  to  have  been  at  that 
date  outside  the  curtain  wall.**  It  does  not  appear  to 
have  formed  part  of  the  later  fortifications,  being 
ignored  in  Speed's  map,  and  in  the  military  drawing 
of  1650,**  but  it  is  shown  in  the  plan  in  the  Gt'ntleman's 
Magazine  for  1800,*  which  is  of  value  as  giving  a  cross- 
section  from  north  to  south  of  the  bailey  and  the 
triple  rampart  guarding  the  northern  entrance.  It 
was  finally  levelled  between  1827  and  1832,  the  earth 
from  it  being  used  to  fill  in  the  moat.* 

The  first  Norman  buildings  may  well  have  been  of 
wood,  since  it  would  take  time  for  the  earthworks  to 
become  settled.  Fxcavations  in  1863  revealed,  amongst 
later  remains,  a  Norman  chamber  with  a  groined  roof 
and  a  central  column,  which  may  have  belonged  to 
the  castle  of  the  time  of  Henry  II.'  The  accounts 
of  Becket's  interviews  with  the  King  in  1164  mention 
a  castle  gateway,  through  which  the  archbishop 
rode  ;  a  hall ;  an  inner  chamber  ;  an  upper  chamber 
where  the  King  received  the  bishops  wlio  tried  to 
mediate  between  Becket  and  himself  ;  and  a  chapel.* 
From  the  time  of  Henry  II  onwards  there  are  constant 
references  on  the  Pipe  Rolls,  Close  Rolls  and  Liberate 
Rolls  to  constructions  and  repairs  at  Northampton 
Castle.*  The  masonry  uncovered  in  1863  belonged 
mainly  to  the  13th  and  14th  centuries,  and  the 
records  indicate  the  greatest  building  activity  under 
Henry  III, with  extensive  repairs  under  Eduird  Hand 
Fdward  III.     There  is  specific  reference  to  the  King's 


•' Before  1130  ;   ice  Pipe  R.  31  Hen.  I. 

''  Rot.  llund.  ii,  I  :  periinct  comiiatui. 

•'  Fine  R.  3  Ed.  Ill,  m.  4. 

••  Cloic  R.  3  Ed.  Ill,  m.  9  ;  4  Ed.  Ill, 
m.  3zd. 

"  Cat.  Pal.  1327-30,  p.  441. 

'•  See  above,  p.  10,  .ind  hclow,  p.  36. 

•'  Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  zii,  app.  3, 
p.  344. 

••  S.  P.  Dom.  Charlei  II,  Entry  Book  I, 
fo.  62.  "  I-ee,  Coll.  p.  98. 

••  See  Record!  of  Quarter  Se«iioni, 
•  t  County  Hall,  Northampt.  I  owe  thl» 
iolormation  to  the  tcindneit  of  Mill  Joan 
Walw. 


'"  Boro.  Rrc.  ii,  148.  Note  .ilso  Henry 
I.ee'i  itatement,  that  in  1670  the  sessions 
houie  was  removed  from  the  caitle  to  the 
Market  Croii  (Lee,  Coll.  p.  118). 

"  R.  M.  Serjeantion,  The  Casile  0 
Norihampl.  reprinted  from  Xorlhnnls.  A'a/. 
Hill.  Soc.  and  Field  Cl:th,  xiv,  pp.  49-52. 

••  Ibid.  p.  53. 

•*  Thii  account  it  baled  on  Asioe.  Arch. 
Soc.  Repls.  XV,  ii,  198-209;  xvi,  63-70, 
243  251,  and  notei  by  Dr.  Cyril  Fox, 
National  Muieum  of  \Valei. 

"  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rcpii.  xv,  2o8. 

••  Ibid.  XV,  205  ;  xvi,  247. 

"  Pipe  R.  20,  23,  28.  29  lien.  H.  Theic 

34 


have  been  interpreted  .t»  referring  to  the 
tower  in  I.atinier'l  Croft,  ncir  Derngato. 
If  thl«  tower  was  a  part  of  the  town  wall 
there  seems  no  reason  for  its  appearance  in 
the  iherifj'i  accounts,  and  nothing  in  iti 
later  history  supports  this  identification. 

•'  Chan.  Misc.  Inq.  16  Edw.  II,  80/15. 

"•Add.  MS.  11564;  reproduced  in 
Serjeantson,   Caiile  of  Norihampl.   p. 

'  Gem.  Ma^.  Ixx,  929. 

•  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rrpis.  xv,  208, 

•  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  p.  55. 

•  Gent.  Ma^.  i860,  part  i,  385-8. 
•Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  pp.    9,   11, 

21. 


»3- 


"> 


XoRTH-WrpTON    CaSTi.F.    W'aLI.    (nOW    DEMOLISHED) 


NoRTHANtl'TON  :    TlIK    OlD    ToUN     HaLL 
(^VflW   an    Old  Dra'wing) 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


great  chamber  in  the  castle  in  1235,'  the  King's 
chapel  in  1 244,'  the  building  of  the  Queen's  chapel 
in  1247,*  fitted  with  glass  wndows  in  1 248,'  the 
King's  wardrobe,  the  great  hall  and  the  chaplain's 
room  in  1249,**  the  wall  of  the  castle  and  the  bailey 
next  the  river  in  1251,^  further  alterations  to  the 
chapel  in  the  tower,  and  stained  glass  windows  in 
the  hall  in  1252  and  1253.**  A  survey  of  1253  refers 
to  repairs  already  carried  out  on  the  great  wall,  but 
says  that  it  needs  further  repairs.*'  In  1318  the  great 
hall,  the  lower  chapel  and  two  otiier  larger  chambers 
were  destroyed  by  fire.  The  sur\ey  of  the  castle 
in  1323,  which  reports  this,  mentions  the  '  new  tower,' 
six  small  towers  in  the  circuit  of  the  castle  wall, 
two  stables,  a  new  gate,  two  old  gates,  an  old  bar- 
bican, the  miinullum  of  the  castle,  the  hall  court,  the 
castle  court  and  the  g,\rdcn.  The  repairs  said  to  be 
necessary  are  estimated  at  7^1,097  6s.  8(f.'*  It  does 
not  seem  probable  that  they  were  ever  carried  out  ; 
but  the  great  hall,  as  we  have  seen,  was  made  fit  for 
the  holding  of  the  eyre  of  1329-30,  and  the  castle 
continued  to  be  used  both  for  royal  and  shrieval 
purposes.  During  the  parliament  of  1380,  however, 
the  king  stayed  at  Moulton,  and  not  at  the  castle,'* 
and  St.  Andrew's  Priory  was  used  for  the  sessions.'* 
Repairs  mentioned  in  1347"  and  1387'*  suggest 
that  the  castle  was  being  used  mainly  as  a  county 
gaol  and  sheriff's  office — a  checker  house  and  a  checker 
board  are  named.  When  Leland  saw  the  castle  it  still 
had  a  large  gate,"  but  in  1593  Norden  described  it  as 
ruinous.  It  was  probably  repaired  for  the  use  of  the 
Parliamentary  garrison,  and  the  drawing  of  1650 
shows  a  wall  round  both  the  inner  and  the  outer 
bailey,  and  four  turrets  in  the  wall  of  the  inner  bailey. 
Soon  after  the  castle  ceased,  about  1671,  to  be  used  as 
gaol  and  sessions  house,  the  site  which  had  been  ori- 
ginally sold  by  the  crown  in  1629*"  was  resold  to 
Robert  Hesilrige,  who  acquired  the  adjoining  strips 
of  land  from  the  borough  in  1680."  A  survey  of  the 
property  in  1743  shows  that  the  outer  bailey  was  then 
known  as  the  old  orchard,  and  the  inner  bailey  as  the 
young  orchard,  both  being  well  planted  with  fruit 
trees  ;  the  moat  was  called  the  upper  and  nether 
roundabout ;  the  northern  rampart,  called  the  Fort 
in  1680,  was  known  as  the  Castle  Ground,  and  the 
whole,  including  the  Castle  holme,  came  to  18  acres. 
No  traces  existed,  apparently  of  the  wall  of  the  outer 
bailey.  The  castle  ground  was  built  over  between  1863 
and  1880  ;  in  1 859  a  small  railway  station  was  built 
on  part  of  the  old  orchard,  and  in  1876,  for  the  purpose 
of  building  the  present  Castle  Station  and  goods 
yard,  the  rest  of  the  site  was  bought  by  the  London  and 
North-Western  Railway  Company,  and  the  remains 
of  the  masonry,  including  a  circular  bastion  on  tlie 
south,  and  a  sohd  fragment  of  the  wall  on  the  river 


side,  Norman  at  the  core,  reinforced  with  Edwardian 
facing  and  buttresses,  were  destroyed.  The  course  of 
the  Nene  was  diverted,  the  greater  part  of  the  earth- 
works levelled,  and  a  new  road  cut  across  the  levelled 
castle  site  joining  Black  Lion  Hill  to  St.  Andrew's 
Road.  A  postern  from  the  wall  above  the  river  was 
re-erected  in  the  southern  boundary  wall  of  the  goods 
station,  and  this  is  all  that  now  remains  of  the  castle 
buildings.^ 

Whilst  prisoners  were  still  kept  at  the  castle  in 
1655,^'  as  early  as  1630  **  a  house  of  correction  for  the 
county  had  been  set  up  in  the  town,  under  the  control 
(if  the  county  justices.  This  was  in  or  near  the  old 
Dell  Inn,^  across  the  road  from  the  south-east  corner 
of  All  Saints'  Churchyard,  and  it  served  as  a  county 
gaol,  supplementary  to  that  in  the  castle.  Here  pro- 
b.ibly  the  Quakers  were  confined,  between  1655  and 
1664**,  who  issued  various  tracts  from  their  prison, 
and  died,  several  of  them,  of  their  hard  usage."  It 
was  formally  conveyed  to  the  use  of  the  county  in 
1670,  as  a  gaol  and  bridewell.^^  The  buildings  were 
destroyed  by  the  fire  of  1675,  and  on  the  same  site, 
as  it  seems,  the  present  County  Hall  was  erected 
between  1676  and  1678  from  the  designs  of  Sir 
Roger  Norwich,  by  H.  G.  Jones,  who  rebuilt  All 
Saints'  Church.*'  The  County  House  of  Correction 
was  at  the  same  time  rebuilt  behind  the  Sessions 
House,  and  a  house  built  by  Sir  William  Haselwood 
on  a  piece  of  land  to  the  west  was  used  as  a  gaol 
and  bought  by  the  county  in  1691.*'  Then,  and  for 
many  years  later,  the  county  gaol  looked  south  across 
Angel  Street  to  the  open  country  with  no  houses 
intetyfening.  In  1777,  when  Howard  visited  it,  some 
new  cells  had  been  built,  but  there  was  still  an  under- 
ground dungeon  like  that  in  which  the  Quakers  had 
suffered.'*  In  1792-4  a  new  gaol  and  bridewell  were 
erected  to  the  south  of  the  County  Hall,  and  the  old 
gaol  was  made  into  the  turnkey's  house.  The  new 
gaol  was  built  so  as  to  conform  with  Howard's  recom- 
mendations and  held  120  prisoners.  This  in  its 
turn  was  found  inadequate  by  rising  standards,  and  an 
addition  to  the  gaol  was  built  to  the  east  and  south  of 
the  old  site  in  1846  by  J.  iMilne.^  This  latest  gaol, 
built  for  140  prisoners,  served  the  county  till  1889, 
\\hen,  all  prisons  having  been  vested  in  the  Secretary 
of  State  by  the  Act  of  1877,^  it  ceased  to  be  used, 
and  the  former  borough  g.iol  became  the  only  prison 
in  the  town.  The  old  county  gaol  wa's  sold  to  Mr. 
J.  Watkins  in  1880,  who  sold  the  portion  now  used 
as  the  museum  and  art  gallery  to  the  Town  Council. 
The  remainder  of  the  property  was  bought  by  the 
Salvation  Army  in  1889  and  purchased  from  them  by 
the  County  Council  in  1914.  The  Salvation  Army 
remained  in  occupation  as  tenants  till  early  in  1928. 
The  building  is  new  being  reconstructed  to  serve  as 


'Cal.  Close  1234-7,  p.  138. 
'  Ibid.  1242-7,  p.  195. 

•  Ibid.  p.  522. 

•  Liberate  R.  33  Hen.  Ill,  in.  II. 
'•  Liberate  R.  33  Hen.  Ill,  m.  3. 
"  Cal.  Close,  1247-51,  p.  510. 

'•  Liberate  R.  36  Hen.  Ill,  m.  15  ;  37 
Hen.  Ill,  m.  1 1. 

'•  Printed  in  full,  Hartshome,  ^^em.  of 
NoTibamfl.,  pp.  136-7. 

"  Chan.  Misc.  Inq.  16  Edw.  II,  89/15. 

"  Hartihome,  Mem.of  NorlbampI,  164. 

"  Part.  R.  iii,  89-90. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1346-9,  p.  196. 


>'  Enrolled  Accounts  (Foreign),  13  Ric. 
II,  Roll  E,  m.  38  d. 

"  llinerary,  i,  9. 

'"  Scr']cinUon,Castle  oj Norlbampt.  p.  45. 

"  NorthampuCorp.  Deeds,  Press  C.  109. 

"  Photographs  of  the  remains  before 
demolition  are  preserved  in  Northampt. 
Public  Library,  and  several  are  reproduced 
in  Scrieantson,  Castle  of  Northampt. 

"  Quarter  Sessions  Records  {NortbanU. 
Rec.  See),  vol.  i,  194. 

"Ibid.  p.  55. 

='  C.  A.  Markham,  Hist,  of  the  County 
Buildings  of  Nortbampt.  (1885),  pp.  5-8. 

35 


"  Ibid.  pp.  3-4. 

"  Ibid.  pp.  53-5.  List  of  Tracts 
written  in  Northampton  gaol.  See  also 
Quarter  Sessions  Records,  i,  191  ;  Brief 
.■hiount  of  the  Sufferings  of  the  People  called 
Quakers. 

*'  See  Quarter  Sessions  Files — Acts  of 
Court.  Epiphany,  21  Charles  II. 

•'Markham,  op.  cit.  p.  42. 

"Ibid.  p.  II. 

"  Howard,  State  of  the  Prisons  in  Eng- 
land and  If  ahs,  1777. 

"Marliham,  op.  cit.  pp.  ic-24. 

"40  and  41  Vict.  c.  21. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


additional  offices  for  the  County  Council  and  a  record 
room  and  students'  room  for  the  Northamptonshire 
Record  Society.^^^ 

The  prison  of  the  vill  of  Northampton,  as  distinct 
from  the  prison  in  the  castle,  is  mentioned  in  1253** 
when  the  keeper  of  the  prison  is  named.  From  an 
incident  narrated  by  the  jurors  of  1274-5  ^  ''^  appears 
that  the  baihffs  kept  the  key  of  the  prison,  and  that 
any  person  who  had  a  thief  to  imprison  could  apply 
to  them  for  it.  There  is  no  means  of  locating  the 
town  gaol  til!  the  i6th  century  ;   then  it  is  mentioned 


in  Northampton  after  the  closing  of  the  county  g.Jol 
in  1889,  was  also  closed  in  1922,  and  Bedford  prison 
now  serves  Northampton  for  male  prisoners  and  Bir- 
mingham for  female. 

The  earliest  mention  of  the  Town  Hall  is  found  in 
1285,  when  the  justices  in  eyre  held  their  session  for 
the  borough  '  in  the  common  hall '  (in  communi  aula).*^ 
The  Guildhall  or  '  Gihalda,'  is  mentioned  in  the 
charter  of  Richard  II  of  1385,*-  as  the  place  where 
the  mayor  and  baiUflfs  hold  their  pleas,  and  in  1387*' 
as  the  place  where  the  court  of  husting  sat.    Henry 


■Mm 


!«I"M„|,^, 


»lll||(/|Jl,..  .,. 


Northampton  :  The  County  Hall 


as  adjoining  the  town  hall,  in  Abington  Street,  and 
from  1584  some  cf  the  rooms  under  the  town  hall 
were  used  as  prisons  for  some  200  years."  In  1 777, 
owing,  it  may  be,  to  Howard's  visit,  complaint  was 
made  that  the  town  gaols  were  close  and  unfit  fur 
the  reception  of  prisoners,^  and  a  levy  upon  the  town 
was  ordered  for  the  necessary  repairs.^  About  1 800 
the  use  of  these  rooms  was  abandoned,  and  a  gaol 
was  built  by  the  town  on  a  site  in  Fish  Lane  given 
by  the  corporation,  and  subsequently  altered  in 
1823  and  1840.'*  This  gaol  was  superseded  in  1845 
by  the  new  town  gaol  on  the  Mounts,  built  by  Hull 
on  the  PentonviUc  model  and  capable  of  holding  80 
prisoners.^  The  gaol  in  Fish  Lane  became  a  police 
station.     The  gaol  on  the  Mounts,  the  only  prison 


Lee  says  that  the  old  Town  Hall  was  in  a  little  close, 
adjoining  the  last  house  on  the  right  hand  in  the 
lane  going  from  the  Mayorhold  to  tlie  Scarlet  well, 
and  he  had  seen  a  circular  mark  of  stonework  on  the 
west  end  of  the  adjoining  houses.""  The  second  Town 
Hall,  which  stood  at  the  south-cast  of  the  IMarket 
Square,  between  Abington  Street  and  Dickers  Lane, 
was  apparently  of  14th  century  origin.**  The  third 
story  may  have  been  added  in  the  I5t!i  century: 
possibly  when  the  assembly  began  to  be  held  here  after 
1489.  Tlie  basement  was  used  for  shops  in  the 
Tudor  period,  and  in  the  17th  and  l8th  centuries 
for  a  town  gaol.  The  assembly  books  and  the  accounts 
report  various  repairs  to  the  Town  Hall  in  the  17th 
and    1 8th   centuries.**      The   building   was   of   tiiree 


•••Inf.  from  Clerk  lo  the  Co.  Council. 

"  Anizs  R.  615,  III.  nd. 

"  Rol.  Ilund.  ii,  5. 

••  BoTC.  Ric.  ii,  175. 

"  Aiitmbly  Rook,  3  Feb.  1777. 


••  Ibid.  9  Feb.  177H. 

•'Hold.  Rer.  ii,  176;  Pari.  I'apen,  1833, 
vol.  niii,  p.  51. 

"  Ci.  N.  Wetton,  Guidebook  U  Norih- 
ampi.  and  its  ytctnity  (1849),  p.  47. 

36 


"  .\»si/c  R.  619.  111.  74. 
"  Roro.  Ree.  i,  367  (;iA/J  un/n). 
"  Ibid,  i,  160.      CyidrhMe  1432,  ibid.. 
I,  269.  •••  Lee,  Coll.  91. 

•'  lloro.  Rrc.  ii,  172.  •'  Ibid.  172-3. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


stories  with  battlemcnted  parapet,  the  hall  being  on 
the  first  floor,  and  the  ground  story  originally  open. 
Several  pointed  two-light  windows  on  the  first  floor 
long  survived,  though  latterly  in  a  more  or  less  muti- 
lated state,  but  the  upper  windows  were  square- 
headed.  The  door  and  the  outside  staircase  were 
burnt  in  1675,  but  the  rest  remained  until  1864, 
when,  on  the  building  of  the  new  Town  Hall  in  St. 
Giles  Street,  the  old  hall  and  its  site  were  sold  by 
auction  for  j^l,20O,  and  the  old  hall  destroyed.*' 
Some  oak  wainscot  from  the  council  chamber  and 
an  Elizabethan  table  with  bulbous  legs 
are  in  the  Abinglon  Museum. 

The  east  wing  of  the  present  Town 
Hall,  designed  by  E.  \V.  Godwin,  was 
built  in  1861-4;  the  west  wing,  added 
in  1889-92,  was  designed  by  A.  W.  Jeflrey 
and  M.  H.  Holding,  the  restorers  of 
Castle  Ashby.  The  public  library  was 
housed  here  with  the  museum,  until  1883; 
the  borough  records  are  now  preserved 
here. 

Of    the    few    surviving   houses  which 
escaped  the  fire  of  1675  the  most  notable 
is  No.  33  Marcfair,  known  as  the  Hazlc- 
rigg  Mansion,  since  1914  a  ladies'  club.'" 
It  is  a   stone-fronted   building  of   two 
main    stories,    and    attics    with    three 
rounded   dormer    gables    corbelled    out 
from  the  wall,  and  appears  to  date  from 
the  end  of  the   l6th  or   early   years  of 
the  17th  century.     It  was  purchased  by 
Robert  Hesilrige  in  1678,''*  and  continued      fl 
in   the   family   till   about    1835,''*   when 
it  was  bought   by  George    Baker,^   ilic 
historian  of  the    county,  who   with   his 
sister  resided  in  it  and  died  there.     The 
building   formerly   extended   farther    to 
the  east,  with  fi\e  gables  to  the  street, 
and    a    frontage    of   about    97  ft.,    now 
reduced  to  51  ft.  3  in.      It  has  a  square- 
headed  moulded  doorway,  and  mullioned 
windows  of  two  or  three  lights,  all  with- 
out transoms  or  hood   moulds.    There 
seems  originally  to  have  been  a  porch.'* 
The  interior  has  been  much  altered  and 
the   plan   modified.     None  of   the  old 
fireplaces  remains,  but  there  is  a  good  contemporary 
staircase  with  twisted  balusters  and  moulded  hand- 
rail.    In  one  of  the  bedrooms  arc  three  large  and 
two  smaller  pieces  of  tapestry.**  The  garden  extended 
from  St.  Peter's  Church  to  the  present  Freeschool 
Lane,  and  contained  a  summer  house.    The  building 
was  recently  restored. 

The  so-called  '  Welsh  House  '  or  '  Dr.  Danvers' 
House  '  from  Dr.  Daniel  Danvers  v,  I\o  lived  in  it  at 
the  end  of  the  17th  century  (No.  2  NewJand)  at  the 
north-east  corner  of  the  Market  Place,**  was  until 


recently  a  building  of  some  architectural  interest,  but 
the  ground  floor  was  first  converted  into  shops  and 
in  1924  the  three  lofty  dormers  of  the  attic  story, 
with  three-light  windows  and  curved  gables,  were 
taken  down.  Little  old  work  therefore  remains  except 
the  calling  and  mullioned  windows  of  the  first  floor, 
between  which  on  the  upper  part  of  the  waU  are  three 
shields  with  the  arms  of  Wake  of  Courteenhall  and 
Parker,  and  another  shield  which  has  been  attributed 
to  Danvers.**  There  is  also  a  shaped  device  with 
tall  finial,  formerly  surmounting  one  of  the  lower 


Mi 


'li  \mfm 


Northampton  :  The  Town  Hall 

windows,  on  which  are  the  initials  and  d.Ue  'W.E.P., 
1595,' and  the  motto  '  heb  .  dyw  .  heb  .  dym  .  dyw  . 
A  DicoN  '  (Without  God,  without  everytliing,  with 
God  enough).  Below  the  motto  is  a  large  shield 
with  the  arms  of  Parker  with  crescent  for  difference, 
flanked  by  two  smaller  unidentified  shields.**  The 
history  of  the  building  is  not  known,  but  judging  from 
the  initials  and  two  of  the  shields,  it  may  have  been 
the  residence  of  John  Parker,  Serjeant  at  law,  of 
Northampton,  and  built  by  one  of  the  family.**  It 
has  a  frontage  facing  west  of  60  ft.  and  a  depth  of 


••  Boro.  Rec.  ii,  17;. 

"  It  ii  alto  the  head>]uartcri  oi  the 
Northampton  and  Oakham  Arch,  and 
Archzol.  Soc.  It  i>  on  the  touth  tide  of 
the  street,  and  it  alio  known  at  Cromwell 
Houie  from  a  local  tradition  that  Crom- 
well ilept  there  the  night  before  the  battle 
of  N>teb)r. 

♦•  Serjeinttoo,  Hill,  of  Cb.  tj  Su  Ptur, 
Koribtmfl.  tji. 


"  Xoribaiiipt.  iV.  anil  O.  i,  57. 

'•  Ibid.  Before  purchase  by  Mr.  B.iker 
the  house  had  remained  so  long  empty 
and  shut  up  that  the  title  \nt  rumoured 
lost.  It  wat  stripped  of  much  of  itt  wains- 
cot and  ornament  at  this  time. 

•'  A  tquare  projection  it  ihown  on  a 
plan  of  1713  ;  ibid.  58. 

"  Noriiampi.  N.  and  Q.,  i,  59,  where 
they  are  detcribed. 

37 


"  It  was  the  only  house  on  the 
Market  PI.->-c  spared  by  the  fire  of 
1675. 

^*  Arch.  '^  urn.  xxxv,  436.  The  third 
sliiclJ  '  thr^c  bars  ermine'  is  not  that 
usually  attributed  to  Danvers. 

*•  A  chevron  between  three  roset,  and  a 
chevron  between  three  birds. 

'*  Sir  Henry  Drydcn  iii  Njrihdmpl. 
,V.  and  Q.  i,  1S5. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


37  ft.,  and  is  built  of  red  sandstone,  but  the  front 
was  stuccoed  and  painted.  Before  the  removal  of  the 
ground  floor  wall  there  was  a  pedimented  doorway, 
two  low  mullioned  windows,  and  a  modern  bay- 
window  at  one  end.  The  roof  was  covered  with  stone 
slates,  and  there  were  three  gables  at  the  back  corre- 
sponding with  those  in  front,  but  plainer.  Theinterior 
has  been  so  altered  that  the  original  arrangements 
are  lost. 

A  building  on  the  east  side  of  Sheep  Street,  the 
ground  floor  of  which  has  been  converted  into  six 
shops,"  was  originally  the  property  of  Lord  Halifax 
and  probably  liis  town  house,  but  it  is  best  known  as 
the  residence  of  Dr.  Doddridge  and  the  seat  of  his 


'""iffiAjau^oI^j^, 


'«*M=,^s«!i:_ 


Northampton  :    The  Hazlericg  Mansion,  now 
THE  Ladies*  Club 

Northampton  Academy  from  1740  to  1752.  It  is  a 
long  stone-fronted  early  1 8th  century  building  of 
three  stories,  the  upper  part  of  which  remains  un- 
changed, with  sash  windows  and  unbroken  eaved  roof. 
The  middle  story  is  divided  by  Ionic  pilasters  into  a 
series  of  bays,  as  was  also  the  ground  floor,  but  the 
top  story,  which  was  added  in  Doddridge's  time,''  is 
quite  plain.  There  was  originally  a  wide  central 
gateway,  two  arched  recesses  over  which  still  remain. 

The  County  Hall,  erected  at  the  close  of  the  17th 
century  in  the  Classic  Renaissance  style  of  the  day, 
is  a  simple  but  dignified  building  of  a  single  story, 
with  high-pitched  hipped  roof,  in  which  the  entabla- 
ture is  supported  by  pilasters  and  coupled  columns 
of  the  Composite  order  standing  on  a  high  base. 
The  main  front,  facing  north  to  George  Row,  is  a 
well-balanced  composition  with  a  balustrade  and 
curved  pediment  at  each  end  containing  the  Royal 
Arms.  The  great  hall  has  a  richly  ornamented 
plaster  ceiling,   completed  in    i688.''     The   County 


Council  Chamber,  erected  in  1 890,  and  a  Record  Room 
built  early  in  the  i8th  century  stand  behind  the  Hall. 

The  Judges'  Lodging,  a  plain  i8th  century  stone- 
fronted  house  adjoining  the  County  Hall  on  the  east, 
was  formerly  a  private  residence,  but  was  acquired  for 
its  present  purpose  in  1819. 

The  nucleus  of  the  Public  Library  was  the 
Northampton  Mechanics'  Institute,  set  up  in  1832 
in  George  Row.  Though  in  1849  it  was  described 
as  '  more  flourislung  than  most  in  the  kingdom  '  *" 
and  possessed  a  Ubrary  of  7,500  volumes,  by  1876  it 
was  in  financial  difficulties,  and  its  books  were  handed 
over  to  form  the  beginnings  of  the  Pubhc  Library. 
It  was  at  first  housed  in  the  Town  Hall ;  transferred 
in  1884,  vrith  the  museum,  to  the  old  county  gaol  in 
Guildhall  Road,  which  had  been  purchased  by  the 
town  and  reconstructed  for  the  purpose  ;  augmented 
in  1885  by  the  library  of  the  ReHgious  and  Useful 
Knowledge  Society  (founded  in  1839,  consisting  of 
some  5,000  volumes)  and  by  a  collection  of  Northamp- 
tonshire books,  purchased  by  public  subscription.  A 
new  wing  was  added  in  1889.  In  1901  the  open 
access  system  was  introduced  ;  and  in  June  1910  the 
present  buildings  in  Abington  Street  were  opened. 
A  juvenile  library  and  reading  room  were  added  in 
191 2,  and  in  1921  a  special  local  room,  containing 
some  16,000  items  dealing  with  the  town  and  county, 
including  books,  pamphlets,  prints,  drawings,  maps, 
plans,  posters,  playbills,  photographs,  manuscripts 
and  transcripts.  The  Photographic  Survey  of  the 
district  is  kept  here.  The  library  possesses  a  com- 
plete file  of  the  Northampton  Mercury,  going  back  to 
May  1720." 

The  Museum,  in  Guildhall  Road,  on  the  site  of  the 
county  gaol,  contains  the  remains  from  Northampton 
Castle,  from  Hunsbury,  from  Duston,  from  Towcester 
and  Irchester,  various  Anglo-Saxon  antiquities,  and  a 
collection  of  boots  and  shoes  and  other  leather  articles. 
There  is  also  a  small  art  gallery. 

Another  museum  is  at  Abington  Hall,  which  was 
presented  to  the  town  by  Lady  Wantage  in  1894; 
most  of  the  Natural  History  specimens  are  preserved 
here,  and  there  are  also  local  engravings  and  portraits 
of  local  worthies. 

The  first  proposal  for  a  county  infirmary*^  was  put 
forward  by  Dr.  John  Rushworth,  son  of  a  vicar  of 
St.  Sepulchre's,  who  practised  as  a  surgeon  in  North- 
ampton for  many  years.  In  a  pampidet  addressed  to 
the  Surgeons'  Company  in  1731  he  urged  the  desira- 
bility of  Parliament's  assisting  in  the  erection  of  an 
infirmary  in  the  centre  of  every  county.  He  followed 
this  up  by  an  advertisement  in  the  London  Gazette, 
offering  to  give  j^5o  towards  the  building  of  such  an 
infirmary  in  his  own  county,  and  suggesting  the 
calling  of  a  meeting  to  discuss  it,  at  Quarter  Sessions 
or  some  other  time.**  Nothing,  however,  came  of  his 
suggestion  till  after  his  death.**  In  1743  Dr.  James 
Stonhouse,  then  aged  27,  came  to  the  town  to  practise, 
and  within  two  months  had  circulated  papers  entitled 
'  Considerations     offered    to    the    Nobility,    Gentry, 


"  Numbered  |8  to  24. 

"  Arnold  and  Cooper,  lliii.  0]  Ch,  0, 
OodJriJge,  8-). 

"  The  ceiling,  which  ».ii  the  woik  of 
F.dNvard  Cfoudge,  16H4-88,  was  cut  in  two 
in  1812  when  the  Crimin;il  Court  wat 
lalien  out  ol  the  hall. 


"  Wctton,  Guidi  10  Notlbampl.  aii.l  ihe 
Vtctntiy^  p.  65. 

"  lltuilratrd  Guide  to  Northampl.  I'ublic 
Library,  iiiucd  by  Northainpt.  I'ublic 
Library  Coinrniltcc  (1926). 

"'The  following  account  is  based  on 
th.it  by  C.  A.  Mjrltham  in  Xoriham/il.  N. 
and  Q.  New  Scriei.  Vol.  II. 

38 


•'  Northampt.  Mrrcurv,  20  December 
1731. 

•*  He  died  in  1736;  in  1747  bit  ion 
Daniel  writcj  from  the  County  Hospital 
to  solicit  Lord  Townihcnd'i  lupport  for 
the  (clicmc.  l/tst.  MSS,  Com.  Rep.  xi,  app. 
iv,  p.  368. 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


&^%% 
'-.-*^ 


Clergy  and  all  who  have  any  property  in  the  County, 
with  regard  to  the  establishment  of  a  County  Hospital 
in  Northampton.'  The  subject  was  brought  up 
before  the  Grand  Jury  at  the  Assizes  on  21  July,  and 
the  design  being  approved,  a  subscription  was  started 
on  the  spot.  The  project  was  warmly  supported  both 
by  the  county,  the  corporation,  and  the  influential 
minister  of  Castle  Hill  Chapel,  Dr.  Doddridge,  who 
preached  a  sermon  on  4  September  1743, "  In  favour  of 
a  design  to  erect  a  County  Infirmary,'  in  which  his 
detailed  account  of  the  eleven  e.xisting  provincial  and 
London  infirmaries  suggests  that  he 
must  share  with  Rushworth  and 
Stonhoase  the  honour  of  originating 
the  scheme.  A  large  edition  of  this 
sermon  was  printed.  At  a  meeting 
of  the  subscribers  on  20  September 
1743,  a  committee  was  elected,  and 
on  17  November  1743  the  statutes 
and  rules  for  the  government  of  the 
hospital,  modelled  upon  those  of  the 
Winchester  Infirmary, were  confirmed; 
and  a  house  in  George  Row,  to  the 
west  of  the  County  Gaol,  was  obtained 
and  fitted  up  by  December.  '  Thus 
has  the  project  of  a  County  Hospital 
at  Northampton,  of  which  some  per- 
sons there  wholly  despaired,  been 
brought  to  maturity  in  less  than  two 
months  from  the  first  meeting  on  this 
occasion.'**  Three  physicians,  includ- 
ing Dr.  Stonhouse,  two  surgeons  and 
an  apothecary,  were  appointed  to  the 
staff.  All  those  who  subscribed  £2 
a  year  or  more  were  governors,  the  Grand  Visitor 
was  the  Duke  of  Montagu,  and  the  Perpetual 
President  the  Earl  of  Northampton.  The  formal 
opening  took  place  on  27  March  1744.**  The  hospital 
contained  thirty  beds  at  its  opening,  and  issued 
its  first  report  in  October  1 744,  when  103  in-patients 
and  79  out-patients  had  been  treated.  Up  to  1829 
the  subscribers  used  to  assemble  on  Anniversary  Day 
to  hear  the  annual  report,  and  proceed  to  All  Saints' 
Church  to  hear  a  special  sermon  and  contribute  to 
collections  when  the  bag  was  taken  round  by  the 
Countess  of  Northampton  and  other  ladies  of  title. 
In  1753  the  building  was  enlarged  and  the  number  of 
beds  increased  to  60,  the  financial  strain  being  met  by 
fresh  appeals  to  the  public,  and  in  spite  of  setbacks 
the  work  of  the  hospital  developed  steadily  and  a 
further  enlargement  was  made  in  1782.  In  1790  it 
was  resolved  to  erect  a  new  hospital,  in  view  of  the 
unfavourable  report  of  Dr.  Kerr,  one  of  the  governors, 
on  the  site,  the  offices  and  the  water  supply."  The 
new  hospital  was  to  accommodate  90-100  patients  ; 
and  amongst  other  conditions  it  was  laid  down  that 
each  patient  should  be  allowed  90  square  feet,  that 
no  ward  should  contain  more  than  10  beds,  and  that 
the  lavatories  should  be  out  of  the  wards.  The  new 
site  was  near  St.  Giles'  Church,  and  had  formerly 
been  part  of  the  possessions  of  St.  Andrew's  Priory. 
The  new  building  was  completed  and  opened  for  use 


in  October  1793,  palicius  from  other  counties  besides 
Northamptonshire  being  admitted  for  treatment. 
In  January  1804  the  practice  of  free  vaccination  of 
out-patients  was  begun,  and  1,882  persons  were 
inoculated  in  the  next  five  years.  It  is  interesting  to 
note  that  the  building  of  the  London  and  Birmingham 
railway,  1835-37,  produced  so  many  casu.ihics  that  the 
Hospital  Committee  resolved  '  that  the  managers  of 
the  railroad  within  reach  of  Northampton  be  informed 
that  it  is  impossible  that  any  more  cases  of  simple 
fracture  can  be  received  into  the  House ;  compound 


9    lO'OL    'llilf- 


-TSJ      ,,        Will'iTHmilllllllHI'l, 

'TSlJlliilllliilliliiiliririjiiii 


Northampton  :  Dr.  Dan  vers'  House  before  1924 


fractures  or  such  cases  only  as  arc  attended  with 
danger  can  be  admitted.'  The  use  of  anesthetics  for 
surgical  operations  began  in  January  1847.  In  1872, 
1879  and  1889  further  additions  were  made  to  the 
hospital,  the  last  to  commemorate  Queen  Victoria's 
jubilee  ;  in  1896  a  new  operating  theatre  was  added. 
The  name  of  General  Infirmary  was  changed  in  1903 
to  '  The  Northampton  General  Hospital.'  In  1901 
two  new  wings  were  erected,  and  the  old  building 
became  a  home  for  the  staflF,  with  a  library  and  labora- 
tories :  the  new  buildings  were  opened  on  2  June  1904, 
The  constitution  of  the  hospital  was  drastically 
revised  in  1904  and  a  new  board  of  management  set  up. 
The  hospital  has  now  231  beds,  with  an  average  yearly 
number  of  2,891  in-patients  and  12,449  out-patients. 

Other  hospitals  now  existing  in  Northampton  are  : 
St.  Andrew's  Hospital  (for  Mental  Diseases),  the 
scheme  for  which  originated  at  a  meeting  of  the 
governors  of  the  General  Infirmary  in  1814,  but  which 
owes  its  beginning  to  a  gift  from  the  second  Earl 
Spencer  in  1828.  It  was  opened  in  1836-7.  The 
Northamptonshire  poet,  John  Clare,  died  here  in  1864. 
It  will  hold  500  patients,  many  of  whose  payments  are 
assisted  from  the  charity. 

The  Royal  Victoria  Dispensary,  opened  in  1845, 
served  a  useful  purpose  till  the  20th  century  in 
pro\'iding  medical  service,  on  an  assisted  contributory 
basis.     It    was    dissolved    in    February    1923,    the 


"  Gtnt.  Ma^.  xiii,  6io.  The  editor  of 
thii  periodical,  Edward  Cave,  the  pro- 
prietor of  the  Cotton  \fiUi  then  recently 
•tarted  in  Northampt.,  wa>  one  of  the 
original  lubtcriberi  to  the  hoipital. 


••  The  lermon  preached  by  Dr.  R.  Grey 
on  the  opening  day  wai  printed  by  W. 
Dicey  of  Northampt.,  together  with  the 
■tattite*  of  the  infirmary,  and  an  engrav- 


39 


ing,  after  a  drawing  by  K.  Gravelot,  of  a 
ward  in  the  infirmary. 

•'  Northampt.  Mercury^  9  Jan.  1790.  Dr. 
Kerr  wji  turgeon  at  the  Infirmary,  1765- 
1815. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


building   sold,   and   the   assets  handed  over   to   the 
General  Hospital. 

The  Northampton  Queen  Victoria  Nursing  Institu- 
tion, opened  in  1901,  has  two  maternity  homes 
dependent  upon  it,  opened  in  1918  and  1919,  in 
Colwyn  Road  and  Kingsthorpe  Road.  There  are  at 
the  present  time  eight  Infant  Welfare  Centres  in  the 
town  with  an  attendance  of  700  mothers,  and  a  stafi 
of  one  lady  doctor,  and  4  health  visitors  assisted  by 
70  voluntar)'  workers. 

Of  other  important  buildings,  the  B-irracks  in  St. 
George's  Square  were  built  in  1 796  on  the  petition 
of  the  townsmen  ;  the  Working  Men's  Club  in  St. 
Giles'  Street  was  founded  in  1865  by  the  late  Major 
Whjte-Melville ;  the  Opera  House  in  Guildhall 
Road  was  erected  in  1884,  the  Temperance  Hall  in 
Newland  in  1887  and  the  Masonic  HaU  in  Princess 
Street  in  1889-90.  A  statue  in  terra-cotta  of  Charles 
Bradlaugh,  for  many  years  member  of  Parhament  for 
the  city,  was  unveiled  by  Sir  Philip  Manfield,  M.P.,  on 
25  June  1894  in  Abington  Square.  There  is  also 
in  the  Market  Square  a  monument  with  a  bronze 
bust  of  Lieut.-Col.  Edgar  R.  Mobbs,  D.S.O.,  'a 
great  and  gallant  sportsman,'  who  raised  a  company 
of  the  Northamptonshire  Regiment  in  1914  and  was 
killed  in  action  31  July  1917.  The  monument  was 
unveiled  by  Lord  Lilford  on  17  July  1 92 1.  There 
is  a  bust  of  King  Edward  VII  in  the  north-west 
angle  of  the  wall  in  front  of  the  General  Hospital  in 
the  Billing  Road. 

A  large  proportion  of  the  names  associated  with 
Northampton  are  those  of  dinnes  of  varying  de- 
nominations. The  famous  schoolman,  Duns  Scotus, 
was  ordained  a  priest  in  St.  Andrew's  Priory  Church 
by  Bishop  Oliver  Sutton  on  17  March  1291.*'° 
Among  the  friars  of  the  Northampton  houses 
were  the  famous  13th-century  Franciscan,  Thomas 
Bungay,  lecturer  at  both  Oxford  and  Cam- 
bridge, who  died  and  was  buried  here  ;  the  Dominican, 
Robert  Hokot,  the  reputed  author  of  Philobiblon 
and  26  other  treatises,  who  died  here  in  1 349;  the 
Augustinian  friar,  Geoffrey  Grandfelt  (d.  1 340); 
the  Carmelites,  John  Avon,  a  distinguished  mathe- 
matician, who  died  in  1349  ;  William  Bcaufcu,  a  noted 
theologian  (d.  1390),  and  Thomas  Ashburne,  the 
author  (in  1384)  of  De  Contemptu  Mundi.  Among  tlie 
Anglican  divines,  besides  a  number  of  distinguished 
rectors  of  All  Saints'  and  St.  Peter's  Churches,  are  T. 
Cartwright  (1634-89),  born  at  Northampton  and  edu 
catcd  at  Chipsey's  Grammar  School,  Bishop  of  Chester, 
1685,  and  a  wholehearted  supporter  of  James  II, 
like  his  fellow-townsmen,  Samuel  Parker  (1640-88), 
Bishop  of  Oxford,  1686-88,  and  intruded  by  James  II 
into  the  presidency  of  Magdalen  College,  Oxford. 
Among  the  famous  Nonconformists, besides  Doddridge 
and  the  Rylands,  should  be  mentioned  John  Penry 
(1559-93),  the  reputed  author  of  m.anyof  the  Marpre- 
late  Tracts,  whose  wife  was  a  native  of  Northampton, 
and  who  lived  here  1587-1590;  Robert  Browne** 
(i 550-1633),  founder  of  the  Brownists,  who  died  in 
Northampton    Gaol    and    was    buried    in    St.    Giles' 


Churchyard ;  and  Samuel  Blower  (d.  1701),  the  founder 
of  Castle  Hill  meeting  house.  Of  literary  worthies, 
Anne  Bradstreet,  the  New  England  poetess  (161 2- 
1672),  should  be  noted  as  a  native  of  Northampton  ; 
also  Thomas  Woolston,  the  freethinker  (1660-1733), 
the  son  of  a  Northampton  currier,  deprived  of  his 
fellowship  at  Sidney  Sussex  College  for  his  icono- 
clastic criticism  of  the  Old  Testament  ;  Simon 
Wastell  (d.  1632),  headmaster  of  Chipsey's  school 
and  author  of  Microbiblion  ;  and  William  Shipley 
(1714-1803),  drawing  master  in  Northampton, 
originator  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Arts  ;  the  two  anti- 
quaries, George  Baker  (1781-1851),  author  of  an 
unfinished  History  of  Northants,  and  his  sister,  Ann 
Baker  (1786-1861),  who  helped  to  save  St.  Peter's 
Church  from  neglect  and  ruin,  and  compiled  a 
glossary  of  Northamptonshire  words  and  phrases  ; 
John  Cole  (1792-1848),  bookseller  and  antiquary, 
the  friend  of  Baker,  the  author  of  a  short  account 
of  Northampton  (18 1 5),  who  pubUshed  many  anti- 
quarian works,  and  made  a  collection  of  books  on 
the  town  and  county,  now  in  the  Pubhc  Library. 
E.  A.  Freeman,  the  liistorian,  was  a  schoolboy  in 
Northampton  from  1829-37,  and  James  Rice,  col- 
laborator with  Sir  Walter  Besant  in  novel  writing, 
was  born  here  in  1843.  Of  the  medical  profession, 
besides  Rushworth  (1669-1736),  Sir  James  Stonhouse 
(1716-98)  should  be  mentioned,  the  founder,  with 
Doddridge,  of  the  County  Infirmary,  converted  by 
Doddridge,  and  ordained  as  a  deacon  of  the  Church 
of  England  in  1749,  practising  medicine  in  Northamp- 
ton 1743-64,  and  ending  his  life  as  a  parish  clergyman. 
Sir  Charles  Locock  (1799-1875),  accoucheur  to  Queen 
Victoria,  was  a  native  of  Northampton.  In  connec- 
tion with  political  hfe.  Sir  Richard  Lane  (1584-1650), 
deputy  recorder  of  Northampton,*  nati\eof  Courteen- 
hall,  defended  Straflord  on  his  trial,  and  was  made 
Lord  Keeper  in  1645.  Spencer  Perceval  and  Brad- 
laugh  have  been  mentioned  in  connection  with  the 
parhamentary  history  of  the  borough.  R.  G.  Gam- 
mage  (d.  1 888),  a  native  of  Northampton,  was  an  active 
organiser  of  Chartism  in  Northampton  and  the 
neighbourhood,  and  author  of  a  History  of  the  Chartist 
Movement  (1854).  W.  L.  Maberley  (1798-1885), 
member  for  Northampton  from  1820  to  1830, 
was  secretary  of  the  Gener.1l  Post  Office  and  a  die- 
hard opponent  of  Rowland  Hill's  postal  reforms  from 
1846  to  1854,  '  wasting  millions  of  public  money.'** 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  stands 
CHURCHES,  on  the  south  side  of  Marefair, 
near  the  west  end  of  the  town, 
close  to  the  site  of  the  castle.  The  building  is  chiefly 
of  late  1 2th  century  date,  but  two  fragments  of  pre- 
Conquest  cross-shafts"  found  in  1850  point  to  an 
earlier  church  having  occupied  the  site.  No  part 
of  the  present  building,  however,  is  older  than  c.  1150- 
75,  to  which  period  the  chancel  and  nave  arcades, 
the  tower  arcli  and  part  of  the  clearstory  walls  belong  ; 
the  arcades  arc  very  perfect  examples  of  the  highly 
decorated  work  of  the  time,  and  have  frequently 
been  noticed  and  illustrated." 


•"  Arrb.  Francti  Hill.  ann.  xxii,  Faic. 
1,  11,  19J9. 

••  A.  Jetiopp'i  life  of  R.  Browne  in  tlic 
Dill.  A'ffl/.  Bio[(.  iliouUl  be  lupplenicnted 
by  R.  M.  Serje.intion'i  account  in  lliii. 
«/  Cb.  of  Si.  6'i/cj,  !<orihampl.  (pp.   188- 


20z).  A  monument  to  hit  memory  w.i» 
erected  in  the  churchyard  in  1913. 

••  Did.  Nat.  Biog.  for  all  prccedin)?. 

"  r.C.II.  Norihanli.  ii,  189.  They 
were  found  under  the  \ve«t  reipondi  of  the 
nave  arcade",  and  arc  now  in  (he  Public 

40 


Museum.  They  are  figured  in  R.  M.  Ser- 
jeantion'i  llist.  of  Ch.  of  St.  Peter, 
Norlhampt.  12.  Mr.  Serjeant  ion's  work 
has  been  used  in  the  following  description. 
"  See  references  in  SrrjeanHon,  op,  cit. 
40. 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


The  church  consists  of  a  continuous  dearstoricd 
chancel  and  nave  under  one  roof  about  93  ft.  long'^ 
by  18  ft.  vride,  continuous  north  and  south  aisles 
6  ft.  6  in.  wide,  north  porch,  and  west  tower  12  ft.  4  in. 
by  12  ft.  8  in.,  all  these  measurements  being  internal. 
The  width  across  nave  and  aisles  is  35  ft.,  and  the  total 
internal  length  of  the  church  is  108  ft.  6  in. 

Except  at  the  west  end  the  plan  is  substantially 
the  same  as  when  first  set  out,  though  the  walls  of 
both  aisles  and  the  east  end  of  the  chancel  have 
been  rebuilt  at  different  times.  Originally  the  nave 
extended  about  10  ft.  further  west,  with  tower  be- 
yond, but  was  shortened  and  the  tower  rebuilt 
in  its  present  position  probably  in  the  early  years  of  the 
17th  century.™    The  aisle  walls  were  rebuilt  in  the 


The  walling  is  generally  of  ironstone  rubble  and  the 
main  roof  is  covered  with  stone  slates  with  slightly 
projecting  eaves  ;  the  aisle  roofs  are  leaded,  behind 
plain  parapets.     Internally  the  walls  are  plastered. 

The  chancel  is  structurally  an  eastward  exten- 
sion of  the  nave,  the  dividing  piers  of  the  arcades 
being  common  to  both.  There  is  no  chancel  arch, 
and  the  design  of  the  arcades  precludes  there  having 
been  one.  The  nave  originally  consisted  of  three 
double  bays,  with  arches  arranged  in  pairs,  supported 
alternately  by  slender  cylindrical  pillars  and  by 
more  massive  compound  piers,  but  the  western 
double  bay  was  cut  in  halves  at  the  time  of  the  altera- 
tions recorded  above,  and  only  its  eastern  portion 
remains.     The  rebuilt  tower  thus  encroaches  on  the 


ILate  121!)  CENr.^.ll75-l200jESgi7I!!  CtiNrukv 
IDLmf.  I2I!1  Cunt. rebuilt  m  new  position  in  1 71!!  Ckxturv 
[1^314!!!  Ceviukv     ^1521  Ci;m-  □Modi':k\(I850-|) 


Sc.vLE  OF  Feet 
Plan  of  St.  Peter's  Church,  Northampton 


14th  century,  the  old  doorways  being  retained,  and 
some  alterations  were  afterwards  made  at  the  east 
end  of  the  north  aisle,  where  a  15th  century  window 
still  remains.''*  Square-headed  windows  were  inserted 
in  the  aisles  in  the  17th  century,  and  the  east  end  of 
the  building  seems  to  have  been  reconstructed  about 
the  same  time,"  the  projecting  square  end  of  the 
chancel  being  removed  and  the  aisles  shortened. 

After  long  years  of  neglect,  the  building  was  re- 
stored in  1850-51  by  Sir  Gilbert  Scott,'*  when  the 
cast  end  was  rebuilt  in  its  present  form,"  the  clear- 
story (which  had  been  mutilated  and  modernised)'* 
restored  to  its  original  character,  and  the  nave  and 
chancel  new  roofed.  The  aisle  roofs  were  renewed 
in  1882.  The  tower  was  further  restored  externally 
in  1901,  and  1912-13. 


clearstory  and  arcades,  the  present  west  responds 
of  which  are  in  reality  whole  pillars  partly  built  into 
the  wall."  The  chancel  arcades  consist  of  three  single 
bays,  with  cylindrical  pillars  on  each  side. 

The  arches  throughout  are  semicircular,  and  of 
about  7  ft.  span,  of  a  single  order,  with  bold  chevron 
ornament  on  each  side  and  plain  soffits,  but  without 
hood  moulds.  The  compound  piers  are  of  quatrefoil 
section,  consisting  of  four  clustered  shafts,  those 
facing  east  and  west  forming  responds  to  the  inter- 
mediate pillars.  The  shafts  on  the  side  towards  the 
nave  are  continued  up  to  the  top  of  the  clearstory 
as  supports  for  the  roof  principals,  and  have  scalloped 
capitals,  while  those  towards  the  aisles  formed  springer.s 
for  transverse  arches  now  destroyed.  The  diameter 
of  the  compound  piers  is  considerably  greater  than 


"  Of  thii  the  chancel  it  42  (t.  6  in. 

••  Sir  Gilbert  Scott  reported  that  he 
had  been  informed  by  the  clerk  that  there 
were  foundation!  extending  from  the  tower 
weitward  which  prevented  the  digging  of 
gravel :  Serjeantion,  op.  cit.  262.  Prof. 
Hamilton  Thompion  luggeiti  that  it  ii 
poiiible  that  the  rebuilding  of  the  tower 
and  of  the  eait  end  and  the  insertion  of 
the  numeroui  iquare-headed  window!  all 
took  place  earljr  in  the  reign  of  Cbarle!  I 
while  Dr.  Samuel  Clerk  wai  rector. 
Clerk  wa!  one  of  the  commi!!ioncr! 
appointed  by  the  Bishop  to  lee  that  the 
churchc!  were  decently  kept,  and  he  would 
feel    bound    to    set    hii    own    house    in 


order  to  begin  with.     Arch.  Jour.  Ixix, 

437- 

"  A  crypt  at  the  east  end  of  the  aisle  is 
probably  not  older  than  the  1 5th  century 
alteration.  It  was  examined  in  1850  and 
found  to  be  16  ft.  by  9  ft.,  with  two 
^^indow!  in  the  north  wall,  and  the  roof 
lupported  by  five  legmental  stone  ribs : 
ibid.  61. 

"  During  its  demolition  in  1850  a  coin 
of  Charles  I  was  found  in  the  then  existing 
east  wall.  The  reconstruction  of  the  cast 
and  west  ends  of  the  church  may  have  been 
contemporaneous. 

"  His  fir!t  report  i!  dated  May  1849. 
The  reitoration  wa!  beg'm  in  June    1850, 

41 


and  the  church  reopened  in  April 
1852. 

'^  The  original  foundations  of  the  chan- 
cel were  found  lome  12  ft.  eastward  of  the 
then  existing  east  wall,  and  new  walls  were 
built  upon  them.  Many  12th  century 
fragments  were  found  in  the  wall  during 
demolition.  The  aisles,  which  had  appa- 
rently been  shortened  about  5  ft.,  were 
extended  to  their  former  length  :  Serjeant- 
son,  op.  cit.  61. 

"  On  the  south  side  the  clearstory 
arcade  had  been  cut  away  to  admit  two 
late  windows,  presumably  of  17th  century 
date  :  Serjeantson.  op.  cit.  60, 

'•  Ibid.    59. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


the  thickness  of  the  wall  above  them,  while  that  of  the 
intermediate  pillars,  which  are  banded  at  rather  more 
than  half  their  height,  is  something  less.  In  the  orna- 
mentation of  the  bands  the  cable  moulding  pre- 
dominates, and  it  occurs  also  in  great  variety  in  the 
necks  of  the  capitals  throughout.  The  moulded  bases 
stand  on  square  plinths  and  some  of  them  have  acutely 
pointed  foot  ornaments.  The  whole  of  the  capitals 
and  their  square  abaci  in  both  nave  and  chancel 
are  most  elaborately  sculptured,  the  deep,  intricate 
chiselling  on  the  former  contrasting  strongly  with  the 


St.  Peter's  Church,  Northampton  :  Capital 

comparatively  rough  axe  work  on  the  arches.**  Tlie 
capitals  are  all  different,  and  their  beautiful  and 
delicate  sculpture,  which  includes  interlacing  foliage 
and  some  animal  and  figure  subjects,  is  of  its  kind 
unsurpassed  in  the  kingdom.** 

In  the  chancel  the  two  pairs  of  pillars  diflfer  in 
size  and  design  ;  the  eastern  pair  is  similar  to  those 
in  the  nave,  wliile  the  western  pillars  are  of  greater 
diameter,  without  bands,  and  built  of  ironstone. 
The  eastern  responds  correspond  with  the  western 
pillars,  the  idea  of  alternation  being  thus  in  some 
measure  carried  out.**  Elsewhere  in  the  interior 
free-stone  is  used. 


The  modern  east  end  of  the  chancel  is  in  the  style 
of  the  1 2th  century,  with  round-headed  windows 
disposed  in  a  somewh.it  unusual  manner.**  No 
ancient  ritual  arrangements  remain  either  in  the 
chancel  or  aisles,  having  no  doubt  perished  at  the 
time  of  the  destruction  of  the  original  east  end. 

The  clearstory  consists  externally  of  a  shallow 
arcading  of  semicircular  unmoulded  arches  on 
detached  shafts  with  scalloped  capitals  and  moulded 
bases  running  the  whole  length  of  chancel  and  nave. 
Every  se\enth  space  is  pierced  for  a  window,  and 
above  the  arcades  is  a  contemporary  corbel  table 
of  heads  and  grotesques.  Internally  the  windows 
are  perfectly  plain  and  widely  splayed,  but  do  not 
correspond  with  the  arches  below,  the  clearstory 
having  been  designed  with  a  single  mndow  immedi- 
ately over  the  pillars  in  the  eastern  and  western 
double  bays  of  the  nave,  and  with  two  windows  in  the 
middle  double  bay.  Of  the  two  western  windows, 
one  was  pushed  out  of  shape  and  the  other  actually 
cut  in  halves  when  the  tower  was  re-erected  further 
east. 

The  east  end  of  both  aisles  was  rebuilt  at  the  same 
time  as  the  chancel,  but  the  outer  walls  elsewhere 
appear  to  be  of  the  14th  century.  In  the  north  wall 
a  re-used  12th  century  stringcourse  is  continued  round 
the  westernmost  buttress,  and  the  original  round- 
headed  doorway  is  of  two  square  orders  and  plain 
hoodmould,  the  outer  order  resting  on  mutilated 
scalloped  capitals.**  The  contemporary  south  doorway 
is  also  of  two  plain  orders,  the  outer  on  shafts  with 
divided  capitals  and  moulded  bases.  One  14th  century 
square-headed  window  of  two  trefoiled  lights  remains 
on  the  north  side,  and  in  the  south  aisle,  near  the  east 
end  of  the  nave  portion,  is  a  moulded  segmental 
tomb  recess  of  the  same  period,  the  arch  supported 
by  small  attached  shafts  with  capitals  and  bases. 
The  15th  century  window  in  the  north  aisle  is  of  three 
cinquefoiled  lights  with  Perpendicular  tracery, 
but  all  the  other  windows  are  late,  square-headed, 
and  of  three  unfoliated  lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  unequal  and  irregular  stages, 
and  offers  many  evidences  of  reconstruction.  The 
lowest  stage,  which  has  a  boldly  moulded  plinth,** 
is  faced  with  alternate  courses  of  ironstone  and  free- 
stone forming  broad  bands  of  contrasting  colour, 
and  inserted  in  the  west  wall  is  a  remarkable  and  beau- 
tiful arch  of  three  delicately  carved  orders  all  flush 
with  the  wall  plane,  with  hoodmould  and  imposts 
similarly  carved,  but  no  jambs.  Set  within  this  arch, 
above  the  plinth,  is  a  much  restored  square-headed 
window  of  three  trefoiled  lights,  but  there  can  be  little 
doubt  that  the  arch  belonged  originally  to  a  1 2th  cen- 
tury west  doorway  of  three  or  more**  recessed  orders 
the  jambs  of  which  were  removed  when  the  tower 
was  rebuilt.  On  the  nortli  and  south  sides  of  the  lowest 


•"  Serjcantion,  op.  clt.  42.  The  capitah 
were  probably  carved  after  the  completion 
of  the  building. 

■*  The  capitali  were  for  long  covered 
by  pbiter  and  whitcw.iih,  but  about  1839 
were  carefully  icraped  by  Miti  Baker  and 
their  original  beauty  revealed  :  Serjeant- 
ion,  op.  cit.  66. 

•■  Ibid.  47. 

"  In  the  eait  wall  tlicre  are  nine 
opening!,  two  in  the  lowc»t  *tagc,  four 
in  a  quintuple  arcading  of  the  middle 
itage  (the  centre  arch  being  left  blinds, 


and  three  in  the  gable — a  centr.il  round- 
headed  light  like  the  otheri,  and  on  each 
»ide  of  it  a  imall  qu.itrefoiled  circle  : 
ibid.  47.  A  lemicircut.'ir  central  but- 
tre»»,  which  survived  the  i7th  century 
alterations  and  hai  been  retained,  wai 
apparently  the  determining  factor  in 
Scott'i  design  :  ibid.  60. 

*•  The  jimbihaftt  were  originally 
cylindric.il  .ind  dct.-iched  ;  ibid.  51. 

"  Sir  Gilbert  Scott  in  hit  report  referred 
to  '  the  extremely  un-Nornnn  appcirancc 

42 


of    tlic    basccourse    round    the    tower '  : 
ibid.  261. 

*•  Sir  Gilbert  Scott  made  incisions  in 
the  west  wall  and  found  that  there  had 
existed  one  or  more  additional  orders, 
but  that  they  had  been  taken  out;  there 
were,  however,  no  traces  of  jambs : 
Serjcantson,  op.  cit.  59,261.  *A  capital 
which  was  duj;  up  on  relaying  the  floor 
may  have  bt-lcmped  to  a  jambibpft  of  this 
doorway,  which  in  its  original  state  must 
have  been  one  of  exceptional  splendour  '  : 
ibid.  59. 


Northampton  :   St.  Peter's  Church  from  the  North- west 


XoRiHVMi'TON  r   Si.  Peter's  Chikcii  :   The  I.s-terior,  eookinc  East 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


stage,  above  the  plain  masonry,  are  two  courses  of  fine 
carving,  and  over  these  an  arcade  of  blind  arches 
ranging  with  those  of  the  clearstory.  The  middle 
stage  is  separated  from  the  lower  by  a  string  course  of 
trowel  point  ornament  supported  by  a  corbel  table 
of  heads  and  grotesques,  and  has  an  arcade  of  round 
irches  on  each  of  its  three  sides,  the  arches  being 
moulded  and  supported  by  octagonal  detached  shafts 
with  scalloped  capitals  and  moulded  bases.  Above 
these  is  another  corbel  table  and  stringcourse  with 
double  roll-moulding. 

The  two  western  angles  are  covered,  to  the  top 
of  the  middle  stage,  by  large  buttresses  of  unusual 
design,  consisting  of  triple  clustered  freestone  shafts, 
perhaps  fashioned  from  1 2th  century  columns  or 
jambshafts,*'  and  at  the  north-east  angle  is  a  massive 
four-stage  buttress,  of  alternate  courses  of  ironstone 
and  freestone,  projecting  in  its  lower  stages  beyond  the 
width  of  the  aisle.  .At  the  south-east  angle  a  large  square 
staircase  turret  serves  as  a  corresponding  buttress. 

To  the  top  of  tlic  middle  stage,  after  the  cessation 
of  the  alternate  bands,  the  tower  is  mainly  of  free- 
stone, but  above  the  arcades  ironstone  is  used. 
The  upper  stage  is  later  in  ch.iracter,  with  battle- 
mented  parapet,  pyramidal  stone  slated  roof,  and 
transomcd  bell-chamber  windows  of  two  trefoiled 
lights  with  separate  hoodmoulds.  The  triple-shafted 
buttresses  are  continued  as  single  shafts,  in  two  stages 
to  the  underside  of  the  parapet.  The  walls  of  the 
upper  part  of  the  tower  are  said  to  be  largely  built 
of  moulded  and  wrought  stones  of  13th  century  date,'* 
which  may  have  been  brought  from  one  or  other  of  the 
destroyed  monastic  buildings  in  the  neighbourhood," 
and  there  is  reason  to  believe  that  the  whole  of  this 
work  in  its  existing  form  dates  only  from  the  early 
17th  century  rebuilding. 

The  reconstructed  late  12th  century  tower  arch 
occupies  the  whole  width  of  the  west  end  of  the  nave, 
and  consists  of  three  orders  all  richly  decorated  with 
cheveron  moulding,"  and  a  bold  square-edged  hood- 
mould  ornamented  with  fine  chiselled  work.  The 
orders  spring  from  half-round  responds  and  detached 
jarab-shafts  with  elaborately  carved  capitals*'  and 
moulded  bases.  Three  of  the  shafts  are  enriched, 
one  on  the  north  side  with  a  spiral  pattern,  while 
two  on  the  south  are  ornamented  respectively  with 
interlaced  work  and  with  studded  cheverons.** 

The  unmounted  octagonal  font  is  of  late  14th 
century  date,  the  sides  panelled  with  cusped  tracery 
under  straight-sided  crocketed  canopies  which  spring 
from  dwarf  buttresses  at  the  angles  and  terminate 
in  floriated  finials.  In  the  upper  part,  between  the 
canopies,  the  angles  are  ornamented  with  crocketed 
attached  pinnacles. 

The  stone  pulpit,  low  chancel  wall,  and  all  the 
roofs  and  fittings  are  modern.  The  carved  oak  reredos, 
first  erected  in   1878,  was  completed  in   1914,  as  a 

"  jlrcb.  Jeur.  xxxv,  417.  The 
moulded  plinth  is  continued  round  these 
buttresses. 

'•  Serjeantson.  op.  cit.  56,  ex.  inf. 
Matthew  Holding,  architect. 

"  Either  from  St.  Andrew's  Priory  or 
from  St.  James's  Abbey  :  ibid.   56. 

**  In  the  middle  order  the  cheveron 
and  ball  ornament  is  used.  The  arch 
is  quite  plain  on  the  west  side. 

"  'The  capitals  of  the  jimbshafts  are 
not  properly  fitted  to  the  orders  of  the 


memorial  to  Edward  Nichols  Tom,  rector  1873- 
1905.  There  are  modern  screens  north  and  south 
of  the  chancel.** 

In  addition  to  the  high  altar,  mention  is  made  in 
the  15th  and  l6th  centuries  of  the  high  rood  loft, 
the  chapel  of  the  Blessed  Virgin  Mary,  and  the  altars 
of  St.  Nicholas,  St.  John  Baptist  and  St.  Katharine, 
and  to  St.   Eregaiar's  altar  (1535)-** 

There  are  monuments  to  jolin  Smith  of  London 
((/.  1742),  '  the  most  eminent  Engraver  in  Mezzo- 
Tinto  in  his  time'  ;  William  Smith  I.L.D.  (d.  1839), 


St.  Peter's  Church,  Northampton  :  Capital 

the  '  father  of  British  geology,'  with  white  marble 
bust;  George  Baker**  {d.  1851),  historian  of  the 
county,  and  his  sister,  Ann  EUza  (d.  1861)  ;  Edward 
Lockwood  (d.  1802),  rector  for  52  years  ;  John 
Stoddart  {d.  1827),  headmaster  of  Northampton 
Grammar  School ;  and  a  brass  plate  in  the  chancel 
in  memory  of  Robert  Meyricke  Serjeantson,  rector 
and  historian  of  the  Northampton  churches  {d.  1916). 
In  the  churchyard  is  a  memorial  cross  to  the  men  of 
the  parish  who  fell  in  the  Great  War  (1914-18). 
There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells  by  Abraham  Rudhall, 

1734°* 

The  plate  consists  of  a  paten  of  1709,  a  cup  and 
paten  of  171 1,  a  flagon  of  1715,  and  a  brcndholder  of 
1713 


97 


archivolt  above  them,  nor  to  the  jambs 
below  them,  and  some  of  the  stones 
composing  the  shafts  seem  upside  down  '  : 
Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  59. 

"•  Sir  Gilbert  Scott  was  of  opinion 
that  the  enriched  shafts  had  been  brought 
from  elsewhere,  probably  from  the  original 
western  doorway  :  ibid.  262. 

'■"  The  organ  occupies  the  north  aisle 
of  the  chancel  and  Testries  the  south 
aisle. 

"  Ser'eantson,  op.  cit.  62-64. 

43 


*''  Buried,  with  his  sister,  at  King  Street 
chapel. 

"  North,  Cb.  Belli  oj  Noithants,  348, 
where  the  inscriptions  are  given.  The 
tenor  was  the  gift  of  Sir  Arthur  Hasllerige. 
The  bells  were  rehung  in  1893,  and  ag.iin, 
with  new  fittings,  in  1928. 

"  Markham,  Ch.  Plait  0/ Norlhatils,  ill. 
The  flagon  was  the  gift  of  Sir  Robert 
Hesilrige,  but  not  purchased  till  two  years 
alter  his  death  in  1713;  the  bread-holder 
was  given  by  Sir  Arthur  Hasilerige  in  1728. 


K 

or! 
O 

2 


o 


O 


2 
< 


8gR'§i 


_  C 


■Dyisn 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (1)  bap- 
tisms, marriages,  and  burials,  1578-1737  ;  (2)  baptisms 
and  burials,  1737-1797,  marriages,  1737-1754;  (3) 
marriages,  1756-1794;  (4)  baptisms  and  burials,  1797- 
1812.     The  earliest  vestrv  book  begins  in  April  1736. 

The  church  of  THE  HOLT  SEPULCHRE,^^  one 
of  the  four'*  remaining  round  churches  in  England, 
dates  from  the  early  12th  century,  and  probably  owed 
its  origin  to  Simon  de  Senlis  earl  of  Northampton, 
by  whom  it  was  granted  c.  Illi  to  the  monastery 
of  St.  Andrew.'  Like  other  churches  of  this  type, 
it  was  built  in  imitation  of  the  church  of  the  Holy 
Sepulchre  in  Jerusalem,  and  consisted  originally 
of  a  circular  nave  and  small  oblong  chancel,  which 
probably  ended  in  an  apse.  About  1180  the  north  wall 
of  the  chancel  was  pierced  by  arches  to  form  a  chapel, 
and  towards  the  close  of  the  13th  century  a  second 
aisle  was  thrown  out  on  the  same  side.  The  present 
south  aisle  dates  from  the  first  half  of  the  I4lh 
century,  and  about  1400  the  whole  of  the  upper 
part  of  the  circular  nave  was  taken  down,  pointed 
arches  placed  upon  the  Norman  columns,  the  tri- 
foriura  destroyed,  and  a  new  clearstory  built.  At  the 
same  time  a  massive  west  tower,  surmounted  by  a 
spire,  was  added,  and  the  present  south  porch  built, 
the  fabric  then  assuming  more  or  less  the  aspect 
it  retained  till  the  19th  century.  The  original  chancel 
had,  however,  been  lengthened  some  time  during 
the  medieval  period,*  but  towards  the  close  of  the 
l6th,  or  beginning  of  the  17th  century,  when  the 
fabric  was  much  neglected,  the  extended  east  end 
was  demolished,  and  the  outer  north  aisle  was  re- 
moved.' 

In  186064  a  new  chancel  with  north  and  south 
aisles,  designed  by  Sir  Gilbert  Scott,  was  added  to  the 
east  of  the  old  one,  which  then  became  the  nave, 
and  the  outer  north  aisle  was  rebuilt.*  The  Round 
was  restored  in  1868-73,  but  the  general  work  of 
restoration  was  not  concluded  till  1879,  when  the 
chancel  was  consecrated.  In  1887  a  vestry  and  organ 
chamber  were  built  at  the  east  end  of  the  outer 
north  aisle.  The  church,  therefore,  now  consists 
of  a  modern  chancel  with  north  and  south  aisles, 
or  chapels,^  nave  46  ft.  by  18  ft.  6  in.,  with  north 
and  south  aisles  respectively  17  ft.  6  in.  and  16  ft.  6  in. 
wide,  outer  north  aisle  17  ft.  10  in.  wide,  the  old  cir- 
cular nave,  or  '  Round,'  now  used  as  a  baptistery, 
south  porch,  and  west  tower  II  ft.  10  in.  by  14  ft.* 
all  these  measurements  being  internal. 

The  church  is  built  throughout  of  ironstone, 
and  all  the  roofs  east  of  the  Round  are  covered  with 


modern  slates  ;  the  nave  and  aisles  are  under  separate 
higli-pitchcd  roofs.  Before  i860  the  old  chancel 
and  its  aisles  extended  about  40  ft.  east  of  the  Round, 
with  three  flush  end  gables  separated  by  buttresses  ; 
the  south  aisle  had  been  modernised  and  the  tracery 
of  its  south  windows  removed.'  All  the  roofs  are 
modern. 

Though  the  Round  has  suffered  many  changes, 
and  some  of  its  original  features  have  been  destroyed, 
it  remains  in  plan  substantially  unaltered  and  its 
geneial  proportions  can  be  readily  detected.  It 
consisted  of  two  stories,  the  upper,  or  clearstory, 
supported  on  an  octagonal  arcade  of  eight  massive 
cylindrical  piers  which  divided  the  central  space  from 
a  circular  groined  aisle  or  ambulatory  10  ft.  6  in.  wide. 
The  internal  diameter  of  the  Round  is  58  ft.  10  in.' 
and  the  outer  wall,  which  is  about  25  ft.  high 
and  4  ft.  4  in.  thick  above  the  phnth,  was  pierced 
by  two  tiers  of  roimd-headed  windows,  the  lower 
lighting  the  aminilatory  and  the  upper  opening 
into  a  triforium  above  its  groined  roof.  In  aU  pro- 
bability there  were  smaller  round-headed  windows 
in  the  circumference  of  the  original  clearstory, 
which  would  be  covered  with  a  conical  roof.  Of  the 
lower  tier  of  windows  only  one,  on  the  south  side 
to  the  west  of  the  present  porch,  is  still  in  use,  but 
there  are  rcm.iins  of  tlirce  others,  two  on  the  north 
side,  and  one  to  the  east  of  the  porch.  The  perfect 
window  is  about  9  ft.  above  the  present  ground  level, 
its  sill  resting  on  a  simple  stringcourse  which  ran 
all  round  the  building.  The  opening  is  4  ft.  in  height 
and  15  in.  wide,  with  plain  jambs,  hoodmould, 
and  wide  internal  splay,  the  head  of  which  has  a 
band  of  cheveron  ornament  on  the  edge  of  the  plaster 
soffit.  Of  the  upper  windows  two  remain  on 
the  north  side,  immediately  over  a  second  string- 
course 10  ft.  4  in.  above  the  first.  These  windows 
are  without  hoodmoulds  and  differ  in  proportion 
from  those  below,  being  3  ft.  9  in.  high  by  20J  in. 
in  breadth.  Above  them  a  third  stringcourse  forms 
the  base  of  a  plain  parapet.  The  wall  was  strengthened 
by  a  series  of  wide  shallow  buttresses  of  which  seven 
still  remain,  three  on  the  north  and  two  on  the  south 
being  in  an  almost  perfect  condition,  while  two  others 
on  the  south  are  cut  away  below  for  the  porch  walls. 
These  buttresses  are  from  4  ft.  to  4  ft.  6  in.  in  viidth, 
with  a  projection  of  8  in.  and  die  into  the  wall  just 
below  the  topmost  stringcourse,  the  two  lower 
strings  being  carried  round  them.  The  main  story 
of  the  Round  was  thus  divided  horizontally  into 
three  stages  and  vertically  into  a  series  of  bays,  that 


"  The  following  dcicriptlon  it  based 
upon  the  account  of  the  church  in  Cox 
and  Scrjeantson's  Htst.  of  Cb.  of  the 
Holy  Sepulchre,  Aoribamfl.   (1897). 

"  Or  five,  if  the  ruined  chapel  in 
Ludlow  Cattle  it  included. 

■  From  the  fact  that  in  the  gift  of  the 
churches  of  Northampton  Co  the  monks  of 
St.  Andrew's  recorded  in  the  confirmatory 
charter  of  1 108  the  church  of  St.  Sepulchre 
is  not  mentioned,  it  has  been  assumed  that 
the  building  was  not  then  finished.  Begun 
about  1 100,  the  work  may  have  been 
interrupted  by  civil  war  and  not  com- 
pleted until  after  1108  :  Cox  and  Serjeant- 
ton,  op.  cit.  23-15. 

'  '  lo  extending  the  church  in  1861 
a  tile  pavement  »as  discovered  outside 
tlie    then   east   end,    showing    that    the 


church  had  formerly  extended  further 
eastward  ' :  ibid.  54. 

'  The  outer  aisle  may  have  been  taken 
down  in  1634,  the  churchwardens' 
accounts  showing  that  a  considerable 
amount  of  work  was  done  in  that  year,  and 
a  vestry  resolution  indicates  that  it  was 
chiefly  on  the  north  aisle.  All  east 
of  the  Round  fell  into  disuse  except  for 
parochial  purposes  of  a  quasi-civil  nature. 
The  communion  table  wat  brought  into 
the  Round,  which  ultimately  became 
filled  with  seats  and  pews  :  ibid.  54. 

*  The  restoration  of  the  church  was 
first  considered  in  1845,  but  nothing  was 
done  till  1851,  when  it  wat  undertaken 
«t  a  memorial  to  the  lecond  Marquis  of 
Northampton,  though  the  work  of  enlarge- 
ment was  not   begun   until   i860.     The 


building  was  re-opened  in  August  1864. 
The  pews  and  galleries  in  the  Round  were 
removed  at  this  time  :  ibid.  70-71. 

'  The  north  aisle  is  now  used  at  a 
morning  chapel,  and  the  south  aisle  it 
the  Warriort'  Memorial  Chapel. 

*  The  greater  dimention  is  from  west 
to  east. 

'  Probably  in  1739  :  Cox  and  Serjeant- 
son,  op.  cit.  61.  Before  i860  there  were 
only  two  windows  in  the  south  wall  with 
a  doorw.iy  between,  the  position  of  which 
may  still  be  seen  below  the  middle  window. 

*  The  church  of  the  Holy  Sepulchre, 
Jerusalem,  is  67  ft.  in  diameter,  the  Temple 
Church,  London,  58  ft.,  Cambridge  41  ft., 
and  Little  Maplestead  26  ft.  Garway, 
in  Herefordshire,  «here  only  the  founda- 
tions remain,  was  43  ft.  9  in . 


45 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


facing  west  being  probably  occupied  by  a  doorway 
and  shallow  porch.  During  the  restoration  the 
foundations  of  a  south  porch  were  found,  slightly 
exceeding  the  present  porch  in  dimensions,  which 
may  have  been  a  later  1 2th  century  addition  covering  a 
doorway  then  inserted.* 

The  piers  of  the  arcade  are  plain  masonry  cylinders 
averaging  3  ft.  9  in.  in  diameter,  but  their  capitals 
and  bases  differ.  The  four  western  piers  have  cir- 
cular scalloped  capitals,  with  plain  circular  chamfered 
abaci  and  moulded  bases  on  low  square  plinths. 
In  the  two  easternmost  piers  the  abaci  are  square, 
the  capitals  merely  shaped,  \vith  plain  angle  orna- 
ments, and  the  high  square  plinths  are  of  two  stages, 
while  the  intermediate  piers  (at  the  north-east 
and  south-east  angles  of  the  octagon)  have  divided 
square  abaci  and  capitals  with  scalloping  on  each 
face.  Nearly  all  traces  of  the  groined  roof  of  the  aisle 
were  removed  during  the  alterations  at  the  end  of 
the  14th  century,  but  there  is  evidence  of  the  general 
direction  of  the  sustaining  ribs,  whilst  a  single  Norman 
wallshaft,  with  capital,  still  remains  to  the  north  of 
the  west  entrance.*"  Of  the  original  round  arches 
of  the  arcade  and  the  triforium  above  them,  nothing 
is  left,  the  present  acutely  pointed  arches  of  a  single 
chamfered  order  and  the  wall  above  them  being  part 
of  the  late  14th  century  reconstruction.  A  stone 
bench  originally  ran  all  round  the  circumference  of 
the  Round,  but,  save  for  a  small  portion  to  the  north 
of  the  entrance  to  the  chancel,  it  has  now  disappeared. 

The  1 2th  century  chancel  was  placed  somewhat 
irregularly  with  its  axis  about  2  ft.  to  the  north 
of  that  of  the  circular  nave,  and  incHning  slightly 
to  the  south.  Considerable  portions  of  its  north 
and  south  1*  walls,  about  36  ft.  in  length,  through  which 
the  later  arcades  have  been  cut,  have  been  retained, 
and  in  the  north  wall  over  the  later  arches,  are  the 
remains  of  three  original  round-headed  windows, 
uncovered  during  the  restoration.  Of  these  the 
westernmost  is  the  least  injured,  its  west  jamb 
being  still  in  position  as  well  as  eight  of  the  voussoirs,** 
but  of  the  others  only  portions  of  the  heads  remain. 
The  chancel,  therefore,  appears  to  have  been  lighted 
by  three  windows  on  each  side  placed  high  in  the  wall 
in  the  usual  way,  and  there  was  probably  a  small 
doorway  in  the  south  wall.*'  Considerable  portions 
of  the  original  external  corbel  tables  still  remain 
at  the  top  of  the  walls  facing  the  aisles,  consisting  of 
moulded   stones   and  grotesque  heads,   though  that 


on  the  south  side  has  been  raised  and  tlie  position 
of  the  heads  changed.'*  Sufficient  evidence  came  to 
light  during  the  restoration  to  prove  that  the  12th 
century  chancel  was  not  square  ended,  though  the 
exact  position  of  the  apse  could  not  be  definitely 
traced.*'  At  the  west  end  the  walls  are  built  up 
against  the  Round  without  bonding.*' 

About  1180-90  a  pointed*'  doorway  of  two  un- 
moulded  orders  and  hoodmould,  on  single  nook-shafts 
with  water-leaf  capitals  and  moulded  bases,  was  inserted 
in  the  north  wall  of  the  Round,  necessitating  the 
removal  of  one  of  the  windows,  and  a  lancet  was 
substituted  for  the  one  next  to  it  on  the  west,  the 
splay  of  which  is  directed  obliquely  to  the  east  in 
order  to  light  the  doorway.  The  addition  of  an  aisle, 
or  chapel,  to  the  chancel  was  effected  about  the  same 
time  by  the  piercing  of  its  north  wall**  with  two 
pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders,  which  spring 
from  a  cylindrical  middle  pier  to  which  is  attached 
on  each  of  its  cardinal  faces  a  cluster  of  small  circular 
shafts,  and  from  half-round  responds,  with  small 
flanking  shafts  to  the  outer  orders.  The  arches 
have  hoodmoulds  on  both  sides,  and  the  character 
of  the  pier  and  its  moulded  capital  and  base  is  fairly 
well  advanced,  but  the  separate  carved  capitals  of  the 
responds  are  of  earlier  transitional  type  with  incurved 
volutes  and  foliation.  The  chapel  was  dedicated  to 
St.  Thomas  of  Canterbury*'  and  St.  John  Baptist, 
and  on  each  side  of  its  east  window  was  a  carved 
image  bracket  supported  respectively  by  the  heads  of 
a  bearded  king  and  a  bishop  with  low  mitre.  These, 
in  a  more  or  less  mutilated  state,  arc  now  at  the  east 
end  of  the  north  chancel  aisle,  to  where  also  the 
window  has  been  moved.  It  consists  of  three  plain 
graded  lancets  beneath  a  containing  hoodmould  and 
appears  to  be  rather  later  in  date  than  the  arcade  ; 
in  the  same  wall,  south  of  the  altar,  is  built  a  13th 
century  round-headed  piscina,  which  no  doubt 
formerly  belonged  to  the  original  north  chapel.'* 

The  outer  north  aisle  appears  to  have  been  added 
about  1275,  the  new  arcade  consisting  of  three  arches 
of  two  chamfered  orders  with  hoodmould  on  each  side, 
on  clustered  piers  and  half-round  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases."*  Attached  to  the 
eastern  respond  is  a  pillar  piscina  the  marble  shaft 
and  basin  of  which  are  copied  from  13th  century 
fragments  found  during  the  restoration. 

It  has  been  suggested  that  the  nearness  of  occupied 
secular  buildings  on  the  south  side  of  the  12th  century 


'  The  position  of  the  buttresses,  which 
formerly  were  continued  to  the  ground, 
preclude  the  idea  that  the  porch  wai 
part  of  the  original  design  of  the  Round  : 
Cox  and  Scrjcantson,  op.  cit.  40. 

'^  The  original  wall-shafts  were  double  : 
a  sectional  stone  of  this  double-shafting, 
as  well  as  a  double  capital,  is  preserved 
amongst  the  Norman  fragments  in  the 
church.  During  the  restoration  a  con- 
siderable number  of  fragments  of  these 
shafts,  capitals  and  ribs  came  to  light  ; 
ibid.  36. 

"  This  was  the  opinion  of  Cox  and 
Scrjcantson,  but  the  decreased  thickness 
of  the  south  wall  (30  in.  as  again&t  4^  in. 
on  the  north  side)  may  indicate  that  the 
original  wall  was  removed  when  the  aisle 
was  added. 

"The  bottom  of  the  jamb  i(  about 
8  ft.  above  the  floor,  some  2  ft.  below  the 
springing  of  the  later  arch. 


"  This  is  suggested  by  a  small  sculptured 
stone  shaped  like  a  tympanum  now  pre- 
served in  the  Round,  which  may  have 
formed  the  head  of  this  doorway.  It  is 
too  small  for  the  west  entrance  of  the 
Round.  The  sculpture  is  of  the  ruder 
sort  of  Norman  work  and  apparently  is 
intended  to  represent  the  contest  between 
good  and  evil  for  a  human  soul.  A  reptile- 
headed  demon  with  long  tail  lays  hold  of 
the  right  arm  of  a  human  figure,  on  \Those 
left  is  a  smaller  and  younger  figure.  The 
tympanum  is  figured  in  Cox  and  Serjeant- 
son,  op.  cit.  39. 

"  On  the  north  side  the  corbel  table 
is  in  its  original  position  21  ft.  from  the 
ground  :  ibid.  39. 

"  Ibid.   39. 

'•  Ibid.    40. 

"  Internally  it  is  round  headed. 

■'  The  arcade  begins  about  7  ft.  cast  of 
the  Round,  as  docs  also  the  later  south 

46 


arcade.  Before  the  enl.irgement  there 
was  an  approximately  equal  length  of 
wall  at  the  cast  end. 

"  Trom  this  it  has  been  conjectured 
that  the  chapel  was  added,  or  begun  to 
be  built,  by  the  second  Simon  of  Scniis 
carl  of  Northampton  who  died  1 184.  in 
order  to  provide  a  fit  altar  for  the  com- 
mcmor.ition  of  the  murdered  archbishop  : 
Cox  and  Serjcantson,  op.  cit.  42. 

"*  There  is  a  13th-century  image  bracket 
built  into  the  wall  at  the  west  end  of  the 
outer  north  aisle,  the  mouldinga  of  which 
are  worked  diagonally  on  to  a  foliated 
Bvipport  :  its  original  position  was  probably 
in  an  uii^le  of  the  original  north  aisle  : 
ibid.  43,  where  it  is  figured. 

"  When  the  outer  aisle  was  pulled 
down  in  the  17th  century  the  arcade  was 
built  up  and  covered  over.  It  was 
opened  out  at  the  time  of  the  restora- 
tion. 


c/2 

-J 

o 


X 

U 


X 
H 
a: 
O 


< 


o 

X 


X 

U 


X 

ai 
O 

Z 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


chancel  was  the  reason  of  the  addition  of  the  outer 
north  aisle,**  but  however  that  may  be  a  south  aisle 
was  thrown  out  in  the  14th  century,  when  an  arcade 
of  two  pointed  arches  of  two  orders  was  made, 
the  inner  order  with  a  half-round  moulding  and 
the  outer  chamfered,  springing  from  a  square  pier 
chamfered  at  the  angles  and  from  responds  of  similar 
type  with  moulded  capitals  and  high  chamfered 
plinths.  Eighteenth  century  repairs  and  modern 
restoration  have  left  little  original  work  in  the  south 
aisle,*'  but  a  piscina  niche  with  plain  pointed  head 
remains  in  the  usual  position  at  the  east  end  of 
the  south  wall,  and  an  image  bracket  supported  by 
a  human  head  is  now  built  into  the  east  wall  of  the 
new  south  chancel  chapel. 

The  late  14th  century  alterations  to  the  Round 
included  not  only  the  rebuilding  of  its  upper  part, 
but  the  destruction  of  the  original  west  doorway  and 
the  wall  on  either  side  consequent  on  the  erection  of 
the  tower,  the  insertion  of  three  large  three-light 
pointed  windows,  two  on  the  south  side  and  one  on  the 
north,**  the  strengthening  of  the  north  wall  by  two 
large  buttresses,  the  rebuilding  of  the  south  porch  and 
insertion  of  a  new  doorway,  and  the  reconstruction** 
of  the  arches  from  the  Round  into  the  eastern  part  of 
the  church.  The  main  structural  change,  however, 
was  the  rebuilding  of  the  clearstory  in  its  present 
octagonal  form,  the  disappearance  of  the  triforium, 
and  the  removal  of  the  groined  roof  of  the  ambulatory 
and  of  the  round  arches  of  the  arcade.  The  clearstory 
has  a  square-headed  two-hght  window  on  each  of  its 
cardinal  faces,  plain  parapet  and  pyramidal  leaded 
roof. 

There  is  an  ascent  of  five  steps**  from  the  Round  to 
the  present  nave,  the  arch  to  which  consists  of  two 
chamfered  orders,  the  inner  springing  from  half-round 
responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  outer 
continuous.  The  arches  opening  to  the  aisles  are 
of  three  chamfered  orders,  with  half-octagonal 
responds,  the  two  outer  orders  being  continuous. 
The  nave  appears  to  have  been  re-roofed  at  this  time*' 
and  a  small  three-light  square-headed  window*' 
placed  in  the  west  gable  over  the  entrance  to  the 
Round.  Six  wooden  corbels  supporting  the  new  roof 
principals  have  sur\'ived,  three  on  each  side,  carved 
with  figures  plajnng  musical  instruments — on  the 
north  rebec,  bagpipe,  and  portative  organ,  on  the 
south  hurdy-gurdy,  kettle-drums,  and  panpipes. 
.\nother  with  harp  player  is  now  above  the  chancel 
arch  on  the  south  side.** 

The  south  doorway  of  the  Round  is  sharply  pointed 
and  of  three  continuous  unmoulded  orders,  with  plain 
segmental  rear-arch,  and  the  outer  doorway  of  the 
porch    of    two    continuous    chamfered    orders    with 


hoodmould.  There  is  a  descent  of  three  steps  from 
the  porch  to  the  floor  of  the  Round,  and  of  two  steps 
from  the  Round  to  the  tower.  The  tower  arch  is  of 
four  chamfered  orders,  the  inner  on  half-octagonal 
responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  others 
continued  or  dying  into  the  wall. 

Cut  into  the  wall  on  the  south-east  of  the  Round 
and  probably  contemporary  with  the  late  14th  century 
alterations,  is  a  banner-stave  locker  nearly  n  ft.  in 
height,**  the  upper  part  of  which,  with  pointed  head, 
is  carried  on  through  one  of  the  blocked  triforium 
windows.  On  the  outside  of  the  wall,  to  the  west  of 
the  porch,  is  an  arched  sepulchral  recess  8  ft.  5  in. 
v\idc,  probably  constructed  for  some  benefactor  at 
the  time  of  the  erection  of  the  tower.  The  two- 
centred  arch  is  without  hoodmould  and  consists 
of  a  single  ornamented  chamfered  order."- 

The  tower  is  divided  externally  into  six  stages  by 
stringcourses  which  run  round  and  mark  the  begin- 
ning of  each  set-off  of  the  diagonal  buttresses.  Owing 
to  the  fall  of  the  ground  the  western  buttresses  are  of 
unusual  size,  having  a  projection  of  10  ft.  and  a  width 
of  over  3  ft.  At  the  south  east  angle  is  a  vice  turret, 
which  is  carried  up  to  the  level  of  the  base  of  the  bell- 
chamber  windows  where  it  slopes  back  behind  an 
embattled  parapet.  The  west  doorway  is  of  four 
continuous  moulded  orders,  with  hoodmould,  and 
above  it  is  a  two-hght  window.  The  deeply-recessed 
bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with 
quatrefoil  in  the  head,  round  which  the  upper  string- 
course is  taken  as  a  hoodmould.  The  tower  finishes 
with  a  battlemented  parapet  and  had  originally 
pinnacles  at  the  angles  :  on  the  north  and  south 
sides  respectively  are  two  gargoyles.  The  octagonal 
spire  has  plain  angles  and  three  tiers  of  pointed 
lights  in  the  cardinal  faces.^* 

At  the  enlargement  in  1860-64  ^^e  nave  and  aisles 
were  increased  in  length  some  6  ft.  and  an  additional 
arch  added  at  the  east  end  of  the  main  arcades.  The 
new  chancel  is  of  two  bays,  with  projecting  semi- 
circular east  end  and  moulded  arches  on  shafted 
piers  to  the  side  chapels,*^  all  the  work  internally 
being  of  a  rather  elaborate  character  in  the  style  of 
the  late  13th  century.  There  is  a  turret  at  the 
junction  of  the  south  chapel  and  aisle  with  a  stair 
leading  on  to  the  roof.  A  new  altar  was  erected  in 
l882.« 

The  font  is  modern  and  stands  on  three  circular 
steps  in  the  middle  of  the  Round  ;  it  is  a  memorial 
to  Canon  James,  who  took  an  active  part  in  the  restora- 
tion, and  is  copied  from  the  13th  century  font  in  the 
cathedral  of  Hildesheim,  save  that  the  figures  sup- 
porting the  bowl  are  knights  in  mail.  The  font 
replaced  a  small  circular  stone  basin,  probably  dating 


■'  Cox  and  Strje.mtson,  op.  cit.  43. 

"  The  window!  have  been  reitored 
in  the  style  of  the  14th  century,  the  middle 
one  being  entirely  modem. 

••  The  mullions  and  tracery  of  these 
window*  were  removed  during  the  i8th 
century,  probably  about  17S1  (Cox  and 
Serieantion,  op.  cit.  61),  .ind  in  their 
present  form  arc  modem. 

••  It  it  possible  that  the  entrances  to 
the  aisles  may  have  been  now  first  con- 
structed. 

••  The  difference  of  level  is  z  ft.  8  in. 

"  Cox  and  Serjeantson  were  of  opinion 
th»t  the   south  wall  of  the  south  aisle 


was  also  then  reconstructed  and  that  a  new 
five-light  window  was  placed  in  the  east 
end  of  the  chancel  :  op.  cit.  46.  This 
window,  with  vertical  tracery,  is  shown  in 
a  south-east  view  of  the  church,  1761. 
The  east  window  of  the  south  aisle  was 
then  square-headed  and  of  three  lights. 

"  The  middle  light  contains  some  14th 
century  glass  brought  from  the  destroyed 
Hospital  of  St.  Thomas,  including  a 
scroll  inscribed,  '  Ave  Maria  gratia  plena." 
This  it  the  only  ancient  glass  in  the 
church. 

•*  Cox  and  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  47-41), 
where  the  corbels  are  figured. 

47 


'"  The  width  is  12  in.  and  the 
depth  at  the  base  2  ft.  3  in.  The 
opening  has  a  rebate  all  round  of  about 
3  in. 

"  The  recess  seems  never  to  have  been 
used  for  burial  :  reasons  for  ascribing  its 
construction  to  Sir  Thomas  Latimer,  who 
died  in  1401,  are  given  by  Cox  and 
Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  124. 

•^  The  total  height  of  tower  and  spire 
is  116  ft. 

■'  The  arches  are  filled  with  wooden 
screens  erected  in   1880. 

'*  Designed,  at  were  the  screens,  by 
Mr.  J.  nidrid  Scott. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


from  1660,  the  shaft  of  which  is  preserved  in  the 
churchyard.**  The  wooden  pulpit  is  modern,  on  a 
stone  base. 

A  number  of  fragments  of  12th  and  13th  century 
ornamented  coffin  lids  have  been  preserved  ;  four 
of  these  are  in  the  Round,  and  others  are  built  into 
the  walls  at  the  west  end  of  the  outer  north  aisle  and 
in  the  east  wall  of  the  north  chancel  chapel. 

In  the  Round,  now  against  the  north  wall,  is  a 
floor  slab^  with  five  quadrangular  brass  plates  and 
border  inscription,*'  in  memory  of  George  Coles 
(d.  1640)  and  his  two  wives.  In  the  upper  plate  he 
is  represented  standing  between  them  giving  a  hand 
to  each,  and  is  bareheaded,  with  falhng  collar,  doublet 
and  hose,  and  a  short  cloak  ;  the  wives  are  in  bodiced 
gowns  and  wear  wide  neck  ruffs  and  high  crowned 
hats.  Below  are  smaller  plates  with  two  groups  of 
children,  three  by  the  first  wife  and  nine  by  the  second, 
and  under  these  again  an  emblem  of  clasped  hands, 
explained  in  eight  lines  of  verse  below. 

Amongst  a  large  number  of  mural  monuments^ 
are  memorials  to  members  of  the  families  of  Fleetwood 
(1676-1747),  Churchill  (1750-1803),  Woolston  (1705- 
1775),  Thompson  (1786-1893),  and  others. 

A  wall  painting  in  the  Round  exposed  in  1843  has 
since  disappeared,  the  walls  having  been  stripped, 
but  there  are  traces  of  another  on  the  splay  of  the 
blocked  westernmost  window  of  the  12th  century 
chancel.** 

There  is  a  scratch  dial  built  bottom  upwards  into 
the  south-east  angle  of  the  porch  about  7  ft.  from  the 
ground.*" 

An  oak  lych  gate  was  erected  in  1888  at  the  west 
entrance  to  the  churchyard  in  Sheep  Street. 

There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells,  seven  of  which  were 
recast  in  1927  by  Gillett  and  Johnson,  of  Croydon  ; 
the  old  bell  (now  seventh)  was  cast  by  Henry  Bagley 
of  Chacomb  in  l68l.*'-  A  clock  is  first  mentioned  in 
1634  ;  the  present  clock  was  erected  in  1882. 

The  plate  is  all  modern  with  the  exception  of  a 
17th  century  pewter  flagon,  and  four  pewter  plates 
made  bv  Thomas  King  of  London  in  1675.*^ 

The  earliest  registers  are  as  follows  :  (i)  baptisms 
1571-1574,  1577-1600,  1606-1722,  marriages  1566- 
1722,**  burials  1571-1722,**  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials 
1723-1778,  marriages  1723-1754.  The  churchwardens' 
accounts  and  vestry  books  begin  in  1634. 

Built  into  the  wall  of  a  house^  at  the  south-west 
corner  of   the   churchyard   is   a   stone   of  cruciform 


shape,  with  a  rudely  carved  figure  of  our  Lord  on 
the  Cross,  probably  a  gable  termination  on  some 
part  of  the  church  at  the  time  of  the  building  of  the 
tower.*' 

The  church  of  ALL  SAINTS  stands  in  the  centre 
of  the  town  on  an  island  site  bounded  on  the  north  by 
Mercers'  Row,  on  the  south  by  George  Row,  on  the 
'.vest  by  the  Drapery,  and  on  the  east  by  Wood  Hill. 
It  was  originally  a  cruciform  structure  consisting  of 
aisled  chancel,  central  tower,  north  and  south  tran- 
septs, and  clearstoried  nave  with  north  and  south 
aisles,  the  oldest  parts  of  which  appear  to  have  dated 
from  the  12th  centuiy.  The  destruction  of  the 
medieval  fabric  in  the  fire  of  1675  was  so  complete 
that  only  the  tower  and  a  small  crypt  below  the 
chancel  were  preserved.  These  are  incorporated  in 
the  present  building,  erected  in  1676-80  in  the 
Renaissance  style  of  the  day,  which  consists  of  chancel, 
rectangular  nave,  and  west  tower  flanked  by  north  and 
south  transepts.  It  stands  on  the  site  of  the  chancel 
of  the  medieval  church,  the  whole  of  which  west  of 
the  tower  was  destroyed,  a  small  churchyard  being 
theie  formed  and  the  rest  of  the  space  thrown  into  the 
roadway. 

There  is  no  authentic  drawing  of  the  church  as  it 
was  before  1675,  but  Speed's  map  (1610)  shows  a 
cruciform  building  with  central  tower,  and  a  picture 
made  in  1669  by  one  of  the  artists  accompanying 
Duke  Cosmo  III  of  Tuscany  indicates  a  long  nave  of 
seven  bays  with  west  gable  flanked  by  turrets  or 
pinnacles.*'  In  a  descripticn  of  the  old  and  new 
churches  by  Henry  Lee,  town  clerk  in  1675,  the  writer 
states  that  the  old  chancel  was  '  very  large  with  great 
stalls  and  large  desks  before  them  on  the  north  and 
south  sides,  and  on  the  west  side  very  gentile  pews 
with  desks  before  them  to  lean  upon,'  and  he  quotes  a 
saying  that  the  church  was  '  as  large  as  some  cathe- 
drals.' At  its  west  end  were  '  very  stately  gates  at 
the  entiance  and  a  veiy  high  and  large  window.' 
There  were  '  three  aisles,'  and  in  26  Henry  VIII 
(1534-5)  'the  middle  roof  was  made  and  raised  very 
high  and  lofty.'  On  the  middle  of  the  church  wall 
was  a  chapel  erected  by  Mr.  Neale  (mayor  in  15 39), 
'  very  finely  built  with  white  stone,'  and  there  was  '  a 
south  porch  very  great  and  large  and  over  it  was  a 
large  room  in  which  the  spiritual  court  was  held.' 
There  is  also  mention  of  a  tomb  and  vault  built  in 
1585  'in  the  place  called  the  Lady  Chapel  in  the 
chancel,'  and  of  '  an  old  strong  building  adjoining  to 


"  The  baiin  l«  buried  beneath  the 
prcient  font. 

"  The  ilab  '  has  been  moved  several 
times  within  the  memory  of  man,  so 
that  it  is  difficult  to  say  what  was  its 
original  position  '  :  Cox  and  Scrjcantson, 
op.  cit.  88. 

•'  The  inscription  reads,  '  Here  rcsteth 
ye  body  of  Mr.  George  Coles  of  North- 
ampton w'h  his  2  wives  Sarah  and  Eleanor 
by  whom  he  had  iz  children.  He  gave 
to  pious  uses  xi'  yearely  for  ever  to  this 
towne  and  deceased  y"  first  of  January 
1640.' 

•• '  At  the  time  of  the  restoration  of 
the  church  the  mural  monuments  were 
all  taken  down,  and  much  carelessness 
and  thoughtlessness  characterised  the 
refiling.'  Cox  and  Serjeantson,  op.  cit. 
89,  where  all  the  inscriptions  are  given. 

••  Ibid.  67. 


*"  It  is  a  complete  circle,  with  a  per- 
pendicular and  a  horizontal  line  cutting 
across  it,  and  radiating  lines  iii  three  of 
the  right  angles  thus  formed. 

"Till  1898  there  were  six  bells,  of 
which  Bagley's  remaining  bell  w.is  the 
fourth,  two  trebles  by  Mears  and  Stain- 
bank  in  commemoration  of  Queen 
Victoria's  Jubilee,  and  dated  1897,  being 
then  added.  In  the  1927  recasting 
Bagley's  bell,  then  sixth,  became  the 
seventh.  Another  of  the  old  bells  was 
dated  1681,  the  tenor  1733,  the  treble 
1739,  and  two  others  1805  and  1857 
respectively.  The  inscriptions  are  given 
in  North,  Ch.  Bells  of  i\'orlhjnli,  349, 

*'  The  modern  plate  consists  of  a  silver 
chalice  parcel  gilt,  and  a  silver  paten  of 
1879,  and  a  silver  gilt  chalice  and  paten 
of  1884.  Of  the  plates  two  arc  inscribed 
'  Saintse  Pulkers,'  and  llie  odifrs  '  S.iint 

48 


Scplkers'  and  'Saint  Sepulkers'  respec- 
tively. 

*^  October  1648-November  1651  miss- 
ing, a  leaf  being  torn  out. 

'*  No  entries  for  1575  and  1576. 

**  In  north  end  wall  of  no.  68  Sheep 
Street,  facing  the  churchyard. 

*"  Cox  and  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  120, 
where  it  is  figured.  The  sculpture  is 
repeated  on  the  other  side  of  the  stone- 
[Northants  N.  and  Q.  ii,  240)  which 
measures  19  in.  across  the  arms  and  about 
20  in.  in  height. 

•'  A  sketch  of  this  drawing  is  reproduced 
in  Rev.  R.  M.  Serjcantson's  Hut.  oj  Ch.  oj 
All  Saintt,  Northampi.  (1901),  160,  but 
its  architectural  veracity  is  open  to  c|uei- 
tion,  especially  as  regards  the  tower, 
which  is  shown  with  open  arches.  Mr. 
Serjcantson's  book  has  been  used  in  the 
following  (ic-S(  ription  of  the  church. 


Northampton  :  All  Saints'  Church  :  The  Interior,  looking  East 


Northampton  :   All  Saints'  Church  from  thk  South-east 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


the  south  side  of  the  chancel  reported  to  be  formerly 
a  chapel,'  in  which  were  the  stairs  to  the  crypt.** 

No  evidence  has  been  found  of  pre-Conquest  worl;, 
and  though  no  architectural  remains  or  fragments  of 
I2th  century  date  have  come  to  light,  there  seems 
some  reason  to  believe  that  the  core  of  the  pillars 
supporting  the  tower  is  of  that  period.**  From  the 
Bishop  of  Lincoln's  grant  in  1 232  of  an  indulgence  of 
twenty  da;  s  to  contributors  to  the  work  of  All  Saints'* 
it  may  be  assumed  that  a  considerable  amount  of 


the  building  was  mainly  of  this  period,"  the  changes 
in  the  15th  century  being  those  already  mentioned, 
together  with  the  introduction  of  pointed  arches 
below  tlie  original  tower  openings.  The  church  was 
'greatly  in  decay'  in  January  1594-5,  and  in  the 
following  March  much  damage  was  done  by  a  storm, 
'  many  large  stones  being  blown  en  to  the  leads  ' 
and  through  the  roof  'just  over  the  mayor's  seat.'  ** 
In  1617  considerable  repairs  were  done  to  the  tower,** 
and  eithor  then  or  a  few  years  later  the  15th  century 


3: 


Organ 
Chamber 


m 


Chancel 


mm^M^ 


«« 


iiiwSik^al 


War  Memorial 
Chapel 


3: 


IE 


I05__0 


10 


20 


30 


40 


50 


Scale  of  Feet 


W 
121!)  Century 
Pre  1675 

^l676-80 

Eai70l 

CH  Modern 


Plan  of  All  Saints'  Church,  Northampton 


-x> 


building  was  at  that  time  in  progress,  perhaps  the 
reconstruction  of  the  Norman  church  ;  but  whatever 
the  nature  of  the  work  then  done  it  probably  con- 
tinued for  many  years  aftet  Bishop  Wells's  death  in 
1235,  though  no  remains  of  distinctly  13th  century 
masonry  have  been  found.  The  church,  however, 
appears  to  have  undergone  a  variety  of  alterations  and 
adaptations  during  the  14th  and  two  succeeding 
centuries."  The  existing  crypt,  below  the  western 
part  of  the  chancel,  is  of  the  early  14th  century,  and 
the  upper  part  of  the  tower  seems  to  be  very  little 
later.  Pieces  of  jamb  and  mullion  stones  recovered 
from  crypt  excavations'*  were  all  of  the  14th  century, 
and  it  is  not  unlikely  that  at  the  time  of  its  destruction 


arches  were  built  up  and  the  existing  narrow  arches 
on  the  north,  east  and  south  sides  constructed.** 
There  were  repairs  at  the  west  end  in  1624,  in  the 
chancel  in  1632,  and  of  a  more  general  character  in 
1633-5";  '"  1667  the  roof  of  the  south  aisle  of  the 
chancel  was  '  very  ruinous  and  out  of  repair.' 

The  new  church  was  opened  in  September  1680, 
but  was  not  completed  in  its  present  form  till  the 
beginning  of  the  1 8th  century.**  The  great  west 
portico  was  erected  in  1701,  and  the  cupola  and  vane 
added  to  the  tower  in  1704.  A  gallery  was  erected  on 
the  north  side  of  the  nave  in  1 714,  but  it  was  not  until 
1 81 5  that  the  south  gallery  was  set  up.**  The  church 
was  partially  restored  in  1 840,*'  and  more  extensively 


*•  Strjeantson,  op.  cit.  245-6. 

•»  Ibid.  236.     "  Ibid.  16.     "  Ibid.  236. 

"  During  alterations  in  1886. 

"  Thii  wai  the  opinion  of  Mr.  Matthew 
Holding,  architect,  quoted  by  Serjeantion, 
139. 

"  Serjeantion,  op.  cit.  243  :  'A  great 
part  of  the  church  ii  fallen  down  by 
meant  of  the  great  wind  that  happened 
on  TbuitJay  lait  (March   20).' 


"  Ibid.  244. 

"  Mr.  Holding  dated  theit  arches  from 
about  1619,  when  it  is  recorded  that  '  this 
year  the  congregation  of  All  Saints  was 
afraid  the  church  would  have  fallen  in 
sermon  time.' 

"  Scrjcantson,  op.  cit.  244.  In  Novem- 
ber 1658  it  was  ordered  that  the  church- 
wardens '  do  take  and  weigh  the  lead  that 
came  oB  the  chapel  of  the  Lady  Mary  and 

49 


other  the  materials  thereof  except  the 
walls  and  what  else  may  be  useful  for 
the  church,  and  make  sale  of  them.' 

"  Ibid.  247. 

"  At  the  west  end  a  gallery  nas  erected 
in  1806  on  each  side  of  the  organ,  which 
had  been  placed  there  in  1700. 

•»  It  was  closed  for  five  weeks :  the 
tower  was  restored  '  in  a  subsuntial 
manner.' 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


in  1865-6  when  the  galleries  were  reduced  in  width,*^ 
the  seating  cut  down  15  in.  in  height,  and  made  to 
face  wholly  east,  the  chancel  screen  removed  and  the 
position  of  the  pulpit  altered.*^  In  1883  an  organ 
chamber  was  built  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel,*^ 
and  in  1920  a  War  Memorial  Chapel**  was  erected  on 
the  south  side.  The  tower  was  restored  and  refaced 
in  1928. 

Of  the  older  parts  of  the  fabric  something  has 
already  been  said  about  the  tower,  the  lower  part  of 
which  appears  to  incorporate  much  12th  century 
masonry,  though  no  architectural  features  of  that 
period  are  now  visible.  Internally,  the  tower  is 
12  ft.  II  in.  square  on  the  ground  floor,  with  walls 
5  ft.  6  in.  thick,  except  on  the  west  side  where  the 
thickness  is  increased  by  the  17th  century  facing. 
There  is  a  vice  in  the  north-west  angle.  The  original 
openings  appear  to  have  been  11  ft.  3  in.  wide,  and 
there  is  some  reason  to  believe  that  the  four  lofty  semi- 
circular arches  in  the  upper  part  of  the  ringing 
chamber  are  ancient.*^  The  inserted  15th  century 
arches  spring  from  half-octagonal  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  at  a  height  of  about  24  ft.  above  the 
floor,**  but  in  their  turn  ai  e  filled  on  three  sides  by  the 
e.\isting  low  and  narrow  17th  century  aiches  of  four 
orders.  The  levels  of  the  different  floors  have  been 
alteied  from  time  to  time.  The  vice  projects  as  a 
half-octagonal  turret  to  the  level  of  the  bell-chamber 
stage,  and  has  a  pointed  doorway  now  giving  on  to  the 
roof  of  the  transept.*'  The  bell-chamber  has  on 
each  side  a  pointed  window  of  two  trefoiled  lights 
with  elongated  quatrefoil  in  the  head**  and  low  tran- 
som, the  windows  being  recessed  within  wide  two- 
centred  moulded  arches.  The  top  of  the  tower  with 
its  balustraded  parapet  belongs  to  the  17th  century 
rebuilding. 

The  cr^pt  is  under  the  western  part  of  the  present 
chancel  and  extends  about  4  ft.  below  the  nave.  It 
was  originally  22  ft.  10  in.  square  internally,  covered 
with  a  vault  of  four  quadripartite  compartments,  with 
longitudinal  and  transverse  chamfered  ribs  foiming 
pointed  arches,  springing  from  a  central  octagonal  pier 
and  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
ribs  spring  at  a  height  of  about  6  ft.  above  the  floor, 
the  lotal  height  of  the  crypt  having  been  about  14  ft., 
but  the  floor  is  now  considerably  raised.  In  the  east 
wall  are  two  small  rectangulai  windows,  now  blocked, 
and   the   diagonal   angle    buttresses   show    that    the 


medieval  chancel  ended  here,  the  17th  century 
chancel  being  erected  about  16  ft.  eastward.  The 
crypt  has  undergone  considerable  alteration  and  has 
long  housed  the  heating  apparatus.  Many  of  its 
original  features  are  mutilated  or  destroyed,  and  its 
size  is  reduced  to  about  18  ft.  by  ig  ft.** 

.4s  rebuilt  in  1676-80"  the  church  may  be  said  to 
follow  the  Greek  cross  plan  used  by  Wren  at  St.  Mary- 
at-Hill,  the  area  enclosed  being  here  a  rectangle 
72  ft.  2  in.  long  by  68  ft.  9  in.  in  width,  the  super- 
structure of  which  is  formed  into  a  cross  by  tlie 
grouping  of  vaulted  ceilings  round  a  central  dome. 
Four  tall  stone  columns  with  enriched  Ionic  capitals,'* 
standing  on  high  pedestals,  carry  a  dentilled  cornice, 
above  which  spring  segmental  plaster  vaults  spanning 
the  four  arms  of  the  cross,  but,  instead  of  intersecting 
in  a  groin,  they  are  treated  as  arches  and  carry  a 
cupola  or  dome  resting  on  pendentives.  The  four 
compartments  at  the  angles  of  the  building  have  flat 
ceilings,  which  form  abutments  to  the  arched  roofs, 
or  vaults,  covering  the  arms  of  the  cross.  The  dome 
is  lighted  by  a  lantern.  Above  the  capitals  of  the 
pillars  the  whole  construction  is  of  wood,  with 
elaborate  plaster  ceilings,  the  general  effect  being  of 
much  dignity  and  beauty. 

The  chancel  measures  internally  33  ft.  by  24  ft., 
and  was  lighted  by  a  large  five-light  east  window  and 
by  two  windows  in  the  side  walls.  The  east  window 
is  now  blocked  by  a  classic  teredos  erected  in  1888, 
occupying  the  whole  of  the  end  wall,  the  principal 
feature  of  which  is  a  large  painted  panel  of  the  Cruci- 
fixion'* flanked  by  coupled  Corinthian  columns 
supporting  an  entablature  and  lofty  semicircular 
canopy.  One  of  the  windows  on  the  north  side  has 
been  displaced  by  the  organ  chamber,  and  those  on 
the  south  have  been  shortened  so  as  to  clear  the  roof 
of  the  War  Memorial  Chapel.  The  elaborate  moulded 
plaster  ceiling  of  the  chancel  is  contemporary  with 
the  rebuilding,  but  the  ornament  on  the  walls  dates 
only  from  1888,  in  which  year  also  the  arch  to  the 
nave  was  remodelled,  its  curve  improved,  and  sup- 
porting Ionic  columns  and  entablature  introduced." 

Externally,  the  17th  century  work  is  faced  with 
ironstone  ashlar,  with  plinth  and  cornice,  and  the 
windows  are  all  round-headed,  with  pseudo-Gothic 
tracery.  The  north  and  south  arms  of  the  cross  and 
the  east  end  of  tlie  chancel  are  slightly  advanced 
and  have  large  five-light  windows  and  curved  pedi- 


"  They  originally  extended  the  full 
width  of  the  aislei,  in  line  with  the  pillars : 
they  were  »et  back  5  ft. 

•"  The  church  wai  re-opened  in  October 
1S66.  There  had  been  much  intra-mural 
burial  :  before  the  seats  were  reconstructed 
the  floors  were  taken  up,  the  graves 
arched  over  or  covered  with  stone 
slabs,  and  the  whole  area  within  the  walls 
laid  with  a  bed  of  concrete  ;  Scrjeantson, 
op.  cit.  252.  A  small  crypt,  or  bonehousc, 
under  the  middle  part  of  the  south  aisle, 
was  filled  up  at  this  lime  :  ibid.  242. 

••  In  the  angle  formed  by  the  nave 
and  chancel  the  walls  of  which  were 
advanced  and  the  windows  re-used.  The 
organ  was  at  this  time  moved  from  the 
writ  gallery. 

*•  Designed  by  Arthur  C.  Blomfield  and 
A.  J.  Driver,  .irchitects,  London.  It  is 
entered  from  the  east  end  0/  the  south 
aisle  of  ihe  nave. 


''■'  This  was  the  opinion  of  Mr.  Holding. 
The  arches  are  about  30  ft.  to  the  spring- 
ing. Portions  of  late  12th  century 
moulding  in  the  angles  of  the  tower, 
10  ft.  from  the  ground,  were  thought  by 
Sir  Henry  Dryden  to  be  the  impost 
mouldings  of  low  arches.  The  difficult 
problem  of  the  tower  is  discussed 
at  length  in  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  237- 
240. 

"  Ibid.  239. 

"'  A  small  fragmentof  weather  moulding 
against  the  turret  indicates  the  height 
of  the  roof  of  the  old  north  transept :  ibid. 
240. 

"  The  tracery  is  modern,  but  is  said  to 
reproduce  the  old  design. 

••  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  241,  where  there 
is  a  lengthy  description  of  the  crypt  by 
Sir  Henry  Dryden,  from  notes  taken 
during  the  alterations  in  1886.  The 
vault  is  mutilated  at  the  west  end  tu  maki- 

50 


room  for  the  pavement  of  the  cast  end  of 
the  17th  century  nave.  The  entrance 
eccms  to  have  been  originally  from  the 
outside,  on  the  south  of  the  chancel. 

•"  It  is  said  to  have  been  designed 
by  Henry  G.  Jones,  architect,  of  North- 
ampton. 

'  *  The  capitals  bear  the  emblems  of  the 
four  Evangelists  in  the  hollows  of  the 
abaci. 

"  The  panel  is  let  into  the  recess  of  the 
window.  Two  large  paintings  of  Moses 
and  Aaron,  together  with  the  Decalogue, 
Creed,  and  Lord's  Prayer,  formerly  at  the 
east  end  of  the  chancel,  were  removed  to 
the  west  gallery  when  the  rcredos  was 
erected.  The  paintings  arc  attributed, 
probably  erroneously,  to  Sir  Godfrey 
Kncller  :    Scijcantson,  op.  cit.  264. 

'*  It  was  originally  quite  plain  ;  the 
pilaitert  in  the  nave  also  dale  from  this 
period. 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


raents,  the  other  windows  in  nave  and  chancel  being 
of  three  lights.  There  are  elliptical  windows  in  the 
nave  pediments,  and  the  roofs  are  leaded.  The 
dome  sits  on  a  square  base. 

The  transepts  are  internally  about  31  ft.  long  by 
20  ft.  in  width,  and  have  straight  dcntilled  pediments 
and  five-hght  end  windows.  They  contain  the 
gallery  staircases  and  vestries,'*  and  in  the  south 
transept  the  Consistory  Court  :  they  also  form 
vestibules,  with  lofty  round-headed  outer  doorways 
opening  on  to  the  portico.  The  smaller  west  door- 
way of  the  tower  is  flanked  externally  by  semicircular 
wall  recesses.  The  great  oct.istyle  portico  covers  the 
west  end  of  the  building  to  within  about  8  ft.  of 
the  ends  of  the  transepts  :  it  is  two  columns  deep 
and  the  Ionic  order  is  used.  The  entablature  is 
surmounted  by  a  balustrade  with  urn  ornaments, 
in  the  centre  of  which  are  the  Royal  Arms  and  a  statue 
of  Charles  II  in  Roman  costume  and  long  flowing 
wig,  added  in  1 71 2.  Along  the  frieze  is  the  inscrip- 
tion :  '  This  statue  was  erected  in  memory  of  King 
Charles  II,  who  gave  a  thousand  tons  of  timbei 
towards  the  rebuilding  of  this  church,  and  to  this 
town  seven  years'  cliimney  money  collected  in  it. 
John  Agutter,  mayor,  1 712.' 

The  white  marble  chalice  font  was  the  gift  in 
1680  of  Thomas  WiUoughby." 

The  carved  17th  century  pulpit  stood  from  1 81 5 
till  1866  in  front  of  the  altar  below  the  chancel  arch, 
but  was  then  removed  to  its  present  position  on  the 
north  side  :  it  was  altered  in  1888  and  a  new  base 
provided."  The  removal  of  the  17th  century  chancel 
screen  is  to  be  deplored  :  its  carved  pilasters,  pedi- 
ment and  Royal  Arms  have  been  worked  up  in  the 
three  western  doorways  of  the  nave.''  The  mayor's 
seat  has  a  carved  and  panelled  back  surmounted  by  the 
arms  of  the  town  and  is  inscribed  'Anno  Majoratus 
20  Ricard  White.    Anno  Dom.  1680.' 

The  only  monument  apparently'*  older  than  1675 
is  a  marble  tablet  at  the  west  end  of  the  south  aisle 
in  memory  of  John  Travell  (d.  1669).  T'^^  '^^^^ 
monuments  include  tablets  to  Dr.  John  Conant, 
vicar  (d.  1693);  Dr.  Daniel  Danvers  (d.  1699); 
John  Bailes  (d.  1706),  who  '  was  above  126  years  old 
and  had  his  hearing,  sight,  and  memory  to  the  last '  ; 
Isabella  Stewart,  daughter  of  John  Haldane  of  Lan- 
rick  and  widow  of  the  Jacobite  leader  Charles  Stewart 
of  Ardsheal,  who  died  at  the  Peacock  Inn,  Northamp- 
ton, 8  .'^pril  1782  ;  Sir  John  Stonhouse,  oart.,  founder 
of  the  County  Infirmary  (d.  1795),  and  others."  A 
record  of  the  monument  of  Francis  Samwell,  erected  in 
1585,  has  been  preserved,  and  also  of  upwards  of  a 
hundred  coats  of  arms  taken  from  stained  glass  or 
from  monuments  in  the  church  at  the  beginning  of 
the  17th  century.** 

There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells  by  Chapman  and  Meats, 


of  London,  1782.*^  In  1829  the  corporation  presented 
a  clock  and  new  set  of  chimes  by  John  Briant  of 
Hertford.** 

The  plate  consists  of  a  set  of  two  cups  and  cover 
patens,  two  breadholders,  two  flagons  and  two  alms 
dishes  of  1677,  given  in  that  year  by  '  Mrs.  Mary 
Reynolds,  relict  of  Edward,  late  Lord  Bishop  of 
Norwich  ' ;  a  cup  and  strainer  spoon  of  1718  ;  a  cup 
of  1740;  two  cups  of  1888,  and  a  small  plain  paten. 
There  is  also  a  plated  set  of  seven  pieces.*' 

The  registers  before  18 1 2  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1560-1722,  marriages  1559-1721,  burials 
1559-1722,  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1721-1812, 
marriages  1721-1754,  (iii)  marriages  1754.-1S12.  There 
is  also  a  series  of  Vestry  Books  from  1620. 

Interments  in  the  churchyard  west  of  the  portico 
were  prohibited  in  1857,  and  in  1871,  with  a  view  to 
widening  the  lower  end  of  The  Drapery  a  portion  of 
the  yard  was  cut  off.  Originally  enclosed  by  low  fence 
walls  on  the  north  and  south  and  by  an  iron  grille 
on  the  west,  the  churchyard  was  afterwards  bounded 
by  a  low  wall  and  chains  ;  these  remained  until  1926, 
when  the  whole  space  was  added  to  the  roadway  and 
the  existing  steps  to  the  portico  formed.  An  octa- 
gonal conduit,  which  stood  at  the  south-west  angle  of 
the  churchyard,  was  taken  down  in  1831  ;  it  is  said 
to  have  been  of  14th  century  date.**  A  war  memorial 
in  the  churchyard,  designed  by  Sir  Edward  Lutyens, 
was  unveiled  by  Gen.  Lord  Home  on  1 1  Nov.  1926. 

The  church  of  ST.  GILES  consists  of  chancel 
42  ft.  by  25  ft.  6  in.  with  north  and  south  chapels, 
central  tower  17  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft.  6  in.,  clearstoried 
nave  of  five  bays  68  ft.  6  in.  by  21  ft.,  north  and  south 
aisles  respectively  14  ft.  6  in.  and  15  ft.  8  in.  wide, 
outer  north  aisle  of  four  bays  14  ft.  9  in.  wide,  and 
north  and  south  porches,  all  these  measurements 
being  internal.  The  tower  is  flanked  on  the  north 
and  south  by  continuations  of  the  aisles  representing 
former  transepts.  Including  the  outer  north  aisle 
the  total  internal  width  of  this  building  is  74  ft.  6  in. 
The  south  chancel  chapel  is  now  the  organ  chamber, 
and  the  vestry  is  in  the  space  south  of  the  tower. 

The  building  is  faced  with  dressed  ironstone  and 
has  plain  parapets  throughout ;  the  porches  are  tiled, 
but  elsewhere  the  roofs  are  leaded. 

The  architectural  history  of  the  building  may  be 
briefly  summarized  as  follows  :  as  originally  built 
early  in  the  12th  century  it  was  an  aisleless  cross 
church  with  central  tower,  the  lower  part  of  which 
remains.  Early  in  the  13th  century  the  chancel  was 
rebuilt,  lengthened  and  increased  in  width  on  the 
north  side,  and  later  in  the  same  century  the  south 
arcade  of  the  nave  was  begun,  with  the  intention 
of  adding  aisles,  but  was  temporarily  abandoned. 
The  tower  was  strengthened  at  the  same  time  by 
blocking  up  its  four  arches  and   building  narrower 


"'*  In  the  north  transept  a  clergy  vcetry 
on  the  ground  floor  with  choir  practice 
room  above,  in  the  louth  transept  a 
temporary  choir  vestry. 

'*  It  is  inscribed  '  Donum  Thomae 
Willoughby  armigeri  Ecclesiz  Omnium 
Sanctorum  in  Northon.' 

"  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  261. 

"  Ibid  252. 

"  It  is  possible  that  this  monument  may 
have  been  erected  after  the  fire. 

"  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  277-297,  where 


the  inscriptions  on  all  the  monuments  are 
given.  Certain  of  the  tablets  were  re- 
moved from  the  ch.Tncel  to  other  parts  of 
the  church  in  1888. 

'°  Ibid.  278-280,  where  the  Samwell 
monument  and  some  pieces  of  heraldic 
glass  are  figured,  taken  from  the  Belcher 
MS.  in  the  Bodleian  Library  (Lansd. 
MSS.  213,  col.  379). 

"  North,  Cb.  Brils  of  Ncritanls,  344, 
where  the  inscriptions  are  given.     Before 


51 


1782  there  were  six  bells,  which  appear 
to  have  been  by  Bagley. 

"  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.,  273.  The  date 
1829  is  on  the  west  face  of  the  tower  above 
the  clock ;  chimes  had  been  presented 
by  the  Corporation  in  the  reign  of  Eliza- 
beth, and  a  *  new  pair  of  chimes  *  was 
erected  in  1628.  The  chimes  were 
renewed  in  1651  and  1680:  ibid. 
275-6. 

"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Norlbants   199. 

'*  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  302. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


arches  within,  of  which  those  on  the  north  and  south 
still  remain.  In  the  first  half  of  the  14th  century  the 
chancel  was  repaired,  its  east  wall  rebuilt,  a  chapel 
added  on  the  north  side,  and  the  aisles  and  arcades 
of  the  nave  (of  three  bays)  completed  ;  the  aisles 
were  afterwards  continued  eastward  on  the  site  of  the 
transepts,**  the  work  being  finished  about  1350-60. 
The  chapel  south  of  the  chancel  was  finished  in  its 
present  form  later  in  the  century,  the  church  then 
assuming  the  plan  it  retained  till  the  middle  of  the 
19th  century.     In  1613  the  tower  fell,  demolishing 


outer  order,  the  greater  part  of  the  hoodmould,  and 
the  moulded  bases  of  the  shafts  only  are  original, 
the  rest  being  a  modern  reconstruction.  The 
doorway  is  of  three  orders  all  with  chevcron  ornament, 
the  two  outer  on  shafts  with  enriched  cushion  and 
scalloped  capitals,  the  inner  continuous  :  the  hood- 
mould  is  enriched  with  a  reticulated  pattern.  The 
smaller  round-headed  north  doorway  is  of  two  un- 
moulded  orders,  but  the  jambs  and  imposts  are 
modern.  The  new  east  and  west  arches  of  the  tower 
represent  the  original  openings  in  dimensions  if  not 


"^^ 


Porch ^ 


-^^r 


JI 


,>^^^ 


<? 


Outer  North  Aisle  ^ 

3"  v::;q  :  :'":s$':':::]o 


■  12™  Century  illSUi  Century  late 

□  121!!  Century  late  ^142  Cent. first  half 
ISIB  Century  early ^142!  Cent. third  quarteu, 
Ei3c.l512 

^  ?  1616  (doubtful) 
□  Modern 


S(m,fofFeet 

Plan  of  St.  Giles'  Church,  Northampton 


or  seriously  injuring  the  north  arcade  of  the  nave, 
but  both  were  rebuilt  three  years  later.**  In  1853-5 
the  nave  and  aisl'^s  were  restored  and  extended  west- 
ward two  bays,*'  an  extra  north  aisle  added,  the  13th 
century  fillings  removed  from  the  east  and  west 
tower  arches,  the  whole  of  the  church  west  of  the 
tower  re-roofed,  its  windows  renewed  and  tlie  porches 
rebuilt.**     The  chancel  was  restored  in  1876.*' 

Of  the  1 2th  century  church  little  remains  but  the 
lower  part  of  the  tower  and  the  west  and  north 
doorways,  both  very  much  restored,  which  were 
re-erected  in  their  present  positions  at  the  time  of  the 
extension.     In  the  west  doorway  some  stones  in  the 


in  details,**  but  several  voussoirs  and  the  line  of  the 
eastern  jamb  of  the  blocked  12th  century  north  arch 
have  been  exposed  towards  the  aisle. 

The  projecting  staircase  turret  at  the  north-east 
angle  of  the  tower,  entrance  to  which  was  from  the 
transept,  appears  to  have  been  added  later  in  the 
century,*'  after  the  completion  of  the  cross-plan  and 
may  at  first  have  been  intended  to  be  external.  On 
its  east  face  are  three  narrow  windows,  the  lowest 
round-headed,  now  overlooking  the  chancel,  and  the 
stairway  is  vaulted  with  a  winding  barrel  vault  of 
plastered  rubble.  The  round-headed  doorway  on 
the  west  side  is  of  a  single  square  order  vrith  quirked 


••  The  tnniepti  probably  itood  till 
thii  time  :  if  the  width  of  the  aiilo  wai 
conditioned  by  the  length  of  the  tnn- 
iepti they  muit  have  been  very  ihort. 

••  Nothing  ii  known  of  a  clearstory 
until  thii  lime:  Serjeantton,  l/nl.  0/ 
Cb.  of  St.  Cilti,  Norihampt.  114.  Prof. 
Hamilton  Thompion'a  account  of  the 
fabric  hai  htre  been  uied. 


"  Before  iti  extension  westward,  the 
nive  was  49  ft.  in  length. 

'"  The  restoration,  begun  in  August 
1853,  was  carried  out  under  the  direction  of 
Mr.  F.  F'.  Law,  architect,  after  a  report  by 
Sir  Gilbert  Scott.  The  church  was  re- 
opened in  November  1855. 

"  Begun  in  lummar  of  187;,  rc-opcned 
Oct.  1876.  Thctowcrwtsrtpairedin  1914. 

52 


*"  Scrjcantson,  op.  cit.  109.  They 
arc  of  three  ordcri,  the  two  inner  with 
chcveron  moulding  on  shafts  and  the 
outrr  Bquarc  with  hnod  mould.  The 
tower  han  a  Hat  wooden  ceiling  immedi- 
ately above  the  archci. 

•'  Mr.  SerjeantBon'i  concluiioni  arc 
here  foUnwed,  op.  cit.  iio. 


v-^^k 


-^«fr 


o 


o 


NoRTMAMi-TON  :   St.  (7ii,i;s'  CiiuRtii  :   Tin:  Intihior,  looking  r'.AST 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


hoodmould,  moulded  imposts**  and  slightly  chamfered 
jambs.  The  12th  century  chancel  appears  to  have 
been  little  shorter  than  at  present,  as  traces  of  a 
blocked  doorway  of  that  period  occur  in  situ  in  the 
south  wall  some  12  ft.  from  the  east  end."  There 
is  also  a  small  rouiul-lieaded  doorway,  also  blocked, 
at  the  eastern  extremity  of  the  wall,  which  if  of  12th 
century  date  must  have  been  originally  elsewhere. 

In  the  13th  century  rebuilding  of  the  chancel 
the  north  wall  was  advanced  4  ft.  and  built  as  a 
continuation  of  the  north  face  of  the  staircase  turret,** 
but  the  line  of  the  south  wall  was  retained.  The 
new  chancel  appears  to  have  consisted  of  three  bays 
divided  by  buttresses,  with  a  lancet  window  in  each, 
and  probably  three  lancets  in  the  east  wall.  Of  these 
windows  two  remain  entire  :  one  in  the  south  wall 
(till  lights  the  chancel,  but  the  other  immediately 
opposite  is  now  covered  by  the  north  chapel.  West 
of  this,  also  in  the  north  wall,  is  the  upper  part  of  a 
third  lancet,  the  lower  portion  of  which  was  cut  away 
when  the  arch  between  the  chancel  and  chapel 
was  pierced.  These  windows  have  rather  broad 
external  chamfers,  and  hoodmoulds  which  are  con- 
tinued along  the  walls  and  round  the  buttresses  as 
strings  ;  there  is  also  a  string  at  sill  level.  Internally 
the  openings  are  widely  splayed  and  moulded  all 
round. 

The  addition  of  aisles  to  the  nave  towards  the  close 
of  the  13th  century  was  begun  on  the  south  side,  the 
first  arch  being  cut  through  the  wall  and  it?  eastern 
respond  built  about  2  ft.  6  in.  west  of  the  tower. 
The  intention  evidently  was  to  proceed  westward 
with  an  arcade  of  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered 
orders  on  octagonal  piers  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases.  Only  one  arch,  with  the  pier  west  of  it,  was, 
however,  completed,  probably  on  account  of  fears 
for  the  safety  of  the  tower,  the  tall  round-headed 
openings  of  which  were  therefore  filled  with  masonry. 
The  existing  filling  on  the  north  and  south  sides  is 
pierced  by  narrow  acutely  pointed  arches  of  three 
chamfered  orders,  the  outer  chamfer  in  each  case 
being  continued  down  the  jambs  and  the  middle  order 
dying  out.  On  the  north  side  the  inner  order  also 
dies  out,  but  on  the  south  it  springs  from  moulded 
corbels  supported  by  sculptured  human  heads,** 
the  south  arch  has  also  a  fourth  order  towards  the 
aisle  where  the  wall  is  thickened,**  and  strengthened 
at  its  east  end  by  a  massive  buttress  of  uncertain 
date,"  which  blocks  the  north  jamb  of  the  arch 
between  the  aisle  and  the  south  chancel  chapel. 

The  14th  century  repair  of  the  chancel  included 
the  rebuilding  of  the  east  wall  in  its  present  form  with 


diagonal  angle  buttresses  of  two  stages  and  two  dwarf 
buttresses  below  the  window,  and  of  about  3  ft. 
of  the  east  ends  of  the  north  and  south  walls.**  The 
cast  window  is  of  five  trefoiled  lights  with  reticulated 
quatrefoil  tracery,  double  chamfered  jambs,  and 
hoodmould  ending  in  head-stops.  A  new  string- 
course was  taken  round  the  whole  chancel  below  the 
sills  of  the  side  windows  and  continued  round  the 
13th  century  buttresses,  which  were  perhaps  rebuilt,** 
though  a  keel-shaped  string  forming  a  continuation 
of  the  hoodmoulds  of  the  lancets  and  taken  round  the 
upper  part  of  the  old  buttresses  was  retained  as 
far  as  the  old  material  would  go,  and  re-used  on  the 
east  wall,  until  broken  by  the  hoodmould  of  the 
window.  During  these  alterations  the  gable  and 
roof  of  the  chancel  were  reduced  to  their  present 
pitch  and  the  parapet  erected.  With  the  refashioning 
of  the  chancel  went  the  building  of  the  north  and 
south  chapels,  though  the  latter  seems  only  to  have 
been  begun.  The  north  chapel  (28  ft.  hy  14  ft.) 
opens  from  the  chancel  by  a  wide  arch  of  three  con- 
tinuous chamfered  orders  with  hoodmould,  which  has 
the  appearance  of  having  been  rebuilt  or  completely 
finished  at  a  later  period,*  and  from  the  transept 
by  a  lesser  arch  of  two  continuous  chamfered  order* 
the  inner  of  which  is  stopped  near  the  ground  by 
mouldings,  while  the  outer,  dying  into  the  wall  on 
the  north  side,  is  stopped  on  the  south  by  a  small 
broach.*  The  windows  of  the  chapel  are  later 
insertions  :'  that  at  the  east  end  is  four-centred,  of 
four  cinquefoiled  lights  with  vertical  tracery,  and 
in  the  north  wall  arc  three  closely-placed  windows, 
one  of  two  lights  and  the  others  of  three  hghts  each, 
the  sill  of  the  two-light  easternmost  window  being 
raised  considerably  in  order  to  clear  a  14th  century 
triangular  headed  aumbry,  opposite  to  which,  in 
the  usual  position  in  the  south  wall,  is  a  restored 
trefoiled  piscina,  with  modern  canopy.  The  north 
chapel  appears  to  have  been  the  Lady  Chapel,  and 
was  planned  simply  as  a  north  aisle  to  the  chancel,* 
but  the  plan  of  a  corresponding  chapel,  which  was 
begun  on  the  south  side,  seems  to  have  been  modified, 
and  the  work  of  completing  the  arcades  and  aisles 
of  the  nave  proceeded  with.  The  south  arcade  was 
first  continued  two  bays  westward,  after  which  the 
north  arcade  was  begun  from  the  east  end,  starting 
about  4  ft.  6  in.  from  the  west  face  of  the  tower. 
The  eastern  respond  is  thus  some  2  ft.  further  west 
than  that  on  the  south  side,  with  the  consequence 
that  the  positions  of  the  piers  of  the  two  arcades 
do  not  exactly  correspond.  Both  western  responds 
were   removed  when  the  nave  was  lengthened,  but 


"  The  louth  impost  and  hood  hive  been 
restored,  and  the  north  impost  and  spring 
of  the  arch  cut  away  in  the  14th  century 
when  the  adjoining  arch  to  the  chapel  was 
made. 

•'These  traces  consist  of  the  four  eastern 
voussoirs  of  a  round-headed  arch  below 
the  lancet  window.  There  has  been  much 
disturbance  in  the  masonry  which  blocks 
the  doorway  towards  the  west,  but  the 
spring  of  the  arch  is  in  its  original 
position;  it  is  figured  in  Serjeantson, 
op.  cit.  114. 

**  The  turret  wai  thus  brought  wholly 
within  the  church,  and  in  order  to  admit 
light  to  the  stair  windows,  which  other- 
wise would  have  been  blocked  by  the  new 
north  wall    the  inner  comer  of  this  wall, 


at  its  west  end,  was  chamfered  off  at  the 
level  of  each  opening  :    ibid.  112. 

•^  The  carving  is  rather  rough,  but  the 
date  is  obviously  about  1300  :  Serjeant- 
son,  op.  cit.  117.  Drawings  made  in  the 
middle  of  the  19th  century  indicate  that 
the  inserted  east  and  west  openings  were 
like  that  on  the  north. 

•*  The  thickness  of  the  south  wall  is 
5  ft.  3  in.,  of  the  other  4  ft.  i  in. 

"  It  '  may  have  been  added  as  a  pre- 
caution by  the  14th  century  builders,  or 
it  may  represent  a  17th  century  addition  ': 
Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  127. 
"  The  junction  of  the  old  and  new  work 
is  very  noticeable,  a  rough  and  irregular 
joint  being  formed  on  both  sides  :  ibid 
119. 

53 


•"Ibid.  120. 

'Ibid.  118:  'At  the  base,  however, 
of  the  east  jamb  there  remains  a  project- 
ing moulding  of  early  14th  century  charac- 
ter, and  a  similar  moulding  has  been 
restored  on  the  west  side.'  The  arch  ii 
now  completely  filled  with  a  traceried 
stone  screen  erected  in  1896. 

•This  arch,  as  already  stated,  cuts  into 
the  hoodmould  of  the  12th  century  stair 
doorway,  the  north  impost  of  which 
seems  then  to  have  been  renewed. 

•An  allusion  to  '  the  new  work  in  our 
Lady  Chapel '  fixes  the  date  of  the  inser- 
tion of  these  windows  at  1512  :  Serjeant- 
son, op.  cit.  128. 

♦  Ibid.  121.  It  is  now  used  as  a  Morn- 
ing Chapel. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


the  octagonal  14th  century  pier  on  the  south  side, 
dividing  the  two  original  western  bays,  remains.  It 
differs  from  the  earlier  eastern  pier,  and  from  the 
evidence  of  its  masonry  appears  to  have  been  height- 
ened or  repaired  at  some  subsequent  date."  The 
capital  is  moulded  with  an  ogee  and  a  swelled  chamfer,* 
and  the  base  is  of  ogee  section  projecting  from  a  high 
plinth  of  two  plain  chamfers. 

The  north  arcade  is  all  of  one  build  and  is  contem- 
porary with  the  additions  on  the  south  side,  but  its 
octagonal  piers  are  lower  and  the  arches  do  not  reach 
a  corresponding  height.  Like  those  opposite,  they 
are  of  two  chamfered  orders  and  the  hoods  are  con- 
nected by  horizontal  mouldings.  In  its  present  form 
the  arcade  is  as  rebuilt  in  1616,  with  high  chamfered 
plinths  to  the  piers,  but  the  mouldings  of  the  capitals 
suggest  a  conservative  reconstruction  or  copy  of  the 
old  work. 

After  the  completion  of  the  nave  aisles  the  tran- 
septs' seem  to  have  been  taken  in  hand  and  rebuilt 
in  their  present  form  as  eastward  extensions  of  the 
aisles,  engaging  the  tower.  The  spaces  thus  formed 
are  divided  from  the  aisles  and  chancel  chapels  by 
pointed  arches,  and  on  the  south  side  the  outer  wall 
is  a  continuation  of  that  of  the  aisle  and  contemporary 
with  it.  East  of  the  porch  the  wall  is  of  14th  century 
date,  but  the  windows  have  been  renewed  and  their 
tracery  is  modern  :  they  are  of  two  trefoiled  Ughts 
with  a  quatrefoil  in  the  head.  On  the  north  side  the 
aisle  wall  west  of  the  transept  was  removed  when  the 
outer  aisle  was  built,  but  the  portion  immediately 
north  of  the  tower  remains  and  contains  a  14th  century 
window  of  three  trefoiled  lights  with  elongated 
quatrefoil  tracery. 

The  south  chapel  of  the  chancel  appears  to  have 
been  first  planned  as  an  aisle  like  that  opposite  and 
of  somewhat  similar  dimensions,  but  when  the  walls 
reached  a  certain  height  and  its  western  arch  was 
pierced  in  the  then  existing  transept  wall  fears  for 
the  stability  of  the  tower  seem  to  have  arisen,  and  as 
the  nave  aisles  approached  completion  a  newer  and 
stronger  arch  was  substituted  for  the  earlier  one, 
shghtly  to  the  east  of  it,  affording  direct  abutment  to 
the  tower  and  itself  abutted  by  a  strong  buttress  on 
the  outside.'  At  the  same  time  the  plan  and  elevation 
of  the  chapel  were  altered  and  it  became  a  kind  of 
transept  (24  ft.  by  20  ft.),  with  a  lofty  arch  of  three 
chamfered  orders'  opening  to  the  chancel  and  occu- 
pying the  whole  height  of  the  wall.  The  chapel  roof 
is  at  right  angles  to  that  of  the  chancel,  with  a  plain 
gable  at  the  south  end,  below  which  is  a  large  pointed 


window  of  five  cinquefoiled  Ughts  with  vertical  tra- 
cery.^" The  chapel  is  also  lighted  on  the  east  side  by 
a  square-headed  window  of  four  trefoiled  hghts  with 
quatrefoil  tracery.  In  the  usual  position  in  the  south 
wall  is  a  piscina  with  trefoiled  ogee  head  and  fluted 
bowl,  and  west  of  it  a  plain  rectangular  aumbry.  In 
the  east  wall,  north  of  the  window,  is  an  image  bracket 
supported  by  a  carved  head,  and  at  the  west  end  of 
the  south  wall  is  a  blocked  low  side  window  with  ogee 
head  and  hoodmould  terminating  in  a  finial.'^ 

Above  the  roof  the  tower  is  of  two  stages  and  finishes 
with  a  battlemented  parapet  and  angle  pinnacles.  No 
portion  of  a  12th  century  superstructure  remains,  but 
the  square  turret  at  the  north-east  angle  and  a  large 
portion  of  the  masonry  on  the  east  and  south  sides  of 
the  lower  stage  are  old.  A  large  part  of  the  north 
and  almost  all  the  west  side  fell  in  161 3  and  at  the 
rebuilding  the  new  work  was  bonded  into  the  old 
masonry.  In  this  stage  there  is  a  doorway  on  the 
east  side  to  the  roof,  and  a  window  of  two  trefoiled 
lights  on  the  north  and  south.^  The  whole  of  the 
upper  stage  belongs  to  the  17th  century  rebuilding, 
and  the  nave  clearstory  of  two-light  four-centred 
windows  was  either  rebuilt  or  added.  The  bell- 
chamber  is  lighted  by  double  two-light  pointed  win- 
dows on  each  side,  with  transoms,  cinquefoiled  heads 
to  each  hght  and  quatrefoil  above,  the  hoodmoulds 
of  which  are  joined  by  strings,  and  there  is  also  a 
stringcourse  at  sill  level  and  another  some  5  ft.  below, 
where  the  walls  are  slightly  gathered  in. 

Set  in  the  wall  of  the  north  arcade  of  the  nave  are 
three  inscriptions*^  on  framed  panels,  recording  the 
17th  century  reconstruction  in  these  terms  :  (l) 
'  Rob.  Sibthorpe's  care  to  God's  true  feare,  This 
downefalne  church  got  helpe  to  reare  1616.  Will. 
Dawes,  mason  ';  (2)  '  Bp.,  Chanc'""'  and  Clergie, 
nobles  knights  &  gent  :  the  countrie  parishes.  All 
Sts.  North'""'  St.  Sepulchers  gave  .  .  .  without 
breefes';  (3)  '  1616  John  Pattison,  Humf  :  Hopkyns, 
churchward  when  this  buil[ding]  began.' 

The  octagonal  stone  font  is  said  to  be  partly  ot 
15th  century  date,**  but  nearly  all  the  carving  is 
modern. 

The  oak  pulpit  belongs  probably  to  the  second 
quarter  of  the  17th  century.  It  is  hexagonal  in  shape, 
with  carved  upper  and  moulded  lower  panels.  The 
balustraded  stair  appears  to  be  an  early  18th  century 
addition  and  the  stem  is  modern. 

There  is  a  brass  candelabrum  given  under  the  will 
of  Samuel  Pennington,  who  died  in  1745. 

There  is  no  ancient  glas<,*^  but  two  chained  books 


'  Strjcantson,  Hist,  of  Cb.  of  St.  Giles, 
Norihampt.  121  : '  It  »ccmi  very  likely  that 
the  masoni  abandoned,  on  renewing  their 
work,  their  previous  plan  of  a  tall  arcade, 
and  built  a  low  arch  next  the  high  one 
already  constructed,  or,  taking  a  new 
centre  for  the  western  curve  of  their  new 
arch,  dropped  that  cur\e  upon  the  capital 
of  a  lower  column  and  so  made  their 
western  bay  altogether  lower  in  elevation 
than  in  their  original  scheme.  The 
heightening,  then,  must  have  taken  place 
in  the  17th  century,  when  so  much  was 
done  to  the  building  ;  the  pillar  would 
have  been  continued  a  few  feet  higher, 
and  the  old  capital,  which  is  of  the  same 
type  of  masonry  as  (he  lower  part  of  the 
column,  would  have  been  replaced  at  the 
higher    level.'     The    churchwardens'    ac- 


counts show  that  something  was  done  to  .t 
'  piUer  '  in  the  nave  in  1628. 

"  Probably  fifty  years  later  than  the 
carefully  grouped  and  geometrically 
drawn  mouldings  of  the  eastern  column 
and  respond'  :    ibid.  122. 

'  No  trace  of  the  12th  century  transepts 
remains,  and  their  extent  is  purely 
conjectural. 

'  Scrjeantson,  op.  cit.  126.  This  but- 
tress covers  a  portion  of  an  earlier  buttress 
(which  took  the  thnist  of  the  first  arch) 
the  bottom  of  which  has  been  cut  away  to 
make  room  for  a  doorway  in  the  angle  of 
the  chapel  and  tower  aisle. 

•  The  two  inner  chamfers  are  hollowed, 
and  there  is  a  shaft  with  moulded  capital 
on  the  jamb  face  of  the  innermost 
order. 

54 


*^  The  tracery  and  mullions  of  this  and 
the  east  window  are  modern. 

"  Internally  it  now  shows  as  an  arched 
recess.  The  sill  is  1 9  in.  above  the  ground 
outside  and  the  opening  is  4  ft.  1  in.  by 
I  ft.  8  in.  :  Assoc.  Ar:h.  Soc.  Reports, 
xxix,  434. 

"These  windows  seem  to  have  been 
reconstructed  on  the  old  lines  :  Serjeant- 
son,  op.  cit.  131. 

'*  TTwo  of  these,  one  above  the  other, 
arc  over  the  first  pier  west  of  the  tower  ; 
the  third  is  above  the  third  pier  from 
the  east. 

'*  Scrjeantson,  op.  cit.  161.  An  old 
font  had,  however,  been  removed  in 
1654  :  ibid.  57. 

"  William  Belcher,  of  Guilsborough,  at 
the  beginning  of  llie  Ijlh  century  noted 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


have  been  preserved  :  (l)  Calvin's  Commentary  on 
Isaiah,  1609,  and  (2)  The  Second  Book  of  Homilies, 
1676. 

The  only  medieval  monument  that  has  survived 
is  a  beautiful  15th  century  table  tomb,  '  said  to  have 
been  erected  for  one  of  the  Gobion  family,'  **  now 
against  the  east  wall  of  the  new  north  aisle.*'  It  is 
of  white  alabaster,  with  six  canopied  niches  on  the 
long  side  and  two  at  the  south  end  containing  shield- 
bearing  angels  and  weepers.  There  is  no  effigy,  and 
the  brass  inscription  round  the  verge  has  disappeared. 

The  1 8th  century  mural  monuments  include  those 
of  James  Keill,  M.D.  (d.  1719),  who  'opened  by  the 
surgeon's  knife  a  path  for  the  physician's  skill '  ; 
Edmund  Bateman  (d.  1731),  Town  Attorney  of 
Northampton,  1689-1700;  Edward  VVatkin,  vicar 
1735-86,  and  his  son  John  VVatkin,  D.D.,  vicar 
1786-95.  There  are  also  monuments  to  members  of 
the  families  of  Goodday  (1683-1797)  and  Woolston 
(1717-1778)." 

There  are  ten  bells,  two  trebles  having  been  added 
in  1895  to  a  ring  of  eight  cast  in  1783  by  Edward 
Arnold,  of  St.  Neots." 

The  plate  is  all  modern  and  consists  of  a  set  of  eight 
pieces,  all  silver-gilt,  presented  in  1883  by  Benjamin 
Vialls  :  it  comprises  a  cup,  two  patens  and  a  strainer 
spoon  of  1876,  a  cup,  flagon,  and  brcadholder  of  1882 
and  an  alms  dish  of  1881.*"  There  are  also  a  plated 
cup  and  five  plates.  Four  pewter  basins  are  exhibited 
in  the  church. 

The  registers  before  18 12  are  as  follows  :  (l) 
bapisms,  marriages,  and  burials  1559-1747,  with 
gaps  1584-87  and  1613-16  ;2*  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials 
1748-1812,  marriages  1748-1766;  (iii)  marriages 
1754-1789;  (iv)  marriages  1789-1812.  There  are 
churchwardens'  accounts  1628-39,  J^53~7o>  1683- 
1709  and  others  till  1855. 

The  churches  of  St.  Peter,  the  Holy 
ADVOWSONS  Sepulchre  and  All  Saints  arc  all, 
as  we  have  seen,  probably  as  old  as 
the  Norman  Conquest.  The  Priory  of  St.  Andrew, 
by  the  charter  of  Earl  Simon  I,**  confirmed  by 
Henry  I  and  Henry  II,*'  had  the  presentation  of  all 


the  churches  in  Northampton,  and  Bishop  Hugh  of 
Lincoln's  charter**  specifies  nine  by  name  :  All 
S.iints',  St.  Giles',  St.  Michael's,  Holy  Sepulchre, 
St.  Mary's  (by  the  Castle),  St.  Gregory's,*^  St. 
Peter's,  St.  Edmund's  and  St.  Banliolomcw's,  as  well 
as  the  chapel  of  St.  Thomas.  AH  these  churches 
then  were  in  existence  by  1200,  and  wc  have  records  of 
presentations  to  all  of  them  by  St.  Andrew's  priory 
between  1219  and  1247.**  Other  churches  men- 
tioned in  the  records  or  by  Henry  Lee  are  St.  George's 
in  the  Castle,*'  St.  Lawrence's  outside  the  North  gate, 
St.  Catharine's  in  College  Lane,*'  St.  Martin's  in  the 
North  quarter,**  and,  outside  the  liberties,  St. 
Leonard's  in  Cotton  End**  and  St.  Margaret's  in  St. 
James'  End,  but  it  is  not  likely  that  all  or  most  of 
these  were  parish  churches.  The  inquest  for  the 
taxation  of  parish  churches  in  1428'*  gives  the  number 
of  parishes  as  eight,  naming  all  those  of  1200  with 
the  exception  of  St.  Bartholomew's.  The  Valor 
Ecclesiasticus**  also  omits  St.  Bartholomew's  as 
well  as  St.  Peter's,  which  was  not  in  the  gift  of 
St.  Andrew's,  but  St.  Lawrence's  is  described  as  a 
chapel  attached  to  the  parsonage  or  rectory  of  St. 
Andrew's.^  Leland  says  that  there  were  seven 
parish  churches,  two  being  in  the  suburb.  It  would 
appear  therefore  that  the  number  of  parishes  was 
constant  from  1200  to  the  Reformation,  though  other 
churches  may  have  been  used  for  parochial  purposes. 

After  the  Reformation  the  ecclesiastical  parishes 
of  Northampton  were  reduced  to  four.  St.  Sepulclire's 
absorbed  the  parishes  of  St.  Bartholomew's  and 
St.  Michael's  ;  St.  Giles'  that  of  St.  Edmund's  ; 
and  All  Saints'  that  of  St.  Mary's  by  the  Castle**  and 
St.  Gregory's,  the  latter  by  the  authority  of  Cardinal 
Pole,  when  the  site  of  St.  Gregory's  was  converted 
to  the  use  of  a  free  school.^  In  a  suit  as  to  tithes 
due  to  the  vicar  of  St.  Giles'  in  1598  it  was  deposed 
that  the  parish  of  St.  Edmund's  had  been  deceased 
for  about  60  years.**  The  same  record  gives  the 
bounds  of  St.  Giles'  parish  at  the  same  date.*' 

The  four  ecclesiastical  parishes  of  Northampton 
remained  unaltered  till  the  19th  century.  The 
smallest,   St.    Peter's,   remains  unaltered   still :    but 


twcnt)r-four  ibieldi  of  arms  in  the  windows, 
and  a  later  copyist  in  1614  noted  twenty- 
three  (hields  on  tombs  and  windows. 
None  of  these  now  remain.  Twenty- 
eight  of  these  coats  are  figured  in  Ser- 
jeantson,  op.  cit.  137-143. 

'•  Bridget,  Hill,  of  Norihanti.  y  445. 
The  male  line  of  the  Gobions  became 
extinct  in  1301,  but  the  tomb  may  have 
belonged  to  one  of  their  descendants,  the 
Paynell-Oobions,  or  the  Turpyns :  Scr- 
ieantton,  op.  cit.  145. 

"In  Bridges'  day  it  stood  'against  the 
cast  end  of  the  south  cross  aisle.'  Serjeant- 
ion,  writing  in  1911,  says  'it  has  been 
moved  three  times  during  the  last  sixty 
years." 

"  The  inscriptions  on  all  the  monu- 
ments earlier  than  the  19th  century  are 
given  in  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  146-159. 

'•  North,  Ch.  Belli  fj  Nortbantt,  347, 
where  the  inscriptions  on  Arnold's  bells 
are  given.  The  two  trebles  are  by  Taylor 
of  Loughborough.  Before  1783  there 
were  six  bells.  Quarter  chimes  were 
added  in  1845  striking  on  all  ten  bells. 
The  earliest  reference  to  a  clock  occurs  in 
1633:  the  present  clock  was  erected  in 
1865. 


"  Markham,  Ch.  Plate  oj  NorihanH,  203. 
The  older  plate  was  stolen  in  1892  :  it 
included  a  cup  and  paten  presented  in 
1683,  a  flagon  of  1735,  a  breadholder  of 
1756,  and  a  cup  of  1878. 

"  No  marriages  arc  recorded  in  1642, 
1644,  1653-4,  and  no  burials  in  1642-44, 
1647-51,  and  1654-59:  Serjeantson,  op. 
cit.  184. 

"  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  v.  190. 

"Cal.Cb.R.xv.  118. 

'*  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  v.  191. 

"  For  the  parochial  history  of  St.  Mary's 
and  St.  Gregory's  see  R.  M.  Serjeantson, 
Hist.  0/  the  Ch.  of  All  Saints,  Northampt. 
c.  viii. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  de  IVelles  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  106,  142,  149,  271  ;  Rot.  Rob. 
Grosseteste,  177,  231. 

•'  The  west  window  was  still  there  in 
Lee's  time.  Lee,  Coll.  p.  98.  The  '  St. 
Miles  in  Cock  Lane  '  mentioned  by  Lee, 
p.  99,  is  St.  Michael's.  See  Boro.  Rec. 
ii,  528. 

"  A  chapel  of  ease  to  All  Saints,  de- 
molished in  1631.  Boro.  Ric. '\l,^^l.  Sec 
above,  p.  21,  and  Serjeantson,  op.  cit. 
pp.  60-62. 

"In    1274-5    '^i'    chapel     had     been 

55 


without  a  chaplain  for  twenty  years,  and 
was  ruinous.  Roi.  Hund.  ii,  2.  But  in 
1348,  Edward  III  was  presenting  to  it, 
as  in  the  gift  of  an  alien  priory.  Cal.  Pat. 
1348-50,  p.  247. 

"'  The  chapel  was  probably  older  than 
the  hospital  and  had  all  the  adjuncts  of 
an  ordinary  parish  church.  Serieantson, 
Leper  Hospitals  of  Northampt.  pp.  7-10. 

*^  Feudal  .■lids,  iv.  504. 

"  Valor  Ecd.  iv.  315-6. 

"  Dugdale,  A/oB. /?ng/.  v,  195.  Pat.  R. 
36  Elii.  pt.  14 ;  6  Jas.  I.  pt.  30  ;  II  Chas.  I. 
pt.  24.  Lee  says  St.  Lawrence's  was 
called  the  lawless  church,  because  mar- 
riages were  performed  there  without 
license  (p.  99). 

"In  1590;  see  Serjeantson,  op.  cit., 
p.  97.  In  1549  the  communicants  in  St. 
Mary's  parish  numbered  150,  as  against 
62  In  St.  Gregory's,  1,000  In  All  Saints', 
and  1,140  In  St.  Giles'.  Chantry  Cert. 
Roll  35,  mm.  i-i  d. 

"■  In  1556  ;  V.C.H.  Northanls.  Ii,  236. 

"  Coram  Rege  Rolls.  33  Eliz.  mm.  22, 
81  d.  See  R.  M.  Serieantson,  Hist,  of 
the  Ch.  of  St.  Giles,  Northampt.,  p.  287. 

"  For  an  account  of  the  bounds  as 
beaten  in  1851  see  ibid.  p.  228. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


as  the  vacant  spaces  within  the  old  walls  filled  with 
houses,  and  the  open  fields  were  first  enclosed  and 
then  built  over,  the  others  had  to  be  subdivided.^ 
From  All  Saints'  parish,  lying  within  the  old  walls, 
was  formed  St.  Katharine's  parish  in  1839,  subse- 
quently enlarged  by  an  addition  from  St.  Andrew's 
parish.  From  St.  Sepulchre's,  which  extended  north 
of  the  old  walls,  was  formed  St.  Andrew's  parish  in 
1842,  with  a  church  designed  by  Mr.  E.  F.  Law, 
architect.  From  St.  Giles'  parish,  which  extended 
east  of  the  old  walls,  was  formed  in  1846  St.  Edmund's 
parish,  the  church  of  which,  consecrated  in  1852, 
was  built  from  plans  by  Mr.  Matthew  Holding  and 
enlarged  in  1 89 1.  In  1879  S^-  Lawrence's  parish 
was  formed  from  part  of  St.  Edmund's  and  part  of 
St.  Sepulchre's ;  the  church,  built  of  red  brick,  was 
consecrated  in  1878.  In  1882  St.  Michael's  and  All 
Angels  was  also  formed  from  a  part  of  St.  Edmund's, 
a  church  of  red  brick  being  built  from  designs  by  Mr. 
George  Vials.  The  district  of  Christ  Church  was 
formed  in  1899,  from  parts  of  St.  Edmund's,  St. 
Michael's  and  Abington  parishes,  and  was  made  a 
parish  in  1907.  The  transepts  and  part  of  the  nave 
of  the  church  were  consecrated  in  1906,  the  chancel 
was  subsequently  built  but  the  nave  has  yet  to  be 
completed.     The  architect  was  Mr.  Matthew  Holding. 

The  enlargement  of  the  municipal  boundary  in  1901 
meant  the  inclusion  of  the  district  parish  of  St. 
James,  formed  in  1872  out  of  parts  of  Duston  and 
Dallington  ;  the  church,  of  red  brick,  was  consecrated 
in  1871,  enlarged  in  1900  with  a  tower,  subsequently 
completed.  St.  Mary's  (an  ecclesiastical  district), 
formed  in  1885  out  of  Hardingstone  parish,  for 
Cotton  End  and  Far  Cotton,  has  a  church  designed 
by  Mr.  Mattheiv  Holding.  St.  Paul's  (an  ecclesiastical 
district),  formed  in  1877  out  of  the  parishes  of  Kings- 
thorpe  and  St.  Sepulchre's,  the  church  of  which  was 
designed  by  Mr.  ^latthew  Holding.  St.  Matthew's, 
an  ecclesiastical  parish  formed  in  1893  out  of  Kings- 
thorpe  parish ;  the  church  built  from  plans  by  Mr. 
Matthew  Holding,  has  a  north-west  tower  with  a 
spire,  170  ft.  high.  Holy  Trinity,  an  ecclesiastical 
district,  was  formed  in  1899  (parish  1908)  out  of 
Kingsthorpe  parish.  Northampton  thus  consists 
to-day  of  15  ecclesiastical  parishes. 

St.  Andrew's  priory  presented  to  the  church  of 
y^iZ  S/^/A'TS  down  to  the  Dissolution.  From  153910 
1616  the  Crown  had  the  patronage,  after  which  date 
it  came  into  the  hands  of  Sir  Thomas  and  Dame 
Kathcrine  Littleton,  who  sold  the  advowson  and 
rectory  to  the  mayor  and  corporation  of  North- 
ampton on  24  May  1619.  The  patronage  remained 
in  their  hands  till  1835,  being  exercised  by  such 
members  of  the  corporation  as  were  parishioners  of 
All  Saints'."  In  1835  the  advowson  was  sold  to 
Lewis  Loyd,  from  whom  it  descended  to  Lord 
Overstone,  whose  daughter.  Lady  Wantage,  made  it 
over  to  the  Bishop  of  Peterborough,  the  present 
patron. 


The  church  of  All  Saints,  first  mentioned  in 
lioS,*"  stands  to  the  south  of  the  market  place,  at 
the  centre  of  the-  modern  as  of  the  medieval  town. 
The  congestion  of  traffic  ovring  to  the  convergence  of 
main  roads  and  tramways  at  this  point  has  been 
reUeved  by  the  town's  acquiring  in  1871  and  more 
recently  the  land  west  of  the  church,  formerly  the 
churchyard  and  before  1675  the  site  of  the  nave. 
The  church  has  bet;n  the  scene  of  many  events  of 
national  importance.  Ecclesiastical  courts  have  been 
held  here*i;  the  convocation  of  the  province  of 
Canterbury  sat  here  in  1380**;  '  prophesyings  ' 
originated  here,  and  it  was  the  centre  of  the  oppo- 
sition to  Laudian  reform,  as  described  in  the  previous 
volume.**  Two  political  sermons  of  some  interest 
were  preached  here  in  the  17th  century,  one  by  Robert 
Wilkinson  on  the  anti-enclosure  riots  on  21  June 
1607,  given  before  the  Lord  Lieutenant  of  the  county 
and  the  Commissioners**  ;  the  other — Sibthorpe's 
Assize  sermon  on  Apostolic  obedience — given  on 
22  Feb.  1626-7.**  ^*  "'^^  t''^  town  church  in  an 
especial  sense.  Mass  was  celebrated  here  before  the 
elections  of  town  officials  under  the  Act  of  1489** ; 
from  1553  the  town  records  were  kept  in  the  vestry, 
in  a  special  chest*'  ;  and  special  seats  were  assigned 
for  the  mayor  and  baihfFs  both  before  and  after  the 
fire,**  which  is  recorded  in  the  register  for  marriages 
by  the  sentence,  '  While  the  world  lasts,  remember 
September  the  20th,  a  dreadful!  Fire,  it  consumed  to 
ashes  in  a  few  hours  3-parts  of  our  Town  and  Chief 
Church.'  The  Justices  of  Assize  attend  service  here 
before  the  Assizes. 

ST. /'£T£/J'S  church  is  first  mentioned  about  1 20O.*» 
Down  to  1266  the  patronage  was  in  dispute  between 
the  priory  of  St.  Andrew's  and  the  Crown.  Henry  III 
presented  in  1222.^  The  jurors  in  the  eyre  of  1253 
presented  that  the  Church  of  St.  Peter's  had  been  in 
the  gift  of  the  Kings  of  England  down  to  Henry  II, 
but  was  now  in  the  possession  of  St.  Andrew's 
priory.*^  In  1266  Henry  III  recovered  the  advowson 
from  the  priory,  allowing  the  prior  an  annual  pension 
of  15  marks  in  compensation,  which,  however,  was 
not  being  paid  in  1334.**  In  1329  Edward  III  granted 
the  advowson  to  the  hospital  of  St.  Katharine,  near 
the  Tower  of  London,^  in  whose  hands  it  remained 
till  the  middle  of  the  19th  century,  though  leased  out 
from  1 550-1640  to  the  Morgan  family.^  The  last 
appointment  by  the  hospital  was  made  in  1873  ;  the 
patronage  has  since  been  exercised  by  the  Queen 
Consort,  the  patron  of  St.  Katharine's. 

From  time  immemorial  the  chapel  of  57".  JOHN 
THE  BAPTIST,  Kingsthorpe,  was  attached  to  St. 
Peter's  as  a  chapel  of  ease.**  It  only  became  an 
independent  parish  church  in  1850.**  The  chapel  of 
St.  Michael  at  Upton  has  also  continued  to  be  appur- 
tenant to  St.  Peter's  as  a  chapel  of  ease  from  the 
earliest    recorded   times.*' 

St.  Andrew's  priory  presented  to  ST.  SEPUL- 
CHRE'S  until  the  Dissolution.    The  advowson  then 


»•  Sec  V.C.H.  Northanti.  ii.  66. 

••  Serjcantion,  lliii.  of  the  Cb.  of  All 
Sainti,  S'ortbampt.  p.  184-5. 

"  Ibid.  p.  12. 

♦'  6Vi/<j  Abbalum  Mon.  S.  Albani  (RoUi 
S«r.),  p.  3?2. 

••  FineR.  4Rie.  IT,m.  21. 

*'  y.C.II.  Norihanii.  ii   44    c,t. 

**  A  Srrmon  frraebrd  at  North  Hampun 


.  .  .  printed  in  London  for  John  Flackct, 
1607. 

"  Apostotiht  Ohcdirnce  ...  by  Robert 
Sybthorpc.  .  .  .  London  ...  to  be  sold  \>j 
Jamei  Bowler,  1627. 

*•  Sec  above,  p.  9. 

"  Boro.  Rrc.  ii,  4. 

"  Seric.intion,  llnl.  of  the  Cb.  of  All 
Sainti,  Korlbampt.  pp.  254-8. 


«»  Ilarl.  Ch.  44,  H.  34. 
'"  Cal.  Pat.  1216-25,  p.  342. 
"  Assise  R.  6  15,  m.  14  d. 
»•  Rot.  Pari,  ii,  76. 
'>  Cal.  Pat.  1327-30,  p.  420. 
"  R.  M.  Scrjeantion,  Hist,  of  the  Cb.  0 
St.  Prter,  Norlhampt.  p.  105-108. 
'»  Ibid.  p.  250  (Harl.  Ch.  44  H.34.) 
■'•  Ibid.  p.  147.  •'  Ibid.  p.  217. 


56 


BOROUGH   OF  NORTHAMPTON 


passed  to  the  Crown,  and  was  in  the  royal  hands  till 
1615,  when  James  I  sold  it  to  Edmund  Dufficld 
and  John  Babington  of  London.**  From  them  it 
passed  a  month  later  to  Sir  John  Lambe."  His 
executors  sold  it  in  1653  to  Peter  Whalley,  twice 
mayor  of  Northampton,  and  Ferdinando  Archer, 
headmaster  of  the  grammar  school,  1646-96.  It 
passed  from  the  Whalley  family  to  the  Watlcins,** 
and  was  sold  early  in  the  19th  century  to  Thomas 
Butcher  and  by  him  to  W.  ButUn,*^  who  sold  it  to 
Lord  Ovcrstone,  whose  daughter,  Lady  Wantage, 
made  it  over  to  the  present  patron,  the  Bishop  of 
Peterborough. 

ST.  GILES'  church  is  first  mentioned  about  iizo.** 
It  served  as  the  meeting  place  of  the  town  assembly 
down  to  the  time  of  the  Act  of  1489,  possibly,  it 
has  been  suggested,  because  it  was  equally  remote 
from  the  Castle  and  the  Priory  of  St.  Andrew's.** 

St.  Andrew's  presented  to  St.  Giles'  church  down 
to  the  Dissolution.  From  that  time  the  advow- 
son  went  with  that  of  St.  Sepulchre's  until  1833, 
when  the  Rev.  Edward  Watkin  sold  it  to  the  Simeon 
trustees,  the  present  patrons. 

Of  the  eleven  newer  churches  of  Northampton,  the 
advowsons  of  St.  Katharine's  and  St.  Andrew's  belong 
to  Hyndman's  trustees,  and  that  of  St.  Matthew's, 
Kingsthorpe,  to  Pickering  Phipps,  Esq.  ;  the  other 
eight  are  in  the  gift  of  the  Bishop  of  Peterborough. 

There  were  a  great  number  of  rehgious 
GILDS,  gilds  and  fraternities  in  Northampton  on 
the  eve  of  the  Reformation.  In  the  church 
of  All  Saints  there  were  the  following.  The  Gild  of 
St.  Mary,  stated  in  1388  to  have  been  founded  before 
1272,  supplied  three  chaplains  for  the  saying  of 
daily  masses  and  other  services.**  The  Gild  of  St. 
John  Baptist,  founded  in  1347  for  the  maintenance 
of  one  chaplain,  and  also,  if  funds  permitted,  for  con- 
vivial purposes,"  was  closely  connected  with  the 
craft  gild  of  the  Tailors.**  The  Corpus  Christi 
Gild,  founded  1351,  was  for  the  maintenance  of  one 
(later  three)  chaplains  and  the  organisation  of  a 
Corpus  Christi  procession.*'  The  Gild  of  the  Holy 
Trinity  and  the  Blessed  Virgin  Mary,  founded  in 
1392,  maintained  four  chaplains  to  say  mass.**  The 
craft  gild  of  the  Weavers  came  to  be  connected  with 
this  gild.**  The  Fraternity  of  the  Rood  was  for 
the  adornment  of  the  Rood  beam.'"  The  Fraternity 
of  St.  George  found  a  priest  to  sing  mass  in  St. 
George's  chapel,  and  was  the  owner  of  St.  George's 
Hall,  which  later  became  the  property  of  the  cor- 
poration.'* The  Fraternity  of  St.  Katharine  appears 
to   have   existed   for   the   purpose   of   assisting    the 


burials  of  those  who  died  of  the  plague  and  were 
buried  in  St.  Katharine's  churchyard  (between  College 
Lane  and  Horsemarkct).'*  The  chaplains  of  these 
several  fraternities  formed  the  college  of  All  Saints, 
described  in  the  previous  volume." 

In  the  church  of  St.  Gregory  there  was  the  Gild 
of  the  Holy  Rood  in  the  Wall,  founded  by  the 
Hastings  in  1473  for  the  maintenance  of  chaplains  to 
celebrate  mass.'* 

In  the  church  of  St.  Mary  there  was  the  Gild  of 
St.  Katharine,'*  founded  in  1347  for  the  maintenance 
of  one  chaplain  (later  two)  to  celebrate  mass,  and  to 
keep  the  gild  Feast  on  St.  Katharine's  Day,  and 
attend  at  the  funeral  of  the  gild  brethren. 

In  the  church  of  St.  Giles  there  were  the  Gild  of 
St.  Clement,  in  existence  by  1469,'*  for  finding  one 
priest,"  and  the  Gild  of  the  Holy  Cross,  mentioned  in 
a  will  of  the  year  1521.'* 

In  the  church  of  St.  Sepulchre's  there  was  the 
fraternity  of  St.  Martin,  mentioned  in  a  will  of  the 
year  1500.'* 

Besides  the  parish 
RELIGIOUS  HOUSES,  churches  and  chapels  of 
ease  there  were  five  con- 
ventual churches  and  a  hospital  chapel  within  the 
walls  of  Northampton  in  the  middle  ages  as  well  as 
several  in  the  suburb. 

The  PRIORT  OF  ST.  ANDREW,'"'  founded  by 
Simon  I  c.  1 100  for  Cluniac  monks,  was  at  first, 
according  to  the  statement  of  its  prior  in  1348,  located 
in  a  house  adjoining  the  chapel  of  St.  Martin,  pro- 
bably on  the  present  Broad  Street.'*  Later,  at  a  date 
to  wltich  we  have  no  clue,  it  was  translated  to  the 
site  in  the  north-west  corner  of  the  medieval  borough 
which  it  occupied  till  the  Reformation,  as  shown  in 
Speed's  map.  The  estate  map  of  1632*^  shows  that 
the  priory  wall  ran  from  St.  Andrew's  mill  along  the 
site  of  the  present  St.  George's  Street  to  the  North- 
gate,  then  west  along  the  present  Grafton  Street  to 
Grafton  Square,  where  the  great  gate  of  the  priory 
probably  stood,  then  south  along  Lower  Harding 
Street,  west  along  Spring  Lane  to  St.  Andrew's  Road 
and  thence  north  to  St.  Andrew's  mill.**  The  priory 
church  stood  between  Brook  Street  and  Lower  Priory 
Street,  and  Monks'  Pond  Street  runs  across  the  site 
of  the  fish  pond.  The  cemetery  lay  across  Upper 
Harding  Street,  Priory  Street  and  Francis  Street, 
where  stone  coffins  were  found  in  1838,  1852,  and 
1880,  some  architectural  fragments  are  now  in  the 
Northampton  Museum.** 

ST.  JAMES"  ABBET,^  was  a  house  of  Austin 
Canons,  founded  at  the  beginning  of  the  12th  cen- 


'•  Pat.  R.  1 2  Ja».  I,  pt.  1 5,  m.  24. 
"Col.    S.    P.    Dm.     1611-1618,     p. 

174- 

"  For  the  descent  see  the  family  tree 
in  Serjeantson,  Hisi.  oj  the  Cb.  oj  St. 
Gilts,  Nortiampt.  p.  289. 

•'  Whellan,  lliit.  of  Nortbanu  (1874), 
p.  135. 

••Cott.  MS.  Veap.     E.  xvii,   f.    17  d. 

••  Serjeantion,  Hist,  of  tit  Cb.  of  St. 
Gilts,  fioTtbampt.  p.  15. 

"  Certif.  of  Gilds,  Chan.  No.  383. 

•»  Ibid.  Chan.  no.  381. 

••  Boro.  Rec.  i,  266,  281. 

•'  Cert,  of  Gilds,  Chan.  no.  380. 

'•  Pat-R.  i6Ric.  ll,pt.  2,  m.  32  j  Chan. 
Inq.  a.q.d.  i;i,  pt.  2  a. 

••  BoTo.  Rec.  i,  332. 


'"  Serjeantson,  Hin.  of  the  Ch.  of  All 
Saints,  Nortbampt.  p.  56. 

'^  Ibid.  pp.  56-9. 

"  Court  of  Augni.  Proc.  bdle  27,  no.  4. 
Aug.  Off.  Bks.  vol.  132,  no.  173. 

"  r.CM.  Notthants.  ii,  18&-1. 

'*Pat.  R.  12  Ed.  IV,  pt.  ii,  m.  8. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  16  Ric.  II,  pt.  i, 
103. 

'•  Serjeantson.  Hist,  of  tbe  Cb.  of  St. 
Giles,  Northampt.  p.  33. 

"'  Ibid.  p.  36.  '•  Ibid.  p.  33. 

"  Cox  and  Serjeantson,  Hut,  of  tbe  Cb. 
of  the  Holy  Sepulchre,  Northampt.  p.  238. 

'"  V.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  102-8  ;  R.  M. 
Serjeantson  in  Nortbants  Nat.  Hist.  Soc. 
Tol.  xiii. 

•'  Cal.    Pat.    1348-50,    p.     247.     This 

S7 


reference  seems  to  have  escaped  the  obser- 
vation even  of  Mr.  Serjeantson. 

*'  Original  in  Messrs.Markham's  offices ; 
copy  in  Northampt.  Public  Library. 

"See  plan;  Nortbants  Nat.  Hist.  Soc. 
xiii,  136. 

"  See  Journal  of  Brit.  Arch.  Assoc. 
viii,  67.  They  are  of  the  I2th  and  13th 
century,  and  include  an  enriched  Norman 
shaft.  There  are  also  two  tiles,  one  with 
arms  of  Fitzwalter  of  Daventry  (possibly 
for  Sir  Thomas  Fitzwalter,  M.P.  for 
Northampton,  d.  1381)  and  the  other 
with  a  lion  rampant  (possibly  for  Sir 
John  Lyons,  sheriff,  1381). 

"V.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  127-30;  Ser- 
jeantson in  Nortbants  Nat.  Hist.  Soc, 
vol.  xiii. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Abbey  or  St.  Janus, 
Northampton.  Party 
argent  and  guUs  a 
scallop  or. 


tury  by  William  Peverel.    It  lay  outside  the  liberties, 

but  in  the  suburb,  and  owned  much  property  in  the 

town.     The    only    trace    remaining    to-day    is    the 

name  Abbey  Street ;   a  small  part  of  the  Abbey  wall 

on   the   Weedon   Road,   near   the   point   where    the 

roads  to  Duston  and  Upton  divide,  was  entirely  taken 

down  in  1927.'^     The  great  barn  of  the  abbey  was 

described  by  Henry  Lee  (1715)  as  '  one  of  the  greatest 

and    stateliest   barns   of   England.     A   carriage   with 

grain  could   stand   in   one  of  its   southern   porches, 

as  I  have  seen,  before  it  was 

shaken  down  and  the  material 

sold.'*'     He    adds    that    the 

abbot  of  St.  James'  entertained 

travellers    coming    from    the 

west,    as    the    prior    of     St. 

Andrew's    entertained    those 

coming   from   the  north,  the 

town  inns  being  often  '  very 

ordinary.'     From  early  in  the 

13th  century  the  two  houses 

were  much  used  for  monastic 

gatherings.  Twenty  at  least  of 

the  triennial  general  chapters 

of    the   Austin   Canons    were 

held  at    St.    James'   between 

1237  and  1446,  and  thirty-nine  of  the  forty  general 

chapters  of  the  Benedictine  order  between  1338  and 

1498  were  held  at  St.  Andrew's,  though  a  Cluniac 

house.*'* 

THE  FR.4.\CISCAN^^  first  settled  in  Northamp- 
ton in  1226.  Valuable  details  as  to  the  foundation  of 
the  house  are  to  be  found  in  the  Phillips  MS.  of 
Eccleston,  not  yet  in  print  when  the  previous  volume 
of  this  history  was  written,  which  contains  a  number 
of  marginal  notes  specially  bearing  on  Northampton. 
The  first  two  friars  arriving  in  the  town  in  1226  were 
received  by  Sir  Richard  Gobion,  '  who  settled  them 
outside  the  east  gate  on  his  own  hereditary  estate 
near  St.  Edmund's  Church.'*'  The  knight's  own  son 
John  was  one  of  the  first  to  take  the  habit,  and  in 
consequence  the  angry  parents  ordered  the  friars  to 
depart.  The  humble  acquiescence  of  the  brothers 
and  their  poverty,  however,  so  touched  Gobion's 
heart  that  he  relented  and  allowed  them  to  stay.  About 
1235  the  friars  moved  into  the  town,  where  the  towns- 
folk had  given  them  a  site  in  St.  Sepulchre's  parish, 
and  thenceforward  a  series  of  grants  from  their 
devoted  patron  Henry  III  of  timber  for  building 
are  found  on  the  Close  Rolls."'  By  1258  the  friary  was 
complete,  and  the  brothers  began  building  a  house 
for  their  schools.  The  Greyfriars'  site,  '  the  best 
builded  and  largest  House  of  all  the  places  of  the 
freres,'  according  to  Leland,"  was  almost  due  north 


of  the  market  place,  near  the  present  Greyfriars 
Street.  Traces  of  interments  were  found  in  1849, 
1887  and  1889,'*  in  Princess  Street,  showing  conclu- 
sively that  the  cemetery  lay  between  Newland  and 
the  south  side  of  Princess  Street,  on  the  site  of  the 
present  Temperance  Hall  and  Masonic  Hall.  The 
well  also  was  discovered,  and  is  under  the  present 
Masonic  H.ill. 

A  house  of  POOR  CLARES  or  SISTERS  MINOR, 
the  first  in  England,  existed  for  a  short  time  in  North- 
ampton. From  1252  to  1272  the  sheriff  of  Northants 
is  ordered  to  provide  the  sisters  with  five  tunics  of 
russet  every  two  years.  They  are  described  as 
dwelling  near  the  Friars  Preachers,  that  is,  not  far 
from  the  Mayorhold.  Nothing  is  known  of  the  house 
beyond  the  references  on  the  Close  and  Liberate 
Rolls,  first  noted  by  Mr.  Serjeantson  in  191 1.*^ 

The  FRIARS  OF  THE  SACK^  also  had  a  house 
in  Northampton,  founded  by  Sir  Nicholas  de  Cogenhoe 
in  the  reign  of  Henry  III.  In  1271  they  received  a 
grant  from  the  king  for  the  building  of  their  church.'"* 
From  the  returns  to  the  inquest  of  1274-5  it  appears 
that  their  house  was  in  the  south-east  quarter, 
between  the  Derngate  and  '  Dandeline's  court,' 
wherever  that  was.**  The  friary  came  to  an  end 
before  1303,"  and  the  order  itself  was  suppressed  in 
1307. 

THE  DOMINICANS*''  first  settled  in  North- 
ampton about  1230,  and  began  building  about  1233, 
assisted  by  a  series  of  grants  from  Henry  III,  from 
1233  to  1270.**  The  house  was  large  enough  for  a 
provincial  chapter  to  be  held  there  in  1239."  The 
building  of '  studies  '  is  mentioned  in  1258.*  Building 
continued  through  the  reigns  of  Edward  I  and  Edward 
II,  and  in  1310  the  friars  obtained  a  license  from  the 
bishop  to  have  six  superaltars  in  their  church.* 
The  royal  chancery  was  estabhshed  in  the  Black- 
friars'  Church  from  31  July  to  6  August  1338.' 
No  traces  of  the  house  are  left ;  it  was  situated  on 
the  east  side  of  the  Horsemarket  and  its  precincts 
came  down  to  Gold  Street.* 

If  the  later  tradition  can  be  trusted,*  by  which 
Simon  de  Montfort  was  one  of  their  first  benefactors, 
THE  WHITE  FRIARSO  must  have  settled  in  North- 
ampton by  1261;  ;  they  were  certainly  here  by  1270, 
when  Simon  dcPateshull  was  bcstowinglands  on  them.' 
An  inquest  of  1278*  shows  that  their  house  was  near 
the  town  wall,  and  they  were  making  additions  to 
it  both  at  that  date  and  in  1299.'  In  1310  they 
obtained  leave  to  have  six  altars  in  their  church,*' 
and  four  provincial  chapters  were  held  in  it  in  the 
course  of  the  14th  century.  The  site  of  their  house 
was  in  the  parish  of  St.  Michael,"  near  the  top  of 
Wood    Street,    formerly    called    Whitefriars    Lane, 


•♦  Ibid.  p.  262.  The  position  indicated 
by  Dr.  Cox  in  hit  map,  horo.  Rec,  vol.  ii, 
ii  definitely  incorrect. 

"  Lee,  Coll.  p.  92. 

•'•  H.  E.  Salter,  Cbapten  of  the  Augiu- 
linian  Canoni(Oxl.  Hist.  Soc),  pp.  xiii-xli ; 
W.  A.  Pantin,  Tram.  Royal  Hut.  Soc. 
4th  Ser.  X,  251-5. 

"y.C.H.  Norihant,.  ii,  146-7;  Ser- 
jeantion,  Hiit.  of  the  Six  Hoiuei  of  Friars 
in  Nortbampt.  (191 1). 

'•  Eccleston,  De  /Idvrntu  Fratrum  Mino- 
runi,  ed.  A.  G.  Little  (Paris,  1909),  p.  29. 

'•"  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  pp.  47,  gives 
full  references. 


*°  Itinerary^  i,  10. 

"  Aiioc.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps.  1887-8,  pp. 
12 1-4,  contains  a  full  .iccount  of  the 
excavations,  by  Sir  H.  Drydcn. 

•*  Serjeantson,  /Itst.  of  the  Six  Houses 
of  Friars  in  Northampt. 

•'  Ibid. 

"  Close  R.  sfillcn.  Ill.ni.  10. 

"  Rot.  Himd.  ii,  3. 

••  Close  R.  31  Ed.  i,  m.  10. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  144-6 ;  Ser- 
jeantson, op.  cit. 

••  Ibid. 

"  Liberate  R.  23  Hen.  Ill,  mm.  5,  R. 

'  ClotcR.  42  Hen.  HI,  m.  2. 


•  Line.  Epis.  Reg.  Dalderby,  Mem. 
fo.  162. 

'  Close  R.  12  Ed.  Ill,  pt.  2,  m.  20  d. 

•  Serjeantson,  op.  cit.  The  position 
indicated  by  Dr.  Cox  upon  the  map  in 
Boro.  Rec.  vol.  ii,  is  incorrect. 

°  Tanner,  Notitia  Monaslica  ;  cf.  Boro. 
Rec.  i,  360. 

'  V.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  148-9;  Ser- 
jeantson, op.  cit. 

'  Rot.  Ihind.  ii,  2. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  148. 

•  Pat.  R.  27  Ed  I,  m.  3:. 

'»  Line.  Epis.  Reg.  Dalderby,  Mem. 
fl.  162,  171.  "  Boro.  Rec.  i,  360. 


■>> 


Northampton  :   Master's  House  of  St.  John's  Hospital  (now  destroyed) 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


lying  between  Newland,  Ladies'  Lane,  and  the 
Upper  Mounts  of  to-day.**  The  foundations  of  the 
church  were  uncovered  in  1846,  under  the  road  now 
known  as  Kerr  Street'^ 

The  house  of  'THE  JUSTIN  FRIJRS^*  was 
founded  by  Sir  John  Longevile  in  1322/*  and  was 
situated  on  the  west  side  of  Bridge  Street,  opposite 
St.  John's  hospital,  on  the  site  now  occupied  by 
Augustine  Street.    No  traces  of  it  remain. 

THE  HOSPITAL  OF  ST.  70//.V,"  founded  by 
Wilhara  de  St.  Clare,  Archdeacon  of  Northampton, 
about  1 1 38,  is  the  only  one  of  the  religious  houses  of 
Northampton  still  standing."  It  is  on  the  east 
side  of  Bridge  Street,  within  the  line  of  the  town 
wall,    near    to    the    site    of    the    south    gate,    and 


now  covered  with  blue  slates  :  the  interior  is  in  a  bad 
state  of  repair.  The  west  end,'*  with  its  gable  to  the 
street,  is  apparently  of  early  14th  century  date,  its 
chief  feature  being  a  wide  and  lofty  recessed  pointed 
arch  of  two  moulded  orders,  the  inner  springing  from 
shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  within  which 
is  set  the  continuous  moulded  west  doorway,  and 
over  it  the  remains  of  a  niche  with  bracket  for  a 
statue.  In  the  gable  above  the  arch  is  a  large  circular 
window  of  four  pairs  of  trefoiled  lights  radiating 
from  a  quatrefoil,  the  spaces  between  having  sexfoil 
cusping :  the  window  is  surrounded  by  a  hood- 
mould  which  dies  into  the  ape.T  of  that  of  the  great 
arch.  Probably  no  other  part  of  the  building  is  con- 
temporary with  the  west  front,  but  parts  of  the  north 


KJ_5__o 


10 


20 


.^_ 


40 


Scale  of  Feet 


14BJ  Century    earlv 
15- Century   late 
161!!  Cent.late  or  1711!  earlv 
C3  182!  Century 
Modern 


Plan  of  St.  John's  Hospital,  North.\mpton 


consisted  originally  of  an  almshouse  and  chapel, 
with  a  master's  house  about  60  yards  to  the  north- 
east. The  site  of  3I  acres  was  bounded  on  the 
north  by  St.  John's  Lane,  on  the  south  by  the  town 
wall,  and  on  the  west  by  Bridge  Street.  The 
master's  house  has  been  pulled  down,  but  the  chapel 
and  almshouse,  or  domicile,  still  stand.  In  1871  the 
property  was  sold  to  the  Midland  Railway  Company, 
and  the  master's  house  was  demolished  to  make  room 
for  the  Midland  Station.  The  infirmary  and  chapel 
were  resold  to  Mr.  Mulliner,  from  whom  they  were 
purchased  in  1877  for  a  Roman  Catholic  community,  in 
whose  possession  they  now  are.  The  inmates  of  the 
hospital  were  transferred  to  a  new  building  at  Weston 
Fa  veil,  opened  in  1879. 

The  almshouse  is  a  building  of  red  sandstone  standing 
east  and  west,  in  plan  a  parallelogram,  measuring 
internally  62  ft.  6  in.  by  22  ft.,  except  that  the  west 
wall  is  shghtly  skewed  in  order  to  accommodate 
itself  to  the  direction  of  the  street,  and  it  is  attached 
by  its  north-east  angle  to  the  south-west  angle  of 
the  chapel.  The  building  is  of  two  stories,  but  has 
been  a  good  deal  rebuilt  and  altered."    The  roof  is 


wall  and  the  middle  part  of  the  south  wall,  which 
contain  pointed  windows,  are  apparently  of  late 
15th  century  date,  and  the  square-headed  windows 
on  the  north  side  are  perhaps  a  century  later.  The 
greater  part  of  the  south  wall  and  the  whole  of  the 
east  wall  were  rebuilt  in  the  1 8th  century,  when 
wooden-framed  windows  were  introduced  on  both 
floors  and  alterations  made  in  the  interior  arrange- 
ments. A  4  ft.  passage  runs  down  the  middle  of  the 
building  from  the  west  to  the  east  door,  with  staircase 
and  a  series  of  bedrooms  on  the  south,  and  four 
larger  rooms  on  the  north  side.  There  is  reason  to 
believe  that  originally  the  building  did  not  extend 
so  far  to  the  east."  the  buttresses  of  the  south-west 
angle  of  the  chapel  having  been  cut  away  to  allow 
for  the  erection  of  the  east  end  of  the  north  wall  of  the 
almshouse,  which  appears  to  be  not  earlier  than  the 
end  of  the  i6th  century.  The  side  walls  are  about 
16  ft.  to  the  eaves,  and  in  the  middle  of  the  south  side 
is  a  window  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights  with  depressed 
head  and  hollow  chamfered  jambs,  lighting  the  stair- 
case, its  sill  about  6  ft.  above  the  ground.  This  window 
contains  the  figure  of  a  man  and  the  name  of  '  Richard 


**  The  positions  indicated  by  Dr.  Cox 
upon  his  map  in  Boro  Rec.  vol.  ii,  for 
the  White  Friars'  and  the  Grey  Friars' 
houses  should  he  exchanged. 

'•  G.  N.  Wetton,  Guidebook  u  North- 
ampt.   p.  4S. 

'♦  F.C.H.  Nortbanis.  ii,  147  ;  Serjeant- 
ion,  op.  cit. 


"  Inq.  a.q.d.  16  Ed.  ii,  i6o-2. 

'•  y.  C.  H.  Nortbanti.  ii,  156-9;  Serj- 
jeantson  in  Northants  Nat.  Hist.  Soc. 
vols,  xvi  and  xvii. 

'"  Bridges  early  in  the  iSth  century 
states  that  it  had  been  '  altered  in  some 
parts  by  modem  reparations ' :  op.  cit.  i, 
457- 

59 


*^  The  elevation  towards  the  street  it 
29  ft.  in  length  inclusive  of  a  later  but- 
tress at  the  north-west  angle.  The 
ground  level  has  been  raised  outside. 

*•  Assoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps,  xji,  233,  in  a 
paper  by  Sir  Henry  Dryden,  1875,  use  of 
which  has  been  made  in  the  present 
description. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Sherd,'  who  was  master  in  1474,''  and  it  formerly  con- 
tained also  fragments  of  painted  glass,  including  shields 
of  Grey,  Hastings  and  Valence,  but  these  have 
been  lately  taken  out.  The  stairs  are  not  centrally 
placed,  being  shghtly  nearer  the  east  end  :  from  a 
landing  below  the  window  they  lead  east  and  west  to 
two  large  upper  rooms,  one  at  each  end  of  the  building, 
said  to  have  been  for  the  '  co-brothers  '  or  chaplains.^^ 
On  the  north  side  of  the  ground  floor  passage  is  a 
room  at  the  west  end  with  a  square-headed  two-hght 
window,  and  next  to  it  one  with  a  smaU  pointed 
external  doorway.  Next  to  this  is  a  larger  room,  or 
hall,  hghted  by  two  three-light  ^-indows  similar  to 
that  on  the  staircase,  and  open  to  the  roof,  and  at  the 
east  end  the  kitchen,  which  has  a  large  projecting  fire- 
place and  a  two-hght  square-headed  window  in  the 
north  wall.  The  roof  of  the  building  is  of  six  bays. 
Although  the  division  of  hall  and  kitchen  is  apparently 
modern  the  construction  of  the  two  bays  of  roof  over 
the  hall  seems  to  imply  that  this  part  of  the  building 
alone  was  always  open  its  fuO  height.*^  Of  the  two 
upper  rooms,  which  are  22  ft.  by  20  ft.,  that  at  the 
west  end  is  hghted  by  the  circular  window  and  by 
two  square-headed  mullioned  windows  on  the  north, 
and  two  wooden-framed  ones  on  the  south  side,  and 
has  a  fireplace  in  the  south-west  angle.  The  eastern 
room  has  also  mullioned  windows  on  the  north  and 
wooden  ones  on  the  south  side,  and  a  fireplace  with 
moulded  jambs.  Both  rooms  extend  the  full  vvidth  of 
the  building,  and  occupy  two  bays  of  the  roof. 

The  chapel  is  in  plan  a  plain  rectangle,  16  ft.  wide  in- 
ternally by  44  ft.  long,  built  of  local  red  sandstone,  and 
the  roof  covered  with  blue  slates.  The  three-light  east 
window  is  of  the  early  14th  century  with  cusped  inter- 
secting tracery  and  moulded  mullions  and  jambs,  and 
the  chapel  was  probably  wholly  rebuilt  in  that  period. 
The  entrance  is  at  the  west  end.  The  north  wall  is 
blank.  The  west  wall  is  of  the  15th  century  and  has 
coupled  buttresses  at  the  angles  standing  wholly 
beyond  the  face  of  the  north  and  south  walls,  i.e.,  the 
west  end  is  nearly  6  ft.  wider  than  the  body  of  the 
chapel,  and  it  is  possible  that  the  whole  of  the  north, 
south  and  east  walls  have  been  rebuilt  on  a  narrower 
plan,  leaving  the  west  end  as  it  was  and  re-using  the 
east  window.^  The  building  was  extensively  restored 
in  1853-4  ''y  '^^  Charity  Commissioners,  the  whole  of 
the  south  wall  being  then  taken  down  and  rebuilt  in  its 
present  form  with  two  two-hght  windows  in  the 
14th  century  style,**  below  the  westernmost  of  which 
is  a  small  pointed  doorway.^  The  roof  of  five  bays 
and  the  wooden  bell  turret  are  modern.  The  building 
was  renovated  in  1882,  to  which  date  the  present 
fittings  belong.  The  buildings  are  now  undergoing 
further  repair. 

The  moulded  west  doorway  has  an  almost  semi- 
circular two-centred  head  under  a  square  label,  the 
spandrels  of  which  contain  quatrefoils  with  square-loaf 


flowers.  The  original  double  doors  remain.  Above  is  a 
large  four-centred  five-hght  window  with  Perpen- 
dicular tracery  and  moulded  jambs  and  mullions.  The 
two-armed  cross  on  the  gable  is  said  to  be  original  .The 
doorway  and  west  and  east  windows  are  of  oolite.  In 
the  east  windows  are  considerable  remains  of  15th 
century  glass,  including  saints,  a  head  of  the  Blessed 
Virgin,  an  angel  holding  a  sliield,  and  a  kneeling 
figure. 

The  Master's  House,  now  demolished,  is  said  to 
have  contained  work  of  every  century  from  the  13th 
to  the  19th,  and  its  architectural  history  was  com- 
pUcated.*'  It  was  rectangular  in  plan  with  a  south 
porch  and  north-west  wing,  and  had  a  frontage  of 
about  87  ft.  The  hall,  26  ft.  3  in.  by  19  ft.  2  in.,  had 
been  divided  in  the  1 8th  century.  The  kitchen  and 
offices  were  at  the  west  end. 

THE  HOSPITAL  OF  ST.  LEONARD,^''  founded 
by  Richard  de  Stafford  in  the  nth  century,  was  in 
Hardingstone  parish,  outside  the  liberties,  on  the 
west  side  of  the  road  leading  to  Queen's  Cross.  The 
hospital  btuldings,  of  which  no  description  is  extant, 
included  a  chapel  and  churchyard  which  served  the 
inhabitants  of  Cotton  End  as  a  parish  church.  The 
Lazar  House  is  mentioned  in  the  Assembly  Books 
from  1623  to  1823,  when  it  was  finally  pulled  down  ; 
it  can  have  been  Uttle  more  than  a  cottage  at  this 
time,  when  there  was  only  one  recipient  of  the 
charity. 

THE  HOSPITAL  OF  ST  THOMAS,^  founded 
apparently  in  the  15th  century,  stood  on  the  east  side 
of  Bridge  Street,  just  outside  the  south  gate.  In 
1834  the  residents  removed  to  a  new  house  in  St. 
Giles'  Street,  and  the  buildings  were  used  for  a 
carriage-builders'  shop  until,  in  1874,  they  were 
pulled  down  to  make  room  for  a  road  to  the  new 
cattle  market.'*  It  was  a  rectangular  15th  century 
stone  building,  consisting  of  a  large  hall,  22  ft.  3  in. 
wide  internally  with  upper  floor,  and  a  chapel  at  its 
east  end  15  ft.  wide  by  16  ft.  9  in.  long,  the  south  wall 
of  which  was  continuous  with  that  of  the  hall.  The 
roofs  were  covered  with  Collyweston  slates.  At  the 
time  of  demohtion  the  hall,  or  domicile,  was  54  ft.  8  in. 
long  internally,  but  it  had  been  shortened  some  3  ft. 
or  4  ft.  at  the  west  end,  probably  for  street-widening 
purposes.  The  original  west  elevation  facing  Bridge 
Street,  as  shown  in  Bridges'  History,  had  a  central 
arched  doorway,  with  window  on  the  south  side, 
and  above  these  a  row  of  quatrefoils  containing  blank 
shields.  Over  the  doorway  was  a  four-light  window 
and  on  each  side  of  it  a  canopied  niche  containing  a 
figure.  The  hall  was,  no  doubt,  formerly  divided  by 
screens  in  the  usual  way,  with  cubicles  arranged 
round  the  walls  :  several  lockers  ^  remained  in  both 
tlie  north  and  south  walls,  but  some  had  been  con- 
verted into  uindows.  In  the  middle  of  the  north  wall 
was  a  large   fireplace,  one  jamb  only  of  which  was 


'°Thi«  may  give  the  approximate  date 
of  the  15th  century  alteration). 

"  Brideei,  //n(.  of  Noribanis.  i  457. 

"  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc,  Reps.  %n,  233. 

*'  Ibid.  232.  There  are  no  buttresses 
St  the  north-east  and  south-east  angles, 
and  except  at  the  west  end,  where  it 
is  chamfered,  the  plinth  is  a  mere  set- 

•*  They  are  said  to  have  been  indicated 
by  fragments  found  in  the  wall,  but  the 
windows    previously    in    the    south    wall 


were  round-headed  and  probably  of  i8th 
century  date  :    ibid.  230. 

"The  doorway  is  probably  in  its  original 
position,  but  the  form  of  the  previous  one 
is  not  known  :  ibid.  230. 

"  Assoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps,  xil,  225, 
where  there  is  a  lengthy  description  by 
Sir  Henry  Drydcn.  His  measured  draw- 
ing of  the  building  in  in  the  collection  of 
the  North.impt.  Arch.  Soc.  in  the  rooms 
of  the  Ladies'  Club. 

60 


'T.C./f.  Northanis.  ii,  159-161  ;  Ser- 
jcantson,  Northanis  Nat.  Hist.  Soc. 
Vol.  xviii. 

"  V.C.n.  Northanis  ii,  161-2  ;  Scr- 
jeantson,  Hospital  ofSi.Thomat,  Northampt. 
(1909). 

"■The  following  description  is  based  on  a 
paper  by  Sir  Henry  Dryden  in  Assoc.  Arch. 
Soc.  Reps,  xiii,  225-231. 

•"They  were  3  ft.  3  in.  high,  2  ft.  2  in. 
wide,  and  16  in.  deep.  There  Were  no 
lockers  in  the  upper  room. 


^-TrfT.  '   -'  ■ 


,4, 


V 


{      ,V» 


k«rE< 


NoRiiiAMPTON  :   St.  Thomas'  Hospital  (now  destroyed) 


BOROUGH   OF  NORTHAMPTON 


original,  and  two  square-headed  two-light  windows. 
There  was  no  arched  wall  opening  to  the  chapel  at  the 
east  end  of  the  '  domicile  '  and  no  trace  of  any  division 
between  the  chapel  and  the  lower  room,  though  pro- 
bably a  screen  had  existed.''  The  upper  room  had 
several  windows.  The  chapel  had  an  east  window  of 
four  cinquefoiled  lights  with  vertical  tracery  and  a 
canopied  niche  on  cither  side  within  :  in  the  south 
wall  was  a  piscina  and  a  window  of  three  lights. 
Both  chapel  and  domicile  had  open  timber  roofs,  the 
former  of  two,  the  latter  of  five  bays,  with  wind  braces 
under  the  upper  and  lower  purlins. 

After  its  vacation  in  1834  the  building  was  used  for 
business  purposes.^^ 

Two  hospitals  stood  outside  the  north  gate  of  the 
town  in  Kingsthorpe  parish  ;  the  Leper  hospital  of 
VValbeck"  and  the  hospital  of  St.  David  and  the 
Trinity,**  founded  in  1200  by  the  prior  and  convent 
of  St.  Andrew's  on  the  petition  of  Peter,  son  of  Adam. 

THE  COLLEGE  OF  ALL  SAINTS,^  founded 
in  1460,  stood  on  the  west  side  of  College  L.inc,  oppo- 
site the  end  of  College  Yard,  and  consisted  of  a 
priest's  house  for  the  warden  and  fellows  and  a 
garden.  It  was  used  as  a  hospital  for  the  sick  during 
the  plague  of  1603  to  1605,  being  then  the  property  of 
Abraham  Ventris.** 

There  were  two  HERMITAGES,  one  on  the  west 
and  the  other  on  the  south  bridge. 

THE  CASTLE  HILL  MEETING  is  prob.ibly 
older  in  origin  than  1662,"  though  it  was  augmented 
by  secessions  from  St.  Giles'  and  St.  Peter's  in  that 
year.  In  1672  licenses  were 
NONCONFORMIST  granted  for  worship  in  6 
CHAPELS.  houses  in  Northampton,  of 

which  three  were  Presby- 
terian and  two  Congregational.'*  The  definite 
history  of  the  Castle  Hill  congregation  begins 
with  the  ministry  of  Samuel  Blower  in  1674  ;  and 
his  meeting  house  was  one  of  the  few  that  escaped 
the  fire.  The  present  Castle  Hill  Chapel  was  built 
in  1695  and  is  now  known  as  Doddridge  Chapel.  It 
is  a  rectangular  building  with  hipped  roof.  On  the 
south  side  is  a  sundial  on  which  was  originally  the 
motto,  '  Post  est  occasio  calva,  1695.'  Within,  the 
roof  was  propped  inside  by  two  great  wooden  pillars, 
and  there  was  a  heavy  white  pulpit  with  sounding- 
board  and  galleries.  In  1852  the  building  was 
enlarged  and  newly  roofed,  the  pillars  removed  and 
new  gaUeries  put  up.  A  spacious  vestibule  was 
added  on  the  south  side  in  1890  covering  the  doorways. 
There  are  five  other  Congregational  chapels,  of  which 
one  was  built  in  the  18th,  three  in  the  19th,  and 
one  in  the  20th  century. 

COLLEGE  STREET  CHAPEL  is  the  second  oldest 
Free  Church  centre.    In  its  origin  it  was  a  secession 


from  Castle  Hill  Meeting,  though  friendly  relations 
were  maintained  between  the  two,  and  the  members 
met  for  some  seventeen  years  at  Lady  Fcrmor's  house 
in  the  south  quarter.  The  '  Church  Covenant  '  at 
the  time  of  the  formal  establishment  of  a  Baptist 
church  is  dated  27  October  1697 ,'*  and  the  chapel  in 
College  Street  was  built  in  1712.  Beginning  as  an 
Independent,  it  became  a  Baptist  community.  As 
Castle  Hill  is  associated  with  Doddridge  (1729-53)  so 
College  Street  is  connected  with  the  Rylands,  father 
and  son,  the  elder  famous  for  his  ministry  (1759-86) 
and  his  school;  the  younger  (minister  1786-93)  for 
his  friendship  with  Carey  and  share  in  founding  the 
Baptist  Missionary  Society  (1792).**  There  are 
eight  other  Baptist  chapels  in  Northampton  besides 
the  College  Street  Chapel,  which  was  rebuilt  in  1863. 
Of  these  one,  Providence  Chapel,  Abington  Street,  was 
built  in  the  eighteenth  and  the  rest  in  the  19th 
century. 

There  are  six  Wesleyan  chapels,  four  Primitive 
Methodist  chapels,  two  chapels  of  the  Plymouth 
Brethren,  one  Unitarian  chapel,  and  two  Salvation 
Army  barracks. 

The  Friends  were  early  persecuted  in  Northampton, 
and  several  died  in  Northampton  gaol.  They  have  a 
meeting  house  in  Wellington  Street. 

The  cathedral  of  the  Roman  Catholic  diocese  of 
Northampton,  opened  as  ST.  FELIX  CHURCH  in 
1844,  now  the  church  of  St.  Mary  and  St.  Thomas 
of  Canterbury,  is  in  the  Kingsthorpe  Road.  The  chapel 
of  St.  John's  hospital  in  Bridge  Street  is  also  used  as 
a  Roman  Catholic  place  of  worship.  There  is  a 
Jewish  synagogue  in  Overstone  Road. 

To  the  account  of  the  early  schools  of 
SCHOOLS.  Northampton  in  the  previous  volume**" 
should  be  added  a  reference  of  the 
year  1 232.  John  de  Duston,  presented  in  that  year 
to  the  church  of  St.  Bartholomew's,  Northampton, 
by  the  prior  and  convent  of  St.  Andrew's,  and  being 
examined  by  the  archdeacon  of  Northampton,  was 
ordered  to  frequent  the  schools  of  Northampton  and 
study  there,  and  at  the  end  of  the  year  to  present 
himself  to  the  archdeacon  for  re-examination.*'  In 
1258  the  Grey  Friars  of  Northampton  were  granted 
ten  oaks  from  Silverstone  Forest  for  the  building  of 
their  schools.*^  In  the  same  year  the  Black  Friars 
were  given  sixgood  oaks  for  the\TS.tudyioomi{studta).*^ 
Possibly  these  buildings  are  to  be  associated  with  the 
transitory  university  of  Northampton,  whose  history 
was  given  in  the  previous  volume.** 

The  Grammar  School*^  endowed  by  Chipsey  in 
1541  and  housed  first  at  '  The  Lamb  '  in  Bridge  Street 
and  later  on  the  site  of  St.  Gregory's  Church,  in  the 
modern  Free  School  Street,  was  moved  in  1867  to  new 
buildings  in  Abington  Square,  and  in    1911    to    the 


*' '  The  part  of  the  east  wall  of  the 
domicile  outiide  the  chapel  roof  wai 
wooden  framework,  covered  with  lath 
■nd  pUitcr,'  except  a  imall  piece  of  atone 
work  covering  the  wall  over  a  doorway 
at  the  eait  end  of  the  hall  north  of  the 
chapd :  Auk.  Arcb.  Soc.  Reps,  ziii, 
227. 

"The  chapel  and  the  east  part  of  the 
hall  were  used  as  a  carriage  house,  double 
doors  being  inserted  at  the  east  end  below 
the  window.  After  the  rebuilding  of  the 
welt  wall,  probably  early  in  the  19th 
century ,a  small  house  had  been  constructed 


in  the  north-west  part  of  this  hall,  and  a 
large  doorway  made  in  the  south  end  of 
the  new  west  wall  to  admit  carriages. 
Some  14th-century  glass  from  the  Hos- 
pital is  now  in  the  Church  of  St. Sepulchre: 
Cox  and  Serjeantson,  /list  of  Ch.  of  Holy 
SepuUbre,  Norihampt.  50. 

"  V.C.H.  Northantt.  ii,  162  ;  Nortbanu. 
Nat.  Hist.  Soc,  Vol.  xviii. 

"  y.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  154-6. 

''-  tbid. 

••  Serjeantson,  Hist,  of  Ch.  of  All  Saints, 
Northampt.,  p.  72. 

*^  V.C.H.   Nortbanu.    Ii,  69;    T.    Cas- 

61 


quoine,  etc.,  Hist  of  Castle  Hill  Cb. 
Northampt.  1896. 

"'  Cal.  S.  P.  Dam.  1671-2,  p.  306  ;  ibid. 
1672,238,379;  ibid.  1672-3,  178,259,261. 

'»  J.  Taylor,  Hist,  of  College  St.  Ch. 
(Northampt.  1896),  p.  3. 

*»  y.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  74;  Diet.  Nat. 
Biog. 

♦»•  y.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  15,  16. 

*'  Line.  Rec.  Soc.  vi,  170. 

♦•Close  R.  42  Hen.  Ill,  m.6. 

"Ibid.  m.  2. 

"  y.C.H.  Nortbants.  ii,  15-17. 

"  Ibid,  ii,  234-41. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


present  buildings  in  the  Billing  Road,  just  outside  the 
municipal  boundary.  It  is  now  known  as  the  Town 
and  County  School,  and  has  some  530  pupils.*® 

In  the  1 8th  century  Northampton  became  a  centre 
of  Nonconformist  higher  education,  by  the  presence 
here,from  172910  l75i,of  PhihpDoddridge'sacademy, 
a  training  college  for  the  Free  Church  ministry.  This 
academy,  opened  in  July  1729  at  Market  Harborough 
under  Doddridge's  headship,  came  to  Northampton 
with  him  and  was  originally  in  No.  34  Marefair,  at  the 
corner  of  Pike  Lane.*'  In  1740  it  was  removed  to  a 
large  house  in  Sheep  Street  opposite  the  Ram.** 
Formerly  the  Rose  and  Crown  inn,  it  later  became  the 
town  house  of  the  Earl  of  HaUfax,  and  later  still  was 
divided  into  tenements.  The  course  of  instruction 
was  based  upon  that  of  Doddridge's  tutor  at  Kibworth, 
John  Jennings,**  and  included  Hebrew,  Greek, 
psychology,  ethics,  divinity,  natural  philosophy, 
civil  law  and  some  mathematics.  All  had  to  learn 
Doddridge's  special  system  of  shorthand.^"  The  full 
course  occupied  five  years,  and  some  two  hundred 
pupils  passed  under  his  care,  of  whom  120  entered  the 
ministry,**  and  several  had  careers  of  distinction.** 
After  his  death,  the  academy  removed  to  Daventry, 
and  was  carried  on  by  Caleb  Ashworth,  one  of  his 
own  former  pupils.  The  elder  Ryland  also  had  an 
academy  ;  but  this  was  no  more  than  a  boarding  school 
(1769-1786)  ;  it  moved  with  him  to  Enfield  when  he 
resigned  the  ministry  of  College  Street  Chapel  to  his 
son.*3 

The  three  charity  schools,  namely,  Dryden's  Free 
School,  or  the  Orange  School,  founded  in  1710,  the 
Blue  Coat  School,  founded  by  the  Earl  of  Northampton 
in  1755,  and  combined  with  Dryden's,  and  the  Green 
Coat  School,  founded  by  Gabriel  Newton  in  1761,  were 
amalgamated  in  one,  known  as  the  Corporation  Charity 
School,  and  survived  until  the  20th  century.  In 
April  1923  the  school  having  been  closed,  the  endow- 
ments of  the  charity  were,  under  a  scheme  of  the  Board 
of  Education,  devoted  to  educational  purposes, 
forming  a  fund  known  as  the  Blue  Coat  Corporation 
Charity  School  Foundation  for  the  provision  of 
scholarships.** 

Becket  and  Sargeant's  (Blue)  Girls'  School,  founded 
in  1738  for  30  girls,**  is  still  in  existence  at  13  Kings- 
will  Street.  On  the  Sunday  next  sfter  29  May, 
following  the  practice  of  the  1 8th  century,**  tlie 
school  girls  attend  a  special  service  at  All  Saints' 
Church,  wearing  their  distinctive  dress. 

In  1738,  owing  to  the  eflForts  of  Doddridge,  a  free 
church  charity  school  was  established  for  instructing 
and  clothing  twenty  boys  which  seems  to  have  come 
to  an  end  about  1 772.*' 

In  1812  British  and  National  Schools  were  set  up  by 
Lancaster  and  Bell  respectively.  A  number  of 
Church  of  England  schools  were  set  up  in  the  course 
of  the  19th  century,  five  being  founded  between 
1839  ^""^  '858,  and  nine  more  before  the  close  of  the 
century.     There  arc  now  22  elementary  schools,  of 


which  two  are  Church  of  England  ;  and  in  addition 
one  special  school  for  mentally  deficient  children  and 
two  Roman  Catholic  elementary  schools. 

There  are  two  girls'  secondary  schools  :  namely, 
the  Girls'  High  School,  Derngate  (165  pupils),  and  the 
County  Borough  Secondary  Girls'  School,  in  St. 
George's  Avenue,  opened  in  191 5  (270  pupils).  There 
are  also  a  number  of  private  schools,  including  a 
convent  school,  a  large  and  imposing  building  in 
Abington  Street,  under  the  Sisters  of  Notre  Dame. 

The  Northampton  School  of  Arts  and  Crafts, 
Abington  Street,  now  under  the  control  of  the  county 
borough,  was  estabhshed  in  1871  ;  the  Technical 
School  in  Abington  Square  was  opened  in  1894;  a 
Domestic  Economy  School,  under  the  Northants 
County  Council,  in  Harleston  Road,  was  estabhshed 
in  1896,  and  there  is  a  housewifery  centre,  under  the 
Northampton  Education  Committee. 

Cleveland  Henry  James  Butterfield, 
CHARITIES,  by  a  declaration  of  trust  dated 
12  April  1923,  gave  ^^loo,  the  interest 
to  be  applied  in  granting  a  prize  to  the  most  deserving 
mother  during  the  year.  The  endowment,  known  as 
the  Catherine  Anne  Butterfield  Memorial  Charity,  now 
consists  of  ;^I24  8;.  id.  3J  per  cent.  Conversion  Stock 
with  the  Official  Trustees  producing  £4  js.  2d., 
which  is  distributed  by  the  Town  Clerk  and  four  other 
trustees  appointed  under  the  previsions  of  the 
declaration  of  trust. 

Mrs.  Mary  Clark,  by  her  will  proved  9  March  1907, 
gave  ;(^200,  the  income  to  be  distributed  among  the 
poor  members  and  attendants  at  the  Doddridge 
Congregational  Chapel.  The  money  was  invested 
in  ;^300  15J.  Consols  and  is  with  the  Official  Trustees 
producing  £j  los.  4d.  yearly  wliich  is  distributed  by 
the  deacons  amongst  the  poor  members  of  the  con- 
gregation. 

Emma  Pressland,  by  her  will  proved  at  Northamp- 
ton 24  Feb.  191 1,  gave  ^£100  to  the  trustees  of  the 
Doddridge  Congregational  Chapel,  to  apply  the  income 
for  providing  coal  for  the  poor  members  of  the  chapel. 
The  money  was  invested  on  mortgage  producing 
approximately  £j  annually. 

William  Jeff  cry,  bv  his  will  proved  14  March  1896, 
gave  ;£200,  the  income  to  he  distributed  among  the 
poor  members  of  the  Doddridge  Congregational 
Chapel.  The  endowment  of  the  charity  now  consists 
of  ;^2ii  13J.  lod.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock  1929-47 
with  the  Official  Trustees  ;  the  dividends  amounting 
to  j^io  in.  %d.  yearly  are  distributed  by  the  trustees 
among  the  poor  members  of  the  chapel. 

Mary  Jeffcry,  by  her  will  proved  at  Northampton  on 
the  4  March  1 864  bequeathed  ;{!l50,  the  interest  to 
be  equally  divided  between  the  Coal  Club,  Sunday 
School  and  Bible  Mission  in  connexion  with  the 
Doddridge  Congregational  Chapel.  The  endowment 
of  the  charity  now  consists  of  ^[284  Northampton 
Gas  Light  Company  Consolidated  Stock ;  the 
dividends  are  distributed  annually. 


"  A.  P.  White,  7bt  Story  0/  Norlhampl. 
pp.  109,  iiz,  150. 

«'  T.  Gaiquome,  Hiil.  oJCauli  IIM  Cb., 
Northampt.^  p.  22. 

"Ibid,  p.  19. 

"Jcnningi'  I.ccturcf,  printed  at  the 
^torthampton  Mercury  oflice  in  1721,  arc  in 
the  Taylor  Collection  in  the  Northampt. 
Public  Library,     (Author  J  J] 


'"The  Rulci  of  the  Acidemy,  from 
a  MS.  Book  at  New  College,  H.Tmp- 
itcad,arc  printed  Gaaquoine,  op.  cit.  pp. 
63-71. 

"Job  Orton,  Life  of  Doddridge  (ed. 
D.  Ruiiell),  p.  115. 

"E.g.  Dr.  Aiken,  Dr.  Kippii,  J.  Orton, 
T.  Urwick,  Samuel  Merivalc,  Stephen 
Addington,  Benjamin  Fawcett,  etc. 

62 


'•  Ibid,  p,  269, 

"  Information  from  the  To«n  Clerk, 

''  See  tombstone  of  founders,  with 
figure  of  Charity  ichool  girl,  in  All  Saints* 
Church,  west  end  of  north  aisle, 

"  The  children  then  wore  gilded  oak 
apples, 

"  Gasquoine,  Util.  of  Caille  Hill  Cb. 
p,  24-5, 


BOROUGH  OF  NORTHAMPTON 


Rebecca  Clifford,  by  her  will  dated  19  Jan.  1719, 
gave  a  yearly  payment  of  ;^lo  issuing  out  of  premises 
No.  24,  in  the  Drapery,  Northampton,  for  the  wives 
or  widows  of  poor  members  of  the  Corporation  of 
Northampton.  This  charge  was  redeemed  in  1915  and 
the  endowment  now  consists  of   jTm  6s.   8</.  India 

3  per  cent,  stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  producing 
j^io  annually.  The  charity  is  administered  by  five 
trustees  appointed  under  the  provi'^ions  of  the  scheme 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners,  dated  8  May  1903. 

The  same  donor,  by  her  will  dated  as  above,  gave  a 
yearly  payment  of  £10  charged  upon  her  messuage 
and  liquorice  ground  in  Northampton,  to  be  distri- 
buted annually  to  the  poor  of  Northampton.  This 
charge  was  redeemed  in  1901  and  the  endowment  of 
the  charity  now  consists  of  /I400  Consols  with  the 
Official  Trustees  producing  j^io  annually.  The 
charity  is  administered  by  five  trustees  appointed 
under  the  provisions  of  the  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  14  March  1902. 

John  Shortgrave,  by  his  will  dated  27  November 
1775,  gave  a  sura  of  ^^350,  the  income  thereon  to  be 
applied  in  the  purchase  of  clothing  for  poor  men  of 
Northampton.  The  endowment  now  consists  of 
^^428  IDS.  3d.  Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees 
producing  annually  ^^lo  14s.,  which  are  applied  in 
accordance  with  the  trusts  by  the  Vicar  of  All  Saints' 
and  three  others  as  trustees. 

Susannah  Elizabeth  Jones,  by  her  will  proved  at 
Northampton  on  13  Feb.  1909,  gave  to  the  Mayor  of 
Northampton  for  the  time  being,  /^i,loo  for  the  benefit 
of  poor  widows  and  spinsters.  The  endowTnent  now 
consists  of  ;{|i,3io  14J.  Sd.  Consols  with  the  Official 
Trustees  producing  ^^32  15/.  ^.  annually. 

Jonathan  Warner,  by  will  dated  17  July  1725,  gave 
j^6o,  the  income  to  be  apphed  in  providing  coats  for 
four  poor  men  of  Northampton.  To  this  sum  a 
further  £6^  16s.  lod.  was  added  by  Christopher  Smyth 
in  order  that  better  coats  might  be  provided.  The 
endowment  now  consists  of  /200  Consols  with  the 
Official  Trustees  producing  £5  annually  which  is 
expended  by  four  trustees. 

Georgiana  Sophia  Worley,  by  her  wiU  proved 
18  May  1907,  gave  to  her  trustees  the  residue  of  her 
estate  (after  payment  of  debts,  legacies,  etc.)  to  be  sold, 
the  proceeds  to  be  invested  and  the  interest  thereon  to 
be  expended  in  providing  pensions  for  poor  widows. 
The  endowment  of  the  charity  now  consists  of  sums  of 
£93  9s.  6d.  Consols,  jfi,3i6  5s.  5d.  Cape  of  Good 
Hope  3J  per  cent,  stock,  £1,300  Natal  3}  per  cent, 
stock,  j£i,8oo  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway 

4  per  cent,  preference  stock,  and  £1,032  London  Mid- 
land and  Scottish  Railway  4  per  cent,  preference  stock, 
with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing  approximately 
£207  annually.  The  charity  is  administered  by  the 
Vicar  and  Churchwardens. 

George  Coles,  by  an  indenture  dated  I  Sept.  1640, 
conveyed  to  trustees  properties  situate  at  North- 
ampton, the  rents  and  profits  to  be  distributed  among 
the  poor.  The  charity  is  now  administered  by 
trustees  appointed  by  a  scheme  estabhshed  by  the 
Charity  Commissioners  dated  11  July  1919.  The 
endowment  consists  of  messuages  known  as  Nos.  37 
and  30,  Gold  Street,  Northampton  ;  £4,714  15/.  \od. 
Consols,  and  £524  17/.  jd.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock 
1929-47,  with  the  Official  Trustee?,  the  whole  produc- 
ing approximately  £436  per  annum. 


Julia  Ellen  Rice,  by  her  will  dated  25  Nov.  1922, 
gave  a  sum  of  £400  as  a  fund  for  providing  pensions 
for  two  poor  old  persons  in  Northampton.  The 
endowment  now  consists  of  £400  5  per  cent.  War 
Stock  1929-47,  with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing 
£20  annually.  The  charity  is  administered  by  the 
trustees  of  George  Coles'  Charity. 

John  Friend,  by  his  will  dated  29  Jan.  1683,  gave 
to  trustees  his  messuage  called  the  Black  Boy  and 
2  acres  of  garden  ground,  the  rent  to  be  appropriated 
to  such  charitable  purposes  as  the  trustees  and  the 
Mayor  and  Justices  of  Northampton  should  think  fit, 
The  properties  were  sold,  and  the  endowment  now 
consists  of  £3,811  IS.  i^d.  Consols,  £4,387  6s.  \d. 
Consols,  £250  13/.  ()d.  3i  per  cent.  War  Stock,  £400 
5  per  cent.  War  Stock  1929-47,  held  by  the  Official 
Trustees  and  producing  £233  14J.  6d.  annually.  The 
charity  is  now  administered  by  trustees  appointed 
by  a  scheme  of  the   Charity  Commissioners  dated 

2  May  1922. 

Henry  Green,  by  his  will  proved  at  Northampton 
on  26  Oct.  1922,  gave  to  the  trustees  of  Kettering 
Road  Free  Church,  Northampton,  £100,  the  income 
thereof  to  be  applied  by  the  trustees  to  such  pur- 
poses in  connection  with  the  church  as  they  think  fit. 
The  endowment  of  the  charity  consists  of  £180  is. 

3  per  cent,  stock,  standing  in  the  names  of  T.  T. 
West,  B.  Nelson  and  John  Sale,  producing  £5  8/. 
annually. 

The  Royal  Victoria  Dispensary,  to  which  charity 
the  Charitable  Trusts  Acts  1853  to  1914  were  ex- 
tended by  an  order  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  of 
21  June  1921,  is  now  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the 
Commissioners  dated  9  Feb.  1923.  The  endowment 
consists  of  £1,367  js.  T,d.  3i  per  cent.  Conversion 
Stock,  £250  India  3V  per  cent,  stock,  and  £623  ifi.  ()d. 
Natal  3i  per  cent.  Inscribed  Stock,  with  the  Official 
Trustees,  producing  £78  \ls.  \d.  annually,  which  is 
administered  by  the  members  for  the  time  being  of 
the  Board  of  Management  of  the  Northampton 
General  Hospital  as  trustees  towards  providing  con- 
valescent treatment  for  patients  or  ex-patients. 

By  a  declaration  of  trust  dated  6  Mar.  1920  Sir 
Henry  Edward  Randall  gave  £;,ooo,  the  interest  to  be 
apphed  in  granting  annuities  of  £25  per  annum  to 
poor  widows  or  spinsters  of  not  less  than  55  years  of 
age.  The  endowment  now  consists  of  £5,949  5/.  i  id. 
^\  per  cent.  Conversion  Stock  with  the  Official 
Trustees,  producing  £267  \\s.  \d.  yearly.  This  is 
distributed  by  the  trustees  appointed  under  the 
provisions  of  the  declaration. 

The  endowment  of  the  charity  of  Jane  Porter  con- 
sists of  £96  19/.  zd.  India  3J  per  cent,  stock  with  the 
Official  Trustees  and  is  administered  by  trustees 
appointed  by  deed.  The  income,  amounting  to 
£3  8.f.  annually,  is  distributed  to  poor  members  of  the 
congregation  of  the  Protestant  Dissenting  Chapel,  in 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  deed  dated 
16  July  1901.     The  origin  of  the  charity  is  unknown. 

The  endowment  of  the  charity  of  Mary  Holmes  and 
the  charity  for  the  Minister  consists  of  £305  i\s.  "id. 
Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing 
£7  izs.  lod.  yearly,  which  is  paid  to  the  minister  of 
the  Protestant  Dissenting  Chapel  by  the  trustees 
appointed  by  deed.  The  origin  of  the  charities  is 
unknown. 

John  Driden,  by  his  vsrill  dated  2  Jan.  1707,  among 


63 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


other  bequests,  gave  £i  per  annum  for  a  sermon  to 
be  preached  one  day  at  Christmas  in  remembrance  of 
the  donor  of  the  charity. 

Daniel  Herbert,  by  his  will  dated  9  Nov.  1696,  gave 
;^lo  per  annum,  charged  upon  his  farm  at  Burton 
Latimer,  for  the  purpose  of  apprenticing  poor  boys 
resident  in  the  borough.  By  an  order  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  6  July  1906  it  was  determined 
that  the  sums  of  ^4°°  ^^^  L^'^  Consols  with  the 
Official  Trustees  should  be  set  aside  to  form  the 
endowments  of  the  above  mentioned  charities.  The 
income,  amounting  to  ^^lo  and  £\  respectively,  is 
applied  by  the  trustees. 

The  Almshouse  adjoining  St.  Thomas's  Hospital 
was  erected  by  Sir  John  Langham  about  the  year  1682. 
By  an  indenture  dated  14  June  1797  £300  stock  was 
given  by  JuHana  l.adv  Langham  for  the  benefit  of  the 
two  women  inmates.  The  endowment  of  the  charity 
now  consists  of  ^^92  3  3/.  3c/.  Consols  with  the  Official 
Trustees,  producing  j^23  K.  \d.  annually,  which  is 
distributed  to  the  two  almswomen.  By  an  order  of 
the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  in  1870,  the  Vicar 
and  Churchwardens  of  All  Saints'  were  appointed 
trustees  ex  officio  of  the  charity. 

St.  John's  Hospital,  formerly  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  High  Court  of  Chancery  of  15  June 
1875,  is  now  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  5  Dec.  1913.  The  endow- 
ment of  the  hospital  consists  of  considerable  pro- 
perties in  Northampton  and  various  sums  of  stock 
held  by  the  Official  Trustees  in  trust  for  the  charity, 
as  set  out  in  the  schedule  of  the  scheme  of  191 3.  In 
accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  scheme,  the 
income  is  applied  in  the  payment  of  the  stipends  of 
the  Master  and  of  the  out-pensioners  of  the  charity, 
and  in  supporting  and  maintaining  the  hospital  and 
the  inmates  therein.  The  trustees  consist  of  14 
persons,  among  whom  the  Master  and  the  Mayor 
for  the  time  being  of  Northampton  are  included 
ex  officio.  The  hospital  has  now  been  moved  to 
Weston  FaveU  and  the  building  in  Bridge  Street  sold. 

U'ilham  Rae,  by  his  will  proved  in  the  Principal 
Registry  13  Aug.  1906,  gave  £'^00  to  the  Weston 
Favell  Convalescent  Home  connected  with  the  St. 
John's  Hospital,  the  income  to  be  devoted  to  the  pur- 
chase of  newspapers,  periodicals  and  books  for  the  use 
of  the  patients.  The  endowment  now  consists  of 
j(^497  9/.  3r/.  New  South  Wales  3^  per  cent.  Inscribed 
Stock  and  ^^104  14/.  id.  3J  per  cent.  Conversion 
Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing  [l\  Is.  6d. 
yearly,  which  is  applied  by  the  trustees  of  St.  John's 
Hospital.  The  same  donor  by  his  will  gave  ^5,000 
and  the  residue  of  his  estate  to  the  Northampton 
Town  and  County  Nursing  Institution,  to  be  in- 
vested and  the  income  devoted  to  the  services  of  the 
Queen's  District  Nurses  in  Northampton.  The  endow- 
ment now  consists  of  various  sums  of  stocks  invested 
in  private  names,  producing  in  1925  approximately 
^^640,  which  is  applied  by  the  trustees  of  the  Queen 
Victoria  Nursing  Institution. 

The  endowment  of  the  Margaret  Spencer  Home  of 
Rest  consists  of  ^£20,000  5  per  cent.  War  Stock 
1929-47  held  by  the  Official  Trustees,  and  forming 
part  of  the  endowments  of  the  Northamptonshire 
Regimental  Prisoners  of  War  Fund,  as  provided  by  a 
acheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  26  Nov. 
1920.    TTie  income,  amounting  to  ;^i,ooo  yearly,  is 


paid  by  the  trustees  to  the  Board  of  Management  of 
the  Northampton  General  Hospital  towards  the 
maintenance  cf  the  Home. 

The  following  charities  are  applied  to  the  General 
Hospital : — 

The  Rev.  John  Henry  Smith,  by  his  will  proved  at 
Northampton  29  Feb.  1884,  gave  to  the  Governors  of 
the  General  Hospital  ^^loo  for  investment.  The 
endowment  now  consists  of  £()<)  21.  Sd.  Consols  with 
the  Official  Trustees,  producing  £z  gs.  ^d.  yearly. 

Wilham  Dash,  by  his  will  proved  at  Northampton 
12  April  1883,  gave  ;^loo  to  be  invested  for  the 
general  purposes  of  the  hospital. 

George  Charles  Benn,  by  his  will  proved  in  the 
Principal  Registry  14  Nov.  1895,  gave  his  farm  and 
lands  situate  at  Bozeat  to  the  Governors  for  the 
benefit  of  the  hospital.  The  property  was  sold  in 
1896  and  the  net  proceeds,  amounting  approximately 
to  ^^1,287,  invested. 

The  John  Putley  Bequest,  founded  by  will  proved 
at  Taunton  17  June  1899,  bequeathed  to  the  trea- 
surer of  the  hospital  ^^loo  for  investment. 

Mrs.  Margaret  Webster,  by  will  dated  1 1  Oct. 
1759,  bequeathed  ;£l30  to  be  applied  to  the  payment 
of  a  chaplain  to  the  hospital  to  the  e.xtent  of  ^^30  a 
year  for  4  years,  and  gave  certain  directions  for  the 
performance  of  the  duties  of  the  chaplain. 

Sir  Edmund  Isham,  Bart.,  by  a  codicil  to  his  will 
dated  3  Jan.  1865,  bequeathed  j(^i,ooo  stock,  the 
income  to  be  apphed  to  the  support  of  the  chaplain. 

Sarah  Edwards,  by  will  proved  in  the  Principal 
Registry  11  Mar.  1919,  bequethed  thesum  of  ^£1,000 
to  the  treasurer  of  the  hospital  for  the  endowment 
in  perpetuity  of  a  bed  to  be  named  the  '  Sarah 
Edwards  "  bed. 

Louisa  Mary  Lady  Knightley  of  Fawsley,  by  will 
proved  in  the  Principal  Registry  3  Feb.  1914,  be- 
queathed to  the  treasurer  a  sum  of  ,{^1,000,  the 
interest  to  be  apphed  for  the  endowment  of  a  bed  to 
be  called  '  The  Rainald  Knightley  '  bed. 

Thomas  Faucott  Sanders,  by  will  proved  in  the 
Principal  Registry  3  June  1921,  bequeathed  the 
residue  of  his  estate  for  the  general  purposes  of  the 
hospital. 

Francis  Clarke,  by  will  proved  at  Northampton 
27  July  1910,  gave  a  third  of  the  residue  of  his  estate 
to  be  disposed  of  and  the  proceeds  invested  for  the 
same  purpose.  The  endowment  now  consists  of  a 
sum  of  ;{^i,866  17;.  4(i.  Consols,  standing  in  private 
names. 

Mary  Augusta  Scott,  bv  will  proved  in  the  Principal 
Registry  15  Mar.  1913,  bequeathed  ^^1,000  to  the 
treasurer  for  endowing  a  bed  in  memory  of  her 
parents,  \\'illiam  and  Sophia  Scott. 

Edwin  EUard,  founded  by  will  proved  in  the 
Principal  Registry  17  Mar.  1925,  whereby  he  devised 
certain  real  estate  in  the  County  of  Northampton, 
subject  to  a  life  interest  to  his  widow,  upon  trust  for 
the  hospital.  The  widow  of  the  testator  is  still 
living. 

The  following  charities  comprise  the  Municipal 
(Church)  Charities,  and  are  regulated  by  a  scheme 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  15  Aug.  1899  : — • 

St.  Thomas's  Hospital  is  supposed  to  have  been 
founded  and  endowed  by  the  citizens  and  burgesses 
of  Northampton  about  the  year  1450  for  the  benefit 
of  the  poor  of  the  town,  and  was  dedicated  to  the 


64 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


memory  of  St.  Thomas  of  Canterbury.  By  the 
original  foundation  twelve  poor  people  were  main- 
tained in  the  hospital  upon  a  sm.ill  weekly  allowance 
besides  clothing  and  fuel,  arising  from  bequests  made 
by  Edward  Elmar,  Agnes  Hopkins,  Thomas  Hopkins, 
John  Bryan,  Thomas  Craswcll  and  others.  In  1654 
and  1680  John  Langham  and  Richard  Massingberg 
made  further  bequests,  and  in  1683  James  Bales 
devised  considerable  estates  for  the  use  and  yearly 
relief  of  the  poor  people  of  the  hospital,  the  rents  of 
which  were  first  received  in  1748.  In  1833  the  present 
hospital  was  erected.  The  income  of  the  charity  is 
derived  from  various  properties  in  Northampton  (the 
donors  of  which  are  in  most  cases  unknown)  and 
considerable  sums  of  stock  held  by  the  Official 
Trustees.  In  1925  the  income  was  approximately 
j^3,ooo.  The  number  of  pensioners  has  varied  from 
time  to  time,  and  in  1925  amounted  to  9  in-pen- 
sioners  and  141  out-pensioners. 

Sophia  Danner,  by  will  proved  at  Peterborough 
13  July  1925,  gave  ^^250  for  the  benefit  of  St.  Thomas's 
Hospital.  The  endowment  now  consists  of 
£2SS  2/.  lid.  Funding  Stock  1960-90  with  the 
Official  Trustees,  producing  j^io  41.  id.  yearly. 

V\'i!liam  Parbery  Hannen,  by  will  proved  at 
Northampton  3  Feb.  1921,  gave  to  the  trustees  £2^, 
the  interest  to  be  applied  in  providing  warm  garments 
for  the  oldest  widow  of  St.  Giles  Street  Almshouses. 
This  sum  is  now  represented  by  ^^34  lis.  6d.  Local 
Loans  3  per  cent,  stock  with  the  Official  Trustees, 
producing  £1  os.  Sd.  yearly. 

James  Henry  CUfden  Crockett  in  1924  gave  ;(|l,ooo, 
the  interest  to  be  used  for  the  benefit  of  in  and  out 
pensioners  of  St.  Thomas's  Hospital.  This  sum  was 
invested  in  £l,l'^.\.  121.  ^.  4  per  cent.  Funding 
Stock  1960-90  with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing 
£45  -js.  Sd.  annually. 

The  endowment  of  Wades'  Charity,  the  origin  of 
which  is  unknown,  consists  of  a  payment  of  £2  out 
of  the  revenues  of  the  town  council,  whereof  j^l  is 
paid  to  the  minister  of  All  Saints'  for  a  charity  sermon, 
13/.  4if.  to  the  churchwardens  for  distribution  in 
bread  to  the  poor,  3/.  ^d.  to  the  clerk,  and  3/.  t^.d.  to 
the  sexton. 

Robert  Ives,  by  will  dated  16  Sept.  1703,  be- 
queathed ;^ioo  to  the  corporation  upon  trust  to 
purchase  freehold  land,  the  rents  of  which  to  be 
appHed  as  follows  : — 20/.  yearly  to  the  minister  of 
All  Saints'  to  preach  a  sermon  in  the  church  on  New 
Year's  Day,  and  the  residue  to  be  applied  by  the 
mayor  and  minister  of  All  Saints'  for  clothing 
poor  old  men  and  women.  The  endowment  now 
consists  of  a  rent  charge  of  ^^5  issuing  out  of  Mill 
Holme  Meadow. 

The  charities  are  administered  by  a  body  of 
trustees  consisting  of  6  representative  trustees  and 
14  co-optative  trustees. 

The  follovnng  charities  comprise  the  Municipal 
(General)  Charities,  and  are  regulated  by  a  scheme 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  30  July  1915  : — 
John  Ball  bequeathed  to  the  corporation  ^^50, 
and  directed  that  the  interest  be  applied  in  clothing 
six  poor  vndows  of  the  parish  of  All  Saints  on  St. 
Thomas's  Day.  The  endovnnent  now  consists  of 
£$0,  invested  on  mortgage,  the  interest  of  £2  being 
distributed  in  money  to  six  poor  widows. 
The  Bugbrookc  Charity,  formerly  the  Corporation 

65 


Charity  School  and  the  Earl  of  Northampton's  Gift, 
was  founded  by  indentures  dated  i  and  2  Jan, 
17SS,  whereby  the  estate  at  Bugbrookc  was  conveyed 
to  the  mayor,  bailiffs  and  burgesses  upon  trust 
that  they  should  apply  two-thirds  of  the  rents  and 
profits  to  poor  freemen  of  Northampton.  The  endow- 
ment of  the  charity  now  consists  of  a  yearly  sum  of 
j^ioo,  payable  out  of  income  of  land  at  Bugbrookc 
containing  about  67  acres,  also  land  and  cottages 
at  Bugbrookc  containing  about  12  acres,  which  is 
applied  in  clothing  and  donations  to  15  poor  freemen, 
Thomas  Crasswell  in  1606  bequeathed  to  the 
corporation  £^0,  the  interest  to  be  given  yearly 
towards  the  preferment  of  a  poor  maid  of  North- 
ampton in  marriage. 

The  endowment  now  consists  of  ^50  invested  on 
mortgage,  producing  £2  annually,  which  is  paid  to 
the  mayor,  and  distributed  as  above. 

Matthew  Sillesby  by  will  dated  18  April  1662 
gave  to  the  mayor,  bailiffs  and  burgesses  a  messuage, 
tenement,  garden,  and  a  close  of  ground  all  in  North- 
ampton, the  rents  and  profits  to  be  distributed  be- 
tween two  poor  widows  or  widowers  of  Northampton, 
more  especially  of  the  parish  of  All  Saints.  The 
endowment  now  consists  of  ;^i,994  15^.  id.  Consols 
with  the  Oflicial  Trustees— ^£333  6;.  Sd.  Consols 
in  the  High  Court  of  Justice,  producing  ^58  4/. 
annually,  which  is  distributed  to  three  poor  widows 
in  annuities,  together  with  residence  at  35,  Horse- 
market. 

Richard  White,  by  will  dated  i  June  1691,  gave 
to  the  mayor,  baihflFs  and  burgesses  two  closes  of 
land  at  Duston,  also  garden  ground  at  St.  Peter 
and  All  Saints,  the  rents  and  profits  to  be  distributed 
between  two  poor  widows,  one  of  whom  to  be  of  the 
parish  of  St.  Peter.  The  land  has  since  been  sold, 
and  the  endowment  now  consists  of  ^^1,3 1 3  ioj.  2d. 
Consols  v^^th  the  Official  Trustees,  £2,178  13;.  41/. 
Consols  with  the  High  Court  of  Justice  and  ;^IS0 
National  War  Bonds  (1927),  the  whole  producing 
jf94  16s.  annually,  which  is  distributed  in  annuities 
to  poor  wdows. 

Sir  Thomas  V\Ttite,  by  an  indenture  dated  26  July 
1552,  conveyed  certain  estates  in  Coventry  and  the 
County  of  Warwick  to  the  mayor,  baihflFs,  and  com- 
monalty the  rents  and  profits  of  the  estates  to  be 
lent  out  in  free  loan  to  young  men  of  Northampton. 
The  rents  are  received  from  the  Coventry  trustees 
every  5  years,  and  lent  out  to  young  men  of  Northamp- 
ton in  sums  of  £100  each  for  9  years  without  interest. 
In  1922  the  sum  of  £3,iS'^  ^S'-  was  received  from  the 
Coventry  Corporation,  and  the  total  amount  of  the 
loans  outstanding  on  31  December  1925  was  £42,900. 
These  charities  are  administered  by  10  representative 
trustees  and  11  co-optative  trustees. 

Ann  Camp,  by  her  will  proved  at  Northampton 
19  April  1899,  directed  that  the  whole  of  her  real 
estate  should  be  sold  and  the  proceeds  after  payment 
of  certain  expenses  and  debts,  invested,  the  income 
to  be  apphed  in  granting  pensions  to  poor  widows 
or  spinsters  possessing  the  quahfications  mentioned 
in  the  will.  The  endowment  of  the  charity  now 
consists  of  £3,300  invested  on  mortgage,  £5,155  Js.  6d. 
5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  and  £5,333  p.  Corporation 
Redeemable  Stock.  The  income  is  distributed  in 
annuities  of  £20  per  annum  to  poor  widows  and 
spinsters.       The    trustees    of   the    charity    arc    the 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


trustees  for  the  time  being  of  the  Municipal  General 
Charities. 

The  endowment  of  the  charity  of  Samuel  WoUaston 
consists  of  a  rent  charge  of  (ji  lo/.  a  year  issuing  out 
of  premises  in  Royal  Terrace,  Northampton,  for  the 
benefit  of  the  poor  of  Northampton.  The  income 
is  administered  by  the  minister  of  All  Saints'  and  the 
mayor  of  the  borough. 

The  charity  of  George  Phillips,  founded  by  will 
proved  at  Northampton  on  21  December  1 899,  is  now 
regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners 
of  23  March  1910.  The  income  of  the  charity  is 
applied  by  the  trustees  for  the  benefit  of  indigent 
blind  persons  belonging  to  the  town  and  county  of 
Northampton. 

The  Northamptonshire  and  Peterborough  Prison 
Charities,  consisting  of  the  charities  of  Rebecca 
Hussey,  Margaret  Countess  of  I.ucan,  and  John 
Plall,  are  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  i  Nov.  1889.  The  endow- 
ment consists  of  ^^1,714  13/.  <^i.  Consols  and  ^^150 
National  War  Bonds  1928,  with  the  Official  Trustees, 
producing  ^£50  7/.  \cl.  annually,  which  is  applied 
for  the  benefit  of  discharged  prisoners,  preference 
being  given  for  the  County  of  Northampton  and  the 
Liberty  of  Peterborough.  The  trustees  of  the  charities 
are  the  Visiting  Committee  of  H.M.  Prison  of  North- 
ampton. 

Whiston's  Gift  is  a  lost  charity.  No  account  can 
be  given  of  a  payment  of  £\  a  year  in  respect  of 
this  gift,  mentioned  in  Gilbert's  Returns.  It  has 
not  been  received  for  many  years,  nor  is  it  known 
from  whom  it  was  received. 

Parish  of  All  Saints. — WiUiam  Parbery  Hannen, 
by  will  proved  at  Northampton  3  Feb.  1921, 
bequeathed  to  his  trustees  properties  known  as 
Nos.  144  and  146,  High  Road,  and  No.  ia,  Villiers 
Road,  Willesden  Green,  London,  the  income  thereof 
to  be  distributed  among  the  aged  poor  of  the  parishes 
of  All  Saints  and  St.  Katherine.  The  properties 
were  sold  in  1921  and  the  proceeds  invested  in 
^869  5^.  \i.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock  1929-47,  in  the 
name  of  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 
By  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated 
2  Jan.  1923  the  sum  of  stock  was  apportioned 
between  the  two  parishes,  each  receiving  ^^434  I2i.  %d. 
5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  1929-47.  The  income, 
amounting  to  [p.l  \\s.  Sd.  yearly  in  dividends  in 
each  case,  is  applied  by  the  churchwardens  of  the 
respective  parishes.  The  same  donor  also  gave  the 
sum  of  j^28  to  the  churchwardens  of  All  Saints'  to 
provide  the  choir  boys  with  a  new  shilling  each  on 
Christmas  Day. 

F.dward  Whitton,  in  or  before  1774,  bequeathed 
a  legacy  consisting  of  ;^loo  4  per  cent.  Annuities, 
the  income  to  be  applied  in  providing  bread  for  poor 
persons  of  the  parishes  of  All  Saints,  St.  Giles,  St. 
Peter  and  St.  Sepulchre.  The  endowment  now 
consists  of  ;^lc>o  Consols,  with  the  Official  Trustees, 
producing  £2  10/.  yearly,  each  parish  receiving 
12/.  6d.  a  year.  By  an  order  of  the  Charity  Com- 
missioners, dated  I  August  1905  the  incumbents' 
churchwardens  of  each  parish  were  appointed 
trustees  for  the  administration  of  the  charity. 

William  Stratford,  by  will  dated  16  July  1753, 
gave  /^500,  the  income  to  be  applied  for  the  benefit 
of  poor  housekeepers  and  other  poor.     Tliis  sum  was 


expended  in  the  purchase  of  an  estate  at  Helmdon, 
which  was  sold  in  1920,  and  the  proceeds  invested 
in  ;£3,II3  8/.  5^.  Local  Loans  3  per  cent.  Stock, 
in  tht.  name  of  the  Official  Trustees.  The  income 
amounts  to  ^93  8/.  annually. 

Francis  Clarke,  by  will  proved  at  Northampton 
27  July  1910,  gave  to  the  vicar  and  churchwardens 
of  All  Saints'  ^^500  London  and  North  Eastern  Rail- 
way 4  per  cent.  Guaranteed  Stock,  and  ;^25o  London 
and  North  Eastern  Railway  4  per  cent.  Guaranteed 
Stock,  the  interest  to  be  distributed  among  the  sick 
and  aged  poor  of  the  parish.  The  stock  has  been 
transferred  into  the  name  of  the  Official  Trustees, 
and  the  dividends,  amounting  to  £^0  annually, 
are   distributed   by   the    vicar    and    churchwardens. 

Mrs.  Dorcas  Sargeant,  as  appears  by  an  entry  in 
the  vestry  book  of  the  parish  of  All  Saints,  gave  the 
rents  of  a  small  plot  of  ground  in  Cow  Lane,  North- 
ampton, for  the  clothing  of  two  poor  widows.  The 
land  was  sold  in  1877,  and  the  endowmwent  now 
consists  of  ^^627  12/.  5<£.  Consols,  with  the  Official 
Trustees,  producing  ^^15  13;.  8^  yearly  in  dividends, 
which  are  applied  by  the  vicar  and  churchwardens. 
In  the  year  ending  31  March  1926,  16  widows  received 
clothing. 

The  Beckett  and  Sargeant  Sermon  Charity  was 
founded  by  Dorothy  Beckett  and  Anne  Sargeant, 
by  deed  dated  20  Sept.  1735.  The  deed  (among 
other  things)  directed  the  trustees  to  pay  the  yearly 
sum  of  j^i  to  the  vicar  of  All  Saints'  to  preach  a  sermon 
yearly  on  the  Feast  of  St.  Andrew  in  All  Saints' 
Church,  for  which  purpose  ^40  Consols  with  the 
Official  Trustees  has  been  set  aside. 

J.imes  Bracegirdle,  by  will  dated  24  March  1633, 
gave  an  annual  rent  charge  of  £2  issuing  out  of  land 
at  Bugbrooke  to  be  distributed  among  the  poor  of  All 
Saints  and  St.  Sepulchre. 

Each  parish  receives  16s.  annually  for  distribution, 
Ss.  being  deducted  from  the  charge  in  respect  of  land 
tax.  The  vicar  and  churchwardens  of  AU  Saints' 
and  St.  Sepulchre's  are  the  Trustees. 

Under  the  charity  of  Sir  Edward  Nicholjs,  founded 
by  will  dated  12  August  1708,  the  vicar  of  All  Saints' 
receives  from  the  trustees  ^^30  per  annum  for  the 
augmentation  of  the  vicarage. 

Parish  of  St.  Andrew. — The  charity  of  Miss  C.  E. 
Hyndman  was  founded  by  deeds  dated  in  1836  and 
1842  which  provided  that  the  interest  on  ^272  3  per 
cent.  Annuities  should  be  applied  towards  the  cost  of 
the  repair  of  St.  Andrew's  Church.  The  endowment 
now  consists  of  ;^272  Consols  with  the  Official  Trus- 
tees producing  £6  l6s.  annually.  The  charity  is 
administered  by  the  churchwardens  of  St.  Andrew's. 

Parish  of  St.  Giles. — The  Feoffment  Estates  com- 
prises the  following  : — The  charity  of  Edward  Watson 
founded  by  deed  dated  2  Edward  VI,  1548,  which 
provided  that  the  income  of  the  charity  should  be 
applied  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor  of  the  parish.  The 
endowment  consists  of  property  known  as  '  The 
Chequers  '  Inn,  4  cottages  and  6  doses  of  land  at 
Rothersthorpe  containing  about  45  acres.  The 
charity  of  George  Coldwell,  founded  by  deed  dated 
22  Mar.  1553,  which  provided  that  the  income  of 
the  charity  should  be  applied  for  the  use  and  relief 
of  the  poor  and  for  other  pious  and  charitable  uses 
within  the  parish  of  St.  Giles.  The  endowment 
consists  of  two  shops  and  houses  known  as  Nos.  40 


66 


BOROUGH  OF   NORTHAMPTON 


and  40a,  Abington  Street,  together  with  the  rent  of 
j^l  per  annum  received  from  the  '  Vine  '  Inn.  The 
charity  of  Thomas  Stone  was  founded  by  deed 
dated  31  Eliz.,  1589.  The  endowment  consists  of 
5  houses  known  as  Nos.  20,  22,  24,  26  and  28,  Wood 
Street.  Tlie  trusts  of  the  charity  were  similar  to 
those  of  George  Coldwell's  charity. 

Owen  Dodden,  by  will  dated  26  July  161 5,  gave 
/[lOO,  the  income  to  be  given  to  the  poor  of  the  parish 
of  St.  Giles.  The  money  was  invested  in  the  purchase 
of  a  dweUing  house  known  as  No.  64a,  Abingdon  Street, 
Northampton.  The  house  was  sold  in  191 3  and  the 
proceeds  invested  in  ;^533  4s.  8d.  Consols  in  the  name 
of  the  Official  Trustees. 

Nicholas  Rothwell  in  1658  gave  the  sum  of  ;^loo 
to  the  Mayor  of  Northampton,  the  interest  to  be 
distributed  among  the  poor  of  the  parish  of  St.  Giles 
and  for  placing  out  poor  boy  apprentices.  The  money 
was  invested  in  the  purchase  of  land  at  Duston 
containing  about  32  acres. 

By  a  deed  dated  6  Apr.  1 802  the  several  properties 
comprised  in  the  before-mentioned  charities  were 
conveyed  to  15  trustees  or  feoflFees.  Under  the 
trusts  of  this  deed  the  income  of  the  Feoffment 
Estates  is  to  be  applied  as  follows  : — To  the  vicar  of 
St.  Giles  the  annual  sum  of  £15  ;  to  the  clerk  and 
sexton  the  annual  sums  of  [i  and  [2.  3s.  4d.  respec- 
tively ;  to  apply  the  residue  for  the  benefit  of  the 
poor  of  the  parish  and  for  such  other  pious  and 
charitable  uses  within  the  parish  as  the  trustees 
should  think  proper.  The  gross  income  of  the 
charities  in  the  year  ending  1925  was  about  £610.  It 
was  distributed  in  accordance  with  the  directions 
contained  in  the  deed,  the  trustees  giving  a  donation 
of  ^50  to  the  funds  of  the  General  Hospital  and 
sums  of  ^^15  each  to  the  funds  of  St.  Giles', 
St.  Edmund's,  St.  Michael's  and  St.  Gabriel's  Sunday 
Schools. 

The  charities  are  administered  by  15  trustees 
appointed  under  the  provisions  of  the  deed  of  6  Apr. 
1802.  When  their  number  is  reduced  to  7  or  less 
new  trustees  arc  appointed  by  the  surviving  trustees. 

Arthur  Goodday,  by  will  dated  13  Jan.  1692,  gave 
a  close  of  garden  ground  at  Northampton  and  a 
rentcharge  of  ^^5  per  annum  issuing  out  of  No.  2, 
Ambush  Street,  Northampton.  The  garden  ground 
was  sold  in  1859,  and  the  endowment  now  consists 
of  Cifi^i  4s.  2d.  Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees 
producing  ^^46  os.  \d.  annuaOy,  and  the  rentcharge  of 
;^S.  Under  the  directions  contained  in  the  will  the 
rentcharge  is  paid  to  the  vicar  of  St.  Giles  and  the 
remainder  of  the  funds  distributed  to  the  poor  of  the 
parish  in  clothing  and  bread.  The  charity  is  ad- 
ministered by  the  trustees  of  the  Feoffment  Estates. 

Wilham  Brooks  Gates,  by  will  proved  in  the 
Principal  Registry  16  May  1876,  gave  ;^200  upon 
trust,  the  income  to  be  given  towards  defraying  the 
expenses  of  the  parish  church  of  St.  Giles  and 
schools.  The  endowment  of  the  charity  for  the 
church  now  consists  of  £106  4s.  lod.  Consols  uith 
the  Official  Trustees  producing  £z   13s.   annually. 


which  is  applied  by  the  vicars  and  churchwardens  as 
above. 

The  Northamptonshire  Orphanage  for  Girls  stands 
in  St.  Giles'  Street.  It  originated  in  the  Northampton- 
shire Servants  Training  Institution  which  was  founded 
at  Wootton  in  1858,  removed  to  St.  James'  Street, 
Northampton,  in  1861,  and  to  the  Horse  Market  in 
1S67.  In  1868  it  was  merged  into  the  Northampton- 
shire Orphanasje  for  Girls,  then  in  process  of  forma- 
tion, and  in  1870  moved  to  the  premises  in  St.  Giles 
Street  which  it  now  occupies — 291  girls  have  been 
trained  at  the  home.^* 

William  Stratford,  by  will  dated  16  July  1753,  gave 
a  sum  of  ;^5oo,  which  was  laid  out  in  the  purchase  of 
an  estate  at  Denton  in  1755.  The  estate  was  sold 
and  the  proceeds  invested  in  ;^794  13s.  7d.  Victoria 
Government  3  per  cent.  Consolidated  Inscribed  Stock 
in  the  name  of  the  Official  Trustees,  and  forms  the 
present  endowment  of  the  charity.  The  income, 
amounting  to  £1"]  \6s.  2d.  annually,  is  distributed  to 
the  poor  of  the  parishes  of  St.  Giles,  St.  Peter  and  St. 
Sepulchre.  Each  parish  receives  about  £()  5/.  yearly, 
which  is  distributed  by  the  minister  and  church- 
wardens of  each  respective  parish. 

The  charity  of  Miss  C.  E.  Hyndman  was  founded 
by  deeds  dated  in  1836  and  1842,  which  provided 
that  the  interest  on  £224  13;.  jd.  Consols  should  be 
applied  towards  defraying  expenses  in  connexion  with 
the  repair  of  St.  Katherine's  Church.  This  amount 
is  now  with  the  Official  Trustees,  and  produces 
j^5  I2S.  \d.  yearly,  which  is  applied  by  the  church- 
wardens towards  church  expenses. 

The  Rev.  Robert  William  Stoddart,  by  will  proved 
16  Aug.  1898,  gave  to  the  rector  and  churchwardens 
of  St.  Peter's  ;^ioo  for  investment,  the  income  to  be 
distributed  among  the  poor  of  the  parish.  The  en- 
dowment now  consists  of  £1)2  ()s.  Sd.  Consols  with 
the  Official  Trustees,  producing  £2  6s.  annually. 

The  origin  of  the  Church  Estate  Charity  is  unknown. 
By  an  indenture  dated  20  Dec.  18  James  I  (1620) 
properties  in  Northampton  were  conveyed  to  the 
churchwardens,  the  rents  to  be  applied  towards  the 
repair  and  expenses  of  the  church.  The  properties 
were  sold  in  191 1  and  the  proceeds  invested  in 
;^I,I56  is.  Sd.  India  3i  per  cent,  stock  in  the  name  of 
the  Official  Trustees.  The  interest  amounts  to 
j^40  ()s.  4^.  yearly. 

Nicholas  Rothwell,  who  died  in  1658,  gave  by  his 
will  ;^loo,  the  income  to  be  applied  towards  the  relief 
of  the  poor  of  the  parish  of  St.  Sepulchre.  This  sum 
was  invested  in  the  purchase  of  a  close  of  land  at 
Northampton  which  was  sold  in  1875  and  the  proceeds 
invested  in  ;^l,l68  13/.  ^d.  Consols  with  the  Official 
Trustees,  the  present  endowment  of  the  charity. 
The  charity  is  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  8  Mar.  1918,  and  the  income, 
amounting  to  £2^  4/.  ^d.  annually,  is  applied  by  the 
trustees  (of  whom  the  churchwarden  of  St.  Sepul- 
chre is  a  trustee  ex  officio)  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor. 

"  Inf.  from  Mils  L.  H.  Wake,  late  Hon.  Sec. 


67 


THE    HUNDRED    OF   POLEBROOK 


CONTAINING    THE    PARISHES    OF 


BARNWELL  ST.  ANDREW 
BENEFIELD 
HEMINGTON 
LUDDINGTON 


OUNDLE 
POLEBROOK 
THURNING 
WARMINGTON 


This  hundred  lies  between  those  of  Willybrook  and  Navisford,  with 
Corby  to  the  west.  To  the  east  it  borders  on  Huntingdonshire.  The  bound- 
aries of  the  hundred  and  the  parishes  assigned  to  it  are  not  conterminous, 
Thurning   and    \\'in\vick   being    partly   in    Huntingdonshire    (Leightonstone 

hundred),  while  part  of  Oundle  is 
in  Willybrook  hundred  and  Warm- 
ington  (detached)  was  formerly  in 
Willybrook  hundred  and  afterwards 
partly  in  Willybrook  and  partly  in 
Polebrook.  In  1 888  Thurning  was 
wholly  transferred  to  Northamp- 
tonshire and  Winwick  to  Hunting- 
donshire. 

The  history  goes  back  to  early 
times,  for  Polebrook  was  part  of  the 
eight  hundreds  of  Oundle  (Eahte 
hundred)  confirmed  to  Peter- 
borough in  972  by  Edgar,^  and  this 
district  again  may  be  derived  from 
the  900  or  800  hides  assigned  to  'Wigesta'  in  the  Tribal  Hidage.  The  eight 
hundreds  were  confirmed  to  the  abbey  by  Eugcnius  III  in  i  146,-  by  Henry  IP 
and  Richard  I^  and  later  kings.^  It  must  be  noted,  however,  that  in  1 125-8 
Vivian  owed  is.  of  the  ^^'?  hundreds  of  Oundle  and  Geoffrey  10s.  ;"  and 
when  in  1329  the  abbot  was  challenged  to  say  which  were  his  '  eight  hundreds,' 
it  being  alleged  on  the  king's  side  that  his  predecessor  had  claimed  only  five, 
viz.,  Polebrook,  Navisford,  Huxloe  and  North  and  South  Naveslund,  he 
brought  the  number  up  to  eight  by  adding  his  two  hundreds  of  Nesse  (Nassa- 
burgh  and  the  town  of  St.  Peter)  and  the  town  of  Finedon  (Thingden)  in 
the  hundred  of  South  Naveslund,  which  in  spite  of  its  name,  involving  a 
'thing,'  docs  not  seem  to  have  been  a  hundred.'  It  seems  probable  that  at 
some  early  time  the  abbey  lost  the  hundred  of  Willybrook,  for  the  Geld   Roll 


..,_..,                                        ^ 

<—*                            ^, — >      ^_-l 

^•%                  /.-'.— V        /**'•.  '"••Vc" ■■■•..'>- 

Index  Map  to  the  Hundred  of  Polebrook 


1  yIngl.-Sax.  Chron.  963  ;   Birch,  Cartul.  Sax.  iii,  582. 

•  Dugdalc,  Mon.  /Ingl.  i,  390.  '  Ibid.  391. 

*  Cal.  Chart,  iv,  274,  278. 

68 


^  Rot.  Cart.  (Rec.  Com.),  82  ;   Cal.  Chart,  i,  19. 

'  Liher  Nigfr  (Camd.  Soc.  47),  167. 

'  Phu.  lie  Quo  11'nr.  (Roc.  Com.),  553,  555. 


POLEBROOK  HUNDRED 

assigns  62  hides  each  to  Polebrook,  Navisford,  Huxloe  and  Willybrook 
hundreds,^  as  if  an  older  district  of  250  hideg  had  been  divided  into  four. 
The  five  hundreds  of  Oundle  were  later  reduced  to  three  by  the  inclusion  of 
the  Naveslunds  in  Huxloe. 

These  three  hundreds  of  Polebrook,  Navisford,  and  Huxloe  remained 
in  the  possession  of  the  abbey  till  the  Dissolution.^  In  1291  the  annual  value 
of  the  hundreds  of  Polebrook  and  Huxloe  was  £s-^^  ^  ^^^^  °^  compositions  for 
sheriffs'  aids,  apparently  of  the  14th  century,  gives  the  total  yearly  receipts  for 
the  hundreds  of  Polebrook  and  Navisford.  In  addition  there  was  in  Irthling- 
borough  a  knight's  fee  of  Avenel  held  in  moieties  by  Walkeline  de  Arderne 
and  Robert  Basset,  whose  tenants  followed  the  hundreds  and  yearly  made 
fine  for  frank-pledge ;  the  vill  of  Barton  also  followed  the  hundreds,  and  the 
bailiff  entered  to  make  view  of  frank-pledge  and  took  a  fine  from  the  men  ; 
also  in  Sudbury  the  free  tenants  and  the  '  capitales  franciplegii '  followed  the 
two  great  hundreds  yearly. ^"^  A  rental  for  the  hundreds  of  Polebrook  and 
Navisford  for  1408  has  been  preserved.!^  In  1462  the  king  made  the  monks 
a  grant  of  felons'  goods,  etc.,  in  the  abbey's  hundreds  of  Polebrook,  Huxloe, 
Navisford  and  Nassaburgh.'-  About  1535  the  issues  of  the  hundreds  of 
Polebrook  and  Navisford  were  estimated  at  £1^  los.  9^.^^ 

After  the  Dissolution  the  hundreds  of  Polebrook,  Navisford  and  Huxloe 
were  in  1541  granted  as  jointure  to  Queen  Catherine  Howard, 1*  reverting  to 
the  Crown  a  year  later  on  her  execution.  In  i  544  the  new  queen,  Katherine 
Parr,  received  the  hundreds  of  Polebrook  and  Navisford,  together  with  the 
castle  of  Fotheringhay,!^  and  she  retained  them  till  her  death  in  i  548.  Robert 
Tyrwhitt  had  been  made  steward  of  the  hundreds  in  1543.1®  The  hundreds 
remained  in  the  Crown  until  in  161 1  James  I  sold  them  to  John  Eldred  and 
William  Whitmore,i^  who  two  years  later  sold  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu,  after- 
wards Lord  Montagu  of  Boughton,i^  and  thus  they  descended  regularly  to 
the  Dukes  of  Montagu  and  from  them  to  the  Dukes  of  Buccleuch.^"  A  writ  of 
*  Quo  Warranto  '  was  issued  against  Sir  Edward  Montagu  regarding  his  rights 
in  the  three  hundreds,  which  were  eventually  allowed  him. 

While  Queen  Katherine  Parr  held  the  lordship  it  appears  that  the  hundreds 
of  Polebrook  and  Navisford  were  put  to  farm  for  ^^14  is.  i.^d.  yearly  ;  a 
court  was  held  for  the  hundred  of  Polebrook  in  i  546,  at  which  loj.  was  received, 
as  follows:  Barnwell  22^/.,  Benefield  i6<2'.,  Armston  ^d.,  Luddington  6*2'., 
Thurning  14^'.,  Polebrook  6J.,  Warmington  12^.,  Winwick  lod'.,  Oundle 
2s.  2J.,  Ashton  4d'.2<'  The  court  of  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  for  the  liberty  and 
hundred  of  Polebrook  used  to  be  held  at  Oundle  in  October.^i 

*  V.C.H.  Northants,  i,  259.  *  Bh.  of  Fee:,  pt.  ii,  p.  936  ;   Feud.  Aids,  iv.  28. 

10  Pope  Nic.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com.),  55-  "*  W.  T.  Mellows,  Swaffham's  Reg. 

"  Con.  MS.  Nero  C  vii,  f.  213.  >«  Cnl.  Pat.  I461-7,  p.  191.     1»  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  279. 

"Z..  fln</P.  Hen.  VIII,  xvi,  p.  716.  iMbid.  xix  (i),  p.  82.  "  Ibid,  xviii  (i),  p.  545. 

"  Pat.  R.  9  Jas.  I,  pt.  6.  "  Buccleuch  Coll.  Series  Chron.  p.  386  ;  Bridges,  Hiit.  of  Northants,  ii,  392. 

**  See  the  account  of  Boughton  in  Weekley.  ^  Mins.  Accts.  Henry  VIII,  2661. 

"  Whelan,  Northants,  711. 


69 


Scale  of  Feet 

\m  I35MCENTURY  c.  1266 

lil3l8aCENTURY 

Plan  of  Barnwell  Castle 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


BARNWELL  ST.  ANDREW 


Beornwelle,  Bcrnewelle  (xi  cent.)  ;  Berncwelle 
Sancti  AnJree  (xiii  cent.)  ;  Rernewell  Moyne  (xiv 
cent.) ;  B.irnwell,  Barnwell  Andree  (xvi  cent.)  ; 
Barnwell  St.  Andrew  (xvii  cent.). 

This  parish,  to  which  Barnwell  All  Saints  has  been 
ecclesiastically  attached  since  1821,  covers  1,681  acres 
on  a  subsoil  of  cornbrash  in  the  west  and  centre  and 
Oxford  clay  in  the  cast,  the  upper  soil  being  mixed. 
The  principal  crops  are  hay,  wheat,  barley  and  beans. 
Barnwell  St.  .Andrew  lies  low,  rising  from  about 
80  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum  on  the  bank  of  the 
Nene,  which  bounds  it  on  the  north-west,  to  117  ft. 
at  the  church,  and  an  average  of  200  ft.  east  and 
south-east  of  the  village.  A  large  tract  of  land  in 
the  north  and  north-west  is  liable  to  floods.  From 
Barnwell  .AH  Saints  on  the  south  a  stream  flows  north- 
wards through  the  village  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew 
into  the  Nene.  The  principal  road  in  the  parish, 
known  as  Barnwell  Road,  leads  from  Thrapston  in  a 
north-westerly  direction  to  Oundle.  The  North- 
ampton and  Peterborough  branch  of  the  London  Mid- 
land and  Scottish  Railway  runs  in  the  same  direction 
on  this  road  ;  Barnwell  station  is  in  the  parish  of 
Lilford.  The  church  of  St.  Andrew  and  its  rectory 
stand  near  the  station  and  from  the  churchyard  a 
shady  pathway  leads  over  a  single-arched  bridge  to 
the  ruins  of  Barnwell  castle. 

The  ruins  of  the  castle  stand  some  20  ft.  above  the 
Barnwell  Brook,  up  a  small  side  valley  opening  on 
to  the  main  valley  of  the  Nene,  to  the  south-east  of 
the  earthwork  already  described,^  which  is  apparently 
the  site  of  an  earlier  castle.  The  position  is  one  of 
no  military  importance.  The  castle  is  a  quadrangular 
stone  structure  with  round  towers  at  the  angles,  and 
a  gatehouse  at  the  south  end  of  the  east  wall,  which 
has  semi-cylindrical  towers  on  either  side  of  its  outer 
entrance.  I;  is  built  throughout  with  oolite  limestone, 
probably  from  the  quarries  at  Barnwell,^  by  Berengar 
le  Moyne  in  or  about  1266-*  and  is  a  good  example  of 
the  type  of  stronghold  erected  when  the  strengthening 
of  outer  walls  and  entrances  had  made  the  keep  super- 
fluous and  the  defence  of  the  curtains  had  made  neces- 
sary the  multiplication  of  flanking  towers.  In  1257, 
William  de  Stokes,  canon  of  Salisbury  and  rector  of 
Barnwell  St.  Andrew,  agreed  that  Berengar  le  Moyne 
should  have  a  chantry  in  his  chapel  in  Barnwell  Castle.^"" 
Leland,  in  1540,  speaks  of  '  four  strong  towers,  part 
of  Berengarius  Moynes  castle  '  as  still  remaining,  and 
mentions  a  '  raeane  house  for  a  farmer  '  within  the 
ruins,  which  has  long  disappeared.'  Half  a  century 
or  so  later  Camden  described  Barnwell  Castle  as  '  a 
little  castle  repaired  and  adorned  with  new  buildings 
by  the  worthy  Sir  Edward  Montacute  Knight.'* 
Charles  I  was  here  on  his  way  to  Bedford  in  August, 
1645,*  and  the  place  remained  one  of  the  residences 


of  the  Montagu  family  until  the  latter  part  of  the 
17th  century.  In  1704,  however,  it  was  said  to  be 
'  late  demolished  '°  and  Stukeley  in  1748  records  that 
the  Duke  of  Montagu  lamented  that  his  father  (who 
died  in  1 709)  had  pulled  the  castle  down.  Buck's 
view  shows  a  great  gap,  or  breach,  42  ft.  wide,  in  the 
western  curtain  wall,  which  was  afterwards  filled  up, 
but  the  filling  is  less  than  half  the  thickness  of  the 
original  wall. 

To  tlie  south-east  of  the  castle  is  a  picturesque 
stone-built  house  with  many  gables  and  chimneys, 
probably  the  successor  of  the  house  mentioned  by 
Leland,  on  whose  porch  is  a  shield  with  the  arms  of 
Montagu  quartering  Monthermer.'  It  is  now  the 
residence  of  the  lord  of  the  manor. 

There  are  no  indications  of  a  moat  or  true  entrench- 
ments of  any  kind,  except  on  the  north  side,  where 
there  is  a  broad  embankment  about  6  ft.  high,  220  ft. 
in  length,  but  ap)^arently  not  of  early  date. 

The  walls  are  now  about  30  ft.  high,  probably  little 
less  than  their  original  height  without  the  battle- 
ments, and  are  12  ft.  in  thickness,  the  masonry  being 
excellent  and  with  fine  joints.  The  enclosed  space, 
or  ward,  is  an  irregular  oblong,  the  greater  length 
being  from  north  to  south,  with  the  corners  (except 
at  the  south-east)  cut  off  by  angle  walls.  On  the  east 
side  the  length  is  135  ft.  4  in.,  on  the  west  133  ft.  6  in., 
while  the  width  is  go  ft.  8  in.  at  the  north  end,  and 
94  ft.  4  in.  at  the  south.  At  the  south-west  corner 
is  a  single  circular  tower,  set  angle-wise,  and  the 
north-west  and  north-east  corners  have  each  a  similar 
tower  with  a  smaller  one  attached  on  the  south-west 
and  north-west  sides,  respectively.  There  is  a  small 
postern  gate  at  the  north  end  of  the  west  curtain 
wall,  but  the  main  entrance,  as  already  stated,  is  at 
the  south  end  of  the  east  wall. 

The  gatehouse  follows  the  normal  plan  of  the  period, 
being  a  rectangle  with  a  passage  through  the  middle 
and  with  projecting  half-round  towers  on  each  side 
of  the  entrance.  The  passage  is  entered  through  a 
porch  beneath  a  drop  arch  of  three  chamfered  orders, 
springing  from  clustered  responds  with  moulded 
capitals,  and  was  guarded  within  the  arch  by  a  port- 
cullis, the  grooves  for  which  remain  in  the  wall  on 
either  side.  Further  on  are  two  other  arches  forming 
the  abutments  for  outer  and  inner  pairs  of  gates, 
beyond  which  is  a  round-headed  doorway  opening  to 
the  courtyard.  The  passage  is  vaulted  throughout. 
The  projection  of  the  gatehouse  is  entirely  towards  the 
outside  and  adjoining  it  on  the  south  is  a  semi- 
cylindrical  tower  similar  to  those  flanking  the  entrance. 
All  three  bastions  are  entered  from  the  courtyard  by 
round-headed  doorways,  and  are  almost  identical  in 
plan,  except  that  in  the  northern  one  there  is  a  closet 
about  3  ft.   square  in  the    thickness    of    the    south 


'  V.C.H.  yoribants,  ii,  413. 

'  C.  A.  Markham,  Barnwell  Castle,  in 
Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Repi.  xxxi,  525,  from 
which  much  of  the  following  deicription 
ii  taken  by  permiiiion. 

*»  The  jurori  of  the  hundred  in  1276 
pretenEed  that  Berengar  le  Moyne  built 
a  caille  at  Barnwell  ten  yean  elapied, 
Roi.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  7. 


"■  Buccleuch  MS.  no.  4. 

>  It  is  not  ihown  in  S.  &  N.  Buck'i 
View  of  the  Castle  in  1729.  Thi«  drawing, 
though  itylcd  the  '  louth  view,'  it  really 
taken  from  the  ealt. 

*  Brit.  (Ed.  Gibion),  i,  407. 

'  C.  Wile,  The  Monlagus  of  Bougblon,  23. 

'  Recov.  R.  Hil.  3  Anne ;  Noribantt 
N.  and  Q.  iti,  89-93  (1890). 

71 


'  The  house  and  stables  are  probably 
the  '  new  buildings '  mentioned  by 
Camden  in  1586  as  having  been  '  of  late 
erected  '  by  Sir  Edward  Montagu.  The 
•tables,  which  stand  at  right  angles  to  the 
house  on  the  north,  were  rebuilt  stone  by 
etone  about  fifty  yean  ago.  Behind  the 
•tables  i«  a  large  barn. 


A  HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


wall.  The  two  lower  chambers,  or  guard  rooms, 
have  groined  vaulting  in  two  bays,  with  cross  ribs 
resting  on  moulded  corbels,  and  contain  each  five 
loopholes,  three  in  the  circular  front  and  the  others 
in  the  side  walls.  The  room  in  the  south  tower  is 
nearly  square  and  has  two  loops  low  down  facing 
east  and  west  and  two  others  high  up  in  the  wall, 
but  the  vaulting  has  been  destroyed,  the  corbels  and 
springing  of  the  ribs  alone  remaining.  It  is  entered 
from  the  court  by  an  arched  passage  at  the  east  end 


Barnwell  Castle 

of  the  south  wall,  twisted  so  as  to  bring  the  inner 
doorway  to  the  middle  of  the  wall  of  the  chamber. 
Access  to  the  upper  floor  of  the  gatehouse  was  by  a 
flight  of  steps  from  the  court  in  the  wall  north  of  the 
passage,  here  curved  out  ;  the  doorway  remains,  but 
the  steps  have  been  altered.  They  led  to  an  oblong 
apartment  over  the  passage,  lighted  by  a  large  window 
at  each  end,  that  facing  east  being  still  entire  ;  traces 
only  of  the  other  remain.  From  this  apartment 
doorways  led  to  large  rooms  in  the  flanking  towers, 
and  from  the  southern  one  to  the  tower  beyond.  The 
windows  in  these  rooms  are  tall,  narrow  openings 
with  acutely  pointed  rear  arches. 

Each  of  the  three  circular  corner  towers  is  entered 
from  the  court  by  a  round-headed  doorway  set  across 
the  angle  leading  to  a  straight  vaulted  passage  giving 
into  a  circular  chamber.  In  the  south-west  lower 
the  chamber  has  two  loops  only,  commanding  respec- 
tively the  western  and  southern  curtains ;  a  small 
vice  in  the  thiclcness  of  the  wall  on  the  left  of  the 
passage  gave  access  to  a  large  square  room  which 
has  a  fireplace  and  muUioncd  window  of  two  lights. 
Above  this  was  a  similar  room,  also  with  fireplace  and 
window.  These  seem  to  have  been  the  principal 
living  rooms. 

The  north-west  tower  has  four  loops  in  the  lower 
chamber,  and  on  its  south-west  side  is  an  attaclied 
•mailer    tower    containing    a    rectangular    chamber, 


formerly  vaulted,  with  two  loops,  and  between  this 
and  the  main  tower  another  still  smaller  attached 
tower,  formerly  containing  the  staircase  to  a  room 
above,  A'hich  had  a  fireplace  and  wooden  floor.  The 
north-east  tower  is  very  similar  in  plan  and  general 
arrangement,  with  loops  commanding  the  north  and 
east  walls,  smaller  attached  tower  on  the  north  side 
and  upper  room.  The  doorway  leading  into  it  has 
been  rebuilt  and  the  whole  angle  appears  to  have  been 
refaced  in  modern  times. 

All  the  buildings  inside  the 
courtyard  have  disappeared,  but 
on  the  east  curtain  are  frag- 
ments of  cross  walls  between 
which  masonry  is  partially 
plastered,  indicating  that  it 
was  the  east  end  of  a  large 
apartment.  Several  parts  of 
the  curtain  inside  have  been 
stripped  of  their  facing  stores, 
leaving  the  rubble  exposed. 
Most  of  the  loopholes  have 
two  cross  slits. 

Latham's  Hospital,  which 
stands  across  the  road  on  the 
south  side  of  tlie  church,  was 
rebuilt  in  1873-4  '"  ^^^  °^'^ 
style  and  is  a  gabled  store 
building  facing  three  sides  of  a 
quadrangle,  the  fourth  side 
open  on  the  north  to  the  road. 
The  old  gateway,  dated  1601, 
has  been  preserved  in  the  en- 
closing fence  wall.  On  it  is  the 
inscription, '  Cast  thy  bread 
upon  the  waters.' 
Place  names  which  occur  are  Boyespital,  Jordones, 
Alwoldeshallyate,  Goldisplace,  Childrebrigg,  and 
Fladerhill. 

In  the  14th  century  there  was  a  town  at  Barnwell 
with  many  tradesmen,  and  we  find  such  names  and 
descriptions  as  gardener,  washerwoman,  '  le  roper,' 
weaver,  '  barcar,'  '  le  woollemongere,'  the  smith, 
'  le  parmenter,'  the  cobbler  and  the  tailor  in  the  deeds 
of  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch. 
There  were  also  important 
mills  at  Crowthorp. 

In     1921     the     population 
numbered  167  persons. 

A  charter  of 
AUNOKS  Edward  the  Con- 
fessor confirmed 
BARN fr ELL  ST.  ANDREW 
to  Ramsey  Abbey  as  the  gift 
of  Ethclric,  Bishop  of  Dor- 
chester," who  died  in  1034;' 
William  I  and  Edward  III 
also  confirmed  this  grant.*"  At 

the  Domesday  Survey  (1086)  and  again  in  the  nth 
century,  the  land  of  St.  Benedict  of  Ramsey  included 
six  liidcs  in  Barnwell. '^  Between  1 1 14  and  1130, 
Abbot  Reinald  granted  '  as  an  inheritance  '  [in  here- 
dttatem]  to  Reginald  le  Moyne,  liis  tenant  in  Barnwell, 
and  to  his  sons,  the  lands  which  Reginald  held  of  him 


Ramsey  Abqky.      Or  a 

hcnd  azure  with  three 
rams'  beads  argent  there- 
on. 


'  Carlul.   Mon.  ii  Ramts.  (Roll»  Str.), 
,    73 ;     Kcmblc,    Cod.    Dtpl.     rol.     iv, 


no.     i.rccix.     The    authenticity    of    the 
latter  deed,  however,  i>  doubtful. 


»  Stubbs,  Reg.  Sacr.  Angl.  33. 
'"  Chart  R.  121,  m.  13,  no.  29. 
"  V.C.II.  Norlhants,  i,  319,  365*. 


72 


Barnwell  Si.  Andrew  •    Latham  Almshouses 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


Le  Muvne.     Aigtnt  a 
crass  paly  gules. 


in  this  parish  and  elsewhere  for  loos,  a  year  and  the 
service  of  one  knight's  fee."^*  Reginald  le  Moyne 
was  the  Abbey's  tenant  in  Barnwell  from  about  mo 
and  possibly  as  early  as  1091.*-  Berengar,  his  son,^^ 
whose  name  appears  as  a  witness  to  various  deeds 
between  11 14  and  1163,*^  was  succeeded  in  or  before 
1166  by  his  son,  another  Reginald  le  Moyne,'^  who 
between  the  years  1184  and 
1 1 89  owed  the  service  of  one 
knight  to  the  abbot  for  a  fee  in 
Northamptonshire.**  He  ap- 
parently had  two  sons,  Beren- 
gar and  Reginald,  and  wis 
succeeded  by  his  grandson 
Reginald,  son  of  Berengar, 
who  was  dead  in  1248  when 
William  of  York,  Provost  of 
Beverley,  was  guardian  of 
his  son  and  heir  Berengar." 
In    1267   Berengar,   who   had 

attained  his  majority  before  1264,**  was  keeper  of  the 
peace  in  Hunts.**  and  in  1270  he  was  one  of  the  col- 
lectors of  the  20th  in  that  county.-"  Protection  for 
four  years  was  granted  him  as  a  crusader  in  the  same 
year.**  About  1266  he  built  the  castle  at  Barnwell, 
and  in  1276  it  was  declared  that  he  was  holding  a 
market,  fair  and  assize  of  bread  and  ale  there  without 
known  warrant.^  In  the  same  year  William  de  God- 
manchester,  abbot  of  Ramsey,  bought  back  the 
manors  of  Barnwell,  Hemington  and  Crowthorp  and 
other  lands  from  Berengar  le  Moyne,  as  it  is  said,  for 
^1,666  ly.  ^d.  and  for  prayers  for  himself  and  for 
the  souls  of  his  father  Reginald  and  his  mother  Rose.*' 
The  grant  was  confirmed  by  Berengar's  widow 
Emma  in  1286.** 

Barnwell  being  held  of  the  king  in  chief,  questions 
arose  about  its  alienation  at  this  time  without  the 
king's  licence.*^ 

In  1329  John,  son  of  Geoffrey  of  Southorpe,  son 
of  Rose,  daughter  of  Berengar  and  Emma,  and  Walter 
Naunton,  husband  of  Joan  daughter  of  Margaret  their 
other  daughter,  sued  the  abbot  for  the  manor  of 
Barnwell,  which,  as  they  alleged,  had  been  settled  on 
Berengar  le  Moyne  and  his  wife  Emma  and  their 
issue.**  A  verdict  was  given  in  favour  of  the  Abbot,*' 
and  eleven  years  later  John  of  Southorpe's  son  Robert 
released  to  Simon  Abbot  of  Ramsey  all  his  right  in 
the  manor. 

After  the  dissolution  of  Ramsey  Abbey  Henry  VIII 
in  1540  granted  in  tail  the  manor  of  Barnwell  to  Sir 


BARNWELL 
ST.  ANDREW 

Edward  Montagu,  Chief  Justice  of  the  King's 
Bench,**  who  had  been  steward  of  the  manor  for 
20  years.**  Sir  Edward  also  purchased  from  Ralph 
Agard  in  l553^another  estate  which  had  belonged  to 
William  Willington  of  Barcheston.  A  few  months 
later  he  was  imprisoned  for  his  opposition  to  the 
succession  of  Lady  Jane  Grey.'*  Probably  in  con- 
firmation of  title  Sir  Edward  Montagu,  his  eldest  son 
and  heir  by  his  third  wife,  Ellen  daughter  of  John 
Roper,  attorney-general  to  Henry  VIII,  who 
succeeded  him  in  1556,'*  bought  the  reversion  of 
the  manor  granted  in  tail  to  his  father,  from  Queen 
Elizabeth  in  1602  for  ^^153  3s.  9d.''  He  seems  to 
have  made  Barnwell  Castle  one  of  his  residences,  for 
he  left  to  his  wife  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  Sir  James  Haring- 
ton  of  Exton,  Rutland  "  all 
my  househoulde  stuff  in  my 
CasteUof  Barnewelle."**  By 
this  lady  he  had  seven  sons,  of 
whom  the  second  but  eldest 
surviving,  another  Edward, 
succeeded     him    in    January 


i6oi- 


A  settlement  made 


Montagu.  Argent  a  (esse 
indented  gttles  of  three 
points  and  a  border  sable, 
for  Montagu,  quartering 
Or    an    eagle     vert   Jot 

MoNTHERMER. 


by  him  rather  more  than  two 
years  later  included  the  manor 
of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew,  as  did 
others  in  161 1  and  1634.'*  ^^ 
1604  Sir  Edward  and  other 
gentlemen  of  the  county  were 
put  from  the  Justiceship  of  the 

Peace  for  favouring  the  Puritan  ministers  deprived  of 
their  livings.''  Later  on  he  made  his  peace  with  the 
king'*  and  was  created  Baron  Montagu  of  Boughton 
in  1621.'*  As  a  royalist  he  incurred  the  displeasure  of 
the  Parliamentary  party  and  was  imprisoned  in  the 
Tower.  In  consideration  for  his  advanced  age,  he 
was  allowed  to  withdraw  to  his  dwelling  in  the  Savoy, 
where,  in  his  82nd  year  and  still  a  prisoner,  he  died 
on  15  June,  1644.'"'  Edward  his  second  surviving 
son,  by  his  second  wife  Frances  Cotton,  succeeded 
him.  He  sat  as  one  of  Cromwell's  lords  in  1657.''* 
Edward,  his  eldest  son  by  his  wife  Anne,  daughter  of 
Sir  Ralph  Winwood,''*  was  killed  fighting  against  the 
Dutch.  On  his  death  in  1683  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  second  son  Ralph,^'  who  with  his  third  son 
John  settled  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  in  1704.^  John 
succeeded  him  four  years  afterwards  in  his  later  titles 
of  Marquis  of  Monthermer  and  Duke  of  Montagu,  and 
died  with  no  surviving  male  issue  in  1749.''* 


"»  Cartul.  Men.  de  Rames.  (RoUi  Ser.), 
u,  259. 

'»  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  365*. 

'•  Chron.  Abb.  Rames.  (Rollt  Ser.),  263. 

'*  Ibid.  259,  261,  274. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  367  n. 

"  Cariul  Mon.  de  Rames.  (Rolli  Ser), 
in,  48. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  232.  See  also  Bucclcuch  Decdi 
148,  A  7,  27. 

"  Bridges,     Hisl.      of    Northants,     ii, 

393-4- 

•»  Cal.  Pat.  1266-72,  p.  132. 

»  Ibid.  p.  418. 

•'  Ibid.  p.  440. 

"  Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  7. 
Nfarkct  and  fair  had  been  granted  him  hj 
royal  charter  (»ee  below). 

«•  Cjriul.  Mon.  de  Rames.  (Rolls  Ser.), 


''i  ^3^1  339i  34°  >   '">   '85;    Add.  Chart, 
33063. 

"  Ibid.    34245  i     Buccleuch    Coll.    50, 

H  42,  43- 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  13,  28. 

'*  Assize  R.  629,  m.  igd.  Cartul.  Mon. 
de  Rames.  (Rolls  Ser.),  iii,  79-81  ;  Buc- 
cleuch Deeds  H  62,  75.  John  de  Southorp 
was  also  known  as  John  de  Layham. 

>'  Ibid. 

"  Pat.  R.  32  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  3,  m.  39. 

"  yalor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  274, 
Buccleuch  Deeds,  C.  5. 

•">  Com.  Pleas.  Deeds.  Enrolled  East. 
7  Edw.  VI,  m.  6. 

•'  Diit.  Nat.  Biog.  ;  Fuller,  tVortbies  of 
Engl,  ii,  167  ;  Lord  Campbell,  Lives  of  the 
Chief  Justices,  170-77. 

••  Did.  Nat.  Biog. 

"  Pat.  R.  44  EUz.  pt.  15,  m.  12. 

73 


"  P.C.C.  I  Mountague. 

s^  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  352  ;  G.  E.  C, 
Complete  Peerage,  v,  342-45. 

"  Recov.  R.  Trin.  2  Jas.  I,  ro.  42  ; 
Hil.  9  Jas.  I,  ro.  37  ;  Trin.  9  Chas.  I. 
ro.  40 ;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  9 
Chas.  I. 

"  Winwood,  Memorials,  ii,  48-9. 
»«  Buccleugh  MSS.  {Hist.  MSS.  Com. 
Rep.),  p.  46. 

»  G.  E.  C.  op.  cit.  V,  342. 

*»  Ibid.  ;  Clarendon,  Hist,  of  the  Rebel- 
lion [ed.  Macray],  bk.  vi,  par.  35  ;  North- 
ants N.  and  Q.  ii,  16;  Cal.  of  Com.  for 
Advance  of  Money,  i,  364  ;  ii,  795. 

•1  G.  E.  C.  loc.  cit ;  Diet.  Nat.  Biog. 

«'  G.  E.  C.  loc.  cit. 

*"  Ibid.  V,  342-3. 

"  Ibid.    Recov.  R.  Hil.  3  Anne. 

♦'  G.  E.  C.  op.  cit.  V,  344. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


In  accordance  with  an  Act  of  Parliament  passed  in 
1723,  upon  the  marriage  of  his  elder  daughter  Isabella 
with  the  second  Duke  of  Manchester,  his  entailed 
estates  including  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  should  have 
been  divided  between  his  two  daughters  and  coheirs, 
Isabella  Dowager  Duchess  of  Manchester,  then  the 
wife  of  Edward  Hussey,  and  Mary,  who  in  1730 
had  married  George  Brudenell,  Earl  of  Cardigan.^' 
Each  sister  had  an  only  son  named  John.  The  late 
Duke  had  directed  that  this  part  of  his  inheritance 
should  be  kept  undivided  and  pass  to  his  daughter 
Mary  and  her  issue,  who  were  to  pay  to  the  Dowager 
Duchess  and  her  issue  a  moiety  of  the  rents  and 
profits.'"  This  arrangement  was  continued  until  the 
death  of  the  latest  survivor  of  the  four,  Edward 
Hussey-Montagu,  Earl  of  Beaulieu,  in  1802.''*  Mary 
the  younger  of  the  two  sisters  died  in  1775,  having 
survived  her  son  five  years,  and  in  the  following  year 
her  husband,  who  had  borne  the  titles  of  Marquis 
of  Monthermer  and  Duke  of  Montagu  since  1766,^' 
held  a  moiety  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  in  conjunction 
with  their  only  surviving  child  Elizabeth  and  her 
husband  Henry  Scott,  Duke  of  Buccleuch.^" 

The  manor  then  passed  with  the  Buccleuch  title 
until  1 91 3,  when  the  present  Duke  sold  it  to  Horace 
Czarnikow,  who  in  1920  sold  the  castle  to  Mrs. 
Baiiibridge,  now  Mrs.  W.  H.  McGrath." 

In  1086  there  were  two  mills  rendering  24J.  in 
Barnwell  St.  Andrew.^-  A  grant  of  two  weekly  markets, 
on  Monday  and  Friday,  and  a  fair  on  the  vigil  of  St. 
Michael  and  the  si.x  days  following  was  made  to 
Berengar  le  Moyne  in  1270.^^  This  grant  was 
renewed  to  tho  Abbot  of  Ramsey  eight  years  later, 
when  the  market  was  to  be  held  on  Wednesdays  only 
but  the  fair  was  to  remain  as  before.^*  These 
privileges  were  disputed  by  the  Abbot  of  Peterborough 
in  1279  on  the  ground  of  the  harm  suffered  therefrom 
by  his  market  at  Oundle.  A  compromise  was  effected. 
Market,  pillory  and  tumbrel  at  Barnwell  St.  .\ndrew 
were  discontinued  ^^  and  the  men  of  Ramsey  Abbey 
in  that  parish  were  appointed  to  come  before  the 
Peterborough  bailiffs  twice  a  year  for  view  of  frank- 
pledge, the  bailiff  of  Ramsey  Abbey  being  allowed  to 
sit  with  the  others  and  receive  half  the  fines  or  profits 
from  the  Abbot  of  Ramsey's  villeins,  but  to  exercise 
no  other  jurisdiction.^'  A  custom  called  '  physsilver  ' 
or  '  phisshesilver  '  was  paid  to  the  lord  of  this  manor 
in  the  13th  century." 

The  Church  of  ST.  AXDRFJf  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  27  ft.  by  16  ft.  3  in.  with  north 
vestry  and  organ  chamber,  clearstoried 
nave  47  ft.  by  18  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  aisles,  south 
porch,^  and  west  tower  7  ft.  6  in.  square  surmounted 
by  a  broach  spire.  All  these  measurements  are 
internal. 

No  part  of  the  building  is  older  than  the  13th 
century,  to  which  period  the  main  portion  belongs,  and 


the  plan  remained  unaltered  until  1873,  when  the 
organ  chamber  was  added  in  the  re-intrant  angle  of 
the  north  aisle  and  chancel.^'  The  original  work 
began  m  the  usual  way  at  the  east  end  about  1 250, 
and  progressed  westward  to  the  tower,  the  upper  part 
of  which,  with  the  clearstory,  is  in  the  geometrical 
style  of  about  1290.  It  is  not  unlikely,  however, 
that  the  building  proceeded  without  serious  interrup- 
tion over  a  number  of  years,  covering  more  or  less 
the  latter  half  of  the  13th  century,  though  the 
architectural  detail  of  the  chancel  arch,  nave  arcades, 
south  doorway,  porch,  and  lower  part  of  the  tower 
is  of  the  earlier  type.  The  north  doorway  and  the 
windows  of  the  aisles  are  14th  century  insertions, 
and  in  the  15th  century  the  chancel  was  largely 
reconstructed,  new  windows  being  inserted  and  the 
upper  part  of  the  walls  rebuilt. 

The  church  is  built  throughout  of  rubble  with 
ashlar  dressings  and  has  plain  parapets  and  low-pitched 
lead  roofs.  The  chancel  is  without  buttresses  and 
has  an  original  string  course  below  the  sill  level  and 
a  I3tli  century  moulded  priest's  doorway  with 
rounded  arch  on  jamb  shafts  with  moulded  capitals 
and  bases.  The  15th  century  east  window  is  of 
five  cinquefoiled  lights  with  four-centered  head  and 
transom  at  mid-height,  but  the  mullions  and  tracery 
are  modern  (1851).  The  two-light  window  at  the 
eastern  end  of  the  north  wall  was  originally  farther 
west,  but  was  moved  to  its  present  position  when  the 
organ  chamber  was  built.  In  the  south  wall  are  two 
15th  century  windows,  the  easternmost,  high  up  in 
the  wall,  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights  and  Perpendicular 
tracery,  and  the  other  of  two  lights.  The  north 
wall  is  open  at  its  west  end  by  a  modern  arch  to  the 
organ  chamber,  and  the  roof  is  a  modern  one  of  three 
bays.  The  double  sedilia,  under  the  easternmost 
south  window,  belong  to  the  15  th  century  recon- 
struction and  have  crocleted  ogee  canopied  arches ; 
the  seats  are  level.  The  piscina  is  modern,  or  a 
restoration.  The  chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered 
orders  supported  by  corbelled  shafts  with  richly 
moulded  capitals. 

The  13th  century  nave  arcades  consist  of  three 
pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders  springing 
from  piers  composed  of  four  fiUetted  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases,  except  at  the  west  end 
on  the  north  side,  where  there  is  a  plain  circular 
pier  with  more  simply  moulded  capital  and  chamfered 
base.  The  responds  follow  the  design  of  the  shafted 
piers.*"  The  rood-loft  doorway  remains  in  position 
over  the  easternmost  arch  of  the  south  arcade  and 
part  of  the  stairs  at  the  end  of  the  aisle.  The 
clearstory  has  three  pointed  windows  on  each  side, 
of  two  grouped  lancets  with  quatrefoil  in  the  head 
under  a  containing  arch,  and  the  parapet  is  carried 
on  an  original  corbel  table.  At  the  east  end  of  the 
south  aisle  is  a  trefoilcd  lancet,  on  either  side  of  which 


«•  P.C.C.  us  Lille  J  Complete  Peerage 
(New  Ed.) ii,  58;  iii,  H-'S- 

«'  P.C.C.  Z55  Li«le. 

«'  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  ii,  58. 

"  Ibid,  iii,  14. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  Eait.  16  Geo. 
Ill  ;  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  ii, 
369. 

"  Inf.  from  Rev.  W.  W.  Baillie. 

»«  V.C.II.  Norihanit,  i,  319. 

•>  Cal.  Chart,  1257-1300,  p.  136. 

"  Ibid.  p.  107. 


'^  The  Commissioner*  of  1276  who 
accused  Berengar  le  Moyne  indiscrimin- 
ately of  building  a  castle  and  holding 
market,  fair  and  assize  of  bread  and  ale, 
all  without  warrant,  did  not  mention 
pillory  and  tumbrel.  Rot.  Uund.  (Rec. 
Com.)  ii,  7. 

"  Chron  Pelrob.  (Camden  Soc.)  31-33. 

»'  Cariul.  Men.  de  Ramet  (Rolls  Ser.), 
i,  52;  iii,  316-17. 

'•  The  north  aisle  is  10  ft.  6  in.  wide, 
and  the  south  aisle  differs  in  width  from 

7+ 


9  ft.  It  in.  at  the  cast  end  to  lo  ft.  3  in. 
at  the  west.  The  porch  i»  10  ft.  6  in,  by 
9  ft.  6  in. 

*•  It  was  built  originally  as  a  chapel  to 
contain  the  monument  of  Nicholas 
Latham,  and  was  known  as  the  Latham 
Chapel. 

*"  There  is  a  measured  drawing  of  the 
Routh  arcade,  with  details,  in  Sharpens 
Chi.  of  the  Nene  f'tiUry,  plate  47.  'I"hc 
height  of  the  piers,  to  top  of  capital,  ii 
7  ft.  9  in. 


o 


H 


U 


3 
O 
c/2 


a: 

a 
U 


CO 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


internally  is  a  crocketed  ogee  niche  of  14th  century 
date,  which  with  the  window  formed  a  teredos  to  the 
aisle  altar.  In  the  south  wall,  in  the  usual  position, 
is  a  plain  pointed  piscina  with  cusped  bowl,  and  above 
it  a  small  round  headed  opening  with  sloping  sill, 
which  in  spite  of  its  heiglii  above  the  ground  seems 
to  have  been  a  lowside  window.''  The  two  14th 
century  windows  in  the  south  wall  are  square-headed 
of  two  trefoiled  lights,  and  there  is  reason  to  believe 
that  the  wall  was  rebuilt  when  they  were  erected.^' 
The  pointed  west  window  of  this  aisle  is 
c.  1280  of  two  elongated  trefoiled  lights  ••■-j^-.=vr 
with  moulded  jambs. 

The  south  doorway  is  a  very  good  ex- 
ample of  13th  century  work,  of  two  moulded 
orders,  the  outer  ornamented  with  dog- 
tooth, on  double  jamb  shafts  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases,  the  inner  shafts  banded 
at  mid-height.  The  porch  has  a  wide 
gable  with  plain  coping,  stone  slated  roof, 
and  pointed  outer  arch  of  two  hollow 
chamfered  orders,  and  large  nail-head  hood- 
mould  with  mask  terminations,  on  shafted 
jambs  with  moulded  capitals.**  There  is 
a  sundial  in  the  gable. 

The  north  doorway  is  equally  good  14th 
century  work,  of  two  moulded  orders,  on 
shafted  jambs,  the  capitals  carved  with  oak 
leaves  on  either  side  of  a  human  head,** 
and  the  windows  in  the  north  wall  are  all 
pointed  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights.  That 
formerly  at  the  east  end  of  the  aisle  is 
now  in  the  north  wall  of  the  organ  cham- 
ber ;  the  west  window  is  of  earlier  type, 
of  two  plain  lights  with  quatrefoil  in  the 
head.  At  the  east  end  of  the  aisle,  origin- 
ally below  the  window,  is  a  14th  century 
reredos  consisting  of  three  crocketed  ogee 
trefoiled  arches,  the  middle  one  wider  than 
the  others,  with  a  band  of  quatrefoils  and 
heads  above,**  and  on  the  east  respond 
of  the  arcade  adjoining,  at  a  height  of 
34  inches  from  the  floor,  a  small  projecting  trefoil 
headed  niche. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages  with  moulded  plinth 
and  projecting  vice  in  the  south-east  angle,  but  is 
without  buttresses.  The  upper  stage  has  a  slight 
setback,  and  the  bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two 
trefoiled  lights  with  quatrefoil  above,  mid-shafts, 
and  moulded  jambs,  the  arches  richly  ornamented 
with  dog-tooth  and  flowers  in  the  outer  order.  The 
spire  has  plain  angles  and  three  sets  of  lights  on  each 
of  its  cardinal  faces.  The  west  doorway  is  of  two 
moulded  orders  on  shafted  jambs  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases,  and  above  it  is  a  window  of  two 
trefoiled  lights.  In  the  middle  stage  on  the  south 
side  is  a  circular  moulded  opening  enriched  with 
dog-tooth  and  flower  ornament.  The  tower  arch  is 
of  three  chamfered  orders  dying  into  the  wall. 


BARNWELL 
ST.  ANDREW 

The  font  is  of  early  14th  century  date,  and  has  a 
richly  ornamented  bowl  with  cusped  and  crocketed 
niches  on  seven  sides,  tlic  west  face  being  blank. 

The  oak  pulpit  is  of  Elizabethan,  or  early  17th 
century  date,  with  arcaded  p.incls  ;  it  stands  on  a 
modern  stone  base.     The  otiier  fittings  are  modern. 

The  monument  to  Nicholas  Latham  (d.  1620), 
founder  of  the  hospitals  at  Barnwell  and  Oundle,  after 
removal  from  the  chancel  to  the  chapel  in  1873,  was 
re-erected  on  the  north  wall  of  the  chancel  about 


Barnwell  St.  Andrew  :  The  South  Porch 

1907.  It  is  coloured  and  bears  the  bust  of  Latham, 
who  is  described  as  '  parson  of  this  church  only  the 
space  of  51  years.'  On  the  south  wall  is  a  brass  plate 
to  John  Orton,  '  first  warden  of  Parson  Latham's 
hospital,'  who  died  in  1607  '  in  the  yeare  of  his  age 
loi,'  and  another  with  Latin  inscription,  formerly 
in  All  Saints'  Church,  to  the  memory  of  Christopher 
Freeman  {i.  1610),  who  is  depicted  kneeling  with 
his  wife  and  eight  children  at  an  altar.^*  In  the  south 
aisle  is  a  floor  slab  to  John  and  Robert  Carter,  who 
died  in  September  and  November  1698,  and  a  painted 
board  in  the  north  aisle  commemorates  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  William  Worthington,  rector  ;  she  died 
in  1665. 

There  is  some  old  glass  in  one  of  the  south  windows 
of  the  chancel  and  in  a  window  in  the  belfry.*' 

There  are  two  bells  in  the  tower,  the  first  medieval, 


"  C.  A.  Markham  in  Ai%oc.  Arch.  Soc. 
Rfpi.  xxix.  The  sill  is  5  ft.  5  in.  above 
the  floor,  at  the  ume  level  as  that  of  the 
adjacent  window. 

•«  There  is  no  string  in  the  east  wall  of 
the  aisle  below  the  13th  century  lancet, 
but  a  14th  century  string  runs  the  length 
of  the  south  wall  at  sill  level  between  the 
end  buttresses. 


•»  The  bases  are  hidden,  and  the  jambs 
lean  outwards. 

•*  On  one  side  the  leaves  issue  from  the 
mouth. 

•'  The  wall  was  pierced  through  the 
arches  when  the  organ-chamber  was 
built. 

"  The  bnss  is  figured  in  Franklin 
Hudson,  Brasiei  of  Nortbantt  :   *  the  man 

75 


and  woman  kneel  one  on  each  side  of  an 
aitar  .  .  .  behind  the  man  arc  the  effigici 
of  four  sons  and  behind  the  woman  are 
four  daughters,  all  kneeling.' 

*'  Bridges  records  the  '  portraits  of 
three  persons  in  episcopal  habits  '  in  the 
upper  south  window  of  the  chancel,  op  cit. 
",  393- 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


with  the  letter  S  three  times  alternating  with  a  cross 
patonce  and  a  mark  generally  ascribed  to  Richard 
Mellor  of  Nottingham  (1488-1508)  ;  the  second  bell 
is  by  Thomas  Norris,  1658.^ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  1570,  a  paten  of 
c.  1684,  a  dish  of  1636,  a  flagon  of  1869,  a  modern 
medieval  chalice  of  1871,  and  a  paten  of  1872.'' 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i) 
baptisms,  marriages  and  burials  1558-1727 ;  (ii) 
baptisms  and  burials  1727-1812,  marriages  1727-53  ; 
(iii)  marriages  1754-1812.  In  the  second  volume 
is  a  list  of  briefs  1 741-3,  and  several  lists  of  the 
'  warden,  sub-warden,  brethren,  sisters  and  nurses 
of  Mr.  Nicholas  Latham's  Hospital  in  Barnwell,' 
1744-50.  The  churchwardens'  accounts  begin  in 
1742. 

There  was  a  priest  in  Barnwell 
ADVOWSON  St.  Andrew  in  1086™  but  no  direct 
mention  of  the  church  itself  seems  to 
be  preserved  before  1178  when  Pope  Alexander  con- 
firmed to  Ramsey  Abbey  among  many  other  of  its 
possessions  Barnwell  with  its  church.'^  At  that  date, 
however,  both  manor  and  advowson  belonged  to  the 
earlier  Berengar  le  Moyne  (see  above)  and  the  rights 
assured  to  the  Abbot  were  those  of  overlordship 
merely.  The  advowson  has  followed  the  descent 
of  the  manor  down  to  1920,  when  Mr.  Czarnikow  sol  J 
the  manor  but  retained  the  advowson.  The  rectory 
has  also  followed  the  same  descent.  A  carucate  of 
land  and  six  acres  belonged  to  it  in  the  13th  century" 
and  in  1535  its  profits  amounted  to  £ij  izs.  6J." 
The  rector  also  received  one  sheaf  from  the  tithes  of 
the  lord  in  Barnwell  St.  Andrew,  the  other  two, 
formerly  of  Berengar  le  Moyne,  being  afterwards 
paid  to  the  sacristan,  who  had  a  portion  of  £i  13/.  \d. 
in  the  church.'*  By  an  Act  of  1830  all  ancient  tithes 
and  glebeland  in  the  united  parishes  of  Barnwell  St. 
Andrew  and  Barnwell  All  Saints  were  commuted  for 
3 1  acres  I  rood  2  perches  of  land  annexed  to  the  rectory 


and  an  annual  rent  of  £^oP^  The  parsonage  house 
of  the  1 6th  century"  was  rebuilt  by  the  Dowager 
Duchess  of  Buccleuch  about  1820." 

There  was  a  chapel  in  the  Castle.'*  The  church  has 
always  been  dedicated  to  St.  Andrew."* 

Parson  Latham's  Hospital  in 
CHARITIES  Barnwell,  founded  and  incorporated 
pursuant  to  the  Statute  39  Eliz. 
cap.  5  ly  Deed  Poll  dated  2 1  February,  i  James  L  (1604) 
and  including  the  charity  of  William  Bigley  for  the 
inmates  founded  by  will  proved  in  Prerogative 
Court  of  Canterbury  11  Oct.  1834,  '^  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  2  Feb. 
1923.  The  general  property  of  the  charity  consists 
of  the  almshouse  buildings,  land  situated  in  the 
counties  of  Huntingdon  and  Northampton  and  com- 
prising about  350  acres,  rent-charges  of  ^20  issuing 
out  of  hereditaments  in  Pilton,  Stoke  Doyle  and 
Wadenhoe  and  two  cottages  at  Ringstead  and  Clapton. 
The  Ringstead  property  consists  of  109  a.  2  r.  12  p. 
of  land  with  farm  and  cottages  at  Ringstead  and  a 
sum  of  ;^25  Consols.  The  Shelton  property  consists 
of  66  acres  of  land  in  Shelton  in  the  county  of 
Bedford.  The  endowment  of  Bigley's  Charity 
consists  of  a  sum  of  £'!■■,'] SS  ^^-  1^-  Consols  which 
forms  the  Repair  Fund  and  any  income  not  required 
for  repairs  is  invested  in  augmentation  of  the  fund. 
Of  the  income  from  the  Ringstead  lands  ||ths  is 
paid  to  the  trustees  of  the  Latham  and  Bigley 
Educational  Foundation.  The  land  belonging  to  the 
hospital  produced  ^^462  \os.  in  1923  and  ^^224  11$.  6d. 
was  paid  to  the  inmates,  ^^lo  spent  on  medical 
attendance,  and  £y  distributed  to  poor  of  Rushden, 
Ringstead  and  Higham  Ferrers.  The  stock  is  with 
the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 

The  Montagu  Dole. — A  sum  of  6s.  Sd.  yearly  is 
payable  out  of  the  estates  of  Lord  Montagu  for 
distribution  to  the  poor.  The  origin  of  the  charity  is 
unknown. 


BENEFIELD 


Benefield  (xi  cent.)  ;  Banefield,  Benifeld  (xii  cent.)  ; 
Beningfelde,  Benefilde,  Berifelde,  Benetfeld,  Beni- 
feud,  Beningfeud  (xiii  cent.);  Benyngfielde  alias 
Beneficlde  alias  Beddingfielde  (xvi  cent.). 

This  parish,  to  which  the  hamlets  of  Biggin  and 
Churchfield,  formerly  in  Oundle,  were  transferred  in 
1894,  contains  5,664  acres  of  clay  land  on  a  subsoil 
of  Oxford  clay  in  the  north  and  cornbrash  in  the 
south.  Nearly  the  whole  of  this  area  is  permanent 
grass,  less  than  a  fifth  is  arable  land,  growing  barley 
and  wheat,  and  some  356  acres  are  woodland  and 
plantations.  The  land  rises  about  100  ft.  from  cast  to 
west,  where  it  reaches  300  ft.  above  the  ordnance 
datum.  The  principal  road  is  the  highway  from 
Kettering  to  Oundle,  which  enters  Benefield  from 
Great  Wcldon  on  the  west  and  leads  eastwards  into 


Upper  Benefield,  formerly  called  Uppthorpe,  Over- 
thorpe  or  Upperthorpe.  Here  there  is  a  good  deal 
of  woodland,  called  in  1800  the  Spring,  Cockendale, 
and  Blackthorns  Woods  ;  here  also  are  the  reservoir, 
some  farms  and  Benefield  and  Springwood  Lodges. 

Tlie  village  lies  some  distance  southwards,  in  Lower 
Benefield,  or  Netherthorp,  as  it  was  called  in  the 
17th  century  and  later.  The  church  of  St.  Mary 
stands  on  rising  ground  and  adjoining  it  on  the  west 
is  the  moated  site  of  the  castle  of  the  Lisurs.  The 
date  of  the  erection  of  the  castle  is  unknown,  but  it 
may  well  have  been  one  of  tlie  numerous  forts  thrown 
up  during  the  anarchy  of  Stephen's  reign  (1138-44). 
It  was  in  existence  in  1208,  when  John  seized  it  for 
the  debts  of  Hugh  de  Lisurs.*  On  15  May  1264,  the 
day  following  the  Battle  of  Lewes,  Henry  III,  while 


**  For  intcriptioni  kc  North,  Cb.  BiUi 
of  NoTihantt^  190  ;  the  date  of  the  iccond 
bell  it  wrongly  given  it  1678.  For  S.S. 
belli  »ec  North,  Cb.  Belli  of  Lincotntbtrt, 
Ii8. 

•»  Markhim.  Cb.  Plan  of  Noribami, 
28. 

"V.C.ll.  Norlband,  i,  319. 

"  Carlul.  Men.  di  Ramn,  ii,  136-37. 


"  Carlul.  Mon.  de  Ramet.  (Rolli.  Ser.), 
i,  48. 

'•  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  292. 

'♦  Cartul.  Mon.  de  Ramet.  (Rolli.  Ser.) 
i,  48;  ii,  182,  207;  Pope  Nicb.  7a.x 
(Rec.  Com.),  39*  ;  Add.  Chart.  33665. 

"  Local  and  Personal  Acti,  Ii  Geo.  iv, 
cap.  79. 

"  Valor Eecl.\ot.  at. 


"  Local  and  Personal  Acts,  loc.  cit. 

'»  Carlul.  Mon.  de  Ramrr.  (Rolli  Ser.) 
i,  54  ;  Ducclcnch  MSS.  (Ouugliton  Houic), 
no.  4. 

'•  Carlul.  Mon.  de  Ramrs.  (RolU  Ser.), 
i,  48  i  Rol.  Rob.  Grosseleili  (Cant,  and 
York  Soc),  232. 

'  Rol.  Lilt.  Pat.  John  (Rec.  Com.),  79b, 
97b. 


76 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


BENEFIELD 


a  prisoner  with  Simon  de  Montfort,  issued  a  mandate 
to  the  knights  and  others  in  Benefield  Castle,  stating 
that  peace  having  been  made  between  the  king  and 
his  barons,  they  were  not  to  go  out  of  the  castle  nor 
do  any  ill  in  those  parts.'  It  was  probably  in  the 
following  year  that,  the  castle  being  held  for  Edward 
the  king's  son,  the  men  of  the  castle  plundered  the 
manor  of  Biggin  and  crossed  the  river  to  Oundle, 
where  and  at  Ashton  they  took  a  number  of  cattle. 
The  men  of  Oundle,  however,  made  a  counter-attack 
and  recovered  many  of  their  beasts.*  Not  long  after 
this  date  the  castle  was  probably  dismantled.  In 
1298  it  is  described  as  an  old  castle,*  and  in  1315  the 
site  of  the  castle  only  is  referred  to.^  It  continued 
a  ruin  and  is  so  described  in  1 378.'  Lcland  about 
1535  mentions  the  site  as  '  the  diche  and  mines  of  an 
old  castelle.' '  Part  of  the  wall  was  still  standing  in 
Bridges'  time  (1724),  when  the  inclosure  was  said  to 
be  square,  covering  about  an  acre  of  land.  On  the 
north  of  it  was  the  manor  house,*  which  apparently 
superseded  the  castle  and  is  mentioned  in  1445. 

A  furlong  to  the  west  of  the  village  are  nine  Swallow 
Holes  where  the  land  floods  occasionally  flow  and 
disappear.  Banhaw  Wood  (the  Banho  or  Danho 
in  the  14th  century)  was  said  to  be  within  the  metes 
of  Rockingham  Forest,  and  Humphrey  de  Bassing- 
bourne  obtained  licence  to  inclose  100  acres  of  its 
waste.'  In  1820  the  wood  covered  nearly  312  acres 
on  the  south  of  the  parish.  Eastward  of  this  wood 
are  the  hamlets  of  Churchfield  and  Biggin  Hall  with 
■jl  large  part  of  its  grounds,  the  rest  of  which  are  still 
in  Oundle. 

An  Act  of  1820  for  the  inclosure  of  certain  waste 
and  commonable  lands  in  this  parish  preserves  many 
place  names,  such  as  Northaws,  Cobs  Hurn,  David's 
Leys,  Rimington,  Cockmore  and  Nuthalls  Closes.^" 
Other  place  names  which  occur  are  Ouldwalles  and 
Pottereswaye,  a  lane  near  Banhaw  Wood,  and  Fezauntes 
landes.  In  1921  the  inhabitants  of  Benefield  num- 
bered 410.  The  modern  parish  of  Beanfield  I, awns 
in  the  Hundred  of  Corby,  which  was  for  some  pur- 
poses considered  part  of  Benefield,  though  extra 
parochial  in  1831,^  lies  about  three  miles  distant 
from  it.  It  was  perhaps  part  of  the  King's  fee  in  the 
Ilth  and  12th  centuries.^  Henry  II  granted  the 
Abbey  of  Pipewell  its  pasturage  and  herbage,  which 
the  Abbot  exchanged  in  1356  for  the  advowson  of 
the  church  of  Geddington.^'  Many  references  to 
leases  or  grants  of  the  custody  of  the  launds    of 


Pkterborougu    Abbey. 
Gulc!  two  crossed  keys  or. 


Benefield  and  to  the  capital  messuage  here  are  found 
in  public  records.** 

Domesday  Book  accounts  only  for 
MANOR  three  virgates  of  land  in  BENEFIELD, 
which  were  of  the  King's  fee*^  and  were 
•  held  in  chief  by  knight's  service  until  the  latter  part 
of  the  l6th  century.  The  service  varied  from  that 
of  one  to  a  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee.** 

Wulfhere,  King  of  the  Mercians,  according  to  a 
spurious  charter,  gave  Benefield  to  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough  in  664,"  but 
Domesday  Book  contains  no 
mention  of  any  such  fee.  A 
single  hide  in  the  Hundred  of 
Stokes  that  the  Survey  of  the 
1 2th  century  ascribes  to  Bene- 
field, now  a  farm  south  of 
Rockingham,**  was  amongst 
the  Peterborough  lands  at  that 
date.*'  The  overlordship  of 
the  manor  remained  with 
Peterborough  until  the  Disso- 
lution,^' when  the  manor  was 
held  direct  of  the  Crown.^* 

Richard  de  Engaine  was  tenant  of  Benefield  at  the 
time  of  the  Domesday  Survey  (1086)^^  and  in  the 
1 2th  century  it  had  passed  to  the  Lisurs.^'  According 
to  a  charter  of  1 1 66  R[ichard]  de  Lisurs  describes 
Richard  de  Engaine  as  his  grandfather.^  It  would 
appear  that  Richard  de  Engaine  married  more  than 
once  and  the  last  of  his  wives  was  the  widow  of 
Richard  Fitz  Urse.-*  His  son,  Viel  or  Vitalis, 
apparently  married  the  daughter  and  heir  of  William 
de  Lisurs?'  and  had  two  sons,  Richard  and  Fulk,  the 
former  of  whom  occasionally  and  the  latter  regularly 
used  their  mother's  surname."  Fulk  de  Lisurs,  who 
succeeded  to  Benefield,  was  the  King's  forester  in  fee 
and  attended  the  King  with  his  horn  hanging  from 
his  neck.-*  He  married  Alice  or  Adelis,  sister  of 
WiUiam  de  Auberville,''  and  died  before  1185.^ 
His  son,  William  de  Lisurs,  married  Isabel,  daughter 
of  Simon  Fitz  Simon,**  and  died  without  issue  in  1194. 
He  left  two  brothers,  Hugh  and  Fulk,*^  and  was 
succeeded  by  Hugh,**  who  died  about  1207,  leaving 
two  daughters,  Alice,  who  married  Nicholas  de 
Bassingbourne,  and  Eleinor,  the  v^fe  of  William  de 
Ayshe.**  The  manor  and  castle  of  Benefield  were 
seized  by  the  Crown  for  debts  owing  by  Hugh  de 
Lisurs,*^  but  were   recovered  by  John  de   Bassing- 


•  Cal.  Pat.,  1258-66,  p.  318. 

•  Sparke,  Hiit.  Angl.  Script,  iii,  135. 

•  Cal,  Inq.  iii,  no.  468. 

»  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E.  Jtxi,  fol.  30b. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Rich.  II,  file  4, 
no.  8. 

'  Itinerary  (ed.  Toulmin-Smith),  i, 
12,13. 

•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  395. 
'Cat.  Pat.  1313-17,  p.  453. 

"  Private  Aft,  i  Geo.  IV,  cap.  31. 
•'  Pop.  Returns. 

'•  V.C.H.  Northanu,  i,  356a,  365*. 
'•  Cal.  Chart.  1226-57,  p.  389;    1257- 
1300,  p.  408  ;   Cal.  Pat.  1354-8,  p.  423. 
"Ibid.  1377-81,  pp.  170,  407;    1381- 

85.  p-  >77;  '396-99,  P-  '9^;  '4'3->6 
p.  232,235,  262. 

"  V.C.H.  Northanu,  i,  356a,  365A. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  I,  file  24 
no.  15  ;   file  84,  no.  4  ;   Edw.  Ill,  file  90 


no.  8  ;  file  193,  no.  15  ;  file  208,  no.  25  ; 
Ric.  II,  file  4,  no.  8  ;  Hen.  IV,  file  90, 
no.  15;  (ser.  2),  ccx,  90;  Chan.  Misc. 
file  12,  no.  7,  m.  1  ;  Chan.  Inq.  a.q.d. 
file  208,  no.  4  i  Fine  R.  170,  m.  10 ; 
Pat.  R.  8  Eliz.  pt.  i,  m.  27;  33  Eliz. 
pt.  8,  m.  33. 

"  V.C.H.  Northants,n,  \2\,  576. 

'»  Ibid,  i,  386*. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants,  ii,  395. 

*"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  2),  xxxiv, 
no.  81. 

"  Pat.  R.  8  Eliz.  pt.  I,  m.  27  ;  32  Eliz. 
pt.  14,  m.  31. 

"  V.C.H.  Northanu,  i,  356a. 

"  Ibid.  365*. 

"  Red  Bk.  ofExcheq.  (Rolls  Ser.)  i,  333. 
The  editor  suggests  from  a  similar  entry 
in  the  Liber  Niger  that  R.  is  a  scribal 
error  for  Ffulk],  but  there  seems  to  be  no 
reason  why  Richard  should  not  have  held 

77 


in  1 166  and  Fulk  his  brother  should  not 
have  succeeded  him. 

»  Ibid. 

=»  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  76  n.  Viel  is,  however,  here 
stated  to  be  son  of  William  Engaine. 

»'  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.)  v,  72-3  ; 
cf.  Red.  Bk.  loc.  cit. 

"  Red.   Bk.    of  Excbeq.  (Rolls  Ser.)  i, 

333- 

"  Cat.  Amt.  D.  (P.R.O.)  ii,  c.  2002; 
Maitland,  Bracton's  Note  Bk.  ii,  251  ; 
Pytchley's  Bk.  of  Fees,  76  j  Wrottesley, 
Ped.from  Plea  Rolls,  4,  62. 

•"  Complete  Peerage,  loc.  cit. 

"  Cat.  Anct.  D.  (P.R.O.)  ii,  C.  2021. 

"Ibid.  C.  2004;  Curia  Regis  R.  ii, 
309. 

"  Complete  Peerage,  loc.  cit. 

•*  Maitland,  Bracton's  Note  Bk.  iii,  4-5. 

•»/?o/.  Lilt.  Pat.  Job.  (Rec.  Com.),  79*. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Bassisgbourne.        Gy~ 

Tonny  argent  and  gules. 


bourne  in  1213.^  In  1216  King  John  granted  the 
manor  to  Baldwin  de  Gisnes*'  possibly  on  account 
of  Nicholas's  debts,  in  which  we  find  him  involved  in 
1222.^  Nicholas  was  paying  scutage  for  his  fee  in 
Benefield  in  1236  and  1243.** 
In  or  before  1252,  he  was 
succeeded  by  his  son,  Hum- 
phrey,'*" who,  in  1273,  leased 
the  castle  and  manor  of  Bene- 
field to  Queen  Eleanor,  the 
King's  mother,  for  ;^ioo  a 
year,  the  rent  of  the  first 
twenty-five  years  being  paid 
in  advance  to  acquit  Hum- 
phrey of  his  debts  to  the 
Jews.^'  Humphrey  died  about 
1280,''-  and  in  1298  Benefield 
passed  from  his  son  and  heir 

of  the  saiLe  name  to  his  grandson,  another  Humphrey 
de  Bassingbourne,*^  lord  of  the  manor  in  1 3 16.*'  This 
Humphrey  obtained  a  grant  of  free  warren  in  1321,** 
a  liberty  which  his  son,  another  Humphrey,  main- 
tained at  law  some  eight  years  later.^  In  1330 
Humphrey  de  Bassingbourne  had  three  sons  living," 
but  by  134.3  Giles,  the  eldest,  had  died,  leaving  a 
daughter  and  heir,  Margaret,**  and  Benefield  was 
settled  on  her  marriage  with  Walter,  son  of  Robert 
de  Colvile.**  Walter  and  Margaret  succeeded  Hum- 
phrey in  1349,*"  Margaret  being  then  fourteen, 
Walter  not  quite  eight  years  old.^^  Walter  was  dead 
before  the  close  of  1367,  and  his  infant  son,  Robert, 
survived  him  less  than  two  years.^^  In  accordance 
with  the  settlement  of  1343  the  castle  and  manor  of 
Benefield  descended  to  the  heirs  of  Robert  de  Colvile, 
Walter's  father.^^  These  were  Ralph  Basset  of 
Sapcote  and  John  Gernoun,  the  former  being  grandson 
of  Elizabeth,  one  sister,  the  latter  son  of  AHce,  the 
other  sister  of  Robert's  father,  Edmund  de  Colvile.^* 
In  1377  the  manor  of  Benefield  was  settled  on  Ralph 
Basset,^  who  died  seised  of  the  manor  and  castle  in 
the  following  year.*^'  His  widow,  Alice,  held  the 
manor  and  a  third  of  the  castle  as  dower.  She  died 
in  1412,  when  her  heirs  were  their  daughter,  Elizabeth, 
wife  of  Richard  Lord  de  Grey,  and  Robert  Moton, 
grandson  of  Alice,  Ralph's  elder  daughter,^*  whose 
father,  William  Moton,  had  died  seised  of  the  site 
of  the  castle  and  lands  in  Benefield  nearly  twenty 


years  before."  Richard  Lord  de  Grey  died  in  1418 
seised  of  the  manor  and  a  moiety  of  the  castle  in  right 
of  his  wife,  Elizabeth.^  In  1445  Elizabeth,  who 
survi\ed  her  husband  about  thirty-three  years,  settled 
the  manor  on  John  Zouche  and  his  wife,  her  daughter 
Elizabeth,^'  and  a  few  months  before  her  death  she 
granted  them  her  moiety  of  the  castle.^  John 
Zouche,  who  had  settled  a  third  of  the  manor  on  his 
second  wife,  Eleanor,  widow  of  John  Melton,  died 
in  1501.  At  her  death  in  1519"'^  she  was  succeeded 
by  her  son,  John  Zouche.  In  1529  his  younger 
brother  David  claimed  for  himself  and  his  late 
brother  Lionel,  a  share  in  the  family  estates  under 
his  father's  will.*^  John  Zouche  was  succeeded  about 
153163  by  his  son  and  heir  George,  who  died  in  1557. 
His  son  and  heir  was  another  Sir  John  Zouche,®*  who 
with  his  wife  Elizabeth  settled  the  castle  and  manor.*-'' 
He  died  in  1586*'  and  his  son 
John  Zouche  with  his  wife 
Mary  settled  the  manor  in 
1590*'  and  in  the  following 
year  sold  it  to  Sir  Christopher 
Hatton,  the  Lord  Chancel- 
lor.^ Sir  Christopher  died 
without  issue  in  1591,  heavily 
in  debt  to  the  Crown.**  His 
heir  was  his  nephew  William, 
son  of  his  sister  Dorothy,  wife 
of  John  Newport,  who  took 
the  ?urname  of  Hatton  on  his 
uncle's  death.™     In  1 594  Sir 

William  Hatton  settled  the  castle  and  manor  of  Bene- 
field on  himself  and  his  heirs  male  with  remainder  to 
his  daughter  Frances.  William  and  Francis  Tate," 
two  of  the  trustees,  obtained  a  lease  of  the  property 
from  the  Crown  the  next  year.'^  Sir  William  died 
without  male  issue  within  two  years.'^  According 
to  the  settlement  of  the  late  Lord  Chancellor,'* 
Benefield  should  have  passed  to  Sir  Christopher 
Hatton  of  Kirby,  his  first  cousin,'^  but  Sir  Robert 
Rich  and  his  wife  Frances,  Sir  William  Hatton's 
daughter,  obtained  the  interests  of  the  Crown  and 
of  the  Zouche  and  Hatton  families.'*  In  1641 
Robert,  then  Earl  of  Warwick,  with  Robert  and 
Charles  Rich,  his  sons  by  Frances,  made  a  settlement 
of  the  castle  and  manor  of  Benefield  among  other 
estates    on    the    marriage    of    Charles    with    Mary, 


Zouche.    Gules  bezanly 
and  a  quarter  ermine. 


pt. 


Close 


**  Rot.  Lit.  Pal.  JoM.  (Rcc.  Com.),  97*. 

*'  Chan.  jMisc.  bdle.  12,  no.  7. 

"Pipe  R.  66,  m.  6d ;  67,  m.  1 3,/. 

"  ^*-  «/  F'",  pt-  i,  494-99  i 
S°i-S,  937- 

"  Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script.  56. 

♦'Chart.    R.    63,    m.    5;     Cat. 
'*72-79i  PP-  "Z,  113- 

•"Chan.   Inq.    p.m.    Edw.    I,    file    24, 
no.  15. 

"Cal.  Inij.  p.m.  iii,  no.  468. 

«•  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  28. 

"Chart.  R,  107,  m.  i. 

"Plac.  de  Quo  fVar.   (Rec.  Com.),  510. 

♦'  Chan.  Inq.  j.q.d.  file  208,  no.  4. 

"Cal.  Pat.  1343-45.  P-  '4'- 

"  Feet    of     F.    Div.    Coi.    caie    287, 
file  41,  no.  345. 

»"  Ibid.   Northanti.  cjie   177,  file   77, 
noi.  290,  293. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.   F.dw.   Ill,  file  90, 
no.  8;  Cloie  R.  185,  m.  27. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  Ill,  file   193, 
no.  ■;  ;  file  208,  no.  25. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  case  287,  file 
41,  no.  345. 

'*  Fine  R.  170,  m.  10. 

"Close  R.  217,  m.  3od ;  218,  m. 
26. 

"^  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Ric.  II,  file  4 
no.  8. 

"Ibid.  Hen.  IV,  file  go,  no.  15. 

"  Ibid.  Ric.  11,  file  75,  no.  21. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Ilcn.  V,  file  30, 
no.  ;. 

"Close  R.  295,  mm.  3d,  i6d  ;  297, 
m.  I5d.  Chan.  Misc.  bdlc.  14,  file  2, 
no.  12. 

•"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  \'I,  file  144, 
no.  34. 

"Ibid.  (ser.  2),  xxxiv,  no.  81. 

••  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  599,  no«.  55, 

56.57-. 

••  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  j  Glover,  llist. 
Derby,  ii,  342. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  2),  cix,  19. 

•»  Pat.  R.  8  Elil.  pt.  I ,  m.  27  i  Feet  of 
F.  Div.  Coi.  East.  8  Eliz. 


"  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  2),  ccx,  90. 

"Pat.  R.  32  Eliz.  pt.  14,  m.  31; 
33  Eliz.  pt.  8,  m.  33. 

•*  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  32 
Eliz. ;  Hil.  33  Eliz. ;  Recov.  R.  Mich. 
32  Eliz.  ro.  64. 

•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  2),  cccxxix, 
193  ;  Pat.  R.  37  Eliz.  pt.  18,  m.  19. 

'"Baker,  Hist.  Northants,  i,  196; 
Diet.  Nat.  Biog. 

"Chan.    Inq.    p.m.    (ser.    2),   cccxxix, 

'93- 

"Pat.  R.  37  Eliz.  pt.  i8,  m.  19. 

'•Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  2),  cccxxix, 
193. 

"  Diet.  Nat.  Biog. 

"Baker,  loc.  cit.  j  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
(ser.  2),  ccclxxvi,  100. 

'•  I-cct  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  9  Jas.  I; 
Ibid.  Northants,  Trin.  12  Jas.  I  ;  Hil. 
14  Jas.  I;  Mich.  1;  Jas.  I;  Notes  of 
Fines,  East.  14  Jas.  I ;  Pat.  R.  14  Jas.  I, 
pt.  22,  m.  II. 


78 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


BENEFIELD 


^^ 


Rich.    CiJes  a  cbtveron 
betvieen  ihree  crossUn  or. 


daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Cork."  Charles,  who  suc- 
ceeded his  elder  brother  in  the  earldom  in  1659,'* 
with  his  wife  Mary,  sold  Bencfield  in  1666  to  Thomas 
Bromfield  of  London  and  others,'*  possibly  acting 
on  behalf  of  Sir  Thomas 
Middleton,  who  held  the 
manor  from  1676  to  1689.*" 

Shortly  after  this  date  the 
manor  was  held  by  William 
Marquis  of  Powis,  who  already 
held  the  adjoining  manor  of 
Oundle.  In  1724  he  sold 
Benefield  to  James  Joye,"  and 
from  this  date  it  followed  the 
descent  of  Oundle  (g.v.). 

In  1280  there  was  a  wind- 
mill'- in  the  Peterborough  fee, 
and  in  1367  a  windmill  and  a 

watermill**  probably  stood  on  the  same  sites  as  the 
two  mills  of  the  manor  of  1566.  A  dovecote  also  is 
mentioned**  at  this  date.  Sir  Thomas  Bnidcnel 
received  a  grant  of  free  warren  within  the  manor  of 
Benefield  in  1616.**  The  Knights  Templars  held 
view  of  frankpledge  over  their  tenants  in  Benefield, 
as  did  their  successors  of  the  Hospital  of  St.  John 
of  Jerusalem  in  England.** 

The  church  of  ST.  MART  stands 
CHURCH  on  the  south-west  side  of  the 
village  and  consists  of  chancel  with 
vestry,  clearstoricd  nave  of  four  bays,  north  and  south 
aisles,  north  porch,  and  west  tower  surmounted  by 
a  broach  spire.  At  the  east  end  of  the  north  aisle 
is  a  transeptal  extension  formerly  used  as  a  choir 
vestrv,  but  since  1925  as  a  memorial  chapel.*' 

With  the  exception  of  the  chancel,  which  is  of 
14th-century  date,  the  whole  of  the  church  was  rebuilt 
in  1847  at  the  charges  of  James  Watts  Russell,  the 
patron,**  in  a  style  roughly  approximating  to  that 
of  the  older  parts  (14th  century)  of  the  building  then 
pulled  down,  but  diflfering  in  many  respects  from  that 
structure.  The  aisles  and  vestry  are  under  separate 
gabled  roofs,  and  all  the  roofs  are  eaved  and  covered 
with  grey  slates.  Bridges  describes  the  old  church 
as  consisting  of  '  body,  north  and  south  aisles  and 
chancel,  all  leaded,'**  with  an  embattled  tower  and 
spire  at  the  west  end  :  the  chancel  also  was  embattled, 
and  the  north  aisle  was  prolonged  at  its  east  end  as  a 
chapel,  covering  the  chancel  for  about  a  third  of  its 
length.  A  drawing  of  the  building  made  before  its 
demolition  shows  the  nave  and  north  aisle**  to  have 
been  completely  niodernised,  probably  in  the   1 8th 


century,  the  windows  of  the  clearstory  being  elliptical 
and  those  of  the  aisle  plain  undivided  pointed  open- 
ings.'* There  was  a  north  doorway  to  the  chancel. 
The  upper  part  of  the  present  tower  differs  completely 
from  the  original  design,  which  had  single  pointed 
bell-chamber  windows  of  two  lights.  The  chancel 
was  restored  and  modernised  internally  in  1847,  and 
a  screen  erected,  but  the  elaborate  mural  decorations 
then  carried  out  perished  in  course  of  time,  necessi- 
tating a  further  restoration  in  1897,  when  a  new  altar 
and  reredos  were  erected  and  other  work  carried  out.'^ 
In  1901  the  south-west  corner  of  the  tower  was 
underpinned  and  rebuilt,  and  the  spire  repaired.*' 

The  chancel  has  an  original  east  window  of  five 
lights  with  reticulated  tracery,  restored  in  parts.  On 
the  south  side  are  three  restored  windows  of  two  lights, 
and  a  similar  single  window  at  the  east  end  of  the 
north  wall.  The  chancel  has  double  angle  buttresses 
of  two  st.ages,  and  a  moulded  plinth  and  string.  The 
piscina  and  sedilia  were  'renewed'  in  1847.  Three 
carved  misericord  seats,  said  to  have  come  originally 
from  Fotheringhay  church,  were  purchased  at  Tansor 
in  1899  and  placed  in  the  chancel,  one  on  the  north 
and  two  on  the  south  side.  In  1904  a  loft  was  added 
to  the  screen,**  and  above  it  a  rood  with  attendant 
figures,  a  staircase  being  added  in  1906.  All  the  other 
fittings,  together  with  the  font  and  pulpit,  are 
modern. 

In  the  chancel  is  a  brass  plate  to  Elizabeth  Grant 
(d.  1608)  inscribed  '  my  child-bed  was  my  death-bed  : 
thanks  I  gave  to  God  that  gave  a  child,  and  so  I  died.' 
Under  the  tower  is  a  marble  slab  to  Mark  Lewis, 
S.T.P.,  rector  (d.  1620). 

Until  191 1  there  were  five  bells,  but  in  that  year 
a  treble,  by  Taylor  of  Loughborough,  was  added, 
making  a  ring  of  six.  The  second  (old  treble)  is  by 
Henry  Penn  of  Peterborough,  171 3,  the  third  by 
Thomas  Eayre  of  Kettering,  1755,  the  fourth  by 
C.  and  G.  Mears  of  London,  1847,  the  fifth  dated 
1733,  and  the  tenor  by  R.  Taylor  of  St.  Neots,  1815.*' 

The  silver  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  cover  paten 
of  1570,  a  paten  of  1637  inscribed  with  the  names  of 
the  churchwardens  of  1658,  and  a  silver-gilt  cup,  two 
patens,  and  a  flagon  of  1843.  There  is  also  a  modern 
plated  cup,  paten  and  flagon.'* 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1570-1705,  marriages  1570-1695,  burials 
1570-1684;  (ii)  baptisms  1705-1742,  marriages  1696- 
1742,  burials  1685-1742  ;  (iii)  baptisms  1743-1812, 
marriagesi743-l778,  burials  1743-1812;  (iv)  marriages 
1778-1812. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  17  Chas.  I ; 
G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage,  viii,  65. 

'»  Ibid. 

'»  Recov.  R.  Mich.  18  Chai. 
226;  Com.  Pleaj,  D.  Enr. 
|g  Char  II,  m.  lod. 

••Inst.  BIcs.  (P.R.O.)j  Feet 
Northants,  Mich.  29  Chas.  II; 
I  Will,  and  Mary;  Recov.  R. 
1  Will,  and  Mary,  ro.  308. 

•'  Feet    of    F.    Northants,    Trin. 
Ceo.  I. 

••  Chan.    Inq.    p.m.    Edw.    I,    file 
no.  15. 

•>  Ibid.  Edw.  Ill,  file  193,  no.  15. 

••  Pat.  R.  8  Eliz.  pt.  I,  m.  27. 

"Ibid.    14  Jas.  I,  pt.  ii,  m.  14. 

••  Plae.  de  Quo  Ifar.  (Rec.  Com.),  531. 

"  In  memory  of  Capt.  A.  E.  Watts 


II,  ro. 
Mich. 

of  F. 
Mich. 
Mich. 


24. 


Russell.  The  internal  dimensions  of  the 
church  are  :  chancel  35  ft.  by  18  ft., 
nave  54  ft.  by  20  ft.  6  in.,  north  aisle 
13  ft.  wide,  south  aisle  17  ft.,  tower 
9  ft.  9  in.  square. 

"  Designed  by  Mr.  Derrick,  of  Oxford. 

"  Bridges   Hisl.  of  Norihants,  ii,  39S. 

'^^  The  drawing  is  from  the  north ; 
probably  the  south  aisle  was  modernised 
also. 

'*  There  were  four  windows  and  two 
doorways  in  the  north  wall  of  the  aisle. 

"  The  altar  and  reredos  were  designed 
by  Mr.  J.  .N.  Comper.  During  this 
restoration  a  piscina  was  uncovered  in  the 
south  wall  of  the  chapel  (now  vestry) 
north  of  the  chancel.  Its  state  not 
allowing  of  restoration,  a  new  one  was  put 
in  itt  place. 

79 


*•  When  the  nave  was  rebuilt  In  1847 
the  ground  was  considerably  lowered, 
and  the  footings  of  the  tower  on  the  south 
fide  were  only  about  15  in.  below  the 
surface. 

"  The  Royal  Arms  were  placed  on  the 
screen  at  this  time,  flanked  by  those  of 
Dr.  Carr  Glynn  (Rishop  of  Peter- 
borough), and  of  the  Ven.  E.  M.  Moore, 
Archdeacon  of  Oakham  (rector  1876- 
1907),  who  was  the  promoter  of  the 
works  of  restoration  within  that  period. 
He  was  also  a  generous  donor.  The  loft 
and  rood  were  designed  by  Mr.  J.  N. 
Comper. 

•^  The  Inscriptions  on  the  old  bella  are 
given  in  North,  Ch.  Bells  of  Northants. 
(1878),   190. 

••  Markham,  Ch.  Plate  of  Northants.  31. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  church*'  was  in  the  gift  of  the 
ADVOWSON  lord  of  Benefield  in  1 225,88  and  has 
followed  the  descent  of  the  manor 
(q.v.)  since  that  date.  In  1329  William  of  Benetfeld 
obtained  licence  to  alienate  land  in  this  parish  to  a 
chaplain  to  celebrate  divine  service  daily  in  the 
church  of  Benefield  for  the  King  and  the  souls  of 
himself,  his  ancestors  and  benefactor s,**  and  in  1515 
William  Newman  bequeathed  40^.  to  the  same  church 
'  to  by  a  coope.'*'^  Its  rectory  was  the  occasion  for 
several  suits  in  the  l6th  centur>'  in  which  the  lord  of 
the  manor  was  involved.  Between  1525  and  1529 
the  parson,  Richard  Robinson,  appealed  to  the  Star 
Chamber  against  George  Zouche  the  patron  '  and  also 
a  man  of  great  strength  and  powre '  for  keeping  him 
out  of  his  benefice  by  force  and  threats.*^""  More 
than  thirty  years  later  George's  son  and  heir,  Sir 
John  Zouche,  was  sued  in  Chancery  by  Thomas 
Washington,  clerk,  for  withholding  the  deed  of  presen- 
tation by  which  he  had  granted  him  the  living  and 
instituting  another  rector.'^'  The  plaintiffs  of  1591 
were  laymen — Francis  Flower  who  sued  the  last 
Zouche  lord  of  Benefield  and  his  uncle,  William 
Zouche,  for  non-fulfilment  of  an  undertaking  to  sell 
him  a  lease  of  the  rectory  of  Benefield,  and  William 
Tate,  who  complained  of  the  detention  by  the  same 
defendants  of  the  indentures  and  bonds  by  which 
they  had  sold  him  the  same  rectory.'''' 

Church  Estate.      In  1683  theCom- 

CHARniES    missioners  of  Charitable  Uses  decreed 

that  the  rent  of  certain  tenements  and 

lands,  which  had  been  given  by  the  family  of  Benning- 


ton, should  be  applied  to  and  for  the  repair  of  the 
Parish  Church.  Under  the  Inclosure  Act  passed  in 
I  George  IV,  an  allotment  of  1 3  a.  o  r.  4  p.  was  set  out 
and  awarded  to  the  Churchwardens  in  lieu  of  the 
original  property.  The  land  produces  (io  yearly 
and  the  Charity  is  also  possessed  of  ;^ioo  5  per  cent. 
War  Stock  standing  in  private  names  and  representing 
accumulations  of  income. 

Poor's  Land.  The  same  Commissioners  in  1683 
found  that  certain  sums  of  money  given  by  persons 
named  Bennington  and  Wright  for  the  poor  had  been 
laid  out  in  the  purchase  of  a  close  of  land  containing 
4  acres.  The  property  consists  of  a  field  at  King's 
CliflFe  containing  5  a.  and  let  for  ^4  5/.  yearly. 

The  Poor's  Money.  The  Commissioners  previously 
mentioned  found  that  other  persons  gave  altogether 
£io  for  the  poor.  This  money  was  originally  secured 
on  a  mortgage,  but  has  since  been  invested  in 
£?i1  l()i.  Sd.  Canada  3J  per  cent.  Stock  with  the 
Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  and  pro- 
ducing £■}  I/,  id.  yearly  in  dividends.  The 
income  of  the  Poor's  Land  and  the  Poor's  Money 
is  distributed  in  doles  on  St.  Thomas's  Day  to  about 
18  poor. 

By  his  will  dated  1783  the  Rev.  Francis  Broade 
gave  ;^ioo  to  the  Rector  and  Churchwardens  the 
income  to  be  distributed  to  the  Poor  on  Good  Friday. 
The  money  is  now  represented  by  ^103  15/.  3;^. 
Canada  3J  per  cent.  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees 
of  Charitable  Funds  and  producing  ^3  12s.  Sd.  yearly 
in  dividends  which  is  distributed  among  about  18 
poor. 


HEMINGTON 


Hinintone,  Hemintone  (xi  cent.)  ;  Hennington, 
Hemingtone,  Heminthon,  Hevinton  (xii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Hemington  covers  an  area  of  1,354 
acres  and  stands  at  an  average  height  of  200  ft.  above 
the  ordnance  datum.  The  subsoil  is  Oxford  clay 
with  cornbrash  in  the  east.  The  upper  soil  varies. 
About  a  third  of  the  land  is  laid  down  as  grass  and 
the  remainder,  except  for  about  15  acres  of  woodland, 
is  arable  land  producing  barley  and  wheat. 

A  road  leading  from  Great  Gidding  to  Polebrook 
goes  through  the  village  past  Hemington  Lodge,  and 
the  vicarage,  church  and  school.  North  of  the  school 
a  branch  road  goes  eastwards  past  the  remains  of  the 
old  Manor  House,  which  survived  as  two  tenements 
in  1888.  This,  the  second  Northamptonshire  home 
of  the  Montagus,  was  surrounded  by  a  moat,  inclosing 
8  acres.  The  last  member  of  the  family  who  lived 
here  was  Elizabeth  Harington,  widow  of  the  second 
Sir  Edward  Montagu,  known  as  '  The  Blind  Lady 
Montagu.'*  Dean  Swift,  writing  to  the  Duke  of 
Montagu  in  171 3,  nearly  a  hundred  years  after  this 
lady's  death,  said,  '  I  was  at  Hcmmington  according 


to  your  order,  and  found  no  mansion  house  there,  and 
was  informed  it  had  been  pulled  down  about  30  years 
before.'^  The  population  of  Hemington  numbered 
106  persons  in  1921. 

Part  of  HEMINGTON  was  given  with 
MANORS      Barnwell  St.  Andrew  (q.z:)  to  Ramsey 

Abbey  by  Ethelric  Bishop  of  Dorchester. 
The  gift  consisted  of  3  hides  and  2  virgates  of  land.^ 
The  area  by  1086  and  in  the  12th  century  had 
fallen  to  2j  hides.*  The  tenants  in  fee  holding  of 
the  Abbot  as  at  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  (q.v.)  were  the 
le  Moynes^  until  Abbot  William  de  Godmanchester 
purchased  the  manor  with  Barnwell  in  1276.'  In  1293 
Abbot  Sawtry  appropriated  Hemington  to  the  uses 
of  the  Abbey  ceilar.'  After  the  Dissolution  the  Crown 
in  1540  granted  the  manor  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu, 
Chief  Justice  of  the  King's  Bench.'  From  1540  the 
manor  descended  with  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  (q.v.), 
but  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  did  not  sell  it  with  that 
manor  in  191 3,  and  is  still  owner.* 

Another  fee  in  Hemington,  also  2^  hides,  the  soke 
of  which  lay  in  Oundlc,  was  held  of  the  abbot  of 


"  Dedicated  to  St.  Mary,  P.C.C.  lo 
Holder. 

••  Rot.  //u?.  Je  Ifellei  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  ii,  123. 

••  Cal.  Pal.  1 327- JO,  p.  364. 

•»'  P.C.C.  10  Holder. 

»••'  Star  Cham.  Proc.  Hen.  VIII,  bdlc. 
17,  not.  Z51  and  257. 


""  Ch.in.Proc.  (Ser.  2),  bdlc.  190,  no.  76. 
"■"1  Ibid.  Elir,.  F.  I  7.,  no.  29  ;  T.t.  8. 
'  C.  Wiic,  The  Monlagui  oj  Boiighwti, 
12,  28. 

•  Duke  0/  Buccleuch  MSS.  (Hi«t.  MSS. 
Com.  Rep.)  i.  359. 

•  Cariul.  Man.    dt  Rames  (Rolli  Ser.), 
i,  280. 

80 


«  r.C.H.  Norihanis.  i,  318*,  367a. 

•  Ibid. 

•  Cariul.  Men.   dt  Rames  (Rolli  Ser.) 
lii,  18;. 

'  Ibid,  ii,  l..\o. 

'  I'.it.  R.  31  Men.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m.  31. 
"  Inf.   from   Messrs.  Nichull,  Maniity 
and  Co. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


REMINGTON 


Peterborough  by  three  knights  in  the  nth  and  12th 
centuries.^'  The  ovcrlordship  of  the  abbey  over  these 
lands  continued  to  the  Dissolution." 

In  the  reign  of  Henry  I,  one  of  the  three  knights 
had  been  succeeded  by  Richard  Fitz  Gilbert,'^  who 
has  been  identified  with  the  son  of  Gislebert  Favel, 
a  tenant  of  the  abbey  in  1086.'''  Riciiard's  holding 
comprising  a  hide  and  i\  virgatc  formed  the  nucleus 
of  the  manor  of  Hemington  parcel  of  the  manor  of 
Southorpe  which  was  held  of  the  abbey.**  Between 
1 173  and  1 176  Ivo,  son  of  Geoffrey  de  Gunthorpe  and 
Richard  his  brother,  probably  the  sons  of  Geoffrey  de 
Southorpe,"  and  John  de  Remington,  confirmed  the 
church  of  Remington  to  the  Priory  of  St.  Neots.^' 
The  same  John  contributed  towards  an  aid  at  the 
end  of  the  12th  century."  Re  was  succeeded  by 
Richard  de  Remington,  said  to  be  his  son,  whose 
wife  was  Amice.'*  Their  son  John  in  1232  acknowledged 
the  right  of  the  daughters  of  Robert  de  Remington 
to  lands  in  Remington.'*  Re  was  succeeded  by  his 
son  Richard  (living  1277),*"  who  in  1254  obtained 
licence  from  the  bishop  of  Lincoln  to  have  a  chapel 
and  chantry  without  burial,  font  or  belfry,  except 
one  bell  for  the  elevation  of  the  Rest,  at  his  manor.''' 
He  confirmed  the  advowson  of  the  church  of  Heming- 
ton to  St.  Neots  Priory  in  1269.^-  Possibly  the  relict 
of  his  son  or  grandson,  Richard  de  Remington,  Joan, 
then  wife  of  a  Colville,  settled  lands  in  Remington, 
which  she  had  of  Gilbert  son  of  Simon,  and  Joan, 
daughter  of  Simon  de  Remington,  on  her  children, 
Roger  (who  had  a  son  John),  Richard  (who  had  a 
son  Richard,  who  married  Divorgela),  and  Elizabeth.^^ 
John,  son  of  Richard  de  Remington,  did  homage  to 
the  Abbot  of  Peterborough  in  1290,  when  he  was 
aged  seven  years.^*  This  John  had  two  sons,  Richard 
andJohn(whohada  sonThomas,mentionedin  1367).^* 
Richard  and  his  wife  Joan  were  living  in  1329  and 
'345-**  Probably  Joan  held  the  manor  in  dower,  a? 
we  find  that  in  1350  Roger  Ryrst  held  for  the  term 
of  the  life  of  his  wife  of  the  inheritance  of  Richard 
de  Remington,  a  third  part  of  a  fee  in  Remington." 
Richard  and  Joan  had  two  sons,  Richard  Remington 
(living  in  1361,  1374),  who  married  Margerie,  and 
John  (living  in  1361),  whose  wife  was  Joan.  Richard 
and  Margerie  seem  to  have  had  a  son  John,  who  with 
his  wife  Joan  was  living  in  1401.^*  It  seems  probable 
that  they  had  a  son  Richard,  as  Katherinc,  daughter 
and  heir  of  Richard  Hemington,  settled  the  manor 
in  1424**  on  her  marriage  with  John  Kirkby,'''who  was 
holding  three  parts  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Remington 


formerly  of  RogerRyrst  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough." 
15cfore  1455  the  manor  had  fallen  to  the  coheirs  of 
Kathcrine  lady  of  Hemington.  In  that  year  William 
Inglcfield  and  his  wife  Agnes  with  William  Elyngton 
and  his  wife  Joan  conveyed  a  third  of  the  manor  to 
llcnrv  Ehen,  chaplain,  and  others.'"  A  settlement  of 
another  third  was  made  in  1456  by  Richard  Blogwyn, 
son  and  heir  of  Margaret  Blogwyn,  one  of  the  coheirs 
of  Katherine,  and  his  wife  Alice.^  A  moiety  of  tlie 
remaining  third  belonged  ten  years  later  to  Henry 
Wytlessy.**  The  manor  of  Hemington  became  settled 
upon  William  Est  the  elder,  with  remainders  to  his 
sons  William  and  Robert  in  tail  male.  Alice,  widow 
of  the  elder  William,  had  a  life  interest,  and  she  and 
her  second  husband,  John  Dann,  held  the  manor. 
William  the  younger  married  Anne  Montgomery, 
upon  whom  a  settlement  was  made,  and  they  had  an 
only  child  Anne.  His  widow  Anne  married  Thomas 
Dykons  and  in  1489  Alice  and  Anne  and  their  husbands 
brought  an  action  against  Robert  Est,  described  as  of 
London,  draper,  who  as  heir  male  under  the  settlement 
had  sold  his  interest  to  Thomas  Montagu.  The  dis- 
pute was  compromised  and  all  parties,  together  with 
John  Hcryng  and  Anne  his  wife,  apparently  the 
daughter  of  William  Est  the  younger,  quitclaimed  their 
interests  to  Thomas  Montagu.^  Tliomas  died  in 
1517,  having  settled  Remington  in  tail  male  on  his 
eldest  son  Edward  with  remainder  to  a  younger  son 
John.^  From  this  date  the  manor  has  followed  the 
descent  of  the  chief  manor. 

The  second  of  the  three  Peterborough  knights  in 
Remington  in  the  reign  of  Henry  I  was  Guy  Maufe, 
whose  share  in  the  fee  was  half  a  hide  and  half  a 
virgate."  Re  was  the  heir  and  probably  the  son  of 
Roger  '  Malfed,'  the  abbot's  Domesday  tenant  at 
Woodford,'*  whom  he  had  succeeded  in  1 1 14.  Re 
and  his  wife  Adeliza  granted  tithes  to  Peterborough 
in  1141.**  Re  was  succeeded  by  Simon,  possibly  his 
son,  who  with  Alexander  Maufe  had  some  right  to  the 
advowson  about  1176.^"  The  Maufe  fee  followed  the 
descent  of  Woodford  (i-v.)  and  about  1254  was  divided 
among  the  four  daughters  of  Robert  Maufe.  The 
small  holding  in  Hemington  seems  to  have  been 
acquired  by  Thorney  Abbey,  Peterborough  Abbey  and 
Richard  de  Hemington,  and  in  the  1 6th  century  came 
to  Thomas  and  Edward  Montagu.^"* 

The  abbot  of  Thorney's  possessions  in  Kingsthorp 
and  Hemington  were  described  as  half  a  knight's  fee 
of  the  fee  of  Maufe  in  1315'"  and  later  in  the  14th 
century.''^ 


••  F.C.H.  Norihants.  i,  315-16,  367J. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60, 1.  159*;  Chron. 
Pttroi.  H7 ;  Feud.  Aiii.  iv,  28,  48 ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (jcr.  2),  xxxii,  37. 

'«  y.C.H.  NoTtbanit.  i,  367a. 

'»  Round,  Feud.  Engl.  167,  223. 

'*  Fine  R.  88,  m.  :  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
Edw.  I,  fife  103,  no.  2;  Close  R.  118, 
m.  yi. 

"  r.C.//.  Northanu.  ii,  466,  514.  It 
•eemi  likely  that  Thomas,  son  of  Robert 
of  Gunthorpe,  who  held  eight  hides  in 
Gunthorpe,  Southorpe,  Stokes  and  Hem- 
ington (Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script.  54), 
it  the  Thomas,  son  of  Robert,  son  of 
Geoffrey  Southorpe  of  1243;  cf.  Stoke 
Doyle. 

'•  Cott.  MS.  Faust.  A  4,  fol.  41; 
Gorham,  Hist,  oj  Eyntsbury  and  St. 
Neott,  ii,  p.  cxrvi. 


"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  fol.  159A. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  401  ; 
Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  30. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  172, 
file  25,  no.  279. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  C.  10(d). 

■'  Ibid.  B,  14,  18. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  174, 
file  49,  no.  889. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  32,  67,  72. 

"  Cbron.  Pelrob.  147. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  73,  87. 

"  Ibid.  A.  69. 

"  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  71  K. 

"Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  851,  G.  25, 
K.  6,  B.  20. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  399- 
401. 

81 


"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  11  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  case  179,  file  93,  no.  49. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  48. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  179, 
file  95,  no.  134. 

"  Ibid.no.  138, 

•*  Ibid,  file  96,  no.  12. 

"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  90,  no.  54  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants,  case  179,  file  97, 
not.  II,  13,  16. 

'•Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  2),  xxxii,  37; 
Coll.  Top.  et  Gen.  v  (c.  viii,),  89. 

•'  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  367a. 

"  Round,  Feud.  i'"g/.  158,  223. 

"•  Pytchley  op.  cit.,  60  «. 

*"  Gorham,  loc.  cit. 

*»•  Pytchley,  loc.  cit.  ;  Cott.  MS. 
Cleo.  C  ii,  fol.  143A. 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Vetp.  E  xxi,  fol.  30A. 

««Ibid.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fol.  143*. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


A  share  in  the  Peterborough  fee  equal  to  that  of 
Guy  Maufe  belonged  to  Reginald  le  Moyne  in  the 
reign  of  Henry  I.**  This  seems  to  be  the  so-called 
manor  said  to  have  been  conveyed  by  Berengar  le 
Moyne  in  the  13th  century  to  Sir  Richard  de  Reming- 
ton,''* but  in  1 31 5  a  later  Reginald  le  Moyne  still  held 
the  sixth  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Hemington  and  Little- 
thorp  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough.'*^ 

Two  landowners  in  Hemington  whose  names  appear 
in  the  return  of  1316  are  John  Sandon  and  John  Car- 
doun.*®  John  Cardoun  was  at  the  same  date  one  of 
the  lords  of  Thurning  with  Winwick,  then  in  the 
county  of  Huntingdon,'*'  and  either  he  or  his  heir  of 
the  same  name  in  1330  defended  his  right  to  take  toll 
of  carts  passing  through  Winwick  to  avoid  the  difficult 
transit  by  the  highway  through  Thurning  and 
Hemington.'**  John  Sandon  may  possibly  be  the 
Essex  landowner  of  that  name  in  1303.'** 

In  1 291  there  was  a  mill  on  the  Ramsey  Abbey  land 
in  Hemington.*" 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  AND  ST. 
CHURCH  PAUL  stands  on  the  south  side  of  the 
village  and  consists  of  chancel  24  ft.  6  in. 
by  16  ft.  2  in.,  nave  38  ft.  6  in.  by  19  ft.  4  in.,  south 
porch,  and  west  tower  8  ft.  8  in.  by  9  ft.  6  in.,  all  these 
measurements  being  internal.  With  the  exception 
of  the  tower,  which  is  of  late  15th  century  date,  very 
little  ancient  work  survives,  the  old  chancel  and  nave 
having  been  pulled  down  in  1666  and  a  new  building 
erected  by  Lord  Montagu  consisting  of  a  rectangular 
body  measuring  38  ft.  by  19  ft.,**  with  square-headed 
windows  taken  from  the  ruins  of  the  old  manor-house.** 
The  church  remained  in  that  condition  until  1872, 
when  the  nave  was  restored  and  a  chancel  and  south 
porch  added.*'  The  new  work  is  in  the  style  of  the 
14th  century,  but  the  chancel  arch  is  said  to  be  a 
reproduction  of  an  arch  which  had  formerly  existed 
and  of  which  a  few  stones  had  been  built  into  the 
walls.**  These  stones  are  of  early  13th  century  date, 
and  include  the  two  respond  capitals,  which  have  nail- 
head  ornament,  and  part  of  a  moulded  base.  The 
arch  itself,  which  is  almost  wholly  modern,  is  of  two 
chamfered  orders.  New  windows  in  the  14th  century 
style  were  inserted  in  the  nave  in  place  of  the  old 
square-headed  windows,  but  the  17th  century  round- 
headed  south  doorway  remains.  The  chancel  is  faced 
with  ashlar  and  has  a  slated  eaved  roof.  The  nave 
retains  its  17th  century  open-timber  roof  of  four  bays, 
with  turned  pendants  to  the  tie  beams.  It  is  covered 
with  grey  Colleyweston  slates. 

The  tower  is  of  grey  rubble  masonry  in  four  stages, 
with  embattled  parapet  and  diagonal  buttresses. 
Above  the  west  doorway  is  a  square  panel  with  the 
arms  of  Montagu,  and  the  west  window  is  of  three 
cinquefoiled    lights,    with    four-centered    head    and 


hoodmould.  The  mullions  and  tracery  are  new. 
The  bell-chamber  windows  are  also  four-centered  and 
of  two  plain  pointed  lights.  The  lofty  tower-arch 
is  Ot  two  chamfered  orders  dying  into  the  wall. 
There  is  no  vice. 

The  font  is  of  late  12th  or  early  13th  century  date, 
and  consists  of  an  octagonal  bowl  and  circular  moulded 
stem,  in  which  the  nail-head  ornament  occurs.  The 
shorter  sides  of  the  bowl  have  carved  heads  in  their 
upper  part. 

In  the  chancel  are  ten  oak  stalls,  five  on  each  side, 
of  late  15th  century  date,  said  to  have  come  from 
Fotheringhay  church.**  All  retain  their  carved 
misericords  the  subjects  of  which  are  as  follows  :— 
North  side  :  (l)  dragon,  (2)  crown,  (3)  hawk  in  fetter- 
lock, (4)  publican  with  jug,  (5)  mermaid  ;  South  side: 
(6)  owl,  (7)  tailed  beast  in  monk's  hood,  (8)  tumbler, 
(9)  two  boars  saltire-wise,  (10)  helm  and  mantling. 
The  four  end  counters  have  traceried  designs,  and 
carvings  of  a  rose,  boar,  crown,  and  hawk  in  fetterlock. 
The  knops  are  also  carved. 

At  the  east  end  of  the  nave  is  a  floor  slab  with  brass 
figures  of  Thomas  Montagu  and  his  wife  Agnes 
(Dudley),  and  a  shield  in  each  of  the  four  corners. 
The  male  figure  is  bareheaded,  with  long  flowing  hair 
and  wears  a  large  cloak  and  gown  edged  with  fur  ;  the 
ladv  is  habited  in  a  tight-fitting  gown  and  wears  a 
pedimental  headdress.  The  inscription  records  that 
Montagu  died  5  September,  1517.** 

A  glass  panel  with  the  arms  of  Montagu  is  in  one  of 
the  south  windows  of  the  nave.*' 

Some  portions  of  carved  screen  work  and  tracery, 
found  in  1 872,  have  been  worked  into  the  new  oak 
pulpit. 

There  are  four  bells  in  the  tower,  the  treble  by 
J.  Taylor  &  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  1872,  the  second 
by  Thomas  Eayre  of  Kettering,  1724,  the  third  a 
recasting  by  Taylor  in  1908  of  a  bell  dated  1598, 
inscribed  '  Cum  voco  ad  ecclesiam  venite,'*'  and  the 
tenor  undated,  but  inscribed  '  Obe  the  Prince.' 
There  is  a  pit  for  a  fifth  bell. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  cover  paten  of 
about  1683,  and  a  paten  and  flagon  of  1699  presented 
by  Robert  Wells  and  .'Mice  his  wife,'  who  designe  to  be 
Buried  in  this  church  by  their  only  son  Robert,  who 
died  y"  12""  of  Nov''  1685.'*'  There  is  also  a  brass 
alms  dish. 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows :  (i)  bap- 
tisms 1574-82,  1596-1783,  marriages  1596-1753, 
burials  1562-90,  1597-1783  ;  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials 
1784-1812  ;    (iii)  marriages  1755-1812. 

The  advowson  of  the  church,  dedi- 

ADVOIVSON      cated  to  St.  Peter,  at  least  as  early 

as  1254,'"  but  since  1786  to  St.  Peter 

and  St.  Paul,"  was  given,  with  a  virgate  of  land  in  the 


*'y.C.H.  tiortbanti.  i,  367a. 

"  Bridgei,  op.  cit.  ii,  399,  quoting  from 
(he  Duke  of  Mcntjgu'j  cvidcncei. 

"Cott.  MS.  Veip.  E  xii,  fol.  30A. 

••  Feud.  Aidi,  iv,  28. 

•'  Ibid,  ii,  472. 

«'  Plac.  de  Quo  War.  (Rec.  Com.),  526. 

"Feud.  Aidi,  ii,  148. 

w  Pope  Nich.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.),  55*. 

"  Theic  are  the  dimeniioni  given  by 
Bridget,  ii,  40t.  He  deicribei  the  building 
ai  of  frecitone,  covered  with  ilate.  and 
joined  at  the  weit  end  to  the  old  itteple. 
Thomai  Montagu  in  i;i4  directed  thai 
hii  bodj  ihould  be  buried  in  the  chapel 


of  Holy  Trinity,  and  left  money  for  the 
repair  of  the  steeple  (Wills,  Probate  OfT. 
Northampton,  A,  329.) 

"Whellan,  Dtreclory  oj  Nortbanis 
(1874),  710.  The  building  i>  said  to  have 
had  an  '  entirely  domestic  appearance.' 

"The  coit  was  borne  by  the  Duke  of 
Bucclcuch. 

"Whellan,  op.  cit.,  710. 
"H.  K.  Bonney,  //»/.  Notes  on  Folher- 
ingbay  {t9it).  The  stalls  are  said  to  have 
been  left  by  will  to  Hemington  church 
by  a  farmer  of  Fotheringhay  in  the  iSth 
cent.  Inf.  from  Rev.  F.  II.  La  Trobe. 
'•  I'ranklin  lludmn.Jiraiieiof  Norlbanli. 

82 


"  Bridges  (op.  cit.  ii,  401)  says  that  the 
arms  of  Mont.igu  were  in  the  east  window. 

'»  The  old  third  hell  also  bore  the 
initials  E.  M.  (probably  for  Sir  Edward 
Montagu,  lord  of  the  manor ;  died 
Jan.  1601-2);  the  inscription  has  been 
retained.  See  North,  Cb.  Bells  oj  Nortb- 
anis. 303. 

'•  The  inscription  is  on  the  paten 
only  :    Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Northants. 

'55- 

•"  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  B  14,  18  ;  Rol. 
Ric.  Gravesend  (Cant,  and  York  Soc), 
119. 

"  Bacon,  Ltber  Regit,  829. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


LUDDINGTON 


parish,  to  the  monks  of  St.  Neot's  by  Thurstan,  the 
priest  of  Hemington,  in  1 149,  on  the  condition  that 
after  his  death  Roger,  his  son,  should  hold  it  for  life.'- 
Between  1173  and  1 1 82  the  prior  and  monks  were 
inducted  into  the  church  by  order  of  Geoffrey,  Bishop 
elect  of  Lincoln, Roger,then  priest, retaining  possession 
in  the  name  of  the  monks  and  paying  them  2;.  a 
year."  Although  Thurstan's  grant  had  thus  obtained 
episcopal  sanction  and  was  ratified  by  the  several 
tenants  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  in  the  parish, 
[see  above]  the  Priory  was  not  undisturbed  by  rival 
claimants.  The  Ramsey  Cartulary  preserves  a  bull 
of  Pope  .\lexander  III  which  confirms  Hemington 
with  its  church  to  the  Abbey,**  and  at  a  later  date  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough  laid  claim  to  the  advowson.** 
The  dispute  between  the  Priory  and  Abbey  was 
finally  settled  in  1 219  when  the  prior  surrendered 
his  right  to  the  church  of  Clapton  on  condition  that 
the  abbot  gave  up  the  advowson  of  Hemington  to 
him  and  paid  him  the  ancient  and  due  pension  which 
he  was  wont   to   receive   from   Clapton.**    It   was 


amongst  the  possessions  of  St.  Neot's  Priory  at  its 
surrender"  and  was  included  in  the  grant  of  Lud- 
dington  (y.t.)  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu  in  1544.  From 
that  date  the  rectory  and  advowson  followed  the 
descent  of  the  manor**  until  1920,  when  the  Duke  of 
Buccleuch  conveyed  them  to  Mr.  Benjamin  Measures. 

A  vicarage  was  ordained  during  the  episcopacy  of 
Hugh  de  Welles  (1206-35).** 

The  rectory  belonged  to  the  Priory  of  St.  Neot's 
until  1539'"  and  in  1544  was  granted  to  Sir  Edward 
Montagu  with  the  advowson  (q.v.)  with  which  it  has 
since  descended. 

In  the  14th  century  the  Priory  of  St.  James,  or 
Hinchinbrooke  Priory,  near  Huntingdon,  owned 
certain  tithes  in  Hemington  which  were  leased  to  Sir 
Edward  Montagu  for  £1  4J.  a  year  at  its  surrender." 
An  annuity  of  13.1.  4d.  is  payable  out 
CHARITY  of  the  Estates  of  Lord  Montagu  for 
distribution  to  the  poor.  Tlie  origin 
of  the  charity  is  unknown,  but  it  said  to  have  been  a 
bequest  of  the  blind  Lady  Montagu. 


LUDDINGTON 


LuUintone,  LuUinthone  (xi  to  xiii  cent.) ;  Lyling- 
ton,  f.oUington,  LuUyngton  (xiv  cent.)  ;  Lodyngton 
in  the  Brooke  (xv  cent.)  ;  Leddyngton,  ah.  Luddyng- 
ton,  als.  LuUyngton  (xvi  cent.)  ;  Ludington  ab. 
Lullington  (xviii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Luddington,  or  Luddington-in-the- 
Brook,  lies  on  the  borders  of  Huntingdonshire  and  a 
small  part  of  it  falls  within  the  Hundred  of  Leighton- 
stone  in  that  county.  It  covers  1,104  ^cres  on  a 
subsoil  of  Oxford  clay,  with  a  border  of  cornbrash 
in  the  east.  Of  this  area  rather  more  than  a  third  is 
pasture,  about  eight  acres  are  woodland,  and  the 
rest  is  arable,  producing  chiefly  wheat  and  barley. 
The  average  height  above  the  ordnance  datum  is 
200  ft. 

A  long  and  rather  narrow  tract  of  land  in  the  east 
of  the  parish  ftretches  south  of  Lutton  and  east  of 
Hemington  along  the  county  boundary  in  Gipsy 
Lane  to  the  Rectory  Farm.  Farther  south  on  the 
east  the  road  from  Great  Gidding  enters  the  parish 
and  runs  through  the  village  in  a  north-westerly 
direction  into  Hemington,  passing  the  church  of  St. 
Margaret  and  the  Church  Farm.  A  very  winding 
itream  called  Alconbury  Brook  rises  in  the  Great 
Hall  Spinney  north  of  the  church  and  flows  in  a 
south-easterly  direction  through  a  tract  of  land  liable 
to  floods.  In  the  early  part  of  the  i8th  century  the 
county  historian  described  the  situation  of  the  village 
as   '  low   and   dirty '   from   the   overflowing   of   this 


rivulet,  and  attributed  its  title  of  Luddington-in-the- 
Brook  to  this  cause.* 

In  1921  the  population  of  Luddington  consisted 
of  65  persons. 

A  hide  and  a  half  in  LUDDINGTON 
MANOR      which  was  parcel  of  Oundle  were  held 
of   Peterborough    Abbey    by   Walter   in 
1086.2     'YYie  lordship  of  the  Abbey  over  this  fee  con- 
tinued without  interruptionuntil  its«urrender  in  1539.* 

The  names  of  Walter's  successors  in  the  12th 
century  and  early  13th  have  not  been  preserved. 
A  mesne  lordship  over  the  fee  was  held  by  Richard 
Poure,  possibly  the  Shropshire  and  Stafford  landowner 
of  that  date,  in  1243.*  It  came  afterwards  to  the 
Marmion  lords  of  Lutton  manor,  of  which  the  manor 
of  Luddington  was  a  member,  until  John  Marmion, 
who  did  homage  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  in 
1300,'  released  all  his  rights  in  Luddington  to  the 
Abbey.* 

In  1243  William  de  Lullington  was  subtenant 
to  Richard  Poure,  holding  half  a  knight's  fee  of  the 
old  enfeoffment,  of  him.'  He  presented  to  the  church 
four  years  later,'  but  in  or  before  1275  had  been 
succeeded  as  patron  by  Gregory  de  Lullington.' 
Within  the  next  thirty  years  the  manor  had  passed 
into  the  possession  of  John,  son  of  Thomas  de  Oundle, 
probably  Gregory's  grandson,*"  who  held  it  of  John 
Marmion  by  homage  and  fealty  and  service  of  half  a 
knight's  fee.** 


••  Gorham,  op.  cit.  ii,  pp.  xxxix,  xl, 
•cxx»i. 

••  Cott.  MS.  Faus:.  A.  iv,  ff.  40A,  41 ; 
Dugdale,  Mtm.  Angl.  iii,  474. 

**  Cartul.  Mon.  de  Rames.  (Rolls  Ser.), 
ii,  137. 

•»  Cott.  MS.  Cleo.  C.  ii,  fol.  io6b ; 
Gorham,  loc.  cit. 

••  Fe«t  of  F.  Nortbants.  case  172, 
file  16,  no.  58. 

•'  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  262. 

•'  Inst.  Bk«.  (P.R.O.). 

•»  Rot.  Hug.  de  WeUes  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  i,  208. 


'»  ValoT  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  262. 
"Add.    Chart.    34326,    39589;     Dug- 
dale, Mon.  Angl.  iv,  388-89. 

'  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants.  ii,  402-4. 
■  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  316a. 

•  Egerton  MS.  2733,  ff.  134,  1344; 
Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  E.  xxi,  fol.  \id;  Chan. 
Inq.  a.q.d.  file  49,  no.  4  ;  Feud.  Aids,  iv, 
23;  Pat.  R.  36  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  6, 
m.   I. 

•  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  ii,  968,  69 ;  Egerton  MS. 
2733,  fol.  134A. 

•  Cott.  MS.  Veip.  E.  xxi,  fol.  I2d. 


•  V.C.H.  Northants.  ii,  584-85. 

'  Egerton  MS.  2733  fol.  134b. 

'  Rot.  Rob.  Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  226. 

'  Rot.  Ric.  Gravesend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  127.  A  John  de  Lullington  and 
Benigna,  his  daughter,  appear  about 
1260-70.  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A  37,  G  8, 
H  28. 

'°  Walter  de  Whyttlcseye  (Sparke, 
Hist.  Angl.  Script,  pp.  157-8)  describes 
him  as  Gregory's  son. 

"Chan.  Inq.  a.q.d.  file  49,  no.  4; 
Cott.  Chart,  xv,  18. 


83 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


In  1304  he  granted  it  to  the  abbot  of  Peter- 
borough, its  chief  lord,  John  Marmion,  the  mesne 
lord  giving  his  consent.'^ 

Abbot  Godfrey  de  Crowland  assigned  the  manor 
to  the  convent  for  his  anniversary .^^  He  was  returned 
as  lord  of  Luddington  in  1316,^*  and  it  remained 
among  the  temporahties  of  his  house  until  the  sur- 
render of  the  Abbey  in  1539.**  In  1544  it  was 
granted  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu,"  and  followed  the 
descent  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  (q.v.),  but  was  not 
sold  by  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  in  191 3,  and  the  duke 
is  still  owner  of  the  manor.  Mr.  James  Cheney  is 
one  of  the  chief  landowners  in  the  parish. 

Land  in  Luddington  formed  part  of  a  knight's 
fee  in  Great  Gidding  and  Luddington,  given  by 
Ingeram  de  Owe  (Auco)  to  the  Austin  Canons  of 
Huntingdon^'  and  confirmed  to  them  by  Henry  I.'^* 
The  lands  and  rents  of  the  Priory  in  Fotheringhay 
and  Luddington  together  were  valued  at  £^  gs.  id. 
in  1291  ^'  and  in  1539  its  rents  in  Luddington  alone 
amounted  to  102s.  lld.^"  The  possessions  of  this 
house  in  Luddington  remained  with  the  Crown  until 
1546,  when  they  were  sold  with  the  manor  of  Great 
Gidding  to  Edward  Watson  of  Rockingham  and 
Henry  Herdson,  skinner,  of  London,^^  who  in  the 
same  year  obtained  licence  to  convey  them  to  Sir 
Edward  Montagu.^- 

The  church  of  ST.  M.-IRGARET:  con- 
CHURCH  sists  of  chancel,  22  ft.  3  in.  by  14  ft.  2  in.  ; 
clearstoried  nave,  39  ft.  by  15  ft.  ; 
south  aisle,  9  ft.  6  in.  wide  ;  south  porch  and  west 
tower,  6  ft.  2  in.  by  6  ft.  8  in.,  all  these  measurements 
being  internal.  The  tower  is  surmounted  by  a  short 
broach  spire.  The  building  is  almost  entirely  of 
15th  century  date,  but  it  appears  to  have  taken  the 
place  of  a  13th  century  church,  which  seems  to  have 
had  both  north  and  south  aisles.  The  building  was 
very  completely  restored  in  1874,  the  chancel  being 
in  a  great  measure  modern  work,  but  four  lancet 
windows,  three  on  the  north  and  one  on  the  south, 
which  had  survived  the  15th-century  rebuilding,  were 
retained  in  modern  form.  The  buttresses  and  part 
of  the  walling  at  the  west  end  of  the  nave  may  belong 
to  the  13th-century  church,  the  north  buttress 
indicating  the  line  of  the  former  north  arcade. 

The  building  is  of  rubble  masonry,  with  plain 
parapets,  large  grotesque  gargoyles,^^  and  leaded 
roofs  to  nave  and  aisle.  The  chancel  is  covered  with 
grey  slates.  All  the  roofs  are  modern.  The  spire 
dates  only  from  1874,  but  is  said  to  be  a  copy  of  a 
spire  long  ago  destroyed  ;  before  the  restoration  only 
its  base  remained,  covered  with  a  slated  pyramidal  roof. 

The  chancel  retains  no  ancient  features  except 
its  15th-century  arch  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases. 
The  rood  loft  doorway  remains  on  the  north  side, 


approached  by  a  stairway,  still  perfect,  in  the  north 
nave  wall,  here  thickened  out.  The  nave  arcade 
consists  of  three  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  outer  running  down  the  piers  to  the 
ground,  the  inner  resting  on  attached  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.  All  the  windows  of  the 
nave  are  four-centered,  those  of  the  clearstory  of 
two  cinquefoiled  lights,  the  others  of  three  lights, 
and  at  the  east  end  of  the  aisle,  in  the  usual  position, 
is  a  piscina  with  four-centered  head  and  quatrefoil 
bowl. 

The  tower  is  divided  by  string  courses  into  five 
short  stages,  and  has  clasping  buttresses  and  bell- 
chamber  windows  of  two  cinquefoiled  lights  with 
quatrefoil  in  the  head.  The  tower  arch  is  lofty  and 
of  a    single  chamfered  order.     There  is  no  vice. 

The  font  is  of  1 5  th  century  date,  with  plain  octagonal 
bowl  and  stem. 

The  oak  pulpit  and  the  seating  are  modern,  but 
some  old  linen  pattern  panels  have  been  used  up  and 
have  been  copied  in  the  bench  ends.  There  is  a  good 
carved  oak  chest,  probably  of  16th-century  date. 

The  only  ancient  glass  consists  of  some  fragments 
of  late  15th-century  canopy  work  in  the  east  window 
of  the  aisle  and  in  one  in  the  north  wall.^ 

The  two  bells  in  the  tower  were  cast  by  Henry 
Penn,  of  Peterborough,  in  1710.^*  The  frames  were 
renewed  in  1861. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  gilt  cup  and  cover 
paten  of  1640,  both  bearing  the  initials  of  Richard 
Faulkner,  and  the  date  1641.^*  There  are  also  a 
pewter  alms  plate  and  a  brass  alms  dish. 

The  registers  before  l8l2  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1673-86,  1702-31,  1733-58,  marriages 
1673-1702,  1711-43,  burials  1635-92,  1711-57; 
(ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1759-1812  ;  (iii)  marriages 
1754-1812. 

The  church,  which  until  the  latter 
ADFOWSON  part  of  the  i8th  century  was  dedi- 
cated to  St.  Andrew,^^  has  been 
known  as  the  church  of  St.  Margaret  of  Antioch  since 
1791.^*  It  was  included  in  the  grant  of  the  manor 
{q.v.)  by  John,  son  of  Thomas  de  Oundle,  to  the 
Abbey  of  Peterborough,  and  remained  one  of  the 
possessions  of  that  house  until  its  surrender.^'  Sir 
Edward  Montagu  bought  it  with  the  manor  in  1 544. 

The  rectory,  which  was  united  to  the  vicarage  of 
Hemington  before  1854,  has,  with  the  advowson, 
followed  the  descent  of  the  manor.  In  1920  it 
was  conveyed  by  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  with  Heming- 
ton to  Mr.  Benjamin  Measures. 

An  annuity  of  13/.  \d.  is  payable  out 
CHARITY         of  the  estates  of  Lord  Montagu  for 
distribution  to  the  poor.     The  origin 
of  the  charily  is  unknown. 


"Chan.  Inq.  a.q.d.  file  49,  no.  4; 
Cott.  Chart,  xv,  iS.  Cal.  Pat.  1301-7, 
p.  241  i  Cott.  MS.  Vcip.  E.  xxi,  ff.  16A, 
17;   Ibid.  CIco.  C.  ii,  fol.  81. 

"  Sparkc,  loc.  cit. 

"Feud,  /lids,  iv,  23. 

■•  A'a/or  Eccl.  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  279. 

"  Pat.  R.  36  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m.  i. 

"  Chart.  R.  Ii4,m.  31. 

"Cart.  Anliq.  II.  no.  8. 

"  Pi<l>e  Nicb.  Tax  (Rcc.  Com.),  556. 

"  faUr  E<cl.  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  253. 


"  Pat.  R.  38  Ilcn.  VIII,  pt.  4,  m.  40. 

"  Ibid.  pt.  6. 

*■  The  g.irgoylc8  .ire  a  very  conspicuous 
feature  of  the  building  ;  there  arc  four  on 
each  side  of  the  clearstory,  four  to  the 
aisle,  and  four  to  the  porch,  all  very  large 
in  comparison  with  the  other  architectural 
details. 

**  Bridges  records  the  fragment  of  an 
inscription  :  '  Joht  ct  Agnet  uxoris  ejus 
.  .  .  fenestra  ..."  in  the  uppermost 
north    windoWi    and     another    window, 


'  from  the  letters  S  and  S  in  many  places 
of  it  appears  to  have  had  the  portraits  of 
different  saints.'  He  also  records  the 
arms  of  Montagu  in  the  cast  window  : 
}hil.  of  Northants.  ii,  403. 

*'•*  I'or  inscriptions  sec  North,  Cb.  Bells 
0/  Norlhanis,  330. 

"  Markham,  Ch.  I'hilt  oJNorihants,  181. 

"Norihjnts  .V.  and  Q.  1888,  ii,  115; 
Bacon,  Liber  Regis,  328. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.,  ii,  402-4. 

'•'  I'alor  Eccl.  (Rcc.  Com),  iv,  293. 


84 


/  f^ 


^i«te' 


I 


>  d  ■u^r.iZJCl 


LuDniNGTON  Church  from  the  South 


LuDDlNCTON  Church  :    The  Interior,  looking  East 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


Undala,    Undela    (x  cent.)  ;    Oundel    (xiv    cent.). 

The  parish  of  Oundle  is  situated  on  the  Nene, 
which  almost  surrounds  the  level  ground  called  St. 
Sythc's  meadow.  This  ancient  market  town  is 
situated  on  the  higher  ground  to  the  north-west,  on 
the  neck  of  this  little  peninsula.  The  hamlets  of 
Ashton  and  Elmington  lie  to  the  north-east,  across  the 
river;  Biggin  and  Churchfield  to  the  west.  The  land 
near  the  river  is  liable  to  floods,  but  the  main  part 
of  the  town  stands  from  25  ft.  to  35  ft.  above  the 
level  of  the  river,  and  the  ground  rises  on  the  east  and 
west  boundaries  to  about  250  ft. 

The  area  of  the  parish  is  4,992  acres,  of  which 
3,144  acres  are  in  Oundle  and  1,848  in  Ashton.  In 
1895  Biggin  and  Churchfield,  with  the  rural  portion 
of  the  township,  were  added  to  Benefield,*  the  area  of 
Oundle  being  thus  reduced  to  2,228  acres.  The  land 
is  mainly  permanent  pasture.  A  private  Act,  un- 
printed,-  was  passed  in  1807  for  the  inclosure  and  the 
tithes  of  Oundle  ;  under  it  the  vicarage  was  augmented 
by  66  acres.' 

There  are  several  mineral  springs  in  the  neighbour- 
hood,* and  a  century  ago  the  making  of  bobbin  lace 
was  a  local  industr)'. 

A  road  from  Thrapston  on  the  south  crosses  the 
river  Nene  by  the  South  or  Crowthorp  Bridge,  which 
has  six  round  keystoned  arches  and  a  plain  sloped 
coping,  but  is  of  no  architectural  interest.  There 
were  formerly  two  crosses  on  the  old  bridge  12  ft. 
apart,  the  bridge  extending  '  20  ft.  from  one  cross  to 
the  north  and  40  ft.  from  the  other  to  the  south. '^ 
The  road  continues  north  and  again  crosses  the  Nene 
by  the  North  Bridge  on  its  way  to  Elton  and  Peter- 
borough. The  North  Bridge  was  rebuilt  and  widened 
in  1912-14.  It  consists  of  eleven  arches,  six  over  the 
river  proper  and  five  more  widely  spaced  in  the  approach 
from  the  town.  A  tablet  recording  a  former  rebuild- 
ing, found  during  the  course  of  repair  in  1835,  has 
been  inserted  in  the  parapet  ;  the  inscription  reads : 
'  In  the  yere  of  oure  Lord  1570  thes  arches  wer 
borne  doune  by  the  waters  extremytie.  In  the  yere 
of  oure  Lord  1 57 1  they  wer  bulded  agayn  with  lyme 
and  stonne.  Thanks  be  to  God.'  On  the  east  side 
of  the  bridge  is  the  railway  station  (opened  1845)  on  a 
branch  of  the  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway. 
Near  by  on  the  river  is  a  wharf  or  dock.  Other  roads 
from  Stoke  Doyle,  Benefield,  Glapthorn  and  Fothering- 
hay  converge  on  the  town.  At  the  junction  of  the 
roads  from  Benefield  and  Stoke  Doyle,  the  district  was 
formerly  called  Chapel  End,  from  the  medieval 
chapel  of  St.  Thomas  of  Canterbury.  Leiand,  refer- 
ring to  this  chapel  about  1540,  describes  it  as  '  the 
church  or  chapel  of  St.  Thomas  now  of  our  Lady.' 
The  site  of  the  chapel  is  at  present  approximately 
occupied  by  Jesus  Church. 

The  town  has  many  picturesque  stone-built  houses, 


La  xto  n.  Argent  a 
chei'eroti  gobotiy  ermine 
and  sable  between  three 
griffons*  heads  gules 
sprinkled  Kith  drops  of 
gold. 


chiefly  of  17th  and  1 8th  century  date,  and  some 
retaining  earlier  work,  but  the  growing  needs  of 
Oundle  School  have  necessitated  the  removal  of 
several  interesting  blocks  of  buildings,  notably  in  New 
Street.  The  new  buildings, 
however,  are  everywhere  de- 
signed to  harmonise  with  their 
surroundings,  and  add  not  a 
little  to  the  pleasant  aspect 
of  the  town,  being  mostly 
in  a  late  Gothic  style  adapted 
to  modern  needs.  The  gram- 
mar school  and  almshouse  on 
the  south  side  of  the  church- 
yard, which  was  a  recon- 
struction by  Sir  William 
Laxton  of  the  then  existing 
guildhall,*  was  pulled  down 
in  1852  to  make  room  for  the 
new  Laxton  School  building, 
and  new  almshouses  were  built  on  a  near  site.  The 
new  school  building  has  an  open  ground  story,  with 
wide  four-centered  arches,  square-headed  mullioned 
windows  above,  and  a  gable  to  the  Market  Place. 
The  bronze  tablet  formerly  over  the  entrance  of  the 
old  school  has  been  built  into  the  end  wall ;  it  bears 
the  escutcheon  of  Sir  William  Laxton  between  the 
arms  of  the  city  of  London  and  of  the  Grocers 
Company  and  an  inscription  in  Latin,  Greek,  and 
Hebrew,  the  Latin  version  of  which  reads,  '  Vndellae 
natus  Londini  parta  labore  Laxtonus  posuit  senibus 
puerisque  levame.'  New  school  buildings  adjoining 
were  erected  in  1885. 

The  Town  Hall  and  Market  House,  which  stands  in 
the  middle  of  the  Market  Place,  is  a  plain  but  not 
unpleasing  gabled  building  of  two  stories  erected  in 
1 826,  in  which  year  the  market  cross,  which  stood  to  the 
east  of  it,  at  the  top  of  St.  Osyth  Lane,  was  destroyed. 
The  cross,  which  was  dated  1591,  consisted  of  a  tall 
shaft  on  two  octagonal  stone  steps,  and  was  surrounded 
by  a  pent  house  of  timber,  also  octagonal,  with  high- 
pitched  roof  covered  with  stone  slates.'  Tlie  war 
memorial  stands  in  the  Marl-et  Place. 

At  the  corner  of  West  Street  (formerly  the  High 
Street)  and  New  Street  is  a  house  now  turned  into  a 
shop  on  the  ground  floor,  with  a  panel  in  the  gable 
inscribed  '  1626  W.W.,'  the  initials  being  those  of 
William  Whitwell,  who  built  the  block  of  property 
on  that  site,  which  extended  to,  and  apparently 
included,  the  Talbot  Hotel  in  New  Street.  Part  of 
this  property  was  pulled  down  for  the  Post  OSice, 
erected  in  1903,  but  the  Talbot  Hotel,  originally  the 
Tabret,'  remains  unaltered,  and  is  a  picturesque  gabled 
building  of  three  stories,  with  mullioned  bay  windows 
and  wide  central  archway.  The  staircase  is  a  good 
example  of  the  period,  with  moulded  rails,  turned 


'  L.G.B.  Order  33,586  ;  a  imall  transfer 
had  been  made  in    1885,   L.G.B.   Order 

'7.763- 

•47  Geo.  Ill,  Sesi.  i.  Cap.  19.  The 
■ward  was  nude  in  1811. 

'  W.  Smalley  Law   Oundle's  Story,  35. 

*J.  Morton,  Nai.  Hist,  of  Nortbantt 
(171a),  p.  273. 


'  .Markham,  Crosses  of  Nortbants.  9Z. 

•The  guildhall  was  described  in  1565 
as'  a  very  fair  hall  builded  with  freestone  '  j 
it  measured  yz  ft.  by  38  ft.  ;  \V.  Smalley 
Law,  Oundle's  Story,  35. 

'  Markham,  Crosses  of  Sortbants.   93. 
Every  Thursday  at  mid-day  a  bell  is  rung 
at  the  parish  church  to  denote  that  the 

85 


market  has  opened.  Up  to  about  forty 
years  ago  two  bells  used  to  be  rung  on 
Sunday  at  7  a.m.  to  indicate  that  it  was 
the  Sabbath  day. 

•The  name  Talbot  is  from  the  '  talbot 
passant,'  the  crest  of  Mr.  WhitweU's 
wife's  family,  the  Griffins,  which  he 
adopted  ;    W.  Smalley  Law,  op.   cit.  90. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


balusters  and  square  newels  with  tall  shaped  finials.* 
The  Wliite  Lion  Hotel  in  North  Street,  another 
gabled  three-story  house  with  mullioned  windows, 
has  a  panel  with  the  initials '  E.H.,  I.H.,'  but  another 
inscribed  '  A.H.,  B.H.  mdcxli  '  appears  to  be 
modern,    though    probably    marking  the  position  of 


Oundle:  The  White  Lion  Hotel 


one  of  that  date.  The  Anchor  Inn,  a  low  two- 
story  building,  at  the  corner  of  St.  Osyth  Lane  and 
East  Road,  with  a  panel  inscribed  '  1637  IM.,'  forms 
the  end  of  a  row  of  small  houses  in  St.  Osyth  Lane, 
which  were  apparently  built  at  the  same  time.** 

A  gabled  house  on  the  north  side  of  West  Street, 
near  Chapel  End,  is  dated  '  W.H.  1650,'  and  in  the 
same  street  are  two  stone  gabled  17th-century  houses 
forming  a  single  property  known  since  1801  as  Paine's 
Almshouses,^  built  on  either  side  of  a  small  court- 
yard and  connected  by  a  high  wall  with  moulded 
coping,  in  which  is  a  small  but  charming  gateway 
with  four-centered  arch  in  a  square  frame,  circular 
pediment,  and  tall  obelisk  finials.'^ 

Latham's  Hospital  and  School*'  in  North  Street, 
built  in  l6ll,  though  much  restored  and  wholly 
modernised  internally,  preserves  generally  its  original 
appearance,  and  is  of  two  stories  with  mullioned 
windows,  and  three  gabled  wings  towards  the  street 


Latham.     Or    a    chief 

indented  azure  {barged 
zvith  three  roundels  ar- 


inclosing  two  small  courtyards  entered  by  stone  gate- 
ways. There  was  a  restoration  in  1837  and  a  more 
extensive  one  in  191 2,  when  railings  took  the  place  of 
the  high  stone  wall  to  one  of  the  courtyards.  The 
inscriptions  over  the  gateways  were  obliterated  in 
Bridges'  time,  but  over  the 
school  door  was  '  a  rude  pic- 
ture of  a  schoolmaster  in  a 
chair,  with  a  cap  on  his  head 
and  his  scholars  around  him, 
but  much  defaced.'**  The 
'  hall '  of  the  hospital,  for- 
merly on  the  ground  floor,  is 
now  in  the  upper  story  :  it 
contains  some  good  17th-cen- 
tury furniture  and  the  prayer 
which  Nicholas  Latham'  pen- 
ned by  himself  '  painted  on  1 
board  above  the  fireplace.*^ 

The  house  known  as  The  Berrystead,**  now  the 
property  of  Oundle  School,  is  a  large  building  of 
two  stories  with  lofty  basement  and  dormered  attics, 
originally  of  17th  century  date,  but  apparently  rebuilt 
from  the  ground  floor  in  the  century  following.  The 
basement  has  mullioned  windows,  and  a  stone  dated 
1670  has  been  reused  in  a  later  wing,  but  the  main 
elevations  have  tall  sash  windows,  central  doorway 
with  pedimented  head,  dressed  quoins,  and  bold 
cornice.  The  house  is  under  parallel  roofs  with  two 
gables  at  each  end.  The  garden  extends  down  to 
East  Road,  where  there  is  a  small  square  17th  century 
pavilion,  or  garden-house,  with  pyramidal  stone 
slated  roof.  The  vvrought-iron  gates  adjoining  the 
lower  ro?d  have  been  erected  at  the  entrance  to  East 
Haddon  Hall.  Another  house,  known  as  Cobthorne,*'in 
West  Street,  is  of  the  same  type,  with  mullioned 
windows  in  the  basement,  central  doorway,  and  barred 
sash  windows  on  the  ground  floor,  and  a  range  of 
five  similar  windows  above.  It  was  built  by  William 
Butler,  commander  of  the  Parliamentary  forces,  who 
used  the  timber  from  Lyveden  House  in  its  construc- 
tion.'^  A  17th-century  oak  staircase  with  turned 
balusters  with  ball  tops  runs  from  basement  to  attic, 
and  is  a  good  specimen  of  the  period,  built  round  a 
central  well-hole.*' 

Bramston  House,  at  the  corner  of  the  Market  Place 
and  St.  Osyth  Lane  (formerly  St.  Sithe's  Lane  or 
Lark  Lane)  is  an  early  18th-century  building  of  three 
stories,  the  front  elevation  of  which  is  of  ashlar  with 
tall  flanking  pilasters,  plain  central  doorway,  sash 
windows,  cornice  and  balustraded  parapet.  York's 
House,  on  the  south  side  of  West  Street,  has  a  lead 
head  dated  1715,  and  attached  to  a  large  i8th  century 
house  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  street  is  a  garden- 
house  of  the  same  period  facing  Milton  Road,  which 
has  round-headed  sash  windows  and  low  domed 
stone  slated  roof. 


•The  'tradition'  that  the  house  wai 
built  with  itonci  from  Fothcringhay 
Cattle  and  that  the  staircase  came  from 
there  is  unsupported  by  evidence,  and 
ai  regards  the  staircase  it  obviously 
without  foundation. 

'•They  may  be  of  16th  century  date, 
and  the  panel  marks  a  rebuilding  or 
reitoration. 

*'  Or  the  '  Chapel  Almshouses,'  from 
the  bequest  of  John  Paine  in  1801.  The 
wing  next  to  the  Congregational  Church 


forms  the  minister's  house  and  is  known 
as  the  Manse ;  the  other  contains  five  free 
tenements  called  the  'almshouse.' 

*■  The  gateway  is  said  locally  to  have 
come  from  Kirby  Hall. 

'•The  school  is  no  longer  held  here. 

'* //ii(.  o/jVor(Aa«/),  ii,  410.  The  in- 
scription over  the  almshouse  was  '  Quod 
dcdi  acccpi  '  and  over  the  school  '  V.x 
ore  infantium  pcrfecisti  laudcm.' 

'•  The  prayer  is  given  in  Smalley  Law, 
op.  cit.  7J. 

86 


"  In  N'orth  Street,  opposite  the  cast 
end  of  the  church.  The  original  Bury 
Stead  was  to  the  north-west  of  the 
church,  between  the  rectory  and  the 
vicarage. 

*'  From  Cobthorne  furlong  in  St. 
Sithc'a  field  ;    Sniallcy  Law,  op.  cit.  30. 

"  \V.  Smalley  Law,  Outflle's  Story^  8$. 

*•  It  appears  not  to  have  been  designed 
for  the  house.  There  is  a  local '  tradition  * 
that  it  came  from  the  Lyveden  New 
Building. 


OUNDLE    BEFORF    1852,    SHOWING    BUILDINGS    NOW    DESTROYED 

(From  II  drazving  by  B.  Riidge) 


OuNDI.C  :      XtW    SlREET    IN     iSj^),    SHOWING    HOUSES    DEMOI.tSHED    IN    THAT    YEAR 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


Ashton  chapel  and  schoolhouse,  erected  in  1706,  is 
a  rectangular  building  measuring  externally  about 
57  ft.  by  18  ft.,  with  diagonal  angle  buttresses,  and  a 
bell-cote,***  containing  one  bell,  over  the  west  gable. 
The  schoolhouse,  of  two  stories,  occupies  the  east 
end  of  the  building,  which  is  faced  with  coursed, 
undressed  stone,  and  has  a  slated  roof.  The  entrance 
to  the  chapel  is  at  the  west  end  by  a  well-designed 
classic  doorway,  above  which  is  a  round-headed 
vnndow  of  three  lights,  forming  with  it  a  single  archi- 
tectural composition.  There  is 
an  altar-piece  of  canvas  painted 
by  Mrs.  Creed,  and  two  wooden 
tablets  with  long  inscriptions 
relating  the  foundation  of  the 
chapel  and  school.-'  Two  doors 
at  the  east  end,  one  on  each 
side  of  the  altar,  lead  to  the 
schoolhouse,  to  which  there  is 
also  external  access.  The  side 
windows  of  the  chapel  are  of 
two  rounded  lights.  There  is 
an  addition  to  the  building  at 
the  east  end  or  the  north  side. 

Oundle  is  governed  by  an 
Urban  District  Council  of  15 
members  formed  in  1895,  and 
is  also  the  head  of  a  Rural  Dis- 
trict Council  extending  from 
Yarwell  to  Thorpe  .\church  and 

from  Bulwick  to  VVarmington,  

the  town  itself  being  excepted. 
The  Urban  District  Council 
succeeded  a  body  of  Commis- 
sioners appointed  under  an  Act  of  l825,^consisting  of 
the  lord  of  the  manor,  the  vicar  and  the  master  of  the 
school  as  ex-officio  commissioners,  and  92  others  named 
in  the  Act.  The  number  was  not  to  fall  below  40 
and  the  qualification  was  ^^500.  The  streets  were  to 
be  improved  by  the  removal  of  the  Butter  Cross, 
Shambles,  etc.  ;  the  market  day  was  changed  from 
Saturday  to  Thursday  and  a  stock  market  added  ; 
provision  was  made  for  lighting  the  town  with  gas  or 
oil.  The  old  Ascensiontide  fair  was  liter  represented 
by  a  pleasure  fair  on  Whit  Monday  ;  St.  Valentine's 
fair  for  horses  is  kept  on  2;  February,  St.  Lawrence's 
fair  is  discontinued,  but  a  new  fair  is  held  on 
12  October.  The  Urban  Council  controls  the  water 
supply,  but  gas  is  supplied  by  a  company. 

The  history  of  Oundle  begins  with  St.  Wilfrid, 
who  established  a  monastery  here,  where  he  died 
in  709 ;  his  body  was  taken  to  Ripon.'^'  A  later 
archbishop  of  York  (Wulfstan)  was  buried  at  Oundle 
in  957.^  The  town  and  the  surrounding  district 
were  at  a  very  early  time  given  to  the  abbey  of  Peter- 
borough, being  restored  or  confirmed  to  the  abbey  in 
972  ;  the  charter  shows  that  it  then  was  the  local 
government  centre  for  '  eight  hundreds '  and  that  it 
had  a  market.*^  It  was  probably  about  this  time  that 
St.  Ethelwold  visited  the  place  in  his  endeavours  to 


restore  the  abbeys  destroyed  by  the  Danes.'*  Leofsi 
son  of  Bixi  afterwards  despoiled  the  abbey  of  Oundle 
and  other  lands,  and  they  lay  waste  for  two  years  ; 
afterwards,  however,  he  was  compelled  to  restore 
them." 

As  in  the  case  of  most  monastic  manors,  the  history 
of  the  place  was  peaceful  and  uneventful.  With 
the  district  generally  it  suffered  from  the  ravages  of 
earl  Morcar  in  1065,**  and  again  from  King  John's 
vengeance  on  the  monks  of  Peterborough  in  1216  ; 


Oundle  :  The  Talbot  Hotel 

the  church  escaped,  but  the  granges  were  destroyed.** 
In  1230  Henry  III  passed  through  on  his  way  south 
from  Stamford  to  Hertford.'"  Occasional  outrages 
are  reported,  as  when  the  bishop  of  Durham's  men 
were  assaulted  in  1297,  and  despoiled  of  the  goods 
they  had  purchased  for  the  bishop  in  the  market  ;'* 
or  when  in  1 35 1  some  knights  and  their  men  broke  into 
the  abbot's  park  and  carried  away  his  goods  and  deer.'* 
A  series  of  grants  of  pontage  for  the  repair  of  Ashton 
bridge  began  in  1352  with  renewals  every  few  years 
till  1401.'' 

Sabi-'e  Johnson,  a  Polebrook  woman,  wrote  in 
1545:  'Ripen  hath  buried  one  of  plague  and  at 
Oundle  they  die  still  very  sore.  I  fear  this  town  ' 
[Glapthorn],'^ ;  and  a  month  later  :  '  At  Oundle  they 
die  sore.''* 

In  the  next  century  Oundle  seems  to  have  been  a 
meeting  place  for  county  business,  especially  in  con- 
nection with  the  musters  of  men  liable  to  serve.'* 

John  Leland  "  gives  a  good  description  of  the  town 
as  he  saw  it  about  1540,  approaching  from  the  south. 
The  river  name  should  be  noticed  :  '  The  town 
standeth  on  the  further  ripe  as  I  came  to  it.  The 
bridge  over  Avon  is  of  five  great  arches  and  two  small. 
There  is  a  little  gutter  or  brook  coming  upon  the 
causey  as  I  entered,  on  the  left  hand,  into  Avon  river. 


•"  The  vane  is  dated  1706. 

•'  The  inscriptions  are  given  in  Bridges, 
ii,  412.      "  Local  Act,  6  Geo.  IV,  Cap.  32. 

"  Bede,  Hut.  EccUs.  v,  19. 

"  Angl.  Sax.  Cbron. 

"  Birch,  Cartul.  Sax.  iii,  582. 

"•  Sparke,  Hut.  Angl.  Script.  (Hugo 
Candidut),  iii,  17. 


"  Hist.  Eltin.  (Anglia  Christ.),  122. 
«»  y.C.H.  Norlhar.is.  i,  262. 
"  Matth.  Paris,  Hist.  Angl.  (RoUs  Ser.), 
ii,   l8g. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1227-31,  p.  284. 
"  Cal.  Pat.  1292-1301,  p.  286. 
"  Ibid.   1350-54,  p.  205.     See  also  p. 


"  Ibid.  p.  304,  &c. 

"  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xx  (2),  641. 

"Ibid.  855. 

"  E.g.  Cal.  S.P.  Dom.  1623-5,  P-  4°^  i 
1627-8,  p.  102.  See  also  1629-31,  p.  351  ; 
1640,  p.  164. 

"  ItiH.  i,  4. 


87 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


among  the  arches  of  the  bridge.  The  town  hath  a  very 
good  market  and  is  all  builded  of  stone.  The  parish 
church  is  very  fair.  One  Robert  Wiat,  a  merchant, 
and  Joan  his  wife  made  a  goodly  south  porch  .  .  . 
They  also  made  on  the  south  side  of  the  churchyard  a 
pretty  almshouse  of  squared  stone,  and  a  goodly 
large  hall  over  it  for  the  brotherhood  of  that  church. 
And  at  the  west  end  of  the  churchyard  they  made 
lodgings  for  two  chantry  priests  founded  there  by 
them.  The  scripture  in  brass  on  the  almshouse  door 
beareth  the  date  of  the  year  of  our  Lord  1485  as  I 
remember.  At  the  west-northwest  end  of  Oundle 
churchyard  is  the  farm  or  parsonage  house^  impro- 
priated to  Peterborough.  It  is  a  £50  by  year.  Peter- 
borough was  lord  also  of  the  town,  and  now  the  king 
hath  allotted  it  to  the  queen's  dowry.  .  .  .  The 
river  of  Avon  so  windeth  about  Oundle  town  that  it 
almost  insulateth  it,  saving  a  little  by  west-northwest. 
Going  out  at  the  town  end  of  Oundle  towards  Fother- 
inghay  I  rode  over  a  stone  bridge  through  which  the 
Avon  passeth.  It  is  called  the  North  bridge,  being  of 
a  great  length  because  men  may  pass  when  the  river 
overfloweth,  the  meadows  lying  on  every  side  on  a 
great  level  thereabout.     I  guessed  there  were  about  a 


^-^n..:tt 


Oundle  :  Laxton's  School 

thirty  arches  of  small  and  great  that  bare  up  this 
causey.  From  Oundle  to  Fotheringhay  a  two  miles 
by  marvellous  fair  corn  ground  and  pasture,  but  little 
wood.' 

An  elaborate  extent  was  made  in  1565.'°  The 
whole  main  street  now  called  West  Street  and  North 
Street  was  then  High  Street,  and  New  Street  was 
Bury  Street  ;  St.  Sithe's  (or  Osith's)  Lane,  leading 
down  to  her  meadow,  was  then  Lark  Lane.  Leland's 
description  of  the  Guildhall  is  borne  out  :  '  A  very 
fair  hall,  builded  with  freestone.'  The  lord's  '  stock- 
house  and  cage  for  punishment '  stood  at  the  turn 
from  the  Market  Place  to  Bury  Street.''"  The 
Burystcde  is  thus  described  :  '  A  general  hall  with 
cook-house  adjoining  and  several  little  garrets  under 


one  roof,  a  tiled  stable  and  the  malthouse  thatched 
with  straw. '*^  Near  by  was  the  Drumming  Well, 
which  was  one  of  the  curiosities  of  the  town.  In  a 
letter  of  Feb.  1667-8  occurs  this  account  of  it  : 

'  There  is  much  discourse  of  a  strange  well  at 
Oundle,  wherein  a  kind  of  drumming,  in  the  manner 
of  a  march,  has  been  heard.  It  is  said  to  be  very 
ominous,  having  been  heard  heretofore,  and  always 
precedes  some  great  accident.  I  wrote  to  the  town 
for  an  account  of  it  and  was  informed  .  .  tliat  it  beat 
for  a  fortnight  the  latter  end  of  last  month  and  the 
beginning  of  this,  and  was  heard  in  the  very  same 
manner  before  the  [late]  King's  death,  the  death  of 
Cromwell,  the  King's  coming  in,  and  the  fire  of 
London.'*" 

V\'illiam  Butler  commanded  the  Parliamentary  forces 
here  ;  he  destroyed  the  house  of  the  Ferrars  at 
Little  Gidding  and  also  Lyveden.*^  The  district 
seems  to  have  been  on  the  Parliamentary  side,  but  a 
letter  writer  in  1655  speaks  of  '  this  disaffected 
corner,'  and  states  that  there  were  persons  enlisting 
horses  and  men  at  Oundle  and  promising  fourteen 
days'  pay.*' 

In  1666  there  was  again  an  outbreak  of  the  plague, 
brought   from  London  ;    there  were  over 
J  200  deaths.**    Several  tradesmen's  tokens 

were  issued  about  that  time,  sixteen  being 
recorded  by  Williamson  between  1657  and 
1669.**  A  project  for  making  the  Nene 
na\igable  from  Peterborough  to  Oundle 
occurs  in  1692,  but  docs  not  seem  to  liave 
been  carried  through.*'  Sir  Matthew 
Dudley  about  1700  tried  to  establish  the 
manufacture  of  serges,  etc.,  bringing 
weavers  over  from  Flanders ;  but  the 
effort  did  not  succeed.*'  A  view  of  the 
town  was  engraved  in  1710.**  In  1722 
there  was  a  complaint  that  the  postmistress 
of  Oundle  was  notorious  for  opening 
letters.*'  Soldiers  were  stationed  in  the 
town  in  the  l8th  century.^" 

A  curious  scheme  for  the  relief  of  the 
unemployed  was  tried  here  a  century  ago. 
At  a  Vestry  meeting  on  9  Feb.  1820, 
it  was  resolved  that  a  levy  of  Sd.  in  the  pound 
should  be  paid  by  every  occupier  of  land  and  other 
property  in  the  parish  who  was  assessed  above  a 
certain  amount  and  considered  competent  to  employ 
his  quota  of  men  and  boys,  or  pay  the  amount 
assessed  to  the  Overseers  according  to  a  plan  outlined 
in  a  pamphlet  printed  at  Oundle  by  T.  and  E.  Bell. 
The  plan  was  that  if  a  farmer  spent  an  amount  equal 
to  the  levy  in  employing  men  and  boys  (men  at 
iSd.  a  day  and  boys  at  6d.)  he  would  be  relieved  alto- 
gether ;  if  not,  he  would  be  relieved  of  so  much  as 
he  had  so  spent. 

Sir  William  Laxton,  founder  of  the  school  and 
almshouses,  was  a  native  of  Oundle,  who  acquired 
wealth  in  London,  becoming  an  alderman  and  mayor 


'*  Hearne  notci  that  Stow  «ay8 : 
'Called  the  Bery-itede,  for  that  it  wat  a 
beriege  in  time  of  pcit.' 

••  .Many  extract!  are  given  in  Canon 
W.  Smalley  Law'i  Oundle'i  Story  24-46 
from  which  the  text  it  taken  ;  liiti  of  the 
freeholderi  and  copyholderi  are  printed, 
pp.  45-'i-     The  lurvey  it  kept  at  Biggin. 

*•  Dr.  Law  tayi  the  itocki  were    later 


moved  to  the  wcit  end  of  the  town,  by 
Jeiui   Church. 

*'  The  houie  now  called  Berryitede  it 
on  a  different  lite. 

"'Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1667-8,  p.  255. 
See  Moreton,  Nal.  Hiii.  0/  Norlhanti. 
310-313;  Norlhcnii.  N.  and  p,  i,  102; 
Dr.  Law  (op.  cit.  41)  give i  later  inttancet. 

*•  W.  Smallry  Law,  op.  cit.  85. 

88 


*•  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1655,  p.  149. 

"  Ibid.  1666-7,  p.  53. 

"  G.   C.   Willianiton,  Traders'  Tokens, 

893- 

"  Hist.  MSS.   Com.  Rep.  xiv  (6),  282-3 

*'  W.  Smalley  Law,  op.  cit.  108. 

"  Ibid.  100. 

«"  //.)/.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  x  (4),  31. 

•"  W.  Smalley  Law,  op.  cit.  1 14. 


!»'■■ 


OuNDLE  :    Old  \'ii\v  of  St.  Osyth's  Lane 


*        ^ 


t^'if 


.  VUMiir. 


\  >r 


^x 


a«  .'•^-.  w-* 


'\>ar  m.    -^-..i... 


V 


..<S 


'^'-W. 


A*, 


JEl 


OUNDLE    IN     I  710 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


(1544).    He  died  in  1556  and  was  buried  in  St.  Mary 
Aldermary." 

Less  attractive  were  two  other  natives — the  fanatic 
William  Hacket  (d.  1591)  and  his  associate  or  disciple 
Giles  Wigginton  (d.  c.  1597).  The  former  was  expected 
to  inaugurate  a  new  religious  era,  but  as  his  disciples 
talked  of  dethroning  the  queen,  he  came  under  the 
suspicions  of  the  Government  and  was  ultimately 
executed  at  the  Cross  in  Cheapside,  London.  Wig- 
ginton's  extreme  Puritanism  brought  him  into  conflict 
with  Whitgift  and  he  was  deprived  of  his  vicarage  of 
Sedbergh  ;  ultimately,  however,  he  was  restored.  He 
wrote  some  theological  works. 

Peter  Hansted  (d.  1645)  was  born  at  Oundle  and 
educated  at  Cambridge,  but  had  the  D.D.  degree 
given  him  at  Oxford  in  1642.  He  published  various 
comedies  and  a  poem  in  praise  of  tobacco ;  also 
several  sermons.   He  died  at  Banbury  during  the  siege. 

John  Newton  (d.  1678),  brought  up  at  Oundle  but 
ipringing  from  a  Devonshire  family,  was  educated  at 
Oxford,  and  distinguished  himself  as  a  mathematician 
and  author  of  school  books.  He  was  also  a  firm 
royalist  and  after  1660  received  promotion,  becoming 
a  canon  of  Hereford  in  1672. 

Richard  Resbury  was  vicar  of  Oundle  during  the 
Commonwealth  period,'^  but  resigned  before  1662 
and  practised  physic,  preaching,  however,  in  his  own 
house  at  Oundle.  His  son  Nathaniel  was  baptised 
at  Oundle  in  1643,  educated 
at  Cambridge,  and  being  a 
conformist  obtained  various 
benefices,  becoming  chaplain 
to  William  and  Mary  in  1691. 
He  died  at  Reading  in  171 1. 

The  Whitwells  were  another 
local  family.  William  Whit- 
well  settled  in  the  house  now 
known  as  Berrystead  about 
1680.  John  Whitwell,  who 
took  the  name  of  Griffin,  was 
born  at  Oundle  in  1719  and 
had  a  distinguished  military 
career,  finally  becoming  field  marshal  (1796).  In  1784 
he  was  allowed  the  title  of  Lord  Howard  of  Walden 
(4th  baron)  in  right  of  his  mother,  and  was  created 
Lord  Braybrooke  in  1788.     He  died  in  1797. 

Stephen  Bramston,  a  lawyer,  resided  at  Bramston 
House  about  1700.  James  Yorke  Bramston,  son  of 
John  Bramston,  born  at  Oundle  1763,  while  studying 
law  with  Charles  Butler,  became  a  Catholic  and  ulti- 
mately a  bishop,  being  Vicar-apostolic  of  the  London 
district  in  1827.     He  died  1 1  July  1836. 

Wynne  Ellis,  born  at  Oundle  in  1790,  made  a 
fortune  in  business  in  London  and  became  famous  as  a 
picture  collector ;  44  of  his  pictures  are  in  the 
National  Gallery.  He  also  gave  large  sums  to 
charities,  including  ^^50,000  to  Simeon's  Trustees. 
He  died  in  1875. 

Thomas  DLx,  usher  of  the  school,  wrote  on  land 
surveying  (1799)  ;  one  of  his  illustrations  is  a  plan  of 
the  fields  in  N.E.  Oundle. 


Whitwell  of  Berry- 
stead.  Azure  three  grif- 
fons' heads  razed  or. 


Miles  Joseph  Berkeley,  F.R.S.,  born  at  Biggin  in 
1803,  was  a  distinguished  botanist ;  he  became  vicar 
of  Sibbenofi,  1868,  and  died  in  1889." 

Other  men  of  note  were  connected  with  Oundle  by 
residence.  Robert  Wild,  a  puritan  divine,  ejected 
from  his  benefice  in  1662,  at  last  settled  in  Oundle, 
where  he  died  in  1679.  Dr.  Anthony  Tuckney, 
ejected  from  the  mastership  of  St.  John's  College, 
Cambridge,  after  the  Restoration,  and  William 
Dillingham,  similarly  ejected  from  the  mastership  of 
Emmanuel,  passed  some  of  their  later  years  in  Oundle. 
Dillingham's  brother  was  the  conforming  vicar.  John 
Noorthouck,  author  of  a  History  of  London,  etc., 
passed  the  end  of  his  life  at  Oundle,  dying  in  1816." 
Thomas  Hayncs,  of  Oundle,  wrote  several  books  on 
gardening,  181 1-2. 

King  Edgar  in  972  confirmed  to  the 
MANORS  monks  of  Peterborough  the  '  tun  '  called 
OUNDLE,  with  all  that  lies  thereto, 
called  the  Eight  Hundreds,  and  market  and  toll, 
so  freely  that  neither  king,  bishop,  earl  nor  sheriff 
may  interfere,  but  only  the  abbot.*^  This  was  con- 
firmed by  later  kings.^'  In  1086  the  abbot  had 
6  hides  in  Oundle.  The  mill  was  let  for  20s.  and 
250  eels.  There  were  50  acres  of  meadow,  and  woodland 
of  3  leagues  by  2  leagues ;  when  stocked,  worth  20i. 
The  market  yielded  25/.  The  whole  was  worth 
5j.  in  1066,  but  in  1086  ;^ii.^'  Land  in  Thurning, 
Winwick,  Luddington  and  Hemington  belonged 
to  this  lordship.  Some  forty  years  later  the  abbot 
held  6  hides  in  demesne  in  Oundle.^'  Yet  another 
document  of  the  same  date  states  that  there  were 
4  hides  geldable,  out  of  which  25  men  held  20  yard- 
lands,  and  rendered  20/.,  40  hens,  and  200  eggs. 
The  men  of  the  town  had  9  ploughs,  .-ind  ploughed 
once  a  week  in  autumn  for  the  lord  ;  and  other  works 
were  done.  Tiiere  were  15  burgesses,  who  ren- 
dered 30'.  The  market  rendered  £^  y.,  and  the 
mill  40/.  and  200  eels.  The  abbot  kept  the  wood  in 
his  own  hand.  The  men  of  the  town  and  6  ox-herds 
rendered  5/.  chevage.  The  church  pertained  to  the 
altar  of  the  abbey .^' 

Richard  I  gave  40  acres  in  the  manor  of  Oundle 
to  be  free  of  all  exactions.*'*  Henry  III  in  1268 
granted  a  yearly  fair  on  the  morrow  of  the  Ascension 
and  for  fourteen  days  following  at  the  manor  of 
Oundle  ;*i  and  in  1304  Edward  I  granted  the  monks 
free  warren  in  their  demesne  lands  of  Oundle  and 
Biggin.*^  In  1316  the  tenants  of  Oundle  and  its 
members  were  the  abbot  of  Peterborough,  the  abbot 
of  Crowland  (for  Elmington),  and  Hugh  de  Gorham 
(for  Churchfield,  etc.)P 

Burgesses  have  been  mentioned  above.  An  "  R., 
abbot  of  Burg,"  Robert  of  Lindsey  (1214-22),  con- 
firmed various  liberties  to  the  men  of  Oundle  :  they 
were  quit  of  all  tallage,  and  might  marry  their 
daughters  as  they  pleased  ;  they  were,  however,  to 
reap  three  days  in  the  autumn,  the  abbot  providing 
food  for  them  on  one  day,  and  to  pay  pannage.  The 
abbot  reserved  all  pleas  of  the  portman-mote  and  all 
customs  belonging  to  the  market.     For  these  liberties 


"  Xorltanis.  .V.  and  Q.  iv,  49. 

"  Cat.  S.  P.  Dom.  1653-4,  p.  31. 

"  Nortbants.  N.  and  Q.  iv,  221. 

'*  These  notes  are  chiefly  from  Diet. 
Nat.  Biog.,  supplemented  \>y  the  local 
information  in  Canon  Law's  Oundle's 
Story. 


"  Birch,  Cartul.  Sax.  iii,  582.  Oundle 
is  called  a  '  former  possession  '  by  Hugh 
Candidus  (Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script,  ii, 

■7)- 
"  Cat.  Chart.  R.  i,  22;    li,   142,  485; 

iv,  4,  8,  274,  276,  278  ;  Rol.  Cart.  (Rec. 

Com.),  82. 


"  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  313.     For  the 
Woodland,  see  ibid.  280.         "  Ibid.  367. 
"  Liber  Niger  (Camden  Soc.  47),  158. 
•K  Cart.  Antiq.  x  (2). 
«'  Cal.  Chart.  R.  ii,  101. 
«•  Ibid,  iii,  43. 
•>  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  28. 


89 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


the  annual  rent  of  ^^5  19/.  "jd.  due  to  the  abbey 
was  increased  to  ^12  l/j.  6i/.**  The  value  of  the 
manor  of  Oundle  and  the  grange  of  Biggin  was 
assessed  at  ^44  \\s.  a  year  in  1291.*^  In  addition  to 
the  burgesses  there  were  franklins  and  virgaters  (or 
semi-virgaters).*'* 

A  long  account  of  the  abbey's  rights  in  OUNDLE 
and  BIGGIN  was  compiled  in  1321  after  the  death 
of  Abbot  Godfrey.  In  the  town  was  a  capital  messuage, 
with  dovecote  and  two  water  mills;  also  170  acres 
arable  land,  with  meadow  and  pasture.  At  Biggin 
were  200  acres  arable  land  in  demesne,  and  other 
260  acres  newly  brought  under  the  plough  and  there- 
fore worth  only  id.  an  acre  ;  also  a  park  ;  two  free 
tenants  rendered  js.  and  a  pound  of  cummin.  There 
were  37  free  tenants  in  Oundle,  holding  24  burgages, 
and  rendering  £10^.  i\d.  ;  ten  natives  with  8  virgates 
of  land,  rendering  £4  ;  twelve  natives  with  7  virgates. 


Market  Place 


rendering  £i  i^s.  \d.  ;  with  various  boon  works. 
The  portman-mote  and  market  tolls  yielded  53J.  ^d.  ; 
and  there  was  another  court  worth  y.  \d.  a  year. 
The  total  was  £43  I  u.**  At  an  enquiry  de  quo  warranto 
in  1329  the  abbot  claimed,  among  other  things, 
'  through  toll '  at  Oundle,  as  held  by  his  predecessors, 
viz.,  for  each  sack  of  wool  zd.,  each  horse  load  iW., 
bundle  on  a  man's  back  \d.,  cartload  of  merchandise 
zd.,  and  other  dues  for  animals  and  wine.  He  alleged 
that  in  former  times  there  was  no  common  way 
through  Oundle,  on  account  of  the  inundation  of  the 
waters,  and  this  toll  was  granted  for  licence  to  pass 
through  the  abbot's  land  and  make  two  bridges 
(at  the  cost  of  the  county)  on  this  soil."  A  rental 
of  April  1400  shows  that  the  burgages  were  then 
held  at  varying  rents,  but  4J.  was  a  usual  sum ; 
suit  to  the  oven  and  portman-mote,  and  other  customs 
were  in  force.  Sometimes  there  were  several  tenants 
for  one  burgage.  The  burgesses'  charter  is  mentioned, 
but  not  recited.  The  list  of  the  free  tenants  is  headed 


by  John  Wakirlee,  who  held  one  carucate  of  land, 
paying  l2s.  rent  and  providing  reapers  at  harvest 
time  ;  if  he  brewed,  there  was  id.  for  ale  toll ;  pan- 
nage, id.  for  each  pig.  His  tenants  also  rendered 
\d.  rent,  ale  toll  and  pannage,  and  did  reaping.** 
About  the  same  time  the  fields  were  measured ; 
Inhamfield,  Howefield,  and  Holmfield  are  names." 
In  1565  a  freehold  tenement  in  Hillfield  was  recorded 
thus  :  '  This  was  a  manor  in  Wakerlees'  days 
and  kept  a  court  baron  upon  the  same,  which  is  now 
dismembered  because  the  land  is  sold  to  divers 
persons.'* 

Of  the  tenants  there  is  little  to  be  told.  Vivien 
de  Churchfield  held  J  hide  in  Oundle  in  the  time  of 
Henry  I,"  having  received  it  from  Abbot  Thorold 
(1070-98),  together  with  \  hide  in  Warmington, 
to  be  held  by  serjeanty  of  serving  as  the  abbot's 
knight  with  two  horses  and  arms.'^  This  probably 
descended  like  Churchfield.  In  1400 
Lord  Fitz  Walter  held  in  right  of  his  wife, 
daughter  of  Sir  John  Devereux,  a  free 
tenement  formerly  belonging  to  Hugh  de 
Gotham."  There  are  a  few  fines  con- 
cerning tenements  in  Oundle,  among 
which  may  be  mentioned  those  by  which 
John  de  Grey  obtained  (1259-61)  a 
messuage  and  land  from  John  de  Suleny 
and  a  similar  tenement  from  William 
de  Musca  and  Joan  his  wife.'*  In  1345 
Thomas  de  Pabenham  held  50/.  rent  of 
Roger  de  Grey  from  a  carucate  of  land 
in  Oundle  occupied  by  Basilia,  widow 
^.^^^  of  John  de  Croyland.'* 

"  William  Cook  of  Oundle,  who  died  in 

1503,  held  messuages  and  land  there  of 
the  abbot ;  his  heir  was  his  son  Richard, 
aged  seven.'®  Richard  Chamberlain  died  in  1624, 
holding  messuages  etc.  in  Oundle  of  the  king  as  of  his 
manor  of  East  Greenwich,  lately  belonging  to  the 
Minoresses  of  .'\ldgate."  From  depositions  taken  a 
few  years  before,  it  appears  he  had  land  by  the  North 
Bridge,  Howehill  fields,  Pexlcy,  Windmill  fields,  St. 
Stithes  fields.  Further  Marsh,  Higher  Marsh,  Hey 
furlong,  the  Long  Leaze  beneath  the  Fleet,  and 
TwidaUs  Crowder  meadow.'*  Other  religious  houses 
having  lands  here  were  the  priory  of  Fineshade,"  the 
college  of  Fotheringhay,*'  and  the  Hospitallers.*' 

The  abbot's  grange  or  manor  of  Biggin  has  been 
mentioned  above.  Fulk  de  Lisures,  forester  to 
Henry  II,  made  a  purpresture  upon  the  demesnes 
of  Oundle  which  William  his  son  quitclaimed 
to  Abbot  Benedict  (U77-93).  The  abbot  then  built 
there  New  Place,  or  Biggin  Grange.*-  Geoffrey  Cras 
later  released  to  the  abbey  his  land  in  the  Biggin, 
the  '  new  place  of  the  monks.'*'  In  1285-91,  Gilbert 
de  Clare,  carl  of  Gloucester,  laid  claim  to  the  manor. 


_^# 

''*'^ii 


"  Black  nook  of  Peterborough  (Soc. 
Antiq.),  f,  lybd. 

*^  Pope  S<ch.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com),  55. 

"•  Note  hj  Mr.  W.  T.  Mcllowi,  citing 
an  old  abbey  rental. 

••Sparkc,  Hiit.  Angl.  Script,  iii,  188-90. 

•'  Plae.  dt  Quo  War.  (Rec.  Com.),  553, 

557- 

••  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C.  vii,  f.  107.  It  ii 
itated  that  lome  burgagei  which  had 
come  into  the  abbot'i  handi  had  been 
turned  into  cottagei. 

"Ibid.  (.  154,/. 


'"  \V.  Smallcy  Law,  op.  cit.  30. 

"  A'.C.//.  Norihanls.  i,  367,  'one 
•mall  virgate.' 

"  Cbron.  Pelrob.  175. 

'•  Cott.  MS.  loc.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  r.  Northanti.  44  Hen.  Til, 
no.  728  ;  4;  Hen.  Ill,  no.  795. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  viii,  598. 

'•  Ibid.  Hen.  VII,  ii,  742.  Hii  will  ii 
at    Canterbury    (Hist.    MSS.   Com.   Rfp., 

viii-  3.U)- 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ler.  ii),  ccccviii,  147. 
Hit   heir  wai  hit  brother   Robert,   who 

90 


married  .\nne  Rowlands,  widow, and  made 
hiB  will  in  1607. 

'»  Eich.  I)ep«.  18  Jas.  I,  Mich.  15. 

'•  Add.  Chart.  7570. 

•"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  («er.  ii)  »x,  29; 
Ciil.  Pal.  1404-1509,  p.  587. 

"  VV.  Smallcy  Law,  op.  cit.  33. 

•■  Pytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northanti. 
Rec.  Soc),  76n.  Cott  MS.  Clco.  C.  ii, 
f.   I5d. 

"Ibid.  f.  73d.  He  received  tenements 
(Crassfee)  in  Oundle  as  compensation  ; 
Pytchley's  Reg.  f.  95. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


alleging  that  it  was  not  appurtenant  to  Oundle, 
as  the  abbot  claimed,  but  was  a  member  of  the  honour 
of  Clare.**  The  plea  is  said  to  have  been  ended  by  the 
sudden  death  of  Earl  Gilbert  (Dec.  1295),  and  the 
abbot  retained  the  manor.'*" 

After  the  dissolution  of  the  abbey  the  king's 
ministers  in  1546  returned  as  profits  of  the  manor 
of  Oundle  the  mill,  the  manor  of  Biggin,  and  various 
minor  profits,  as  the  oven,  fishery  (at  farm),  the 
custom  called  Tolchester  ale,  tolls  of  fair  and  market, 
and  pannage.**  The  steward  was  Sir  Robert  Tyrwhitt, 
and  the  bailiff  Gilbert  Pickering,  both  appointed 
in  1543.**  This  lordship  was  among  those  assigned 
as  jointure  to  Queen  Katherine  Howard  in  1542,*' 
and  then  in  1543  to  her  successor,  Queen  Katherine 
Parr  ;**  the  latter  held  until  her  death  in  1548.  Then 
on  26  January  1549-50  Edward  VI  granted  to  John 
earl  of  Bedford  the  manors  of 
Oundle  and  Biggin,  with  fairs, 
markets,  and  sheriflf's  tourn  in 
Oundle,  with  other  lands,  to 
be  held  by  the  fortieth  part 
of  a  knight's  fee,  and  render- 
ing for  Oundle  ^^39  ip.  li.** 
He  died  in  1555,  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  Francis. 
Two  new  fairs  on  the  feasts 
of  St.  Valentine  (14  Feb.)  and 
St.  Lawrence  (10  Aug.)  were 
granted,  and  the  survey  al- 
ready cited  was  made  for  this 
earl    in    1565.     He    died    on 

28  July,  1585,  having  in  1580  settled  the  manors  of 
Oundle  and  Biggin  on  his  wife  Bridget,  with  re- 
mainder to  his  eldest  son  Francis.  This  son  having 
died  the  day  before  his  father,  the  succession  passed 
to  his  son  Edward,  then  aged  1 3.**  Edward  died  on 
I  May  1627,  without  issue,  and  was  succeeded  in  the 
title  and  entailed  estates  by  his  cousin  Francis  (son 
of  William),  but  the  heir  general  was  Anne,  daughter 
of  John,  son  of  Francis,  the  2nd  earl,  and  wife  of 
Henry  Somerset  Lord  Herbert,''  who  in  1628  suc- 
ceeded his  father  as  earl  of  Worcester. 

A  dispute  as  to  a  court  leet  at  Oundle,  between 
Francis  earl  of  Bedford,  as  lord  of  the  manor,  and 
Sir  Edward  Montagu,  as  lord  of  the  hundred,  about 
1630,  shows  what  were  the  customs.  The  former 
argued  that  the  grant  of  the  manor  to  the  first  earl, 
as  it  included  the  sheriff's  tourn,  proved  his  claim, 
while  the  latter  insisted  on  the  grant  of  the  hundred 
to  his  predecessor.  Sir  Edward  Montagu.  The  abbots 
of  Peterborough  had  kept  a  leet  of  the  hundred, 
and  the  residents  and  inhabitants  of  Oundle  had  done 
suit  and  service  at  it.  Two  eminent  lawyers,  to  whom 
the  matter  was  referred,  agreed  that  the  old  leet 
was  of  the  hundred,  not  of  the  manor,  and  that  the 
earl's  tenants  in  Oundle  were  not  discharged  of  suit 
to  it.     No  new  court  had  been  created.      The  sum 


Russell,  Earl  of  Bed- 
ford. Argent  a  Uon 
guUi  and  a  chief  sable 
charged  with  three  scal- 
lops argent. 


\ 

T7' 

I    y 

\ 

w 

# 

^-^^^'^ 

MI 

m 

tourn,  belonged  to  the  manor ;  also  8;.  for  the  view 
of  frankpledge.  There  might  be  suits  for  anything 
under  40J.  in  the  manor  court,  although  the  manor 
was  within  the  hundred.  Goods  of  felons  and  fugi- 
tives also  pertained  to  the  manor.  As  to  fines  and 
amercements  there  was  a  doubt  ;  they  probably 
belonged  to  the  hundred.'^ 

The  story  about  this  time  is  not  clear.  Edward 
earl  of  Bedford  and  Lucy  his  wife  in  1614  gave 
the  grange  of  Biggin,  with  its  appurtenances  in 
Oundle,  Barnwell  and  Southwick,  to  trustees,** 
and  later  in  the  same  year  they  demised  the  manor 
house  of  Oundle  (i.^.,  the  Berrystead),  with  its  dove- 
cote, lands  etc.  to  John  Okes  for  99  years,"*  and 
this  term  or  a  fresh  one  became  vested  in  Sir  James 
Evington  in  1632-33.*^  The  manor  itself,  with  the 
rectory  and  the  advowson  of  the  vicarage,  are  stated 
in  a  fine  of  1629  to  be  in 
the  hands  of  Henry  earl  of 
Worcester  and  Anne  his  wife 
and  John  Somerset,  son  and 
heir  apparent  of  the  earl  ;  *' 
this  was  probably  Anne's  in- 
heritance. Mention  of  the 
rectory  and  advowson  seems 
to  be  a  mistake.  The  rectory, 
which  had  a  manor  of  its 
own,  had  been  sold  by  James  I 
in  1607  to  Sir  Thomas  Mon- 
son  and  William  Darwyn,  but 
the  advowson  of  the  vicarage 
was  retained   by  the  Crown.' 

On  this  point,  therefore,  the  fine  of  1629  is  mis- 
leading. John  Somerset  died  soon  afterwards, 
and  in  1636  the  manor  of  Oundle,  with  the 
rectory  and  advowson,  ten  messuages,  three  water 
mills,  dovecote,  lands,  etc.,  in  Oundle,  Barnwell,  and 
Southwick  was  held  by  his  brother  Edward,  then  son 
and  heir  apparent  of  the  earl  of  Worcester.^  It  is 
probable  that  he  wished  to  sell  it,  for  the  earl  of 
Manchester,  writing  to  his  brother,  Lord  Montagu, 
says  :  '  The  last  time  I  spoke  to  my  lord  of  Worcester 
he  told  me  he  thought  his  son  would  sell  Oundle. 
I  accepted  of  his  offer.  .  .  .  The  place  is  so  fit  for  you 
as  I  imagine  you  will  strain  your  purse  or  sell  some 
other  land  to  have  this.'*  The  Montagus  did  not  get 
it,  and  in  1650  Henry  earl  of  Worcester  was  a 
vouchee  in  a  recovery  of  the  manor.*  The  manor 
and  part  at  least  of  the  lands  were  held  by  Sir  Gilbert 
Pickering  and  Elizabeth  his  wife  in  1662,'  but  in 
1676  William  earl  of  Powis,  Elizabeth  his  wife, 
Henry  earl  of  Norfolk  and  Henry  his  son  and  heir 
apparent  held  the  manor  of  Oundle  with  the  rectory 
and  advowson  of  the  vicarage.  Warranty  was  to  be 
given  by  the  heirs  of  Elizabeth,*  who  was  the  younger 
daughter  of  the  above-named  Edward  (Somerset),  mar- 
quis of  Worcester  ;  her  elder  sister  Anne  had  married 
the  earl  (later,  duke)  of  Norfolk,  and  this  accounts 


Somerset,  Earl  of  Wor- 
cester. France  quar- 
tered tvith  England  tn 
a  border  gobony  argent 
and  azure. 


of  6s.  lod.  for  20J  yardlands,  in  respect  of  the  sheriff's      for  her  husband  and  son  being  named  in  the  fine. 


"  Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script,  iii,  148  ; 
Rolls  of  Parlt.  i,  69. 

"•Pytchlcy's  Reg.  f.  138. 

"  Mini,  .\ccts.  Hen.  VIII,  2661. 

••  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VUl  xviii  (i),  p.  545, 
546. 

"  Ibid,  xvi,  p.  716. 

"  Ibid.  lix  (1),  644. 

"  Pat.  R.  3  Edw.  VI,  pt.  7,  m.  43. 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  ii),  ccxi,  183. 

"  Ibid,  ccccxxxv,  118. 

"  Bridges,  Hut.  Nortbants.  ii,  407, 
citing  the  Duke  of  Montagu'i  evi- 
dence!. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  1 1  Jaj.  I. 

•*  Ibid.  Trin.  12  Jas.  I. 

»  Ibid.  Easter.  8  Chas.  I ;  Hilary 
8  Chas.  I. 

91 


I. 


»•  Ibid.  Divers    Cos.  Easter  5  Cha 
'  Pat.  R.  5  Jas.  I,  pt.  19. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  1 1  Chas.  I. 
>  Buccleuch   MSS.    (Hist.    MSS.    Com. 

Rep.)  i,  276. 

•  Com.   Pleas   Recov.  R.    Mich.    1650, 
m.  21. 

'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  1 4  Chai.II. 

•  Ibid.  HU.  27/28  Chas.  II. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  earl  (later,  marquis)  of  Powis  refused  to  accept 
the  Revolution  of  1688  and  went  into  exile  with 
James  II,  dying  at  St.  Germains  in  1696.  Being  out- 
lawed, his  estates  were  confiscated,  and  in  1691  it  was 
found  on  inquiry  that  he  had  held  the  manor  of 
Oundle,  with  court  baron,  market,  three  fairs,  water 
mill,  lime  kiln,  Park  Wood, 
Hills  Wood,  Pexley  Wood, 
Hall  Wood,  Parson's  Wood, 
the  capital  messuage  called 
the  Berrystead  and  site  of  the 
manor  (late  in  the  possession 
of  Bridget  Page  and  then  of 
Thomas  Manning),  also  the 
manor  of  Biggin,  with  appur- 
tenances in  several  adjacent 
parishes.'  The  estates  were 
in  1696  granted  to  William 
Earl  of  Rochford*  but  were 
eventuaUyrestored  to  theMar- 

quis  of  Powis's  son  William  (d.  1745),*  who  sold  Oundle 
and  Biggin  together  with  Benefield  in  1724.  to  James 
Jove.  He  died  in  1741  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Charles  who  died  unmarried  in  1776.  Charles  was  fol- 
lowed by  his  brother  Peter  Joje  of  the  Inner  Temple, 
who  by  his  wiU  proved  in  17821"  left  his  property  to  his 
wife  Anne  for  life  with  remainder  to  his  sisters  Eliza- 
beth and  Jane.  Anne  married  as  her  second  husband 
Sir  Isaac  Pocock  and  died  in  l8l8,i'  being  predeceased 
by  her  sisters-in-law.  The  trustees  under  the  will  of 
the  survivor  Jane  Joye^^  sold  the  property  in  1822  to 
Jesse  Watts   Russell,  who  had  taken  the  additional 


Herbert,  Earl  of  Powis. 
Party  azure  and  guUs 
three  lions  argent. 


Watts.  Azure  a  bend 
engrailed ermtnois  between 
two  crescents  or  xotth  a 
quarter  gules. 


Russell.  Ermine  a  lion 
gules  with  a  collar  argent 
and  a  chief  azure  with 
three  roses  argent  thereon. 


name  of  Watts  on  his  marriage  with  Mary  daughter 
of  David  Pike  Watts  of  Portland  Place.  He  was 
succeeded  in  1875  ^X  ^'^  son  Jesse  David  Watts 
Russell,  M.P.  for  North  Staffordshire  (1879)  whose 
eldest  daughter  Josephine  married  Sir  Arthur  Birch, 
K.C.M.G.  Their  son  Capt.  Arthur  Egerton  Watts 
Russell  (who  took  the  name  of  Watts  Russell  in  1898) 
died  in  1923  leaving  a  son  David.  Mrs.  Watts 
Russell  of  Biggin  Hall,  is  now  lady  of  the  manor. 

The   Court    Rolls    begin   in   October    1678.     The 
market  dues  are  still  paid  to  the  lord  of  the  manor.*^' 


The  RECTOR!'  MANOR  has  been  mentioned  in 
the  preceding  account.  Nothing  is  known  of  the 
conditions  while  it  was  in  the  possession  of  the  rectors 
of  ..he  parish  ;  the  rector  about  1400  paid  2J.  a  year 
for  free  entry  to  the  fields.*'  When  the  vicarage  was 
constituted  the  rectory  was  appropriated  to  the  monks 
of  Peterborough  and  shared  the  fate  of  their  other 
estates.  In  1546  John  Nox  farmed  the  rectory  for 
^55  13/.  \d.  a  year,i*  and  in  1590  the  Crown  granted 
the  rectory,  with  the  advowson  of  the  vicarage,  to 
Sir  Anthony  Mildmay,  Grace  his  wife,  and  Mary  their 
daughter,  for  life."  Mary  became  Countess  of  West- 
morland and  died  in  1640,  when  this  grant  would 
expire.  As  already  stated  it  was  sold  by  James  I  to 
Sir  Thomas  Mounson  and  WiUiam  Darwyn  with  all 
rights,  court,  view  of  frank  pledge,  etc.,  except  the 
advowsons  of  churches,  vicarages,  etc.,  to  be  held  in 
socage  of  the  manor  of  East  Greenwich  at  a  perpetual 
rent  of  j^39  6s.  Sd.  ;  ecclesiastical  dues  were  to  be  paid 
also,  including  6s.  Sd.  a  year  to  the  poor  and  ^^i  3  6s.  Sd. 
to  the  vicar  of  Oundle. ** 

In  1674  the  rectory  manor  was  acquired  by  Bernard 
Walcott  from  William  Page  and  Bridget  his  wife,  as 
the  manor  of  the  rectory  of  Oundle  and  the  rectory 
with  its  tithes,  etc.,  two  messuages,  30  acres  of  land, 
dovecote,  etc. ;  i'  and  Bernard  Walcott  and  Elizabeth 
(Page)  his  wife  were  in  possession  in  1680.**  Out  of 
the  Crown's  reserved  rent  ^32  13^.  ^d.  a  year  was 
granted  by  James  I  to  his  queen  Anne**  and  by 
Charles  I  to  Queen  Henrietta  Maria.^"*  Later  it  was 
sold  and  shared  by  various  persons,^*  whose  rights 
were  purchased  in  1750  by  William  Walcott,^^  who 
thus  held  the  rectory  clear  of  the  rent  to  the  Crown. 
Dr.  WilUam  Walcott,  who  died  in  1806,  left  (by  his 
wife  Mary  Creed)  a  son  William,  after  whose  death  in 
1827,  aged  74,  the  property  went  to  the  Simcoe  family, 
who  disposed  of  it.''  The  rectory  manor  was 
purchased  by  John  Smith,  who  was  succeeded  by  his 
son  John  WilUam  Smith,  of  a  local  family  of  brewers 
and  bankers.  The  dues  included  mortuaries  and 
Easter  dues,  called  '  Apron  money '  in  Oundle, 
because  the  tradesmen  were  the  chief  contributors ; 
these  were  originally  fixed  at  2d.  per  head,  but  ulti- 
mately stood  at  is.  2^d.  per  house.^''  About  1870  the 
court  of  the  rectory  manor  was  held  every  two  or 
three  years. 

CHURCHFIELD  occurs  as  Ciricfeld  in  an  ancient 
account  of  the  boundaries  of  a  pieceof  land  atOundle.*' 
Abbot  Thorold  gave  Vivian  \  hide  in  Circafeld"  as 
well  as  the  \  hide  in  Oundle  already  mentioned,  and 
he  held  it  c.  1125.^'  He  was  succeeded  by  Henry 
Angevin,  who  was  living  in  1 133  and  1 163,  and 
he  by  William  Angevin  before  1 169,  who  left  a 
widow  Ismania.^*  Baldric  the  Angevin,  his  son, 
held  a  knight's  fee  in  Churchfield,  Warmington 
and  Oundle  in  1189,^'  and  acquired  32  acres  in 
Churchfield  from  Matefrei  the  dispenser  in  1202,** 
and  was  witness  to  a  charter  of  Abbot  Robert  de 


'  Excheq.  Spec.  Com.  6806 ;  Cal.  S.  P. 
Dom.  1691-2,  p.  545;    1693,  p.  447. 

•  Pat.  R.  8  Will.  HI,  pt.  6. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Nurthanti.  Trin.  10  Geo.  I. 
"P.C.C.  548  Goieling, 

"Berry,  County  Geneal.  Berkt,  118; 
In.tit.  Bki.  fP.R.O.). 

'•  Priv.  Acti,  I  Geo.  IV,  cap.  31; 
P.C.C.  190  Blihop. 

"•  Information  of  Mr.  L.  M.  Hewlett. 

'•  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C.  vii,  f.  ro;. 


"Minj.  Acct).  Hen.  VIII,  n.  2661. 

"  Pat.  R.  3i  Eliz.  pt.  19. 

"Pat.  R.  5  Jame»  I,  pt.  19. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  15/26 
Chai.   II. 

"Ibid.   Mich.   32  Cha».   II. 

'•  Pat.  R.  II  Ja..  I,  pt.  13. 

"  Pat.  R.  2  Ch.:i.  I,  pt.  4. 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Nortlianti.  Hil.  z  Will,  and 
Mary  ;   Trin.  9  Geo.  I. 

"Ibid.    Trin.    24   Geo.    II.     The   dc- 

92 


forcianls  were  Elizabeth  Horton,  widow, 
James  Horton,  and  Thomas  Roane. 

"W.  Smallcy  Law,  op.  cit.  98,  121-3, 
130.  "  Ibid.  130. 

"  Birch,  Ciriul.  Sa.x.  iii,  368. 

«'  Chron.  Petrob.   175. 

•'  r.C./l.  Northants.  i,  366. 

"  For  this  descent  tee  Pytchley,  Bk.  of 
Fees  (Northants.  Rec.  Soc),  I2i. 

••  Cal.  Chart.  K    iv,  277. 

•»  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  4  John. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


Lindsey  (1214-22).*'  Later  (f  1242)  William  Angevin 
held  J  a  knight's  fee  in  the  three  places  named,*' 
but  he  or  a  son  William  incurred  forfeiture 
in  the  Barons'  war,  his  lands  being  given  to  Philip 
Marmion,  who  afterwards  released  the  same  to  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough.'^  Hugh  de  Gorham  married 
Margery,  daughter  of  William  Angevin,^''  and  in  1289 
did  homage  to  the  abbot  for  lands  in  Churchfield, 
Oundle,  Stokes,  and  Warmington.*^  Hugh  died  in 
1325,  but  in  1312  he  and  Margery  his  wife  gave  the 
reversion  of  this  estate  to  William  de  Gorham  (their 
son)  and  Isabel  his  wife.*"  William  and  Isabel  sold 
the  manor  of  Churchfield  to  Robert  de  Wyvill,  bishop 
of  Salisbury,  in  1332.^  Four  years  later  it  was 
settled  on  Henry  Wyvill  and  Katherinc  his  wife  and 
their  issue,^  and  in  1346  Henry  Wyvill  held  J  knight's 
fee  in  Churchfield,  formerly  the 
estate  of  Geoffrey  Angevin.-"*  Kathe- 
rine,  as  widow  of  Henry,  held  it  in 
1352,  when  it  was  settled  on  Geof- 
frey Blount  and  Margaret  his  wife, 
probably  the  daughter  of  Henry.*" 
Twenty  years  later  (1372)  Walter  de 
Frampton  of  Melcombe  Regis  and 
Margaret  his  wife  had  the  manors 
of  Churchfield  and  Lyveden.*'  From 
this  date  Churchfield  followed  the 
descent  of  Lyveden  in  Aldwinkle 
St.  Peter  (y.f.). 

In  1338  the  abbot  of  Peterborough 
received  licence  to  acquire  in  mort- 
main inUr  alia  33/.  rent  from 
tenementsin  Oundle  called  CL.4RT- 
VAUS  FEE,  the  vendor  being  the 
rector  Robert  de  Croyland.''^  It  does 
not  appear  that  this  '  fee  '  was  a 
manor.  The  surname  occurs  in  1347, 
when  Richard  Aloora  of  Oundle  was 
pardoned  for  the  death  of  Nicholas 
Clerivaux.^'' 

ASWION  (Ascetone,  1086,  Ays- 
ton,  Hen.  I  and  common,  Ashton,  xvi 
cent.)  is  now  a  separate  township, 
formed  in  1885  when  the  adjacent 
hamlet  of  Elmington  was  added  to  it 
abbot  of  Peterborough  held  it  as  4J  hides.  Two  mills 
rendered  40/.  and  325  eels.  It  was  worth  only  8/.  in 
1066,  but  in  1086  j[j.  There  was  a  free  tenant,  Ivo, 
who  held  J  hide,  worth  4J."  About  1 1 25  the  abbot 
held  4  hides  in  demesne,  and  there  were  now  two  free 
tenants,  Ralph  Papilian  and  Levenoth,  holding 
\  hide  each.**  The  descent  of  these  free  tenements 
cannot  be  traced;  they  are  mentioned  in  1321  as 
paying  5/.  each,*'  in  1408  the  fees  formerly  held  by 
John  Papilliun  and  WiUiam  son  of  Ralph  contributed 
lid.  each  to  the  sheriff's  aid**.     Simon  de  Stokes  in 


1242  did  the  service  of  J  knight  for  the  2  hides  and 
one  virgate  he  held  of  the  abbot  in  Stoke,  Ashton  and 
Warmington.*'  Some  13th  century  deeds  ^^  show 
that  there  was  a  family  using  the  local  name,  Robert 
son  of  Adam  de  .'Vyston  making  some  small  gifts."' 
Roger  Malherbe  of  Polebrook  gave  to  the  Hospital  of 
St.  John  Baptist  at  Armston  the  rent  of  a  pound  of 
cummin  due  from  David  de  Ayston  and  Constance  his 
wife  for  land  at  Ashton.'*  The  abbey  of  Peter- 
borough's estate  in  Ashton,  lands,  rents,  miUs,  and 
bakehouse,  was  valued  at  £10  ijs.  \d.  a  year  in 
1 291.5' 

In  1309  Godfrey  abbot  of  Peterborough  and  the 
convent  demised  to  John  de  Croyland  and  Robert  his 
son  for  life  a  messuage  and  3  virgates  of  land  in 
Ashton,  with  the  water  mills,  millpool,  moor,  Yak- 


In  1086  the 


Oundle  :  Paine's  Almshouses 

holme  and  meadow  ;  they  were  to  render  £"]  16/.  %d. 
a  year  and  do  ploughing  and  other  services."  A 
survey  made  in  1 321  shows  that  in  Ashton  there  were 
a  messuage  and  two  water  miUs  ;  in  demesne  were 
102  acres  of  arable  and  10  acres  of  meadow.  Fourteen 
natives  each  held  a  messuage  with  I  virgate  of  land 
(which  would  account  for  3J  hides,  unless  the  '  small 
virgate  '  was  used),  paying  8/.  rent  and  doing  two 
ploughings  at  the  winter  and  Lent  sowings,  and 
reaping  two  days.  Two  other  natives,  holding 
2j  virgates,  rendered  25/.,  and  two  customary  tenants 
held  I  virgate  and  rendered  lis.  ;   but  these  four  did 


"  Pytchley,  Bk.  0}  Fees,  loc.  cit. 

"  Sparlce,  Hut.  Angl.  Script,  iii,  62. 

••  Ibid.  (Swaffham)  cclxxxii  b.  A  Geof- 
fre/Angcvin  was  apparently  holding  about 
that  date  {Feud.  Aiii.  iv.  448).  Godfrey 
Angevin  occurs   in    1235  ;    Bk.  of  Fees, 

5«5- 

••  CM.  Top.  el  Gen.  v,  334. 

"  Cbron.  Petroh.  144. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northantt.  case  175,  file  64, 
no.  127. 

"  Ibid,  case  177,  file  74,  no.  113. 

"  Ibid,  file  75,  no.  152. 


•»  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  448. 

•"  Fe«t  of  F.  Northants.  case  177,  file  79, 
no.  382. 

•'  Ibid.  46  Edw.  III. 

♦'  Cal.  Pat.  1338-40,  p.  56. 

♦»  Ibid.  1345-8,  p.  561.  The  Clerevaus 
family  is  mentioned  in  the  Peterborough 
register  at  the  Society  of  Antiquaries, 
f.  1S4. 

«•  L.G.B.  Order  17763. 

♦'  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  314. 

"  Ibid.  367. 

*'  Sparke,  Hill.  Angl.  Script,  iii,  191. 

93 


•»  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C.  vil,  i.  213. 

"  Sparke,    Htst.   Angl.    Script,   iii,    62. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  41  Hen.  Ill, 
13  Edw.  I. 

"  Harl.  Chart.  45  E.  62-64 ;  Emma 
relict  of  Robert  Areyd  of  Ayston  and 
daughter  of  John  son  of  Hubert  de 
.'Vyston  were  dealing  with  land  in  Pole- 
brook  in  1326.     Buccleuch  Deeds  K  5. 

"Cott.  Chart,  xxvii,  14;  see  Harl. 
Chart.  44,  A. 6. 

"Pope  Nicb.  Tax.  (Rcc.  Com.),  55. 

•«  Cott.  MS.  Cleo.  C.  ii,  f.  83  d. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


no  works.  A  cottar  paid  6d.  rent,  but  worked  for  the 
lord  every  Monday  from  midsummer  to  Michaelmas." 

John  Nor\s7ch  of  Gayton  died  in  1504  holding  a 
messuage  in  Ashton  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  by 
fealty  and  Sd.  rent.  His  wife  Katherine  is  named, 
and  his  son  Simon,  aged  13,  was  heir.'* 

In  1535  the  revenues  of  the  abbey  from  Ashtprt  are 
given.*'  In  1553  the  manor  of  Ashton,  with  manor 
house  and  three  mills,  and  the  rectory,  etc  ,  of  Wil- 
boston,  were  sold  by  the  Crown  to  Hugh  Lawe  and 
Thomas  Lawe,  who  were  to  hold  them  by  the  service 
of  Jj;  knight's  fee.** 

A  dispute  arose  in  1602  between  Sir  Anthony 
Mildmay  and  others  and  Thomas  Lawe  concerning 
the  tithes  of  Ashton  and  its  four  mills.  Three  of  the 
mills  were  corn  mills  under  one  roof;  the  other  was 
a  fuUing  mill.  Defendant  and  his  father  Hugh  Lawe 
were  alleged  to  have  had  the  tithes  by  lease  50  years 
ago.  Robert  Selbie,  a  tanner,  aged  78,  deposed  that 
in  his  youth  the  fulling  mill  was  known  as  the  New 
Mill;  13/.  4^.  used  to  be  paid  as  tithe  for  the  corn 
mills.  Hugh  Lawe  had  transferred  his  lease  of  the 
tithes  to  Mr.  Price  (who  married  Hugh's  daughter), 
and  Sir  Anthony  Mildmay  then  had  it.  He  remem- 
bered the  chapel  of  ease  at  Ashton;  a  priest  called 
Sir  John  said  service  there  in  the  time  of  Henry  VIII, 
and  witness  had  acted  as  his  clerk.  Another  witness 
said  that  the  minor  tithes  were  paid  to  Sir  John  as 
'  chapel  tithes,'  but  the  tithes  of  corn,  wool,  lamb, 
and  the  mills,  with  30^.  2\d.  and  a  few  pence  for  the 
ancient  meadows  belonged  to  the  rectory.  There 
was  mention  of  Sandells  meadow  in  Ashton,  said  to 
belong  to  Oundle.*' 

Thomas  Lawe  died  at  Ashton  in  1628,  holding  the 
manor  of  Ashton,  and  a  capital  messuage  occupied  by 
Peter  Dayrew.  By  a  settlement  made  in  1627  the 
estate  was  to  remain  to  John  Lawe  of  VVigston  (Leics) 
and  then  to  his  brother  Thomas  Lawe  of  Mount 
Sorrell  (Leics)  ;  but  the  heirs  were  Bridget  Aprice, 
widow,  his  sister  ;  Thomas  Aprice,  son  of  Robert 
Aprice  by  Elizabeth  his  wife,  another  sister  ;  John 
Wildbore,  gent.,  son  and  heir  of  Matthew  Wildbore 
and  Elizabeth  his  wife,  one  of  the  daughters  of  John 
Flamsteed  and  Catherine  his  wife,  another  sister  of 
Thomas  Lawe  ;  and  this  Catherine's  four  other 
daughters — MericU  wife  of  William  Gifford,  KLiry 
wife  of  Francis  Muscott,  Joan  wife  of  Roland  Tampian, 
clerk,  and  Catherine  Fowler,  widow.*"  The  brothers 
were  probably  half-brothers  and  therefore  passed  over 
by  the  jury. 

The  estate  was  probably  disposed  of  in  parcels  and 
the  '  manor  '  does  not  occur  again,  though  J.  W. 
Smith  of  the  Rectory,  Oundlc,  was  styled  lord  of  it  in 
1874.'!  A  manor  house  and  a  green  are  marked  on 
the  map  to  the  south  of  the  chapel. 

Peter  Dayrew  or  Darrell,  mentioned  above,  was 
succeeded  by  Newdigate  Paynes,  who  died  at  Ashton 
in  1643,  leaving  a  son  and  heir  Thomas,  aged  14J. 
The  tenure  was  unknown.** 


Croyland  Adbey.  GuUs 
three  knnes  argent  quar- 
tering azure  three  scourges 


Bridges  states  that  about  1710  there  were  25 
families  in  Ashton.*^  About  1870  '  a  few  scattered 
farm  houses '  was  the  description.  The  Hon.  Mrs. 
N.  C.  Rothschild  is  now  the  owner,  with  a  residence 
called   Ashton    Wold. 

In  ELMINCTON,  according  to  a  spurious  charter 
in  Ingulph,  the  abbey  of  Croyland  held  3  hides  of 
land  at  an  early  date,  possession  being  confirmed  by 
Edred  (946-95 5). *■'  Ingulph  says  that  Abbot  Turketul 
gave  this  manor  when  he  became  a  monk.**  In  1086 
the  abbey  had  two  estates 
there  ;  one  hide  was  held  in 
demesne,  with  land  for  one 
plough,  and  was  worth  8s.  in 
1066  and  l6x.  in  1086  ;  two 
hides,  with  land  for  three 
ploughs,  were  worth  12s.  and 
20/.  res[iectively  at  those 
dates.**  In  the  survey  made 
c.  1125  only  one  hide  is  re- 
corded.*' A  fine  in  121 8-9 
between  the  abbot  of  Croyland 
and  Ascelin  de  Waleis  con- 
cerning land  in  Elmington  is 
recorded.**  It  was  found  in 
1276  that  the  abbot's  tenants  in  Elmington  had 
withdrawn  suit  to  the  hundred  court  for  the  last 
24  years  ;  they  had  been  accustomed  to  do  this  suit 
and  pay  lid.  at  the  sheriff's  tourn.*^  In  1 3 16  the 
abbot  of  Croyland  was  lord." 

At  the  dissolution  it  was  found  that  the  abbey  had 
received  £j  los.  from  Elmington,  by  a  demise  made 
in  1534  to  Thomas  Clark  and  Margaret  his  wife  ;  the 
money  was  used  by  the  pittancer  and  almoner."  The 
reversion  of  the  '  manor  and  hamlet '  was  sold  to  Sir 
Robert  Kirkham  in  1542,  it  being  stated  that  Richard 
Clark,  father  of  Thomas,  had  held  it  beforetime  ; 
Kirkham  was  to  hold  by  knight's  service.'*  The  manor 
had  been  included  in  the  jointure  of  Queen  Katherine 
Howard  in  1541,"  but  she  was  executed  a  year  later. 
Sir  Robert  Kirkham,  who  also  acquired  Fineshade, 
which  became  the  seat  of  his  family,  died  in  1558,  while 
the  lease  was  still  in  force.'* 
The  manor  of  Elmington  was 
included  in  a  settlement  made 
by  his  son  William  Kirkham 
the  elder  in  1586.'*  This  settle- 
ment is  recited  in  the  inquisi- 
tion taken  after  his  death  in 
1599,  when  he  was  succeeded 
by  a  son  William,  who  had  a 
brother  Thomas.'*  Walter 
Kirkham  son  of  William  died 
in  1636  holding  the  manor  of 
Elmington  of  the  king  by 
knight's  service  ;  the  heir  was 
his  cousin  Robert  (aged  40), 
son  of  the  above-named  Thomas 
Kirkham,  Anne  his  wife  and  Wa 


000 


Kirkham  of  Fine- 
ahadc.  .Urgent  a  fesse 
piles  xvith  three  bezants 
thereon. 


In  J647  Robert 
Iter  (his  son)  joined 


"  Sparke,  ffiit.  An^l.  Script,  iil,  191. 
"  Cal.  Inq.  p.  m.  Hen.  VII,  ii,  882. 
•'  Valor  Eccl.  (Rtc.  Com.)  iv,  279. 
"  Pat.  R.  7  Edw.  VI    pt.  3. 
"  Exch.     Ucpi.     44     Eliz.     Trin.     4, 
Northantt. 
•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.  m.  (ler.  ii)  ccccUxiv,69. 
•'  Whclan,  Northantt.  716. 
••  Chan.  In<j.  p.  m.  (ler.  ii)  dcclxxvi,  69. 


••  llitl.  Northantt.  ii,  411. 

"  Dugdalc,  Mon.  Angl.  ii,  115. 

•'  Ingulph's  Chron.  (cd.  Birch)  55,  59. 

"  V.C.H.  Northanls.  i,  319. 

•'  Ibid.  387. 

"  Feet  ol  F.  Northantt.  caie  172,  file  14. 

••  Rot.  llund.  (Rec.  Com.)  ii,  14. 

'"  Feuil.  jlidi,  iv,  23. 

"  Mini.  Accti.  Hen.  VIII,  2020. 

94 


'•t.  and  r.  Urn.  VIII,  xvii,  g.   1012 

(4°). 

"  Ibid,  xvi,  p.  716. 

'*  Chan.  Inq. p.m.  (per.  ii),  cxix,  117. 
Will  printed  (but  misdated  1657)  in  Coll. 
Top.  et  Gen.  vii,  44. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  28  Elii. 

'°  Chan.  Inq.  p.  m.  (ler.  ii),  cclxxx,  76. 

'^  Ibid,  cccclxxxi,  104. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


Corpus  Christi  Col- 
lege. GuUi  a  pelican  tn 
ber  piety  argent  quarter- 
ing azure  three  lilies 
argent  with  stalks  and 
leaves  vert. 


in  selling  this  manor  to  Henry  Pickering  ;  warranty 
was  promised  against  the  heirs  of  Sir  Robert  Kirk- 
ham,  the  great  grandfather,  William  the  uncle,  and 
Walter  his  son.'*  Kirkham  was  deeply  in  debt." 

Henry  Pickering  and  Elizabeth  his  wife  were  in 
possession  in  1660.*"  He  was  created  a  baronet  soon 
afterwards,  and  seated  at  Whaddon  in  Cambridgeshire. 
His  father  was  rector  of  Aldwinkle  in  the  Common- 
wealth time  (1647-1657),  and  he  himself  had  been  a 
colonel  in  the  Parliamentary  army.  His  wife  was 
Elizabeth  daughter  of  Sir  Thomas  V'incr.  He  died 
in  1668.*'  The  manor  of  Elmington,  with  a  messuage, 
150  acres  of  land,  etc.,  was  in  1681  secured  to  Sir 
Henry  Pickering,  bart.,'-  but 
was  sold  in  1687  to  Dr.  John 
Spencer,  master  of  Corpus 
Christi  College,  Cambridge, 
and  dean  of  Ely.  The  price 
paid  was  ;£3,6oo  and  the 
estate  was  said  to  be  worth 
£200  a  year.  Dr.  Spencer  gave 
it  to  his  college,  for  the  aug- 
mentation of  the  mastership 
and  other  endowments.  He 
expressed  a  wish  that  the 
master  should  visit  the  estate 
twice  in  three  years.*^  There 
is  now  no  manor  claimed,  but 
the    estate    remains    in    the 

possession  of  the  college.  There  were  two  farm- 
houses in  Elmington  about  1870. 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  47  ft.  by  21  ft.,  with  north 
and  south  chapels,  each  22  ft.  by  17  ft., 
clearstoried  nave  80  ft.  by  20  ft.,  north  and  south  aisles, 
each  18  ft.  wide,  north  and  south  transepts,  each 
36  ft.  by  20  ft.,  south  porch,  and  west  tower  17  ft. 
square,  surmounted  by  a  lofty  spire.  All  these 
measurements  are  internal.  There  is  also  a  two- 
storied  vestry  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel  at 
its  east  end.  The  total  internal  length  of  the  church 
is  153  ft.,  and  the  width  across  nave  and  aisles  62  ft.  ; 
across  the  transepts  the  width  is  98  ft. 

No  portion  of  the  building  is  older  than  the  12th 
century,  but  part  of  a  pre-Conquest  grave-slab,  or 
coffin-lid,  with  plait-work  in  two  panels,*''  found  below 
the  south  transept  about  1904.,  is  probably  a  relic  of 
the  burial  ground  attached  to  the  first  church  on  the 
site. 

The  plan  of  the  existing  building  seems  to  have 
developed  from  a  cruciform  12th-century  church 
with  central  tower,  the  nave  of  which  was  the  same 
width  as  at  present,  and  about  51  ft.  long.  The  tower 
occupied  the  position  of  the  existing  eastern  bay,  with 
transepts  about  18  ft.  long,  extending  north  and 
south,and  the  chancel  wasabout  half  itspresent  length. 
There  is  no  reliable  evidence  of  any  change  of  plan 
before  the  end  of  the  12th  century,  though  a  plain 
chamfered  string  at  the  west  end  of  the  north  aisle 


has  suggested  that  an  aisle  may  have  been  added  on 
that  side.  It  is  more  likely,  however,  that  the  string 
is  not  in  its  original  position,  and  that  the  plan  of  the 
building  remained  unchanged  until  the  first  half  of  the 
13th  century,  when  very  extensive  alterations  and 
additions  were  made,  amounting  almost  to  a  rebuild- 
ing. Tlic  chancel  was  lengthened,  chapels  added  on 
both  sides  at  its  west  end,  that  on  the  south  being  the 
Lady  Chapel,*^  and  aisles  thrown  out  from  the  nave 
in  line  with  the  ends  of  the  already  existing  chapels. 
All  this  work  appears  to  have  been  completed  by  about 
1260,  but  the  south  aisle  and  chancel  chapels  seem 
to  have  been  built  first  and  finished  before  the  north 
aisle  was  taken  in  hand,  and  probably  before  the  chan- 
cel was  completed.  The  reconstruction  and  lengthen- 
ing of  the  transepts  followed  during  the  last  quarter 
of  the  13th  century  at  a  time  when  geometrical 
window  tracery  was  fully  developed,  but  the  central 
tower  appears  to  have  remained  standing  till  about 
1340-50.  It  was  then  taken  down,  the  western  arch 
of  the  crossing  being  entirely  removed, and  the  tower 
space  added  to  the  nave,  new  arches  made  into  the 
chancel  and  transepts,  and  a  clearstory  carried  through 
from  the  west  wall  of  the  chancel  to  the  west  end  of 
the  church.  The  three  new  arches  closely  correspond 
in  moulding  to  the  chancel  arch  at  Cotterstock 
church,  which  was  rebuilt  soon  after  the  foundation 
of  the  chantry  college  there  in  1338  ;  it  is  therefore 
reasonable  to  suppose  that  this  work  at  Oundle 
dates  from  the  decade  immediately  preceding  the 
Black  Death,  the  outbreak  of  which  may  have  post- 
poned the  building  of  the  west  tower.  The  five-light 
east  window  of  the  south  chapel,  and  possibly  one  of 
the  south  windows,  was  inserted  about  this  time,  or 
perhaps  a  little  later.  The  tower  and  spire  were  not 
begun  until  the  end  of  the  14th  or  the  beginning  of  the 
15th  century.  Their  scale  suggests  that  a  rebuilding 
of  the  nave,  such  as  took  place  later  at  Kettering, 
was  contemplated,  though  never  carried  out.  The 
tower  was  built  a  little  to  the  west  of  the  existing 
wall  of  the  church,  with  complete  buttresses  on  all 
sides,  the  old  wall  being  afterwards  taken  down  and 
the  nave  joined  to  the  tower  by  hastily  executed 
masonry. 

The  chancel  walls  were  heightened  and  the  pitch  of 
the  roof  lowered  in  the  15th  century,  when  the  present 
east  window  was  inserted.  The  roof  of  the  north 
chapel  was  also  lowered  in  the  same  way,  the  head  of 
its  east  window  being  raised  and  a  large  new  window 
inserted  in  the  north  wall.  Other  windows  were 
inserted  during  this  period  in  the  aisles.  The  porch 
is  said  to  have  been  built  about  1485  by  a  merchant 
named  Robert  Wyatt  and  Joan  his  wife,  who  founded 
the  almshouse  to  the  south  of  the  churchyard.  The 
vestry  is  an  addition  of  the  l6th  century.*' 

The  spire  was  rebuilt  in  1634,  and  restored  in  1837, 
and  again  in  1899.  The  church  underwent  an  exten- 
sive restoration  in  1864,  when  galleries  and  pews 
erected  earlier  in  the  century  were  removed. 


'*  Feet  of    F.   Northant).    Mich 
Chji.  I. 

'•  Cat.  Com.  for  Comp.  ii,  1088. 

••  Feet      of      F.      Northant! 
II  Chai.  II. 

"  G.  E.  C.  Complete  Bart,  iii,  151. 

"  Feet    of    F.   Northanti.   Mich.    33 
Chai.  II. 


23 


Trin. 


"  R.  Masters,  Htst.  of  Corpus  Christi 
Coll.   167. 

"  The  slab  is  figured  in  The  Reliquary 
and  lUust.  Archaologist,  xi,  127  (April 
1905).  It  is  not  earlier  than  the 
nth  century  and  may  be  a»  late  a> 
c.  1050. 

'*  Alio  known  lateral  the  Guild  Chapel 

95 


from  the  Guild  of  Our  Lady  founded  by 
Robert  Wyatt. 

"  In  1908.  when  some  work  in  connec- 
tion with  the  heating  apparatus  was  in 
progress  on  the  north  side  of  the  vestry, 
a  two-handled  earthenware  drinking  cup 
of  the  Tudor  period  was  found  a  few  feet 
below  the  surface  of  the  ground  :  Smalley 
Law,  Oundle's  Story,  ao. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  whole  of  the  building  is  faced  with  rubble 
and  has  low-pitched  leaded  roofs  behind  plain  and 
battlemented  parapets.  InternaUy,  except  in  the 
chancel  and  chapels,  where  the  plaster  remains,  the 
waDs  have  been  stripped. 

Of  the  1 2th  centur}'  fabric  a  fair  amount  of  walling 
remains  at  the  east  end  of  the  nave  and  west  part  of 
the  chancel,  the  arches  to  the  chapels  and  transepts 
having  been  cut  through  the  earlier  walls.  Archi- 
tectural features,  however,  are  scanty.  The  top  of 
a  round-headed  window  remains  over  the  arch  between 
the  chancel  and  north  chapel,  and  the  inner  arch  of 
the  blocked  north  doorway  of  the  chapel  appears  to 
be  of  this  date,  but  if  so  it  is  not  in  its  original  place, 


probably  indicates  that  there  was  a  projecting  vice 
or  staircase  turret  at  the  north-west  corner  of  the 
tower,**  which  would  stand  within  the  aisle  until  the 
tovver  was  demolished,  and  thus  account  for  the 
different  spacing  of  the  arcade  on  that  side. 

The  chancel  has  a  five-light  east  window  with 
perpendicular  tracery  and  a  roof  of  four  bays.  In  the 
south  wall  are  two  13th  century  windows,  each  of 
two  trefoiled  lights  and  quatrefoil  plate  tracery, 
lengthened  in  the  15th  century  by  their  heads  being 
raised,  and  there  is  a  similar  window  in  the  north 
wall.  The  plain  trefoiled  piscina  recess  is  original, 
but  the  three  sedilia  west  of  it,  arranged  in  ascending 
order,  were  made  in  the  14th  century,  and  have  ogee 


■  120  Century 

[111132  Century 
OI4™Cent.cI340-5 
^  14  111  Century  late 

□  I511JCE.NTURYCI485 

S 162  Century 

□  Subsequent  &.  Modern 


SovLE  OF  Feet 


Plan  of  Oundle  Church 


the  position  of  the  vnndow  indicating  that  there  was 
no  chapel  here  in  Norman  times.*'  The  south-west 
quoining  of  the  original  south  transept  at  its  junction 
with  the  aisle  is  still  visible,  and  portions  of  early 
masonry  in  all  probability  remain  at  the  angles  of 
both  transepts,  and  possibly  at  the  west  end  of  the 
nave.**  The  position  of  the  west  arch  of  the  central 
tower  seems  to  be  indicated  by  corbels  which  remain 
in  the  walls,  and  the  12th  century  plinths  of  the  chancel 
arch  and  of  the  responds  of  the  north  and  south 
arches  of  the  crossing  remain  below  the  present 
bases.  The  longer  masonry  pier  at  the  east  end  of 
the    13th   century   nave    arcade   on    the    north    side 


cinquefoiled  arches  with  crocheted  hoods  and  finials 
on  detached  shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases. 
The  responds  of  the  arches  between  the  older  western 
part  of  the  chancel  and  the  chapels  have  rounded 
capitals  with  good  early  13th  century  mouldings  and 
bases  with  deep  water  moulds.  The  arch  on  the 
north  side  is  segmental  in  form  and  cuts  into  the 
sill  of  the  Norman  window  ;  that  on  the  south  side 
is  pointed,  with  two  chamfered  orders,  and  retains 
traces  of  colour.  The  west  arches  of  both  chapels 
opening  into  the  transepts  are  of  two  chamfered 
orders  and  the  capitals  of  the  half  round  responds 
have  nail-head  ornament  much  renewed.     The  arch 


"The  chamfered  itring  in  the  north           "  Ahience    of    bonding    between    the  been  deilroyej  when  the  tower  wai  joined 

aiile   and    a   fragment    of    itring   in    the       nave  and  aiile  walli  «hows  th.it  the  12th  up  to  the  nave. 

louth   wall  of    the   louth   chapel  appear       century  church  wai  aiilcleti ;    but  all  the  "  Reaioni  for  this  view  are  itatcd  bjf 

alio     to     belong    to    the    12th    century       original  maionry  at  the  west  end  may  have  Mr.  A.  B.  Whittingham  in  Smalley  Law, 

building.  op.  cit.  17. 

96 


OuNDLE  Church  :    The  Interior,  looking  East 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


from  the  south  aisle  into  the  transept  corresponds  to 
these  in  detail,  and  the  south  arcade  of  the  nave,  of 
three  bays,  has  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders,  and 
cylindrical  columns  with  deep  water-moulds  in  the 
bases  and  elaborately  moulded  capitals  with  nail-head 
ornament  in  the  groove  above  the  lowest  projecting 
member.     The  west   window  of   the   south   aisle  is 
composed  of  five  graduated  lancets.     All  the  work 
from  the  west   part  of   the  chancel  represents   the 
alterations   of   the   beginning  of   the    13th   century. 
In  the  north  arcade  of  the  nave,  also  of  three  bays, 
the  bases  of  the  cylindrical  columns   have  hollow 
mouldings  of  a  more  cramped  design  than  those  on 
the  south,  and  there  are  no  bands  of  nail-head  in  the 
capitals,  while  the  abaci,  instead  of  consisting  of  a 
roll,  fillet,  and  soffit  hollow,  are  formed  of  a  scroll, 
quirk   and    small   undcr-roll.     The   arch"*  into   the 
north  transept  from  the  aisle  has  a  continuous  outer 
chamfer    and    the    responds    supporting    the    inner 
chamfer  are  filleted,  as  are  also  the  responds  of  the 
arcade  on  this  side.     The  west  window  of  the  north 
aisle,  wholly  renewed  on  the  outside,  consists  of  four 
lancets  of  equal  height,  the  head  being  filled  with 
plate    tracery — two     quatrefoiled    circles     below    a 
sexfoiled  circle.     The  westernmost  of  the  two  south 
windows  of  the  south  chapel  has  three  quatrefoiled 
circles    in    the    head.     The    north    doorway    has    a 
moulded  arch  of  three  orders  on  jamb  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.     All  this  work,  with  the 
possible   exception   of   the   doorway   which   appears 
earlier,  is  of  about  the  same  date  as  the  east  part  of 
the  chancel,  c.  1250-60. 

The  transepts  project  18  ft.  beyond  the  aisles  and 
beneath  the  south  transept  is  a  small  vaulted  crypt, 
or  bone-hole,  approached  by  steps  from  the  outside. 
The  five-light  north  window  and  the  two-light  west 
window  of  the  north  transept  have  tracery  formed  by 
the  curving  and  intersection  of  the  muUions,  and  the 
three-light  east  window  has  geometrical  tracery  in  the 
head,  with  very  acute-angled  trefoil  cusping,  and  a 
row  of  ball-flower  round   the  upper  portion.     The 
south  window  of  the  south  transept    is  also  of  five 
lights  with  excellent  geometrical  tracery,  and  the  east 
and  west  windows  are  each  of  two  rounded  trefoil 
lights  with  a  large  quatrefoiled  circle  in  the  head. 
The  five-light  east  window  of  the  north  chapel  is  of 
this  later  period  and  has  geometrical   tracery,   but 
it  appears  to  have  been  lengthened  in  the  15th  century 
when  the  plain  four-light  north  window  was  inserted. 
The  window  in  the  south  aisle  east  of  the  porch  is 
of  five  trefoiled  lights  with  geometrical  tracery,  but 
that  west  of  the  porch  and  the  corresponding  window 
in   the   north   aisle   are   four-centered    15th   century 
openings  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights.     The  window  in 
the  north  aisle  east  of  the  doorway  is  of  five  cinque- 
foiled lights  like  the  east  window  of  the  chapel.     In 
the  south  chapel  is  a  piscina  beneath  a  cusped  ogee 
arch,  and  there  is  another  piscina  of  the  late   14th 
or  early  15th  century  in  the  south  transept,  together 
with  an  aumbry.*' 

The  three  arches  of  the  former  crossing  are  of  two 
moulded  orders,  the  outer  continuous,  the  inner  on 
responds    with    moulded    capitals    and    bases.     The 


northern  entrance  of  the  rood-loft  remains  high  up 
in  the  north  wall  above  the  arch  to  the  transept, 
and  near  the  chancel  arch.  Close  to  it  is  a  corbel 
for  the  rood  beam  and  above  is  a  small  window 
inserted  to  throw  light  upon  the  rood.  There  are 
four  three-light  clearstory  windows  on  each  side  of 
the  nave,  but  owing  to  the  masonry  left  between  the 
new  arches  and  the  nave  arcades  the  eastern  window 
of  the  clearstory  on  cither  side  is  not  above  tlie  eastern 
arches. 

The  tower  is  of  two  main  stages  and  has  a  moulded 
plinth,  double  angle  buttresses,  battlemented  parapets, 
and  octagonal  angle  turrets.  Tlie  first  stage  is  again 
sub-divided  into  two,  the  lower  of  which  has  traceried 
panels.  The  shallow  west  porch,  with  cinquefoiled 
ogee  arch  and  crocketed  gable,  is  a  late  example  of  a 
local  peculiarity  of  design,  the  earliest  instances  of 
which  are  the  west  porches  of  Higham  Ferrers  and 
Raunds.*'  On  either  side  of  the  gable  is  a  canopied 
niche, and  the  west  doorway  has  continuous  mouldings. 
Above  the  porch  is  a  two-light  pointed  window,  with 
a  similar  '  blind  window  '  on  either  side.  The  upper 
stage  of  the  tower  has  three  tall  traceried  belfry 
openings  forming  the  middle  panels  of  a  row  of  five 
on  each  face,  and  below  the  windows  is  a  less  lofty 
range  of  panels  the  middle  one  alone  of  which  is 
open.  The  tall  lower  stage  is  vaulted,  with  a  large 
central  well  hole  and  the  arch  to  the  nave  is  of  three 
chamfered  orders.  The  spire  has  crocketed  angles 
and  three  sets  of  lights  on  the  cardinal  faces.  The 
date  1634  '^  ^^^  ^^  ^°^^  numerals  under  the  lowest 
light  on  the  south  side.  The  general  design  of  the 
tower  and  spire  is  of  much  grace  and  beauty,  the 
predominant  vertical  lines  giving  it  an  apparent 
lightness  which  its  bulk,  in  proportion  to  the  building 
to  which  it  is  attached,  might  seem  to  preclude. 

The  south  porch  is  vaulted  and  has  a  chamber 
above  approached  by  a  circular  stair  from  the  aisle. 
The  outer  opening  has  a  four-centered  arch  with  square 
label  and  quatrefoiled  circles  in  the  spandrels.  Above 
are  three  empty  niches,  with  windows  between,  and 
the  gable  has  a  battlemented  parapet.  The  inner 
doorway  is  of  the  same  date  as  the  porch,  with  panelled 
jambs.     In  the  porch  is  a  stone  coffin. 

The  lower  portion  of  a  15th  century  rood  screen 
remains,  with  three  traceried  panels  on  each  side  of 
the  opening,  and  the  screens  separating  the  chancel 
from  the  chapels,  which  appear  to  be  rather  earlier 
in  the  same  period,  are  entire.  The  fine  painted 
pulpit  is  apparently  of  15th  century  date,  though  it 
used  to  be  known  as  the  '  Reformation  pulpit.'  It 
has  traceried  panels  ornamented  with  gilded  leaden 
stars  on  a  black  background,  and  is  picked  out  in  red. 
The  fine  brass  lectern  with  eagle  book-rest  is  of 
mid-i5th  century  date  ;  the  '  tradition  '  that  it  came 
from  Fotheringhay  seems  to  be  unsupported. 

The  font  now  in  use  dates  only  from  1909  and  is  of 
late  gothic  pattern,  but  there  is  an  early  i8th  century 
block  font  with  panelled  sides  under  the  tower. 

At  the  end  of  the  gangway  in  the  north  transept 
is  a  heavy  oak  chair  used  by  the  master  of  Sir  William 
Laxton's  School,  on  the  head  of  which  is  the  inscrip- 
tion 'svMPTv  APtiMATOnnAiiN  lo.vdinensivm  a.d. 


•0  When  the  suir  to  the  central  tower       apei  is  north  of  the  middle  of  the  span.  "There      are      other      neighbouring 

was  removed  the  arch  would  be  rebuilt  "  There  is  also  an  aumbryin  the  north       examples    at    Rushden,     and     Keyston, 

and    widened    on    the    south    side ;    its       transept.  Hunts. 


97 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


1576  '  ;  and  in  the  vestry  a  small  wooden  box  inscribed 
'This  belongs  to  the  vestry  in  Oundle  1676,'  a  17th 
century  table,  and  a  chest  with  two  locks  of  about  the 
same  period.  Below  the  tower  is  a  brass  chandelier 
inscribed  '  Ex  dono  Edvardi  Bedell  generosi  anno 
Dni  1687.' 

The  oldest  monument  is  the  grave  slab  of  John 
de  Oundle,  rector  {d.  1278),  in  the  floor  of  the  chancel. 
It  has  a  floriated  cross  and  imperfect  border  inscrip- 
tion in  Lombardic  characters,  which  Bridges  recorded 
as  'Johan  :  de  :  Undele  :  ke  :  ci :  Lid:  Re:  de:  Scoteye.'*' 
In  the  chancel  floor  are  also  three  large  blue  slabs 
with  indents  of  brasses,  two  of  which  were  of  priests, 
and  stones  marking  the  burial  places  of  John  Lewis, 
apothecary,  and  William  Filbrigge,*-*  gent.,  both  of 
whom  died  in  1687.  On  the  north  wall  of  the  chancel 
is  an  elaborate  Renaissance  monument  with  Ionic 
columns,  strapwork  patterns,  and  shields  of  arms,  to 
Martha  Kirkham  of  Fineshade  {il.  1616),  the  pedestal 
of  which  bears  inscriptions  to  Susanna,  widow  of 
William  Walcot  {d.  1737)  and  her  daughter  Elizabeth 
(d.  1735),  and  on  the  opposite  wall  tablets  to  William 
Walcot,  M.D.  of  Oundle  {d.  1806),  and  his  son  of  the 
same  name  (d.  1827).  There  is  also  a  tablet  in  the 
chancel  to  William  Raper,  gent.  {d.  1746),  who 
'  studied  physick  all  his  life,  not  to  profit  but  for  the 
pleasure  of  doing  good.'  In  the  floor  of  the  north 
aisle  is  a  stone  with  indents  of  two  figures  and  a  brass 
inscription  recording  the  burial  of  Katharine,  wife  of 
Peter  Dayrell,  second  son  of  Sir  Thomas  Dayrell 
of  Lillingstone  Dayrell,  Bucks,  and  eldest  daughter  of 
Edward  Cuthbert  of  Oundle,  who  died  in  1615,®^ 
and  at  the  west  end  of  the  same  aisle  is  a  small  mural 
monument  to  William  Loringe  of  Haymes,  Gloucester- 
shire (d.  1628).**  In  the  south  aisle  is  an  inscription 
to  James  Risley  (d.  1605)  and  Joan  his  wife  {d.  1612). 
There  is  an  elaborate  monument  between  the  windows 
of  the  south  chapel  to  Mary  Gaymes  {d.  1760)  and 
Mrs.  Mary  Kirkham,  formerly  wife  of  W.  Langhorn 
Games  (d.  1754),  and  at  the  west  end  of  the  south 
aisle  one  commemorating  the  Rev.  John  Shillibeer, 
head  master  of  Oundle  School  and  rector  of  Stoke 
Doyle  {d.  1 841). 

There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells  in  the  tower,  four  of 
which  (the  treble,  second,  third  and  tenor)  were 
recast  by  Mears  and  Stainbank  in  1869,  after  damage 
by  a  fire  in  the  belfry  on  16  August,  1868.  The 
fourth  is  by  Thomas  Eayre,  of  Kettering,  1735,  the 
fifth  by  the  .same  founder  1742,  the  si.xtli  by  Joseph 
Eayre,  of  St.  Neots,  1763,  and  the  seventh  by  Thomas 


Osborn,  of  Downham,  Norfolk.  1801.*'     The  chimes 
date  from  the  renewal  of  the  clock  in  1868. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup,  paten,  flagon 
and  breadholder  of  1697,  given  by  William  Whitwell, 
each  piece  engraved  with  liis  crest,  a  talbot  passant ;" 
two  silver  basins  of  1729;  two  silver  plates  of  1731, 
inscribed  '  The  gift  of  Mrs.  Alice  Hunt,  widow,  to 
the  church  of  Oundle,  Com.  North'ton,'  with  the 
.irms  of  the  donor;  two  silver  cups  of  1847,  and  two 
plated  cups  given  in  1855.^ 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i)  all 
entries  1625-1732,  (ii)  all  entries  1733-1748,  (iii) 
baptisms  and  burials  1 749-1  Si 2,  marriages  1749-5S, 
(iv)  marriages  1755-80,  (v)  marriages  1780-1806, 
(vi)  marriages  1808-12. 

The  advowson  of  the  rectory  be- 
ADVOWSON  longed  to  the  abbey  of  Peterborough. 
The  earliest  of  the  rectors  known  is 
one  Ralph,  who  occurs  in  1159.'  He  may  be  the 
rector,  Ralph,  who  renounced  his  right  to  certain 
tithes.^  The  earliest  recorded  presentation  is  that  of 
John  de  Burgo,  subdeacon,  in  1234.^  John  deThoresby, 
one  of  the  king's  clerks,  held  the  rectory  of  Oundle 
for  a  time  (1346)  as  one  of  his  many  preferments; 
he  became  chancellor  (1349-56)  and  archbishop  of 
York  (1352-73).*  Richard  de  Treton,  rector,  made 
an  agreement  with  the  abbot  in  1395  concerning  his 
claim  to  take  wood  and  brushwood  in  the  abbot's 
woods  at  Oundle  for  his  fires  in  the  rectory.* 

To  Treton  in  1393  succeeded  Thomas  Brake, 
presented  by  the  abbot  ;  two  years  later  the  king 
presented  John  Boor,  and  a  long  dispute  ensued,  in 
the  courts  in  England  and  at  Rome,  with  various 
changes  of  fortune,*  but  at  last,  in  1402,  Brake's 
right  was  fully  acknowledged,  and  he  retained  the  rec. 
tory  for  about  thirty  years  in  peace.'  Anotlier  dispute 
occurred  about  1447,  when  Dr.  Henry  Sharp,  rector 
of  Potterspury,  obtained  a  papal  grant  of  the  rectory, 
vacant  by  the  promotion  of  John  Delabere  to  the  see 
of  St.  David's  ■?  the  king  pardoned  this  breach  of  the 
statute  of  provisors  on  account  of  Sharp's  services 
at  Rome  in  the  establishment  of  Eton  college,*  but 
one  John  Middlehame  appealed  to  the  pope  against 
it,  alleging  a  presentation  by  the  abbot. ^* 

In  1477  the  king,  after  inquiry,  allowed  the  abbot 
to  appropriate  the  rectory  in  mortmain,  a  sufficient 
endowment  for  a  vicarage  lacing  provided,  and  a 
distribution  to  the  poor  yearly.  For  this  permission 
the  convent  gave  the  king  certain  lands  at  Cotten- 
ham."     This  was  carried  out,  and  the  vicars  were 


"  lliil.  oj  Northanls.  ii,  408.  John 
was  also  rector  of  Scotter,  in  I.incoln- 
thirc. 

*•  He  issued  .1  token  in  i/i^S  with 
inscription  *  Will.  I-'ilbrigp,  linen  draper 
of  Oundle  '  and  arms  borne  by  the  family 
of  the  same  name  se.tced  at  Fclbrigg, 
Norfolk.     Sorlhanis  X.  and  (J.  ii,  92. 

•*Thc  Inscription  is  given  in  Bridges, 
op.  cit.  ii,  409.  The  brasses  had  then 
been  lorn  a"ay. 

•*  The  monument  wa»  on  the  sicstcrn- 
most  pillar  of  the  north  aisle  in  Bridget' 
time.  It  has  small  Corinthian  pillars, 
but  the  figure  of  I.oringe  (kneeling  at  a 
desk)  il  missing,  below  are  twelve  children 
— five  loni,  five  daughters,  and  two 
infants.  This  William  Loringe  had  two 
sons  at  Sir  William  Laxton'i  school; 
.Smilley  law,  op.  cit.  61. 


"'  The  former  treble  and  second  uerc 
by  Thom.TS  Osborn,  1780,  the  third  hy 
Henry  Baglcy,  of  Ecton,  :6S8,  and  the 
tenor  by  Thomas  Eayre,  174S.  'I'he 
inscriptions  on  all  the  bells  arc  given  in 
North,  Ch.  llelli  of  Xorihniiis.  3-;5.  The 
old  third  was  the  gift  of  John  Lewis;, 
apothecary,  who  is  buried  in  the  chancel. 
Ili<  bequest  of  ,^50  '  to  buy  a  sixth  bell  ' 
indicates  that  there  were  then  five,  and 
that  a  new  treble  was  added.  Eayrc's 
tenor  of  1748  was  a  recasting  of  one  '  paid 
for  by  Thomas  Tranklin,'  who  in  his  will 
dated  12  May,  1544,  beijiicathcd  xijd. 
to  the  rcp.'iration  of  the  bells  within 
Oundle  church  :     Smallcy   Law,  op.   cit. 

"The  flagon,  in  addition,  bears  the 
inscription  '  Lx  dono  Wm.  Whitewell, 
cent.   1697.' 


'•''  ^Llrkham,  Cit.  Plate  of  Norlhaiiis.  221. 

'  W.  S.  Law,  UundU's  Story,  15. 

'  Sp.irkc,  lliil.  Angl.  Script.  (Swaphain), 
t.  \cvii. 

=  Rat.  /fug.  df  ll'rUes  (Line.  Rec.  Soc). 
ii,   115. 

*  U.  N.  B.  i   C<il.  Pat.  1343-45,  p.  4S0. 

'  Cal.  Pat.  1391-96,  p.  610;  Cal.  Pap. 
Letters,  v,  608  ;    vi,  26. 

'Cal.  Pal.  1391-96,  p.  649;  1396-9, 
P'  52'  i  '399-'4ot,  p.  311  ;  1401-5. 
p.  9 ;  Cal.  Pap.  Letters,  v.  94, 229,  330,  367, 

3871  442- 

'  tW.  Pat.  1413-6,  p.  igo;  1429-36, 
p.  229. 

'  Cal.  Pap.  Letters,  x,  4. 
"  Cal.  Pal.  144O-52,  p.  17;. 
'»  Cal.  Pap.  Letters,  X,  1 8. 
'*  Chan.    Inq.    p.    ni.     17    Ldw.    I\'  ; 
Cal.  Pat.  1476-85,  p.  41. 


98 


POLEBROOK    HUNDRED 


OUNDLE 


nominated  by  the  abbots  till  the  Dissolution,  and 
by  the  Crown  (except  possibly  during  the  lease  to 
Mildmav  mentioned  above)  until  1 869,  when  this 
advowson  was  exchanged  with  the  bishop  of  Peter- 
borough for  that  of  Harpenden,  Herts. 

The  Rectory  manor  has  been  noticed  above. 
In  1535  the  vicar  had  £1^  6s.  M.  a  year  ;  and  there 
were  two  cliantry  priests,  each  receiving  loSs.  8d. 
(8  marks).'-  Lights  in  the  church  had  an  endow- 
ment of  i8r/.'' 

In  1636  Walter  Kirkliani  of  Fincshade  left  £10  a 
year,  charged  on  his  estate  at  Elmington,  to  maintain 
daily  service  at  Oundle  at  7  in  the  morning  and  5  in 
the  evening  ;  but  the  service  was  not  rendered  and 
the  money  ceased  to  be  paid.'* 

Henry  Bedell,  vicar  of  Southwick,  in  1692,  was  son 
of  '  Captain  Bedell  of  Oundle,  who  died  in  1693  •'•n'^ 
left  an  estate  in  reversion  to  the  value  of  ^£140  a  year 
(after  the  death  of  his  son)  to  remain  in  perpetual 
augmentation  of  the  vicarage  of  Oundle,  on  condition 
of  paying  ;^I5  a  year  to  his  sister  for  her  life  and  ^^300 
to  other  relatives. ''■> 

In  1710  the  vicar  had  the  20  marks  from  Mr. 
\Valcott,the  impropriator;  also^^io  for  reading  prayers 
on  Wednesdays  and  Fridays,  and  £30  under  the  will 
of  the  late  Sir  E.  Nichols." 

Jesus  Church  was  built  in  1879  at  the  west  end  of 
the  town  by  the  late  Mr.  Watts  Russell  on  or  near 
the  site  of  the  chapel  of  St.  Thomas  of  Canterbury. 
It  was  designed  by  Sir  A.  W'.  Blomfield,  and  is  in  plan 
a  Greek  cross  with  central  octagonal  tow^er  or  lantern 
with  pointed  roof.  It  possesses  a  silver  cup,  paten 
and  flagon  of  1878. 

There  were  chapels  at  Ashton,  Elmington  and 
Churchfield  in  1189,'^  but  the  two  latter  have  dis- 
appeared without  leaving  any  history.  In  later 
times,  as  already  stated,  there  was  a  chapel  at  the 
west  end  known  as  St.  Thomas's ;  its  origin  is  un- 
known, but  it  is  mentioned  in  the  rental  of  1400,'* 
and  Leland  records  its  new  title  of  St.  Mary,  after 
Henry  VIII's  prohibition  of  the  '  traitor  Thomas.' 
What  remained  of  it  about  1700  is  described  by 
Bridges." 

'  John  parson  of  Aston  '  attested  a  local  charter 
next  after  John  parson  of  Oundle,  in  1248,-"  but 
may  have  been  rector  of  some  other  church.  The 
chapel  of  St.  Mary  M.agdalen  (.')  was  still  in  use  in  the 
time  of  Henry  \  III,  as  appears  by  a  suit  quoted  above, 
in  which  the  small  tithes  of  the  township  were  shown 
to  have  been  given  to  the  priest  who  served  it.  It 
was  desecrated  shortly  afterwards,  and  in  1548  the 
cemetery  and  chapel  of  Ashton  in  Oundle,  and  the 
cemetery  and  chapel  of  Oundle  (probably  St. Thomas's) 
were  sold  by  the  crown  to  Francis  Samwell,  to  be  held 
in  socage  as  of  the  manor  of  Green's  Norton.^'  The 
site  is  said  to  be  that  of  the  Manor  House.  A  new 
chapel  and  schoolhouse  was  built  in  1708,  under  the 
will  of  Jemima  Creed,  daughter  of  John  Creed  of 
Oundle. 

Joan  Wyot,  widow  of  Robert  Wyot,  obtained  the 


king's  licence  in  1499  to  found  a  gild  of  St.  Mary  in  the 
parish  church  of  Oundle,  and  endow  it  with  lands  to 
the  value  of  £10  a  year  for  the  maintenance  of  one 
or  more  chaplams  to  celebrate  for  the  soul  of  Robert 
Wyot  and  for  Joan  herself  and  the  members  of  the 
gild,  who  might  be  both  men  and  women.*^  Jqj,, 
died  in  or  before  1507,  when  her  executors  obtained  a 
further  licence  to  alienate  32  messuages,  16  acres  of 
land  and  10  acres  of  meadow  in  Oundle  for  the  en- 
dowment.^'  The  gildhouse  stood  in  the  churchyard 
of  Oundle,  and  was  admired  by  Leland  ;  it  was  later 
used  as  the  home  of  the  grammar  school  and  alms- 
house. In  the  time  of  I'hilip  and  Mary  a  rent  of  10;. 
came  from  the  Gildhall,  which  abutted  on  a  bake- 
house called  the  Cornhill  on  the  east,  the  churchyard 
of  St.  Mary  on  the  north,  and  lands  of  Lord  Bedford 
and  —  Rudston  on  the  south  and  west.  Before  the 
suppression  of  the  gild  certain  poor  folk  had  lodging 
and  allowances,  and  afterwards  they  were  maintained 
by  the  charity  of  the  people.  The  executors  of  Sir 
William  Laxton  desired  to  make  a  perpetual  foundation 
there,  and  in  1557  Lady  Laxton  agreed  to  pay  £20  for 
the  building.2'  The  rest  of  the  lands  had  been  sold 
in  1550.25 

Of  the  religious  history  of  the  place  there  is  little 
to  be  told.  Among  the  presentments  to  the  bishop 
in  161 3  was  one  against  Henry  Wortley,  who  had 
maintained  that  '  women  had  no  souls  but  their  shoe- 
soles,'  but  recanted  ;  and  another  against  William 
Wortley  for  allowing  a  wizard  to  come  into  his  house 
to  tell  fortunes. 2*  The  vicars  seem  to  have  been 
Puritans,  Eusebius  Paget  being  deprived  for  that 
reason  in  1573.^'  His  successor  'found  the  people 
in  a  state  of  the  most  deplorable  ignorance  and  pro- 
faneness,  living  in  the  constant  profanation  of  the 
Lord's  day  by  Whitsun  ales,  morris  dances  and  other 
ungodly  sports. '2*  At  the  archbishop's  visitation  in 
1635  the  church  and  churchyard  were  found  to  be 
very  much  out  of  order.  The  schoolmaster  (Mr. 
Cobbes)  was  admonished  for  using  a  wrong  catechism 
and  for  expounding  the  Ten  Commandments  out  of 
the  writings  of  a  silenced  minister;  he  refused  to 
bow  at  the  name  of  Jesus.  The  ministers  of  the 
deanery  appearing,  were,  in  general,  canonical  in  their 
habits,  except  those  of  the  peculiars,  of  whom  there 
was  but  one  in  a  priest's  cloak.^'  The  Quakers  were 
no  more  welcome  here  than  elsewhere  to  the  estab- 
lished Presbyterians ;  a  document  of  1655  names 
William  Butler  of  Oundle  among  '  those  now  in 
commission  who  have  all  along  given  the  power  unto 
the  Beast  and  have  fought  with  the  Lamb,  and  to 
this  day  think  they  do  God  service  in  imprisoning 
His  servants.'**  It  does  not  appear  that  there  was 
ever  a   Quaker  meeting-house   here. 

At  the  Restoration  the  vicar,  Richard  Resbury, 
retired,  but  ministered  in  his  house.  He  was 
licensed  in  1672  as  a  Congregationalist,  and  Robert 
Wild  and  Thomas  Fownes  as  Presbyterians  ;  the 
house  of  Mary  Breton  at  Oundle  was  licensed  for 
meetings. '1 


"  falor  Ecd.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  290. 
"Charity  Ccrtlfs.  35-+0. 
'*  W.  Smalley  Law,  op.  cit.  79. 
'*  W.    Kcnnet     Case    of    Impropriaton 
(1704),    337;     quoted     by     Bridges,     ii, 

472- 

'•  Bridget,  Hisl.  Nortbanlt.  ii,  408. 
"  Cal.  Chart.  R.  iv,  274. 


"  Cott.  MS.  Nero,  C.  vii,  f.   nod. 

"  Iltsi.  Xonhatils.  ii,  405. 

»J  Add.  Chart.  5888. 

=  '  Cal.  Pat.  1547-8,  p.  311. 

"  Ibid.  1494-1509,  p.   173. 

'Mbid.  518. 

"  Harl.  MS.  607,  f.  Sid. 

»^  Cal.  Pat.  1550-53,  p.  23. 

99 


'»  \orlhaiils  X.  and  Q.  i,  I  58. 
='  T.     Coleman,     Indep.     Churches    1 
.\orthants.  250. 
"  Ibid.   252. 

"  S.  P.  Dom.  Chas.  I,  293,  n.  128. 
"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1655-6,  P-  64. 
"  Ibid.  1672,  pp.  473,  475,  578,  678. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  existing  Independent  congregation  appears  to 
have  originated  from  these  efforts,  and  in  1690  or 
1691,  soon  after  the  Toleration  Act,  a  meeting  house 
was  built,  which  in  1724  became  the  property  of  the 
congregation.^  It  continued  in  use  until  the 
present  Congregational  Chapel  in  West  Street  was 
built  in  1864.     John  Paine  (1801)  left  ;£300  to  it. 

The  Baptist  Chapel,  now  part  of  New  House, 
Stoke  Road,  is  stated  to  have  been  founded  in  1800. 
The  present  building  in  West  Street  dates  from  1852. 

The  Wesleyan  Methodists  had  two  ministers  in 
1827.^  The  old  chapel  was  in  New  Street ;  the 
present  one,  in  West  Street,  was  built  in  1842. 

The  Jinks  family,  carriers,  set  apart  a  room  in 
their  house  in  West  Street,  where  Mass  was  said 
occasionally  from  1807  to  about  1880  by  priests  from 
Peterborough.  Fr.  Ignatius  Spencer,  the  Passionist, 
preached  his  first  sermon  there.^ 

The  Feoffee  or  Town  Estates 
CHARITIES  comprised  in  Indenture  of  Lease 
and  Release  dated  9  and  10  July, 
1828,  include  the  following  property,  viz.  :  allot- 
ments in  Stoke  Road  ;  a  field  called  '  Bouners  Home  ' 
containing  3  roods ;  Wakerley  and  Dovehouse  Close 
and  Cottage  containing  22a.  2r.  32  poles ;  a  field 
on  Heme  Road  containing  la.  3r.  9p.  ;  a  field  on 
Stoke  Road  containing  4a.  2r.  29p.,  and  a  field  at 
Elton,  Hunts,  containing  7a.,  and  wharf  and  land  at 
North  Bridge,  Oundle ;  £z^  os.  ()d.  India  3  per 
cent.  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable 
Funds ;  a  sum  of  ;^2lo  los.  6d.  5  per  cent.  War 
Stock  in  the  names  of  John  Miller  Siddons  and 
others,  the  whole  producing  in  1924,  with  the  income 
from  Franklyn's  Charity  mentioned  below,  ^^96  is.  \d. 
The  estates  are  chargeable  with  annual  payments  in 
respect  of  the  following  benefactions  which  were  paid 
to  and  became  merged  in  the  general  property  of  the 
Feoffees,  viz.  :  £20  given  by  William  Thirlby  to  the 
poor  ;  ^10  given  by  Ralph  Robinson,  half  the  income 
to  be  applied  towards  the  repair  of  the  church  and 
half  towards  repairing  the  highway  in  Oundle  ;  ^^lo 
given  by  Thomas  Orton,  the  interest  to  be  employed 
in  such  good  charitable  uses  as  the  Feoffees  should 
think  fit;  £\2  given  by  Hester  Lucas,  the  interest 
to  be  applied  in  the  purchase  and  distribution  of 
copies  of  the  Netu  Whole  Duty  of  Man  ;  and  /[lo 
bequeathed  by  Thomas  Webb  in  1753,  the  interest 
to  be  applied  in  the  distribution  of  penny  loaves  on 
St.  Thomas'  Day  by  the  vicar  and  churchwardens. 

Francis  Hodge  by  his  Will  dated  11  November, 
1695,  gave  j^20,  the  interest  to  be  applied  in  the 
purchase  of  Bibles  for  poor  children  and  like  pur- 
poses. 

In  1924  £z  was  distributed  in  doles  to  8  persons ; 
;f3  wa?  expended  in  gifts ;  ^^3  10/.  6d.  in  Bibles ;  8;. 
in  bread  on  St.  Thomas  Day  ;  ^£20  to  the  Oundle 
Nursing  Association  ;  £5  5/.  ^d.  to  the  Beneficiaries 
of  Clifton's  Charity,  and  ^^8  ijs.  iid.  was  expended 
in  material  and  labour  on  Ashton  Road. 

By  his  Will  dated  12  May,  1544,  Thomas  Franklyn 
gave  about  13  acres  of  land  for  the  relief  of  the  poor. 
The  land  was  sold  and  the  endowment  of  this  Charity 
is  now  represented  by  a  sum  of  j^336  lis.  od.,  Consols 
with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  pro- 

"  T.  Coleman,  Indep.  Churcbei  in  Norlhanti.  253-7. 
"  W.  Sm.illcy  Law,  op.  cit.  129. 
"  WheUn,  Nonhanii.  714. 


ducing  £%  8/.  4^.  in  dividends,  which  sum  is  applied 
by  the  Feoffees  of  the  Town  Estates 

The  Almshouses  of  Sir  William  Laxton  were  founded 
by  a  Codicil  to  his  Will  dated  27  July,  1556,  and  are 
under  the  management  of  the  Grocers'  Company  of 
the  City  of  London.  The  almshouses  are  for  the 
accommodation  of  7  poor  men,  who  receive  a  weekly 
stipend,  and  a  nurse.  The  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds  hold  a  sum  of  £1,664  Consols 
producing  ^^41  12s.  od.  yearly  in  dividends.  This 
sum  of  Stock  represents  the  redemption  of  a  yearly 
payment  of  £\l  l2s.  od.  issuing  out  of  propertv  in 
the  City  of  London  in  the  possession  of  the  Grocers' 
Company. 

Parson  Latham's  Hospital,  founded  and  incor- 
porated pursuant  to  the  Statute  39  Eliz.  c.  5,  by 
Deed  Poll  dated  15  May,  161 1,  is  regulated  by 
schemes  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  I  July, 
1910,  i6  January,  1914,  and  I  March,  1921.  It  is 
administered  by  a  body  of  10  Trustees.  The  fuU 
number  of  almspeople  shall  be  not  less  than  8  and 
not  more  than  12.  They  shall  be  poor  widows  or 
spinsters  of  not  less  than  50  years  of  age.  The 
endowment  consists  of  land  situate  in  various  parts 
of  the  Counties  of  Northampton  and  Huntingdon 
aggregating  about  397  acres,  and  the  following  sums 
of  stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable 
Funds:  £900  13/.  31^.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock; 
£293  16;.  2d.  3J  per  cent.  Conversion  Stock,  and 
^^307  13/.  id.  4J-  per  cent.  Conversion  Stock;  the 
whole  producing  nearly  ;^650  in  1924.  Out  of  the 
income  a  sum  of  j^5o  is  payable  to  the  Trustees  of 
Parson  Latham's  Educational  Foundation.  In  1924 
stipends  amounting  to  ;^I49  10s.  od.  were  paid  to  9 
inmates,  £1^  15/.  od.  was  expended  on  medical 
attendance  and  nursing,  £3  was  distributed  to  6 
poor  of  Oundle,  £2  to  4  poor  of  Polebrook,  and  £2 
to  8  poor  people  in  Kirton  in  Holland  in  County  of 
Lincoln. 

The  Parish  of  Oundle  participates  in  the  Charity 
of  Clement  Bellamy  founded  by  Will  dated  12  October, 
165S.  It  is  administered  by  a  body  of  Trustees 
appointed  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners 
dated  3  June,  1910.  The  property  consists  of 
£2!^'i  ijs.  lod.  Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds  producing  £6  is.  Sd.  yearly  in 
dividends  and  a  rent  charge  of  j{^20  issuing  out  of 
land  in  Cotterstock  called  Bartons  Holme.  The 
income  is  subject  to  a  payment  of  £S  to  the  Bellamy 
Educational  Foundation,  and  the  residue  is  applicable 
in  putting  out  apprentices  to  some  useful  trade  or 
occupation  deserving  and  necessitous  boys  and  girls 
whose  parents  have  been  boiu2  fide  resident  in  one  of 
the  parishes  of  Cotterstock,  Glapthornc,  Oundle  and 
Tansor. 

Jemima  Creed's  Charity,  founded  by  will  dated 
II  February,  1705,  is  administered  by  a  body  of 
trustees  in  accordance  with  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  22  January,  1909.  The  pro- 
perty consists  of  a  building  used  as  a  chapel,  about 
20  acres  of  pasture  land  known  as  Law's  Holme  near 
Ashton  Bridge  let  for  ^^25  yearly,  and  a  sum  of 
£224  lis.  6d.  Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds  producing  £^  izs.  41/.  yearly  in 
dividends.  The  stock  arose  partly  from  accumula- 
tions of  income  and  partly  from  the  sale  of  31  poles 
of  land.     Out  of  the  net  yearly  income  ^£20  is  applic- 


100 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


POLEBROOK 


able  to  the  Creed  Educational  Foundation,  and  the 
residue  is  paid  to  the  Vicar  in  consideration  of  his 
conducting  religious  services  and  giving  religious 
instruction  in  the  Hamlet  of  Ashton. 

By  his  will  dated  29  January,  1723,  John  Clifton 
gave  ;^30O  to  the  feofTees  of  the  Town  Estates,  the 
interest  to  be  applied  for  the  benefit  of  two  poor 
blind  people,  or  failing  this  to  be  distributed  among 
deserving  old  men.  In  respect  of  this  charity  a  sum 
of  j£5  5/.  4//.  was  distributed  in  1924. 

Paine's  Almshouses.  By  an  Indenture  dated 
21  May,  1801,  John  Paine  conveyed  to  trustees  4 
tenements  situate  at  Chapel  End  in  Oundle  upon 
trust  to  place  therein  poor  persons  or  families  of  or 
attending  the  congregation  of  Protestant  dissenters 
in  Oundle.     The  almshouses  have  no  endowment. 

By  an  Order  of  the  Northamptonshire  County 
Court  holden  at  Oundle  17  April,  i860,  the  Vicar 
and    Churchwardens    of    Oundle    were    appointed 


Trustees  of  the  Charity  of  Miss  Charlotte  Simcoe, 
the  endowment  of  which  consists  of  ;^S00  Consols 
with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  pro- 
ducing £12  10;.  od.  yearly  in  dividends,  which  is 
distributed  in  flannel  to  about  100  recipients. 

The  Unknown  Donors  Chanty  consists  of  a  yearly 
payment  of  6s.  Sd.  paid  by  the  Hon.  Mrs.  C.  Roth- 
schild out  of  the  Tring  Estate.  This  payment  is 
distributed  in  flannel  by  the  Vicar  and  Church- 
wardens with  Miss  Simcoe's  Charity. 

The  Charity  of  John  William  Smith,  founded  by 
will  proved  in  P.R.  I  June,  1 897,  is  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  2  April, 
1912.  The  property  consists  of  £iJS  4  P^f  cent. 
1st  Prcf.  Stock  of  the  L.  and  N.E.  Rly.  with  the 
Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  producing 
yearly  £s  Si.  od.  in  dividends,  which  is  distributed 
in  doles  by  the  Trustees  of  Parson  Latham's 
Hospital. 


POLEBROOK 


Pochebroc  (xi  cent),  Pokebroc  (xii  cent),  Pokebroke 
(xiii  cent.),  Pokesbrook,  Pogbroke,  Polbrok  (xv  cent.), 
Polehbrooke  als  Polebrooke  (xviii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Polebrook  covers  1,836!  acres,  its 
hamlet  of  Armston,  852J  acres,  on  a  subsoil  chiefly 
of  Oxford  clay,  but  of  cornbrash  in  the  north-west, 
the  upper  soil  being  clay.  There  are  here  681  acres 
of  arable  land,  1,037!  of  permanent  grass,  and  13  of 
woods  and  plantations.  The  chief  crops  are  hay, 
barley  and  wheat.  In  the  north-west  of  the  parish 
where  the  River  Nene  separates  it  from  Oundle, 
and  about  the  village,  the  land  is  100  ft.  above  the 
ordnance  datum,  but  rises  towards  the  south  and 
east  to  200  ft. 

The  road  from  Peterborough  enters  the  parish 
through  Ashton  on  the  north  and  runs  south-east- 
wards through  the  village.  A  branch  road  bears 
east  to  Lutton,  Washingley  and  Norman  Cross,  with 
a  small  Wesleyan  chapel,  built  in  1863,  on  its  north, 
and  the  rectory,  Polebrook  Hall,  the  school  and 
Manor  House  on  its  south.  The  main  road  con- 
tinues in  a  southerly  direction  to  the  Giddings, 
passing  the  church  of  All  Saints  on  the  one  side  and 
on  the  other  the  post  office,  noteworthy  for  two 
16th-century  chimneypieces.  In  the  centre  of  the 
village  a  stone  column  commemorates  the  fallen  in 
the  war  of  1914-18.  The  Northamptonshire  his- 
torian in  the  early  part  of  the  1 8th  century  describes 
the  village  as  standing  low  on  a  rocky  ground,  with 
two  bridges,  one  '  Pottock  bridge,'  outside,  the 
other,  a  small  horse  bridge  of  two  arches,  within, 
its  area.i  At  Armston  are  woods  called  New  Fox 
Covert,  Horse  Close  Spinney,  Burray  Spinney,  and 
Cow  Shackle  Coppice,  a  name  which  recalls  the  Cow- 
shakell  bushes  and  Cowshakell  slade  of  1602.^  There 
are  two  moats  here  and  the  site  of  a  chapel,  possibly 
that  of  St.  John  Baptist.  In  or  before  1791  there 
remained   in   a    building   here  four  large   windows 


resembling  '  chapel  windows,'  and  a  high  arched  roof 
within  and  two  columns  without.'  The  remains  of 
the  chapel  of  St.  Leonard  at  Armston  were  also  found 
at  the  end  of  the  19th  century  in  a  farmhouse  to  the 
east  of  the  Green,  and  near  to  them  were  some  evidences 
of  a  moat  and  fishponds.*  This  chapel  was  founded 
apparently  by  Ralph  de  Trubleville  and  Alice  his  wife 
early  in  the  13th  century,  who  gave  it  to  Royse 
lady  of  Polbrook  and  patron  of  the  church,  together 
with  six  acres  of  land.  Whereupon  Royse  gave  to 
the  chapel  a  font  for  the  baptism  of  infants  and  pro- 
vided a  chaplain  to  say  services  daily  excepting  burial 
of  the  dead. 5  There  was  an  altar  of  St.  Mary  in  the 
chapel.*  The  abbot  of  Peterborough  was  bound  to 
find  a  chaplain  to  say  divine  service  daily  for  the  soul 
of  Robert  le  Fleming.'  To  the  east  of  Polebrook 
stands  the  rectory  farm,  now  the  property  of  Brig.- 
Gen.  A.  Ferguson,  and  Polebrook  Lodge,  with  New 
Lodge,  near  the  borders  of  Hemington.  Three  Acre 
Spinney,  with  Kingsthorpe  Lodge  and  Kingsthorpe 
Coppice,  with  a  moat  adjacent  and  other  woods,  are 
all  in  this  direction. 

Armston  is  said  to  have  been  inclosed  in  1683. 
Long  before  that  time,  however,  other  parts  of  the 
parish  had  been  inclosed  by  tenants.  In  1602,  at 
the  instance  of  Edward  Batley,  farmer  of  the  Queen's 
manor  of  Polebrook,  it  was  found  on  inquiry  that 
30  acres  of  arable  land  and  pasture  had  been  inclosed 
by  the  first  Sir  Edward  Montagu  and  his  son,  besides 
various  other  lands  in  the  hamlet  of  Kingsthorpe.* 
An  Act  was  passed  in  1790  for  inclosing  the  common 
fields  of  Polebrook,  then  reported  to  contain  about 
1,400  acres.*  Armston  was  finally  inclosed  by  an  Act 
of  1807.9' 

Among  place  names  which  occur  are  Le  Lynch- 
furlong,  Cookesgreene,  Haselbrooke,  Cuttstones  Crosse 
(Le  Cutcrosse  in  Kingsthorp),  Hensons  Closse, 
Saltersmeare,  the  Queenes  Closse,  Hartmere  Furlong, 


'  Bridges,  ftist.  Nortbants.  ii,  414. 

•  Duchy  of  Lane.  Spec.  Com.  633. 

•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  417. 

•  T.    H.    Wright,    MS.    notes   on 
Barnwell  Esute,   1909. 


•  Buccleuch   Deeds,   F.   26. 

•  Ibid  F.  3. 

'  Ibid  F.  45. 
the  •  Duchy  of  Lane.  Spec.  Com.  633,  645. 


lOI 


» Private     Act,     30    Geo.     Ill,     cap. 

•"  Loc.  and  Personal  Act,  47  Geo.  Ill, 
SesB.  I,  cap.  19  (not  printed). 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Splint  Close,  the  stone  bridge  called  Brokforde 
Brigge,!"  (13th  century),  le  Kirkegrene  and  Copthorn- 
hill  at  Armston.ii 

In  1921  the  population  of  Polebrook  was  310,  that 
of  Armston  28,  persons. 

In   1086  Si  hides  in  POLEBROOK 

MANORS      belonged    to    Peterborough     Abbey, 

which    were    held    by    Eustace    the 

Sheriff.'-    The  overlordship  was  claimed  by  the  heirs 

of  the  Earl  Gilbert  of  Gloucester  (d.  I3i4),i3     but 

it  was  retained  by  the  Abbey  until  the  Dissolution.'^ 

In  the  reign  of  Henry  I  2J  hides  of  the  Peterborough 
fee  in  Polebrook  had  passed  from  Eustace  the  Sheriff 
to  Walter  de  Clopton.'^  A  mesne  lordship  over  this 
fee  or  some  part  of  it  was  afterwards  held  by  the 
Lovetot  lords,  as  at  Clapton  {q.v.),  until  Margery  de 
Vernon  and  Nigel  de  Amundeville  surrendered  their 
rights  in  it  to  the  Abbey.'*  It  is  probable  that  the 
manor  of  Polebrook  descended  with  that  of  Clapton 
(q.v.)  until  the  close  of  the  12th  century  when  it  fell 
to  the  share  of  Rose  or  Rohesia,  probably  sister  of 
WiUiam  de  Clopton,  Lady  of  Polebrook,"  who 
apparently  married  Hugh  le  Fleming.  Hugh  held 
the  Peterborough  manor  in  Polebrook,'*  and  presented 
to  the  church  there."  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Robert  le  Fleming,'*"  possibly  before  1 2 19  when 
Rose  by  her  son  Robert  granted  the  advowson  of 
Clapton  to  the  Abbot  of  Peterborough.-"  Robert  le 
Fleming  was  patron  and  parson  of  Polebrook  in 
1232-'  and  in  1245  held  a  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee  of 
the  old  feoffment  of  the  Honour  of  Lovetot  in  Pole- 
brook.-- This  seems  to  be  the  Polebrook  fraction  of 
the  Fleming's  third  of  a  knight's  fee  which  they  held 
together  with  a  knight's  fee  and  a  half  de  sancta 
terra  in  Polebrook,  Kingsthorpe  and  Clapton.^^  These 
tenements  went  to  make  up  the  manor  which  in 
1252  Robert  granted  in  frankalmoigne  to  Abbot 
John  de  Cauz.-''  Out  of  the  revenues  of  the  manor 
the  abbot  assigned  ;^ioa  year  for  wine  for  the  monks.-* 
The  manor  continued  in  the  hands  of  the  abbey 
until  its  dissolution  in  1529.-'' 

Another  Peterborough  tenant,  Thomas  Smert,  held 
land  in  Polebrook  in  demesne  in  the  early  years  of 
the  13th  century.'-'  He  or  his  heir  of  the  same  name 
and  others  paid  sciitage  for  their  fees  in  Polebrook, 
Kingsthorp  and  Armston  before  1252.-*  In  1299 
Thomas  Ellger  did  homage  to  the  Abbot  for  a  tene- 
ment of  the  fee  of  Smert,'-^*  but  in  1314  the  name  of 
Thomas  Smert  appears  again  as  one  of  four  tenants 
who  held  of  the  Abbot  in  Polebrook.™     A  holding  in 


Polebrook  belonged  to  the  family  of  Porthors.  A 
Reginald  Porthors  paid  scutage  in  Warmington  in 
1253,3'  and  William  Porthors  is  described  as  of  Pole- 
broo!'  in  1260,^'-  and  held  lands  there  about  lijt).'^^ 
He  had  a  son  Ralph  who  did  homage  to  the  abbot  in 
I289,'"  and  a  daughter  Sarah  who  married  Geoffrey 
le  Dispenser. 3*  Ralph  apparently  mortgaged  the 
so-called  manor  of  Polebrook  to  John  son  of  Thomas 
de  Oundle  at  the  end  of  the  13th  century.^^  Robert 
Porthors,  presumably  his  heir,  w-as  holding  here  in 
1315,"  and  was  living  in  1326- 30.^*  Richard  Porthors 
of  Polebrook  and  Agnes  his  wife  were  deaUng  with 
lands  in  Polebrook  in  1326,^' and  WiUiam  Porthors  of 
Polebrook  in  1356  to  1373.'"'  The  last  of  the  family 
at  Polebrook  to  which  reference  has  been  found  is 
Hugh  Porthors  of  Polebrook,  who  witnessed  a  charter 
in  1404.^' 

Another  hide  and  a  virgate  of  the  Peterborough 
lands  in  Polebrook  had  come  into  the  possession  of 
Roger  Marmion  in  the  reign  of  Henry  I.'-     This  land, 
as  part  of  the  fee  of  Robert 
Marmion    in     Langton     and 
Polebrook    was    confirmed   to 
the  Abbey  in   1146  by  Pope 
Eugenius  III,  and  in  1189  by 
Richard  l.« 

The  mesne  lordship  of  the 
Marmions  passed  from  Roger 
to  his  son  Robert  who  was 
slain  in  1143.  He  was  suc- 
ceeded by  another  Robert 
who  was  living  in  1155,  and 
had  a  son  Robert  who  died  in 
1 2 18.   He  had  by  his  first  wife, 

Maud  de  Beauchamp,  a  son,  '  Robert  Marmion, 
senior,'  and  by  his  second  wife,  Philippa,  two  sons, 
'  Robert  Marmion,  junior,'  and  William  Marmion,  a 
clerk.  Robert,  senior,  died  about  1242,  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  Philip,  a  minor,''^  who  died  without 
issue  about  1292.''*  On  his  death  the  mesne  lordship 
appears  to  have  reverted  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough. 

The  holders  of  this  fee  under  the  Marmions  were 
the  Grendons.  Herlwin  de  Grendon  held  J  knight's 
fee  of  the  Marmion  Fee  in  Polebrook  in  the  middle 
of  the  13th  century.'"'  He  was  succeeded  by  Ralph  de 
Grendon,  who  paid  scutage  for  ^  fee  in  1253,'"  and 
was  living  in  1262  to  1272.''*  His  son  John  was 
living  1270  to  1315.''*  Ralph  son  of  John  de 
Grendon  did  homage  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough 
in    1318,''"   and   was   apparently    succeeded    by    two 


Vair  a  fesse 


'°  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  K.  4. 

"  Ibid.  H.  80,  81. 

"  V.C.II.  Nortbanls.  i,  315A,  362. 

"  Cf.  manor  of  Cbpton  ;  see  also 
Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C  ii,  ff.  101-12  ;  Cal. 
Inq.  p.m.  v.  no.  538  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
lidw.  Ill,  file  230,  no.  Cp2  ;  ibid.  Ric.  II, 
file  47,  no.  38  ;   Hen.  IV,  file  38,  no.  41. 

'*  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  279. 

'•  r.C.II.  Norihanti.  i,  366*. 

"  Cf.  manor  of  Cl.ipton  ;  let  alio  Cot(. 
MS.  Clcop.  C  ii,  ff.   109-12. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  159b;  Ciir. 
Reg.  R.  (I'.R.O.),  i,  (I.  117,  119,  283. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C  ii,  f.  104. 

'•  De  Banco  R.  54,  m.  I5d.         '•"Ibid. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  ca«c  172, 
file  14,  No.  25. 

"  Rcl.  Hug.  dt  Wtllo  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),   ii,    164. 

"  F.gerinn  MS,  2733,  f.  141b. 


■'  Ibid.  ff.    129,   129b. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  li,  f.  1 1 1  ; 
Chi  on.  Pelrob.  (Camden  Soc.)  15  ;  De 
Banco  R.  54,  m  i5d. 

"  Gunton, //i;(.  Ch.  oj Petcrlwrough,  34; 
Sparke,  lUst.  Aiigl.  Script.  (Walter  de 
Whytlesey),   129. 

•*  Valor  Ecd.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv.  279. 

"  Cotton  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  f.  10. 

■'  Ibid.  f.  nob. 

"  Ibid.  Vesp.  E  xxi,  f.  lid. 

•°  Ibid.  f.  30  b. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  249. 

••  Bucclcuch   Deeds,  A.  37. 

"  Cott.  Chart,  xvii,  i. 

"  Chron.    I'clroh.   145. 

"  Bucclench   Deeds,   F.  41. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  175, 
file  58,  no.  32. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  E  xxi,  fol.  30  b. 

"  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  G.  17,  22,  K.  5. 

102 


"  Ibid.  K.  5. 

"  Ibid.  A.  77,  84,  D.  24.  G.  24,  25. 

"  Ibid.  G.  19. 

"  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  366A. 

"  Dugdalc,  Mou.  Angl.  i,  391  :  Cliart. 
R.  119,  m.  14. 

"  VVrottesley,  PeJ.  from  the  Pl-a  K. 
491-2. 

"  Cf.  Round,  Fend.  Engl.  189-194, 
where  the  Marmion  pedigree  is  set  out 
with  authorities. 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C.  ii,  101  b,  106. 

•'  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  248  b  ;  I'ytch- 
ley,  Bk.  0/  Fees  (North.ints  Rec.  Soc.) 
52  n.  The  '  Radulpho  Ucrlewinc  '  may 
be  for  *  Radulpho  filio  Ilerlcwine.* 

'"  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  A.  40,  41,  46, 
D.  17,  G.  8. 

"  Ibid.  F.  10,  G.  1  ;  Cott.  MS.  \'esp. 
F.  xxi,  f.  30  b. 

••  Pyfchley,  op.  cit.  157. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


POLEBROOK 


sisters."  From  these  sisters  it  passed  to  William  de 
Carlton,^'^  possibly  a  husband  or  son  of  one  of  them, 
who  was  holding  in  1346.^'  William  Carlyll  was 
described  as  of  Polebrook  in  I36l*''  and  1367,^*  and 
he  and  his  wife  Margaret  were  dealing  with  land  there 
in  1397.^"  Possibly  it  was  his  son,  William  Carlyll, 
who  did  homage  to  the  abbot  for  lands  in  Polebrook 
in  1401,-''  and  was  in  possession  of  lands  there,  held 
by  knight  service,  in  1428.'''  William  Carlyll  of  Pole- 
brook son  of  William  Carlyll  conveyed  lands  in  Pole- 
brook to  William  son  of  William  Armston.'* 

The  descent  of  ihis  holding  after  this  date  is  uncer- 
tain, it  seems  to  have  been  acquired  by  the  overlords 
the  abbots  of  Peterborough,  and  came  to  the  Crown 
at  the  Dissolution  of  that  monastery  in  1539.  It  was 
granted  together  with  the  holdings  of  Robert  le 
Fleming,  Thomas  Smert,  the  Porthors  and  the 
Grendons  as  the  manor  of  Polebrook  late  of  Peter- 
borough monastery  in  1542  to  the  Dean  and  Chapter 
of  Peterborough,'"  but  was  afterwards  resumed  and 
leased  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu.*'  Another  grant 
was  made  in  1548  to  Sir  William  Sharington,'-  who 
within  a  few  days  obtained  licence  to  alienate  the 
property  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu.*'  From  that  time 
until  1910  Polebrook  manor  has  followed  the  descent 
of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  {q.v.),  but  was  not  sold  with 
that  manor  in  191 3  and  still  belongs  to  the  Duke  of 
Buccleuch. 

In  1086  Eustace  the  Sheriff  was  tenant  in  chief 
in  Polebrook  of  a  hide  and  a  virgate  which  had  for- 
merly been  held  freely  by  Ormar.**  This  fee,  which 
had  come  into  the  possession  of  Robert  de  Cauz  in 
the  1 2th  century,*^  seems  to  be  the  manor  of  Pole- 
brook which  in  1455  was  declared  to  be  held  of 
Walter  Norton  in  socage.**  It  was  parcel  of  the 
Duchy  of  Lancaster  in  1610,*'  and  parts  of  it  were 
held  of  the  King  in  1615  and  1623.** 

In  1236,  three  parts  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Polebrook, 
Thurning  and  Clapton,  were  held  by  Robert  le 
Fleming  of  William  Patrick,  tenant  of  part  of  the 
Lovetot  fee.**  This  part  of  the  King's  fee  in  Pole- 
brook may  have  come  into  the  possession  of  Peter- 
borough Abbey  with  the  rest  of  the  Fleming  manor. 

In  1207  Ralph  son  of  Reginald  de  Polebrook 
acquired  a  virgate  in  Polebrook  from  Walter  son  of 
Agnes,  widow  of  Robert.'"  In  1229  Ralph  petitioned 
for  leave  to  divert  a  way  in  Polebrook."  Three 
years  later  the  Bishop  of  Lincoln  granted  him  per- 
mission to  have  a  chapel  with  a  chantry  in  his  court  of 
Polebrook.'^     William   son  of    Ralph    de    Polebrook 


witnessed  the  deeds  relating  to  Hemington  of  the 
middle  of  the  13th  century,'^  but  no  later  record  of 
his  tenement  seems  to  be  extant. 

Certain  messuages  and  lands  in  Polebrook  of  which 
the  reversion  was  granted  to  the  Abbot  of  Peter- 
borough by  Richard  de  Outheby  in  1339,'''  must  be 
assumed  to  have  been  part  of  the  King's  fee.  The 
rest,  as  the  manor  of  Polebrook,  had  come  into  the 
possession  of  the  Lovels  of  Tichmnrsh  before  1455, 
when  William  Lovel  '  chivalcr,'  Lord  Lovel  of  Tich- 
marsh,  died  seised  of  the  reversion  of  the  manor,  John 
Greyby  being  life  tenant.'''  Lord  Lovel  settled 
Polebrook  on  his  younger  son,  Robert,'*  whose  widow, 
Eleanor,  was  accused  of  illegal  treatment  of  his  former 
tenants  here."  In  1466,  Eleanor,  with  her  second 
husband,  Thomas  Prount,  claimed  Polebrook  and 
other  manors  as  jointure.'"  John,  Lord  Lovel,  her 
first  husband's  elder  brother,  had  died  in  1465, 
leaving  a  son,  Francis,  who  was  attainted,  and  died 
without  issue  in  1487."  His  manor  of  Polebrook 
was  granted  in  1491  to  John  Moton,'"  after  whose 
death  in  1492  it  was  acquired  by  George  Kirkham, 
who  left  it  by  will,  dated  March,  1527-28,  to  his  son 
Sir  Robert  Kirkham,  and  his  wife  Sibill.*'  Messuages 
and  lands  in  Polebrook  were  in  the  possession  of 
Sir  Robert  and  his  wife,  Richard  and  Katherine 
Pallady,  and  Thomas  Henson  in  1547,'-  but  at  the 
beginning  of  the  ne.\t  century  the  manor  belonged  to 
the  Crown  as  parcel  of  the  possessions  of  the  Duchy 
of  Lancaster.®'  Messuages  and  lands  which  seem 
to  have  formed  part  of  it  were  held  of  the  King  in 
chief  in  1615,  1623  and  1634,"^  but  about  the  middle 
of  the  I7fh  century  it  was  conveyed  by  William  Raby 
and  his  wife,  Katherine,  Thomas  Roborne,  and  Richard 
Goodman  and  his  wife,  Joan,  to  Thomas  Andrew,®^ 
possibly  the  Thomas  Andrew,  senior,  who  held  it 
with  Thomas  Andrew,  junior,  in  168 1."*  Later 
owners  were  John  Buxton  and  his  wife,  Ehzabeth, 
and  Lawford  Watts  and  his  wife,  Sara,  from  whom  a 
moiety  of  the  manor  passed  to  Thomas  Goodfellow 
in  1694."'  Both  moieties  were  in  1774  the  property 
of  Mary  Goodfellow,  widow,  and  Catherine  Good- 
fellow,"®  the  latter  of  whom  was  presumably  the 
spinster  of  that  name  who  owned  land  in  Polebrook 
in  1790."' 

Domesday  Book  accounts  for  5  hides  of  land  in 
JRMSTON  (Mermeston  xi  cent.,  Armeston  xii  cent., 
Ermeston,  Armston  xiii  cent.,  Armenston,  Armis- 
torem,  Armyston  xiv  cent.)  and  Kingsthorpe  belong- 
ing to  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough.*'    In  the  reign  of 


"  Pytchley,  op.  citu  52. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  415. 

"  Buccleuch   Deeds,    K.    6. 

"  Col.  Close,   1364-8,  p.  374. 

»•  Buccleuch  Deeds,  I.  8a,  K.8. 

•'  .\dd.  MS.  25288. 

"  Feud.     Aids,     iv.     48  ;      Buccleuch 
Deeds,  K.  9. 

"  Ibid.  I.  8a. 

"Pat.  R.  33  lien.  V1!I,  pt.  3, 

*'  Gunton,  op.  cit.  66. 

••  Pat.  R.  2  Edw.  VI,  pt.  4,  m.  14. 

"  Ibid.  2  Edw.  VI,  pt.  3, 
Buccleuch  Coll.  Ser.  Chron.  p.  259. 
Sir  Edward  bought  out  the  interests 
of  the  Crown  lessees,  Ibid.  p.  259-74. 

'•  V.C.H.  Nortbants.  i,  349  *. 

"  Ibid.  i.  366  b. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  VI,  file  158, 
no.  28. 


'4- 


35; 


"  Pat.  R.  7  Jas.  I,  pt.  35,  m.  6. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii)  cccxlviii, 
122  ;    ccccxv,   III. 

"  Book  of  Fees,  i,  580. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  171, 
file  12,  no.  202. 

"  Close  R.  39,  m.  16. 

"  Roi.  Hug.  de  yVelles  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  ii,  255-56. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  12,  30,  R.  43, 
G.  4. 

"Inq.  a.  q.  d.  file  251,  no.  5;  Cal. 
Pal.    133S-40,    pp.    249-50. 

"  Exch.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  i)  file  199, 
no.  2. 

"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  31,  no.  254. 

"  Chan.  Proc.  Eliz.  (Rec.  Com.)  ii, 
p.  Ixix. 

"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  31,  no. 
254. 

'•  Complete  Peerage  v,  164-65. 


">  Pat.  R.  6  Hen.  \'II,  m.  13  ;  Cal  Pat. 
i.|S5-94,  p.  406. 

"  Coll.  Top.  ct  Gen.  vol.  v,  cli.  24, 
p.  307. 

»'  I'eet  of  F.  N'ortliants.  E;ist.  37  Hen. 
VIII. 

'"  Duchy  of  L.'inc.  Spec.  Com.  633. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii)  cccxlviii, 
122;   cccctviii;    Dcxxxi,  8. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  22 
Chas.  I.  In  1651,  however,  the  site  of 
the  manor  was  owned  by  Nicholas  Hunt. 
(Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  1651  ;  Recov. 
R.   East.   1651,  ro.    15.) 

•*  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  22  Chas. 
II. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  4  and 
I!il.  6    Will,  and  Mary. 

"  Ibid.  Trin.    14  Geo.   III. 

"  Private  Act  30  Geo.  Ill,  cap.  26. 

"  y.C.H.  Xonhanis.  i,  315*. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Henry  I,  however,  Armston  alone  is  described  as 
extending  over  more  than  5  hides,  the  whole  still 
forming  part  of  the  Peterborough  fee,"-  and  this 
overlordship  continued  until  the  15th  century. 

The  five  knights,  tenants  of  Peterborough  Abbey 
in  io86,'2  were  followed  by  five  others  in  the  next 
century.'^  One  of  these  knights  was  probably 
Geoffrey  of  Winchester,  who  held  3  virgates  in 
Burghley  of  the  Abbot.^^  Geoffrey's  fees  went  to 
William  de  Burghley,  who  claimed  to  be  hereditary 
reeve  of  the  abbot's  liberty  of  Stamford,  and  is  men- 
tioned in  1 1 16  and  lliS.*''  He  was  succeeded  by 
Roger  de  Burghley,  who  surrendered  the  office  of 
reeve  of  Stamford,  and  was  living  in  1143-4.'^  The 
next  holder  apparently  was  William  de  Burghley, 
who  was  holding  in  1189  and  by  1212  had  been 
succeeded  by  a  third  William,  who  was  holding  two 
fees  in  Burghley  and  Armston  in  1227.^'  Probably  a 
fourth  William  was  holding  in  1254  and  1260,^'  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Roger,  who  died  in  1280.*' 
Roger  was  followed  by  Thomas  de  Burghley ,1  and  he 
by  Geoffrey  de  Burghley,  who  did  homage  to  the 
abbot  in  1322  and  1327  for  his  fee  in  Armston.- 
Geoffrev,  by  his  wife  Mariota,  had  a  son  Peter.'  In 
1346,  Mariota,  widow  of  Geoffrey,  is  mentioned  as 
holding  a  fee  in  Burghley,""  and  in  1428  she  is  named 
as  a  former  tenant  of  the  fee  of  the  abbot  of  Peter- 
borough in  Armston,  then  held  by  Gerveys  Wykes.^ 

Another  mesne  lordship  here,  possibly  over  the 
same  lands,  belonged  to  Reginald  de  Grey  in  1256, 
who  settled  on  John  de  Grey  a  knight's  fee  in  Armston 
inherited  from  his  mother,  Emma.*  His  successor, 
Reginald  de  Grey,  in  1295 
held  of  the  Burghley  heirs,' 
and  Richard  de  Syward  was 
his  sub-tenant.'  Below  Syward 
again  came  James  Byron. 
Richard  Byron,  probably 
James's  great  nephew  and 
heir,'  complained  in  1308  that 
the  prior  of  the  Hospital  of 
Armston  and  others  had  be- 
sieged him  in  his  manor  house 
for  two  days  and  assaulted 
him   in   the   High    Street    of 

Armston.^"  Sir  James  Byron  was  dealing  with  lands  in 
Kingsthorp  and  Armston  in  the  middle  of  the  14th 
century,'!  anj  John  Byron  was  holding  lands  there 
in  1364.!^  A  small  property  in  Armston,  held  of 
John  Byron  by  Sir  John  Knyvet  of  Winwick,  Hunts, 
who  died  in  1381,''  seems  to  have  been  part  of  this 
Byron  manor  which  was  included  in  a  settlement 
made  in   1441   on  Sir  Robert  Booth  and  others  by 


BvRoN.     Argent    three 
bastons  gules. 


•'  y.C.H.  Norihanls.  i,  366A. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Ibid. 

•*lbid.  315  a;  Pytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Fees 
(Northanu  Rec.  Soc.)  88  n. 

••  Ibid.  88  n. 

••  Ibid.  88,  88  n. 

•'  Ibid.  88  n,  89  n ;  Cal.  Chart.  R. 
1226-57,  p.  20. 

••  Pytchlcy,  op.  cit.  88,  89  n  ;  Egerton 
MS.  2733,  f.  128  b. 

"  Pytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Fees,  89  n. 

'  Ibid. 

•  Cott.  MS.  Vcipaiian  E  xxi,  i.  41, 
78  b.  81. 

•  Pytchlcy,  op.  cit.  88,  89  n. 

•  Ibid. 


*  Frud.  Aids,  iv,  47. 

*  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  case  283,  file  14, 
no.  318. 

'  Intj.  .T.q.d.  file  24,  no.  i8.  •  Ibid. 

*  Thoroton,  Hist.  Nolls,  ii,  2S5. 
"Cal.  Pal.  1307-13,  p.  168,  Rich.ird's 

•on,  J.ime»,  must  be  the  J.imes  Byron 
mentioned  in  the  return  of  1428,  and  the 
Abbey's  former  ten.int  in  Armston. 
{Feud.  Aids,  iv,  47.) 

"  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  A.  69,  F.  42. 

"Ibid.  G.  25. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Ric.  II,  file  15, 
no.  32. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  case  293,  file 
70,  no.  253. 

"  Fts.  of  Now.  (Harl.  Soc.  iv),  9. 

104 


Sir  John  Byron  of  Clayton  and  his  wife  Margery,** 
daughter  of  John  Booth  of  Barton,  Lancashire.'^ 
Bridges  identifies  the  carucate  possessed  by  James 
Byron  in  1295  with  lands  called  from  their  owner 
'  Buren's  thing.'  These  lands  were  settled  in  1463 
by  William  Aldvvincle,  lord  of  Ticlimarsh  manor  in 
Aldwincle,  on  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  who,  with  her 
second  husband,  William  Chamber,  granted  them  in 
1489  to  the  chantry  they  had  founded  in  the  church 
of  Aldvvincle.'*  The  manor  of  Armston  belonging  to 
this  chantry  was  sold  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu  in 
1547,"  and  descended  from  that  time  with  Barnwell 
St.  Andrew  (q.v.),but  was  not  sold  in  191 3  and  is  still 
in  the  possession  of  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch. 

Another  of  the  five  Peterborough  tenants  in 
Armston,  in  the  reign  of  Henry  I,  was  Guy  Maufe, 
who  held  a  hide  of  the  Abbey  land.'*  Some  part  of 
his  fee  seems  to  have  been  included  in  Hervey  de 
Borham's  grant  to  Thorney  Abbey,  of  the  manor  of 
Kingsthorpe  (q.v.),  and  was  held  by  this  house  in 
1291."  As  lands  in  Armston  of  the  late  Abbey  of 
Thorney,  then  occupied  by  John  Robery,  they  were 
acquired  by  Sir  Edward  Montagu,  with  the  manor  of 
Luddington  (q.v.),  in  1544. 

From  the  first  half  of  the  12th  century  the  history  of 
the  rest  of  t!:e  Peterborough  lands  in  Armston,  held  by 
Turkil,  by  Geoffrey  de  Gunthorpe,  and  by  Tedrick,^* 
is  obscure.  Geoffrey  may  have  been  ancestor  of  the 
Geoffrey  of  Southorpe  who  did  homage  to  the  Abbot 
for  lands  in  Armston  in  1275,^'  but  no  later  mention 
of  the  tenure  of  this  family  occurs,  and  it  can  only 
be  supposed  that  all  three  holdings  were  eventually 
united  in  the  manor  of  Armston,  in  Armston,  and 
that  the  nucleus  of  it  may  have  been  the  lands  held 
by  a  family  who  bore  the  name  of  the  hamlet. 

These  lands  were  originally  held  apparenily  by 
Gudold  the  Beadle,  whose  lands  were  confirmed  to 
Peterborough  Abbey  by  Henry  I.-^  Philip  de  Armston 
paid  lid.  towards  an  aid  at  the  close  of  the  12th 
century,  and  held  land  in  Armston  by  the  service 
of  •[\  of  a  knight's  fee  payable  to  the  chamber  of  the 
Abbot.2'  It  was  probably  the  same  Philip  who  was 
holding  of  the  Honour  of  Peterborough  in  1211-12,2* 
and  with  his  son  Reginald  witnessed  a  charter  of  Abbot 
Robert  de  Lindsey  (1214-22). ^^  Philip  also  had  a  son 
Bartholomew,  whose  son  Geoffrey,^®  with  Stephen  de 
Winwick,  held  J  of  a  fee  in  1 254.2^  The  descent  at 
this  date  becomes  uncertain.  A  John  de  Armston, 
probably  a  brother  or  son  of  Geoffrey,  had  a  son 
Robert,  who  took  the  name  of  Berncwcll,-'  and  a 
daughter  Isabel,  who  had  a  son  John.-"  John  de 
Armston  seems  also  to  have  had  a  son  '  John  de 
Armston,  called  Despenser,''"  whose  name  frequently 

*•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  211. 

"  Pat.  38  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  7,  ni.  36. 

••  r.C.H.  Northaiits.  i.  366*. 

'»  Pope  Nich.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com.),  55  b. 

"  V.C.H.  Norihanls.  ii,  366*. 

"  Soc.  Aniiq.  MS.  60,  159/1. 

"  Pytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northanti 
Rec.  Soc),  136  n.  This  land  may  have 
been  held  later  byTuricor  Teduck.    Ibid. 

»  Ibid. 

»  Red.  Bk.  of  the  Exch.  (Rolls  Scr.), 
ii,  619. 

'•  Pytchlcy,  loc.  cit. 

■"  Bucclcuch  Deeds,  A,  31,  D.  11. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  249. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  15,  F.  3. 

"  Ibid.  F.  3.  "Ibid.  K.  3. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


POLEBROOK 


occurs  in  the  Buccleuch  Deeds  of  the  last  quarter 
of  the  13th  century  as  John  le  Despenser,  or  Spenser, 
of  Armston.'i  He  had  by  his  wife  M.ibel  three  sons, 
John  le  Despencer,  Geoffrey,  and  Walter.^-  Of  these, 
John  had  three  sons,  Philip  le  Spenser,  by  whom  he 
was  succeeded  in  I3I4,''^  David  le  Spenser,-'''  and 
John  le  Spenser,  chaplain,^*  who  together  held  a 
part  of  Philip  de  Armston's  {3  of  "  knight's  fee  in 
Armston'*  ;  Geoffrey  had  by  his  wife  Sarah"  a  son, 
John  le  Spenser,  who  was  holding  in  the  middle  of  the 
14th  century. 

Another  tenement  in  Armston  was  held  by  Ralph 
de  Trublcvill,  sheriflF  of  Northamptonshire  in  1223, 
whose  name  appears  here  as  early  as  1202.'*  His 
wife  was  Alice,  who  seems  to  have  been  an  heiress.^" 
In  1224  he  received  timber  from  the  King's  wood 
of  VVrikes  towards  the  repair  of  his  house  at  Armston,'" 
and  in  1 232  he  and  his  wife  built  the  Hospital  of  St. 
John  the  Baptist  of  Armston  on  their  land,"  and 
Alice  presented  the  first  master.''-  The  fee  later  went 
to  Geoffrey,  brother  of  Berengar  le  Moyne  of  Barn- 
well St.  Andrew,  and  he  presented  a  master  to  the 
hospital  in  1274.''*  Two  years  later  Geoffrey  claimed 
view  of  frankpledge  and  assize  of  bread  and  ale.'''' 
He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Reginald,''*  who  pre- 
sented a  master  in  1298'*  and  in  1302.  His  wife's 
name  was  Divorgilla.*'  John  Moyne  presented  in 
1353,'"  and  with  his  wife  Cecily  settled  the  manor 
and  advowson  of  the  Hospital  possibly  in  favour 
of  William  Peytevj'n  of  Armston,  who  had  letters 
of  protection  for  the  King's  service  in  Ireland  in 
1363.''*  In  1381  he  presented  to  the  Hospital,^*  and 
in  1393-4  William  with  his  wife  Joan  conveyed  lands 
in  Armston  and  Kingsthorpe  and  the  advowson 
of  the  Hospital,  all  of  Joan's  inheritance,  to  William 
Armston,"^  whose  wife  Joan  was  possibly  the  daughter 
of  William  Peytevyn.  William  Armston  claimed  to 
be  patron  when  a  new  constitution  was  given  to 
the  Hospital  in  1397,*^  and  he  and  his  wife  were 
alive  in  1428.*^  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  William, 
who  married  Maud  and  presented  to  the  Hospital 
in  1430.*''  He  was  succeeded  by  another  William 
Armston,  whose  widow  Ellen  was  in  1500  the  wife  of 
Robert  Halley.**  Thomas,  son  of  the  last-named 
William  Armston,  inherited  his  father's  estate  and 
was  living  in  1535.**  A  petition  was  presented  by 
Thomas  Armston  against  Richard  Compton,  master  of 


the  Hospital,  for  neglect  of  his  duties  in  not  praying 
for  the  souls  of  the  founders  nor  saying  divine  service 
in  the  chapel  of  the  Hospital  for  the  benefit  of  the 
inhabitants  living  at  a  distance  from  tlie  parish 
clurch.^' 

Thomas  was  succeeded  by  his  half-brother,  William 
Armston,  who  was  dead  by  1540,*'  when  the  in- 
heritance was  disputed  under  various  settlements. 
The  claimants  were  Thomas  Henson,  son  of  Elizabeth, 
sister  of  the  last-named  William  Armston,  who  is 
said  to  have  married  John  Henson  ;  Katherine, 
daughter  of  Guy,  son  of  the  elder  William  Armston 
by  his  third  wife,  which  Katherine  was  then  liiewife 
of  Richard  Pallady,  and  was  said  to  be  illegitimate  ; 
and  Sir  Robert  Kirkham,  son  of  Anne,  sister  of  Guy, 
who  had  married  George  Kirkham.^*  The  matter 
was  compromised,  and  the  disputants  joined,  about 
1545,  in  conveying  the  estate  to  John  I.anc,^''  by 
whom  it  was  sold  in  1548  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu.** 
The  Hospital  was  dissolved  by  Sir  Robert  Kirkham 
in  1536,  and  sold  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu.*-  The 
Crown,  however,  granted  it  in  1548  to  Sir  William 
Sharington,  who  conveyed  his  title  to  Sir  Edward 
Montagu.  Probably  on  account  of  Sharington's 
attainder  it  was  granted  by  the  Crown  in  1588  to 
Edward  Wymark.'^  The  Montagus  seem  to  have 
come  to  terms  with  Wymark  and  retained  possession, 
and  the  lands  of  the  Hospital  remained  part  of  the 
Manor  of  Armston,  which  descended  with  Barnwell 
St.  Andrew**  until  1913,  when  it  continued  in  the 
possession  of  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch. 

A  family  of  Porthors  of  Armston  held  lands  there 
in  the  13th  century.**  Andrew  Porthors  had  a  son 
John,  who  with  his  wife  Rose  was  living  about 
1270.**  They  had  a  son  John  and  a  daughter  Alice, 
who  married  John  de  Milton,*'  living  in  1305.*' 

One  hide  and  a  virgate  of  land  in  Kingsthorpe 
(Chingestorp,  xi  cent.  ;  Kyngesthorp,  xii  cent. ; 
Kynestorp,  xiii  cent.)  belonged  to  the  fee  of  Peter- 
borough*^ from  the  12th  to  the  15th  century.'"  The 
Abbot  of  Peterborough's  lands  here  were  partly  of  the 
fee  of  Maufe  and  partly  of  the  fee  of  Lovetot.'i  The 
mesne  lordships  followed  the  descents  of  Woodford 
and  Clapton  respectively  (q-v.)-  Walter  de  Lodinton, 
the  abbot's  immediate  tenant  in  the  reign  of  Henry  I,'^ 
may  have  been  the  predecessor  of  the  one  or  other, 
or  of  both.  Robert  Maufe  gave  lands  here  to  the  abbot 


"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  7,  A.  46,  D.  10, 
22,  23,  F.  I,  2,  4,  23,  24. 

"  Ibid.  F.  34,  41  ;    Cbmn.  Petrob.  23. 

"  Ibid. 

•*  Buccleuch  Deeds,  A.  121,  G.  23. 

••  Ibid.  F.  42,  43,  G.  17,  23. 

••  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 

•'  Buccleuch  Deeds,  F.  10,  41. 

"List  of  Sberifs,  92;  Plac.  Abbrev. 
(Rec.  Com.),  41. 

"  She  was  possibly  Alice  de  Polebrock, 
who  held  lands  in  Kingsthorp  at  this 
time  (Buccleuch  Deeds,  G.  2,  4). 

"  Close  R.  28,  m.  3. 

"  Anct.  D.  C.  31 19;  Rot.  Hug.  ie 
Wellfs  (Cant,  and  York.  Soc),  ii,  255-6. 

"  Ibid.  164.  In  1269  Walter  de  Vernon 
gave  5  marks  for  prayers  for  the  soul  of 
Margaret  de  Pomeray  (Buccleuch  Deeds, 
D.  25). 

"  Ibid.  H.  30,  34  i  Rot.  Rich,  de  Graves- 
tnd  (Cant,  and  York.  Soc),  122. 

'*  R<it.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  8. 

*•  Buccleuch  Deeds,  F.  23.    CtoRttj't 


widow  Lucy  was  dealing  with  lands  in 
Armston  about  1280.    Ibid.  F.  24. 

*•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  419. 

*'  Buccleuch   Deeds,  F.  23. 

*'  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  177, 
file  81,  no.  494;  Cal.  Pat.  1361-4, 
p.  428. 

'"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  case  178, 
file  88,  no.  144. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  F.  44. 

"  Feud.  Atds,  iv,  48. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

••  Buccleuch  Deeds,  I.  6,  6  a. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

•'  Buccleuch  Deeds,  D.  36. 

"  Ct.  of  Req.  bdle  6,  no.  133  ;  bdle  7, 
no.  120. 

"Bridges,  ii,  417-20;  according  to 
the  Visitation  of  1564,  Anne  was  the 
daughter  of  Thomas  Armston.  (Met- 
calfe, Visit,  of  Northants,  p  .30 ;  Ct.  of  Req. 
bdle  6,  no.  133  ;  bdle  7,  no.  120). 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hen.  VIII, 
case  32,  file  218. 

■*  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Chantry.  Cert.  Northants  xxxv,  no. 
44  ;   xxxvi,  no.  33. 

"  Pat.  R.  30  Eliz.  pt.  7,  m.  6. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  9  Chas.  I ; 
Mich.  1658;  ibid.  Northants.  East.  33 
Geo.  II  i  16  Geo.  Ill;  Recov.  R.  Trin. 
9  Chas.  I,  m.  40  ;  Hil.  3  Anne,  m.  223  ; 
East.  33  Geo.  II,  m.  162  ;  9  Geo.  IV,  m. 
122. 

"  Buccleuch  Deeds,  D.  9,  G.  4. 

"  Ibid.  D.  7,  10,  F.  3,  12,  21,  G.  4,  K.  4. 

"  Ibid.  F.  23.  ••  Ibid.  H.  47,  48. 

••  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  367. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  xxi,  fol.  30  b  ; 
Cleop.  C  ii,  fols.  104  b,  743  b  ;  Feet  of 
F.  Northants.  case  174,  file  50,  no.  902  ; 
Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  8  ;  Feud. 
Aids,  iv,  48,  51. 

"  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  56,  90. 

"  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  367a. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


of  Thorney,'^  and  in  1346  the  abbot  of  Thorney 
and  Roger  Hurst  held  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Kings- 
thorpe  and  Remington  of  the  two  fees  which  William 
Maufe  formerly  held  of  Peterborough.'*  In  1270 
probably  the  Lovetots'  manor  of  Kingsthorpe  was 
held  by  Alan  de  Chartres  in  right  of  his  wife  Joan. 
They  granted  it  to  Hervey  de  Borham,  Archdeacon  of 
Salop,'*  who  in  1256  conveyed  it  with  lands  in  Heming- 
ton  and  Armston  to  the  abbot  of  Thorney."  It  seems 
that  Thorney  Abbey  acquired  the  lands  of  both  fees 
which  it  held  through  several  mesne  lords  of  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough. 

In  1540  messuages  and  over  loo  acres  in  Kings- 
thorpe vrith  land  in  Remington  and  Luddington, 
and  in  1544  a  small  property  in  Armston  and  Kings- 
thorpe, all  belonging  to  the  late  monastery  of  Thorney, 


ScALK  OF  Feet 

Plan  of  Polebrook  Church 

were  granted  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu."'  Togetiier 
they  seem  to  have  made  up  the  Montagu  manor  of 
Kingsthorpe  which  followed  the  descent  of  Barnwell 
St.  Andrew. 

The  Church  of  ALL  SAINTS  con- 
CHURCH  sists  of  chancel  29  ft.  8  in.  by  15  ft., 
clearstoried  nave  45  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft., 
with  north  and  south  aisles  and  porches,  north  and 
south  transeptal  chapels,  and  tower  9  ft.  8  in.  square, 
surmounted  by  a  spire  at  the  west  end  of  the  south 
aisle.  All  the  above  measurements  are  internal. 
The  whole  of  the  building  is  faced  with  rubble,  and 
has  plain  parapets  throughout.  The  roofs  of  the 
aisles  and  chapels  are  leaded,  while  the  nave  is  covered 
with  small  grey  slates  and  the  chancel  with  blue 
slates.     All  the  walls  are  plastered  internally. 

The  church  seems  to  have  consisted  at  first  of  a 
chancel   and   nave   with   an   '  axial  '   tower   between 


them,  as  at  Barton  Seagrave.  Late  in  the  12th  cen'.ury 
the  north  aisle  was  added  to  the  nave,  and  a  transeptal 
chapel  constructed  on  this  side,  for  which  an  arch 
was  maae  in  the  north  wall  of  the  tower.  The  chancel 
arch,  if  not  the  whole  chancel,  was  also  rebuilt. 
The  present  aisle  and  chapel,  however,  belong  to  the 
next  century,  and  are  part  of  a  general  reconstruction 
and  enlargement,  possibly  when  the  church  was 
granted  in  1232  by  Robert  le  Fleming  to  Peterborough 
Abbey.  This  reconstruction  included  a  lengthened 
chancel  and  the  entire  rebuilding  of  the  west  wall 
of  the  church,  which  was  continued  southward  as  the. 
base  of  a  tower  which  was  now  added.  East  of  the 
tower  a  south  aisle  was  built,  opening  into  the  nave 
by  an  arcade  of  two  bays.  During  the  14th  century 
a  small  transeptal  chapel  was  added  on  the  south 
side.  The  nave  clearstory  was  added 
later,  when  the  roof  was  flattened. 
The  church  was  restored  in  1S43. 

The  chancel  retains  in  the  south 
wall,  towards  the  west  end,  a  plain 
priest's  doorway  with  a  round  arch, 
now  blocked  externally,  which  seems 
to  belong  to  the  earlier  and  shorter 
chancel.  The  south  wall  is  lighted  by 
three  lancets  with  internal  splays. 
These  break  the  external  string-course, 
and  appear  to  have  been  altered  after 
their  first  making.  The  westernmost 
was  lengthened  downwards  into  a 
low-side  opening,  partly  blocked,  the 
lower  part  of  which,  beneath  a  tran- 
som, was  rebated  for  a  shutter  opening 
outwards.  In  the  east  wall  is  a  group 
of  three  lancets,  the  middle  one  being 
higher  than  the  others,  and  all  being 
treated  very  plainly  on  the  outside, 
with  separate  labels.  The  east  part  of 
the  north  wall  was  covered  by  a  vestry, 
some  traces  of  which  remain  in  the 
walls  of  the  modern  vestry  on  the  site. 
West  of  this  are  two  lancets.  That 
on  the  east  is  shorter  than  those  in 
the  opposite  wall,  and  was  left  un- 
altered when  they  were  lengthened. 
The  western  has  a  low-side  extension  like  that  of 
the  window  opposite,  also  partly  blocked.  The  chancel 
is  without  buttresses  and  the  parapets  are  carried  on 
13th  century  corbel  tables  with  grotesque  heads.  At 
the  south-east  angle  are  three  scratch  dials." 

The  north  chapel,  which  measures  internally 
32  ft.  by  17  ft.  6  in.,  is  a  remarkable  feature  in  the 
plan,  being  actually  longer  and  wider  than  the  chancel. 
It  has  a  plain  string-course  carried  round  it,  which  is 
lowered  on  the  north  wall.  In  the  east  wall  there  are 
two  two-light  openings  with  flowing  tracery,  inserted 
in  the  14th  century.  Tlierc  is  a  modern  four-light 
window,  with  a  four-centred  head,  in  the  north  wall. 
An  original  lancet  remains  in  the  west  wall.  The 
gable  cross  is  of  the  13th  century,"  to  which  date  also 
the  cross  above  the  east  window  of  the  church  seems  to 
belong.  The  parapets  of  the  chapel  are  on  corbel 
tables,  with  masks  which,  except  five,  arc  plain. 


12U  Cent,  earlv 
C.1I80-90 

131  Century 

I liU  CilNTURY 
D  .\  ioDERN 


"  Pytchlty,  op.  cit.  (io  n. 
"  Bridget,  op.  cit.  ii,  420. 
"  Feet  of    F.    Northanti.    ca»e     174, 
file  41),  no.  895,  Chjrt.  R.  135,  m.  26. 
'•  Feet    o(    F.    Northanti.    caie    174, 


file  50,  no.  1)02  j   Biircleuch  Deeds,  A.  26, 
C.  7. 

"•  Pat.  R.  31  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m.  31, 
32  ;  36  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m.  I  ;  Chart.  R. 
135,  m.  26. 

106 


"  The  peg  hole  of  one  is  12  in.  from 
the  .ingle,  and  of  the  others  12  in.  and 
2  ft.  8  in. 

"  The  gable  itself  has  been  rebuilt. 


w 


u 


o 

Oh 


< 


OS  ^ 

2  H 

a:  U 

■^  O 


I-H 


u 


o 


^tH 


'  111*. 


X 


---*• 


j  te?»2:^-.-'4  i4kj^,:^*i.  _  I 


\ 


■^. 


I'oLtBRooK  Church  i  rom  ihl  West 


I'oi.iuRooK  CiRRtii  :    W.M.I.  Arcadi:  or   Norih   (.'haimi 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


POLEBROOK. 


There  are  no  windows  in  the  wall  of  the  north 
aisle,  which  is  of  one  build  with  the  adjoining  wall 
of  the  transept.  Towards  the  east  end  there  is  a  plain 
pointed  doorway  witli  plain  hood.  This  is  covered  by 
a  large  porch  with  a  fine  outer  archway  of  two  orders 
with  shafted  jambs.  The  arch  is  elaborately  moulded 
with  deep  hollows  between  the  rolls,  the  shafts  have 
capitals  with  conventional  foliage,  dog-tooth  is  freely 
used,  and  grotesque  figure-sculpture  is  introduced 
into  the  ornament.  At  the  north-west  corner  of  the 
aisle  is  a  diagonal  buttress,  and  the  west  window 
is  of  two  lights,  inserted  about  1300. 

There  is  a  13th-century  buttress  at  the  junction 
of  the  aisle  with  the  west  wall  of  the  nave,  which  is 
of  the  same  build.  There  is  no  west  doorway,  and  the 
four-light  west  window  has  been  much  modernised, 
themullionsand  tracery  being  new.  The  gable  has  been 
rebuilt.  As  already  noted,  the  west  wall  is  continued 
southward,  with  a  slight  thickening,  as  the  base  of  the 
tower,  the  point  of  departure  being  concealed  by  a 
buttress  set  diagonally.  This,  with  the  corresponding 
buttresses  at  the  south-west  and  south-east  angles 
of  the  tower,  are  apparently  part  of  the  original 
design,  and  if  so,  are  a  very  early  and  unusual  example 
of  the  use  of  this  plan  of  buttress.  The  tower  has  a 
round-headed  west  window  with  a  wide  internal  splay, 
and  a  small  blocked  window  in  the  south  wall.  In 
each  face  of  the  belfry  stage  is  a  two-light  window 
with  mid-shaft  and  double-shafted  jambs,  and  the 
whole  is  finished  with  a  broach-spire.  The  spire  has 
plain  angles  and  three  sets  of  spire  lights. 

The  short  length  of  aisle  wall  between  the  tower 
and  south  chapel  is  almost  covered  by  an  early 
13th-century  porch,  which  has  a  plain  doorway 
with  clustered  jamb-shafts,  much  weathered,  and  a 
deep  hood-mould  with  a  fleur-de-lys  at  the  apex. 
On  the  gable  of  the  porch  is  a  curious  coped  stone. 
The  doorway  inside  the  porch  is  round-headed  with 
a  roll-moulding,  and  is  probably  the  south  doorway 
of  the  earlier  church  rebuilt  in  this  position. 

The  south  chapel  was  built  in  the  14th  century, 
and  is  narrower  and  much  shorter  than  the  north 
chapel.  There  is  a  three-light  window  in  the  south 
wall  with  modern  tracery,"  and  a  square-headed 
window  of  two  lights  in  the  east  wall.  North  of  this 
the  junction  with  the  13th-century  east  wall  of  the 
south  aisle  is  clear,  but  the  string-course  which  is 
carried  round  the  chapel  is  continuous  with  the  earlier 
work,  and  has  evidently  been  re-used.  There  is  a 
lancet  in  the  east  wall  of  the  aisle. 

Internally,  the  irregularity  of  design  is  very  notice- 
able, owing  to  the  want  of  correspondence  between 
the  spacing  of  the  north  and  south  arcades.  This  is 
due  to  the  unusual  position  of  the  tower,  and  to  the 
fact  that  the  two  bays  of  the  north  arcade  are  west 
of  the  piece  of  wall  which  marks  the  north-west  angle 
of  the  earlier  tower  between  nave  and  chancel,  while 
on  the  south  the  corresponding  piece  of  wall  was 
removed,  and  the  arcade  of  two  bays  carried  to  the 
east  end  of  the  nave.  The  north  arcade,  the  arch 
opening  from  the  old  tower-space  into  the  north 
chapel,  and  the  chancel  arch  are  all  of  one  date,  about 


1180-90.  The  arches  are  round-headed,  with  two 
chamfers  and  end-stops.  The  responds  of  tlic  chancel 
and  chapel  arches  and  that  at  the  west  end  of  the 
arcade  have  capitals  of  cruciform  pattern  with  broad 
waterleaf  ornament,  the  tips  of  the  leaves  finishing  of? 
in  crockets.  The  east  respond  and  the  pier  of  the 
arcade  have  handsome  voluted  capitals  with  foliated 
angle-crockets.  The  pier  and  responds  are  circular 
and  slender  in  diameter.  The  bases  of  the  pier  and 
the  chancel  responds  have  claw-corners,  left  plain. 
Some  of  the  foliage  of  the  capitals  has  been  left 
uncarved. 

On  the  south  side  of  the  nave  the  tower,  occupying 
the  western  part  of  the  south  aisle,  was  built  before 
the  rest  of  the  aisle  and  was  probably  begun  shortly 
after  the  first  additions  upon  the  north  side.  It 
opens  into  the  nave  by  an  arch  with  three  chamfered 
orders  and  half  round  responds  with  moulded  capitals 
and  bases.  A  similar  low  arch  communicates  in  the 
east  wall  with  the  south  aisle;  above  this  arch  is  the 
line  of  a  former  steep  pitched  aisle  roof.  As  already 
noted,  there  is  a  splayed  window  with  a  round-headed 
arch  in  the  west  wall. 

The  arcade  between  the  nave  and  the  south  aisle  is 
of  the  early  part  of  the  13th  century.  There  are  two 
lofty  round-headed  arches,*"  of  two  chamfered  orders 
and  the  capitals  of  the  responds  and  dividing  pier 
are  carved  with  a  variety  of  foliage,  that  of  the  pier 
having  very  thick  stalks,  while  the  foliage  of  the  west 
respond  is  arranged  in  wind-blown  fashion.  The 
bases  of  the  piers  have  thin  and  rather  shallow 
water-moulds. 

The  north  chapel  is  entirely  of  the  13th  century, 
the  earlier  chapel  having  probably  been  much  shorter. 
Belowthe  windows  in  the  east  wall  runs  a  roll-and-fiUet 
string-course,  which  is  lifted  below  the  northernmost 
window  to  give  room  for  the  retable  of  an  altar,  but 
has  been  broken  and  badly  rejoined  at  the  south  end 
of  the  heightened  piece.  It  is  continued  along  the 
north  wall,  near  the  east  end  of  which  it  is  again  lifted 
for  a  large  rectangular  aumbry  with  rebated  edge. 
West  of  this  in  the  north  wall  are  three  elaborately 
moulded  pointed  arches,  set  on  a  bench-table,  and 
springing  from  slender  single  shafts.*'  The  heads 
of  the  stones  which  join  the  capitals  to  the  wall  at  the 
back  are  carved  at  the  ends  with  dog-tooth  pattern, 
and  at  the  joining  of  the  inner  mouldings  there  are 
fine  sculptured  bosses.  The  bosses  at  the  ends  of 
the  hood-moulds  are  carved  with  (west)  a  mitred 
head,  (centre)  an  elaborate  floriated  cross,  beneath 
which  is  a  somewhat  similar  cross,  and  (cast)  conven- 
tional foliage.  Against  the  west  wall  of  the  chapel  is 
a  similar  arcade  of  six  arches  upon  a  lower  bench-table. 
The  two  rows  of  arches  seem  to  have  been  built 
independently  of  one  another  and  then  roughly 
joined.  The  heads  at  the  ends  of  the  hoods  in  the 
western  row  have  gone  for  the  most  part,  but  one 
remains  with  stiffly  carved  hair.  At  the  intersection 
of  the  arches  is  trefoiled  foliage  of  various  patterns. 
The  arch  between  the  chapel  and  the  north  aisle 
springs  on  the  north  side  from  a  corbel  with  three 
detached  shafts. 


'•  The  original  window  had  jutcrKCting 
miillions.  Mary  Montagu  in  1524  di- 
rected that  her  body  should  be  buried  in 
the  aisle  before  Our  Lady  of  Pity  which 


it  on  the  south  side  of  the  church.    (Pro- 
bate of  Xorthampton,  B.  169.) 

"  The  height  to  the  springing  of  the 
arches  is  13  ft.  6  in.,  on  the  north  side  it 
is  9  ft.  9  in. 

107 


"  The  shafts  are  restorations.  Bridges, 
early  in  the  18th  century,  says  the  arches 
were  '  supported  formerly  by  small 
columns,  which  are  now  taten  away.' 
Hitl.  of  Northanti.  ii,  416. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  windows  of  this  chapel  have  been  noted.  The 
lancet  in  the  west  wall  has  a  wide  splay.  Of  the 
two  14th-century  windows  in  the  east  wall,  the 
northern  has  been  inserted  in  an  arch  of  the  13th 
century,  which  probably  marks  the  inner  opening  of 
a  splayed  lancet.  At  the  back  of  the  respond  at  the 
south-east  corner  of  the  chapel  there  is  a  small 
rectangular  hollow. 

The  south  chapel,  as  already  stated,  is  much  smaUer*- 
and  is  altogether  of  later  work.  Internally,  however, 
a  large,  thick  string-course  which  runs  beneath  the 
lancet  at  the  east  end  of  the  south  aisle  is  continued 
along  the  east  waD  of  the  chapel,  and  evidently,  as  on 
the  outside,  the  builders  took  pains  to  conceal  their 
additions.  The  string  is  not  continued  along  the 
south  wall,  in  which  there  is  a  double  piscina  with 
two  lancet  openings,  the  heads  of  which  are  cut  in  a 
Untel,  and  which  are  separated  by  a  small  sturdy 
shaft.  The  bowls  are  circular,  with  drain-holes. 
The  tracery  of  the  east  window  of  this  chapel  is 
formed  of  two  trefoils  with  rounded  ends,  the  heads 
of  which  are  carved  out  of  one  stone.  A  squint  is  cut 
through  the  east  respond  of  the  south  arcade.  At 
the  south-east  angle  outside  is  an  incised  di.il. 

The  chancel,  except  the  arch,  is  almost  entirely 
of  the  13th  century,  with  a  string-course  similar 
to  that  in  the  north  chapel.  The  three  eastern 
lancets  have  rich  mouldings  and  clusters  of  detached 
shafts  in  the  jambs.  North  of  the  altar  is  a  rectangular 
aumbry*^  and  the  adjoining  vestry  doorway  has  a  head 
cut  in  a  lintel.  In  the  south  wall,  in  addition  to  the 
windows  already  described,  there  is  a  beautiful  double 
piscina  with  much  delicately  carved  dog-tooth 
ornament  and  a  hood-moulding  stopped  by  masks 
and  a  floral  boss  similar  to  those  which  end  the  hood 
of  the  vestry  doorway  and  are  found  in  the  arcading 
of  the  north  chapel.  In  the  spandrel  beneath  the 
arch  of  the  piscina  is  a  sunk  quatrefoil.  Both  bowls 
are  fluted. 

The  examination  of  all  this  work  shows  that  the 
chancel,  the  north  chapel,  and  the  outer  walls  of  the 
north  aisle  with  the  porch  belong  to  one  period  of 
building,  which  followed  the  addition  of  the  south 
aisle.  It  was  probably  intended  to  build  a  south 
chapel  similar  to  that  on  the  north,  but  the  work 
was  stopped,  and  the  south  chapel,  when  it  was  built, 
had  no  relation  to  the  former  plan. 

There  is  a  15th  century  traceried  rood-screen,  with 
some  remains  of  colour  on  the  panels.  Some  traces 
of  colour  are  also  left  upon  the  soffit  and  capitals  of 
the  arch  which  opens  into  the  north  chapel.  The 
chancel  has  a  15th  century  roof  of  three  bays,  with 
well-moulded  tie-beams.  The  roofs  of  the  nave, 
aisles  and  chapels  are  largely  new,  but  there  are  some 
carved  bosses  in  the  nave  roof,  one  of  which  has  the 
shield  of  the  abbey  of  Peterborough. 

The  octagonal  font  is  of  the  later  part  of  the  13th 
century  wnth  trefoiled  panels,  circular  pedestal,  and 
shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases  supporting 
the  bowl.     The  oak  pulpit  is  plain  work  of  the  17th 


century,  with  fluted  upper  panels,  on  a  modern  stone 
base  :  attached  to  the  adjoining  wall  is  an  hour-glass 
stand  There  is  some  17th  century  seating  in  the 
south  chapel,  and  two  chairs  of  the  same  period  in  the 
chancel  given  by  Gen.  Ferguson. 

The  organ,  given  in  1909  by  Sophia  Lady  Paston- 
Cooper,  is  in  a  loft  over  the  chancel  arch.  In  the 
chancel  are  tablets  to  Joseph  Johnston,  rector  (d. 
1719),  and  Capt.  John  Orme  (d.  1764),  and  in  the 
north  chapel  one  to  Charles  Euseby  Isham  (d.  1862), 
who  was  rector  for  nearly  sixty-two  years. 

There  is  a  ring  of  five  bells.  The  treble  is  dated 
1717  and  the  tenor  is  by  Joseph  Eayre,  of  St.  Neots, 
1765,  who  also  cast  the  fourth  in  1771.  The  second  is 
inscribed  "  fAndrea,"  and  is  by  Thomas  Newcombe, 
of  Leicester  (1562-80),  while  the  third,  inscribed 
"  S.  Maria  "  bears  a  stamp  used  by  Francis  Watts,  of 
Leicester  (i564-i6oo).*3 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver-plated  cup,  paten  and 
breadholder,  each  inscribed  '  Parish  of  Polebrook, 
anno  Dom.  1811  ' ;  a  plated  cup  and  flagon  given 
by  Miss  Hames  in  1879  >  ^  silver  chalice  and  flagon 
and  processional  cross  were  given  by  Gen.  Ferguson  ; 
a  silver  almsdish  by  Lady  Paston-Cooper,  and  two 
silver  almsbowls  by  Ivor  Ferguson,  Esq. 

The  registers  begin  in  1655,  the  first  volume  con- 
taining entries  to  1770. 

There  was  a  priest  on  the  King's 
ADVOWSON  fee  in  Polebrook  in  io86.8^  The 
advowson  apparently  belonged  to 
the  Clopton  family  and  at  the  beginning  of  the  13th 
century  Rose  de  Clopton  as  patron  of  the  church  of 
Polebrook  made  an  agreement  regarding  St.  Leonards 
Chapel  at  Armston.*^  Her  husband  Hugh  le  Fleming, 
presented  a  clerk  in  the  reign  of  Henry  III.  The 
advowson  descended  to  his  son  and  heir,  Robert 
le  Fleming,*'  who  granted  the  church  and  manor  to 
the  Abbey  of  Peterborough.*'  The  claim  to  the 
advowson  made  by  Hugh's  great-great-granddaughters 
in  1284  was  refuted  by  the  production  of  Robert  le 
Fleming's  charter'*  and  the  church  remained  in  the 
possession  of  the  Abbey  until  its  surrender,*'  when 
the  profits  of  the  rectory  with  tithes,  mansion  and 
glebe  amounted  to  ^^29  14J.  a  year.^  In  1542 
Henry  VIII  granted  the  advowson  of  the  rectory 
of  Polebrook  to  the  Bishop  of  Peterborough'*  but 
it  was  afterwards  sold  with  the  manor  to  Sir  William 
Sharington  and  alienated  by  him  to  Sir  Edward 
Montagu  (see  above).  Sir  Edward's  heirs,  however, 
did  not  succeed  in  establishing  their  right  to  the  church 
though  they  made  some  attempt  to  do  so  in  the  17th 
century,'-  and  it  has  remained  in  the  gift  of  the  Bishop 
of  Peterborough  to  the  present  day."'' 

In  1 291  the  Prior  of  Huntingdon  enjoyed  a  portion 
of  tithes  amounting  to  ^l  a  year,  in  the  church  of 
Polebrook  and  portions  of  equal  value  from  the  church 
also  belonged  to  the  sacristans  of  Peterborough  and 
Croyland  and  the  Prior  of  St.  Neots."''  The  Hunting- 
don portion  amounted  to  only  1 3;.  4^/.  in  1539,'* 
when  the  Croyland  portion  was  described  as  a  certain 


•"  It  projecti  beyond  the  aiile  inter- 
nally 12  (t.,and  ii  13  ft.  6  in.  wide.  There 
ii  no  separating  arch. 

"  Now  covered  by  panelling. 

••  North,  Cb.  ttrlll  of  Sorlhanli.  384, 
where  the  inicriptioni  are  given.  There 
ii  no  founder'!  name  on  the  treble. 

••  y.C.II.  Norlbatiii.  i,  349*. 


"  Buccleuch  Decdi,  F.  26. 
"  De  Banco  R.  54  m.  15  d. 
"  Chron.  Pelrob.  i  5. 
"  De  Banco  R.  54,  m.  15  d. 
"  Cal.    Pal.     1361-64,    p.    27; 
E(el.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  293. 

"  Fahr  Ecd.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  293. 
•'  Pat.  33  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  31,  m.  13 

108 


"Buccleuch  MSS.  (Hist.  MSS.  Com. 
Rep.),  i,  214.  Ciil.  S.  P.  Dom.  1660-61. 
p.  llS. 

"  Inst.  Bks,  (P.R.O.)  ;  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom. 
Valor  163S-39,  p.  56;  Bacon,  Lib.  Rrg.  828. 
Private  Act   30  Ceo.  Ill,  cap.  26. 

•'  Pope  Nich.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com.)  39  b. 

•'  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  254. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


THURNING 


portion  of  rent  issuing  from  the  church  of  Polebrook.** 
Tlie  Croyland  tithes  were  granted  in  1562  to  Henry 
Best  and  John  Holland  who  conveyed  them  to  Thomas 
Eastchurch  and  Robert  Hunt  who  in  1563  sold  them 
to  Sir  Edward  Montagu."'^  A  pension  of  20s.  a  year 
was  due  from  the  rectory  of  Polebrook  to  Peterborough 
Abbey  at  its  dissolution,  and  was  included  in  the  grant 
of  1548  to  Sir  William  Sharington  (y.f.)  as  was  also 
some  land  in  the  parish  which  had  belonged  to  the 
Hospital  of  St.  John  of  Jerusalem.  Sir  Edward 
Montagu  agreed  with  the  parson  of  Polebrook  in 
consideration  of  the  inclosure  of  Polebrook  and  in 
order  to  discharge  the  manor  from  all  tithes  proposed, 
he  would  give  a  portion  of  the  tithes  belonging  to  the 
parsonage  of  Hemington,  a  pension  of  20s.  and  a  lease 
of  certain  tithes  in  Polebrook  belonging  to  the  late 
monastery  of  Croyland.*' 

A  gild  of  Corpus  Christi  in  the  church  of  Polebrook 
is  mentioned  in  1518  and  1524.'^ 


The  Rev.  Nicholas  Latham, 
CHARITIES  founder  of  the  Hospital  at  Oundle, 
gave  £z  yearly  to  be  distributed 
equally  among  four  poor  people.  This  sum  is  regu- 
larly paid  and  applied  by  the  Trustees  of  Parson 
Latham's  Hospital  at  Oundle. 

The  Rev.  Charles  E.  Isham  by  Declaration  of 
Trust  dated  ll  February,  1858,  declared  that  the 
dividends  on  a  sum  of  /^loo  Consols  should  be  distri- 
buted by  the  Rector  equally  among  six  of  the  most 
deserving  poor  inhabitants  who  are  members  and 
communicants  of  the  Church  of  England,  first  con- 
sideration to  be  given  to  widows.  The  distribution 
takes  place  after  divine  service  on  Christmas  Day. 

The  Wcslcyan  Methodist  Chapel  comprised  in  an 
Indenture  dated  25  July,  1863,  is  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners,  and  is  held  on 
trusts  as  expressed  in  The  Wesleyan  Chapel  Model 
Deed. 


THURNING 


Terning,  Torning,  1086 ;  Thiringez,  Terringes, 
Thirning,  Thorning  (xii  cent.)  ;  Thernynge  (xiv 
cent.)  ;   Thurning  (xv  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Thurning  was  formerly  partly  in 
Northamptonshire  and  partly  in  Huntingdonshire 
(Leightonstone  Hundred),  the  church  being  in  the 
latter  county.  The  boundary  went  north  and  south 
through  the  main  street.  In  1888,  however,  the  whole 
was  included  in  Northamptonshire. ^  The  area  is 
1,016  acres,  of  which  about  two-thirds  are  under 
permanent  grass.  The  soil  is  clay,  upon  which 
wheat  and  barley,  beans  and  peas  are  grown.  The 
land  rises  gradually  from  north  to  south,  from  about 
150  ft.  to  240  ft.  above  sea  level.  The  population 
was  133  in  1921. 

The  village  lies  about  l\  miles  south-east  of  Oundle 
at  the  crossing  of  the  roads  from  Barnwell  St.  Andrew 
to  Alconbury,  and  from  Clapton  to  Luddington  in 
the  Brook.  The  church  stands  to  the  south  of  the 
village.  The  rectory  house,  which  is  to  the  east  of 
the  church,  is  a  two  story  building  of  timber  and 
plaster,  with  reed-thatched  roof,  probably  of  the  late 
15th  century  date,  but  partly  refaced  in  yellow  brick 
with  single  story  brick  additions.  The  interior  has 
been  modernised,  but  the  original  timber  construc- 
tion is  everywhere  visible.  It  has  been  the  rectory 
since  the  17th  century,  to  which  period  the  stone 
tithe  barn  on  the  north  side  of  the  house  apparently 
belongs. 

In  1263  Berengar  le  Moyne  obtained  a  charter  for 
a  weekly  market  on  Wednesday  at  his  manor  of 
Thurning,  and  a  three  days'  fair  at  Michaelmas.^ 
The  grant  may  not  have  become  effective,  for  Thur- 
ning does  not  seem  later  to  have  been  reckoned  as  a 
market  town. 

Sir  William  Thirning,  a  prominent  lawyer  and 
judge  of  the  Common  Pleas  in  the  time  of  Richard  II 
and  Henry  IV  is  supposed  to  have  belonged  to  this 


place,  but  nothing  is  definitely  known.  He  took  a 
prominent  part  in  the  deposition  of  Richard  II  in 
1399,  and  died  in  141 3.' 

In  Domesday  Book  (1086)  the  greater 
MANOR  part  of  the  land  is  recorded  under 
Huntingdonshire.  The  abbot  of  Croy- 
land held  ij  hide,  with  land  for  a  plough  and  a  half  ; 
the  soke  was  in  the  King's  manor  of  Alconbury. 
Eustace  (the  sheriff)  held  it  of  the  abbot.  In  1066 
the  value  was  20^.,  and  in  1086  the  same.  Eustace 
held  5  hides  in  chief,  there  being  land  for  5  ploughs ; 
the  soke,  as  in  the  last  case,  was  in  Alconbury.  The 
value  alike  in  1066  and  1086  was  60/.  Alured  and 
Gozelin  held  the  land  of  Eustace,  and  Robert  the 
Dispenser  claimed  I  virgate  and  i  hide.*  In 
Northamptonshire  there  was  only  J  hide,  with  land 
for  half  a  plough  ;  it  belonged  to  the  abbot  of  Peter- 
borough and  was  appurtenant  to  Oundle.  The 
value,  2od.  in  1 066,  had  doubled  by  1086,  being  then 
3^.  4i.6_ 

It  is  impossible  to  trace  these  various  estates  clearly. 
The  chief  tenant  in  1086  was  Eustace,  the  sheriff, 
whose  fee  passed  to  the  Lovetots  and  followed  the 
descent  of  Clapton*  {q.v.).  Alured's  holding  went  to 
the  Cloptons  of  Clapton  {q.v.).  The  holding  of 
Robert  the  Dispenser  may  be  represented  by  the 
Marmion  fee,  as  Roger  Marmion,  according  to  the 
survey  of  c.  11 25,  held  3  small  virgates  of  the  fee  of 
Peterborough.'  By  the  end  of  the  13th  century  these 
mesne  tenancies  had  all  been  surrendered  to  Peter- 
borough Abbey. 

The  sub-tenants  of  the  Lovetot's  fee  in  the  13th 
century  were  Robert,  son  of  Walter  de  Polebrook, 
Berengar  le  Moyne,  Thomas  de  Hotot,  Roger 
Beaumes  (de  Bello  Mesuagio)*  and  Ralph  de  Grendon. 
Of  these  the  holding  of  Robert,  son  of  Walter  de 
Polebrook  (liung  in  1260-2)'  appe.irs  to  have  passed 
to  his  son  Walter,  son  of  Robert  de  Polebrook.^'    The 


•'  VaUr  Ecd.  (Rcc.  Com.)  iv,  85. 
••«  Buccleuch  Coll.  Ser.  Chron.  271. 
•'  Ibid.  269. 

"  P.C.C.  10  Aylofts ;    Prob.  of  N'orth- 
ampt  B.  169.  ■  Loc  Gov.  Bd.  order. 

•  Cai.  Chart.  1257-1300,  p.  46. 


•  Foi3.  yud^fS. 

•  V.C.H.  Hunt!,  i,  342A,  350a. 

•  V.C.H.  Northantt.  i,  314. 

•  The  long  dispute  with  the  Earls  of 
Gloucester,  which  included  Thurning,  is 
given  under  Clapton. 

109 


'  V.C.H.  Norihanls.  i,  367J ;  cl.  Round 
Feud.  Engl.  194-5. 

•  Pytchley,    Bk.    of   Fefs    (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  100. 

•  Buccleuch  Deeds   A  31,  38,  39. 
'"Ibid.  G2,  K2,  4. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


later  descent,  however,  of  this  holding  has  not  been 
ascertained.  The  holding  of  Berengar  le  Moyne 
seems  to  have  been  acquired  by  his  ancestor  Reginald, 
who  in  the  time  of  Henry  II  exchanged  lands  in 
Woodwalton  (Co.  Hunts.)  for  lands  in  Thurning, 
Thorp  and  GrafTham.*'-  From  this  date  the  descent 
followed  that  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  {q.v.)  until  the 
holding  was  acquired  by  the  abbot  of  Peterborough. 
The  Hotot  holding  of  the  Lovetot  fee  probably 
foDowed  that  of  Clapton  {q.v.).  The  descent  of 
Ralph  de  Grendon's  holding  doubtless  followed  that 
of  his  property  in  Polebrook  (g.v.).  His  descendant 
William  Carlyll  was  in  1428  holding  half  a  fee  in 
Polebrook  and  Thurning,  formerly  held  by  William 
Carleton  and  others  of  the  Peterborough  Fee.i- 

In    1316  Thurning  was   recorded   as   making  one 
vill  with  Winwick,  the  holders  being  Walter  de  Aloles- 


Mullysworth's  and  the  advowson  of  the  church  of 
Thurning.  This  is  recorded  in  the  inquisition  after 
his  death  in  1505  ;  the  heir  was  his  son,  the  famous 
John  Colet,  Dean  of  St.  Paul's. ^*  It  became  part  of 
the  Knyvet  estate  in  Thurning. 

The  Beaumes  were  holding  in  1236  when  Reginald 
de  Beaumes  was  a  tenant  in  Thurning,"  and  in  1263 
another  Reginald,  son  and  heir  of  Robert  de  Beaumes, 
paid  rehef,  his  lands  being  in  the  King's  hands  by 
reason  of  the  custody  of  the  heir  of  Richard,  Earl  of 
Gloucester.'*  The  Beaumes  estate  appears  to  have 
descended  to  Thomas  Beaumes,  who,  in  1373,  in  con- 
junction with  Katherine  his  wife,  sold  to  Sir  John 
KnjTet  seven  messuages  3J  virgates  of  land,  rents 
of  21.  6d.  and  a  pair  of  gloves  and  five  villein  tenants. 
Thomas  and  Katherine  were,  however,  to  retain  it 
for  life.19 


Thurning  Rectory 


worth,  Geoffrey  de  Beaumes,  John  de  Holme  and 
John  Cardon.''  The  estate  of  the  first  of  these, 
which  probably  represents  one  of  the  above  holdings, 
was,  on  the  death  of  Walter  de  Molesworth  in  1 318, 
divided  between  his  daughters  Katherine  and  Mar- 
garet.'* A  small  part  of  the  estate  in  Molesworth 
was  settled  on  Margaret  and  the  rest  in  Thurning 
and  Wold  Weston,  including  the  advowson  of  two 
parts  of  the  church  of  Thurning,  was  settled  on 
Katherine  and  Richard  de  Bayeux,  her  husband, 
and  their  issue,  with  reversion  to  Margaret.'^  The 
other  third  part  would  be  held  by  Walter's  widow 
Katherine.  The  later  descent  is  not  known,  but 
Sir  Henry  Colet,  of  London,  purchased  from  Thomas 
Molesworth,  probably  about  1470,  the   manor  called 


Sir  John  Knyvet  acquired  much  of  the  Peterborough 
property  in  Thurning,  and  his  family  seem  eventually 
to  have  obtained  all  of  it.-"  In  1380  Sir  John  held 
the  manor  of  Winwick  and  also  held  a  messuage  and 
land  in  Thurning  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  by 
suit  of  court.^i  Joan  (?  Kn)Tet)  in  1428  held  the 
third  part  of  a  fee  in  Tliurning.'^  She  seems  to 
have  been  the  widow  of  John  Knyvet  the  elder,  on 
whom  (in  conjunction  with  his  wife)  the  estate  had 
been  settled  for  life  in  141 1,  should  Sir  Robert  Ty 
and  Margaret,  his  wife,  die  without  issue,  with 
remainders  to  Catlierinc  and  Elizabeth,  daughters  of 
another  John  Knyvet.  Margaret  Ty  was  no  doubt 
a  sister.-'  By  1456  it  had  come  to  Edmund  Radcliffc, 
as  son  and  heir  of  Elizabeth,  wife  of  Sir  John  RadcliflFe 


"  Roi.  dt  Obi.  el  Fin.  (Rcc.  Com),  395 
»•  Fend.  Aidi,  iv,  4(1. 
'•  Ibid,  ii,  472. 
'*  Cal.  Inq.  vi,  no.  166. 
"  Fctt    of    K.    Hiintt. 
caic  93,  flic  2J. 
"  Chan.  Inq.  p.  m.  (Ser 
"  Bk.ofFeei,H,<)iy 


12    Edw.   II, 
ii),  xix   28. 


*'  F.xcerpia  e  Rot.  Fin.  ii,  400. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Ilunti.  llil.  47  F,d\v.  III. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (nt. 
no8.),  file  230,  no.  62.  See  ttUo  Exch. 
Inq.  p.m.  fSrr.  i),  liii,  2  (for  Hugh  Earl 
of  Stafford,  1387)  and  Ch.Tn.  Inq.  p.m. 
4  Hen.  IV,  file  39,  no.  41  (for  Edmund 
Earl  of  Stafford,  1403). 

I  10 


•'  Ch.TH.  Inq.  p.m.  4  Ric.  II,  file  15, 
no.  32.  For  the  pedigree,  ace  Klomeficld, 
NorJ.\,l7<);  v.  153. 

"  Frud.  Aids,  ii,  474.  Slie  is  called 
Thyrninp  in  the  print. 

"  Add.  Chart.  7567,  7575,  7578  ; 
Hridgcs,  //m/.  Northanti.  ii,  420. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


THURNING 


Azure   six 


of  Chadderton,  in  Lancashire,^*  but  twenty  years 
later  had  reverted  to  the  heir-at-law,  Sir  William 
Knyvet,  who  mortgaged  and  sold  various  estates, 
including  his  lands  in  Thurning,  to  Sir  Henry  Colet, 
of  London,  in  1472-7.^''  The 
sale  was  confirmed  by  fine  in 
1478,  the  estate  being  de- 
scribed as  the  manor  of 
Thurning,  etc.^*  Sir  Henry 
had  married  Christian  Knyvet, 
a  kinswoman  of  the  vendor. 
He  purchased  other  estates 
in  Thurning,  as  will  be  seen 
below. 

On  Sir  Henry's  death  in 
1505,  the  manors  and  estates 
descended  to  his  son  and  heir 

Dean  Colet,  who  died  in  1519,  and  by  liis  will  left 
his  estate  to  his  mother  for  her  life,  for  division  after 
her  death.  The  manor  of  Thurning,  with  other  manors 
and  lands  purchased  from  Sir  William  Knyvet,  was  to 
pass  to  his  mother's  kinsman  Edmund  Knyvet,  of 
Ashwellthorpe  (Norf.),  Serjeant  porter  to  Henry  VIII, 
while  Molesworth's  manor  and  the  advowson  of  the 
church,  purchased  from  Thomas  Molcsworth,  2 
messuages,  etc.,  in  Thurning 
purchased  by  Sir  Henry  from 
Thomas  Henson,  and  another 
messuage  purchased  from 
Thomas  Newman  were  togo  to 
Christopher  Knyvet,  brother 
of  Edmund  ;  another  brother, 
Anthony,  being  in  the  re- 
mainders.2^ 

Christopher's  estate  seems 
to  have  reverted  to  his  elder 
brother  Edmund,  whose  son 
John  and  grandson  Thomas 
inherited  Thurning.  The  last- 
named  in  1577  sold  the  manor  of  Thurning  and  lands 
appurtenant  in  Thurning,  Hemington  and  Ludding- 
ton  to  four  of  the  tenants — Robert  Byworth,  Robert 
Smyth,  Nicholas  Smyth,  and  Silvester  Collyn,-'  who 
seem  to  have  di\'ided  it  among  themselves.  Thus  the 
manor  seems  to  have  ceased. 

From  the  inquisition  after  the  death  of  Robert 
Smith  in  1622  it  appears  that  his  estate  in  the  three 
places  named  had  been  parcel  of  the  manor  called 
Mullesworth's  and  afterwards  Collet's  manor,  and 
had  been  purchased  by  the  deceased  from  Thomas 
Knyvet.  The  heir  was  his  son  Henry  Smith,  aged 
44.     The  lands  were  held  of  the  king  by  fealty  only .2* 

Silvester  Collyn,  another  purchaser,  died  in  1589 
holding  his  lands  in  Thurning,  etc  ,  of  the  queen  in 
chief ;  the  lands  lay  in  Northamptonshire  and  Hun- 
tingdonshire, but  the  capital  messuage  was  in  the 
latter  county.  His  heir  was  a  son  Silvester,  only 
4  years  of  age.^ 

Margery   Sturrapp,   widow   of  Thomas    Sturrapp, 


Knyvet.  .h^ciit  a  bend 
and  a  border  engrnUcd 
sable. 


and  daughter  and  heir  of  Robert  Byworth  (another 
purchaser),  died  in  1624  holding  her  land  of  the 
king."^  Her  son  and  heir  Thomas,  then  26  years  of 
age,  died  in  1631,  leaving  a  son  Thomas,  aged  12. 
The  land  was  now  stated  to  be  held  of  the  king  by 
knight's  service.*- 

\'arious  religious  houses  had  estates  in  the  parish. 
The  earliest  reference  to  Thurning  is  in  a  charter 
by  Burgred,  king  of  Mercia  (852-74)  confirming  a 
grant  of  a  hide  and  a  half  in  Thurning  made  by 
Grimketel  to  Croyland.'^  The  estate  is  recorded  in 
Domesday  Book,  the  land  being  held  by  Eustace  in 
1086.  In  1303  only  one  hide  was  reckoned;  the 
services  were  unknown. '■*  The  abbey  had  a  rent  of 
56/.  id.  from  it  in  1538  ;  the  pittancier  used  it.^^  \^ 
1546  it  was  leased  to  John  Strenie.^' 

Eugenius  III  in  1147  confirmed  lands  in  Thurnmg 
and  Winwick  to  St.  Mary's  priory,  Huntingdon. =" 
The  priory  had  copyhold  rents  in  Winwick  in  1538 
amounting  to  £2  "js.  y^-arly  value. '* 

The  Hospitallers  had  some  estate  in  Thurning,^' 
held  as  of  the  preceptory  of  Temple  Bruer.  In  1540 
they  had  a  free  rent  of  I3if.  from  Thomas  Henston 
for  a  cottage  and  lands  called  Sessikke.*"  This  tene- 
ment was  with  others  sold  in  1546  to  WiUiam 
Ramsden  and  Richard  Vavasor,'"-  who  quickly  resold 
it  to  George  Smyth,  of  Sibston.''- 

According  to  the  Parliamentary  Survey  of  1650, 
the  Crown  had  had  rents  of  js.  from  the  freeholders 
of  Thurning,  in  lease  to  the  Earl  of  Manchester  ■" 

In  1874  the  chief  landowners  were  Borrett  Bletsoe. 
who  lived  at  Barnwell  All  Saints,  and  John  and  James 
Fortescue.**- 

There  were  60  a.  common  in  1840.** 

The  church  of  ST.  JAMES  consists  of 
CHURCH  chancel,  25  ft.  by  15  ft.  6  in.,  with 
north  vestry,  clearstoried  nave  33  ft.  by 
16  ft.,  north  aisle  7  ft.  6  in.  wide,  south  aisle  9  ft.  wide, 
south  porch,  and  west  tower,  or  turret,  containing 
two  bells.     All  the  above  measurements  are  internal. 

In  1880-81  a  great  part  of  the  structure  was  taken 
down  and  rebuilt  as  nearly  as  possible  in  accordance 
with  the  previous  design,  only  the  chancel,  nave 
arcades,  south  aisle  wall,  and  the  porch  being  left 
standing  ;  the  chancel  was  restored  in  1902.  Exter- 
nally therefore  the  whole  of  the  north  and  west  sides 
of  the  building,  as  well  as  the  tower  and  clearstory, 
is  modern,  but  it  appears  to  have  replaced  work  of 
the  15th  century.  The  walls  are  of  rubble,  and  the 
roofs  are  modern  and  covered  with  lead. 

The  earliest  church  of  which  there  is  evidence  was 
built  in  the  first  half  of  the  12th  century,  and  con- 
sisted of  a  small  square-ended  chancel  and  an  aisleless 
nave  which  probably  covered  the  area  of  the  present 
nave.  The  semi-circular  chancel  arch  belongs  to 
this  church.  It  is  9  ft.  wide,  of  two  square  orders, 
and  has  moulded  imposts  and  half  round  responds 
with  scalloped  capitals  and  chamfered  bases.  The 
north   aisle  was   thrown  out   and  the  north   arcade 


"  y.C.II.  Lams,  v,  117. 

"  Bridget,  loc.  cit.,  and  Add  Chart. 
813-6,  7579-  )  or  a  lease  made  by  Colet 
in  1482,  see  the  Deeds  Enrolled  00  De 
Banco  R.  882. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Divers  Cos.  18  Edw.  IV  ; 
see  Early  Chanc.  Proc.  bdle.  120,  no.  18. 

"  P.C.C.  22  Ayloffe. 

"  Add.     Chart.    704,    705 ;     Pat.    R. 


19  EHj;.  pt.  3  (lie.  of  alienation)  ;   Feet  of 
F.  Hunts.  Mich.  19  Elii. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccccxv,  115. 

"'  Ibid,  ccxx,  5.      "  Ibid,  ccccxvi,  104. 

»=  Ibid,  cccdxiv,  8. 

"  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  ii,  113,  115. 

"  Feud  Aids,  ii,  470. 

''  Mins.  Accts.  Hen.  VIII,  2020. 

•«  L.  6-  P.  He;.  VIII,  xxi  (2),  p.  440. 

Ill 


"  Diigdali-,  !\fcti.  An^l.  vi,  80. 

"  Ibid.  82,  citing  Mins.  Accts. 

"  Cal.  Pal.  1549-51,  p.  232. 

"  Mins.  Accts.  Hen.  VIII,  n.  7274. 

"  /..  (S-  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xxi  (i),  p.  356. 

"  Ibid.  p.  488. 

"  Parly.  Surv.  Common  W.  Hunts,  i, 

**  V^'helan,  Northants.  72;. 

*'  Lewis,  Tofofi.  Diet. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


nserted  about  1180-90.  The  nave  was  at  the  same 
time  lengthened  westward  by  a  bay,  and  the  former 
north-west  angle  of  the  nave  now  forms  the  square 
part  of  the  masonr)'  pier  at  the  west  end  of  the  existing 
north  arcade.  The  arcade  as  built  was  of  three  round 
arches,  now  reduced  to  two,  of  two  orders,  the  inner 
chamfered  on  both  sides  and  the  outer  moulded.  It 
has  a  circular  pillar  and  half-round  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The  east  respond  of 
the  destroyed  western  arch  now  stands  within  a 
recess  in  the  modern  wall  and  has  the  nail-head  orna- 
ment in  its  capital ;  otherwise  it  is  similar  to  the 
others.     The  south  aisle  with  its  arcade  was  erected 


■HI2IH  CCMURV  EARLY 

E3c  II8O-9O 
:i]13ffiCi;NTURy 
__j  I  IB  Century 

□  I5ffiCENT.ILATEi!500) 


NoTE:SouIhwail 

Jmey  be  6'-cent.  with /-%       r, 

|l4'-''cenT.inserrions,or  LJ  |880  —81 

may  be  rebuilt  in 

14!'  cent. 
10     5      O  10  20  30 

III    iImiiI  I  4  I 

Scale  of  Feet 
Plan  of  Thurninc  Church 


in  the  13th  century,  and  is  probably  the  first  aisle 
on  this  side,  as  there  is  no  evidence  of  an  earlier  one. 
The  arcade  was  of  three  pointed  arches,  of  which  two 
only  remain,  of  two  hollow  chamfered  orders  resting 
on  a  pillar  composed  of  four  shafts  with  fillet  on  face 
and  hollows  between.  The  springing  of  the  third 
arch  still  remains,  but  the  westernmost  pillar  is 
octagonal  and  appears  to  be  of  later  date  ;  it  may 
indicate  a  proposed  rebuilding  of  the  arcade  from  this 
end.  The  cast  window  of  this  aisle  is  of  two  trefoiled 
lights,  with  a  trefoil  opening  over  each,  and  in  the 
south  wall  is  a  piscina  with  a  cinquefoiled  head.  The 
three-light  square  headed  window  in  the  same  wall 
is  apparently  a  14th  century  insertion,  and  the  south 
doorway  is  of  this  period.  The  south  wall  may  have 
been  rebuilt  at  this  time. 

The  chancel  was  rebuilt  in  the  14th  century  and 
probably  took  the  place  of  one  which  replaced  the 
1 2th  century  chancel  referred  to  above.  The  windows 
are  contemporary  with  the  rebuilding,  the  cast  window 
of  four  trefoiled  lights,  and  two  south  windows,  one 
with  three  and  the  other  with  two  lights ;  below  the 
western  of  these  is  a  pointed  low-side  window  with 
traccried  cinquefoiled  head,  the  sill  of  which  is  4  ft. 
above  the  ground.  There  is  also  a  priest's  doorway 
on  this  side.  On  the  north  side  is  a  modern  window 
of  three  lights  similar  in  design  to  the  others,  and 


further  west  is  a  doorway  to  the  vestry,  and  two  arches, 
one  (modern)  open  to  the  vestry  itself  and  the  other 
to  a  small  chapel  on  the  east  end  of  the  north  aisle. 
The  vestry  appears  to  have  been  originally  a  priest's 
room,  or  sacristy,  from  which  a  circular  stone  stair 
gave  access  to  the  chancel  roof ;  the  uppc  part  of 
this  stair  and  the  turret  surmounting  it  still  remain. 
Above  the  arch  opening  to  the  chapel  the  rood  loft 
doorway  rei.aains  in  the  wall,  and  from  the  chapel 
a  squint  is  directed  to  the  high  altar.  There  are 
two  plain  sedilia  and  a  trefoil-headed  piscina  in  the 
usual  position  in  the  chancel,  and  on  the  north  side 
an   aumbry. 

Towards  the  end  of  the  15th  century, 
or  early  in  the  1 6th,  if  the  evidence  of 
the  rebuilding  of  1881  is  to  be  trusted, 
the  clearstory  was  added  and  the  porch 
and  vestry  built.  The  nave  was  at  the 
same  time  reduced  in  length  by  one  bay, 
a  new  west  wall  being  erected  in  front 
of  the  two  westernmost  piers.  This  wall 
carries  the  east  side  of  the  tower,  the 
west  front  of  which  is  set  upon  a  lofty 
external  arch  enclosing  a  two-light  tran- 
soraed  window.  The  south  porch  has  a 
four-centred  moulded  outer  arch  on 
attached  shafts,  and  there  is  an  octagonal 
stoup  in  its  north-east  angle. 

The  font  is  ancient  and  has  a  plain 
octagonal  bowl. 

The  oak  pulpit,  lectern,  litany  desk, 
and  a  seat  in  the  chancel  are  all  of  i6th 
century  date,  and  are  said  to  have  come 
from  Barnwell  All  Saints.''*  The  other 
fittings  are  modern.  There  is  a  mural 
tablet  in  the  north  aisle  to  Robert  Negus, 
gent.,  d.  1657.  The  chancel  arch  is 
filled  by  a  modern  rood-screen  and  the  organ  is  placed 
above  the  arch. 

The  smaller  of  the  two  bells  is  a  recasting  by  Taylor 
of  Loughborough  in  1899  of  a  medieval  bell  which 
bore  the  inscription  :  '  Dei  genetrix,  Virgo  Maria, 
ora  pro  [nobis].'  The  larger  bell  has  four  pairs  of 
letters,  perhaps  part  of  an  alphabet,  and  appears  to 
be  of  pre-Reformation  date  from  a  Leicester  foundry.*' 
The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  cover  paten,  the 
latter  dated  1569  and  the  cup  inscribed  '  For  the 
towne  of  Thorneing  ' ;  an  early  15th  century  Florentine 
chalice,  silver  gilt,  with  enamels  on  the  knop  and  foot, 
given  in  1924  by  the  parishioners  as  a  thankoffering 
for  the  rector's  (Rev.  H.  B.  Gottwaltz)  twenty-five 
years'  service  ;  a  jewelled  silver-gilt  ciborium  given 
in  1900  ;  a  silver  ciborium  of  1908-9  ;  and  a  flagon  of 
1 870-1,  given  in  1872.  There  is  also  a  pewter  flagon 
and  a  plated  almsdish. 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows: — (i) 
baptisms  1560-1804,  marriages  1560-1641,  1666-1809, 
burials  1560-1803;  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1809- 
1812;  (iii)  marriages  1754-1812. 

The  advowson  was  in   1318  held 

ADFOWSON     with  the  Molesworth  manor,  for  in 

that  year  the  king  presented  to  the 

church,  because  he  had  the  custody  of  the  heirs  of 

Walter  de   Molesworth.**     In    1403  Thomas  Hethe, 


"  The  church  of  All  -Sainti,  Barnwell, 
WM  pulled  down  about  1825. 


"  Owen,  Cb.  Bells  of  Huntingdonibirt, 
137.  There  were  retained  by  the  church 
in    I  {53   a    chalice   of    lilver,   two  great 

I  12 


bells    and  a    aaunce  bell.      F.xch.    K.R. 
Church  Gds.  bdlc.  ii,  no.  33. 
"  Cttl.  Pal.  1317-21,  p.  196. 


Thurning  Church  :    The  Interior,  looking  South-east 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


WARMINGTON 


clerk,  transferred  to  his  brother  Henry  all  the  estate 
he  and  another  brother  Richard  had  in  half  an  acre 
in  Thurning  (John  Mabbot  had  been  tenant),  with 
the  advowson  of  the  church.'"  As  shown  above, 
Sir  Henry  Colet  purchased  the  advowson  from 
Thomas  Molesworth  about  1470,  and  it  came  to 
Christopher  Knyvett  after  the  de.ith  of  Dr.  John 
Colet  in  isig.*" 

One  Richard  Routhall  acquired  it  with  certain 
tenements  in  Thurning,  and  these  passed  to  his 
widow  Agnes  and  her  second  husband  Robert  Char- 
nock.''  Her  son  Tliomas  Routiuil  made  a  feoffment, 
in  1529,  a  few  months  before  his  mother's  death,  in 
which  the  advowson  was  included.''-  The  advowson, 
however,  came  back  to  Thomas  Knyvet,  for  it  was 
excepted  when  he  sold  the  manor  in  1577  ;■''■'  he  trans- 
ferred a  moiety  to  trustees  in  1580.'"'  In  1617  the 
advowson  was  acquired  by  Thomas  Wells,  clerk,'*  and 


John  Wells,rector  of  Thurning  from  l627,and  probably 
son  of  Thomas,  bequeathed  it  in  1656  to  Emmanuel 
College,  Cambridge.''''  Tlie  master  and  fellows  have 
since  presented  to  tiic  rectory. 

In  1291  the  cliurcli  of  Thurning  was  taxed  at  £&.'"'' 
By  1535  tiie  value  had  increased  to  /^IZ,'*  but  in  the 
tiiiie  of  Elizabeth  the  rector  leased  the  rectury  for  £lo, 
out  of  wliich  a  pension  of  6j.  Sd.  was  paid  to  Hunting- 
don priory.'*  The  tithes  were  commuted  for  /180. 
Tliere  are  60  acres  glebe.  The  rectory  house  is  near 
tlic   church. 

A  National  school  was  built  in  l8.).3. 

The  Rev.  John  Wells,  by  his  Will  in 
CHARITY  1640,  gave  a  rentcharge  of  ^1  to  the 
poor  vested  in  the  Minister  and  Over- 
seers. In  respect  of  tiiis  an  annual  sum  of  £\  was 
paid  out  of  lands  in  the  parish  and  distributed  equally 
among  20  po^r  families. 


WARMINGTON 


Wermingtimc,    c.    980 ;    Wirminton,    Werminton, 
Wormington. 

Warmington  extends  eastward  from  the  Nene ; 
on  the  northern  boundary  is  Elton  in  Huntingdonshire, 
the  old  part  of  its  manor-house  standing  on  the  border 
line,  part  in  each  county,  and  Elton  Park  extending 
some  way  into  this  parish.  The  acreage  is  4,013 
(including  20  acres  in  water),  of  which  a  good  deal 
more  than  half  are  permanent  grass.  The  soil  is 
clay,  with  gravel  underlying.  Wheat  and  barley 
are  grown.  The  land  rises  to  about  212  ft.  above  sea 
level  in  the  middle  of  the  parish,  whence  it  falls 
towards  Billing  Brook  on  the  eastern  boundary  to 
100  ft.,  and  more  quickly  towards  the  Nene  on  the 
north-west,  where  the  level  is  as  low  as  55  ft.  to  50  ft. 
The  straggling  village  is  in  this  western  part,  with 
the  church  to  the  south  and  the  manor-house  or 
Berry  stead  to  the  north;  there  is  a  moat  a  little  north- 
east of  the  latter.  To  the  south  of  the  church  is  a 
late  l6th  or  early  17th  century  two-storey  house,  now 
unoccupied  and  in  a  dilapidated  state,  with  two  bay 
mndows  on  the  ground  floor,  low  muUioned  windows 
above,  and  a  thatched  roof.  The  mill  is  on  the  river 
some  distance  to  the  north-west.  The  chief  road 
leads  from  Oundle  north-east  through  the  village, 
going  to  Elton  and  Peterborough  ;  another  road  goes 
east  towards  Norman  Cross.  Eaglethorpe  to  the  north 
and  Papley  to  the  south-east  were  formerly  hamlets, 
but  were  depopulated  even  in  Bridges'  time  (171 1), 
when  he  records  only  three  shepherds'  cottages  in 
the  latter  place.  There  is  a  moat  at  Papley.  Eagle- 
thorpe House  has  a  door  said  to  have  been  brought 
from    Fotheringhay. 

Formerly  the  parish  was  considered  partly  in 
WilTibrook  Hundred  and  partly  in  Polebrook,  and 
Bridges  thus  states  the  position  :  "  Adjoining  the 
touin  and   lying  intermixed   with  it   is   Warmington 


hamlet,  all  lying  in  (Willibrook)  Hundred.  In  the 
earliest  records  this  township  is  comprised  within 
Willibrook  Hundred,  but  Warmington  town  is  now- 
reputed  a  member  of  the  Hundred  of  Polebroo'-,.*  Maps 
of  a  century  ago  show  the  north-west  portion  (the 
Grange)  in  Willibrook  Hundred.  One  part  of  the 
town  was  called  Southorp  and  the  other  Mill  End. 
Near  the  town  are  two  springs  formerly  known  as 
Stockwell  and  Caldwell  or  Chadwell,  the  latter  yielding 
a  mineral  water. 

In  1393  the  lordship  was  divided  into  four  fields — 
the  Ernefield,  Bolwell  Field,  Blackthorn  Field  and 
Westfield.2  The  common  fields  were  enclosed  by 
an  Act  of  1774. 

In  1921  the  population  numbered  550. 
George  Thicknesse,  a  former  master  of  St.  Paul's 
School,  at  one  time  resided  with  an  old  schoolfellow 
at  Arlescote,  and  was  buried  in  Warmington  church- 
yard  in  1790.' 

From  a  very  early  time  the  whole 
MANORS  of  WARMINGTON  belonged  to  the 
abbey  of  Peterborough,  possibly  from  its 
foundation.  There  is  a  charter  attributed  to  Wulphere'' 
embodying  such  a  claim,  and  Edgar's  charter  of  963 
names  Warmington  among  the  estates  confirmed  or 
restored  to  the  monks.'  Two  of  the  inhabitants 
about  that  time  have  their  names  recorded  as  sureties 
for  land  here- — Thurferth  and  Cytel  Claccessune,^ 
and  one  Swerteling  took  land  on  the  understanding 
that  it  should  revert  to  St.  Peter  at  his  death.' 

In  1086  the  abbey  held,  as  it  had  held  in  1066, 
10  hides  in  Warmington.*  (I)  Of  these  7J  were  held 
in  demesne ;  the  mill  rendered  40/.  and  325  eels 
yearly.  The  value  in  1066  was  5/.,  but  in  1086  it 
had  risen  to  £11,  pointing  to  ruthless  devastation 
just  before  the  Conquest."  In  this  portion  the 
rubrication**   is  defective   or   erroneous.     (II)   Two 


"  Add  Chart.  699.         "  Sec  ibid.  S26. 
•'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  I,  114. 
••  Feet    of    F.,    Diveri    Co».    Hil.    20 
lien,  VIII. 
••  Add  chart.  705. 
'*  Feet  of  F.  Hunti.  Trin.  Z2  Elii. 
•'  Ibid.  Mich.  IS  ]»».  I. 
'•  E.  S.  Shuckburgh,  Emmanutl  CoU.,i2i. 


"Pope   A'ifi.    Tax.  (Rec.   Com.),    36; 
Feud.  /IrJsy  ii,  481. 

"  ruhr  Kcd.  (Rec.  Com.),  260. 
"  Ct.  of  Req.  bdlc.  76,  no.  30. 
'  HiU.  Northanls,  ii,  478. 
*  Bridge!      citing     Abbot      Elncston'i 
rental,  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C.  vii. 
'  Dut.  Nat.  Biog. 


•  Birch,    Ciiriul.   Sat.    i_  36 — ipuriouf, 
for  the  names  of  the  shires  are  used. 

•  .'Ingl.  Sax.  Chron.  an.  963, 

•  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  42. 
'  Ibid.  f.  44rf. 

'  V.C.H.  korlhant!.  i,  314,  315,  316. 
'  See  Oundle. 
'•  "  In  Wiceilt  Hund." 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


kniglits  held  one  hide,  which  belonged  to  VVillybrook 
Hundred  ;  the  value  had  risen  from  2s.  to  20J.  The 
two  knights  were  probably  ancestors  of  the  Gargates 
and  Peverels  of  later  days.  (Ill)  Isembard  [Artifex] 
and  Rozelin  held  Ij  hide  ;  the  land  had  increased  in 
value  from  5;.  to  40.(.  between  1066  and  1086.  This 
estate  was   Papley. 

The  Survey  made  c.  1 1 25  gives  no  further  infor- 
mation, but  again  affirms  that  one  hide  was  in  Willy- 
brook  Hundred  ;  the  assessment  of  Papley  is  given 
as  one  hide  only,  and  is  recorded  under  Polebrook 
Hundred." 

Later  than  Domesday  the  abbots  appear  to  have 
made  further  grants  to  free  tenants.  Thus  one 
portion,  \  hide,  was  joined  with  the  manor  of  Church- 
field  in  Ouiidle'2  ;  another  with  Stoke  Doyley,'''  and 
a  third  with  Torpel  in  UfTord.  Papley  seems  to  have 
been  the  only  free  tenement  entirely  within  Warming- 
ton,  for  Gargate  had  land  in  Irthlingborough  as  part 
of  his  fee,  and  the  Peverel  holding  here  was  attached 
to  Paston. 

The  manor  proper,  that  held  in  demesne  by  the 
abbots,  remained  undisturbed  till  the  Dissolution. 
W.irmington,  with  its  churches  and  mills,  was  con- 
firmed to  the  abbey  by  Eugenius  HI  in  1146'*  and 
by  Richard  I  in  1189,^*  as  well  as  by  later  kings.  Its 
condition  about  11 25  is  described  in  det.iil  in  the 
Liber  Niger,  as  follows  :  ** 

In  Warmington  there  are  8  hides  geldable  ;  of 
which  20  full  villeins  and  29  half-villeins  hold  34J 
virgates.  The  full  viUeins  work  3  days  weekly  ;  the 
otheis  according  to  their  tenures.  In  all  they  have 
16  ploughs  and  plough  68J  acres,  and  also  do  3  boon 
works  with  their  ploughs ;  they  carry  34  cartloads 
from  the  wood.  They  render  ^4  I  is.  ^d.,  and  give 
to  the  charity  of  St.  Peter  lo  rams,  400  loaves,  40 
dishes  (disci),  1 34  hens  and  260  eggs.  There  are  also 
8  sockmen,  who  have  6  ploughs.  In  demesne  are 
4  ploughs  for  32  oxen,  9  cows,  5  calves  and  one  idle 
beast,  129  sheep,  61  pigs,  a  draught  mare  {aura)  and 
a  foal.  Also  a  mill  with  one  yard  {z'ir^a)  of  land  and 
6  acres,  rendering  60s.  and  500  eels.  Ascelin  the 
clerk  holds  the  church  with  2  yards  of  land  of 
the  altar  of  St.  Peter  of  Burgh.  Robert,  son  of 
Richard,  has  2\  yards.  In  this  town  can  be  stocked 
100  sheep. 

In  1231  a  composition  was  made  between  Abbot 
Martin  and  John  (Scot),  earl  of  Huntingdon,  as  lord 
of  Fotheringhay,  concerning  the  fishing  in  the  Nene. 
It  was  agreed  that  where  tiie  earl  had  one  side  of  the 
river  and  the  abbot  the  other,  the  two  should  have 
the  fishing  ;  but  where  the  abbot  had  land  on  both 
sides  he  should  have  the  sole  right  of  fishing  between 
them  ;  from  Turnbrook  to  Pirihou  (in  Southwick) 
the  carl  should  have  sole  right." 


There  is  a  very  full  rental  made  in  I393i*under 
Abbot  Nicholas  de  Elnestovve. 

After  coming  into  the  hands  of  Henry  VIII  the 
manor  was,  with  Oundle,  etc.,  given  to  Katherine 
Howard,  his  queen,  in  1541,'*  and  after  reverting  to 
the  Crown  on  her  execution  in  the  same  year  was 
given  to  queen  Katherine  Parr  in  1544,2"  and  she 
retained  it  till  her  death  in  1 548,  when  it  again  fell  to 
the  Crown.  A  very  full  survey  made  in  1546  is 
extant.^l 

From  a  survey  of  1605^^  it  appears  that  Thomas 
Elmes  held  by  charter  of  28  October,  1555,  a  messuage, 
late  of  Edmund  Elmes,  his  father,  and  previously  of 
Robert  Kirkham,  and  various  others ;  also  the  rectory. 
The  Warden  of  Stamford  had  land  in  Middlefield  and 
Westfield.  The  inhabitants  claimed  to  hold  by  copy 
a  tenement  near  the  parsonage  called  Scobhouse. 
William  Dickenson  had  the  tithes  of  Eaglethorpe, 
paying  ^3  a  year.  The  jury  found  that  the  fines  of  all 
the  ancient  copyholds  were  certain,  being  half  a  year's 
rent  ;  all  freeholders  and  copyholders  were  accus- 
tomed to  feed  their  cattle  on  the  common  ;  copy- 
holders could  use  the  timber  on  their  copyholds  for 
repairs ;  land  had  been  taken  out  of  every  farm  to 
make  cow  pastures,  called  Angerstonne  Leyes  (50  ac.) ; 
leys  at  the  over  end  of  Golding  Slade  next  the  Wold 
were  their  sheep  and  neats'  pasture,  and  there  was 
other  pasture  on  the  Greens.  There  was  no  waste 
in  the  woods.  "  Thomas  Elmes,  esq.,  had  a  fishing  in 
the  manor  butting  on  the  east  end  of  Thornbrook,  and 
so  to  the  Fishhouse  butting  east,  so  to  the  Holme 
butting  east,  so  to  Elton  dam  butting  north  ;  being 
in  the  same  water  these  kind  of  fishes — perch,  roach, 
cheviun,  pickerell,  eel,"  etc.  ;  the  extent  was  about 
J  mile.  There  were  ashes  and  wiches  in  the  woods. 
These  were  the  ancient  bounds  of  the  manor  : 
Portersherne  on  the  north-west,  to  Warmington 
Grove,  to  Tansor  Cross,  to  the  corner  of  William 
Blofield's  close,  so  up  Barnwell  slade,  to  Tansor  Mere, 
to  Potter's  Hill,  to  Butcher's  Gr.ive,  to  Lutton 
brook,  to  Wasingley  brook,  to  Odgarstone  brook,  to 
Great  Wolwell,  to  Foxhalls  hill,  to  Eglethorp,  to  the 
Watch  close,  so  to  Thornbrook  east,  over  the  high 
stream  to  the  weir  of  Fotheringhay  Park  to  Fother- 
inghay bridge,  from  the  bridge  in  the  farther  side  of 
the  causey  (the  bridge  lying  east)  to  Portersherne. 

Leases  of  portions  had  been  made  by  the  Crown 
from  time  to  time-'  until  in  1614  the  manor  was  sold 
to  Thomas  Elmes  of  Green's  Norton^'*  ;  court  let 
and  view  of  frank-pledge  were  added  in  161 7." 
Tliomas  Elmes,  who  had  inherited  the  manors  of 
Lilford  and  Papley,  with  various  other  estates  in  the 
neighbourhood,  settled  this  manor  of  Warmington  on 
his  younger  son  Thomas  on  his  marriage  (1621)  with 
Anne,    daughter    of    Robert    Clark    of    London,    as 


"  V.C.H.  Northaiili.  i,  366,  387. 

*'  Cbron.  Petrob.  (C.imdcn  Soc),  175, 
fri>m  'hf  I.ibcr  Nigrr. 

*'  By  fine  in  114S-0.  Robert  dc  Stoke 
acknowledged  the  abbot's  right  in  J 
knight'l  fee  in  Stoke,  Warmington  and 
Aihton.  The  abbot  thereupon  released 
the  lame  to  him  for  a  rent  of  8i.  (Pytch- 
lej't  Reg.  f.  9+rf). 

"  Gunton,  lliil.  Ch.  of  Pettrborotifb, 
131. 

"  Cal.  Chan.  1327-41,  p.  174. 

'•  ChroH.  Pnrth.  160. 

"Colt.    MS.    CIcop.    C.    ii,    f.    ai</. 


For  question  as  to  the  fisitery  at  Elton, 
between  Divorgilla,  widow  of  John 
Balliol,and  the  Abbot  of  Rirnscy  in  1286 
sec  Assize  R.  \^%  m.  yd. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C.  vii.  f.  85. 

'•  /,.  (?>■  P.  Urn.  Vlll,  xvi,  p.  716. 

•»  Ibid,  xix  (1),  p.  644. 

■■  Mins.  AccM.  Hen.  VIII,  2661.  The 
issues  of  a  messuage  with  the  '  Rurgh 
wcrke  '  were  401.  4jd.  ;  the  site  of  the 
manor  was  in  lease  to  Thomas  Rootlie 
and  the  mill  and  rectory  to  lluinphrry 
Ilornc  ;  from  the  warden  of  the  Hospital 
called    the    Dc.idehouse   in    Stamford,   8(. 


"Miic.  Bki.  (Land  Revenue),  221,  fl. 
2S6-326. 

"  Eg.  in  15(10  the  manor  to  William 
Gerard  and  others  (Pat.  R.  2  Eliz.  pt.  15); 
in  1588  a  close  to  Thomas  Newman 
(Pat.  R.  30  Elir.  pt.  4);  in  1608-q,  the 
site  of  the  manor  to  Roger  Dale  (Pat.  R. 
6  Jas.  I,  pt.  2)  ;  also  a  messuage  and  three 
water  mills  to  Edward  Cuthbert  (Pat.  R. 
6  Jas.  I,pt.  23). 

'*  To  he  held  in  chief  as  one  knight's 
fee  (P.it.  It.  11  Jas.  I,  pt.  12).  Acreman's 
land  had  been  demised  to  John  KIdred  and 
others.  "  Pat.  11.  15  Jas.  I,  pt.  16. 


I  \i 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


WARMINGTON 


appears  from  the  inquisition  after  tlie  father's  death 
in  1633.-'  In  1651  Thomas,  the  sun,  was  discharged 
of  an  assessment  for  the  service  of  the  State,  as  possess- 
ing no  considerable  estate."^'  In  1653  he  suflEered  a 
recovery  of  the  manor  of  Warmington,  with  four 
water  mills  and  a  rent  of  £i\  from  the  rectory  ;-* 
and  then  in  1657,  in  concert  witli  his  wife,  trans- 
ferred this  manor  to  trustees.^'  He  died  in  1664, 
aged  73,  having  liad  by  his  wife  four  sons  and  nine 
daughters.  Only  one  of  the  sons,  William,  reached 
manhood,  and  he  died  before  his  fatlier  in  1653,  aged 
iS*" ;  so  the  inheritance  became  divisible  ultimately 
among  the  five  surviving  daughters,^'  the  widow 
retaining  the  manor  till  her  death  in  1686.  The 
daughters  were  Ann,  wife  of  John  Pain,  of  Colsden 
Grange  in  Roxton^-  ;  Margaret,  wife  of  Robert  Tat- 
nall,  of  London,  cleric^'  ;  Martha,  wife  of  Edmund 
Spinkes,  of  Oundle,  clerk''*  ;  Elizabeth,  wife  of 
Richard  Holt,  and  Mary,  wife  of  George  Wroth  of 
South  Farnham,  mercer.'^  There  were  disputes  in 
1692  among  the  coheirs,  and  according  to  Nathaniel 
Spinks,  clerk,  of  St.  Giles  in  the  Fields,  eldest  son 
and  heir  of  Edmund  and  Martha,  Richard  Holt 
obtained  possession,  and  Nathaniel  had  to  sue  in 
Chancery  for  his  own  right  in  the  Elmes  estate.  He 
had  three  brothers — Seth,  William  and  Elmes  Spinks — 
and  a  sister  Martha.'"  The  youngest  of  these  sons, 
Elmes  Spinks,  appears  to  have  obtained  possession  of 
the  whole  manor,"  and  Bridges  describes  him  as  lord 
of  it  in  17U.  By  his  will  of  1720  this  Elmes  left 
all  his  real  estate  in  Aldwinkle  and  Warmington  to 
his  only  son  Elmes,  with  remainder  to  daughters 
Debora  and  Ann.'**     He  died  soon  afterwards. 

Elmes  Spinks  the  son,  in  1738  suffered  a  recovery 
of  the  manor,"  and  again  in  1745  in  conjunction 
with  his  wife  Jemima.''*'  In  the  next  year  (10  January, 
1745-46)  he  sold  it  to  Thomas  Powys  of  Lilford  for 
^[4,362  ;  the  sale  included  the  manor  house  (Berry- 
stead),  Millholme,  Bcrrystead  and  Lammas  closes, 
land  in  Bolwell  field,  various  pieces  of  meadow,  and 
a  fee  farm  rent  of  ^24  from  the  rectory.** 

Thomas  Powys,  who  bought  up  a  number  of 
smaller  estates  in  the  parish,  died  in  1767,  leaving  a 
son  and  successor  of  the  same  name,  who  was  created 
Baron  Lilford  in  1797.  He  also  bought  some  minor 
estates,  and  made  a  settlement  in  1772,  previous  to 
his  marriage  with  Eleanor  Mann  of  Bourne  Place, 
Kent.''-  A  further  settlement  of  the  manors  of 
Warmington,  Lilford  and  Wigsthorpe,  with  various 


V£ 


Proby,  Earl  of  Carjri- 
fort.  Ermine  a  festt 
gules  uiith  a  lion  paisani 
or  thereon. 


lands  there,  was  made  in  1 794,  to  provide  for  younger 
children,  and  in  June,  1797,  Powys  sold  the  manor  of 
Warmington  with  quit  rents  and  other  perquisites,  a 
fishery  in  the  Nene,  and  various  messuages,  closes, 
etc.,  to  John  Joshua  (Proby),  1st  Earl  of  Carysfort,  of 
Elton  Hall.  The  manor  descended  in  this  family 
until  the  death  of  the  last  Earl  of  Carysfort  in  1909,*' 
when  it  passed  to  a  nephew.  His  sister  Elizabeth 
((/.  1900)  had  married  Lord 
Claud  Hamilton,  brother  of 
the  1st  Duke  of  Abercorn,  and 
their  son.  Col.  Douglas  James 
Hamilton,  who  took  the  name 
of  Proby  in  1904,  is  now  lord 
of  the  manor. 

The  Gargatc  knight's  fee 
lay  two-thirds  in  Warmington 
and  one-third  in  Irthling- 
borougli.''''  Robert  de  Gar- 
gate,  who  was  living  about 
1 160,  is  said  to  have  been  the 
first  fcofTee.'''  He  had  appa- 
rently   two    sons,  Roger  and 

Robert.  Roger  and  Agnes  his  wife  had  a  son  Hugh,  who 
held  the  fee  in  1 189.'**  In  1206  Robert  de  Gargate,  pro- 
bably his  uncle,  gave  him  8J^  virgates  of  land  in  War- 
mington,*' and  two  years  later  he  conveyed  2  virgates 
to  Walter,  prior  of  St.  Andrew's  of  Northampton,  the 
grant  being  confirmed  by  Robert  and  Maud  his  wife.'*' 
Hugh  is  mentioned  in  1216,  but  died  before  1220.** 
He  left  two  daughters  by  his  wife  Sibyl,  namely,  Muriel, 
the  wife  of  William  de  Ros,  who  died  before  1 2  30,  leav- 
ing a  son  Hugh,'"  and  Isabel,  wife  of  Gerard,  son  of 
Roger  de  Munibery,  who  had  a  son  Peter.*'  Appar- 
ently the  Irthlingborough  third  of  the  Gargate  fee 
passed  to  Gunfrid  de  Gargate,  whose  son  David 
conveyed  7  virgates  of  the  fee  there  to  Walter,  abbot 
of  Peterborough  (i 233-46). '^  Ernulf,  prior  of  St. 
Andrew's,  Northampton,  granted  the  2  virgates  in 
Warmington  given  to  his  house  by  Hugh  de  Gargate, 
to  Simon  de  St.  Liz,*^  and  in  1253  and  1254  the  two- 
thirds  of  the  Gargate  fee  in  Warmington  were  held 
by  John  de  St.  Liz.'*  William  de  St.  Liz  acquired 
further  lands  in  1285,'*  and  he,  or  another  of  the  same 
name,  did  homage  in  1 3 10,*'  and  in  1315  held  these 
two  parts  of  the  Gargate  fee."  About  1322  William 
de  St.  Liz  sold  his  interest  to  Ralph  de  Thorney, 
who  died  in  1333.^  His  widow  Margaret  was 
holding  in  1 346,  and  their  son  Thomas  was  in  pos- 


••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccccxcii,  87. 

■'  CM.  Con:,  for  Advance  of  Monev^  730. 

"  Rccov.  R.  Xorthantj,  Mich.  1653. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Comm.  Easter 
1657.  ••  M.I.  in  Warmington  ch. 

•*  Another  daughter,  Christian,  wife 
of  Joseph  Bulkcley,  teems  to  have  died 
before  the  partition. 

"Conveyed  to  trustees;  Feet  of  F. 
Xorthants,  Mil.  16  &  17  Chas.  II. 

'*  Conveyed  to  trustees  (Feet  of  F. 
Northants,  Hil.  i6  Si  17  Chas.  II) j  and 
after  to  John  Ward  ;  Ibid.  Hil.  2-3 
James  II. 

"  These  in  conjunction  with  Elizabeth 
Elmes,  then  unmarried,  conveyed  to  the 
Pain  trustees  (Feet  of  F.  Northants, 
East.  iS  Chas    II). 

"  Conveyed  to  Setb  Spinks  (Ibid. 
East.  3  Jas.  II). 

**  Conveyed  to  trustees  (Ibid.  Trin. 
16    Chas.    II).     Afterwards    Wroth    con- 


veyed to  Leonard  Child  (Ibid.  Hil. 
I  &  2  Jas.  II). 

"'  Chan.  Proc.  before  1714,  Bridges 
Div.  bdle.  16S,  no.  11.  'I'he  plaintiffs 
were  Robert  Johnson  of  Spalding,  mercer, 
and  Martha  his  wife,  sister  of  the  defend- 
ant Nicholas  Spinks. 

"  Abstract  of  title,  kindly  lent  by  .Mr. 
Granville  Proby. 

"  Recov.  R.  Northants,  Mich.  12 
Geo.  II  ;  the  manor  with  a  free  fishery  in 
the  Nene. 

*'  Abstract  of  title. 

"  Ibid. 

•■  Recov.  R.  Hil.  11  Geo.  III. 

"  John  Joshua  Proby,  ist  earl,  d.  1828 
—  son  John,  2nd  carl,  d.  1855— bro. 
Granville  Leveson,  3rd  earl,  d.  18C8 — 
son  Granville  Leveson,  4th  earl,  d.  1872 — 
bro.  William,  5th  earl,  d.  1909. 

"  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Feet  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  126,  i26rt.  127. 


"  Ibid. 

"  Cat.  Chart.  R.  1327-41,  p.  277. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  7  John,  no.  198. 

"  Ibid.  9  John,  no.  212  ;  27  Hen.  Ill, 
no.  468  ;   Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E.  ii,  f.  225-6. 

*•  Farrer,  Honors  and  Knigbts*  Fees, 
iii,  410-11. 

'"  Ibid. ;  Maitland,  Braclon't  Note  Bk. 
no.  382. 

"  Farrer,  loc.  cit. ;  cf.  V.C.H.  Buikt, 
iv,  158. 

••  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  ii,  f.  226*  ;  Soc. 
Anliq.  MS.,6r,  f.  248. 

'«  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  37  Hen.  Ill, 
no.  637  ;  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  13  Edw.  I, 
no.  147. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  248. 

"  Pytchley,  loc.  cif.  j  Cott.  MS.  Vesp. 
E  xxii. 

"  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


session  shortly  afterwards.'^  The  almoner  of  Peter- 
borough secured  a  virgate  of  this  fee.*" 

Soon  afterwards  the  Stokks  or  Stock  family  became 
prominent.  They  may  have  originally  been  con- 
nected with  the  Stoke  Doyly  land  in  Warmington.** 
In  1375  the  right  of  Thomas  del  Stokkes  to  a  tene- 
ment in  Elton  and  Warmington  was  acknowledged  by 
Hugh  Rauf  and  Agnes  his  wife  ;'''-  and  the  same  was 
held  by  John  Stokkes  and  Alice  his  wife  in  1390.*^ 
It  was  probably  the  same  John  who,  in  1428,  held  the 
fourth  part  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Warmington  which 
had  formerly  (1346)  been  held  by  Margaret  wife  of 
Ralph  Thorney.*^  He  or  his  son  John  seems  also  to 
have  had  a  grant  of  lands  forfeited  by  John  Moyne.^* 
A  son  of  John  and  Agnes  Stock  was  Sir  William 
Stock,  knight,  of  Warmington,  who,  in  1464,  was 
attainted  as  an  adherent  of  Henry  VI,**  but  procured 
pardon  and  restitution  in  1472.*'  He  died  in  1485, 
leaving  as  heir  his  brother  Thomas  Stokes,  clerk.** 

Agnes,  widow  of  John  Stok,  died  in  August,  1465, 
holding  tenements  in  Warmington  and  Papley  of  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough,  and  others  in  various  places 
in  the  district.  The  heir  was  her  son  the  above- 
named  Thomas  Stok,  clerk.**  This  son  died  23  Octo- 
ber 1495,  having  settled  his  estate  on  one  Thomas 
Stock  the  younger  and  his  sister  Agnes ;  these  may 
have  been  illegitimate,  for  his  heirs  were  his  two 
sisters,  Isabel,  widow  of  —  Fazakerley  and  Margaret 
wife  of  William  Brown  of  Stamford,  whose  daughter 
and  heir  married  John  Elmes.'"  The  Fazakerley 
share,  described  as  8  messuages,  100  acres  of  land 
and  40  acres  of  meadow  in  Warmington  and  Church- 
field,  was  purchased  by  George  Kirkham  about 
1504.'!  By  his  wilF'^  (3  March  1527-28)  he  be- 
queathed all  his  land  to  his  son  Robert,  some  being 
in  the  hands  of  trustees  for  Robert's  wife  Sibyl ; 
should  Robert  have  no  children,  then  the  lands  in 
Warmington,  Papley,  Churchfield,  Elton,  etc.,  were 
to  be  given  to  his  daughter  Margaret  Middlcton,  with 
remainders  to  his  other  daughters  Agnes  Lynne  and 
Cecily  Kirkham.'^  Dying  soon  afterwards,  he  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  Sir  Robert  Kirkiiam,  who  at 
the  Dissolution  acquired  the  priory  of  Fineshade  and 
made  it  his  seat,  selling  his  lands  in  Warmington, 
which  he  styled  a  manor,'*  to  Edmund  Elmes  in 
1555.'"  The  Stock  estate  was  thus  reunited  and 
afterwards  descended  with  Papley  (g-v.). 

Walo  de  Paston  held  of  the  abbot  (about  1 100) 
J  hide  in  Warmington  for  the  third  part  of  a  knight's 
fee,  in  conjunction  with  his  land  in  Paston.'*  This 
had  descended  to  Robert  Peverel  by  1 146,"  and  to 

"  Pytchley,  loc.  cit.;  Cott.  M.S.  CIcop. 
C.  i. 

•"  Pjrechlcy,  op.  clt.,  p.  155. 

•*  Wymund  dc  Stoke  was  holding  a 
knight's  fee  in  Warmington  in  1125-8 
and  in  1199  Robert  dc  Stoke  held  half  a 
knight's  fee  in  Warmington  and  chcwhcrc 
(I'ytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Frei,  ii4>i,  1451,  cf.  I'cct 
of  F.  Northants.  10  Rich.  I,  no.  77). 
Vivi.m  de  Stokes  occurs  in  1227  {Cal. 
Chan.  R.  1226-57,  p.  20). 

•«  Feet  of  F.  Divers  Cos.  49  Edw.  \U. 

"  Ibid.  14  Ric.  11. 

*«  /•>urf.  /f<i/i,  iv,  48. 

"  Fine  R.  12  lien.  VI  |  CI.  Pjl. 
1456  41,  p.  467. 

'•  RoHioj  I'arl.  v,  512. 

*"*  Ibid,  vi,  28.  In  1469  he  w.is 
described  as  "  of  Temple  Ncwsam," 
Vorki ;  Cal.  fill.  R.  1467-77.  p.  153. 


William  Peverel  by  1 189,'*  and  he  was  succeeded  by 
Robert  Peverel.  Robert's  under-tenant  a  httle  later 
(121 1)  was  Gilbert  Peverel,"  who  released  to  abbot 
Mart'n  the  4  virgates  of  land  he  held  by  the  service 
of  the  third  part  of  a  fee.  Robert  quitclaimed  to  the 
abbot  all  his  right  in  Gilbert's  tenement,  and  at  the 
same  time  released  its  liability  to  knight's  service. 
Gilbert  retained  one  virgate  at  a  rent ;  the  other 
holders  were  Hugh  Gargate,  Hugh  de  Codestoke, 
Reginald  son  of  Walter  Le  Noreys.*  The  name 
Peverel  fee  was  retained  for  some  time.  It  rendered 
13/.  4(£.  to  the  scutage  of  Deganv^  c.  I250,''i  and  the 
reeve  of  Warmington  received  from  it  iSd.  yearly  for 
ward  of  Rockingham  castle.'^  The  tenants  at  this 
time  were  Robert  Peverel,  the  almoner  of  Peter- 
borough (successor  of  Coterstock),  Reginald  Porthors 
(Noreys),  and  John  de  St.  Liz  (Gargate).'^  Hugh 
Aubrey  and  Athelina,  widow  of  Robert  Coif,  had 
succeeded  Pe\erel  and  Porthors  in  1346.** 

The  Churchfield  (Angevin)  part  of  Warmington 
seems  to  have  lain  in  Eaglethorp.  In  1202  Christian, 
widow  of  Adam  Gargate,  released  to  Ismena,  widow  of 
WiUiam  Angevin,  dowry  in  Warmington.*'  The 
same  Christina  was  concerned  in  another  sale  to 
Geoffrey,  the  clerk  of  Elton.**  Baldric,  son  of 
William  Angevin,  released  to  the  almoner  of  Peter- 
borough a  virgate  which  his  mother,  Ismena,  had  once 
held,'''  and  he  was  holding  in  1227.'*  The  property 
seems  to  have  followed  the  descent  of  Churchfield  in 
Oundle  and  Lyveden  in  Aldwinckle  St.  Peter  (y.f.), 
and  formed  part  of  the  lands  in  Warmington,  and 
Elton  forfeited  by  Sir  John  Holt  in  1387.'^ 

John,  son  of  Sir  John  Knyvet,  in  1395  made  a 
settlement  of  an  estate  in  Warmington  and  Elton 
sometime  held  by  Joan,  widow 
of  Richard  Knyvet,  and  by 
John  Ki'.yvet  the  father,  by 
feoffment  of  William  Lyve- 
den."" From  abbot  Elnestow's 
rental  of  1393*^  it  appears  that 
the  Knyvet  holding  was  largely 
in  Eaglethorp,  and  a  later 
corrector  altered  the  name 
Knyvet  to  Sapcote.  How  the 
latter  family  succeeded  is  not 
manifest,  but  Richard  Sapcote 
and  Margaret  his  wife  held  the 
manor  of  Elton  and  lands  in  Eaglethorpe  in  1517."- 
The  estate  descended  to  Henry  Sapcote,  who  was  in 
possession  in  1600,  in  right  of  his  wife  Joan,  daughter 
and  coheir  of  Robert  Sapcote.*''  Soon  afterwards  it  was 


Sapcote.       Sable 
dovitvles  argent. 


tire; 


°«  Cal.  Inij.  p.m.  Hen.  VII,  i,  no.  45. 

•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  5  Ed.  IV,  no.  32. 

'"  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  VII,  i,  no.  1179. 
Will,  I'.C.C.  32  Vox. 

"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  328,  no.  58. 
See  Ibid.  bdlc.  254,  no.  53  and  bdle.  32S, 
no.  57. 

"P.C.C.  38  Porch. 

'•  Ibid,  printed  in  Coll.  Top.  el  Gen. 
V.  307. 

'«  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Mich,  and  Ilil. 
4  &  5  Phil,  and  Mary. 

'•Com.  Pleas  Deeds  enrolled,  Midi. 
2  &  3  I'hil.  and  Mary. 

'•  Soc.  Antlq.  MS.  (to. 

"  PytthUy,  Ilk.  of  Feel  (Northants 
Rec.  Soc),  122,  12311. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  p.  277. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  case  171, 
file  13,  no.  233. 


»»  Cott.  MS.  Cleo.  C.  ii,  ft.  37,  37^. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  245J. 

"  Sparkc,  lint.  Angl.  Script  (Swaffhan.^, 
f.  265. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  246. 

"«  Cott.  MS.  Cleo.  C.  i,  '.  105. 

"'  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  case  171, 
file  9,  no.  141.  "  Ibid.  no.  142. 

•'  Sparkc,  Hill.  Angl.  Scri/>/ (Swaflham), 
ccixiii. 

"'  Cal.  Chart.  1226-57,  p.  20. 

"'  Cal.  Close,  1389-92,  p.  540. 

""  Ibid.  1392-96,  p.  397. 

"'  Cott.  MS.  Nero,  C.  vii,  (.  86d. 

'■  Harl.  ch.  55,  G.  i«. 

•'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccliii,  89. 
For  pedigree,  see  Vtm.  of  II  unit  (Camd. 
Soc),  p.  12  ;  John  Sapcot  — s.  Richard — 
8.  John — s.  Richard — s.  Robert — daus. 
lilranor,  Mar^.irct  and  Frances. 


116 


3 


u 


o 


U 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


WARMINGTON 


acquired  by  the  Proby  family,  descending  through  the 
Earls  of  Carysfort  to  the  present  owner  as  shown 
above.  In  an  inquiry  made  in  December  1605  it  was 
stated  that  Henry  Sapcote  had  copyhold  and  freehold 
lands  in  Warmington,  rendering  ^^3  gi.  lod.  a  year,  but 
how  much  was  copyhold  and  how  much  freehold  was 
not  known.  He  also  had  copyhold  tenements  in 
Eaglethorp,  which  decayed  about  1570.** 

In  1291  the  prior  of  Fineshade  had  is.  rent  from 
Warmington,  and  the  prior  of  St.  Andrew's  19/.  ; 
the  almoner,  sacrist  and  infirmarer  of  Peterborough 
had  respectively  ^^3  13/.  ^d.,  6s.  8J.,  and  6s.*''  In 
153s  the  almoner  received  £z8  3/.  ^^J.  from  this 
manor  and  the  cellarer  had  60s.  from  Eaglethorp."* 

The  nups  of  Stamford  had  an  estate  here,"  called 
Blofield.  In  1545  a  rent  of  lo^d.  and  lands  in  War- 
mington were  granted  to  Richard  and  Robert 
Taverner.*^  Bridges  gives  the  following  description 
of  the  house  there  :  '  There  are  still  [1711]  remaining 
arched  windows  and  a  chamber  at  the  west  end,  now 
a  dove  house,  called  the  Chapel  Chamber  ;  4  ac. 
of  meadow  called  Nuns'  Acres  belong  to  it.''  There 
was    a    local    family    named    Blofield,    and    Ishmael 


^:U7 

Knights  Iemplars. 
Ardent  a  cross  gules 
and  a  chief  sable. 


K.NIGHTS  Holl'ITALUBi. 

Gules  a  cross  argent. 


Blofield,  gent.,  died  in  1636,  holding  a  tenement  called 
Ederley  Place,  descending  to  him  from  his  father 
William  and  grandfather  Thomas.  He  left  sons, 
William  and  Ishmael.-  The  Knights  Templars 
(afterwards  the  Hospitallers)  had  an  estate  here  from 
an  early  time,  for  Brother  Aymery,  Master  of  the 
Temple,  claimed  from  Hugh  Gargate  land  in  War- 
mington and  Ogerstone  in  1209;^  in  1546  appur- 
tenances of  the  manor  of  Sibston,  late  of  Temple 
Brewer  preceptory,  were  sold  by  the  Crown.*  Rents 
of  "jd.  and  4J.  are  recorded  from  Warmington  and 
Lutton  in  the  Temple  Brewer  accounts.* 

The  various  minor  tenements  of  Gargate  and  others 
seem  to  have  varied  considerably  from  time  to  time. 


so  that  the  tracing  of  them  is  uncertain,  but  the 
manor  of  PJPLET  retained  its  individuality.  Isem- 
bard  Artifcx,  named  in  Domesday  Book,  is  recorded  to 
have  been  the  first  enfeoffed  by  the  abbots  of  a  knight's 
fee."  His  successors  took  the  local  surname  but  the 
descent  cannot  be  traced  in  detail.  Martin  dc 
Pappele  attested  charters  of  the  abbot  in  1 117  and  1 1 20 
and  is  mentioned  in  1 1 46.  Probably  a  son  or  grandson 
of  the  same  name  held  the  knight's  fee  in  1 189,' 
and  was  defendant  in  a  claim  for  dower  in  1 202.* 
Walter  de  Papley  had  succeeded  by  1 21 2.'  Roger 
de  Peterborough  gave  land  in  Peterborough  to 
Martin  son  of  Walter  de  Papley  in  free  marriage 
with  his  daughter  Alice."  Martin  de  Papley  was 
tenant  in  1227II  and  acquired  other  land  in  1240;'^ 
he  occurs  in  12421^  and  1 254,  paying  4^.  for  ward  of 
Rockingham  Castle.'*  The  hamlet,  which  made 
with  Warmington  one  geldal.le  vill,  about  this  time 
contributed  zs.  for  sheriff's  aid,  is.  for  view  of  frank- 
pledge and  3 1.  for  suit."*  John  de  Papley  did  homage 
in  1276  and  Thomas  son  of  John  in  1300.'*  Tlie 
name  of  this  latter  occurs  again  in  1316,"  and  1322, 
when  he  was  recorded  to  hold  a  knight's  fee  and  the 
fourth  part  of  the  serjeanty  of  being  bailiff  at  Castor 
Court. 1*  He  or  another  TThomas  occurs  in  1346," 
and  the  Bishop  of  Lincoln  in  1398  gave  licence  for 
divine  service  in  the  manor  house  of  Papley  for  two 
years  to  Thomas  Papley  and  Isabel  his  wife.-"  The 
same  tenement  was  held  in  1428  by  John  Papley 
(I  fee),  and  John  Beven  and  John  Ward  (}  fee). 2' 
In  1456  Richard  Papley,  son  and  heir  of  John,  and 
Isabel  his  wife,  joined  in  selling  the  manor  to  William 
Brown  of  Stamford,  merchant. -- 

As  already  stated,  this  William  Brown  married 
Margaret  Stock,  so  that  his  descendants  inherited 
Papley,  Lilford  (which  he  acquired  in  1473)"  and  a 
large  estate  in  Warmington  and  the  surrounding 
country.  He  appears  to  have  been  an  innkeeper  in 
Stamford,  where  he  founded  an  almshouse  called  the 
Bedehouse.  He  died  14  April,  1489,^'  having  made 
a  will  in  which  he  desired  to  be  buried  in  Our  Lady's 
chapel  in  All  Hallows',  Stamford.^"  The  manor  of 
Papley  was  held  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  by 
fealty  only.  Margaret,  his  widow  and  executrix, 
survived  but  a  short  time,  dying  on  28  October,  1489. 
The  heir  was  their  daughter  Elizabeth,  wife  of  John 
Elmes,  aged  48  and  more.^"  Margaret's  will-'  left 
many  gifts  to  churches,  including  a  vestment  of  black 
velvet  for  Warmington  (cope,  chasuble  and  two 
tunicles)  ;  it  mentions  John  Elmes  the  elder,  my  son, 
and  Elizabeth  his  wife,  William,  Katherine,  John  the 


"  Mis.  Bks.  (Land  Rev.),  221,  f.  321. 

•»  Pope  Nicb.  Tux  (Rec.  Com),  55. 

••  Valor  Ecil.  (Rcc.  Com),  iv,  279. 

•*  Roger  de  Torpcl  gave  them  landi 
for  the  health  of  the  loul  of  his  wile 
Mary  in  the  12th  century,  Pytchley, 
Dk.  of  Fees,  33. 

••  L.  &■  P.  Hen.  Fill,  xx  (2),g.  496(7). 
'  Nortbants.  ii,  480. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccczc,  48. 

•  Feet     of     F.    Northantj,    caie     171, 
file  12,  no.  222.  ;    alio  Plac.  de  quo  War. 

{  Rec.  Com.),  532. 

•  L.i>P.  Hen.  Fill,  xxi  (1),  g.  718  (4). 

•  Mins.  Accti.  Hen.  VIII,  7274. 

•  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60. 

'  Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  p.  277. 
'  Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  ca«e  171,  file  8, 
no.  107;   Pytchley,  op.  cit.  119. 


>  Red  Bk.  619. 

'°  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 

"  Cal.  Chart,  1226-57,  p.  20. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Nortliants,  case  173 
file  28,  no.  375.  Martin  was  called  to 
warrant  by  Wiscard  Ledet.  Olhcr  fines 
occur  in  53  Hen.  Ill  (883)  and  23  Edw.  I, 

(337). 

'•  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  248. 

'*  Sparks,  lltst.  Angl.  Script,  Swaffham. 

"  Ibid.  267. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  E.  xxii,  f.  46. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  2S. 

**  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60. 

'»  Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C  i. 

"  Bridges,  llist.  Northants,  ii,  484. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv.  48. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  case  179, 
file  95,  no.  139. 


"  De  Banco  R.  845  (Hil.  12  Edw.  IV), 
m.  21. 

■*  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  Henrv  Vll.  i,  no.  476, 
478. 

"'  P.C.C.  22  Mille*.  He  left  20J.  a 
year  to  the  ancrcss  at  Stamford.  An  en- 
graving of  the  brasi  of  William  Brown 
and  his  wife  in  All  Hallows'  Church 
will  be  found  in  F.  Peck's  .-Jnnah  oj Stam- 
ford;  also  one  of  the  brass  of  Margaiet 
daughter  of  John  and  Elizabeth  Elmes. 
who  died  i  August,  1471,  and  one  of  the 
Bedehou&e  seat,  bearing  the  arms  of 
Elmes. 

«•  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  Ihn.  VII^  i.  no.  525, 
533»  55'-  ^^^  •*  pedigree  of  Elmes, 
see  Metcalfe,  Vistt.  of  Northanti^  ^S^li 
p.  18. 

^  P.C.C.  30  Milles. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


■4  f 
0 

a 

♦* 

4 

0 

i  ■* 

% 

♦  •* 

\0 

0 

0/ 

Elmes.  Ermine  two 
burs  sable  each  sprinkled 
with  elm  leaves  or. 


younger,  Joan  and  Isabel  Elmes,  Thomas,  Margaret 
and  Jane  f'azalcerley,  and  the  executors  were  her 
brother  Thomas  Stock,  clerk,  John  Elmes  and 
William  his  son. 

John  Elmes,  son  of  John  Elmes  of  Henley,  died 
4  May,  1491,  and  it  appears  by  the  inquisition  that 
he  had  married  Elizabeth  by  1457  ;  their  son  and 
heir  William  was  27  years 
old.-*  Elizabeth  and  William 
Elmes  obtained  the  manor  of 
Papley  and  other  estates  from 
Brown's  trustee  in  1495.-* 
Thomas Stockdied  23 October, 
1495,  leaving  as  heirs  his 
sister  Isabel  Fazakerley  and 
his  niece  Elizabeth  Elmes. ^* 
Elizabeth  survived  till  1511,-" 
but  her  son  William  Elmes, 
of  Stamford  and  the  Inner 
Temple,  died  in  1 504,  having 
by    his     will-'^     made     many 

charitable  gifts,  including  one  to  Warmington. 
The  will  mentions  his  moiher  Elizabeth,  his  wife 
Elizabeth  and  Joan  Iwardby  her  mother,  sons  John 
and  Thomas,  and  daughters  Elizabeth  and  Joan.  He 
desired  to  be  buried  in  the  Temple  church  in  London. 
His  wife  was  one  of  the  three  daughters  and  coheirs 
of  John  Iwardby  of  Great  Missenden,  Bucks,  where 
she  was  born  24  August,  1475.^^  She  seems  to  have 
died  in  1526.^* 

The  son,  described  as  John  Elmes  of  Lilford,  esq., 
made  his  will,'*^  a  very  long  one,  in  No\'ember,  1540, 
and  it  was  proved  7  February,  1544-5.  By  it  he  left 
jf  10  to  his '  grandfather  '  William  Brown's  almshouses 
at  Stamford  and  small  gifts  (including  6s.  id.  to  War- 
mington) to  many  churches,  the  gild  of  our  Lady 
at  Oundle,  etc.  His  son  Edmond  was  under  22  years 
of  age,  and  other  children  and  kinsfolk  are  mentioned  ; 
also  lands  in  Papley,  Ogerston,  Elton,  Fotheringhay 
and  Stamford.  The  executors  were  desired  to  make 
reparation  for  any  wrongdoing  by  him,  and  to  give 
knowledge  of  this  '  about  Oundle  and  Stamford, 
where  I  shall  be  most  defamed.'  His  wife,  who  sur- 
vived, was  Edith,  daughter  of  John,  lord  Mordaunt 
of  Turvey,  Beds.  In  1539  charges  had  been  brought 
against  him  in  the  Star  Chamber,  which  may  explain 
t)ic  defamation  mentioned  in  his  will.  The  inhabi- 
tants of  Warmington  and  Barnwell  claimed  common 
of  pasture  in  these  places  and  in  Lilford  and  alleged 
that  Elmes  had  closed  up  highways  in  Papley,  etc., 
converted  arable  into  pasture  and  impounded  their 
cattle.  He  was  learned  in  the  law  and  a  man  of 
great  lands  and  substance.  The  witnesses  for  com- 
plainants described  Papley  as  a  hamlet  in  War- 
mington, and  the  inhabitants  of  Warmington  had 
common  there  till  Elmes  stopped  them.  Once  there 
had  been  twelve  ploughs  going  in  the  fields  of  Papley, 


but  now  only  three.  There  had  been  ten  houses  of 
husbandmen  and  four  cottages  in  Papley,  but  only 
two  houses  were  now  inhabited.  Elmes  had  surcharged 
the  fields  with  cattle  and  sheep.  He  had  stopped  tiie 
highway  from  Huntingdon  to  Fotheringhay  called 
Bradgate,  and  other  roads.'" 

The  son  Edmund  succeeded,  and  made  in  1579  a 
settlement  of  his  manors  of  Papley  and  Warmington 
(this  latter  being  the  Stock  estate)" ;  and  he  died 
12  March,  1601-2,  holding  these  manors  of  the  bishop 
of  Peterborough,  having  settled  them  on  his  second 
son  Thomas.  The  heir  was  a  son  John,  then  aged  40.-'* 
No  reason  is  given  for  thus  giving  them  to  a  younger 
son,  but  his  widow  Alice  (sister  of  Oliver  St.  John 
of  Bletsoe)  in  her  own  will  directed  that  her  late 
husband's  will  was  to  be  carried  out,  and  left  household 
stuff  at  Lilford  to  John  on  condition  that  he  did  not 
disturb  it  ;  Thomas  was  to  have  the  household  stuff 
at  Papley.  Thomas  Elmes,  who  thus  succeeded,  had 
already  several  children — William,  John,  Edmund, 
Thomas  and  Anthony  being  named.'* 

A  survey  of  Warmington  and  Papley  in  1605  has 
been  cited  above.  Thomas  Elmes  complained  as  to 
Papley,  that  the  jury  had  done  their  work  badly. 
He  said  the  cow  pastures  in  Ogerstone  Leyes  were 
in  the  waste  of  Papley  manor  between  Goldingdale 
gutter  and  Papley  hedge.  Ogerstone  Leyes  had  been 
common  or  several,  according  to  the  time  of  the  year. 
In  1573  Sir  Walter  Mildmay  procured  a  commission 
to  have  the  bounds  between  Warmington  and  Papley 
defined'"'  and  also  obtained  an  exchange  of  lands, 
acre  for  acre.  After  this  exchange  Warmington  and 
Papley  did  not  intercommune.  Ogerstone  Leyes 
(though  in  Papley)  were  then  allotted  to  Warmington 
for  common  of  cattle,  but  the  soil  still  belonged 
to  the  lord  of  Papley,  who  felled  the  wood,  etc.  The 
true  and  ancient  bound  of  Papley  and  Warmington 
was  Goldingdale,  not  Lutton  brook.*'  Thomas 
Elmes  made  settlements  of  the  manor  of  Papley  in 
1615  and  1621-'-;  and  died  at  Lilford,  10  July,  1632. 
.'\s  already  stated,  he  had  divided  his  estates,  leaving 
the  older  manors  of  Lilford  and  Papley  to  his  eldest 
son  William,  then  aged  40  or  more,  and  the  newly- 
purchased  manor  of  Warmington  to  the  younger  son 
Thomas.*'  William  had  in  1614  married  Margaret, 
sister  of  Sir  Francis  Goodwin.  The  manor  of 
Papley  was  held  of  the  bishop  of  Peterborough  in 
socage.  The  rectory  of  Warmington  descended 
with  it  for  a  time.  William  Elmes  suffered  a  recovery 
of  his  manors  of  Papley,  Lilford  and  Wigsthorpe 
watermill,  etc.,  in  I632,''-*  and  died  17  April,  1641, 
leaving  a  son  and  heir  Arthur,  aged  only  ten  years.** 
Arthur  Elmes  and  Jane  his  wife  were  in  1663  still 
in  possession  of  the  manor  of  Papley  and  the  rectory 
of  Warmington.**  Arthur  died  in  that  year  and  Jane 
married  Sir  Francis  Compton,  the  estate  being  sold  in 
1668  to  Edward  (Watson),  lord  Rockingham.*'  Lilford 


*•  Cal.  Inij.  p.m.  I/en.  Vll,  i.  no.  592, 
lie,  relating  only  to  Uifordihirc  and 
IJcrkihirc. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Divcri.  Col.  Trin.  10 
Hen.  VII. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  VII.  i.  no.  1179. 
Mil  Undi  in  Warmington  .ind  Papley  were 
held  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough. 

•'  P.C.C.  1  Fetlipl.ice. 

••  P.C.C.  II  llolgrave. 

>>  Cal.  Irti/.  p.m.  Ilrn.  I'll,  i.  n.  328, 
1080  ;  ii.  n.  627. 


"  P.C.C.  II  Porch. 

"  P.C.C.  22  Pynney. 

"Star  Chamber  Proc.  lUn.  \I1I, 
23/29. 

"  Feet  of  I".  Northanls.  Mich.  21/22 
Eli?.. 

•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cclxxiii,  89. 
Will  in  I'.C.C.  7  Montague. 

"  P.C.C.  <;7  Huddlc<ton. 

">  ICxche.  Spec.  Com.  1658  (Northanti 
16  F.Iiz.).  The  boundary  at  given  was  : 
North  from  I'antworth  Furret  to  Colder- 

118 


ingdalc,  Brodegate  w.iy,  Losborrow 
lladon,  Archcsladc  and  Craneland. 

«'  Mis.  llks.  (Land  Rev.),  221,  f.  325. 

*•  Feet  of  F.  Northantj,  Trin.  ijjai.  I., 
Faiter,  19  Jal.  I. 

*'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccccxcii, 
87. 

"  Kecov.  R.  Mich.  8  Chaj.  I. 

*'  Clian.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcxiv,  88. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Norihanti,  'Fiin.  1658  ; 
and  Trin.  1 1;  Chai.  If. 

«'  Ibid.  Mich.  2oCha».  II. 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


WARMINGTON 


descended  separately.  In  1708  Lewis,  lord  Rocking- 
ham (son  of  Edward)  was  in  possession,^*  and  in 
1735  his  grandson  Lewis,  earl  of  Rockingham.'"' 
On  his  death  in  17.^5  his  brother  Thomas  (d.  1 746) 
succeeded  and  left  his  estates  to  a  kinsman,  Lewis 
Monson  (afterwards  Watson),  created  baron  Sondes  in 
1760,  who  held  Papley  in  1751.^*'  The  same  family''' 
were  in  possession  in  1785^''  and  1818.*^  Afterwards 
Papley  went  to  the  FitzW'illiam  family,  one  of  whom 
had  married  Anne,  sister  and  coheir  of  Charles,  2nd 
marquis  of  Rockingham,  heir  male  of  the  Edward, 
lord  Rockingham  of   1668.     It   was  owned   in    1864 


\V*rsos,  tarl  of  Rock- 
ingham Argent  a  ihev- 
iron  azure  engrailed 
benseen  three  martleti 
labU  toitb  three  ires- 
ceitti  ttr  on  the  cheveron. 


FiriwiLLiAM.    /.ozengy 
urgent  and  gules. 


by  the  Hon.  George  Wentworth-FitzWilliam,  younger 
son  of  Charles,  5th  earl  FitzW'illiam,  whose  son, 
George  Charles  Wentworth-FitzWilliam,  is  the 
present  owner. 

The  church  of  ST.  MART-IHE- 
CIIURCH      VIRGIN  consists  of  chancel,  42  ft.  6  in. 

by  19  ft.,  clearstoricd  nave  of  five  bays, 
73  ft.  6  in.  by  15  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  aisles  each 
13  ft.  6  in.  wide,  north  and  south  porches,  and  west 
tower  13  ft.  6  in.  square,  surmounted  by  a  broach 
spire.  The  width  across  the  nave  and  aisles  is 
47  ft.  9  in.  All  these  measurements  are  internal. 
An  organ  chamber  was  added  in  1893  in  the  angle  of 
the  chancel  and  south  aisle. 

The  church  is  built  of  Barnack  ragstone,  plastered 
internally,  and  has  plain  parapets  throughout.  The 
chancel  is  covered  with  grey  slates,  the  rest  of  the 
roof-i  being  leaded.  With  the  exception  of  the  nave 
arcades  and  certain  minor  alterations  named  below, 
the  building  is  all  of  13th  century  date,  a  very  beauti- 
ful example  of  the  work  of  that  period,  the  plan  of 
which  has  remained  practically  unaltered.  Shortly 
before  1850  the  interior  was  partially  restored, 
numerous  coats  of  whitewash  and  a  west  gallery 
being  then  removed^'' :  a  more  extensive  and  careful 
restoration  of  the  whole  building  was  carried  out  in 
1876. 

The  nave  arcades  belong  to  an  earlier  building  and 
date  from  c.  1 180-90,  at  which  time  aisles  were  prob- 
bably  first  added  to  a  12th  century  church.  The  tall 
and  slender  columns  are  octagonal  on  the  north  side 
and  on  the  south  cylindrical  in  section,  with  responds 
to  correspond.     The  bases  rest  on  plinths,  probably 


fragments  of  the  walls  of  tlie  earlier  cliurch,  and  have 
good  water  mouldings.  The  capitals,  which  on  both 
sides  have  octagonal  abaci,  differ  considerably.  The 
eastern  respond  and  the  two  eastern  columns  on  the 
north  side,  and  the  western  respond  and  eastern  column 
on  the  south  side  have  scallopped  capitals.  The 
third  column  and  west  respond  on  tiic  north  and  the 
second  and  third  columns  on  the  south  have  water- 
leaf  foliage,  the  northern  column  and  respond  having 
volutes  in  addition.  The  western  column  on  the 
north  side  has  well-developed  crocketed  foliage, 
while  the  western  column  and  eastern  respond  on  the 
soutii  have  plain  early  gothic  mouldings,  the  respond 
having  also  an  extra  band  of  moulding  in  the  base. 
Tiic  arches  are  high  and  pointed  with  small  hood- 
moulds  and  consist  of  two  orders  of  square  outline 
with  I.ecled  edge-rolls  and  broad  flat  sofTits. 

About  the  middle  of  the  13th  century  the  original 
chancel  was  lengthened  and  rebuilt,  the  aisles  were 
rebuilt  and  widened,  a  clearstory  was  added  to  the 
nave,  and  the  tower,  spire  and  porches  were  erected. 
The  south  aisle  seems  to  have  been  set  out  first, 
but  the  whole  of  the  work  was  planned  with  strict 
regard  to  the  spacing  of  the  existing  arcades  of  the 
nave.  The  south  doorway,  covered  by  a  magnificent 
vaulted  porch,  is  in  the  middle  of  the  length  of  the 
wall,  with  two  three-light  windows  on  each  side,  and 
the  north  door  is  directly  opposite  in  the  middle  bay 
of  the  aisle,  covered  by  a  vaulted  but  less  lofty  porch. 

In  the  14th  century  new  buttresses  were  added  to 
the  aisle  walls,  and  the  east  wall  of  the  chancel  seems 
to  have  been  rebuilt  in  the  15th  century  with  a  window 
of  poor  design,  and  other  windows  were  inserted  in 
the  south  wall.  New  buttresses  were  also  added  to 
the  chancel,  a  three-light  window  inserted  in  the 
west  wall  of  the  south  aisle,  and  a  stair-turret,  giving 
access  to  the  roof,  made  at  the  north-west  angle  of 
the  north  aisle. 

The  chancel  is  of  three  bays  and  retains  two 
original  windows  on  the  north  side,  each  of  two-lights 
divided  by  a  slender  mullion  and  with  a  cusped 
quatrcfoil  in  tlie  head.  Their  hoods  are  continued 
as  a  string  along  the  upper  part  of  the  wall  inside 
and  out,  and  the  windows  are  extremely  plain  in 
detail.  Below  the  sills  is  another  string,  continued 
round  *he  whole  chancel  and  raised  to  form  a  hood 
to  the  round-headed  doorway  of  a  former  sacristy 
and  to  the  pointed  priest's  doorway  in  the  south 
wall.  Both  these  doorways  are  now  blocked.  The 
east  window  is  four-centered  and  of  five  cinquefoiled 
lights  without  tracery.  The  windows  on  the  south 
side  are  of  similar  type,  the  first  of  two  and  the  others 
of  three  lights,  and  at  the  west  end  of  the  wall  a 
modern  arch  opens  to  the  organ  chamber,  in  which 
the  displaced  window  has  been  re-used.  No  traces 
are  visible  in  the  chancel  of  either  piscina  or  sedilia, 
but  at  the  east  end  of  the  north  wall  is  a  rectangular 
aumbry,  and  on  each  side  of  the  east  window  is  a 
13th  century  image  bracket,  that  at  the  north  end 
elaborately  carved  but  in  a  mutilated  state,  the  other 
moulded.     A   stone  bench  remains  along  the  lower 


**  Recov.  R.  Eait.,  7  .\nnc. 

«•  Ibid.  nil.  9  Ceo.  II. 

••  Ibid.  Eait.  24  Geo.  II. 

"  Lewii  lord  Sondet,  d.  1765 — 1. 
Lewii  Thomas,  d.  1806 — t.  Lewii 
Richard,  d.  1836.  The  Rockingham 
eitatei  then  went  to  hi:  youngest  brother, 


Richard  Watson,  who  d.  1852,  leaving  a 
•on  and  heir,  Wentworth,  born  1848. 

»■  Recov.  R.  Mich.  26  Geo.  III. 

"  Ibid.  Trm.  58  Geo.  III. 

"  W.  Caveler,  Ar<h.  llluslralicitt  of 
h'armington  Church  (1850),  p.  9.  The 
drawings  are  from  sketches  made  in  1847. 

H9 


The  plates,  eighteen  in  number,  include 
elevations,  sections  and  details.  The 
restoration  of  the  chancel  in  1876  was 
carried  out  under  the  direction  of  Ben- 
jamin Fcrrcy  and  that  of  the  nave  and 
the  rest  of  the  church  by  Sir  Gilbert 
Scott, 


A  HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


part  of  the  north  and  south  walls,  and  against  the 
north  wall  is  a  large  table  tomb,  with  dowel  holes 
at  the  corners.'^  The  chancel  arch  is  of  two  moulded 
orders,  the  inner  one  resting  on  slender  detached 
shafts  with  moulded  bands  half-way  up  and  un- 
restored  foliated  capitals  ;  the  outer  order  dies  into 
the  wall.  The  roof  of  tlie  chancel  dates  from  the 
restoration  of  1876,  when  it  took  the  place  of  a  plaster 
ceiling  and  flat  roof  which  had  apparently  been  erected 
in  the  18th  century.** 

The  nave  has  a  remarkable  timber  inner  roof  of 
13th  century  date,  in  imitation  of  stone  vaulting,  with 
ridge  rib  and  two  diagonals  in  each  bay,  the  spiringers 
of  which  are  carried  on  stone  shafts  resting  on  corbel 
heads  in  the  spandrels  of  the  arcades.  The  capitals 
of  these  shafts  have  foliage  which  shows  a  strong 
naturalistic  tendency,"  and  the  bosses  of  the  wooden 


grouped  lancets  with  moulded  mullions  and  jambs 
under  a  containing  arch  or  label.  Externally  the 
detail  is  fairly  elaborate,  especially  in  the  windows 
east  of  the  porch,  which  are  richly  ornamented  with 
dog-tooth  and  have  jamb-shafts  with  foliated  capitals, 
but  internally  the  openings  are  simply  splayed,  with 
chamfered  rear-arches.  There  is  also  a  small  window 
of  two  lights  over  the  doorway.  The  east  window  of 
the  aisle,  now  opening  to  the  organ  chamber,  is  of 
five  lights,  with  I3lh  century  jamb-shafts,  but  its 
mullions  at  a  later  date  were  continued  upward  to 
meet  the  arch.  A  string,  like  that  of  the  chancel, 
is  continued  at  sill  level  round  both  aisles. 

The  south  doorway  is  of  three  moulded  orders  on 
jamb-shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and  the 
porch  has  an  internal  wall-arcade  of  three  moulded 
arches  on  each  side  set  on  a  bench  table.     The  oak 


'iww^m 


North  Aisle 

:m:;v;:;;:j§:::::;:::::i§::::v:::v.[oirr:::±t{41 

Nave 


ifflF^ai 


:;::ii:::::::;:[oi:;:::;".::@::::;;:::g 
South  Aisle 

Pi^iX3lll|nMfez^||'l|||[;  Bi!!5D 


10    s    o 


10 


20 5p 


JE^i^ 


-S 


Scale  of  Feet '  ^p^:Vl|!||p 

Plan   of  VVarmington  Church 


tn  (1180-1190 

6«  131!!  Century 
C_  ill' I!!  Century 
S 15!!!  Century 
□Modern 


diagonals  are  formed  by  grotesque  heads  and  carved 
foliage.  The  ribs  are  deep  and  massive  with  cham- 
fered edges.  At  the  east  end  of  the  nave  are  two 
small  sexfoiled  circular  openings  lighting  the  space 
between  the  outer  and  inner  roofs*'  ;  the  pitch  of  the 
outer  roof,  always  low,  has  been  preserved. 

The  windows  of  the  aisles  differ  considerably  in 
detail.  The  east  window  of  the  north  aisle  is  of 
tracery  formed  by  the  curving  and  intersection  of  the 
mullions,  but  all  the  others*"  on  tliis  side  arc  of  two 
lights  similar  to  those  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel, 
and  the  clerestory  windows  on  both  sides  are  of 
similar  type,  but  smaller.  In  the  south  aisle  the 
windows  on  each  side  of  the  doorway  consist  of  three 


door  is  original  and  retains  plain  13th  century  hinges. 
The  porch  is  covered  by  a  single  quadripartite  vault 
with  chamfered  ribs  springing  from  the  end  shafts 
and  meeting  in  a  carved  boss.  The  outer  opening 
has  an  arch  of  three  moulded  orders  on  jamb-shafts 
with  moulded  capitals,  bases  and  mid-bands,  the 
outer  order  being  enriched  with  dog-tooth.  On  the 
inside  there  are  two  chamfered  orders  only.  The 
north  doorway  is  of  a  single  moulded  order  and  hood- 
mould,  on  attached  jamb-shafts  with  moulded  capitals 
and  bases,  and  the  porch  opening  is  of  two  orders,  the 
outer  on  engaged  and  the  inner  on  detached  shafts,  all 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.*"  The  porch  walls  are 
plain  and  the  ribs  of  the  vault  die  out  in  the  angles. 


''  Tht  top  i>  10  ft.  7  in.  by  4  ft.  ancJ 
9  in.  thick,  chamfered  on  the  uncleriidc. 
It  may  have  been  the  alt.ir  slab  of  the 
chancel,  but  there  are  no  coniccration 
croiici  viiiblc.  It  ii  deicribcd  by  Bridget 
ai  '  a  free  itonc  monument  covered  with  a 
rough  »tone,  on  which  have  been  por- 
craiti  and  armt  in  brail  * :  //rir.  of 
Ncriiaitu,  ii.  482. 


"  Cavcler  in  1850  wrote,  '  the  original 
roof  of  the  chancel  has  been  removed, 
and  a  Hat  plaster  ceiling  with  large 
beami  lubititutcd,  cutting  acrosi  the 
chancel  arch,  the  upper  part  of  which 
appears  on  the  outside  of  the  building, 
above  the  chancel  roof  '  ;    op.  cii.  9. 

*'  Molt  of  tht-m  have  been  much  re- 
stored, but  three  at  least  arc  left  untouched. 

120 


^*  'I'hcre  arc  also  imall  circular  openings 
between  the  clearstory  windows,  lighting 
the  roof  space. 

'•  hxccpt  a  small  single  quatrefoil 
opening  over  the  doorway. 

•®  The  outer  order  only  i^  moulded  on 
the  exterior  ;  both  are  chamfered  inside 
the  porch. 


will 


SSHrsSrit-^?^- 


i 


w 


h 


u 

o 

1- 
o 


o 
o 


o 


POLEBROOK   HUNDRED 


WARMINGTON 


At  the  east  end  of  the  south  aisle  there  was  an 
altar,  with  a  leJge  for  an  image  in  the  soutli-east 
corner,  and  the  piscina  niche  in  the  south  wall  has  a 
rounded  trefnil  opening  with  a  triangular  head,  in 
the  tympanum  of  which  is  an  octofoiled  circle.  West 
of  this  is  a  tomb  recess  in  the  wall,  now  half  blocked 
up,  and  there  is  another  recess  in  the  same  wall  west 
of  the  doorway.  In  each  of  these  recesses  part  of  a 
13th  century  grave  slab  is  exposed.*' 

The  tower  is  low  and  massive  and  of  three  stages 
with  moulded  plinth  and  square  angle  buttresses. 
The  elaborate  west  door-vay  has  an  inner  trefoilcd 
head  set  within  an  outer  arch  of  three  moulded  orders 
on  jamb-shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases, 
the  whole  profusely  ornamented  with  dog-tooth. 
In  the  lower  stage,  north  and  south,  is  a  tall  round- 
headed  window,  and  in  the  middle  stage  a  quatre- 
foiled  circle  on  each  face.  The  bell-chamber  windows 
are  of  two  lights  deeply  set,  with  a  quatrefoil  in  the 
spandrel,  dog-tooth  ornament,  and  jamb-shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The  spire  is  low,  but 
well  proportioned  to  the  tower.  It  rises  from  a  corbel 
table  of  masks  and  has  three  tiers  of  lights  of  somewhat 
disproportionate  height.  The  doorway  to  the  vice, 
in  the  south-west  corner,  has  a  rounded  head  and  the 
arch  into  the  nave  is  of  three  chamfered  orders, 
the  outer  springing  from  small  moulded  corbels, 
the  others  resting  on  half  octagonal  jambs  round  which 
the  mouldings  of  the  corbels  are  continued  ;  the 
jambs  have  bases  with  water-moulding  and  stand  on 
very  large  plinths. 

The  stair  to  the  rood  loft  is  at  the  south-east  corner 
of  the  north  aisle,  and  the  doorway  remains  in  the 
wall  of  the  nave  above.  The  whole  of  the  upper  part 
of  the  existing  rood  screen  dates  only  from  1876, 
before  which  time  "  a  portion  of  the  base  "  only 
remained,  in  the  panels  of  which  were  some  vestiges 
of  colour.*^  The  original  work,  which  is  of  15th 
century  date,  has  been  restored  and  the  whole  is 
richly  coloured  and  gilded.  The  pulpit,  similarly 
restored,  appears  to  be  of  about  the  same  date  ;  it 
has  six  panelled  sides,  with  painted  figures  of  our 
Lord  and  St.  John  the  Baptist.  A  handsome  Jacobean 
screen,  extensively  restored,  incloses  the  eastern 
bay  of  the  north  aisle,  which  contains  a  late  gothic 
table  tomb,  said  to  have  been  erected  by  Sir  Robert 
Kirkham,"  and  an  alabaster  mural  monument  to 
Thomas  Elmes,  of  VVarmington  (died  1664),  his  wife 
Ann  (died  1686)  and  son  William  (died   1653). 

The  font  has  an  octagonal  bowl  with  trefoiled 
panels,  on  a  pedestal  dated  1662,  with  the  initials 
S.S.,  W.B.  ;   it  has  a  plain  flat  cover. 

The  tower  contains  six  bells,  the  treble  being  an 
addition  in  1912''  to  a  former  ring  of  five,  the  second"' 
and  tenor  of  which  had  been  recast  by  Mears  and 


Stainbnnk  in  1876.  The  present  second  (original 
treble)  is  dated  1670,  the  fourth  1604,  and  the  fifth 
is  by  ilenry  Penn,  of  Peterborough,  1710.°* 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup  and  cover  paten  c. 
1570,  a  silver  flagon  of  1736  given  by  Mrs.  Anna  Maria 
Compton,  and  a  silver  plate  of  1834." 

The  registers  before  1812  arc  as  follows  :  (i)  all 
entries  1558-1687  ;  (ii)  all  entries  1688-1718  ;  (iii) 
baptisms  and  burials  I7l()-l8l2,  marriages  1719- 
1754  ;  (iv)  marriages  1754-1802  ;  (v)  marriages  1802- 
1812. 

The  advowson,  like  the  manor,  bc- 
.inrOJl'SON  longed  to  the  monks  of  Peterborough, 
and  they  presented  the  rectors.  Giles 
do  Spolcto,  one  of  the  Legate  Otho's  clerks,  was  rector 
in  1238,  but  not  being  resident,  a  "  vicar,"  or  deputy, 
Thomas  de  Wudeston,  chaplain,  was  appointed  for 
Giles's  life  ;  he  was  to  have  all  the  altarage."'  Ellis 
de  Bedingham,  a  judge  without  a  taint,  was  rector  in 
1281  ;  he  was  buried  at  Bottisham  (Cambs.)*' 

In  1 291  the  value  of  the  rectory  was  estimated  at 
j^38  a  year,  out  of  which  a  pension  of  261.  8tJ.  was 
paid  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough.'"  In  1 316  the  rec- 
tory was  appropriated  to  the  abbey,  and  a  vicarage 
was  ordained." 

On  the  dissolution  of  the  abbey  the  rectory  came 
to  the  Crown.  A  lease  of  it  was  granted  in  1595  to 
Thomas  Elmes,'-  who  in  1609  obtained  it  in  fee,  a 
condition  being  that  he  paid  ^10  a  year  to  the  vicar 
and  j^24  to  the  King."  The  advowson  of  the  vicarage 
was  reserved.  The  rectory  descended  with  the  manor 
of  Papley  to  Arthur  Elmes,  who  in  1654  sold  or  mort- 
gaged it  to  Sir  John  Trevor.'''  Sir  P'rancis  Compton 
and  Jane  his  wife  (daughter  of  Sir  John  Trevor  and 
widow  of  A.  Elmes)  passed  it  to  trustees  in  1668,''' 
and  in  1701  James  Compton  had  the  tithes  in  Warm- 
ington,  Papley  and  Eaglethorp.'"  Mrs.  Anne  Comp- 
ton, widow  of  James,  son  of  Sir  Francis  Compton, 
was  the  lay  rector  in  1711."  In  1656  an  augmentation 
of  £20  a  year  for  the  minister  was  approved,"  but  this 
would  not  continue  after  the  Restoration.  Soon  after- 
wards the  rectory  was  subdivided.  The  separate  tithes 
of  Papley  were  acquired  by  Lord  Rockingham,  owner 
of  that  manor,  in  1704,'*  and  those  of  Eaglethorp 
were  held  by  William  Whitwell  and  his  wife  in  1739  ;'" 
the  residue  was  probably  the  "  moiety  of  the  rectory  " 
which  occurs  in  a  fine  of  1719  between  Francis  Cud- 
worth  Masham  and  Nathaniel  Gower,  clerk,  and 
Frances  his  wife.*'  In  1775  John  Williamson  acquired 
the  rectory  from  William  Compton  and  Catherine  his 
wife.'2  The  tithes  had  been  commuted  in  1774,  when 
the  Inclosure  was  made,  excepting  those  of  Eagle- 
thorp. 

The  rent  of  ^^24  reserved  to  the  Crown  when  the 
rectory  was  sold,  was  granted  out  in  l6l9,''''  and  came 


•'  The  stoncj  arc  moulded  on  the  edge 
and  have  a  cross  with  shaped  ornament 
similar  to  that  on  a  slab  at  Titchmarsh. 

•"  Caveler,  op.  cit.  9. 

•'  Bridges,  lltst.  oj  Northant:^  ii.  4S2 
where  it  is  described  as  "  an  altar  tomb 
of  grey  marble,  covered  with  a  grey  slab, 
round  the  verge  of  which  was  an  inscription 
in  brass  and  on  the  sides  three  escutcheons 
of  arms,  all  of  which  arc  now  torn  off." 

•*  "  In  memory  of  William  3rd  Earl  of 
Carysfort  K.P.  who  restored  the  church 
in  1S76  "  :  inscription  on  bell. 

"  Present  third. 


"•  The  inscriptions  on  the  old  ring  of 
five  are  given  in  North,  Cb.  Bclb  oj 
Northants,  429. 

"  Markham,  Ch.  /'laicofNorihanis,  299. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  GrosieUite  (Line.  Rcc. 
Snc),  170,  192. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Nortbanls,  ii,  4S3  ; 
F088,  Judges,  iii,  52. 

"  Pope  Xirb.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com),  39. 

'*  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  480,  quoting  the 
Lincoln  Registers. 

"  Pat    R.  37  Elii.  pt.  5. 

"  Ibid.  7  Jas.  I,  pt.  39  i  Cat.  S.  P. 
Do:n.  1C03-IO,  p.  496. 

121 


"  Fret  of  K.   Northants,  Mich.    1654. 

"  Ibid.  Midi.  20  Chas.  II.  Thomas 
Elmes  was  vouchee  in  the  accompanying 
recovery. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Easier  13 
Will.  III. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants,  ii,  4S0. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1655-56,  p.  331. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Mil.  2  Anne. 

'»  Ihid.  nil.  12  Geo.  II 

"  Ibid.  Mich.  6  Ceo.  I. 

»'  Ibid.  Trin.  15  Geo.  III. 

••  Pat.  R.  17  Jas.  I,  pt.  3. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


to  the  Elmes  family,  becoming  divided,  like  the  manor, 
among  the  five  daughters  of  Thomas  Elmes,  who  died 
in  1664.'*  A  fifth  part  of  it  was  acquired  by  William 
Walcott  in  1709.'^ 

Sir  Walter  Mildmay  of  Apethorpe'*  acquired  the 
advowson  of  the  vicarage,  and  it  descended  regularly 
to  the  earls  of  Westmorland.  It  was  sold  with  the 
Apethorpe  property  in  1904  to  Sir  Leonard  Brassey  who 
exchanged  the  advowsons  of  Warmington  and  King's 
Cliff  with  the  Bishop  of  Peterborough  for  those  of 
Apethorpe  and  Woodnewton.  The  Bishop  is  the 
present  patron.  About  1880  the  vicar  had  £2^  a  year 
from  the  Tithe  Rent  Charge,  and  £106  rent  from  the 
44  acres  of  glebe.  The  net  income  is  now^^lSs,  with 
a  house." 

According  to  Bridges  (171 1)  there  '  was  anciently  St. 
Andrew's  chapel  [near  the  manor-house],  of  which  no 
vestige  hath  been  remaining  within  any  person's 
memory,  nor  any  mention  occurs  in  any  record.'  Wil- 
liam Proby  had  paid  ^4  i6j.  a  year  out  of  Eaglethorpe, 
which  was  supposed  to  be  the  purparty  of  this  chapel ; 
the  rent  was  then  paid  to  Lord  Rockingham,  who 
owned  part  of  the  impropriated  rectory  by  purchase 
from  Mr.  Whitwell  of  Oundle,  who  had  purchased 
from  Mrs.  Compton.** 

The  Wesleyan  Methodists  have  a  chapel,  which  was 
rebuilt  in  1 88 1. 

Three  almshouses  for  aged  widows  were  built  in 
i860  by  the  Ladies  Fanny  and  Charlotte  Proby. 

Poor's  money.  A  sum  of  £100,  for- 
CHJRITIES  merly  given  for  the  poor  by  benefactors 
whose  names  are  unknown,  was  placed 
out  in  1754  on  security  of  the  tolls  of  the  turnpike 
road  from  Peterborough  to  Wellingborough.  The 
endowment  is  now  represented  by  ^^113  l<)s-  2J.  Con- 
sols producing  £i  ijs.  od.  annually.     The  income  is 


distributed  in  money  to  poor  men  who  have  attained 
the  age  of  65.    In  1924  there  were  13  recipients. 

The  Mossop  Fund  was  founded  by  Declaration  of 
Trust  dated  September  1879.  The  endowment  consists 
of  ;(^30l  8.t.  \d.  Consols  producing  £j  \0!.  id.  yearly. 

By  his  Will  proved  23  September  1908  the  Rev. 
Charles  Henry  Ward  Capron  gave  ^1,000  to  the  Vicar 
and  Churchwardens  upon  trust  to  apply  the  income  in 
the  distribution  of  coal  to  the  poor  on  or  about  St. 
Thomas's  Day.  The  money  was  invested  in  £l,\l'! 
14J.  io<^.  India  3  per  cent.  Stock,  producing  ^f  34  14J.  %d. 
yearly.  In  December  1924  4  cwts.  of  coal  were 
delivered  to  each  of  98  recipients,  by  the  Vicar  and 
Churchwardens  in  respect  of  this  Charity  and  the 
Mossop  Fund. 

By  his  Will  proved  27  August  1888  Daniel  John 
Baxter  gave  ^^loo  to  the  Oundle  Wesleyan  Methodist 
Circuit  Superintendent  and  Circuit  Stewards  and  the 
Chapel  Stewards  and  Society  Stewards  of  the  Wes- 
leyan Methodist  Chapel  at  Warmington  upon  trust  to 
apply  the  income  for  the  benefit  of  poor  Widowers 
and  Widows  without  respect  of  creed,  sect  or  other- 
wise. The  endowment  consists  of  £()6  is.  6d.  India 
3J  per  cent.  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charit- 
able Funds  producing  ^3  ji.  ^d.  annually  in  dividends. 
The  income  is  distributed  in  money  to  about  25  re- 
cipients. 

By  her  Will  proved  at  Peterborough  13  April  1 891 
Mrs.  Elizabeth  Mossop  gave  a  sum  of  money  to  the 
Vicar  and  Churchwardens  now  represented  by  ^93 
21.  5(/.  India  3^  per  cent.  Stock  producing  ^3  5f.  ^d. 
yearly,  the  income  to  be  distributed  to  poor  Widows 
on  St.  Thomas's  Day.  There  are  about  18  re- 
cipients. 

The  several  sums  of  Stock  are  with  the  Official 
Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 


"  Teet  of  F.  Northants,  Easter, 
20  Chas.  II  and  Hil.  i  Anne. 

••  Ibid.  Trin.  7  Anne. 

••  lie  died  in  15S9  holding  intrr  alia  the 
advr>w8on  of  W'armington,  and  left  a 
ion  Anthony  ;    Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii). 


ccxxiii,  61.  This  son  died  similarly  seised 
in  1617,  and  his  heir  was  his  daughter 
M?.ry,  wife  of  Sir  Fr.Tncis  Fane,  after- 
wards earl  of  Westmorland  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccclxxvi,  94. 


«'  Crockford. 

*' Bridges,  Wnr.  Northaiils,\i,  4%2.  The 
sum  appears  to  be  a  fifth  part  of  the  ^24 
a  year  due  to  the  Crown  from  the  tithe- 
owner. 


122 


THE    HUNDRED    OF    NAVISFORD 

CONTAINING  THE   PARISHES   OF 

CLAPTON  THR.-VPSTON 

PILTON  TITCHMARSH 

STOKE  DOYLE  WADENIIOE 
THORPE  ACHURCH 

The  Hundred  of  Narresford  or  Navisford  was  one  of  the  eight  hundreds 
held  by  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough,  which  were  confirmed  to  it  in  the  charter 
of   Richard    I.'      In   tlie   Domesday   Survey,   the   four  parishes  of  Clapton, 


-r  ^ 


/  .STOKE  DOYLB^»         ^ 


Index  Map  to  the  Hundred  of  Navisford 

Thrapston,  Titchmarsh  and  Wadenhoe  are  given  under  the  definite  heading 
of  Navisford  Hundred  ^  and  there  is  no  reason  to  think  that  Thorpe  Achurch 
and  Pilton,  which  were  held  of  the  Abbey,  did  not  belong  to  it.  Stoke  Doyle 
is  given  under  the  heading  of  '  VVicesle,'^  but  this  apparently  is  a  mistake. 
The  Abbot,  however,  seems  to  have  held  only  one  court  for  the  Hundreds  of 
Polebrook  and  Navisford,  so  that  the  seven  parishes  frequently   appear  under 

'  Cal.  Chart.  IZ26-57,  p.  19;   Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  118,  124-125. 
^  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  309a,  333(3,  349^,  3S0(J. 
*  Ihid.   ii^a. 

123 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 

Polebrook.'*     A  part  of  Catworth  in  Huntingdonshire  was  held  with  Thrapston, 
and  was  within  the  Hundred  of  Navisford/^ 

After  the  dissolution  of  the  Abbey,  the  issues  of  the  courts  of  the  two 
hundreds  were  returned  jointly,  and  only  one  bailiff  and  one  steward  are 
named. ^  Henry  VIII  granted  the  Hundred  of  Navisford  for  life  to  Queen 
Catherine  Howard,^  but  after  her  death  it  remained  with  the  Crown' 
until  i6i  I,  when  James  I  granted  it  to  John  Eldred  and  George  Whitmore^ 
to  hold  with  all  the  privileges  formerly  belonging  to  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough.^  In  1 6 1 3  the  two  grantees  sold  it  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu 
of  Boughton.i"  Shortly  afterwards  a  writ  of  quo  warranto  was  issued  against 
Sir  Edward  regarding  his  rights  in  the  Hundreds  of  Polebrook,  Huxloe  and 
Navisford  which  were  duly  allowed  to  him.^^  In  the  early  i8th  century  his 
descendant  the  Duke  of  Montagu  held  it,  and  the  court  of  the  hundred  was 
held  at  Thrapston. ^^  It  afterwards  passed  to  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  and 
Queensberry, 

^Cf.  Chron.  PetTob.  p.  118. 

<*  Buccleuch  Coll.  Ser.  Chron.  353  ;   V.C.H.  Northunts.  i,  365^-. 
'"  ydor  Ecclts.  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  pp.  279,  280,  282. 
'  Close  R.  2,165  ;  ^-  ^1^^  P-  ^''"-  fm,  xvi,  p.  716;   Pat.  R.  no.  695. 
'  P.R.O.  Court  R.  ptf.  19s,  no.  56. 
'  Pat.  R.  (no.  1905),  9  Jas.  T,  pt.  6. 

'  Close  R.  2,165  ;    Anglo-Sax.  Chron.  (Rolls  Ser.),  i,  220;     Cal.  Pat.  1226-57,  P-  '9:    P^^-   ^■ 
38  Hen.  VI,  pt.  ii,  m.  8. 
•"Close  R.  2,165. 
"  Buccleuch  Cell.  Ser.  Chron.  387. 
'-  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  264. 


124 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


CLAPTON 


Cloton  (xi  cent.),  Clopton,  Clotton  (xii  cent.),  Clop- 
ton,  Cl.ipton  (xiii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Clapton  lies  on  the  eastern  side  of 
tlie  county,  the  Huntingdonshire  county  boundary 
marking  its  eastern  limits.  It  covers  1,952  acres  of 
land  of  which  over  half  is  laid  down  in  grass.  A  stream 
crosses  its  western  side  and  here  the  land  is  only 
some  100  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum,  but  eastward 
near  the  church  it  rises  to  about  250  ft.*  The  sub- 
soil is  mainly  Oxford  clay,  with  some  stone  marls.'^  No 
railway  crosses  the  parish  and  the  nearest  station  is  at 
Thorpe,  on  the  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Rail- 
way. The  vill.ige  lies  to  the  east  of  the  main  road  from 
Kimbolton  to  Oundlc,  with  the  church  and  rectory  a 
little  to  the  south.  Tliere  is  a  homestead  moat  in 
Ringsdale's  wood,'  and  SkulLing  Dudley  Coppice  pre- 
sumably gained  its  name  from  one  of  the  former  lords 
of  the  manor.  A  water-mill  at  Clapton  is  mentioned  in 
1397.*  There  were  formerly  brick-works  in  the 
parish. 

The  manorial  history  of  CLAPTON  or 
MANORS  CLOPTON  in  the  years  succeeding  the 
compilation  of  Domesday  Book  is  dif- 
ficult to  unravel,  the  confusion  arising  from  the  fact 
that  Eustace  the  Sheriff  of  Huntingdonshire  held  part 
of  Clapton  in  chief  of  the  King  and  part  as  a  tenant  of 
the  Abbey  of  Peterborough.  The  manor  of  Clapton, 
later  held  in  demesne  of  the  Abbey,  developed  from 
land  forming  part  of  the  Abbey  holding,  but  the 
manor  of  Clapton  Hotots  or  Hotofts  was  formed  from 
land  belonging  to  both  of  the 
Domesday  holdings. 

In  1086,  Eustace  held  3 
hides,  3  virgates  and  \  part  of 
J  hide  of  land,  of  the  Abbey 
of  Peterborough.'  No  tenant 
is  named  in  the  12th  century 
Survey  of  the  county,'  but  in 
1125  Eustace  had  been  suc- 
ceeded by  Roger  de  Lovetot, 
who  held  2  knights'  fees  of  the 
Abbev,'  containing  as  appears 
later  land  in  Clapton,  Pole- 
brook,  Catworth,  Winwick  and 
Remington.*    In  1 146  William 

de  Lovetot  his  son  was  the  Peterborough  tenant.* 
William  had  two  sons,  Richard  and  Nigel,  the 
Hallamshire  (co.  York)  fees  passing  to  Richard  and 
the  Southoe  (co.  Hunts)  and  Peterborough  fees,  in- 
cluding Clapton,  going  to  Nigel.  There  is  some 
uncertainty  about  the  family  of   Nigel,  who   is  said 


Lovetot.  Arg.'nt aUon 
parted  fessewtse,  gules 
and  sable. 


to  have  had  five  sons,  namely,  Richard,  Roger,  Nigel, 
Robert  and  William.  The  identity  of  Richard  and 
Roger  has  been  confused,  but  it  appears  that  Richard 
died  childless  before  1192.  Roger  seems  to  have 
had  six  children,  namely,  William,  who  died  child- 
less,'* Nigel,  a  clerk,  who  before  1201  held  Clapton 
and  later  gave  it  to  his  brother  Geoffrey  for  life. 
Geoffrey  refused  to  pay  the  relief  and  the  Abbot 
of  Peterborough  seized  his  land.  Both  Nigel  and 
Geoffrey  died  without  direct  heirs,  and  their  property 
passed  to  their  three  sisters  or  their  heirs,  whose 
homage  and  relief  was  refused  by  the  Abbot  because 
the  earlier  relief  was  still  unpaid. '^  The  matter  was 
apparently  settled  and  Clapton  passed  to  Elias  de 
Mundevillc  or  Amundeville,  the  son  of  the  eldest 
sister.  Amice  or  Avice,  wife  of  Ralph  de  Amundeville, 
and  to  William  Patrick,  the  son  of  the  youngest  sister 
Alice,  who  had  married  William  Patrick. i''  Rose,  the 
second  sister,  was  still  living  at  the  time  of  Nigel's 
death  in  1219,''  but  no  part  of  Clapton  was  assigned 
to  her.'''  Before  1234,  William  Patrick  granted  his 
moiety  to  his  sister  Margery,  the  wife,  first  of  William 
de  Vernon  and  secondly  of  John  de  Littebury.'^  After 
the  death  of  her  first  husband,  both  she  and  her 
cousin,  Nigel  de  Mundeville,  the  brother  and  heir 
of  Elias,  granted  their  moieties  in  Clapton,  consisting 
of  the  homage  and  service  of  their  sub-tenants,  to  John 
de  Caux,  abbot  of  Peterborough  (l  250-1 262)."  Before 
1259,  however,  Margery  and  John  de  Littebury,  her 
second  husband,  sold  to  Richard  de  Clare,  Earl  of 
Gloucester,"  the  services  of  Thomas  de  Hotot,  a  sub- 
tenant in  Clapton,  and  other  properties.  This  sale  led 
to  a  claim  being  made  in  1347  by  Hugh  Audley,  Earl 
of  Gloucester  (whose  wife  had  inherited  part  of  the 
Honour  of  Clare),  to  the  overlordship  of  land  in  Clap- 
ton held  by  the  Abbot.  A  lawsuit  ensued'*  and  the 
case  is  interesting  as  showing  the  care  with  which  the 
Abbot's  defence  was  prepared  from  researches  among 
public  records.  The  abbot  was  able  to  prove  that  the 
Earl  could  have  no  claim  in  the  land  since  Margery 
and  John  de  Littebury  had  no  right  to  it  at  the  time 
of  the  sale  to  Richard,  Earl  of  Gloucester.  Although 
in  1372  the  land  in  Clapton  was  returned  amongst  the 
fees  held  by  the  Earl  of  Stafford,'*  the  Abbey  was 
apparently  left  in  undisputed  possession  of  the  Love- 
tot rights  there. 

The  history  of  the  sub-tenants  of  the  Lovetot's  lands 
is  confused.  In  1086  a  nameless  knight  appears  as  the 
tenant  under  Eustace  the  Sheriffj^"  who  may  perhaps 
be  identified  with  Alured,  Eustace's  tenant  in  the 
other  holding  in  Clapton.*'     In  c.  1 125,  Walter  son  of 


'  Ord.  Surv. 

•  V.C.H.  Soribanls.  i.  Geological 
Map. 

*  Ibid.  ii,4i2. 

*  Col.  Pal.  1396-9,  p.  184. 
'  V.C.H.  Soitbants.  i,  316*. 

•  Ibid.  p.  366.  Bridget  {Hist.  Sn'tbants. 
ii,  367)  give*  the  early  history  of  Clapton 
from  a  MS.  in  the  possession  of  the  Dud- 
leys, the  lords  of  the  manor.  In  the 
nuin  facts  the  manuscript  is  corrobor- 
ated by  other  contemporary  evidence. 
The  statement,  however,  that  Roger  de 
Lovetot  was  enfeofled  by  Abbot  Turold 
(1069-109S)  docs  not  scciii  correct,  as  his 


name  would  in  that  case  have  appeared  in 
the  Survey. 
"  Cbron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc).  p.  173. 

'Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,1.  64. 

'  S.  Gunton,  Hist,  oj  Cb.  of  Peter- 
bjfeugb,  129;  Thoroton,  H.st.  of  Notts,  i, 
63. 

*"  The  above  descent  is  taken  from 
Pytchlcy,  Bk.  0/  Fees  (Northants  Rcc. 
Soc),  95fl,  96«,  where  authorities  are 
quoted.  See  also  Rot.  de  Obi.  et  ?  tn. 
(Rec.  Com.),  149. 

"  Egerton  MS.  (II. M  )  No.  2733, 
f.  129. 

"  I'ytchley,    Bk.    of   Fees    (Noilh.inii 

125 


Rcc.  Soc),  p.  541.  Excerpt,  i  Rot.  Fin. 
(Rcc.  Com.),  i,  p.  32  ;  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38 
f.  64;  ibid.  MS.  60,  f.  156^. 

"  Excerpt.  >  Rot.  Ftn.  (Rec.  Com.)  i, 
p.  32. 

'*  Soc  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f,  64. 

"  Excerpt.  >  Rot.  Fin.  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
p.  255  ;    Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  64. 

'•  ("ylchlcy,   op.  cit.  96  ;    Soc   Antiq. 
MS.  38,  f.  64.  "Ibid. 

'»  Ihid.  ft.  62-121J. 

"  Chan.    Inq.   p.m.   45  Edw.  Ill  (iil 
nos.),  no.  62. 

"  f'.C.H.  Northants.  i,ii('h. 

"  Ibid.  3:ca. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Alured,  or  Walter  de  Clapton,  was  the  sub-tenant  of  the 
Abbey  fee.  He  held  one  hide  and  one  virgate  of  Roger 
de  Lovetot  and  3J  hides  of  the  abbey.^  Walter  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  William,  who  alienated  a  great 
deal  of  his  land  in  Clapton.  His  only  child  was  his 
daughter  Emma,^'  but  she  died  without  descendants  ^•' 
as  his  heirs  were  Alice  the  wife  of  Robert  de  Hotot, 
Denise,  the  wife  of  Robert  de  HofFord,  and  Rohesia  or 
Royce,  probably  the  daughters  of  his  brother  Robert.-^ 

The  manor  of  CLAPTON  HOTOTS  may  be  traced 
to  the  grant  of  lands  partly  in  demesne  and  partly  in 
villeinage  made  before  1 190 ^^  by  William  de  Clapton  to 
Thomas,  the  son  of  Alice  de  Hotot.^'  The  manor  was 
originally  held  of  the  Lovetots  and  the  homage  and 
service  of  a  later  Hotot  was  granted  by  Margery  de 
Vernon  and  Nigel  de  Mundeville  to  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough,^  but  when  the  latter  claimed,  in  1288,^° 
the  homage  of  the  sub-tenant,  it  appeared  that  between 
tlie  death  of  Nigel  de  Lovetot  and  the  grant  to  the 
Abbey,^  the  homage  and  service  due  had  already 
been  granted  to  a  mesne  lord,  an  ancestor  of  David 
de  Fletewik,  lord  of  Ringsdon.^*  The  latter,  however, 
granted  his  rights  in  Clapton  to  the  Abbot, ^^  who  from 
that  lime  was  the  immediate  lord  of  the  manor.^* 

Thomas  de  Hotot,  the  original  grantee,  who  was 
living  in  1 190,  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Richard,  the 
tenant  in  1243.^^  Richard  is  said  to  have  bought  back 
part  of  the  land  given  by  William  de  Clapton  to  the 
nuns  of  Chicksand,  as  well  as  the  share  of  William's 
lands  which  passed  to  his  sister  Denise  and  to  her 
granddaughter  Isabella,  the  wife  of  Hugh  de  Rings- 
don. -"^  Before  1254  another  Thomas  appears, ^^  and  in 
1272  he  made  a  settlement  of  the  manor,  with  re- 
mainder to  his  son  William,^'  who  succeeded  him  in 
1288.^  William's  son  Robert  did  homage  to  the 
Abbot  in  1311,^*  and  his  grandson,  another  Robert,  in 
1322.'"'  The  latter  was  presumably  the  tenant  in 
1346.*'  He  seems  to  have  been  succeeded  by  another 
Robert,  at  whose  dwelling  in  Clapton  there  was  a 
chapel  which,  with  other  chapels  and  oratories  in  the 
parish  drew  the  parishioners  from  the  parish  church, 
and  was  interdicted  in  I369.''2  His  daughter  and 
heir  married  Richard  Dudley  of  Barnwell. ''^  In  141 2 
and  1428  John  Scot  held  the  manor  presumably  as  a 
trustee,'**  since  Dudley  afterwards  enfeoffed  other 
trustees,  from  whom  his  son  and  heir  William,  be- 
tween 1467  and  1472  liad  difBculty  in  obtaining  livery 
on  coming  of  age.""^  William  died  seised  of  the  manor 
in  1505,  when  his  heir  was  his  grandson  William,  tlicn 


a  minor.''*  The  manor  was  held  by  the  Dudleys,  passing 

from  father  to  son,  with  one  temporary  break,  until  the 

1 8th   century.     Their   names 

were   Thomas,*'  Edward  who 

succeeded   before  1588**  and 

died  in  1608,'"  Edward,  who 

died    in    1632,^"  and  a   third 

Edward,   who    died   in   1641, 

leaving    four    daughters    and 

heirs,  all   under   age.^^     The 

manor,  however,  was   settled 

on    their    uncle    William,    to 

enable  him  after  their  father's 

death  to  pay  the  portions  left 

to  them.^-      William    Dudley 

was    created    a    baronet     in 

1660.*^      His     son     Matthew 

and  grandson  William  succeeded  him,  hut  the  latter, 

who  had  no  children,^''  sold  the  manor  in   1724  to 

William  Peere  Williams. ^^  His  son  Hutchins  Williams 

was  created  a  baronet  in  1747.    On  the  death  of  the 

third  and  last  baronet.  Sir  Booth  Williams,  in  1784,'''' 

it  passed  to  the  nephew  of  the  first  baronet.  Admiral 

Peere  Williams,  who  assumed  the  name  of  Freeman 


DuDLiv  of  Barnwell. 
Azure  a  cheveron  he- 
tvieen  three  Horn*  beads 
razed  or. 


WiLMAMS.  Gules  a 
wolf  coming  out  of  bis 
den  argent. 


Freeman.     . 

lozenges  or. 


three 


in  1822."  His  descendants  hold  it  till  1906,  when 
Augustus  Freeman  died  unmarried.  It  was  then  sold 
to  Sir  John  Brunner,  who  settled  it  upon  his  son  in 
law,  the  Hon.  Audley  Blyth,  in  March  1906.  He  died 
21  March  1908,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  widow,  from 
whose  trustees  it  was  purchased  in  1910  by  Thomas 
William  Buckley,  M.D.,  J. P.,  the  present  owner. 

The  third  heir  of  William  de  Clapton  m.iy  be 
identified  with  Rohesia,  lady  of  Polcbrook,  who 
renounced  her  claim  in  the  advowson  of   the  cluirch 


of    Clapton    in 
her  quitclaim.-''' 


"  I'.C.II.  Xorlhants.  i,  366  ;  Chroi:. 
Petrob.  173.  In  the  Dudley  MS.  Alured 
is  called  Alfred  dc  Crauntkort  and  his 
family  is  said  to  have  taken  the  name 
of  Clapton. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Nortbanis,  ii,  369 ; 
Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  68  j  Cal.  Curtn 
Regis,  i,  pp.  25, 14S. 

"Soc.  Antiij.  MS.  38,  f.  06,  121J; 
Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

«*  Cal.  Curia  Regis,  i,  pp.  25,  117,  119, 
253  ;  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  gives  them  as 
sisters  of  Willi.im,  but  from  the  pleadings 
in  the  Curia  Regis  Royce  is  said  to  be  the 
niece  of  William  and  daughter  of  Robert 
de  Clapton. 

"  SwafFham  Reg.  clxxi. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  368. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  3K,  f.  66.     See  above. 

'•  CBron.  I'ftrob.  (Camden  Soc.)  142-3. 

"Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,1.66. 

•'  Cote.  MS.  CIcop.  C  ii,  f.  105./. 


"  Ibid.  f.  Ill ;  Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden 
Soc),  pp.  142-3. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  xxii,  f.  49; 
FaiJ.  Aids,  iv,  p.  448  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xix,  129. 

"  EgcrtonMS.  (B.M.),  2733,f.  141^. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  369  ;  cf.  Feet  of 
F.  .Northants.  llil.  24llcn.  HI. 

••  S,.c.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  248./. 

•'  I'cct  of  F.  Northants.  East.  56 
Hen.  III. 

"  Chron.  Petrob.  142-3;  William  seems 
tfi  have  paid  huinage  again  in  1301,  pcr- 
li:.ps  after  the  dispute  with  David  dc 
I'letcwlk  was  finally  settled  (Cott.  MS. 
\'e!p.  F.  xxii,f.  49). 

••Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  Exxii.  f.  110. 

"  Ibid,  xxi,  f.  80  ;  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38, 
I.  65.  ♦'  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  44S. 

"  J. inc.  Epis.  Reg.  Memo.  Bucking- 
ham, 67. 

"  Mctcilfr,  Visit.  Northantt.  15. 

126 


1219.'*      Her    son     Robert    ratified 
It    seems   probable    that    she    was 

•*  Fend,  .■tuts,  vi,  501  ;    ibid.  Iv,  48. 

"  Early  Chan.  I'roc.  bdle.  38,  no.  114. 

*"  Clian.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  II)  xlx,  128. 

*'  Meicalfe,  loc.  cit.  ;  Northants  .V.  and 
Q.  (new  Sor.)  iv,  52.  "  Ibid.  45,  46. 

*•  Chan.  Intj.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii)  ccc  v,  129. 

^*'  Ibid,  cccclxvill,  93. 

"  Ibid.  dcxvll,4i. 

"Ibid.;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trln. 
1649;  ibid.  Mich.  1651;  ibid.  Mich. 
1654  ;  ibid.  Trin.  165;. 

"'  Ci.E.C.  Complete  Baronetage,\\\.  p. loo. 

"  Ibid. 

"  I'cet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  to  Ceo.  I 
ibid.  llil.  I  Geo.  II. 

"  G.E.C.  Complete  Baronetage,  v.  94. 

"  Burke,  Landed  Gentry,  1921  ;  Recov. 
K.  Trin.  24  Ceo.  Ill;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  Trin.  2<)  Geo.  III. 

••  Swatlham  Reg.  ccl.  b.  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.    Trln.  3  Hen.  HI. 

'•  Swatlham  Reg.  cclxi.  b. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


CLAPTON 


the  wife  of  Hugh  le  Fleming  who  held  land  in 
Clapton  of  the  Lovetots.'"  Her  lands  in  Clapton 
presumably  followed  the  history  of  the  manor  of  Pole- 
brook  (y.f.).  which  was  bought  by  Abbot  John  de 
Cau7.  from  Robert  son  of  Hugh  le  Fleming."  They 
were  assigned  to  the  Almoner  and  were  held, 
possibly  with  other  lands  in  Clapton,  as  one  tenth 
of  a  knight's  fee.** 

The  manor  of  CLAPTON,  held  by  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough,  may  be  traced  in  origin  to  various 
benefactions  made  by  the  Clapton  family,  which 
were  assigned  by  Abbot  Benedict  (1177-I194)  to  the 
Almoner  of  the  abbey.*'  William,  son  of  Walter  do 
Clapton,  granted  in  frankalmoin  one  messuage  and  one 
virgate  of  land  and  a  meadow  called  Sumc's  yard  or 
MawnesyerdtoPetcrborough'-'and  this  land  is  specially 
mentioned  in  the  charter  of  Richard  1  of  1189.'^  In 
the  following  year  William  and  his  wife  Emma  seem 
to  have  given  a  further  release  of  it  to  Abbot  Bene- 
dict.** The  latter  recovered  a  carucate  of  land  from 
William  Dacus  and  Thomas  de  Hotot*'  as  well  as  6 
acres  of  the  land  of  the  nuns  of  Chicksand.**  Richard 
de  Clapton  and  Geoffrey  son  of  Ralph  dc  Clapton,  a 
military  subtenant  of  William  de  Clapton,  made 
various  gifts  of  land  to  the  Prior  of  St.  Ncots,  Hunt- 
ingdon,** and  Abbot  Martin  of  Peterborough  (1226- 
1233)  bought  the  rent  of  zs.  a  year  arising  from  these 
tenements  from  the  Prior,  and  assigned  it  to  the 
Almoner.'"  In  1347  the  latter  held  in  frankalmoin  in 
chief  of  the  king  249J  acres  of  land."  In  1300  the  manor 
of  Clapton  was  valued  at  56.1.  \d.  a  year,'^  and  at  the 
dissolution  of  the  abbey  it  was  worth  £t,  8;.  5W.'^ 
In  1542,  Henry  VIII  sold  it  to  Roger  Tyrwhitt,  who 
in  the  same  year  resold  it  to  William  Dudley,  the 
lord  of  the  manor  of  Clapton  Hotot  (y.t.).'^ 

In  1086,  Eustace  the  Sheriff  held  one  hide  and  one 
virgate  of  land  in  chief  of  the  King.''  This  land 
also  passed  to  the  Lovetots,  but  was  held  of  their 
Huntingdonshire  Honour  of  Southo.'*  In  1236, 
William  Patrick  held  a  third  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Clap- 
ton, Polebrook  and  Thurning  as  part  of  the  Honour, 
so  that  he  had  not  by  then  granted  his  rights  in  this 
land  to  his  sister."  It  seems  probable,  however,  that 
she  obtained  them  later,  and  that  it  was  the  homage 
and  service  of  their  tenants  in  this  holding  that  she 
and  John  de  Littebury  granted  to  Richard  de  Clare 
in  1259.'*  If  so,  Hugh  Audley  had  presumably  some 
right  in  his  claim  against  the  Abbot  of  Peterborough, 
but  put  himself  in  the  wrong  first  by  claiming  too 
much  and  secondly  by  distraining  the  lands  which 


were  held  in  frankalmoin  in  the  almoner's  manor  of 
Clapton  {/]."'.). 

The  mesne  tenants  in  the  early  l3tli  century  were 
Hugh  le  Fleming  and  his  son  Robert,"  and  the  homage 
and  service  which  Robert  le  Fh-ming  and  Tlif)nias 
Sincrt  held  in  this  part  of  Clapton  prob.ibly  passed 
with  their  otlier  holding  which  the  Almoner  held  by 
military  service.""  The  holding,  however,  had  been 
again  sub-infcudated.  The  hide  of  land  was  held  by 
Walter  le  Stiward,  apparently  in  the  middle  of  the  13th 
century,  and  was  sold  to  Thomas,  son  of  Richard  de 
Hotot,"  so  that  it  presumably  was  incorporated  with 
the  manor  of  Clapton  Hotots  (■??'•),  the  Abbey  of  Peter- 
borough being  the  overlord  of  both  holdings.  The  vir- 
gate of  land  was  held  by  Hugh  de  Cliastillon,  who  was 
living  in  1 240,'- and  it  seems  to  have  passed  to  the  Abbey 
of  Tiiorncy,"^  wliicli  held  one-tenth  of  a  knight's  fee  of 
the  .'\bbey  of  Peterborough  as  of  the  fee  of  Lovetot."'' 

Another  reputed  manor  of  CLAPTON  may  be 
traced  to  half  a  hide  of  land,  held  in  1086  of 
the  Abbey  of  Peterborough,  by  Elmar.'^  In  the  early 
part  of  the  12th  century  he  had  been  succeeded  by 
Ascclin,  who  may  be  identified  with  Ascclin  de 
Waterville,'*  the  lord  of  Thorpe  Waterville  and 
Achurch,  and  his  successors  held  the  ovcrlordsliip  of 
this  land  until  the  middle  of  the  14th  century,  but 
it  is  not  mentioned  after  the  time  of  Robert  de 
Holand.*'  The  half  hide  seems  to  have  been 
granted  before  1185  to  Osbert  le  Bret,"*  but  in  1243 
it  was  held  as  one-seventh  of  a  knight's  fee  by  William 
Hay,"®  who  had  obtained  it  from  Ralph  de  Ccstreton.'" 
Hugh  dc  Cliastillon  also  claimed  some  right  in  it  at 
this  time,  but  William  Ha\  re- 
tained possession.®!  Between 
1 261  and  1274  Sir  William 
Hay  granted  his  manor  in 
Clapton  in  exchange  to 
William  Jakeley,  Abbot  of 
Thorney®^  to  be  held  in  frank- 
almoin and  in  1286  the  Abbot 
obtained  a  quitclaim  of  the 
half  hide  of  land  from  John  le 
Bret  and  his  wife  Sarah.®'  In 
1450  the  Abbey  of  Thorr.cy 
was  said  to  hold  a  manor  in 
Clapton,'*  and  at  the  Dissolu- 
tion of  the  Abbey,  the  rent  was  returned  at  £6  !  y.  \d. 
a  year,  but  the  issues  of  the  court  were  of  no  value.®* 
In  1542,  Henry  VIII  granted  all  the  lands  formerly 
belonging   to   the    Alibey    of    Thorney    to    Robert 


Thorney  .Arrfy.  Azure 
ihrff  crozicri  bctzvecn  as 
Ttiatjy  crosihis  or. 


••  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  64. 

"  Ibid. 

•«  Cott.  MS.  CItop.  C  i,  ff.  I45</,  128J. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  3!!,  (.  66. 

••  Ibid. ;  Swaffham  Reg.  cculix  b,  xxl. 
This  is  presumably  the  same  virgalc 
which  was  confirmed  to  the  Abbey  by  Pope 
Eogcnius.  If  so,  William,  son  of  Waller, 
must  have  succeeded  his  father  before 
1 146  (Gunton,  Hut.  nf  Cb.  Pelerhorougb. 
ed.  16S5,  p.  129. 

"  Cat.  Chart.  1226-57,  p.  19. 

•*  Swiflham  Reg.  f.  clxxi ;  Soc.  Antiq. 
MS.  38,  f.  I. 

"  Sparke,  Hist.  An^l.  Script.  (Swaffham) 
p.  100. 

••  Bridges,  op.  cit.  368. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  66. 

'•  Ibid;  Swaflham  Reg.  fol.  c.  b.  A 
Ralph  de  Clapton  at  the  end  of  the 
1 3th  century  had  a  son  John  and  a  daugh- 


ter Rose.  John,  son  of  John  dc  Clapton, 
was  dealing  with  lands  in  Hemington 
in  1438-52  (Buccleuch  Deeds  A.  76,  77, 
78.  85,  H.  6,1c,). 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  3«,f.  66. 

'•  Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  E  xxii,  f.  61. 

'*  Du^dale,  Mon.  -Jngl.  i,  404. 

'•/..  III.,/  P.   Hen.   I'm,   xvii  g,  714 

(IS,  17)- 

"  I'.C.H.  Nortbants.  i,  350  a. 

'•  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  367  ;  Soc.  Antiq. 
MS.  38,  f.  64. 

"  Bk.ofFtes{f.V..O.)\,  580. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  64  ;  Pytchley, 
op.  cit.  91. 

"  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.)  2733,  f.  129; 
JJ*.  o/f«j(P.R.O.)i,  580. 

•"  See  above. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  370. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  24 
Hen.  III. 

127 


"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  370. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  92./;  Cott. 
MS.  Cleop.  Ci,f-  i-!-7<l- 

"  V.C.H.  Northanis.  i,  31'iA. 

"  Ibid.  366a  ;  see  Thorpc-.\church. 

"  Kgcrton  MS.  (B.M.)  273;,  f(.  izM, 
134^;  Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C  i,  ff.  14'. 
14.'/. 

"  Pipe  R.  31  Hen.  II,  mid. 

"  Ki;crton  MS.  (R.M.)  2733>  '■  '34''- 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  24 
Hen.  III. 

•'  Ibid. ;    Egerton   MS.    (B.M.)   2733, 

'=  Dugdale,  Mon.  Anef.  11,  p.  604; 
Rol.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  84;  Cal. 
Chart.  1341-1417,  p.  79. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  14 
Edw.  I. 

••  Dugdale,  Mon.  An"!,  ii,  597. 

••  Ibid.  613. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Tyrwhitt,  who    sold    them   with   the    Peterborough 
manor  of  Clapton  to  William  Dudley.*' 

The  Church  of  ST.  PETER  stands  at 
CHURCH  the  extreme  south  end  of  the  village 
and  is  a  structure  in  the  style  of  the 
late  13th  century,  erected  in  1862-3  at  the  charges  of 
William  Peere  Williams-Freeman,"  on,  or  near,  the 
site  of  an  older  building  then  pulled  down.  The 
former  church  consisted  of  chancel,  clearstoried  nave 
of  four  bays,  north  and  south  aisles,  south  porch,  and 
west  tower  and  spire,  and  appears  to  have  been  mainly 
of  late  13th  or  early  14th  century  date,  though  one  of 
the  stones  in  the  hoodmould  of  the  chancel  arch  was 
a  re-used  fragment  of  the  pre-Conquest  period.'* 
The  tower  and  spire  having  been  struck  by  lightning 
at  the  end  of  the  1 8th  century,  were  allowed  to 
fall  in  order,  it  is  said,  to  save  the  expense  of 
repair.  A  wall  enclosing  the  nave  at  its  west  end 
was  built,  but  the  base  of  the  tower  remained  stand- 
ing to  the  top  of  the  plinth  until  1 862.'* 

The  present  building,  which  was  consecrated  23 
July,  1863,  consists  of  chancel  21  ft.  8  in.  by  17  ft.  loin., 
with  north  vestry  and  organ  chamber,  nave  of  three 
bays  38  ft.  6  in.  by  18  ft.  6  in.,  north  aisle  10  ft. 
wide,  south  porch,  and  west  tower  9  ft.  6  in.  square, 
all  these  measurements  being  internal.  The  building 
is  faced  with  coursed  dressed  stone  and  has  red-tiled 
eaved  roofs.  The  tower  is  of  three  stages  with 
diagonal  buttresses  and  saddle-backed  roof.  The 
aisle  is  under  a  separate  gabled  roof. 

The  font  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal  bowl, 
apparently  ancient,  on  a  modern  pedestal.  The 
pulpit  and  all  the  fittings  are  modern.  A  13th  century 
sepulchral  slab  with  dog-tooth  ornament  and 
elaborately  carved  top,  is  preserved  under  the  tower, 
and  in  the  vestry  is  a  marble  tablet  to  William  Breton, 
D.D.,  rector  (d.  1658). 

The  tower  contains  one  bell,  by  Thomas  Mears 
of  London,  1800.* 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver-gilt  cup  and  cover 
paten  of  1548,  a  silver-gilt  paten  of  1740  given  by  the 
Rev.  Claudius  Founereau,  rector,  in  1 749,  and  a 
plated  cup  with  two  handles.^ 

The  registers  begin  in  1558. 

The  advowson  was  granted  either 

ADFOWSON    by   one    of   the    Lovetots   or    their 

sub-tenants,     the    Claptons,     before 

1 183  to  the  Priory  of  St.  Neots,  Huntingdon,  the  gift 

being  confirmed  by  Richard,  son  of  Walter  de  Clapton 


in  tliat  year.3  In  1219  Abbot  Robert  de  Lindesey  of 
Peterborough  obtained  the  advowson  from  the  Prior 
of  St.  Neots  in  exchange  for  that  of  Hemington,* 
but  the  Abbey  was  apparently  disturbed  in  possession 
by  the  claims  of  various  tenants  of  lands  in  Clapton, 
who  had  succeeded  William  de  Clapton.  The 
archdeacon  of  Northampton  held  an  inquiry  into  the 
matter  in  1220  and  the  patronage  was  confirmed  to 
Peterborough.^  Renunciations  of  their  claims  were 
made  by  Ralph  de  Clapton,  possibly  the  heir  of 
Geoffrey,  son  of  Ralph  de  Clapton,  a  sub-tenant  of 
William  de  Clapton,  by  Sir  William  Dacus,  husband  of 
Emma,  niece  or  great-niece  of  William '  and  by 
Rohesia,  the  lady  of  Polebrook  and  her  son  Robert.' 
In  1282,  John  Faunel  obtained  the  next  presentation 
to  the  living,*  but  from  that  time  it  passed  with  the 
manor  of  Clapton.* 

In  1274-5  Hugh  de  Colingham,  as  rector  of  Clapton, 
had  for  three  years  withdrawn  the  suit  of  his  tenants 
there  at  the  Hundred  Court  as  well  as  the  payment 
of  2s.  a  year  for  sheriff's  aid.  He  also  claimed  to  have 
view  of  frank-pledge  and  the  assizes  of  bread  and  ale.'* 

W'illiam  de  Clapton  granted  the  third  sheath  of 
the  tithes  of  his  demesne  to  the  Prior  of  Huntingdon 
and  this  was  reserved  to  the  Priory,  when  the  advow- 
son of  the  church  was  assigned  to  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough."^  In  1 291  the  Priory  received  an 
annual  pension  of  £z.^'  A  further  sheath  of  the 
tithes  of  his  demesne  was  granted  by  William  to  the 
Sacrist  of  Peterborough,*^  whose  pension  in  1 291  was 
worth  ^l  6s.  Sd.  a  year.'''  A  pension  25^.  8d.  a  year 
was  reserved  to  the  Priory  of  St.  Neots,  when  the 
advowson  was  exchanged,'^  but  in  1 291  the  value 
was  returned  as  ;^i." 

In  1250,  a  chapel  is  said  to  have  been  built  in 
honour  of  the  Holy  Trinity,  in  the  churchyard  of 
Clapton,  but  no  mention  of  it  appears  in  later  docu- 
ments." In  1306-7  Sir  William  Hotot  gave  a  pension 
of  j^4  to  Ralph  de  Clapton  to  celebrate  daily  at  the 
altar  of  St.  Mary  Magdalen  in  Clapton  church,  but 
presumably  it  was  merely  a  grant  for  life.'* 

The  Rev.  William  Breton  who  died 
CHARITY  in  1658,  by  his  will  directed  his 
executors  to  purchase  land  of  the 
yearly  value  of  ^5  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor.  The 
land  is  situated  in  the  adjoining  parish  of  Winwick 
and  contains  about  15  acres,  producing  £\6  10/. 
yearly,  which  is  distributed  in  coal  to  about  30 
householders. 


"  L.  and  P.  Hen.  fill,  xvil,  g.  714 
(15  and  17). 

•'  There  is  a  memorial  tablet  to  him  in 
the  nave  ;  he  died  in  1X73.  The  fovmdation 
stone  wai  laid  3  Jidy,  1S62.  The  architect 
wai  Rictiard  Armstrong,  of  London. 

••  It  was  ornamented  with  plait  work 
and  was  probably  part  of  a  cross  shaft  ; 
see  V.C.n.  Northants.  ii,  i83. 

••  There  is  a  plan  of  the  old  church, 
made  by  Sir  Henry  IJryden  in  1862 
among  the  Dryden  papers  in  the  Nortli- 
ampton  Free  Library.  The  east  end  of 
the  north  aisle  widened  out  and  was  the 
burial  place  of  the  Dudley  family  ; 
Bridges,  Htit.  of  Northnntf.  ii,  370.  There 
was  a  figure  of  St.  Katharine  in  the  cast 
window.  There  is  also  an  account  of 
the  old  church  with  drawings  of  details, 
dated  1862,  among  the  church  papers. 

'  There  svere  four  bells  in  the  tower 
of  the  old  church,  one  of  which  was  by 


John  de  Yorkc,  of  Leicester  (15th  cen- 
tury) ;  another  was  inscribed  "  Sancte 
Petre,  ora  pro  nobis."  North,  Cb.  Beth 
oj  Xorthants.  222. 

•  Markham,  Ch.  I'lile  of  Xorlhanls.  70, 
where  the  1548  cup  and  paten  are  figured 
full  size.  On  the  foot  of  the  paten  is 
inscribed  "1595:  E.D.,"  the  initials 
being  those  of  Edward  Dudley,  son  and 
heir  of  Thomas  Dudley,  lord  of  the 
manor. 

•  Soc.  of  Antlt].  MS.  38,  p.  M'. 

•  I'eet  of  I".  Northants.  Trin.  3  Men.  Ill; 
Ducclruch  Deeds,  U.  1 1  j  Kol.  Iluj;.  de 
If'fllet  (Cant,  and  York  Soc.)  '.,  160-1. 

•  Roi.  Hug.  de  ll'elles  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  ii,  190. 

•  Ibid. ;  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  38,  f.  66  j 
Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  26S-9  ;  cf.  Feet  of  V. 
Northants.  Trin.  1  John. 

'  Swallham  Reg.  IT.  ccl.6,  cclxl.6  ;  Feet 
of    F.  Northants.  Trin.  3  Hen.  III. 

128 


•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  to  Edw.  I. 

•  Rot.  RfC.  Gratrsend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  pp.  109,  il6;  Add.  MS.  25288, 
f.  38  i  /,.  c~  P.  Hen.  rill,  xvii,  g.  714 
(15  and  17);  Ch;in.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  ii) 
cccv^  129;  dcxviii,  4t  ;  F"ect  of  F. 
Northants.  Trin.  10  Geo.  1  ;  ibid.  Trin. 
29  Geo.  HI. 

"  Rot.  Hund.  (Rcc.  Com.),  ii,  S4. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  de  It'elles  (C.mt.  and  York 
Soc),  i,  160-I  ;  Cill.  Papal  Letters,  i, 
p.  ss*!- 

"  Pope  Nicb.  Tax.  (Rcc.Com.),  p.  39A. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  de  IfeUes  (Cant,  and 
^'ork  Soc.)  i,  160-I. 

"  Pope  Nieb.  Tax.  (Rcc.  Com.),  39A. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  de  ll'elles  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  loc.  cit.  ;  Feet  of  V.  Northants. 
Trin.  3  llro  HI. 

"  I'ofte  \i,h.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com.),  39*. 

"  Bridges,  //ij(,  Northants.  ii,  37J. 

"Ibid. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


PILTON 


Pilchetone  (xi  cent.),  Pilkctlion,  Pilkintona,  Pilkctun 
(xiii  century). 

The  parish  of  Pilton  contains  1,4c/)  acres  of  land.' 
The  subsoil  is  mainly  Oxford  clay,  with  some  great 
oolite  and  cornbrash-.  The  greater  part  of  the  land 
is  laid  down  in  permanent  grass.  In  the  north-west, 
the  land  near  Bearshank  Wood  rises  to  254  ft.  above 
the  ordnance  datum,  but  near  the  River  Nene,  which 
forms  the  eastern  boundary,  it  is  low-lying,  about 
100  ft.  above  tile  ordnance  datum.'  A  bridge  over 
the  river,  which  is  mentioned  in  the  reign  of  Ed- 
ward I,*  connects  the  village  of  Pilton  with  Lilford 
parish.  In  the  early  i8th  century  the  bridge  was 
built  of  stone  with  ten  arches,  the  three  nearest  to 
Pilton  being  repaired  by  the  lord  of  the  manor.*  The 
name  Bearshank,  now  only  given  to  the  wood,  may 
have  been  used  for  the  north-western  portion  of  the 
parish,  since  Robert  '  Bareschanke  '  of  Caistor  in  the 
13th  century  paid  separately  for  his  land  in  Pilton  his 
quota  for  sheriff's  aid  and  other  dues  to  the  Hundred 
Court.'  The  wood  is  mentioned  in  1540,'  and  in 
1565  was  appurtenant  to  Aldwinkle  manor,  but  the 
inhabitants  of  Pilton  had  common  rights  in  it.*  A 
homestead  moat  lies  to  the  north  of  the  wood.' 
Quarries  existed  in  the  l6th  century  and  were  used 
in  the  building  of  Lyveden  House.''  They  were 
worked  in  the  early  l8th  century,  but  are  now  disused. 

The  village  lies  near  the  Nene,  with  the  church  and 
rectory  to  the  cast.  The  rectory  house  stands 
immediately  to  the  south-east  of  the  church,  and  is  the 
old  manor  house  of  the  Treshams.  It  is  a  picturesque 
l6th  century  building,  with  dormered  gables  and 
mullioned  windows,  much  restored  and  with  modern 
additions.  Little  of  the  ancient  work  is  left  inside 
except  a  handsome  oak  staircase  with  turned  balusters 
and  square  newels  with  shaped  tops,  which  goes  the 
full  height  of  the  house,  and  a  large  panelled  upper 
room  with  a  segmental  ceiling  and  good  four-centered 
(tone  fireplace. 

PILTON    or    PILKETON    may 
MANORS  probably    be    included    amongst    the 

pre-conquest  possessions  of  the  Abbey 
of  Peterborough,  but  the  first  mention  of  it  seems  to 
be  in  Domesday  Book,  when  the  Abbey  held  zj  hides 
of  land  of  the  King  in  chief.''  The  whole  of  this  land 
was  subinfeudated,  and  the  Abbey  retained  the 
overlordship  till  its  dissolution,  the  last  actual  mention 
of  the  overlordship  of  the  manor  being  in  1534.'^ 


The  sub-tenant  in  1086  was  Roger,'*  ancestor  o( 
tlic  Torpel  family,  who  held  12  hides  of  the  Abbey  in 
Northamptonshire,  for  the  service  due  from  6  knights' 
fees.'''  Later  ilocumcnts  show  that  their  manor  in 
Pilton  was  held  for  the  service  of  1}  knights'  fees," 
with  castle-guard  at  Rockingham,  li  seems  possible 
that  these  fees  also  included  li  virgales  of  land, 
wliich  in  Domesday  Book  were  held  by  Roger  in 
Wadenhoc.'"  In  the  1 2th  century  Survey  of  North- 
amptonshire, Roger  Infans,  his  successor,  held 
2  small  virgates  under  the  heading  of  Wadcnhoe,  but 
the  entry  is  confused,  and  it  seems  probable  tiiat  the 
land  was  in  Pilton,  which  with  Wadenhoe  and  Stoke 
formed  one  township."  The  Torpels  held  Pilton  till 
the  first  half  of  the  13th  century.'*  Robert  de 
Torpel,  who  succeeded  Roger  Infans,  was  tenant  in 
1130."  He  was  apparently  succeeded  by  Roger  de 
Torpel,  who  granted  land  to  St.  Michael's  of  Stam- 
ford for  the  soul  of  his  wife  Mary,^''  and  died  about 
1178.2'  His  son  Roger,  a  minor  at  his  father's  death, 
married  Ascelina,  daughter  of  Saher  de  Quinci.^^  It 
was  probably  their  son  Roger  who  in  1225  brought  an 
action  against  his  aunt  Maud  regarding  the  lands  of 
his  mother.-'  He  died  in  that  year,  when  the  custody 
of  the  lands  of  his  heir,  held  of  Peterborough,  was 
granted  to  the  Abbot  of  Peterborough,^''  and  the  lands 
held  in  chief,  to  Ralph  Bishop  of  Chichester.-*  The 
last  Roger  died  in  1 229,  apparently  a  minor,  before 
having  livery  of  his  inheritance.^*  He  had  married 
in  his  father's  lifetime,  and  was  survived  by  his  widow 
Mabel.^^  The  wardship  and  marriage  of  their  son 
Roger  was  granted  in  1229  to  L.  Dean  of  St.  Martin's- 
le-Grand,  later  Archbishop  of  Dublin.-*  The  last- 
named  Roger  probably  died  a  minor  and  unmarried, 
as  Ascelina  de  Torpel,  the  wife  of  Ralph  de  Camoys,^* 
obtained  seisin  of  his  lands  between  1242  and  1251.'" 
As  the  Torpel  fees  were  still  apparently  held  in  ward- 
ship, at  the  earlier  date,  Ascelina  must  have  been  the 
sister  of  the  last  Roger  de  Torpel.  Her  husband  is 
said  to  have  been  that  Ralph  de  Camoys  who  died  in 
1259,  but  none  of  the  Torpel  fees  is  mentioned  in  the 
inquisition  taken  after  his  death,*""  and  it  seems  im- 
possible that  Ascelina  could  have  been  the  mother  of 
his  son  and  heir  Ralph,  who  was  over  40  years  old  at 
his  father's  death.*'  It  seems  clear  that  she  was  the 
wife  of  the  younger  Ralph,  who  died  seised  of  the  6  fees 
of  the  Torpel  inheritance  in  1277.*^  His  son  and  heir 
John  was  then  over  25  and  of  a  suitable  age  to  be 


•  Ordnance  Survey. 

•  V.C.H.  Sonbanu.  i,  Geological  Map. 

•  Ordnance  Survey. 

•  Cal.  And.  D.,  B.  2,R90. 

^  Bridges,  //»/.  Noribanu.  ii,  374. 
•Egcrton  MS.  (B.M.),  2731,  f.  15;. 
^  L.  &■  P.  I/en.  Vlll,  XV,  g.  831  (50). 

•  Bridget,  Idc.  cit. 

•  y.C.H.  Ncribanti.  ii,  \lt. 

"Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Pep.  (Var.  Coll.) 
iii,  pp.  li,  liii. 

"y.C.H.  Noribanls.  i,  p.  316a. 

"  Cbron.  Peirob.  {Camden  Soc),  p.  170; 
Red  Book  of  Excbej.  (Rolls  St.),  p.  618  ; 
Egerton  MS.  2733  (B.M.),  ff.  135b, 
IJ7;  Cott.  MS.  Veip.  E  xxi,  f.  81; 
FeuJ.  Aids,  IT,  pp.  48,  448  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  (Str.  ii),  dcxcvi,  2. 


"V.C.H.  Norlhants.  i,  316a. 

**  Cbron.  Petroh.  (Camden  Soc.),  pp. 
169,  170;  Pilton  followed  the  same  de- 
scent as  the  manor  of  Torpel  until  1280; 
cf.  y.C.H.  Nortbanls.  ii,  p.  466. 

"  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  135b  ; 
Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  «.  136-7. 

^' y.C.H.  Noribanls.  i,  316.  The  ser- 
vice of  1}  knights'  fees  was  very  heavy, 
according  to  the  custom  of  the  Abbey,  to 
be  due  from  2  hides  .ind  1  virgate  of  l;ind. 

"  Ibid.    366  ;     Egerton    MS.    (B.M.), 

^733,  f-  I54<i- 

"  Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script,  pp.  54, 
So,  83;  Cal.  Cbari.  1226-57,  p.  20; 
Gunton,  Hist.  Cb.  0/  Pelerborougb,  296  ; 
Rot.  Litl.  Claus.  (Ret.  Com.),  i,  p.  237b  ; 
Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  Ci,  f.  136. 

129 


'0  Pytchley,  Bk.  of  Fees  (Northanti 
Rec.   Soc),   34«. 

"Ibid.  33.         "Ibid.  34«.        "Ibid. 

"  Maitland,  Bracton's  Note  Bk.  iii,  no. 
1045. 

"  Excerpt,  c  Rot.  Fin.  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
133  ;  Rol.  Lilt.  Claus.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  50. 

«'  Excerpt,  e  Rol.  Fin.  (Rec.  Com),  i,  187. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1227-31,  pp.  145,  197. 

"Ibid.  "Ibid.  198,  330. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  244. 

"  Ibid.  ;  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733, 
f.137. 

'"'  Complete  Peerage  (new  ed.) ;  Cal. 
Iriq.  i,  no.  443. 

"Ibid. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  ii,  no.  212. 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


GOO 


Camoys.  Argent  a  chief 
gules  with  three  bezants 
therein. 


Ascelina's  son.-"^  John  was  also  the  heir  of  Mabel  de 
Torpel,  probably  the  widow  of  the  last  Roger  de  Torpel, 
who  died  the  same  year  seised  of  a  Kentish  manor.^"* 
She  also  held  certain  assarts  in  Pilton,  presumably  as 
part  of  her  dower.'' 

In  1280,  John  de  Camoys  released  part  of  the 
Torpel  fees  to  the  King  and  Queen,  but  retained 
Pilton.''  It  passed  after  his  death  in  1298  to  his 
son  Ralph "  and  grandson 
Thomas. 3'*  The  latter  was 
granted  one  fee  in  Pilton  by 
his  father,  including  all  the 
demesne  lands,'^  and  after  his 
father's  death  in  1336  he 
obtained  the  other  half  fee.'* 
Thomas  de  Camoys  and 
Robert  de  Thorpe  were  hold- 
ing a  fee  here  in  1 346.'"'  In 
1 369,  however,  Camoys,  whose 
only  son  died  in  his  father's 
lifetime,''^  released  all  his  right 
in  the  manor  of  Pilton  to  Sir 

Robert  Thorpe.*^  The  latter  was  succeeded  by  Sir 
WilliamThorpe,'"  who  died  in  1 391,  and  directed  in  his 
will  that  the  option  of  buying  certain  lands  in  Pilton 
should  be  first  offered  to  John  Mulsho.'"''  Presumably 
John  Mulsho  obtained  the  whole  manor,  since  in  1428 
the  l\  knights'  fees  formerly  held  by  Sir  Thomas 
C.imoys  and  Robert  de  Thorpe  had  passed  to  Thomas 
Mulsho,''*  probably  Sir  Thomas  Mulsho  of  Newton, 
one  of  whose  daughters  and  co-heirs,  Alice,  married 
Henry,  second  son  of  Sir  William  Tresham,^"  father 
of  Sir  Thomas,  who  founded 
the  Rushton  branch  of  the 
family.  Richard  Tresham,  said 
to  be  her  grandson,*'  died 
seised  of  Pilton  manor  in 
1533.**  It  passed  in  direct 
descent  to  John  {d.  1539),'" 
Maurice,*"  and  Sir  Thomas 
Tresham.*^  The  last  named 
was  succeeded  in  1636  by 
his  son  Thomas,  whose  son 
Maurice  is  mentioned  in  a 
settlement  of  1628. ^^  It 
would    seem  possible  that  he 

was  the  Maurice  Tresham  who  held  the  manor  in 
1639,*'  but  a  Maurice  Tresham  was  apparently  the 
lord  of  the  manor  in   1666  and    l67l.*''     It    passed 


Tresham.  Parly  sal- 
tircu'ise  sahle  and  or 
with  six  trefoils  or. 


to  George  Tresham,  who  died  before  May,  1684,** 
and  to  his  son  Edward  Tresham,  who  only  survived 
him  till  1692.**  His  heir  seems  to  have  been 
Clemencia  Tresham,"  but  in  1714  his  mother  and 
others,  probably  trustees,  sold  the  manor  to  Sir 
Thomas  Powys,*' whose  descendant.  Lord  Lilford,  is 
now  lord  of  the  manor.** 

The  small  holding,  which  the  nth  and  1 2th  century 
tenants  of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough  held  in  Waden- 
hoe  or  in  Pilton,*"  may  perhaps  be  identified  with 
the  land  held  by  a  family  taking  their  name  from  the 
place.  The  Piltons  were  tenants  of  the  Torpels,*' 
and  their  successors,  and  held  i^  of  a  knight's  fee  of 
the  manor  of  Pilton,*^  bm  {^^y  pjjj  sheriff's  aid  and 
other  dues  themselves,''  so  that  it  is  probable  that 
their  holding  was  originally  separate  from  the  main 
holding  in  Pilton.  William  de  Pilton  (Pilkinton), 
who  was  also  known  as  WiUiam  de  Liveden,*''  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  Robert  de  Pilton  or  Robert  the 
knight  (le  knith  or  chnit)  of  Pilton,  who  lived  in  the 
last  quarter  of  the  13th  century.'*  Robert  had  three 
sons  :  GeofTrey,  his  successor ;  John,  apparently  a 
clerk,  and  Thomas,  and  a  daughter  Cicely."  Geoffrey 
was  succeeded  by  Thomas."  It  seems  possible  that 
their  quarter  fee  was  bought  by  Sir  Robert  de 
Thorpe,**  who  evidently  held  land  there  by  military 
service  as  a  sub-tenant  of  Sir  Thomas  Camoys,'*  before 
the  latter  sold  the  manor  {qv.)  to  him. 

In  1318,  Ralph  de  Camoys  obtained  a  grant  of  free 
warren  in  his  demesne  lands  in  Pilton,™  but  in  1329, 
when  summoned  as  to  his  claim  for  free  warren,  the 
warren  was  taken  into  the  king's  hands,  in  spite  of  the 
charter,  because  Ralph  had  enfeoffed  his  son  Thomas 
with  all  the  demesne  lands  of  Pilton."  In  1620  Sir 
Thomas  Tresham  obtained  a  new  grant  of  free 
warren  in  the  manor  of  Pilton.'^ 

A  free  fishery  at  Pilton  is  mentioned  in  an  extent  of 
,73 


"277 
CHURCH 


The  church  of  ST.  MART  and 
ALL  SAINTS''*  consists  of  chancel, 
24  ft.  by  14  ft.  ;  clearstoried  nave  of 
three  bays,  35  ft.  9  in.  by  17  ft.  6  in.  ;  north  and  soulli 
aisles,  south  porch,  and  west  tower,  6  ft.  6  in.  square, 
surmounted  by  a  broach  spire.  The  width  of  the 
north  aisle  is  10  ft.,  and  that  of  the  south  13  ft.  6  in., 
the  total  width  across  nave  and  aisles  being  45  ft.  8  in. 
All  these  measurements  are  internal.  There  is  also  a 
modern  vestry  covering  the  north  aisle  doorway. 
The  chancel  was  rebuilt  in  1864,  and  an  extensive 


"  Cal.  Inq.  ii,  no.  212  ;  Chron.  Petrob. 
(Camden  Soc),  p.  23. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  ii,  no.  178  ;  Cal.  Fine., 
i,  p.  76. 

"Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  Ci,f.  59. 

"Cal.  Close,  1279-1288,  p.  66;  I-cct 
of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  15  Edw.  I,  no.  50. 

"  Cat.    Fine,    i,    p.    34<) ;      Cal.     Pat. 

'3>.Vi7.  rP-  i''5.  37o>4S2. 

•'•Coll.  MS.  Vcsp.  K  xxi,  f.  II; 
riac.  de  Quo  lyarr.  (Rcc.  Com.),  |;o8. 

■•  Asiizc  R.  no.  632,  m.  76  ;  Plac.  tie  Quo 
H'arr.  (Rtc.  Com.),  508. 

••  Cal.  Pat.  1334-38,  p.  275  ;  Cott.  MS. 
Clcop.  C  i,  f.  I36d  ;  A»flizc  R.  no.  632, 
m.  76. 

*•  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  p.  448. 

**  Complete  Peerage  (new  ed.). 

"Cloic  R   4  3  F.dw.  Ill,  m.  6. 

"  Feet  of  F.  ih\.  Coi.  'Frin.  7  Ric.  II. 

"  Northanti.  A'.  <5>-  Q.  iv,  141  ;  c(. 
King'i  Dcnch  R.  534,  m.  54. 


"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  p.  48. 

"  Uridgcs,  Hist.  Northanls.  ii,  323. 

*'  Ibid.  lie  w.ts  sun  of  Rich.Trd 
Trcjh.im. 

**  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcxcvi,  2. 

"  Ibid.  Ix,  35. 

•"  Feet  of  F.  North.mts.  E.ist.  5  Y.Vn.. 

"  Ilridgcs,  op.  cit.  ;  Feet  of  F.  Nortli- 
.Tnts.  Trin.  16  J.ts.  I. 

"  Ch.in.  Inc],  p.m. (Ser.  ii),  cccclssxi,  13. 

"  Krrov.  R.  Trin.  15  CIi.ts  I,  ro.  51. 

•M'.R.O.    Initit    Boolii,  1606-1671. 

"  Norlhants.  A'.  (S-  Q.  V,  238,  239. 

"Ibid. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Norlhants.  F^.iit.  12  Will. 
iSiMary. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  13  Anne. 

"  Recov.  R.  Mich.  6  Ceo.  IV,  ro.  265  ; 
G.E.C.  Complrir  Peerage.       '**  See  above. 

"  Soc.  Anii'|.  MS.  60,  f.  159  d. 

•MMd.  f.  is6. 

•■  Egerton  MS.  (Il.M.),  2733,  f.  154  d. 

130 


'*  'I'he  Piltons  were  benefactors  of  the 
Ilospit.-il  of  St.  John  Baptist  of  Armslon, 
.ind  much  information  about  them  will  be 
found  among  the  deeds  of  that  house  in 
lUiccleuch  Charters  66  to  75  ;  Soc.  of 
Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  I59</. 

"  liuccleuch  Ch.  71,  72,  76;  Egerton 
MS.  (Il.M.),  2733,  f.  155;  Cott.  MS. 
Clcop.  C  i,  f.  58  d. 

••  liuccleuch  Ch.  66,  69,  72,  74,  75  ; 
Soc.  of  Antiq.  MS,  60,  f.  i|;6. 

•'  Coll.  MS.  Clcop.  C  i,  f.  59  d. 

••  Cf.  Pytchley,  Hk.  of  Fees,  40  n,  43, 

4!;  n.  53.  55  "• 

"  Feud,  .-lids,  iv,  448. 

'»  Cal.  Chart.  1300-26,  pp.  397,  417. 

"  Plac.  de  Quo  IVarr.  (Rolls.  Ser.),  508. 

"Pat.  R.  18  Jas.  I,pt.  15. 

"  Cal.  Inij.  ii,  no.  212. 

"The  early  dedication  seems  lo  have 
been  lo  All  Saints  (Assize  R.  no.  632, 
m.  72). 


t^ 


:(1:5 


1 


1 


w 


^»^ 


kiSv-'-" 


PiLTON  r    O1.D  Manor  Holse  (now  the  Rectory) 


PiLTON   Church  from  the  South 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


PILTON 


restoration  of  the  church  in  1874-5  involved  a  l.irgo 
ainount  of  rebuilding,  but  the  reconstruction  appears 
to  have  followed  the  lines  of  a  12th  and  13th  century 
church,  considerable  portions  of  which  remain.  The 
cliancel  is  faced  with  dressed  stone  and  has  a  slated 
eaved  roof,  but  the  rest  of  the  building  is  of  rubble, 
plastered  internally,  with  plain  parapets  and  low- 
pitched  leaded  roofs.  The  tower  and  spire  were 
restored  in  1896. 

The  chancel  is  of  three  bays  with  windows  in  the 
13th  century  style,  but  the  arch  to  the  nave  is  old,  of 
two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner  springing  from  half- 
round  responds  with  restored  13th  century  capitals 
and  bases.  The  nave  arcades  are  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  outer  stopped  by  a  half  dog-tooth,  on 
octagonal  piers  and  responds  with  moulded  capitals 
and  bases.  The  nail-head  ornament  occurs  in  the 
capital  of  the  eastern  pier  on  the  south  side. 

The  south  doorway  (c  1 170-80)  has  a  round  arch 
of  two  orders.  The  outer  order  has  a  row  of  chevcrons 
on  the  wall-plane,  and  another  on  the  sofiit-planc, 
forming  a  series  of  hollow  lozenges  :  the  capitals  of 
the  jamb-shafts  have  water-leaf  ornaments,  and  there 
is  a  row  of  dog-tooth  in  the  hood.  The  south 
porch  is  mainly  of  the  13th  century.  It  has  lateral 
benches  and  a  chamfered  arch,  with  nail-head  on 
the  chamfer  and  in  the  hood.  On  either  side  of  the 
opening,  below  the  springing  of  the  arch,  are  two 
shields,  set  one  above  the  other.  The  upper  shield  in 
each  case  bears  a  saltire,  while  the  lower  shield, 
which  is  larger,  bears  three  trefoils,  the  arms  of  the 
Treshams  who  were  lords  of  the  manor  from  the 
15th  century. 

Much  of  the  outer  walls  of  nave  and  aisles  is  old, 
as  well  as  of  the  window-tracery,  but  all  has  been 
patched  with  new  masonry.  In  the  east  wall  of  the 
south  aisle  is  a  very  good  three-light  window  with 
cusped  circles  in  the  head,  and  the  neighbouring  two- 
light  window  in  the  south  wall  is  of  similar  character. 
The  east  window  of  the  north  aisle  is  composed  of 
three  very  slender  lights  with  intersecting  tracery, 
and  there  is  a  three-light  15th-century  window  at  the 
east  end  of  the  north  wall.  A  two-light  square 
headed  window  of  the  late  l6th  or  early  1 7th  century, 
has  been  built  into  the  north  wall  of  the  vestry. 

The  tower  is  tall  and  slender,  of  three  stages,  with 
moulded  plinth  and  diagonal  buttresses.  The  west 
doorway,  with  rather  solid  13th  century  mouldings 
on  jamb-shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases, 
has  been  much  restored.  The  bell-chamber  has  two- 
light  openings  with  forked  mullions  and  excellent 
mouldings,  c.  1 280- 1300.  There  is  no  vice.  The 
spire  is  contemporar)',  with  two  rows  of  spire-lights, 
above  a  corbel  table  of  heads  and  other  devices. 

These  portions  of  ancient  work  indicate  the  re- 
building of  a  1 2th  century  church  towards  the  end 
of  the  13th  century.  The  clearstory  and  parapet  of 
the  nave  were  added  in  the  later  part  of  the  14th 
century  ;  the  windows  of  the  clearstory,  two  on  each 
side,  appear  to  be  old,  with  tracery  of  quasi-flam- 
boyant character. 


The  font  is  octagonal,  with  a  band  of  carved  foliage 
on  the  underside  of  the  bowl,  on  an  octagonal  pedestal 
with  moulded  base  and  grifles  at  the  angles.  The 
piscina  in  the  south  aisle  is  modern,  but  is  probably 
imitated  from  an  earlier  one.  An  old  scratch  dial  is 
built  into  the  east  jamb  of  the  western  window  in 
the  south  wall. 

The  pulpit  and  other  fittings  arc  modern.  There 
are  brass  tablets  to  the  4th  Baron  I.ilford  (d.  1896), 
and  his  first  wife  Emma  Klizabcth  Brandling  (d.  1884). 

There  are  four  bells  in  the  tower,  the  same  number 
as  in  1552.  The  treble  is  by  Thomas  Newcombe,  of 
Leicester  (1506-20),  with  the  recurrent  letter  S 
alternating  with  a  cross  ;  the  second  and  third  are 
by  Tobie  Norris,  of  Stamford,  1610,  and  the  tenor 
has  the  inscription  '  Nomen  Magdalene  Canipana 
gcret  melodic,'  with  the  marks  of  John  Danyell,  of 
London  (1450-61).'* 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup,  paten,  and  flagon 
of  1864,  given  by  the  Rev.  Richard  Hodson,  rector.'* 

The  registers  before  1 81 2  are  contained  in  two 
volumes;  (i)  baptisms  and  burials  1569-1812, 
marriages  1569-1754,  (ii)  marriages  1754-1812. 

The  advowson  of  the  church  was 
ADVOIVSON  presumably  always  appurtenant  to 
the  manor,  the  first  recorded  pre- 
sentation being  in  1221  by  Roger  de  Torpel."  The 
presentations  have  been  made  uninterruptedly  by  the 
lords  of  the  manor  or  their  trustees,'*  with  the  possible 
exceptions  of  Thomas  Beofitz  in  1472  and  1475,'* 
and  James  Digby  in  1670.'"  Lord  Lilford  is  the 
present  patron  of  the  living.  The  benefices  of  Pilton 
and  Wadenhoe  being  united  in  1925,  the  presentation 
is  now  made  alternately  by  Lord  Lilford  and  the 
trustees  of  Capt.  Hunt. 

The  charity  of  Thomas  Thurlby 
CHARITIES  founded  by  will  dated  24  September 
1515,  and  the  Inclosure  Rent  Charge 
recited  in  a  deed  poll  dated  30  March  1756,  arc 
regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners 
of  10  July  1900.  The  property  originally  consisted 
of  a  close  of  2  acres  called  Chambers  Close,  and 
about  15  acres  of  land  and  a  rent  charge  of  £2  out  of 
land  in  Pilton.  The  land  has  been  sold  and  the 
rent  charge  redeemed  and  the  endowment  now  con- 
sists of  ;^6oi  5^.  2d.  Consols  producing  ^^15  os.  \d. 
yearly  in  dividends.  The  income  is  applied  by  the 
Churchwardens  as  to  two-thirds  in  church  expenses 
and  as  to  one-third  in  the  distribution  of  coal.  By 
his  will  dated  30th  January  1711,  Richard  Ragsdale 
gave  a  sum  of  los.  yearly  to  the  poor.  This  sum  is 
charged  upon  Lord  Lilford's  estate,  and  is  applied 
by  the  churchwardens  in  the  distribution  of  clothing. 

By  his  will  proved  in  the  Prerogative  Court  of 
Canterbury  4  May  1863,  John  Baseley  Selby  gave  a 
sum  of  money,  now  represented  by  ^^48  7;.  ■},d. 
Consols  producing  ^l  4J.  yearly  in  dividends.  The 
income  is  distributed  by  the  rector  and  churchwardens 
to  the  poor  in  coal. 

The  sums  of  Consols  are  with  the  Official  Trustees 
of  Charitable  Funds. 


"  North,  Cb.  Belli  of  Norlbantt.  382, 
where  the  inscription!  on  the  second  and 
third  .ire  alio  given. 

"  .Markham,  Cb.  Plait  of  Noribanis.  239. 
An  inscription  on  the  fi:igon  records  that 
Mr.    Hodson    presented    .ilso    *  the    new 


chancel  and  all  its  furniture.*  He  was 
rector    1858-70. 

"  Roi.  Hug.  it  WcUts  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  iii,  p.  III. 

"  Bridges,  //u/.  of  KortbanU.  ii,  375  ; 
Inq.  a.q.d.  file  240,  no.  18  ;  Feet  of  K. 
niv.  Cos.  Trin.  7  Ric.  II  ;      Norihanti. 


N.  &■  Q.,  iv,  p.  141  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
(Scr.  ii),  dcxcvi,  2  ;  cccclxxxi,  13  ;  Feet 
of  F.  Northants.  East.  13  Anne  j  Recov. 
R.  Mich.  6  Geo.  IV,  ro.  265  ;  Instit.  Bks. 
P.R.O.  1625,  1666,  1671,  1765, 1772,  1794. 

'•  Bridges, /or.  cit. 

•»  Instit.  Bks.  F.R.n.   iC/o. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


STOKE  DOYLE 


Stoche  (xi  cent.),  Stokes,  Stok  juxta  Hundel 
(Oundle)  (xiii  cent.),  Stokes  de  Olv,  Stoke  Leukenors 
(xiv  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Stoke  Doyle,  which  lies  about  two 
miles  south-west  of  Oundle,  contains  1,570  acres, 
the  greater  part  of  which  is  laid  down  in  permanent 
grass.  The  subsoil  is  Oxford  clay,  stone  marls  and 
cornbrash.  The  land  rises  gently  to  the  west  from 
the  River  Nene,  which  forms  the  eastern  boundary. 
Along  the  river  bank  the  ground  falls  to  a  little  below 
the  100  ft.  contour  line,  but  in  the  north-west  of  the 
parish  near  Stoke  Wood  it  reaches  238  ft.  above  the 
ordnance  datum.  Stoke  Doyle  was  formerly  within 
the  metes  of  the  Forest  of  Rockingham,  but  in  1638 
Edward  Doyley  obtained  licence  to  disafforest  his 
manor  which  contained  1,200  acres  of  land  within  the 
Forest.i  There  are  two  disused  stone  quarries  in  the 
parish. 

The  village  lies  along  the  road  from  VVadenhoe  to 
Oundle,  where  the  road  is  crossed  by  a  stream  rising 
in  Lilford  Wood  and  running  into  the  Nene.  The 
church  stands  on  the  east  side  of  the  road.  A  little 
distance  to  the  south-east  is  the  Rectory,  a  17th 
century  house  with  later  additions.  On  one  of  the 
bay  windows  is  the  date  1633  with  the  initials  T.  B., 
and  a  gable  of  this  north  wing  is  dated  1 731.  The 
old  manor  house  south  of  the  church  was  pulled  down 
about  1870  and  a  farm  house  erected  on  the  site.^ 
A  square  stone  dovecot  with  hipped  roof  and  lantern 
survives  from  the  old  buildings. 

There  is  no  railway  line  in  the  parish,  and  the 
nearest  station  is  at  Oundle  on  the  London  Midland 
and  Scottish  Railway. 

The  manor  of  STOKE  DOYLE  may 
MJA'ORS  be  identified  with  one  of  the  Domesday 
holdings  of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough, 
which  contained  2  hides  and  a  virgate  of  land,  but 
was  then  appurtenant  to  Oundle  manor.'*  By  II25, 
tlie  land  had  been  subinfeudatcd,  but  the  overlord- 
ship  was  held  by  the  Abbey,  until  its  dissolution.* 
Afterwards  the  manor  was  held  of  the  Crown  as  of 
the  Hundred  of  Navisford^  (?-^-)>  -""^  when  the  latter 
was  granted  by  James  I  to  Lord  Montagu,  he  also 
obtained  the  overlordship  of  Stoke  Doyle.* 

About  1 1 25,  Wymund  de  Stoke  was  the  tenant  of  this 


land,  which  he  held  as  one  knights'  fee,  but  claimed 
to  hold  l\  hides  in  socage.'  In  the  1 2th  century 
survey  of  Northamptonshire,  Stoke  does  not  appear, 
but  as  Wadenhoe,  Pilton  and  Stoke  formed  one  town- 
ship,* it  is  possible  that  the  entries  under  Wadenhoe 
include  holdings  in  the  other  two  parishes.  Wymund 
appears  as  holding  one  virgate  of  land,'  which  may 
have  been  the  virgate  which  the  lords  of  Stoke  Doyle 
afterwards  held  of  the  manor  of  Pilton,"  but  if  so 
his  main  holding  is  omitted.  He  was  probably  suc- 
ceeded by  another  Wymund  before  1146.*'  In  1 189, 
the  fee  was  held  by  Guy  de  Stoke, ^-  and  in  1 199 
Robert  de  Stoke  agreed  to  perform  the  military  service 
due  from  half  a  knight's  fee  and  to  pay  a  rent  of  8x. 
a  year  for  the  other  half.^^  He  was  living  in  1227,** 
but  was  succeeded  by  Edmund  or  Simon  de  Stoke 
shortly  afterwards. ^^  In  1242-3  John  de  Stoke  was 
the  tenant,**  but  he  had  died  before  1246-7,*'  and  in 
1254  the  half  fee  was  held  by  the  heir  of  Robert  de 
Stoke.**  In  1275  John  de  Stoke  was  lord  of  the 
manor,"  but  he  apparently  died  before  1280.-" 

The  manor  then  passed  to  Alice,  the  wife  of  John 
Doyley,  who  obtained  in  I3I3,2<'-"  {rom  Robert  son  of 
John  de  Stoke,  a  quitclaim  of 
his  right  in  the  manor.  In 
the  same  year  they  settled  it, 
with  remainders  to  their  son 
Thomas  and  the  right  heirs  of 
Alice.^*  Thomas  did  homage 
to  the  abbot  in  1322.2'-  A 
John  Doyley,  possibly  son  of 
Thomas,  held  the  manor  in 
1 34123  and  in  1353  he  made  a 
settlement  on  his  son  Tliomas 
by  his  second  wife  Margery.** 
This  Thomas  seems  to  have 
died   young,   and    the   manor 

went  to  Henry  Doyley,  probably  his  great-uncle, 
son  of  John  Doyley  and  his  wife  Alice.25  On  his 
death  after  1367  the  manor  went  to  John,  son  of 
Robert  Knightley  (d.  c.  1326)  and  Alice  his  wife 
(d.  1349),  who  was  sister  of  Henry  Doyley.  John 
Knightley  presented  to  the  church  in  1 369  and  1390.2* 
A  settlement  of  Stoke  Doyle  was  made  in  13702'  on 
Joan,  said  to  be  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  John  Doyley, 


DovLEV.  Ctilfs  thref 
bans'  brads  cabosbed 
argent. 


'  I'.it.  R.  14  Ch.iB.  I,  pt.  18. 

'  Whclbn,  lliil.  of  Noribani!  1S74. 
The  iron  gatci  were  taken  to  a  house  in 
Oundte. 

•  V.C.U.  A'orlhanls.  i,  JI4'J. 

•  C'bron.  Peiroh.  (Camden  Soc),  1 57  ; 
Ftud.  Aidi,  iv,  48,  448  ;  Chan.  Int).  p.m. 
18  p.dw.  IV,  no.  37. 

'Ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  civlii,  14;  P.R.O.  Ct. 
R.  ptf.  19;,  no.  56. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  miic.  ptf.  22,  no. 
9b. 

'  Chron.  Peiroh.  (Camden  Soc),  i  57. 

•  Kgcrton  MS.  (ll.M.),  27J3,  f.  15  ;. 

•  Cott.  MS.  Vein.  F.  xxii,  f.  94. 
"Soc.  Antiq.  -MS.  60,  f.  ijCi. 

"  Sparke,  Ihil.  /Itif.l,  Script,  d;,  81. 
^^  (.'al.  Chart.  1226-57,  p.  20. 
'•I'eet    o(    F.    Northanti.    10    Ric. 


caie  77,  no.  •). 

"  Rfd    Hi.    0/    rx.hrj.    (Rolli 


I, 
Ser), 


C19;  Rot.  Hug.  dc  H'clles  (Cant,  and 
\'ut\(  Soc.),  ii,  140. 

"Egerton    MS.  (B.M.)  2713,  f.  Ijzd. 

'*  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  251  d. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Clfop.  C  i,  f.  58  d. 

"Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  (io,  f.  249.  Sit 
Robert  de  Stoke  had  a  brother  Walter 
(Hucclcuch  Deed.  II.  18). 

'»  Rot.  Ric.  Gravcscnd  (C.int.  and  York 
Soc),  126.  In  1273  a  John  de  Stiike  juxta 
Ilundcl  (Oundle)  wa«  in  gaol  for  robbing 
Borne  merchants  of  a  great  Bum  of  money 
[Cal.  Pat.  1272-81,  p.  S).  VV'ilh.mi  Bon 
of  Sir  Jolin  Stoke  waB  witness  to  a  13th 
century  diartcr  as  to  landi  in  Itarnwcll 
(Duitleuch  Decdi,  II.  20). 

■"  De  Ilanco  R.  42,  m.  82d.  As  lord 
of  the  manor,  John  presented  to  the 
rectory  in  1275,  but  in  1280  the  Ilishnp  of 
Lincoln  presented  owing  to  lapse  (HridgcB, 
//ii/.  Norlhanli.W,  377).    Rifore  12S2,  John 

132 


Doyley  and  his  wife  Alice  recovered  the  ad- 
vowsun  from  John  de  Stoke  and  others,  but 
it  seems  clear  that  the  defendant  in  thii 
case  must  have  been  another  John  de  Stoke. 

•»•  Dc  Ranco  R.  201,  m.   id    (3). 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  llil.  6  Edw.  11; 
Cott.  MS.  CIcop.  C  i,  f.  144. 

"  Ibid.  Vcsp.  E  xxi,  I.  79b. 

"Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  14 
Edw.  Ill  ;    Feud.  Aids,  iv,  44X. 

»«  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  26 
Edw.  III. 

'*  See  I'.C.ll.  Northants.  Familtcs,  174, 
where  John  tie  Kniglilley  is  descrihetl  as 
his  nephew,  and  Alice,  John's  mother, 
wife  of  Robert  Knightley,  is  described  ai 
daughter  of  John  Doyley  in  1313. 

•"  List  of  I'resentatiimi,  cit.  Ilridgei, 
op.  cit.  ii,  377. 

"  Baker,  Northants.  508  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Div.  Cos.  Trin.  44  Edw.  III. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


STOKE  DOYLE 


and  Thomas,  son  of  Roger  Lcwkcnor  of  Sussex,  her 
husband,*'  and  in  1391  a  further  settlement  of  the 
manor  was  made  on  Joan  and  her  second  husband, 
John  Cobham,  with  a  life  interest  to  John  Knightlfy.-' 
Roger  l.ewkenor  apparently  granted  it  to  trustees,*" 
one  of  whom,  Nicholas  Nymmes,  did  homage  in 
l.joi,"  and  the  trustees  still  held  it  in  141 2.^-  By 
1428  the  manor  had  reverted  to  Thomas  Lewkenor, 
Joan's  grandson,'-"  whose  son  Roger  presented  to  the 
church  in  1453  and  died  in  1478,  leaving  a  son  and 
heir  Thomas,*''  who  forfeited  his  lands,  probably  as 
a  Yorkist.  Stoke  Doyle  was  granted  to  William 
Sapcote  in  1484,'''''  but  Lewkenor  was  probably  re- 
instated in  possession,  as  his  son  Roger  presented  to 
the  church  in  1 491.**  He  left  four  daughters,  and 
his  heirs  apparently  sold  the  manor  to  Sir  George 
Puttenham,  who  in  1 526  levied  a  fine  of  it  against 
Roger  Corbet.**  It  seems  to  have  passed,  with  other 
property  to  Andrew,  first  Lord  Windsor,  before 
1536.*'  On  his  death  it  passed  to  his  son  V\'illiam** 
and  grandson  Edward.  The  latter  sold  it  in  1560  to 
Richard  Palmer,**  who  was  already  lord  of  another 
manor  in  Stoke  Doyle  (j.t'.). 
Richard  Palmer  died  in  1570,"' 
and  the  property  passed  in 
direct  descent  to  Anthony 
(d.  1633),  Edward,  Edward, 
Geoffrey  (living  1677),  and 
Anthony  Palmer.'*  The  last- 
named  sold  it  in  1697  to  Sir 
Edward  Ward,  Chief  Baron  of 
the  Exchequer.*-  His  sons,''* 
Edward  (d.  1734),''''  and  Philip, 
successively  succeeded  liim.''* 
On  the  death  of  the  latter  in 
1752,'"  the  manor  was  divided 

amongst  his  sisters  or  their  descendants.'"  The  whole 
manor,  however,  was  obtained  before  1789  by  Rowland 
Hunt,  grandson  of  Jane,  the  eldest  daughter  of  Sir 
Edward  Ward,''*  who  married  Thomas  Hunt  (d.  1753) 
and  had  a  son.  Rev.  Rowland  Hunt,  D.D.,  rector  of 
Stoke  Doyle  (d.  1785).  Rowland  Hunt  (d.  183 1),  his 
son,  apparently  conveyed  the  manor  to  the  Rev.  Robert 
Roberts,  D.D.,  after  whose  death  it  was  put  up  for 
auction  in  March  1830,  when  it  was  stated  to  be 
discharged  from  tithe  and  to  extend  over  1,300 
acres,  and  there  went  with  it  the  right  of  fishing  in 


Palmer,  .-izttre  a  che- 
vcron  engraiUd  bettvfen 
ibree  craccnts  arpent. 


Cahbon.  rarly  cheve- 
ronti'isr  [quit's  anii  azure 
a  ihet'eton  enaiaiUd 
argent  heiween  tzvo  Uorts 
ermino:s  fating  one 
another  in  the  ihief  and 
a  ( rojj  paiy  or  m  the  foot 
uiith  three  nwiets  sable 
on  the  theieron. 


the  Nene  for  nearly  two  miles,  and  tiic  right  to  cut 

rushes.     In    .'\pril    1830,    however,   it    was   privately 

sold  by    the    trustees   of   Dr. 

Roberts    to   George    Capron. 

It    passed    on    his    death    in 

1872    to   his    son,    the   Rev. 

George   Capron,    whose    son, 

Mr.  G.  Herbert  Capron,  is  the 

present  lord  of  the  manor.'" 

In  1086,  the  Abbey  of 
Peterborough  had  a  second 
holding  in  Stoke.  The  under 
tenants  were  two  knigiits,  two 
Serjeants,  with  one  sokman, 
who  held  2  hides  and  3  vir- 
gates  of  land." 

One  of  the  knights  may  be 
identified  withGeofTrey  Infans, 
said  to  have  been  nephew  of 
Abbot  Thorold  (1069-98),  and 
tenant  of  8  hides  in  Gunthorp, 

Southorp,  Stoke  and  Hemington."'  Geoffrey  Infans 
or  de  Gunthorpe  seems  to  have  had  three  sons,  Ive, 
Richard  and  Ralph.  Ive  apparently  left  no  issue. 
Richard,  who  succeeded  him,  had  a  son  Geoffrey 
whose  son  Geoffrey  is  mentioned  in  1189.  In  1198 
Waleran  son  of  Ralph,  who  took  the  name  of  de 
Helpston,  claimed  against  Geoffrey,  son  of  Geoffrey,  3 
knights'  fees  in  Southorpe,  Gunthorpe  and  Stoke.*" 
Geoffrey  was  succeeded  after  I2I2  by  liis  son  Robert, 
who  was  followed  by  Thomas,  his  son,  and  another 
Geoflrey,  son  of  Thomas.  Geoffrey  de  Southorpe  con- 
veyed the  manor  of  Southorpe,  with  the  homages  and 
services  pertaining  to  it,  to  Stephen  de  Cornhill,  citizen 
of  London,  probably  in  security  for  a  loan.  Stephen 
de  Cornhill  sold  the  manor  and  services  to  Elias  de 
Bckyngham,  apparently  on  behalf  of  the  abbot  of  Peter- 
borough. Geoffrey  de  Soutliorpe,  however,  being  im- 
prisoned for  a  debt  to  Queen  Eleanor,  repudiated  ti^e 
conveyance  of  Southorpe,  saying  it  was  made  while  he 
was  under  duress,  and  therefore  of  no  effect.  But 
William  de  Woodford,  out  of  respect  for  Geoffrey's 
poverty  and  to  avoid  a  scandal,  gave  him  10  marks  and 
two  horses,  and  Geoffrey  confirmed  the  manor  to  the 
abbot.   The  transactions  were  completed  in  1291.'* 

The  knight's  service  held  in  Stoke  was  in  respect  of 
the    manor    of    STOKE    or    STOKE    DOT  LEI'}'* 


>'  I'isil.  of  Sussex  (llarl.  Soc),  25. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  17S,  file 
88,  no.  136. 

"  De  Banco  R.  572,  m.  210. 

"  Add.  MS.  (B..M.),  252SS,  i.  9. 

*•  Feud.  Aids^  vi,  500.  Thomas  Torp, 
another  of  the  trustees,  lu'ld  a  rent  of  ^ifi 
a  year,  and  Robert  Knyvet  a  rent  of  J[j 
as  dower  of  his  wife,  the  widow  of  Roger 
Lewkenor.  "  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  4S. 

."  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  18  Edw.  IV,  no.  37. 

"•  Cal.  Pal.  147C-85,  p.  42S. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  For  descent  of 
I.cwkcnor,  see  Vistt.  of  Sussex  (Harl.  Soc), 
p.  25-30;  Cal.  Inij.  Hen.  Vll  vol.  ii, 
no.  620,  and  Wrottesley,  Pedigrees  from 
the  Plea  R.  p.  432. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  18 
lien.  VIII. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  126. 

••G.li.C.  Complete  Peerage;  Ct.  of 
Req.  bdle.  14,  no.  33  ;  Recov.  R.  Trin. 
1556,  ro.  546;  ¥.\K.O.  Ct.  R.  pif.  195, 
no.  56. 


*•  Recov.  R.  Mich.  1560,  ro.  915; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.   5  Eliz. 

'°  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  civiil,  14. 

"Metcalfe,  Visit,  of  Northants.  123; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Misc.  pt.  22,  no.  9b  ; 
Pat.  R.  14  Chas  I,  pt.  18  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  East.  29  Chas.  II. 

«'  Recov.  R.  Trin.  9  Will.  Ill,  ro.  185  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  9  Will.  III. 

*'M.I.  in  church;  Diet.  Nat.  Biog.  ; 
Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  12. 

*'  Centos.  Mag.  1734,  p.  330. 

*'  Instit.  Bki.  (P.R.O.)  1735. 

"•  Glut's.  Mag.  1752,  p.  192. 

''Diet.  Nat.  Biog.;  Recov.  R.  Ilil. 
26  Geo.  II,  ro.  16^  ;  ibid.  Mich.  29 
Geo.  II,  ro.  161  ;  ibid.  Mich.  3  Geo  III, 
ro.  272;  ibid.  Mich.  18  Geo.  Ill,  ro. 
279;  ibid.  Mich.  20  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  339; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  20  Geo.  III. 

"Recov.    R.    Mich.    30   Geo.    Ill,    ro. 


lOQ 


*"  Inform,    supplied    by    Mr.     Cj. 
Capron. 


II. 


'°  y.C.ll.  Northants.  i,  3iCa. 
"  CAroB.   Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  168; 
Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  137. 

'2  Curia  Regis  R.  i,  38,  61-2,  120,  288, 

444- 

"The  descent  and  other  details  of  the 
Southorpe  Fee  are  set  out  in  Pytchley, 
Bk.  of  Fees  (Northants.  Rec.  Soc),  63-71. 
The  last-named  Geoffrey  married  Rose, 
daughter  and  co-heir  of  Berengar  Ic 
Mijyiie  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew.  John 
de  l.ayham,  son  of  Geoffrey  de  Southorpe, 
released  all  his  right  in  Berengar  Ic 
Moync's  manors  to  Ramsey  Abbey  in 
1329  (Buccleuch  Deeds,  11.62).  Robert, 
son  of  John,  son  of  Geoffrey  de  Southorpe, 
had  done  the  same  in  132S.  (Ibid.  Ii.  75). 

"  In  thr  ]4lh  century,  the  manor  wai 
called  Stoke  Doyley,  though  it  never 
apparently  had  any  connection  with  the 
Doylevs'  manor,  and  the  same  confusion 
continued,  presumably  because  the  name 
Stoke  D(jyle  caioc  to  be  used  for  the  whole 
parish. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


At  what  date  it  was  sub-infcudated  is  not  known, 
but  in  1242-3  Thomas  Wake  held  a  quarter  of  a 
knight's  fee  of  Thomas,  son  of  Robert,  and  Thomas 
of  Peterborough  Abbey.*^  In  1 3 16,  Hugh  Wake  was 
liiC  tenant,**  and  in  1329  Andrina  Wake,  possibly  his 
widow,  holding  for  life,  had  apparently  succeeded 
him."  Thomas  son  of  Hugh  was  at  this  time  a 
minor  in  the  wardship  of  the  abbot.'*  Another 
Hugh  Wake  appears  in  1347,*^  and  he  seems  to  have 
been  succeeded  by  Thomas  Wake.^  -A  Hugh  Wake 
of  Stoke  Doyle  was  living  about  1400.'^  The  manor 
seems  to  have  been  bought  either  by  Sir  William 
Thorpe,  senior,  or  his  brother  Sir  Robert  Thorpe, 
since  Sir  William  Thorpe,  junior,  inherited  it  *"^  and 
settled  it  in  1383.*^  After  his  death  it  passed  with 
the  manor  of  Pilton  (y.t'.)  to  the  Mulshos  and  Tres- 
hams."  Just  before  his  death  in  1533,  Richard 
Tresham  sold  the  manor  to  John  Palmer,*^  and  the 
transaction  was  completed  by  his  son  and  heir  John.'"* 
John  Palmer  died  in  1558,"'  and  the  manor  passed  to 
his  son  Richard,^  who  some  years  later  purchased 
the  main  manor  of  Stoke  Doyle  (ij.i'.).  The  manor  is 
mentioned  separately  in  the  inquisition  on  the  lands 
of  Anthony  Palmer  in  1633,**  but  the  two  manors 
afterwards  became  merged. 

The  second  knight,  who  held  of  the  Abbey  of  Peter- 
borough, apparently  only  held  3  virgates  of  land,  and 
his  holding  may  be  identified  with  the  land  held  by 
Ingram  {d.  II 14),  whose  fee  was  seized  by  Geoffrey  de 
Gunthorpe.  The  next  holder  was  Hugh  Olifard  of 
Stoke  in  1 125.'*  Hugh  held  another  third  part  of  a 
virgate,"  but  later  documents  show  that  some  land 
in  the  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee  held  by  his  successor 
lay  in  Churchfield.'-  His  land  passed  in  succession 
to  Ingelram,  who  was  the  tenant  in  1146,'''  and  to 
Vivian  de  Stoke,  who,  however,  had  died  before 
llSy.'-*  Ive  de  Stoke  was  holding  in  1 1 89,  and 
Henry  his  son  was  the  tenant  in  121 1,'*  and  he  was 
followed  by  another  Ive  de  Stoke.'*  By  1243  it  had 
passed  to  Henry  Knight  (Miles),"  and  in  1254 
Robert  Knight  paid  the  scutage  due  from  a  quarter 
fee.'"*  In  1300  Nicholas  Knight  did  homage  for  his 
land  in  Stoke,'*  and  another  Nicholas  did  homage  in 


1322,^"  but  shortly  afterwards  he  gave  it  to  William 
de  Whatton,  rector  of  the  church  of  Stoke,  who  sold 
it  to  Thomas  Doyley,*^  the  lord  of  the  chief  manor  of 
Stoke  Doyle  (y.t'.),  to  which  this  quarter  fee  seems  to 
have  been  united.*^ 

A  free  fishery  was  apparently  parcel  of  the  second 
manor  of  Stoke  Doyle,  and  is  mentioned  in  1537  and 
1610.'^ 

A  fulling  mill  is  referred  to  in  1408." 

The  church  of  ST.  RUM  BALD 
CHURCH  or  ALL  SAINTS  stands  on  the  east 
side  of  the  village,  and  is  a  plain, 
classic  structure  erected  in  1722-25  on  the  site  of  an 
older  building.  The  former  church,  which  appears  to 
have  belonged  mainly  to  the  middle  of  the  13th  cen- 
tury, consisted  of  chancel  with  north  chapel  (or 
'  burying  isle,')  nave  with  north  aisle,  and  west  tower 
surmounted  with  a  broach  spire.  The  nave  was  of 
four  bays,  and  the  chancel  opened  to  the  chapel  by 
an  arcade  of  three  arches.  There  was  a  large  round- 
headed  south  doorway  with  many  shafts  and  orna- 
mented with  dog-tooth,  but  no  porch.*' 

In  a  petition  to  the  bishop  to  pull  down  the  old 
church  it  was  stated  that  the  building  had  become 
'  so  ruinous  that  to  repair  it  would  be  a  burden  too 
heavy  for  the  parish  to  bear';  the  spire*'  was  in 
danger  of  falling,  and  the  structure  was  described  as 
'  very  much  larger  than  is  necessary  for  the  inhabitants 
of  so  small  a  parish.'  The  building,  therefore,  was 
pulled  down  in  the  spring  of  1722,  and  the  first 
stone  of  the  new  church  laid  in  May  of  that  year. 
The  roof  was  completed  in  the  autumn,  but  no  joiners' 
work  was  done  in  the  interior  until  the  summer  of 
1724,**''  when  the  pews,  pulpit,  wainscot  and  doors 
were  put  in,  the  windows  glazed,  and  the  ceiling  and 
walls  plastered.  The  tower  was  begun  in  June,  1724, 
and  finished  in  August,  1725,  but  the  building  was 
not  opened  until  the  following  March.*' 

The  church  as  then  completed  remains  unaltered. 
In  plan  it  is  a  rectangle  measuring  internally  61  ft.  by 
24  ft.  6  in.,**  with  west  tower,  and  mortuary  chapel, 
now  used  as  a  vestry,  at  the  east  end  of  the  north 
wall  ;    it  is  faced  with  aslilar,  and  has  a  cornioe  and 


"Kgcrton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  135. 

'«  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  2S. 

"  De  Banco  R.  272,  llil.  2  Edw.  III. 

'''  Pytchley,  op  cit.  61,  62. 

»»Cott.  .MS.  Clcop.  C.  i,  f.  i32d. 

•»  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  48. 

"  Pytchley,  op  cit.  128. 

"  Soc  .\ntiq.  M  j.  jS,  f.  112. 

•>  Feet  of  I'.  Oiv.  Coj.  Trin.  7  Ric.  II. 

•'/■>«</.  Aids,  iv,  48;  Ct.  of  Rcq. 
bdlc.  2,  no.   103. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  dcxcvi,  2  ; 
cxix,  116. 

••  I'cet  of  I-'.  Northants.  Trin.  26  Hen. 
VIII  1  Rccov.  R.  F.a»t.  26  lien.  VIII, 
ro.  141  J  P.R.O.  Ct.  R.  ptf.  195,  no.  56. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cxix,  116. 

•"  Ibid,  civiii,  14. 

••Ibid.  Hxxvii,  96. 

'"  Cbron.  PtiToh.  (Camden  Soc),  p.  175  j 
Round,  Feudal  En^l.  223,  224. 

''  Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  175. 

"Sparke,  op.  cit.  p.  62. 

"Ibid.  p.  Si. 

'*  Cat,  Chan.   i2  2'>-^7,  p.  20. 

^^  Red  Ilk.  of  Fx.b.  (Koll.  .Ser.),  15S, 
619;   Soc.  Aniir|.  MS.  6  .,  I.  i<;9(l. 

'*  Pytchley,  op  rii.  14611,  14711. 

"  Egerton     MS.   (ll.M.),   2733,   f.    135. 


From  the  Rucclcuch  Deeds  we  find  refer- 
ences to  the  KniglitB  (Miles,  le  Cnit, 
le  Knyt,  Knyvct)  of  Stoke,  of  Pilton,  of 
Wykingsthorp  and  of  Polebrook  in  the 
13th  century.  The  name  Robert  is 
common  to  all  of  them,  but  the  entries 
arc  too  disconnected  to  show  whether 
tiicy  have  .'iny  relation  to  one  another. 
It  is  possible  tlut  Henry  tiie  knight  of 
Stoke  was  son  of  Ive  dc  Stoke. 

'^  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  f.  249. 

'•  Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  K  xxii,  f.  47. 

'"  Ibid,  xxi,  f.  79b. 

"Pytchley,  op.  cit.,  146;  Cott.  MS. 
Cleop.  ('  i,  f.  145.  'Fhomas  Doyley  was 
holding  in  1346. 

"  F.-ud.  Aids,  iv,  48,  448;  Cott. 
MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  f.  I32d. 

"•Feet  of  V.  Northants.  Mil.  28 
lien.  \III  i    Rccov.  R.  East.  8  Jas.  I,  ro. 

If)2. 

"Add.  MS.  (n.M.),  25288,  (.  115. 

"  The  Ilebutldittg  o(  the  Parish  Church 
of  Slohe  Doyle,  from  an  orig)n;iI  MS.  by 
Rev.  John  Vorkr,  rector,  1721,  anriol.ited 
by  Rev.  J.  T.  Hurt,  and  with  architectural 
notes  by  Rev.  \V.  D.  Swecliuc  1SS4. 
This  paiiiphh-t  has  been  used  in  ifie 
description  that  follows.     An  illustration 

•34 


of  the  old  church  thows  five  two-light 
clear  It ory  wim^ows  on  the  south  side, 
though  there  was  no  south  aisle,  and  low- 
pitched  leaded  roof  to  the  nave.  The  ro(»f 
of  the  chancel  was  of  high  pitch  and 
covered  with  tiles.  The  internal  length 
of  chancel  and  nave  was  92  ft.,  and  the 
width  across  nave  and  aisle  36  ft. 

"•  Bridges  pays  tliat  at  the  base  of  the 
spire,  facing  south-east,  was  cut  '  Oia 
pro  aninia  Hawisig  '  :    U%H.  Nortbantiy  li, 

377. 

■'"  '  The  summer  of  1723  was  too  little 
to  dry  the  walls.' 

"  It  was  intended  that  the  church 
should  I'c  opened  in  the  summer  of  1725, 
but  Mr.  Ward,  the  patton,  at  whose 
charges  it  had  been  erected,  'happening 
not  to  come  into  the  country  till  the 
lunmicr  was  almost  over,  and  some 
utensils,  etc.,  being  wantini;,  the  opening 
was  put  off  for  that  winter.'  :  Yorkc'i 
MS. 

'"  The  west  wall  11  in  the  same  position 
as  (he  west  wall  of  the  old  na\e,  but  the 
south  wall  is  about  ^  ft.  in  front  of  the 
(lid  one.  The  ea^t  wall  of  (lie  chancel 
nf  the  old  church  was  30  ft.  to  the  eabi 
of  the  prc'cnt  cast  wall. 


Stoke  Doyle  Church  :    Monument  to  Sir  Edward  Ward 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED       thorpe  achurch 


plain  parapet,  and  semi-circular  hcaJcd  side  windows 
with  moulded  architraves  and  sills.  The  east  window 
is  of  the  three-light  '  Venetian  '  type,  and  the  south 
doorway  has  a  semi-circular  arch,  pilasters,  and  broken 
segmental  pediment.  The  tower  is  of  three  stages, 
witii  balustraded  parapet  and  angle  pinnacles, 
round-headed  bell  chamber  windows,  and  west 
doorway. 

There  is  no  structural  division  of  chancel  and  nave 
inside,  >  coved  plaster  ceiling  covering  the  whole 
space.  The  font,  pulpit,  seating  and  wainsct)t  are  all 
contemporary  with  the  building. 

The  vestry,  or  mortuary  chapel,  opens  to  the 
sanctuary  by  a  round  stone  arch  and  has  a  window 
facing  east.  It  contains  an  elaborate  marble  monu- 
ment to  Sir  Edward  Ward,  knight.  Lord  Chief  Baron 
of  the  Exchequer  (d.  1714),  wdth  reclining  figure  in 
judge's  robes,  said  to  be  by  Rysbrack."  In  the 
sanctuary  is  a  canopied  mural  monument  in  marble 
and  alabaster  to  Mrs.  Frances  Palmer  {J.  1628),  wife 
of  Edward  Palmer,  Counsellcr  at  Law,  and  memorials 
to  Katharine  {d.  1760),  wife  of  Dr.  Rowland  Hunt, 
rector,  and  to  Hannah  (d.  1819),  wife  of  the  Rev.  R. 
Roberts,  curate,  the  latter  by  Chantrey. 

There  is  a  ring  of  five  bells  by  Thomas  Eayre,  of 
Kettering,  cast  in  the  winter  of  1727.'*' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  cover  paten,  flagon, 
and  two  plates  of  1734,  each  inscribed  '  Stoke  Doyle 
in  Northamptonshire.'" 

The  registers  begin  in  1560.  The  first  volume  has 
all  entries  to  1653,  the  second  from  1654  to  1736,  and 
the  third  from  1736  to  181 2.*^ 

On  the  south  side  of  the  building  is  the  base  of  a 
churchyard  cross,  of  somewhat  unusual  form,  the 
chamfered  stops  of  which  have  scroll-like  projec- 
tions.*' 

Bridges  records  in  the  chancel  of  the  old  church  a 
stone  8  ft.  long,  on  which  was  cut  the  name  '  Ricardus 
Ashton.'** 


A  recumbent  efTigy  of  a  priest  now  in  the  church- 
yard to  the  east  of  the  chancel  was  formerly  in  the  old 
church,  between  the  chancel  and  north  chapel.'-" 

The  advowson  of  the  church  of 
.■IDI'OII'SOX  Stoke  Doyle  has  been  always  held  by 
the  lords  of  the  first  manor  of 
Stoke  Doyle,  the  earliest  recorded  presentation  being 
in  1222,  by  Robert  de  Stoke."*  Mr.  Capron  is  the 
owner  of  the  advowson  at  the  present  day. 

A  rent  of  los.  a  year  from  the  rectory  of  Stoke 
Doyle  was  paid  to  the  Sacrist  of  the  Abbey  of  Peter- 
borough in  1291."  All  portions,  tithes  and  pensions 
in  the  parish  were  granted  in  1541  to  the  dean  and 
chapter  of  the  newly  founded  cathedral.** 

At  the  Dissolution  of  the  chantries,  a  sum  of 
53J.  •^d.  existed  to  maintain  an  obit  and  light  in  the 
church  as  well  as  an  annual  rent  of  2/.'* 

In  1591  a  dispute  arose  as  to  a  messuage  and  20  acres 
of  land  lield  for  the  benefit  of  the  parish  for  repairing 
bridges,  the  relief  of  the  poor,  etc.  The  deeds  were 
in  the  possession  of  Anthony  Palmer,  the  lord  of  the 
manor,  and  two  others,  who,  it  is  alleged,  tried  to 
conceal  the  property,  pretending  that  it  had  been 
given  for  superstitious  uses.'"** 

Thomas  Hewitt  in  1749  left  ^^20  for 
CHARITIES  the  poor.  This  sum  was  subsequently 
invested  in  £20  8j.  ()d.  Consols  pro- 
ducing 10/.  yearly  in  dividends.  The  income  is 
distributed  by  the  rector  and  churchwardens  in 
bread  on  St.  Thomas's  Day  to  about  20  recipients. 

George  Capron  by  indenture  dated  24  June  1844 
gave  /^20O  to  the  rector  and  churchwardens  for 
charitable  purposes.  The  money  was  invested  in 
/^2I5  10/.  loii.  Consols  producing  £^  ys.  Sd.  in  divi- 
dends. £2  is  distributed  to  the  local  Clothing  and 
Coal  Clubs,  £2  in  aid  of  the  Sunday  School  and  ^l 
to  Peterborough  Infirmary. 

The  sums  of  Stock  are  with  the  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds. 


THORPE  ACHURCH 


Asechurch  (xi  cent.),  Torpe  and  Achirche  (xii  cent.), 
Thorp,  Asechirche  (xiii  cent.),  Thorp  Watervill, 
Acherche  (xiv  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Thorpe  Achurch  lies  about  5  miles 
south  of  Oundle  and  covers  i  ,608 J  acres,  most  of  which 
arc  laid  down  in  grass.  The  land  rises  gradually 
from  the  River  Nene  which  forms  the  western  boun- 
dary of  the  parish  and  is  for  the  most  part  about 
100  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum,  although  it  reaches 


157  ft.  near  the  church  of  Achurch.  Along  the  valley 
of  the  river  the  soil  is  alluvium  and  the  subsoil  is 
formed  of  the  great  1  olite  scries,  red  marl  and  Oxford 
clay. 

The  village  of  Achurch  is  in  the  northern  part  of 
the  parish  and  lies  a  little  to  the  west  of  the  mrin 
road  from  Wellingborough  and  Thrapston  to  Oundle. 
It  consists  of  a  farm  and  16  cottages,  the  church  of 
St.  John  and    the    rectory,  which    is    a   picturesque 


"  YorkcMS.(printed),whcrf  the  inscrip- 
tion 18  given,  p.  30.  The  name  of  Rysbrack 
(loei  not  occur  on  the  monument. 
,  •*  They  were  recastings  of  five  oIH  bells, 
two  of  which  were  cracked.  They  were 
liung  in  the  tower  in  new  frames  in  the 
lummer  of  1728,  and  about  the  same  time 
a  new  clock  wns  provided.  The  inscrip- 
tioni  arc  given  in  North,  Cb.  Bells  oj 
ynrlkantSy   408. 

•'  In  in  inventory  of  171 1  arc  recorded 
a  silver  gilt  cup  and  cover  given  in  170S, 
a  small  silver  cup,  a  silver  dish  for  bread, 
and  two  pewter  flagons  dated  1647.  The 
whole  of  this  was  exchanged  in  1734  for 
the  present  set.  Markham,  Cb.  Pluie  of 
Noribanis,  271. 


"Notes  to  Yorke's  MS.  1884.  A  few 
extracts,  mostly  relating  to  the  lords  of 
the  manor  cr  to  the  rectors,  are  given, 
pp.  26-27. 

"  .Markham,  Crosses  of  Northants,  107. 
The  socket  is  let  diagonally,  and  the  lower 
part   of  the  shaft  is  still  in  the  hole. 

•'  llist.  of  Noribanis.  ii,  378.  Ashton 
was  rector  1390-1435. 

"  I'hc  elTigy  is  1 1  ft.  east  of  the  chancel, 
slightly  to  the  north.  It  is  probably  in 
its  original  position,  though  now  out- 
side. 

"  Roi.  Hug.  de  H'elUs  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  eo8,  140;  Roi.  Ric.  Cravtsend 
(Cant,  and  York  Soc),  126  ;  Dc  Banco  R. 
42,    m.    Szd ;     Feet    of    F.    Northants. 


Mil.  6  Kdw.  II;  Mich.  14  Edw.  Ill; 
Mich.  26  Edw.  Ill  ;  Div.  Cos.  Trin. 
44  Edw.  Ill  ;  Northants.  Trin.  18  Hen. 
VlII  ;  East.  5  Eli?..  ;  Recov.  R.  Trin. 
Phil,  and  Mary,  ro.  546  ;  ibid.  9  Will.  Ill, 
ro.  185;  Insiit.  Bks.  P.R.O.  In  1823 
a  recovery  suggests  that  Sir  James 
I.angham,  Bart,  owned  the  advowson, 
but  presumably  he  only  held  land  or 
tithes  in  the  parish  (Recov.  R,  Mich. 
4  Geo.  IV,  ro.  285). 

•'  Pope  Nub.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.),   39b  ; 
Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  xxii,  f.  bod. 

••  /..  and  r.  Hen.  VI II,  vol.  xvi,  g.  1216 
(10). 

••  Chantry  Certif.  (P.R.O.),  35. 

'"  Ct.  of  Req.  bdle.  98,  no.  25. 


A   HISTORY   OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


gabled  stone  house  built  about  1633,  with  mullioned 
windows  and  two-storied  porch.  Most  of  the 
inhabitants,  however,  live  at  Thorpe  VVaterville, 
about  a  mile  to  the  south  of  the  church  and  on  the 
west  side  of  the  main  road.  Near  the  river  here  are 
the  remains  of  Thorpe  Waterville  Castle,  built  by 
Walter  de  Langton,  Bishop  of  Lichfield,*  who  held  the 
manor  from  1300  to  1307  and  had  licence  to  crencllate 
his  house  there  in  1301.- 

The  castle  is  mentioned  in  1307,  after  the  forfeiture 
of  his  lands,  when  the  gate  of  the  castle  and  chapel 
are  referred  to.*  In  the  next  century,  the  castle  is 
regularly  mentioned  with  the  manors  (j.f.)  and  in 
1461  it  was  held  for  the  Lancastrians  against  Edward 
IV,  who  ordered  Sir  John  Wenlock  to  besiege  it  with 
three  cannon.^  Presumably  it  was  more  or  less 
destroyed  at  this  time.  A  constable  was  appointed 
certainly  as  late  as  1485,^  and  in  1537,  '  le  Parke  '  in 
the  castle  is  mentioned.*  About  the  same  time 
John  Leland  refers  to  the  ruins  of  the  outer  wall  of 
the  castle  as  he  passed  through  the  village.'  The 
castle  was  apparently  of  the  type  of  fortified  manor 
house  which  was  being  built  early  in  the  14th  century. 
Only  a  portion  of  this  house  survives,  which  for  a  long 
time  has  been  used  as  a  barn.  It  is  built  of  stone 
and  measures  externally  70  ft.  in  length  from  north  to 
south,  by  25  ft.  10  in.  in  width.  This  structure, 
which  has  a  plinth  all  round  and  a  gable  at  each  end, 
was  originally  of  two  stories,  but  the  upper  floor  has 
long  been  removed,  and  wide  openings'  have  been 
made  in  the  middle  of  the  side  walls.  There  is 
evidence  of  a  partition  having  run  across  the  building 
at  its  centre  and  a  two-story  gabled  porch  is  said  to 
have  stood  on  the  east  side  until  about  a  century  ago.* 
At  the  north  end,  corbelled  out  from  the  first  floor, 
is  a  chimney,  the  upper  part  of  which,  above  the 
gable,  is  octagonal  and  battlemented,  and  on  either 
side  of  the  chimney  is  a  circular  moulded  opening, 
nearly  2  ft.  in  diameter.  There  is  said  to  have  been 
a  similarly  constructed  chimney  at  the  south  end.*" 
There  arc  loop  windows  in  the  longer  sides,  and  the 
roof  principals  have  moulded  collars  and  kingposts. 
The  walls  arc  3  ft.  thick  and  the  roof  is  covered  with 
thatch.  All  the  remaining  arcliitcctural  features  arc  of 
14th  century  date.  Thorpe  station,  near  the  village, 
is  on  the  Northampton  and  Peterborough  branch  of 
the  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway.  The 
parish  was  inclosed  by  Act  of  Parliament  in  1772.*' 

Robert  Browne  (1550-1630  f),  who  formed  the 
first  Independent  congregations  in  England,  was 
rector  of  Thorpe  Achurch  from  1 591  for  40  years. 
He   liad,  however,  finished   his  active    career  as   an 


itinerant  preacher,  before  Lord  Burghley  presented 
him  to  the  benefice. ^^ 

The  two  manors  of  THORPE 
MANORS  WATERVILLE  and  ACHURCH  were 
held  together  throughout  their  history. 
In  Domesday  Book,  both  parts  of  the  parish  were 
entered  under  the  heading  of  '  Asechurch,'  which  was 
then  held  of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough. l''  They  were 
held  by  knight  service  and  is.  was  due  for  guard  of  the 
Castle  of  Rockingham.  As  each  knight  of  the  Abbey 
of  Peterborough  was  quit  of  service  in  the  time  of 
peace  for  a  payment  of  4J.  a  year,  it  is  probable  that 
the  two  manors  were  held  as  two  knights'  fees.**  The 
overlordship  of  Peterborough**  is  last  mentioned  in  a 
law-suit  between  Abbot  Kirketon  and  Lady  Margaret 
Beaufort,  the  tenant  for  life,  as  to  the  rent  due  to 
the  Abbey.*'  After  the  Dissolution,  the  manors 
were  held  in  chief  of  the  Crown.*' 

In  1086,  Ascelin  and  two  Englishmen  held  6i  hides 
of  land  of  the  Abbey  in  Achurch,*'  but  in  the  North- 
amptonshire Survey  of  the  following  century,  the 
Englishmen  disappear  and  Ascelin  de  VVaterville  was 
the  tenant  of  the  land  in  Thorpe  and  Achurch.*'  An 
Ascelin  de  VVaterville  appears 
amongst  the  knights  of  Peter- 
borough in  1 1 25-1 1 28.-"  Pos- 
sibly there  were  two  Ascelins, 
father  and  son,  who  succeeded 
each  other.  After  11 26,  but 
before  1155,  Hugh  de  VVater- 
ville, the  son  of  Ascelin 
herited  the  manors.^* 
heir  was  another  Ascelin 

before  1189  his  son  or  grand 

HI          1          1   •        J      1  Waterville.  ArP':»t 

ugh,  wiio   claimed   the  „           ,  / 

o    '  crustily      and  a    jcae 

office      of      hereditary      high        dancetiy  gula. 
steward  of  Peterborough,  was 

holding  Thorpe  Waterville.-'  Between  1 1 97  and  1 21 1, 
Richard,  son  of  the  second  Hugh,  had  succeeded.-^  He 
was  living  in  1240-*  and,  together  with  his  son  John,  his 
name  appears  in  the  list  of  the  anniversaries  observed 
at  Peterborough  Abbey.-'  John  must  have  predeceased 
his  fatlier,  whose  heirs  were  his  sister  Maud  and 
Alice.  Thorpe  and  Achurch  apparently  formed  part 
of  Maud's  moiety  and  passed  in  1241,  to  Reginald  de 
Waterville,  said  to  be  her  son.^'  He  joined  Simon 
de  Montfort  and  his  manors  were  forfeited  on  his  being 
taken  prisoner  at  Northampton  in  1264.  He  was 
pardoned  two  years  later  and  held  his  lands  till  his 
death  in  1287.^'  His  heirs  were  the  heirs  of  his  daugh- 
ters, Robert  de  Vere,  son  of  Joan,  Robert  de  Wykham, 
son  of  Maud  or  Elizabeth,  and  his  third  daughter, 


3  w 


'  Pytchlcy,  Ilk.  of  Fca  (Norlhants. 
Rcc.  Sor),  42.  Bridget  [Ilisl.  Norlhiinls. 
ii,  367)  st.ttci  th.it  it  was  prob.Tbly  built 
b^  Aicclin  dc  Waterville,  but  there  seems 
to  be  no  historic.'il  or  arcl)itectur.il  evi- 
dence for  this  early  date. 

'Cat.  Pal.   121J2-1301,  p.  561. 

•Sparte,  llnl.  /Ing.  Script.  (Var.), 
172  J  P.R.O.  Mini.  Accts.  Gen.  Scr. 
bdlc.  1 132,  no.  2. 

'  Cat.  Pal.  1461-67,  p.  28. 

'  Rol.  Pari.  (Rec.  Com),  vi,  372.1. 

•  L.    and    P.    Hen.    yill,    ii,   g.    1008 

{"9)- 

'  l.cland,  liincrary,  ed,  1744,  i,  f.  6. 
•The  openings  are  12  It.  wide. 

•  T.  L.  Selhy  in  jliwc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep. 
(1861),  Ti,  64-^,  where  it  is  stated  that  the 


porch  was  pulled  down  '  about  thirty-six 
years  ago.' 

"•Ibid,  where  it  is  said  to  have  been 
'  removed  probably  a  himdred  years 
since  '   (fr(Mn    1861). 

"  Slat.  12  Geo.  Ill,  c.  105. 

' '  Did.  A'<J/.  Biof. 

"I'.C.II.  Xorthann.    i,  316a. 

"  Kgeiton  MS.  fll.M.),  2733,  f.  148. 

''' Val.  Chan,  iv,  276;  Egerton  MS. 
fll.M.),  2733,  (.  I26d  ;  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E 
xxii,  ft.  4<)d,  104  ;  FriiJ.  /lids,  iv,  p.  48  ; 
Bridges,  Hiil.  Norlhanls.  ii,  365. 

■»  Ibid. 

"  Pat.  R.  5  Udw.  VI,  pt.  7. 

"I'.C.II.  Narihanli.  i,  3160. 

■»  Ibid.  366*. 

'"  Cbron.  Pttroh.  (Camden  Soc),  p.  169. 


•'  Sparkc,  //«;.  Angl.  Scripi.  (Var.),  88  ; 
Dugtiair,  Man.  Ani^l.  i,  393.  "  Ibid. 

•"  Pytchlcy,  Ilk.  of  Feel  (Northanti. 
Rec.  Soc),  4';«. 

'*  Feel  of  Fines  (Pipe  Roll  Soc),  xx,  no. 
IS4;  Red  Ilk.  Fxcb.  (Rolls  Scr.),  618; 
Wrotletlcy,  Prd.  from  the  Plea  Rolls,  4S2. 

"  (,'ii/.  Close,  1237-42,  p.  221. 

'"  Dugdilc,  Mon.  .inj^l.  i,  p.  362. 

"Cott.  MS.  I'leop.  I"  ii,  f.  133; 
Feet  of  K.  Norlhanls.  East.  25  Hen,  III, 
no.  460.  Maud  was  living  in  1 24S,  and 
was  apparently  then  the  wife  of  William 
de  Palmus.  If.  ibid.  East.  27  lien.  Ill, 
no.  472. 

"Cal.  Pal.  1258-66,  pp.  359,  634; 
ibid.  1266-72,  p.  10;  Chron.  Ptlroh . 
(Camden  Soc),  142. 


136 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED       thorpe  achurch 


Margaret,  the  wife  of  Henry  de  Titclim.irsli,^' 
Reginald  appears,  however,  to  have  sold  Thorpe  and 
Achurch  to  Simon  dc  Eylesworth  (Ailsworth),  rector 
of  Thrapston,**  who  did  homage  and  fealty  to  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough  for  the  manor  of  Thorpe 
VN'aterville  in  1291.^'  Simon  conveyed  the  manors 
to  William  de  Louth,  bishop  of  Ely  (l 290-8),  and 
he  to  William  Tuchet,  his  kinsman.  Tuchet  conveyed 
the  manors  to  Walter  de  Langton,  bishop  of  Coventrv, 
in  exchange  for  lands  in  Leicestershire  on  condition 
that  if  Tuchet  were  impleaded  concerning  the  Leices- 
tershire lands  he  might  re-enter  upon  these  manors.^- 
Walter  de  Langton  seems  to  have  obtained  a  con- 
tirniation  of  title  in  1300  from  Robert  de  Vere  and 
Robert  dc  Wykham.''''  He  did  homage  to  the  Abbot 
in  1303. '^  After  his  fall  in  1307,  Edward  II  seized 
his  lands  and  granted  them  before  1313  to  Aymer  de 
\'alence.  Earl  of  Pembroke,  for  life,  but  the  terms  of  the 
condition  as  to  the  Leicestershire  land  having  come 
into  operation,  his  possession  was  disputed  by  William 
Tuchet,  who  forced  an  entry  by  means  of  ladders  and 
seized  the  castle  of  Thorpe  Waterville.*'  John  de 
Hotot  also  made  claim  to  the  manors.'*  In  13 14, 
the  Earl,  at  the  request  of  the  King,  granted  them  to 
Thomas,  Earl  of  Lancaster,  receiving  other  lands  in 
exchange."  In  1316,  the  Earl  of  Lancaster  obtained 
quit-claims  of  their  rights  to  the  manors  from  the 
Bishop,  William  Tuchet  and  John  de  Hotot.'*  In 
1 3 19  the  Earl  granted  them  to  his  secretary,  Robert 
de  Holand.**  After  Lancaster's  rebellion  and  defeat 
in  1322,  Holand  surrendered  his  manors  to  the  King, 
who  granted  them  in  fee  tail  to  Aymer  dc  Valence 
Earl  of  Pembroke  and  Mary  his  wife.'"'  The  latter, 
after  her  husband's  death  in  1 324,  granted  Thorpe 
Waterville  and  Achurch  in  1329  to  Maud,  widow  of 
Robert  de  Holand.'"  Her  son  and  heir,  Robert  de 
Holand,  renewed  a  settlement 
made  by  his  father  in  1322,  by 
which  various  remainders  were 
created  in  tail  male,  but  the 
final  remainder  was  to  the 
right  heirs  of  Robert  de 
Holand.''^  Robert  de  Holand 
died  in  1373  leaving  a  grand- 
daughter, Maud,  the  wife  of 
John  Lord  Lovel,  daughter  of 
his  son  Robert.*'  The  manors 
of  Achurch  and  Thorpe  Water- 
ville, being  settled  on  the  heir 
male    of    Robert    the    father, 

passed  to  his   nephew  John  Holand  Duke  of  Exeter, 
who  was  beheaded  in  1400.     The  Duke's  lands  were 


Holand.  Azure  pow- 
dered tvttb  Jleurs  de  Us 
and  a  lion  argent. 


restored  in  141 7  to  John  his  son,  who  was  created 
Duke  of  Exeter  in  1 444.  lie  died  in  1446,  leaving  a 
son  Henry,  Duke  of  Exeter,  who  was  attainted  and 
beheaded  in  1461.*''  Edward  IV  granted  the  manors 
of  Acluirch  and  Thorpe  Waterville  in  the  same  year  to 
his  sister  Anne,  the  wife  of  the  last  Duke,  first  for 
life,  and  then  with  remainder  to  the  heirs  of  her  body.** 
The  manors  were  held  in  trust  on  her  behalf''"  and  in 
1477  the  trustees  granted  them  to  Thomas,  Marquis 
of  Dorset,  the  King's  stepson,  and  he  granted  them 
to  his  brother  Richard  Grey.'"  The  latter  died 
without  heirs  of  his  body  and  on  the  accession  of 
Richard  III,  they  seem  to  have  reverted  to  the  Crown. 
Erancis,  Viscount  Lovel,  however,  claimed  them  under 
the  Holand  settlements  of  1322  and  1331,  as  the  right 
heir  of  the  second  Robert  de  Holand,  whose  daughter 
and  heir  married  John  Lovel.''*  In  1485,  Lovel's 
lands  were  forfeited  and  Henry  VII  granted  Thorpe 
Waterville  and  Achurcii  to  his  mother.  Lady  Margaret 
Beaufort,  for  life.''*  On  her  death,  they  remained  in 
the  King's  hands  until  1525,  when  Henry  VIII  granted 
them  to  his  illegitimate  son  Henry  Fitzroy,  Duke 
of  Richmond  and  Somerset.^"  The  Duke  died  in 
1536^'  and  the  next  year  Thorpe  Waterville  and 
Achurch  manors  were  granted  to  Sir  William  Fitz- 
William  and  his  heirs  male.*^  This  grant  must  for 
some  reason  have  been  revoked,  since  in  1544,  they 
were  granted  to  Queen  Katherine  for  life.^'  After 
her  death,  Edward  VI  granted  them  to  Sir  William 
Cecil,  later  Lord  Burghley,**  and  they  remained  in 


Cecil,  Earl  of  Kxctcr. 
Barry  of  ten  pieces 
argent  and  azure  six 
scutcheons  sable  with  a 
lion  argent  in  each. 


Powvs,  Lord  Lilford. 
Or  a  UfirCs  paw  razed 
and  bend-wise  between 
two  crosslcts  /itchy  gules. 


the  possession  of  his  descendants  the  Earls  of  Exeter, 
till  1773,°^  when  they  were  sold  to  Thomas  Powys  of 
Lilford.^'  His  descendant.  Lord  Lilford,  is  the  lord 
of  the  manor  at  the  present  day. 

Richard  de  Waterville  had  a  grant  of  free   warren 


"Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  f.  141; 
Plae.  de  Quo  li'arr.  (Rec.  Com.),  570. 

"  Pytchlcjr,    if*,    of   Fees    (Northanti 
Rec.  Soc),  41. 
■     "  Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  p.  149. 

"  Pytchlcjr,  op.  cit.  41. 

••  Feet  ot  F.  Northants.  Trin.  29 
F.dw.  I,  no.  58  ;  ibid.  Div.  Cos.  29  Edw.  I, 
no.  258  ;  Jchn  de  V'cre,  son  of  Robert  de 
Vere,  was  holding  lands  in  Achurch 
(Drayton  Ch.  no.  47). 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  «ii,  f.  49d. 

••  Pytchley,  op.  cit.  42. 

••  Col.  Pat.  1313-17,  pp.  44,  7».  Ui- 

•'  Cal.  Chart,  iii,  242 ;  Feud.  Aids, 
ir,  18. 

••  Mins.     Aces.     (Duchy    of     Lanes.) 


(P.R.O.),  bdle.  I,  no.  3  ;  Feet  of  Fines, 
Northants,  East.  9  Ed.  II  ;  ibid.  Hil. 
9  Edw.  II. 

••Ibid.  Hil.  12  Edw.  II;  Cal.  Pat. 
1317-21,  p.  431. 

"  Cal.  Pal.  1321-24,  pp.  87,  S8. 

"Cal.  Close  1327-30,  pp.  281,  581; 
Pot.  Pari,  ii,  27b. 

"  Feet  of  Fines,  Northants.  Hil. 
4  Edw.  III. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Edw.  Ill  (lit 
DOS.),  no,  19. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Edw.  Ill  (ist 
nos.),  no.  19;  Fend.  /Jii^,  iv,  48,  51. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1461-67,  pp.  7,  104. 

"Ibid.  533;  Rot.  Pari.  (Rcc.  Cor.), 
V,  602a  ;  vi,  75a. 


•'  Cal.  Pat.  1467-77,  pp.  147,  582; 
Pot.  Pari.  (Rcc.  Com.),  vi,  217a  and  b. 

"  Ibid.  244a,  254b-255b. 

"Cal.  Pat.  1485-94,  pp.  154-7. 

"L.  and  P.  Hen.  VIll,  iv,  no.  1500. 

•'  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

•'  Pat.  R.  29  Hen.  VIII,  no.  873. 

"  Ibid.  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  17. 

"Ibid.  5  Edw.  VI,  pt.  7. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  r>om.  1541-80,  pp.  84,  88  ; 
Feet  of  Fines  Div.  Cos.  Mich.  1649; 
East.  22  Chas.  II;  Hil.  8  Will.  Ill; 
Recov.  R.  Hil.  7  Will,  and  Mary, 
ro.  76  ;   ibid.  Trin.  10  Geo.  I,  ro.  51. 

••Close  R.  6369,  no.  7;  Recov.  R. 
Mich.  6  Geo.  IV,  ro.  265  ;  G.E.C. 
Complete  Peerage. 


137 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


in  his  demesne  lands  in  Thorpe  in  1 235."  The  same 
right  was  granted  to  William  Tuchet  in  1300  and  to 
the  Bishop  of  Coventry  and  Lichfield  a  few  months 
later,^*  and  it  was  claimed  by  the  Countess  of  Pem- 
broke and  her  feoffee  Maud  de  Holand.'' 

A  water-mill  is  mentioned  in  1330,  and  was  held 
with  Thorpe  Waterville  manor.  It  had  then  been 
recently  reconstructed. '^  It  was  leased  in  1519  with 
other  demesne  lands  to  Miles  Brykehead  and  his  wife 
Joan  for  21  years''  and  is  mentioned  again  in  the  grant 
of  the  manors  to  Sir  William  Fitzwilliam.'^ 

The  church  of  ST.  JOHN-THE-BAP- 
CHURCH  TIST  consists  of  chancel  32  ft.  3  in.  by 
16  ft.  6  in.,  nave  54  ft.  9  in.  by  19  ft., 
north  and  south  transepts,  north  aisle,  south  porch, 
and  west  tower  surmounted  by  a  broach  spire.  The 
tower  is  10  ft.  3  in.  square  and  the  width  across  the 
transepts  45  ft.,  all  these  measurements  being  internal. 


of  the  easternmost  window  is  lowered  to  form  a 
seat. 

The  transepts  are  identical  in  size,  being  12  ft.  6  in. 
in  widtn  by  10  ft.  6  in.  deep,*^  and  are  separated  from 
the  nave  by  pointed  arches.  The  end  windows  are 
of  two  lights  with  geometrical  tracery  similar  to  that 
in  the  westernmost  window  of  the  chancel,  but  the 
one  on  the  north  is  wholly  restored.  At  the  east 
end  of  the  north  wall  of  the  north  transept  is  a  trefoil- 
headed  recess,  probably  a  piscina,  but  the  sill  is 
covered.  The  end  of  the  south  transept  is  wholly 
covered  by  the  monument  to  Sir  Thomas  Powys." 
The  windows  of  the  nave  are  similar  to  those  in  the 
transepts,  but  the  tracery  is  modern. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages,  with  moulded  plinth 
and  projecting  vice  at  the  north-west  angle  weathering 
back  at  the  level  of  the  bell-chamber.  The  spire  is 
carried  on  a  trefoiled  corbel  table  and  has  plain  angles 


Scale  of  Feet 

Plan  of  Thorpe  Achurch  Church 


mSIUCcNTURYLATE 

C]  Modern 


The  aisle  and  porch  are  additions  made  in  1862,  when 
the  church  was  extensively  restored,  and  in  191 2  an 
organ  chamber  was  built  on  the  north  of  the  chancel 
against  the  transept ;  with  these  exceptions  the  build- 
ing is  all  of  one  date,  having  been  erected  c.  1280-90 
on  a  regular  cruciform  plan,  with  transcptal  chapels 
opening  from  the  east  end  of  the  nave.  The  roofs 
are  all  modern  and  covered  with  grey  slates  ;  the 
walling  is  of  coursed  rubble  with  buttresses  and 
dressings  of  ashlar  and  having  corbel  tables  to  chancel 
and  nave.     The  aisle  has  a  plain  parapet. 

The  chancel  is  of  two  bays  with  gabled  buttresses 
of  two  stages,  and  cast  window  of  three  trefoiled 
lights,  the  geometrical  tracery  of  which  is  a  modern 
copy  of  the  original.  The  other  windows  in  the 
chancel  are  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  simple  geome- 
trical tracery,  one  on  the  north  side  and  three  on  the 
south,  diflferiiig  in  detail  and  in  part  restored.  At 
the  west  end  of  the  south  wall  arc  the  remains  of  a 
rectangular  low-side  window,  now  blocked,  and 
without  architectural  features.  The  walls  arc  plas- 
tered internally  and  no  piscina  is  visible,  but  the  sill 


and  two  sets  of  lights  on  each  of  the  cardinal  faces 
The  west  doorway  has  a  segmental  head  of  two 
moulded  orders  and  shafted  jambs  ;  there  is  a  single 
light  window  over  and  in  the  stage  above  a  tall 
round-headed  window.  On  the  north  and  south 
the  lower  stage  is  blank,  but  the  middle  is  pierced  by 
a  quatrefoil  opening  within  a  circle.  The  bell-chamber 
windows  are  of  two  plain  lancets  with  trefoiled  circle 
in  the  head  within  an  enclosing  arch,  the  hood- 
mould  of  which  is  continued  round  the  tower  as  a 
string.  The  tower  arch  is  of  three  chamfered  orders, 
the  inner  resting  on  moulded  corbels,  the  outer 
dying  out. 

The  font,  which  stands  in  the  south  transept,  is 
ancient,  and  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal  bowl  and 
stem. 

The  church  was  reseated  in  1862,  but  tbc  pulpit, 
choir  stalls,  and  tower  screen  date  from  1 91 2.  In  the 
chancel  are  four  1 8th  century  brass  candelabra,  and 
in  the  nave  is  an  old  oak  chest  with  three  locks. 

The  elaborate  monument  to  Sir  Thomas  Powys  in 
the   south   transept  was  brought  here  from   Lilford 


"  Cat.  Chan,  1116-57,  p.  111. 
"  Ibid.  1157-1300,  p.  4S1 ;    1300-1316, 
pp.  1,  77. 
"Anile  R.  631,  (.  76. 
"Ibid.  I.  75. 


"  L.  and  r.  Urn.  I'lll,  ii,  g.  1008  (19) ; 
iii,  g.  i86i  (6). 

"Pat.  R.  2c)  Men.  VIII,  pt.  i. 

"  Or  13  ft.  i(  mr.iiurcd  from  the  face  of 
(he  nave  wall,  which  il  30  in.  thick. 


"*  The  monnment  blocks  the  south 
window,  but  there  ia  a  two-light  window 
in  the  enst  w;ill.  The  cut  wall  of  the 
nor t h  tr.iTiscpt  is  now  covered  by  the 
or^an  chamber,  and  on  the  west  the 
transept  is  open  to  the  aiilc. 


TliORl't    AcllURCH    CllUKCll    hRO.M    THE    NoRlll-SAST 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


THRAPSTON 


church  after  its  demolition  in  1778.  Sir  Thomas, 
who  died  in  1719,  is  represented  in  a  reclining  position 
in  his  judge's  robes,  below  a  canopy  supported  by 
Corinthian  columns  ;  the  inscription  is  by  Matthew 
Prior.  There  is  also  a  blue  stone  floor-slab  marking 
the  place  of  burial  of  Sir  Tliomas,  and  others  in 
memory  of  his  son  Thomas  (d.  1719),  his  grandson  of 
the  same  name  (d.  1767),  and  Ambrose  Powys  (d.  1753); 
on  the  wall  is  a  tablet  to  the  Hon.  Charles  Powys, 
R.N.  (d.  1804)  and  his  brother  Henry  killed  at  Badajoz 
in  1812,  and  also  a  brass  plate  to  the  third  Baron 
Lilford  (d.  i86i).«» 

There  are  four  bells,  the  first  by  Taylor  and  Co., 
of  Loughborough,  1861,  the  second  and  third  re- 
castings  by  Taylor  in  1898  of  two  bells  dated 
respectively  1675  and  171 1  (the  latter  by  Henry 
Penn,  of  Peterborougli),  and  the  tenor  by  Thomas 
Eayrc  of  Kettering,  1735.*'  There  were  four  bells 
in  1552. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup,  paten,  and  flagon 
of  1669,  given  by  Thomas  Elmes  to  the  church  of 
Lilford,  and  a  silver  alms  dish  of  1713,  the  gift  of  Sir 
Thomas  Powys." 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i) 
baptisms,  marriages,  and  burials,  1591-1669,  with 
gap  from  1635  to  1644;  (ii)  baptisms  1670-1807, 
marriages  1670-1755,  burials  1671-72;  (iii)  burials 
1678-1812;    (iv)   baptisms    1808-12;    (v)   marriages 


1755-1812.  The  first  volume  contains  a  note  by 
Robert  Browne,  founder  of  the  "  Brownists,"  who 
was  rector  for  thirty  years.  The  churchwardens' 
accounts  begin  in  1784. 

The  churchyard  is  entered  from  the  cast  through 
a  lycli-gate  erected  in  memory  of  the  fourth  Lord 
Lilford  (d.  1896). 

The  advowson  of  the  rectory  of 
ADl'OU'SON  Achurch  has  been  held  by  the 
tenants  in  demesne  of  the  manor 
since  tlie  early  13th  century.  Richard  de  Water- 
villa  presented  before  1219**  and  the  advowson 
accompanied  all  subsequent  grants  of  the  manor.** 
In  1439,  three  fcoflees  of  John,  Duke  of  Exeter,  made 
the  presentation  and™  in  1633  Thomas  Ashton  pre- 
sented for  one  occasion."  Lord  Lilford  is  the 
present  patron. 

The  church  land.  On  the  inclosure 
CHARniES  of  the  commonfields  in  the  parish  an 
allotment  was  awarded  to  the  church- 
wardens in  lieu  of  their  rights  in  the  open  fields.  Tlic 
allotment  consists  of  about  18  acres  of  grass  land  and 
is  in  the  occupation  of  Lord  Lilford  at  a  yearly  rent 
of  £1%  which  is  applied  to  church  expenses. 

Richard  Ragsdale  by  will  30  Jan.  1711,  gave  20/. 
yearly  to  the  poor.  This  is  paid  out  of  land  belonging 
to  Lord  Lilford  and  applied  by  the  Rector  in  aid  of 
the  Village  Coal  Club. 


THRAPSTON 


Trapestone  (xi  cent.),  Thrapeston  (xiii  and  xiv 
cent.). 

The  parish  of  Thrapston  contains  1,149  *cres  of 
land  and  is  low-lying,  being  only  about  100  ft.  above 
the  ordnance  datum.  The  subsoil  is  alluvium,  near 
the  bed  of  the  River  Nene,  which  forms  the  western 
boundary  of  the  parish,  upper  lias,  great  oolite  series 
and  Oxford  clay.  The  Thorpe  brook  forms  part  of 
the  eastern  boundary.  About  half  the  acreage  is 
arable  land  and  the  remainder  grass  land,  with 
practically  no  woods.  A  quarry  is  mentioned  in  1330, 
and  mines  and  quarries  in  a  sale  of  the  manor  in 
1770.'  There  is  an  ironstone  quarry  at  the  present 
day,  but  the  Nene  Side  Iron  Works  which  once 
flourished  no  longer  exist. 

Thrapston  is  a  small  market  town,  probably  owing 
its  prosperity  to  its  situation  near  the  bridge  over  the 
Nene,  towards  which  bridge  several  roads  converge.  It 
is  the  head  of  the  Thrapston  Petty  Sessional  Division, 
the  Thrapston  and  Oundle  County  Court  District 
and  the  Thrapston  Rural  District.  It  was  almost 
entirely  rebuilt  in  the  19th  century,  the  later  buildings 
being  of  red  brick.     A  few  older  houses  remain  ;    a 


cottage  in  the  Huntingdon  road  is  dated  175S,  2nd 
the  Baptist  Chapel  adjoining  bears  a  tablet  recording 
that  "  This  place  of  Worship  was  built  by  public 
Subscription  A.D.  1787,  for  the  Propagation  of  the 
Gospel  of  Jesus  Christ."  It  is  a  plain  brick  building 
of  two  stories.  There  is  also  a  Wcsleyan  Chapel  in 
the  town. 

There  is  a  market  place  in  the  centre  of  the  town 
and  the  church  and  manor  house  lie  on  its  north  side. 
The  bridge  over  the  Nene  is  mentioned  in  1224,  when 
Bishop  Hugh  of  Welles  granted  an  indulgence  to 
travellers  contributing  to  its  repair^  and  in  1313 
Bishop  Dalderby  granted  an  indulgence  for  the 
fabric  of  the  chapel  of  St.  Thomas  the  Martyr  next 
the  Bridge  of  Thrapston.'  In  the  later  14th  and  early 
15th  centuries,  the  bailifTs  and  men  of  Thrapston 
obtained  several  grants  of  pontage  for  the  repair  of 
the  bridge.*  Leland  about  1543  mentions  a  stone 
bridge  with  eight  arches,'  but  in  a  brief  for  its  repair 
of  1664  it  is  said  to  have  twenty-four  arches.* 

The  Leper  Hospital  of  St.  Leonard  existed  in  the 
1 2th  and  13th  centuries,  but  nothing  is  known  of  its 
history  and  it  probably  had  no  endowment.'* 


"  There  are  alio  memoriali  in  the 
church  to  the  firit  and  terond  Baroni 
(1800,  1825),  the  Rev.  Littleton  Powyt 
(d.  1842),  the  Hon.  Adelaide  .Marjr 
Powyi(d.  i873),Thomai  Atherton  Powyi 
(d.  i8$i),  eideit  ion  of  the  4th  Baron, 
and  Thomas  Atherton  Powjri  (d.  1909), 
the  two  latter  in  the  chancel. 

••  The  inicriptions  are  given  in  North, 
Cb.  Brllt  of  SoTibanit.  175.  Thoje  on 
the  iccond  and  third  have  been  retained 
in  factimile.  On  the  bell  frame  ii  cut 
•  W.  Selby,  c.w.  |S|6.' 

•'  MarUiam,  Ch.   Phle   0/     Noribanit. 


281.  The  alma  dish  bean  the  arms  of 
Powyi  impaling  Mcdowi ;  Sir  Thomas's 
second  wife  was  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir 
Philip  Medows. 

••  Rol.  Hug.  di  ll'ellcs  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  i,  J. 

••  Rol.  Ric.  Gravesend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  122;  Cal.  Pal.  1307-13,428;  Chart. 
R.  8  Edw.  II,  m.  20,  no.  42  ;  Pat.  R. 
29  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  I  i  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt. 
17;  5  Edw.  VI,  pt.  7;  Instit.  Bks. 
(PRO),  1638,  1643,  1685,  1737,  1743, 
'74S1  1778  i  Close  R.  13  Geo.  Ill,  rn.  19, 
no.  7. 

139 


">  Bridges,  Hill.  Nonbanti.  ii,  365. 
"Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.),  1633. 
'Cum.    Pleas.    Assiie    R.    632,    t.    73; 
Eect  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  10  Geo.  III. 

•  Rot.  Hug.  de  Welln  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  207,  219. 

•  Line.    Epii.   Reg.  Memo.   Dalderby, 
f.2<;3. 

«  Cal.  Pal.  1367-70,  p.  273  ;  1381-1385, 
pp.  116,  556;    1385-89,  P- 457;   '39'-9^ 

p.   108  ;     1408-13,  p.  281. 

•  Leland,  //incrrfry,  ed.  1744,  p.  6. 

•  ('al.  S.P.  Dom.  1663-64,  p.  32O. 
••  r.C.H.  Norlhanli.  ii,  166. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


OOO 


There  is  a  station  on  the  Northampton  and  Peter- 
borough branch  of  the  London  Midland  and  Scottish 
Railway,  which  crosses  the  parish.  Thrapston  mill 
is  on  the  river  Nene,  to  the  south  of  the  town.  A 
water  mill  is  mentioned  as  parcel  of  the  manor  in 
1336  and  1355.'  The  parish  was  inclosed  by  .Act  of 
Parliament  in  1780.'* 

There  is  no  mention  of  a  pre-Conquest 
MANORS  tenant  in  THRAPSTON,  but  in  1086 
Oger  the  Breton  held  2j  hides.*  In  the 
following  century  2  hides  and  I  virgate  were  held  by 
his  son  Ralph  fitz  Oger  of  the  fee  of  Bourne  in  Lin- 
colnshire.* The  honour  of  Bourne  passed  to  the 
Wakes  and  Baldwin  Wake  granted  his  holding  to 
Robert  de  \'cre,  in  the  latter  half  of  the  1 2th  century. '" 
The  overlordship  was  held  by 
the  Wakes,  until  1350,  when  it 
passed  to  Margaret,  Countess 
of  Kent,**  sister  and  heir  of 
Thomas  Wake.  On  the  death 
of  her  son  John,  Earl  of  Kent, 
it  went  to  his  sister  Joan,  the 
wife  of  Sir  Thomas  Holand,*^ 
but  Elizabeth,  the  widow  of 
John,  held  it  in  dower  till  her 
death  in  1411.1^  In  the  in- 
terval four  Earls  of  Kent  had 
died,**  and  in  1424  Joan, 
daughter  of  Thomas  Holand 

and  Joan,  above  mentioned,  died  seised  of  the  rent  of 
50/.  from  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Thrapston.  Her 
property  was  divided  amongst  her  six  sisters  or  their 
descendants**  and  the  overlordship  probably  disap- 
peared after  this.  In  1481  Roger  Wake,  of  Blisworth, 
was  stated  to  be  the  overlord,**  and  in  1493  Edward, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire,*'  but  both  statements  were  probably 
due  to  a  confusion  with  the  tenure  of  other  property. 

The  manor  of  Thrapston  was  granted  by  Baldwin 
Wake  to  Robert  de  Vere,  and  followed  the  descent 
of  Great  Addington  {q.v.),  where  the  Veres  lived, 
until  the  iHth  century,  when  Thrapston  was  sold. 
In  1335  during  Ralf  de  Vere's  tenancy  an  extent 
of  the  manor  of  Thrapston  shows  there  was  there 
a  capital  messuage  with  two  gardens,  100  acres  of 
arable  land  in  demesne,  10  acres  of  meadow,  10  free 
tenants,  10  native  tenants,  10  cottages,  a  water  mill, 
and  a  market  and  fair.**  Alice,  widow  of  John  de 
Vere,  in  1386  had  her  dower  in  Tlirapston,  including 
the  profits  of  the  market  and  fair,  the  common  oven 
and  a  cottage  in  '  le  Draperie.'**     Thrapston  was  sold 


Wake.  Or  two  ban 
tvitb  three  roundels  gules 
in  the  chief. 


to  Humphrey  Morice  (d.  1731),  a  merchant  and  M.P. 
for  Grampound,  or  to  his  son  of  the  same  name 
(d.  I785).2''  It  was  sold  by  the  latter  in  1770  to 
Lejnard  Burton,^*  and  the  Burton  trustees  were  hold- 
ing in  l874.'^2  Mr.  John  Pashler  afterwards  held  the 
manor,  and  his  widow  now  holds  it. 

The  third  part  of  the  manor,  which  went  to 
Etheldreda,  the  youngest  daughter  of  Henry  Vere,  on 
his  death  in  I493,  was  still  in  her  possession,  as  a 
widow,  in  1553.-^  She  gave  it  to  her  son,  George 
Browne,  and  it  passed  to  his  son,  Wystan,^*  but  before 
1572  her  third  part  seems  to  have  been  again  divided 
amongst  heiresses,  as  transactions  as  to  their  thirds 
of  one-third  of  the  manor  were  carried  out  by 
Christiana  Browne  in  1572,-5  and  Catherine  Browne 
in  1576,^*  and  later  by  Christiana,  the  wife  of  John 
Tufton,  Mary,  the  wife  of  Thomas  Wilfride  and 
Catherine,  the  wife  of  William  Rooper."  The  last 
of  these  transactions  was  in  1 590  ;  no  later  history  of 
this  part  of  the  manor  appears,  and  it  was  probably 
conveyed  to  the  Mordaunts. 

In  the  14th  century  Ralph  de  Vere  claimed  view  of 
frank-pledge,  pillory  and  tumbrels  in  the  manor,^ 
and  the  view  is  mentioned  in  l66829  and  again  in 
1770.'" 

In  the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor,  Burred  held 
freely   3   virgates  of  land  in  Thrapston.^*     In   1086 


Clare.    Or  three  cbeve- 
rons  gules. 


Stafford.    Or  a  ibeve- 
ron  gules. 


this  land  was  held  of  the  Bishop  of  Coutances,^-  but 
after  his  fief  escheated  it  was  granted  to  the  Clares, 
this  holding  apparently  formed  part  of  half  a  knight's 
fee  held  of  the  fee  of  Clare  in  Thrapston,  Dcnford  and 
Ringstead.^^  After  the  death  of  the  last  Gilbert  de 
Clare  at  Bannockburn,  this  half  fee  passed  to  his 
eldest  sister,  Margaret,^*  and  through  her  to  the 
Earls  of  Stafford.^*  The  last  overlord  mentioned 
was  Edward,  Duke  of  Buckingham,  who  was  attainted 
and  beheaded  in  1521,^*  and  the  half  fee  was  presum- 
ably held  of  the  Crown  after  lliat  date. 


'  Hal  stead,  SMffiHr/Cz-wrd/ogiVi,  268,  270. 

"  Private  Art  oj Pari.  20  Geo.  lll,c.  59. 

'  y.C.II.  Norlbants,  i,  349. 

•Ibid.  365;  Cott.  MS.  Veip.  E  xxii, 
f.  94. 

>' Plac.  de  Quo  H'arr.  (Rec.  Com.), 
500;  the  charter  it  given  in  M.ilstead's 
Succinet  Cenealo'^jes,   l''94,  p.   is'i- 

"  /Ik.  of  Fees  (I'.R.C),  ii,  p.  937; 
Cat.  Irnj.  ii,  no.  439  ;  Cal.  Close  1272-79, 
p.  259;  Tear  Books  (Rolli  Ser.),  18-19 
Ediv.  Ill,  pp.  246-264  ;  Cal.  Iiiij.  ix, 
not.  219,  234. 

*■  Cal.   tnq.  X,  no.  46, 

"Cal.  Close,  1349-54,  p.  553;  Chan. 
In(|.  p.m.  12  Hen  IV,  no.  35. 

'«  Ibid.  20  Ric.  II,  no.  30;  G.E.C. 
Complete  Peerage. 

"Ibid.;  Chan.  In.|.  p.m.  lien.  IV, 
file  66,  no.  43. 


'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  IV,  file  74, 
no.  II. 

"  E\ch.  In<].  p.m.  Scr.  ii,  vol.  673,  no.  2. 

"  Drayton  Ch.  91  ;  Cal.  Close,  1337-39, 
p.  144  ;    llalstcad,  op.  cit.  268. 

'"  Dr.iyton  Ch.  45. 

'»  D.\.JI. ;    Bridget,  op.  cit.  ii,  3S0. 

'*  Feet  of  I'.  Northnnts.  Trin.  10  Geo. 
Ill  ;  Recov.  R.  Trin.  10  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  749. 

"  Whcllan,  I/ist.  of  Aorthants,  p.  732. 

"Common  Pleat  Recov.  R.  Hil. 
I  Mary,  ro.  415. 

"  Chan.  I'roc.  (Ser.  ii),  82  (15). 

"  Common  Pleat  Recov.  R.  Eait. 
14  Eliz.  ro.  io68. 

■«  Ibid.  Trin.  18  Eli«.  ro.  1107. 

"  Feel  of  F.  Northantt.  Mich.  iX  and  19 
Eliz.  ;    ibid.  Trm.  32  Flir. 

"  Plac.  de  Quo  H'arr.  (Rec.  Com.),  500  ; 
Halttcad,  op.  cit.  p.  268. 

140 


"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Hil.  10  and  21 
Chat.  II. 

"  Feet  of  F.  I^orthanls.  Trin.  10 
Geo.  III. 

•'  y.C.H.  Northanis.  i,  311  A. 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Vcsp.  Exxii,  f.  94  ;  I'.C.ll. 
Northanis,  \,  31  Ii'',  365(1. 

••  Colt.  MS.  Veip.  E  xxii,  f.  94  ;  Rot. 
Ilund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  8  *  ;  Feud.  Aids, 
iv,  449. 

"  Cal.  Im;.  v,  no.  538  ;  G.E.C.  Com- 
plete Peerage. 

»»  Atsi/e  Roll,  no.  6)2,  f.  76;  Chan. 
Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (i«t  not.),  no.  62; 
ibid.  10  Ric.  II,  no.  3S  ;  ibid.  16  Ric.  II, 
pt.  i,  no.  27;  ibid.  18  Ric.  II,  no.  43; 
ibid.  4  Hen.  IV,  no.  41  ;  Cal.  Pat. 
1401-05,  p.  349. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  xxx,  117  j 
G.E.C.  Comptrle  Peerage. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


THRAPSTON 


In  1086,  Odelin  held  this  land  of  the  Bishop,"  and 
his  son  Robert  was  the  tenant  under  the  Clares  early  in 
the  I2th  century.*'*  Towards  the  end  of  the  century 
the  tenant  was  Riclurd  de  Marun,^  but  it  is  difficult 
to  trace  the  descent  of  the  land  in  Thrapston.  In  1236 
Maud,  the  wife  of  William  Hay,  was  dealing  with  land 
in  Thrapston,  and  in  1242  William  Hay  held  an  eighth 
part  of  a  knight's  fee  there  and  in  Denford.'"  Be- 
tween 1252-3  and  1263,  William  de  Shardclawe  and 
his  wife  Joan  were  parties  to  various  fines  levied  on 
land  in  Thrapston  which  were  part  of  her  inheritance.'" 
The  next  tenants  seem  to  have  been  John  Spigurnel 
and  his  wife  .Mice.''^  In  1310,  they  settled  a  con- 
siderable estate  in  Thrapston,  Woodford  and  Den- 
ford  on  themselves  and  the  heirs  of  their  bodies,  with 
remainder  of  John,  son  of  Roger  Bozun.**  Before 
1330,  John  Bozun  sold  one  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee  in 
Thrapston  to  Bernard  de  Brus,  the  son  of  John  de 
Brus  of  Thrapston.*''  Athelina,  daughter  of  Ber- 
nard, is  mentioned  in  1367  in  connection  with  other 
property,*'  but  the  next  tenants  were  William 
Everard  de  Sutton  in  Holand  and  his  wife  Alice,  who 
settled  the  manor  of  Thrapston  in  1379  on  Hugh 
Hekclyng  and  Richard  Gcttyngton,  clerks,  with 
warranty  by  the  heirs  of  Alice.*'  In  1387,  amongst 
the  tenants  of  the  half  fee  held  of  Hugh,  Earl  of 
Stafford,  appear  Alice  Vere,  possibly  identical  with 
Alice  Everard,  and  Henry  Petelyng,  clerk.*'  In  1392 
they  were  succeeded  by  Margery  Table,**  in  1394  and 
1396  by  William  Braunspath,**  but  in  1401  Margery 
Table  reappears.^  No  further  tenants  are  recorded 
till  15 1 5,  when  William  Thorley  died  seised  of  two 
virgates  of  land  and  other  property  in  Thrapston, 
held  of  the  Duke  of  Buckingham,  his  heir  being  his 
son  Richard.*'  This  holding,  however,  can  only  have 
been  a  small  part  of  the  lands  attached  to  the  manor 
of  Thrapston,  and  presumably  they  had  passed  into 
the  hands  of  many  tenants.  They  seem,  however, 
again  to  have  come  into  the  possession  of  one  tenant 
and  the  manorial  rights  revived,  possibly  when  the 
over-lordship  passed  to  the  Crown.** 

In  1574  the  manor  of  THR.4PST0N,  alias 
THRAI'&JON  G  4LES,  was  held  by  John  Gale,  and 
was  possibly  the  manor  formerly  held  of  the  honour 
of  Clare.  Gale  sold  it  to  Henry  Daye,"  who  in 
turn  sold  it  in  1575  to  Lewis,  Lord  Mordaunt.**  In 
1582  the  latter  obtained  a  quit-claim  of  the  manor 
from  Anthony  Muscott  and  his  wife  Ellen,  presum- 
ably the  heir  either  of  John  Gale  or  Henry  Daye.** 
From  this  time  the  manor  of  Thrapston  Gales  was 
held  with  Thrapston  manor  (j.e/.).** 


The  tenant  of  the  land  held  of  the  Honour  of  Clare 
did  suit  at  the  .Abbot  of  Peterborough's  court  for 
Navisford  Hundred."  The  Earl  of  Gloucester  also 
held  a  view  of  frankpledge,  pleas  '  de  namio  vctito,' 
and  the  assizes  of  bread  and  ale  for  his  tenants  at 
Thrapston.**  He  also  had  the  return  of  writs,**  and 
his  successors  held  a  view  of  frankpledge  and  a  court, 
generally  at  Denford,  for  their  tenants  of  the  half  fee 
in  Thrapston,  Denford  and  Ringstead.*"  In  the  early 
part  of  the  l8th  century  the  Duke  of  Montagu  held 
the  court  of  Navisford  Hundred  at  Thrapston." 

In  1205  Baldwin  de  Vere  gave  two  palfreys  for  the 
privilege  of  having  a  market  every  Tuesday,'-  and  his 
market  rights  were  specially  reserved  to  him  in  the 
agreement  as  to  view  of  frankpledge  made  with  the 
Abbot  of  Peterborough.'*  Ralph  de  Vere  in  1330 
claimed  the  market  under  a  charter  of  Henry  111,'* 
and  presumably  the  succeeding  lords  of  the  manor  of 
Thrapston  held  a  market  there,  as  it  was  in  the 
possession  of  Sir  John  Germaine  and  his  wife  in 
1706.**  It  was  not  mentioned  in  the  sale  of  the 
manor  in  1770"  to  Leonard  Burton,  and  in  1870  the 
Thrapston  Market  Co.  was  formed  by  Act  of  Parlia- 
ment, in  which  all  control  and  profit  of  the  market 
and  of  the  fairs  are  vested.  In  1226  Baldwin  de 
Vere  obtained  a  grant,  until  the  coming  of  age  of 
Henry  III,  of  a  fair  to  be  held  on  the  eve  and  day  of 
St.  Michael."  A  fair  is  now  held  on  the  first  Tues- 
day after  old  Michaelmas  day. 

Robert  de  Vere  obtained  the  grant  of  another  fair 
in  1245  on  the  \igil,  feast  and  morrow  of  St.  James 
the  Apostle.**  A  fair  was  still  held  on  St.  James'  day 
early  in  the  1 8th  century,'*  and  was  afterwards  kept 
on  5  August,  old  St.  James'  day,  but  it  had  fallen  into 
disuse  before  1874.'"  The  second  fair  is  now  held  on 
the  first  Tuesday  in  May. 

The  church  of  ST.  JAMES  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  37  ft.  8  in.  by  19  ft.  4  in., 
with  organ  chamber  and  vestry  on  the 
north  side,  clearstoried  nave,  50  ft.  6  in.  by  20  ft., 
north  and  south  aisles,  each  12  ft.  8  in.  wide,  and  west 
tower,  13  ft.  6  in.  by  11  ft.,  surmounted  by  a  spire. 
All  these  measurements  are  internal.  The  ground 
floor  of  the  tower  forms  the  porch.  The  nave  and 
aisles,"  together  with  the  chancel  arch,  were  entirely 
rebuilt  in  1842  in  the  Gothic  style  of  the  period, 
when  galleries  were  erected  on  three  sides.  The 
galleries  still  remain.  In  1888  an  old  vestry  which 
had  blocked  a  14th  century  window  in  the  chancel 
was  removed,  and  the  present  vestry  built  further 
west.     The   building   throughout  is  of  rubble  with 


•'  J'.C.H.  Noribanli.  i,  31 1  ». 

•»Ibid.  365*. 

"  ERcrton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733  I.  155  d. 

"  Cal.  Close  1234-37,  343  ;  Bk.  of  Feet 
(P.R.O.),  ii,  p.  936- 

*'  Fe«t  of  F.  Northants.  Jlil.  37  Men. 
Ill;  ibid.  Trin.  45  Hen.  Ill;  ibid. 
Trin.  47  Hen.  III. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mil.  22 
F.dw.  I  j  Ciil.  Ituj.  V.  no.  538  j  Ch.in.  Inq. 
p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (lit  noi.),  no.  O2. 

*'  Feet  of  F.N'orthant S.Mich.  4 Edw.  II. 

«•  Assiie  R.  no.  632,  f.  76 ;  Cal.  Close, 

'333-37,  P-  '^(^■ 

"  Cal.  Close,  1364-68,  p.  366. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Hit.  2  Ric.  II. 

*'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  10  Ric.  II,  no   3S. 

•'  Ibid.  16  Ric.  II,  pt.  i,  no.  27. 

«»  Ibid.  iS  Ric.  II,  no.  43  ;  22  Ric.  II, 
no.  46. 


"  Ibid.  4  Hen.  IV,  no.  41. 

**  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxx,  1 17. 

'-  See  above. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  i<>  and 
17  F.liz. 

"  Ibid.  East.  17  Eliz. 

"  Ibid.  nil.  24  Eliz. 

'«  Ibid.  Trin.  22  Jas.  I ;  ibid.  East. 
2  Chas.  I;  ibid.  Ilil.  i  and  2  Jas.  II; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcxxiv,  64. 

"  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  155  d. 

"  Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  S  b ; 
Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  114. 

"  Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  8  b. 

">  Cal.  Inij.  iv,  no.  435  ;  v,  no.  53X  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.), 
no.  62  ;  10  Ric.  II,  no.  38;  22  Ric.  II,  no. 
46;  Cal.  Pal.  1401-05,  p.  349. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Norihanis.  ii,  379. 

"'  Pipe  R.  Northants,  7  John,  m.  21  d. 


"  Swaflham  Reg.  cciii  b. 

"  riac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  500  ; 
I[.-.lstead,  op.  cit.  p.  268. 

«'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  4 
Anne. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  10  Geo. 
III. 

•'  Rot.  Litt.  Claus.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii, 
p.  121. 

•»  Cal.  Chart,  i,  288. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants,  ii,  379. 

'°  Whcllan,  Hist.  Northants^  732. 

'*  'I'he  old  nave  and  aisles  were  appa- 
rently of  14th  century  date.  Bridges 
states  that  before  the  building  of  the  two 
aisles  there  seems,  from  the  difTerence  of 
the  fabric,  to  have  been  a  cross  aisle,  or 
two  chapels,  at  each  end  :  Hist.  0] 
Northants.  ii,  3S0.  No  evidence  of  this 
remains. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


ashlar  dressings,  and  has  low-pitched  roofs  and  plain 
parapets.   The  walls  inside  are  plastered. 

The  chancel  is  substantially  of  the  later  part  of  the 
13th  century,  and  retains  strings,  angle  buttresses, 
priest's  doorway,  and  internally  a  double  piscina  of 
that  date.  The  piscina  has  two  plain  pointed  arches 
set  within  a  larger  arch,  the  tympanum  being  pierced 
with  a  quatrefoil.  In  the  14th  century  an  east 
window  of  five  lights  with  reticulated  tracery  (now 
restored)  was  inserted,  and  long  two-light  windows 
with  transoms  in  the  side  walls.  These  windows, 
two  in  the  south  wall  and  one  in  the  north,  have 
cinquefoiled  lights  and  a  quatrefoil  in  the  head. 
West  of  the  piscina,  below  the  first  window,  are  three 
ogee-headed  sedilia  of  14th  century  date,  with 
crocketed  arches  and  dividing  shafts  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases.  The  seats  are  on  one  level.  The 
sanctuary  was  panelled  in  oak  and  a  reredos  erected 
in  1920  as  a  war  memorial. 

The  14th-century  tower  has  a  battlemcntcd  parapet, 
and  is  of  five  stages  marked  by  strings,  with  diagonal 
buttresses  and  a  vice  at  the  north-east  angle.  The 
west  doonvay  has  a  continuous  series  of  wave 
mouldings  divided  by  deep  casements,  and  over  it  is 
a  two-light  window  with  modern  tracery.  The  bell- 
chamber  windows  are  each  of  two  cinquefoiled 
lights  with  a  quatrefoil  in  the  head.  Below  the 
parapet  is  a  continuous  row  of  square  quatrefoiled 
panels,  and  the  gargoyles  are  set  in  the  middle  of  each 
side.  The  spire  is  without  ribs,  and  has  three  sets 
of  lights  on  each  of  its  cardinal  faces.  The  tower  arch 
is  of  three  chamfered  orders,  the  inner  carried  on 
responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases. 

The  nave  is  of  four  bays,  and  retains  most  of  the 
fittings  of  the  period  of  its  erection.  In  the  west  wall 
is  set  a  stone  with  the  arms 
and  crest  of  Washington.  It 
is  without  inscription,  but  is 
said  to  commemorate  Sir  John 
Washington,  some  members  of 
whose  family  are  buried  in 
the  churchyard.  The  font 
dates  from  1888. 

There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells, 
cast  in  1897  by  John  Taylor 
and  Co.  of  Loughborough.''^ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup 
and  paten  of  1570,  and  a  cup, 
paten,  and  flagon  of  1855, 
given  by  Alfred  Wigan  in  i860.  There  are  also  a 
pewter  flagon,  pewter  plates  and  a  brass  alms 
dish." 

The  registers  before  181 2  are  as  follows:    (i)  bap- 


l^l^tV 


WASiiiNr.TON.  Argent 
ttL'O  bars  itntb  three 
motets  gules  in  the  cbtef. 


tisms,  marriages  and  burials  1560-1640;  (ii)  births  and 
baptisms,  marriages,  and  burials  1653-87,  with  a  few 
earher  notes  (1641-52)  on  one  page  of  births ;  (iii) 
parish  clerk's  paper  register  book  1643-87  ;  (iv)  parish 
clerk's  register  1688-1709;  (v)  baptisms  and  burials 
1709-59,  marriages  1709-54  ;  (vi)  marriages  1754-98  ; 
(vii)  parish  clerk's  book  1761-90;  (viii)  baptisms  and 
burials  1790-95  ;  (ix)  baptisms  and  burials  1796-1812, 
marriages  1798-1812. 

In  the  churchyard  is  the  head  of  a  medieval  grave 
slab  with  cross  patonce. 

The  church  of  St.  James  '*  was 
ADVOWSON  granted  by  Baldwin,  son  of  Gilbert, 
to  the  Abbey  of  Bourne  in  Lincoln- 
shire, which  he  founded  in  1138.'*  The  abbey  held 
the  advowson  until  its  dissolution  in  1534,  but  from 
1422  frequently  granted  away  the  presentation  on  a 
particular  occasion.'*  From  the  Dissolution  till  the 
present  day  the  advowson  has  belonged  to  the  Crown." 
No  vicarage  was  instituted,  but  the  rector  paid  a 
pension  of  4s.  a  year  to  the  abbey .'^  In  1600  Queen 
Elizabeth  granted  certain  tithes  in  Thrapston  formerly 
belonging  to  the  abbey  to  the  Bishop  of  Ely." 

Three  roods  of  land  and  a  fishery  in  the  Neve  were 
given  for  the  maintenance  of  a  light  in  Thrapston 
church,  and  in  1552,  Edward  VI  granted  them  to 
Sir  Thomas  Tresham  and  George  Tresham.** 

Mary  Allen  in  1685  bequeathed  £1 
CHARITIES  a  year  for  poor  widows.  The  sum 
of  ;{|20  which  was  appropriated  to 
answer  this  charity  was  applied  towards  building  a 
poor  house,  and  £1  a  year  was  formerly  paid  out  of 
the  rates  and  distributed  in  bread. 

By  his  will  proved  at  Lichfield  31st  October,  1878, 
Matthias  Royce  Griffin  gave  ^^1,000  to  the  trustees  of 
the  Baptist  Chapel  at  Thrapston  for  the  poor.  The 
sum  was  invested  in  stock  now  represented  by 
^^969  13/.  lid.  India  3^  per  cent.  Stock,  producing 
£33  I9-'-  yearly  in  dividends.  The  income  is  dis- 
tributed in  kind  among  about  50  recipients. 

The  Reynold  Hogg  Fund  is  regulated  by  a  scheme 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  l6th  April,  1924. 
The  property  originally  consisted  of  a  piece  of  land 
in  Church  Street  with  buildings  formerly  used  as  a 
Protestant  Dissenting  Chapel  comprised  in  an  inden- 
ture dated  6  November,  1812.  The  property  was 
sold  in  1924  and  the  proceeds  invested  in  £177  19J.  ^d. 
5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  which  stock  was  made  up  to 
;f20O  by  the  deacons  of  the  Baptist  Chapel  who  were 
appointed  trustees  of  the  scheme.  The  income  is 
applied  for  the  general  purposes  of  the  chapel. 

The  sums  of  stock  are  with  the  Oflicial  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds. 


TITCHMARSH 


Thichemcrs,  Tychcmers  (xiii  cent.),  Tychcmersh, 
Tichmarsh  (xiv  cent.),  Ticiimcrsh  (xvii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Titchmarsh  contains  3,988  acres,  of 


which  more  than  two-thirds  are  under  grass.  The  land 
lies  between  120  ft.  and  175  ft.  above  the  ordnance 
datum.      The  river  Nene  forms  part  of  the  western 


''They  take  the  place  of  3  ring  of 
five,  ihe  inicriplioni  on  which  are  given  in 
North,  Cb.  /fetiioj Nortbantt^^it).  Theie 
brll«  were  rc-cait  and  three  new  onci 
a'lded  ai  a  memorial  of  the  Diamond 
Jubilee  of  Queen  Victoria.  One  of  the  old 
belh  wai  o(  16th  century  date,  and  three 
othcrt  were  dated  reipcctivcly  1634,  1677, 
and  1686. 


"  Markham,  Cb.  Piute  of  Nortbitnts, 
283- 

"  Cal.  Close,  1318-23,  p.  328. 

"  Chart.  K.  I  Edw.  Ill,  m.  24,  no. 
4'- 

"  Ibid.  ;  Rot.ll«g.d,lfellei{C»m.  and 
York  Soc),  i,  169;  ii,  iqo;  iii,  2; 
Koi.  Rob.  Crossttesle  {Cant,  and  York  See), 

142 


226;    Epii.  Reg.  cit.  Bridgci,  op.  cit.  ii, 
380. 

"  P.R.O.  Initit.  Bk».  1628,  1631,  1662, 

1680,  I70(),  171:5,  1789. 

"  Pope  Nub.  Tax  (Rcc.  Com.),  39  *  ; 
I'utor.  F.eeles.  (Rec.  Coin.),  iv,  103. 

"  I'at.  R.  42  V.Wi.  pt.  9,  m.  4. 

•»  Ibid.  5  Edw.  VI,  pt.  7. 


•-^'.SS 


:^?'i^-__.M*i»-«^. 


TiiKAPsroN  Church   from  the   North 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


TITCHMARSH 


boundary  and  the  Thorp  brooL  that  of  the  north 
and  east.  The  sub-soil  is  alluvium,  great  oolite 
series  and  Oxford  clay.  The  parish  was  inclosed 
under  an  Act  of  Parliament  of  1778.'  The  name  of 
Foxholes,  now  a  farm,  is  mentioned  in  1227.' 

The  village  lies  off  the  main  road  from  Northampton 
to  Peterborough,  about  2j  miles  from  Thrapston. 
At  the  north-west  end  of  the  long  village  street  is  the 
church.  Not  far  from  it  is  the  rectory  house,  which 
was  rebuilt  in  1861,  and  has  in  its  garden  a  fine  cedar 
tree  planted  about  1744.'  The  Pickering  almshouses 
are  to  the  south-west  of  the  church  on  the  Denford 
road,  and  form  a  long  one-story  stone  building  with 
dormer  windows,  a  tablet  records  that  "This  Hos- 
pital was  erected  and  endowed  for  the  support  of 
eight  Poor  Persons  by  Mrs.  Dorothy  Elizabeth 
Pickering,  eldest  daughter  of  the  late  Sir  Gilbert 
Pickering,  Bart.,  Anno  Domini  1756."  There  is  a 
modern  extension  at  each  end.*  Near  by  are  two 
blocks  of  cottages  dated  respectively  1742  and 
1750. 

The  old  manor  house  stood  on  the  south  side  of  the 
village  a  quarter  of  a  mile  south-east  ot  the  church,  on 
or  near  a  site  which  has  already  been  described.'  The 
date  of  its  erection  is  not  known,  but  it  may  have  been 
built  of  stone  obtained  from  an  older  house  known  as 
Titchmarsh  Castle,*  which  seems  to  have  been  deserted 
at  the  beginning  of  Queen  Elizabeth's  reign,  and  the 
ruins  of  which  were  taken  down  in  the  1 8th  century.' 
The  earlier  building  would  be  the  house  which  Sir 
John  Lovcl  in  1304  obtained  licence  to  crenellate,' 
and  which  in  the  inquisition  on  his  death  (1346-7) 
was  described  as  moated  round  and  enclosed  with  a 
stone  wall  after  the  manner  of  a  castle.'  In  1363, 
however,  the  castle  is  returned  as  being  in  a  ruinous 
condition,"  and  no  part  of  it  now  remains  above 
ground.  An  excavation  of  the  site  by  Sir  Henry 
Dryden  in  1887,'^  however,  revealed  considerable 
remains  of  the  lower  portion  of  numerous  buildings, 
apparently  of  two  different  periods,  some  of  the  older 
having  been  destroyed  before  the  others  were  erected. 
It  was  found  impossible  from  the  fragmentary  nature 
of  the  remains  and  the  confusion  of  the  plan  to  appro- 
priate the  greater  number  of  the  buildings  or  to  decide 
the  period  of  their  erection.  The  material  was  all  of 
limestone,  and  Sir  Henry  Dryden  was  of  the  opinion 
that  theearliest  buildingon  the  site  had  been  bounded  by 
a  wall  nearly  circular  in  plan,  inclosing  several  irregular 
buildings,  of  which  some  of  the  foundations  uncovered 
were  portions.  This  first  building  he  assumed  to  have 
been  pulled  down  when  the  house  was  reconstructed 


by  Sir  John  I.ovel,  and  he  conjectured  that  it  was  an 
early  castle,  built,  as  he  suggests,  by  the  Ferrers 
f.imily,  but  possibly  by  the  grandsons  or  great- 
grandsons  of  Saswalo,  the  Domesday  holder,  in  the 
latter  part  of  the  l2tli  century.  If  this  was  so,  the 
present  quadrangular  moat  is  of  early  14th  century 
date,  and  belongs  to  Sir  John  Level's  building,  the 
lower  parts  of  whose  external  walls  were  laid  bare 
along  the  greater  part  of  four  sides,  from  12  in.  to 
8  ft.  in  height  above  the  bottom  of  the  moat.  The 
space  inclosed  was  an  irregular  parallelogram,"'  and 
at  three  of  the  angles  were  found  the  foundations  of 
tive-sided  towers  projecting  from  the  walls ;  the 
north-west  angle  had  disappeared.  Boniface  Picker- 
ing died  in  1585  seised  of  a  pasture  called  Castle 
Yard,  with  a  barn  standing  in  it  wliich  was  again 
mentioned  in  1629." 

A  bridge  carrying  the  main  road  to  Peterborough 
over  the  brook  running  into  the  Ncnc  south  of  Thorpe 
station,  has  remains  possibly  of  medieval  work  on  its 
south  side. 

In  the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor, 
MANORS  Bundi  held  freely  10  hides  and  a  portion 
of  a  hide  in  TITCHMARSH.^*  In 
1086  the  land  was  held  by  Henry  de  Ferrers,  ancestor 
of  the  Earls  of  Derby,*'  and 
the  overlordship  of  it  con- 
tinued in  the  possession  of 
the  Earls  of  Derby  as  of  their 
Honour  of  Tutbury  until  the 
forfeiture  of  Earl  Robert  in 
1266."  The  overlordship 
passed  with  the  Honour  to 
Edmund,  Earl  of  Lancaster," 
and  later,  with  the  Duchy  of 
Lancaster,  to  the  Crown.'* 

The  Domesday  under-tenant 
was  named  Saswalo,  who  held 
other  lands  of   the  Ferrers.'' 

This  holding  appears  as  forming  first  one  and  a  half 
knights'  fees,^"and  then  as  two  knights'  fees,^'  through- 
out the  nth  and  12th  centuries.  Sewal,  son  of  Henry, 
held  it  in  I233,''2  and  from  him  it  passed  to  James 
Shirley,  said  to  be  his  son.^*  Shirley  granted  the  mesne 
lordship  to  Gilbert  de  Clare,  Earl  of  Gloucester,"*  but 
presumably  only  for  a  term  of  years,  as  his  son,  Ralph 
Shirley,  had  recovered  the  lordship  by  1286.2'  Between 
1298  and  1302  Ralph  granted  it  to  Bishop  Walter  de 
Langton,  the  Royal  Treasurer.^'  On  the  latter's  death 
it  passed  to  his  nephew,  Edmund  Pevercl,  a  minor  in 
the  wardship  of  the  king."     The  Peverels  continued 


Ff-Rrers.      Argent    six 
horseshoes  sable. 


•  Priv.  Act  of  Pari.  18  Geo.  Ill,  c.  8. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  Trin.  11  Hen. 
III. 

•  N.  and  Q.  cliii,  103.  The  tree  wai 
damaged  by  a  »tonn  in  March  1916  and 
again  in  Jan.  19Z8. 

•At  the  north  end  for  "two  Bedei- 
women,  erected  A.D.  1857  by  donation 
of  the  late  T.  Coalcs,  Esq.'  :  at  the  south 
end  (or  '  two  Bedesmen,  erected  A.D. 
1863.'  The  original  building  hat  four  door- 
wayi  and  eight  windows  on  the  ground 
floor,  and  eight  dormers  in  the  roof. 

»  y.C.H.  Nortbanls.  ii,  413  (under 
■  Homestead  Moats '). 

•  More  correctly  a  fortified  manor- 
house. 

'  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  381. 

•  Cal.  Pat.  1301-7,  p.  290. 


'  .issoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep.  xxi,  245. 

'"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  Ill,  file  14. 

"Assoc.  .Ircb.  Soc.  Rep.  xxi,  243-52- 
See  also  the  measured  drawings  in  the 
Dryden  Collection,  Northampton  Public 
Library. 

"The  measurements  from  outside  to 
outside  of  opposite  walls  are  thus  given  ; 
north-east  side  about  238  ft.,  south-west 
about  257  ft.,  south-east  about  220  ft., 
north-west  about  210  ft. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccix,  33; 
cccclix,  44. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants,  i,  333a.       "  Ibid. 

'•  Ibid.  365*  ,-  Bk.  of  Fees,  i,  495  ;  Cal. 
Inq.  ii,  no.  622  i  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  i,  137. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  Hen.  IV,  no.  29  ; 
ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxxix,  120. 

H3 


"  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  333a. 

"  Bk.  oj  Fees,  i,  495. 

•'  Cal.  Inij.  ii,  no.  622  ;  Bk.  of  Fees,  ii, 
937.  Sewal  had  two  sons,  Henry  and 
Fiilchcr,  and  Fulchcr  also  had  two  sons, 
Henry  and  Sew.il,  the  latter  of  whom  was 
heir  to  his  father  and  uncle.  Cf.  Round 
in  Derbyshire  Arch.  Soc.  "Journ.  1905. 

"And.  Deeds,  D.  286. 

"  E.  P.  Shirley,  Slemmata  Shirleiana, 
362. 

'*  Tear  Books  (Rolls  Ser.),  30-31 
Edw.  I,  p.  8. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  ii,  no.  622. 

■'  Ibid,  iii,  p.  302  ;  v,  no.  263  ;  Tear 
Books  (Rolls  Ser.),  30-31  Edw.  I,  p.  8. 

*'  Cal.  Iruj.  vi,  no.  330  (the  inquisition 
enumerates  only  the  lands  held  in  demesne 
by  the  Bishop). 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Shirley.  Paly  or  and 
azure  with  a  quarter 
ermine. 


to  be  the  mesne  lords,-*  but  in  1 363  their  fee  was 
again  in  the  king's  hands,  and  their  rights  seem  to 
have  disappeared  before  1408.^' 

The  Ferrers'  land  in  Titchmarsh  mav  be  identified 
with  the  manor  of  TITCHMARSH,  alias  LOVELLS, 
alias  SOMERSETS.  The  first  tenant  in  demesne  of  the 
manor  recorded   was   Ascelin 
d°  Sidenham,**  who  in    1224 
hjd  a  law  suit  with  the  Abbot 
of  Peterborough  as  to  suit  of 
court  due  from  his  tenants  to 
the  courts  of  the  Hundred  of 
Navisford.^i  He  was  succeeded 
by    William     de     Sidenham, 
who  had  died  before  1233.^'^ 
William's  heir  was   a   minor, 
and  the  wardship  of  his  fees  in 
Titchmarsh   was    granted    by 
Sewal,   son  of  Henry,  to  Sir 
John  de  Plesseys,^^  who  mar- 
ried  William's   widow'*  and  held  there    in    1243.^5 
Maud  de  Sidenham  is  said  to  have  been  William's 
daughter  and  heir  and  to  have  married  John  Lovel 
of    Minster  Lovel,   but    contemporary    evidence    of 
this  does  not  appear.^    John  Lovel  was  undoubtedly 
the    tenant   of  the  manor  in 
1268,^'  and  died  seised  of  it  in 
1287.^  His  son  Sir  John  Lovel 
was  summoned  to  Parliament 
as  Lord  Lovel  of  Titchmarsh 
in  1299  and  his  descendants'* 
held  the  manor  until  the  for- 
feiture of  the  lands  of  Francis, 
Lord  Lovel,  in  1485.40    The 
following     year     the     King 
granted     Lovel's     manor     to 
Charles   Somerset,  afterwards 
Earl     of    Worcester.*^       His 
grandson,    William     Earl     of 

Worcester,  obtained  a  new  grant  of  the  manor  in 
1553,42  and  in  the  same  year  sold  it  to  Gilbert 
Pickering.''^"  Gilbert's  son  John  (d.  1591)  had  a  son 
Gilbert,  who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of . .  .Hogard 
of  Bourn,  in  Cambridgeshire.  He  was  succeeded  in 
1613  by  his  son  John,  who  in  1609  had  married 
Susannah,  daughter  of  Sir  Erasmus  Dryden.'"^  Their 
son,  Sir  Gilbert  Pickering,  was  created  a  baronet  in 


ruwi 
njvu\ 


Lovel  of  Titchmarsh. 
Barry  tvavy  or  and 
gules. 


Pickering.      Ermine  a 
lion  azure  crowned  or. 


1638,  and  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  Sidney 
Montagu.'*'*  He  was  an  ardent  Parliamentarian  and 
chamberlain  to  both  protectors.  He  was  one  of  the 
regicide  judges,  but  did  not  sign  the  death  warrant 
of  Charles  I,  and  obtained  a  pardon  after  the  Restora- 
tion.44*  His  great  grandson,  Sir  Edward  Pickering, 
M.P.,  the  fourth  baronet,  died  unmarried  in  1749,*° 
and  his  estates  passed  to  his  two  sisters,  Elizabeth, 
who  died  unmarried  in  1766,  and  Frances,  afterwards 
the  wife  of  Thomas  Byrd. 
She  also  died  childless  and  a 
widow  in  1765,  and  by  their 
wills  the  sisters  directed  that 
the  Titchmarsh  estate  was  to 
be  sold.'*'  It  seems,  however, 
to  have  been  vested  in  trustees 
before  their  deaths,  as  Frances 
Byrd  conveyed  her  moiety  of 
the  manor  and  advowson  in 
1764  to  Edward  Dickenson,'*' 
while  Elizabeth's  moiety  ap- 
parently was  transferred  to 
Anne  Pye.'**  Before  1778  it 
was  acquired  by  Thomas  Powys,**  whose  descendant, 
Lord  Lilford,  is  now  lord  of  the  manor. 

In  the  early  13th  century,  the  geld  payable  by 
Titchmarsh  was  divided  amongst  the  three  holders  of 
fees  there,  Ascelin  de  Sidenham,  Ralph,  son  of  Ralph, 
and  Robert,  son  of  Thomas.^"  The  holding  of  Ralph, 
son  of  Ralph,  may  probably  be  identified  with  the 
knight's  fee  held  of  John  de  Plesseys  in  1242  by  Ralph 
de  Titchmarsh,  Robert  le  Her  and  William  de 
Suthburc.**  Sir  Ralph  de  Titchmarsh  witnessed  a  deed 
as  to  lands  in  Hemington  in  1264^-  and  Robert 
witnessed  charters  of  a  few  years  later.*'  Ralph  de 
Titchmarsh  whose  heirs  held  a  several  fishery  in  the 
Nene  in  1348  may  have  followed  in  the  descent.''* 
Possibly  the  fee  had  been  divided  before  this,  since 
Sir  John  Lovel's  lands  had  been  considerably  sub- 
infcudated  ;  one  quarter  of  a  fee  was  held  by  Richard, 
son  of  Guy  and  his  wife  Joan,  another  quarter  by 
William  de  Clavbrook  and  his  wife  Elizabeth,  a  third 
quarter  by  Isabel  Drayton  and  two  eighth  parts 
respectively  by  John  de  Seymour  and  the  successors 
of  Simon  ISIullesworth.  It  seems  possible  that  these 
tenants  represented  the  heirs  of  Ralph  de  Titch- 
marsh.'" •" 


"  Feud,  /lids,  ii,  569 ;  Cat.  Inq.  ix, 
no.  44. 

»»  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  36  F.dw.  Ill,  file  14, 
no.  326  ;   ibid.  9  Men.  IV,  no.  29. 

""  Egcrton  MS.  (l).M.),  2733,  f.  155. 

"  Curia  Regis  R.  85,  m.  2.  lie  is  de- 
scribed 38  Ascelin  dc  'ritchm.irsh  of 
Titchmarsh,  but  this  is  probably  a 
mistake.  Although  two  families  n.imed 
Titchmarsh  held  p.irts  of  the  parish,  there 
docs  not  seem  to  have  been  an  Ascelin  nt 
this  time  and  the  defendant  of  the  law- 
suit seems  to  have  been  a  man  of  more 
importance  than  the  Titchmaishes. 

"  Cal.  I'al.  1231-  34,  p.  354  ;  Anct.  D. 
D.  236. 

"  Anct.  Deeds,  D.  286. 

'•  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

»'  Egerion  MS.  (n.M.),  1733,  f.  141  ; 
nk.  of  /■'(■«,  ii,  937. 

••  Aihmole  MS.  (Rodley's  Lib.)  804, 
fl.  31,  42  (evidences  of  the  l.ovel  family). 

"  Hunter,  Rot.  Select.  (Rec.  Com.),  197. 

■*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  I,  file  47,  no.  2. 


"Cal.  Pat.  1 292- 1 3c I,  pp.  44,  45; 
1301-7,  p.  145  i   1396-99,  P-  .=;4'- 

*»  Chan.  In<|.  p.m.  Edw.  II,  file  20, 
no.  14  ;  file  37,  no.  3  ;  Edw.  Ill,  file  84, 
no.  15  ;  Hen.  V,  file  S,  no.  30  ;  Hen.  VI, 
file  158,  no.  I  ;    Cal.  Anct.  D.,  A.  4790. 

*'  Cat.  Pat.  14S5-94,  p.  100;  I'eet  of 
F.  Div.  Cos.  East.  4  and  5  Hen.  VIII  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xlv,  63  ;  G.E.C. 
Complete  Peerage. 

•"  Pat.  R.  7  Edw.  VI,  pt.  3. 

*'»  Recov.  R.  Trin.  7  Edw.  VI,  ro.  516  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mich.  1  Mary. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxxix,  120. 
Bridges,  llilt.  Sorthant).  ii,  3S3,  384. 

*•*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccxlii,  94. 

**  Rridges,  loc.  cit. 

"»CE.C.  ComplcleBaronetage,\\,a2-i. 

"  Ibid.  He  was  son  of  Gilbert  (rf.  173ft), 
son  of  John  (d.  1703),  son  of  Gilbert 
(d.  f6fi8). 

"  Ibid.  ;  J.  Nichols,  Nitl.  and  Aniii].  of 
I.eici.  i,  615;  ii,  664;  cf.  Instit.  Bks. 
(I'.R.O.),  17SI- 

144 


'■  Recov.  R.  East.  4  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  278. 

"  Cf.  Instit.  liks.  fl'.R.U.),  1770. 

"  Pr,v.  .let  of  Pari  18  Geo.  Ill,  cap.  8. 

"»  I-gerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  155; 
n  R.ilph  df  Titchni.irsh  was  li\ing  in  1 199. 
Rot.  Cur.  Rrz.  (Rcc.  Com.),  389. 

*'  Bk.  of  I-'ns,  ii,  937.  Robert  le  Her 
was  probably  Robert  son  of  Ralph  llcrcde 
of  Wiulenhoe  (Hncclcuch  MS.  71). 

6'  UiKcleuch  Deeds,  G.  8. 

^>  Ibid.  ]l.  19,  28  ;    Bwccleuch  MS.  73. 

"  Ch.in.  In.),  p.m.  Kdw.  HI,  file  S4, 
no.  11;.  Sir  Rich.ird  dc  'iiicbni.irsh 
witnessed  deeds  .is  to  lands  at  Kingstliorp 
in  1264  and  Linda  at  Barnwell  c.  1270 
(Rncclcuch  I>rcds,  A.  40,  M.  21).  C'»cnffrcy 
{\c  ritchm.irsh  witnessed  a  deed  as  tol.inds 
iit  IN-min^ton  in  n4(;  (ibid.  A.  71;)  and 
Sir  Richard  W.itrrvilie,  R.dph  de  Titch- 
marsh, (Icoffrey  si>n  of  Rr>gcr  dc  Titch- 
marsh, and  I'ulk  de  Tilchnuirsh  witnessed 
n  ijlh  century  charter  as  to  Unds  at 
l.iHurd  (Uuctlcuch  MS.  20). 

•*  Cal.  Inq.  ix,  no.  393. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


TITCHMARSH 


A  rent  of  20  marks  held  in  1412  by  Nicholas  Mores, 
in  Rothevvell,  Titchmarsh,  and  Glapthorn  may  have 
arisen  from  one  or  more  of  these  portions  of  land  ^'  and 
equally  be  represented  by  the  manor,  later  known  as 
TrRR!NGH.^.MS,  which  was  bouglu  from  John 
Morice  in  1512  by  Thomas  Tyrringham  and  otliers." 
On  the  death  of  Thomas,  the  manor,  which  was  held 
of  Lovel's  manor  by  fealty  only,  passed  to  his  son 
Robert,  a  minor.^'  The  latter  died  in  1532  and  his  heir 
was  his  brother  Thomas,**  who  settled  the  manor  in 
1544  on  Edmund,  his  son,  and  he,  in  1557,  conveyed  it 
to  Thomas,  probably  his  brother.  Apparently,  in  1557, 
it  was  held  by  Boniface  Pickering,''"  the  third  son  of 
the  Gilbert  Pickering,'*  who  had  bought  I.ovel's 
Manor  (j.f.).  In  1583  Boniface  settled  the  manor  on 
his  second  son,  James,  on  his  marriage  with  Anne 
Clifford.  James  obtained  seisin  when  his  father  died 
in  1586.**  He  was  succeeded 
in  1629  by  his  grandson 
Christopher,''  who  owned  the 
manor  in  1655.'^  On  his  death, 
it  seems  to  have  been  divided 
between  his  two  heiresses, 
Anne  the  wife  of  Alexander 
Wilkinson  and  Jane  Picker- 
ing." They  probably  sold  it 
in  1679  to  John  Farrer  and 
William  Sherard,**  who  sold 
it  in  1685  to  John  Creed,  of 
Oundle,"  who  had  married 
Elizabeth,     daughter    of    Sir 

Gilbert  Pickering,  the  lord  of  Lovel's'  manor.  John 
Creed  died  in  1701,  and  his  eldest  son  Major  Richard 
Creed  was  killed  at  the  Battle  of  Blenheim  in  1704."" 
John,  brother  of  Richard,  apparently  succeeded  and 
died  in  1731.*'  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  John,*' 
who  made  a  settlement  of  the  manor,  in  1745,  on 
another  John  Creed,  the  younger.™  In  1766,  the 
property  was  in  the  possession  of  Dr.  William  Walcott 
and  his  wife  Mary,''  the  younger  daughter  of  Col. 
John  Creed  (d.  1751).  Their  son,  William  Walcott, 
died  in  1827 

Margaret,the  daughter  of  Ascelin  de  Sidenham,  the 
tenant  of  Lovel's  manor,  married  Simon  de  Borard 
and  Joan  their  heiress  brought  the  manor  of  Clifton 
Reynes,  iu  Buckinghamshire,  to  her  husband  Thomas 
de  Reynes  about  1293.'-     It  seems  probable  that  she 


Creed.  Azure  a  ch£vc~ 
ron  bet'vccn  three  ytvans 
argent. 


brought  land  in  Titchmarsh  also,  since  in  1 349  Thomas 
de  Reynes,  grandson  of  Thomas  and  Joan  and  Geoffrey 
de  Titchmarsh  held  j\-  of  a  fee  of  Jolin  Lovel.'* 
In  1383,  Sir  Thomas  de  Reynes,  of  Clifton  Reynes, 
son  of  the  last  named  Thomas,  settled  lands  in  Titch- 
marsh and  other  places  on  his  younger  son  Richard'* 
and  in  141 2  Robert  Reynes  had  rents  in  Titchmarsh 
of  z6s.  8d.  a  year,'*  but  this  appears  to  be  the  last 
mention  of  this  holding. 

TITCHM.IRSH  alias  KNOLLES  manor  was  held 
of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough.  In  973,  2 J  hides  of  land 
at  Titchmarsh  are  mentioned  in  a  forged  charter  of 
King  Edgar  to  the  Abbey"  and  in  10S6  it  held  3  hides, 
I  virgate  there."  The  overlordship  is  last  mentioned 
in  1428,'*  but  it  presumably  lasted  till  the  dissolution 
of  the  abbey. 

In  1086,  the  under-tenant  was  Ascelin"  who  may 
be  identified  as  the  ancestor  of  the  de  Watervilles, 
who  held  Thorpe  Waterville  and  Achurch  of  the 
Abbey.*"  In  the  early  13th  century,  the  manor  was 
sub-infeudated*!  and  the  mesne-lordship  followed  the 
descent  of  Thorpe  Waterville  (y.t'.),  Lord  Burghley 
being  the  mesne  lord  in  1590.'''- 

The  manor  was  held  in  demesne  by  a  second  family 
named  Titchmarsh,  but  their  pedigree  is  obscure.  A 
Robert  de  Titchmarsh  was  living  in  1 199*'  and  may 
have  been  the  same  as  Robert  son  of  Thomas,  who 
paid  geld  from  his  fee  in  Titchmarsh  early  in  the  13th 
century.*''  In  1243  he  had  been  succeeded  by  Thomas 
son  of  Robert,  who  held  a  fee  of  Reginald  de  Water- 
ville.** Robert  de  Titchmarsh  was  seised  of  land  in 
Titchmarsh  before  1269*'  and  was  living  in  1280.*' 
His  son  William  was  living  in  1298,**  but  before  1301 
it  seems  to  have  passed  to  Henry  de  Titchmarsh, 
presumably  the  husband  of  the  youngest  Waterville 
heiress.*'  In  1 317,  he  settled  the  manor  of  Titch- 
marsh on  his  elder  son  John,'"  but  he  seems  to  have 
been  living  in  1324.'!  John  was  seised  of  other  family 
property  in  1330'^  and,  in  an  undated  inquisition, 
was  said  to  hold  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Titchmarsh." 
Before  1 348,  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Henry .'^  from 
whom  the  manor  passed  to  Katherine,  the  wife  of 
John  Bray.  Two  parts  of  the  manor  were  acquired 
by  Sir  John  Lovel,  who  died  seised  of  them  in  1408, 
when  the  remaining  third  part  was  held  for  life  by 
Margaret,  widow  of  Henry  de  Titchmarsh  of  the 
inheritance  of  Katherine  Bray.'*     The  Brays'  portion 


•*  Feud.  .iiJs,  vi,  500. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xlvl,  64. 
The  chief  reaion  for  luggciting  that  the 
m.inor  of  Tyrringhams  represented  part 
of  Ralph  de  Titchmarsh**  fee  is  that  a 
free  fishery  was  one  of  the  appurtenances 
of  the  manor  and  that  it  was  held  of 
Lovel's  manor.  For  Tyrringham  descent 
•ee  y.C.H.  Bucks,  iv,  482-3. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xlvi,  43  (i), 

«♦• 
»•  Ibid,  liv,  48  ;   L.  and  P.  Hen.  Fill, 

Tol.   vi,  g.    105   (23). 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  36  Hen. 
VIII  i  ibid.  4  and  5  Ph.  and  Mary  ;  Court 
R.  (P.R.O.)  (Gen.  Ser.),  ptf.  195,  no. 
56. 

•'  Metcalfe,  Vtsil.  Nortbanls.  42. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  25  and 
26  Eliz. ;    Chan.  Inq.  p.m    (Ser.  ii),  ccix, 

33- 

••  Ibid,  ccccxlix,  44. 

•*  Recov.  R.  Mich.  1655,  to.  26  ;  Feet 
of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  165;. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  30  Chas. 
II. 

"  Ibid. 

•'  Ibid.  Mich.  36  Cha..  II ;  Recov.  R. 
Trin.  36  Chas.  II,  ro,io. 

"»  M.I.  in  church. 

"  Did.  Nat.  Biog. 

"  Bridges,  Hist.  Northants,  ii,  384. 

">  Recov.  R.  Trin.  18  and  19  Geo.  II, 
ro.  240. 

"  Recov.  R.  Trin.  6  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  8. 

'  »  V.  C.H.  Bucks,  iv,  3 1 7-8 ;  Lipscombe, 
Hist,  of  Bucks,  iv,  105. 

'*  Cal.  Inq.  ix,  no.  393. 

'«  Close  R.  6  Ric.  II,  pt.  ii,  m.  1 1  rf. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  vi,  500. 

'•  Kemble,  Cod.  Ihpl.  dlxxix. 

"  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  316A,  365*. 

"  Egcrton  MS.  (B.M.)  2733,  f.  134  i; 
Feud.  Aids,  iv,  48. 

'•  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  316*. 

»»  See  p.  136. 

"  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.)  2733,  f.  134  d. 

••Cott   MS.   Vesp.    E    ixii,    f.    113; 

H5 


Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  IV,  file  66,  no.  29  ; 
ibid.  Hen.  V,  file  8,  no.  30  ;  Feud.  Aids,  iv, 
48,  51 ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxxix, 
120. 

"'  Rot.  Cur.  Regis  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  389. 

e«  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  155. 

"  Ibid.  f.  134  d. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  53 
Hen.  III. 

«'  Chron.  Pctroh.  (Camden  Soc),  36. 

«»  Cal.  And.  D.,  A.  1288. 

«»  Coram  Rege  R.  166;  Pytchley,  Bk.  of 
Fees  (Northants  Rec.  Soc),  43  ;  Feud. 
Aids,  iv,  28  ;  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i, 
141  d. 

"Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  II 
Edw.  II. 

»'  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  II,  no.  619. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  3  Edw. 
III. 

••  Cott  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  f.  141  d. 

•«  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  II,  ix,  no.  44. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  IV,  file  66,  no. 
a9- 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


is  not  mentioned  again,'®  but  the  two  parts  acquired 
hj  Sir  John  Lovel  remained  with  his  descendants 
presumably  until  the  forfeiture  of  Francis,  Lord 
Lovel  in  1485."  They  do  not,  however,  seem  to  have 
been  included  in  the  grant  of  Lovel's  manor  (q.v.) 
to  Sir  Charles  Somerset.  Possibly  they  may  be 
identified  with  the  manor  held  in  1532  by  Sir  John 
Mordaunt,  in  right  of  his  wife  EHzabeth'^  and  sold 
by  him  to  William  Saunders,  John  Smyth  and  Thomas 
Saxby.  In  1553,  a  settlement  of  the  manor  was  made 
on  Gilbert  Pickering  and  his  son  John,  to  which 
Roger  Knolles  was  a  party  and  presumably  the  manor 
took  its  name  from  him.*'  From  this  time  the  manor 
of  Knolles  was  held  with  Level's  Manor  by  the 
Pickerings  and  is  last  mentioned  as  a  separate  manor 
in  1638.1 

In  1274  John  Lovel  claimed  free  warren  at  Titch- 
marsh,"  but  it  is  not  mentioned  later.  The  right  of  a 
free  fishery  in  the  Nene  is  mentioned  in  1 3 14  as  parcel 


A  mill  is  mentioned  on  the  land  of  Henry  de  Ferrers 
in  Domesday  Book  and  later'  there  was  a  water-miU 
in  Lovel's  manor'  and  a  windmill  is  mentioned  in 
1330'  and  was  parcel  of  Knolles'  manor  in  1553.' 
A  mill  in  Tyrringham's  manor  is  mentioned  in  1613.^" 

An  interesting  custom  of  Lovel's  manor  is  recorded 
in  1350  that  each  of  the  bond  tenants  with  his  wife 
dined  with  the  lord  on  Christmas  Day  and  that  each 
dinner  was  worth  ■^d.  At  the  same  date  a  common 
oven  is  mentioned.^^ 

In  1305,  Edward  I  granted  the  second  John  Lovel 
a  weekly  market  on  Mondays  and  an  annual  fair  to  be 
held  on  the  eve  and  day  of  Trinity  Sunday  and  on  the 
seven  days  following.''' 

The  Church  of  ST.   MART  THE 

CHURCH       riRGlX^'  consists  of  chancel  42  ft. 

6  in.  by  18  ft.  9  in.,  with  north  aisle  or 

chapel  31  ft.  10  in.  by  15  ft.  8  in.,  clearstoried  nave  of 

three  bays  50  ft.  6  in. by  21  ft.  8  in.,  north  and  south 


%m^'=^mf~^^. 


■  I31i!  Century 

■  142!  Century 
^152  Century 

E3  Subsequent  6.  Modern 


Scale  of  Feet 


Plan  of  Titchmarsh  Church. 


of  Level's  manor'  and  in  1348  it  was  said  to  be  several 
except  that  the  parson  of  Titchmarsh,  Henry  de 
Titchmarsh,  then  tenant  of  Knolles'  manor,  and  the 
heir  of  Ralph  de  Titchmarsh,  had  the  right  to  fish 
from  the  river  bank.''  The  free  fishery  attached  to 
Tyrringham's  manor  (g.v.)  is  referred  to  in  the  17th 
and  18th  centuries.' 


aisles  each  12  ft.  3  in.  wide,  short  north  transept, 
south  porch,  and  lofty  west  tower  17  ft.  6  in.  square, 
all  these  measurements  being  internal.  There  is  a 
small  modern  vestry  north  of  the  chancel  aisle. 

No  part  of  the  existing  structure  appears  to  be 
older  than  the  13th  century,  but  the  rear  arch  of  the 
priest's    doorway    is    a    12th    century    semi-circular 


••  It  ii  pojsibic  thnt  the  Jrd  part  of 
the  m.Tnor  of  RancBic  in  the  town  of 
Titchmarih  of  which  John  de  Styude 
.Tnd  Katherinc  his  wife  held  the  reveriion 
in  1381,  might  be  identical  with  thii 
portion  of  the  manor,  hut  (he  life  tenant! 
who  were  in  iciiin  were  different.  Cf. 
Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  caic  178,  file  86. 
no.  31. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Hen.  V,  file  8,  no. 
30;   Cat.  Pat.  i485-()4,  p.  100. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  24  Hen. 
VIII. 


"  Ibid.  nil.  6  and  7  Edw.  VI. 
'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccixix,  120  ; 
cccxvi,   61;     cccxiii,   94;     ccccxlvi,   84; 
Rccov.  R.  Mich.  12  Ja«.  I,  ro.  142  ;    Feet 
of  F.  Northanti.   Trin.  14  Chai.  I. 

*  Roi.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.),  ii,  8*. 
•Chan.    Inq.   p.m.   Edw.    II,  file   37, 

no.  3. 

*  Ibid,  file  84,  no.  15. 

'  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  30  Chai. 
n  i  ibid.  Mich.  36  Chai.  II  ;  Reco».  R. 
Trin.  18  and  19  Ceo.  II,  ro.  240. 

*  y.C.H.   Northanti.   i,   333a  ;     Chan. 


Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  II,  file  37,  no.  3  ;    ibid. 
Edw.  Ill,  file  84,  no.  15. 

'  Rccov.  R.  Mich.  20  Chat,  II,  ro.  225  ; 
ibid.  Trin.  3  Will,  and  Mary,  ro.  173  j 
ibid.  East.  4  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  278  (two  watcr- 
milli) ;  ibid.  Mich.  6  Geo.  IV,  ro.  265. 
'  Aiiiie  R.  632,  f.  yid. 
'  I'ect  of  F.  Northanti.  Ilil.  6  and  7 
Edw.  VI. 

">  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  10  Jai.  I. 
"  Cal.  Ihj.  Edw.  IH,  ix,  no.  664. 
'•  Chart.  R.  33  Edw.  I,  m.  12  (66). 
'"  Aiiiie  R.  635,  m.  56d. 


146 


w 


H 


u 

X 


^iSi:      :^ 


^^       4 


U 


H 


NAVISFORD  HUNDRED 


TITCHMARSH 


arch  re-used,  and  in  all  probability  a  12th  century 
church  stood  on  the  site  consisting  of  an  aislcless 
nave  and  chancel.  The  first  extension  was  probably 
made  by  the  Lovel  family,  in  1250,  by  adding  an  aisle 
on  the  north  side  and  by  lengthening  the  cliancel  to 
its  present  extent.  The  chapel  is  also  of  the  same 
period  and  seems  to  have  been  part  of  the  original 
re-building.  .'\  south  aisle  was  added,  or  a  former  one 
rebuilt,  early  in  the  14th  century,  and  a  little  later 
the  north  aisle  was  rebuilt  in  its  present  form  and 
the  transept  added.  The  tower,  clearstory  and  porch 
were  additions  of  the  15th  century,  at  whicli  period 
new  windows  were  inserted  in  the  chancel,  aisles, 
and  chapel,  the  building  then  assuming  its  present 
appearance.  Tliere  were  restorations  in  1840-3  and  in 
1866,  and  in  1926  a  chancel  screen  and  new  pulpit 
were  erected.  Tlie  tower,  which  is  about  loo  ft.  higli, 
has  lately  been  repaired. 

The  tower  is  faced  with  wrought  Weldon  stone,  but 
the  rest  of  the  building  is  of  rubble  with  wrought 
stone  buttresses  and  dressings.  The  parapets  of 
the  chancel  and  clearstory  are  battlemented,  but  else- 
where plain,  and  the  roofs,  which  are  modern,  are  of 
low  pitch,  leaded.  The  porch  has  a  chamber  over,  at 
one  time  used  as  the  pew  or  '  gallery  '  of  the  Pickering 
family,'^  and  said  to  have  been  connected  by  an  over- 
head passage  with  the  manor-house,  which  then  stood 
immediately  to  the  south  of  the  church.  The 
chamber  is  now  inaccessible,  the  openings  having 
long  been  blocked  :  the  chimney  from  the  fireplace 
remains  on  the  west  side. 

The  walls  of  the  chancel  and  the  arcade  opening  to 
the  chapel  '*  on  its  north  side  are  of  13th  century  date 
and  the  walls  of  the  chapel  are  probably  contemporary, 
but  with  one  exception  aU  the  windows  are  15th 
century  insertions.  The  four-centered  east  window 
is  of  five  lights  with  perpendicular  tracery,  and  in  the 
south  side  are  three  windows  of  similar  type  but  of 
three  lights.  The  pointed  13th  century  priest's 
doorway  has  a  plain  continuous  chamfer  ;  the  rear- 
arch  already  referred  to  is  ornamented  with  chevrons. 
The  piscina  is  original,  with  trefoiled  head  and  stone 
shelf  above  the  bowl,  but  the  sedilia  are  formed  in  the 
sill  of  the  easternmost  window  at  two  levels.  Below 
the  westernmost  window  is  a  blocked  rectangular 
low-side  opening,  and  in  the  north  wall  at  the  east 
end  is  a  restored  recess  similar  to  that  of  the  piscina. 
West  of  this  a  low  pointed  13th  century  doorway, 
now  blocked,  led  to  what  appears  to  have  been  a 
priest's  room,  or  sacristy,  the  lean-to  roof  of  which  was 
below  the  sill  of  the  late  1 3th  century  two-light  window 
with  forked  mullion  at  the  east  end  of  the  north  wall 
of  the  chancel.  The  greater  length  of  this  wall  is 
open  to  the  chapel  by  an  arcade  of  two  arches  springing 
from  a  cylindrical  pier  and  half-round  responds,  all 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  nail-head 
occurring  in  the  former.  The  lofty  chancel  arch  was 
rebuilt  in  the  15th  century,  but  the  north  jamb  to  a 
height  of  about  7  ft.  is  original.*''* 

The  chapel  had  originally  an  east  window  of  two 


lights,  which  was  refashioned  in  the  15th  century 
into  one  of  four  lights,  using  the  old  hood-mould,  the 
jambs  re-used  for  the  wider  opening  and  the  sill 
lowered  :  it  has  external  shafted  jambs  with  delicately 
carved  capitals  at  its  original  13th  century  springing. 
A  three-liglit  window  in  the  north  wall  has  been 
blocked.  The  original  piscina  in  the  south-east 
corner  was  cut  through  in  the  14th  century  to  form  a 
squint  from  the  chapel  ;  the  openings  on  either  side 
have  cusped  heads  and  moulded  jambs.  The  chapel 
is  open  to  the  north  aisle  of  the  nave  by  a  13th  century 
arch. 

The  north  arcade  of  the  nave  has  arches  springing 
from  cylindrical  piers  and  half-round  responds,  all 
with  moulded  bases  and  capitals,  in  the  latter  of  which 
the  nail-head  occurs.  The  14th  century  south  arcade 
is  generally  of  the  same  character,  the  piers  having 
moulded  bases,  but  the  capitals  have  boldly  carved 
upturned  leaf  ornament,  and  the  mouldings  are  later 
in  character  and  without  the  nail-head. 

The  moulded  north  doorway  belongs  to  the  14th 
century  rebuilding  of  the  aisle,  but  has  been  restored  : 
west  of  it  is  a  restored  window  with  intersecting 
tracery,  and  in  the  west  wall  a  square-headed  window 
of  two  trefoiled  lights.  The  other  window  and  that  in 
the  transept  are  15th  century  insertions.  In  the 
south  aisle  all  the  windows  are  15th  century  insertions 
with  four-centered  heads,  cinquefoiled  lights  and 
perpendicular  tracery,  similar  in  type  to  those  of  the 
clearstory,  of  which  there  are  five  on  each  side. 

In  the  south  aisle,  between  the  two  easternmost 
windows,  is  a  14th  century  tomb  recess  **  with  pointed 
arch  of  two  hollowed  orders,  containing  a  13th  century 
grave  slab  with  floriated  cross.  The  south  doorway 
is  a  modern  restoration.  A  scroll  string  runs  round 
the  south  aisle  externally,  and  the  buttresses  are  of 
an  early  type  with  gabled  heads. 

The  magnificent  west  tower  is  of  a  type  uncommon 
in  the  county,  being  rather  akin  to  the  towers  of 
Somersetshire.  It  is  of  four  stages,  with  open  para- 
pets and  lofty  angle  and  intermediate  pinnacles.  The 
two  lower  stages  are  blank  on  the  north  and  south 
but  in  the  third  stage  is  a  pointed  two-light  window 
with  transom  at  half-height,  and  the  double  bell- 
chamber  windows**  are  of  the  same  type,  the  thick 
dividing  mullion  between  them  being  carried  up  the 
face  of  the  wall  to  form  the  intermediate  pinnacle. 
Ornament  is  chiefly  concentrated  in  the  ground 
story  and  upper  stage,  there  being  a  triple  band  of 
quatrefoils  in  circles  above  the  moulded  plinth,  and  on 
either  side  of  the  west  doorway  a  pointed  niche  with 
straight-sided  crocketted  hood-mould.  There  are 
also  canopied  niches  in  the  second  and  third  stages  on 
the  west  side,  all  the  niches  being  filled  with  modern 
statues.  The  moulded  arch  of  the  doorway,  which  has 
an  ogee  crocketted  label,  is  set  within  a  rectangular 
frame,  the  spandrels  of  which  are  filled  with  blank 
shields  in  quatrefoils.  The  vice  is  in  the  south-west 
angle  and  is  lighted  by  quatrefoil  openings.  The 
four-centered  west  window  is  of  three  cinquefoiled 


"  Bridget,  Hut.  Norlhants.  ii,  385. 

'*  Possibly  the  chapel  of  St.  James 
mentioned  in  wilts  of  1521.  Ex  inf. 
Canon  Luckock.  Now  used  as  an  organ 
chamber. 

'**  One  of  the  stones  at  the  base  was 
part  of  a  Norman  capital  inverted.  Ex 
inf.  Canon  Luckock. 


*^  The  recess  was  opened  out  in  the 
restoration  of  1866.  Possibly  it  was  the 
tomb  of  one  of  the  Lovcls  who  probably 
rebuilt  the  church. 

*•  The  windows  are  now  filled  with 
open  brickwork  set  diagonally ;  the 
windows  in  the  third  stage  are  similarly 
treated  on  the  north  and  aouth ;   oa  the 

H7 


east  and  west  they  are  blocked.  On  the 
south  side  of  the  tower  is  a  painted  sun- 
dial dated  1798,  the  gnomon  gone,  and 
lower  down  the  disused  clock  face  made 
by  George  Eayre  in  1745.  The  present 
clock  with  quarter  chimes  was  installed 
in  1886. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


lights,  with  double  transoms  and  perpendicular 
tracery.  The  lofty  arch  to  the  nave  is  of  three  hollow 
orders,  the  two  inner  resting  on  embattled  imposts, 
below  which  the  jambs  are  moulded. 

The  15th  centur)'  font  consists  of  an  octagonal 
panelled  bowl  and  plain  pedestal.  Bridges  records 
some  old  glass,i'  but  this  has  disappeared. 

At  the  east  end  of  the  south  aisle  is  a  medijeval 
grave  slab,  re-used  in  the  17th  century,  inscribed 
round  the  verge  in  Lombardic  characters — '  Margery 
la  femme  Johan  ci  Dieu  de  sa  alme  eyt  mercy.'^* 

In  the  north  chapel  is  a  mural  monument  to  Sir 
John  (d.  1703),  Sir  Gilbert  (d.  1735),  and  Sir  Edward 
Pickering  (d.  1749),  baronets,  and  other  members 
of  the  family  down  to  1766  ;  and  a  table  tomb  to 
John,  eldest  son  of  Sir  Gilbert  Pickering,  who  died  in 
1703  in  his  eighth  year.  The  chapel  also  contains  two 
wooden  mural  tablets  painted  by  Mrs.  Elizabeth 
Creed,  the  first  about  1710^*  in  memory  of  her  brother 
the  Rev.  Theophilus  Pickering,  D.D.,  Prebendary 
of  Durham,  and  successively  rector  of  Gateshead  and 
Sedgefield,  who  died  in  1710  :-*  the  second  in  1722  in 
memorv  of  her  cousin  John  Dryden,  and  his  parents 
Erasmus  Dryden  and  Mary  Pickering,  which  is  sur- 
mounted by  a  wooden  bust  of  the  poet.-' 

The  east  end  of  the  south  aisle,  which  was  the 
burial  place  of  the  Creed  family  and  formerly  enclosed 
by  a  wooden  screen,^  contains  mural  monuments  to 
John  Creed  of  Oundle  (d.  lyci),  '  a  wise,  learned, 
pious  man,'  who  '  served  His  Majesty  King  Charles 
ye  II  in  divers  Honorable  employments  at  home  and 
abroad  '  ;23  his  wife  Elizabeth  (d.  1728),  daughter  of 
Sir  Gilbert  Pickering  ;-••  his  son  Richard  who  was 
kiUed  at  Blenheim  in  1704  ;25  and  his  daughter 
Jemima  (d.  1705).  In  another  part  of  the  aisle  is  a 
monument  to  Colonel  John  Creed  (d.  1 751)  who 
'  served  under  the  Duke  of  Marlborough  in  the 
wars  during  the  reigns  of  King  William  and  Queen 
Ann.' 

There  are  three  scratch  dials  on  the  south  side  of 
the  church,  (i)  on  porch,  (ii)  on  gable  of  middle 
buttress  of  aisle,  and  (iii)  on  lower  stage  of  angle 
buttress  of  chancel. 

There  were  formerly  six  bells  in  the  tower,  but  two 
trebles  were  added  in  1885,  and  the  whole  eight  recast 
in  1913  by  Gillett  and  Johnson,  of  Croydon.-* 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup  and  cover  paten  of 


1670,  another  cup  and  cover  paten  of  1674,  ^  flagon 
of  1670  (inscribed  '  1671  '),  and  a  silver  alms-dish  of 
1836,  given  in  1837  by  the  Hon.  and  Rev.  L.  Powys, 
recto.  .^' 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i) 
baptisms  1544-1651,  marriages  1556-1646,  burials 
1543-4,  1556-1646;  (ii)  all  entries  1653-1715  ;  (iii) 
baptisms  1715-1789,  marriages  1715-1754,  burials 
1715-1787;  (iv)  baptisms  and  burials  1789-1812;  (v) 
marriages  I7r5-l8l2.  There  are  two  volumes  of 
churchwardens' accounts :    (1)1730-1766;    (ii)   1779- 

The  church  of  St.  Mary  the  Virgin^* 
ADVOWSON  is  a  rectory,  of  which  the  advowson 
was  held  by  the  lord  of  Lovel's 
manor  since  the  early  13th  century.-'  The  first 
recorded  presentation  was  by  Ascelin  de  Sidenham  in 
1224.5"  At  the  present  day.  Lord  Lilford  is  patron.  In 
1616,  Sir  John  Pickering  sold  the  next  presentation 
to  Lord  Say  and  Sele,^'  who  presented,  together  with 
Robert  Horseman  in  1633,'-  while  in  1660,^  presum- 
ably before  Sir  Gilbert  Pickering,  the  Parliamentarian, 
obtained  his  pardon,  a  presentation  was  made  by  the 
Crown.  The  rector  of  Achurch,  in  1291,  had  a 
portion  in  the  rectory  worth  ^i  a  year.^'" 

The  free  chapel  of  St.  Stephen^*  founded  by  John, 
son  of  John  Lovel,  is  first  mentioned  in  1293^*  and 
was  a  chantry  chapel  in  the  castle  or  manor  of  Titch- 
marsh.  It  was  served  by  a  chaplain  presented 
by  the  lords  of  Lovel's  manor,^'  the  last  recorded 
presentation  being  by  Alice,  the  widow  of  William, 
Lord  Lovel  in  1462.^'  No  chantry  certificate  exists 
and  presumably  the  Somersets  retained  possession  of 
the  Chantry  lands,  though  the  latter  and  some  of  the 
demesne  lands  called  Somerset's  lands  were  later 
separated  from  Lovel's  manor.  They  came  into  the 
possession  of  Boniface  Pickering,  who  died  seised 
of  the  Chantry  lands  in  1586,  which  were  held  in  chief 
of  the  Crown.^  The  lands  presumably  passed  with 
Tyrringham's  manor  {q.v.)  to  the  Creeds,  but  they 
did  not  include  the  Chapel  itself  and  the  Chapel  Hill, 
which  were  held  by  James  Pickering,  the  second  son  of 
the  first  Gilbert  Pickering.  On  his  death  in  1602 
they  passed  to  his  grandson  William  Bury,^*  who  is 
said  to  have  sold  them  again  to  the  Pickerings.*' 
Bridges  mentions  the  Chapel  Hill  in  the  centre  of  the 
village  in  the  early  l8th  century.*' 


•'  Hist.  Norihanis.  ii,  385.  In  the  lower 
window,  south  aisle,  the  effigy  of  a  woman 
'  Mar^areta  Hlythc,'  and  in  tfiis  and  the 
adjoining  window  were  *  snints,  a  king, 
a  bishop,  and  an  old  man.*  In  the  east 
window  of  the  same  aisle  '  a  parson 
praying  '  with  the  inscription  '  Lord  God 
who  sittcst  on  Thy  t?nc  have  fiici  on 
Thos,  Criston.' 

*•  The  inscription  is  now  partly  covered, 
but  is  recorded  by  Bridges ;  the  slab  was 
re-uscd  in  1691,  and  again  in  1765  (for 
John  Creed,  jun.). 

"  The  inscription  records  that  she  was 
lixty-cight  when  the  tablet  was  erected. 

*°  He  was  son  of  Sir  Oilbert  Pickering, 
born  1662,  buried  at  Sedgefield,  co.  Dur- 
ham. The  inscription,  which  is  a  very  long 
one,  is  given  in  Itridgcs,  op.  cit.  ii,  3K7. 

"  He  is  described  as  '  the  celebrated 
Poet  and  Laureate  of  his  time.'  The 
inscription  consists  of  sixty-four  lines, 
and  was  executed  by  Mrs.  Creed  in  her 
eightieth  year. 


"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  3S5. 

"  He  was  Secretary  to  the  Commis- 
sioners for  Tangier. 

^*  She  painted  the  tablets  recorded 
above. 

''  There  is  a  monument  to  M.ijor  Creed 
in  Westminster  Abbey  (south  aisle  of 
nave).  He  was  interred  on  tlu  field  of 
battle. 

**  Four  of  the  old  bells  were  cast  by 
Henry  Ha^Icy  of  F.cton,  1688,  the  tenor 
was  by  Henry  Penn  of  Peterborough,  1708, 
^nd  the  third  by  l-'dward  Arnold  of  St. 
N^ots,  178 r.  The  inscriptions  are  given 
in  North,  Cb.  Dells  oj Northann.  420;  only 
two  have  been  retained  on  the  new  bells. 

•'  Markham,  Ch.  I'laUaJNortbants.  284. 

"  Assise  R.  632,  f.  751/. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  dc  H'cUcs  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  119,  215;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
Edw.  II,  file  37,  no.  3  1  F.dw.  HI,  file  84, 
no.  15;  ibid.  Hen.  VI,  file  6;  Common 
Pleas,  Rccov.  Trin.  7  Edw.  VI  ;  Recov. 
Mich.  12  Jai.  I,  ro.  142  ;   East. 4  Ceo.  HI, 


ro.  27S  ;  Mich.  6  Geo.  IV,  ro.  265 ; 
Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.),  1631,  1648,  1751, 
1770,  17SS. 

"  Rol.  Hug.  dc  irdles  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  119. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccccxlvi,  84. 

"Instit.  Bks.  (I'.R.O.),  1633. 

•>  Ibid.  1660. 

>'»  Pope  .\'iih.  Tax.  (Rcc.  Com.),  39*. 

"  Cal.  I'm.  1327-30,  p.  319. 

"  Line.  Fpis.  Rep.  Inst.  D.ilderby  Lilt 
of  Instit.,  Bridges,  Hist.  NorthntttSy  ii,  388. 

"■  Line.  Epis.  Rog.  Inst.  Chedworth, 
fol.  651/;  List  of  Instit.,  Bridges,  Hist. 
h'orthiints,  ii,  388;  Cal.  Pat.  1327-1330, 
pp.  319,  324;  ibid.  1350-54,  p.  Sof'i 
Cal.  Inq.  ix,  no.  393  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
Edw.  HI,  file  84. 

"  List  of  Instit.,  Bridges,  Hitl. 
NoTthanis.  ii,  388. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  ccix,  33. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cclxxxiv,  97. 

*"  Bridges,  Htit.  Nertbanti.  ii,  383,  384. 

"Ibid. 


148 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


WADENHOE 


In  1672,  George  Foule  obtained  licence  to  use 
James  Cole's  house  and  barn  at  Titchmarsh  as  a 
Congregational  Chapel.''^  There  is  now  a  Wesleyan 
chapel  in  the  parish. 

The  Hospital  or  Almshouses 
CHARITIES  founded  by  Dorothy  Elizabeth 
Pickering  and  Frances  Byrd  by  in- 
dentures dated  I  and  2  January,  1756,  consist  of  The 
Almshouses  in  Titchmarsh  and  a  farm  of  210a.  ir.  6p. 
at  Molesvvorth,  Huntingdonshire,  let  for  ^^165, 
including  sporting  rights.  The  property  and  the 
following  subsidiary  charities  are  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  6  June, 
1882.  Mrs.  Francis  Byrd  by  her  will  and  codicil 
gave  ;^i, 500  Bank  Annuities, now  Consols, and  produc- 
ing ^■^-j  los.  yearly,  for  the  benefit  of  the  Hospital. 
Thomas  Knight  by  his  will  proved  at  York,  19  June, 
1858,  gave  £900.  This  sum  was  invested  in  ^^839  3^.3^/. 
India  5  per  cent,  now  3^  per  cent.  Stock  producing 
j^29  7/.  4</.  yearly.  Thomas  Attenborough  by  Declar- 
ation of  Trust  1  September,  1 891,  gave  £1,000,  which 
was  invested  in  ;^i,047  2s.  ^d.  India  3  per  cent.  Stock 
producing  £11  %s.  yearly.  The  Almshouses  are 
managed  by  a  body  of  trustees  consisting  of  the  rector 
and  five  others.  The  full  number  of  almswomen  is 
twelve  and  during  the  year  ended  30  June,  1924, 
j^l34  15^.  was  applied  in  stipends,  ^{^33  os.  i^d.  in 
firing,  £2^  los.  ^d.  in  clothing,  £()  \os.  in  nursing  and 
medical  attendance  for  inmates. 


By  his  will  dated  30  March,  1697,  Edward  Pickering 
gave  £300  to  the  poor.  The  money  was  laid  out  in 
the  purchase  of  land  let  for^^is  yearly  and  17a.  3r.  I4p. 
let  in  allotments  and  producing  about  £\i  yearly. 
The  sporting  rights  arc  let  to  Lord  Lilford  for  j^i  10/. 
yearly.  The  charity  is  known  as  The  Non- 
ecclesiastical  Charity  and  is  regulated  by  the  scheme 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners  regulating  the  Alms- 
houses and  the  trustees  consist  of  those  for  the 
Almshouses,  together  with  five  trustees  appointed  by 
the  Parish  Council.  The  income  is  applied  in  sub- 
scriptions to  the  local  coal  and  clothing  clubs,  in 
urgent  relief  of  poor  and  in  subscriptions  to  hos- 
pitals. 

An  allotment  of  five  acres  of  land  was  set  out  upon 
the  inclosure  of  the  open  fields  in  or  about  the 
year  1 778  in  lieu  of  land  formerly  appropriated  to 
the  use  of  the  church.  The  land  is  let  to  Mr.  A. 
Abbott  for  £10  yearly  which  is  applied  by  the 
churchwardens  in  the  maintenance  and  upkeep  of  the 
church. 

By  her  will  proved  in  P.R.  23  June,  1887,  Caroline 
Powys  bequeathed  £s°°  ^o  ^^^  rector  and  two  other 
trustees  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor.  The  endowment 
consists  of  £534  L.  and  N.E.R.  3  per  cent.  Debenture 
Stock  and  the  income,  amounting  to  £16  o;.  6d.,  is 
applied  in  doles  to  about  40  aged  poor. 

The  several  sums  of  stock  are  with  the  Official 
Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 


WADENHOE 


Wadenho  (xi  cent.)  ;  VVadenhowe  (xii  cent.) ;  Wad- 
denhoo,  Wandenhoe  (xiii-.\vii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Wadenhoe  is  bounded  on  the  south- 
east by  the  River  Nene,  near  to  which  the  land  is  low- 
lying,  being  only  some  80  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum. 
The  ground  rises,  however,  to  the  north-west,  where  it 
reaches  258  ft.  near  Wadenhoe  Great  Wood.  The 
surface  soil  is  clay  and  the  subsoil  is  Oxford  clay, 
cornbrash  and  Great  Oolite.  The  parish  comprises 
1,199  acres.  It  was  inclosed  by  Act  of  Parliament 
in  1793.^ 

The  village  stands  on  rising  ground  near  to  the 
River  Nene,  a  little  way  off  the  high  road  from  I  slip 
and  AldwinUe  to  Oundle.  The  church  is  in  an 
isolated  position  to  the  south-west  of  the  village  on 
high  ground  overlooking  the  river.  On  the  opposite 
side  of  the  village  is  the  Old  Rectory,  sold  toG.  Ward 
Hunt  and  occupied  by  Capt.  W.  Ward  Hunt,  R.N., 
D.S.O.,  as  the  rector  resides  at  Pilton,  the  living  of 
which  he  holds  with  that  of  Wadenhoe.  Wadenhoe 
House,  the  property  of  G.  Ward  Hunt,  is  a  17th- 
century  building  with  modern  additions  standing  in 
extensive  grounds.  At  a  farm-house  in  the  village  is  a 
circular  stone  dovecote  with  conical  roof  and  louvrcd 
turret.  A  reservoir  adjoins  the  Oundle  Road  and 
there  were  formerly  some  quarries  in  the  parish, 
which  are  now  no  longer  worked.     No  railway  crosses 


the    parish,  the    nearest    railway    station    being    at 
Thorpe  on  the  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway. 

John  Palsgrave,  tutor  to  Henry  Fitzroy,  natural 
son  of  Henry  VIII,  was  rector  here  from  1545  to  1554.* 
Samuel  Parr,  the  educationist  and  political  writer, 
became  rector  in  1789  by  exchange  with  Dr.  Bridges, 
but  apparently  never  resided  in  the  parish.' 

In  the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor, 
MANORS  Burred  held  freely  2  hides  and  \  virgate 
of  land  in  Wadenhoe,  but  after  the 
Conquest  they  were  granted  to  the  Bishop  of  Cou- 
tances,  who  was  the  overlord  in  1086.*  After  the 
forfeiture  of  the  bishop's  lands  under  William  Rufus, 
Wadenhoe  must  have  been  granted  to  King  David 
of  Scotland,  as  it  was  included  in  his  fee  in  the  first 
half  of  the  12th  century. *  A  holding  of  2^  hides  and 
I  bovate  of  land,  included  among  the  lands  in 
Wadenhoe  given  to  the  Bishop,  should  probably 
belong  to  Wold.^ 

Another  holding  in  Wadenhoe,  consisting  of  ij 
virgates,  was  in  1086  held  of  the  Abbey  of  Peter- 
borough, by  Roger,'  who  may  be  identified  as  the 
ancestor  of  the  Torpel  family,  since  in  the  early  12th 
century  Roger  Infans  held  2  small  virgates.^  Later 
the  Torpels  do  not  appear  to  have  held  any  land  in 
Wadenhoe,  and  it  is  possible  that  this  holding  after- 
wards was  accounted  a  part  of  Pilton  {q.v.). 


♦•  Cal.  S.P.  Dom.  1672,  pp.  42,  198. 
'Priv.  Act  of  Pari.  33  Geo.  Ill,  cap. 


'D.N.B. 
ixi.  p.  7S3. 


L.  and  P.   Hen.  Fill,  vol. 


•  D.N.B. 

*  y.C.H.  Nortbanu.  i,  pp  309^,  310a. 


'  Ibid.  366a. 

•  Ibid.  362.  In  the  12th  century 
Survey  (/'.C.W.  Koribants.  i,  366)  various 
other  entrio  arc  given  under  Wadenhoe, 
lome  of  which  belong  to  Stoke  Doyle 
(y.o).  'I  he  fact  that  Wadenhoe,  Pilton 
and    Stoke    were    reckoned    ai    one    vill 

149 


(cf.  Egerton  MS.  (B.M.),  2733,  f.  155) 
probably  accounted  for  this  confusion, 
while  the  transcript  of  the  Survey  in  the 
Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  xxii,  is  somewhat 
corrupt. 

'  y.C.H.  Xortbanls.  i,  316J. 

'  Ibid.  366J. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Vere,  Earl  of  Oxford. 
Quarterly  gules  and  or 
with  a  niolet  argent  tn 
the  quarter. 


In  1086,  the  sub-tenant  of  the  2  hides  and  I 
virgate  was  Aubrey,  the  ancestor  of  the  Veres.' 
His  successor,  Aubrey  de  Vere,  held  the  land  under 
King  Dand.i"  and  the  Earls  of  Oxford  claimed  the 
overlordship  until  the  15th  century,  the  last  mention 
being  in  1449.^^  The  manor  of  Wadeohoe  is  said 
to  have  been  held  by  the 
service  of  half  a  knight's  fee, 
sometimes  of  the  Honour  of 
Winchester,^^  and  at  others 
in  chief.'' 

The  Veres,  later  in  the  12th 
centur)',  enfeoffed  another 
branch  of  the  family  with 
their  land  in  Wadenhoe.  Before 
1 167,  it  had  been  in  the  pos- 
session of  Geoffrey  de  Vere,'* 
and  in  1 1 85  was  held  by 
Henry  de  Vere.'^  He,  or  more 
probably  his  successor  of  the 
same  name,  was  the  tenant  in 

1229,''  but  before  1236  the  manor  of  Wadenhoe  had 
been  again  subinfeudated  to  John  de  Lacy,  Earl  of 
Lincoln."  He  was  succeeded  in  1241  by  his  son 
Edmund,  who  obtained  livery  of  his  father's  lands  by 
124918  and  in  1254  granted  the  manor  to  Roger  de 
Quinci,  Earl  of  Winchester, 
for  life.'*  On  Roger's  death 
in  1264,^"  it  reverted  to  the 
Lacys  and  was  held  in  dower 
by  Edmund's  widow  Alice.^i 
Her  son  Henry,  Earl  of  Lin- 
coln, succeeded,-^  but  on  his 
death  in  1 312,  the  manor 
passed  to  his  daughter  and  heir 
Alice,  the  wife  of  Thomas, 
Earl  of  Lancaster.^'  After 
Lancaster's  execution  in  1321, 
his  widow   obtained   a   grant 

of  the  Lacy  manors  for  life  from  Edward  H,  with 
remainder  to  Hugh  le  Despencer,  the  younger.^'' 
She  afterwards  married  Ebulo  Lestrange,  and  from 
Edward  III  obtained  a  grant  of  Wadenhoe  manor  to 
hold  to  them  and  their  heirs.^'  On  the  death  of  both 
Ebulo  and  Alice,  the  manor  should  have  passed  to 
Ebulo's  nephew  Roger  Lestrange  of  Knokyn,  on  whom 
it  had  been  settled  in'l336,28but  ini337he  had  granted 


Lacy,  Earl  of  Lincoln. 
Or  a  lion  purpure. 


Lestrange.     Gules  two 
leopards  argent. 


The  latter  died  seised  in  1356  and  the  manor  passed 
to  Roger's  son  and  heir,  another  Roger  Lestrange.^* 
His  descendants  held  it  tiU 
the  d-'ath  of  John  Lestrange 
in  1477.2*  It  probably  then 
passed  to  his  daughter  and 
heiress  Joan,  the  wife  of 
George  Stanley,  who  pre- 
sented to  the  rectory  of 
Wadenhoe  in  1487.*'  Waden- 
hoe was  presumably  sold  by 
the  Stanleys,  perhaps  after  the 
death  of  Joan  in  1513,  since  it 
was  held  in  1532  by  Sir  William 
Blount,  Lord  Mountjoye.^' 
His  son  and  successor  Charles  sold  it  to  Henry  VIII 
in  1543,'^  and  in  1550  Edward  VI  granted  it  to  Princess 
Elizabeth.^  In  1 55 1,  however,  an  exchange  was 
made  with  Sir  Walter  Mildmay.**  From  the  Mild- 
mays,  the  manor  of  Wadenhoe  passed  in  1617  through 
Mary,  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Anthony  Mildmay, 
to  the  Earls  of  Westmoreland.'*  In  1668,  Charles, 
Earl  of  Westmoreland,  sold  it  to  John  Stanyan,**  who 
sold  it  sixteen  years  later  to  Brooke  Bridges."  The 
latter  died  in  1702  and  the  manor  passed  to  his 
great-nephew  John  Bridges,  the  historian,  who  died 
unmarried  in  1724.^* 

The  manor  was  apparently  sold  before  1714  to 
Sir  Edward  Ward,  Chief  Baron  of  the  Exchequer, 
whose  daughter  Jane  married 
Thomas  Hunt  of  Boreatton, 
Shropshire.  Their  son, Edward 
Hunt  of  Oundle,  a  merchant, 
had  a  son  Thomas,  who  suc- 
ceeded to  Wadenhoe,  but  left 
no  surviving  issue. 

The  manor  passed  to  his 
brother  Rowland,  who  married 
Frances  Welch,  and  from  him 
to  his  son  Thomas  Welch 
Hunt,  who  with  his  wife 
Caroline  Isham  was  murdered 
at  Paestum  on  their  wedding 

tour  in  1824.  Thomas  Welch  Hunt  left  Wadenhoe  to 
his  aunt,  Mary  Hunt  (d.  unm.  1835),  with  remainder 
to  his  cousin,  Mary  Caroline  Hunt  (d.  unm.  1847), 
daughter   of   Rev.    Edward    Hunt,    younger    son   of 


Hunt  of  Boreatton. 
Party  argent  and  sable 
a  saltire  parted  and 
counter-coloured. 


the  reversion   to   Nicholas   de   Cantilupe   for   life."      Thomas    Hunt    of    Boreatton,    and    with    ultimate 


»  V.C.H.  Nortbanti.  i,  309*. 

'•  Ibid.  366J. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 34  Edw.  Ill  (lit  nos.), 
no.  84  ;  27  Hen.  VI,  no.  29  j  Book  of  Fees 
(P.R.O.),  ii,  937. 

'"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.,  29  Edw.  Ill  (lit 
noi.),  no.  6. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1324-27,  p.  103  J  1334-38, 
p.  319  ;   Feud.  /Itds,  iv,  50. 

'*  Pipe  Roll  Soe.  xi,  p.  119. 

'•  Pipe  R.  31  Hen.  II,  m.  4. 

'•  Rot.  Hug.  de  IVelles  (Cant,  .ind  York 
Soc),  ii,  127,  239. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  168  ;  Cal.  Close,  1234-37,  p.  300, 

'•  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  ;  Rot.  Rob. 
Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York  Soc),  212; 
Book  0/  Fees,  ii,  1399;    Cal.  Chan,  i,  346, 

357- 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cof.  38  Hen.  Ill, 
no.  86  ;  Rot.  Ric.  Gravesend  (Cant,  and 
York  Soc),  loD. 

••  Cal.  Inq.  i,  no.  27. 


«'  Rot.  Hund.  (Rcc.  Com.),  i,  8i  ;  Cal. 
Close,  1296-1302,  p.  164.  In  1274,  Henry 
de  Vere  seems  to  have  been  heavily  in 
debt  to  various  Jews  and  ^15  was  levied 
on  the  manor  of  Wadenhoe,  held  by  the 
Countess  of  Lincoln  [Cal.  of  Excb.  oj  the 
Jews,  ii,  147,  248). 

"  Cal.  Close,  1296-1302,  p.  164. 

•>  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  ;  Cal.  Close, 
i3'8-23,  p.  575- 

•*  Cal.  Pat.  1321-24,  pp.  156,  179,  180, 
182. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Hil.  18  Edw.  II; 
Ctil.  Chart,  1317-41,  pp.  199,  213. 

"  Cal.  Pal.  1334-38,  p.  319. 

•'  Ibid.  p.  463. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  29  Edw.  Ill  (lit 
nni),  no.  6  ;    Cal.  Fine,  vi,  434. 

"  Close  R.  47  Edw.  Ill,  m.  5  and  6; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  21  Ric.  II,  no.  52; 
ibid.  5  Hen.  IV,  m.  27  ;  ibid.  27  Hen.  VI, 
no.  29  J  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  50  ;  ibid,  vi,  500  ; 
G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  ;    Kegister  Bp. 

ISO 


John  Chedworth,  cit.  Bridges,  Hist. 
Nortbants.  ii,  390. 

•°  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Feet  of  V.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  24  Hen. 
VIII. 

"  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xviii,  pt.  ii,  g. 
449  (i) ;  Pat.  R.  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  5,  m. 
4  d;  Feet  of  F.  Northanti,  Hil.  35  Hen. 
VIII. 

••  Pat.  R.  4  Edw.  VI,  pt.  3. 

•«  Pat.  R.  5  Edw.  VI,  pt.  3. 

■*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  ccxxiii,  61  j 
Rccov.  R.  Hil.  41  Eliz.  ro.  68  ;  Chan. 
Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  ccclxxvi,  94  ;  ccccxcviii, 
44  ;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  2  Chas.  I ; 
Northants.  Trin.  8  Chas.  I  ;  Recov.  R. 
East.  i6i;6,  ro.  189. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Trin.  19  Chai. 
II. 

•'  Ibid.  Mich.  35  Chai.  H. 

"  Bridj;ei,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  391  ; 
Wotton,  English  Baronetage,  ed.  1741, 
pp.  188-190. 


NAVISFORD   HUNDRED 


WADENHOE 


remainder  to  Rev.  George  Hunt  (d.  1853),  son  of 
Rowland,  son  of  the  last-named  Thomas.  George 
Hunt  was  succeeded  by  his  son  the  Right  Hon. 
George  Ward  Hunt,  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer  and 
First  Lord  of  the  .-Vdmiralty.  His  son  George  Eden 
Hunt  succeeded  him  in  1877  and  died  in  1892  leaving 
i  son  George  Ward  Hunt,  captain  in  the  Northamp- 
tonshire regiment,  who  was  killed  in  action  in  1915. 
His  son  George  Edgar  Ward  Hunt,  born  191 1,  is  the 
present  owner.'' 

In  1249,  Edmund  de  Lacy  obtained  a  grant  of  free 
warren'"'  and  Ebulo  Lestrange  and  his  wife  claimed  it 
in  1330.  They  also  claimed  view  of  frankpledge, 
pillory,  tumbrel,  the  assize  of  bread  and  ale,  and 
waifs.**  View  of  frankpledge  was  held  by  the  lords 
of  the  manor  in  the  17th  century. ''^ 

In  1298,  Henry,  Earl  of  Lincoln,  was  granted  per- 
mission to  inclose  30  acres  pertaining  to  the  manor 
of  Wadenhoe,  lying  within  the 
Forest  of  Rockingham,  in  order 
to  make  a  park.*' 

A  water-mill  and  free  fishery 
are  mentioned  in  1356**  and 
two  mills  are  referred  to  in  1656 
and  again  in  1818.** 

The  church  of 
CHURCH  ST.  GILES  con- 
sists of  chancel 
27  ft.  by  16  ft.  with  a  modern 
vestry  on  the  south  side,  clear- 
storied  nave  36  ft.  6  in.  byl9  ft., 
north  and  south  aisles  each 
12  ft.  6  in.  wide,  north  porch, 
and  west  tower  with  saddleback 
roof  15  ft,  by  14  ft.  6  in., 
all  these  measurements  being 
internal. 

The  tower  is  all  that  is  left 
of  a  late  12th  century  church 
(c.  1 195-1200),  the  chancel  and 
nave  of  which  were  rebuilt 
some  time  in  the  next  century. 
The  nave  arcades  are  of  this 
period,  that  on  the  north  being 
the  earlier,  but  the  aisles  appear 

to  have  been  rebuilt  and  widened  in  the  14th  century, 
when  the  clearstory  was  added,  the  porch  erected, 
and  some  alterations  made  in  the  tower.  The  chancel 
was  recased  externally  early  in  the  l8th  century  and 
the  tower  restored,*'  and  in  1901  there  was  an  exten- 
sive restoration  of  the  fabric  when  the  floors  of  the 
nave  and  aisles  were  lowered  to  their  original  level 
and  the  tower  was  underpinned  to  a  solid  foundation.*' 
The  roofs  are  all  modern,  those  of  the  nave  and  aisles 
being  leaded  and  the  chancel  roof  tiled.  The  parapets 
throughout  are  plain. 

The  ground  falls  rapidly  from  west  to  east  and  the 
chancel  stands  high  above  the  level  of  the  churchyard  : 


on  the  north  side  there  are  two  steps  down  to  the 
porch  and  five  from  the  porch  to  the  floor  of  the 
church.  The  chancel  has  an  east  window  of  two 
lights  with  a  circle  in  the  head,  originally  c.  1250, 
and  there  are  single  lancets  in  the  north  and  south 
walls.  The  vestry  is  of  brick  and  is  five  steps  below 
the  chancel  level.  The  13th  century  arch  to  the 
nave  is  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner  one  resting 
on  moulded  corbels  supported  by  grotesque  heads. 

The  north  arcade  (c.  1250)  consists  of  three  pointed 
arches  on  piers  composed  of  four  attached  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases,  a  half-round  respond 
at  the  east  end,  and  a  corbel  at  the  west.  The  pellet 
ornament  occurs  in  the  capitals  of  the  respond  and 
of  the  first  pier,  and  small  rosettes  in  that  of  the 
second  pier.  The  piers  stand  on  large  plinths.  The 
south  arcade  may  be  as  late  as  1280-90  and  differs 
from  the  other  in  that  the  shafts  have  a  fillet  on  the 


10     3     O 


K) 


20 


30 

-I — 


*o 


22  Cent,  late 
CJ250-80 
I42J  Cent,  late 
»  ED  18™  Century 
□  Modern 


Scale  of  Feet 

Plan  of  Wadenhoe  Church 


face  ard  there  is  a  half-octagonal  respond  at  each 
end.  The  capitals|aIso  vary,  those  of  the  east  respond 
and  second  pier  having'rather  bold  conventional  stiff 
up-turned  foliage  of  large  veined  leaves  and  round 
stems.     The  plinths  have  claw  corners. 

The  windows  of  the  north  aisle  are  all  of  14th 
century  date,  that  at  the  east  end  being  of  three 
trefoiled  lights  with  modern  reticulated  tracery,  the 
others  of  two  lights  with  quatrefoil  in  the  head.  On 
each  side  of  the  east  window  is  a  moulded  corbel 
for  a  statue.  In  the  south  aisle  the  east  window  is  of 
three  tall  trefoiled  lights,  with  slight  piercings, 
c.  1280,  and  near  it,  in  the  usual  position,  is  a  pointed 


**  The  account  of  the  Hunt  tiicceiiion 
wai  kindly  supplied  by  the  late  Mrs.  Mary 
C.  Hall,  great-aunt  of  the  present  owner. 
See  also  Burke,  Landed  Gentry^  under 
Hunt  of  Boreatton. 

"  Cat.  Chart,  i,  346,  357. 

•'  Plac.  de  Quo  IVarr.  (Rec.  Com.),  p. 
5.8. 

♦•  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  East  1656,  no. 
189. 


♦'  Cal.  Close,  1296-1301,  p.  164. 

'*  Chan.  Iiiq.  p.m.  29  Edw.  IH  (i»t 
nop.),  no.  6. 

"  Recov.  R.  East.  1656,  ro.  189  ;  ibid. 
East.  58  Geo.  HI,  ro.  215. 

"  During  the  incumbency  of  the  Rev. 
Brooke  Bridges  (instituted  1713),  Bridges, 
the  historian,  says  the  chancel  and  tower 
were  built  at  the  charge  of  the  present 
incumbent,'  but  as  regards  the  tower  this 


can  only  refer  to  restoration  or  repair: 
Hut.  of  Northants.  ii,  390. 

*'  The  pillars  of  the  nave  arcadci  were 
also  underpinned  as  it  was  found  that 
they  stood  immediately  over  faults  in  the 
rock,  causing  their  bases  to  be  crushed  to 
a  dangerous  extent  :  ex.  inform.  Mr.  W. 
Talbot  Brown,  F.S.A.,  architect  of  the 
restoration. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


piscina  with  fluted  bowl  and  inner  trefoil  arch  on 
plain  corbels.  The  other  windows  are  later  and  of 
two  cinquefoiled  lights.  Both  doorways  have  con- 
tinuous moulded  head  and  jambs,  and  there  is  a 
pseudo-Gothic  plaster  ribbed  ceiling  to  the  porch. 
At  the  west  end  of  the  south  aisle  is  a  stone  wall- 
bench.  The  clearstory  windows  are  square-headed 
and  of  two  trefoiled  lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages  with  later  diagonal 
angle  buttresses  and  new  tiled  roof.  On  the  north 
side  in  the  lower  stage  is  a  waU  arcade  of  three  arches, 
the  outer  semi-circular,  the  middle  one  pointed, 
springing  from  shafts  and  responds  with  moulded 
bases  and  capitals  with  conventional  foliage.  The 
west  window  is  a  single  lancet  (restored)  and  in  the 


Wadenhoe  Church  Font 

stage  above  is  a  small  blocked  round-headed  opening. 
There  is  also  a  small  lancet  on  the  south  side  in  the 
middle  stage.  The  bell-chamber  windows  vary,  those 
on  the  east  and  west  being  of  two  round-headed  lights 
within  a  semi-circular  enclosing  arch,  the  tympanum 
pierced  with  a  small  vesica-shaped  opening  ;••*  on  tlie 
south  two  lancets ;  and  on  the  north  a  restored  late 
14th-century  square-headed  window  of  two  lights. 
There  is  a  vice  in  the  north-west  angle.     The  13th 


century  arch  to  the  nave  is  of  two  chamfered  orders, 
the  inner  resting  on  half-octagonal  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases. 

The  beautiful  13th  century  font  consists  of  a  cir- 
cular bowl  moulded  round  the  lower  edge  and  orna- 
mented at  the  top  with  lunettes  of  foliage,  below  each 
joint  of  which  are  rosettes,  dogtooth  and  masks  in 
relief  set  vertically  on  the  face  of  the  cylinder.  The 
font  has  been  reset  on  an  octagonal  stone  step. 

The  early  iSth  century  oak  pulpit  was  re-arranged 
at  the  restoration.  The  seating  is  modern,  but  in 
the  aisles  are  some  carved  and  traceried  bench  ends, 
perhaps  of  l6th  century  date.  There  is  a  brass  plate 
in  the  floor  of  the  nave  to  John  Andrewe  (d.  1629), 
and  in  the  chancel  a  mural  monument  to  Brooke 
Bridges  (d.  1702). 

There  are  three  bells  in  the  tower,  the  first  cast 
by  Tobie  Norris,  of  Stamford,  in  1603  ;  the  second 
a  mediaeval  bell  inscribed  'Ave  Maria  gratia  plena 
Dominus  tecum';  the  tenor  dated  1607.  The 
tenor  alone  is  rung,  the  others  being  cracked.*' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup  and  cover 
paten  of  1755,  a  flagon  of  1776,  and  a  silver  dish 
with  the  mark  of  Jacques  Cottin,  of  Paris,  r.  1726, 
inscribed  '  To  the  Pious  Memory  of  ye  Revd.  Mr. 
Nat.  Bridges  who  was  33  years  Rectr.  of  this 
Church  1747.'" 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i)  all 
entries  1559-1648,  and  births  1654-81  ;  (ii)  bap- 
tisms 1695-1812,  marriages  1695-1754,  burials 
1683-1812;  (iii)  marriages  1754-1812.  The  second 
volume  contains  entries  of  penances  between  1719 
and  1763. 

There  are  some  good  17th  century  tombs  and 
headstones  in  the  churchyard,  and  on  one  of  the 
buttresses  on  the  south  side  are  three  scratch  dials. *^ 
The  advowson  of  the  rectory 
ADVOWSON      of  Wadenhoe  has  been  held  with 
the    manor    throughout    its    his- 
tory.*'    The  first  recorded  presentation  was  made 
by  Henry  de  Vere  in  1227.*''     In  1307  the  King 
granted    licence  to   Henry,   Earl   of    Lincoln,    to 
alienate  in  mortmain  the  advowson  of  the  church 
in  substitution  for  that  of  Wivelingham,  which  he 
had  granted  to  the  scholars  of  a   newly-founded 
house  in  the  University  of  Oxford.**     It  does  not 
appear,  however,  that  the  licence  was  ever  used. 
The  benefice  was  in  1925  united  to  Pilton  {q.v.). 
A  pension  of  10/.  a  year  was  payable  in  1 291  from  the 
rectory  of  Wadenhoe  to  the  Prior  of  Colne,  Essex.*^ 
The  grant  was  probably  made  by  one  of  the  Veres. 

Francis  Hilditch  gave  ^^30  to  the  poor 
CUARIT7'  and  this  sum  was  invested  in  1789  in 
j^39  8j.  %d.  Consols  now  with  the 
Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  and  producing 
19;.  9,d.  annually  in  dividends.  The  income  is 
applied  by  the  Rector  to  the  widows  of  Wadenhoe. 


*•  The  cast  window  has  a  circular  mid- 
shaft with  rough  cushion  capital,  the  other 
a  plain  mullion.  The  confusion  of  detail 
may  he  due  to  the  '  rebuilding  '  mentioned 
by  Bridges  (see  above). 

*•  'f'herc  arc  mural  tablets  in  the  north 
aisle  to  Thomas  Welch  Hunt  and  his 
wife,  '  both  cruelly  shot  by  banditti,  near 
Paestum,  in  Italy,'  Dec.  3,  1824,  and  to 
Mary  Caroline  Hunt,  lady  of  the  manor 
(d.  1847)  :  she  contributed  largely  to  the 
repair  of  the  church  in  1844  ;  in  the  south 


aisle  is  a  brass  plate  to  Admir,il  Sir 
M;chacl  Culmc  Seymour  (d.  192c). 

'»  North,  Ch.  Bells  of  Nonhanls.  425, 
where  the  inscriptions  are  given.  The 
treble  is  Tobie  Norris's  earliest  bell  in  the 
county. 

"  Markham,  Ch.Plair  of  Norihants,  293. 

^'  One  perfect,  and  traces  of  two  others. 

'•  Koi.  Hug.  dr  Hrlln  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  127,  239;  Rot.  Rah.  Gnaetesle 
(Cant,  and  York  Soc),  168,  212  ;  Rot.  kic. 
Gravettnd  (Cant,  and  York  Soc),  1 00, 1 2 1  i 

152 


Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cof.  Mil.  12  Edw.  Ill; 
Trin.  24  Hen.  VII!  ;  Northants.  Hil.  35 
Hen.  VIII;  Trin.  19  Chas.  II;  Mich. 
35  Chas.  II  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  27  Hen.  VI, 
no.  29 ;  ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  ccclxxvi,  94 ; 
Pat.  R.  5  Edw.  VI,  pt.  3  ;  Instit.  Bki. 
(P.R.O.),  1641,  1670,  1674,  1747,  1783, 
1792. 

"  Rot.  Hug.  de  Wellrs  (Cant,  and  Yoik 
Soc),  ii,  127. 

"  Col.  Pat.  1307-13,  p.  II. 

••  Popt  Ntch.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.),  39*. 


W'AnENiioi:  Church  from  thi;  South-west 


W'adenhok  Church  :    The   Interior,  looking  Easi 


THE    HUNDRED    OF    HUXLOE 


GREAT  ADDINGTON 
LITTLE  ADDINGTON 
ALDWIXKLE  ALL  SAINTS 
ALDVVINKLE  ST.  PETER 
BARNWELL  ALL  SAINTS 
BARTON  SEAGRAVE 
BURTON  LATIMER 
CRANFORD  ST.  ANDREW 


CONTAINING    THE    PARISIUS    OF 

CRANFORD  ST.  JOHN 

DENFORD 

FINEDON 

GRAFTON  UNDERWOOD 

IRTHLINGBOROUGH 

ISLIP 

KETTERING 


LILFORD  CUM  WIGSTHORPE 

LOWICK 

SLIPTON 

SUDBOROUGH 

TWYWELL 

WARKTON 

WOODFORD 


The  Hundred  of  Huxloe  is  formed  of  the  three  ancient  hundreds  of 
Huxloe,  Suthnaveslund  and  Northnaveslund,  which  were  included  in  the 
eight  hundreds,  claimed  by  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough,^  and  confirmed  to  it 


\ 

''*•*. 

/■ 

s  ^ 

/x 

,0-^i 

C    0    R    B     V           /^•... 

?  i 

•"    0      . 

1         ^ 

\    CUM        •■>     • 

^-       V1>-|CSTH0RBE  <ts,\ 

-A       — -^  ^' 
^         /\ 

ftLDWlNKu'*^'^ 

.•Varktun^ 

-.   ST    PETERi     f 

I 

,      BARTON 

•■;?/'  .•'iwwELL  '•: 

••>.^.-.^ 

.      ,./      « 

^"> 

.     SEAGRAVE 

•'■*'**.•••'' 

•        \ 

V 

'^■..•"  ' 

.  I^ANFORd  WOOUtUKD  .'  ■  V  ■ 
:ST.  JOIU**      _  _      _       *.          ■ 

■••"     tiENfORD* 

T"^      ? 

'^•burton  tATlMtR'V-vDD^NCTON/^"^ 

\                   o 

'  FINEDON  •             .*>             1 
1                     .           .*■          .'"^ 

\                   ^5 

•"' 

S'" 

/ 
/ 

/ 

•■ 

1 

Index  Map  to  the   Hundred  of  Huxloe 


by  Richard  I.^  In  the  iith  century  Northamptonshire  geld-roll  Naveslund 
is  said  to  have  contained  two  hundreds^  ;  in  Domesday  Book  Naveslund  is 
mentioned  without  any  qualification,*  but  in  the  i2th  century  survey  of  the 
county  the  names  Suthnaveslund  and  Northnaveslund  are  used.^  The  former 
contained  Irthlingborough,  Great  Addington  and  Little  Addington,  Wood- 
ford and  Finedon  ;  the  latter,  Cranford,  Barton  Seagrave,  Warkton,  Kettering, 

1  Plac.  de  Quo  JVarr.  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  558. 

*  Cal.  Chart,  i,  p.  19;    Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  pp.  69,  70,  Il8,  122,  124-125. 

9  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  p.  297. 

«  Ibid. 

'  Ibid.  388fl,  389  a  and  b. 

153 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 

Grafton  Underwood  and  Burton  Latimer.*  By  1316,  however,  these  two 
hundreds  were  both  included  in  Huxloe  Hundred'  and  the  names  disap- 
peared from  use.  In  1447,  Henry  VI  granted  various  privileges  to  the  Abbey 
of  Peterborough,  including  the  goods  and  chattels  of  felons  and  outlaws,  etc., 
not  only  belonging  to  the  men  and  tenants  of  the  Abbey,  but  also  of  residents 
within  the  Hundred  of  Huxloe  and  other  Hundreds  ;  also  all  fines,  ransoms, 
forfeitures,  issues  and  amerciaments  as  well  as  fines  for  licence  to  agree  in 
whatever  court  the  judgment  might  have  been  given. ^  This  was  confirmed  in 
1462,  and  the  charter  also  confirmed  the  grants  by  previous  kings  of  deodands, 
wreck  of  sea,  treasure  trove,  evasions  and  escapes,  and  other  privileges.^  In 
1 540-1,  after  the  dissolution  of  the  Abbey,  Henry  VIII  granted  Huxloe 
Hundred  to  Queen  Katherine  Howard  for  life,^''  but  after  her  execution  it 
remained  in  the  Crown^^  until  161 1,  when  James  I  granted  it  to  John  Eldred 
and  George  WTiitmore.^^  Two  years  later  they  sold  it  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu 
of  Boughton,^^  whose  descendant  Ralph,  Earl  of  Montagu,  owned  the  Hun- 
dred in  1704.^*  A  moiety  of  it  appears  to  have  been  alienated  before  1760,^^ 
but  the  remaining  moiety  passed  by  descent  to  George,  Duke  of  Montagu,  who 
held  it  in  1776.^*  From  him  it  passed  to  his  daughter  and  heir,  Elizabeth,  the 
wife  of  Henry,  Duke  of  Buccleuch,^'  and  the  present  Duke  of  Buccleuch  is 
now  lord  of  the  Hundred. ^^  The  court  was  probably  held  at  Huxloe  Cross 
in  Lowick  parish  (q.v.). 

«  V.C.H.  Northanti.  i,  388a,  389  a  and  *. 

^  Ibid.  297. 

5  Cal.  Chart,  vi,  p.  88.  »  Cal.  Pat.  1461-67,  p.  191. 

i«  L.  IsS  P.  Hen.  Vlll,  xvi,  p.  716  ;  Pat.  R.  32  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  3. 
'1  L.  (J  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xviii,  pt.  i,  no.  982  ;   Cal.  S.P.  Dom.  1603-10,  p.  157. 
>2  Pat.  R.  9  Jas.  I,  pts.  6  &  8. 
^  Close  R.  11  James  I,  pt.  12,  no.  9. 

"  Recov.  R.  Hil.  3  Anne,  ro.  223  ;  cf.,  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  9  Chas.  I  &  Mich.  1658. 
1'  Recov.  R.  East.,  33  Geo.  II,  ro.  162. 

"  Recov.  R.  East.  8  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  479  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  16  Geo.  Ill ;  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants. 
ii,  p.  203. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  16  Geo.  Ill ;  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 
'*  Inf.  from  Messrs.  Nicholl  Manisty  &  Co.,  Solicitors  to  the  Duke. 


154 


HUXLOE    HUNDRED 


GREAT  ADDINGTON 


Edintone  (xi  cent.) ;  Haderingtona,  Nordadington, 
Borcalis  Adintona,  Adington  Major  (xiii  cent.). 

The  Addingtons  lie  on  the  left  bank  of  the  River 
Nenc  and  are  very  nearly  equal  in  size  ;  Great  or 
North  .^ddington,  as  it  was  once  called,  is  1,260  acres 
in  extent,  being  but  127  acres  larger  than  Little 
Addington,  which  lies  to  the  south  of  it.  A  little 
to  the  east  of  the  dividing  line  between  them  is  Ring- 
stead  and  Addington  Station  on  the  Northampton 
and  Peterborough  branch  of  the  London  Midland 
and  Scottish  Railway.  The  soil  is  partly  light,  and 
partly  stif?  clay  :  the  subsoil  clay  and  ironstone.  The 
chief  crops  grown  are  wheat,  barley,  peas,  and  beans. 
Ironstone  quarries  were  opened  in  1877,  but  are 
now  no  longer  worked.  The  population  in  1921 
was  285. 

The  little  village  of  Great  Addington  lies  on  the 
road  from  Irthlingborough  to  Lowick,  which  is  here 
crossed  by  a  road  from  Ringstead  to  Cranford  St.  John. 
It  is  about  1 1  miles  away  from  the  station,  and  about 
4  miles  south-west  of  Thrapston.  A  stream  flowing 
into  the  Nene  almost  encircles  it,  its  water  driving 
the  mill  on  the  south  of  the  village.  At  Shooters 
Hill  burials  with  weapons  and  ornaments  have  been 
found.* 

At  the  northern  end  of  the  village  is  the  church, 
and  grouped  near  it,  on  the  eastern  side  of  the  road, 
are  the  school  (erected  in  1873-4)  ^""^  ^^^  smithy. 
Opposite,  and  west  of  the  road,  is  the  Manor  House, 
a  good  example  of  simple  Jacobean  work,  and  the 
residence  of  Licut.-Col.  Malcolm  Romer,  O.B.E. 
The  rectory,  a  little  distance  to  the  north-east,  a 
substantial  building  of  stone,  erected  in  1678,  and 
repaired  in  1870,  is  pleasantly  situated.  The  hall 
windows  of  the  rectory  house,  as  Bridges  noted,  contain 
several  escutcheons :  arms  of  the  Peterborough  see. 
Bacon,  Isham,  and  Towers.  Outlying  properties  are 
Rectory  Farm  in  the  north-west  of  the  parish,  and  in 
the  south-west  Great  Addington  Lodge,  to  the  west  of 
which  are  chalk  pits  and  Patch  Lodge.  There  were 
riots  here  and  at  Rushton  and  '  Pightesley  '  in  1607 
regarding  the  inclosure  of  lands.  An  agreement  made 
in  1232-3  between  Baldwin  de  Vere  and  the  Abbey  of 
Croyland  confirming  a  grant  to  the  church  (q.v.)  gives 
various  place  names,  such  as  Sleng  near  the  fee  of 
Maurice  de  Audely  ;  Wudefordebanlon',  Grenewey,* 
Ridgeway,  Trendlade,  Lidewellehil,  Michelwelle, 
Westfield  on  Scitershul  (Shooters  Hill),  Brook  furlong. 
By  a  very  doubtful  charter  of  833, 
MANORS  Witlaf,  King  of  the  Mercians,  confirmed 
to  Croyland  Abbey  the  gift  of  Wulnoth 
his  steward  of  2  hides  of  land  in  Addington,  with  a 
fishery,  the  advowson  of  the  church  of  the  vill,  and  a 
•virgateof  land  in  another  [Little]  Addington.'  This 
grant  was  confirmed  in  other  doubtful  charters  by 
Behrtulf,   King  of  Mercia   in   851,*   by   Burgred  of 


Ittli 

litii 


Croyland  Abdey. 
Quarterly :  16-4,  Gulrs 
three  knives  with  thetr 
points  upwards  set  Jesse- 
utise^  ivith  hafts  or  and 
blades  argent  ;  2  dj*  3» 
Azure  three  scourges  or 
also  set  fesseuiise  and 
upright. 


Mercia  in  868,'  and  by  King  Eadred  in  948  ;•  the 
last  confirmation  refers  to  the  gift  as  3  hides,  with 
the  advowson  of  the  church  of  the  vill. 

In  the  Domesday  Survey, 
the  Abbot  of  Croyland  was 
entered  as  holding  2  hides  in 
Addington,  and  a  mill  render- 
ing 131.  \d.  The  value  had 
risen  from  15/.  to  40J.'  The 
abbey's  tenant  of  these  2  hides 
in  the  reign  of  Henry  I  was 
William  son  of  Guy  [f  de 
Reinbuedcourt].*  The  Abbot 
of  Croyland  in  1284  held  two 
parts  of  the  vill  of  'Adington 
Major'  of  the  king  in  chief  in 
frankalmoin,*  and  in  1 291 
the  value  of  his  lands  was 
£6  8/.*"  Addington  with  its 
members  was  in  1316  held 
by   the   Abbot   of   Croyland, 

the  Abbot  of  Sulby,  and  Robert  de  Vere,"  the  two 
latter  each  holding  manors  or  lands  in  both  Adding- 
tons. In  1318  the  Abbot  of  Croyland  was  engaged 
in  a  suit  against  William  Marmaduke,  bailiff  of  Richard 
Marmaduke  of  Raunds,  and  others,  for  damage  done 
to  his  mill  pond  at  Addington.** 

The  abbey  continued  to  hold  the  manor,  rectory  and 
advowson  until  the  Dissolution.** 

The  manor  and  advowson  of  the  rectory  and  church 
on  25  March,  1544,  were  granted  as  parcel  of  the 
property  of  Croyland  Abbey  to  Sir  William  Parr, 
Lord  Parr  of  Horton,  in  tail  male.**  After  the  death 
of  Lord  Parr  without  male  issue  in  1546,  a  fresh  grant 
was  made  in  1558  to  Sir  Robert  Lane,  Kt.,  of  Horton, 
and  Anthony  Throckmorton,  of  Charleston  (co. 
Oxon),togetherwith  grants  of  other  monastic  property. 
Great  Addington  manor  was  held  with  Brinklow 
(co.  Warwick)  for  one  fortieth  of  a  knight's  fee.*'  By 
Sir  Robert  Lane  and  Anthony  Throckmorton  the 
manor  (but  not  the  advowson)  was  sold  in  1562 
to  Henry  Clarke  of  Stanwick,**  who,  in  his  will  dated 
1574,  refers  to  his  farm  at  Stanwick  where  he  dwelt, 
to  his  wife  Anne  (who  survived  him),  and  to  his  sons 
Gabriel  and  Christopher.  He  died  in  that  year,  his 
heir  being  his  son  William,  aged  28  years.*'  William 
Clarke,  as  lord  of  the  manor  of  Great  Addington, 
was  with  Richard  Curteys  (son  of  Richard  Curteys, 
late  of  Great  Addington,  husbandman),  Richard 
Bolney,  and  John  Bolney,  defendant  in  1588  in  an 
action  instituted  by  John  Curteys  of  Great  Addington, 
another  son  of  Richard  Curteys,  and  others,  as  to  the 
admission  to  certain  copyhold  lands.** 

William  Clarke  died  in  1604, leaving  a  widow  Eleanor, 
who  lived  at  Potterspury.*'  His  heir  was  his  brother 
Gabriel,  aged  fifty,  who  in  1608  conveyed  the  Manor  of 


>  V.C.H.  Nortbami.  i,  241. 
'Rot.  Hug.  de  WeUei{Ctat.  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  260. 

•  Kemble,    Cod.    Dip.   i,    no.    233,    p. 
307. 

♦  Ibid,  ii,  no.  265,  p.  43. 

•  Ibid.  no.  297,  p.  91. 

*  Ibid.  no.  420,  p.  284. 

'  F.C.H.  Narlbanli.  i,  319.     Thi«  riie 


probably  indicated  a  previous  fall  through 
invading  devastation. 

•  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  3893. 

•  Feud.  Aids.,  iv,  12. 

>»  Pope  Nich.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.),  54*. 

**  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  29. 

'' Abhrev.  Plae.  (Rec.  Com.),  331-  The 
dam  of  the  mill  pond  had  flooded  lands  in 
Raundi. 

155 


'•  falor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  85-7. 

"  Pat.  R.  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  13. 

>'  Ibid.  4  &  5  Phil.  &  Mary,  pt.  12. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cclxxivi, 
178. 

"  Ibid.  cUxi,  loi. 

"  Chan.  Proc.  (Ser.  ii),  223  (ii5). 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cclxxxvi, 
178. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Great  Addington  and  lands  in  Great  and  Little  Ad- 
dington  to  William  Bedell  and  William  Ward,  and 
the  heirs  of  William  Ward.^* 

The  manor  next  appears  in  the  hands  of  Christopher 
Curteys  and  his  wife  Dorothy,  by  whom  it  was  con- 
veyed in  1618  to  William  Bletsoe  and  Robert  Sander- 
son.^^ Thomas  Bletsoe  of  Addington,  who  appears 
in  a  list  of  '  friends '  in  1655,'"  was  presumably  holding 
the  manor,  which  by  1668  was  in  the  hands  of  three 
generations  of  Thomas  Bletsoes,  grandfather,  father, 
and  son,  and  by  them  with  Thomas  Gerrard,  was 
conveyed  to  Samuel  Whitby  of  London,  with  the 
chief  messuage  or  manor  house  of  Great  Addington,** 
and  lands.  The  Bletsoes  seem  to  have  held  under  a 
settlement  or  mortgage,  for  in  1664  the  manor  with  a 
water  mill,  a  windmill,  a  dovecot,  and  lands  in  Great 
and  Little  Addington  and  Woodford  was  held  by 
Thomas  Andrews,  who  made  a  conveyance  of  it  to 
John  Clarke  and  Henry  Hemington,**  and  in  1678, 
Thomas  Andrew  and  his  wife  Ann  conveyed  the  manors 
of  Great  Harleston  and  Great  Addington  to  John 
Clendon  and  Thomas  Bletsoe. ^^  After  this,  the  manor 
remained  in  the  Andrews  family,  by  whom  it  was 
held  with  the  manor  of  Harleston  (q.v.).  Both  manors 
were  entailed  by  John  Andrews  by  will  of  22  July, 
1736,  and  in  1794  Robert  Andrews  the  elder,  son  of 
John  Andrews,  and  Robert  Andrews  the  younger, 
conveyed  them  to  James  Kindersley  and  John  Russel.*' 
No  manorial  rights  are  mentioned  in  the  inclosure 
Act  of  1803,  when  Robert  Andrews  was  one  of  the 
owners  and  proprietors  of  the  open  and  common 
fields,*'  and  no  manorial  rights  are  now  in  existence. 
Addington  Manor  is  occupied  by  Lt.-Col.  Malcolm 
Romer,  O.B.E.  Mr.  S.  E.  R.  Lane  and  Mr.  G.  H. 
Capron,  J. P.,  are  the  chief  landowners. 

A  second  manor  in  Great  Addington  originated  in 
ij  hides  in  Addington  held  in  1086  by  William's 
trusted  minister  Geoffrey,  Bishop  of  Coutances  and 
under  him  by  Hugh.  The  land  had  risen  in  value 
from  10;.  in  1066  to  40/.  at  the  date  of  the  Domesday 
Survey  (1086),**  a  rapid  recovery  after  the  devastation 
of  the  land  at  the  Conquest  or  before.  The  Bishop 
forfeited  his  lands  on  account  of  his  rebellion 
against  WiUiam  Rufus  in  1088.  Before  the  time  of 
the  Northamptonshire  Survey  (c.  1 1 25),  the  Bishop's 
fee  had  passed  to  Aubrey  de  Vere  or  the  Chamberlain, 
but  whether  the  grant  had  been  made  to  him  or  his 
father  Aubrey  is  uncertain.**  It  was  there  entered 
as  '  2  hides  of  the  King's  fee,'**  the  2  hides  being  made 
up  of  the  Domesday  ij  hides  and  an  additional  half 
hide  of  the  Bishop's  land  at  Drayton  in  Lowick, 
which  properties  continued  to  be  held  together. 
The  manor  pissed  to  Robert,  younger  son  ot  Aubrey 
the  Chamberlain,*'  who  was  holding  Addington  in 


n66.  He  married  twice,  his  first  wife  being  Margaret 
Wake,  presumably  daughter  of  Geoffrey  Wake  and 
sister  of  Hugh  Wake;  with  her  he  received  a  charter 
from  Baldwin  Wake  (Wac)**  granting  to  him  '  with 
Margaret  my  aunt'  (auita  mea),**  the  vill  of  Thrapston. 
The  charter  is  undated,  but  must  have  been  made 
after  1 168  when  Hugh  Wake,  father  of  Baldwin  the 
grantor,  was  alive  and  would  have  been  holding 
Thrapston.  By  his  first  wife  he  had  at  least  one  son 
William.  His  second  wife  was  Maud,  daughter  of 
Robert  de  Furnell.  By  an  undated  charter,  Robert 
de  Furnell  granted  to  '  Robert  son  of  Aubrey  de 
Twiwell  with  Maud  my  daughter  in  free  marriage  ' 
certain  lands  in  Cranford.**  These  lands  were  later 
confirmed  by  John,  son  of  Maud,  daughter  of  Robert 
de  Furnell,  '  to  Robert  de  Ver '  as  lands  which  Robert 
de  Furnell  gave  '  to  my  mother  in  free  marriage.'** 
Evidently  John  was  a  son  of  Maud  by  a  former  hus- 
band. By  his  second  marriage,  Robert  de  Vere  had 
a  son  Henry,  known  as  Henry  son  of  Robert,  who  is 
said  to  have  been  brought  up  by  his  kinsman  William 
de  Mandeville,  Earl  of  Essex  and  Albemarle,  son  of 
Roesia  de  Vere,  and  to  have  commanded  with  re- 
putation at  Gysors.**  He  was  probably  the  judge 
of  this  name  of  the  end  of  the  12th  century.  He  is 
said  to  have  died  about  1 193-4,  and  was  succeeded 
by  Walter,  his  son.  This  Walter,  as  Walter  son  of 
Henry  son  of  Robert,  by  an  undated  charter  of  the  early 
years  of  the  13th  century,  gave  to  William  '  patrunculo 
meo,'  or  uncle  on  his  father's  side,  all  his  land  in  Twy- 
well  for  the  service  of  half  a  knight  and  in  Addington 
for  the  service  of  a  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee  which 
Robert  his  grandfather  held  on  the  day  he  died, 
to  be  held  of  Walter  and  his  heirs.*'  Walter  married 
Lucy,  daughter  of  Gilbert  Basset  of  Weldon.  He 
had  apparently  two  brothers,  William  and  Geoffrey, 
and  died  in  1210-11.  This  branch  of  the  family, 
which  took  the  name  of  '  de 
Drayton,'  continued  to  be  the 
overlords  of  the  Veres'  holding 
in  Addington.  Its  descent 
is  given  under  Drayton  in 
Lowick  (q.v.). 

William,  the  elder  son  of 
Robert  de  Vere,  lived  on  till 
the  early  part  of  the  13th 
century.  Under  the  name  of 
WiUiam  son  of  Robert  son  of 
Aubrey,  he  endowed  the  Hos- 
pital of  St.  John  Baptist  of 
Northampton  with  lands  in 
Slipton  and  Twywell.**  His 
passed     to    Thomas    de 


D  E  Vere.  Quarterly 
gules  and  or  with  a  moUt 
argent  tn  the  quarter. 


lands    in    Thrapston 

Vere,    perhaps     his    son, 

who  died  in  1204  and  was  succeeded  by  his  brother 


•«  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East. 
«'  Ibid.  Mich.  16  JaJ.  I. 


5  jas.  I. 


"  Cal.  S.P.  IJom.  1655-6,  p.  64. 

•»  Cloic  R.  20  Cha».  II,  pt.  11  ;  Feet  of 
F.  Northants.  Mich.  20  Chas.  II; 
Recov.  R.  Mich.  20  Chas.  II,  ro.  125. 

'*  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mil.  15  and  16 
Chas.  II. 

•*  Ibid.  Div.  COS.  Mil.  29,  30  Chas,  II. 

•*  Close  R.  34  Geo.  Ill,  pt.  21,  m.  7  ; 
Recov.  R.  Mil.  34  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  292. 

"  Priv.  Stat.  43  Geo.  Ill,  cap.  108. 

«•  y.C.H.  Northantt.  i,  311. 

••  Ibid.  360. 

••  Ibid.  389J. 

"  Dugdalc,   Mon.    Angl.    ii,    603.     As 


Robert  son  of  Aubrey  the  chamberlain  of 
the  King,  he  made  an  agreement  with  the 
Abbot  of  'I'horncy  as  to  tithes  in  Adding- 
ton and  elsewhere,  by  which  agreement 
his  father  Aubrey  had  been  bound. 
Drayton  Ch.  no.  1.  This  Robert  must 
not  be  confused  with  his  uncle  Robert 
de  Vere,  who  was  in  frequent  attendance 
at  the  Courts  of  Henry  I  and  Stephen. 

"This  important  charter  is  in  the 
collection  of  the  late  Mr.  Stopford- 
Sackville  at  Drayton  House.  A  series  of 
photographs  of  this  collection  lias  kindly 
been  lent  by  Miss  Joan  Wake,  hon.  sec. 
of  the  Northants  Rec.  Soc.  It  is  no.  10 
of  this  collection.    This  collection  will 


hereafter  be  referred  to  as  Drayton 
Charters.  Henry,  a  hitherto  unrecorded 
abbot  of  Bourne,  was  a  witness  to  this 
charter. 

"  The  word  is  clearly  '  auita,'  but  it  is 
probably  a  mistake  of  the  scribe  for 
'amita.* 

•*  Drayton  Ch.  104. 

•'  Ibid.  76. 

*•  He  was  witness  to  two  of  William  dc 
Mandevillc's  charters  c.  1176-81.  Round, 
Cal.  Doc.  France,  243;  Pipe  Roll  Soc.  31 
Hen.  11  (1185),  p.  51. 

"  Dr.iyton  Ch.  i.  The  charier  is  wit- 
nessed by  Richard  and  Simon  Basset. 

•'  Ibid.  2,  40,  93. 


156 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


GREAT  ADDINGTON 


Baldwin  de  Vere,  who  in  1233  was  described  as 
constable  of  Clun  Castle."  He  obtained  exemption 
from  suit  at  the  hundred  court  for  his  lands  and 
men  of  Thrapston  from  Alexander,  Abbot  of  Peter- 
borough (1222-6)*"  and  appears  to  have  taken  up  his 
residence  and  possibly  built  a  house  at  Addingon. 
In  1232  he  received  licence  from  tl\e  Abbot  of  Croyland 
as  patron,  Walter,  rector  of  the  church  of  Addington, 
and  Bishop  Hugh  of  Lincoln,  to  build  a  chapel, 
without  a  baptistery  or  belfry,  in  his  court  at  Adding- 
ton, where  he  and  his  wife  Havvise,  their  guests  and 
household,  might  hear  divine  service,  but  they  were 
to  visit  the  parish  church  on  certain  feasts.  Baldwin 
and  his  heirs  could  present  a  chaplain  who  would  be 
admitted  by  the  rector,  and  he  and  his  wife  granted 
certain  lands  to  the  parish  church.**  At  the  same 
time  he  exchanged  certain  lands  with  the  abbot  of 
Croyland  for  other  lands  before  his  gate,  evidently 
with  the  object  of  improving  the  approach  to  his 
house.**  He  was  alive  in  1242-3,**  but  in  1 245, 
Robert  his  son  was  holding  his  lands.**  Robert 
married  Joan  de  Waterville,  one  of  the  heiresses  of 
Thorpe  Waterville,  with  whom  he  received  one  third 
of  the  manor  of  Ludborough  and  other  lands.  He 
died  before  1 277  when  Baldwin  his  son  was  under  age. 
Baldwin  died  before  1287,  when  Robert  his  brother 
did  homage  for  part  of  the  inheritance  of  Joan  his 
mother.**  Robert  de  Vere,  who  was  sheriff  of  North- 
amptonshire in  1 301  and  13 19,  paid  scutage  for  his 
manor  of  Thrapston  held  of  Thomas  Wake  in  1316.** 
His  wife's  name  was  Maud.  He  died  before  1330, 
and  was  succeeded  by  Ralph  his  son.*'  Ralph  died 
in  133s,**  and  an  extent  of  Addington  Manor  taken 
after  his  death,  showed  there  was  then  a  capital  mes- 
suage, a  dovecot,  a  garden  with  a  mill  in  it  and 
60  acres  of  demesne.*'  His  son  John  de  Vere,  who 
married  Alice,  was  one  of  the  1 10  defendants  in  a  suit 
as  to  dower  in  Thrapston  in  1345.^  He  was  killed 
at  the  Battle  of  Crecy  (1346)'*  leaving  a  son  John 
who  survived  his  father  only  a  few  years  and  died 
under  age. 

In  1349  Simon  de  Drayton,  the  overlord  of  Adding- 
ton, granted  the  wardship  of  John  in  respect  of  that 
manor  to  Thomas  Wake,  lord  of  Liddell^^  who  was 
John's  overlord  at  Thrapston.  John  was  succeeded 
by  his  uncle  Robert,  who  is  described  as  of  Addington 
He  and  his  wife  Elizabeth  entailed  the  manor  of 
Addington  in  1351,  when  Alice  widow  of  John  de  Vere 
had  her  dower  in  it.**  Robert  died  about  1369,  leav- 
ing three  sons,  Robert,  Baldwin  and  John.  Elizabeth 
his  widow  had  her  dower  in  the  lands,  and  she  is 
described  in  1400  as  lady  of  Great  Addington,** 
where  no  doubt  she  lived.  Robert  the  eldest  son,  also 
described  as  of  Addington,**  was  still  under  age  in 


1400.**  In  1408,  by  deed  dated  at  Great  Addington, 
he,  described  as  '  Robert  Vere  of  Thrapston,'  granted 
the  manors  of  Thrapston,  with  his  lands  in  Little 
Addington  and  Woodford,  to  Sir  John  Pilkington, 
Ralph  Grenc  of  Drayton,  Thomas  Mulsho  and  John 
de  VVelton  of  Bolde,  probably  for  the  purposes  of  a 
settlement.*'  On  26  February  1420,  Pilkington, 
Mulsho  and  Welton  reconvcycd  these  lands,  except  the 
site  and  demesnes  of  the  manor  of  Thrapston  and  other 
lands  there,  to  Robert  de  Vere.**  Robert  died  appar- 
ently in  this  year  or  the  following,  leaving  a  daugliter 
Margaret,  married  to  Thomas  Ashby.  In  1421 
Thomas  Ashby,  of  Louseby  in  Leicestershire,  and 
Margaret  his  wife  granted  the  manor  of  Thrapston  to 
Baldwin  de  Vere,  uncle  of  Margaret.*'  Baldwin, 
described  as  of  Addington,  by  deed  dated  there  in 
1405,  conveyed  all  his  lands  to  William,  parson  of  the 
church  of  Islip,  and  William  Seymour,  apparently 
for  the  purposes  of  a  settlement.*"  He  died  in  1424, 
leaving  a  son  and  heir  Richard,**  who  married  Isabella, 
sister  of  Sir  Henry  Grene.  Richard  died  in  1480  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  Henry  de  Vere'^  who  died 
in  1493,  leaving  four  daughters  and  heirs  by  his  wife 
Isabella  Tresham,  all  under  age.**  These  ladies  were 
also  co-heirs  of  their  mother  to  the  lands  of  Constance, 
daughter  of  Sir  Henry  Grene,  wife  of  John  Stafford, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire,  on  the  death  of  their  son  Edward, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire**  in  1499.  These  de  Vere  co-heiresses 
were  (i)  Elizabeth,  who  married  John  son  of  Sir  John 
Mordaunt,  who  was  created  a  baron  in  1522,  and  whose 
descendants  eventually  obtained  nearly  the  whole  of 
Henry  de  Vere's  property ;  (2)  Anne,  who  married,  first, 
Robert,  another  son  of  Sir  John  Mordaunt,  by  whom 
she  had  no  issue,  and  secondly,  Humphrey  Brown, 
brother  of  Sir  Wistan  Brown,  by  whom  she  had  a  son 
George  who  died  without  issue  in  1558  ;  after  George's 
death  his  share  in  the  manor  of  Great  Addington  being 
conveyed  by  the  three  daughters  of  Sir  Humphrey 
Brown  by  his  second  wife  Anne,  daughter  of  John, 
Lord  Hussey,**  and  their  descendants,  to  the  Mor- 
daunts  before  the  end  of  the  century  ;  (3)  Constance, 
the  third  daughter,  who  married  John  Parr  and  died 
without  issue  in  1501,  when  her  share  fell  to  her  three 
sisters ;  (4)  Audrey  or  Etheldreda,  the  fourth  daughter, 
who  married  John,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Wistan  Brown  ; 
they  and  their  son  George  conveyed  their  share  in 
Great  Addington  to  Sir  John  Mordaunt  in  1548.** 
Thus  by  the  end  of  the  l6th  century  all  the  shares  in 
Great  Addington  and  Thrapston  had  come  into  the 
possession  of  Lewis,  third  Lord  Mordaunt,  son  of  John 
son  of  John  first  Lord  Mordaunt  and  Elizabeth  de 
Vere.  Lewis  leased  the  manor  house  of  Great  Adding- 
ton to  Arthur  Darcy  with  the  chief  messuage  in  the 
tenure  of  John  Cootes.     In  1610,  a  term  of  six  years 


•»  Rol.  Liu.  Claus.  (Rcc.  Com.),i,  loA. ; 
Cat.  Liberate  R.  1226-40,  p.  232. 

"  Drayton  Chart,  no.  52. 

*  *  Ibid.  nas.  2 1 ,  94,  98  j  Line.  Epis.  Reg. 
Bp.  Wells,  Jol.  23. 

••  Drayton  Chart,  no.  68. 

••  Bk.  of  Fees,  pt.  ii,  937. 

"  PUe.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rcc.  Com.),  500. 

♦'Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  136; 
Cbron  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  142. 

*•  Drayton  Chart,  no.  6. 

♦'  Plac.  de  QuolVarr.  (Rcc.  Com.),  500; 
Halstead,  op.  cit.  265,  268. 

"  Duchy  of  Lane.  Inq.  p.m.  no.  128. 

**  Drayton  Chart,  no.  91. 


"  rear  Bks.  (Rolls  Scr.),  18-19  Edw. 

eo 

in,  4Sq. 

61 

"  HaUtead,    Succinct    Genealogies,    lyj 

no.  I 

(See  Lowick,  note  57)  ;  Cal.  Close,  1346-9, 

Add. 

233- 

62 

"  Drayton  Chart,  no.  75. 

6a 

"  Feet  of  F.    Div.    Cos.  25  Edw.  Ill, 

61 

no.  67. 

" 

"  Drayton  Chart,  no.  53. 

Feet 

"  Ibid.  no.  65. 

Div. 

"  Ibid.  no.  57. 

18,  I 

"  Ibid.  no.  55. 

East. 

"  Ibid.  No.  52. 

66  1 

'•  Feet    of    F.    Northants.    case    179, 

m.  6 

file  92,  DO.  45. 

Edw. 

Drayton  Chart.  7. 

Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  IV,    file    74, 
II  ;    Cal.  Pat.  Hen.  VII,  vol.  ii,  419; 
,  MS.  1025,  p.  6. 
Ibid. 

Exchcq.  Inq.  p.m.  ptf.  573,  no.  2. 
Cal.  Pat.  Hen.  VII,  vol.  ii,  p.  419. 
Visit,  of  Essex  (Harl.  Soc.),  i,  166  j 
of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  22  Hen.  VIII ; 
Cos.  East.  4  Eliz. ;  Northants.  Mich. 
9  Eliz. ;  IVin.  40  Eliz. ;  Recov.  R. 
,  1572,  ro.  1068;  Trin.  1576,  ro.  H07. 
Com.  PI.  D.  Enr.  East,  i  Edw.  VI, 
d  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  X 
.VI. 


157 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


still  remaining  of  this  lease  was  granted  to  George 
Ciiambers  on  the  conviction  for  recusancy  of  Arthur 
Darcy  and  his  son  Henry.*'  In  1609  Henry,  fourth 
Lord  Mordaunt,  son  of  Lewis,  died  seised  of  the 
manors  of  Great  Addington,  Thrapston,  Lowick,  Islip 
and  Slipton,  and  of  the  chantry  of  Great  Addington.** 
The  manor  of  Great  Addington  passed  with  the  barony 
of  Mordaunt  and  earldom  of  Peterborough  until  18 14, 
when  the  last  Earl  of  Peterborough  died  without  issue.** 

Lands  in  Great  and  Little  Addington  held  by  John 
Pyel  by  the  rent  of  a  pair  of  gloves,  were  granted  in 
1357  by  John  Daundelyn  the  elder  of  Cianford,  to 
Adam  Franceys,  citizen  of  London,  and  Henry  Pyel, 
clerk.'"  In  1386  a  grant  for  life  of  50  marks  rent  from 
the  manors  of  Inhlingborough,  Sudborough,  Great  and 
Little  Addington  was  made  by  Simon  Symeon  and 
John  Curtys  of  Wennyngton  (co.  Hunts),  who  had 
these  manors  from  Henry  Pyel,  Archdeacon  of 
Northampton,  and  William  Braybrook,  by  release  from 
John  Pyel  to  Joan,  the  widow  of  John  Pyel,  citizen  of 
London.'^  Land  in  Addington  held  by  Nicholas 
Pyel  was  included  among  the  fees  held  of  Edmund 
Earl  of  Stafford  at  his  death  in  1403.'^  The  manors 
held  by  the  Pyels  descended  to  the  Cheyneys  of 
Irthlingborough,  and  after  the  death  without  issue  of 
Elizabeth  Pyel  were  inherited,  as  her  kinsman  and 
heir,  by  Sir  Thomas  Cheyney,  Kt.,  son  of  Sir  John 
Cheyney,  who  settled  them  on  his  wife  Anne.  He 
died  in  15 14,  leaving  a  daughter  Elizabeth,  then  aged 
nine  and  married  to  Thomas  son  and    heir  of  Sir 

Nicholas  Vaux  of  Harrowden. 

Margaret  Vere,  widow  of  Sir 
George  Vere,  Kt.,  unsuccess- 
fully claimed  the  manor" 
which  passed  with  IrthHng- 
borough  (q.v.)  to  the  Vaux 
family.  Lord,  Vaux  of  Har- 
rowden. 

The  abbot  of  Peterborough 
held  land  in  Great  Addington 
in  the  12th  century.'^  This 
may  have  been  the  manor  of 
Great  Addington  which,  with 
the  advowson  of  the  rectory, 
parcel  of  tlie  possessions  of  the  Abbey,  was  granted 
to  William,  Lord  Parr  of  Horton,  in  1544.'°  It 
seems  to  have  passed  to  Lewis  Mordaunt,  who  with 
WilHam  le  Hunt  conveyed  it  in  1646  to  Richard 
Raymond  and  Thomas  Watts.'*  In  1649  Richard 
Raynsford  and  Katherine  his  wife  conveyed  it  to 
Richard  Andrew  and  Henry  Paynter,"  in  1760  Robert 
Lambe  conveyed  it  to  John  Woodford,  clerk.'* 

Early  in  the  reign  of  Henry  II  (l  154-89)  Arnold  de 
Pavilly  (Papilio)  granted  a  mill  in  Addington  to  Sulby 
Abbey  which  was  confirmed  to  the  Abbey  in  the  time 
of  Henry  II.'» 

The  Church  of  ALL  SJlNTSconshu 

CHURCH     of  chancel  28  ft.  by  14  ft.  4  in.,  with  north 

chapel  15  ft.  3  in.  by  10  ft.,  clcarstoried 

nave  of  three  bays  39  ft.  by  14  ft.  9  in.,  north  and  south 


\Uu.v.  Cheeky  argitit  and 
gules  a  chezeron  azure 
uittb  three  roses  argent 
thereon. 


aisles  each  9  ft.  6  in  wide,  south  porch,  and  west 
tower  lift.  4  in.  by  12ft.,  all  these  measurements  being 
internal.  The  width  across  nave  and  aisles  is  38ft.  6  in. 
The  chapel  (the  chantry  of  Our  Lady)  is  a  continua- 
tion of  the  north  aisle  and  covers  the  chancel  about 
half  its  length  :  it  is  now  used  as  an  organ  chamber. 
Further  east  is  a  modern  vestry. 

The  church  is  built  of  rubble  and  has  plain  parapets 
and  low-pitched  leaded  roofs,  except  to  the  porch, 
which  is  covered  with  grey  slates.  The  interior  is 
plastered.  The  chancel  was  restored  in  1891,  and  the 
nave  roof  renewed. 

Of  the  12th-century  aisleless  church  there  are 
traces  in  the  large  plinths  beneath  the  piers  of  the 
nave,  embodying  fragments  of  the  former  walls  ; 
and  the  south  doorway  of  this  building,  with  a  round 
arch  carved  with  a  row  of  chevron,  and  jamb-shafts 
with  foliated  capitals,  is  now  the  outer  doorway  of  the 
south  porch.  The  usual  process  of  enlarging  the 
chancel  and  adding  aisles  to  the  nave  was  begun  in 
the  later  part  of  the  13th  century,  and  further  altera- 
tions were  made  in  the  two  following  centuries,  includ- 
ing the  addition  of  the  south  porch  and  of  the  tower. 

The  work  of  rebuilding  appears  to  have  started  with 
the  nave.  The  chancel  and  north  chapel  were  built 
about  I300,and  the  string-course  beneath  the  windows 
is  of  this  approximate  date.  At  present  the  east 
window  and  the  three  two-light  windows  in  the 
south  wall  are  15th-century  insertions,  much  restored 
in  modern  times.  The  eastern  window  on  the  south 
side,  however,  is  the  original  opening  with  inserted 
tracery  :  the  sill  is  lowered  to  form  a  sedile,  and  from 
the  east  jamb  of  the  window,  within  the  opening, 
there  projects  the  bowl  of  a  piscina  with  a  cinquefoil- 
headed  niche  behind.  On  the  north  side  of  the  chancel 
there  is  a  small  oblong  squint  from  an  old  vestry,  the 
place  of  which  has  been  taken  by  the  modern  building. 

The  chancel  communicates  with  the  north  chapel 
by  an  arch  of  c.  1300,  which  is  filled  with  early  I5tli- 
century  screen-work.  Another  screen,  later  and  more 
formal  in  design,  separates  the  chapel  from  the  north 
aisle.  Immediately  to  the  east  of  the  arch  from  the 
chancel,  in  the  south  wall  of  the  chapel,  is  a  projecting 
half-octagon  piscina  with  roses  on  the  bowl,  resting 
upon  a  cluster  of  attached  shafts,  and  having  a  small 
ogee-headed  hollow  behind.  There  are  two  windows 
in  the  north  wall  of  tliis  chapel.  One,  a  two-light 
14th-century  opening,  contains  glass  with  shields  of 
arms.  The  other,  set  low  in  the  wall,  contains  frag- 
ments of  15th-century  glass,  and  lights  a  recess  in 
which  is  the  alabaster  efligy  of  Sir  Henry  Vere 
(d.  1493),  founder  of  the  chantry.  The  efligy  has 
already  been  described.*' 

The  arch  between  nave  and  chancel,  with  semi- 
circular responds,  is  contemporary  with  the  nave 
arcades.  South  of  the  arch,  in  the  angle  between  the 
south  respond  and  the  east  respond  of  the  south 
arcade,  a  doorway,  inserted  in  the  I5tli  century,  leads 
to  a  steep  stair  by  which  the  rood-loft  was  approached. 
The  stair  is  corbelled  out  towards  the  south  aisle. 


•'  Pat.  R.  7  Jai.  I,  pt.  47. 

"  Chan.  Inc|.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cccix, 
200. 

••  Rccov.  R.  Hil.  19  Jai.  I,  ro.  40; 
1-2  Jai.  II,  ro.  62 ;  Trin.  54  Ceo.  Ill,  ro. 
•33  i  If  o'  •■•  '■'i*-  Coi.  Trin.  19  Jai.  ; 
Northanti.  Hil.  14  Chai.  I,  22  Chai.  1, 
I    and    2   Jai.  II,  41  Geo.  Ill;    Pat.   R. 


p.m. 


15    Chai.    I,   pt.    10;     Chan.    Inq. 
(Scr.  ii)  di,  64  ;  dii,  26. 

"•  Cal.  Close,  1354-60,  p.  428. 

"Ibid.     1385-9,    p.     143;     Cloic    R. 
9  Ric.  II.  pt.  i,  m.  8. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  4  Ilcn.  IV,  no.  4. 

"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  587,  no.  40. 

'«  y.C.H.  Nortbantt.  i,  389a. 

158 


"  /,  &■  r.  Hen.  Fill,  vol.  xix  (i)  g.  141 

(75)- 

"  Icct  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  22 
Chai.  I.  "  Ibid.  Mich.  1649. 

'•  I'cct  of  I".  Northanti.  Trin.  33  and 
34  Geo.  II. 

"Add.  Ch.  21512. 

"  J'.C.H.  Nortbanli.  i,  413. 


■^  mn,  «»«,, 


Great  Audington  CiiuRtii  trom  tiil  South 


Great  Addincton  Church  :    Thl  Intkrior,  looking  East 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED      great  addington 


and  infringes  upon  an  earlier  bracket  in  the  east  wall : 
it  is  lighted  on  this  side  by  a  small  double  opening. 
The  upper  doorway  remains,  but  the  screen  is 
gone. 

The  nave  arcades  are  plain  late  13th-century  work. 
The  piers  are  octagonal,  with  slender  half-octagon 
responds ;  but  the  eastern  arch  of  the  north  arcade 
springs  from  a  corbel ;  and  the  pier  on  its  west  side 
is  formed  by  a  cluster  of  four  shafts.  The  arches  are 
very  wide,  and  much  ironstone  is  used  in  them. 

Both  aisles  underwent  some  alteration  after  their 
original  construction,  and  the  outer  wall  of  tlie  north 
aisle,  which  is  now  continuous  with  that  of  the  north 
chapel,  has  been  practically  rebuilt.  Tlicre  is  a  plain 
round-headed  north  doorway.  Tlie  windows  of  the 
north  aisle  are  14th-century  two-light  openings  with 
flat  heads  :  the  west  window  is  rather  later.  In  each 
case,  the  tracery  has  been  considerably  renewed. 

The  south  aisle  was  partly  rebuilt  in  the  14th 
century  and  was  probably  repaired  in  the  15th  century, 
to  which  date  belong  the  east  and  west  windows,  both 
of  three  lights.  The  two  windows  in  the  south 
wall  are  each  of  two  lights  :  the  western,  with  a 
round  quatrefoil  in  the  head,  is  contemporary  with 
the  arcades :  the  other  has  ogee  lights  and  a  pointed 
quatrefoil,  and  is  of  the  early  14th  century.  Between 
this  window  and  the  east  wall  of  the  aisle  is  a  very  large 
tomb-recess,  practically  rebuilt. 

The  south  doorway  is  of  the  14th  century,  with 
mouldings  on  the  chamfer-plane.  It  is  covered  by 
a  porch  which  is  partly  of  13th-century  date.  The 
stone  benches  on  either  side  stop  short  of  the  outer 
doorway,  which,  as  already  noted,  is  a  fine  late  12th- 
century  arch.  It  is  clear  that  this  arch  was  at  first 
rebuilt  in  the  south  wall  of  the  aisle  and  was  covered 
by  the  porch,  and  that,  when  a  new  doorway  was  made 
in  the  14th  century,  the  porch  was  slightly  lengthened 
and  the  old  arch  added  to  its  outer  face.  This  work 
formed  part  of  the  repair  which  included  the  east 
part  of  the  aisle,  but  was  apparently  not  continued 
west  of  the  porch,  where  the  older  window  was  left 
undisturbed.  The  porch  has  a  plastered  barrel-roof, 
apparently  of  the  18th-century. 

The  clearstory,  consisting  of  two-light  windows, 
three  on  each  side,  was  added  in  the  15th  century, 
below  the  high  pitch  of  the  older  roof,  which  appears 
above  it  externally. 

The  tower  was  built  towards  the  middle  of  the 
14th  century,  and  has  diagonal  buttresses  and  a 
finely  moulded  west  doorway,  with  filleted  rolls  in 
the  outer,  and  a  sunk  chamfer  and  wave  in  the  inner 
orders,  and  with  a  scroll  hood-moulding.  Above  this 
is  a  vaulted  niche.  In  the  second  stage  there  is  a 
lozenge-shaped  opening  with  reticulated  tracery. 
A  similar  lozenge  is  pierced  in  the  lower  stage  of  the 
south  wall,  which  is  lighted  in  the  second  stage  by  a 
two-light  window  like  those  of  the  belfry  above.  The 
second  stage  in  the  north  wall  has  a  plain  single  light. 
The  bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two  lights  with 
rather  formal  reticulated  tracery.  The  carved  band 
and  high  parapet  with  cross-loops  above  seem  to  have 
been  added  in  the  15th  century.  The  tower  communi- 
cates with  the  nave  by  a  chamfered  arch  of  three 
orders.   The  vice  is  in  the  south-west  angle. 


The  font  is  of  the  13th  century,  with  a  circular 
bowl  upon  a  circular  stem  furnished  with  four  attached 
shafts,  the  capitals  of  which  are  joined  to  the  bowl 
by  grotesque  head-shaped  projections.  There  is  a 
good  early  17th-century  pulpit,  and  there  is  some  old 
glass  in  the  heads  of  the  north  aisle  windows,  in  addi- 
tion to  that  already  mentioned. 

In  the  chancel,  upon  a  marble  slab  placed  upon  a 
low  stone  table  north  of  the  altar,  is  the  brass  of  a 
priest  in  mass  vestments,  carrying  the  chalice  and 
wafer,  with  a  scroll  inscribed  '  Illu  fili  dei  miserere 
raei.'  In  medallions  at  the  corners  are  the  emblems 
of  the  four  evangelists.  The  inscription  reads  : 
'  Orate  pro  aia  magistri  Johis  Bloxham  primi  Capellani 
istius  Cantarie  bcate  marie  qui  obiit  quinto  die 
mensis  decembris  Anno  xpi  millimo  quingentesimo 
xix°  cuius  anirae  propicietur  deus  amen.  Henricus 
Veer  erat  fundator  istius  cantarie.'  This  brass  evi- 
dently was  originally  in  the  north  chapel,  where  the 
effigy  of  the  founder,  as  already  mentioned,  still 
remains. 

There  are  mural  tablets  in  the  chancel  to  William 
Lambe  (d.  1762)  and  two  of  his  sons,  one  of  whom 
of  the  same  name  was  rector  (d.  1767),  and  to  William 
Lambe  (d.  1780). 

There  is  a  ring  of  six  bells,  by  J.  Taylor  and  Co., 
of  Loughborough,  1899.  They  take  the  place  of  four 
bells'^  which  were  then  recast,  to  which  a  treble  and 
tenor  were  added. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  1835  and  paten 
of  1845,  both  London  make,  and  an  almsdish 
made  in  Birmingham  in  1832,  the  gift  of  Mary 
Tyley,  wife  of  the  Rev.  James  Tyley,  rector,  in 
1846.  There  are  also  two  plated  almsdishes  given 
in  1863.M 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (l) 
baptisms,  1 694-1 767  ;  marriages,  1692-1 754  ;  burials, 
1692-1767;  (ii)  baptisms,  1768-1812;  burials, 
1767-1812;   (iii)  marriages,  1754-1812. 

The  church  is  referred  to  in  a 
ADVOWSON  doubtful  charter  of  833  to  Croyland 
Abbey,  and  the  advowson  was  held 
by  that  abbey  until  the  Dissolution,*'  after  which  it 
was  granted  with  the  Croyland  manor  to  Lord  Parr 
of  Horton  in  1544,  and  in  1558  to  Sir  Robert  Lane, 
Kt.,  of  Horton,  and  Anthony  Throckmorton,  of 
Charleston.  Before  1 562  the  manor  and  advowson 
had  been  separated,  and  in  1586  the  advowson  was 
conveyed  by  Thomas  Birte  and  Cresida  his  wife 
to  William  Goodfellow  and  Mary  his  wife,'*;  since 
then  it  has  been  held  by  a  succession  of  owners,  some- 
times incumbents. 

Henry  Vere  at  his  death  on  22  May,  1493,  left 
directions  for  the  endowment  of  a  chantry  of  one 
chaplain  in  the  parish  church  of  Great  Addington, 
to  be  called  the  Henry  Vere  chantry,  for  the  souls  of 
King  Henry  VII  and  his  consort  Queen  Elizabeth, 
Prince  Arthur  and  Henry,  Duke  of  York,  the  said 
Henry  Vere,  his  parents  and  benefactors.  On  18  Oc- 
tober, I5CX3,  licence  was  obtained  for  the  alienation 
in  mortmain  to  the  priory  of  St.  Andrews,  Northamp- 
ton, of  lands  to  the  yearly  value  of  9  marks,  or  to 
charge  the  lands  of  the  priory  in  Sywell  with  the  pay- 
ment of  9  marks  yearly  to  the  chaplain,  and  to  alienate 


*■  The  first  and  lecond  of  the  old  belli 
were  by  R.  Taylor,  St.  Neots,  1807,  the 
third  wai  by  Tobie  Norrii,  1605,  and  the 


fourth  watdated  1630.  The  inscriptioniare 

given  in  North,  Cb.  Belli  oJNoribartis.  175. 

"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  oj  Nortbanii.  i. 


••  See  above,  under  the  hittory  of  the 
manor. 
"  Feet  ofF.NorthantJ.Mich.zS-agElii. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


to  him  a  messuage,  garden,  and  3  acres  of  land  in 
Great  Addington.**  At  the  Dissolution  the  profits 
from  the  chantry,  of  which  Robert  Aleyn  was  incum- 
bent, were  £(>?^  The  manor  of  Sywell,  belonging 
to  St.  Andrew's  Priory,  exclusive  of  the  payment 
to  this  chantry,  was  granted  to  John  Mershe  in  1543.*' 


The  chantry  and  its  endowment  were  granted 
to  John,  Lord  Mordaunt,  by  George  Brown  in 
'547)**  ^nd  continued  to  be  held  by  the  Mor- 
daunts,*'  as  the  manor  of  the  chantry  of  Great 
Addington. 

There  are  no  charities  in  this  parish. 


LITTLE  ADDINGTON 


Edintone  (xi  cent.) ;  Adington  Watervill  or  Parva 
(xiv.  cent.). 

The  smaller  of  the  Addingtons  differs  little  in  its 
main  features  from  Great  Addington  {q.v.),  which 
lies  to  the  north  of  it.  The  height  varies  from  about 
300   ft.    to    about    150   ft.    above   ordnance   datum. 


LiTTLi:  Addington  Church  :  West  Tower  Doorway 


the  ground  near  the  River  Ncnc  being  liable  to  floods. 
The  area  is  1,134  acres  of  land  and  9  of  water.  The 
population  was  280  in  1921. 

The  village,  triangular  in  shape,  is  about  3^ 
miles  north  of  Higham  Ferrers,  and  |  mile  south- 
west from  Ringstead  and  Addington  Station.  The 
Church  of  St.  Mary  lies  at  its  southern  end,  and  is 
noteworthy  for  the  beauty  of  its  tower. 

To  the  east  of  the  church  is  the  Manor  Farm,  the 
home,  during  many  generations,  of  the  Sanderson 
family.  South  of  it  is  St.  Mary's  vicarage,  built  in 
1859,  but  the  vicar  resides  now  at  Great  Addington. 
To  the  south-west  of  the  church  is  a  two-story  thatched 


house,  now  used  as  a  Working  Men's  Institute, 
dated  1712,  and  a  pair  of  houses  on  the  north  side 
of  the  village  green,  also  of  two  stories,  with  thatched 
roof,  is  dated  1715.  In  both  cases  the  windows 
have  been  modernised.  Two  farms  have  good  stone 
barns  of  late  17th  or  early  l8th  century  date,  with 
thatched  roofs  and  coped  end  gables,  and  there 
is  a  rectangular  dove-house  west  of  the  green, 
with  panel  inscribed  '  R.  L.  1739,'  and  red 
pantiled  roof.  Another  dove-house,  to  the  south- 
east of  the  church,  with  thatched  roof  and 
lantern,  is  now  in  a  state  of  dilapidation.  The 
public  elementary  school,  built  in  1873  for  66 
children,  also  lies  to  the  south  of  the  church,  and 
near  by  is  the  smithy.  A  Wesleyan  chapel  was 
built  in  1844.  Little  Addington  Lodge  stands 
by  itself  in  the  west  of  the  parish. 

We  have  a  glimpse  of  17th-century  village  life 
in  a  dispute  in  1620  over  the  inclosing,  by 
Richard  and  Edward  Beeby,*  of  ways  by  which 
access  was  obtained  to  the  common  well,  the 
washing  block  on  the  common  ground,  where  it 
was  used  by  all  the  inhabitants,  and  the  cattle 
troughs  there. 

The  history  of  the  two  Adding- 
MANORS  tons  before  the  Conquest  is  given 
under  Great  Addington  (q.v.). 
The  abbot  of  Peterborough  held  3  hides  in 
inTLE  ADDINGTON,  which  were  held  by 
Hugh  his  tenant  in  1086.^  In  the  Northampton- 
shire Survey  of  the  time  of  Henry  I  Hugh's  fee 
with  another  half  hide  had  passed  to  Richard  son 
of  Hugh.8  They  later  went  to  the  Lisurs,  and 
Richard  son  of  Hugh  may  have  been  a  Lisurs. 
Possibly  it  was  his  grand-daughter,  daughter  of 
William  Lisurs,  who  married  Viel  de  Engaine.* 
Their  son  Fulk  took  his  mother's  name,  and  from 
him  this  mesne  lordship  passed  with  Bencfield 
(q.v.)  to  the  Lisurs  and  Bassingbournes. 
According  to  Pytchley's  Survey  of  Peterborough 
Fees,  there  were  four  fees  in  Addington  which  were 
held  under  Peterborough  of  the  Lisurs  and  Bassing- 
bournes, namely,  those  of  Daundelyn,  Waterville, 
the  abbot  of  Sulby,  and  the  Earl  of  Gloucester.^  These 
fees  were  partly  in  Great  and  partly  in  Little  Adding- 
ton, but  mostly  in  the  latter,  and  so  it  is  more  con- 
venient to  take  them  here. 

The  Daundelyn  fee  passed  with  Cranford  St. 
Andrew  (q.v.).  A  part  of  it  went  to  the  liarnacks,* 
of  Irthlingborough  (q.v.),  and  from  them  to  Sulby 
Abbey. 

The    Waterville    fee    went    willi    the    Watervilles' 


"CW.  Pal.  Hen.  VII,  ii,  p.  zi6. 
••  Valor  Ecd.  fRcc.  Com.),  iv,  312. 
•'  L.  and  F.  Hen.  VIII,  xviii,  (i)  g.  216 
(38)- 

"  Com.    Pleat.    DecJi    Enr.     Eait.    1 
"Edw.  VI. 


••  Chan, 
id.,  r.4. 
'  Chan. 


In 


q.  p.m. 


Proc.    (Scr.  2),  vol. 
cccxtIx,  no.  9. 

•  V.C.II.  Nortbanti.  i,  317a. 

•  Ibid.  388.^ 


(.Scr.  ii)  cccix,  joo  \ 
bdlc. 


•  Pytchlcy,  lik.  of  Fm  (North.Tnti 
Rcc.  Soc),  76  «. 

»  Ibid.  75. 

'  Feet  of  F.  Ilcn.  Ill,  catc  173,  file  40, 
no.  658. 


160 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED        little  addington 


lands  at  Thorpe  Achurch  (q.v.).  They  were  holding 
in  1 196,  when  Hugh  do  Watervillc  convoyed  land 
to  Maud  de  Houghton,  and  in  1240  Richard  do  Water- 
villc granted  lands  and  a  mill  to  William,  abbot  of 
Sulby.*  The  remainder  of  their  lands  here  was 
apparently  acquired  from  the  heirs  of  Reginald  de 
Waterville,  who  died  in  1287,  by  the  Barnacks,' 
and  from  them  by  the  abbot  of  Sulby. 

The  abbey  of  Sulby  gradually  bought  up  the  lands 
of  the  other  holders  in  Little  Addington  from  the 
early  part  of  the  13th  century  if  not  before.  Kdward  II 
confirmed  the  gifts  of  Arnold  de  Pavilly  (Papilam) 
of  lands,  the  church  and  mill  of  Addington  ;  of 
Roger  Ic  Brabanhoun  (i  Brabazon)  ;  of  John  de 
Hotot,  of  Hampton  ;  of  the  manor  of  Sir  Richard 
son  of  Gervase  de  Barnack,  and  the  lands  of  William 
son  of  Richard  de  Barnack.*  In  1300  a  composition 
was  made  between  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  and 
the  abbot  of  Sulby  whereby  the  abbot  of  Sulby 
had  licence  to  enter  on  the  Barnack  lands  subject 
to  the  continuance  of  the  homage  to  the  abbot  of 
Peterborough,  as  chief  lord,  of  Humphrey  de  Bassing- 
bourne,  under  whom  the  Barnacks  had  held,  suit 
at  the  court  of  Castor,  and  relief  and  fealty  by  the 
abbot  of  Sulby  to  Peterborough.*'  The  abbey  of  Sulby 
had  a  grant  of  free  warren  here  in  1 316,**  and  con- 
tinued to  hold  the  whole  manor  until  the  Dissolution. 

In  1543,  Edward  Humfrey,  a  younger  son  of  Richard 
Humfrey,  of  Barton  Seagrave,  received  a  grant  of  the 
manor  and  rectory  of  Little  Addington,  formerly  the 
property  of  Sulby  Abbey.**  He  settled  the  manor 
on  his  younger  brother  John,  and  died  without  issue 
in  1552.**  John  Humfrey  died  in  1592,  when  he 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  John,  aged  thirty,**  who 
died  without  issue  in  1 596,  when  his  mother,  Margaret, 
survived  him.  John  Humfrey,  the  son,  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother  Edward,*^  citizen  and  merchant  tailor 
of  London,  aged  27,  who  with  Mary  his  wife  in 
1597  sold  to  John  Weekly,  of  Little  Addington, 
for  £S'^  '^^  manor  and  manor  house  of  Little 
Addington,  in  the  occupation  of  Thomas  Selby, 
late  in  the  occupation  of  John  Weekly,*'  the  rent  of 
Zi.  from  the  mills  called  Cotton  Mills,  and  two  barns 
known  as  the  Tithe  Barn  and  Church  Barn.  John, 
father  of  Edward  Humfrey,  had  settled  the  manor 
and  advowson  on  his  wife  Margaret,  and  had  had  a 
daughter  Elizabeth  Burton,  the  mother  of  Rowse, 
Thomas,  and  Israel  Burton,  and  a  daughter  Marjory 
Mallory,  the  mother  of  Thomas,  Anthony,  William, 
and  Katherine  Mallory.  Edward  left  a  son  Edward, 
who  died  in  1599,  aged  five,  leaving  sisters,  Eleanor 
aged  two,  and  Dorothy  aged  one,  as  his  heirs.*' 
John  Weekly,  in  1606,  settled  certain  lands  in  Little 
Addington  on  his  son  Thomas  on  his  marriage  with 
Anne,   daughter  of   Richard  Templer,   and   died   in 


1628.**  A  settlement  was  made  in  1630  by  Thomas 
Weekly,  with  John  Weekly,  presumably  his  son, 
and  .Anne  Weekly,  widow,  evidently  his  mother,** 
and  in  1656  the  manor  was  in  the  hands  of  John  Weekly 
(Weckeley)  and  Mary  his  wife,  and  Thomas  Weekly, 
presumably  their  son.^'  John  Weekly  and  Thomas 
Weekly,  senior,  and  Susan  his  wife  in  1682  conveyed 
the  manor  to  Robert  Underwood,  and  Henry  Weekly,'* 
the  latter  of  whom  was  already  holding  the  Gloucester 
manor  (q.v.)  in  Little  Addington.  This  was  probably 
only  a  settlement,  as  in  1685  Thomas  Weekly,  senior, 
and  his  wife  Susan,  with  Thomas  Weekly,  junior, 
conveyed  it  to  Samuel  Penn,  apparently  for  the  pur- 
pose of  a  mortgage.*'  Thomas  Weekly,  senior,  and 
Susan  his  wife  were  holding  it  in  1691.**  It  was 
possibly  the  manor  which  William  Murdin,  clerk, 
and  his  wife  in  1737  conveyed  to  Robert  Lambe.'* 

When  Bridges  wrote,  the  lordship  was  divided 
among  several  freeholders,  but  the  manor  belonged  to 
Henry  Weekly.  The  most  considerable  estate,  he 
writes,  was  owned  by  the  family  of  Sanderson,  who 
with  it  held  the  advowson. 
At  the  Inclosure  Act  of  1 803, 
William  Zouth  Lucas  Ward 
was  lord  of  the  manor,  and 
one  of  the  principal  proprie- 
tors of  lands  and  messuages 
with  Thomas  Sanderson,  clerk, 
vicar  and  owner  of  the  ad- 
vowson, and  George  Capron. 
There  is  now  no  lord  of  the 
manor,  but  Mr.  G.  H.  Capron, 
lord  of  the  manor  of  Stoke 
Doyle,  is  one  of  the  principal 
landowners  in  the  parish. 

One  and  a  half  hides  in  Little  Addington,  held 
before  the  Conquest  by  Azor,  were  entered  in  the 
Domesday  Survey  among  the  lands  of  the  Bishop  of 
Coutances,^'  whose  tenant  there  was  Osmund.^' 
After  the  forfeiture  of  the  bishop's  lands  it  was 
bestowed  on  either  the  first  Earl  of  Gloucester  or  his 
father-in-law,  and  continued  parcel  of  the  Gloucester 
fee.  In  the  12th  century  Northamptonshire  Survey^' 
it  is  entered  as  a  hide  and  one  and  a  half  virgates,  held 
by  William  de  Huntingdon  of  the  fee  of  Gloucester. 
The  Grimbalds  seem  to  have  succeeded  William  de 
Huntingdon,  as  in  1198-9  Maud,  widow  of  Robert 
Grimbald,  granted  land  in  Addington  and  Slipton  to 
Ernald  de  Bosco,-'  and  this  property  appears  in  1284 
as  a  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Little  Addington 
which  John  de  Bosco  was  then  holding  of  the  Earl  of 
Gloucester.  It  was  held  of  John  de  Bosco  by  Hugh 
Daundelyn,  under  whom  Warner  de  Garney  and 
Beatrice  de  Wolaston  were  sub-tenants.'* 

The  Daundelyn  descent  followed  that  of  Cranford 


Sanderson.  Paly  argent 
and  azure  a  bend  sabte 
tviib  three 
thereon. 


rings 


'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  8  Rich.  I,  caie 
.  171,  file  I,  no.   15;   ibid.  Hen.  Ill,  case 
1731,  file  19,  no.  386. 

•  There  wai  a  family  quarrel  in  1281 
ai  to  lands  in  Addington,  when  the 
question  of  the  legality  of  the  marriage  of 
Robert  de  Waterville  and  Alice,  his  wife, 
was  raised.  Anct.  D.  A5010.  In  1284 
this  fee  is  said  to  have  been  held  by  the 
heirs  of  Reginald  de  Waterville  and 
Richard  de  BarnacV.  Feud.  Aids  iv,  12  ; 
cf.  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fol.  44^. 

•  Dugdale,  A/ob.  Angl.  vi  (ii),  904 ; 
ef.  Col.  Pal.  1292-1301,  p.  520. 


"Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fol.  ^id ; 
Reg.  Rob.  Swaffham  (Peterb.  Cath.  Lib.), 
cclxxvi.  "  Cat.  Chan,  iii,  306. 

'•  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xviii  (i),  g.  981 
(62) ;  Pat.  R.  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  16,  m.  32. 

'*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xcv,  104. 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxxxvi,  89. 

"  Ibid,  ccxlv,  93. 

'•  Close  R.  39  Eliz.  pt.  22  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants,  Hil.  39  Eliz. 

^'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cclxii,  122. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccdxxviii, 
48. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  6  Chas.  I. 

161 


"  Ibid.  Trin.  1656. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Mich.  34 
Chas.  II. 

"Ibid.Mich.IJas.il. 

«•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  3  Wm. 
and  Mary. 

"  Ibid.  Trin.  loand  11  Geo.  II. 

•*  In  Naveslaad  hundred. 

••  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  311. 

•'  Ibid.  388.     In  South  Navesland. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  10  Ric.  I,  case 
171,  file  2,  no.  38;  Farrer,  Honors  and 
Knights'  Fees,  i,  37. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


St.  Andrew  (q.v.).    Maurice  Daundeljii  was  returned 
in  the  1 2th  centur>-  Northamptonshire  Survey. 

In  1357  John  Daundelyn  the  elder,  of  Cranford,  sold 
to  Adam  Franceys,  citizen  of  London,  and  Henry 
Pyel,  clerk,  lands,  rents,  etc.,  in  Cranford,^  a  yearly 
rent  of  6  barbed  arrows,  which  he  used  to  receive  of 
Walter  Daundelyn,  John  Daundelyn,  and  Thomas 
Daundelyn  of  Little  Addington,  of  their  lands  in 
Little  Addington,  of  the  fee  of  the  Earl  of  Glou- 
cester, and  a  rent  of  a  pair  of  gloves  from  the  lands  of 
John  Pyel  in  Great  and  Little  Addington.  Walter, 
John  and  Thomas  Daundelyn,  of  Little  Addington, 
were  witnesses  to  this  grant.  It  was  possibly  this 
John  Daundelyn  of  Little  Addington  who  was 
assaulted  and  maimed  at  Higham  Ferrars  in  I3S4-^' 
When  the  Daundelyns  ceased  to  hold  in  Addington 
does  not  appear.  But  their  property  is  evidently 
represented  by  a  manor  of  Little  Addington,  of  which 
Barnabas  Wykyrley  or  Wykeley  or  Weekly  made  a 
conveyance  in  1553  to  Giles  Wykeley^^  (or  Weekly), 


ScA'.F  OF  Feet 
Plan  of  Little  Addington  Church 


v/ho  settled  it  in  1554^  on  his  wife  Eleanor.  Accord- 
ing to  Bridges,  Eleanor  was  the  daughter  of  Thomas 
Sawyer  of  Raunds,  and  Giles  died  in  1558  9  se'sed  of 
the  manor  of  Addington  Parva,  held  of  the  Crown  as 
of  the  honour  of  Gloucester,  leaving  a  son  John  as  his 
heir.**  A  Richard  Weekly  appears  as  a  tenant  in  the 
Sulby  manor  (q.v.)  in  1597,  and  in  1627  Richard 
Weekly  died  at  Little  Addington  seised  of  a  messuage 
and  lands  held  of  F^dward  Lord  Montagu  as  of  his 
hundred  of  Huxloc  ;  of  one  and  a  half  virgates  of  land 
held  of  the  king  in  chief  by  knight  service  i^  and  of  a 
cottage  held  of  Edward  Lord  Montagu  as  of  the 
honour  of  Gloucester.  By  his  will,  dated  3  June  1626, 
he  bequeathed  this  cottage  to  his  son  Richard,  but 
his  heir  was  his  son  Henry .^ 

The   church   of   ST.    MART    stands 

CHURCH   on   high  ground    above    the    road,    and 

consists    of    chancel    20   ft.    by    15    ft., 

with    modern    vestry    and   organ   chamber    on    the 


north  side,  clearstoried  nave  of  three  bays  41  ft. 
by  14  ft.  3  in.,  north  and  south  aisles  each 
about  II  ft.  wide,^'  north  and  south  porches,  and 
engaged  west  tower  11  ft.  by  8  ft.  9  in.,  all  these 
measurements  being  internal.  The  tower  is  sur- 
mounted by  a  short  spire.  The  church  is  built  on 
ground  falling  sharply  from  south  to  north,  so  that 
while  the  level  of  the  south  porch  is  two  steps  above 
that  of  the  nave,  the  north  porch  is  five  steps  below 
it.     There  is  also  a  westward  slope. 

The  church  is  built  of  rubble,  plastered  internally, 
and  the  chancel  has  a  low,  modern  slated  roof.     The 
other  roofs  are  leaded,  with  plain  parapets  to  the 
clearstory  and  north  aisle  ;   the  lead  overhangs  on  the 
south  aisle.     The  greater  part  of  the  building  belongs 
to  the  last  quarter  of  the  13th  century,  covering  per- 
haps the  period  c.  1 280-1 300,  the  north  arcade  and 
two  windows  at  the  west  end  of  the  north  aisle  being 
rather  earlier  in  character  than  the  rest  of  the  work, 
though  the  whole  appears  to  have  been  more  or  less 
continuous.     The  tower   was 
built  towards  the  end  of  the 
14th  century,  when  the  clear- 
story and   south   porch  were 
added  and  the  chancel  altered. 
The   east    end   of    the  north 
aisle  was  rebuilt  in  the  15th 
century,  and    the   date    1705 
on  a  stone  below  the  parapet 
apparently   records    some   re- 
construction of  the  north  wall 
at  that  time.    The  church  was 
restored  and  reseated  in  1857, 
and  there  was  a  more  exten- 
sive   restoration    in    1882-3, 
I280~  1300  when  the  vestry  was  added. 

I360~70  The    chancel   has    a    small 

1512  Century  14th  century  east  window  of 

EH  Subsequent  »lV1oa  two    trefoiied    lights    with 

20 30 40 K3  quatrefoil  in  the  head,  and  a 

diagonal  buttress  at  the  north- 
east angle.  If  the  window  is 
in  its  original  position  it 
seems  likely  that  the  north 
rebuilt  at  this  period,  and 
In  the  south  wall  is 


and  east  walls  were 
possibly  the  chancel  shortened, 
a  13th  century  priest's  doorway  of  a  single  chamfered 
order,  and  west  of  it  a  low-side  window,  the  lower 
part  of  which  (now  blocked)  is  contemporary  with  the 
doorway,  the  head  being  of  14th  century  date.  There 
are  remains  of  a  destroyed  window  east  of  the  doorway. 
The  chancel  is  open  its  full  width  to  the  nave  by  a  late 
13th  century  arch  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner- 
most resting  on  moulded  corbels  supported  by  heads. 
The  nave  arcades  have  excellently  moulded  arches 
and  piers  composed  of  clusters  of  four  sli.ifls,  with 
arriscd  projections  in  the  hollows  between.  In  the 
later  south  arcade  these  projections  are  enlarged 
and  treated  as  additional  shafts,  but  have  no  capitals. 
The  responds  correspond  with  the  piers,  except  at  the 
east  end  on  the  south  side,  where  the  arch  springs 
from  a  moulded  corbel  carved  on  the  underside  with 
foliage. 


••  Cat.  Clou,  1354-60,  p.  428. 
•'  Cal.  Pat.  1354-8,  p.  87  i  ibid.  n^iM, 
p.  .87. 

••  Fttt  ol  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  7  Ed.  VI. 


"  Ibid.  Mich.  1  Phil,  and  Mary. 
•*  llin.    Noribanli.    ii,    207 ;    let    alio 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cxjiv,  217. 
•*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Str.  ii),  dcizviii,64. 

162 


••  Ibid. 

"  The  north  .liilo  it  10  ft.  q  in.  wide  at 
icicait  end,  and  the  inuth  aide  11  ft.  The 
width  acroti  n.ivc  and  aiilca  i>  41  ft. 


J.ITILE    AdDINCTON    ChURCII    KROM     lllE    SoU TH 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED        little  addington 


The  south  doorway  is  of  two  moulded  orders  on 
angle  shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and  the 
porch  opening  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner 
springing  from  half-octagonal  responds  with  much 
restored  moulded  capitals.  The  plainer  north  door- 
way has  a  continuous  round  and  hollow  moulding, 
without  hood,  and  tlie  porch,  which  is  lo  ft.  square 
internally,  is  covered  by  a  stone  vault  with  chamfered 
diagonal  ribs.  The  roof  space  above  was  lighted  by  a 
window  in  the  gable,  now  blocked,  but  was  never 
properly  a  porch-chamber.  The  porch  has  stone 
benches  and  an  outer  double  chamfered  arch  of  two- 
centred  segment  form. 

There  is  a  beautiful  double  piscina  with  two 
trefoiled  openings  and  quatrefoil  over,  together  with 
an  aumbry  in  the  south  aisle,  and  a  single  piscina  in 
the  east  wall  of  the  nortli  aisle.  Above  the  double 
piscina  is  a  plain  stone  image-bracket.  The  east 
window  of  the  south  aisle  consists  of  three  uncusped 
gradated  lancets  with  pierced  spandrels,  and  the 
west  window  and  one  on  either  side  of  the  doorway, 
are  of  two  lights  with  forked  mullion.  Another 
window  in  this  aisle  is  a  14th  century  insertion,  of 
three  trefoiled  lights  with  fully  developed  reticulated 
tracery.  In  the  north  aisle  the  west  window^  and 
another  in  the  north  wall  adjoining  it,  are  each  of  two 
plain  lights  with  a  cuspcd  circle  in  the  head,  c.  1280  ; 
another  has  a  forked  mullion,  and  two  at  the  east  end 
are  four-centred  15th-century  windows  of  three 
cinqucfoiled  lights.  The  clearstory  has  four  win- 
dows on  the  south  side  and  three  on  the  north,  all 
square  headed  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights. 

The  tower  is  inserted  at  the  west  end  of  the  nave, 
cutting  it  short  by  a  bay,  the  reason  being  perhaps  the 
westward  slope  on  which  the  church  stands.  The 
tower  is  of  three  stages  with  moulded  plinth,  coupled 
buttresses,  and  battlemented  parapet  above  a  band 
of  quatrefoils.  The  beautiful  western  doorway,  with 
sculptured  figures  in  the  hollow  mouldings,  has  a 
crocketed  hood  with  finial  and  flanking  pinnacles, 
and  over  it  is  a  traceried  window  of  two  lights.  The 
deeply  recessed  bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two 
trefoiled  lights  with  quatrefoil  in  the  head  except  on 
the  south  side,  where  the  upper  part  of  the  window  is 
older  work  re-used,  with  a 
trefoiled  circle  in  the  head, 
similar  to  the  west  windows 
of  the  north  aisle.  The  spire 
has  two  sets  of  lights.  The 
arms  of  Pyel  (a  bend  between 
two  molets)  occur  upon  the 
upper  stage  of  the  tower  on 
the  north  side,  and  ironstone 
is  freely  used  with  picturesque 
effect.  Internally  the  tower 
opens  into  the  nave  by  a  lofty 
arch  of  four^  continuous 
chamferdU  orders,  and  into  the  aisles  by  similar  but 
less  lofty  arches.  The  vice  is  in  the  south-west  angle. 
The  15th-century  rood  screen,  with  its  doors, 
remains ;   it  has  two  bays  on  each  side  of  the  middle 


PviL.     Argent    a    bend 
between  two  moleti  sable. 


opening,  but  has  been  badly  painted  in  brown  pigment, 
and  the  top  is  new.  The  oak  pulpit  is  contemporary 
with  the  screen,  and  has  carved  panels ;  it  stands  on  a 
modern  stone  base.  Outside  the  east  wall  of  the  south 
aisle  are  indications  of  a  blocked  outer  doorway,  but 
there  is  no  sign  of  any  remains  of  an  internal  stair  to 
the  rood  loft.  The  font  is  modern,  with  octagonal 
p.inelled  bowl.     The  seating  dates  from  1 857. 

At  the  restoration  of  1883  most  of  the  monumental 
slabs  in  the  chancel  floor,  with  the  Sanderson  arms 
and  inscriptions,  were  sunk,  and  tiles  placed  over 
them.  Some  brass  plates,  including  one  to  John 
Sanderson,  1672,  are  in  the  vestry. 

There  are  three  bells,  all  by  Hugh  Watts  II,  of 
Leicester.  The  treble  is  an  alphabet  bell  dated  1610, 
and  the  second  and  third,  dated  respectively  1620  and 
1629,  are  inscribed  '  HIS  Nazarenus  Rex  Judeorum 
Fili  Dei  miserere  mei.' '"' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  paten  of  1853  and  a  cup  of 
1857,  both  I-ondon  make.'** 
The  registers  begin  in  1588. 

The  advowson  belonged  to  Arnold 
ADFOWSON  de  Pavilly  (Papilam)  in  the  middle  of 
the  1 2th  century,  who  gave  it  to 
Sulby  Abbey.*^  The  lords  of  the  manor  seem  to  have 
regained  possession,  and  in  123.).  it  was  regranted  to 
William  Abbot  of  Sulby  by  Richard  de  Waterville,  who 
was  received  into  all  benefits  of  the  Abbey.*'  It  was 
held  by  the  abbey  until  the  Dissolution,  when  in  1543 
it  was  granted  with  the  manor  and  rectory  to  Edward 
Humfrey.**  It  was  not  included  in  the  sale  of  the 
manor  to  John  Weekly,  but  in  1608  was  in  the  hands 
of  Rowse  Burton,  John  Humfrey's  grandson,  who 
conveyed  it  to  Dorothy  and  Eleanor  Humfrey,  the 
daughters  and  co-heirs  of  John  Humfrey's  son 
Edward. ■*'  It  was  conveyed  in  1621  by  Richard  Pickes 
andEleanor  his  wife,  and  Henry  Calthorpe  and  Dorothy 
his  wife,  evidently  Edward  Humfrey's  daughters,  to 
John  Sanderson,**  of  Little  Addington.  In  1634  John 
Sanderson,  and  his  wife  Cecily,  and  Thomas  Sander- 
son were  dealing  with  the  rectory  and  advowson,*'  as 
were  John  Sanderson  and  his  wife  Margaret  and 
Theophilus  Sanderson  (their  son  and  heir)  in  1 662,*' 
and  Theophilus  alone  in  1669.''*  John  Sanderson 
died  in  1672,  and  the  death  in  1683  of  his  son  Theo- 
philus was  followed  by  that  of  John  Sanderson,  son 
and  heir  of  Theophilus,  in  1687,  at  the  age  of  twenty- 
three.^"  The  rectory  and  advowson  must  then  have 
been  held  by  Sanderson  co-heiresses,  the  daughters 
of  Theophilus,  one  of  whom,  Martha  wife  of  Thomas 
Pemberton,  was  with  her  husband  dealing  with  one- 
third  in  1695,5*  and  in  1697.^^  Elizabeth  Sanderson, 
the  daughter  of  Theophilus,  married  her  cousin, 
Anthony  Sanderson,  of  Serlby  Hall,  Co.  Nottingham, 
and  died  in  1694.^'  The  rectory  and  advowson  ulti- 
mately passed  to  her  husband  with  Little  Addington 
mansion.  He  became  vicar  in  1720,'*  and  died  in 
1737.  Harvey  Sparkes  and  William  Sanderson  pre- 
sented in  1737,  William  Sanderson  in  1770,  and 
Thomas  Sanderson  in  181 3. ^^ 

The  last  Sanderson  to  hold  the  rectory  and  advow- 


•*  The  we»t  window  is  wholly  restored. 
•*  Three  on  the  inner  tide. 
♦•  North,  Cb.  Bells  of  Nortbants.  176. 
♦'  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Nortbantt.  3. 
♦•  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  vi,  (ii)  904. 
•»  Feet  o(  F.  Norcbanti.  Hen.  Ill,  ca»e 
172,  file  27,  no.  340. 


««  Pat.  R.  35  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  16,  m.  32. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  6  Ja».  I. 

"  Ibid.  Hil.  I9]as.  I. 

«'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  10  Chas.I. 

"  Ibid.  Hil.  12  and  i3Chas.  II. 

"Ibid.  East.  21  Cha>.  II. 

'»  M.I.  in  church. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  7 
Will.  HI. 

'» Ibid.  Hil.  9  Will,  and  Mary. 

"  M.I.  in  church. 

"  Information  supplied  by  Mrs.  Eliz. 
Sander  son-Etough. 

"  Inst.  Bks.  (P.R.O.). 


163 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


son  was  Thomas  Sanderson,  who  was  also  vicar,  and 
died  unmarried  in  1855.^*  Mrs.  Benton  Keane  now 
holds  the  advowson. 

A  vicarage  is  referred  toe.  1 2 14-15,  and  was  endowed 
with  a  moiety  of  the  church,  the  abbey  and  convent  of 
Sulby  retaining  the  other  half.*'    The  endowment  now 


includes  275  acres  of  glebe,  a  part  of  which  was  a 
thank-offering  for  the  Restoration,  given  by  John 
Sanderson,  '  Counsellor  at  law,'  who  had  been  '  a  great 
suffer>,r  for  King  Charles  I.'^  An  allotment  was  made 
for  tithes  at  the  passing  of  the  Inclosure  Act.*' 
There  are  no  charities  in  the  parish. 


ALDWINKLE  ALL  SAINTS 


Aldvincle  {x\  cent.) ;  Aldwj'ncle,  Audewinlde, 
Ardewinlde  (xv  cent.).  The  parish  of  Aldwinkle  All 
Saints  was  united  to  that  of  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter  by 
Order  in  Council  of  29  November  1 879.^  The  combined 
parishes  contain  2,886  acres,  the  most  of  which  isgrass- 
land,  with  a  fair  amount  of  wood  around  Lyveden. 
The  parishes  are  bounded  on  the  east  by  the  River 
Nene,  and  on  the  south  by  its  tributary  Harper's 
Brook.  From  the  low  land  near  these  streams  the 
ground  rises  towards  the  north-west,  where  it  reaches 
a  height  of  nearly  290  ft.     The  soil  is  clay  and  gravel. 

A  road  from  Thorpe  Waterville  leads  over  the  Nene 
and  across  the  bridge,  called  Brancey  Bridge,  over 
Harper's  Brook,  to  the  village  of  Aldwinkle  All  Saints. 
The  church  lies  on  the  south  side  of  the  road  and  the 


South  Hay,  Lady  Wood,  Bradshaw  Wood  and 
Bareshanke  Meadow  (now  Bearshank  Wood).'  Old 
Mill  Bridge,  carrying  the  road  from  I  slip  to  Lowick 
over  Harper's  Brook,  may  mark  the  site  of  the  manorial 
mill.  Other  place  names  are  Cockermouth  Closes, 
Great  Laund,  Old  Laund  and  Old  Park. 

In  1651  the  constables  and  third-boroughs  presented 
seven  recusants  and  declared  that  the  village  contained 
no  ale  house  nor  any  Sabbath  breakers,  common 
drunkards  or  profane  swearers ;  that  it  was  well 
provided  with  churches  in  a  state  of  repair;  its  high- 
ways and  bridges  were  in  good  repair  and  there  was 
provision  for  its  poor.* 

An  Act  for  inclosing  the  common  lands  of  Aldwinkle 
was  obtained  in  1772. 


>— ^i."^ — '•«.,. .  •  ^aJt-Tf^!- 


Aldwinkle:  Dryden's  Birthplace 


manor  house,  which  was  pulled  down  about  1826, 
adjoined  the  churchyard  on  the  east.*  The  rectory 
house,  the  birthplace  of  John  Drydcn,  the  poet,  is  a 
plain  but  rather  picturesque  two  story  building  of 
rubble  and  plaster  with  a  thatched  roof.  It  is,  in 
part,  of  i6tli  century  date,  but  tlic  windows  have  been 
modernised  and  the  liouse  othcrv/ise  altered.  The 
road  continues  through  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter  to  Oundlc. 
A  branch  from  it  goes  to  Lowick  and  another  to  the 
north  to  Lyveden  where  some  of  the  woodland  is  in 
this  parish.  We  have  here  mention  in  the  17th 
century  of  the  Over  and  Great  Assart,  South  Wood  or 


In  1086  Picot,  Landric  and  Oger  held 
M.4N0RS  of  Guy  de  Reinbuedcurt  5  hides  in 
Aldwinkle  All  Saints,  wliich  in  King 
Edward's  time  had  bcin  held  freely  by  Lef si.*  Richard, 
son  of  Guy  de  Reinbuedcurt,  held  in  Aldwinkle 
3  hides,  less  half  a  virgatc,  of  the  queen's  fee.*  His 
licir  was  his  daughter  Margery,  who  married  Robert 
Foliot,  lord  of  the  barony  of  Wardon,'  and  ihe  over- 
lordship  of  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Aldwinkle  afterwards 
passed  with  this  barony.* 

Tlie  mesne  tenant  in  1242-3  was  Henry  de  Ald- 
winkle,* probably  failicr  of  Richard  de  Aldwinkle,  son 


**  Norihonii  N.  and  Q.  i,  115. 
»'  Rot.  Hug.  dt  Wtllet  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  130. 
•'  Lanidownc  MS.  1029. 
"  Priv.  Stat.  1 1  Cto.  IV,  c.  19. 
'  London  Gaxillt,  5  Dtc.  1879,  no.  7201. 


Set  also  Loc.  Gov.  Bd.  Order,  25  Mar. 
1885.  ^  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep.  vii,  251. 

■  Pat.  R.  9  Chai.  I,  pt.  5,  no.  24 ; 
12  Chai.  II,  pt.  24,  no.  12. 

*  Quarter  Sen.  Rtc.  (Norlhanlf.  Rcc. 
Soc),  124,  161, 172,  227. 


'  r.C.H.  Northanti.  i,  343a. 

•  Ibid.  365/I. 

'  Rrldgci,  Hill.  Northanti.  i,  i  iz. 

•  Uk.  of  Feel,  pt.  i,  495,  499  ;   Cat.  lag. 
p.m.  ii,  374. 

'  Bk.  of  Feei,  pt.  ii,  937. 


164 


HUXLOE    HUNDRED 


of  Henry**  and  grandfather  of  Henry  de  Aldwinkle, 
who  rendered  2/.  6d.  a  year  to  the  barony  of  Warden 
in  1280,"  and  held  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Aldwinkle  in 
1284."  This  Henry  had  a  son  Richard  de  Aldwinkle/* 
who  in  131 3  helped  to  carry  off  the  goods  of  Aymer 
de  Valence  in  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter**  (y.f.).  and  was  a 
tenant  by  knight's  service  in  Aldwinkle  in  1316.**  In 
1 35 1  Henry  de  Aldwinkle,  probably  Richard's  son, 
conveyed  the  manor  of  Aldwinkle  to  Adam  Bacoun, 
knight,**  evidently  as  trustee,  for  John  de  Aldwinkle 
held  there  in  1376,**  and  lands  were  conveyed  by  Sir 
Simon  Felbrigge  and  his  wife  Katherine,  probably  as 
trustees,  to  William  Aldwinkle  in  1434-5*'*.  William  de 
Aldwinkle  died  in  1 463  leaving  a  widow  who  married 
William  Chambre,  founder  of  Chambre's  chantry.*' 
His  heir  was  his  kinsman  Thomas  Lenton**  who  died 
seised  of  the  manor  in  1504  leaving  a  son  John,*'  who 
died  in  1558.  His  grandson  John  son  of  Robert 
Lenton  succeeded,  and  apparently  settled  the  manor 
in  1582*'  and  again  in  1583**  on  his  first  wife  Dorothy. 
She  died  in  the  following  year  and  he  married  as  his 
second  wife  Elizabeth  Shepperde.  In  1587  and  again 
in  1593  he  leased  his  messuage  and  lands  in  Aldwinkle 
to  Robert  Hatley  and  John  Viccars.  His  son  Simon 
was  holding  at  the  end  of  the  l6th  century,  when  he 
disputed  his  father's  leases.*^ 

In  161 3*'  and  1616^*  Simon  Lenton  conveyed  the 
manor  to  Sir  Oliver  Luke  of  Woodend  (Co.  Beds)  and 
Sir  John  Luke,  probably  in  trust  for  Sir  Oliver's  sister 
Anne,  wife  of  Sir  Miles  Fleetwood,*'  who  dated  a 
document  from  Aldwinkle  in 
1627**  and  presented  to  the 
church  in  1637.*'  He  was 
Receiver  of  the  Court  of 
Wards,  and  had  three  eminent 
sons,  William,  a  Royalist, 
George,  who  fought  in  the 
Swedish  army  under  Gustavus 
Adolphus,  and  Charles,  a  well- 
known  Parliamentary  officer. 
Sir  Miles  Fleetwood  died  in 
1641  and  was  succeeded  in  his 
estates  and  office  by  his  son 
William,  also  a  knight,  who 
was  deprived  of  the  Receivership  of  the  Court  of  Wards 
by  Parliament,  the  office  being  conferred  in  1644  on  his 
brother  Charles.**  In  1646  Sir  William  Fleetwood  of 
Aldwinkle  petitioned  to  compound  for  his  delinquency 
in  having  attended  the  king,  as  his  sen'ant  in  ordinary, 
at  Oxford  and  elsewhere.  He  was  certified  to  be 
suffering  from  dropsy  and  annuities  were  payable  to 
his  brother  Charles  and  his  sister  Anne.*'     Sir  William 


Fleetwood.  Party 
tvavy  azure  and  or  six 
martlets  countercoloured . 


ALDWINKLE 
ALL  SAINTS 

and  his  wife  Elizabeth  conveyed  the  manor  of  Ald- 
winkle in  1650  to  Richard  Gorman  and  William  Snowe, 
probably  for  purposes  of  settlement." 

In  1659  Nathaniel  Whiting,  minister  of  Aldwinkle 
All  Saints,  dedicated  his  '  Old  Jacob's  Altar  newly 
repaired  '  to  the  three  Fleetwood  brothers.  '  I  am 
not  ashamed.  Right  Worsliipful,'  he  says  in  words 
particularly  addressed  to  the  eldest  of  them,  '  to  tell 
the  world  how  ancient  and  affectionate  a  Maecenas 
you  have  been  to  me,  that  I  received  many  encourage- 
ments from  you  when  I  was  a  student  in  the  Universi- 
tie,  how  ready  I  have  always  found  you  to  lay  forth 
your  power  and  interest  for  me,  how  freely  and  speedily 
you  placed  me  at  Aldwinkle,  and  how  muche  I  have 
found  the  favour  of  a  Patron  and  the  affections  of  a 
friend  (I  might  go  higher)  for  the  space  of  many 
ycares.  .  .  .' 

Sir  William  died  in  1674***  and  was  succeeded  by  his 
son  Miles,  M.P.  for  Northampton  county  (1677-80), 
who  died  in  1688,  leaving  a  son  and  heir  William.** 
This  William  Fleetwood  with  his  wife  Elizabeth 
conveyed  the  manor  of  Aldwinkle  All  Saints  and  a  free 
fishery  to  John  Carpenter  and  William  Whitwell  in 
1693,**  probably  for  a  settlement.  Bridges  states  that 
William  Fleetwood  sold  the  manor  to  Elmes  Spinkes, 
who  was  holding  in  1723.**  From  Elmes  Spinkes  the 
manor  and  fishery  seem  to  have  passed  to  Elizabeth 
Spinkes,  the  wife  of  Col.  Thomas  Gwillim,  of  Old 
Court, aide-de-camp  to  General  Wolfe,  who  was  holding 
in  1754.**  Their  daughter  Elizabeth  Posthuma 
married  Lt.-Col.  John  Graves  Simcoe,**  who  was 
dealing  with  the  property  in  1784  and  1788.*'  The 
estate  has  been  sold,  but  all  manorial  rights  have  ap- 
parently fallen  into  desuetude. 

In  1242-3  half  a  knight's  fee  in  Aldewinkle  repre- 
senting TITCHMJRSH  MANOR  was  said  to  be 
held  of  William  de  Ros  of  Hamelak.*'  Mentions  of 
this  overlordship  recur  until  the  15th  century.**  In 
1242-3  the  demesne  tenant  of  this  half  knight's  fee 
was  William  de  Mosca.**  In  1284  he  had  been 
succeeded  by  William  de  la  Zouche,*"  who  was  tenant 
of  one  knight's  fee.  In  1316  allot  part  of  this  holding 
had  passed  to  Henry  Titchmarsh,**  and  in  1346  to 
Gilbert  Titchmarsh  "  In  1428  a  fourth  part  of  a 
knight's  fee  in  Aldwinkle,  held  of  the  Lord  of  Ros  and 
once  in  the  tenure  of  Gilbert  de  Titchmarsh,  was 
shared  by  William  Aldwinkle,  Henry  Neville  and  John 
Travers.**  The  manor  of  Aldwinkle  called 'Tyche- 
mersh  Manor'  was  conveyed  in  1427-8  by  Robert 
Longe  and  his  wife  Anne  to  William  Aldwinkle,William 
Armeston,  John  Beans,  clerk,**  and  may  afterwards 
have  passed  with  the  chief  manor  of  Aldwinkle  (q.v.). 


*>Buccleuch  MS.  no.  67. 

'•  Cal.  Inq.  ii,  374. 

**  Feud.  Aids.,  iv,  13. 

"Feet  of  F.Ed.  II,  case  175,  file  65, 
jio.  193. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1313-17,  p.  72. 

'«  Fiud.  Aids,  iv,  28. 

«  Feet  of  F.  Ed.  Ill,  caie  177,  file  79, 
no.  379. 

'•  Bridget,  Hist.  Nortbanls.  ii,  209. 

"•»  Feet  of  F.  Hen.  VI,  caie  179,  file  94, 
no.  77. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1485-94,  p.  253. 

'•  Buccleuch  Deedi,  G  31. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  xviii,  95. 

••  Recov.  R.  Northanti.  Hil.  Eliz.  ro. 
44«- 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  25  &  26 
Eliz. 

"Chan.  Proc.  (Ser.  ii)  vol.  ii,  bdle. 
244,  no.  1. 

"  Feet  of  K.  Northanti.  Eaat.  n  Jas.  I ; 
Recov.  R.  Northantt.  East.  11  Jas.  I,  ro. 
122. 

'♦  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  14  Jai.  I. 

"  V.C.H.  Beds,  iii,  239;  D.N.B. 

'«  Cal.  S.P.  Dom.  1627-8,  p.  372. 

«'  Init.  Bks.  P.R.O.  "  D.N.B. 

••  Cal.  Com.  for  Comp.  1403. 

•"Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  1650; 
Recov.  R.  East.  1652,  ro.  i. 

"a  D.N.B. 

"  Nortbanls.  N.  and  Q.  (new  Ser.)  i,  1 1 3 
et  seq. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  5  Wm. 
and  Mary. 

"  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  209. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  27 
Geo.  II. 

•'  Burke,  Landed  Gentry. 

"  Recov.  R.  Northanti.  24  Geo.  Ill, 
ro.  18;  ;  28  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  41. 

•'  Bk.  of  Fees,  pt.  ii,  937. 

••  Feui..  Aids,  iv,  13,  49,  51  ;  Cal.  Inq. 
viii,  339. 

••  Bk.  of  Feel,  pt.  ii,  937. 

*"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  13  ;  Cal.  Inq.  viii,  339. 

*^Feud.  Aids,  iv,  28. 

•«  Ibid.  449.  *>Ibid.  49,  51. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Hen.  VI,  case  179,  file  93, 
no.  46. 


165 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  church  of  ALL  SAINTS  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  25  ft.  6  in.  by  15  ft.  9  in. 
with  vestry  on  the  north  and  chapel  on 
the  south  side,  clearstoried  nave  of  three  bays  36  ft. 
6  in.  by  14  ft.,  north  and  south  aisles,  south  porch, 
and  west  tower  11  ft.  6  in.  square,  all  these  measure- 
ments being  internal.  The  north  aisle  is  8  ft.  6  in. 
wide  and  the  south  aisle  7  ft.  6  in.,  the  width  across 
nave  and  aisles  being  34.  ft.  8  in. 

With  the  exception  of  the  tower,  which  is  faced 
with  dressed  stone,  the  church  is  built  of  rubble, 
plastered  internally,  and  the  chancel  has  a  grey  slated, 
eaved  roof.  The  other  roofs  are  leaded  and  of  low  pitch, 
behind  battlemented  parapets. 

The  chancel,  chancel  arch  and  south  arcade  of  the 
nave  belong  to  the  latter  half  of  the  13th  century, 
though  the  chancel  retains  only  two  original  windows 
and  has  been  otherwise  altered.     The  north  arcade 


m  m^^'^-mm^^m 


North  Aisle 

.w.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.nii'''.'.'. 

Nave 
South  Aisle 


ilK'-'t-'-^l 


a  132!  Century  |,' 

Q 14™  Century  I 
ESISIHCentur/^ 


10   5 


Scale  of  Feet 
Plan  of  All  Saints'  Church,  Aldwinkle 


and  aisle,  vestry  and  clearstory  date  from  the  14th 
century,  the  arcade  being  first  built,  while  the  chapel, 
tower  and  porch  are  15th-century  additions,  the 
chapel  having  been  erected  by  William  Chambre  and 
his  wife,  who  founded  a  chantry  there  in  1488.  Several 
new  windows  were  inserted  about  this  time.  The 
chancel  was  restored  in  1863,  and  the  rest  of  the 
church  in  1893,  when  the  old  scats  and  a  west  gallery 
were  removed  and  the  tower  arch  opened  out.  The 
building  is  at  present  used  chiefly  for  funerals,  and  is 
furnished  with  chairs. 

The  chancel  has  a  four-light  east  window  with 
much  restored  early  geometrical  tracery,  and  in  the 
north  wall  is  a  window  of  two  uncusped  lights  with  a 
quatrcfoilcd  circle  in  the  head.  The  other  windows, 
one  at  the  west  end  of  the  north  wall  and  tlie  other  on 
the  south  side,  are  15th-century  insertions,  each  of 
two  cinquefoiled  lights.  The  piscina  is  in  the  sill  of 
the  south  window  and  there  are  brackets  for  statues 
in  the  east  wall,  on  cither  side  of  the  window.  The 
chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders  on  moulded 
corbels,  that  on  the  south  side  having  nail  head  orna- 
ment and  a  small  angle  shaft  supporting  the  outer 
order. 

The  13th-century  south  arcade  has  chamfered 
arches  of  two  orders  springing  from  cylindrical  piers 


with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and  from  a  similar 
respond  at  the  west  end.  The  nail  head  occurs  in  the 
capital  of  the  easternmost  pier,  and  at  the  east  end  the 
arch  'ests  on  a  corbel.''*  The  circular  bases  stand  on 
large  square  plinths  9  in.  high,  which  may  be  part  of 
the  south  wall  of  an  earlier  church.  The  north  arcade 
has  cylindrical  piers  of  less  diameter*^  and  half-round 
responds,  all  with  circular  moulded  capitals  and 
bases,'"  and  the  arches  are  also  of  two  chamfered 
orders.  There  is  a  14th-century  piscina  with  muti- 
lated bowl  in  the  south-east  corner  of  the  north  aisle, 
and  this  aisle  retains  its  14th-century  east  and  west 
windows,  each  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  a  quatre- 
foil  in  the  head,  and  the  west  window  of  the  south 
aisle  is  of  the  same  period  and  style.  The  other  win- 
dows of  the  aisles  are  four-centred  15th-century 
insertions  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights,  and  the  clear- 
story has  two  square-headed  two-light  windows  on 
each  side.  The  moulded  north 
doorway  is  contemporary  with 
the  wall,  but  the  south  door- 
way is  of  15th  century  date. 
The  nave  roof  has  four 
moulded  principals,  one  of 
which  bears  the  initials  and 
date  '  I.B.  1676.'  The  chancel 
roof  is  modern. 

The  Chambre  chantry  chapel 
is  14  ft.  6  in.  long  by  10  ft.  6  in. 
wide  and  is  open  to  the  chan- 
cel by  a  15th-century  arch  of 
two  moulded  orders  on  at- 
tached shafts,  and  to  the  aisle 
by  a  narrower  arch  of  the 
same  type,  the  shafts  having 
moulded  capitals.  In  the  east 
capital  of  the  arch  to  the 
chancel  and  the  north  capital 
of  the  aisle  arch  are  shields  of 
arms,  the  former  the  arms  of  William  Chambre,  and 
there  is  a  third  below  a  bracket  in  the  east  wall.  The 
chapel  stands  in  front  of  the  south  aisle  and  is  lighted 
by  a  four-light  east  window  with  Perpendicular  tracery 
and  by  two  three-light  windows  of  the  same  type  on 
the  south  side.  Below  the 
westernmost  window  is  an  ex- 
ternal doorway  with  rectang- 
ular hood,  and  in  the  usual 
position  an  elaborate  traceried 
piscina  recess  with  battle- 
mented cresting  and  circular 
bowl.  The  late  14th-century 
vestry  retains  two  original 
windows  and  its  west  wall  is 
weathered  back  so  as  to  clear 
the  older  chancel  window. 

The  tower  is   of   four   un- 
equal stages  and  has  a  moulded 

plinth  and  buttresses  covering  the  angles,  on 
which  animal  figures  are  carved  on  the  strings  at 
each  stage.  The  moulded  west  doorway  is  deeply 
recessed,  with  crocketcd  ogee  hood  set  within  a 
rectangular  frame,  with  quatrcfoilcd  circles  in  the 
spandrels.  Over  the  doorway  is  a  traceried  window  of 
three  cinquefoiled  liglits,  with  a  small  niche    above, 


C  II  A  M  a  R  E .  Ciilei  a 
cbeveron  bettveen  three 
cintjfoili  9r. 


*•  The   corbel   may  have  been    ihapcd 
from  a  former  reipond, 


*"  'I'lic  piers  arc  17  in.  diam.     Those  of 
the  *ou(h  ;nc.i(Jc  arc  21  in. 

166 


*'  There  arc  no  i^uare  pliiuhi. 


Aldwinkle  All  Saints'  Church  from    rut  South  fast 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


both  with  crocketed  ogee  hoods.  The  three  lower 
stages  on  the  north  side  and  the  two  lower  on  the 
south  are  blank,  the  third  having  a  small  traceried 
opening.  The  lofty  upper  stage  is  almost  wholly 
occupied  by  double  square-headed,  traceried  bell- 
chamber  windows  of  two  lights,  with  wide  middle 
muUions  and  traceried  transoms,  above  which  is 
a  band  of  quatrefoils  and  battlcmentcd  parapets 
with  tall  crocketed  angle  pinnacles.  The  tower  arch 
is  of  three  chamfered  orders,  the  innermost  on  half- 
round  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
vice  is  in  the  south-west  angle. 

The  late  13th-century  font  consists  of  an  octagonal 
bowl  moulded  on  the  under  edge,  on  a  pedestal  com- 
posed of  eight  keel-shaped  shafts  with  moulded  bases. 
The  font  was  sold  in  1655,  but  was  set  up  again  in 
1662,  when  it  was  rclcaded.^* 

In  the  chancel  is  the  brass  of  William  Aldwincle 
(d.  1463),  who  is  represented  in  a  long  garment  with 
his  feet  resting  on  a  dog.  The  inscription  reads, '  Hie 
jacet  Williu  Aldewyncle  armig.  qui  obiit  xxviii  die 
augusti  A°  Dni.  Millmo  cccclxiii  cujus  ale  ppicietur 
Deus.'  On  the  waU  of  the  north  aisle  is  a  brass  com- 
memorating John  Pykering,  physician  (d.  1659) 
with  a  rhyming  inscription  written  by  himself  in 
1652. 

There  are  Jacobean  turned  altar  rails,  and  over  the 
chancel  arch  the  names  of  the  churchwardens  of  1814 
on  either  side  of  the  space  formerly  occupied  by  the 
Royal  Arms. 

Bridges  records  a  '  portrait  of  St.  Catharine  with  her 
wheel '  in  the  lower  window  of  the  south  aisle,'"  but 
this  is  lost. 

There  were  formerly  five  bells^"  in  the  tower,  but  in 
1903  four  were  melted  down  to  provide  metal  for  a 
new  ring  at  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter.  The  remaining 
bell  (tenor)  was  found  to  be  so  badly  cracked  that  it 
was  recast. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  cover  paten  of 
c.  1570,  and  two  patens  of  1861,  one  inscribed  '  Ald- 
wincle All  Saints  Church  1864.  R.  Roberts,  rector.' 
There  is  also  a  pewter  flagon/^ 

The  registers  begin  in  1653.  The  first  volume  con- 
tains entries  of  baptisms  to  1726,  of  marriages  to 
1725,  and  of  burials  to  1679. 

There  is  a  lych  gate  in  memory  of  Fanny  Satter- 
field  Hodgson  (d.  191 7). 

The  advowson  presumably  passed 
ADVOWSON  with  the  manor  of  the  Aldwinkle 
family  until  in  1 315  it  was  conveyed 
by  Richard  son  of  Henry  Aldwinkle  to  Robert  de 
Holand.^'  It  then  went  with  the  manor  of  Ald- 
winkle St.  Peter  (q.v.)  until  the  forfeiture  by  Francis 
Lord  Lovel  in  1487.  Sir  Ralph  Butler,  possibly  as 
trustee,  presented  in  1 47 1.  The  advowson  later 
passed  to  the  Somerset  family,  Sir  Charles  Somerset 
afterwards  Earl  of  Worcester  presenting  in  1503  and 


ALDWINKLE 
ALL  SAINTS 

15 II.*'  It  was  conveyed  by  William  Earl  of  Worcester 
in  1553  to  Gilbert  Pickering,'''' apparently  on  behalf  of 
his  son  Boniface,  who  died  seised  of  it  in  1586.^*  Boni- 
face left  it  to  his  younger  son  John,'*  and  it  was  prob- 
ably he  who  in  1597  presented  his  kinsman  Henry 
Pickering,  father  of  Mary,  mother  of  John  Dryden,  the 
poet,  who  was  born  at  the  rectory  in  1631."  Early  in 
the  17th  century  the  advowson  was  acquired  by  Simon 
Lcnton,wiio  conveyed  it  with  the  manor  (q.v.)  in  161 3 
to  the  Fleetwoods.**  Elizabcth,vvidow  of  William  Fleet- 
wood who  sold  the  manor,  presented  in  1 72 1,**  and 
died  in  1722.  Her  eldest  son  Miles  had  a  son  and 
heir  William**  who  died  without  issue  in  1747.  Eliza- 
beth, one  of  his  three  sisters  and  coheirs,  wife  of  John 
Kimpton,  obtained  her  sister's  shares  in  the  advowson. 
John  Kimpton  desired  to  sell  the  advowson,  but  fail- 
ing, presented  Thomas  Haweis,  a  Methodist,  who  was 
assistant  chaplain  at  the  Lock  Hospital.  Later,  being 
offered  £1,000  for  the  advowson,  Kimpton  tried  to 
eject  Haweis.  Eventually  Lady  Huntingdon  bought 
the  advowson  and  Haweis  remained  incumbent  until 
his  death  in  1820.*""  The  advowson  was  afterwards 
purchased  by  Lord  Lilford,  who  held  it  with  Ald- 
winkle St.  Peter,  to  which  parish  it  was  united  in  1 879.** 
The  present  Lord  Lilford  is  patron  of  the  united 
parishes. 

The  chantry  of  William  Chambre  in  the  church  of 
All  Saints  was  founded  by  William  Chambre  in  1488  to 
pray  for  William  and  his  wife  Elizabeth  and  her 
former  husband  William  Aldwinkle  (d.  1463). '^  It  was 
endowed  with  the  manors  of  Armston  and  Denford  and 
lands  there  and  in  Aldwinkle  and  Benefield.*'  It  was 
founded  to  provide  a  priest  who  taught  six  poor 
children  of  the  town  of  Aldwinkle.  Its  lotal  value  in 
1549  was  £10  15J.  6d.  out  of  which  26s.  8<^.  was 
annually  distributed  in  alms  to  two  poor  bedesmen  in 
the  almshouses  in  Aldwinkle.**  On  18  December, 
1546  William  Dudley  and  others  were  ordered  to  take 
possession  of  the  chantry**  and  nine  days  later  the 
endowment,  including  the  Chantry  House  in  Ald- 
winkle, was  granted  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu.**  The 
property  of  the  chantry  seems  to  have  reverted  to 
the  Crown  and  was  granted  out  again  in  1570  to 
Thomas  second  Lord  Wentworth  in  tail.  At  the 
request  of  Lord  Wentworth's  son  William,  it  was  re- 
granted  in  1585  to  Theophilus  Adams  and  Thomas 
Butler.*'  In  1619  William  Montagu,  younger  son 
of  Edward  the  original  grantee,  died  seised  of  a 
messuage  and  20  acres  of  wood  called  Priestes 
Coppice,  probably  part  of  the  endowment.  His  heir 
was  his  nephew  Edward  afterwards  second  Lord 
Montagu.** 

The  chantry  house,  which  had  been  the  priest's 
dwelling  and  the  school  house,  seems  to  have  been  held 
with  the  manor.  Bridges  (1724)  states  that  its  ruins 
'  which  were  lately  pulled  down  stood,  in  Mr.  Spincke's 
yard,  where  human  bones  were  dug  up.'  *' 


••  Assoc.  Arch.  Sac.  Rep.  vii,  244. 

*'  Bridges,  Hist,  oj  Nortbants.  ii,  210. 

'»  North,  Ch.  Bells  of  Northanis.  178, 
where  the  inscriptions  are  given.  The 
treble  and  tenor  were  dated  1720,  the 
second  1830,  the  third  was  by  Thomas 
Eayre  1724,  and  the  fourth  by  Thomas 
Norris,  1637. 

"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Nortianls.  6. 

'«  Feet  of  F.  bdle.  175,  file  65,  no.  193. 

"Bridges,  H:sl.  Nortbanls.  ii,  210; 
G.E.C.  Compute  Peerage,  viii,  20. 


'*  Rccov.  R.  Northants.  Trin.  7  Edw. 
VI,  ro.  516. 

"  Bridges,  op  cit.  ii,  3S4  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Div.  Cos.  Mich,  i  Mary  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m 
209  (33).  "  Ibid.  "  D.N.B.     ■ 

"  Recov.  R.  Northants.  East.  11  Jas.  I, 
ro.  122;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  II 
Jas.  I  ;  Mich.  14  Jas.  I. 

"  Inst.  Bks.  (P.R.O.). 

•»  Northants  N.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.),  i, 
119;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  20 
Geo.  II. 

167 


'"^n.N.B.  XXV,  186;  XXXV,  288; 
jV.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.),  vi,  73. 

"  London  Gaz.  5  Dec.  1879,  no.  7201. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1485-94,  p.  253. 

"Ibid.  311. 

••  Chant.  Certif.  36,  no.  9. 

"  L.  &■  P.  Hen.  VIII,  vol.  xxi,  pt.  ii, 
g-  64S  (39). 

"  Ibid.  (52). 

"  Pat.  R.  27  Eliz.  pt.  4.  m.  31. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii)  ddxxxv,  51. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  21 1. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


By  indenture  dated  19  Dec  1765, 
CHARITIES      in  performance   of  the  intention  of 

Henry  Wotton,  as  expressed  by  his 
will,  a  yearly  rentcharge  of  £1  lis.  was  granted  to 
trustees.  The  rentcharge  is  paid  out  of  land  belong- 
ing to  Lord  Lilford  and  is  applied  by  the  overseers  in 
the  distribution  of  120  twopenny  loaves  and  12s.  in 
money  to  between  50  and  60  recipients. 

Poor's  Allotment.  On  an  inclosure  of  the  lands  at 
Aldwinile  land  was  set  out  for  the  use  of  the  poor.  The 
property  consists  of  24  a.  I  r.  30  p.  of  land  let  to  Lord 


Lilford  for  ^^30  yearly,  which  sum  is  distributed  by 
the  rector  and  churchwardens  in  coal  to  about  60 
recipients. 

The  Church  Land  was  set  out  on  the  inclosure  of  the 
lands  in  AldwinJde  and  consists  of  3  r.  1 8  p.  let  to  Lord 
Lilford  at  £1  15/.  yearly,  which  is  applied  by  the 
churchwardens  towards  church   repairs. 

Richard  Thorpe,  rector  of  Barby,  who  died  in  167 1, 
left  by  his  will  a  quarter  of  a  yardland  in  Barby  Field 
for  teaching  poor  children  at  Aldwinkle.  The  rent  is 
paid  to  the  managers  of  Aldwinkle  Church  School. 


ALDWINKLE  ST.  PETER 


The  description  of  the  parish  of  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter 
is  covered  by  that  of  Aldwinkle  All  Saints  (q.v.)  to 
which  it  was  united  in  1879.  T^^  villages  adjoin 
Aldwinkle  St.  Peter,  which  is  the  larger,  lying  to  the 
north  of  Aldwinkle  All  Saints.  The  present  rectory 
house  was  built  in   1867.     The  old  rectory,  which 

■  Steps 
desfroyei 


I  Late  I6I2J  Century 


Plan  of  LyvEDtN  New  Building 

appears  to  have  been  a  timber-framed  house,  was  pulled 
down  at  the  end  of  the  1 8th  century  by  the  first  Lord 
Lilford.i 

At  Lyvcdcn,  where  the  land  rises  some  150  ft.  from 
the  River  Nenc  and  the  country  is  well  wooded,  are 
the  two  interesting  houscsknown  as  the  Old  Building 
and  the  New  Building.  The  former  stands  on  the  site 
of  an  old  manor  house  of  the  Treshams  of  Rushton. 
Of  rcccnl  years  it  has  been  occupied  as  a  farmhouse, 
and  has  become  encumbered  with  farm  buildings. 
Only  a  few  fragments  of  the  old  house  which  it  replaced 
are  preserved,  some  built  into  the  house  itself,  others 
into  an  adjacent  cottage.    It  had  an  imposing  Jacobean 


'  Attoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rtp.  vii,  251. 


staircase  and  some  handsome  fireplaces  of  the  same 
period,  but  the  staircase  has  now  been  sold.  It  appears 
to  have  extended  farther  to  the  east  than  at  present, 
and  there  was  a  forecourt  entered  through  a  fine  arch- 
way, which,  however,  was  taken  down  about  the  middle 
of  last  century  and  re-erected  at  the  neighbouring 
house  of  Farming  Woods  by 
the  then  owner,  Lord  Lyveden. 
Towards  the  end  of  the  l6th 
century.  Sir  Thomas  Tresham  of 
Rushton,  of  whom  Thomas  Fuller 
in  his  Worthies  says  '  hard  to  say 
whether  greater  his  delight  or 
skill  in  building,  though  more 
forward  in  beginning  than  fortu- 
nate in  finishing  his  fabricks,' 
devised  a  fine  lay-out  at  the  back 
of  the  Old  Building,  extending 
some  way  up  the  hill.  Remains 
of  it  still  exist,  particularly  a 
long  raised  terrace  with  a  mount 
at  each  end.  Adjoining  this  is  a 
'  canal,'  part  of  a  series  which 
inclosed  a  '  water  orchard.'  Be- 
yond these  again,  and  doubtless 
once  connected  to  them  in  the 
design,  lies  the  curious  New 
Building,  one  of  three  notable 
buildings  erected  by  Sir  Thomas, 
the  others  being  the  Triangular 
Lodge  at  Rushton  and  the  Market 
House  at  Rothwell.  Sir  Thomas 
was  a  Roman  Catholic  and  a  mys- 
tic. As  the  former  he  suffered 
long  terms  of  imprisonment, 
which  incidentally  gave  him 
leisure  as  a  mystic  to  elaborate 
many  curious  conceits,  some  of  which  he  embodied 
in  the  Triangular  Lodge  and  this  New  Building.  The 
first  is  based  on  the  number  3  and  illustrates  tiie 
doctrine  of  the  Trinity.  The  New  Building  symbolises 
the  I'assion,  and  its  design  is  influenced  by  the 
numbers  3,  5,  7,  9.  The  plan  is  an  equal-armed 
cross,  each  arm  being  a  square  with  a  bay  window 
at  the  end.  The  basement  windows  and  shields 
are  grouped  in  threes ;  the  bay  windows  have  five 
sides  of  5  ft.  long  ;  the  lower  cornice  carries  seven 
emblems  of  the  Passion  placed  in  rotation  ;  in  the 
upper  cornice  were  appropriate  legends,  parts  of 
which  remain,  and  they  were  so  selected  that  those  on 
each  arm  had  eighty-one  letters  (nine  times  nine). 
The  building  wa«  intended  for  a  small  house  or '  lodge,' 


168 


Aldwinkle  St.  PtTER  :    Lvveden  Ntw   Huilding 


Ai.inviNKLE  Sr.  I'liek  :    Lyveden   Old   IU  ii.uinc; 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


and  it  contained  the  usual  rooms  of  the  period,  hall, 
parlour,  great  chamber,  bedrooms,  kitchen,  pantry, 
larder,  staircase,  etc.  The  arch  that  connects  the 
parlour  with  its  bay  window  bears  the  arms  of  Sir 
Thomas  and  his  wife,  Muriel  Throckmorton.     The 


Tkuham.  Party  lallirt- 
vfise  argent  and  labU 
with  six  trefoils  vert. 


THROCrMORTON.     OultS 

a  cbeveron  argent  charged 
tvith  three  gemell-bars 
sable. 


building  is  of  stone  and  is  admirably  built,  much  of 
the  detail  being  as  sharp  as  when  new.  It  was  pur- 
chased, together  with  the  water  orchard  and  the  long 
terrace,  in  1922  by  the  National  Trust  for  Places  of 
Historic  Interest  or  Natural  Beauty.  The  walls  were 
then  protected  against  the  weather,  but  no  restoration 
was  attempted.  It  has  been  a  ruin  from  the  time 
when  it  was  built,  for  Sir  Thomas  died  before  it  was 
completed,  and  immediately  afterwards  the  house  and 
manor  (q.v.)  were  forfeited,  as  his  son  Francis  became 
implicated  in  the  Gunpowder  Plot.  The  Lyveden 
estate  appears  to  have  been  rescued  from  the  general 
disaster,  for  the  Old  Building  was  rebuilt  by  another 
son,  Sir  Lewis.  His  arms,  impaling  those  of  his 
Spanish  wife,  were  in  a  panel  in  the  principal  gable, 
but  were  removed  along  with  the  archway  and  in- 
corporated with  it  when  it  was  rebuilt  at  Farming 
Woods.* 

In  the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor  3 
MANORS  hides  in  ALDWINKLE  or  HOLLANDS 
MANOR  were  held  by  Peterborough 
Abbey  for  the  sustenance  of  the  monks,  but  by  1086 
Ferron  held  them  by  the  king's  command,  against  the 
will  of  the  abbot. ^  According  to  the  survey  of  c.  11 25 
3J  hides  were  held  of  the  abbey  by  Ascelin  de  Water- 
ville.*  Ascelin's  son  Hugh  before  1 155  made  a 
composition  with  Abbot  Martin  whereby  he  should 
hold  the  manor  of  Aldwinkle  at  a  rent  of  60/.  ^d.,^ 
From  this  date  the  manor  followed  the  descent  of 
Thorpe  Achurch  (q.v.)  to  the  end  of  the  15th  century.' 
In  1487,  while  Margaret  Countess  of  Richmond  held 
it  for  life,'  the  reversion  of  Hollands  Manor,  in  tail 
male,  was  granted  to  John  Risley,  knt.,  the  king's 
servant.  The  grant  included  woodland  called  Bare- 
thanke  and  meadow  in  Brantsey  and  Swillyngholt 
in  Aldwinkle.*  The  Countess  of  Richmond  died  in 
1509  and  John  Risley,  to  whom  the  manor  then  passed, 
died  in  1513  leaving  no  son.'  The  manor  thus  reverted 


ALDWINKLE 
ST.  PETER 

to  the  king,  who  in  this  year  granted  it  in  fee  to 
Sir  William  Compton."  He  died  seised  of  Hollands 
Manor  in  1528  having  a  son  and  heir  Peter,  then  six 
years  old,  who  died  in  1539  ^'^^  ^^^^  succeeded  by  his 
son  Henry,  afterwards  Lord  Compton.*^  In  1570 
Henry  Compton,  at  this  time  a  knight,  had  licence  to 


C  o  M  p  T  0  N.      Sahlt  a 

leopard  or  between  three 
helms  argent. 


Cecil.  Barry  of  ten 
argent  and  azure  six 
scutcheons  sable  each 
charged  with  a  lion 
argent. 


alienate  Aldwinkle  or  Holland  Manor,  to  Thomas 
Cecil,*2  who  became  Earl  of  Exeter  in  1605.  The 
manor  of  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter  afterwards  followed  the 
descent  of  the  Earldom  of  Exeter  until  in  1773  it  was 
conveyed  by  Henry  Brownlowe,  ninth  Earl,  to  Thomas 
Powys  of  Lilford,^^  created  Baron  Lilford  in  1797." 
It  subsequently  passed  with  this  barony. 

One  large  virgate  of  land  in  Aldwinkle  was  stated 
in  the  12th  century  survey  of  Northamptonshire 
to  be  held  by  Geoffrey  de  Glinton  of  the  fee  of 
Gloucester  belonging  to  the  Barton.**  In  1285  this 
overlordship  of  the  earls  of  Gloucester  in  Aldwinkle 
was  disputed  by  the  abbot  of  Peterborough,  who 
alleged  that  the  earl's  bailifTs  had  usurped  one-eighth 
part  of  the  vill  of  Aldwinkle,  which  had  been  wont  to 
answer  to  the  abbot's  bailiffs  for  all  that  pertained  to 
the  king's  dues,  in  the  same  way  as  all  other  vills 
within  the  abbot's  liberty.  Writs  of  summons  were 
accordingly  issued  against  the  earl,"  but  his  right 
seems  to  have  been  maintained,  and  henceforth  it 
passed  with  the  overlordship  of  Denford  (q.v.).  Joan, 
the  widow  of  the  Earl  of  Gloucester  and  the  king's 
daughter,  was  found  in  1306-7  to  have  received  yearly 
rents  from  Aldwinkle,*'  and  two  Icets  in  Aldwinkle 
were  held,  as  parcel  of  one-third  of  the  earldom  of 
Gloucester  and  in  right  of  his  late  wife  Margaret,  by 
Ralph,  Earl  of  Stafford,  who  died  in  1372,**  and  by 
succeeding  earls  of  Stafford.**  In  1404,  Humphrey, 
Earl  of  Stafford,  being  a  minor  and  a  royal  ward,  the 
king,  after  assigning  a  dower  to  the  late  earl's  widow, 
granted,  from  the  two-thirds  of  the  possessions  of  the 
earldom  still  in  his  hands,  a  leet  of  the  township  of 
Aldwinkle  to  his  consort.  Queen  Joan,  to  hold  during 
the  young  earl's  minority.'"*  At  the  view  of  frank- 
pledge held  at  Denford  in  1549,  Sir  Thomas  Tresham, 


*  For  a  full  Recount  of  Lyveden  BuUd- 
ingi,  lee  J.  A.  Gotch,  The  Buildings  of 
Sir  Thomas  Tresham.  A  number  of 
references  to  them  will  also  be  found  in 
Hist.  USS.  Com.  Rep.  (Rushton  MSS.) 

*  y.C.H.Northants.i,  3166. 
«  Ibid.  365*. 

*  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fol.  236. 

*  Feud.  Aids,  iv.  13;  Feet  of  F.  29 
Edw.  I,  case  175,  file  58,  no.  398;  ii 
Edw.  II,  case  176,  file  69,  no.  368  ;  Cal. 
Pat.    1307-13,  p.    loa;   1313-17,  pp.  72, 


184;  1317-21,  p.  43';  '3Z'-4,  88.  >'3i 
1327-30,   p.    455;    Cal.    Chart,    1300-26, 
p.   242  ;   Chan.    Inq.   p.m.   47  Edw.   Ill 
(ist  nos.),  19;  I  Hen.  VI  (51). 
'  Cal.  Pat.  1485-94,  p.  155. 

•  Ibid.  p.  210. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  ptf.  25,  no.  63  ;  ptf. 
79,  nos.  174,  191. 

">/..  6-  P.  Hen.  VIII,  1509-13,  no. 
1662  (58),  no.  2772(51). 

"  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iii, 
390. 


'"  Pat.  R.  12  Eliz.  pt.  7,  m.i  ;  pt.  9,  m. 
34  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  13  Eliz. 

'•  Close  R.  13  Geo.  Ill,  pt.  19,  no.  7. 

'«  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage,  y,  80. 

»  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  365*. 

'^  Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  113- 
119. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  iv,  p.  316. 

"  Ch.  Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.), 
62. 

'•  Ibid.  10  Ric.  II,  no.  38  ;  4  Hen.  IV 
no.  41.  •"  Cal.  Pat.  1401-5,  p.  349. 


169 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Thomas  Webster  of  Barnewell  and  Richard  Webster 
were  presented  from  Aldwinkle  for  failure  to  give 
suit  at  the  court  and  were  amerced.^*  Bridges  states 
that  two  houses  in  the  parish  of  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter 
and  two  in  that  of  Aldwinkle  All  Saints  were  held  of 
the  honour  of  Gloucester  in  1723.** 

LYVEDEN  was  partly  in  the  Bassingbourne  fee 
and  partly  in  the  Angevin  fee  of  Churchfield,  both  of 
which  fees  were  held  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough.*' 
It  was  divided  into  Upper  and  Lower  or  Great  and 
Little  Lyveden.  The  Angevin  portion  followed  the 
descent  of  Churchfield  in  Oundle  (q.v.)  and  the 
Bassingbourne  that  of  Benefield  (q.v.)  until  the  end 
of  the  14th  century  when  in  1372  we  find  that  Walter 
de  Frampton  of  Melcombe  Regis  and  Margaret,  his 
wife,  conveyed  the  manors  of  Churchfield  and  Lyveden 
with  lands,  wood  and  rent  in  Pottereslyveden,  Over- 
ly\'eden,  Lyveden  and  Lyveden  Daundelyn  to  Richard 
de  Spredlyngton  and  Roger  de  Wymondham,  clerks.** 
Possibly  the  grantees  were  acting  on  behalf  of  Sir 
John  Holt,  justice  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas, 
who  was  in  possession  of  the  manors  about  this  time. 
He  was  impeached  in  the  Parliament  of  1388  and 
forfeited  his  lands. *s  His  property,  however,  was 
restored  to  his  son  John  Holt  in  1390,  except  the 
manor  of  L}'veden  which  had  been  granted  to  Sir 
John  Devereux,  knt.,  and  others  to  whom  it  was 
confirmed  in  1392  in  payment  of  debts  due  from  the 
Crown.**  Devereux  apparently  sold  to  Sir  William 
FitzWalter,  who,  with  his  wife,  Joan,  conveyed  the 
manor  in  1401  to  Nicholas  de  Pye.*'  Eventually  it 
went  back  to  John  Holt,  the  son,  who  died  seised  of 
rents  from  the  manors  of  Lyveden  and  Churchfield 
in  1419,  leaving  a  son  Hugh  aged  30  years.**  Hugh 
died  in  1420,  his  heir  being  his  brother  Richard  Holt, 
clerk,  aged  37  years.*'  As  early  as  1458  the  Treshams 
of  Rushton  were  holding  the  manor.  A  messuage 
and  lands  in  Aldwinkle  were  held  by  Sir  Thomas 
Tresham,  controller  of  the  king's  household,  who  was 
beheaded  as  a  Lancastrian  in  ^ei."  This  property 
was  granted  in  1462  to  John  Donne,  usher  of  the 
king's  chambers,"  who  in  1465  conveyed  it  to 
George,  Bishop  of  Exeter,  and  other  feoffees.**  In 
1480  it  was  given  by  the  Crown  to  William  Sayer  and 
Margaret  his  wife  for  their  lives,''  and  in  1484  it  was 
granted  in  tail  male  to  Edward  Brampton,  esquire  of 
the  king's  body.**  After  the  accession  of  Henry  VII, 
however,  the  manor  of  Lyveden  was  restored  to  John 
son  of  Thomas  Tresham,**  who  did  homage  to  the 
abbot  in  1499.**  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son. 
Sir  Thomas  Tresham,"  who  with  Isabel  Tresham, 
widow,  probably  his  mother,  settled  the  manor  in 
1536.**    In  1540  Sir  Thomas  Tresham  had  licence 


to  impark  120  acres  of  wood,  250  acres  of  pasture  and 
50  acres  of  meadow  in  Lyveden  commonly  called 
Lyveden  Park  ;  the  lands  abutted  on  the  east  on 
Bareshank  Wood  and  on  Whynney  Green  in  Pilton  ; 
on  the  west  on  the  wood  called  Sherylappe  and 
Sudborough  Green  ;  on  the  south  on  Sir  Thomas's 
own  wood  called  Ladywood  and  Bradyhawe,  and  on 
the  north  on  the  highway  called  Harlowe  Ryding." 
Leland  wrote  '  he  cauUith  himself  communely 
Tresham  of  Lyveden  a  2  miles  from  Undale  in 
Northamptonshire  where  yet  standithe  Parte  of  aun- 
cient  Manor  Place  and  godely  Medows  about  it,  and 
there  hath  Tresham  a  300  Markes  by  the  yere.'*" 

Sir  Thomas  died  in  1547  leaving  a  son,  Thomas,  then 
a  minor,  who  became  prior  of  the  order  of  St.  John  of 
Jerusalem  in  England.*^  He  died  in  1558  seised  of 
the  manor  of  Ly\'eden  and  was  succeeded  by  his 
grandson  Thomas,  son  of  John  Tresham,  then  under 
age,**  who  was  later  imprisoned  several  times  for 
recusancy.  The  New  Building  at  Lweden  was  built 
by  him  and  he  laid  out  the  gardens  there.*'  He 
settled  the  manor  on  his  wife  Muriel  and  his  son 
Francis,  in  1584,  and  died  in  1605.  His  son  Francis, 
then  aged  38  years,**  was  implicated  in  the  Gunpowder 
Plot  and  died  in  the  Tower  within  a  year  of  his  father, 
his  estates  having  been  forfeited.  He  left  no  son,  but 
in  1634,  after  the  deaths  of  Muriel,  widow  of  Thomas, 
and  Anne,  widow  of  Francis,  who  had  interests  in 
the  manors  under  settlements,  the  manor  of  Lyveden 
and  other  estates  were  granted  to  Sir  George  Simeon 
and  another,**  who  in  that  year  conveyed  them  to 
Francis'  brother.  Sir  Lewis  Tresham,  and  his  wife 
Mary.**  Lewis,  who  had  been  created  a  baronet  in 
161 1,*'  died  at  Lyveden  seised  of  the  manor  in  1639 
leaving  a  son  and  heir  William.**  The  manor  had 
been  settled  in  1634  °"  ^^^  marriage  of  William  with 
Frances,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Gage  of  Firle  in  Sussex, 
on  William  and  his  heirs  male,  with  remainder  to 
Toby  Tresham  and  his  sons  Edward  and  Thomas.  A 
month  before  his  death,  however,  Lewis  Tresham 
revoked  this  settlement  for  another  on  William  and 
his  heirs.  Sir  William  Tresham  died  without  issue 
in  1643  leaving  as  his  heirs  his  sister  Mary,  the  wife 
of  Thomas  Lord  Brudenell,  and  the  sons  of  his  sisters 
Elizabeth,  Frances,  and  Katherine,  namely,  Henry 
Lord  Morley  and  Mounteaglc,  William  Lord  Stourton, 
and  Sir  John  Webbe,  bart.**  None  of  these  heirs, 
however,  appears  to  have  had  any  interest  in  Ly\eden, 
the  limitations  under  the  various  settlements  being 
to  heirs  male.  Frances,  widow  of  Sir  William 
Tresham,  who  in  1649  married  George  Gage,  held 
the  manor  after  Sir  William's  death  and  it  was 
sequestered  for  her  and  her  husband's  recusancy.*" 


»>  Court  Rolli,  Gen.  Scr.  ptf.  194,  no. 

49- 

••  Hill.  Norlbanti.  11,  210. 

"  Pytchlcy,  Bk.  of  Fiei  (Northanti. 
Rec.  Soc),  73,  120. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  46  Edw.  Ill, 
DO.  644. 

»  Rolli  0/  Pari.  (Rec.  Com.),  iii,  240A, 
2410. 

••  lUrl.  Ch.  49  D.  54. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  bdlc.  179,  file 
90,  no.  14. 

»•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  6  lien.  V,  file  43  ; 
Eicheq.  Inq.  p  m.  bdle.  114,  no.  7. 

••Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Hen.  V,  file  52; 
the  Northanti  portion  ii  illrRible. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  17  Edw.  IV,  no.  65  ; 


Varioui  Coll.  iii  [Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Hep.), 
pp.  vi,  vii. 

•'  Fine  R.  5  Edw.  IV  ;  Cal.  Pal.  1461-7, 
p.  III. 

"Ibid.  431. 

"  Ibid.  1476-85,  201. 

»«  Ibid.  416. 

"  Varioui  Coll.  iii  {Hist.  MSS.  Com. 
Rfp.)y  pp.  vi,  vii. 

••  Hriclgd,  Hill,  oj Northanls.  ii,  373. 

•'  Ibid.  69. 

•"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Mil.  27  Hen. 
VIII. 

••  L.  &■  P.  lien,  yill,    1540,  no.   831 

(5°)- 

♦"  Lrland,  llinerary  (ed.  1744),  vi,  32. 
"  Dridgci,  op.  cit.  ii,  374. 

170 


*•  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  bdle.  124,  no.  144. 

♦•  Varioui  Coll.  iii  (Hut.  MSS.  Com. 
Rep.),  pp.  xlix  to  Ivii. 

**  Wardi  and  Liv.  Inq.  p.m.  bdle.  294, 
no.  104. 

"  Pat.  R.  9  Chai.  I,  pt.  5,  no.  24  ; 
Recov.  R.  Eait.  26  Elii.  ro.  56. 

«•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  9  Cha».  I. 

*'  G.E.C.  Baronetage,  i,  56. 

"  VVardiand  Liv.  Inq.  p.m.  ii,bdle.  66, 
no.  81. 

"Chan.    Inq.  p.m.    II  Miic.   524(5); 

537  (>8).  539  (s).  54°  (75)- 

»»  Cat.  Com.  Jor  Comp.  2624,  3049  ; 
S.  R.  Gardiner,  Hist.  0/  Commonwealth,  iii, 
197. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


Major-General  Butler,  the  Parliamentary  commander, 
about  1655  attempted  to  demolish  Lvveden  House 
built  by  Sir  Thomas  Trcsham,  but  his  efforts  were  in 
vain,  and  he  was  only  able  to  take  the  timber,  which 
he  carried  to  Oundle  to  be  used  for  the  house  there 
afterwards  belonging  to  Major  Creed." 

At  the  Restoration  the  manors  of  Lyveden  and 
Churchfield,  with  Lyveden  House,  were  said  to  be  in 
the  Crown,  either  by  attainder  or  escheat,  and  in  1660 
were  granted  to  Edward  Earl  of  Sandwich.'*  The 
property,  however,  was  claimed  by  Maurice,  son  of 
Thomas  Tresham,  and  in  l66l  he  and  the  Earl  of 
Sandwich  were  together  enfeoffed  of  it.'*  In  1667 
Maurice  Tresham  was  said  to  be  desirous  of  selling 
his  part  in  order  to  pay  his  debts,"  and  he  and  the  carl 
probably  conveyed  to  George  Mathcw  and  Mary  his 
wife,  Sir  William  Smith,  bart.,  of  Redcliffe  (co.  Bucks) 
and  Thomas  Rymer,  in  whose  possession  the  manors 
are  found  in  1668.'*  It  is  possible  these  grantees 
were  acting  on  behalf  of  William  Harbord,  of  Grafton, 
the  politician  and  diplomat,  who  held  the  manor  and 
died  in  1691  at  Belgrade  on  his  way  to  undertake  the 
duties  of  ambassador  at  Constantinople.  He  left  by 
his  first  wife  Mary,  daughter  of  Dr.  Arthur  Ducks, 
three  daughters,  namely,  Margaret,  the  wife  of 
Robert  King,  second  Lord  Kingston  in  the  Peerage  of 
Ireland,  who  died  without  issue  ;  Mary,  the  wife  of 
Sir  Edward  Ayscough,  who  left  two  daughters, 
Letitia,  the  wife  of  Lt.  Andrew  Thornhaugh,  and 
Isabel,  the  wife  of  Matthew  Bourcherett ;  and  Grace, 
the  wife  of  Thomas  Hatcher,  who  died  without  issue  ; 
and  by  his  second  wife  Catherine  Russell,  he  left  a 
daughter  Letitia.wife  of  Sir  Rowland  Winn  of  Nostell.'* 
The  Harbord  co-heirs  were  dealing  with  the  manor 
during  the  first  half  of  the  1 8th  century.  The  largest 
share  became  acquired  by  the  Winns.*''  Rowland 
Winn  and  his  wife  died  at  Bath  in  1722,  and  their  son 
Rowland^  in  1732  conveyed  his  share  to  Anne 
Fitzpatrick  of  Farming  Woods,  widow  of  Richard 
Fitzpatrick,  Lord  Gowran.'*  She  died  in  1744  and 
her  son,  John  Fitzpatrick,  created  Earl  of  Upper 
Ossory  in  1751,  seems  to  have  purchased  the  rest  of 
the  manors  of  Lyveden  and  Churchfield.**  He  died 
in  1758, and  his  son  John  in  1769  settled  both  manors." 
John  the  second  Earl  died  in  1818,  leaving  two 
unmarried  daughters,  Gertrude  and  Anne,  known  as 
the  ladies  Fitzpatrick  of  Farming  Woods.  Both  these 
ladies  died  in  1841,  when  the  manors  passed  to  an 
iUegitimate  daughter  of  the  second  earl,  Emma  Mary. 
In  1823  she  married  Robert  Smith,  who  took  the  name 
of  Vernon.  He  held  various  ministerial  offices  and 
was  created  Lord  Lyveden  in  1859.  On  his  death  in 
1873  he  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son  Fitzpatrick 


ALDWINKLE 
ST.  PETER 

Henry  Vernon,  who  died  without  issue  in  1900. 
The  manor  then  went  to  his  nephew  Courtenay  Robert 
Percy,  son  of  the  Rev.  Courtenay  John  Vernon,  some- 
time rector  of  Grafton  Underwood.'* 


FitzPatrick.  Sabli  a 
ialtire  argent  and  a  chtef 
azure  tuitb  three  fieurt 
de  Us  or  tbrrein. 


Argent  fretty 


"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  373. 

"  Pat.  R.  12  Chai.  II,  pt.  24,  m.  12. 

»•  Cal.S.P.Dom.  16601,  351,  367  ;  Feet 
of  F.  Northant!.  Trin.  1 3  Chas.  II. 

»«  Cat.  S.P.  Dom.  1667,  88. 

"  G.E.C.  Baronetage,  iii,  191  ;  D.N.B. 

•*  Pedigree  in  Baker,  Hut.  of  Noribants. 
ii,  172. 

•'  Recov.  R.  Mich.  8  WiU.  Ill,  ro.  22  ; 
Trin.  2  Anne,  ro.  148,  361  ;  Mich.  5  Geo. 
I,  ro.  243;  Trin.  9  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  453; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  8  WUl.  III. 

"  Bridget,  op.  cit.  ii,  374  ;  Recov.  R. 
Mich.  I  Anne,  ro.  298  ;  Mich.  2  Anne, 
ro.  361. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  5 
Gto.  II. 


There  were  several  large  freeholders  in  the  manors 
of  Lyveden  and  Churchfield.  Matefrei  the  Dispenser 
held  lands  in  Churchfield  in  1202  and  in  the  time  of 
Abbot  Robert  de  Lindsey  (l2l4-22).«*  In  1233-4 
Richard,  son  of  Simon  de  Lyveden,  conveyed  a 
messuage  to  his  brother  Roger.'*  William  Aldwyncle 
in  1428  held  a  fourth  part  of  a  knight's  fee  in  Church- 
field, formerly  held  by  Henry  de  Wyville,*'  and  Sir 
John  Holond  had  a  free  tenement  in  Oundle  formerly 
held  by  William  de  Lyvenden  and  previously  by  Sir 
Reginald  de  Wadville  (Waterville  ?).»«  The  Lyveden 
family  held  considerable  property  in  the  manors.*' 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  31  ft.  by  17  ft.  9  in.,  with 
north  vestry,  clearstoried  nave  of  three 
bays  36  ft.  9  in.  by  14  ft.  8  in.,  north  and  south  aisles, 
south  porch,  and  west  tower  8  ft.  by  7  ft.  6  in., 
surmounted  by  a  spire.  The  north  aisle  is  8  ft.  6  in. 
wide,  the  south  aisle  10  ft.  6  in.,  the  width  across  nave 
and  aisles  being  38  ft.  8  in.  All  these  measurements 
are  internal. 

The  tower  is  faced  with  ashlar,  but  the  rest  of  the 
building  is  of  rubble,  with  lead  covered  roofs.  There 
are  plain  parapets  to  the  chancel,  north  aisle  and  north 
side  of  the  clearstory,  but  elsewhere  the  parapets  are 
battlemented.  The  porch  has  a  plain  gable  and 
overhanging  stone  slated  roof. 

The  earliest  work  in  the  present  building  is  the 
west  respond  and  the  western  cylindrical  pier  of  the 
north  arcade,  which  are  c.  1180-90.  At  this  time  a 
north  aisle  was  added  to  an  earlier  12th  century  aisle- 
less  building,  the  nave  of  which  was  probably  about 
the  same  length  as  at  present.  The  pier  has  a  moulded 
base  and  rudely  carved  capital  with  square  abacus, 
and  the  respond  a  square  impost,  but  no  other  work 

de  Liveden  and  Fithio  Palmer  hi»  father, 
Thomas  son  of  Fethio,  Andrew  son  of 
Wilham  de  Liveden  (no.  55) ;  Walter  eon 
of  the  late  Richard  Ic  Palmer  of  Great 
Liveden,  Walter  son  of  the  late  Robert  le 
Palmer  of  Liveden  and  Amabilia  his  wife, 
Robert  de  Wivile  of  Liveden,  Robert  ion 
of  William  de  Liveden  and  Richard  son 
of  William  de  Liveden  (no.  56)  ;  Humfrey 
de  Bassingburne,  knt.,  Richard  son  of 
William  son  of  Luke  de  Liveden,  Ralph  le 
Maine,  William  son  of  Andrew  de  Live- 
den (no.  57) ;  Richard  son  of  Thomas  le 
Paumer  of  Great  Liveden,  Andrew  son  of 
William  de  Liveden,  Robert  son  of 
William  de  Liveden  and  Richard  hit 
brother  (no.  58). 


"  Recov.  R.  Trin.  9  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  453. 

•'  Ibid. 

•■  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"V.C.H.  Northant!.  i,  366;  Pytchley, 
Bk.  of  fees  (Northants  Rec.  Soc),  121. 

•«  Feet  of  F.  Hen.  III.  bdle.  172,  file  27, 
no.  338. 

•'  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  448. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Nero  C  vii,  fol.  107. 

"  In  tome  13th  and  14th  century 
charter!  relating  to  Great  and  Little 
Liveden  among  the  Buccleucb  MSS. 
(Boughton  House),  nos.  53  to  58,  there  are 
references  to  Richard  son  of  William  de 
Liveden,  Robert  le  Wyvile  and  William  le 
Palmer  (no.  53) ;  Robert  son  of  William 
de  Liveden  (no.  54) ;  Jordan  son  of  Fithio 

171 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


of  this  period  survives.  The  next  enlargement  was 
about  the  middle  of  the  13th  century, when  a  south  aisle 
was  added,  and  later  in  the  century,  c.  1290,  the  north 
aisle  was  rebuilt,  the  south  arcade  reconstructed  with 
the  old  materials,  and  the  aisle  widened.  The  chancel 
was  rebuilt  in  its  present  form  about  1370-75,  and  the 
porch,  clearstory,  and  tower  and  spire  are  approxi- 
mately of  the  same  date.  The  vestry  is  contemporary 
with  the  chancel.  The  chancel  was  restored  in  i860, 
and  the  rest  of  the  building  in  1876,  when  the  north 
aisle  was  rebuilt.  With  the  exception  of  the  tower 
and  the  west  end  of  the  nave,  all  the  walls  are  plastered 
internally. 

The  chancel  has  an  east  window  of  five  cinquefoiled 
lights  with  vertical  tracery,  perhaps  a  later  insertion, 
and  is  lighted  on  the  south  side  by  three  14th-century 
windows  each  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  traceried 
heads  differing  in  design,  and  one  at  the  west  end  of 
the  north  wall.  The  sill  of  the  eastern  window  is 
lowered  internally  so  as  to  form  two  graded  sedilia, 
on  either  side  of  which  in  the  window  jambs  are 
ogee-headed  niches.  The  moulded  piscina  is  also  ogee- 
headed  and  has  a  fluted  bowl.  The  west  window  has 
a  transom  at  the  level  of  the  other  window  sills, 
which  cuts  off  the  lower  portion  of  both  lights,  one 
of  which**  is  rebated  as  a  low  side  window.  There  is  a 
scroll  string  all  round  the  chancel  externally  at  siU 
level.  In  the  north  wall  is  a  rectangular  aumbry, 
and  a  moulded  doorway  to  the  vestry,'*  and  west  of 
this  a  restored  wall  recess.  In  the  east  wall,  north 
of  the  altar,  is  an  image  bracket.  The  chancel  arch 
is  of  two  chamfered  orders  with  hoodmould  on  each 
side,  the  inner  order  resting  on  carved  and  moulded 
corbels.  The  oak  chancel  screen  was  erected  in 
1921. 

The  north  arcade,  as  rebuilt  in  the  late  1 3th  century, 
has  three  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders  with 
hoodmoulds,  resting  at  the  west  end  on  the  square 
respond  and  early  pier  already  described.  The  eastern 
pier  (c.  129c)  consists  of  four  attached  shafts  with 
moulded  capital  and  base  ;  at  the  east  end  the  inner 
order  of  the  arch  is  carried  on  a  moulded  and  carved 
corbel.  The  hoods  have  stops  over  the  piers.  The 
cylindrical  piers  of  the  south  arcade  are  c.  1240,  but 
differ  in  detail.  Both  have  circular  moulded  bases, 
and  the  capital  of  the  western  pier  is  also  circular  and 
has  nail-head  ornament.  The  eastern  pier  is  of 
slightly  less  diameter  and  has  an  octagonal  moulded 
capital  with  pellet  ornament,  and  the  base  stands  on 
an  octagonal  plinth.  The  responds  are  similar  to 
those  of  the  north  arcade  and  all  four  piers  stand  on 
high  square  plinths,  perhaps  parts  of  the  walling  of 
the  original  church.  The  arches,  as  on  the  north,  are 
of  two  chamfered  orders. 

In  the  south  aisle  are  three  late  13th-century 
windows  of  two  lights,  that  in  the  west  wall  witli 
forked  mullion  and  low  transom,  the  bottom  lights 
of  which  are  rebated  inside  though  the  sill  is  over 
5  ft.  above  the  floor.  The  window  west  of  the  porch 
is  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  a  cuspcd  circle  in  the 
head,  and  the  window  at  the  east  end  of  the  aisle  is 
of  the  same  type,  with  an  image  bracket  on  either  side. 


Next  to  it  in  the  south  wall  is  a  two-light  window  with 
14th-century  tracery  ;  its  sill  is  lowered  inside  to 
form  a  seat,  at  the  back  of  which  below  the  window  is 
a  piscina  with  trefoiled  ogee-head  and  projecting 
moulded  basin  carried  on  a  small  shaft.  The  middle 
window  of  the  aisle  is  a  15th-century  insertion  of  three 
lights.     The  south  doorway  is  modern. 

At  the  east  end  of  the  north  aisle  is  a  pillar  piscina 
with  moulded  basin  on  three  clustered  and  banded 
shafts  with  chamfered  base  and  square  plinth  ;  the 
recess  has  a  plain  ogee  head  and  the  bowl  is  fluted. 
More  to  the  north  is  a  13th-century  piscina  with 
trefoil  headed  recess  and  bowl  in  the  thickness  of  the 
wall.  There  are  two  image-brackets  in  the  east  wall, 
the  window  of  which  is  modern ;  but  with  one  exception 
the  other  windows  of  the  aisle,  and  the  north  doorway, 
are  the  old  ones  re-used.  The  clearstory  windows, 
four  on  each  side,  are  square-headed  and  of  two  tre- 
foiled lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages  with  moulded  plinth, 
diagonal  buttresses  and  a  projecting  vice  in  the  south- 
east angle.  The  two  lower  stages  are  blank  on  the 
north  and  south,  but  on  the  west  there  is  an  ogee- 
headed  window  of  two  lights,  the  mullion  and  tracery 
of  which  are  new,  and  in  the  middle  stage  a  circular 
moulded  window  with  modern  '  roue  tournante  ' 
tracery.  The  bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two 
trefoiled  lights  with  quatrefoil  in  the  head,  and  the 
cornice  above,  from  which  the  graceful  broach  spire 
rises,  is  carved  with  grotesque  heads  and  birds  clinging 
head  downwards.  The  broaches  have  small  octagonal 
pinnacles,  and  there  are  three  sets  of  spire  lights  on 
the  cardinal  faces.  The  tower  arch  is  of  three 
chamfered  orders  on  moulded  and  carved  corbels. 
The  doorway  to  the  vice  has  a  shaped  and  moulded 
head. 

The  late  13th-century  font  is  similar  to  that  at 
All  Saints'  church,  with  octagonal  bowl  and  shafted 
stem. 

The  pulpit  and  other  fittings  are  modern. 

In  the  chancel  is  an  elaborate  mural  monument  to 
Margaret  Davenant  (d.  1613)  with  shield  of  arms,  and 
on  the  entablature  the  date  of  erection  '  Anno  Domini 
1616.' 

There  is  some  interesting  mediaeval  glass.  In  the 
western  window  south  of  the  chancel  are  figures  of 
St.  George  and  St.  Christopher  beneath  canopies, 
c.  1290,  and  with  a  border  of  alternate  white  hounds 
and  yellow  hares  ;  in  the  top  lights  of  the  east  window 
are  figures  of  two  priests,  one  representing  Roger 
Travers,  rector,  and  the  other  William  de  Luffwyck, 
the  builder  of  the  chancel,  who  was  rector  1335-80  : 
both  are  mentioned  by  name  in  inscriptions.  The 
tower  window  has  modern  glass  commemorating 
Thomas  Fuller. 

There  are  five  bells  by  Taylor  and  Co.  of  Lough- 
borough, 1903.  A  former  ring  of  three  (the  tenor 
dated  1585,  and  the  second  by  Thomas  Eayre  of 
Kettering,  1724)'"  was  then  recast  and  a  new  treble 
and  tenor  added. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup,  paten,  and  flagon  of 
1855  ;  there  is  also  a  plated  paten." 


••  The  wcit  light :  the  lower  hook  on 
the  weitern  jamb  itill  rcmalni,  and  the 
two  bolt  hold  on  the  mullion  cin  itill  be 
traced.     The  height  of  the  lill  above  the 


floor  ii  z  ft.  8   in. 
nil,  379. 


Asi.  Arch  Soc.  Reps. 


••  The  vcitry  originally  wai  of  two 
itoriei  \  it  hat  a  lingle  upper  window  on 
the  north  tide. 


"  North,  Cb.  Bells  of  Norlhanls.  178, 
where  the  inscriptions  on  the  old  bells  are 
given, 

"  Markham,  Ch.  Hate  of  Nortbanls.  6. 


172 


It 


:^t 


tit  '■  ^i 


■'<     B  I"    , 


ii  ^ 


AtDWiNkLE  St.  Peter's  Church  FROi\i  the  South-west 


Aluwinki.k  St.  Peter's  Church;    Tnt   Inikkiok,  looking  North-east 


HUXLOE  HUNDRED 


The  first  volume  of  registers  contains  entries  of 
baptisms  from  156J  to  1653,  but  there  are  no  marriages 
or  burials,  the  book  having  been  mutilated.'*  The 
second  volume  contains  baptisms  1653-1711,  mar- 
riages 1654-1706,  and  burials  1653-1678.  At  the  end 
of  the  second  volume  are  sixteen  pages  of  briefs. 

There  was  a  priest  among  the 
ADl'OiySON  tenants  of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough 
in  Aldwinkle  between  1 125  and  1 128'' 
and  two  parts  of  the  tithes  were  confirmed  to  the  abbot 
by  Pope  Eugenius  III.'''  The  church  was  held  with 
the  manor  in  the  middle  of  the  12th  century  \t'hen 
Hugh  de  Waterville  held  them,  and  they  continued  to 
be  so  held.  In  1372  it  was  found  by  inquisition  that 
Oliver  de  Lufwik  and  Richard,  parson  of  the  church  of 
Stanwigg,  might  assign  tenements  in  Aldwinkle,  held 
of  Sir  Robert  de  Holand,  to  William  de  Lufwik,  parson 


BARNWELL 
ALL  SAINTS 

of  St.  Peter's  church,  to  provide  a  priest  to  celebrate 
daily  at  the  high  altar.'*  At  the  time  of  the  Dissolution, 
the  tithes,  the  rectory  house,  the  land  and  glebe  were 
worth /;i  I  16;.  8(/.  a  year,  whence  loj.  7(f.  was  paid  to 
the  archdeacon  of  Northampton  for  procurations  and 
synodals.'*  In  1570,  at  an  episcopal  visitation,  it  was 
presented  against  the  rector  of  Aldwinkle  St.  Peter 
that  '  the  parsonage  is  in  decay.  And  that  he  helpeth 
not  the  poore  nor  tcacheth  anie  children.'" 

In  1602  Thomas  Fuller  became  rector,  whose  son, 
born  at  Aldwinkle  in  1608,  was  Thomas  Fuller,  author 
of  the  '  Worthies."*  Joseph  Drury,  the  distinguished 
headmaster  of  Harrow  School  from  1785  to  1805,  held 
the  living  for  some  years  on  condition  he  should  resign 
it  to  the  son  of  Lord  Lilford,  the  patron,  but  he  never 
lived  at  Aldwinkle." 

There  are  no  separate  charities  for  this  parish."" 


BARNWELL  ALL  SAINTS 


Bernewelle  (xi  cent.)  ;  Bernwella  (xii  cent.)  ; 
Barnewell,  Kyngesbernewelle  (xiv  cent.)  ;  King's 
Barnwell  (xvi  cent.)  ;    Barnwell  .All  Saints  (xvii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Barnwell  All  Saints,  which  since  1821 
has  been  united  with  the  sister  parish  of  Barnwell 
St.  Andrew '  covers  1,781  acres  on  a  subsoil  of  Corn- 
brash,  surrounding  Great  Oolite  in  the  north  and 
centre  and  Oxford  Clay  in  the  south-east.  The  land 
is  mostly  under  grass,  but  hay,  wheat,  barley  and 
beans  are  grown.  There  are  over  200  acres  of  wood- 
land. The  average  height  above  the  ordnance 
datum  is  200  ft.  In  the  west  of  the  parish  the  main 
road  from  Thrapston  to  Oundle  leads  northwards, 
separating  it  from  Lilford  cum  Wigsthorpe.  The 
village  is  watered  by  a  stream  flowing,  also  northwards, 
into  and  through  the  neighbouring  village  of  Barnwell 
St.  Andrew,  which  passes  in  its  course  the  site  of  the 
manor  house,  tenanted  in  the  early  years  of  the  1 8th 
century  by  Mrs.  Elizabeth  Creed,  philanthropist 
and  artist,  a  Montagu  by  birth,^  and  the  remains  of 
the  church  of  All  Saints.  A  little  distance  to  the 
east  are  Friar's  Close  Farm,  a  moat,  and  Foot  Hill 
Spinney.  There  is  a  considerable  amount  of  wood- 
land in  the  south-east  of  Barnwell  All  Saints  and 
different  parts  of  this  are  named  Rough  Wold, 
Common  Wold,  Barnwell  Wold,  Gunwell's  Wold, 
Middle  Coppice,  and  New  Park  Close.  Earlier 
place  names  are  Newdegardun,  which  belonged  to  the 
chief  manor  in  the  14th  century,'  Tuthill  and  Break- 
hill  situated  east  of  the  village,  and  Kilsey  meadow, 
all  three  known  in  the  1 8th  century. 

Barnwell  All  Saints  is  said  to  have  been  inclosed  in 
1683.*     In  192 1  its  population  numbered  79  persons. 


Barnwell  All  Saints  belonged  to  the 

MANORS     king   in    1086,    but   in    the    following 

century    was    alienated    to    Robert    de 

Ferrers.*     Robert   and  his   successors  in  the  parish 

held  of  the  Crown  in  chief  until  l6o8.' 

From  the  first  Robert  de  Ferrers,  created  Earl  of 
Derby  in  1 138,  SPENSER  or  KINGS  BARN  If  ELL 
descended  to  his  son  of  the  same  name'  who  gave 
10  librates  of  his  fee  here  to  his  daughter  Isold  on  her 
marriage  with  Stephen  de  Beauchamp.  Isold  was  a 
widow  in  1 1 85,  with  a  son  aged  four  and  five  daughters." 
Her  son,  another  Stephen  de  Beauchamp,  was  dead 
without  issue  in  1216"  and  his  lands  in  Barnwell  went 
to  John,  son  of  his  sister  Isold  de  Suburie,  (Sud- 
borough),  by  her  husband  Richard  de  Suburie,  and 
Maud,  another  sister,  widow  of  William  de  Wascough*" 
who  conveyed  their  shares  in 
the  manor  to  Sir  Philip 
Basset.**  This  conveyance  was 
confirmed  by  John  de  Suburie 
and  Ralph  son  of  Maud  de 
Wascough,  in  1248. '^ 

Sir  Philip  Basset  gave  the 
manor  of  Barnwell  All  Saints 
to  Hugh  le  Despenser  in  free 
marriage  with  his  daughter 
Aline  or  Aveline,*'  who  be- 
came the  wife  of  Hugh  Bigod, 
Earl  of  Norfolk**  after  her 
first  husband's  death  at  the 
battle    of    Evesham.**      She 

died  in  1 28 1   and  the   manor  descended  to  her  son 
and  heir  Hugh   le   Despenser**  afterwards   Earl  of 


Despenser.  Argent 
quartered  tvitb  gules 
fretty  or  with  a  baston 
sable  over  all. 


"The  book  consisted  originally  of  65 
parchment  leaves,  of  which  only  14  re- 
main. 

'•  Cbron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  166. 

'•  Sparke,  Hist.  Angl.  Script.  (Hugo 
Candidus),  83. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (znd 
nos.)  35. 

'•  Valor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv.  291. 

"  Sorthants.  N.  &■  Q.  (New  Ser.),  ii,  176. 

"Ibid.  173. 

"  Diet.   Nat.  Biog. 

">  See  Aldwinkle  All  Saints. 
*  Vardon,  Index  to  Local  Personal  and 
frivau  Acts.     In  134;  <  croft  in  Barnwell 


next  the  well  which  is  called  '  Barnewell  * 
is  referred  to  (Bucdeuch  Coll.  148  H  78). 

•  D.N.B. 

*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  49  Edw.  Ill,  file 
251,  no.  29. 

'  Bridges,  Hist.  Noribanis.  ii,   213-14. 

'  y.C.H.  Nortbanls.  i,  307a,  359-61, 
jC^b. 

•  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  13  ;  Pat.  R.  25  Edw.  I, 
pt,  ii(ii7),  m.  7 ;  16  Edw.  II,  pt.  i 
(157),  m.  10;  II  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  ii  (190), 
m.  29  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  ;  27  Edw.  Ill, 
file  121,  no.  12  ;  2  Hen.  V,  file  8,  no.  27  ; 
6  Hen.  VI,  file  35,  no.  58  j  (Ser.  ii)  cccv. 
129. 


'  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.)  iv,  190. 

«  Rot.  de  Dom.  (Pipe  R.  Soc),  20. 

»  Close  R.  (2  Hen.  Ill  (19),  m.  l8d. 

'*•  Dugdale,  Baronage^  i,  252. 

"  Anct.  D.  A.  5033,  5069. 

"  Anct.  D.  A.  5027  ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  case  173,  file  36,  no.  569. 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  Edw.  I,  file  27, 
no.  8. 

'•  Cal.  of  Inq,  p.m.  Edw.  I,  vol.  ii, 
no.  389. 

"  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iv,  261. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  Edw.  I,  file  27, 
no.  8. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Winchester."  In  1284  two-thirds  of  the  manor  was 
held  by  Hugh  and  the  remaining  third  by  John  de 
Beaumont,  on  whom  Godfrey  de  Beaumont  and  his 
wife  Cecily,  two  years  before,  had  settled  lands,  the 
inheritance  of  Cecily  in  Barnwell.'* 

Hugh  leased  the  manor  in  1297*'  and  before  1316 
granted  it  for  life  to  Walter  de  Langton,  Bishop  of 
Coventry  and  Lichfield,  who  died  seised  of  the  manor 
called  Spenser  in  Barnwell.-" 

In  1326,  the  Earl  and  his  son  were  executed  and 
their  lands  forfeited.-' 

After  the  death  of  Giles  de  Wachesham,  another 
life  owner,2-  the  king  in  1337  granted  the  manor  to 
his  yeoman,  John  de  Ravensholme.^'  Later  in  the 
same  year  Hugh  le  Despenser,  the  earl's  grandson, 
renounced  his  right  in  the  manor  in  John's  favour.'* 
John,  in  1344,  made  a  settlement  of  the  manor  in  his 
wife  Margaret  and  his  heirs.-*  He  died  in  1353,^' 
Margaret  and  their  son  Thomas,  then  aged  four, 
surviving  him.-'  After  Thomas's  death  without  issue 
in  1370,  the  manor  was  held  by  his  mother  until  her 
death  in  1375.'*  The  heirs  of  John  de  Ravensholme 
were  then  found  to  be  the  descendants  of  Margery 
and  Cicely,  the  sisters  of  his  father  William  de  Ravens- 
holme,  namely,  John  Dyn,  grandson  of  Margery, 
and  John  Dounome,  son  of  Cicely .^^  John  Dyn  had 
already  conveyed  the  reversion  of  his  moiety  to  Sir 
Richard  Stury,^  to  whom  John  Dounome  soon  after 
Margaret's  death,  sold  his  moiety.^'  In  1376  Sir 
Richard  received  a  life  grant  from  the  Crown  of  a 
weekly  cartload  of  firewood  for  his  hearth  at  Barnwell 
such  as  Sir  John  de  Ravensholme  had  enjoyed  before 
him.'-  In  1385  he  settled  the  manor  in  tailmale,'^'  and 
on  the  death  of  his  widow  Alice  in  141 3  Barnwell  All 
Saints  descended  to  Robert  Stury,  the  third  but  first 
surviving  contingent  heir.**  Sir  Robert  settled  it  on 
his  son  Richard,  to  whom  Catherine  Stury,  his  widow 
and  Richard's  mother,  released  her  right.**  In  1436 
Joan  Pavy,  widow,  formerly  relict  of  John  Kent, 
also  renounced  her  right.'*  In  1438  Richard  Stury, 
then  knight,  sold  Barnwell  All  Saints  to  John 
Sturdys,  citizen  and  goldsmith  of  London."  A 
considerable  part  of  the  manor  seems  also  to  have 
belonged  to  John  Laurence  of  Wyboldston,  Bedford- 
shire, and  Elizabeth,  wife  of  John  Estwyk,  who, 
together  with  John  Estwyk,  sold  their  rights  here  to 
John  Sturdys  in  1441.**     John  Sturdys  sold  the  manor 


in  1447  to  Thomas  Thorpe''  in  whose  possession  it 
was  in  1451.'"'  Thomas,  one  of  the  Barons  of  the 
Exchequer  under  Henry  VI,  was  taken  prisoner  at  the 
Baale  of  Northampton  and  executed  after  a  long 
imprisonment.'"  His  lands  in  Northamptonshire 
were  confiscated  by  Edward  IV  in  I46l,''2  but  were  re- 
stored to  his  son  Roger  on  the  accession  of  Henry  VII.''* 
Roger  was  lord  of  the  manor  of  Barnwell  All  Saints 
in  1496  when,  with  his  wife  Constance,  he  sold  it  to 
David  Phelip''*  afterwards  knight  of  the  body  to 
Henry  VII.«  \\'ithin  a  year  of  his  death  in  1506** 
Sir  David  sold  the  reversion  to  George  Kirkham,  who 
sued  his  executors  in  Chancery  for  their  refusal  to 
complete  the  bargain.'"  George,  however,  was  seised 
of  the  manor  of  Barnwell  All  Saints  when  he  died  in 
1528.  He  had  settled  it  on  his  son  Robert  and  his 
wife  Sybil.'**  In  1548  Sir  Robert  Kirkham  and  Sybil, 
together  with  John  Banastre,  whom  Sir  Robert  had 
enfeoffed  of  some  part  of  his  estates,**  sold  the  manor 
to  Sir  Edward  Montagu*"  and  within  the  next  three 
years  George  Middleton  and  George  Lynne,  sons  and 
heirs  respectively  of  Margaret 
Middleton  and  Agnes  Lynne, 
the  daughters  of  George  Kirk- 
ham, confirmed  his  title.*' 
From  that  time  to  the  present 
day  Barnwell  All  Saints  has 
descended  with  Barnwell  St. 
Andrew  (q.v.) 

Another  so-called  manor  in 
this  parish  was  in  the  posses- 
sion of  William  Dudley  of 
Clapton  in  1521  and  descended 
with  the  manor  of  Clapton 
(q.v.)  until  1666,  when  it  was 
mortgaged  by  Sir  William 
Dudley*^  and  acquired  six  years  later  by  Edward 
Lord  Montagu.** 

An  estate  in  this  parish  called  Barnes  between 
15 1 8  and  1529  appears  to  be  the  so-called  manor  of 
Barnes  sold  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu  in  1548  by 
John  Banastre  who  seems  to  have  acquired  it  from 
Sir  Robert  Kirkham.*'' 

The  manor  of  Barnwell  All  Saints  had  two  dove- 
cotes in  the  14th  century,**  twelve  in  1548.**  A 
fishery  is  mentioned  amongst  its  appurtenances  in 
1 28 1.*'     There  were  a  capital  messuage  and  a  wind- 


MoNTAGU.  Quarterly  : 
I  (S-  4  Argent  a  Jesse  in- 
dented of  three  points  and 
a  border  sable  ;  26-3, 
Or  an  eagle  vert. 


*'  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iv,  261;. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  caie  174,  file 
51,  no.  12.  Cecily  was  probably  a 
Ferreri    by     birth    [Bridges,    op.    cit.    i, 

485]- 

"  Pat.  R.  25  Edw.  I,  pt.  2  (117),  m.  17. 

•"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  28  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
15  Edw.  II,  file  70,  no.  7. 

"  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iv,  266, 
6^-70. 

"  Pat.  R.  16  Edw.  II,  pt.  I  (157),  m.  10, 

"  Ibid.  II  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  2  C"9o)i  n>-  29. 

••  Close  R.  II  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  2  (159), 
m.  i^d. 

"Pat.  R.  i«  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  2  (212), 
m.  26;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  177, 
file  77.  no.  287. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  27  Edw.  Ill,  file  121, 
no.   12. 

•'  Ibid. 

"Ibid.  49  Edw.  Ill,  file  251,  pt.  2 
(ist  nos),  no.  29. 

••  Close  R.  49  Edw.  Ill  (213),  m.  9. 

••  Feet  of  F.  North.ints.  case  178,  file  84, 


no.  648  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  49  Edw.  Ill, 
pt  2.  (ist  nos,),  file  251,  no.  29. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  178,  file 
85,  no.  689. 

"  Cal.  Pat.    1377-81,  p.  314. 

"  Pat.  R.  6  Ric.  II,  pt.  i  (313),  m.  27  ; 
8  Ric.  II,  pt.  ii  (319),  m.  31. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  2  Hen.  V,  file  8, 
no.  27. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  214. 

"  Close  R.  14  Men.  VI  (286),  m.  9. 

•'  Ibid.  if.  Men.  VI  (288),  m.  10. 

■"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  179,  file 
95,  no.    104. 

•*  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Close  R.  32  Hen.  VI  (304),  m.  22J. 

♦'  Pari.  R.  (Rec.  Com.)  vi,  pp.  294-5. 

"  Pat.  I  Edw.  IV,  pt.  4  (495),  m.  81/. 

*•  Pari  K.  (Rcc.  Com.)  vi,  pp.  294-5. 

'*  Feet  o(  F.  Northants.  case  179,  file  97, 
no.   39. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1494-1509,  p.  383. 

"  Ibid.  pp.  490,  514-15. 

•'  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  328,  no.  56. 

•74 


"  Chancery  Warrants,  file  608,  no.  161  j 
L.  and  P.  Hen.  I' III,  iv,  g.  4993  (4); 
Exch.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  2),  file  692,  no.  13. 

"  Com.  Pleas  D.  Enr.  East.  2  Edw.  VI, 
m.  7. 

'»  Ibid.  Trin.  2  Edw.  VI,  m.  91/;  Feet  of 
F.  Northants.  Trin.  2  Edw.  VI. 

"  Com.  Pleas  1).  Enr.  Mich.  3  Edw.  VI, 
m.  91/1  nil.  3  and  4  Edw.  VI,  m.  qd ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  3  and  4 
Edw.    VI. 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  18 
Chas.  II. 

*'  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  214. 

'•  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  510,  nos.  12, 
13  ;  Com.  Pleas  \).  Knr.  East.  2  Edw.  VI, 
m.  7. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  q  Edw.  I,  file  27, 
no.  8;  15  Edw.  II,  file  70,  no.  7;  27 
Edw.  Ill,  file  121,  no.  12. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  2 
Edw.  VI. 

*'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  Edw.  I,  file  27, 
no.  8. 


Barnwell  All  Saints:    Old  Church,  taken  down   in   1S23 
{From  a  ivater-colovr  drawing) 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


mill  here  in  1322.**  The  windmill  was  still  standing 
about  thirty  years  Liter  but  only  the  site  of  the  manor 
remained.*'  John  de  Ravensholme  received  a  grant 
of  a  weekly  market  on  Friday  and  a  fair  every  year  on 
St.  Luke's  day,  in  ijig.*" 

The  church  of  ALL  SAINTS  consisted 
CHURCH  of  chancel,  nave,  north  and  south  aisles, 
and  tower  with  broach  spire  on  the 
south  side  forming  a  porch.  The  east  end  of  the 
south  aisle  was  widened  out  to  form  the  Montagu 
chapel,  the  south  wall  of  which  was  in  line  with  the 
tower.  All  the  roofs  were  leaded.  The  whole  of 
the  building,  with  the  exception  of  the  chancel,  was 
pulled  down  about  1825.  From  the  evidence  pre- 
served*' it  seems  to  have  been  of  1 3th  and  14th  century 
date,  the  tower  and  spire  being  of  the  latter  period, 
and  very  good  examples  of  a  well-known  local  type. 
The  chancel  was  left  standing  as  the  burial  place  of 
the  Montagus,  Earls  of  Sandwich,  and  contains 
many  mural  monuments  to  members  of  the  family. 
It  was  restored  in  1894,  but  the  vault  had  been  closed 
ten  years  earlier. 

The  chancel  now  stands  isolated  in  the  middle  of  a 
field.  It  is  built  of  rubble  and  has  plain  parapets 
and  a  low-pitched  roof.  Internally  it  measures  29  ft. 
in  length  by  1 7  ft.  6  in.  in  width,  and  is  of  1 3th-century 
date.  There  are  no  buttresses,  but  some  portion  of 
the  walling  north  and  south  of  the  chancel  arch  has 
been  left  standing,  the  arch  itself,  which  is  of  two 
chamfered  orders  on  half-round  responds  with  octa- 
gonal moulded  capitals,  being  blocked  by  a  modern 
wall  in  which  a  doorway  is  inserted.  At  the  west  end 
of  the  north  wall  is  a  small  lancet  low-side  window, 
now  blocked  and  covered  on  the  inside,  and  there  is  a 
blocked  square-headed  two-light  window  of  14th- 
century  date  at  the  west  end  of  the  south  wall.  The 
five-light  east  window  is  a  15th-century  insertion,  as 
are  also  a  two-light  transomcd  window  on  the  north 
and  one  of  three  lights  on  the  south  side.  Internally 
the  walls  are  plastered,  but  the  east  end  was  panelled 
in  oak  in  the  early  part  of  the  1 8th  century  by  the 
Duke  of  Montagu,'^  the  panelling  covering  the  lower 
part  of  the  window. 

The  font  is  ancient  and  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal- 
to-square  bowl  standing  on  four  short  pillars. 

The  most  interesting  of  the  monuments  is  that  to 
Henry  Montagu,  infant  son  of  Sir  Sidney  Montagu, 
who  was  drowned  28  .4pril  1625  at  the  age  of  3.  He 
is  figured  under  a  curious  tapering  alabaster  canopy 
and  is  described  as  '  a  wittie  and  hopeful  child  tender 
and  deare  in  ye  sight  of  his  parents  and  much  lamented 


BARNWELL 
ALL  SAINTS 

by  his  friends. "**  There  are  also  memorials  to  Dame 
Lettice  Montagu  (d.  1611),  Thomas  Dillingham, 
rector  (d.  1704),  Mrs.  Dorothy  Creed  (d.  1714), 
Rev.  Matthew  Hunt  (d.  1 729),  William  Dillingham, 
gent.  (d.  1753),  and  Ann,  wife  of  William  Ord  (d. 
1808).  In  the  floor  are  armorial  slabs,  with  brass 
inscriptions,  to  the  4th  and  5th  Earls  of  Sandwich 
(1792,  1814),  and  a  brass  plate  on  the  wall  records  the 
names  of  all  the  Montagus  buried  here  from  1622  to 
l862.«' 

High  up  on  the  south  wall  are  two  iron  brackets, 
one  designed  to  support  a  flag  staff,  and  the  other  a 
long  spike  to  hold  a  helmet.  The  helmet  is  hammered 
out  of  sheet  iron  and  has  a  wooden  crest  of  Montagu 
— a  gritlin's  head  couped  and  collared  with  a  crown, 
between  two  expanded  wings  ;'•''  the  flagstaff  is  lost, 
and  a  sword  is  now  suspended  from  its  bracket. 

The  four  bells  were  sold  when  the  church  was  taken 
down  ;  no  record  of  them  appears  to  have  been 
kept.** 

The  registers  are  now  at  Barnwell  St.  Andrew  ; 
before  1812  they  are  as  follows  :  (i)  baptisms  and 
burials  1695-1812,  marriages  1705-1753  ;  (ii)  mar- 
riages 1 754-1 81 2.  A  large  number  of  briefs  is  recorded 
1707-43. 

The  church  of  ALL  SAINTS, 
ADFOfVSON  which  has  been  under  this  dedica- 
tion since  1260,*'  belonged  to  the 
king's  fee  until  Henry  I  gave  it,  it  is  said,  about  the 
year  1 120,**  to  the  Priory  of  St.  Neots,  upon  Michael 
its  rector,  son  and  successor  of  the  .\rchdeacon  Nigel, 
rector  under  William  II  and  Henry  I,  taking  the  habit 
of  a  monk.*'  The  priory  was  confirmed  in  its  pos- 
session by  Alexander  Bishop  of  Lincoln  in  1 140,  and 
by  Hugh  Bishop  of  Lincoln  about  seventy  years 
later.'"  A  pension  of  ^3  a  year,  payable  from  this 
church  to  the  Prior  of  St.  Neots,  was  disputed  by 
Robert  the  parson  in  1232"  but  was  still  due  in  1291.'^ 
During  the  14th  century  the  church  was  several  times 
in  the  king's  gift,  the  temporalities  of  the  alien  Priory 
of  St.  Neots  being  in  his  hands  on  account  of  the  war 
with  France"  and  a  grant  of  the  advowson  was 
made  by  Edward  III  to  John  de  Ravensholme  in 
1345.'"  In  1496  Roger  Thorpe  included  the  church 
in  his  sale  of  the  manor.'*  A  later  lord  of  the  manor, 
George  Kirkham,  was  seised  of  the  advowson  of 
Barnwell  All  Saints  at  his  death  in  1528,'*  holding 
it  by  grant  of  next  presentation  from  the  prior, 
who  afterwards  made  similar  grants  to  John  Lord 
Mordaunt  and  Sir  Edward  Montagu."  Lord  Mor- 
daunt  presented  to  the  church  in  1554'*  and  the  ad- 


•'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  15  Edw.  II,  file  70, 
no.  7. 

"  Ibid.  27  Edw.  in,  file  121,  no.  12. 

•0  Chart.  R.  23  Edw.  Ill  (136),  m.  i. 

•*  There  is  a  drawing  (undated)  of  the 
church  from  the  louth-east  by  Edward 
Blore  in  Baker'i  Htttory  of  Nortbanti 
(at  end  of  vol.).  Bridget  gives  the  length 
of  nave  and  chancel  as  77  ft.  and  width 
across  the  aisles  36  ft.  6  in.  :  Hist,  oj 
Nortbanti.  ii,  214.  In  1321  an  indulgence 
for  the  fabric  of  the  church  of  Barnwell 
All  Saints  was  granted  (Line  Epis.  Reg. 
Memo.  Burghersh,  f.  22). 

•"  Bridges,  Htit.  of  Nortbanti.  ii,  214. 

*•  The  monument  was  erected  in  August 
1626.  It  is  fully  described  by  Bridges, 
op.  cit.  ii,  216.  In  a  cupboard  in  the 
panelling  on  the  south  tide  of  the  altar  is 


preserved  a  parchment  recording  the  life 
and  death  of  this  infant.  Another 
panel  opens  to  disclose  a  piscina. 

"  They  include  the  2nd  Earl  of  Sand- 
wich (d.  1688),  and  his  four  successors,  the 
3rd  (d.  1729),  4th  (d.  1792),  5th  (d.  1814), 
and  6th  (d.  18 18)  Earls.  The  burial  vault 
is  below  the  chancel,  the  floor  of  which 
is  paved  with  black  and  white  marble. 

"  The  wings  are  gone.  For  full  de- 
scription see  C.  A.  Markham  in  An.  Ar^b. 
Soc.  Reports,  xxxvi,  78. 

"  North,  Cb.  Bells  of  Northants.  190. 
Not  only  the  bells,  but  the  material  of  the 
fabric  and  interior  fittings  were  sold  at 
auction, and  the  registers  were  even  offered, 
but  being  claimed  by  the  churchwardens 
were  saved  :  MS.  Notes  by  Thos.  H. 
Wright  (1909). 


•'  Rot.  Ric.  Gravtsend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  pt.  ii,  100. 

"  Gorham,  Hist.  St.  Neots,  ii,  p. 
cxiviii. 

••  Ibid.  Cott.  MSS.  Faust.  A  4,  fol.  46. 

'"  Gorham,  op.  cit.  ii,  pp.  xii,  xiii ; 
Cott.    MSS.    Faust.    A   4,    fol.    41,  41^. 

"  Gorham,  op.  cit.  ii,  p.  xv. 

''^  Pope  Nicb.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.)  39*. 

"Ca/.  Pat.  1338-4°,  P-  3'8i  1354-58. 
PP-  249>273i  1385-89,  P-  3°'- 

'«  Pat.  R.  19  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  I  (213),  m.  22. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  179, 
file  97,  no.  39. 

'•  Chan.  Warr.  file  608,  no.  161  ; 
Excheq.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcxcii,  no.  13. 

"  Gorham,  op.  cit.  ii,  Ixxii ;  Bridges, 
op.  cit.  ii,  215. 

'•  Ibid. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


vowson  remained  in  his  family  until  1 600,  when  his 
grandson,  Lewis  Lord  Mordaunt,  with  his  son  and  heir 
Henry  Mordaunt,  sold  it  to  Edward  Haselrigg,"  by 
whom  the  reversion  was  granted  to  Robert  Syers  of 
Isham,  convicted  of  recusancy  in  1603.  Five  years 
later  Edward  Haselrigg  obtained  a  grant  of  the  ad- 
vowson  for  forty-one  years  on  payment  of  a  fine  to 
Robert  Syers.®"  The  presentation  of  1617,  however, 
was  made  by  Sir  Edward  Montagu,*^  and  although 
the  Crown  reasserted  its  rights  in  1620  by  granting 
the  church  to  Sir  Henry  Spiller  and  others,'^  it  seems 


to  have  followed  the  descent  of  the  manor  until  1821" 
when  it  was  united  to  the  church  of  Barnwell  St. 
Andrew.** 

This    parish    participates    in    the 
CHARITIES      benefits    of    Parson    Latham's    Hos- 
pital, an  account  of  which  is  given 
under  the  parish  of  Barnwell  St.  Andrew. 

A  sum  of  6s.  Sd.  yearly,  known  as  the  Montagu 
Dole,  is  due  on  St.  Thomas'  Day  for  the  poor  of 
Barnwell  All  Saints  out  of  Lord  Montagu's  Estate. 
The  origin  of  this  charity  is  unknown. 


BARTON  SEAGRAVE 


Bertone  xi  cent. 

The  parish  of  Barton  Seagrave  contains  1,826  acres 
of  land,  and  lies  between  200  ft.  and  just  over  300  ft. 
above  the  ordnance  datum.  The  subsoil  is  Great  and 
Inferior  Oolite  and  Upper  Lias.  The  river  Ise  forms 
part  of  the  western  boundary  and  another  stream  part 
of  the  eastern  boundary.  The  village  is  on  the  Ket- 
tering and  Thrapston  road  about  two  miles  south-east 
of  Kettering.  The  church  lies  on  the  south  side  of 
the  road  and  south-west  of  it  is  the  site  of  Barton  Sea- 
grave  Castle  built  in  the  early  part  of  the  14th  cen- 
tury by  Nicholas  Segrave  the  younger,'  and  is  appa- 
rently last  mentioned  in  1433,^  after  which  it  probably 
became  a  ruin.  It  was  surrounded  by  a  moat,  and 
another  moat  lies  to  the  north  of  the  castle  site.  Barton 
Seagrave  Hall,  lately  the  property  of  Mr.  George 
Edward  Stringer,  but  now  of  the  Wicksteed  Village 
Trust,  is  on  the  north  side  of  the  road.  It  appears  to 
have  been  rebuilt  in  the  first  half  of  the  1 8th  century, 
the  date  1725  being  on  the  lead  rain-water  heads.  The 
house  is  of  two  stories,  constructed  throughout  of 
limestone  and  roofed  with  CoUyweston  slates.  The 
main  front  faces  south  and  has  projecting  end-wings 
■with  plain  gables  and  a  middle  gabled  porch  of  two 
stories  with  classic  doorway.  A  wing  at  the  east  end 
containing  a  number  of  small  rooms  appears  to  be  older 
than  the  rest  of  the  building.^ 

The  Kettering  and  Huntingdon  branch  of  the  Lon- 
don Midland  and  Scottish  Railway  crosses  the  parish, 
the  nearest  station  being  at  Kettering. 

The  manor  of  BARTON,  which  was 
MANORS  afterwards  divided  into  the  manors  of 
BARTON  HANRED  and  BARTON 
SEAGRAVE,  was  held  in  the  time  of  Edward  the 
Confessor  by  Burred.''  He  and  his  parents  are  said 
to  have  granted  it  to  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough,^  but 
it  was  not  amongst  the  abbey  lands  in  the  Domesday 
Book  (1086),  but  appears  under  those  of  Geoffrey 


Bishop  of  Coutances,  to  whom  it  and  other  lands  of 
Burred  and  his  son  Eadwine  were  granted.*  It 
was  assessed  at  4J  hides  in  1086,'  and  passed  to 
Robert  de  Mowbray,  who  forfeited  it  to  William 
Rufus.  Rufus  probably  gave  them  to  Robert  Fitz- 
Hamon,  whose  daughter  married  Robert  first  Earl  of 
Gloucester.*  They  thus  passed  to  the  Gloucester  Fee 
in  Northamptonshire.*  In  1086  the  sub-tenant  of 
the  manor  was  named  Robert,'"  but  early  in  the  12th 
century  he  had  been  succeeded  by  Geoffrey  the  cham- 
berlain, probably  Geoffrey  de  Clinton,  who  held  5 
hides  of  land  in  Barton.''  In  1284,  the  immediate 
mesne  tenant  of  the  Earl  of  Gloucester  was  Joan 
Chambernon,"'  who  was  living  in  1 314,"  but  her 
successors  are  not  named,  nor  does  it  appear  what 
right  she  had  in  the  manor. 

In  the  second  half  of  the  12th  century  Barton  was 
held  in  mesne  lordship  by  Richard  de  Hanred,'* 
who  gave  his  name  to  the  manor  of  BARTON  HAN- 
RED. His  son  William  succeeded  as  a  minor,  but  was 
of  age  in  1201,'^  and  he  held  the  manor  partly  as  a 
mesne  lord  but  had  also  2i  virgates  of  land  in  de- 
mesne." He  died  before  1209"  and  was  succeeded 
by  his  son  Richard  ;'*  the  latter's  heir  was  holding 
Barton  in  1243;'®  he  was  probably  another  Richard  de 
Hanred,  who  was  living  in  1266.^"  His  successor, 
William  Hanred,^'  was  hanged  for  felony  in  1295,  and 
his  possessions  escheated  to  the  king  for  a  year  and  a 
day,  and  the  mesne  lordship  disappeared.^^ 

The  first  tenant  of  the  manor  in  demesne  whose 
name  is  recorded  was  William  Clifford,  who  was 
hanged  for  felony  in  the  latter  part  of  the  12th  cen- 
tury .^^  It  escheated  to  his  lord,  Richard  de  Hanred, 
and  while  William  de  Hanred  was  a  minor  his  guar- 
dian granted  it  to  Thomas  de  Buketon,  who  married 
Agatha  sister  of  William  Cliff^ord.-''  It  passed  to  her 
son  John  de  Buketon  before  1 201,  when  William  de 
Hanred  tried  to  recover  it.^^     An  agreement  was  made 


'•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  42  and 
43  Ellz. 

'"  Pat.  R.  6  Ja».  I.  pt.  ii  (1761),  no.  17. 

"  Init.   Bk..    (P.R.O.). 

••  Pit.  R.  18  Jai.  I,  pt.  21  (2136),  no.  5. 
m.  7. 

••  Init.  Bki.  (P.R.O.). 

••  Vardon,  Index  U  ImcoI  Pen.  and  Priv. 
Acu,    1798-1839. 

'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  15  Edw.  II,  no.  37  ; 
D.N.B. 

'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  11  lien.  VI,  no.  43. 
■  •  C.  A.  Matkham  in  Norlhanli  N.  and 
Q.  (N.S.),  T,  146-9. 

'  V.C.H.  Norlbanlt.  i,  p.  311. 


'  Sparkc,  Hiu.  An^l.  Script.  (Var.),  ii, 
43.  •  V.C.H.  Noribanis,  i,  287. 

'  Ibid.  311a.  •  Ibid.  287-8. 

'  Ibid.  389A  ;  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Edw. 
II,  no.  68  ;  46  Edw.  Ill  (i«t  nos.),  no.  62  ; 
10  Ric.  II,  no.  437  ;  4  Hen.  IV,  no.  41. 

'"  V.C.H.  Norlhanti.  i,  p.  311. 

"  Ibid.  389*. 

"  Feud  Aids,  iv,  12. 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Edw.  II  no.  68  j 
Col.  Close,  1313-18,  p.  138. 

'«  Abkrev.  Plac.  (Rcc.  Com.),  p.  34. 

"  Ibid. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  4  John,  caic 
171,  file  9,  no.  145. 

176 


'^  Booh  of  Fees,  \,  19, 

■»  Red  Bk.  of  E.ych.  (Roll.  Ser.),  533  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  2  Hen.  Ill,  case  172, 
file  14,  no.  3  ;  4  Hen.  HI,  case  172,  file  16, 
no.  64  ;  Bk.  of  Fees,  i,  326. 

'•  Ibid,  ii,  937;   Egcrton    MS.  (B.M.), 

J73.1.  '"'•    '42<'- 

•"  Cal.  Pal.  1258-66,  p.  592. 

"  Feud.  Aids,{v,  12  ;  Cat.  Close,  1272-79, 
p.  4i;i-2. 

"Ibid.  1288-96,  p.  478;  1330-33, 
p.    70-1. 

"  Ahhrev.  Plac.  (Rec.  Com.),  p.  34. 

•«  Ibid. 

»•  Ibid. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


r.ARTON  SEAGRAVE 


HuMPHRtY  of  Barton. 
GuUs  a  iTOSsUt  quarter 
pureed  argent  with  three 
scallops  sable  upon  each 
arm. 


by  which  John  licld  the  manor  of  William,  who,  how- 
ever, reserved  2j  virgatcs  of  land  in  demesne.'-'  In 
1218  another  agreement  was  made  between  Simon  de 
Hal  and  Arnold  de  Buketon,  the  heirs  of  John  dc 
Buketon  and  Richard  de  Hanred."  Before  1278  it 
had  passed  to  William  de  Lisle.^*  In  1284  the  tenant 
was  Roger  de  Lisle,'-'  who  obtained  certain  land  which 
William  de  Hanrcd  held  when  it  escheated  to  the 
king  in  1295.^  John  de  Lisle  made  a  settlement  of 
the  manor  in  1334  on  himself  for  life  with  remainder 
to  his  grandson  John,  son  of 
his  daughter  Amice  and  her 
husband  Simon  de  Lanshull,'" 
but  before  1368  it  had  passed 
to  Richard  Cloun,'-  who  was 
still  the  tenant  in  1402.^  It 
passed  before  1446  to  Henry 
Garstang,**  probably  in  right 
of  his  wife  Elizabeth,  who 
afterwards  married  Peter 
Humphrey,^  probably  a  mem- 
ber of  a  family  long  settled  at 
Barton."  The  Humphreys 
held  Barton  Hanred  manor  till 
the  middle  of  the  17th  century. 
They    also    obtained    Barton 

Segrave  manor  (q.v.),and  from  this  time  no  distinction 
seems  to  have  been  made  between  the  two  manors, 
which  were  later  known  as  the  manor  of  Barton  Sea- 
grave  or  Hanred.  Elizabeth's  son  John"  was  suc- 
ceeded in  direct  succession  by  William,^  Richard,^ 
William,^"  Richard,**  and  Nathaniel  Humphrey.''- 
Nathaniel  left  two  daughters,  Anne,  the  wife  of  Ed- 
ward Tudor,  and  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of  Thomas 
Brudenell.''*  The  manor  apparently  got  into  the  hands 
of  trustees  or  mortgagees  at  this  time.''*  Sir  John 
Robinson,  Lord  Mayor  of  London,  and  Anne  his  wife 
were  dealing  with  it  in  1659,*^  and  others  a  little 
later.**  John  Bridges  states  that  his  father  John  Bridges 
bought  the  manor  about  1665  from  Mr.  Humphrey, 
Brien  Cockayne  (Lord  Cullen),  Lord  Mayor  of  Lon- 
don, and  others,*'  and  the  historian  of  Northampton- 
shire was  born  there  in  1666.**  John  Bridges  died  in 
1725.  He  had  been  successively  appointed  Solicitor 
of  the  Customs  in  1695,  Commissioner  of  the  Customs 
in  171 1,  and  Cashier  of  Excise  in  1715.*'  He  was  a 
Fellow  of  the  Royal  Society*"  and  had  devoted  both  his 
time  and  money  to  collecting  material  for  a  history  of 
Northamptonshire.    His  collections  were  left  to  his 


brother  William,  but  owing  to  various  misfortunes 
they  were  not  published  till  I79l,and  then  appeared 
in  a  form  which  does  not  do  justice  to  the  great  amount 
of  research  and  mass  of  accurate  information  which 
he  had  collected.  The  manors  of  Barton  seem  to  have 
been  sold  and  came  into  the  possession  of  Richard 
Tibbits  before  1 793.*'  He  was  succeeded  by  Richard 
John  Tibbits,  whose  daughter  and  heir,  M.irv  Isabella, 
in  1837  married  Samuel,  tliird 
Viscount  Hood.  She  died  in 
1904  and  was  succeeded  by  her 
son  Francis,  fourth  Viscount 
Hood,  who  died  in  1907  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Grosvenor  Arthur  Alexander, 
fifth  Viscount  Hood,  the 
present  owner.*^ 

At  some  period  in  the  13th 
century  part  of  Barton  was 
granted  to  Nicholas  de  Segrave 
the  elder,*' possibly  when  the 
manor  was  in  the  king's  hands 
after  William  de  Hanred's  felony.**  It  was  known  as 
the  castle  and  manor  of  Barton  Segrave,  and  contained 
some  12  virgates  of  land,  as  well  as  meadow,  pasture, 
and  20  acres  of  wood,  besides  rents.**  Nicholas  granted 
it  to  his  younger  son  Nicholas  de  Segrave,  who  died 
seised  in  1322,  when  it  passed  to  his  daughter  and  heir 
Maud,  the  wife  of  Edmund  de  Bohun.*'  It  afterwards 
reverted  to  the  elder  branch  of  the  Segraves*'  from 


Mood.  Azure  a  fret 
argent  and  a  chief  or 
charged  with  three  cres- 
cents sable. 


Segrave.  Sable  three 
sheaves  argent  banded 
gules. 


Mowbray.    Gulrs  a  Itcn 
argent. 


whom  it  passed  to  the  Mowbrays**  and  was  in  the  pos- 
session of  John,  Duke  of  Norfolk,  in  I469.*»  Before 
1331,  a  manor  had  been  granted  to  Simon  de  Drayton 
and  his  wife  Margaret,*"  but  in  1 336  they  and  their  son 
John  and  his  wife  Christina  quitclaimed  it  to  John," 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northantj.  4  John,  case 
171,  file  9,  no.  145. 

"  Ibid.  2  Hen.  Ill,  case  172,  file  14 
no.  3  ;  ibid.  4  Hen.  Ill,  case  172,  file  16, 
no.   64. 

••  Cat.  Close,  1272-9,  p.  451-2. 

"Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12;  Chron.  Peirob. 
(Camden  Soc),  109  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northanls, 
Mich.  13  Edw.  I,  case  174,  file  53,  no.  162. 

">  Cat.  Close,  1288- 1296,  p.  478. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  8  Edw.  Ill, 
case  177,  file  74,  no.  130. 

"Ibid.  42  Edw.  Ill,  case  178,  file  84, 
no.  609. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  4  Hen.  IV,  no.  41. 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  24 
Hen.  VI,  case  179,  file  95,  no.   117. 

"  Bridges,  Wur.  o/iVoriian/j.  ii,  217-18, 
cit.  Harve/'s  yijil. 

"  See  below. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 


'"  Exch.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcUxi,  3. 

"  Ibid,  dccx,  16. 

"  Pat.  33  Eliz.  pt.  6 ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  Mich.  33  &  34  Eliz.  ;  Chan. 
Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxciv,  100 ;  Chan. 
Proc.   (Ser.  ii),  bdlc.  273,  no.  18. 

*'  Chan.  Inq   p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccxxvi,  38. 

*=  Recov.  Mich.  18  Jas.  I,  ro.  90;  Feet 
of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  21  Jas.  I. 

"  Bridges,  loc.   cit. 

**  Chan.  Proc.  (Ser.  ii),  bdle.  454,  no. 
64. 

*'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  1659 ; 
G.E.C.  Complete  Baronetage,  iii,  52. 

"  Recov.  Mich,  i  Jas.  II,  ro.  59. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  p.  v  j  ii,  p.  2l8. 

'»  D.N.B. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  p.  v. 

»"  Ibid. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  33  Geo. 
Ill ;  ibid.  East.  57  Geo.  III. 

177 


'« The  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.). 
VI,  570-1  ;  Whellan,  Htst.  of  Northants. 
1874,  p.  746. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  15  Edw.  II, 
no.  37. 

^*  See  above. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  4  Edw. 
Ill,  case  176,  file  73,  no.  77. 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  15  Edw.  II,  no.  37  ; 
Inq.  a.q.d.  file  clxxxiii,  no.  13. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Hil.  10  Edw. 
Ill  ;  Mich.  18  Edw.  Ill ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
27  Edw.  in  (ist  nos.),  no.  69. 

'«  Ibid  ;  46  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.),  no.  38  ; 
22  Ric.  II,  no.  !oi  ;  file  150,  no.  71a  ; 
8  Hen.  IV,  no.  76  ;  1 1  Hen.  VI,  no.  43. 

'»  Feet  of  F.  Uiv.  Cos.  Hil.  8  Edw.  IV. 

"•  Ibid.  Northants.  Trin.  4  Edw.  Ill, 
case  176,  file  73,  no.  77. 

•'  Ibid.  Hil.  10  Edw.  Ill,  case  177, 
file  74,  nos.  145  and  148. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


son  of  Stephen  de  Segrave,  and  in  1 344  John  dc  Segrave 
was  apparently  holding  the  manor  in  demesne.*-  In 
1493  Henry  Vere  who  succeeded  through  the  Greens 
to  the  Drayton  property*^  died  seised  of  property  in 
Barton,^  which  seems  to  have  been  sold,  before  his 
daughters  and  co-heirs  came  of  age.  In  1557  Richard 
Humphrey,  the  lord  of  Barton  Hanred  manor  (q.v.), 
died  seised  of  the  manor  of  Barton  Seagrave*''  and 
from  this  time  the  manors  were  held  together. 

The  Earls  of  Gloucester  held  a  court-leet  and  view 
of  frankpledge  for  their  tenants  of  Barton,  the  court 
being  held  within  the  manor  of  Barton  Seagrave.  They 
also  had  the  rights  of  assizes  of  bread  and  ale,  pillory, 
tumbril,  infangentliief  and  outfangcnthief,  chattels 
of  felons  and  fugitives,  waif  and  strays  and  the  return 
and  execution  of  writs,  summons  and  orders  of  the 
king." 

The  prior  of  the  Hospital  of  St.  John  of  Jerusalem 


Scale  of  Feet 

Plan  of  Barton  Seagrave  Church 

in  England  held  a  view  of  frankpledge  for  his  tenants 
of  Barton  Hanred,  at  Glapthorn." 

Two  mills  are  mentioned  in  1086,  paying  los.  a 
year."*  One  mill  appears  to  have  been  granted  to  the 
Abbey  of  Sulbv  before  1227,  but  in  that  year  Abbot 
Walter  granted  it  to  Simon  dc  Hal  in  exchange  for  half 
a  virgate  of  land."  Another  mill  was  held  in  1 285 
of  William  de  Hanred,'"  by  William,  son  of  William 
Cranford. 

The  priory  of  St.  John  of  Jerusalem  held  lands  in 
Barton,  some  of  which  probably  liad  been  held  by  the 
Knights  Templars,'^  but  a  messuage  and  virgate  of 
land  were  granted  them  in  1 292  by  William  de  Barton, 
chaplain.'''  In  1546,  the  lands  of  the  Hospitallers 
were  granted  to  Giles  and  George  Isham,  and  were 
occupied  by  Richard  Humphrey.'^ 

The  Abbey  of  Suiby  also  held  lands  in  Barton,  which 


after  the  Dissolution  of  the  Monasteries  were  granted 
with  the  advowson  (q.v.)  to  Edward  Humphreys.'* 
The  church  of  ST.  BOTOLPH  is  a 
CHURCH  building  of  considerable  interest  con- 
sisting of  chancel  and  nave  with  massive 
axial  tower  built  in  the  early  part  of  the  12th  century, 
to  which  about  1270  a  south  aisle  was  added  with  a 
chapel  at  its  cast  end,  covering  the  tower.  Other  work 
done  before  the  close  of  the  13th  century  and  later  did 
not  affect  the  plan,  which  remained  unaltered  until 
1878,  when  the  south  aisle  and  chapel  were  pulled 
down  and  rebuilt  on  a  larger  scale,  forming  a  new  nave 
and  chancel.  A  modern  north  porch  was  at  the  same 
time  removed  and  the  church  completely  restored.'" 

The  original  building  is  of  rubble  and  some  herring- 
bone work  remains.    The  heightened  nave  has  a  plain 
parapet  with  low-pitched  leaded  roof,  but  the  chancel 
is  covered  with  red  tiles.     The  new  work  is  faced  with 
ashlar  and  is  under  a  separate  tiled 
roof.  Internally,  all  the  walls  are 
plastered. 

The  north  and  west  walls  of  the 
nave,  the  bulk  of  the  tower,  and  in 
the  main  the  walls  of  the  chancel 
are  original  12th-century  work, 
though  the  chancel  has  been  mucli 
altered  :  a  clearstory  was  added  to 
the  nave  c.  1 300  and  the  tower  was 
heightened  in  the  middle  of  the 
14th  century. 
12]^  Century  The  chancel  measures  internally 

c  1280"! 300   '9  ^'-  9  '"•  ^y  H  ^'-  ^  '"•  ^"'^  ^^' 

I — IMoDFRN  *"  n^°'^'^i'n  three-light  east  window. 

On  the  north  side  it  retains  a  12th 
century  round-headed  window  high 
in   the  wall,  with   moulded  outer 
arch  on  shafts  with  volute  capitals, 
and    in    the    south  wall  are   two 
13th-century  lancets.    Later  in  the 
century  a  wall  arcade  was  carried 
round  the   chancel   inside,    below 
the    windows,    and    this    remains    along    the   north 
and  south  walls.     It  consists  of  seven  trefoiled  arches 
on  each  side,  with  moulded  bases  and  capitals  alter- 
nately  moulded   and   carved   with   upturned   foliage. 
The  arcading,  long  hidden,  was  uncovered  and  restored 
in  1878  and  tiiat  on  the  east  wall  reconstructed.  There 
is  also  a  return  arch  on  each  side  at  the  west  end  on 
either  side  of  the  tower  opening,  that  on  the  south 
being  pierced  to  form  a  squint.     The  trefoiled  pis- 
cina, set  within  the  arcading,  has  a  modern  drain,  and 
at  the  west  end  of  either  wall  are  two  rectangular  low- 
side    openings    with    outer    trefoiled    heads."     The 
remains  of  a  panelled  tabic  tomb,  with  shields  retain- 
ing traces  of  colour,  are  built  into  the  north  wall  below 
the   arcading. 

The  tower  is  the  full  width  of  the  nave  and  has 
flat  angle  buttresses  north  and  south  :    it  measures 


•'I«t    of     V.     Div.     Coi.     Mich.     18 

'°  Ibid.    13   Edw.   I,  ca«c   174,  file   54, 

tilw.    Ill,  caic  2S7,  lilc  41. 

no.  163. 

•■  Bridget,  op.   cit.   ii,  p.  250. 

"  Feet  of  F.    Northanli.  37  Hen.  Ill, 

**  Exch.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  dclxiiii,  2. 

case  173,  file  38,  no.  623. 

•Mbid.   dcci,    16. 

"  Inquis.     a.q.d.     file     xx,     no.      25  ; 

"  Pltu.    df    Quo    tCarr.    (Rtc.    Com), 

Cal.  Pat.  1292-1301,  p.   101. 

57>- 

"Pat.     R.    38     lien.    VIII,    pt.     10; 

•'  IM.   531   2. 

/..  (S-  P.   lien.    I'm,    xxi,    pt.    ii,   g.    476 

••  KC.-.W.  AV/Aanli.  i,  ^r., 

(66). 

••Feci  o(  F.   Norlh.ioti.    11    lien.  Ill, 

"  L.  &■  P.  lien,  rill,  ivili,  pt.  i,  g. 

ca«c  172,  file  10,  no.  139. 

981  (62). 

'*  The  faculty  for  altering;  and  restoring 
the  church  is  dated  9  October,  1S77. 
The  width  of  the  aisle  was  increased  by 
about  R  ft.,  its  present  dimensions  being 
31  ft.  6  in.  by  20  ft.  3  in.  The  new 
chancel  at  its  cast  end  is  22  ft.  by  20  ft. 
3  in.     These  measurements  are  internal. 

'•  In  each  case  the  sill  is  4  ft.  9  in. 
above  the  floor  and  about  (t  ft.  above  the 
ground  outside  :  An.  Anb.  Soc.  Rrportt^ 
ixix,   383. 


ryS 


U 


h 


u 


^        ^y^^w^W^N**^ 


|i.l        * 


^^V 


y-'ommd' 


o 


u 


,SSi-' 


•'rtv;,^"'''^^  ^feSi.'T^-^ 


T.  ^*.  to   -r 


Barton   StACRAVt  Church  :    TY.NrpANUM  of  North   Uoorway 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


BARTON  SEAGRAVE 


internally   1 8  ft.  8  in.  by   19  ft.  6  in.,  the  grc.iter 
dimension  being  from  north  to  south,  .ind  the  walls 
are  3  ft.  10  in.  thick.     The  lower  stage  is  open  to  the 
chancel  and  nave  by  semi-circular  arches  of  two  orders 
facing  west,"  the  inner  square  and  the  outer  with  big 
edge  rolls,  billet  hood  moulds,  and  jamb  shafts  with 
sculptured  capitals.      In  the  chancel  arch  the  capital 
of  the  south  shaft  is  carved  with  birds  and  that  on  the 
north  with  a  volute  and  acanthus.     Both   shafts  of 
the  western  arch  have  volutes  and  foliage  of  a  more 
advanced  type  and  a  cable  soffit  to  the  impost.     In 
the  north  wall  is  an  inserted  pointed  doorway  and 
above  it  a  late  13th-century  window  of  two  lights  with 
forked    mullion    and    modern    cusping.     Above    this 
again   is   an   original   recessed   semi-circular  window 
with  moulded  arch  and  jamb  shafts  similar  to  that 
in  the  chancel,  but  with  star  ornament  on  the  imposts : 
a  corresponding  window  on  the   south   side  of  the 
tower  is   unmoulded.     The   later  bell-chamber  win- 
dows are  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with    a    quatrcfoil 
in  the  head,  and  the  tower  terminates  in  a  restored 
15th-century     battlemented     parapet     with     angle 
pinnacles.  The  height  to  the  top  of  the  parapet  is  55  ft. 
The  nave  measures  internally  31  ft.  6  in.  by  21  ft. 6 in. 
In  the  north  and  south  walls,  at  a  considerable  height 
above    the   floor,   are    the    remains   of    two    blocked 
round-headed  windows,  that  on  the  south  side  in  the 
spandrel  above  the  pier  of  the  arcade,  the  arches  of 
which  were  cut  through  the  old  wall.     The  north 
doorway  has  a  semicircular  arch  with  roll  and  hollow 
moulding  and  a  hood  with  cable  and  sunk  star  decora- 
tion, on  angle  shafts  with  high  moulded  bases  and 
carved   capitals.     The   tympanum   has   already  been 
described.'*    The  capitals  have  grotesque  heads  with 
volutes  at  the  join,  and  that  on  the  east    a    cable 
moulding.     The  panelled  oak  door  is  probably  of  the 
l6th  century  and  retains  a  ring  handle.     East  of  the 
doorway  is  a  late  13th-century  window  of  three  lights 
with  intersecting  tracery  and  modern  cusping,  but 
the  west  window  dates  only  from  about  1845."    The 
clearstory   windows,   four   on   each    side,    are    small 
trefoiled    openings     set    within     curved     triangular 
labels,  similar  in  type  to  those  at  Cranford,  and  possibly 
as  late  as  c.  1310-20. 

The  late  13th-century  nave  arcade  is  of  two  bays 
with  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders  springing 
from  an  octagonal  pier  and  responds  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases.  The  single  arch  cut  through  the 
south  wall  of  the  tower  to  the  former  chapel  is  of  the 
same  period  and  type,  the  inner  order  carried  on 
moulded  corbels  supported  by  heads.  There  are 
remains  of  a  rood-loft  stair  in  the  tower  wall  at  the 
north-east  corner  of  the  chapel,**  and  a  late  13th- 
century  trefoiled  piscina  has  been  re-used  in  the  south 
wall  of  the  new  south  chancel.  All  the  roofs  are 
modern. 

The  late  12th-century  font  has  a  plain  circular  bowl 
and  flat  17th-century  cover. 


The  pulpit  is  modern,  but  some  16th-century  linen 
pattern  panelling  has  been  worked  up  in  a  prayer  desk. 
There  is  also  some  good  late  l6th  or  early  17th  century 
oak  panelling  in  the  screen  forming  a  vestry  on  the 
north  side  of  the  tower  :  from  the  vestry  a  circular 
wooden  staircase  gives  access  to  the  ringing  chamber. 
In  the  chancel  is  a  brass  tablet  to  Jane  Floyde 
(d.  1616),  wife  of  Hugh  Floyde,  rector,  who  is  depicted 
at  a  prayer  desk  attended  by  five  children  :  below  the 
tower  is  a  blue  slab  with  indents  of  four  corner  shields 
and  an  inscription,  but  re-used  in  1686  for  William 
Henchman,  rector.*'  The  east  end  of  the  former  aisle 
was  the  burial  place  of  the  Bridges  family  :  the 
marble  wall  monument  to  John  Bridges  (d.  1 71 2)  and 
Elizabeth  his  wife,  is  now  at  the  west  end  of  the  aisle, 
and  in  the  old  nave  is  a  monument  to  his  grandson 
John,  son  of  William  Bridges,  who  died  in  1741  : 
both  have  long  Latin  inscriptions.  There  is  no 
monument  to  the  historian  of  the  county,*^  but  in  the 
floor  of  the  new  nave,  near  the  pulpit,  is  a  slab  in- 
scribed '  Johannes  Bridges  Armiger,  obiit  16  Marti 
An.  Dom.  1723/4,  aetatis  suae  57.' 

There  are  five  bells,  the  treble  by  Taylor  and  Co., 
of  Loughborough  1903,  the  second  by  Thomas 
Newcombe  of  Leicester  (c.  1562-80)  with  an  imperfect 
inscription,  and  the  others  of  pre-Reformation  date 
inscribed  respectively  '  S.  Jacobe,'  '  Sti  Petre  o.p.n.,' 
and  '  S.  Johanne.'*^  A  clock  was  presented  in  1 891 
by  Viscountess  Hood. 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup,  paten  and  almsdish  of 
1832,  each  inscribed  '  Barton  Seagrave  1833,'  a 
flagon  of  1868,  and  a  silver  christening  bowl  of  1763 
with  the  arms  of  the  see  of  Rochester,  inscribed 
'  In  nomine  Patris  et  Filii  et  Spiritus  Sancti  Amen. 
Ecclesia  de  Barton  Segrave  in  agro  Northantoniensi.'** 
The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1609-1810,  marriages  1609-1750,  burials 
1610-1685,  (ii)  burials  1678-1812,  (iii)  marriages 
1754-1809,  (iv)  marriages  1811-12.  There  are  church- 
wardens' accounts  1 743-1 836,  and  overseers'  and 
constables' accounts  1728-1797. 

The  advowson  of  the  church 
ADVOWSON  of  Barton  Seagrave  was  granted  by 
Geoffrey  de  Clinton  to  the  Priory 
of  Kenilworth,  which  he  founded  about  1 1 22.*-'  In 
the  early  13th  century  Richard  de  Hanred  unsuccess- 
fully claimed  the  advowson.*'  The  priory  held  the 
advowson  at  the  Dissolution  and  a  yearly  pension  of 
£z  was  paid  to  it  from  the  rectory.*' 

In  1543,  the  advowson  and  pension  were  granted  to 
Edward  Humphrey,  a  younger  son  of  Richard 
Humphrey,  the  lord  of  the  manors  of  Barton  Seagrave 
and  Hanred  (q. v.)**  William  Humphrey,  his  brother, 
held  them  on  a  lease  at  the  time  of  Edward's  death  and 
they  seem  to  have  passed  into  his  ownership,  as 
John  Humphrey,  an  elder  brother,  predeceased  tlicir 
father.*'  Before  1629,  however,  they  seem  to  have 
been  alienated,  since  Sir  John  Lambe  presented  in 


"  On  the  ca»t  lide  the  archci  have  a 
■ingle  iquare  order  only. 

"  y.C.H.  Nortbanti.  ii,  196.  See  alio 
Kcfter'i  Norm.   Tympana,  fig.  67. 

'•  Churchfi  Archd.  Nor' Ion  (1849),  150, 
where  the  window  ii  itated  to  have  been 
inserted  '  a  few  yean  ago.' 

•*  Now  the  new  chancel.  In  iti  original 
form  the  chapel  wai  divided  from  the  aitlc 
b^  a  wall  and  arch.  The  piicina  belonged 
to  the  chapel  altar. 


''  It  is  Eaid  to  have  been  the  tombstone 
of  one  of  the  Seagrave  family  :  Bridges, 
//irr.    of  Northantt.   ii,    220. 

•'  The  monumental  inscription  printed 
on  p.  vi  of  the  Preface  to  Bridges'  Iliiiory 
is  not  in  the  church. 

"  North,  Cb.  Bells  of  Norlbanli.  190. 

'*  Marlcham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Norlbanli.  29. 

"  Cat.  Cbari.  R.  iii,  276-7  ;  Dugdale, 
Mon.    Angl.    vi,   220-1. 

179 


"  I'eet  of  F.  Northanti.  14  Hen.  Ill, case 
172,  file  23,  no.  245  ;  Rot.  Hug.  de  Ifillei 
(Cant,  and  York  Soc),  ii,  157. 

"  Cal.  Pal.  1345-8,  p.  292;  Dugdale, 
Afon.    .^ngl.    vi,    222. 

"«  L.  &■  P.  Hen.  Fin,  xviii,  i,  g.  981, 
no.  62. 

*•  Wards  and  Liv.  Inq.  p.m.  (Set.  ii)  vi, 
41  ;  L.  S-  P.  Hen.  fill,  xi«,  ii,  g.  527 
(48);  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  IVIich.  36 
Hen.  VIH. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


that  year**'  and  Robert  Ekins  in  1631.'*  Jane  Ekins 
presented  in  1686*-  and  JefFery  Barton  and  John  Sawyer 
in  1703.'^  The  advowson  was  acquired  before  1773 
by  the  Duke  and  Duchess  of  Montagu**  and  the 
Duke  of  Buccleuch  is  patron  of  the  living  at  the 
present  day. 


By  his  will  dated  in  1760  John 
CHARITIES.  Ekins  gave  ^^50  for  the  poor.  In 
respect  of  this  charity  a  sum  of 
£1  los.  is  yearly  paid  out  of  land  now  belonging  to  the 
Islip  Iron  Co.  near  Thrapston  and  is  distributed  by 
the  churchwardens  equally  among  six  poor  widows. 


BURTON  LATIMER 


Burtun  (xiii  cent.)  ;  Burton  I.atymer  (xv  cent.)  ; 
Burton  Lattimer  (xvii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Burton  Latimer,  which  was  con- 
stituted an  urban  district  in  1923,  comprises  2,756 
acres.'  The  soil  is  clay  and  limestone  lying  on  Upper 
Lias,  Great  Oolite  and  Cornbrash  beds.  The  land 
rises  northward  and  eastward  from  the  river  Ise 
which  forms  a  part  of  the  western  boundary  and  from 
a  stream  flowing  into  the  Ise  on  the  south,  the  height 
at  the  rivers  being  a  little  below  200  ft.  and  in  the 
north-east  of  the  parish  about  300  ft.  above  the 
ordnance  datum. 

The  village,  which  is  fairly  large,  lies  on  the  road 
from  Higham  Ferrers  to  Kettering,  about  4  miles  from 
the  latter  place.  The  church  stands  in  the  middle  of 
the  village.      The  rectory  house  is  a    I7th-centurv 


Burton  Latimer  Hall 

building  with  vaulted  cellars  of  that  period  but  was 
newly  fronted  in  the  style  of  the  time  in  the  1 8th 
century  and  added  to  in  more  recent  years.  A  house 
known  as  the  Manor  House,  wliich  lies  immediately 
to  the  west  of  the  church,  probably  stands  on  the  site 
of  the  Plcssey  manor  house.  It  is  a  two-story  build- 
ing with  thatched  roof,  in  a  gable  of  which  is  a  panel 
dated  1704  and  with  the  initials,  I  *  M.  The  house 
has  been  modernised  and  none  of  the  original  windows 
remain.  The  school  house  is  situated  to  the  north- 
west of  the  church  and  is  a  rectangular  17th-century 
building  of  Wcldon  ragstone  measuring  internally 
44  ft.  4  in.  by  16  ft.,  with  a  fine  oak  roof  of  five  bays, 
now  covered  with  modern  tiles.     The  front  to  the 


road  has  four  mullioned  windows  and  a  good  central 
doorway,  above  which  is  a  curved  gable  breaking  the 
roof-line  and  containing  a  panel  inscribed; — this  house 

WAS  BUILT  1622  I  THE  FRESCHOOLE  WAS  FOUNDED  | 
BYTHOMASBURDANKE  AND  |  MARGARET  HIS  WIFE  I587  | 
MEMORIA  •  IVSTI  ■  BEKEDICTA.       Pro.  10.        Over    Cach     of 

the  windows  is  an  inscription,  as  follows: — (i) '  Ex 
dono  Johannis  Michel '  (ii)  '  l6  Donum  Johannis 
Barriffe  22  '  (iii)  '  16  Georgius  Plowright  me 
dedit  22 '  (iv)  '  W.  Carpes  citius  quam  imitaberis. 
N.'^  The  larger  three-light  end  windows  have  the 
middle  light  heightened.  The  school-house  was 
renovated  and  additions  made  at  the  back  about  1904. 
To  the  north  of  the  village  is  Burton  Latimer  Hall, 
which  was  the  manor  house  of  the  Latimer  manor.  It 
is  a  picturesque,  two-story  gabled  stone  building  of 
simple  but  attractive  design,  erected  in 
the  first  half  of  the  17th  century.  It 
contains  a  fine  oak  staircase  and  some 
original  oak  doorways  of  unusual  char- 
acter. Alterations  were  made  in  the  l8th 
century,  including  one  or  two  new 
windows  and  a  wing  facing  the  main 
road,  and  the  house  was  restored  and 
additions  made  in  1872.  The  garden 
retains  the  spacious  outline  given  to  it 
in  the  l8th  century,  and  near  the  house 
are  stables  of  the  same  period  and  a 
rectangular  dovecote  with  end  gables  and 
lantern,  all  this  work  being  of  a  plain 
character.  In  the  grounds  are  some 
ancient  fishponds.  A  boot  and  shoe 
factory,  large  flour  mills,  and  quarries 
give  employment  to  the  inhabitants. 
The  parish  was  inclosed  by  Act  of  Par- 
liament.* 

Several  of  the  rectors  of  the  parish 
attained  a  certain  degree  of  eminence  or  notoriety 
beyond  its  limits.  Hugh  Ashton,  who  owed  his  pre- 
ferment to  Lady  Margaret  Beaufort,  was,  like  her,  a 
generous  benefactor  of  St.  John's  College,  Cambridge.* 
Dr.  Robert  Sibthorpe  was  a  royalist,  who  made  his 
reputation  by  his  advocacy  of  extreme  obedience  to  the 
king  in  an  assize  sermon  preached  in  1627.*  John 
Owen,  who  succeeded  his  father  in  1608  in  the  rectory 
of  Burton  Latimer,  became  Bishop  of  St.  Asaph,  and 
was  chiefly  famous  for  his  work  as  a  W'clsh  bishop.* 
Thomas  Grimthorpc  is  best  known  for  his  Life  and 
H'orki  of  H'illiam  Cotvper,  published  in  1 835,  and 
Thomas  Barlett  for  the  Memoir  of  the  Life,  Character 
and  Writings  of  Bishop  Butler,  published  in  1839.'' 


'»  Init.  Bki.  (P.R.O.). 
•'  Ibid.  ;   Feet  o(   F.   NorthanO.    E.iie. 
16  Chai.  I. 
•'  Init.  Dk».  (F.R.O.)  ••  Ibid. 

•*  Ibid     1773,    1798,   1800. 


'  Minii.  of  I  Ii alth  ('onf.  Order,  29  Mjy. 

'  The  fiKnrci  and  Ictlcrt  at  the  begin- 
nings :tn<i  rndf  of  linei  are  dates  and 
iniii-ili,  r.c,   1622  twice,  and  W.N. 

180 


>  I'rivitif  .1(1,  43  Cieo.  III.  c.  65. 

« ly.s.n. 

'  Ibi.l. 
«  Ibid. 
'  Ibid. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


BURTON  LATIMER 


In  the  reign  of  lulward  tlic  Confessor, 
MANORS  Earl  Ralph,  probably  the  carl  of  Here- 
ford, held  8J  hides  of  land,'  which 
constituted,  until  the  first  half  of  the  13th  century,  the 
manor  of  Burton,  and  paid  the  service  due  from  1} 
knights'  fees.'  In  1086,  it  was  held  of  the  king  in 
chief  by  Guy  de  Reinbuedcurt,'"  whose  son  Richard 
was  the  tenant  under  Henry  I."  Richard  is  said  to 
have  pledged  the  manor  in  payment  of  a  gambling  debt, 
to  the  King,'-  who  granted  it,  to  hold  at  pleasure, 
to  Alan  de  Dinant,  a  Breton  who  defeated  the  cliam- 
pion  of  the  King  of  France  near  Gisors.**  This  grant, 
which  was  continued  to  Alan's  successors,  evidently 
caused  confusion  as  to  the  payment  of  scutage,  and 
in  1 173-74  ••"  inquiry  was  ordered  as  to  the  fee  which 
Roland  de  Dinant  held  of  the  King.*'*  Margery,  the 
daughter  and  heir  of  Richard  de  Reinbuedcurt, 
married  Robert  Foliot  and  their  descendants  con- 
tinued to  return  Burton  amongst  their  fees.'*  Margery, 
the  granddaughter  of  Robert  Foliot,  brought  their 
rights  in  the  manor  to  her  husband  Wischard  Ledct, 
who  answered  for  the  Foliot  barony  in  1210-12." 
In  1215,  his  lands  were  seized  by  King  John,  and  his 
Northamptonshire  holdings  were  granted  to  Hugh 
Neville."  Ledet,  however,  recovered  Burton,  which 
escheated  to  the  Crown  at  his  death,  about  1221.'' 
It  seems  clear,  however,  that  at  this  time,  or  a  few 
years  bter,  a  division  of  the  manor  was  made  between 
the  heir  of  Wischard  Ledct  and  the  successors  of 
Alan  de  Dinant.  The  former  relinquished  the  over- 
lordship  of  the  whole  manor  and  obtained  a  third 
of  the  township  of  Burton,  which  formed  a  separate 
manor,  held  in  chief  of  the  King  in  demesne  as  half 
a  knight's  fee."  It  was  known  as  Jl'LESFORD'S 
MJ.\OR-<>  or  BURTON  LJTIMER.-^  Wischard 
Ledct's  heir  was  his  daughter  Christina,  the  wife  first 
of  Henry  de  Braybroc"  and  then  of  Gerard  dc 
Furnival.-^  She  outlived  both  her  eldest  son  Wischard, 
who  took  the  name  of  Ledet,  and  his  son  Walter,  so 
that  on  her  death  between  1266  and  1270,-*  her  h^-irs 
were  Walter's  daughters  Alice  and  Christina,  the  wives 
of  the  brothers  William  and  John  Latimer,  and  Burton 
was  apparently  assigned  to  Alice.^  In  the  meantime, 
the  manor  had  been  subinfeudated.  In  1242  it  was 
held  by  Henry  de  Aldwinkle,  probably  only  for  life,"' 
since  it  wasgiven,  possibly  in  the  lifetime  of  Christina," 
to  her  younger  son  Gerard  de  Furnival.'-*  He  gave 
it  to  his  elder  daughter  Christina,  the  wife  of  William 


Gules  a  cross 


de  Aylesford  or  Eylcsford,'"  and  it  was  held  of  the 
Latimers  for  the  rent  of  i  oz.  of  silk  or  121/.  a  year.*" 
The  younger  Christina,  as  a  widow,  apparently  granted 
it  both  to  Gerard  dc  Furnival  and  to  John  Devereux 
and,  though  an  ensuing  lawsuit  in  1283  was  decided  in 
favour  of  Furnival,*'  Devereux  evidently  obtained  a 
further  grant  of  it  for  life  as  he  died  seised  in  1316.*^  It 
reverted  to  Christina's  son,  Gerard  de  Aylesford**  and 
passed  in  direct  succession  to 
lidmund,**  John*^  and  John  de 
.Aylesford.  The  last  granted 
all  his  right  in  the  manor  in 
1369  to  his  overlord  William, 
Lord  Latimer,  the  great- 
grandson  of  Alice  Ledet.**  On 
the  death  of  Lord  Latimer's 
widow  in  1389  it  passed  to 
their  daughter  Elizabeth  and 
by  her  marriage  to  the 
Nevilles,*'  who  held  it  till 
the    death   of    John    Neville, 

Lord  Latimer,  in  1577.**  It  was  inherited  by 
Catherine,  the  eldest  of  his  four  daughters  and  heirs, 
and  wife  of  Henry,  Earl  of  Nortliumberland.**  Her 
son  sold  it  in  1605  to  Francis  and  George  Mulsho,** 
from  whom  it  passed  to  Edward  Bacon.'"  He  died 
seised  of  the  manor  of  Burton  Latimer  in  1627'-  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  Thomas,  a  vigorous  opponent 
of  the  levy  of  ship-money.''*  Thomas's  son  Edmund 
inherited  it  in  l642''''  and  was  living  in  1670.  Early 
in  the  1 8th  century.  Dr.  Perkins,  who  had  married 
the  widow  of  Edmund  or  his  successor,  was  lord  of  the 
manor.** 

About  1760  the  manor  was  purchased  by  John 
Harpur,  on  whose  death  it  passed  to  his  cousin 
Joseph  Harpur,  of  Chilvers  Coton  (co.  Warwick).  His 
son,  Henry  Richard  Harpur,  was  succeeded  in  1870  by 
his  brother,  the  Rev.  Latimer  Harpur,  who  died  in 
1872.  His  son  and  heir,  the  Rev.  Henry  Harpur, 
died  in  1904,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son,  Thomas 
Wilfred  Harpur,  the  present  owner.'" 

The  two-thirds  of  the  township  of  Burton  which 
in  the  13th  century  were  assigned  to  the  successors 
of  Alan  de  Dinant  became  known  as  the  manor  of 
BURTON  by  THINGDEm''  or  BURTON  PLESSl' 
or  PLACr*'*.  Alan,  the  grantee  of  Henry  I,  was 
succeeded  as  tenant  at  will  in  the  whole  of  Burton  by 
Roland  de  Dinant,  who  was  holding  it  in  1166  and 


•  y.C./f.  Xorihants.  1,  342A. 

•  Red  Bk.  of  Ex.b.  (R.ill)  jcr.),  jji-z. 
'"  y.C.H.  S'oribants.  i,  342A. ' 

"  Ibid.  p.  3S9A. 

"  B.nkcr,  Hist,  oj Northants.  i,  521. 

■>  Book  oj  Fees  (P.R.O.),  ii,  937. 

■«  Great  Roll  of  the  Pipe  (Pipe  Roll  Soc), 
xxi,   53. 

"  Dugddlc,  Baronage,  1,  679  ;  Red  Bk. 
of  Exch.  (Roll»  ler.),  331-2;  Pipe  Roll 
Soc.  xviii,  53;  Pipe  Roll,  13  John,  m.  13. 

"  Wrottcjicy,  PeJ.  from  the  Plea  R. 
SIS  J  Pipe  Roll,  5  John ;  Red  Bk.  of 
Ex.b.  (Roll  tcr.),  173,  532. 

"  Rot.  Litl.  Claui.  (Rec.  Com.),  i,  235*. 

"  Excerpt,  e  Rot.  Fin.  i,  80. 

*•  Book  of  Fees,  i,  499  ;  Feud.  Atds,  iv,  12. 

"■  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  12    Ric.  II,  no.  34. 

«'  And.  D.  A,  8428. 

"  Excerpt,  e  Rot.  Fin.  i,  80. 

"  Cat.  Inq.  p.m.  ii,  no.  374. 

«*  Cal.  Pat.  1258-66,  p.  559  J  Cal.  Inq. 
i,  no.  781. 


'•'-  Ibid.  ;  Cal.  Close,  1279-88,  p.  325  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  5  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.), 
no.  43. 

'•  Bk.  of  Fees,  ii,  p.  937. 

"  Cf.  Rot.  Ric.  Gravcsend  (Cant,  and 
York.  Soc),  p.  105. 

"  Ibid.  ;  Assize  R.  1256,  m.  33  ;  Dc 
Banco  R.  427,  m.  203. 

«•  Ibid. 

""  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  v,  no.  569. 

"  Assize  R.   1256,  m.  33. 

'^  Feud.  Aids,  IV,  12,  29;  Cal.  Inq.  v, 
no.  569. 

"  Ibid.  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  17  Edw.  II, 
no.  37. 

"  Ibid. ;  ibid.  5  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos ),  no. 
43  ;    Cal.  Close,  1327-30,  p.  414. 

>»  Ibid. 

"  Close  R.  46  Edw.  Ill,  m.  28  ;  G.E.C. 
Complete    Peerage. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  12  Ric.  II,  no.  34. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  20  Ric.  II,  no.  54; 
ibid.    5    Urn.    IV,   no.    28;     Ecct    of    F. 

181 


Div.  Cos.  Hil.  22  Hen.  VI ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  9  &  10  Edw.  IV,  no.  28  ;  Anct.  D. 
A.  8428  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  clxxviii, 

57- 

'"  Ibid,  ccxlviii,  22  ;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos. 

Trin.  21  Eliz.  ;  Hil.  22  Eliz.  ;  Trin.  28  Eliz. 

"  Rccov.  R.  Hil.  2  Jas.  I,  ro.  95  ;  Feet 
of  F.  Nnrthants.  Mich.  2  Jas.  I  ;  Northants 
Record  Society,  i,  p.  49(cit.  Quarter  Sessions 
Records). 

"  Metcalfe,  Visit,  of  Northants.  p.  66; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  i  Chas.  I. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccccxixv, 
115. 

"  Ibid. ;  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1635-36,  pp. 

J29,  33>.  349- 

**  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dxxi,  47  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  1654  ;  ibid. 
East.  21  Chas.  II. 

*'  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants.  ii,  223. 

"  Burke's  Landed  Gentry. 

*'  Cal.  Inq.  iv,  no.  47. 

*'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m    8  Hen.  IV,  no.   63 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


1 173.'"  Before  1 190,  it  had  passed  to  his  nephew 
and  heir  Alan,  the  son  of  his  sister  Emma  and  Robert 
de  \'itry.^  He  seems  to  have  died  shortly  and  Burton 
passed  to  his  mother  and  Robert  de  \'itry,  but  before 
1196  it  escheated  to  the  King.'^  Burton  passed 
to  Thomas  Malemains,  the  husband  of  Joan,  a  grand- 
daughter of  Emma  de  \  itry,  and  one  of  the  daughters 
of  Eleanor  de  Vitry  by  her  second  husband,  Gilbert 
de  Tellieres.^-  Malemains  went  to  Germany  in 
1209,^3  and  apparently  during  his  absence,  King 
John  gave  Burton  to  Fullc  de  Cantilupe  to  hold  at 
will.^^  Malemains  on  his  return  joined  the  king's 
party,  and  recovered  the  manor  of  Burton  in  1 216, 
as  part  of  his  wife's  inheritance.^  In  1217,  it  was 
again  granted  to  Cantilupe,**  but  presumably  he 
obtained  other  compensation,  since  on  the  death  of 
Thomas  Malemains,  it  was  granted  during  pleasure 
in  1219  to  his  widow  Joan.*'  She  died  in  1221,  and 
the  custody  of  her  lands  and  heir  was  granted  to 
William  Longsword,  Earl  of  Salisbury  and  his  wife 
Ela,  her  half-sister.**  Nicholas  Malemains  obtained 
livery  of  the  manor  before  1225**  and  it  was  probably 
during  his  life  time  that  the  division  of  the  manor  of 
Burton  already  mentioned  was  made.  In  1 236, 
Nicholas  apparently  held  the  whole  of  the  I J  knight's 
fees.^  Before  1 225,  he  leased  the  manor*'  and  then 
forfeited  it.  In  1228  it  was  granted  to  William 
Marshall,  Earl  of  Pembroke,  on  behalf  of  his  brother 
Richard  Marshall,*-  on  whose  death  in  1233,  it  was 
granted,  during  the  king's  pleasure,  to  Gilbert  de 
Segrave.*^  In  1234,  however,  Nicholas  Malemains 
obtained  restitution  of  the  manor.**  He  died  before 
1240**  and  his  widow  apparently  only  held  the 
smaller  manor  for  her  life.**  His  heir,  presumably 
his  daughter,  was  Ela,  the  granddaughter  of  Thomas 
Malemains  and  wife  of  Robert  de  Plessy.*'  On  the 
death  of  Nicholas's  widow,  Beatrice,  after  1284,**  the 
manor  was  held  in  direct  descent  by  John,  son  of 
Robert  and  Ela  (d.  1313),  Edmund  (d.  1327),  Nicholas 
(d.  1356),  and  John  who  was  succeeded  by  his  brother 
Nicholas  Plessy,  a  minor,  who  died  in  1362.*'  It 
passed  to  his  sister  Joan,  the  wife  of  John  Hamely.'* 
Their  son  John  died  without  issue,  and  after  the 
death  of  John  Hamely  in  1399,  the  reversion  of  the 
manor  belonged  to  Joan's  uncle,  Peter  Plessy,"  who 
had  granted  it  to  John  Plessy  of  Shapwick  (co.  Dorset), 


'■'  Rrd  Bk.  of  F.xch.  (Rolls  str.),  331-2  ; 
Crtai  Roll  of  iht  Pipe  (I'ipc  Roll  Soc), 
xi,    119,  lii,  54,  xxi,  p.   53. 

'0  Cott.  MS.  (B.M.),  Doinit.  A  8, 
(ol.  87  ;  Pipe  Roll  Soc.  (New  «cr.),  i,  p.  30  ; 
Mag.  Rot.  Scacc.  Norm.  (Soc.  of  Antiq.), 
ii,  p.  xlvii,  note  O. 

"  Pipe  R.  8  Kic.  I.  m.  17. 

'M/<jg.  Rot.  Scacc.  Norm.  (Soc.  of 
Antiq),  ii,  p.  xlvi,  note  O. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Red  Rk.  of  Exch.  (Rollj  ler.),  p.  532  ; 
Pipe  R.  13  John,  m.  13. 

"  Roi.  I.itt.  Pat.  (Rcc.  Com),  i,  195*  j 
Rot.  Lilt.  Claui.  (Rcc.  Com.),  i,  2S4. 

"  Ibid.    34r,A. 

"  Ibid.  p.  389,   390*. 

•'  Ibid.  468*  i  A/af.  Rot.  Scacc.  Norm. 
(Soc.  of  Antiq.),  ii,  p.  xlvi,  note  O. 

"  Cal.  Pal.  1216-25,  p.  532. 

"  Rk.  of  Fen,  i,  603. 

*'  Cal.   Pat.    1216-25,  p.   532. 

••  Cal.  Cloie,  1227-31,  pp.  36,  542. 

•■  Cal.   Cloie,   1231-34,   p.    344. 

•«  Cal.   Pal.    1232-47,  p.  83. 

•'  Cal.  Cloie,   1237-42,  p.  257. 


whose  son  John  came  into  possession.''^     In  1406,'* 
another  John  succeeded,  and  on  his  death  in  1417,  it 
passed  to  John  Cammell,  son  of  Joan,  the  sister  of 
the  fi.st  John  Plessy  of  Shap- 
wick.'*    His  son  Robert  and 
grandson    William    succeeded 
him,'^  but  William  sold  Burton 
Plessy  in  1496  to  feoffees  ap 
parently  to  the  use  of  Nicholas 
Boughton,  who  died  seised  in 
1 5 19.'*    His  son  Edward  pre- 
sumably sold  it  to  Sir  Nicholas 
Vaux,    who    died     seised    in 


vo/ 


Plessy.  Argent  six  rings 
gules. 


•«  Ibid.  ;  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  p.  12. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  p.m.  iv,  no.  17  ;  Cur. 

Reg. 

R.  no.  173,  m.  \od. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12. 

•»  Wrotteslcy,  Ped.  from  Plea  R. 

"3i 

Cal.    In(j.   p.m.    iv,    no.    17;     Ch.m. 

Inq. 

p.m.    7    Edw.    II,    no.    5  ;     i    Edw 

Ill 

(ut  noj),  no.  42  ;    31  Edw.  Ill  (ist 

DOS.), 

no.   18  ;     35  Edw.   Ill,   pt.   2   (1st 

no«.) 

no.    15. 

'»  Ibid. 

"  Ibid.   22  Ric.   II,  no.   25. 

"  Ibid.;    Feet    of    F.    Div.    Cos. 

Mil. 

22  Ric.  II. 

'•Ch:m.  Inq.  p.m.  8  lien.  IV,  No 

63; 

frud.  Aids,  vi,  p.   501. 

'*  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  4  lien.  V,  no 

3' ; 

Feud.  .Iidt,  iv,  49. 

'•  llutcliins,  llisl.  of  Dorset,  iii,  p. 

166; 

Cal.    Pat.    1446-152,    p.    278;    I'ect 

jf   F. 

NorthanH.  28  lien.  VI,  no.  124. 

"  Feet    of    F.     Northants.     Mich 

12 

Hen.    VII,    no.    43;     Ch.in,     Inq. 

p.m. 

(Srr.  ii),  xxxiv,  93. 

"  Ibid,  xli,  60. 

'•  /,.  6-  P.   Hen.   Vlll.  ix,  697  ; 

Feet 

1523."  The  Vaux  family 
held  it  till  the  death  of 
Edward,  Lord  Vaux  of  Har- 

rowden,"  when  it  passed  under  a  settlement  of  1646 
to  Nicholas  KnoUys,  Earl  of  Banbury."  His  son 
Charles  sold  it  to  Christopher  Cratford  and  John 
Kenricke  in  1687.**  It  changed  hands  frequently 
at  this  time.  Early  in  the  1 8th  century,  John  Whiting 
was  lord  of  the  manor,*'  but  in  1738  Mrs.  Anne 
Dickinson,  a  widow,  sold  it  to  Arthur  Brooke.'-  In 
1764,  William  Steer  and  his  wife  Anne  sold  it  to  George 
Udny,*^  who,  in  turn,  sold  it  in  the  same  year  to  John 
Harpur,**  who  already  had  the  manor  of  Burton 
Latimer  {q.v.) 

The  Priory  of  Bradstoke  held  the  NETHER  manor 
or  PRIOR'S  manor  in  BURTON  in  frankalmoin  of 
the  lords  of  the  manor  of  Burton  Plessy.**  In  1221 
Henry  de  Braibroc  and  his  wife  Christina  Ledet 
granted  one  virgate  of  land  to  the  Prior,**  but  the 
greater  part  of  the  manor  must  have  been  formed 
from  the  land  which  Nicholas  Malemains  granted 
to  his  sister  Hillary  in  marriage.  After  the  death 
of  her  husband,  VValter  de  Godarville,  she  granted 
it  in  frankalmoin  to  the  Priory,  and  further  charters 
were  obtained  from  her  daughter  Joan,  the  wife 
of  Geoffrey  Gacelyn.*'  The  Priory  held  the  manor 
till  the  early  1 6th  century,**  but  it  had  been  granted 
to  under-tenants  at  fee-farm.*'  In  1502,  it  was  held 
by  John  Ashby*"  in  right  of  his  wife  Letitia,  and  they 
sold  it  to  Sir  Richard  Empson.*'  It  was  forfeited 
on  Empson's  attainder  in  1509,'-  and  in  1512  Henry 
VIII  granted  it  to  Sir  William  Compton.'^  In 
some  way,  however,  Thomas  Empson  regained  pos- 


of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  3  &  4  Ph.  and  Maiy  ; 
Trin.  31  Eliz.  pt.  i  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
(Scr.  ii),  ccxliv,  121  ;  Pat.  lojas.  I,  pt.  15  ; 
Recov.  R.  4  Chas.  I,  ro.  12. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mich.  22 
Chas.  I  i  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich. 
1A55. 

'"  Ibid.  Mil.  2  &  3  Jas.  II. 

*'  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants.   ii,   224. 

•'  Feet  of  F.  Ni>ithant8.  K.ist.  1 1  Ceo.  II, 

"■  Ibid.  Norlhants.  Mich.  4  Ceo.  III. 

"*  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  East,  4  Geo. III. 

"  Slowe  MS.  (IIM.),  925,  fol.  152. 

"  Ibid.  fol.   ibid. 

»'  Ibid,  fol,  152-3  ;  Feet  of  F.  case  172, 
file  27,  no.  345  ;  case  173,  file  40,  no.  657  ; 
Cal.  Chart,  iii,  225. 

""  /'/«.,  dr  Quo  ll'arr.  (RccCom,),  548-9. 

»•  /..  6>-  P.  lien.  11 II,  i,  g.  587  (10). 

"'  Ibid,  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mil. 
17  Hen,   VII. 

•'  Ibid. 

"'  Exch.  Inq.  p,m,  (.Ser.  ii),  dclxxvi, 
10,  I  I  ;  Chan,  IiKi,  p,m,  (Ser,  ii),  xxvi,  21. 

"•  /..  6-  /'.  //-•".  /■///,  i,  K  10S3  (41)  i 
Pat.  3  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  3,  m.  13. 


182 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


BURTON  LATIMER 


Croxton  Abdiy.  Or 
a  bend  betzoeen  iix  mart- 
Uis  xuble. 


session  of  the  manor.*'  He  seems  to  have  sold  it 
to  Ricliard  Fermor,  a  merchant  of  the  Staple  of  Calais 
who  was  attainted  under  Henry  \'1II,  but  when  par- 
doned in  1550,  only  tenements  in  Burton  l.atinier 
are  mentioned  among  the  lands  restored  to  liim.*^ 
The  Prior's  manor  was  apparently  incUided  amongst 
them,  since  his  son,  Sir  John  Fermor,  together  with 
his  wife,  sold  it  in  1555  to  Richard  Humphrey.'^  Tiie 
latter  died  seised  of  it  in  1557,"  but  its  later  history 
does  not  appear.  In  1803  William  King  claimed  to 
have  a  manor  in  Burton  Latimer,  wiiich  may  iiave  been 
the  Nether  manor."' 

The    Abbey    of    Croxton    held    a    manor,    called 
'THINGDEN  and  BURTON  LAJIMER,  with  lands 
in  both  townships.   Its  history 
appears  under  Fineden.®' 

The  lords  of  the  manor  of 
Burton  Plessy  held  a  view  of 
frankpledge,  to  which,  in 
1285,  the  tenants  of  the  Prior 
of  Bradstock  did  suit."*  The 
Farls  of  Gloucester  also  held 
a  view  of  frankpledge  for  the 
township  of  Burton,  with- 
drawing suitors  from  the 
Abbot  of  Peterborough's  court 
for  the  Hundred  of  Huxloe.* 
It  passed    by   inheritance    to 

the  Earls  of  Staflord,^  and  came  into  the  hands  of  the 
king.' 

In  1803,  Henry,  Duke  of  Buccleuch  and  his  wife 
Elizabeth  owned  the  Honour  of  Gloucester  Fee  in 
Northants,  to  which  the  view  probably  belonged. 
They  also  claimed  to  own  a  manor  in  Burton  Lati- 
mer.** 

Two  mills  were  attached  to  the  manor  in  1086, 
paying  l6i.  a  year.*  One  mill  is  mentioned  in  1220 
as  part  of  the  inheritance  of  Margery  Foliot,^  and 
presumably  passed  with  the  manor  of  Burton  Latimer. 
The  second  mill  seems  to  have  been  assigned  to  the 
Malemains,  whose  sister  Hillary  granted  it  to  the 
Priory  of  Bradstock.'  The  Priory  of  Bushmede 
also  had  a  mill  in  Burton  Latimer  at  the  time  of  its 
dissolution.'* 

The  church  of  ST.  MART  THE 
CHURCH  VIRGIN  consists  of  chancel  41  ft.  6  in. 
by  18  ft.,  with  modern  south  vestry, 
clearstoried  nave  71  ft.  by  17  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south 
aisles  11  ft.  wide,  north  porch,  and  west  tower  and 
spire.  The  width  across  nave  and  aisles  is  44  ft.  6  in., 
and  the  tower  is  13  ft.  square,  all  these  measure- 
ments being  internal. 

The  church  throughout  is  built  of  rubble,  with 
leaded  roofs  to  nave  and  aisles,  and  high-pitched 
modern  tiled  roof  to  the  chancel.  The  aisle  parapets 
are  plain,  and  those  of  the  clearstory  battlemented. 
The  church  was  extensively  restored  in  1866-68,  when 
the  tower  and  spire  were  taken  down  and  rebuilt  with 


•*  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  406,  no.  42  ; 
Anct.  I).  A.   5400. 

•'Bridges,  op.  cit.  i,  290;  Cal.  Pat. 
1550-2,  p.   22-23. 

••  Fett  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  2  &  3 
Ph.   and    Mary. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cxiv,  3. 

"*  Pnv.  Act  of  Pari.  43  Geo.  Ill, 
C65. 

••  S«e  btlow. 

••  Cbm.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),   109. 


The  prior  was  later  allowed  a  view  :  Plac. 
de  Quo  fVarr.  (Rec.  Com.),  548-9. 

'  Chron.    Petrob.    109. 

'  Cal.  Pat.  1401-5,  p.  349. 

•  P.R.O.  Ct.  R.  ptf.   194,  no.  40. 
••  Priv.  Act  of  Pari.  43  Geo.  Ill,  c.  65. 
«  V.C.H.   Northanti.  i,   342*. 
'  Feet  of  F.  case  172,  file  17. 

•  Stowe  MS.  (B.M.),  925,  fols.  152, 
1521/,  153;  Feet  of  F.  case  173,  file  40,. 
no.  657  i  Mich,  z  &  3  Ph.  and  Mary. 


the  old  materials,  and  the  flat  roof  of  the  chance! 
removed.  In  1882,  the  porch  was  restored,  the  vestry  ' 
rebuilt,  an  organ  recess  constructed  on  the  north 
side  of  the  chancel,  and  the  nave  reseated.  All 
the  walls  are  plastered  internally. 

A  prc-Conqucst  stone  with  plait-work  upon  it 
was  re-used  in  the  rebuilding  of  tlic  tower,  but  no 
part  of  the  present  building  is  older  than  the  1 2th 
century,  in  the  early  part  of  which  there  was  an 
aisleless  church,  the  nave  occupying  at  least  the 
existing  three  west  bays  and  probably  a  fourth  farther 
west,  of  which  only  half  now  remains.'  The  south 
wall  of  this  building  was  pierced  c.  1 1 30  by  an  arcade 
of  four  round  arches,  three  of  which,  with  a  half 
arch  at  the  west  end,  and  three  piers  still  remain. 
The  eastern  arch  has  a  chevron  moulding  on  the 
nave  side,  the  second  a  roll,  while  the  others  arc 
unmouldcd,  and  all  are  plain  facing  the  aisle.  The 
cylindrical  piers  have  moulded  bases  and  scalloped 
capitals,  the  square  abaci  of  which,  in  two  of  the 
piers,  have  incised  carving  on  the  north  face.  No 
north  aisle  was  made  at  this  time,  but  a  transeptal 
chapel  was  added  on  the  north  side  at  its  east  end, 
entered  through  a  round  arcli,  one  of  the  jambshafts 
of  which  remains  in  the  compound  pier  of  the 
north  arcade.  This  arch,  which  is  equal  in  height 
to  the  opposite  arch  in  the  south  arcade,  was  originally 
lower,  and  is  now  stilted  on  the  west  side  :  it  has  an 
edge-roll  towards  the  nave,  and  its  impost  blocks 
remain  on  both  sides. 

A  north  aisle  was  added  c.  1200,  an  arcade  of  three 
bays  with  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders 
being  cut  through  the  wall  west  of  the  transept,  two 
and  a  half  bays  of  which  remain.  The  eastern  pier 
is  a  small  square  with  large  attached  shafts,  and  the 
western  pier  is  cylindric.il,  both  having  moulded 
bases  and  capitals  with  good  stiff  leaf  foliage.  The 
half-round  east  respond,  which  forms  part  of  the 
compound  pier  of  the  transept,  has  also  a  stiff-leaf 
capital  and  square  abacus,  and  the  pier  has  also  shafts 
at  the  angles  with  foliated  capitals  and  moulded 
bases  above  a  chamfered  plinth.  From  the  north 
aisle  an  arch  (now  destroyed)  was  made  into  the 
transept,  springing  from  short  angle-shafts  in  the 
wall  and  from  the  back  of  the  compound  pier,  some 
2  ft.  beow  the  arches  of  the  nave.' 

The  great  west  tower  was  built  in  the  second  quarter 
of  the  13th  century,  and  intruded  on  the  west  end 
of  the  12th-century  nave,  cutting  it  short  by  half  a 
bay,  and  shortly  after,  about  1250,  the  nave  was 
lengthened  to  the  east  by  three  bays,  the  old  arches 
immediately  adjoining  the  new  work  being  adapted 
to  it — on  the  south  side  by  leaving  a  portion  of  the 
12th-century  respond  capital  above  the  capital  of 
the  new  pier,  and  on  the  north  by  the  retention 
of  the  impost  block,  new  piers  taking  the  place  of  the 
original  east  responds.  The  aisle  walls  appear  to 
have  been  rebuilt  at  the  same  time,  except,  perhaps, 

••  Rent  &  Surv.  (P.R.O.)  ptf.  20, 
no.  15. 

'  It  was  of  comparatively  modern  date. 

®  The  massive  stonework  beneath  the 
eastern  piers  of  the  present  nave  suggests 
that  the  early  nave  extended  farther  east, 
but  the  length  seems  abnormal  for  an  earlj 
12th-century  building. 

'  There  are  indications  of  a  transverst 
arch  across  the  south  aisle  in  the  same 
position. 


183 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


in  the  western  bay,  and  the  chancel  was  completed 
in  its  present  form  c.  1270-80.  A  keel-shaped  string- 
course runs  round  the  whole  of  the  chancel  below 
the  windows,  and  along  the  aisles  to  within  about 
20  ft.  from  the  west  end. 

About  the  middle  of  the  15  th  century,  the  clear- 
story was  added,  the  porch  built,  and  new  windows 
inserted  in  the  aisles,  the  walls  of  which  were 
heightened.  The  spire  is  approximately  of  the  same 
date,  perhaps  immediately  following  the  clearstory, 
and  the  church  then  assumed  its  present  aspect. 

The  chancel  has  been  much  restored.*"  It  has 
two-stage  buttresses  of  small  projection,  and  a 
modern    five-light    east    window    with    geometrical 


with  smaller  attached  shafts  at  the  angles.  The 
west  windows  of  the  aisles  are  modern  copies  of 
late  13th-century  two-light  openings,  but  all  the 
other  windows  north  and  south  are  four-centred 
15th-century  insertions  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights. 
The  clearstory  windows,  six  on  each  side,  are  three- 
centred,  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages,  with  good  coupled  but- 
tresses and  moulded  plinth.  The  old  stones  having 
been  used  in  the  rebuilding,  it  has  lost  little  or  nothing 
of  its  original  appearance.  The  doorway  on  the  north 
side  reproduces  a  14th-century  opening  in  the  same 
position  ;  the  entrance  to  the  vice-turret  in  the  south- 
west angle,  with  its  beautiful  trefoiled  head,  has  been 


te^^^^ 


■  12111  CiNTUKv  H 1311!  Cr.NTURv  C.I2 10 

□  C.I195-I200  [UT1C.I280 

eaiSHJ  Clmuky  rebuilt  rrJI5i!!  Ci.ntuky 

^^^^Ml^^ □MOD.KN 


North  Aisle 


.#: 


Nave 

'.'Ml.\\'.¥'".'''^: 
South  Aisle 


'.W 


i!w^iiiiniiiiiiiirf^^^:^-[ijiiiiiiiiiiif,w^nT 


10    5    o 


^-^  f-i-f-n-T-1  j—^ 


10 


20 


30 


O 


Scale  of  Feet 
Plan  of  Burton  Latimer  Church 


tracery,  but  the  other  windows,  three  on  each  side, 
are  c.  1 280  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  with  pointed  trefoils 
and  cusped  circles  differing  in  detail  in  the  heads. 
There  is  a  scroll  string  at  sill  level  inside,  but  no 
ancient  ritual  arrangements  remain.  The  13th 
century  chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders, 
the  inner  springing  from  half- octagonal  responds 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  capitals  being 
cut  back  for  a  much  restored  and  painted  15th-century 
screen." 

The  arches  of  the  three  13th-century  eastern  bays 
of  the  nave  arc  of  two  chamfered  orders  springing  from 
piers  of  four  clustered  shafts  and  from  half-octagonal 
responds,  all  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
13th-century  north  doorway  is  of  a  single  continuous 
chamfered  order  with  hood,  and  retains  a  15th- 
century  oak  door  on  which  are  inscribed  the  names 
of  '  Ihon  Campyon  and  Ihoan  hys  wyf.'  Tiic  lofty 
porch  is  open  to  the  roof  and  has  a  moulded  outer 
arch  with  canopied  niche  above  breaking  the  parapet 
of  the  gable.  The  south  doorway  is  of  late  12th- 
century  date  with  round  head  of  two  moulded  orders, 
the  outer  on   nook   shafts  with  carved  capitals  and 


blocked  and  an  external  doorway  made.  The  west 
window  is  a  widely  splayed  single  lancet  with  rear 
arch,  and  the  lower  stage  is  open  to  the  nave  by  an 
arch  of  three  chamfered  orders  springing  from  clus- 
tered shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
middle  stage  has  plain  arcading  of  three  pointed  arches 
on  the  north,  south  and  west  sides,  the  middle  arch 
on  the  west  being  pierced  by  a  lancet.  The  double  two- 
light  bell-cliamber  windows  were  originally  without 
tracery,  but  the  lights  were  afterwards  trefoiled  and 
a  quatrefoil  inserted  in  the  head.  The  battlemented 
parapet  is  the  same  date  as  the  spire,  which  has  two 
sets  of  crocketed  gabled  lights. 

The  roofs  of  the  nave  and  aisles  are  in  the  main 
ancient,  with  moulded  principals  and  carved  bosses, 
but  all  the  rafters  arc  new. 

The  font  is  ancient  and  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal 
bowl  and  stem  on  a  chamfered  base  :  on  the  west  the 
stem  has  a  solid  projection  bringing  it  in  line  with  the 
bowl. 

The  north  aisle  wall  had  formerly  a  painting,  per- 
haps of  the  14th  century,  representing  tlie  story  of  St. 
Katharine,  within  a  border,  but  only  a  fragment  now 


"About  1750  a  pUiter  ceiling  wai 
erected  over  the  ch.incel  and  the  cait 
end    partitioned  of!  Co  form  ■  veitr/,  a 


doorway  bcinj;  broken  thr'»u;!i   the  east 
wall. 

"  The  icrcen  ,wh(ch  had  been  removed 

184 


W.1S  put  hack  at  tlic  time  of  the  restoration 
and  a  luft  added. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


BURTON  LATIMER 


remains.  A  scries  of  late  Elizalicthan  paintings  of  the 
twelve  patriarchs  in  strapworlc  frames  occupy  the 
spandrels  of  the  nave  arcades  and  are  in  a  fair  state  of 
preservation,  though  two  have  perished.^ 

There  is  a  good  Jacobean  oak  poor  box  :  a  large  iron- 
bound  chest  is  dated  1629. 

Below  the  tower  is  a  marble  wall  monument  with 
brass  figure,  shields  and  inscription  to  Margaret  Bacon 
a  '  chrisom  '  cliild  (d.  Jan.  1626-7),  •'"'^  <"  t''<^  •^•"t  ^"J 
of  the  nave  and  in  the  chancel  are  two  grave  slabs 
with  indents  of  brasses,  one  of  which  retains  a  group 
of  nine  daughters  and  a  shield,  and  the  other  a  shield 
only. 

There  is  a  ring  of  eight  bells.  The  treble  and  second 
arc  by  Taylor  &  Co.  of  Loughborough  1920,  the  third 
by  the  same  founders  1903,  the  fourth  dated  1620, 
the  fifth  by  T.  and  J.  Eayre  of  Kettering  1718,  the 
sixth  and  seventh  dated  1619,  and  the  tenor  by  Thomas 
Eayre  of  Kettering  1749.*' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup  and  cover  patent 
of  1569,  the  paten  inscribed  '  1571  '  on  the  foot  ;  a 
paten  of  c  1682,  and  a  flagon  and  almsdish  of  1774.*'* 

The  registers  begin  in  1538,  but  the  earlier  entries 
are  on  two  parchment  rolls.  The  first  roll  contains 
baptisms  to  1559,  marriages  to  1561  and  burials  to 
1560,  and  the  second,  baptisms  and  burials  to  1569 
and  marriages  to  1367.  The  contents  of  the  books 
before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i)  baptisms  1558-1700, 
marriages  1558-1718,  burials  1558-1678,**  (ii)  burials 
1678-1735,  (iii)  baptisms  1700-1812,  (iv)  marriages 
1719-1757,  (v)  marriages  1754-1812,  (vi)  burials  1736- 
1812.  The  first  book  contains  lists  of  churchwardens 
and  overseers  from  1668  to  1757  and  of  constables 
from  1679  to  1757.  There  are  cliurchvvardens'  ac- 
counts beginning  in  1559  but  not  continuous,  and  a 
book  of  briefs  1670-1753. 

The  Foliots  held  the  advowson 
ADVOWSON  of  the  church  of  Burton  Latimer  in 
the  1 2th  century,  but  Richard  Foliot 
seems  to  have  made  some  kind  of  grant  of  it  to  the 
abbot  of  Beaulieu  in  Brittany,  since,  in  1220,  the 
abbot  quitclaimed  it  to  Richard's  daughter  and  heir 
Margery  and  Wischard  Ledet.*'  Thomas  Male- 
mains  presented  to  the  church  between  12 16  and  1219" 
and  in  1263  his  granddaughter  Ela  and  her  husband 
claimed  the  advowson  against  Christina  Lcdet,  but 
they  lost  their  case'*  and  Christina  gave  it  to  her  son 
Gerard  de  Furnival.*'  When  he  went  to  the  Holy 
Land  he  entrusted  the  advowson  and  an  acre  of  land 
to  the  rector,  Master  John  Fleming,  on  condition  that 
if  Gerard  did  not  return  they  should  be  granted  to 


Christina  de  Aylcsford,  with  remainder  to  her  son 
Gerard  de  Aylcsford.'''"  Fleming  presented  in  1290,'* 
but  in  a  lawsuit  of  1368  it  appears  lie  did  not  carry  out 
Furnival's  stipulations.''^ 

Prior  to  13 16,  Sir  Walter  de  Neville  recovered  the 
advowson  from  Robert  Fleming  and  Gerard  de  Ayles- 
ford^'  and  granted  it  to  Philip  de  la  Bechc.'-'  Pliilip's 
heir  was  his  brother  Jolin  who  died  before  lie  obtained 
seisin-^  and  liis  two  sons  died  childless,  so  that  the 
advowson  was  inherited  in  1 348  by  his  three  daughters.-' 
In  the  meantime,  however,  Thomas  Fytling,  who 
presented  in  1348,^'  and  his  wife  Alice  seem  to  have 
obtained  the  advowson,  but  it  was  recovered  in  1349 
by  Andrew  de  Sackville  and  his  wife  Joan,  the  eldest 
of  the  de  la  Bechc  heiresses.'^*  The  heiresses  and  their 
husbands  granted  it  to  Edmund  de  la  Bechc,  Arch- 
deacon of  Berkshire,^"  who  died  seised  of  it  before 
1364.^  He  was  said  in  1369  to  have  granted  it  to 
Roger  de  Elmerugge,  who  successfully  defended  his 
right  in  it  against  Sir  William  Latimer.''  In  1369 
Latimer  obtained  a  grant  of  the  advowson,  wliich  was 
held  by  John  de  Aylesford  and  in  some  way  ousted 
John  de  Elmerugge,  and  from  this  time  the  advowson 
was  held  by  the  lords  of  Burton  Latimer  manor  ''(q.v.) 
until  after  1676,  when  Edmund  Bacon  presented.''^  It 
was  sold  by  him  or  his  successor  to  Sir  Gilbert  Dolben 
bart.,**  whose  family  retained  it  till  1803.*^  In  1809 
John  Grimshaw  presented''*  and  in  1874  '^  belonged 
to  the  Rev.  Francis  Brown  Newman.^'  At  the  pre- 
sent day  Mrs.  Jaques  is  the  owner  of  the  advowson. 

A  considerable  amount  of  land  was  attached  to  the 
rectory  and  in  1 3 30  the  rector  was  said  to  hold  two 
carucates.  He  and  his  predecessors  held  a  view  of 
frank-pledge,  waifs  and  strays,  the  assize  of  bread  and 
beer,  and  certain  amercements.  The  right  to  hold  the 
view  was  disputed  by  the  crown  officials,  but  the  rector 
recovered  it  on  payment  of  a  fine.^ 

About  1239,  the  rector  of  Burton  Latimer  presented 
Walter,  a  chaplain,  to  the  vicarage  of  Burton,  but  ap- 
parently no  vicarage  was  permanently  ordained.'"  A 
Baptist  Chapel  here  dates  from  1744  ;  there  is  also  a 
Wesleyan  Chapel  in  the  village. 

An  allotment  of  10  acres  was  set 
CHARITIES  out  on  an  inclosure  of  the  lands  in 
this  parish  in  1804  in  lieu  of  land 
formerly  appropriated  to  the  repairs  of  the  church. 
This  land  was  sold  in  1919  and  the  proceeds  invested 
in  ;^5I7  10/.  jd.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  producing 
;^25  17/.  6d.  yearly  in  dividends.  The  income  is  ap- 
plied by  the  churchwardens  towards  church  repairs. 

Another  allotment  containing  about  2j  acres  was 


"  The  fifth  from  the  east  on  the  north 
•idc  and  the  westernmost  on  the  south 
•ide.  The  names  of  Levi  and  Issachar 
and  the  general  reference  to  Gen.  xlix 
and  verses  can  be  easily  read.  The  refer- 
ence to  Levi  is  Deut.  xxxiii,  8-1 1. 
•  '•  The  third  bell  was  added  as  a  treble 
to  a  then  existing  ring  of  five,  the  inscrip- 
tions on  which  arc  given  in  North,  Ch. 
Brill  of  NorthanU.  213.  The  two  new 
trebles  were  added  in  1920  as  a  War 
Memorial. 

"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  \ontanii.  59. 

■'  Many  of  the  entries  between  1643 
and  1646  were  not  made  in  the  time  of  the 
war,  but  some  were  afterwards  inserted. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  c.ise  172,  file    17,  no.  77. 

"  Cur.  Reg.  R.  no.  173,  m.  io</j 
Roi.  Lilt.   Clam  (Rec.  Com.),  i,  390*. 


"  Cur.  Reg.  R.  no.   173,  m.   lod. 

"  Rot.  Ric.  Gravesend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),    105,  306. 

"  Dc  Banco  R.  no.  427,  m.  203. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  224,  cit.  Epis.  Reg. 

-'  De  Banco  R.  no.  427,  m.  203. 

='  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

:«  De  Banco  R.  Mich.  22  Edw.  Ill, 
m.  420. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  2  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.), 
no.   51. 

=»  Dc  Banco  R.  Mich.  22  Edw.  Ill, 
m.  420;  Cal.  Pat.  1348-50,  p.  12S. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1348-50,  p.  149. 

"  De  Banco  R.  Mich.  22  Edw.  Ill,  m. 
420. 

"  Feet  of  F.  case  177,  file  79,  no.  389  ; 
ibid,  case  177,  file  80,  no.  450. 

»"  Cal.  Pat.  1364-7,  p.  45. 


203, 


"  Dc    Banco     R.    no.    427, 
Cal.  Close,  1364-68,  pp.  374-5. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  224  ;  Cal.  Close, 
1381-85,  p.  393;  Chan  Inq.  p.m.  20 
Ric.  II,  no.  54  ;  ibid.  (Scr.  ii),  clxxviii,  57  j 
ibid,  ccxlviii,  22  ;  Feet  of  F.  Nurthants. 
Trin.  I  Chas.  I  ;  East.  21  Chas.  1. 

"  Inst.  Bks.   (P.R.O.),   1676. 

**  Bridges,  op.   cit.   ii,   225. 

"  Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.),  1757. 
I*'.  Northants.  Trin.  i  Geo. 
Geo.  III. 

"  Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.),  1809. 

'■  Whdl.ui,  Hist.  0/  Northants.  t874, 
p.  748. 

«  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com), 
p.  536. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  Grosseteste  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),    183. 


Feet  of 
"Ii    45 


185 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


set  out  in  lieu  of  land  formerly  called  the  Bell 
Land  or  Bell  Close.  This  land  was  also  sold  in  1919 
and  the  proceeds  invested  in  £iji  l6s.  id.  5  per  cent. 
War  Stock,  producing  ^^8  i  is.  lod.  yearly  in  dividends. 
This  is  also  applied  by  the  churchwardens  towards 
church  repairs. 

The  charities  of  William  and  Agnes  Scott  are  regvi- 
l.itcd  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated 
28  January  1S81.  In  1514  William  and  Agnes  Scott 
gave  ;^I0  for  the  relief  of  the  poor,  and  this  with  a 
further  sum  of  ^^40  arising  from  rents  of  some  of  the 
Charity  Estates  was  laid  out  in  land  for  which,  on  the 
inclosure  of  the  parish,  an  allotment  known  as  the 
40  acre  allotments  was  awarded.  This  property  was 
sold  in  1919  and  the  proceeds  invested  in  j^a.foo 
4  per  cent.  Funding  Stock,  producing  £100  yearly, 
which  is  distributed  in  coal  by  the  rector  and  15 
other  trustees. 

By  his  will,  date  unknown,  Richard  Hopkins  gave 
a  piece  of  land  in  Burton  Latimer  containing  about 
I  a.  3  r.  to  the  churchwardens  for  the  poor.  The  land 
has  been  sold  and  the  endowment  now  consists  of 
£2^6  js.  8d.  Consols  producing  £6  3/.  yearly,  which  is 
applied  in  the  distribution  of  six  2  lb.  loaves  weekly 
to  the  poor. 

An  allotment  of  70  acres  was  awarded  for  the  benefit 
of  the  poor  upon  the  inclosure  of  the  parish.  The 
charity  is  administered  by  the  lord  of  the  manors  of 
Burton  Latimer,  the  rector  of  St.  Mary  and  4  other 
trustees  in  compliance  with  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  23  May  1919.  The  land  was 
sold  for  £2,500  in  1919.  Owing  to  the  insolvency  of 
the  solicitor  acting  for  the  trustees  the  deposit  money 
of  ;^25o  was  lost.  The  residue  of  ^{^2,250  was  invested 
in  j^2,8i2  los.  4  per  cent.  Funding  Stock.  Of  this  £500 
has  been  placed  to  an   Investment  Account  in   tiie 


books  of  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds 
to  replace  the  sum  of  £'2.S°-  The  income  from  the 
residue,  amounting  to  j^92  los.,  is  distributed  in  coal 
and  "lothing. 

By  his  will  dated  3  July  1546  William  Luck  gave 
6s.  yearly  for  the  poor.  This  charge  which  issued  out 
of  a  house  and  premises  in  Burton  Latimer  was  re- 
deemed in  1924  by  the  transfer  of  £ll  Consols  to  the 
Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds.  The  income 
is  applied  by  the  trustees  of  the  charities  of  William 
and  Agnes  Scott  in  the  distribution  of  coal. 

The  same  trustees  administer  the  charity  of 
George  Plowright  who  by  deed  in  1633  gave  a  similar 
sum  for  the  poor.  This  charge,  which  issued  out  of 
the  same  premises  as  William  Luck's  rentcharge,  was 
also  redeemed  by  the  transfer  of  £\2  Consols  to  the 
Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  in  1924  and 
the  income  is  applied  in  the  distribution  of  coal. 

By  his  will  dated  in  1727  William  Dickenson  gave 
j£6o  for  the  poor  not  receiving  parochial  relief.  This 
fund  was  placed  out  on  mortgage,  but  was  after- 
wards applied  in  defraying  inclosure  expenses  concern- 
ing allotments  set  out  in  lieu  of  some  of  the  Charity 
estates. 

By  iiis  will  proved  in  P.R.  22  August  1921  Thomas 
Ambler  gave  £1  yearly  for  the  Old  People's  Treat.  The 
charge  has  been  redeemed  by  the  transfer  of  ^^40 
Consols  to  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 
The  charity  is  managed  by  a  committee. 

By  her  will  proved  19  Sept.  1856  Elizabeth  Dop- 
ping  Arnold  gave  ^^loo  Consols  to  the  rector  and 
churchwardens  for  the  poor.  The  dividends  amount- 
ing to  £z  los.  yearly  are  applied  in  April  for  the  relief 
of  the  poor. 

The  several  sums  of  stock  arc  with  the  Official 
Trustees  of  Cliaritable  Funds. 


CRANFORD  ST.  ANDREW 


Craneford  (xi  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Cranford  St.  Andrew  hes  between 
100  ft.  and  300  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum,  the 
subsoil  being  Great  and  Inferior  Oolite.  One  of  the 
numerous  streams  of  the  district  forms  the  southern 
boundary.  The  little  village  lies  about  half  a  mile 
to  the  north  of  the  main  road  from  Kettering  to 
Thrapston  and  Huntingdon.  It  consists  only  of 
Cranford  Hall  and  tlie  cliurch  of  St.  Andrew,  a  few 
cottages  and  an  Institute  founded  by  the  Rev.  Sir 
George  Robinson.  There  are  various  spinneys 
in  the  parish.  The  nearest  station  is  at  Cranford 
St.  John,  on  the  Kettering  and  Huntingdon  branch 
of  the  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway  Iron- 
stone was  extensively  worked  in  the  19th  century.' 

The  parish  was  inclosed  in  1775  by  a  private  Act  of 
Parliament,  for  dividing  and  inclosing  certain  common 
and  open  fields  and  meadows  in  tlie  parish  of  Cran- 
ford .= 

In  tlic  early  records  of  the  manors  in 

MANORS      CR/INFORD  no  distinction    is  made 

between  the  two  parishes  of  Cranford 

St.  Andrew    and    Cranford    St.  John,    so   that  it  is 

difficult  to  decide  in  which  parish  their  lands  were 


situated.  Probably  the  different  estates  spread  into 
both  parishes,  and  certainly  the  same  undertenants 
held  lands  in  Cranford  of  different  overlords.  In 
Domesday  Book,  four  separate  holdings  are  mentioned, 
of  which  two  belonged  to  the  fee  of  Peterborough 
Abbey  ;  the  first  of  these  was  held  by  Robert  and 
consisted  of  3  hides  of  land  ;  the  second  contained 
l\  hides,  to  which  apparently  no  undertenant  is 
given,  but  there  appears  the  ambiguous  and  difficult 
passage  that  '  Godric  holds  (or  held  it)  of  the  King.'' 
The  third  holding  contained  only  one  virgate  and 
was  held  of  the  Bishop  of  Coutances  by  Robert.^ 
The  fourth  consisted  of  3  virgates  held  of  Guy  de 
Reinbuedcurt  by  Odelin.*  In  the  12th-century 
survey  more  than  double  this  amount  of  land  is 
assigned  to  Cranford,*  and  it  is  diflicuh  to  identify 
the  holdings,  except  in  the  case  of  the  Rcinbuedcurts. 
Guy's  son  Richard  had  succeeded  him  and  held  a 
hide,  instead  of  3  virgates,  which  was  said  to  belong 
to  the  fee  of  Peterborough,  instead  of  being  held  of 
the   King.' 

It  seems  clear,  however,  that  the  manor  of  CRAN- 
FORD ST.  ANDREW,  alias  DAUNDELTNS  or 
DORLANDS  MANOR,  may  be  traced  to  the  manor 


'  Whclbn,  lliit.  of  Norlitnli.  1874,  p. 
749. 


•  15  Geo.  Ill,  c.  35. 

•  y.C.U.  Northanli.  i 

186 


VT>- 


•  Ibid.  311a. 
'  Ibid-  343- 


•  Ibid.  389a. 
f  Ibid. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


Or  two  bends 


held  in  1086  by  Robert  as  a  mesne  lord  of  the  Abbey 
and  identified  with  the  somewhat  smaller  holding  of 
Maurice  Daundelyn  in  the  12th-century  survey.' 
Robert  was  presumably  Robert  D'Oylcv  who  was 
the  tenant  in  1125-2S,"'  and 
the  manor  continued  to  be 
held  of  the  fee  of  D'Oyley  til! 
1253.'°  In  1284  John  son  of 
Guy  was  the  mesne  lord,**  but 
afterwards  the  manor  seems 
to  have  been  held  immediately 
of  the  Abbey.'-  In  1086  a 
nameless  knight  was  the  sub- 
tenant of  Robert  D'Oyley," 
and  early  in  the  next  century 
the  manor  was  in  the  hands  of 
Maurice  Daundelyn.'*    It  was 

held  by  the  service  due  from  half  a  knight's  fce.'^ 
Maurice  was  succeeded  in  direct  male  succession'"  by 
Ralph  (living  1189),"  Maurice  (living  temp.  John),'* 
Ralph  (living  1228),'*  Maurice  (l  261),  Hugh  (living 
1 280- 1 3 16),-"  John  (living  temp.  Edward  III)-'  and 
John  Daundelyn  (living  1346).--  The  second  John  sold 
the  manor  in  1360  to  Henry  Pyel,  afterwards  Arch- 
deacon of  Northampton,  and  Richard  Bryan,  chaplain, 
presumably  as  trustees  of  John  Pyel.'-^  The  manor 
followed  the  descent  of  Pyel's  manor  in  Woodford,-'  in 
spite  of  attempts  by  John,  son  of  William,  son  of  the 
last-named  John  Daundelyn-''  in  1403  and  by  his  son 
William-"  in  1469,  to  recover  possession.  In  1595, 
William,  Lord  Vaux  of  Harrowden,  who  had  been 
empowered  by  Act  of  Parliament  to  alienate  certain 
manors,  sold  Cranford  to  Thomas  Hensman,  Owen 
Prise  and  Thomas  Conwaye,"  who  also  obtained  a 
quitclaim  of  the  manor  from  Sir  Thomas  Cecil  and  his 
wife  Dorothy.-*  It  is  said  to  have  come  before  1676 
into  the  possession  of  a  family  named  Coo,  wlio  were 
lords  of  the  manor  of  Cranford  St.  Johns  (q.v.) 
Dr.  Christopher  Coo,  D.D.,  sold  it  in  1715  to  Sir 
James  Robinson,  bart.,-'  and  his  descendant  Sir 
Frederick  Robinson  is  now  lord  of  the  manor. 

Godric's  holding  in  Cranford  mentioned  in  Domes- 
day Book^  may  possibly  be  identified  with  CURZON'S 
Af.4.\0R,  which  was  held  of  the  Abbey  of  Peter- 
borough early    in  the   12th  century  by  Bertram  de 


Robinson.  Vrrt  a  hart 
Inppiit^  in  an  orle  of 
trcjoili  or. 


CRANFORD 
ST.  ANDREW 

Verdun,  whose  holding,  however,  contained  2  hides  and 
I J  virgates  of  land,"  instead  of  the  l}  hides  held  bv 
Godric.  In  the  latter  half  of  the 
13th  century  John  de  Verdun, 
Constable  of  Ireland,  seems  to 
have  held  the  overlordsliip.''- 
Wliile  the  lands  came  into 
liis  hands  owing  to  the  for- 
feiture for  felony  by  an  under- 
tenant, he  seems  to  have 
enfeoffed  John  de  Kirkby  with 
part  of  them,  overriding  the 
rights  of  his  intermediate 
tenant.  Sir  Richard  Curzoii.^ 
No  furtlier  mention  is  made 
of  the  Verdun  mesne  lordship, 

but  lands,  parcel  of  the  manor  of  Cranford,  were 
held  of  the  Curzons  of  Croxhall,  in  Staffordshire, 
as  late  as  1638.^' 

Richard  Curzon  granted  it  to  his  son  Thomas,^ 
whose  son  Robert  was  the  tenant  in  1278  and  1284,"* 
and  who  seems  to  have  settled 
at  Cranford.^'  In  1300  and 
1316  the  tenant  was  John 
Curzon,^  who  was  probably 
succeeded  by  Thomas  Curzon 
before  1329.^'  It  passed  before 
1374  to  Margaret  Curzon, 
who  probably  married  John 
Fossebrook.  He  was  living  in 
1391,  but  seems  to  have  died 
before  I403.  His  son  and  heir, 
John,  died  in  1418,  and  both 
he  and  his  wife  Maud,  who 
was  nurse  to  King  Henry  VI, 
arc  buried  at  Cranford  St.  Andrew.  She  survived  him 
for  many  years,  and  apparently  held  the  manor  for 
life.  She  was  succeeded  in  direct  succession  by 
Gerard,  John  and  Robert  Fossebrook,  the  last-named 
dying  seised  of  Curzon's  manor  in  1518.  He  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  John,''"  who  died  in  less  than  a 
year.  The  manor  passed  to  Richard,  John's  brother  and 
heir,'"  whose  direct  descendants  held  it  till  1630,''- 
when,  after  the  death  of  John  Fossebrook,  leaving 
several  daughters  as  his  heirs,  it  was  sold  to  Lawrence 


Curzon  of  CroxI)all. 
Azure  a  bend  between 
tion  Iiotis  argent  wt  th  three 
piirrots  vert  on  the  bend. 


»  r.C.H.  Norlbants.  i,  389A. 

•  Cbron.  Pelrob.  (Camden  Soc),  173. 

'»  Ibid. ;  Sparke,  Htst.  Angl.  Script. 
(Var.)  pt.  ii,  62,81;  Cal.  Chart,  i,  20 ;  Cal. 
Imj.  i,  no.  10;  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  fol. 
249. 

"  Feud  Aids,  iv,  13. 

"Colt.  MS.  (B.M.),  Vesp.  E  xxii, 
fol.  112;  Feud  Aids,  iv,  49;  Cal.  Inq. 
Hen.  f'J/,  i,  no.  297. 

"  V.C.H.  Norlbants.  i,  317a. 

'*  Ibid.  389. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  i,  no.  10 ;  Egerton  MS. 
(B.M.)  2733,  fol.  136,^;  Feud  Aids, 
iv,  13;  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  152 
(in  another  entry,  in  the  same  register 
(fol.  128)  John  Daundelyn  is  said  to  hold 
I  \  fees  in  Cranford,  but  this  is  probably 
a  mistake). 

'•  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  152;  De 
Hanco  R.  833,  m.  324. 

*'  Cbron.  Petrob.  173  ;  Sparke,  op.  cit. 
C2 ;  Cal.  Chart,  i,  p.  20;  iv,  p.  277. 
The  dates  are  talicn  from  Mellows, 
Pytebley's  Bk.of  Fees,  116  «,  who  quotes 
authorities. 

*•  Cal.   Inq.  i,  no.    10;    Egerton   MS. 


(B.M.)  2733,  fol.  1 36;  Feet  of  F.  Northants. 
37  Hen.  Ill,  case  173,  file  39,  no.  627  ;  45 
Hen.  Ill,  case  174,  file  46,  no.  805. 

'»  Mellows,  Pytchley's  Bk.  0/  Fees 
(North.ints  Rcc.  Soc),  116  »,  quoting 
Swaflham,  fol.  267*. 

">  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  pp.  13,  29  ;  Cott.  MS. 
Vesp.  E  xxii,  fol.  1 12. 

•'  Ibid.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  152;  Cal. 
Pat.  1350-54,  p.  254. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  152. 
"  Feet    of    F.     Northants,   Mich.   33 
Edw.    Ill,   case    177,    file    81,    no.    477  ; 
;o  Edw.  Ill,  case   178,  file  85,  no.  696  ; 
Cal.  Close  13S5-S9.  p.  143. 

"  See  below  j  Feet  of  F.  Northants. 
4  Hen.  VI,  case  179,  file  93,  no.  35  ; 
Feud.  Aids,  iv,  p.  49  ;  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  VII, 
i,  no.  297  ;  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  587, 
no.  40 ;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  27 
Elii.  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii)  ccxiiv, 
115. 

«'  Wrottcsley,  Ped.  from  the  Plea  R. 
231,  citing  De  Banco  R.  Mich.  4  Hen.  IV, 
m.  492. 

«•  Ibid.  428,  citing  De  Banco  R.  9 
Edw.  IV,  m.  324. 

187 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxiiv,  115; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  37  Eliz. 

"  Ibid.  nil.  38  Eliz. 

"  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants.  ii,  227  ; 
G.E.C.  Baronetage,  iii,  55. 

""  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  317,1. 

>'  Ibid.  3890  kb. 

"  Colt.  Ch.  XXX,  2. 

''  Cf.  Ch.in.  Inq.  p.m.  iS  Edw.  I,  no.  37. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dcclxxt,  5S. 

"Ibid.  18  Edw.  I.  no.  37. 

s'  Ibid.  ;  cf.  Rot.  Ric.  Cramsend  (Cant, 
and  Yoik  Soc),  136;    Feud.  Aids,  iv.  13. 

»'  Cf.  Abbrev.  Rot.  Orig.  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
166;   Cal.  Close,  1307-13,  p.   150. 

'"  Rot.  Jn.  Dalderby,  cit.  Bridges,  ii, 
228  ;  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  19. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1327-30,  589. 

'"Northants.  N.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.),  ii, 
12-13;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxxiii, 
78.  «'Ibid. 

"J.  Metcalfe,  yisit.  of  Northants,  20, 
89;  /,.  and  P.  Hen.  I'll  I,  xvil,  g.  1012 
(39) ;  F'ect  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  33  St 
34  Eliz.  ;  East,  1  Jas.  I  ;  Mich.  11  Jas.  I  j 
Exch.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  dccii,  10;  CUian. 
Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  Misc.  iii,  4;. 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


FossFBROOK.  Azure  a 
salttre  between  four  cinq' 
foils  argent. 


a  year 
CHURCH 


Maidwell,  Arthur  Bold  and  Jolin  Bland."  In  1654, 
Arthur  and  John  Bland  sold  it  to  Henry  Hudson," 
who  resold  it  in  1657  to  Bernard  Walcott.*^  In  1700, 
his  grandson  William,  son  of  another  Bernard  W'alcott, 
sold  it  to  Sir  James  Robinson,  bart.,^*  who  later 
purchased   Daundclyn's   manor   (q.v.). 

The  Earls  of  Gloucester  claimed  various  privileges 
in  connection  with  their  holding  in  Cranford,  which 
they  presumably  obtained  after  the  forfeiture  of  the 
Bishop  of  Coutances,  but  they 
held  more  than  the  virgate  as- 
signed to  the  bishop  in  1086.*' 
Both  the  Daundelyns''*  and 
Fossebrooks*^  held  land  of  the 
honour  of  Gloucester.  The 
earls  had  a  view  of  frank- 
pledge, court  leet,  assize  of 
bread  and  ale,  pillory,  tumbril, 
infangthief  and  outfangrhief, 
chattels  of  felons  and  fugitives, 
waifs  and  strays,  and  the  re- 
turn and  execution  of  all  writs, 
summons  and  orders   of  the 

king,  for  their  Cranford  lands.^"  A  mill  belonged  to 
Godric's  land  in  Cranford  in   1086.     It  then  paid  2s. 

.  61 

The  church  of  ST.  ANDREW  stands 
within  the  park  of  Cranford  Hall,  a 
short  distance  south-west  of  the  house, 
and  consists  of  chancel  24  ft.  6  in.  by  13  ft.,  north  and 
south  chapels,  each  8  ft.  6  in.  wide,  clearstoried  nave 
of  three  bays  38  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft.  3  in.,  north  aisle 
8  ft.  wide,  north  transept,  south  porch  and  west 
tower  9  ft.  6  in.  square,  all  these  measurements  being 
internal.  The  width  across  the  nave  and  aisle  is 
26  ft.  10  in.  The  transept  was  added  in  1847  at  the 
eastern  end  of  the  north  wall,  and  measures  internally 
II  ft.  8  in.  square.*- 

The  building  generally  is  of  rubble,  with  low- 
pitched  leaded  roofs.  A  former  external  coat  of 
plaster  is  now  rapidly  peeling  away.  There  are 
plain  parapets  to  the  nave,  aisle  and  chapcl.%  but  the 
chancel  and  porch  are  battlemented.  The  chapels 
cover  the  chancel  its  full  length,  the  walls  being  flush 
at  the  east  end. 

The  earliest  part  of  the  building  is  the  nave  arcade, 
which  is  of  late  12th-century  date,  and  consists  of  three 
round  arches  of  two  square  orders  springing  from 
cylindrical  piers  with  plain  circular  capitals  and  roll 
bases,  and  at  either  end  from  corbels.  In  the  13th 
century  the  church  appears  to  have  been  largely 
reconstructed,  the  tower  being  then  erected,  the 
nave  probably  rebuilt,''^  and  a  north  chapel  first 
added.  The  13th-century  arch  between  the  aisle 
and  chapel  is  of  two  chamfered  orders  on  half-round 
responds,  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  but  the 
chapel  itself  retains  no  original  architectural  features. 
The  tower  consists  of  a  lofty  lower  stage  with  coupled 
buttresses  of  small  projection  and  a  bell-chamber 
story    which    has    been    heightened    at     some    later 


period  by  the  addition  of  plain  masonry  above  the 
windows,  and  an  embattled  parapet.  The  13th- 
century  west  doorway  is  of  two  moulded  orders  on 
noo''  shafts  with  moulded  capitals,  but  the  bases  are 
gone,  and  the  outer  order  is  disfigured  with  plaster. 
Above  is  a  single  wide  lancet,  and  there  is  another 
lancet  on  the  south  side  high  up  in  the  lower  stage, 
the  north  side  being  blank.  The  bell-chamber 
windows  are  c.  1 280,  of  two  trefoiled  lights  and  cusped 
circle  in  the  head,  except  on  the  west  side,  where 
there  is  simple  trefoiled  tracery  above  the  lights  and 
a  plain  circle.  The  arch  to  the  nave  is  a  beautiful 
piece  of  13th-century  work  of  four^''  chamfered  orders, 
the  first  or  innermost  springing  from  triple  shafts 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  second  and 
outer  continuous,  while  the  third  terminates  with 
tall  'extinguisher'  stops  above  slender  angle  shafts 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.^ 

In  the  first  half  of  the  14th  century  the  church 
underwent  a  very  extensive  alteration,  amounting 
almost  to  a  rebuilding,  the  clearstory  and  porch  being 
then  added  and  new  windows  inserted.  The  aisle 
may  have  been  rebuilt  at  this  time,  but  the  south 
wall,  at  any  rate  up  to  sill  level,  was  retained.  Further 
alterations  took  place  in  the  15th  century,  when  the 
south  chapel  was  added,  and  the  chancel  and  north 
chapel  assumed  their  present  aspect.  The  south 
chapel  was  largely  refaced  with  ashlar  in  1674.** 

The  chancel  has  a  four-centred  east  window  of 
three  cinquefoiled  lights,  with  vertical  tracery,  and 
is  open  to  the  chapels  by  arches  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  that  on  the  south  carried  on  corbels,  the 
other  dying  out.  The  piscina,  reredos,  and  all  the 
fittings  are  modern  :  a  screen  was  erected  in  1893. 
The  14th-century  chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  inner  springing  from  half-octagonal 
responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
rood-loft  stair  remains  on  the  north  side,  at  the  end 
of  the  aisle,  the  steps  ascending  from  the  east  in 
front  of  the  13th-century  arch  to  the  chapel :  the  loft 
doorway  is  blocked  and  covered  with  plaster. 

The  north  chapel  is  now  used  as  a  vestry  and  orgar. 
chamber  and  is  lighted  by  I5th-rcntury  windows, 
but  both  windows  ot  the  south  chapel  are  modern. 
The  aisle  retains  a  14th-century  square-headed  two- 
light  window,  but  its  doorway  has  been  transferred 
to  the  transept  :  another  window  of  the  aisle  is  a 
15th-century  insertion.  Both  windows  in  the  nave 
are  14th  century,  that  west  of  the  porch  square- 
headed  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  the  other  a  pointed 
three-light  window  with  curvilinear  tracery :  the 
clearstory  windows,  four  on  each  side,  are  trefoiled 
openings  similar  to  those  at  Barton  Seagrave,  within 
curved  triangular  labels.  There  is  a  14th-century 
trefoiled  piscina  in  the  south  wall  of  the  nave,  west 
of  the  screen,  but  the  south  doorway  is  a  I5tli-century 
insertion  with  four-centred  head.  The  porch  has 
a  continuous  moulded  outer  arch  and  small  windows 
of  two  trefoiled  lights  on  each  side. 

The  font  is  ancient  and  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal 


"  Sorihonli  N.  and  Q.  (New  Scr.),  il, 
14-15;  I'lct  of  F.  Nnrllianli.  Mich. 
1;  Cl>]i.  I  ;  ibid.  Mil.  22  Chat   I. 

"Ibid.  Mich.  1654. 

'"'  Nolciof  Finci,  Northanti,  Trin.  ilj;/. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  1 1 
Will.  III. 

«'  I'C.II.  S'erlhnnll.  i,  Jllfl. 


"  i.'j/.  Close  1354-60,  p.  4;3. 

*•  Ch.irt.  In(^.  p.m.  4  llcii.  IV,  no.  41. 

'»  flac.  de  Quo  If'arr.  (Rcc.  Com.),  571  ; 
Cal.  Pal.  1401-5,  341). 

"  y.C.U.  Nonhanli.  i,  J17A. 

"  It  wa>  erected  by  the  Rev.  Sir  OorRe 
Robiiiion,  b.irt.,  rector,  at  a  kind  of  *  hall 
prw,'  with  futernil  entrance. 

188 


**A  kecI-B)t.ipfd  BtriiiK  at  lilt  level  (»n 
tlir  south  nidc  is  -ill  the  architect urat 
cvidrticc  that  mirvivcs. 

'^'  Three  orJcn  facing  west. 

^'•^  The  :ircli  was  opened  out.  ahiiut  1847 
by  the  removal  of  a  wc^t  gallery. 

''"  The  date  is  on  the  south  wall  over 
the  dnnrway. 


r 


Cranfokd  St.  Andrew's  Church  from  the  South 


Cranfdrd  Si.  Andrmv's  Cmirui  :    'I'lit   Imi.kiok,  looking  East 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


of  Simon  Fitz  Simons,  the  last  of  whom  died  in 
1280,  when  he  was  succeeded  by  his  grandson  or 
nephew  Sir  John  de  Verdun.  His  son  Sir  Thomas 
succeeded  in  1295  and  died  in  1315  leaving  a  son 
John.  Sir  John  de  Verdun  was  holding  in  1368  of 
Robert  de  Lisle.*  In  1466,  however,  this  part  of 
Cranford  was  held  of  Richard  Earl  of  Warwick,' 
and  in  1479  of  Richard  Duke  of  Gloucester.*  In  the 
reign  of  Henrj-  VII  the  overlordship  came  to  the 
Crown.* 

In  the  1 2th  century  the  tenant  in  demesne  of  these 
5  hides  was  Ralph  fitz  Roger.*"  Part  .of  the  land  was 
later  held  by  knight's  service  by  William  de  Cranford, 
who  died  before  1 209,  when  his  heir,  presumably  a 
minor,  had  succeeded  him.**  Ralph  de  Cranford 
was  the  tenant  between  1235'-  and  1262."  He  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  William  who  was  holding  in 
I284,i''  but  in  1295  Ralph  son  of  William  appears.*^ 
William  son  of  Ralph  de  Cranford  made  a  settlement 
of  the  manor  in  1330.'*  The  next  tenants  were 
Baldwin  Drayton  of  Cranford  and  his  wife  Alice,  and 
as  the  manor  formed  part  of  her  inheritance,  she  may 
have  been  the  daughter  of  the  last  William  de  Cran- 
ford." She  and  her  husband  sold  it  in  1394  to  John 
son  of  Baldwin  Drayton,**  and  in  1426  the  latter 
together  with  his  son  John,  who  had  married  ."Vnne, 
daughter  of  Robert  de  Cran- 
ford, were  parties  to  a  lawsuit 
over  lands  in  Cranford.*'  In 
1466  William  Drayton  died 
seised  of  a  capital  messuage 
and  land  in  Cranford.-"  His 
son  Richard  died  in  1479.^* 
Tlie  property  seems  to  have 
passed  to  Richard's  sister 
Anne,  the  wife  of  Thomas 
I.ovett."  Henry  Lovett,  pre- 
sumably her  son,  died  seised  of 
'Drayton's  manor'  in  Cran- 
ford in  1492.^  He  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  Thomas,  who  died  seised  in  1 542, 
his  heir  being  his  grandson,  another  Thomas  Lovett.-' 
The  latter  sold  the  manor  in  1550  to  Thomas  Good- 
fellow.-^  In  1614  Christopher  Goodfellow  was  the 
tenant-"  and  it  passed  about  1652  to  liis  daughters 
Jane,  the  wife  of  William  Coo,  and  Mary  and  Sarah 
Goodfellow.^'  The  manor  came  to  the  family  of  Coo 
and  passed  on  the  death  of  William  Coo  in  1676  to 
their  son  Christopher  Coo,  D.D.,  who  also  was  lord 
of  Daundelyn's  manor  (q.v.)  in  Cranford  St.  Andrew.^' 


Lovett.      Argent  three 

wolves  passant  pjli':vise 
sable  . 


In   1805,  Elizabeth,  Duchess  of  Buccleuch,  owned 
the  manor  of  Cranford  St.  John.^*' 

A  second  holding  in  Cranford  St.  John  was  known 
in  the  1 6th  century  as  the  manor  of  CRANFORD.  It 
originally  formed  part  of  the  holding  of  Bertram  of 
Verdun  in  the  early  1 2th  century-'  and  seems  to  have 
been  separated  by  the  overlord,  John  de  Verdun, 
Constable  of  Ireland,  from  Curzon's  manor  in  Cran- 
ford St.  -Andrews.^  In  1476  this  estate  was  said  to  be 
held  directly  of  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough,^*  and 
after  the  Dissolution,  of  the  king  in  chief.*-  In  the 
reign  of  Henry  III  certain  lands  were  held  by  William 
de  Esseby  of  Sir  Richard  Curzon,  but  they  were  for- 
feited for  felony  and  escheated  to  the  Constable,  who 
granted  them  to  John  de  Kirkby,  Bishop  of  Ely,  to 
hold  as  the  sixth  part  of  half  a  knight's  fee.^  On  the 
bishop's  death  in  1289  the  lands  should  have  escheated 
to  Robert  Curzon,*^  but  they  passed  to  William  dc 
Kirkby,  the  bishop's  brother,  and  were  neld  immedi- 
ately of  the  \'erduns.^  William  died  in  1302  seised 
of  rents  and  tenements  in  Cranford  and  in  1303  his 
lands  were  divided  between  his  four  sisters  and  co- 
heirs, Cranford  being  assigned  to  Maud,  the  wife  of 
Gilbert  de  Houby.^"  She  died  seised  about  131 1  and 
was  succeeded  by  her  son  Walter  de  Houby.^'  Cran- 
ford seems  to  have  passed  to  his  son  Anketine,  who 
died  seised  of  6  messuages,  6  virgates  of  land  and 
8  marks  rent  in  Cranford.^  These  tenements  finally 
passed  to  John  Bellers,  the  son  of  Elizabeth,  the 
daughter  of  Anthony,  the  son  of  Alice,  the  daughter  of 
Anketine  de  Houby.'*  Bellers  died  seised  in  1476 
and  Cranford  passed  to  John  Villers,  the  son  of  his 
sister  Joan."*"  In  1506  Villers  was  succeeded  by  his 
son,  another  John,''*  who  sold  the  manor  of  Cranford 
to  Edward  Montagu,  scrjeant-at-law,  William  Dudley, 
William  Stokes,  Thomas  Stokes  and  Henry  Freeman, 
giving  a  quitclaim  to  the  purchasers  and  the  heirs  ot 
Montagu.^-  Henry  Freeman,  however,  appears  to 
have  obtained  possession  of  these  lands,''^  and  his  son 
Thomas  Freeman  died  in  1637  seised  of  the  manor 
and  left  the  land  which  was  parcel  of  the  manor  to 
his  executors  for  provision  for  the  children  of  his 
brother  Henry.''''  His  heir  was  Henry's  son  Thomas, 
a  niinor.*^  A  Thomas  Freeman  died  in  1692,  and 
the  manor  passed  to  his  daughter  Elizabeth,  the  wife 

of Weaver.''*  In  1730,  their  son,  the  Rev.  William 

Henry  Weaver,  was  lord  of  the  manor.'"  A  free 
fishery  in  Cranford  is  mentioned  in  1753''*  and  1786^' 
as  appurtenant  to  Lovett's  manor,  and  at  the  latter 
date  3  water  corn  mills  belonged  to  the  manor.^ 


'  Farrrr,  op.  cit.  i,  114-118;  Book  of 
Feel,  ii,  1)37;  FeuJ.  Aids,  iv,  13;  Cal. 
Close,  12S8-5C),  p.  448  ;     1364-68,  p.  497. 

'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  5  Edw.  W,  no.  7. 

•  Ibid.  If)  Edw.  IV,  no.  44. 

•  Cal.  lisq.  lien.  VII,  \,  no.  753. 

'"  V.C.II.  Norlhants.  i,  389  a  &  *  ;  cf. 
rcmsrki  on  thii  point  in  K,irrcr,  op.  cit. 
i,  ii3. 

■'  Book  of  Fees,  i,  18. 

"Ibid,  i,  500;  ii,  937  J  Fcft  o(  F. 
Northanti.  Mil.  24  Ilcn.  Ill  ;  45  lien.  Ill, 
no.  806. 

"  Exeerpi.  e  Rot.  Fin.  ii,  382. 

*•  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  13. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1288-96,  p.  448. 

"  Feet  of  F.North.inti.  Hil.  3  Edw.  III. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Mich.  i«  RIc.  II, 
no.  370.  '■  Ibid. 

"  Ejtiy  Chan.  Prof.  bdlc.  7,  no.  250. 


'»  Ch.nn.  Inq.  p.m.  5  Edw.  I\',  no.  7. 

•'  Ibid.  19  Edw.  IV,  no.  44. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  VII,  i,  no.  7^3. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii)  Ivvi,  42. 

•'  Rccov.  R.  nil.  4  Edw.  VI,  ro.  100; 
Feet  of  v.  Norliiants.  East.  5  Edw.  VI. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Notthanls.  Mil.  11  Jas.  I. 

•'  Ibid.  Trin.  1652;  Bridgei,  op.  cit.  ii, 
230. 

••  Ibid.  Feet  of  F.  Northanli.  Trin.  5 
Anne  ;  Hil.  10  Anne. 

"'»  Privau  All  of  Pari.  45  Ceo.  Ill, 
c.  34. 

"  r.C.ft.  Nonhanii.  i,  389  a  lib. 

>**  ('ban.  Inq.  p.m.  18  Edw.  I,  no.  37. 

"  Ibid.  16  E<lw.  IV,  no.  14. 

*■  Clian.  Iri(|.  p.m.  (.Scr.  ii)  dcdi,  141. 

"  Colt,  Cb.  (H.M.)  XXI,  2  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  18  Edw.  I,  no.  37. 

190 


"  Ibid. 

"  Ibid. ;  ibid.  30  F.dw.  I,  no.  31. 

•«  Ibid. 

•'  Ibid.  5  Edw.  II,  no.  28. 

"  Ibid.  16  Edw.  IV,  no.  14. 

"»  Ibid.  "  Ibid. 

*'  Ibid.  (Ser.  ii)  xx,  37. 

"  Rccov.  R.  Mich.  27  Hen.  VIII,  ro. 
121  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  27 
Ilcn.  VIII. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cccxii.  2  ; 
ccxciii,  <;. 

"  Ibid,  dccli,  141. 

«'  Ibid. 

"  Dridgei,  Hist,  of  Norihanls.  ii,  227. 

"Ibid.;  Rccov.  R.  Trin.  4  Geo.  II, 
ro.  241. 

*"  Kicnv.  R.  nil.  26  Geo.  II,  ro.  313. 

"  llnd.  nil.  26C;eo.  lll,ro.  169. 

'"  Ihid. 


m 


1^^  11  H 


.V-2». 


Cranford  St.   John's  Church  from  the  South 


Cranford  St.  John's  Church  :    The  Interior,  looking  East 


HUXLOE    HUNDRED        cranfordst.  jomn 


The  church  o(  ST.  JOHN  consists  o{ 
CHURCH  chancel,  28  ft.  3  in.  by  12  ft.  10  in., 
with  north  chapel  and  vestry,  clear- 
storied  nave  of  three  bays  38  ft.  by  13  ft.  10  in., 
north  and  south  aisles,  north  and  south  porches,  and 
west  tower  8  ft.  6  in.  square,  all  these  mcisurcments 
being  internal.  The  north  aisle  is  1 1  ft.  wide,  the 
south  aisle  10  ft.  6  in.,  the  width  across  nave  and 
aisles  being  39  ft.  2  in.  The  chapel  is  structurally  a 
continuation  of  the  north  aisle,  with  the  vestry  at  its 
east  end,  and  covers  the  chancel  its  full  length.  The 
south  aisle  had  been  taken  down 
before  Bridges'  time  (d.  1724),  but  was 
rebuilt  in  1842,*'  and  a  south  porch 
added  ;  in  1880  the  aisle  was  extended 
eastward  about  half  tlie  length  of  the 
chapel  to  form  an  organ  chamber,  and 
the  chancel  restored.  There  was  a 
general  restoration  in  1887.  Bridges, 
at  the  beginning  of  the  1 8th  century, 
records  that  the  stump  of  a  spire  was 
then  standing  ;  the  spire  had  '  fallen 
down  some  years  ago  '  and  broken  in 
upon  the  roof  of  the  church.  It  has 
never  been  rebuilt. 

The  building  throughout  is  of  rub- 
ble, with  plain  parapets,  and  the  walls 
are  plastered  internally.  The  chancel 
has  a  high-pitched  tiled  roof,  but  the 
roofs  of  the  nave  and  aisles  are  leaded. 

The  nave  arcades  arc  the  oldest  part 
of  the  building,  dating  from  the  end  of 
the  1 2th  century.  The  north  arcade 
consists  of  two  wide  round-headed 
arches  with  a  narrower  and  lower 
one  at  the  west  end.  The  two  eastern 
arches  were  cut  through  the  wall  of  an  earlier  church 
and  are  of  almost  elliptical  form,  of  two  orders, 
the  outer  square  and  the  inner  slightly  chamfered, 
springing  from  a  cylindrical  pier  and  from  half-round 
responds,  with  separate  attached  shafts  carrying 
the  outer  order.  The  circular  moulded  capitals  of 
pier  and  responds  are  elaborately  carved  with  stiff-leaf 
foliage  in  low  relief,  and  the  abaci  follow  the  cross  plan 
of  the  arch  orders ;  the  base  of  the  pier  is  cut  away. 
The  work  dates  from  c.  1 190,  and  a  few  years  later  the 
nave  appears  to  have  been  extended  westward  by  the 
addition  of  the  smaller*^  bay,  the  whole  of  the  south 
wall  taken  down,  and  an  entirely  new  arcade  con- 
structed with  a  narrow  and  lower  west  bay  to  corre- 
spond with  that  on  the  north.  The  added  bay  of  the 
north  arcade  has  a  round  arch  of  two  square  orders  on 
plain  corbels,  and  is  of  ironstone.  The  south  arcade 
is  all  of  one  build,  with  round  arches  of  two  orders 
springing  from  piers  and  responds  with  richly  carved 
capitals  similar  to  those  opposite.  The  piers  differ  in 
section,  the  eastern  one  being  a  plain  cylinder  and  the 
other  a  square  with  four  attached  shafts ;  the  responds 
are  similar  to  those  on  the  north  side. 

As  thus  altered  in  the  last  years  of  the  1 2th  century, 
the  church  was  not  very  much  smaller  than  the  present 
building,  with  an  aisled  nave  and  a  chancel  somewhat 


shorter  than  the  existing  one.  The  chancel  was 
rebuilt  and  lengthened  in  the  course  of  the  13th  cen- 
tury, and  the  chapel  added  c.  1290.  The  tower 
belongs  to  the  earlier  part  of  the  13th  century,  but 
was  heightened  a  century  later  (c.  1320),  vviicn  the 
clearstory  was  added  and  the  north  aisle  recon- 
structed. 

The  chancel  is  substantially  of  the  13th  century 
with  an  east  window  of  three  trefoiled  lights  and 
beautiful  geometrical  tracery,  c.  1290.  In  the  south 
W.1II  is  an  inserted  1 41)1 -century  square-headed  window 


■  WI  Cem URY  m  1421  Cent. 
a  C.I190-1200  E]  I51!J  CtNT. 
■1 13111  Century  .□  Modern 

inic.l290 

Plan  of  St.  John's  Church,  Cranford 

of  two  trefoiled  lights,  and  the  north  wall  is  pierced 
at  its  west  end  by  a  late  13th-century  arcade  of  two 
chamfered  arches  on  an  octagonal  pier  and  half-round 
responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  opening  to 
the  chapel.^^  On  the  south  side  there  is  a  modern 
arch  to  the  organ  chamber.  The  I3th-centur) 
chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders  with  hood, 
the  inner  order  on  moulded  corbels.  The  upper 
steps  of  the  rood-loft  stair  and  the  loft  doorway 
remain  on  the  north  side  of  the  arch.  The  insertion 
of  the  rood  stair  at  the  back  of  the  north-east  respond 
weakened  the  chancel  arch  and  a  big  buttress  of  two 
stages  was  afterwards  added  within  the  aisle.  Over 
the  south  window  of  the  chancel  a  panel  inscribed 
'  I.L.  1692  '  probably  indicates  some  repair  or  recon- 
struction in  that  year. 

The  north  aisle  has  two  square-headed  14th-century 
windows  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  one  on  each  side  of 
the  porch,  and  there  is  a  similar  window  in  the  north 
wall  of  the  chapel,  but  another  of  three  lights  further 
east  is  a  late  15th-century  insertion.  The  north 
doorway  is  modern.  In  the  north  aisle  is  a  restored 
wall  recess  with  segmental  chamfered  arch. 

There  are  three  clearstory  windows  on  each  side, 
the  two  outer  ones  being  trefoiled  openings  within 
curved   triangular   labels   like  those  at  St.  Andrew's 


"  It  wa«  built  by  the  Rev.  Sir  George 
Robinson  a»  a  memorial  to  two  of 
hii  children,  who  died  respectively  in 
1836  and  1841.  The  porch  wai  built 
'  to     rcKmble    a    north     porch    recently 


added  '  :  Chs.  Archd.  NorihampI,  (1849), 
'73- 

"  It  is  about  5  ft.  9  in.  wide,  the  cattern 
baji  being  about  13  ft. 

*•  The  cast  respond  springs  from  a  very 

191 


high  and  roughly  moulded  plinth.     '  Each 

kpring  of  the  arches  is  higher  thaa  that 
next  to  it  to  the  west,  though  the  points 
of  the  arches  are  of  the  same  height  '  : 
C')s.  Archd.  Nortbampt.  172. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


church,  but  the  middle  window  on  each  side  is  a 
traceried  circle.  On  the  south  side  the  windows  are 
modern. 

The  tower  is  of  two  stages  with  a  small  west  lancet.^' 
and  another  higher  up  on  the  south  side  in  the  lofty 
lower  stage.  The  diagonal  buttresses  were  probably 
added  in  the  14th  century  when  the  upper  story  was 
erected,  the  windows  of  which  are  of  two  trefoiled 
lights  with  transom  and  quatrefoil  in  the  head. 
Immediately  below  the  stepped  battlemented  parapet 
is  a  band  of  paneUing,  the  design  of  which  differs  on 
the  four  sides,^  and  there  are  gargoyles  at  the  angles 
but  no  pinnacles.  The  14th-century  tower  arch  is  of 
three  chamfered  orders,  the  innermost  on  half- 
octagonal  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases. 
There  is  no  vice. 

The  font  is  of  the  14th  century,  with  a  plain 
octagonal  bowl  moulded  on  the  under  side ;  it  has  a 
flat  17th  century  cover. 

The  pulpit  is  modern,  but  worked  into  it  are  two 
Renaissance  carved  panels  of  the  same  type  as  those 
in  St.  Andrew's  church,  the  subjects  represented 
being  our  Lord  before  the  High  Priest,  and  Pilate 
washing  his  hands.  There  is  an  early  17th-century 
low  panelled  chancel  screen,  and  in  the  east  window 
is  some  14th-century  heraldic  glass  taken  from  one 
of  the  windows  of  the  chapel — (i)  the  leopards  of 
England,  (ii)  the  arms  of  Bassingbourne,  gyronny 
of  twelve  argent  and  gules,  (iii)  the  same  with  a 
label  of  three  points  azure.  In  the  window  is  also 
some  foreign  glass  with  medallions,  shields,  figures, 
etc.,  one  piece  of  which  is  dated  1547,  others  being 


of  the   17th  century  similar  in   style  to  that  at   St. 
Andrew's  church.'* 

There  are  no  monuments.  All  the  roofs  are 
modern  or  much  restored. 

There  are  six  bells,  a  treble  and  tenor  having  been 
added  to  a  former  ring  of  four  in  1907  by  Taylor  & 
Co.  of  Loughborough,  who  also  recast  the  old  third. 
The  second  bell  is  by  Hugh  Watts  II  of  Leicester 
1629,  the  third  by  Thomas  and  John  Eayre  of  Ket- 
tering 1 71 7,  and  the  fifth  a  recasting  by  Taylor  in 
1857  of  a  bell  inscribed  '  S.  Katerina.'" 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  paten  of  1569, 
and  a  paten  of  c.  1682.^ 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1627-1753,  marriages  1629-1752,  burials 
1627-1670;  (ii)  baptisms  1753-1812;  (iii)  burials 
1679- 181 2;  ('^0  marriages  1753-1812.  There  are 
churchwardens'  accounts  beginning  in  1755. 

The  advowson  of  the  church  of 
ADVOWSOy  St.  John"  was  given  before  1218  to 
the  Abbey  of  St.  James,  North- 
ampton,** when  the  pension  due  to  the  abbey  from 
the  rectory  was  already  considered  '  ancient,'  but  in 
1240  it  was  claimed  by  Ralph  de  Cranford,  who 
obtained  in  return  for  a  quitclaim  of  all  right  in  the 
advowson,  the  homage  and  service  of  one  of  the  abbot's 
tenants  at  Cranford.*'  Before  1272  the  advowson 
came  into  the  possession  of  the  Bishop  of  Lincoln,*^ 
\,hose  successors  were  the  patrons  of  the  living  until 
the  19th  century,  when  the  rectory  of  Cranford 
St.  John  was  consolidated  with  that  of  Cranford  St. 
Andrew  and  the  bishop  relinquished  the  advowson.*'' 


DENFORD 


Deneforde  (xi  cent.) ;  Deneford  (xii,  xiii,  xiv  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Dcnford  lies  on  the  eastern  boundary 
of  the  county.  The  land  rises  from  the  River  Nene 
eastward  about  1 50  ft.  The  soil,  which  is  a  stiff 
clay  lying  on  the  Great  Oolite,  Cornbrash  and  Oxford 
Clay  beds,  produces  barley,  wheat  and  root  crops. 
The  Kettering  and  Huntingdon  branch  of  the  London 
Midland  and  Scottish  Railway  crosses  the  parish, 
the  nearest  station  being  at  Thrapston.  There  were 
formerly  brick  and  tile  kilns  which  are  now  disused. 

The  village  stands  on  the  road  from  Chclvcston  to 
Thrapston  and  adjoins  the  eastern  bank  of  the  River 
Nene.  The  church  is  on  the  northern  side  of  the 
village  near  the  river.  Not  far  from  it  is  the  Cock 
Inn,  a  two-storied  house  which  is  dated  1593:  except 
for  one  or  two  muUioncd  windows,  it  has  no  special 
architectural  features.  Another  house  in  the  village 
has  a  panel  inscribed  '  T.G.  1622.' 


The  parish  was  inclosed  in   1765  but  mention  is 
made  in  the  award  of  previous  inclosures.* 

In  the  reign  of  Edward  the  Confessor, 
MANORS  Burred  held  5  hides  of  land  in  Denford.= 
In  10S6  he  had  been  succeeded  by  the 
Bishop  of  Coutances,  but  it  seems  clear  that  the 
holding  as  described  in  Domesday  Book  included 
much  land  in  other  townships.'  In  the  12th-century 
survey,  which  was  drawn  up  after  the  Bishop's  fief 
had  escheated  to  the  crown,  Denford  seems  to  have 
been  included  under  Ringstead  and  Cotton.''  By 
1 1 24-9  the  manor  of  Denford  had  come  into  the 
possession  of  Gilbert  Fitz  Richard,  whose  wife 
Adeliza  de  Claremont  or  Montmorency  in  1147-68 
is  described  as  Lady  of  Denford.  Roger  de  Clare, 
c.  1 152,  gave  to  St.  Werburgh's,  Chester,  a  mark 
yearly  from  Rothwcll  so  that  when  God  delivered  to 
him  his  inlieritancc  of  Denford  he  would  assign  a 


'*  A  west  doftrw.iy  IhIuw  the  window 
iniertrfi  aliout  1X42,  h.is  been  blocked. 

"  On  the  north  alternate  c]u.ilrcfoiIcd 
K^uarri  and  circled,  on  the  ftouth  roiieB 
tourn.Tnici,  on  the  cant  quatrefoilcd 
circles,  on  the  west  four-leaved  squares. 

*'  One  is  inscrilicd  '  IIonora*"k  Ian 
Iavhin  B)V»GmM~t  Dt  Visr  ».t  ANCNr.s 
Ptup.u  ION  KsPKVSE,'  nnuthcr  has  a 
mutiLited  inscription.  Modern  glass  in 
the  east  window  with  figures  of  St. 
Andrew  and  .St.  John  commemorates  the 
union  of  the  two  rectories. 


"  North,  Ch.  Bdh  oj  Noiihiuils.  231;. 
The  old  third  (now  fourth)  was  by  Charles 
Graye  of  Amplhill,  1661, 

"  Markhaiii,  Cb.  I'lalr  0/  A'orlhanls. 
84. 

"  I'rct  of  !•'.  Northanl).  llil.  2} 
Ucn.  111. 

•°  Rot.  If.  it  Hrllei  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  i,  fi;  ;    ii,  221. 

"  I-cet  of  r.  Northanls.  llil.  24 
Men.  III. 

"  Rol.  Rk.  Cravcirn,!  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  120. 


"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  224  (cit.  r.pi\ 
lUg.) ;  instit.  liks.  (I'.R.O.),  1621,  1024, 
i'i2i;,  I'liS,  if>37,  1640,  i(ifi2,  i'i;i),  1681, 
•7<'4.  '745.  '75°.  '752.  lyf.;,  1774,  1S15. 
In  i^i^i  Edward  Mnuntagu  presented 
'  pro  hac  vice  '  and  in  t62t  Thomai 
I"rccnian  presented. 

'  I'riv.  Act.    5  Geo.  Ill,  c.   34;   Recov 
R.    Trin.    6   Geo.    Ill,    Deeds    enrolled, 
m.  275. 

'  y.C.II.  Noribanlt.  i,  309*. 

'  Ibid. 

*  Ibid.  36511,  377a. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


DEN FORD 


Clare.     Or  three  cheve- 
ront  gules. 


place  there  from  which  the  rent  should  be  taken. 
Probably  Adeliza  his  grandmother  was  then  still 
ahve.  The  manor*  was  apparently  held  of  the  honour 
of  Clare  in  1242,*  while  in  1262  Richard,  Earl  of 
Gloucester,  died  seised  of 
the  overlordship  there.'  The 
manor  was  afterwards  held  of 
the  Gloucester  Fee  in  North- 
amptonshire,* to  which  it  still 
belongs. 

The  first  tenant  in  demesne 
of  whom  record  has  been 
found  was  Frumbold  Denford, 
who  in  the  12th  century  survey 
appears  as  holding  half  a  hide 
of  land  in  Cotton  of  the 
fee  of  Denford.*     In  charters 

of  the  same  century,  Walter  son  of  Gilbert  Denford 
appears'"  and  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Gilbert 
and  grandson  Walter,  the  latter  of  whom  was  living 
in  1219."  Shortly  afterwards  the  manor  was  divided, 
but  the  fact  that  the  number  of  knights'  fees  in  Den- 
ford varies  in  different  inquisitions  on  the  Gloucester 
lands  makes  its  history  difficult  to  trace.  Probably, 
however,  the  manor  was  held  as  one  knight's  fee  and 
the  later  moieties  each  as  half  a  knight's  fee.*^ 

In  1242  Walter  Denford  held  half  a  fee  of  the 
honour  of  Clare  and  was  probably  the  mesne  lord  of  the 
other  half  fee.'''  He  was  succeeded  by  Gilbert 
Denford,  whose  heir  was  holding  in  1262'*  and  may 
possibly  have  been  Joan  the  wife  of  William  Sharde- 
low,  who  was  certainly  the  heiress  of  lands  in  Den- 
ford at  this  time.'*  She  and  her  husband  granted 
lands  in  1263  to  Richard  Trailly  of  Woodford'*  and 
in  1284  William  Trailly  is  said  to  have  held  the  town- 
ship of  Denford  of  the  Earl  of  Gloucester."  In  1285 
the  lands  that  had  formerly  been  held  by  Walter  and 
Gilbert  Denford  had  passed  to  William  Trailly  and 
John  de  Tolthorp.'*  It  seems  fairly  clear  that  John 
de  Tolthorp  held  the  half  fee  which  Walter  Denford 
held  in  1242,  since  in  or  before  1326  his  widow  Maud 
died  seised  of  a  moiety  of  the  manor  of  Denford,  which 
was  held  as  half  a  knight's  fee."  Her  heir  was  her 
son  Gilbert^"  and  his  sons  Gilbert  and  John  both 
seem  to  have  succeeded  him.^'  John  in  1353  quit- 
claimed all  his  right  in  the  manor  to  Sir  Richard 
Chamberlain,*'  who  also  obtained  the  third  part, 
which  Ehzabeth,  the  wife  of  Ralph  Beauchamp,  held 


in  dower.-'  In  1373  John  Chamberlain  and  his 
wife  Kathcrine,  who  seems  to  have  had  some  right 
in  the  manor,  quitclaimed  it  to  Sir  Richard  Cham- 
berlain,'-' on  whose  death  his  son  and  heir  Richard 
assigned  the  manor  to  his  mother  Joan  in  dower.^* 
She  died  seised  in  1410  and  it  passed  to  her  grandson, 
another  Richard  Chamberlain,-*  who  granted  it  to 
certain  feoffees."  In  1432  these  feoffees  granted  it 
to  John  Gryffyn  and  William  Aldwinkle,  who  were 
in  seisin  at  the  time  of  the  death  of  Richard  in  1439,^* 
and  of  his  son,  a  fourth  Richard,  in  1440.^'  Aldwinkle 
died  before  1472,  when  his  heir  Thomas  Lenton  gave 
a  release  of  the  manor  to  a  fifth  Richard  Chamber- 
lain.'* Another  Richard,  probably  his  son,  died  in 
1496,  leaving  the  manor  in  trust  to  be  divided  amongst 
his  three  sons,  with  remainder  to  his  daughter  Anne." 
The  next  tenant,  however,  who  appears  is  John 
Audlett,  of  Abingdon,  Berks,  who  died  seised  of  the 
manor  in  1537.'^  His  heirs  were  first  said  to  be  his 
cousins  Ralph  Edmunds  and  Margaret,  wife  of  Ralph 
Tomson.^  Edmunds  sold  his  moiety  to  Katherine, 
the  widow  of  Audlett,'*  and  the  Tom  sons  granted 
their  moiety  to  her  for  life  in  satisfaction  of  her 
dower.'*  Later,  William  Boiler,  the  true  heir  of 
Audlett,  appeared  and  sold  the  manor  to  Katherine 
Audlett  and  her  nephew  Thomas  Reade  and  his  wife 
Anne.'*  After  BoUer's  death, 
his  daughter  and  heir  Margaret 
and  her  husband,  William 
Sergeant,  tried  to  recover  the 
manor."  An  agreement,  how- 
ever, was  reached  in  1544  with 
the  Reades,'*  whose  descend- 
ants retained  possession  of  the 
manor.'*  In  1661  Corapton 
Reade  was  created  a  baronet,'"' 
but  in  the  early  years  of  the 
l8th  century  the  manor  was 
sold  by  Sir  Thomas  Reade  to 

Joseph  Diston,*'  who  in  1719  resold  it  to  Jeremiah 
Sambrooke.*^  It  afterwards  passed  to  John  Freeman, 
who  sold  the  manor  in  1764  to  Leonard  Burton.*' 
The  trustees  of  Thomas  Burton  owned  the  manor  in 
1874,'**  and  Mr.  Thomas  Freeman  and  Mr.  George 
Keeble,  J. P.,  are  the  chief  landowners  at  the  present 
day. 

The  other  half  fee  in  Denford  seems  to  have  been 
in  the  hands  of  Matthew  the  Butler  in  1242,''*  but 


Reade.     Gules  a  salrire 
betzoeen  Jour  sheaves  or. 


'  Farrer  Honors  and  Knigbls'  Fees,  ii, 
210-1 1.  •  Book  of  Fees,  ii,  937. 

'  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Noribanls.  ii,  231, 
cit.  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Hen.  III.  no. 
34.  The  list  of  the  Earl's  Northampton- 
ihire  tees  now  appears  to  be  lost. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  i  Hen.  V,  no. 
Exch.  Dep.  by  Com.  Northants. 
II  Jas.  I,  no.  15. 

•  y.C.H.  Northanu.  I,  377a. 
'»  Harl.  Chart.  4S  B.  25  and  26. 
"  Ibid.  50  A.  41. 
"  Chan.     Inq.     p.m.      47     Hen. 

no.  34;  ibid.  46  Edw.  Ill  (ist  nos.) 
no.  62  ;  18  Ric.  II,  no.  43  ;  22  Ric.  II, 
no.  46 ;  38  and  39  Hen.  VI,  no.  59 ; 
Bk.  of  Fees,  ii,  937  ;  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12,  49. 

'•  Bk.  of  Fees,  ii,  937. 

'♦  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Hen.  Ill,  no. 
34  ;    Chron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc.)  113. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  41; 
Hen.  HI. 

■•  Ibid.  Trin.  47  Hen.  III. 


33  i 
Hil. 


Ill, 


*'  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12.  It  seems  possible 
that  William  Trailly  was  the  second  hus- 
band of  Joan  Shardelow  ;  cf.  Feet  of  F. 
Northants.  East.  18  Edw.  I. 

'*  Chron.  Petrob.   113. 

*•  Cnl.  Inq.  vi,  no.  621. 

»»  Plac.  de  Banco.  Trin.  2  Edw.  Ill, 
m.  72d. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1349-54,  P-  616.       "  Ibid. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  27 
Edw.  III. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  46 
Edw.  III. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  I  Hen.  V,  no.  33. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Ibid.  17  Hen.  VI,  no.  31.  "  Ibid. 

"  Ibid.  iS  Hen.  VI.  no.  45  ;  Early  Chan. 
Proc,  bdlc.  18,  no.  18.  His  heir  was  his 
cousin  William  Rokeby,  but  he  does  not 
seem  to  have  obtained  seisin. 

w  Close  R.  1 1  Edw.  IV,  m.  5. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xi,  4. 

•»  Ibid.  Ixxxii,  75.  ••  Ibid. 


•*  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  East.  29 
Hen.  VIII. 

"  Star  Chamber  Proc.  Hen.  VIII, 
bdle.  17,  no.  196. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  Ixii,  30  j 
Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  30  Hen.  VIII. 

"  Star  Chamber  Proc.  Hen.  VIII, 
bdle.  17,  no.  196. 

»'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  36 
Hen.  VIII. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  30  Eliz.  ; 
Mich.  13  Chas.  I;  Trin.  34  Chas.  II; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxc,  125  ; 
Exch.  Dep.  by  Com.  Northants.  Hil. 
12  Jas.  I,  no.  15  ;  Pat.  R.  13  Jas.  I,  pt.  18; 
Recov.  R.  Trin.  31  Chas.  II,  ro.  30. 

*"  G.E.C.  Baronetage,  iii,  p.  172. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  321. 

*'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  5  Geo.  I. 

♦>  Ibid.  East.  4  Geo.  III. 

**  Whellan,  Hist,  of  Northants.  1874,751. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  26 
Hen.  III. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


bv  the  following  year  his  heir  or  heirs  had  succeeded 
him.^  His  heirs  possibly  were  Isolda,  the  wife  of 
Brian  Denford'"  and  the  wife  of  Ralph  de  Pulteney, 
as  in  1262  Brian  and  Ralph  were  tenants  here  of  the 
Earl  of  Gloucester.''* 

In  1285  Ralph  de  Pulteney"  was  living,  but  in  1 3 14 
he  had  been  succeeded  by  William  de  Pulteney,'"  and 
in  1365  Isabella,  daughter  of  William  Pulteney,  sold  a 
messuage  and  lands  to  Sir  Richard  Chamberlain  Knt.'' 
Before  1425  a  tenement  called  Pultpneys  was  in  the 
hands  of  Richard  Chamberlain,'-  who  held  the  other 
moiety  of  Denford  (q.v.),  and  though  he  granted  it  to 
Thomas  Chamberlain  and  his  wife  Katherine,  it 
seems  probable  that  from  this  time  the  Chamberlains 
and  their  successors  held  the  greater  part  at  least  of 
Matthew  the  Butler's  half  fee.'^  Brian  Denford's  share 
cannot  be  traced  after  1285,  when  his  son  Robert  had 
succeeded  him.*'' 

Another  tenant  of  the  Gloucester  Fee  in  Denford 
before  1240  was  Simon  de  Berughby,  whose  wife 
Alice**  was  possibly  another  heir  of  Matthew  the 
Butler.  Alice  de  Berughby  was  holding  in  1262,** 
William  and  Hugh  Berughby  appear  as  tenants  in 
1285,"  and  John  and  Robert  Berughby  in  1314.*' 
This  may  be  the  manor  in  Denford  which,  though 
not  held  in  chief,  is  said  to  have  been  granted 
in  1374  or  5  by  Edward  III  to  Robert  Ward.*' 
The  latter,  with  his  wife  Emma,  conveyed  it  in 
1410  or  II  to  Thomas  Cantlowe,"  who  granted 
it  to  William  Aldwinkle.'^  The  latter  by  will  left 
it  to  his  wife  Elizabeth,  who  afterwards  married 
W'illiam  Chaumbre*^  It  seems,  however,  to  have 
been  in  the  hands  of  trustees,  who  sold  it  in 
1488  to  John  Selyman,  the  chaplain  of  the  chantry 
founded  by  Chaumbre  in  Aldwinkle  church.*^  The 
lands  of  the  chantry  seem  to  have  been  seized  by 
Henry  \'I1I,  who  in  1546  granted  the  manor  to  Sir 
Edward  Montagu." 

The  Earls  of  Gloucester  and  their  successors  held 
a  court  leet  and  view  of  frankpledge  for  their  tenants 
at  Denford.**  In  1616,  Thomas  Reade  obtained  a 
grant  of  free  warren  in  his  manor  of  Denford.^ 

In  1086,  two  mills  at  Denford,  paying  [z  los.  Sd. 
and  250  eels  a  year  are  mentioned,  but  it  is  not  certain 
that  both  were  in  Denford  itself."  A  mill  at  Denford 
is  mentioned  in  the  reign  of  Henry  HI,*'  and  again 
in  1537.** 

A  free-fishery  in  Denford  was  granted  in  1545, 
by  William  Burton  and  his  wife  Joan,  and  Margaret 
Gale,  widow,  to  Gilbert  Pickering.™ 

The  church  of  the  HOLJ'  TRINITT 

CHURCH     consists  of  chancel  31  ft.  by  14  ft.  9  in., 

clcarstoried  nave  of  four  bays,  49  ft.  4  in. 

by  21  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  aisles  each  10  ft.  6  in. 


wide,  south  porch,  and  west  tower  12  ft.  6  in.  by 
12  ft.,  surmounted  by  a  spire.  All  these  measure- 
ments are  internal. 

The  building  belongs  generally  to  the  later  part  of 
the  13th  century,  c.  1275-90,  but  the  lower  stage  of 
the  tower  and  some  other  features  appear  to  be  rather 
earlier,  and  it  is,  therefore,  not  unlikely  that  the 
church  was  building  during  a  rather  protracted  period, 
extending  over  the  latter  half  of  the  century.  In  the 
14th  century,  new  windows  were  inserted  in  the 
south  aisle,  and  the  clearstory  was  added,  but  no 
material  alteration  was  effected  in  the  plan.  The 
east  window  and  two  in  the  north  aisle  are  15th- 
century  insertions,  and  a  window  at  the  east  end  of 
the  south  aisle  is  about  a  century  later.  Originally, 
the  north  aisle  extended  some  20  ft.  further  eastward, 
covering  the  chancel  for  more  than  half  its  length, 
and  forming  a  chapel  with  a  vestry  at  its  east  end. 
The  church  was  restored  in  1864,  and  in  1897  the 
lower  part  of  the  tower,  including  the  buttresses,  was 
newly  faced  and  the  spire  restored.  In  1925,  the 
east  ends  of  both  aisles  were  taken  down  and  rebuilt," 
the  north  aisle  roof  renewed  and  the  roof  of  the  nave 
repaired.  The  roofs  are  of  low  pitch,  leaded  to  the 
aisles,  slated  to  the  nave  and  chancel. 

The  chancel  is  built  of  grey  stone  with  an  iron-stone 
band  every  fourth  course,  and  has  plain  parapets 
and  chamfered  plinth,  but  no  string  course.  The 
walls  inside  are  plastered.  The  east  window  retains 
13th-century  moulded  jambs  and  part  of  the  early 
rear  arch  has  been  re-used,  but  is  otherwise  of  15th 
century  date,  of  four  trefoOed  lights  and  Perpendicular 
tracery.  Two  late  13th-century  windows  remain  in 
the  south  wall,  one  of  three  and  the  other  of  two  lights, 
with  tracery  formed  by  the  forking  and  intersection 
of  the  mullions.  There  is  no  window  in  the  north 
wall,  but  a  doorway  (now  blocked)  with  a  drop  arch 
and  continuous  roll  moulding,  led  formerly  into  the 
vestry,  from  which  there  was  a  squint  to  the  chancel. 
In  the  usual  position  on  the  south  side  is  a  rather 
plain  13th-century  piscina,  the  bowl  of  which  has 
been  blocked.  Originally  the  interior  of  the  chancel 
was  surrounded  with  trefoiled  arcading.  Two  arches 
remain  on  the  south  side,  and  four  on  the  north, 
with  excellent  filleted  roll-mouldings  and  soffit 
cusping,  on  triple  clustered  shafts  and  single- shafted 
responds.  The  shafts  stand  clear  of  the  wall  and 
have  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and  in  the  spandrels 
on  the  north  side  are  sculptured  faces,  a  man's  and 
two  women's.  Of  the  northern  arches,  three  are 
placed  beneath  a  relieving  arch  in  the  wall,  and  in  the 
tympanum  thus  formed,  are  four  recesses,  which 
may  have  been  intended  for  acoustic  purposes.^'' 
The  chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders,   the 


*•  Book  of  Feet,  ii,  937. 

♦'  Feet  of   F.  Northants.  Trin.  31  Ilcn. 

in. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Hen.  Ill,  nu.  34. 

**  Cbron.  I'ctrob.  113. 

"  Cban.  In<i.  p.m.  8  Edw.  II,  no.  68. 

»'  Cott.  Ch.  (B.M.)  jtxviii,  105. 

»>  Harl.  Ch.  (B.M.)  47  I.  29. 

••  Cban.  Idc|.  p.m.  18  Ric.  II,  no.  43  ; 
22  Ric.  II,  no.  46;  38  and  39  lien.  VI, 
no.  59. 

**  Chron.  Petrob.  113. 

"  IVet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  24 
Hen  III. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  47  Hen.  Ill,  no.  34. 

•'  Cbron.  Petrob.  1 13. 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Edw.  II,  no.  62. 
"  Bridges,  Uist.  of  Nortbanls.  i),  231. 
«"  Ibid.  •'  Ibid.  •'  Ibid. 

«•  Cal.Pat.  1485-94,  pp.  253,311. 
"  L.   and  P.   Hen.    fill,  xxi  (pt.  ii), 
g.  648(52). 
*•  Cal.  Inij.  iii,  no.  371  ;  iv,  435  ;   Cat. 

Pat.  i343-45>  P-  3'''' i  '4o'-°5.  P-  349; 
Chan.  Iruj.  p.m.  36  Kdw.  Ill,  pt.  i,no.  37  i 
P.R.O.  Court  R.  (gen.  «er.)  pif.  194,  f.  49. 

"Pat.  R.  13  Jan.  I,pt.  18. 

•'  y.C.ll.  Northanti.  i,  309^. 

"  Cott.  Ch.  xxviii,  74. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  U«xii,  75. 

"•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich. 
37  Hen.  VIII. 

194 


"  The  old  materials  were  used  and  the 
windows  replaced.  The  fnnndaticms  of 
the  original  east  end  of  tbo  north  aisle 
were  uncovered  at  this  time  :  ex. 
inform.  Mr.  H.  F.  'IMylen,  F.S.A. 
architect.  A  considerable  amount  of 
repair  appears  to  have  been  done  to  the 
north  side  of  the  chancel  in  the  18th 
century,  or  perhaps  earlier. 

"  The  recesses  were  discovered  in 
1864  :  one  of  them  still  contains  an 
earthenware  pot,  or  acoustic  jar.  The 
rubble  face  of  the  wall  is  here  left 
exposed.  Sec  An.  Arcb.  Soc.  Reporti, 
vii,  102  ;  Bloxam,  Gothic  Arcb.  (iitb  ed.) 
ii,  154. 


Denford  Church  from  the  South-East 


DhNKORl)     ChLKLH    :      Tnh     ImIRIOK.     LOOKIM,     EaST 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


DENFORD 


innermost    carried    on    moulded    corbels.     There    is 
no  screen. 

The  nave  arcades  spring  from  piers  composed 
of  four  attached  shafts  with  moulded  capitals,  and 
from  half-octagonal  responds.  The  arches  are  of 
two  chamfered  orders.  On  the  south  side,  the  piers 
have  moulded  bases,  but  not  on  the  norlli.  The  door- 
ways of  the  aisles  are  of  the  13th  century  ;  the  northern 
has  a  simple  chamfer,  the  southern  is  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  innermost  on  shafts  with  moulded  capitals 
and  chamfered  bases,  the  shafts  being  new.  The 
outer  arch  of  the  porch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders 
on  imposts,  with  tooth  ornament  in  the  hood  mould. 
The  windows  of  the  aisles  are  of  various  dates.  The 
easternmost    window    in    the    soutli    wall    and    the 


The  tower  is  of  two  stages  with  massive  double 
buttresses  to  half  its  height,  and  a  vice  in  the  south- 
west angle.  The  lower  stage  is  of  rubble,  and  the 
upper  or  bell-chamber  story  of  dressed  stone.  The 
west  doorway  is  a  modern  13th-century  restoration, 
but  the  tall  lancet  window  above  is  original.  The 
north  and  south  sides  of  the  lower  stage  are  blank, 
and  tlie  bell-chamber  stage  sets  back  slightly.  The 
windows  consist  of  two  grouped  trefoilcd  lancets, 
witli  shafted  jambs  and  moulded  heads,  with  trefoil 
opening  above,  set  between  two  blind  lancets,  the 
whole  composition  forming  a  triple  arcade  on  each 
side,  covering  the  greater  part  of  the  wall  surface. 
The  arch  between  the  nave  and  tower  is  modern. 
The  spire  belongs  to  a  type  sometimes  known  as  timber 


Scale  of  Feet 


]3I!J  Century 
14  B  Ceintury 
1512  Century 
161!!  Century 
ES  Subsequent  4.  Mod 


Plan  of  Denford  Church 


westernmost  in  the  north  wall  are  of  three  lights 
and  have  the  late  13th  century  intersecting  tracery 
already  described,  and  another  at  the  east  end  of  the 
north  wall  has  three  gradated  lancets  under  a  single 
arch  with  pierced  spandrels.  The  west  window 
of  the  north  aisle  is  blocked,  and  the  two  15th-century 
middle  windows  are  of  three  trefoiled  lights  with 
vertical  tracery.  In  the  south  aisle,  on  either  side 
of  the  doorway,  and  at  the  west  end,  are  rectangular 
openings  with  excellent  mouldings  and  tracery  of 
a  late  14th  century  type,  and  the  window  at  the 
east  end  of  the  aisle  is  four-centred  and  of  three 
uncusped  lights  with  vertical  tracery.  It  appears 
to  be  a  16th-century  insertion,  at  which  time  probably 
the  east  end  of  the  north  aisle  was  walled  up,  after 
the  disuse  or  removal  of  the  chapel.  The  south 
aisle  appears  to  have  been  repaired  at  the  end  of  the 
14th  century,  as  indicated  by  the  character  of  the 
square-headed  windows,  and  the  parapet  has  fine 
gargoyles  of  this  date.  The  clearstory  windows 
are  square-headed  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  but 
on  the  north  side  they  were  altered  to  plain  single 
openings  probably  in  the  1 8th  century,  the  old  rear 
arches  being  retained. 

"  Ac  a  parochial  viucation  held  in  the  Thii,  apparently,  wai  removed  in  1864. 
church  3  Juoe,  1718,  according  to  an  order  The  pretent  Kone  pulpit  wai  erected  in 
of  the  court  there  wit  to  be  •  new  pulpit.        1926. 


spires  worked  in  masonry,  and  rises  from  behind  a 
plain  parapet  with  angle  pinnacles,  carried  on  a 
bold  corbel  table.  The  spire  has  ribbed  angles,  and 
two  sets  of  gabled  lights  on  its  cardinal  faces.  At 
the  level  of  the  lower  lights,  it  is  ornamented  with 
bands  and  strings. 

The  font  and  pulpit"  are  modern.  The  roofs 
also  are  modern  throughout,  but  the  corbels  for  the 
wall-pieces  and  some  fragments  of  the  timbers  appear 
to  be  old.  A  bracket  for  an  image  remains  in  the 
south-east  corner  of  the  south  aisle.  The  east  end 
of  the  north  aisle  is  screened  off  to  form  a  vestry. 
The  organ  is  under  the  tower  arch. 

There  are  six  bells,  the  first  by  Thomas  Norris 
of  Stamford,  1629,  the  second  by  Robert  Mott  of 
Whitechapel,  1581,  and  the  others  by  Matthew  and 
Henry  Bagley,  of  Chacomb,   1680.'^ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver  cup  of  c.  1570,  a  paten 
inscribed  '  Denford  1682,'  and  a  cover  paten  of 
c.  1700." 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i)  all 
entries  1597-1613,  1618-38,  1654-73,  (ii)  all  entries 
1674-1718,  (iii)  all  entries  1727-52,  Isaptisms  and 
burials    1753-1812,   (iv)   marriages   1754-1812. 


'*  North,  Cb.   Belli  of  Nonbanit.  247, 
where  the  iatcriptiona  are  given. 
"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  SorthamU.  96. 


195 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  advowson  of  the  church  of 
ADVOU'SON  Denford  appears  to  have  been  held 
by  Hugh,  Earl  of  Chester,"  after  the 
forfeiture  by  the  Bishop  of  Coutances.  Before  lioo, 
the  earl  granted  it  to  the  abbey  of  St.  Werburgh  at 
Chester."  In  1394,  it  was  obtained  by  Richard 
(le  Scrope),  Bishop  of  Coventry  and  Lichfield,'"  who 
two  years  later  appropriated  it  to  his  table,  on  con- 
dition that  a  vicarage  was  ordained.'^  Before  1535, 
the  vicarage  of  Denford  was  united  to  the  chapelry 
of  Ringstead.*"  In  1551,  Richard  (Sampson),  Bishop 
of  Coventry  and  Lichfield,  leased  the  rectory  and  the 
advowson  of  Denford  for  a  hundred  years  at  a  rent 
of  ^18  to  Nicholas  Williamson  of  Kingsthorpe  and 
his  wife  Marj'.*'  She  married  as  her  second  husband, 
John  VVarde,  and  they  were  sued  for  the  rent  by 
Bishop  Thomas  (Bentham).'-  The  property  passed 
to  Bridgit,  apparently  the  daughter  and  heir  of 
Nicholas,  who  married  Thomas  Williamson,  presum- 
ably her  cousin.*'  In  1588,  Thomas  and  Bridgit, 
together  with  their  son  Nicholas  and  his  wife  Anne, 
sold  the  rectory  to  Lewis,  Lord  Mordaunt,**  whose 
descendants  owned  the  advowson  and  rectory  till 
after  1681,*^  whether  still  as  leaseholders  of  the 
Bishop  of  Coventry  and  Lichfield  or  as  freeholders 


does  not  appear.  They  were  probably  sold  after 
the  death  of  Henry,  the  last  Earl  of  Peterborough,  in 
1697.*^  In  1720,  the  rectory  was  sold  by  William 
Freina,  clerk,  and  his  wife  Bridgit,  Mary  Cleter, 
widow,  and  Stephen  Ashby  to  Jeremiah  Sambrook,*' 
who  had  recently  bought  the  manor  (q.v.).  He  pre- 
sented to  the  vicarage  in  1752,**  and  both  advowson 
and  rectory  passed  with  the  manor  in  1764  to  Leonard 
Burton*'  and  his  descendants. 

Before  1874,  Miss  Leggatt  was  patron  of  the  living."*' 
In  1898  it  belonged  to  S.  G.  Stopford  Sackville  of 
Drayton  House,  Thrapston,  and  is  now  owned  by 
Mr.  Nigel  Stopford  Sackville. 

Church  Estate.  There  is  no  docu- 
CHARITIES  mentary  evidence  of  the  origin  of 
this  charity.  The  property  consists  of 
meadowland  containing  about  4  acres  and  4  cottages 
with  gardens,  the  whole  producing  ^^31  13^.  yearly 
which  is  applied  to  church  expenses. 

Three  cottages  and  a  garden  situate  in  Pegg's  Lane 
were  sold  in  1916  and  the  proceeds  invested  in 
;^2ll  10/.  \d.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock  with  the  Official 
Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds.  The  dividends  on 
this  sum  are  invested  in  augmentation  of  the 
principal. 


FINEDON 


Tingdene,  Thingdene  (xi  cent.)  ;  Thyngden,  Tyn- 
den  (xiii  cent.)  ;  Thynden  (xiv  cent.)  ;  Thingdon 
(xvi  cent.)  ;    Finedon  (xviii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Finedon  contains  3,541  acres  of  land. 
It  rises  to  a  little  over  300  ft.  above  the  ordnance 
datum  from  the  River  Ise  which  forms  the  western 
boundary.  The  sub-soil  is  Upper  Lias,  and  Great  and 
Inferior  Oolite,  the  surface  soil  being  clay  producing 
wheat  and  barley.  The  parish  was  formed  into  an 
urban  district  in  1894  with  a  council  of  twelve 
members.  It  was  inclosed  under  a  private  Act  of 
Parliament.*  The  large  village  lies  at  the  inter- 
section of  the  roads  from  Wellingborough  to  Thrap- 
ston and  from  Higham  Ferrers  to  Kettering.  It  is 
a  somewhat  uninteresting  looking  town  of  red- 
brick houses,  a  red  brick  water  tower  on  the  Irth- 
lingborough  road  being  a  prominent  landmark. 
The  rectory  house  stands  on  the  north-west  of 
the  church  and  is  a  well-designed  building  of  two 
stories,  faced  with  ironstone  and  roofed  with  CoUy- 
weston  slates,  erected  in  1688  by  Roger  Altham, 
rector.  A  few  late  17th  or  early  1 8th  century 
houses  remain  in  the  old  part  of  the  town,  one  of 
them  in  Mulsho  Square  with  a  thatched  roof,  is  dated 
1693  and  another  in  the  same  square  is  dated  1736. 
In  Church  Street,  the  Charity  School  for  girls  is  a 
well-designed  two- story  house  with  slated  roof  erected 


in  171 2,  while  the  Gothic  revival  is  represented  by  the 
Almshouses  in  the  same  street,  built  in  1847  and  by 
the  Bell  Inn.  At  the  west  end  of  the  town  is  the 
Old  Hall  or  manor  house  which  was  rebuilt  about 
1835,-  and  enlarged  some  twenty  years  later,'  but  it 
incorporates  on  the  north-west  side  some  rooms 
belonging  to  a  former  structure,  which  appears  to 
have  been  an  Elizabethan  house  of  only  moderate  size. 
The  existing  mansion  is  a  picturesque  gabled  building 
of  local  yellow  stone,  with  Weldon  stone  dressings.'' 
Iron-stone  was  formerly  worked  and  the  Finedon 
Ironworks  belonging  to  the  Glendon  Iron  Ore 
Company  are  now  disused.  The  principal  industry 
at  the  present  time  is  the  manufacture  of  boots  and 
shoes.  Finedon  station  on  the  London  Midland  and 
Scottish  Railway  is  two  miles  from  the  village  in 
Isham  parish. 

In  the  reign  of  Edward  the  Confessor, 
MANORS  Queen  Edith  held  the  great  soke  of 
Finedon,  which  contained  27  hides  of 
land  in  six  hundreds.  In  1086  it  was  in  the  king's 
hands  and  formed  part  of  the  ancient  demesne  of  the 
crown.  Only  1 1  hides  were  in  the  later  hundred  of 
Huxloc  and  a  holding  of  9J  hides  seems  to  represent 
the  manor  of  FINEDONfi  In  the  12th  century 
survey  of  the  county,  the  king  held  10  hides  there.' 
The  men  of  Finedon  in  1 388  successfully  claimed  that 


'•  Dugd.ilr,  Man.  Angl.  ii,  385-6,  cit. 
Chart.  R.  2  Ilea.  V,  pt.  1,  m.  26. 

"  Ibid.  ;  Rol.  Roll.  Grotitleue  (Cant. 
•  nd  York  Soc),  167  ;  Rol.  Ric.  Gravestnd 
(Cant,  and  York  Soc),  126. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  17  Ric.  II,  no.  80; 
Cat.  Pal.  1391-96,  p.  516. 

"Ibid.  p.  686;  1399-1401,  p.  51.1; 
1413-16,  p.  391. 

•»  Ta/or  F.cd.  (Rcc.  Com),  iv,  3 1 2. 

•'  Chan,  Proc.  (Srr.  ii),  bdlc.  35  (119). 

••  Ibid.  ;  Walwr  C.  Metcalfe,  f  m.(.  0/ 
Nortbanli,  55. 


"  Ibid.  ;  Feet  of  V.  Northants.  Kast. 
13  Eliz. ;    Mil.  29  Eliz. 

•«  Tcct  of  F.  Northants.  Mil.  30  Elii. 

■'  Ch.TH.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii)  cccix,  200; 
Feet  of  F.  Div  Cob.  'Frin.  19  Jas.  I  ; 
Rccov.  R.  nil.  19  Jas.  I,  ro.  40; 
Initit.  Bk».  (I'.R.O.)  1648,  1677,  1681J 
Feet  of  F.  Northantj,  Div.  Cos.  Uil  6 
Geo.  I. 

«•  G.E.C.  Complrte  Peerage. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Norlh,iiil«.  Mil.  6  Geo.  I. 

"  Initit.  Bk..  (P.R.O.). 


196 


'•  Feet    of     F.     NorthanU.     East.     4 
Geo.  III. 
•»  Whellan,  llisl.  of  Nonbanu.  1874,  p. 

75'- 

'  Priv.  Act  45  Geo.  Ill,  c.  44.  An 
Incloiurc  award  of  1808  ii  in  the  custody 
of  the  vicar. 

■  'Fhis  date  is  on  one  of  the  cliitnneys. 

•  The  dates  1851,  1856,  and  1859  occur 
on  parts  of  the  house. 

•  A'orrAun/j.A'.iiiK/p. (NcwScr.),iv,  161. 

•  V.C.H.  Nonbanu.  i,  308a. 

•  Ibid,  i,  3890. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


FINEDON 


it  was  ancient  demesne  and  proved  their  right  to  be 
quit  of  toll  throughout  the  kingdom.'  The  sokcmen 
of  the  ancient  demesne  appear  in  a  rental  of  the  manor 
in  1423."  The  manor  apparently  remained  in  the 
crown  until  King  John  granted  it  in  1200  for  life 
at  fee-farm  to  his  clerk,  Stephen  de  Clay,*  who  was 
holding  it  in  1209.^"  In  I2i7it  was  granted  to  Thomas 


which  passed  to  their  daughter  DivorgiUa,  the  wife  of 
John  Balliol.-"  From  her  it  went  to  John  de  Burgh, 
grandson  of  the  justiciar.'^'  On  his  death  in  1279,'"  his 
moiety  was  assigned  to  his  eldest  daughter,  DivorgiUa, 
the  wife  of  Robert  Fitz  Walter,  Lord  Fitz  Walter,  who 
in  1283  sub-infeudated  their  moiety  of  Finedon.-'' 
One  quarter  of  the  manor  was  granted  to  Ralph  de 


^S5.  r 


iBr^ 


M^,il4jd 


FiNEDON  :  Church  Porch 


Malemains"  and  in  1218  to  William  Longsword, 
Earl  of  Salisbury,^  who  possibly  retained  it  till  his 
death  in  1226.''  At  some  time,  however,  it  was 
granted  to  the  justiciar,  Hubert  de  Burgh,  but  after 
his  outlawry,^*  it  was  given  to  Stephen  de  Segrave 
and  his  heirs. '*  Stephen's  son  Gilbert  was  holding 
the  manor  in  1234,  when  he  was  ordered  to  restore  it 
to  Hubert  de  Burgh.*'  In  1241  it  was  at  farm  to  the 
men  of  Finedon,"  but  in  the  same  year  the  manor 
was  granted  in  fee  to  William,  son  of  William  de 
Forz,  count  of  Aumale,  and  his  wife  Christina, 
daughter  and  heir  of  the  Earl  of  Chester,  in  part 
compensation  for  her  inheritance  in  the  earldom.'' 
In  1246  they  granted  one  moiety  of  the  manor  to 
Richard  de  Bolebec,**  but  retained  the  other  moiety, 


'  Cal.  Close,  1385-89,  p.  408. 

•  Add.  Roll  (B.M.)  38983. 

•  Chart.  R.  1  John,  pt.  4.9,  m.  10. 

'°  Pipe  R.  2  John,  m.  4d  ;  7  John, 
m.  21  ;    II  John,  m.  i6d. 

"  Rol.  Lin.  Claus.  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
32oi,  343*. 

"  Ibid,  i,  364A,  368* ;  Pipe  R.  3 
Hen.  Ill,  m.  7. 

'"  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

'*  Cat.  Close,  1231-34,  p.  567. 

"  Cal.  Chari.i,  116. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1231-34,  p.  567. 

"  .hid.  1237-42,  p.  307. 


■»  Cal.  Chan,  i,  262 ;  Feet  of  F. 
Div.  Cos.  26  Hen.  Ill,  no.  55. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northante.  East.  29 
Hen.  III. 

'0  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.) ; 
Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.)  545. 

•■  Ibid. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Edw.  I,  no.  9. 
In  the  inquisition  of  his  lands,  only  the 
advowson  of  Finedon  is  mentioned,  but  the 
manor  was  mentioned  at  the  time  of  the 
redivision  of  his  daughters'  inheritance  in 
1282  {Cal.  Close,  1279-88,  p.  186). 

"  Cal.  Close,  1279-88,  p.  186  ;  Feet  of 


Kirketon,  who  held  it  by  the  service  of  a  quarter  of  a 
knight's  fee.2*  He  demised  it  to  William  Bernak, 
probably  only  in  settlement  on  Alice  de  Kirketon.^* 
Alice  may  have  been  identical  with  Alice  the  wife  of 
John  de  Thorp,  who  jointly  with  her  husband  was 
holding  it  in  1321.2'  She  granted  it  for  his  life  to 
John  de  Harwedon,  who  was  the  tenant  in  1 334," 
but  in  1 341  William  de  Thorp  sold  the  reversion  to 
Simon  Simeon  of  Grimsthorp.^* 

The  other  quarter  of  the  manor  was  granted  by  the 
Fitz  Walters  in  1283  to  Ralph  Seymour,  also  for  the 
service  due  from  a  quarter  of  a  knight's  fee.^'  In 
1 3 10,  however,  the  service  had  been  changed  to  the 
yearly  gift  of  a  pair  of  gilt  spurs. ^^  Ralph  died  seised 
in  1310^1  and  alter  the  death  of  his  widow  Alice,  who 

F.  Northants.  East.  11  Edw.  I;     Plac.  de 
Quo  h'arr.  (Rec.  Com.)  545. 

"  Ibid.  ;  Fit2  Walter's  descendant, 
the  Earl  of  Sussex,  held  the  overlordship 
in  1609  (Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (ser.  ii),  cccvii 
98). 

«»  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  545. 

"  Cal.  Itu/.  Misc.  Chan.  ii.  no.  445. 

»'  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com. 
545  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin. 
13  Edw.  III. 

'*  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  15  Edw. 
III.  «•  Ibid.  East.  II  Edw.  I. 

»  Cal.  ;«j.  V,  no.  186.  •'  Ibid. 


A   HISTORY   OF    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


held  it  for  life,'^   it  passed  to   his    son    Edmund.^ 
Lawrence  Seymour  was  holding  it  in  1334^  presumably 


DJ  Burgh.      Gules  seven 
lozenges  voir. 


DE  FoRZ.      Gules  a  cross 

paty  vair. 


as  a  trustee  for  settlements  made  on  Thomas  Eey» 
mour,^^  but  the  latter  sold  it  in  1 348  to  Simon 
Simeon,^  who  thus  became  possessed  of  the  whole 
moiety  of  the  manor.  He  settled  it  jointly  on  himself 
and  his  wife  Elizabeth  Neville.''  He  died  without 
heirs,^  and  Elizabeth  brought  the  manor  to  her  second 


BoLBrc.      Vert    a    lion 
argen  t. 


FiTzwALTER.  Orajesst 
between  two  cbeverons 
gules. 


husband  John  la  Warre,''  who  died  seised  of  it  in 
1398.'"*  She  had  predeceased  him,  and  his  heir  was  his 
brother  Thomas,'"  who  seems  to  have  sold  the  moiety 
of  Finedon  manor  between  1400  and  1405  to  John 
Mulsho ;  ■»-  at  the  same  time  Mulsho  obtained  a 
quarter  of  the  other  moiety  of  the  manor  (q.v.).  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  son,  who  died  in  1478,  and  his 
grandson,  who  died  in  1536,  both  named  John.''* 
Thomas,  the  grandson  of  the  third  John  Mulsho, 
succeeded  him^'  and  bought  the  remainder  of  the 
other  moiety  of  Finedon  manor  (q.v.),  which  had  been 
alienated  by  the  Count  of  Aumale  in  1246**  so  that 
from  this  time  the  whole  manor  was  held  by  the 
Mulshos.  Thomas's  eldest  son,  another  Thomas,  sold 
the  manor  in  1604  to  his  brother  Robert'*  from  whom 


it  passed  in  direct  descent  to  William,  Robert"  and 
Tanfield  Mulsho.^  On  Tanfield's  death  his  heirs 
were  his  daughters  Anne  and  Elizabeth,  who  married 
two  brothers  Gilbert  and  John  Dolben,  the  sons  of  the 


Mulsho.  Ermine  a  bend 
sable  wt:b  tbree  goats* 
beads  razed  argent  wttb 
horns  or  thereon. 


Dolben.  Sable  a  helm 
betivcen  three  broad  arroto 
heads  argent  all  pointing 
inwards. 


Archbishop  of  York,  but  Anne  and  Gilbert  bought 
Elizabeth's  share.''*  Gilbert  was  created  a  baronet  in 
1704^"  and  his  successors  were  lords  of  the  manor  till 
the  death  of  Sir  John  English  Dolben  in  1837,^^ 
when  it  passed  to  his  daughter  Frances,  the  wife  of 
William  Mackworth,  who  took  the  name  of  Dolben."^ 
She  died  in  1892,  and  the  last  owner  of  the  manor  was 
her  daughter  Ellen  Mackworth  Dolben,  on  whose 
death  in  191 2,  the  whole  estate  was  sold  in  separate 
portions.^-* 

The  moiety  of  the  manor  of  Finedon  which  Lord 
FitzWalter  and  his  wife  granted  in  1246  to  Richard  de 
Bolbec  was  held  by  the  annual  payment  of  a  pair  of 
gilt  spurs.^''  On  the  death  of  Richard's  son  Hugh  in  or 
before  1262,  it  was  divided  between  Hugh's  four 
daughters  and  heirs,  Philippa,  the  wife  of  Roger  de 
Lancaster,  Margery,  the  wife  of  Nicholas  Corbet, 
Alice  the  wife  of  Walter,  son  of  William  de  Hunter- 
combe,  and  Maud  who  was  then  unmarried.''^ 

Philippa's  eighth  part  of  the  manor  passed  on  her 
death  before  1294  to  her  son  John  de  Lancaster,^" 
who  was  holding  it  in  1321.^'  It  was  then  held  in 
demesne  by  John,  son  of  Robert  de  Lancaster,'*  but 
probably  before  1327  it  had  passed  to  Robert  de 
Sandford.^'  In  1342,  Robert  gave  it  to  his  son 
Thomas  and  Margaret  Spryng,^  but  in  1367  Thomas 
de  Sandford  sold  it  to  Simon  Symeon  of  Grimsthorp," 
and  from  that  date  it  seems  to  have  followed  the 
descent  of  the  other  moiety  of  the  manor  (q.v.)  since 
John  Mulsho  died  seised  in  1478  of  one  moiety  and  a 
fourth  part  of  the  other  moiety .*- 

The  eighth  part  assigned  to  Margery  and  Nicholas 


"  Teet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Trin.  5  and  6 
Edw.  II  ;  Cal.  Inq.  Misc.  Chan,  ii, 
no.  445. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  3  Edw.  II,  no.  20. 

•'  Ptac.  de  Quo  Ifarr.  (Rec.  Com.),  54;. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Mich.  3  Edw.  III. 

"  Ibid.  Northanti.  Eait.  21  Edw.  III. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Trin.  30  Edw. 
Ill ;  Mich.  I  Ric.  II  i  Cloie  R.  9  Ric.  II, 
part  I,  m.  7. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  11  Ric.  II,  no.  48. 

••  Cloic  R,,  12  Ric.  II,  m.  38d.  i 
Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Mil.  12  Ric.  II. 

*"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  22  Ric.  II,  no.  53. 

«'  Ibid. 

*■  Add.  Chart.  (B.M.)  22005  ;  Feet  of 
F.  Northanti.  caie  179,  file  90,  no.  34; 
Add.  Roll  (B.M.),  38983. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii)  xx,  101; 
l»il.  III.  "Ibid. 


"  See  above. 

"  Metcalfe,  Fisil.  of  Noribants.  38, 
116;  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  1  Jai.  I ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccvii,  98. 

"  Mctcilfe,  op.  cit.  116. 

*»  Recov.  R.  Eait.  13  Chai.  II,  ro.  196; 
Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Trin.  25  Chai. 
II  ;  Norihants.  N.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.)  iv, 
166-8. 

♦•  Ibid.  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich. 
35  Chai.  II. 

»»  r..E.C.  Complete  Baronetage. 

"Ibid.;  Recov.  R.  Trin.  6  Geo.  I, 
ro.  217;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  Trin.  21 
and  22  Geo.  II  ■,  Recov.  R.  42  Geo.  Ill, 
ro.  211. 

"Whcllan,  Hist,  of  Northanti,  1874, 
p.  752  ;    Norihants  N.  and  Q.  loc.  cit. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Feet    of     F.    Northanti.    Eait.     29 


Ilcn.  Ill ;  riac.  de  Quo  H'arr.  (Rec. 
Com.)  545. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  i,  no.  528.  In  1333/4  '" 
a  plea  of  Quo  Warranto  (cf.  previoui  note) 
there  ii  a  very  full  account  of  the  deicent 
of  the  manor,  but  the  namci  of  Hugh'i 
d.iughtcn  are  given  as  llawisia,  Lora, 
Cecilia  and  Joan.  The  names  in  the 
inquisition  appcir  from  otlier  evidence  to 
be  correct. 

••  Cal.  Inq.  ili,  no.  177. 

*'  Cal.  Inq.  Misc.  Chan,  ii,  no.  445. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1318-23,  p.  289. 

"  i'lac.  de  Quo  H'arr.  (Rec.  Com.), 
54^  ;    Plac.  de  Banco,  no.  570. 

•"  Cal.  Close,  1  341-43,  p.  680. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  East.  40  Edw, 
III. 

•'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xx,  101  ; 
Ivii,  112. 


198 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


FINEDON 


CRtvaTocK.  Barry  ar- 
gent and  azure  three 
wreaths  gules. 


Corbet  was  granted  to  Robert  Burnel,  Bishop  of 
Bath  and  Wells,*^  presumably  as  trustee  of  a  settlement 
on  Margery,  daughter  of  Nicholas  and  wife  of  Ralph 
fitz  William  of  Greystock.*'  The  latter  enfeoffed  his 
son  Robert  and  his  wife  Elizabeth  with  all  his  lands  in 
Finedon.^  Robert  died  seised  in  1315"'  and  his 
widow  was  the  tenant  in  1 334.'''  Their  direct  descen- 
dants in  the  male  line  held  this 
part  of  Finedon  till  the  death 
of  Ralph,  Baron  Greystock,  in 
1487.*"  It  then  passed  to  his 
granddaughter  Elizabeth,  who 
married  Thomas,  Lord  Dacre 
of  Gillesland.**  The  Dacres 
seem  to  have  sold  or  demised 
it  to  James  Harrington,  who 
brought  an  action  for  recovery 
of  the  manor  against  Sir 
William  Dacre.'"  Two  years 
later  Harrington  conveyed  it 
to  Sir  Robert  BrudeneU."  The 
latter  left  it  to  his  son  Anthony,'-  but  it  came  into 
possession  of  Sir  Robert's  eldest  son  and  heir 
Thomas,'^  who  sold  it  in  1542  to  Thomas  Mulsho,''* 
the  lord  of  the  other  moiety  of  Finedon  Manor  (q.v.). 

The  share  in  the  Bolcbec  moiety  of  Finedon, 
assigned  to  Alice,  wife  of  Walter  de  Huntercombe,'* 
was  demised  by  them  to  Master  Giles  de  Barinton, 
who,  presumably  for  his  own  life,  granted  it  to 
Robert  Burnel,  Bishop  of  Bath  and  Wells.'*  The 
latter  died  seised  in  1292  and  his  heir  was  his  nephew 
Philip."  Barinton  was  apparently  holding  it  as 
trustee  for  Amice  de  Shepey,  possibly  the  daughter 
of  Alice  de  Huntercombe,'*  and  when  Philip  Burnel 
died  about  1294,  except  for  a  small  holding,"  it 
was  in  the  hands  of  William  de  Shepey.  In  1 321, 
it  had  passed  to  John  Poleyn  and  his  wife  Amice,*" 
who  had  also  come  into  seisin  of  the  fourth  and  last 
share  of  the  moiety  of  Finedon  manor  (q.v.). 

The  youngest  daughter  of  Richard  Bolebec,  Maud, 
married  Hugh  de  Laval,  who  after  her  death,  gave  her 
pourparty,  during  his  life-time,  to  Robert  Burnel, 
Bishopof  Bathand Wells, who  thus  held  a  quarter  of  the 
manor  of  Finedon.*'  On  the  Bishop's  death,  it  passed 
to  his  nephew  Philip  Burnel.*'-  Hugh  de  Laval  died 
about  1 301  and  his  wife's  share  passed  to  her  nephew 
John  de  Lancaster.*^  The  latter,  however,  only  held 
as  a  mesne  lord,  as  this  share  passed  with  the  other 
eighth  share  held  by  the  Bishop  to  Amice  de  Shepey 
and  William  de  Shepey.**     In  1321,  the  quarter  part 


of  the  manor  had  passed  to  John  Poleyn  and  his  wife 
Amice,**  who  is  said  to  have  been  the  daughter  of 
Amice  de  Lacey,"'  but  she  was  presumably  descended 
from  the  Shcpeys.  In  I412,  a  lady  Poleyn  had  a 
rent  of  10  marks  in  Finedon,*'  but  in  1415,  the  fourth 
part  of  the  manor  had  passed  to  Rose,  the  wife  of 
John  Fish  of  Bishop's  Hatfield.**  Rose  was  a  descendant 
of  the  daughter  of  John  and  Amice  Poleyn.*"  In 
1415,  she  and  her  husband  sold  it  to  William  Sack- 
ville.""  A  hundred  years  later,  it  is  said  to  have  been 
in  the  hands  of  Thomas  Sackville,  who  sold  it  about 
15 15  to  Michael  or  possibly,  more  correctly,  to 
Nicholas  Boughton."  In  1521,  Edward,  the  son  of 
Nicholas  Boughton,  granted  it  to  John  Docwra  and 
Thomas  Sackville."'-  In  1569,  Thomas  Docwra  and 
his  wife  sold  the  quarter  part  of  the  manor  to  Thomas 
Mulsho,^'  who  thus  became  lord  of  all  the  pourparties 
of  the  manor  of  Finedon.  It  should  be  noted, 
however,  that  in  a  Chancery  case  of  1533-38,  John 
Saby  is  said  to  have  been  lord  of  the  manor  of  Fine- 
don,"* while  about  1542,  Gabriel  Shaller  and  Robert 
Plante  and  his  wife  Margaret  sold  a  quarter  part  of 
the  manor  to  William  Franklin,  who  had  been  suc- 
ceeded before  1 579  by  his  son  Nicholas."^  What 
right  these  tenants  had  in  the  manor  does  not 
appear. 

A  manor  called  THINGDEN  and  BURTON 
LATIMER  may  be  traced  in  part  to  two  holdings, 
one  of  half  a  hide  in  Finedon  and  the  other  of  one  and 
a  half  hides  in  Burton  Latimer,  which  Burred  held  in 
the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor.'*  Burred  also  held 
two  hides  and  three  virgates  of  land  in  Burton,  but 
whether  these  formed  part  of  the  later  manor  is  not 
certain."' 

The  three  holdings  passed  to  the  Bishop  of  Cou- 
tances,'*  and  the  first  two  seem  certainly  to  have 
passed  with  much  of  his  Northamptonshire  land  to 
the  Clares,  as  the  manor  was  subsequently  held  by 
knight's  service  of  the  Honour  of  Gloucester.""  In 
1086,  the  bishop's  sub-tenant  in  the  two  small 
holdings  was  named  Richard.'  In  the  Northampton- 
shire survey,  William  de  Houton  held  one  and  a  half 
hides  in  Burton,^  but  the  half  hide  in  Finedon  is  not 
mentioned.  In  1222,  Robert,  son  of  Richard,  granted 
a  messuage  and  27  acres  of  land  in  Finedon  and  rents 
from  7  virgates  of  land  in  Burton  and  Finedon  to  the 
Abbot  of  Croxton  in  frankalmoin.^  In  1250,  this 
grant  was  confirmed  by  Richard,  Earl  of  Gloucester.* 
After  the  dissolution  of  theAbbey,Henry  VIII  granted 
the  manor  of  Thingden  and  Burton  Latimer  in  1539 


••  Cal.  Inq.  vi,  no.  51. 

•«  Ibid.  ;  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec. 
Com.),  545  ;  G.E.C.  Complete  Pierage 
itates  that  Ralph  FitzWilliam  was  the 
iccond  husband  of  Margery  Bolcbec,  but 
this  does  not  »cem  to  be  borne  out  by  the 
two  documents  mentioned. 

•'  Cal.  Inq.  vi,  no.  51. 

"  Ibid. ;    G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

•'  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  545. 

•'  Feetof  F.  Div.  Cos.  Hil.  i8Edw.  Ill  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  48  Edw.  Ill  (ut  nos), 
no.  33  ;  6  Hen.  V,  no.  37  ;  14  Hen.  VI, 
no.  34;  Harl.  Chart  (B.M.),  112  H  52  ; 
G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Ibid. 

'•  Bridges,  Hist,  of  Northants.  cit. 
Dolben  papers,  ii,  250.  "  Ibid. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  Hi,  64 ; 
Fett  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  24  Hen.  VIII. 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),    lii,  64. 

"'  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  34 
Hen.  VIII. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  i,  no.  528. 

"•  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  545. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  iii,  no.  65. 

'•  Amice  may  have  been  one  of  Robert 
Burnel's  illegitimate  children,  of  whom  he 
had  several. 

"  Ibid.  no.  194. 

"  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  545. 

*'  Ibid. ;  Cal.  Inq.  iii,  no.  65  \  iv, 
no.  81. 

"  Ibid,  iii,  no.  65. 

'"  Ibid,  iv,  no.  81. 

'*  Ibid,  iii,  no.  194;  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr. 
(Rec.  Com.),  545. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1 3  18-23,  P-  189. 

"  V.C.H.  Herts,  iii,  63,  64. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  vi,  501. 

199 


««  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  2 
Hen.  V. 

"  y.C.H.  Herts,  loc.  cit. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Mich.  2  Hen.V. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  258. 

"  Ibid. 

•»  Feet  of  F.    Northants.  Trin.  1 1  Elii. 

'*  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  851,  no.  20. 

"■  Chan.  Proc.  (Ser.  ii),  bdle.  68,  no.  24. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants.u  iio. 

•'  Ibid. 

»«  Ibid. 

"  Book  of  Fees,  ii,  p.  937  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  8  Edw.  II,  no.  68  ;  10  Ric.  II,  no  38  ; 
4  Hen.  IV,  no.  4. 

'  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  310. 

»  Ibid.  389. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  6Hen.  III. 

*  Nichols,  Hist,  of  Leicester,  ii,  pt.  t, 
p.  156. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


to  Thomas,  Earl  of  Rutland,  and  his  wife  Elizabeth.' 
In  1555,  his  son  Henry,  Earl  of  Rutland,  sold  it  to 
Richard  Lambert,  citizen  and  grocer  of  London,^  who 
immediately  re-sold  it  to  Edward  Jackman,  a  fellow 
grocer.'  In  1561,  it  was  sold  by  Jackman  to  John 
Isham*  and  in  1564  it  passed  to  Richard  Peacock.* 
Peacock  died  in  1616,  and  the  manor  passed  under  a 
settlement  of  1604,  to  his  cousin  William  Peacock, 
who  was  succeeded  in  1625  by  his  son  Richard.^"  The 
latter  sold  it  in  1659  to  William  Downhall,*'  who  with 
his  wife  sold  it  in  1671'^  to  Thomas  Goodinge.     It 


mentioned  in  1301'*  and  it  seems,  like  the  other  privi- 
leges, to  have  been  divided  amongst  the  holders  of 
the  different  parts  of  the  manor.  It  is  mentioned  in 
the  various  transfers  of  the  manor  and  appears  in 
1720.-" 

Three  mills  are  mentioned  in  Domesday  Book,  but 
presumably  they  were  not  all  at  Fincdon  itself.-"-  In 
the  14th  century  there  was  apparently  only  one  water- 
mill,  divided  up  similarly  as  the  manor,^^  but  in 
1650  and  1661  3  water-mills  and  a  windmill  are  men- 
tioned.-' 


^^..^.•^■> 


1142!  Century  early 
3MiD  H-I!1Ci;ntury(cI350) 
3 182!  Century  c  Modern 


Scale  of  Feet 


Plan  of  Finedon  Church 


passed  about  1673  to  Tanfield  Mulsho,*'  the  lord  of 
the  main  manor  of  Finedon  (q.v.). 

A  market  was  held  at  Finedon  at  the  end  of  the 
13th  century"'*  and  in  1 330,  the  holders  of  the  various 
pourparties  of  the  manor  claimed  to  have  a  view  of 
frank-pledge,  a  market  every  Thursday,  thourtol,  waif, 
infangthief,  together  with  gallows,  tumbril  and 
pillory,  for  their  tenants.  The  right  of  thourtol, 
however,  was  recovered  at  this  time  by  the  Crown."* 
In  the  early  1 8th  century  part  of  the  gallows  was 
still  standing."  A  grant  of  the  right  of  free  warren 
in  his  demesne  lands  was  made  to  Simon  Simeon  in 
1386"  and  is  mentioned  in  1720.'*     A  free  fishery  is 


The  church  of  ST.  MARV-THE- 
CnURCn  VIRGIN  consists  of  chancel  51  ft.  by 
21  ft.,  north  and  south  transeptal 
chapels  31  ft.  by  16  ft.,  clearstoried  nave  of  four  bays 
80  ft.  by  20  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  aisles  about 
14  ft.  6  in.  wide,^''  south  porch,  and  west  tower 
14  ft.  10  in.  by  13  ft.  6  in.,  all  tlicse  measurements 
being  internal.  The  tower  is  surmounted  by  a  lofty 
spire  and  the  porch  has  an  upper  story.  There  is  a 
modern  vestry  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel. 

Of  the  original  12th-century  building  nothing  re- 
mains except  the  font,  the  church  having  been  entirely 
rebuilt  at  the  beginning  of  the  14th  century.     With 


»  L.   and  P.   lien. 

g*5'(43)- 


yjll,    xiv, 
Mil.  ) 


pt.    1 
and 


•  Veet    of  F.  Northanli. 
Ph.  and  Mary. 

'  Ibid.  Trin.  1  and  2  Ph.  and  Mar;. 

•  Ibid.  Eait.  3  F.Iir.. 

•  Ibid.  .Mich.  6  and  7  Elii. 

'•  Chan.    Inf|.    p.m.    (Scr.     ii),    ccccv, 

•57- 

"  Fe<rt  of  F.  Northanti.  Mil.  1659. 
"Ibid.  Mil.  21  .ind  22  Chai.  II. 


"  Exch.  Dcp.  by  Com.  Northants, 
Mich.  27  Chaj.  II,  no. 18. 

"Cat.  Jnj.  iv,  no.  81;  Cal.  Pat. 
1317-21,  p.  255. 

"  Pliu.  de  Quo  Il'arr.  (Rcc.  Com.)  545. 

"  Ilriilj;c»,  /Int.  of  NoTlhanti,  ii,  256; 
cf.  Feet  of  F.  North.iiits.  Mich.  35  Chai.  II. 

"  Cal.  Chart,  v,  304. 

'"  Rfcov.  R.  Trin.  6  Geo.  I,  ro.  217. 

"  Cal.  Inij.  iv,  no.  81. 

•»  Recov.  R.  Trin.  6  Geo.  I,  ro.  217. 

200 


«'  V.C.U.  Noribants.  i,  p.  308a. 

"Cal.  Pat.  1317-21,  p.  285;  Chan. 
Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  lii,  64 ;  Cal.  Inq. 
iv.  no.  81  ;  Feet  of  F.  Northanti. 
Trin.  1 1  Eliz. 

"  Recov.  R.  Eait.  1650,  ro.  91  ;  ibid. 
Eadt.  13  Cbas  II,  ro.  196. 

'*  The  aislci  arc  of  «nci|ual  wi(Uh 
throughout,  the  north  aisle  beini?  wider  at 
the  west  end,  and  the  south  aiale  at  the 
eait. 


FiNEDON  Church  from  the  West 


w 


h 


X 

U 


h 


X 

O 


HUXLOE  HUNDRED 


FINEDON 


the  exception  of  the  tower  and  spire  it  is  all  of  one 
date,  and  is  one  of  the  finest  examples  in  the  county 
of  a  church  of  this  period."  The  tower  and  spire 
were  erected  about  fifty  years  later,  perhaps  shortly 
after  the  appropriation  of  the  church  to  Croxton 
Abbey.  The  whole  building  is  therefore  substantially 
of  one  style  and  it  preserves  a  unity  in  design  which 
gives  it  particular  distinction. 

The  church  is  built  largely  of  dark  local  ironstone, 
but  internally  a  contrast  of  colour  is  obtained  by  the 
use  also  of  light  freestone.  All  the  roofs  arc  leaded 
and  of  low  pitch  behind  battlemented  parapets,  except 
those  of  the  chancel,  which  are  plain.  Internally  the 
walls  are  plastered.  The  vestry  was  built  in  1841  on 
the  site  of  one  long  destroyed  and  the  church  was 
extensively  restored  a  few  years  later. 

The  windows  are  of  two  main  types :  those  of  the 
chancel  and  nave  and  the  end  window  of  the  south 
transept  have  uncusped  elongated  reticular  tracery, 
while  those  of  the  north  transept  and  the  side  windows 
of  the  south  transept  are  composed  of  three  acutely 
pointed  uncusped  lights,  or  gradated  lancets,  under 
a  single  arch,  with  pierced  spandrels.  All  these 
windows,  with  the  exception  of  the  east  window  of 
the  chancel,  are  of  three  lights  with  ogee  heads  and 
hood  moulds,  those  in  the  chancel  and  transepts 
being  in  addition  richly  moulded  and  with  internal 
shafted  jambs.^*  In  the  nave  the  jambs  have  a  double 
hollow  chamfer  only. 

The  chancel  is  divided  into  three  bays  by  boldly 
projecting  buttresses,  and  was  planned  to  carry  a 
vaulted  roof.  The  springing  of  the  ribs  remains  in 
the  corners,  but  the  vault  seems  not  to  have  been 
executed.'^'  The  five-light  east  window  has  un- 
cusped reticulated  tracery  similar  to  that  in  the  other 
windows,  but  with  a  circle  in  the  head,  and  the 
double  jamb  shafts  have  foliated  capitals.  In  the 
eastern  bay  the  south  window  has  been  blocked,  and 
on  the  north  the  wall  was  covered  by  a  vestry,  the 
doorway  to  which  remains,  as  well  as  a  piscina  and 
aumbry  now  within  the  modern  vestry.  The  two 
western  bays  are  lighted  by  windows  on  each  side, 
the  jambshafts  of  which,  except  in  three  instances, 
have  carved  capitals.  In  the  usual  position  in  the 
south  wall  are  a  rectangular  aumbry,  piscina,  and 
triple  sedilia,  exposed  during  the  restoration,^'  the 
piscina  and  sedilia  forming  a  single  composition  of 
four  arches.  The  inner  wall  arcades  of  the  sedilia, 
on  triple  attached  shafts  with  moulded  bases  and 
carved  capitals,  remain,  but  the  front  arcade  and 
canopies  have  been  cut  away.^'  The  priest's  door- 
way, in  the  middle  bay,  is  blocked,  and  further  west 
is  a  large  shallow  recess,  with  a  pointed  arch  on  clus- 
tered shafts,  probably  the  rear  arch  of  a  low-side 
window,*"  the  opening  of  which  no  longer  is  visible 
on  the  outside."-     The  chancel  arch  is  of  two  moulded 


orders  on  triple  shafts,  tlie  capitals  of  which  are 
richly  carved  with  naturalistic  foliage.  A  burial  vault 
vv.is  made  under  the  cast  end  of  the  chancel  about 
1710.^'- 

Thc  nave  arcades  have  arches  of  two  moulded 
orders  on  piers  composed  of  four  shafts  with  hollows 
between  and  responds  of  similar  character  all  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases  and  standing  on  massive 
square  plinths  of  three  courses  of  masonry.^^  The 
two  eastern  piers  are  increased  in  diameter  from 
north  to  south,  being  planned  to  receive  the  spring 
of  transverse  arches  between  the  aisles  and  transepts. 
Their  inner  faces  differ  but  slightly  from  the  piers 
further  west,  but  towards  the  aisle  the  soutliern  pier 
is  elongated  by  the  addition  of  three  smaller  shafts, 
and  its  capital  is  finely  carved  with  naturalistic  foliage 
like  that  of  the  chancel  arch.  The  north  pier  is  simi- 
larly planned,  but  differs  in  detail,  and  the  capital 
has  been  rebuilt.  The  transverse  arches  are  of  two 
moulded  orders  similar  to  those  of  the  nave  arcades, 
and  spring  from  shafted  responds  against  the  aisle 
walls. 

In  course  of  time,  the  transverse  arches  came 
to  exercise  strong  outward  pressure,  against  which 
the  supporting  piers  proved  inadequate  and  the 
expedient  of  a  strainer  arch  across  the  nave  wa» 
adopted.  The  arch  appears  to  be  of  early  15th  cen- 
tury date,  or  of  the  last  years  of  the  14th  century, 
and  consists  of  a  moulded  segmental  pointed  lower 
arch,  springing  from  the  capitals  of  the  greater  piers, 
with  an  upper  single-centred  segmental  inverted 
arch  resting  upon  it.  The  spandrels  are  filled  with 
large  traceried  circles  and  elongated  quatrefoils, 
and  the  inverted  arch  is  richly  decorated  with  a  band 
of  pierced  quatrefoiled  circles  between  embattled 
mouldings,  the  whole  producing  a  very  striking  and 
characteristic  effect,  combining  grace  with  strength. 

The  transepts  project  16  ft.  beyond  the  aisles  and 
have  two  windows  in  the  east  wall,  and  one  in  the 
end  and  west  waOs.  The  south  transept  has  coupled 
buttresses  of  four  stages,  but  on  the  north  the 
buttresses  are  set  diagonially,  as  also  those  of  the 
porch.  There  is  a  rood  stair  turret  north  of  the 
chancel  arch,  the  doorway  to  which  from  the  transept 
is  now  blocked,  a  new  one  having  been  made  outside ; 
the  turret  stair  occupies  the  angle  of  the  transept 
and  chancel,  and  gives  access  to  the  roofs.  There  is 
a  rectangular  aumbry  in  the  east  wall  of  the  north 
transept,  but  no  other  ancient  ritual  arrangements 
remain  west  of  the  chancel.  A  moulded  string  runs 
all  round  the  church  at  sill  level  inside.  There  are 
eight  clearstory  windows  on  each  side,  of  two- 
lights  with  ogee  heads. 

The  north  and  south  doorways  are  in  the  second 
bay  from  the  west,  and  have  continuous  mouldings. 
The  porch  is  vaulted  and  has  an  outer  doorway  of 


**  A  resemblance  between  the  windowi 
at  the  west  end  of  Acton  Burnell  church, 
Salop,  built  by  Bishop  Burnell  before  1290, 
and  those  of  the  transept!  at  Finedon,  hat 
led  to  the  surmise  that  the  rebuilding  of 
Finedon  church  may  be  due  to  the 
Bishop's  nephew  and  successor  Philip 
Burnell,  and  that  he  may  have  inherited 
his  uncle's  munificence  and  taste  in  archi- 
tecture. G.  A.  Poole  in  Cbs.  Arcbd. 
Nortbampi.  141. 

**  Except  the  west  window  of  the  south 
transept,  which  has  moulded  jambs  only, 


the  shafts  are  of  octagonal  section  and  have 
moulded  (or  carved)  capitals  and  bases. 

"  The  plaster  has  been  removed  in  part 
from  the  north  and  south  walls  in  order 
to  show  the  line  of  the  wall  ribs. 

"  On  the  removal  of  the  painted  deal 
wainscot  which  lined  the  whole  of  the 
chancel  walls.  Bridges  says  there  were 
'long  forms  on  each  side  adjoining  to  the 
wainscot.'  There  was  also  a  '  high 
rcrcdo!  which  concealed  more  than  half 
the  east  window  ' :  Cbi.  Arcbd.  Norlhampt. 
140. 

201 


"  Probably  when  the  wainscotting  wai 
erected. 

'"  An.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps,  xxix,  41 1. 

"  The  external  arch  had  been  removed 
by  the  rector  before  the  restoration,  and 
used  in  the  stair  tuiret  of  the  porch. 

"  Bridges,  Hut.  oj  Northanis,  ii,  260. 
First  used  for  the  burial  of  John  Dolben, 
son  of  the  Archbishop  of  York,  who  died 
29  May,  17 10. 

••  The  plinths  measure  4  ft.  by  3  ft. 
10  in.  OD  plan. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


three  moulded  orders,  the  two  inner  springing  from 
attached  shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases. 
The  chamber  over  measures  internally  1 1  ft.  3  in. 
by  9  ft.  6  in.,  and  is  lighted  on  the  south  by  a  tran- 
somed  window  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  quatrefoil 
in  the  head,  and  there  was  also  a  window,  now  blocked, 
at  the  north  end  opening  to  the  church.  The  original 
stairway  from  the  aisle  is  blocked,  access  to  the  cham- 
ber being  by  an  external  stair  turret  at  the  north-east 
corner,  added  in  1794,^  the  doorway  to  which,  as 
already  stated,  was  removed  from  the  chancel  and 
placed  here  about  1841.  The  porch  chamber  contains 
a  collection  of  about  a  thousand  books  given  to  the 
church  in  1788  by  Sir  John  Dolben.^ 

The  tower  is  of  four  stages,  with  moulded  plinth 
and  coupled  buttresses  well  set  back  from  the  angles 
and  finishes  with  a  battlemented  parapet,  the  height 
to  the  top  of  which  is  76  ft.  There  is  a  vice  in  the 
north-west  corner.  The  tower  was  built  clear  of 
the  church  and  afterwards  joined  up  to  the  nave, 
the  length  of  which  was  thus  extended  by  about  5  ft. 
The  west  doorway  has  continuous  mouldings  and 
ogee  crocketed  hoodmould,  flanked  by  pinnacles, 
and  above  it  is  a  three-light  window  with  reticulated 
tracery.  The  two  lower  stages  are  blank  on  the  north 
and  south  sides,  but  in  the  third  stage  is  a  window 
of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  quatrefoil  in  the  head, 
breaking  an  ornamental  panelled  band  composed 
of  trefoiled  triangles  arranged  alternately  with  the 
base  and  apex  uppermost.  The  bell-chamber  stage 
is  slightly  recessed,  the  angles  of  the  tower  above 
the  buttresses  forming  plain  pilasters.  The  lofty 
double  windows  are  of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  a 
quatrefoil  in  the  head  and  have  separate  hoods  ;  above 
them  is  a  row  of  quatrefoils,  and  an  elaborate  trefoiled 
corbel  table  supporting  the  parapet.  The  spire  is 
133  ft.  high  above  the  ground,  and  has  ribbed  angles 
and  two  sets  of  lights  on  each  of  the  cardinal  faces. 
It  was  rebuilt  in  1897.  The  tower  arch  is  of  two 
chamfered  orders  which  die  into  the  wall. 

The  12th-century  sculptured  font  has  already  been 
described.^' 

Before  the  restoration  in  1848,  the  nave  and  aisles 
were  filled  with  oak  seats  of  late  15th  or  early  l6th 
century  date,  with  tracery  panelled  ends  and  original 
doors  of  the  same  character.  A  number  of  these 
still  remain,  but  all  the  doors  have  disappeared. 

The  organ  is  in  a  west  gallery  ;  it  was  originally 
built  for  tiiis  position  by  Christopher  Shrider  at 
the  cost  of  Dr.  Dolben  in  1717,  and  the  handsome  case 
remains  unaltered. 

The  lower  part  of  a  stone  chancel  screen  remains, 
but  it  was  so  extensively  restored  in  1858  as  to  be 
practically  of  that  date.  The  upper  or  '  ornamental 
portion  '  was  destroyed  in  1848.'" 

Painted  on  the  plaster  of  the  north  wall  of  the 


tower  is  the  name  '  William  Clifton  clarke  and  sixston 
1686,'  and  six  other  names. 

There  are  eight  bells,  two  trebles  having  been  added 
in  1897  to  a  former  ring  of  six  ;  five  of  these  were 
recast  by  Gillett  and  Johnson,  of  Croydon,  in  191 3. 
The  tenor  is  by  Taylor  and  Co.,  of  Loughborough, 
1875.38 

The  plate  consists  of  a  silver-gilt  cup,  cover  paten, 
flagon  and  breadholder  of  1683.  There  are  also  a 
mother  of  pearl  christening  bowl  and  alms-dish  pre- 
sented by  Sir  John  English  Dolben,  bart. ;  the  sides 
of  the  bowl  are  formed  of  curved  sections  riveted 
together  and  enclosed  by  a  metal  rim,  and  the  dish 
is  of  the  same  character.  Both  appear  to  be  of  foreign 
workmanship.^' 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  (November)  1538-1708,  marriages  (May) 
1539-1705,  burials  (November)  1538-1678;  (ii)  bap- 
tisms and  marriages  1695-1728,  burials  1678-1728; 
(iii)  baptisms  1729-1785,  marriages  1729-1753; 
burials  1729-1784;  (iv)  marriages  1754-1812;  (v) 
baptisms  and  burials  1785-1812. 

There  are  churchwardens'  accounts  1653-82, 
1732-84,  and  1825-32. 

A  lychgate  was  erected  in  1888. 

The  advowson  of  the  church  of 
ADVOWSON  Finedon  was  apparently  held  by 
the  king^"  until  1 241,  when  it  was 
granted  with  the  manor  to  William  de  Forz  and 
his  wife  Christina.*'  It  passed  to  John  de  Burgh, 
who  presented  to  the  rectory  in  1262,''-  but  after  his 
death  his  daughters  and  their  husbands  exchanged 
it  in  1280  with  the  king  for  lands  in  Somerset.*''  In 
1339,  Edward  III  granted  it  to  the  Abbey  of  St. 
Michael  at  Antwerp,  in  consideration  of  the  long 
residence  of  the  king  and  queen  and  the  birth  of  the 
king's  son  Lionel  there. '^  In  1346  the  abbot  obtained 
licence  to  assign  the  advowson  in  frankalmoin  to 
the  Abbey  of  Croxton,  which,  like  Antwerp,  belonged 
to  the  Premonstratensian  order.''^ 

Leave  to  institute  a  vicarage  was  obtained  from 
Pope  Clement  VI  in  1347,  15  marks  a  year  being 
assigned  to  the  vicar.'* 

After  the  dissolution  of  Croxton  Abbey,  the  rectory 
and  advowson  of  the  vicarage  were  held  by  the  lord 
of  the  manor  of  Thingdcn  and  Burton  Latimer  (q.v.), 
till  after  1805.*'  In  1810  the  advowson  of  the 
vicarage  was  in  the  possession  of  Samuel  W.  Paul** 
and  in  1874  of  the  Rev.  George  Woodfield  PjuI. 
It  was  purchased  about  1895  by  Miss  Mackworth 
Dolben  from  Canon  Paul  and  presented  by  her  to 
the  Bishop  of  Peterborough,  who  is  now  patron  of  the 
living.** 

A  chantry  was  founded  by  William  Aston,  but  no 
date  is  recorded,  for  a  priest  to  sing  mass  in  the  church 
of  Thingdcn.     He  received  a  pension  of  7  marks  a 


•*  The  date  it  cut  on  a  itone  iniidc  the 
itaircaie. 

•*  It  includn  a  copy  of  the  great  Bible 
printed  in  1541    by  Edward   Whitchurch. 

••  y.C.II.  Northanti.  ii,  194. 

^  Cbt.  Arch.  Sortbampt.  (1S49),  139. 
The  upper  portion  ii  ihown  in  the  view 
of  Che  interior  of  the  church. 

"The  old  tenor  wat  dated  1613. 
The  five  belli  recast  in  1913  dated  from 
1815.      North,  Ch.  Belli  cf  Norlhanli.  270. 

'•  Markham,  Cb.  Plan  of  Nonbantt. 
115. 


*"  Rot.  Chart.  (Rec.  Com),  p.  192*; 
Rot.  Lilt.  Pat.  i,  p.  103  ;  Cal.  Pal. 
1216-25,  p.  29;  Rot.  Roht.  Groisrtestt 
(Cant,  and  York  Soc),  221. 

"  Cal.  Chart.R.i,p.i6i. 

"  Rot.  Rtc.  Gravetend  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  loi. 

*•  Feet  of  F.  Dlv.  Coi.  Trin.  9  Edw.  I  ; 
Cal.    Pal.    1292-1301,    p.    234;    1317-21, 

P-79;    HJUmo,  P- 117- 
"  Ibid.  133S-40,  pp.  313,  404. 
"Cal.    Pal.    1345-48,    p.    157  J  Valor 

F.ccl.  (Rec.  Com.)iv,  p.  311. 

202 


••  Cal.  Papal  Pelitioni,  1 342-1419, 
p.  128  ;    Cal.  Pat.  1350-54,  p.  18. 

"  /..  and  P.  Urn.  till,  xiv,  pt.  i, 
g.  651  (43);  Feet  of  F.  North.mis.  Ilil. 
I  and  2  Ph.  and  Mary  ;  ibid.  Trin.  1  and  2 
Ph.  and  Mary;  ibid.  Eait.  3  Eliz.  ; 
ibid.  Mich.  6  and  7  Eliz.  \  ibid.  Ilil. 
1659;  ibid.  Mich.  3  Jai.  II;  Initit. 
Bk«.  (P.R.O.)  1615,  1684,  1688,  1757, 
1785;  Priv./lctofParl.^^  Go.  III,c.  44. 

♦«  Inntit.  Bki.  (P.R.O.)  1810. 

♦•  Whellan,  //»(.  0/  Norlhanli.  1874,  p. 
752  ;  inf.  from  Rev.  A.  C.  Bagthaw. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


year.  In  1549,  at  the  dissolution  of  tlic  chantries, 
John  Cotton,  M.A.,  the  incumbent,  was  stated  to  be 
well-learned  and  a  preacher,  who  taught  the  children 
of  the  parish.^  Tlie  chantry  lands  seem  to  have  been 
confiscated,  but  in  1597  Richard  Walter  obtained 
licence  to  found  a  free  school  at  Finedon.^' 

The  Friends'  Meeting  House  was  founded  in  1690, 
and  there  are  also  Wesleyan  and  Wesleyan  Reformed 
chapels  in  the  parish. 

The  Church  Land. — By  an  award 
CHARITIES  pursuant  to  the  Parish  Indosure 
Act  of  1805,  land  containing  nearly 
35  acres  was  awarded  to  the  vicar  and  churchwardens 
for  the  parish  church.  The  land  was  sold  in  1916 
and  the  proceeds  invested  in  ^^2,894  is.  id.  Consols 
producing  (ji  js.  yearly  in  dividends. 

The  Parish  Clerk's  Charity  is  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  27  June,  1916.  The  property  originally 
consisted  of  nearly  an  acre  of  land  known  as  the 
Clerk's  Close.  This  was  sold  in  1916  and  the  proceeds 
were  invested  in  £"]!  os.  lid.  Consols  producing 
£1  l6s.  in  dividends.  The  income  is  payable  to  the 
parish  clerk,  or  if  there  is  no  clerk,  to  the  verger  or 
person  performing  the  clerk's  duties. 

The  parochial  charities  are  administered  by  the 
vicar  and  churchwardens  and  5  other  trustees  in  con- 
formity with  the  provisions  of  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  25  Oct.,  1878.   They  comprise  : 

The  charity  of  Thomas  Harvey,  given  in  13  Eliza- 
beth. 

The  charity  of  Mary  Mulso,  founded  in  1677. 

Joan  Mulso,  who  died  in  1636,  by  her  will  gave  40/. 
a  year  to  the  poor.  This  charge  is  paid  out  of  land 
in  Finedon  belonging  to  the  Ebbw  \'ale  Iron  Co. 

Deborah  Hampton  by  her  will  in  1725  gave  16  acres 
of  land  with  a  messuage  and  premises  for  the  main- 
tenance of  a  poor  maiden. 

Mrs.  Catherine  Whitelock  by  her  will  left  X'°° 
for  the  poor  to  be  paid  after  the  decease  of  her  sister, 
which  happened  in  1813.  This  gift  was  augmented 
by  a  sum  of  ^^20  given  by  Mrs.  Frances  Dolben  and 
the  two  sums  were  invested  in  3  per  cent.  Annuities. 
The  property  now  consists  of  £l^S  ¥■  ^'-  Consols. 

Mrs.  Elizabeth  Whitworth  by  her  will  dated 
28  May,  1810,  gave  a  sum  of  ^^l  is.  yearly  to  be  paid 
out  of  her  land  in  Finedon  to  be  laid  out  in  the  pur- 
chase of  two  gowns  to  be  given  to  the  two  most 
aged,  infirm  and  necessitous  virgins  and  if  no  virgins, 
to  two  widows. 

Juliana  Dolben.  Will  dated  I  June,  1863.  The 
property  consists  of  £()(>6  ip.  \d.  Consols. 


GRAFTON 
UNDERWOOD 

The  gifts  of  Thomas  Harvey  and  Mary  Mulso 
were  invested  in  about  29  acres  of  arable  land  with 
3  cottages  in  Church  Street.  This  land,  together 
with  the  land  belonging  to  Deborah  Hampton's 
Charity,  was  sold  in  1916  and  tlie  proceeds  invested 
in  j^3,6io  14J.  lod.  Consols.  The  3  cottages  were  sold 
in  1924  for  ;^I30.  Of  this  ;^I07  11;.  was  spent  in 
repairs  to  the  cottage  occupied  by  the  Hampton 
pensioner  and  the  residue  invested  in  £'i'i  Is.  %d. 
Consols.  By  an  order  of  the  Charity  Commissioners 
dated  20  March,  1925,  ;{^400  Consols  was  placed 
to  an  investment  account  to  replace  the  cash 
expended. 

The  income  amounts  to  ^£104  i  is.  yearly.  In  1924 
^20  ()s.  was  paid  to  the  Hampton  pensioner,  ^^64  lis, 
was  distributed  in  cash  to  165  recipients,  and  dona- 
tions of  ;^I0  were  made  to  the  Northampton  Hospital 
and  the  Finedon  Nursing  Association. 

Juliana  Dolben,  before-mentioned,  by  her  will  gave 
£10  Consols  to  the  vicar  and  churchwardens  upon 
trust  that  the  income  should  be  applied  in  giving  a 
dinner  and  tea  and  6d.  each  to  12  poor  inhabitants. 

The  charity  of  Ellen  Frances  Julia  Mackworth 
Dolben,  founded  by  her  will  proved  in  Peterborough 
Registry,  20  September,  191 2,  is  regulated  by  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  21  April, 
1914.  The  charity  is  administered  by  the  vicar 
and  the  endowment  consists  of  50  shares  of  £l 
each  in  the  Finedon  Gas  Co.  The  interest,  which 
amounted  to  ^^24  7/.  lod.  in  1924,  is  applied  in 
supplying  milk,  eggs  and  medical  comforts  to  the 
sick  poor.     There  were  46  beneficiaries  in  1924. 

The  Wesleyan  Chapel  and  Trust  Property  is  com- 
prised in  indentures  of  20  November  1822,  10  and  11 
April,  1838,  and  28  February,  1849,  and  the  property 
is  vested  in  a  body  of  trustees  appointed  by  order 
of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  8  October, 
1889. 

The  Independent  Chapel  and  Trust  Property, 
whereof  trustees  were  appointed  by  order  of  the 
Charity  Commissioners,  dated  23  August,  1895,  is 
comprised  in  indenture  of  22  November,  1752,  will 
of  George  Wallis  dated  11  June,  1755,  will  of  John 
Carver  dated  29  April,  1796,  and  indenture  of  11  June, 
1 85 1.  The  property  consists  of  the  chapel  and 
2  cottages  and  a  yard  in  High  Street  and  I  r.  27  p.  of 
land  in  Orchard  Road,  producing  £2^  18/.  id.  yearly. 
The  income  is  applied  towards  the  repairs  of  the 
chapel. 

The  several  sums  of  stock  are  with  the  Official 
Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 


GRAFTON  UNDERWOOD 


Grastone  (xi  cent.),  Grafton  (xii,  xvii  cent.), 
Grafton  Underwood  (xviii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Grafton  Underwood  contains 
1,825  seres.  It  lies  for  the  most  part  between  250  ft. 
and  350  ft.  above  the  ordnance  datum.  The  sub- 
soil is  Great  Oolite,  the  upper  soil  being  clay  and 
gravel  growing  wheat  and  oats.  There  is  a  consider- 
able amount  of  woodland  in  the  northern  part  of  the 
parish   belonging  originally   to   Rockingham    Forest, 


••  Chantry  Ctrtif.  35,  no.  15  ;   I'alor  Eccl.  (Rec.  Com.)  iv,  Jii. 
*^  Col.  S.P.  Dom.  1595-97,  P- 35J- 


from  which  the  name  of  Underwood  is  derived.  The 
chief  woods  are  Grafton  Park  Wood,  Old  Head  Wood, 
Freier  Wood,  besides  Kirtly  Coppice. 

The  village  stands  on  the  by-road  from  Cranford 
to  Brigstock.  There  still  remain  a  few  17th-century 
thatched  stone  houses.  The  Duke's  Arms  Inn  is 
dated  1645,  and  a  gabled  house  in  the  main  street 
1653  ;  on  a  barn  adjoining  the  latter  is  a  panel  in- 
scribed '  R.B.  1676.'  A  stream  runs  through  the 
village.  The  nearest  railway  station  is  at  Cranford 
on  the  Kettering  and  Cambridge  branch  of  the  London 
Midland  and  Scottish  Railway,  2i  miles  from  the 


203 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


village.     The    parish    was    inclosed    in    1777,    by    a 
private  Act  of  Parliament.^ 

In  the  time  of  Edward  the  Confessor, 
MANORS  Achi  held  the  manor  of  GRAFTON 
or  GRAFTON  UNDERWOOD  freely .2 
After  the  Norman  Conquest  it  was  given  to  Robert 
Albus,  who  was  the  tenant  in  1086,  his  three  hides 
of  land  being  held  by  a  sub-tenant  named  Roger.' 
Another  holding  of  half  a  hide  is  mentioned  in  Domes- 
day Book,  when  it  was  held  by  Agemund  of  Eustace 
the  sheriff.*  Both  holdings  apparently  were  granted 
early  in  the  next  reign  to  Richard  de  Humez,^  who 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  William,  constable  of 
Normandy.*  The  latter's  lands  escheated  to  the 
Crown'  and  in  1205  Grafton  was  granted  to  Philip 
of  Worcester.*  In  1217  the  manor  was  granted  to 
Ralph  de  St.  Sampson.^  At  his  death  about  1248, 
it  passed  to  his  daughters  and  heirs,  Brunna,  the  wife 
of  Simon  Maufe,  and  Joan,  the  wife  of  William 
de  la  Bruere.i"  The  manor,  which  was  held  of  the 
king  by  the  serjeanty  of  keeping  a  white  brachet  with 
red  ears,'^^  was  divided  into  two  moieties  at  this 
time.  Brunna's  moiety  passed  to  her  daughter  Joan, 
wife  of  Alan  de  Chartres.^^  Her  son  Roger  and  his 
wife  obtained  licence  in  1335  to  grant  the  manor  to 
his  son  Peter,!'  jj^j  jjj  j^^j  jj^gy  jointly  sold  it  to 
Simon  Simeon,^*  who  settled  it  on  himself  and  his 
wife  Elizabeth  Neville.*^  After  his  death,  she  married 
Sir  John  la  Warre  and  in  1389  it  was  settled  on  them 
and  their  direct  heirs,  but  both  died  without  children 
and  it  presumably  passed  in  1398  to  Thomas  la  Warre, 
his  brother  and  heir  ;i'  its  later  history  does  not  appear, 
but  it  seems  probable  that  it  came  into  the  possession 
of  the  tenantsof  the  other  moiety  of  the  manor  (q.v.). 

Joan,  the  other  co-heir  of  Ralph  de  St.  Sampson, 
and  William  de  la  Bruere  sold  her  moiety  to  William 
de  Lisle  and  his  wife  Mabel  in  or  before  1253." 
William  subinfeudated  the  manor  and  owing  to  the 
subtenant  William  Hanred  being  convicted  of  felony, 
the  mesne  lordship  seems  to  have  been  lost,  although 
in  1330  John,  the  grandson  of  William  de  Lisle,  tried 
to  recover  the  moiety  of  the  manor.'* 

In  1266,  William  de  Lisle  granted  it  to  Richard 
Hanred  and  his  heirs,''  but  Richard  appears  to  have 
granted  it  to  Robert  le  Baud  before  1284.-"  His  son 
William  Hanred  was  hanged  for  felony  in  1295^'  and 
the  king  entered  the  moiety  of  Grafton  manor  and 


granted  it  for  life,  at  a  rent  of  ^^lo  a  year,  to  Thomas 
Brown,  although  the  Crown  should  only  have  held 
it  for  a  year  and  a  day.^^  In  131 1  Simon  le  Baud,  pos- 
sibly che  successor  of  Robert  le  Baud,  obtained  licence 
to  grant  in  fee  to  Thomas  Brown,  a  mill,  land  and  rents 
in  Grafton-'  and  Brown  had  licence  to  grant  the  same 
premises  to  John  le  Bole.-''  In  1313,  the  rent  of  /^lo 
was  granted  to  Jakinet  de  Mareygny,  in  reward  for 
his  good  services^*  and  after  the  death  of  Brown,  the 
moiety  of  the  manor  was  jIso  in  1317  granted  for  life 
to  Jakinet.28  On  his  death  about  1328,  the  rent  of 
£\o  was  granted  for  life  to  Owen  Corder.-'  In  1316, 
however,  Thomas  Brown  had  obtained  leave  to  grant 
7  messuages,  a  mill,  4  virgates  and  8  acres  of  land 
and  certain  rents  to  John  Seymour  and  liis  wife 
Maud.2*  This  probably  represented  the  moiety  of 
the  manor.  John  died  seised  in  1340  and  his  widow 
held  the  lands  for  her  life.^'  They  passed  to  their 
son  John  Seymour^  and  their  grandson,  another 
John  Seymour  held  the  manor  in  1 362.''  He  died  seised 
of  rents  in  Grafton  in  1363,  which  passed  to  his 
brother  and  heir  Thomas,'^  who  was  the  tenant  of 
the  manor  of  Grafton  in  1397."  In  that  year,  he 
settled  the  manor  on  himself  for  life  with  remainder 
to  Thomas  Greene,  son  of  Sir  Henry  Greene,  knt. 
The  final  remainder  was  to  Sir  Henry  Greene  and 
his  wife  Maud  and  the  right  heirs  of  Maud,  which 
suggests  that  she  was  the  heir  of  Thomas  Seymour. 
Thomas  Greene  apparently  died  without  children 
and  the  manor  passed  to  his  brother  John,  who  was 
mentioned  in  the  settlement  of  1397.** 

In  1450,  it  was  held  by  Henry  Greene  of  Drayton, 
the  son  of  John.'*  His  daughter  and  heir  Constance, 
the  wife  of  John  Stafford,  son  of  Humphrey,  Duke  of 
Buckingham,  made  a  settlement  of  the  manor  in 
1469.'*  Their  son  Edward,  Earl  of  Wiltshire,  died 
leaving  no  children  and  the  Greene  property  passed 
to  the  three  surviving  daughters  and  heiresses  of 
Sir  Henry  Vere,  a  nephew  of  Henry  Greene."  The 
eldest  daughter  Elizabeth  married  John,  first  Lord 
Mordaunt,'*  and  their  descendants  obtained,  as  at 
Great  Addington  (q.v.),  all  three  parts  of  the  manor  of 
Grafton."  John  Mordaunt,  the  first  Karl  of  Peter- 
borough, died  seised  of  the  manor  of  Grafton  Under- 
wood in  1644,'"'  but  it  was  apparently  sold  to  Sir  John 
Robinson  in  the  latter  part  of  the  17th  century.  Sir 
John  died  before   1708,  leaving  two  daughters  and 


'  17  Ceo.  III.  c.  107. 

»  V.C.H.  Noribantt.  i,  336*. 

•  Ibid. 

•  Ibid.  350a. 

•  Ibid.  389*. 

•  Red  Bk.  ojf  Exchfq.  (Roll.  Ser.)  129, 
172;  Rol.  Lill.  Claui.  (Rcc.  Com.),  i, 
345*  i    ^0/.  CAar J.  (Rtc.  Com.)  160. 

'  Rol.  Lill.  Claui.  (Rcc.  Com.)  i,  345*. 

•  Ibid.  57*,  345*. 

•  Ibid.  345*,  392*.  In  1228  a  further 
grant  wai  made,  by  which  Ralph  was  to 
hold  Grafton  freely  until  the  king  might 
reitore  it  to  the  hciri  of  William  de 
Humez  or  until  a  peace  wai  made 
{Col.  Chan.  1226-57,  p.  86.) 

'•  Cat.  Chan.  1226-57,  p.  432  ;  Bridge*, 
//ill.  Norihanli.  ii,  233. 

"  Fiud.  Aidi,  iv,  12;  Cal.  Iiuj.  viii, 
no.  278. 

"Cal.  Pal.  1301.7,  p.  418  ;  Bridget, 
op.  cit.  ii,  233. 

"Cat.  Pal.  1334-8,  p.  119J  Ch«n. 
Inq.  p.m.  9  Edw.  MI  (2nd  noi),  no.  30. 


'«  Cal.  Pat.  1340-43,  pp.  270,  334. 

'»  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Trin.  30  Ed.  Ill  ; 
Cal.  Pal.  1381-85,  p.  387. 

'•  C.E.C.  Complete  Peerage;  Feet  of 
F.  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  12  Ric.  II;  ibid,  case 
178,  file  88,  no.  116;  Cal.  Pat.  1388-92, 
p.  1 1  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  22  Ric.  II,  no.  53. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1226-57,  p.  432  ;  Feet  of 
F.  Northants,  45  Hen.  III. 

"Cat.  Pat.  1258-66,  p.  592;  Cat. 
C/ojf,  133033,  p.  70-1. 

'•  Cal.  Pat.  1258-66,  p.  592  J  Ilund.  R. 
(Rec.  Com.)  ii,  7  j    Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12. 

•»  Ibid. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1301-7,  p.  442  ;  Cal.  Close 

'330-33.  P-70-'- 
•■  Ibid. 

■•  Cal.  Pat.  1307-13,  p.  321. 
"  Ibid.  p.  400. 
"  Ibid.  1313-17,  p.  40. 
"  Ibid.  1317-21,  pp.  37,  250. 
"Ibid.  1327-1330,  p.  264  J  Cal.  Close, 

'330-33.  P-  70-1- 
"Cat.  Pat.  i3i3-'7,  P  338. 

204 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  14  Edw.  Ill  (i«t 
nos.),  no.  32  ;    Cal.  Pat.  1341-3,  p.  94. 

•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  23  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  ii 
(i8t  nos.),  no.  76. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East. 
35  Ed.  III. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  36  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  ii 
(lat  nos.),  no.  44. 

"Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  21 
Ric.  II.  •*  Ibid. 

"  Rolls  of  Pari.  (Rcc.  Com.),  v,  195*  ; 
Chart.  R.  27  to  49  Hen.  VI,  no.  38. 

•"  Cal.  Pat.  1467-77,  p.  158. 

>'  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage;  Bridges, 
Hist.  Northants,  ii,  25. 

•»  Ibid. 

••  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Ilil.  31 
Hen.  VIII  ;  ibid.  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  2  and  3 
Ph.  and  Mary;  Northants.  Mil.  3  and  4 
Ph.  and  Mary  ;  Div.  Cos.  Hil.  4  Eliz.  ; 
Northants.  Trin.  10  Eliz.  ;  Northants. 
Hil.  6  Jat.  I  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p  m.  (Scr.  ii), 
cccix,  200. 

"  Ibid,  di,  64. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


IPea^lllllllltJ^'^^ 


heiresses,  Mary  the  wife  of  the  Earl  of  Wemyss  and 
Anne,  afterwards  the  wife  of  Lord  Gowran  ;  Anne 
obtained  both  moieties  of  the  manor.'"  which  de- 
scended to  her  son  John  Fitz  Patrick,  who  was  created 
Earl  of  Upper  Ossory  in  1751.-'-  On  5  April  1748  Jolui 
Fitz  Patrick  sold  the  manor  to  John  second  Duke  of 
Montagu.^^  The  Duke  died  in  the  following  year  and 
the  manor  descended  through  his  daughter,  Mary 
wife  of  George  Brudenell,  Duke  of  Montagu  to  the 
present  Duke  of  Buccleuch,  who  is  now  lord  of  the 
manor.** 

In  1086  woodland  was 
attached  to  the  manor  a 
league  in  length  and  four 
furlongs  in  breadth.'**  The 
manor  was  within  the  Forest 
of  Rockingham,  but  in 
1343  Simon  Simeon  obtained 
licence  to  enclose  his  wood 
there  and  five  years  later  to 
empark  it,  but  he  was  not 
allowed  to  make  a  deer-leap 
in  it.'"  In  1450  Henry 
Greene  obtained  leave  to 
empark  his  woods  called 
Grafton  Park  and  Grafton 
Woods  and  certain  fields 
and  to  have  free  chase  in 
the  woods.*'  The  manor 
was  disafforested  in  1639.''* 

A  mill  is  mentioned  in 
131 1,  when  it  was  granted 
in  fee  with  other  tenements 
to     Thomas     Brown,     the 

tenant  for  life  of  a  moiety  of  the  manor,'"  with  which 
it  was  granted  in  1316  to  John  Seymour.^" 

The  church  of  ST.  JAMES  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  30  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft.  9  in. 
with  north  chapel,  clearstoried  nave  of 
three  bays  32  ft.  6  in.  by  18  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south 
aisles  about  9  ft.  wide,  south  porch,  and  west  tower 
8  ft.  6  in.  square  surmounted  by  a  spire  ;  all  these 
measurements  are  internal.  The  north  chapel  and 
aisle  are  continuous  without  division  and  there  is  a 
small  vestry  north  of  the  tower.  The  width  across 
nave  and  aisles  is  42  ft. 

The  building  is  of  rubble  throughout,  and  the 
roofs  of  the  nave  and  aisles  are  leaded  behind  plain 
parapets ;  the  chancel  has  a  high-pitched  tiled  roof 
with  overhanging  eaves,  and  the  porch  is  also  covered 
with  tiles. 

The  earliest  work  in  the  present  building  is  the 
north  arcade  of  the  nave,  which  is  of  late  12th  century 
date,  at  which  time  an  aisle  was  probably  first  added 
to  an  earlier  church.  The  arches  are  semi-circular 
and  of  two  square  orders,  springing  from  cylindrical 
piers  with  moulded  bases  and  shallow  capitals  with 
square  abaci,  and  from  half-round  responds  with  outer 
angle  shafts.  The  capitals  are  carved  with  bold 
scroll  foliage  and  the  bases  stand  on  square  plinths. 


GRAFTON 

UNDERWOOD 

The  south  arcade  and  the  tower  were  built  early 
in  the  13th  century  and  the  chancel  arch  is  of  the 
same  period,  but  there  are  no  architectural  features 
in  the  chancel  itself  older  tiian  c.  1290.  The  round 
arches  of  the  south  arcade  are  of  two  orders,  the 
outer  square  and  the  inner  chamfered,  springing  from 
cylindrical  piers  of  more  slender  dimensions''"'  than 
those  opposite  with  moulded  bases  and  carved  capitals 
with  circular  abaci  :  the  responds  are  half-octagonal. 
The   capitals    have  elementary  stiff- stalk   trefoils  in 


North  Aisle 

:::.?s::::.::u:::. 

Nave 


:g)  South  Aisle 


□  1212  Century  late;c.H90 

I3S  Century 

I4EJCENTURYC.I34.0 

1512  Century 
E3  Subsequent 

so 


20 


40 


JP 


Plan 


Scale  of  Feet 

OF  Grafton  Underwood  Church 

low  relief  with  nail  head  up  the  middle  leaves,  and 
nail  head  also  occurs  on  the  west  respond.  In  the 
east  respond  the  foliage  is  more  fully  developed. 

About  the  middle  of  the  14th  century  alterations 
were  made  to  the  chancel,  and  the  chapel  added.  The 
spire  also  dates  from  this  period,  and  the  south 
aisle  seems  to  have  been  rebuilt.^'-  The  aisle  has  a 
string  course  at  sill  level  and  retains  its  west  window 
and  south  doorway,  in  front  of  which  the  porch  was 
built.  New  windows  were  inserted  in  both  aisles  in 
the  15th  century  and  the  clearstory  was  added,  or 
an  old  one  rebuilt. 

The  chancel  has  diagonal  angle  buttresses  and  an 
east  window  of  four  cinquefoiled  lights,  with  transom 
and  excellent  tracery  of  mixed  geometrical  and 
curvilinear  character,  the  date  of  which  may  be 
c.  1340.  The  two-light  window  at  the  east  end  of 
the  north  wall  and  the  three-light  window  opposite 
are  of  the  same  period,  the  former  with  trefoiled  lights 
and  quatrefoil  in  the  head,  the  latter  with  reticulated 
tracery.  The  plain  priest's  doorway  is  of  the  late 
13th  century  and  west  of  it  is  a  contemporary  window 
of  two  trefoiled  lights  and  plain  circle  in  the  head, 
which  seems  to  have  been  re-used  in  the  14th-century 
alterations,  its  jambs  being  of  that  period.''^  In  the  east 
wall,  north   and   south   of    the    altar,   are    elaborate 


*' Bridgei,  op.  cit.  ii,  233;  Recov.  R. 
Hil.  7  Annf,  ro.  125. 

*•  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

*•  Inf.  from  Messrs.  NicboU  Mani^ty  and 
Co.  "  See  WarVton,  p.  254  below. 

"  V.C.H.Northanu.\,-ii(>b. 

"Col.  Pat.  1343-45,  P-  **>  ''''''• 
1348-50,  p.  57. 


"  Chart.  R.  27  to  49  Hen.  VI,  no.  38  ; 
Rolls,  of  Pari.  (Rec.  Com.)  v,  195*. 

"  Pat.  R.  15  Chas.  I,  pt.  10. 

*•  Cal.  Pal.  1307-1313,  pp.  321,  400. 

•"  Ibid.  1313-17,  p.  338. 

**  They  arc  20  in.  diam.  and  7  ft.  10  in. 
to  the  top  of  the  capital.     In  the  north 

205 


arcade  the  diam.  is  :i  in.  and  the  height 
7  ft.  6in. 

*■  And  perhaps  widened  :  its  width  at 
the  west  end  is  9  ft.  8  in.,  that  of  the  north 
aisle  8  ft.  loin. 

•'  They  have  a  double  hollow  chamfer, 
similar  to  the  window  at  the  west  end  of 
the  south  aisle. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


14th-century  niches,  that  on  the  north  (which  is  the 
larger)  having  a  smaller  trefoiled  niche  over  it.  At 
the  extreme  east  end  of  the  south  wall,  about  6  ft. 
from  the  floor^''  is  a  curious  squint,  or  small  opening 
of  two  trefoiled  lights  cut  out  of  a  single  stone, 
similar  in  many  respects  to  one  at  Weekley,  the  purpose 
of  which  cannot  be  definitely  stated.^*  The  14th- 
century  triple  sedilia  have  cinquefoiled  ogee  heads 
beneath  a  rectangular  traceried  canopy  and  are  on 
the  same  level :  the  piscina  has  a  fluted  bowl  and 
trefoiled  ogee  head.  In  the  north  wall  is  a  rectangular 
aumbry  with  modern  door,  and  further  west  the 
wall  is  pierced  by  a  broad  chamfered  arch  opening  to 
the  chapel,  the  floor  of  which  is  raised  three  steps. 
The  13th-century  chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  inner  springing  from  corbels  with  nail- 
head  in  the  upper  mouldings.  The  lower  panels  of 
15th-century  oak  screens,  with  carved  rails,  remain 
below  the  chancel  arch  and  between  the  north  aisle 
and  chapel. 

The  plain  13th-century  north  doorway  is  now 
blocked,  and  both  windows  in  the  north  wall  (to  aisle 
and  chapel)  are  three-light  15th-century  insertions. 
The  east  window  of  the  chapel  is  square-headed  and 
of  three  trefoUed  lights.  The  south  aisle  has  a  15th- 
century  east  window  and  another  in  the  south  wall, 
both  of  three  lights,  but  the  older  west  window  is  of 
two  trefoiled  lights  with  a  quatrefoil  in  the  head. 
The  13th-century  piscina  of  the  aisle  altar  remains  ; 
it  has  a  fluted  bowl  and  plain  pointed  head.  The 
south  doorway  is  of  two  hollow  chamfered  orders  with 
stops  above  the  imposts  and  mas';  terminations  to 
the  hood.  The  porch  is  of  unusual  depth,  measuring 
internally  15  ft.  from  north  to  south,  by  8  ft.  6  in. 
wide,  and  has  an  outer  arch  of  two  chamfered 
orders,  the  inner  springing  from  attached  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The  clearstory  windows 
are  square-headed  and  of  two  trefoiled  lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  stages  marked  by  strings,  and 
has  plain  parapets  with  big  gargoyles  in  the  middle 
of  each  face,  but  no  pinnacles.  The  lower  stage  has 
early  lancets,  widely  splayed  inside,  on  the  west  and 
south,  the  heads  in  one  stone  and  without  hoods. 
In  the  second  stage  there  is  a  tall  narrow  round-headed 
opening  on  the  south,^*  but  the  north  and  west  sides 
are  blank.  The  bell  chamber  windows  are  of  two 
lights,  those  on  the  west  and  east  being  unaltered 
13th-century  openings  with  solid  tympanum  and 
hood  ;  the  north  and  south  windows  have  14th- 
century  heads  of  two  trefoiled  lights  and  quatrefoil 
above.  The  13th  century  tower  arch  is  of  two  square 
orders  with  imposts,  the  inner  order  resting  on  conical 
corbels.  A  buttress  has  been  added  at  the  south-west 
corner  of  the  tower,  and  a  modern  doorway  in  the 


south  wall  blocked.  The  spire  is  of  the  '  stone-timber ' 
type,  with  broaches  behind  the  parapet,  like  that  of 
Denford  :  it  has  plain  angles  and  two  sets  of  lights  on 
the  cardinal  faces,  w^ith  a  band  below  the  lower  lights. 

The  vestry  seems  to  be  a  comparatively  modern 
addition,  but  in  its  west  wall  is  a  small  early  13th 
century  window,  probably  taken  from  the  north  side 
of  the  tower,  against  which  it  is  built. 

Two  lead  rain  water  heads  on  the  north  clearstory 
are  dated  1758. 

The  font  has  a  plain  13th-century  bowl  with  curved 
sides,  and  a  flat  Jacobean  oak  cover  with  knob  handle. 

The  panelled  oak  pulpit  is  dated  1728. 

In  the  chancel  is  a  marble  wall  monument  com- 
memorating Richard  Fitzpatrick,  Baron  Gowran 
(d.  1727),  his  wife  Ann  Robinson  (d.  1744),  their  son 
John,  Earl  of  Upper  Ossory  (d.  1758)  and  his  wife 
Evelyn  Leveson-Gower  (d.  1763)  ;  also  John,  2nd 
Earl  of  Upper  Ossory  (d.  1818)  and  his  wife  Ann 
Liddell  (d.  1804)  ;  they  are  all  buried  'in  this  vault.' 
Another  monument  is  to  the  Rev.  William  Bidwell, 
rector  (d.  1794).  In  the  north  chapel  is  a  table  tomb 
with  modern-media'val  brass  to  Lady  Gertrude 
Fitzpatrick,  who  died  30  September,  1841,  and  on  the 
waU  a  monument  to  Lady  Anne  Fitzpatrick,  who  died 
14  December  in  the  same  year. 

There  are  five  bells,  the  treble,  second  and  tenor 
by  John  Taylor  &  Co.,  Loughborough,  1923,  and  the 
third  and  fourth  by  Matthew  and  Henry  Bagley, 
dated  1682." 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  and  paten  without 
marks  but  inscribed  '  1664,'  an  almsdish  of  1690,  a 
bread-holder  of  1704  and  a  flagon  of  1836.^* 

The  registers  begin  in  1538. 

The  advowson  of  the  church  of 
ADVOWSON  Grafton  Underwood  was  given  to 
the  alien  priory  of  St.  Fremont  in 
Normandy,  probably  by  Richard  or  William  de 
Huniez.^"  The  temporalities  of  the  priory  were  seized 
by  the  crown  during  the  Hundred  Years  War  and 
presentations  were  made  by  the  crown  from  1337  to 
1413.''''  In  1389  or  1390,  the  prior  of  St.  Fremont 
had  granted  the  advowson  to  the  Carthusian  priory 
of  Beauvale,  in  Nottinghamshire,  although  the  grant 
could  not  take  practical  effect  as  the  king  had  leased 
the  rectory  in  1382  to  Walter  Malet  and  again  in  1399 
to  Robert  Hastings.®'  In  1464,  however,  Edward  IV 
granted  the  advowson  to  Beauvale,  but  it  does  not 
appear  amongst  its  possessions  at  the  Dissolution  of 
the  monasteries.''^  It  seems  to  have  come  into  the 
possession  of  the  heirs  of  Henry  Vere,*'  between  whose 
heirs  the  manor  (q.v.)  was  divided  and  finally  passed 
to  the  Mordaunts."  It  followed  the  descent  of  the 
manor*''''  and  in  1874  Lord  Lyveden  was  patron  of  the 


**  The  height  of  the  sill  from  the  ground 
outiide  ii  8  ft. 

**  The  opening  bclongi  to  a  category 
lomctimcs  ttylcd  'high  lide  windowi.' 
It  iplayi  intcrn.illy  to  ii  in.  and  com- 
mandi  the  louth  niche  and  the  altar. 
The  itonc  in  which  it  is  cut  measures 
20  in  by  iz  in  :  the  lights  are  4  in.  wide 
by  14I  in.  high.  Inside,  the  opening  is 
rectangular  and  goes  right  back  to  the 
east  end  of  the  chancel.  The  sill  is  very 
•loping.     All.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep.  xxix,  415. 

**  The  head  is  new. 

"  There  were  formerly  four  bells,  all 
by  M,  and  II.  Bagley,  1682  j    in  1923  a 


treble  was  added,  and  two  of  the  old  bells 
recast.  The  bells  were  rehung  in  1924, 
a  pit  being  left  for  another  treble.  The 
inscriptions  on  the  old  belli  are  given  in 
North,  Ch.  nelts  of  Nortbanls.  279,  but 
not  in  their  right  order. 

"  M.irkham,  Cb.  Plate  0/  Noribanti. 
135.  The  almsdish  was  given  in  1854 
by  Robert  Vernon  Smith,  afterwards 
Lord  Lyveden,  and  his  wife  ;  the  bread- 
holder  was  app.ircntly  a  domestic  salver. 

"  Rot.  Rob.  Groiiileiti  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  213. 

•"  Cat.  Pal.  1334-8,  p.  521  ;  1348-50, 
PP'    374.    470.    5'»i    '358-6'i    P-    16 1  ; 

206 


1391-96,  pp.  204,  212;  i40'-5^  P-  270; 
1413-16,  p.  18. 

"'  Ibid.  1461-67,  p.  155. 

'^^  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  vi,  14. 

'*  I'ret  of  F.  Northants,  Ilil.  3  .ind  4 
Ph.  .ind  Mary  ;  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  4  Elii.  ; 
Northants.  Trin.  lo  Elir.  ;  I'ai.  R. 
3  and  4  Ph.  and  Mary,  pt.  6. 

"  I'cct  of  !•'.  Norlhanls.  Ilil.  6  Jas.  I  ; 
Trin.  8  Chas.  1  ;  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  i  and 
2  Jas.  II;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii) 
cccix,  200;  Instit.  Bks.  (I'.R.O.)  1621, 
1641,  1649. 

"Ibid.  1667,  1742,  1794;  Recov.  R. 
Ilil.  7  Anne,ro.  125. 


IP*' 


Grafton  U.NutRwuoD  Church  trom   iiit  East 


Grafton  UNotRwoou  Chukcii  :    Tut  iNTtKioR,  looking  East 


iissffUff'^--*- 


-.«-^. 


Iri  Mi.iNGBOROLi.il  :    'I'lii    Marki-  I'  Cross 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED        irthlingborough 


church.**    About  1918  he  sold  the  advowson  with  the 
Fermyn  Woods  estate,  to  Mr.  Robert  Davidson. 

The  church  land  consists  of  3  a. 
CHARITIES  3  r.  37  p.  at  Grafton  Underwood  let 
to  Mr.  W.  Palmer  at  £6  yearly.  The 
income  is  applied  by  the  rector  and  churchwardens, 
agreeably  to  immemorial  usage,  to  the  expenses  of  the 
church. 

The  Poor's  Land  has  been  appropriated  time  out 
of  mind  to  the  use  of  the  poor.  It  consists  of  9  a. 
I  r.  17  p.  in  the  parish  of  Geddington  and  is  let  to 
Henry  Smith  at  ^^lo  yearly.     In  1905  a  sale  of  timber 


took  place  and  the  proceeds  were  invested  in 
£}\  14J.  4<^.  Consols,  producing  15^  8J.  yearly  in 
dividends.  The  income  is  distributed  in  bread  and 
meat    by    the   rector    and    churchwardens    to   about 

5  recipients. 

By  her  will,  proved  19  September,  1856,  Elizabeth 
Dopping  Arnold  gave  /jioo  Consols  to  the  rector  and 
churchwardens  for  the  benefit  of  6  poor  families. 
The   income  amounting  to  £z  ioj.  is  distributed  to 

6  families  in  bread,  meat  and  clotliing. 

The  stock  is  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable 
Funds. 


IRTHLINGBOROUGH 


Erdeburne,  Erdinburne  (xi  cent.),  Yrlingbure, 
Irtlingburg,  Irtlibure,  Urtlingburch  (xii  cent.), 
Yrthingburia,  Irelingburg,  Irtlingburgh  (xiii  cent.), 
Hertillingborogh  (xiv  cent.),  Artleborough  (xvi,  xvii, 
xviii  cent.),  Itchingborovve  (xvii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Irthlingborough  comprises  3,676 
acres,  of  which  about  half  is  arable  and  half  under 
grass.  It  lies  in  the  bend  of  the  River  Nene,  which 
forms  its  eastern  and  southern  boundaries,  while  the 
Ise,  a  tributary  of  the  Nene,  is  its  western  boundary. 
The  land  rises  northward  and  westward  from  the  river, 
reaching  260  ft.  at  Crow  Hill  near  the  confines  of  Little 
Addington.     The  soil  is  clay,  iron-  and  limestone. 

Until  the  latter  part  of  the  l6th  century  Irthling- 
borough formed  two  parishes,  the  one  with  its  church 
of  St.  Peter  standing  in  the  village  on  the  south  side 
of  me  main  road,  and  the  other  with  its  church  of 
All  Saints  about  a  quarter  of  a  mile  east  of  St.  Peter's. 
The  site  of  this  church  is  in  a  field  overlooking  the 
Nene  on  the  south-west  of  the  road  to  Higham  Ferrers, 
near  the  manor  house,  which  was  probably  the  manor 
house  of  the  BataiUe  fee  to  which  the  church  was 
attached.  As  early  as  1428*  there  were  only  eight 
parishioners,  and  in  1562  the  church  is  said  to  have 
been  '  dcvasted  and  in  utter  ruin.'  Sir  William 
Cecil,  being  in  want  of  lead  for  the  roof  of  Burleigh 
House,  was  informed  that  the  parishioners  of  All 
Saints  were  '  otherwise  sufficiently  provided  of  a 
church,'  and  that  the  Dean  of  Peterborough,  who  had 
been  approached,  declared  the  lead  on  the  church  was 
worth  ;^io,  and  no  one  should  have  it  except  Cecil.' 
In  1570,  after  an  episcopal  visitation,  the  church- 
wardens were  admonished  regarding  the  state  of  the 
church.  The  glass  windows  were  broken  '  that  20 
nobles  will  not  make  them  sufficient,'  two  altars  were 
half  standing  and  '  not  pulled  down  as  they  ought,' 
there  was  '  much  superstition  which  would  grieve  any 
man  to  come  to  '  and  the  churchyard  was  '  in  con- 
fusion.' The  churchwardens  were  ordered  to  certify 
that  the  repairs  had  been  made.*  Probably  no  repairs 
were  carried  out,  and  the  church  at  this  time  fell  into 
complete  ruin,  although  the  fragment  of  a  gravestone, 
bearing  the  date  1670,  found  on  the  site,  may  indicate 
thai  the  churchyard  was  in  use  until  the  close  of  the 
1 7th  century.  The  church  had  been  pulled  down  long 
before  Bridges  wrote  {d.  1724),  though  considerable 


remains  of  it  then  existed,  built  into  a  house.  In  1849 
only  the  foundations  of  the  eastern  and  northern  walls 
could  be  made  out,  and  from  them  it  was  considered 
that  the  church  was  smaller  than  that  of  St.  Peter's. 
The  foundations  are  now  only  discernible  for  a  few  feet. 
The  village  clusters  round  the  road  from  Higham 
Ferrers  to  Kettering  where  it  is  crossed  by  the  by-road 
from  Wellingborough  to  the  Addingtons  and  Wood- 
ford. The  former  road  crosses  the  River  Nene  to  the 
east  of  the  village  by  Irthlingborough  Bridge,  which 
was  built  probably  in  the  14th  century.  It  consists  of 
ten  ribbed  arches  of  three  chamfered  orders  with  five 
refuge  cutwaters  on  the  down-stream  side  and  three 
further  cutwaters  at  the  south  end  weathering  back 
below  the  parapet.  One  of  the  cutwaters  bears  the 
date  1668  denoting,  probably,  the  time  of  some  repair. 
The  bridge  was  widened  on  the  up-stream  side  in  1754 
by  the  addition  of  semicircular  brick  arches  which  are 
advanced  nearly  to  the  front  of  the  old  cutwaters*  ; 
on  a  stone  of  one  of  these  cutwaters  are  the  arms  of 
Peterborough  Monastery.  The  refuges  above  on  this 
side  have  been  destroyed.  The  bridge  was  repaired 
in  1922.  The  expense  of  the  repairs  of  this  bridge, 
and  that  at  Ditchford  at  the  south  of  the  parish,  was 
formerly  borne  jointly  by  Irthlingborough  and  Higham 
Ferrers. 

The  market  cross  stands  at  the  junction  of  the  two 
main  reads.  It  is  of  late  1 3th  century  date  and  consists 
of  a  calvary  of  seven  octagonal  steps^  with  a  shaft 
splayed  from  a  square  base  to  form  an  irregular 
octagon,  on  each  face  of  which  at  unequal  distances  are 
carved  ballfiowers  resembling  crockets.  The  capital 
is  carved  with  trefoil  foliage  and  is  surmounted  by  a 
square  abacus  set  diagonally  to  the  base.  The  cross 
was  restored  in  1925  by  H.M.  Office  of  Works. 
Bridges  states  that  '  the  stafT  '  of  the  cross,  in  height 
13  ft.,  was  used  as  a  standard  for  the  pole  to  measure 
the  '  parts  or  doles  on  the  meadows.'* 

A  house  at  the  west  end  of  the  main  street  is  dated 
1624,  but  very  few  old  buildings  remain  in  the  town. 
On  a  small  two-storied  house  in  Gosham  Street  is  a 
panel  inscribed  : 

WILLIAM    TRIGC 
BUILT  THIS    HOUSE 
FOR    TWO    WIDOWS 
ANNO    DOM.    1724 


"  Whellan,  Hist,  of  Noribanu.  Thomai 
Harper  preiented  in  1692  prctumably 
'  pro  hac  vice '  (Initit.  Bki.  (P.R.O.) 
1692). 

'  Ftud.  Aidi,  IT,  52. 


•  Nortbantj,  A',  and  Q.  vi,  201. 

•  Ibid.  (New  Ser.)  ii,  175. 

•  Ibid   i,  91  ;   ii,  26,  42,  136. 

'  There  are  leven  iteps  on  one  side  and 
eight  on  the  other,  the  lower  itep  being 

207 


divided  into  two  on  the  south  side  and 
raised  high  above   the  road  :  Asi.  Arch. 
Soc.  Reps,  xxiii,  179. 
•  Bridges,  Hill.  Norlbanli.  ii,  235. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


In  1630  there  is  mention  of  a  meadow  called '  Towne 
Hulme  '  probably  part  of  the  common,  the  tenants 
of  which  and  those  of  the  King's  meadow  in  Higham 
Ferrers  had  to  maintain  the  ditch  between  them.  An 
Act  for  inclosing  lands  in  the  parish  was  passed  in 
1808.' 

Boot  and  shoemaking  has  been  the  principal  industry 
in  the  parish  for  a  long  time.  There  are  also  iron 
works. 

IRTHLINGBOROUGH  may  have 
MJXORS  been  included  in  Edgar's  grant  of  Ketter- 
ing (q.v.)  to  the  abbot  and  convent  of 
Peterborough.  In  1086  the  abbey  held  there  five 
hides  and  one  virgate.'  The  survey  of  the  abbey's 
land  made  between  112*5  ^"^  nzS  states  that  two 
hides  were  in  demesne,  that 
three  villeins  and  ten  half- 
villeins  held  I  hide,  the  priest 
one  virgate  and  two  socmen 
one  bovate  and  a  half,  that 
there  were  two  cottars,  and 
that  one  hide,  less  half  a  vir- 
gate, lay  vacant.  Further,  the 
socmen  of  Irthlingborough 
were  said  to  hold  one  hide, 
one  virgate  and  one  bovate 
and  to  owe  knights'  service. 

The  Northamptonshire  Sur- 
vey gives  the  land  of  the  abbey's  fee  in  Irthlingborough 
as  five  and  a  half  hides  and  one  small  virgate.*  A 
charter  of  Pope  Eugenius  III  of  1146*"  and  royal 
charters  of  1189,11  1227I-  and  13321^  confirmed 
their  holding  in  Irthlingborough  to  the  abbot 
and  convent.  Abbot  Martin  de  Bee  (1135-SS) 
assigned  the  profits  of  Irthlingborough  to  the  work 
of  the  sacristy  ;!'•  Abbot  Walter,  of  Bury  St.  Edmunds 
(1233-45),  built  there  a  new  byre  and  new  stables  ;i^ 
and  Abbot  Godfrey  of  Crowland  (l 299-1 321)  inclosed 
the  right  side  of  the  manor  with  a  new  stone  wall  and 
new  gates  in  front  of  the  hall,  the  former  wall  being 
in  ruins.*"  Officials  of  the  abbey  must  have  stayed 
in  the  hall  from  time  to  time,  and  in  1281  it  sheltered 
the  Bishop  of  Lincoln.*'  In  1321-2,  there  was  a  capital 
messuage,  and  the  demesne  included  70  acres  of  arable 
land,  21  acres  of  meadow,  and  pasture  of  the  annual 
value  of  6s.  Sd. ;  seven  free  tenants  rendered  10/.  6J. 
a  year,  twenty-three  customary  tenants  held  virgates 
of  land  and  were  bound  to  do  tillage,  weeding, 
reaping  and  harvesting  on  46  acres  of  the  demesne, 
and  to  till  the  remaining  24  acres.  Further,  for  each 
virgate,  they  had  to  supply  a  man  for  a  day  in  every 
week  in  the  year,  except  at  Christmas,  Easter,  and 
Whitsuntide,  or  render  \il.  for  each  day's  work  of  one 


Peterborough    Abdev. 
Gules  two  CTOised  krys  or. 


The  manor  continued  in  the  possession  of  Peter- 
borough Abbey  until  the  Dissolution.** 

In  1542  the  manor  of  Irthlingborough  was  granted 
to  the  Jean  and  chapter  of  Peterborough,^"  who  are  still 
lords. 

Hugo  Candidus  states  that  when  Thorold,  Abbot 
of  Peterborough  (1069-88),  distributed  land  in  knights' 
fees,  because  he  desired  defenders  against  Hereward 
the  Wake,  he  made  two  fees  in  Irthlingborough.-*  In 
1086,  however,  four  knights  held  there  of  the  abbot 
five  hides,  less  one  virgate."  In  the  middle  of  the 
ne.\t  century  these  knights'  fees  were  apparently  repre- 
sented by  3  J  hides  held  by  Reginald  de  la  Bataille,  and 
one  hide  by  Simon  Basset  of  the  Avenel  fee.^^  These 
holdings  were  included  in  the  confirmatory  charters 
granted  to  the  abbey  by  Eugenius  IIl,^*  Richard  I,^^ 
Henry  III,"^  and  Edward  III.2' 

With  regard  to  the  BATAILLE  FEE,  there  appears 
to  have  been  some  doubt  whether  it  was  held  directly 
of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  or  of  the  Bassingbourne 
fee,  which  was  held  of  the  abbot.-^  Reginald  de  la 
Bataille  seems  to  have  been  succeeded  by  William  de  la 
Bataille  (de  Bello),  who  held  land  in  Irthlingborough 
in  1179"*  and  in  1189  he,  with  Richard  del  Peak,  held 
3  knights'  fees  in  Irthlingborough  and  Addington. 
William  de  la  Bataille  in  1214  claimed  the  advowson  of 
the  church  of  All  Saints,'"  and  in  the  middle  of  the 
13th  century  Robert  de  la  Bataille  held  ij  knights'  fee 
in  Irthlingborough,  Addington  and  Woodford.'*  In 
1 3 16-17  Henry  de  Drayton  conveyed  a  manor  of 
Irthlingborough  to  Simon  de  Drayton  probably  in 
settlement.'-  Simon  held  it  of  the  fee  of  Bataille" 
and  in  1 327  obtained  a  grant  of  free  warren  over  his 
lands  there.**  In  1353  he  conveyed  the  manor  to 
John  Pyel,  citizen  and  mercer  of  London,'*  whose 
widow  Joan,  at  his  desire,  founded  the  college  of 
Irthlingborough  in  1388.'*  The  manor  passed  to 
Nicholas  Pyel,  who  did  homage  to  the  abbot  of 
Peterborough  in  1399."  He  married  Elizabeth 
Gorge  and  died  in  1402-3.  He  is  said  to  have  had  a 
son  John,  who  was  succeeded  by  Elizabeth,  probably 
his  daughter.  Elizabeth  married  Sir  William  Huddle- 
ston  and  on  her  death  the  manor  passed  to  her  son, 
Henry  Huddleston,  who  at  his  death  in  1488  be- 
queathed it  to  his  daughter  Elizabeth,  wife  of  Thomas 
Cheyney,  but  failing  heirs  of  her  body  it  was  to  be 
devoted  to  the  salvation  of  his  soul  and  the  souls  of 
his  parents  and  ancestors.'*  Sir  Thomas  Cheyney  and 
others,  in  151 1,  obtained  licence  to  grant  to  the  dean 
and  chapter  of  the  collegiate  church  of  Irtlilingborough 
lands  of  the  annual  value  of  £2\?^  These  lands 
probably  went  towards  the  endowment  of  the  two 
additional  prebends  of  the  foundation  of  Lady  Chey- 
ney to  which  reference  is  found  in  1530.'"'    At  the  dis- 


'  Norihanls.  N.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.)  ii, 
117. 

*  y.C.H.  Norlhann.  i,  314A ;  »cc 
alio   Cbron.  Petrcb.  (Camdrn  Soc),   i6'>, 

•  y.C.II.  Norihanls.  i,  388*. 
«'  Sparkc,  llisl.  Corn.  Burg.  Script.  Var. 
(Hugo  Candidui),  78. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  p.  275. 

"  Ibid.  1226-57,  p.  19. 

"  Ibid.  1327-41,  p.  275. 

'«  Sp.irkc,  op.  cit,87. 

'»  Ibid.  120. 

'•  Ibid.  i<;4. 

>'  Cbron.  /•<(«>.  (Camden  Soc), 85. 


"  Sparke,  op.  cit.  120. 

'•  Valor  Ecd.  (Rcc.    Com.\    iv,    279, 
2S0,  282. 

»»  I'at.  R.  33  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  3. 

"  Sparkc,  op.  cit.  61. 

"  V.C.II.  Norlhanli.  i,  317a. 

"Ibid.  388. 

"  Sparkc,  op.  cit.  78. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  275. 

"  Ibid.   1226-57,  H). 

■'  Ibid.  1327-41,  275. 

••  Pytchlcy,    Hk.    of    Fees    (Nortlianli 
Rcc.  Soc),  73-5. 

••  Pipe  Roll  Soc.  XXV,  p.  65. 


208 


"  Rot.  de  Oblatis  et  Fin.  (Rcc  Com.), 

535- 

"  Pytchlcy,  op.  cit.  74. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Edw.  II,  ca«e  176,  file  68, 
no.  323. 

"  Pytchlcy,  op.  cit.  75. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  p.  13  ;  Plae.  de 

uo  Ware.  (Rcc.  Com.),  543. 

"'  Bridges,  llist.  Northants,  ii,  235. 

'"  r.i.'.ll.  Northants,  ii,  179. 

"  Ibid.  cf.  Woodford. 

""  K.trly  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  587,  no.  40  j 
Col.  Inq.  Hen.  VII.  i,  297. 

"  I.,  and  P.  Hen.  I'll  1,1,  1724. 

*"  \'iRitalion  of  l.ongland. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


IRTHLINGBOROUGH 


•olution  of  the  college  in  1547,  it  seems  to  have  been 
possessed  of  manorial  rights  in  Irthlingborough.'" 

A  manor  in  Irthlingborough  was  settled  by  Sir 
Thomas  Cheyney,  by  his  will  dated  1512,  on  his  wife 
Anne  for  life  with  remainder  in  fee-tail  on  Elizabeth, 
his  daughter  by  his  first  wife,*^  Klizabcth  Huddlcston. 
Sir  Thomas  died  seised  in  1514  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  daughter  Elizabeth,  then  aged  9  years,  and  affianced 
to  Thomas,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Nicholas  V'aux,'"  who 
became  second  Lord  Vaux  of  Harrowdcn.  Elizabeth 
died  in  1556  and  was  succeeded  by  her  son  William, 
third  Lord  N'aux,**  who  settled  the  manor  in  1564.''* 
He  held  lands  inherited  from  liis  mother  in  Irthling- 
borough and  those  of  the  late  College.''*  In  1574  he 
mortgaged  the  glebe  lands  of  the  rectory  and  parson- 
age. He  married  M.iry,  sister  of  Sir  Thomas 
Tresham,  and  was  imprisoned  as  a  recusant  in  1583.'" 
In  1 591  his  second  son  Ambrose  was  accused  of  having, 
at  his  father's  instigation,  carried  ofT  the  barley  of 
Robert  Gage,  farmer  of  the  parsonage.**  Lord  Vaux 
died  in  1595,  having  been  predeceased  by  five  weeks 
by  his  son  George,  whose  heir  Edward  was  a  minor.^" 
For  assurance  of  title  he  obtained  a  crown  grant  of 
the  manor  in  1612  and  1613,'*'  and  in  l6l6  he  had  a 
fresh  grant  of  free  warren."  The  manor  was  settled 
on  him  in  1628.*-  In  1632  he  married  Elizabeth, 
widow  of  the  first  earl  of  Banbury,  and  in  1646,**  and 
1655"  he  settled  Irthlingborough  manor  on  his 
reputed  son  by  her,  Nicholas,  who  was  born  in  1632, 
and  had  succeeded  to  the  earldom  of  Banbury. 
Nicholas  inlierited  the  manor  on  the  death  of  Lord 
Vaux  in  l66l,  and  died  in  1680,''*  when  Irthling- 
borough manor  passed  to  his  eldest  daughter  Anne, 
the  wife  of  Sir  John  Briscoe,  knight.  By  Sir  John  it 
was  sold  before  1724  to  John  Underwood,  attorney-at- 
law,  of  Higham,  who  was  succeeded  by  his  son  John, 
a  minor  at  this  date.^  John  Underwood  settled  the 
manor  on  himself  and  his  wife  in  1738,"  and  was 
dealing  with  it  in  1768.^'  It  subsequently  passed  to 
the  dean  and  chapter  of  Peterborough,  who  are  the 
present  owners. 

The  AfENEL  FEE  in  Irthlingborough  of  one 
knight  was  held  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  by 
William  .Avenel  (11 25),  whose  son  William  was  living 
in  1 168.*'  The  second  William  left  two  daughters, 
Amice,  the  wife  of  Richard  de  Vernon,  and  Elizabeth, 
the  wife  of  Simon  Basset.*"  The  whole  fee  seems  to 
have  passed  to  Simon  Basset*'  after  William,  son  of 

Richard  and    Amice,  had    subinfeudated    one  

Harang  of  their  share.  Simon  Basset  left  a  son  John 
Basset  (12 1 2)  and  a  daughter  Mabel,  the  wife  of  Guy 
Wake.  Robert  son  of  John  Basset  was  succeeded  by 
his  grandson  Robert.*^    The  last  Robert  had  a  son 


Robert  Basset  of  Rushton,  who  did  homage  to  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough  for  his  father's  lands  in 
Irthlingborough  of  the  fee  of  Avenel  in  1291."  John 
Basset  was  holding  in  1348,  when  we  find  that  Hugh 
Wake,  John  Ic  Warde  and  Henry  Green  held  the 
knight's  fee  of  him.**  Hugh  Wake  was  the  great- 
grandson  of  Guy  and  Mabel  Wake,  referred  to  above, 
whose  son  Thomas  had  a  son  Hugh,  whose  son  Hugh 
was  the  holder  in  1346.**    John  le  Warde  and  Henry 

Green  represented  the  interest  of Harang,  above 

referred  to,  whose  share  passed  to  Walkclin  de  Arderne, 
and  from  his  son  Peter  it  seems  to  have  been  divided 
between  Richard  le  Warde,  whose  son  John  le  Warde 
was  holding  in  1346,  and  Hugh  Heroun  whose  share 
passed  to  Henry  Green.**  By  1428  the  whole  fee  of 
Hugh  Wake  and  John  le  Warde,  possibly  including  the 
share  of  Henry  Green,  had  been  acquired  by  William 
Braunspath.*'  The  later  descent  of  this  holding  has 
not  been  traced,  but  it  was  probably  acquired  by  the 
chief  lords,  the  abbot  and  convent  of  Peterborough, 
who  were  purch.ising  much  property  about  this  time. 

Apparently  the  first  feoflee  of  the  G  ARC  ATE  FEE 
of  one  knight  in  Irthlingborough  and  Warmington 
was  Hugh  Gargate,  who  was  enfeoffed  probably  in  the 
reign  of  Henry  II.**  Hugh  was  followed  by  Gunfrid 
Gargate,  whose  son  David  granted  to  Walter,  abbot 
of  Peterborough  (1233-45)  17  virgates  of  land  with  a 
messuage  in  Irthlingborough.**  About  1228  the  fee 
became  divided,  two-thirds  of  it  in  Warmington  going 
to  the  St.  Liz  family  and  one-third  in  Irthlingborough 
to  Robert  de  Meysy  and  John  de  Dene.  In  1254 
Ralph  Fitz  Henry  paid  aid  on  this  part  of  the  fee  and 
in  1315  it  was  held  by  Roger  de  Lisle  and  later  by 
John  de  Lisle.'" 

In  1 341  John  de  Seymour  (St.  Maur)  died  seised 
of  rents  in  Irthlingborough,  held  of  Alan  de  Seymour, 
leaving  a  son  John,"  who  in  1347  held  of  the  abbot  of 
Peterborough  in  Irthlingborough  one-third  of  the 
knight's  fee  in  Warmington  and  Irthlingborough 
which  had  been  in  the  tenure  of  Hugh  Gargate.'^ 
This  John  de  Seymour  died  in  1349,  leaving  a  son 
John,  a  minor,  but  before  his  death  he  had  demised 
his  holding  in  Irthlingborough  to  William  de  Seymour 
of  Hardwick."  This  conveyance  may  have  been  in 
trust,  for  in  1357  Thomas  de  Seymour  died  seised  of 
messuages  and  land  in  Irthlingborough,  held  of  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough.  The  holding  had  been 
settled  on  Thomas,  in  tail,  by  the  grant  of  Warine 
de  Seymour,  with  remainders  to  his  brothers,  of  whom 
Nicholas  alone  survived  and  inherited,  since  Thomas 
died  without  issue.'"  In  1428  the  tenants  of  the  fee 
in  Irthlingborough  once  in  the  tenure  of  John  de 
Seymour  were  said  to  be  William  Braunspath,  Richard 


♦'  Falor  Eccl  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  309. 

"  Coll.    Top   el  Cm.  v,  88  ;    G.   E.  C. 
ComfUie  Peerage,  viii,  18,  19. 
.    *■  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  xxix,  3. 

"  G.  E.  C.   Complete  Peerage,  viii.  19. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  East.  6  Elii. 

*•  Chan.  Proc.  vol.  ii,  bdle.  225,  no.  loi. 

"  Hut.  MSS.   Com.  Rep.   (Var.  Coll.), 
iii,  pp.  vii,  33,64,  65,72,  73. 

"  ^cis  oj  Prtvy  Council,  1590-1,  p.  303. 

"  G.  E.  C.  loc.  cit. 

*•  Pat.  R.  10  Ja».  I,  pt.  15  ;    II  Jai.  I, 
pt.  6,  no.  13. 

"  Pat.  R.  I4jai.  I,  pt.  j. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  4  Chai.  I. 

"  Ibid.  Chai.  I,  22  March  1646. 

"Ibid.  Mich.  1655. 


"  G.E.C. 

"  Bridget  (who  died  in  1724)  Wis/. 
Nortbants,  ii,  236. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  12 
Geo.  II. 

'«  Ibid.  8  Geo.  III. 

"  See  Mellow,  in  Pytchley,  Hk.  of 
Fees  (Northant*.  Rec.  Soc),  128-9. 

•°  Ibid.  ;  Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  (Bclvoir 
Caitic),  iv,  23. 

•'  Cbron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  174; 
V.C.H.   Northanti.  i,  388* ;   Cat.    Cbart, 

Ui7-4'.  P-  J7S- 
•«  Pytchley,  loc.  cit. 
••  Cbron.  Petrob.  (Camden  Soc),  148. 
'*  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  147,  njd. 
•'  Pytchlej,  loc  cit. 

209 


••  Ibid. 

•'  Feud.  Aids,  iv.  49.  A  Sir  William 
Bramspath  of  Bloreston  (Co.  Leicester) 
and  hi»  brothers  John  and  Thomas  died 
f.p.  and  their  nephew,  John  Howell, 
brought  an  action  against  William  I  sham 
about  Bloreston  in  1474.  Wrottesley, 
Pcd.from  Plea  R.  437. 

"  Sec  Mellows  in  VytMiy,Bk.oJ  Fees, 
127H. 

"  Reg.  Rob.  Swaflfham,  cclxiiii. 

">  Pytchley,  op.  cit.  126,  127,  12711. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  14  Ed.  Ill  (ist  nos.), 

"Cotton  MS.  Cleop.  C  i,  foil.  143* 
and  144. 

'I  Ca/. /»•/.  ii,  281.  '•  Ibid.  I,  437. 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Lord  and  John  Lord.'*     The  later  descent  cannot  be 
traced. 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  41  ft.  by  16  ft.,  with  north 
and  south  chapels,  nave  of  four  bays, 
44  ft.  6  in.  hy  18  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  transeptal 
chapels,  17  ft.  by  16  ft.,  north  and  south  aisles, 
west  porch,  18  ft.  by  11  ft.  6  in.,  and  west  tower 
13  ft.  square,  all  these  measurements  being  internal. 
The  north  aisle  is  13  ft.  6  in.  wide  and  the  south  aisle 


in  li.'u,  but  no  other  work  of  this  period  remains,  the 
church  having  been  entirely  rebuilt  in  the  second 
quarter  of  the  13th  century,  approximately  on  the 
existing  plan.  The  chancel,  chapels,  nave,  tran- 
septs and  aisles  are  substantially  of  this  period,  but 
the  chancel  was  lengthened  a  bay,  c.  1280-90,  and 
windows  inserted  in  other  parts  of  the  building. 
The  tower  was  probably  built  or  begun  by  John 
Pvel,  but  may  not  have  been  completed  at  his  death 
in  1 376  :  he  was  also  responsible  for  the  west  doorway, 


mc  1221-50 
nnjc  1280-90 

Ei!lcl3S5 
fBcl385(Ki:i\tmT  18SS-90) 

in  161!!  Ci^iTURv 


Plan  of  St.  Pitfr's  Church,  Irthlingborouch 


15  ft.,  the  width  across  nave  and  aisles  being  51  ft.  6  in. 
There  arc  clearstories  both  to  chancel  and  nave,  with 
battlementcd  parapets,  but  elsewhere  the  parapets 
are  plain.  All  the  roofs,  except  that  of  the  porch, 
are  leaded  and  of  low  pitch. 

The  tower  stands  west  of  the  porch  and  is  con- 
nected with  it  by  a  building  measuring  internally 
14  ft.  by  10  ft.,  to  which  other  buildings  were  attached 
on  the  north  side  covering  the  tower  :  the  vaulted 
cellars  of  these  remain.  This  western  structure  formed 
part  of  the  buildings  of  the  college  :  other  collegiate 
buildings  appear  to  have  been  on  the  south  side. 

The  church  is  built  of  rubble,  and  internally  tiie 
walls  have  been  stripped  of  plaster,  except  in  the  aisles 
and  transepts.  The  use  of  mingled  ironstone  and 
freestone  in  the  nave  and  chancel  arcades  produces  a 
rich  note  of  colour. 

The  original  church  was  of  12th-century  date.  It 
had  a  nave  the  same  size  as  at  present  and  a  south 
arcade   the    moulded   pier-bases  of    which    arc   still 


porch,  and  connecting  building,  and  the  establishment 
of  the  college  led  to  other  alterations  in  the  church, 
the  chancel  being  heightened  by  the  addition  of  a 
clearstory  and  new  windows  inserted  in  other  parts. 
The  nave  clearstory  was  added  in  the  latter  part  of 
the  15th  century. 

Tiie  tower  having  long  been  in  a  dangerous  state" 
was  taken  down  in  18S7  and  rebuilt  on  a  new  concrete 
foundation  in  188S-93  as  far  as  possible  with  the  old 
stone.  The  first  portion  was  completed  in  the  spring 
of  1889  and  the  tower  finished  as  far  as  the  battle- 
ments in  1892  :   the  octagon  was  rebuilt  in  1893. 

The  chancel  has  an  east  window  of  five  gradated 
lancets  with  pierced  spandrels,  and  north  and  south 
windows  of  two  lights  with  forked  mulliuns,  all  having 
chamfered  rear  arches  and  plain  jambs.  Ncrtii  of  the 
altar  in  the  cast  wall  is  a  triangular  headed  aumbry, 
and  in  the  south  wall  below  the  window  a  double 
piscina.'*  Below  the  north  window  is  a  segmental 
wall   recess  with   inner  moulded  arch  and   trefoiled 


'*  FeuJ.  Aidi^  iv,  4(^. 

'•  Cf.  nalaillc  I'cc,  ahovc. 

^'  Examination  in  1883  ihowctl  tlic  devi- 


ation from  ihc  pcrprndicular  .it   Rroutui  two     plain    ch.imfcrcd    archci,     but     the 

level  to  be  2  It.  ti  in.  to  tlic  njuth-c.ist.  ccntr;il  8h;i(t  fif  any)  is  gone.     Tlic  bowli 

"  The  rcccti  ii  i  (t.  8J  in.  wide  with  are  without  (oil«. 

210 


w 


X 


H 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED        irthlikgborough 


cusping,  containing  a  I3th-cenfar)  coped  coffin  lid 
witii  cross  in  circle.  Thus  far  the  work  belongs  to 
the  late  13th  century  bay,  which  extends  about  12  ft. 
beyond  the  chapel  on  the  south  side.  Further  west 
in  the  south  wall  is  a  fragment  of  the  earlier  13th- 
century  piscina  and  a  rectangular  aumbry,  the  lintel 
of  which  has  a  cusped  trefoil  cut  on  the  face.  The 
western  half  of  the  chancel,  which  formed  the  collegiate 
quire,  is  open  to  the  chapels  on  both  sides  by  13th- 
century  arcades  of  two  arclies  on  piers  composed  of 
four  clustered  shafts  and  hall-round  responds,  all 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases  :  the  arches  are 
of  two  chamfered  orders.  The  wide  and  lofty  chancel 
arch  is  of  similar  character,  the  outer  order  continuous, 
the  inner  springing  from  attached  shafts  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases  on  high  plinths.  The  chancel 
clearstory  has  four  square-headed  three-light  win- 
dows on  each  side,  the  western  windows  being 
narrower  than  the  rest. 

The  chapels  ditTer  in  size,  but  that  on  the  north 
has  been  rebuilt  and  its  east  wall  moved  slightly 
west  of  the  respond  of  the  chancel  arcade.  This  was 
probably  done  at  the  beginning  of  the  l6th  century 
by  Sir  Thomas  Cheyney,  whose  arms  occur  on  two  of 
a  row  of  otherwise  blank  shields  on  the  parapet.  The 
walling  is  rather  rough  and  without  string-course  or 
buttress,  but  the  old  windows  were  re-used.  As 
rebuilt,  the  chapel  measures  internally  21  ft.  6  in.  by 
13  ft.,  and  it  is  divided  from  the  north  aisle  by  a  13th- 
century  arch  of  two  chamfered  orders  springing  from 
half-round  responds  at  a  considerably  higher  level 
than  those  of  the  nave  and  chancel  arcades.  The  east 
window  is  of  two  lights  with  forked  muUion  and  in 
the  north  wall  is  a  restored  14th-century  window  of 
two  trefoiled  lights  and  quatrefoil  in  the  head. 

The  south  chapel  is  29  ft.  long  by  16  ft.  wide,  and 
has  a  moulded  outer  doorway  and  two  two-light 
windows  with  forked  muUions  in  the  south  wall. 
The  east  window  is  blocked  :  on  its  north  jamb  is 
an  image  bracket  and  another  in  the  north  wall 
adjoining.  From  the  north-east  angle  of  the  chapel 
a  15th-century  squint  with  cinquefoiled  and  em- 
battled head  is  directed  to  the  high  altar.'^  The 
arch  to  the  aisle  is  similar  to  that  on  the  north  side, 
but  has  been  restored. 

The  13th-century  nave  arcades  consist  of  four 
arches*-'  of  two  chamfered  orders  springing  from  piers 
of  four  clustered  shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases  and  from  half-round  responds.  The  capitals 
of  the  north  arcade  are  more  elaborately  moulded 
and  of  greater  projection  than  those  opposite,  but  on 
both  sides  the  arches  are  built  of  approximately 
alternate  voussoirs  of  ironstone  and  freestone,  like 
those  of  the  chancel  arcades.*'  The  bases  of  the  piers 
of  the  south  arcade  stand  upon  square  plinths  and 
12th-century  circular  moulded  bases  with  foot  orna- 
ments :  the  plinths  alone  remain  on  the  north  side. 
The  lines  of  the  high-pitched  13th-century  roof  are 
still  visible  at  the  ends  of  the  nave  and  high  in  the 
west  wall  is  a  three-light  14th-century  window  with 
excellent  tracery,  probably  inserted  by  Pyel.  The 
lofty  clearstory  windows  have  very  depressed  arches 


and  are  of  three  trefoiled  lights.  The  doorway  to 
the  rood  loft  remains  in  the  south  wall  west  of  the 
chancel  arch  :  towards  the  aisle  several  steps  of  the 
rood  stair  remain  in  the  thickness  of  the  wall. 

The  north  aisle  has  a  late  14th-century  square- 
headed  window  of  four  trefoiled  lights  at  the  west  end 
and  in  the  north  wall  a  blocked  doorway  with  con- 
tinous  mouldings,  a  15th-century  window  of  three 
lights  like  those  of  the  nave  clearstory,  and  furtlicr 
east  a  square-headed  I4th-cenlury  two-light  windov/. 
Externally,  east  of  the  doorway,  is  a  mutilated  stoup 
and  above  it  a  moulded  rectangular  recess  with  blank 
panel. 

The  south  aisle  has  a  restored  west  window  of  three 
gradated  lancets,  and  in  the  south  wall  a  square- 
headed  14th-century  three-light  window  with  good 
reticulated  tracery.  West  of  this  is  a  single  lancet 
vvhicii,  though  modernised,  appears  to  be  one  of  the 
original  windows  of  the  13th-century  church:  there 
is  another  in  the  west  wall  of  the  south  transept. 

This  transept  is  divided  from  the  aisle  by  a  wide 
14th-century  arch  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner 
springing  from  half-octagonal  responds  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases,  and  is  lighted  at  the  end  by  a 
pointed  14th-century  window  of  three  lights  with 
reticulated  tracery  :  in  the  east  wall  is  a  late  13th 
century  two-light  window  with  forked  mullion. 
Below  the  transept  is  a  crypt,  or  bone-hole,  approached 
from  the  aisle  by  a  staircase  in  the  thickness  of  the 
west  wall  and  covered  by  a  single  bay  of  quadripartite 
vaulting,  the  ribs  of  which  spring  from  low  angle- 
shafts.  The  crypt  is  lighted  by  windows  on  the 
south  and  east. 

The  13th-century  arch  to  the  north  transept  is 
similar  in  character  to  that  between  the  aisle  and 
the  north  chapel.  Externally  the  transept  has  low 
diagonal  buttresses,  and  is  lighted  at  the  end  by  a 
window  of  three  gradated  lancets  and  from  the  west 
by  a  two-light  window  with  forked  mullion.  In 
the  east  wall  is  a  wide  and  deeply  recessed  moulded 
arch  resting  on  three  short  shafts;  the  arch  appears 
never  to  have  been  opened  and  probably  contained 
the  transept  altar. 

The  west  porch  had  originally  a  chamber  over,'- 
but  is  now  open  its  full  height  and  covered  with  a 
modern  high-pitched  tiled  roof  hipped  at  the  east  end 
so  as  not  to  interfere  with  the  nave  window  *^  The 
porch  has  four  doorways,  those  north  and  south  being 
external  and  placed  near  the  west  end  of  the  walls. 
They  have  a  continuous  moulding  and  labels  on  the 
outside,  but  internally  plain  segmental  rear  arches 
only.  The  east  doorway  is,  of  course,  the  west 
doorway  of  the  church  and  is  moulded  similarly  to 
the  porch,  but  with  some  difference  in  the  termina- 
tions of  the  label.  On  each  side  of  the  doorway  is  a 
trefoiled  niche  and  above  are  two  transomed,  or  double 
stage  niches  with  groined  canopies  and  the  arms  of  Pyel 
below  the  sills.  The  doorway  into  the  forebuildingof 
the  tower  corresponds  in  moulding  with  theothers.and 
over  it  is  a  trefoiled  niche  with  a  flue  behind,  evidently 
intended  for  a  light."  The  porch  is  now  lighted  by 
modern  pointed  windows  of  two  lights  in  the  north 


"  On  the  chancel  lidc  the  opening  ii 
quite  phin. 

'°  The  eastern  arch  of  both  arcades 
oppoiite  the  traniepti  ii  10  ft.  wide  i  the 
width  of  the  other*  ii  9  ft. 

•'  Ironilonr  is  alio  uied  in  some  of  the 


piers  and  responds,  but  is  disposed  »ery 
irregularly. 

"^  The  room  had  a  fireplace  and  was  at 
one  time  used  as  a  school  It  was  rcmoTed 
about  1S46  :    ths.  Archd.  Northamfl.  1 16. 

^'  Under  the  window  arc  the  marks  of 

211 


the  original  porch  roof,  which  wai  of  verj 
low  pitch. 

^^  Chi.  Archd.  Northampt.  Ii6.  The 
niche  wai  originnllr  higher  ;  it  was 
lowered  when  a  flat  ceiling  was  inierted  in 
the  porch. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


and  south  walls,  but  traces  of  square-headed  windows 
remain  on  the  south  side,  one  of  which,  high  in  the 
wall,  retains  its  label. 

The  15th-century  font  has  an  octagonal  bowl  with 
ehhorate  traceried  panels  and  embattled  top  moulding 
rtn  a  panelled  stem. 

There  are  four  I5th-centurj'  stalls  on  each  side 
of  die  quire,  but  the  misericords  are  missing  from 
three  :  of  the  others  one  has  a  man  holding  a  shield 
and  four  are  moulded. 

The  pulpit  and  seating  are  modern. 

In  the  floor  of  the  north  chapel  is  a  fragment  of 
the  brass  inscription  from  the  grave  of  Richard 
Frysseby,  first  dean  of  the  college,  which  reads 
'  .  .  .  pro  anima  domini  Ricardi  .  .  .  qui  obiit  ...'*" 

The  monument  of  the  founder  John  Pyel  (d.  1376) 
and  Joan  his  wife  in  the  south  chapel  has  already 
been  described  :*''  the  effigies  are  mutilated  and  lie 
on  a  tomb  with  panelled  sides.  A  later  mutilated 
female  effigy,*'  supposed  to  represent  Elizabeth,  first 
wife  of  Sir  Thomas  Cheyney,  lies  on  the  floor  of  the 
chapel,  and  against  the  east  wall  is  a  l6th  century 
canopied  table  tomb  at  the  back  of  which  are  indents 
of  two  figure  brasses,  two  shields  and  two  inscrip- 
tions.** In  the  floor  of  the  chapel  are  three  grave 
slabs  containing  indents,  one  a  blue  stone  with  figure 
of  priest,  inscription,  shield  and  corner  roundels, 
another  with  figures  of  knight  and  lady  and  shields 
at  bottom,  and  the  third  is  a  fragment  only  with 
canopy  work  and  two  shields. 

In  the  north  chapel  are  wall  monuments  to  Mary, 
wife  of  Anthony  Leybourne  (d.  1690),  Henry  Wyckley 
(d.  1723),  Simon  Taylor  (d.  1786),  Simon  Oliver 
Taylor  (d.  1819)  and  .Ann  his  wife  (d.  1773). 

The  tower  is  of  unusual  design  and  stands  about 
36  ft.  west  of  the  nave,  having  apparently  been 
planned  with  the  college  buildings,  of  which  it  formed 
part.  It  is  of  four  stages,  with  battlemented  parapets 
and  angle  turrets  and  is  surmounted  by  an  octagonal 
lantern  of  two  stages  with  pointed  roof,  or  short 
spire  of  lead.  The  total  height  of  tower  and  octagon 
is  99  ft.  The  three  lower  stages  of  the  square  tower 
have  rectangular  buttresses  set  back  a  little  from  the 
angles  and  carried  up  the  bell-chamber  stage  as  flat 
pilasters.  The  lower  stage  has  windows  on  three 
sides,  that  on  the  north  being  square-headed  and  on 
one  side  set  towards  the  east.  The  middle  stage  has 
openings  on  the  north  and  west  only,  while  in  the 
third  stage  there  are  windows  on  all  four  sides  with 
the  arms  of  Pyel  in  a  panel  above.  The  bell-chamber 
windows  consist  of  two  single  pointed  openings  with 
flowing  tracery  and  hoods,  set  widely  apart  and  with 
a   trefoiled   and  gabled  niche**  between.     The   two 


external  stages  of  the  lantern  are  divided  by  a  string 
and  in  the  lower  one  wide  rectangular  openings  with 
trefoiled  heads,  except  on  the  west  side,  which  is  blank. 
On  each  face  of  the  upper  stage  is  a  square-headed  and 
panelled  window  of  three  trefoiled  lights  with  quatre- 
foils  in  the  head.  The  tower  has  a  vice  in  the  north- 
east corner  giving  access  to  the  bell-chamber  :  the 
parapet  is  carried  on  a  corbel-table  and  has  cross 
loopholes. 

In  a  description  of  the  tower  written  by  Professor 
Freeman  about  1848,'"  it  is  stated  that  the  buttresses 
on  the  south  side  were  then  new  and  '  but  feeble 
imitations  of  the  older  work.'  A  vast  buttress  had 
been  built  against  the  east  face  as  high  as  the  bell- 
chamber  windows,  concealing  any  openings  on  that 
side,  the  tower  having  '  previously  been  in  a  somewhat 
dangerous  state,  which  had  been  increased  by  opening 
a  small  doorway  in  the  south  wall.'**  At  that  time 
the  structure  leaned  '  very  perceptibly  '  to  the  south- 
east. 

Internally  the  lantern  was  divided  by  floors  into 
three  stories  connected  by  staircases  and  passages 
in  the  thickness  of  the  walls.  The  lower  and  upper- 
most chambers  had  fireplaces,  and  all  three*-  floors 
appear  to  have  formed  part  of  the  collegiate  buildings. 
The  uppermost  chamber  was  lighted  from  the  large 
panelled  '  windows '  of  the  top  stage,  the  lower  parts 
of  which,  however,  were  blocked.  The  theory  that 
the  interior  of  the  lantern  had  been  cased  and  the 
fireplaces  added  some  time  after  its  actual  building 
and  that  the  stability  of  the  tower  was  thus  affected,*^ 
was  not  borne  out  by  any  structural  evidence  at  the 
time  of  demolition.  No  straight  joint  in  the  thickness 
of  the  wall  was  found,  the  outer  and  inner  stones 
being  tailed  into  the  wall  and  built  with  lime  mortar, 
but  the  fiUing-in  between  was  found  to  be  of  rubble 
and  mud.  Upon  removing  the  recessed  stone 
traceried  panelling  of  the  upper  windows  it  was  found 
that  on  seven  sides  the  spaces  between  the  mullions 
had  been  filled  in  with  ironstone  without  bonding 
into  the  mullions  or  jambs,  and  in  tlie  remaining  one 
(facing  north)  the  filling  was  worked  out  of  the  solid 
stone.  The  walls  of  the  square  tower  from  the  bell- 
chamber  downwards  were  also  constructed  with  a 
filling  of  rubble,  and  it  was  found  that  as  the  walls  got 
thicker  the  proportion  of  rubble  filling  in  the  centre 
increased  in  ratio,  causing  the  walls  to  split  apart 
vertically  and  thus  largely  to  crush  and  destroy  the 
wrought  stone.*^  The  failure  of  the  14th-century 
structure  therefore  seems  to  have  been  due  to  an 
unequal  pressure  of  the  lantern  on  walls  of  very 
imperfect  construction  below,  rather  than  to  any 
additional   weight    imposed   later.     As    rebuilt,    the 


"  In  Bridgci'  time  the  inicription  wai 
'  on  an  antique  marble  in  the  area  of  the 
chancel  '  :  it  it  piven  a*  '  Orate  pro 
anima  Ricardi  Fryieby  primi  Decani  iitiui 
Collegii  qui  obiit  A"  l><>'  MCCCC  ..." 
1'hc  indent  in  which  the  fragment  remaini 
meaiurei  i8  in.  by  zj  in.  The  dale  of 
death  ii  left  incomplete. 

"  y.C.II.  Notthanu.  i,  409. 

•'  Deicribcd  ibid.  414. 

**  The  braiiei  had  been  taVen  away 
before  Bridget'  time.  He  dctcribci  the 
monument  at  *  an  antique  tabernacle 
tomb  of  blue  marble  '  Hut.  NoTthann. 
ii,  23S.  The  tomb  wat  formerly  under 
the   caiternmoit    window    on    the    louth 


tide.  It  it  described  in  detail  in  Cbi. 
Ar^hii.  iXorthampt.  125.  Three  of  the  sup- 
porting shafts  of  the  canopy  arc  of  wood, 
inserted  about  1840  when  the  tomb  wat 
moved  to  its  present  position. 

"*  One  of  the  old  statuci  remains. 

•"  In  Chs.  Archd.  Korihampt.  (1849). 

*'  Ibid.  118.  It  is  nowhere  stated  in 
what  year  the  great  cast  buttress  had  been 
built.  It  it  ihown  on  all  early  drawingt 
of  the  tower.  During  the  procett  of 
demolition  in  1887  the  buttrcit  wat  found 
to  h.ive  been  insudiciciilly  bonded  into 
the  old  work,  thus  '  adding  weaknrst 
rather  than  helping  in  the  stability  of  the 
lower  '  :    A!\.  Arch.  Soc.  Rtfi.  xxvii,  122. 

212 


"  The  middle  chamber  was  of  consider- 
ably less  height  than  the  others. 

*"  This  theory  was  set  out  in  a  report 
by  Sir  Henry  Drydcn,  dated  June  1879, 
printed  in  An.  Arch.  Sec.  Reps,  xv, 
p.  xxxvi, 

"  Report  of  Mr.  W.  T.ilbot  Brown, 
F.S.A.,  architect,  in  Ass.  Arch.  Soc.  Reps, 
xxvii,  122.  On  removal,  the  strings,  quoins, 
weatherings,  doors,  steps,  windows,  trac- 
ery, etc.,  were  found  to  be  so  badly  shat- 
tered or  crushed  that  their  conveyance  to 
the  ground  became  a  difllcully  :  their  re- 
use was  not  possible.  All  the  architectural 
detail  of  the  rebuilt  tower  is  new. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED        irthlingborough 


Untern  retains  its  original  internal  features,  but  the 
floor  joists  are  left  open  to  allow  of  greater  dispersion 
in  the  sound  of  the  bells. 

The  doorway  in  the  middle  stage  on  the  north  side 
of  the  tower  no  doubt  gave  access  to  a  building  on 
tliat  side,  which  was  continued  eastward  as  far  as 
the  porch,  covering  and  forming  part  of  the  existing 
building  between  the  porch  and  the  tower.  The 
cellars  of  this  structure,  as  already  stated,  still  remain 
and  consist  of  two  vaulted  chambers  about  6  ft. 
high,  one  opening  from  the  other.  The  larger  is 
entered  from  the  chamber  west  of  the  porch  and  has 
two  bays  of  quadripartite  vaulting  in  one  of  which  the 
boss  bears  the  arms  of  Pyel  :  the  smaller  cellar  north 
of  the  tower  is  about  13  ft.  square  and  has  a  more 
complicated  vault  the  boss  of  which  is  carved  with 
a  rose.  Both  cellars  are  lighted  by  splayed  windows 
just  above  ground  level. 

The  building  between  the  porch  and  tower  is 
approximately  the  height  of  the  second  stage  of  the 
tower,  but  its  south  wall  has  been  rebuilt.  On  the 
north  side  it  is  of  two  stories  with  a  blocked  pointed 
doorway  in  each.  From  the  ground  floor  the  tower 
is  entered  by  a  moulded  doorway  and  in  the  south-cast 
corner  is  a  squint  piercing  the  buttress  and  command- 
ing the  south  doorway  of  the  porch. 

There  are  eight  bells,  two  trebles  by  J.  Taylor 
and  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  having  been  added  in 
1893  to  a  former  ring  of  six  cast  by  T.  Mears  of 
London  in  1829.** 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup,  paten,  flagon,  and  two 
plates  with  the  London  date-letter  1832-3,  each 
inscribed  '  Irthlingboro'  1833.'** 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i) 
baptisms  and  burials  1562-1739,  marriages  1562-1738; 
(ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1739-1812,  marriages 
1739-1753;  (iii)  marriages  1754.-1812.  The  earlier 
entries  in  the  first  volume  were  copied  from  an  old 
register  book  in  the  year  1603. 

The  church  of  St.  Peter  must  be 
ADVOWSON  that  church  of  Irthlingborough  con- 
firmed to  Peterborough  Abbey  in  the 
charters  of  Eugenius  III,*'  Richard  I,"*  Henry  III,** 
and  Edward  III.*  Pope  Eugenius  III  also  confirmed 
to  the  abbey  two  parts  of  the  tithes  of  the  lordship 
of  Irthlingborough .2  In  1291  the  value  of  the  church 
was  £\6  ly.  \d.  a  year,  in  addition  to  a  pension  of 
£2  6s.  Sd.  paid  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough.^  In 
1332  an  inquisition  having  found  that  no  wrong 
would  thus  be  done,*  the  abbot  and  convent  of  Peter- 
borough received  licence  to  grant  to  the  parson  of 
St.  Peter's  Church  in  Irthlingborough,  for  the 
enlargement  of  the  rectory  house,  a  messuage  there, 
in  exchange  for  another  messuage  and  an  acre  of 
land  in  the  same  place.* 

In  1388  the  rectory  became  Irthlingborough 
College*    (q.v.)    and    the    patronage    was    exercised 


alternately  by  the  heirs  of  the  founder  and  the  abbot 
of  Peterborough.  This  house,  when  dissolved,  was 
found  to  hold  lands  and  other  property  to  the  value  of 
^73  4s.  9d.  a  year,  and  to  have  goods  and  chattels 
variously  returned  as  worth  £6  1  p.  ^d?  and  £"]  y.  2d.* 
The  commissioners  stated  that  '  a  vicar  of  necessitie 
is  to  be  indowed  there  forasmuch  as  the  master  of 
the  seyd  college  is  both  vicar  and  person  there.' 
The  college  house,  which  was  annexed  to  the  church, 
was  roofed  with  lead.'  The  rectory,  the  advowson  of 
the  vicarage  and  the  church  were,  in  1581,  granted  by 
the  queen  in  fee-farm  to  Edward  Downing  and  Peter 
Ashton,  the  fee  simple  being  vested  in  John  Morley." 
At  this  time  the  holder  of  the  rectory  was  bound  to 
pay  out  £2^  ios.  ^^d.  a  year,  namely  ^^13  6s.  id. 
to  the  curate  for  his  stipend,  33^.  ^d.  to  the  dean  and 
chapter  for  their  pension,  and  ^^^9  2;.  \o\d.  to  them  for 
their  due  rent,  13;.  ^d.  to  the  bishop  for  his  pension 
and  is.  ^d.  to  him  for  the  visitation  of  Irthlingborough 
College,  and  10/.  ()d.  to  the  Archdeacon  of  North- 
ampton for  synodals  and  procurations.**  In  1597 
Irthlingborough  rectory  was  conveyed  to  Edward 
Vaux,  Lord  Harrowden,  by  Sir  Thomas  Tresham  and 
others.*^  It  is  not  clear  when  the  advowson  passed 
to  this  family.  Thomas  Infield,  clerk,  in  1639  peti- 
tioned Archbishop  Laud,  who  had,  he  alleged, 
licensed  him  in  1633,  during  a  vacancy  of  the  bishopric 
of  Peterborough,  to  serve  the  cure  of  St.  Peter's, 
Irthlingborough.  He  stated  that  subsequently 
William  Crane,  clerk,  had  been  nominated  to  the  cure 
by  Edward,  Lord  Vaux,  and  that  the  archbishop, 
by  an  oversight,  had  licensed  him.  George  Broughton, 
Lord  Vaux's  bailiflF,  had  seized  the  keys  of  the  church 
and  kept  Infield  out  of  it,  so  that  on  Sunday,  21 
October  1638,  there  had  been  no  service.  Infield 
declared  that  the  records  had  been  searched  and  the 
church  found  to  be  a  vicarage  to  which  the  king 
presented,  institution  and  induction  being  by  the 
archbishop.  Crane  counterpetitioned,  stating  that 
he  was  a  poor  man  with  a  wife  and  eight  children  and 
no  means  of  subsistence  except  his  curacy,  and  that 
Infield  had  created  a  disturbance  in  the  church. 
The  Court  of  High  Commission  found  in  favour  of 
Infield,  Broughton  and  Crane  being  ordered  to  make 
submission  and  the  former  fined  /20  and  the  latter 
^10.     Crane  was  also  ordered  to  pay  costs. '^ 

It  seems  to  have  been  established  that  the  advowson 
was  vested  in  the  Crown,  for  in  1641  the  receiver  of 
the  king's  revenues  for  Northamptonshire  was  directed 
to  stay  payment  to  Thomas  Infield  of  the  stipend  due 
to  him  as  curate  of  Irthlingborough,  since  he  was 
acting  as  vicar  and  claiming  tithes.**  The  advowson 
of  St.  Peter's  vicarage,  as  well  as  the  rectory,  was, 
however,  settled  in  1646,**  1651*"  and  1655"  on 
Nicholas,  first  Earl  of  Banbury,  the  holder  of  the 
manor.  From  him  both  the  rectory  and  the  advowson 
of  the  vicarage  passed  to  his  son  Charles,  the  second 


"  North,  Ch.  Bills  of  Norihanii.  J 12. 
The  inscription  on  the  tenor  records  that 
five  old  bells  were  '  exchanged  for  this 
peal  of  six  a.d.  1829.' 

••  Mirkham,  Ch.  Plate  of  Nortbonli.  165. 

•^  Sparke,  HtU.  Cotn.  Burg.  Script.  Far. 
(Hugo  Candidus).  78. 

"  Col.  Chan.  1327-41,  p.  275. 

••  Ibid.  1226-57,  p.  iq. 

'  Ibid.  1 327-4 >>  P-  VS- 

*  Sptrke,  op.  cit.  82. 


•  Popt  Nich.  Tax.  fRec.  Com),  \oh. 

•  Inq.  a.  q.  d.   F.ccxxiii,  no.   4  ;    Cal. 
Inij.  a.  (j.  d.  (Rec.  Com),  294. 

'  Cal.  Pat.  1330-34,  p-  405. 

•  Ibid.  1385-9,  p.  42S. 

'  Chant.  Cert.  36,  no.  3. 
'  Ibid.  35,  no.  10. 
•Ibid. 

'»  Cal.  Chan.  Proc.  Eliz.   (Rec.   Com), 
i,  105. 

"  Pat.  R.  23  Elii.  pt.  i,  m.  19. 

213 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  39    Eliz. 

'•  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1639-40,  pp.  123, 
156;  1640,  p.  399;  1640-41,  p.  381. 
George  Broughton  ii  sometimes  called 
Draughton. 

'«  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1625-49,  p.  751. 

■'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Chas.  I,  22 
March  1646. 

'•  Ibid    Hil.  1651. 

"  Ibid.  Mich.  1655. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


earl.'*  He  in  1694  conveyed  these  rights  to  Thomas 
and  George  Watson,''  and  in  1696  George  Watson 
conveyed  them  to  Thomas  Wentworth,  aUas  Watson, 
and  his  wife  Alice.^"  This  Thomas,  the  third  son  of 
Lewis  Watson,  first  Earl  of  Rockingham,  had  in  1695 
inherited  the  estates  of  his  mother's  brother,  the 
second  Earl  of  Strafford,  and  had  then  assumed  the 
additional  surname  of  Wentworth.  He  was  created 
Baron  and  Ear!  Malton,  and  inherited  the  earldom  of 
Rockingham  in  1746.  In  1738  he  presented  to  the 
vicarage  William  Knowler,  who  a  year  later  published 
Thi  Earl  of  Strafford's  Letters  and  Despatches  from  the 
collection  inherited  by  his  patron.-'  Lord  Malton 
was  created  Marquess  of  Rockingham  in  1746  and 
died  in  1 750,  leaving  a  son  and  heir  Charles,  who  died 
without  issue  in  1782,  when  the  rectory  and  advowson 
of  Irthlingborough  passed  to  his  sister's  son,  William, 
fourth  Earl  Fitzwilliam.^-  They  are  now  in  tlie 
tenure  of  George  Charles  Wentworth-Fitzwilliam, 
grandson  of  the  fifth  earl. 

The  church  of  .411  Saints  followed  the  descent  of  the 
Bataille  fee  to   1 2 14,  when   William  de    la    Bataille 


FiTZWILLIAM.     Lozetioy 
argent  and  gules. 


Wenttworth.  Sable  a 
cbeveron  belv)ei;n  three 
leopards'  beads  or. 


eave  the  advowson  to  the  abbot  and  convent  of 
Peterborough  in  exchange  for  lands  in  the  tenure  of 
Nicholas,  son  of  Geoffrey.'^''  In  131 3  the  pope  gave 
to  Robert  de  Bukyngham,  alias  de  Selford,  rector, 
dispensation  to  accept  another  benefice  of  the  value 
of  £.^o.^*  John  de  Thornton  was  provided  to  the 
church  in  I  328,  and  on  his  death  in  the  same  year  the 
king  successfully  claimed  the  right  to  present  during 
a  vacancy  of  tlie  abbacy.^*  After  the  Dissolution  tiic 
rectory,  namely,  the  great  and  small  tithes,  the  house 
and  the  glebe,  was  worth  lo6s.  Sd.'^^  The  advowson 
of  the  rectory  was  granted  in  1541  to  the  dean  and 
chapter  of  Peterborough^'  who  presented  in  1661 
and  1664.^*  Tlie  bishop  collated  in  1675,  but  in 
1646,  1651,  1655  and  16832'  the  advowson  of  All 
Saints  together  with  that  of  St.  Peter  was  settled  as 
parcel  of  the  estates  of  the  earls  of  Ilarrowden.  Tiic 
church,  as  already  stated,  had  fallen  into  ruin  and  ihe 
site  and  parsonage  seem  to  have  passed  with  the 
manor  (q.v.) 

William  Trigg  built  a  school  and 

CII ,1 RITIES      an  almshouse  in   two  tenements  and 

by  his    will,    dated    25    I'cb.     1728, 

cliargcd    his   lands    with  renlcharges   amounting    to 


^^27  4J.  The  charity  is  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the 
Cliarity  Commissioners  dated  18  May  1897,  pursuant 
to  which  rentcharges  of  £\j  and  ^l  issuing  out  of 
various  properties  in  Finedon  and  Irthlingborough, 
including  the  house  at  Irthlingborough  in  which  the 
founder  lived, were  made  the  endowments  of  a  separate 
charity  called  the  Educational  and  Ecclesiastical 
Charity  of  William  Trigg.  £1"]  is  applied  to  the 
National  School  and  £\  to  the  rector,  the  trustees 
being  the  incumbent,  churchwarden  and  two 
others. 

The  remaining  rentcharges  issuing  out  of  various 
pieces  of  land  in  Irthlingborough,  and  amounting  to 
£()  4s.  yearly,  form  the  endowment  of  William  Trigg's 
charity  for  the  poor.  The  trustees  are  the  incumbent 
and  two  others  appointed  by  the  U.D.C.  £1  is  paid  to 
each  of  the  two  inmates  of  the  almshouse,  ^^i  4J.  is 
distributed  to  poor  widows,  and  the  balance  in 
coal. 

Richard  Glover,  by  indenture  dated  I  July  1 801, 
settled  his  land  in  trustees  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor 
people  of  the  Society  of  Friends  and  charged  the  same 
with  j^io  yearly  for  the  benefit  of  the  poor  of  the 
parish.  The  land  known  as  Glover's  Charity  Farm, 
and  containing  about  177  acres  with  farmhouse  and 
buildings,  was  sold  in  1916  and  the  proceeds  were 
invested  in  ;^2,387  lis.  id.  Metropolitan  Water  Board 
Stock,  £()i6  'is.  2d.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  £3,793 
H)s.  lod.  3J  per  cent.  Conversion  Stock,  and  ;^2,530 
3^.  2d.  Liverpool  Corporation  5^  per  cent.  Red. 
Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds, 
producing  ^£389  is.  yearly  in  dividends 

There  are  five  trustees  each  of  whom  is  entitled  to 
£1  Is.  yearly  for  his  own  use  ;  £10  is  distributed  to 
the  poor  at  Christmas  and  the  residue  is  applicable 
for  the  benefit  of  poor  Quakers. 

The  Church  Land  : — An  allotment  was  awarded 
on  an  inclosure  to  the  churchwardens  in  lieu  of 
lands  previously  appropriated  to  the  repairs  of  the 
Church.  The  property  consists  of  19  a.  2  r.  22  p.  of 
land  abutting  on  Marsh  Lane  and  is  leased  to  the 
U.D.C.  at  a  rent  of  j^70  per  annum. 

The  Irthlingborough  Nurses'  Home  Trust  was 
founded  by  indenture  dated  4  June  1921.  The 
indenture  recites  that  during  the  late  War  a  fund 
was  raised  called  the  Northamptonshire  Regimental 
Prisoners  of  War  Fund,  and  as  the  objects  for  whicii 
had  been  completely  s.itisfied  and  a  balance  of 
/[l,059  left  in  the  hands  of  the  Prisoners  of  War 
Committee,  it  was  determined  to  apply  the  balance  for 
the  purposes  of  the  Irthlingborough  Nurses'  Home 
Tiust  to  provide  accommodation  for  a  nursing  staff 
for  the  parish  and  for  the  stretchers  and  other  appli- 
ances belonging  to  the  St.  John  Ambulance  Associa- 
tion. /[615,  part  of  the  sum  of  ^^1,059,  was  applied  in 
the  purchase  of  three  tenements  known  as  Nos.  27, 
29  and  31  Victoria  Street,  which  premises  are  used 
for  the  purposes  of  the  trust.  The  trustees  con- 
sist of  the  rector  for  the  time  being  and  four 
others. 


'•  Fcrt  of  F.  Northanii,  Trin.  35 
Chai.  II. 

'•  Ibid.  nil.  (,  Win.  III. 

'»  Ibid.  Mich.  8  Wm.  Ill  ;  InMit.  Bin. 
(H.R  O). 

"  Ibid.  1    D.N.B. 


"  JnsM.BVt.  (r'.V..O.);  G.¥..C.  Peerage, 
vi,  38r.. 

'-  Colt.  MS.  CIcop.  Cii,p.  13. 

"  Cal.  Pup.  l.rtirn,  ii,  116. 

"  Dc  Banco  R.  347,  in.  150. 

"  Valor  Ectl.  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  311. 


"  /,.  and  P.  Urn.  nil,  vol.  xvi,  g.  1226 
(10). 

»"  Inilit.  Bkr  (I'.R  O.). 

'"  Fcpt  of  F.  Northants.  Chai.  1, 
11  March  164^1 )  Hi!.  1651  ;  Mich.  16;;  ; 
Trin.  35  Chai.  II. 


214 


HUXLOK   HUNDRED 


ISLIP 


Slcpe,  Yttcslepc,  Isteslcpe  (xi  cent.) ;  Hystlcpa 
(xii  cent.),  Eslcp,  Ittcslcp  (xiii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Islip  covers  an  area  of  1,383  acres. 
The  surface  of  the  parish  is  undulating.  Liable  to 
floods  in  the  vicinity  of  the  Nenc,  it  rises  about  250  ft. 
in  the  north-west,  and  in  the  east  is  mostly  about 
too  ft.  above  ordnance  datum.  The  soil,  which 
varies  in  quality,  is  mainly  clay  and  i;r.i\cl,  with  .1 
subsoil  of  clay  and  ironstone.  Harper's  Brook, 
which  flows  into  the  Nenc,  forms  its  northern  boun- 
dary, and  separates  it  from  Aldwinkle.  There  is  a 
bridge  over  this  brook  to  carry  the  road  to  Aldwinkle, 
with  the  mill  stream  near  by.  The  Nene,  flowing 
northward,  forms  its  eastern  boundary,  and  the  parish 
is  divided  from  \\  oodford  on  the  south  by  a  stre.im 
flowing  east  into  that  river.  A  little  to  the  north  of 
this  stream  is  the  Kettering,  Thrapston,  and  Hun- 
tingdon brancli  of  the  I. .M.S.  Railway,  which  lias  a 
station  about  half  a  mile  away  in  Twywell.  The 
Northampton  and  Peterborough  branch  of  the  London 
Midland  and  Scottish  Railway  traverses  the  southern 
corner  of  the  parish,  and  a  tramway  takes  a  circuitous 
route  to  the  Islip  furnaces  in  the  south-west,  where 
the  Islip  Iron  Company  have  valuable  mines  of  iron 
stone,  and  three  smelting  furnaces.  There  are  old 
quarries  in  the  same  direction.  A  fine  white  stone  is 
quarried  for  building  ;  and  good  stone  for  repair  of 
roads.  Besides  the  iron  work  and  quarrying  carried 
on,  the  manufacture  of  horse  collars  and  matting 
was  a  considerable  industry.  The  population  was 
616  in   1921. 

The  village  lies  along  the  road  from  Lowick  to 
Woodford.  It  has  a  charming  situation  and  contains 
a  fair  number  of  17th  and  1 8th  century  stone  houses, 
roofed  with  thatch,  stone  slates  or  pantiles,  with  good 
stone  chimneys.  The  newer  houses  generally  are  of 
red  brick.  The  manor  house  probably  of  Drayton 
manor,  on  the  east  side  of  the  street,  now  occupied 
by  Mr.  Waller,  is  a  modernised  17th-century  gabicd 
building  with  mullioned  windows  and  tiled  roof. 
The  Norwyches  manor  house  is  possibly  the  17th- 
century  two-storied  cottage,  with  stone  slated  roof, 
on  the  opposite  side  of  the  road  a  little  to  the  north. 
It  has  its  end  gable  and  chimney  to  the  street,  but 
only  one  mullioned  window  is  now  left.  Inside  there 
are  the  remains  of  an  oak  staircase  and  two  stone 
fireplaces.  The  Rose  and  Crown  Inn,  in  the  middle 
of  the  village,  is  dated  1691,  but  is  without  architec- 
tural features,  and  two  other  houses  are  dated  re- 
spectively 1744  and  1763.  At  the  north  end  of  the 
main  street  is  a  house  dated  f;fj  and  another  at  the 
south  end  {jj,.  The  recreation  ground  on  the  west 
side  of  the  village  street  was  presented  by  Mr.  S.  G. 
Stopford  Sackville  as  a  memorial  of  the  Great  War 
(1914.-18).  The  public  elementary  school,  erected  by 
subscription  in  1862  (and  enlarged  in  1883  and  again 
in  1894),  on  a  site  given  by  William  Bruce  Stopford, 
then  lord  of  the  manor,  is  somewhat  south  of  the 


church  ;  ind  there  is  an  infants'  school,  built  in 
1905,  on  a  site  given  by  Mr.  S.  G.  Stopford 
Sackville. 

The  rectory  house,  a  substanti.il  stone  building, 
stands  on  the  north-west  of  the  cluircii.  A  reading 
room,  with  billiard  room  and  small  library,  was  built 
in  1897  by  public  subscription.  Two  almshouses 
for  two  poor  widows  were  erected  under  the  will 
(d.  1705),  of  Henry  Medbury,  a  member  of  a  family 
long  connected  with  the  parish,  Thomas  Medbury 
having  been  instituted  rector  in  1646-7.  The  alms- 
houses form  a  pleasing  block  on  the  east  side  of 
the  main  street,  with  good  end  gables,  middle  chimney 
and  dormer  windows  to  the  upper  floor,  but  the 
windows  and  chimney  are  modern  and  the  roof 
is  covered  with  modern  blue  slates.  The  inscription 
on  the  tablet  is  indecipherable  :  only  the  figure;  of 
the  date  [i]  7  [o]  5  can  he  distinguished. 

Chapel  Lane  led  to  the  chapel  of  Si.  Thomas  of 
Canterbury^  on  the  bridge  over  the  Nene  on  the  road 
to  Thrapston.  I.eland  wrote  c.  1 545  'At  the  very 
end  of  Thrapeston  Bridge  stand  Ruines  of  a  very  large 
hermitage  welle  buildcd  but  a  late  discovered  and 
suppressed  :  and  hard  by  is  the  Toune  of  Islep  on 
Avon  as  upon  the  further  Ripe.'^  Bridges  says  that 
the  ruins  referred  to  by  Leland  were  probably  those  of 
the  chapel  of  St.  Thomas  the  Martyr,  in  a  close  called 
Hermitage  close  on  the  right  hand  from  Thrapston  '  in 
which  stood  several  stews  of  water.'  The  chapel  was 
standing  in  1400,  when  William  Mareschal,  chaplain, 
had  the  custody  of  the  king's  free  chapel  or  hermitage 
at  the  end  of  the  bridge  of  Islip.^  In  1492,  Henry  Vere 
bequeathed  10/.  to  the  chapel.  It  is  described  as  one 
of  two  chapels  annexed  to  the  mother  church  of 
Islip.*  The  bridge  has  no  architectural  features,  and 
is  of  uncertain  date  It  consists  of  seven  round  arches, 
and  has  four  cut-waters  facing  up  stream  and  two 
down  stream ;  the  arches  are  of  yellow  brick  and  the 
superstructure  of  stone.  The  view  from  the  bridge 
towards  Islip  is  very  picturesque. 

In  the  Domesday  Survey  i  hide  I 
M.4N0RS  virgate  of  land  were  entered  as  held  of 
the  Bishop  of  Coutances  by  Algar  in 
ISLIP  in  the  hundred  of  Huxloe.^  Before  the  taking 
of  the  12th-century  Northamptonshire  Survey,  the 
lands  of  this  bishop  had  been  forfeited,  and  his  lands 
in  Islip,  with  an  addition  making  a  total  of  2  hides, 
h.id  passed  into  the  hands  of  Aubrey  [dc  Vere],  the 
chamberlain,  by  whom  they  were  held  of  the  king's 
fee.*  From  this  date  the  manor  has  passed  with  that 
of  Drayton  in  Lowick  parish  (q.v.).  The  bishop's 
manor  of  Drayton  in  Lowick  had  also  passed  to 
Aubrey,'  who  made  a  grant  of  tithes  from  land  in 
Islip,  Drayton  and  Addington  to  Thorney  Abbey, 
which  his  son  Robert  confirmed.  In  1584  the  manor 
place  and  close  in  Islip  called  the  Lords  Lands,  in 
which  was  the  chief  messuage  of  the  manor,  were  the 
subject  of  a  suit.' 


*  The  patronage  of  thii  chapel  was  in 
diipute  between  Henry  de  Drayton  and 
Gervate  dc  Islip  in  1231  and  1232. 
Gcrrate  maintained  his  right  as  patron 
of  the  mother  church  of  Islip.  There 
were    no    tithes   nor   right   of    sepulture 


belonging     to     the    chapel  :     Maitl.ind, 
Bracton't  Note  Bh.  625,  693. 
'  Itinerary^  i,  8. 

*  Cal.  Pat.  1309-1401,  p.  197. 

*  Red  Bk.  of  Thorney,  pt.  4,  fol.  iv. 
'  y.C.U.  Northanti.  i,  31 14. 


»  Ibid.  365. 

'  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  ii,  603,  nos. 
27,  23  ;  Chart.  R.  22  Edw.  Ill,  m.  26, 
no.  36. 

•  Ct.  of  Req.  lix,  17. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


NORWrCHES  MANOR  may  have  had  its  origin 
as  a  member  of  the  royal  manor  of  Brigstock  called 
Slepe.'  It  was  possibly  the  manor  to  which  the 
advowson  of  the  church  (q.v.)  was  attached.  Gervase 
son  of  Richard  de  Islip,  living  in  1230,1'  was  succeeded 
by  his  son  Adam.'*  Lands  were  held  by  Hugh  son 
of  William  de  Islip,  in  1238,'^  and  John  and  Simon 
de  Islip  in  1329.'''  Master  Simon  de  Islip,  parson 
of  Horncastle  in  Lincolnshire,  possibly  a  son  of  John, 
or  at  least  a  member  of  this  family,  in  1 348  requested 
licence  to  alienate  land  in  mortmain  for  a  chaplain  to 
celebrate  daily  there  for  the  souls  of  his  father  and 
mother,  John  and  Margaret  dc  Islip,  and  William, 
Thomas,  and  Richard  de  Islip,  his  brothers,  and 
others.'*  In  1376  Alice,  widow  of  William  de  Islip, 
quit-claimed  to  John  Holt  and  his  wife  Alice,  and  the 
heirs  of  the  said  John  Holt,  all  lands,  rents,  reversions 
and  services  of  free  men  and  neifs  in  the  towns  of  Islip, 
Lowick,  Aldwinkle,  Grafton  by  Cranford,  and  Wood- 
ford, formerly  belonging  to  the  said  William  de  Islip 
and  Millicent  de  Islip.'*  The  lands  of  Sir  John  Holt, 
Kt.  (justice  of  the  Common  Pleas)  were  forfeited  in 
1388,  but  restored  to  his  son  John  in  1391.'^  John 
the  son  died  in  1419  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Hugh,  and  he  in  1420  by  his  brother  Richard  Holt, 
clerk,'*^  from  whom  this  manor  descended  in  1451-2 
to  his  next  heir  Simon  Norwich."  John  Norwich,  the 
son  of  Simon,  died  in  1504  seised  of  a  manor  of  Islip 
held  of  the  Earl  of  Wiltshire,  which  he  had  settled 
on  his  wife  Katherine ;  his 
son  and  heir  John  was  aged 
thirteen.'*  John  Norwich  died 
in  1557  seised  of  this  manor, 
and  left  a  son  and  heir  Simon 
Norwich,  aged  19.  Margaret, 
the  widow  of  Simon  the  grand- 
father, was  still  living  at 
Leicester  in  1558,  and  Alice, 
the  widow  of  her  son  John,  at 
Brampton."  Simon  Norwich 
was  dealing  with  this  manor 
with   Brampton,  Cotterstock, 

etc.,  in  1579,^  and  in  1594  it  was  held  by  Charles 
Nonvich,  and  Anne  his  wife,  who  then  conveyed  it 
as  the  manor  of  Islip  alias  Norwiches  Manor  to  Sir 
Lewis  Mordaunt,  Lord  Mordaunt,"  to  whom  the 
overlordship  already  belonged  as  representative  of  the 
heirs  of  the  earls  of  Wiltshire,  and  with  whose  other 
manor  it  then  descended. 

A  member  of  the  family,  Ascan  Norwich,  was 
holding  a  messuage  or  farm  and  40  acres  of  land  in 
Islip  at  his  death  there  on  20  May  1 630,  in  socage  of 
the  heirs  of  Katherine  Green  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son  John.^* 

In  the  12th-century  Northamptonshire  Survey  4 
sokemen  of  the  king  were  entered  as  holding  a  hide 
in  Islip  of  the  fee  of  Westminster  Abbey.^'     This 


Norwich.     Party  gules 
and  azurf  a  lion  ermine. 


was  possibly  the  land  in  Islip  formerly  belonging  to 
Hugh  de  Morevill  for  which  Robert,  son  of  Hawise 
of  IsHd,  claimed  quittance  before  the  barons  of  the 
Exchequer  in  II90-I."  It  was  held  by  Reginald  de 
Waterville  in  1284  as  5  virgates  of  land  in  Islip,  of 
the  abbey  of  Westminster,  which  the  abbot  held  of 
the  king  in  chief.-*  The  abbey  was  holding  £"]  in 
rent  in  Sudborough  and  Islip  c.  1291.^^*  Their  land 
was  possibly  that  which  John  de  Tolthorp  was  holding 
in  1 3 16." 

Water  mills  in  Islip,  known  in  1624  as  Drawater 
Mills,  were  the  subject  of  dispute.-*  Possibly  the 
mills  were  those  held  with  Norwyches  Manor. 

An  inclosure  Act  for  the  parish  was  passed  in  1800." 
Allotments  were  made  {inter  alia)  for  shares  in  the 
Low  Town  Leys  and  in  Lammas  ground  called  the 
Five  Leys  Close.  The  common  or  open  fields  were 
estimated  at  about  1,320  acres. 

The  church  of  ST.  NICHOLAS  con- 
CHURCH  sists  of  chancel  30  ft.  by  15  ft.  3  in.  with 
vestry  on  the  north  side,  clearstoried 
nave  of  four  bays  42  ft.  4  in.  by  15  ft.  4  in.,  north 
and  south  aisles  8  ft.  6  in.  wide,  south  porch,  and 
west  tower  and  spire.  The  width  across  nave  and 
aisles  is  37  ft.,  all  these  measurements  being  internal. 
The  church  is  of  one  period  throughout,  having 
been  rebuilt  in  the  latter  part  of  the  15th  century, 
and  is  a  very  perfect  example  of  a  village  church  of 
that  date,  unaltered  in  plan  and  little  changed  by 
restoration.  At  the  east  end  of  the  nave  outside  is 
a  roof  table  wider  and  of  higher  pitch  than  that  of 
the  present  chancel,**  which  seems  to  indicate  that 
the  body  of  the  church  was  built  on  to  an  earlier 
chancel,  which  was  afterwards  pulled  down  and  the 
present  one  erected.  The  whole  structure,  however, 
is  uniform  in  design,  and  its  situation  on  rising  ground 
above  the  valley  of  the  Nene  makes  its  spire  a  pro- 
minent landmark. 

With  the  exception  of  the  upper  stage  of  the  tower, 
which  is  of  dressed  stone,  the  whole  of  the  building 
is  of  rubble,  with  flat-pitched  leaded  roofs  and  plain 
parapets.  The  walls  are  plastered  internally.  The 
building  was  restored  in  1854-55,  new  roofs  being 
then  erected  and  the  nave  reseated. 

The  chancel  is  of  two  bays  and  has  a  four-centred 
east  window  of  five  cinquefoiled  lights  and  diagonal 
angle  buttresses.  On  the  south  side  are  two  three-light 
windows  and  one  in  the  west  bay  on  the  north,  the 
east  end  of  the  north  wall  being  covered  by  the 
vestry,"  which  was  built  about  1881  on  the  site  of 
an  old  vestry  which  had  long  disappeared ;  the  doorway 
of  the  old  vestry  alone  remained.  At  the  cast  end 
of  the  south  wall,  set  within  the  window  splay,  to 
which  it  also  opens,  is  a  piscina  recess  with  fluted 
bowl,  with  which  is  combined  a  rectangular  aumbry 
in  the  thickness  of  the  angle  of  the  wall.  The  chancel 
arch  is  of  two  orders,  the  outer  with  a  hollow  chamfer 


•  V.C.II.  Ncrlbanli.  i,  305A. 

■"  Rtl.  Iluf.  de  IVellei.  (Cant,  and  Vurk 
boc.;,  ii,  133,  151,236. 

"  Drayton  Chart.  83. 

'•Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  caici73,file  28, 
no.  370. 

"  Bridgci,  //ill.  Ncrlbanli.  ii,  239. 

'*  Cat.  Pal.  1348-50,  pp.  127-8,  374. 

'»  Cal.  Cloie,  1  374-7,  p.  3''<o. 

"Cfl/.  Pal.  1388-92,  p.  236. 

'••  .Str  Churchficid  in  Oundlc. 

"  Bridgci,    Hill.    Ntribami.    ii,    265. 


John  dc  Tolthorp  rclcaied  lands  in  Wood- 
foid,  ai  brother  and  heir  of  Gilbert  flon 
of  (Gilbert  dc  Tolthnrp,  in  1353  to  Sir 
Richard  Chamberlain,  Kt.  (Clo»c  R. 
27  Ed.  Ill,  n).8),  which  poniibly  indicate! 
a  connection  with  John  dc  Tolthorp  in 
Itlip. 

'"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xviii,  54. 

'*  Ibid,  cxii,  1 15. 

"  Feet  of  r.  Div.  Coi.  Trin.  21  Elii. 

"  Ibid.  Northanti,  Trin.  3^  Elii. 

"  Chan.  In<i.  p.m.  (.Scr.  ii),  dxc,  I. 

216 


"V.C.II.  Northanti.  i,  365. 
"  Pipe  R.  2  Ric.  I,  m.  43.     Moreville 
here  m.iy  be  a  slip  for  Waterville. 
"  t'eud.  .lids,  iv,  12. 
•"  Pope  Nub.  Tax.  55A. 

•'    Feud,  .itdfj  iv,  It). 

"  Chan.  Proc.  fScr.  2),  ccclxvi,  37. 

"  Priv.  St.it.  40  Ceo.  Ill,  cap  2. 

"■*  It  extend"  downwards  along  part  of 
the  eait  walli  of  the  aislci. 

•'  rhe  veitry  ii  9  ft.  6  in.  long  by  9  ft. 
wide  internally. 


w 


u 


u 


.>!,i^&d 


»'  - 


//  y 


u 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


ISLIP 


continued  to  the  ground,  and  the  inner  on  attached 
shafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The  oak 
screen,  with  rood  and  attendant  figures,  is  modcrn.''- 

The  arches  of  the  nave  arcades  are  of  two  orders, 
like  the  chancel  arch,  but  have  an  ogee  curve  at  the 
top,  and  spring  from  piers  of  unusual  type,  in  plan 
an  oblong  set  north  and  south,  down  the  angles  of 
which  the  outer  hollow  chamfered  order  is  carried, 
and  with  attached  shafts  east  and  west  :  the  responds 
are  of  similar  character.  The  tower  arch  is  also  of 
the  same  tvpe.  All  the  shafts  have  moulded  capitals 
and  high  moulded  bases,  and  the  uniformity  in  design 
and  detail  make  the  interior  of  the  church  one  of 
much  dignity  and  beauty.  The  north  and  south 
doorways  occupy  the  second  bay  from  the  west,  each 
of  the  other  bays  having  a  recessed  three-light  window 
similar  to  those  in  the  chancel,  with  wall  benches 
below  the  sills.  There  is  a  piscina  at  the  east  end 
of  the  north  aisle,*'*  in  the  jamb  of  the  respond,  the 
bowl  of  which  is  partly  cut  away,  and  to  the  east  of 
the  south  doorway  a  groined  niche  for  a  stoup,  the 
supporting  half-octagonal  shaft  of  which  still  re- 
mains. 

The  clearstory  windows,  four  on  each  side,  are 
four-centred  and  of  two  cinqucfoiled  lights,  and 
there  are  similar  windows  in  the  side  walls  of  the 
porch.  Over  the  outer  moulded  doorway  of  the  porch 
is  a  niche  containing  a  modern  figure  of  St.  Nicholas. 

The  tower  is  of  four  stages,  marked  by  strings, 
and  has  wide  clasping  buttresses  and  battlemented 
parapets  with  crocketed  angle  pinnacles  and  gar- 
goyles. The  moulded  west  doorway  is  set  within 
a  rectangular  frame  with  quatrefoiled  circles  in  the 
spandrels,  and  above  it  is  a  three-light  window.  On 
the  north  and  south  the  two  lower  stages  are  blank, 
but  in  the  third  stage  on  each  side  is  a  small  rectangular 
opening  containing  a  quatrefoiled  circle.  The  bell- 
chamber  windows  are  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  with 
quatrefoil  in  the  head  and  ogee  hoodmoulds. 
Below  the  parapet  is  a  band  of  quatrcfoils  set 
lozengewise.  There  is  a  vice  in  the  north-west 
angle.  The  spire  is  crocketed  and  has  two  tiers  of 
lights,  the  lower  on  the  cardinal  and  the  others  on 
the  diagonal  faces. 

The  font  appears  to  be  of  13th  century  date,  and 
consists  of  a  plain  octagonal  bowl  on  eight  short 
attached  shafts  without  bases  or  capitals. 

The  chancel  contains  wall  monuments  to  Mary, 


wife  of  Sir  John  Washington,  kt.,  of  Thrapston,  and 
daughter  of  Philip  Curtis,  who  died  in  January, 
1624-5,  and  to  Katharine,  wife  of  Philip  Curtis  {d. 
1626).  In  the  floor  is  a  modern  brass  commemorating 
John  NicoU  (./.  1467)  and  Annys  his  wife,  placed  here 
in  19IQ  by  their  descendants  in  the  United  States  of 
America.''^ 

There  are  some  fragments  of  old  glass  in  one  of  the 
windows.^'  The  modern  glass  in  the  east  window  is 
of  great  excellence. 

The  pulpit  and  all  the  fittings  are  modern.  The 
organ  is  in  a  loft  at  the  west  end  below  the  tower. 

There  are  six  bells,  the  first  and  third  by  Henry 
Bagley  of  Chacomb  1678,  and  the  others  by  J. 
Taylor  &  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  1892.*' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  1570,  a  paten  of 
c.  1682,  a  silver  gilt  cup  and  paten  1883,  a  cup  and 
paten  of  I917,  and  a  bread  box  of  I925.  There  is 
also  a  pewter  flagon.^* 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i)  bap- 
tisms and  burials  1695-1754,  marriages  1695-1753; 
(ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1755-1809  ;  (iii)  baptisms  and 
burials  1810-1812  ;    (iv)  marriages  1755-1812. 

The  graveyard  was  extended  eastward  as  far  as  the 
main  street  in  I927,  and  a  lych  gate,  erected  in  1903  to 
the  north  east  of  the  church,  was  moved  to  form  an 
entrance  from  the  road.  The  War  Memorial  en  the 
north  side  of  the  church  was  designed  by  Mr.  Temple 
Moore. 

The  advowson  was  held  by  the 
ADVOWSON  Islip  family.  In  1202  Joscelin  de 
Islip  was  holding  lands  in  the  parish^' 
and  some  twenty-five  years  later  Gervase  son  of 
Richard  de  Islip  held  lands,  apparently  a  manor, 
here.'*  This  Gervase,  it  would  seem,  presented  to  the 
church  in  1227-8  and  1230.'"  He  married  Eustachia 
and  had  three  sons,  Adam,  Hugh  and  Joscelin.'"'     In 

1248   Eustachia,  then  the  wife  of    de  Pavilly, 

claimed  the  advowson  against  her  son  Adam,  and  it 
was  seized  by  the  king  by  default  of  Adam.*'  In 
1253  Thomas  de  Pavilly  agreed  to  presentation  being 
made  by  the  King  if  the  next  presentation  were  made 
by  himself.'-  In  the  mcanwliile  in  1264  Baldwin  de 
Vere  claimed  the  advowson  by  grant  of  Adam,  son 
of  Gervase  Islip,  to  his  father  Robert  de  Vere.*' 
Thomas  de  Pavilly  said  that  his  mother  Eustachia  had 
enfeoffed  him  of  the  advowson,  which  she  had 
obtained  from  her  son  Adam  de  Islip.     Baldwin  evi- 


*•  The  icrcen,  stalls  and  reredos  were 
erected  in  19U  by  Dclancy  NicuH  and 
Benjamin  NicoU,  of  New  \'ork,  to  com- 
memorate their  ancestor.  Matthias  NicoU, 
who,  as  secretary  of  the  Duke  of  York's 
expedition  to  America  in  1664  and  after 
the  capture  of  New  Amsterdam,  became 
mayor  of  New  York  in  1671,  Speaker  of 
the  first  Colonial  Assembly,  writer  of  the 
Duke's  Laws.  He  died  22  December 
i6'?7,  and  was  buried  at  Manhasset,  Long 
Island,  U.S. .A.  [from  inscription  on 
icrcenj.  In  1570  the  churchwardens  were 
presented  for  not  having  taken  down  the 
rood  loft.     Scrjeantson  MS. 

*''  There  is  reference  to  the  altar  of  the 
Blessed  Mary  in  this  church  of  Islip  in  an 
undated  charter.     Drayton  Chart,  no.  58. 

"  Bridges  records  '  the  portrait  of  a 
woman  in  brass '  in  the  chancel,  but  the 
inscription  at  her  feet  had  gone.  A  copy 
had  been  kept,  which  he  gives  (//.jr. 
Noribanli.  ii,  141).     Thi*  it  reproduced 


on  the  new  brass.  The  new  brass  with 
figures  of  John  and  Annys  [not  Amys] 
.NicoU  has  this  inscription  around  verge  : 
*  An  ancient  stone  bearing  elhgies  and 
inscription  as  here  depicted  lay  near  this 
spot  and  to  commemorate  their  ancestors 
the  descendants  of  John  and  Annys  NicoU 
in  the  United  States  of  America  have 
caused  this  memorial  to  be  placed  a.d. 
.MCMX.'  The  old  inscription,  i+f)?,  is 
reproduced,  and  the  two  figures. 

"  Bridges  (op.  cit.  ii,  240)  notes  heraldic 
glass  in  one  of  the  south  windows  of  the 
chancel,  a  figure  of  a  man  praying  in  one 
of  the  north  aisle  windows,  and  '  some 
imperfect  portraits '  in  other  windows. 

'^  There  were  five  bells  before  1892, 
when  a  tenor  was  added  and  the  second, 
third  and  fifth  were  recast.  The  old 
second  and  third  were  by  Bagley  1678, 
and  thefifthbyHughVVattsII  of  Leicester 
1621.  The  inscriptions  are  given  in 
.North,  Cb.  Billi  oj  Norlbant%.  313. 

217 


>»  Markham,  CA.  PlatcoJ Northants.  166. 
The  modern  cups  are  of  mediaeval  design, 
the  later  one  given  in  1919. 

*•'  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  case  171, 
file  10,  no.  154. 

'^  Drayton  charters  50;  Joscelin  de  Islip 
and  Peter  his  brother  were  witnesses  to 
this  deed.  Close  R.  12  Hen.  Ill,  no.  loi/  ; 
Cal.  Close,  1227-31,  p.  oS. 

"  lioi.  Huz-  de  ll'elln  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  ii,  133,  ii;i,  23O. 

">  Drayton  Chart.  83. 

*'  AssiicR.  East.  32  Hen.  III.  6a. 

'■  Cal.  Pal.  1247-58,  pp.  185,  203. 

*■'  The  charter  is  among  the  Drayton 
Charters  (no.  83)  whereby  Adam,  son  of 
Gervase  de  Islip,  granted  a  rod  of  land 
and  the  advowson  of  the  Church  of  the 
Blessed  Nicholas  of  Islip  to  Robert  de 
\'ere,  knt.,  to  hold  of  Adam  and  his 
heirs.  Hugh  son  of  Gervase  and 
Josccline  his  brother  were  witneiset. 


A   HISTORY   OF    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


dently  won  his  case,  and  in  1277-8  the  presentation 
was  made  by  Sir  Baldwin  Wake  as  guardian  of  the 
heir  of  Baldwin  de  V'ere.'''  From  this  time  the  ad- 
vowson  followed  the  descent  of  the  manor,  which  was 
the  same  as  that  of  Drayton  (q.v.). 

The  charity  of  Henry  Medbury, 
CHARITIES  founded  by  will  dated  27  December, 
1705,  is  administered  by  the  rector 
and  four  co-optative  trustees  in  conformity  with  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  12  Feb. 
1S92.  The  property  originally  consisted  of  two  alms- 
houses, land,  and  tenements  in  Earls  Barton  and  Islip. 
The  land  was  sold  in  1920  and  the  proceeds  invested 
in  sums  of  £z,\(p  ijs.  2d.  Consols  and  ^^1,900  6j.  8 J. 
4  per  cent.  Funding  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees 
of  Charitable  Funds,  producing  £138  ^1.  6d.  yearly  in 


dividends.  The  Official  Trustees  also  hold  a  sum  of 
^£130  15J.  4^/.  Consols  to  a  Rebuilding  Fund  Account 
the  dividends  upon  which  are  invested  in  augmenta- 
tion of  the  principal. 

In  1924  j^26  was  paid  to  the  two  almswomcn,  who 
are  widows  and  members  of  the  Church  of  England. 
The  almswomen  must  be  inhabitants  of  Islip,  or, 
failing  that  parish,  then  of  Earls  Barton.  Failing 
Earls  Barton,  then  of  any  of  the  following  parisiies  : 
Thrapston,  Slipton,  Twpvell,  Lowick,  Denford, 
Woodford,  Titchmarsh  or  Aldwinklc. 

Four  clergymen's  widows  receive  £20  each,  the 
Vicar  of  Earls  Barton  receives  £l,  and  ^3  is  paid  to 
him  for  distribution  to  the  poor  of  that  parish.  £j 
is  also  applied  by  the  rector  and  churchwardens  of 
Islip  in  doles  at  Christmas  to  30  recipients. 


KETTERING 


Cytringan,  Kyteringas  (x  cent.)  ;  Cateringe  (xi 
cent.)  ;   Keteringes,  Ketteringe  (xii,  xiii  cent.). 

The  civil  parish  and  urban  district  of  Kettering 
covers  2,814  *t^tes,  of  which  the  town  occupies  the 
greater  part  ;  there  are  still,  however,  over  1,000  acres 
of  pasture  and  arable  land  growing  corn  and  roots. 
The  soil  is  iron  and  lime  stone,  and  in  1766  borings 
were  unsuccessfully  made  for  coal.  The  land  rises 
from  the  River  Ise  on  the  east  and  a  stream  on  the 
west  to  a  height  of  a  little  over  300  ft.  above  the 
ordnance  datum.  Objects  of  the  Bronze  Age  and  the 
Romano-Briti;h  and  Anglo-Saxon  periods  have  been 
found  in  the  parish,  suggesting  an  early  settlement  of 
the  district. 

The  town  stands  on  high  ground  and  probably 
owes  its  importance  to  the  fact  that  it  is  a  centre  of 
the  road  system  of  the  Midlands.  In  1086  and 
probably  before,  Kettering  was  a  prosperous  agri- 
cultural manor  and  grew  into  a  trading  town  with  the 
grant  to  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  of  a  market  here 
on  Fridays,  in  1227.'  The  building  of  a  '  noble  hall  ' 
faced  with  stone,  by  Walter,  abbot  of  Peterborough 
(1233-45)-,  added  to  the  importance  of  the  town  and 
brought  traffic  to  it  when  the  abbot  was  in  residence 
there.  The  town  remained  a  prosperous  market 
town  down  to  the  dissolution  of  Peterborough  .'\bbcy 
in  1540.  Leland  refers  to  it  about  1535  as  a  '  pratie 
market  town,'  and  Camden,  about  1600,  as  a  market 
town  of  considerable  resort.  Owing  to  its  easy  access 
from  all  parts,  it  was  selected  in  1625  as  the  place  for 
holding  the  quarter  sessions'"  whicii  gave  it  increased 
importance  in  the  county.  In  1613  the  justices 
petitioned  that  the  sessions  might  be  held  alternately 
at  Northampton  and  Kettering,'  but  this  apparently 
was  not  done,  and  in  1629  the  Earl  of  Wesunorlaiid, 
then  Custos  Rotulorum,  built  in  tlic  IMarket  Place 
'  a  very  fair  sessions  house.'  A  reference  at  this  lime 
to  the  old  session  house  suggests  that  the  sessions  had 
been  held  there  for  a  long  time  previously.  It  was 
said  that  the  town  could  accommodate  all  those  who 
usually  appeared  at   tlie  winter  session    of    tlie  five 


hundreds  and  those  who  attended  could  return  home 
the  same  night  after  they  had  done  their  service, 
'  whereas  when  the  session  was  at  Northampton  they 
were  forced  to  lie  there  two  nights  at  charges.'' 
Kettering  was  also  a  meeting  place  of  the  musters, 
and,  as  the  musters  were  held  almost  annually,  the 
billeting  and  payments  to  the  muster  master  became 
a  burden  to  the  inhabitants  for  which  repayment  was 
very  irregularly  made.* 

During  the  Civil  War,  Kettering's  sympathies  were 
mainly  on  the  Parliamentary  side.  The  imposition 
of  ship-money  was  strongly  resented.  Francis 
Sawyer,  brother  of  Edward  Sawyer  who  lived  at  the 
Manor  House  in  1638,  refused  to  pay  this  tax  and 
assaulted  the  collectors,'  and  in  1640  the  grand  jury 
at  the  quarter  sessions  held  at  Kettering  complained 
to  the  Bench  that  there  was  '  a  great  and  unsupport- 
able  grievance  lying  upon  the  county  under  the  name 
of  ship-money  to  be  raised  for  providing  of  ships,  for 
which  their  goods  were  forcibly  taken  and  detained.' 
They  prayed  for  redress  from  a  burden  which  they 
were  not  well  able  to  bear.*  In  August  following, 
there  was  a  meeting  of  ministers  of  the  neighbourhood 
at  tlic  '  Swan  '  in  Kettering  to  consider  the  oath  in 
'  the  late  Book  of  Canons  '  known  as  the  '  Etcetera 
0.1th.'  Those  attending  resolved  never  to  take  the 
oath  but  rather  to  lose  their  livings."  Led  by  the 
Sawyer  family,  Kettering  remained  Puritan  in  sym- 
pathy throughout  the  Civil  War,  although  for  a  time 
in  1643  it  was  a  rendezvous  for  the  royal  troops.'" 

The  town  suffered  severely  from  the  plague  in 
1665,  which  claimed  some  80  victims."  The  justices 
of  the  peace  presented  a  petition  to  the  Bishop  of 
Peterborough,  calling  attention  to  the  distressed  con- 
dition of  the  town  by  reason  of  the  plague  and  asking 
for  relief  out  of  tlic  money  collected.'^ 

Tlic  failure  of  the  crops  in  1795  was  the  cause  of 
much  distress,  and  bread  riots  took  place  at  Kettering ; 
wagons  loaded  with  flour  passing  through  the  town 
had  to  be  protected  by  soldiers,  wlio  were  attacked  by 
the  niob.'^ 


'*  Rol,  Rich,  dt  Gravtiend  (Cant,  and 
York  Soc),  xTvi,  p.  133. 

'  Cal.  Chan,  i,  21. 

'  AH.1.  MS.  (n.M,)io25,  i34. 

•  IJuke  ol  Uucclcuch,  lliil.  MSS.  Com. 
Rtf.  i,  168. 


•  Cal.  S.  v.  Dom.  1611-1S,  p.  218. 

'  F.  W.  Hull,  lint,  of  KclUrini;,  p.  16. 

'Cal.  S.  P.  Dorn.  1629-31,  p.  452; 
Hill.  MSS.  Com.  Rfp.  x,  App.  vi.  p.  32. 

'  Cal.  S.  I'.  Pom.  163K-31J,  pp.  5-16,  34, 
36,45,  l6i,  455;    1625.49,588. 

218 


"  Ibid.  1639-40,  p.  312. 
'  Cj/.  S.  I'.  IJom.  1640,  pp.  636-8,  644  ; 
1640-41,  7  ;   Hull,  op.  cit.  19,  20. 

'"  llull.cip,  al.  20,21.      "Ibid.  I".P.  32. 
"  L.msdownc  MS.  1027,  p.  155^,  158. 
'•Bull,  op.  cit.  38. 


Kettkrinc  :    Old  lloust  in   IIazi.i.wood  Lani; 


1 

■ 

X 

, ^^ "C*^. 

- 

pi 

^:w.^-^:            W 

■p- 

,.nj,,„          J, 

yr  FTrn 

a 

Kettering  :    The  Sawyer  Almshouses 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


KETTERING 


About  1700,  Kettering  is  described  in  the  Maptia 
Britannica  as  '  a  well  traded  popidous  market  town  ' 
which  owed  its  prosperity  wholly  to  the  woollen  manu- 
facture, introduced  by  Mr.  Jordan  and  then  still 
carried  on  by  his  posterity.  About  20  years  later 
Bridges  described  Kettering  as  '  a  large  and  populous 
town  '  containing  566  houses  and  2,645  inhabitants. 
The  market  place  lay  to  the  north-west  of  the  church, 
in  the  middle  of  which,  dividing  the  Sheep  Market 
from  the  Butcher  Row,  was  a  row  of  houses  later 
known  as  Rotten  Row.  At  the  end  of  Butcher  Row 
was  the  Sessions  House,  '  a  good  stone  building  sup- 
ported by  pillars '  ;  eastward  was  Newland  pond  and 
in  one  of  the  pond  walls  was  fixed  a  piece  of  the  stump 
of  a  cross.  '  Coming  out  of  the  north  end  of  Newland 
and  crossing  the  stone  pit  Leys,'  where  stone  was  then 
dug  '  you  descend  by  going  westward  into  Staunch 
Lane,  so  named  from  pellucid  or  vitrified  stones, 
which  from  the  shape  of  some  of  them  are  called 
Kitcats  and  are  seemed  good  for  staunching  blood.' 
They  are  also  found  in  several  other  shapes  in  the  clay 
used  for  making  brick  and  sometimes  near  the  surface 
of  the  ground.'* 

The  growth  of  the  town  through  the  latter  part  of 
the  19th  century  was  rapid.  Besides  the  woollen 
trade  already  alluded  to,  silk,  plush  and  ribbon 
weaving,  linen  making,  lace  making  and  wool  combing 
were  carried  on,  and  bells  were  cast  at  a  foundry  at 
W'adecroft  Lane  from  c.  1710  to  1762  by  the  Eayre 
family.  All  these  trades  save  the  bell  foundry  were 
prosperous  at  the  beginning  of  the  19th  century, 
but  they  gradually  gave  place  to  the  manufacture  of 
boots  and  shoes,  a  trade  said  to  have  been  introduced 
by  Thomas  Gotch  about  1790.  It  was  not,  however, 
till  about  1857  that  this  industry  developed,  and  it 
greatly  increased  in  1870  during  the  Franco-German 
war.  Railway  communication,  which  reached  the 
town  in  1857  when  the  Leicester  and  Hitchin  Railway 
was  opened,  also  helped  towards  its  prosperity.  Since 
this  date  Kettering  has  become  an  important  railway 
centre.  Previously  the  means  of  communication  had 
been  by  one  coach  which  passed  through  the  town 
from  Uppingham  to  Wellingborough,  and  an  omnibus 
to  the  latter  place. 

In  connexion  with  the  woolcombing  industry  there 
were  processions  on  the  festival  of  St.  Blaise  (3  Feb- 
ruary)'* the  patron  saint  of  the  trade,  the  last  of  which 
took  place  in  1829. 

The  old  town  of  Kettering  lay  on  the  west  side  of 
the  main  road  from  Wellingborough  to  Uppingham. 
Eayre's  map  of  the  town  made  about  1720  (here  repro- 
duced) gives  a  good  idea  of  its  extent  at  that  date. 
The  fires  which  devastated  it  in  1744  and  1766  have 
left  little  in  the  nature  of  old  buildings.  The  Sessions 
House  built  by  the  Earl  of  Westmorland  in  1629,'''' 
which  stood  in  the  Market  Place  as  already  mentioned, 
was  pulled  down  in  1805.  The  Market  Place  was 
rciYiodclled  at  the  end  of  the  l8th  century;  the  line 
of  thatched  shops  called  Rotten  Row  in  the  middle  of 
the  Market  Place,  was  pulled  down  between  1785  and 
1789.  The  cross,  with  a  dungeon  or  lock-up  under  it, 
which  stood  close  to  the  old  .Market  House  near  the 


entrance  to  the  churchyard,  w.is  removed  about  1 790. 
The  smaller  cross  which  was  erected  on  the  site  of 
the  old  cross  was  destroyed  about  1808.  Near  it 
stood  the  stocks,  later  moved  to  Hog  Leys,  the  whip- 
ping post  and  pillory.'" 

'Fhe  Sawyer  almshouses  in  Sheep  Street  were 
formerly  of  one  story  with  high-pitched  roof  and 
dormer  windows,  but  the  walls  have  been  heightened 
and  have  windows  lighting  the  upper  rooms.  The 
block  consists  of  six  dwellings  with  as  many  dor.rvvays 
and  mullioned  windows  on  the  ground  floor  and  is 
built  of  ironstone  rubble  ;  the  roof  is  covered  with 
stone  slates.  Over  the  middle  windows  is  a  panel 
inscribed  '  This  Hospitall  was  Built  by  Edmund 
Sawyer  Esqr  Afio  Dmni,  1688,'  and  the  founder's 
arms  above  with  helm,  crest  and  mantling. 

The  government  of  the  town  was  administered  at 
the  Abbot  of  Peterborough's  manorial  court  and  we 
have  references  to  the  bailiff  of  the  manor  as  the 
principal  oflicial  of  the  manor  and  town  and  the 
constable  acting  under  him,  to  carry  out  the  orders  of 
the  steward."  The  vestry  began  to  assume  powers 
possibly  in  the  17th  century,  but  certainly  early  in  the 
l8th  century,  and  the  organization  of  a  workhouse  by 
the  vestry  in  1717  is  an  early  instance  of  such  an 
institution.'*  In  1862  the  officials  of  the  vestry 
were  the  four  overseers,  two  surveyors  of  highways, 
a  Nuisance  Removal  Committee,  twelve  in  number, 
and  a  Sanitary  Committee."  A  Local  Board  was 
formed  in  1873  which  in  1894  became  the  Urban 
District  Council,  now  consisting  of  twenty-five 
members.  The  district  is  divided  into  five  wards. 
Proposals  were  made  in  1893  and  again  in  1901  to 
apply  for  a  charter  of  incorporation,  but  they  were 
negatived.  There  was  an  Inclosure  Av\'ard  in  1804. 
The  Public  Library  and  Museum  were  given  by  Mr. 
Andrew  Carnegie  in  1904  and  the  Alfred  East  Art 
Gallery  adjoining  it  was  built  in  1913  as  a  memorial 
to  Sir  Alfred  East,  R.A.,  a  native  of  the  town.  The 
Gallery  contains  a  representative  collection  of  Sir 
.Alfred's  paintings. 

By  a  charter  of  956  King  Edwy 
MANORS  granted  10  cassati  of  land  at  KETTER- 
ING to  his  thegn  Aelfsige  the  gold- 
smith.^"  The  boundaries  of  the  land  are  set  out  and 
seem  to  have  included  the  site  of  the  present  town. 
They  run  from  Cransley  Bridge  along  the  brook  to 
Humbridge,  thence  to  the  gallows  tree  on  Debden, 
from  there  to  Kinston  Head  to  Flie  Long  Dike,  then 
to  Weekley  Ford  along  the  Ise  until  it  came  to  Pytchley 
Ford,  and  from  the  ford  along  the  brook  until  it  came 
back  to  Cransley  Bridge.  Possibly  Aelfsige  gave 
Kettering  to  the  monastery  of  Medeshamstede  or 
Peterborough  as,  by  a  charter  dated  972,  King  Edgar 
confirmed  it  to  that  monastery.-'  Although  this 
charter  is  spurious,  it  is  probably  correct  as  to  its 
facts,  for  in  975  it  is  said  thatLeofsi  son  of  Bixi,  '  an 
enemy  of  God,'  dispossessed  Peterborough  Abbey  of 
Kettering  for  two  years,  but  by  the  influence  of 
Actlielvvold,  Bishop  of  Winchester,  possession  was 
regained.  The  manor  is  assigned  to  the  abbey  in 
the  Domesday  Survey  (1086)  and  by  several  confirma- 


"  DiiJgci,  Uiit.  NortbaHts.  ii,  241.                  refer  to  the  Sessions  House,  which  cvisted  "  Ibid.  55-8  ;  Webb,  F.ngl.  Local  Govit. 

'•  Hull  op.  cit.  4^.                                              twenty  ycart  earlier.  I3in,  ijm.                      "  Bull.op.  cit.  70. 

''»  A    stone    bearing    the    dale    1640,            "  Bull,  op.  cit.  160,  161  j  //hoc  /Jrri.  "  Birch,  Caria/.  S<jAr.  iii,  no.  943;  Lansd. 

built   into  the  old    Loal  Board  room  in        Hoc.  Reps,  xxiii,  iHo;  xxviii,  no.  MS.  lozg,  fol.  79  ;   Bull,  op.  cit.  3. 

the  comer  of  the   Market  Place,  cannot            "  Bull,  op.  cit.  141  el  seq.  "  Birch,  op.  cit.  iii,  no.  1281. 

219 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


tion  charters.  King  Stephen  gave  the  abbot  a  grant 
of  free  warren  in  Kettering^'*  and  the  abbey  held  the 
manor  attached  to  the  office  of  Sacrist,  in  demesne, 
until  its  dissolution  in  1540.^^ 

In  1544  the  manor  and  advovvson  of  the  rectory  of 
Kettering  were  granted  to  William  Lord  Parr  in  tail 
male.2'  Lord  Parr  died  two  years  later  without  male 
issue  and  Kettering  reverted  to  the  Crown.  In  1560 
a  grant  was  made  to  William  Garrard  and  others,-'" 
which  they  surrendered  two  years  later. 

The  manor  of  Kettering  from  which  the  site  of 
the  manor  {q.v.)  had  been  separated  was  granted  in 
1624  to  Sir  Henry  Hobart  and  others  for  99  years,  in 
trust  for  Charles  Princeof  Wales,  afterwards  Charles  I.^* 
In  1628  the  trustees  assigned  their  interest  to  William 
Williams,  Robert  Mitchell  and  others,  citizens  of 
London,  reserving  a  rent  of  £66  7/.  lo\d.-^  In  the 
same  year  Charles  I  mortgaged  the  reversion  in  fee 
of  the  manor  and  much  other  property,  to  Edward 
Ditchfield  and  others^'  representing  the  City  of 
London,  for  a  large  sum  of  money.  Sir  Henry  Hobart 
and  the  other  trustees  had  apparently  conveyed  the 
remainder  of  their  lease  of  the  manor  subject  to  the 
rent  of  ^66  7/.  loW.  to  Sir  Edward  Watson,  who  was 
holding  it  in  1628,  while  Peter  Cawston  held  the 
market  tolls,  etc.^  The  interest  of  William  Williams 
and  the  other  trustees  was  sold  in  1630  to  William 
Child  and  Thomas  Gardiner,  and  in  the  same  year 
Edward  Ditchfield  and  the  others  sold  the  reversion 
in  fee  to  John  Child  and  Daniel  Britten  subject  to 
the  fee  farm  rent  of  ^^66  "js.  \Q\dp  It  appears  that 
Sir  Lewis  Watson,  assignee  of  the  lease  of  the  manor, 
John   Sawyer,   Everard    Sturges   and   certain   others. 


Watson,  E.irl  of  Rocl- 
ingh.im.  Ardent  a  cbeve- 
Ton  azure  bctwfen  three 
martlets  saitle  with  three 
crescents  or  on  the  cheve- 
Ton. 


Sawvkr.  Lozeii^y  or  and 
azure  a  piile  gu}rs  ivith 
three  scallops  or  thereon. 


copyholders  of  tlic  manor,  hearing  that  the  King  was 
selling  the  manor,  desired  to  purchase  it.  They 
quarrelled,  however,  over  the  terms  on  which  the 
purchase  should  be  made,  and  Sir  Lewis  Watson 
lirought  an  action  against  Sawyer  and  the  others  for 
non-performance  of  the  agreement.  In  the  mean- 
while Sawyer  and  nine  others  obtained  the  residue  of 
the  term  of  99  years  from  William  Child  and  Thomas 
Gardiner  and  John  Child  and  Daniel  Britten  sold 
the  reversion  in  fee  of  the  manor  to  Robert  Breton   of 


Teton,  Valentine  Goodman  of  Blaston  and  eight 
others.'"  Thus  the  manor  became  divided  into  ten 
shares.  In  1634  ^^^  shareholders  sold  to  Sir  Edward 
Watso.a  and  Edward  Watson,  at  the  nomination  of 
Sir  Lewis  Watson,  all  the  fairs  and  markets,  the 
common  bakehouse,  erc.^' 

The  shareholders  of  the  manor  in  1641  were  Edward 
Watson,  created  Lord  Rockingham  in  1645,  who  held 
six  shares,  and  Edmund  Sawyer,  William  Good, 
William  Billing  and  John  Drury,'^  who  owned  the 
remaining  four  shares.  The  Sawyers  acquired  a 
second  tenth  and  their  two  tenths  were  obtained 
by  John  Duke  of  Montagu  in  1724.  He  also  acquired 
two  other  shares  in  1726  and  1729  from  Mrs.  Falkner 
and  Mrs.  Bass,  thus  bringing  his  holding  up  to 
four  tenths. '^  The  Duke's  daughter,  Mary  Duchess 
of  Montagu,  had  an  only  daughter  Elizabeth,  who 
married  Henry  Duke  of  Buccleuch,  and  these  four 
shares  came  to  the  present  Duke  of  Buccleuch.  The 
other  six  tenths  remained  in  the  Watson  family 
Earls  and  Marquesses  of  Rockingham  and  Lords 
Sondes,  and  were  held  by  Mr.  George  Lewis  Watson 
at  the  time  of  his  death  on  31  Dec.  1899.**  They 
then  passed  to  the  Rev.  Wentworth  Watson  and  on 
his  death  without  issue  on  5  July  1925,  Sir  Michael 
Culme  Seymour,  a  minor,  grandson  of  Mary  G.  Culme 
Seymour,  sister  of  George  Lewis  Watson,  succeeded 
to  the  property  which  was  vested  in  the  hands  of 
trustees,  called  the  Manor  trustees. 

The  fee  farm  rent  of  ^^66  yj.  lo^d.  was  granted  in 
1635  to  James  Duke  of  Lenox,^  who  settled  it  on 
George  and  Bernard  Stuart.  They  in  1652  assigned 
their  interest  to  Thomas  Gorstelow  and  John  Knight 
on  behalf  of  Sir  Jeffrey  Palmer,  Bt.,  attorney  general. 
Sir  Jeffrey  settled  it  on  his  son  Lewis  and  Jane  his 
wife  in  1654,  and  he  on  his  son  Sir  Geoffrey  Palmer. 
Sir  Geoffrey  in  1728  sold  it  to  trustees  for  John  Duke 
of  Montagu,  from  whom  it  passed  with  his  shares 
of  the  manor  to  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  until  extin- 
guished in  1891.^" 

In  1582  the  market  tolls  and  rights,  the  profits 
of  the  common  bakehouse  and  the  annual  returns 
called  eleven  '  dussens  '  or  tithings,  were  leased  for 
21  years  to  Edward  Depupper.  In  1 592  a  furtlier 
term  of  21  years  was  granted  to  Peter  Cawston/" 
who  was  still  holding  in  1628.  The  fairs  and  markets 
and  bakehouse  were  in  1634  sold  by  Robert  Breton, 
Valentine  Goodman  and  others,  trustees  for  John 
Sawyer,  Francis  Sawyer  and  others,  to  Sir  Edward 
Watson  and  Edward  Watson,  at  the  nomination  of 
Sir  Lewis  Watson.-"*  In  1661  Sir  Edward  Watson, 
then  Lord  Rockingham,  received  a  grant  of  three 
yearly  fairs  at  Kettering  on  Tuesday  before  the  feast 
of  the  Passover,  Tuesday  before  tiie  feast  of  Michael- 
mas, and  Tuesd.iy  before  the  feast  of  St.  Thomas.** 
The  market  rights  were,  on  16  March,  1881,  sold  by 
George  Lewis  Watson  to  the  old  Local  Board,  and 
the  market  is  now  controlled  and  owned  by  the 
Lhban  District  Council. 


"  Reg.  Rob.  Swaflham,  fol.  xlii. 

"  falor  Ecil.  (Kcc.  Com.),  iv,  279. 

■'  I.,  and  P.  lien.  Illl,  vol.  xix,  (i) 
r.  '41  (75)- 

"'  Pat.  R.  zEllz.  pt.  13, 

"  Ibid.  22jai.  I,pt.  16. 

"  Bull,op.cit.,23. 

"  P»t.  R.  4  Cha..  I,  pi.  35;  ^  Cliai.  I, 
pi.  ig. 


"  Ibid.  4Chai.  I,  pt.  35. 

"  Bull,  op.  cit.  cii.  Cloic  R.  6  Chai.  I, 
pt.  17,  no.  21. 

'"  Cloic  R.  7  CliaJ.  I,  pt.  i^,  no.  5; 
Exchcj.  Ililli  ft  Acci.  Nortlumpt.  Mich. 
7  Ch.T».  I,  no.  97. 

"  Hull,  op.  cit.  27,  cii.  rio«p  R.  9 
Chai.  I,  pt.  iH,  no.  6. 

220 


"  Hull,  op.  cit.  cit.  Exchcq.  Decreet  & 
Orders,  i0-2i  Chai.  II,  fol.  46A. 

"  Dull,  op.  cit.  31.  ''Ibid. 

"  I'ai.  K.  II  Ch,i«.  I,pt.  I  J. 

-''  Rllll,  op.  cii.  2iJ,  30. 
''  I'at.  R.  34  Eli/.,  pi.   II,  m.  17  j    Hull, 
op.  cii.  p.  14. 

*"  Cloic  U.  9  Chai.  I,  pt.  18,  no.  6. 
"  r.il.  R.  13  Chat.  II,  pt.  17,  no.  24. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


KETTERING 


The  pasture  and  lands  called  Haselfield  and  the 
site  and  demesne  lands  of  the  manor  were  in  15S6 
granted  to  Sir  Christopher  Hatton  and  his  heirs 
at  a  rent  of  ^27  6j.  SJ.*"  After  his  death  in  1 591 
his  licir,  Sir  William  Hatton,  or  Newport,  son  of 
John  Newport  and  Dorothy  his  wife,  sister  of  Sir 
Chrisiophcr,  sold  tlic  H,illfii.-ld,  otherwise  known 
as  Haselfield,  and  the  site  of  the  manor  in  1596  to 
Edmund  Sawyer,'"  and  for  confirmation  of  title 
Sawyer  obtained  a  Crown  grant  in  1602.''-  Edmund 
Sawyer  died  seised  of  the  manor  house  where  he  lived'* 
in  1630,  which  in  161 2  he  and  his  wife  Ann  had 
settled  on  their  son  John  and  Sarah  his  wife,  daughter 
of  Francis  Harvey.'"  John  was  killed  in  a  skirmish 
at  VV'eliingborouf^h  in  1646,  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son  Edmund.  He  had  a  dispute  as  to  the  repair 
of  the  church,  whereby  it  was  eventually  agreed  in 
1665  that  he  and  his  family  should  occupy  their 
accustomed  seats,  and  so  long  as  other  parishioners 
who  wanted  room  were  permitted  by  Edmund  Sawyer 
to  sit  in  the  aisle  or  chancel  anciently  belonging  to 
his  (Sawyer's)  house,  the  churchwardens  should  repair 
the  same,  except  only  the  pavement  of  the  lower 
chancel,  which  should  be  maintained  and  repaired 
by  Edmund  Sawyer,  because  it  was  the  burial  place 
of  his  family.  Edmund  Sawyer  died  in  1680,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  Henry.  The  hospital  or  alms- 
houses were  founded  under  the  will  of  his  younger  son 
Edmund,  who  died  abroad  in  1687.^* 

Henry  Sawyer  settled  the  site  of  the  manor  on  his 
wife  Mary,  daughter  of  William  Gomeldon,  of 
London,  in  1688,'"  and  had  by  her  a  son  Edmund. 
He  apparently  lost  his  money  in  the  South  Sea  Bubble, 
and  he  and  his  son  Edmund  sold  the  site  of  the  manor 
and  all  his  property  in  Kettering  in  1720  to  Francis 
Havves,  who  was  connected  with  the  South  Sea  Com- 
pany, and  Susan  his  wife.  In  the  following  year  the 
estates  of  the  directors  of  this  company,  being  seized 
for  the  benefit  of  the  sufferers,  Hawes'  property  in 
Kettering  was  sold  to  John  Lord  Montagu  by  a 
series  of  conveyances  completed  in  1729.'"  From  this 
date  the  site  of  the  manor  has  followed  the  descent 
of  the  Montagu  property,  and  is  now  held  by  the  Duke 
of  Buccleuch. 

The  fee  farm  rent  of  ^^27  6s.  8J.  reserved  by  the 
grant  to  Sir  Christopher  Hatton,  and  later  by  that  to 
Edmund  Sawyer,  was  leased  to  Henry  and  Francis 
Tate  in  1594.  for  21  years.**  In  1616  this  rent  was 
granted  to  Nathaniel  Rich  and  Robert  Hatton,  who 
were  possibly  acting  for  Sawyer  in  order  to  extin- 
guish it.*' 

The  RECTOR!'  MANOR  was  probably  in  exist- 
ence in  the  13th  century,  and  was  held  by  the  suc- 
cessive incumbents.  Its  lands  lay  to  the  north  of  the 
Market  Place.  In  1562  Anthony  Burton,  LL.B., 
the  rector,  with  the  consent  of  the  Bishop,  leased 
the  manor  to  Edward  Watson,  junior,  for  60  years, 
at  a  rent  of  £20.  In  1565  a  further  term  of  five  score 
years  was  added  at  the   rent  of  £^6,  and  in   1569 


a  still  further  term  of  80  years  at  the  rent  of  j^40. 
The  manor  was  held  under  these  leases  by  the  Watsons, 
Earls  of  Rockingham,  until  1802.  Since  this  date 
it  has  been  held  by  the  rectors  for  the  time  being.'* 

The  Church  of  ST.  PETER  AND 
CHURCH  ST.  PAUL  consists  of  a  chancers  ft. 6  in. 
by  16  ft.  9  in.,  with  north  and  south 
chapels,  clearstoried  nave  of  six  bays  73  ft.  by 
21  ft.  6  in.,  norlli  and  south  aisles  18  ft.  6  in.  wide, 
north  porch,  and  west  tower  16  ft.  square,  surmounted 
by  a  lofty  spire.  All  these  measurements  are  internal. 
The  width  across  nave  and  aisles  is  63  ft.  8  in.,  and 
across  chancel  and  chapels  61  ft.  5  in. 

The  church  stands  on  a  gradually  rising  slope 
from  the  west  and,  wit!i  the  exception  of  the  tower, 
south  chapel  and  the  west  bay  of  the  south  aisle, 
is  faced  with  rublile.  The  roofs  arc  of  flat  pitch  and 
leaded,  behind  plain  parapets  ;  internally  the  walls 
arc  plastered. 

In  the  outer  wall  of  ^}^e  south  aisle  is  a  fragment 
of  a  pre-Conquest  cross  shaft,  possibly  of  the  8th  or 
9th  century,  and  a  Norman  corbel  also  remains  in  one 
of  the  window  jambs  ;  but  of  any  church  which 
existed  before  the  14th  century  there  are  no  further 
remains,  owing  to  the  extensive  rebuilding  which  took 
place  in  the  Lite  mediaeval  period. 

The  eastern  part  of  the  chancel  projecting  beyond 
the  chapels  dates  from  about  1300,  and  the  north  door- 
way of  the  nave  is  of  the  same  period  ;  but  the  rest 
of  the  fabric  belongs  to  the  middle  or  third  quarter 
of  the  isth  century,  at  which  time  the  church  was 
rebuilt  and  assumed  its  present  aspect.  The  tower 
was  probably  first  erected,  being  built  to  the  west 
of  the  then  existing  nave  (after  the  demolition  of  its 
western  bav),  and  the  new  nave  afterwards  joined  to 
it." 

Considerable  changes  were  made  in  the  interior 
during  the  early  part  of  the  19th  century,  and  in 
1890-91  the  church  underwent  a  very  extensive 
restoration,  the  galleries  and  old  box  seats  being 
removed,  new  roofs  erected  over  the  aisles,  the  nave 
roof  repaired,'^  and  the  stonework  of  many  of  the 
windows  renewed  ;  a  large  detached  vestry  connected 
by  a  lobby  with  the  south  chapel  was  also  added.'^ 

The  chancel  has  good  double  angle  buttresses, 
and  a  scroll  string  at  sill  level.  The  east  vi'indow  is 
of  three  trefoiled  lights,  with  three  uncusped  circles 
in  the  head  and  moulded  jambs  and  muUions,  and  in 
the  north  wall  is  a  window  of  two  trefoiled  lights 
with  two  pointed  trefoils  in  the  head  ;  both  windows 
are  c.  1300,  but  have  been  restored.  A  contemporary 
moulded  doorway  below  the  north  window  was  re- 
moved in  1890  to  the  east  end  of  the  north  chapel, 
but  has  recently  been  blocked.  The  roof  of  the  old 
chancel  was  lowered  in  the  15th  century,  and  the 
present  parapet,  with  good  angle  gargoyles,  added. 
The  roof  is  of  five  bays,  and  has  carved  tracery 
between  the  ties  and  principals.  The  sedilia,  piscina, 
and  the  chancel  arch  are  all  modern.     On  the  north. 


">  Pat.  R.  23  Elii.  pt.  2,  no.  2. 

"  Bull,  op.  cil.  p.  15. 

*:  Pat.  R.  45  Elit.  pt.  I. 

*•  Bull,  op.  cit.  p.  15. 

"  Chan.    Inc|.    p  m.    7    Chaj.    I,    no. 

43 

"  Bull,  op.  cit.  (Supplement),  55-6. 

••  Recov.  R.  Mich.  4  Jai.   II,  ro.  87; 
Feet  o(  F.  Notthanti.  Mich.  4  Jat.  II. 


"  Bull,  op.  cit.  p.  58 ;  Feet  of  F. 
Northanl).  East.  2  Geo.  II. 

"  Pat.  R.  37  Elii.  pt.  18,  m.  19. 

'•  Ibid.  14  Jas.  I,  pt.  22. 

">  Bull.op.  cit.  86-91. 

"  The  axis  of  the  tower  inclines  con- 
lidcrably  to  the  north-west. 

"  Billings  (1843)  sayi  that  the  nave  and 
aisle  roofs  appeared  to  have  been  recon- 

221 


ftructed.  On  one  of  the  tie  beams  of 
the  nave  was  a  plate  with  the  date 
1688,  and  a  beam  in  the  south  aisle 
was  dated  1678.  The  south  aisle  roof  had 
been  rcleadcd  in  the  latter  year  and  the 
nave  roof  in  1789:  y^rri.  Ilium,  of 
KrtlrringCb.  13. 

'*  The  restoration  was  carried  out  under 
the  direction  of  Sir  Arthur  Blumfield. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


side  the  chancel  opens  to  the  chapel  by  a  15th-century 
arcade  of  two  arches,  and  on  the  south  by  a  similar 
arcade  of  tliree  arches,  all  of  two  moulded  orders  on 
piers  composed  of  four  attached  slufts  with  separate 
capitals  and  bases.  The  north  chapel  is  about  28  ft. 
long  internally  by  18  ft.  6  in.  wide,  and  has  a  five- 
light  east  window  and  two  three-light  windows  in  the 
north  wall  with  three-centred  heads,  cinquefoiled 
lights  and  transoms ;  all  are  restorations.  In  the  south- 


I5th-century  work  of  three  bays,  the  principals  of 
which  are  increased  in  depth  and  connected  with  the 
wall-pieces  by  braces,  with  solid  spandrels  carved  in 
low  relief. 

Both  chapels  are  separated  from  the  aisles  by 
moulded  arches,  and  the  chancel  arcades  are  filled 
with  modern  screens.  There  is  also  a  modern  screen 
between  the  north  chapel  and  the  aisle. 

The  nave  arcades  follow  the  design  of  those  of  the 


^^^^^^^^M^^?3&2^^E-^ 


BloCKeo    cJOorv/ay 


F^^--^^?--^^^^^^^^^% 


B 14- Ei  Century  early 

OI5Ii!  Century  C.I4- 50 

^1512  Century  C.I470-80       ^'LsL^ 

EZj  Modern 


10 


20  30  «0  50 


Scale  of  Feet 

Plan   of   KerrERiNC  Church 


E  S  T  R 


I  E  S 


-■  j.«j^»-X"  .■■'.-:' ' 


I 


east  corner  is  a  cinquefoiled  piscina,  and  in  the  east 
wall,  north  of  the  altar,  a  niche  for  a  statue.  The  roof 
is  of  two  bays,  with  good  carved  tie-beams. 

The  south  chapel,  sometime  known  as  '  Mr. 
Sawyer's  aisle,'"*  is  about  38  ft.  long  by  21  ft.  in 
width,  and  is  faced  with  ashlar.  It  is  divided  into 
three  bays,  and  has  a  five-light  cast  window,  and  three 
four-centred  windows  of  three  liglits  on  the  south, 
with  Perpendicular  tracery,  but  no  transoms.  The 
rood-screen  crossed  the  whole  church,  and  the  stair- 
way to  the  loft,  with  lower  and  upper  doorways, 
is  in  the  south-west  corner  of  the  chapel,  but  no  part 
of  the  screen  remains.  In  the  north-west  corner, 
higli  in  the  wall,  is  the  doorway  to  the  chancel  Kift, 
and  below  it  a  consecration  cross  within  a  roundel. 
TiiC  roof  of  the  chapel  is  a  very  beautiful  piece  of 


chancel,  with  clustered  columns  of  four  attached 
shafts  and  well-moulded  arches.  The  windows  of  the 
aisles  are  all  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights,  with  four- 
centred  heads  and  embattled  transoms,  but  the  west 
window  of  the  north  aisle  is  higher  and  narrower 
than  the  corresponding  window  on  the  south  side.^ 
At  the  east  end  of  both  aisles  there  were  altars  against 
the  screens,  the  aumbries  in  connection  with  which 
remain,  and  in  the  north  aisle  a  niche  for  a  statue. 
Tlic  early  14th-century  north  doorway  has  a  moulded 
arch  and  jamb  shafts,  with  moulded  capitals,  but  the 
bases  are  hidden  ;   the  door  bears  the  date  1682. 

The  porch  is  set  at  an  oblique  angle,  a  position 
accounted  for  by  the  ancient  entrance  to  the  church- 
yard, with  which  it  is  in  line."  It  is  of  two  stories, 
with  low-pitched  gable,  access  to  the  chamber  being 


"  From  16th-century  Kettering  wilU 
it  appciri  there  were  chaprli  of  St.  John 
the  Hjptiit,  probably  that  on  the  luuth 
■ide  ;  a  Lady  chapri  with  a  tabernacle  or 
niche  for  the  figure  of  the  Virgin,  which  ii 
probably  repreicnted  by  the  remaini  of 


the  niche  in  the  nortli  chapel ;  and  the 
chapel  of  St.  Kalherine  which  may  have 
been  at  the  eait  end  of  the  nnrtii  or  south 
aisle.  There  were  aWo  gilds  of  St.  John  the 
Haptist.Our  Lady, and  the  Holy  Sepulchrr 
(Hull,  op    fit.  Supplement,  21,  22.) 

222 


"  Over  the  west  end  of  the  south  aisle 
is  a  panel  with  the  names  of  the  church- 
wardens and  the  date  1746,  probably  the 
year  in  which  the  west  hay  was  refaced 
in  ashlar. 

'■"  hillings,  op.  cit.  1 1. 


w 


h 


u 


3 
O 
c/2 


o 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


kettp:ring 


by  a  stair-turrtt  at  the  north-west  corner  of  the  aisle. 
The  pointed  outer  doorway  is  set  within  a  square 
frame,  the  spandrels  of  which  are  filled  with  quatrc- 
foils  in  circles,  and  above  are  three  canopied  niches, 
the  outer  ones  formerly  occupied  by  statues  of  St. 
Peter  and  St.  P.iul,  whose  emblems  appear  on  shields 
below.  The  porch  has  a  square-headed  two-light 
window  on  each  side,  but  no  wall  benches  ;  the 
chamber  is  lighted  by  a  similar  window  facing  west. 

The  clearstory  windows  are  of  three  cinqucfoilcd 
lights  with  four-centred  heads  and  moulded  jambs. 

The  magnificent  tower  and  spire  arc  equal  in  height," 
and  are  amongst  the  best  examples  of  work  of  their 
kind  in  the  kingdom.    The  wliole  tower  was  carefully 


i-iiilii;:;:;.. 


Kettering  :  Church  Porch 

designed  with  relation  to  the  spire  whicii  it  was  to 
bear  and  the  slope  of  the  buttresses  was  contrived 
with  this  end  in  view.  The  tower  is  of  four  stages, 
with  a  slight  set-back  at  each  stage,  and  finishes  with 
battlemented  parapets  and  octagonal  angle  turrets. 
There  is  a  vice  in  the  south-west  angle.  Above  the 
moulded  plinth  is  a  band  of  quatrcfoils  in  circles, 
which  is  continued  round  the  enclosing  rectangular 
frame  of  the  west  doorway.  The  doorway  is  richly 
moulded  and  flanked  by  small  panelled  buttresses, 
terminating  in  lofty  pinnacles,  and  has  a  crocketcd 
hood  with  large  finials ;  the  spandrels  are  filled  with 
Perpendicular  tracery.  The  tower  buttresses  are 
well  set  back  from  the  angles,  and  there  is  a  band 
of  quatrefoils  marking  each  stage.  The  great  west 
window  is  of  five  lights,  with  transom  and  Perpen- 
dicular tracery,  and  the  stage  above  is  filled  on  each 
face  with  five  transoraed  panels,  the  middle  one  of 
which  is  pierced.  On  each  side  of  the  bell-chamber 
stage  are  three  admirably  proportioned  windows 
of  two  trefoiled  lights  with  transoms,  and  the  battle- 
ments have  cross  loopholes.    The  spire  was  repaired 


in  1887,  when  31  ft.  were  taken  down  and  rebuilt'*; 
the  angles  are  crocketcd,  and  there  are  three  sets 
of  lights  on  the  cardinal  faces,  the  two  lower  with 
mullions  and  tracery.  The  tower  arch  is  of  four 
chamfered  orders,  the  innermost  springing  from  half- 
round  responds. 

The  font  and  pulpit  are  modern. 

There  are  some  traces  of  mural  paintings  ;  on  the 
north  clearstory  wall,  near  tlie  chancel  arch,  is  the 
figure  of  an  angel  with  gaze  apparently  directed 
to  the  rood  above  the  loft,  and  in  the  spandrel  of  the 
arch  below  is  a  fragment  of  a  post-Reformation  text.''' 
On  the  inncrwall  of  the  nortii  aisle  are  the  remains  of 
a  figure  of  St.  Roeli  on  a  blue  ground  powdered  with 
gilt  stars.*" 

A  fragment  of  15th-century  glass,  with  kneeling 
figure  bearing  an  inscription  to  the  Blessed  Virgin, 
remains  in  a  window  of  the  south  chapel,  and  another 
inscription  in  the  same  window  '.  .  .  pro  statu  magistri 
Tho.  Bloxham,'  may  have  reference  to  this  figure." 

In  the  south  chapel  is  a  small  brass  plate  to  Edmund 
Sawyer  (d.  1630)  and  his  wife  Ann  Goodman,  of 
Blaston,  with  kneeling  figures ;  the  chapel  also  con- 
tains a  17th-century  bookstand  and  desk  for  two 
chained  books,  tlie  chains  of  which  remain.*^  In  the 
vestry  is  an  old  iron-bound  chest  with  three  locks. 

There  is  a  ring  of  ten  bells.  The  two  trebles  are 
by  Gillett  and  Johnson,  of  Croydon,  1921,  the  third 
and  fourth  by  Richard  Sanders,  of  Bromsgrove, 
1714,  the  fifth  by  John  Taylor  and  Co.  of  Lough- 
borough, 1890,  the  sixth  a  recasting  by  Taylor, 
in  1905,  of  a  bell  by  Thomas  Eayre  of  Kettering, 
dated  1714,  the  seventh  dated  1630,  the  eighth  by 
Thomas  Eayre,  1732,  the  ninth  by  the  same  founder, 
1722,  and  the  tenor  by  VV.  and  J.  Taylor,  1832.*^ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  c.  1663,  inscribed 
'  The  gift  of  Elizabeth  Crosey  to  Kettering  Church,' 
with  the  maker's  mark  re  four  times  repeated; 
a  plate  of  1716  inscribed  'The  gift  of  Mrs.  Fowler 
in  the  parish  of  Kettering  who  dyed  the  27th  of 
Aprill  1715  '  ;  a  flagon  of  1756,  by  William  Sliaw  and 
William  Priest  ;  a  silver-gilt  chalice  of  1908,  given  in 
1915  ;  a  silver-gilt  chalice  by  Frank  Knight  of 
Wellingborough,  given  in  1926  ;  a  silver-gilt  ciborium 
of  1914,  and  another  by  Frank  Knight,  1926.  There 
are  also  two  plated  dishes  1871,  and  a  pewter  flagon. 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i) 
baptisms  1637-1680,  marriages  and  burials  1637-1681  ; 
(ii)  baptisms  1681-1710,  marriages  1697-1709,  burials 
1683-1710;  (iii)  baptisms  and  burials  1710-1812, 
marriages  1710-1754;  (iv)  marriages  1754-1781; 
(v)  marriages  1781-1812.  In  the  third  volume  is  a 
terrier  of  1727. 

The  advowson  belonged  to  the 

ADVOW^ON        abbot  and  convent  of  Peterborough 

down    to   the   dissolution   of   that 

house.     It   was    granted    with    the   manor    to   Lord 


"  Billingt  gives  the  height  from  the 
floor  of  the  nave  to  the  baie  of  the  spire 
ai  88  ft.  q)  in.  and  of  the  tpire  (without 
the  vane)  88  ft.  8  in. 

•*  Bull,  WiK.  0/  Kettering,  p.  72  it.  The 
last  II  ft.  were  entirely  new  work.  The 
height  of  the  «pirc  was  slightly  increased, 
the  total  height  of  tower  and  spire,  ex- 
clusive of  finial  and  vane,  being  now 
178  ft.  loj  in. 

••  It  runs  "...  Cod  which  givcth 
his  abundance  to  all  things  living.    That 


they  doe  good,  that  they  be  rich  in  good 
works." 

•^  It  was  discovered  about  1840.  The 
figure  is  represented  in  a  scarlet  coat,  an 
angel  holding  his  right  hand,  a  dog  against 
his  left  leg,  with  wallet  and  escallop  shell, 
and  in  his  left  hand  a  pilgrim's  staff. 
The  figure  was  at  one  time  attributed  to 
St.  Jamei  the  Greater. 

*'  In  Undges' time  there  were  'broken 
portraits  of  saints  and  bishops  in  most  of 
the  windows  of  the  aisles ' ;  op.  cit.  ii,  243. 

223 


^^  The  cover  of  one  book  also  remains. 
In  an  inventory  of  1745  are  named  the 
Book  of  Homilies,  Jewel's  Apology,  and 
Foxe's  Acts  and  Monuments. 

*^' North,  Ch.  Belli  of  Northanis.  315, 
where  the  inscriptions  on  the  older  bells 
are  given.  During  the  restoration  of 
1890-91  the  bell-chamber  floor  was  raised 
several  feet.  The  17th  century  wooden 
pillars  which  formerly  supported  the 
tinging  and  organ  gallery  now  form  part 
of  a  staircase  in  the  ringing  chambrr. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Parr  in  1 544  and  reverted  to  the  Crown  on  his 
death  in  1546.  It  was  granted  in  1550  and  again 
in  1552  to  William  Parr,  Marquis  of  Northamp- 
ton,** nephew  of  Lord  Parr,  but  was  forfeited  on 
his  attainder  in  1554.  In  1558  it  was  granted 
to  Thomas  Reve  and  Christopher  Bullyt,  who  sold  it 
in  the  same  year  to  Henry  Goldeney.**  It  had  passed 
to  Edward  Watson  in  1561,  and  has  remained  in  the 
hands  of  the  family  of  Watson,  Lords  Rockingham 
and  Sondes,**  then  of  George  Lewis  Watson,  and 
has  followed  the  descent  of  the  Watson  shares  of  the 
manor  (q.v.). 

There  are  the  modern  churches  of  St.  Andrew  in 
Rockingham  Road  built  in  1 870;  St.  Mary  the  Virgin, 
in  Fuller  Street  (1895);  All  Saints,  in  William  Street 
(1899) ;  and  Mission  Churches  of  St.  Luke,  Alexandra 
Street  (1876);  St.  Philip's,  in  Brook  Street  (1893)  ; 
and  St.  Michael's,  Garfield  Street,  built  in  1894. 
The  Roman  Catholic  Church  of  St.  Edward,  in  the 
Grove,  was  built  in  1893,  and  there  are  many  Non- 
conformist chapels,  including  those  known  as  Toller 
Chapel,  first  built  for  the  Independents  in  1723  and 
called  after  Thomas  Northcote  Toller,  and  Fuller 
Chapel  for  Baptists,  named  after  Rev.  Andrew  Fuller, 
pastor  there  1783  to  1815,  both  in  Gold  Street. 

The  Church  and  Town  Allotment. 
CHARITIES  In  the  Parish  Book  it  is  stated  that 
^50  was  given  by  James  Cater  and 
j^io  by  Alderman  Pack,  which  sums  were  laid  out  in 
the  purchase  of  5  doles  of  meadow  ground  lying  in 
Killingholme  and  Walcots,  the  rents  to  be  applied  to 
put  forth  poor  children  to  trades.  The  old  brass 
tablet  of  Charities  states  that  John  Pettifer  gave  the 
rent  of  Emmerton's  Holme  (or  Lads'  Holme),  which 
consisted  of  about  3V  acres,  for  putting  out  of  poor 
people's  children.  By  the  award  of  the  Inclosure 
Commissioners  dated  23  Nov.  1 805  two  allotments  in 
the  Middle  Field,  containing  respectively  8  a.  i  r.  30  p. 
and  8  a.  16  p.,  were  awarded  to  the  Rector,  Church- 
wardens and  Overseers  in  lieu  of  lands  appropriated 
for  apprenticing,  for  the  church  and  for  the  poor.  The 
lind,  which  is  let  in  allotments,  produces  a  net  rent  of 
about  ;^43  yearly.  The  charity  is  administered  by  the 
rector  and  churchwardens  and  four  trustees  ap- 
pointed by  the  Urban  District  Council  in  place  of  the 
overseers.  l2/43rds  of  the  income  are  applied  by  the 
churchwardens  towards  church  expenses.  26/43rds, 
together  with  the  dividends  amounting  to  £()  <)s. 
yearly  on  £378  is.  lod.  Consols  (representing  accumu- 
lations of  income),  are  applied  in  the  maintenance  of 
Exhibitions  in  conformity  witli  a  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  17  Jan.  1896,  and  5/43rds  are 
distributed  to  the  poor  by  the  trustees  of  Hunt's 
Charity. 

Poor's  Allotment.  An  allotment  of  9  a.  I  r.  17  p. 
was  set  out  on  the  inclosure  for  tiic  poor  in  lieu  of  their 
rights  of  cutting  fuel  on  certain  lands.  The  land  is 
let  in  allotments  and  produces  about  /^20  10/.  yearly, 
and  the  Ofiicial  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  hold 
a  sum  of  j[H^7  15/.  loJ.  Consols  producing  ^£21  ■}!.  Sd. 
yearly  in  dividends.  This  sum  of  stock  represents 
the  investment  of  mine  rents  under  lease  to  the 
Kettering  Coal  and  Iron  Co.     The  income  is  applied 


by  the  rector  and  two  trustees  appointed  by  the 
Urban  District  Council  in  the  distribution  of  coal 
and  in  donations  to  the  Kettering  and  District  Nurs- 
ing Association. 

By  his  will,  proved  23  Feb.  1617-18,  William  Cave 
gave  £20  to  the  poor.  A  rentcharge  of  £1  2s.  on  3 
doles  of  meadow  land  was  purchased  with  this 
sum. 

By  his  will  dated  in  1733  Thomas  Dawson,  inn- 
keeper at 'The  George'  in  Kettering,  gave  £50  to  the 
poor,  and  Mrs.  Ann  Dawson,  his  widow,  added  ;^io. 
A  rentcharge  of  £^  was  purchased  with  these  sums 
aided  by  a  donation  from  tlie  parish.  These  two 
charges  are  paid  out  of  land  belonging  to  Mr.  James  B. 
Sutton. 

Christopher  Eady  in  1680  gave  ^^4  yearly  to  the 
poor  out  of  the  White  Hart  Inn  and  one  yard  of 
land.  This  charge  was  redeemed  in  1891  by  the 
transfer  of  ^^160  2J  per  cent.  Annuities  to  the  Official 
Trustees. 

These  charities  are  distributed  in  doles  to  the  poor 
in  January  by  trustees  appointed  by  the  Urban  Dis- 
trict Council  in  place  of  churchwardens  and  over- 
seers. 

The  endowment  for  this  parish  of  the  charity  of 
Edward  Hunt — -particulars  of  which  are  given  in  the 
Charities  of  the  parish  of  Warkton — consists  of 
/I384  6s.  T,d.  Derby  Corporation  6  per  cent.  Redeem- 
able Stock  and  ;^388  2s.  ^d.  Middlesbrough  Corpora- 
tion 6  per  cent.  Stock,  producing  £46  6s.  lod.  yearly 
in  dividends.  The  charity  is  administered  by  the 
minister  and  6  trustees  appointed  by  the  Urban 
District  Council,  and  the  income  is  distributed  to  the 
poor. 

The  .Mmshouse  Charity  of  Edmund  Sawyer  and 
others  is  regulated  by  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Com- 
missioners dated  28  Oct.  1910,  and  comprises  :— 

(i)  Sawyer's  Hospital,  founded  by  will  proved  in 
the  Prerogative  Court  of  Canterbury  23  June  1688, 
consisting  of  6  almshouses  and  a  rentcharge  of  £6 
paid  by  the  owner  of  the  Boughton  Estate. 

(2)  Elizabeth  Baker's  Charity  for  Bread.  Deed  poll 
15  Sept.  1790  and  declaration  of  trust  30  April  1816, 
originally  ;^I50  South  Sea  Annuities,  and— 

(3)  Martha  Baker's  Charity.  Will  proved  at  North- 
ampton 23  July  1782,  originally  ;^20o  South  Sea  An- 
nuities. The  endowments  of  these  two  charities  are 
now  represented  by  £277  13^.  8(/.  5  per  cent.  War 
Stock  producing  j^l3  \js.  id.  yearly. 

(4)  James  Gibbon's  Charity.  Will  proved  in  Preroga- 
tive Court  18  May  1888;  endowment  ,^500  Queensland 
Government  4  per  cent.  Stock,  producing  ^^20  yearly. 
The  Duke  of  Buccleuch,  as  owner  of  Boughton  House 
in  V\'eekley,  is  the  patron  of  the  charity,  which  is 
administered  by  a  body  of  trustees  consisting  of  the 
rector  and  seven  others.  The  income  is  divided 
equally  among  the  six  almswonien  who  to  qualify 
must  have  resided  in  Kettering  for  not  less  than  ten 
years.  One  almswoman,  called  Baker's  Almswoman, 
must  be  a  member  of  the  Church  of  England.  The 
Stock  is  with  the  Official  Trustees. 

Anne  Aldwinklc  by  codicil  to  her  will,  proved  in 
the   Prerogative  Court   of  Canterbury   2   Nov.  1 793, 


•'  Pat.  R.  4  Edw.   VI,   pt.    7  ;    5    Edw. 
VI,  pt.  5. 
••  Ibid.  4  &  ;  Ph.  &  Mjry,  pt.  3. 
"  Chan.    Inq.     p.m.,    bdlc.     37^,   no. 


93  ;  Feet  of  F.  NorthanH,  Mich.  18 
Jai.  I  ;  Eait.  1652  ;  llil.  i6i;3  ;  Trin. 
29  Chai.  II  ;  Rccov.  R.  jlil.  l6i;3, 
ro.    65;     Trin.  19    Ch.ii.    II,    ro.     165; 

224 


Hil.  9  Geo.  II,  ro.  189;  Ea»t.  14  Geo. 
II,  ro.  3ii  26  Geo.  II,  ro.  Si  $8  Geo.  Ill: 
ro.  260. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


KETTERING 


gave  to  the  vicar  and  churchwardens  a  sum  of  stock 
producing  ^^30  yearly,  to  be  applied  as  to  j^I2  to  the 
inmates  of  Sawyer's  Hospital,  ^^2  10/.  for  a  person  to 
read  and  pray  with  the  inmates,  £\  \os.  for  the  pur- 
chase of  books,  j^5  to  the  poor,  and  the  remainder  to 
the  poor  at  Christmas.  A  sum  of  /600  Navy  5  per 
cent,  was  appropriated  to  answer  this  bequest.  Tlie 
capital  money  was  never  transferred  to  the  minister 
and  churchwardens,  and  a  draft  scheme  was  prepared 
in  1894  but  was  never  carried  through.  No  payment 
has  been  made  in  respect  of  this  cliarity  for  the  last 
20  years. 

Sir  John  Knightlcy,  Bart.,  by  a  codicil  to  his  will 
proved  in  the  Prerogative  Court  of  Canterbury 
18  .\pril  1 81 2  gave  ^([200  in  support  of  the  Sunday 
Schools.  The  endowment  consists  of  ;^l8o  4J.  2d. 
Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable 
Funds  and  the  interest  amounting  to  ^4  10/.  yearly 
is  applied  by  the  rector,  churchwardens  and  over- 
seers for  the  benefit  of  the  Sunday  School. 

Thomas  Dash,  by  his  will  proved  28  Sept.  1841, 
gave  ^£50  to  the  rector  and  churchwardens  in  sup- 
port of  the  Sunday  Schools.  The  legacy  with  accu- 
mulations was  invested  in  ^91  5/.  lod.  Consols 
svith  the  Official  Trustees,  producing  £i  5/.  id.  in 
dividends. 

Mrs.  McGrouther's  Charity.  Many  years  ago  a 
Mrs.  Mary  Hogg  established  by  subscription  a  charity 
for  the  relief  of  aged  poor  widows,  which  became  known 
as  '  The  Kettering  Poor  Widows'  Fund,'  and  Mrs. 
Sophia  Susan  McGrouther,  by  deed  dated  29  May 
1872,  gave  ;^3oo  Bank  Annuities,  the  interest  to  be 
applied  for  the  benefit  of  poor  widows  or  single  women 
of  good  character  not  under  50  years  of  age.  The 
annuities  became  z\  per  cent.  Consolidated  Stock, 
and  this  was  converted  into  (^lo"]  \6s.  31/.  5  per  cent. 
War  Stock  standing  in  the  names  of  the  Rev.  C.  B. 
Lucas  and  C.  E.  Lamb.  The  charity  is  administered 
by  Mrs.  Alice  Lamb,  of  Warkton.  Monthly  payments 
are  made  to  about  25  poor  widows. 

James  Gibbon,  by  his  will  proved  18  May  1888, 
gave  £500  Queensland  Govt.  4  per  cent.  Stock  upon 
similar  trusts  to  Mrs.  McGrouther's  Charity.  The 
stock  is  standing  in  the  same  names,  and  the  dividends 
amounting  to  yr20  yearly  are  distributed  in  cash  to 
about  16  poor  widows. 

The  Great  Meeting  House  known  as  Toller  Chapel 
is  comprised  in  an  indenture  of  II  March  1723, 
and  the  following  charities  are  in  connection  there- 
with : — 

(1)  By  his  will,  proved  at  Northampton  15  July  1732, 
Samuel  Langley  gave  an  annual  sum  of  ^^i  out  of  his 
lands  for  the  benefit  of  the  minister.  This  charge  is 
paid  out  of  land  in  Nether  Field  now  the  property 
of  the  Kettering  Industrial  Co-operative  Society, 
Ltd. 

(2)  Matthew  Wilson,  by  will  proved  in  the  Prero- 
gative Court  of  Canterbury  3  Feb.  1827,  gave  £500 
for  the  benefit  of  the  minister.  This  sum  is  placed  on 
mortgage. 

The  following  charities  are  administered  by  the 
deacons  of  the  chapel  and  the  income  amounting  to 
£l\  is.  lid.  yearly  is  applied  in  cash  and  other  dis- 
bursements to  about  20  poor  persons  and  in  the 
purchase  of  books  for  use  at  the  chapel. 

(l)  Joseph  Wright,  by  his  will  proved  in  Preroga- 
tive Court  of  Canterbury  2  Jan.  1746,  gave  ^^30. 


(2)  John  Wakelin,  by  will  proved  at  Northampton 
12  Jan.  1793,  gave  £i,o. 

(3)  John  Meadows,  by  his  will  proved  at  Northamp- 
ton on  27  Nov.  1799,  gave  /50. 

(4)  Ephraim  Busweli,  by  will  proved  in  Prerogative 
Court  of  Canterbury  7  Aug.  1801,  gave  /50. 

(5)  George  Satchell,  who  died  22  April  1835,  by 
his  will  gave  j^20,  the  interest  to  be  distributed  in 
meat  at  Christmas. 

(6)  Joseph  Nunneley,  by  will  proved  at  Northamp- 
ton 16  .August  1769,  gave  ;tioo,  on  trust  that  £1  los. 
should  be  paid  to  the  minister  yearly,  zos.  distributed 
in  meat  to  the  poor,  and  30J.  in  cash  to  the  poor. 

(7)  Miss  Mary  Mce,  by  will  proved  at  Northamp- 
ton 24  July  1826,  gave  £19  19/.,  the  interest  to  be 
applied  in  distribution  of  books. 

(8)  Joseph  Wright,  by  will  proved  2  July  1834, 
gave  £^0  for  the  general  purposes  of  the  Meeting. 

(9)  Thomas  Dash  beforementioned,  by  will  gave 
;{^loo,  the  interest  to  be  applied  in  the  distribution  of 
meat. 

The  endowments  of  these  charities  were  originally 
placed  on  mortgage,  but  those  of  Joseph  Wright  1746, 
Wakelin,  Meadows,  Busweli,  Satchell  and  Nunneley 
now  form  part  of  a  sum  of  ^^41 2  Js.  6d.  5  per  cent. 
War  Stock  in  private  names  and  a  sum  £y  os.  ()d,  part 
of  the  dividends  on  this  sum  of  stock,  is  applied  in 
satisfaction  of  these  legacies. 

The  endowments  of  the  charities  of  Mee,  Wright 
(1834)  and  Dash  are  represented  by  £177  5j.  id. 
Consols  with  theOfficialTrustees  of  Charitable  Funds, 
producing  £^  Ss.  \d.  yearly. 

The  charity  of  Nathaniel  Collis  was  founded  by 
declaration  of  trust  dated  11  April  1849.  The  en- 
dowment, which  originally  consisted  of  shops,  is  now 
represented  by  ^^300  Consols  in  the  names  of  George 
Barratt  and  two  others.  The  dividends  amounting 
to  £7  los.  yearly  are  applied  by  the  trustees  of  the 
Great  Meeting  in  the  distribution  of  cash  to  about 
40  poor  and  the  purchase  of  hymn  books  for  use  in  the 
chapel. 

Jane  Curchin,  by  will  proved  9  March  1900,  be- 
queathed the  sura  of  ^^200,  to  be  called  Mrs.  Curchin's 
Bequest  to  the  trustees  of  the  Toller  Chapel,  the 
interest  to  be  distributed  in  money,  coal,  flannel  or 
calico.  The  personalty  was  insufficient  to  pay  the 
bequest  in  full,  and  ^156  15/.  was  all  that  was  received. 
This  was  invested  in  5  per  cent.  War  Stock  and  forms 
part  of  the  above-mentioned  sum  of  ^^41 2  "js.  6d.  In 
respect  of  this  bequest  a  sum  of  £6  5/.  6d.  is  dis- 
tributed in  money  payments  to  about  36  poor  and  in 
garments. 

The  following  charities  are  in  connection  with  the 
Fuller  Baptist  Chapel  comprised  in  an  indenture  dated 
25  Feb.  1816:— 

The  Fuller  Allotment.  By  the  Inclosure  Award  of 
23  Nov.  1805,  a  piece  of  land  in  Middle  Field,  Ketter- 
ing, was  granted  for  the  support  of  public  worship  in 
the  Fuller  Chapel.  The  land  was  sold  and  the  pro- 
ceeds invested  in  ;^2lo  is.  Sd.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock 
with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds,  pro- 
ducing/lo  10;.  2(/.  yearly,  which  is  applied  to  expenses 
of  the  chapel. 

By  his  will,  proved  in  the  Prerogative  Court  of 
Canterbury  6  Feb.  1734-5,  ]°^  Davenport  devised 
land  and  hereditaments  to  trustees  for  the  benefit  of 
the  minister  of  the  Protestant  Dissenters  called  the 


225 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Baptists  or  Anabaptists  in  Kettering.  The  property 
consisted  of  about  5  acres  of  land  with  a  house  and 
stable.  This  was  sold  some  years  since  and  the  pro- 
ceeds invested  in  £523  16/.  id.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock 
with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing  ^26  3/.  lOt^. 
yearly.  The  trustees  of  the  Fuller  Baptist  Chapel 
were  appointed  trustees  by  scheme  of  the  Charity 
Commissioners  dated  15  March  1918.  The  income 
is  applied  to  the  general  expenses  of  Fuller  Chapel. 

Mrs.  Beeby  Wallis,  by  will  proved  in  Prerogative 
Court  of  Canterbury  6  May  I  Si  3,  gave  /400  to  the 
minister  and  deacons  of  the  Particular  Baptist  Con- 
gregation upon  trust  to  apply  the  interest  yearly  as 
to  £2  los.  to  the  minister  for  preaching  occasionally 
in  neighbouring  villages,  £2  I0.r.  in  Bibles  and  hymn 
books  for  poor  of  congregation,  £^  to  poor  of  congre- 
gation, ;^4  10^.  in  repair  of  Meeting  House  and  residue 
for  minister.  The  money  was  invested  in  Consols, 
which  were  sold  in  1897,  and  the  proceeds,  £^SS  '■'•1 
after  being  placed  on  mortgage  were  subsequently 
invested  in  £480  lys.  ~d.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock,  with 
the  Official  Trustees,  producing  ^24  oj.  10(/.  yearlv.  In 
1924  £16  los.  was  placed  to  the  general  fund  of 
Fuller  Chapel,  £2  IQS.  to  the  Hymn  Book  and  Bible 
Fund,  and  ^^5  was  distributed  to  the  poor. 

Thomas  Gotch,  by  his  will  proved  in  the  Preroga- 
tive Court  of  Canterbury  12  March  1806,  gave  ;£loo 
to  the  minister  and  deacons  of  the  Baptist  Meeting 
upon  trust  to  distribute  the  interest  among  the  poor 
of  the  congregation.  The  money  was  placed  on  mort- 
gage, but  was  subsequently  invested  in  £170  los.  8J. 
Consols  standing  in  the  names  of  William  Timpson 
and  three  others.  The  dividends,  ^^4  5;.  yearly,  are 
distributed  to  tlie  poor. 

Mary  Marlowe,  by  her  will  proved  in  the  Prerogative 
Court  of  Canterbury  13  March  1779,  gave  to  trustees 
;{^I50,  part  of  ^^,900  3  per  cent.  Bank  Annuities, 
towards  tiic  support  of  the  minister  of  the  Particular 
Baptists  at  Kettering,  and  £co  3  per  cent.  Bank  An- 
nuities to  the  poor  members  of  the  congregation.  At 
her  death  there  was  not  suflicient  property  for  the 
trustees  to  execute  her  will,  and  the  money  was  put 
into  Chancery.  In  1787  the  share  for  this  charity 
was  fixed  at  ^^l  8.r.  The  capital  is  invested  in  Consols 
and  the  trustees  now  pay  17s.  4d.  for  the  minister  and 
5/.  \od.  for  the  poor. 

Elizabeth  Seward,  by  her  will  dated  2  June  1753, 
gave  to  trustees j^400  South  Sea  Annuities  upon  trust 
to  pay  the  interest  to  the  ministers  of  the  four  con- 
grcgationsof  Particular  Baptistsof  Bolton  of  the  Water, 
Alcester,  Leicester  and  Kettering.  The  capital  is  in 
Consols,  and  the  sum  now  received  for  Kettering  is 
£'i  IS.  lod.  yearly. 

Mrs.  Agnes  Percival,  by  her  will  proved  24  March 
1917,  gave  /I400  to  the  trustees  of  the  London  Road 
Congregational  Church  upon  trust  to  apply  the 
interest  in  religious  work  in  connection  with  the 
chapel.  The  money  was  invested  in  ^^411  18/.  lod. 
5  per  cent.  War  Stock  with  the  Ollicial  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds  producing  ^^20  i2j.  yearly  in 
dividends. 

William  Wilson,  by  his  will  proved  at  Oxford, 
June,   1928,  gave  /^loo    in   augmentation    of   Agnes 


Percival's  charit)'.  £q6  l8s.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock 
was  purchased  by  the  Oificial  Trustees  of  Charitable 
Funds  and  produces  ^^4  i6s.  lod.  per  annum. 

Mrs.  C.  Arnsbv,  by  her  will  proved  at  Peterborough 
12  March  1912,  bequeathed  the  residue  of  her  estate 
to  the  trustees  of  the  Strict  Baptist  Church  Jehovah 
Shalom,  Wadcroft,  for  the  benefit  of  the  church. 
The  endowment  consists  of  ;^4lo  loi.  Gd.  3J  per  cent. 
War  Stock  and  ^^81  3;.  T,d.  5  per  cent.  War  Stock  in 
names  of  D.  E.  Rootham  and  two  others,  and  pro- 
duces £\i  8/.  4J.  yearly  in  dividends.  The  income 
is  placed  to  the  church  incidental  fund. 

The  Wicksteed  Village  Trust  is  comprised  in  an 
indenture  dated  29  Jan.  1916.  181  acres  of  land, 
known  as  Barton  Seagrave  Suburb  Estate,  used  as  a 
public  park,  and  41  acres  called  the  Pebbleford 
Building  Estate,  were  granted  to  trustees  for  the 
amelioration  of  the  conditions  of  the  working  classes 
in  and  near  the  town  of  Kettering  and  elsewhere  in 
the  LInited  Kingdom,  by  the  provision  of  improved 
dwellings  with  gardens,  etc.  In  1924  ^^8,119  i6s.  jd. 
was  received  from  sale  of  turf,  loam,  gravel,  refresh- 
ments, farm  sales,  etc. 

Tiie  following  legacies  were  left  for  the  endow- 
ment fund  of  the  Kettering  and  District  General 
Hospital : — 

Miss  Laura  Rebecca  Morris.  Will  proved  27  Aug. 
1908;  gavCj^iooasan  addition  to  the  endowment  fund. 
This  sum  has,  with  other  monies,  been  invested  in 
/]65o  Dominion  of  Canada  3J  per  cent.  Stock  in  the 
names  of  F.  Mobbs  and  three  others. 

The  Rev.  Cecil  Henry  Maunsell.  Will  proved 
23  Dec.  191 1,  gave  /l,ooo.  The  legacy,  less  duty, 
was  invested  with  other  monies  in  £550  Glasgow 
Corporation  3  per  cent.  Stock  and  ;^6o7  L.  &  N.W.R. 
3  per  cent.  Deb.  Stock. 

Mrs.  Mary  Ann  Brown.  Will  proved  12  April  191 1, 
gave  ;^20.  This  was  invested  in  Glasgow  Corporation 
3  per  cent.  Stock,  and  forms  part  of  the  above- 
mentioned  sum  of  ;^55o.*' 

Sir  Edward  Nicolls,  by  his  will  proved  in  the  Pre- 
rogative Court  of  Canterbury,  17  |uly  1717,  gave  land 
situate  at  Haslebeech,  Sulby,  Hardwick,  Old,  Wil- 
barston,  and  Walgrave,  amounting  altogether  to  about 
593  acres,  to  trustees  upon  trust  to  pay  out  of  the 
income  thereof  ^^30  yearly  to  each  of  the  incumbents 
of  the  following  parislies — namely,  Northampton  All 
Saints,  Kettering,  Rothwell,  Oundlc,  Hardwick, 
Mouhon,  Cjuilsborough  and  Spralton,  and  he  directed 
that  the  residue  of  the  income  siiould  be  applied  to 
charitable  uses  at  the  discretion  of  the  trustees.  The 
land  has  been  sold  and  the  proceeds  invested  in 
/i,6o8  11/.  jd.  Consols  and  £15,900  ijs.  ^d.  4  per 
cent.  Funding  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds,  producing  £(>j6  \s.  Sd.  yearly  in 
dividends.  Each  of  tiic  respective  incumbents  re- 
ceives a  cheque  yearly  for£30,  and  the  residue  is  applied 
in  special  grants  varying  from  j^20  to  j^30  to  other 
incumbents  and  in    donations  to  hospitals. 


•'  There  .Trc  Bcvcr.Tl  other  legacies  mentioned  in  the  yearly 
report  of  the  Ilotpital,  but  information  concerning  them  has 
not  been  obtained. 


226 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LILFORD-WITII-WIGSTHORPE 


Lyllofordc  (xiv  cent.) ;  W'ykenclliorp  (xiii  cent.) , 
Wykyiigesthorpe  (xiv  cent.). 

This  parish,  though  inchidod  in  the  Hundred  of 
Hu.\loe,  is  locally  situated  in  the  Hundred  of  I'i)lebrook. 
It  lies  on  the  east  bank  of  tiie  Nene,  which  is  spanned 
by  a  handsome  stone  bridge  with  fluted  pilasters, 
erected  within  a  short  distance  of  Lilford  Hall  in 
1796. 

The  hamlet  of  Wigsthorpe  forms  the  eastern  portion 
of  the  parish,  the  road  from  Thrapston  to  Oundlc 
running  between  it  and  I.ilford.  'I'hc  few  houses 
which  constitute  the  village  are  clustered  round  the 
railway  crossing  in  Wigstliorpe.  In  Bridges'  time 
I.ilford  possessed  a  village  of  12  houses  and  a  church 
dedicated  to  St.  Peter,  and  the  hamlet  of  Wigsthorpe 
also  held  12  houses.  A  fine  soft  spring  of  water  to 
the  south  of  Lilford  Park  marks  what  was  once  the 
centre  of  Lilford  village. 

The  greater  part  of  the  Lilford  portion  of  tlic  parish 
is  occupied  by  Lilford  Park.  Lilford  Hall  lies  near 
its  western  limit,  and  possesses  an  extremely  charming 
view,  across  the  Nene,  of  Pilton  with  its  old  church 
and  manor  house.  The  Hall  is  a  fine  example  of 
late  Jacobean  work  built  in  1635,  this  date  appearing 
on  two  great  chimney  stacks  in  the  court  at  the  back 
of  the  house.  The  estate  then  belonged  to  the  family 
of  Elmes,  and  it  must  have  been  William  Elmes,  who 
succeeded  in  1632  and  died  in  1641,  who  was  the 
builder.  The  three  principal  fronts  are  treated  in  the 
traditional  Jacobean  manner,  with  niullioned  windows 
and  gables,  some  of  wliich  are  straight  in  outline  and 
some  curved,  the  whole  being  disposed  symmetrically; 
but  the  entrance  front  has  no  projecting  wings,  its 
line  being  only  broken  by  a  large  semicircular  bay 
window  of  two  stories  at  each  end,  and  a  porch  of  one 
story  in  the  middle.  Wings  project  at  the  back  and 
form  a  kind  of  court.  This  general  disposition  is 
indicative  of  the  end  of  the  Jacobean  period.  The 
architectural  treatment  is  quite  simple,  but  none  the 
less  satisfactory  on  that  account.  An  unusual 
feature  is  the  grouping  of  many  chimney  flues  in  a 
long  straight  row  with  separate  shafts  all  joined 
together  at  the  top.  The  house  stands  well  up  above 
the  adjacent  river  Nene  and  has  charming  prospects. 
Sir  Thomas  Powys,  who  purchased  the  property  in 
1 71 1,  decorated  the  interior  in  the  fashion  of  the 
time.  The  upstairs  drawing  room  retains  its  original 
character,  and  the  main  staircase  dates  from  this 
period  ;  but  the  entrance  hall  and  corridor  appear 
to  have  undergone  alterations.  There  is  one  room, 
the  library,  where  the  oak  panelling  and  a  handsome 
oak  chimneypiece  of  the  early  house  still  remain  ; 
otherwise  the  interior  work  is  of  the  1 8th  century  and 
later.  Relatively  small  but  judicious  additions  have 
been  made  by  the  present  Lord  Lilford.  The  stables 
at  the  rear  form  part  of  the  architectural  grouping. 
They  are  of  the  1 8th  century,  simply  but  carefully 
planned  and  they  add  to  the  interest  of  the  general 
arrangement.     The    gardens    have    been    admirably 


laid  out  in  modern  times,  and  in  conjunction  with 
much  fine  old  timber,  form  an  attractive  setting  to 
the  house.  In  aviaries  attached  to  the  house  is  a 
collection  of  rare  birds. 

The  area  of  the  parish  is  1827  acres  of  land  and 
13  acres  of  water.  The  ground  near  the  Nene  is 
liable  to  floods,  and  nowhere  rises  to  much  more  than 
200  ft.  Tiie  soil  is  clay  ;  the  sub-soil  clay  and  rock. 
To  the  west  of  the  Thrapston  road  it  is  good  :  to  the 
east  of  it,  cold  and  inferior.  The  chief  crops  grown 
are  wlicat,  barley  and  beans.  The  population  in 
1921  was  164.* 

The  vicarage  is  annexed  to  the  rectory  of  Achurch, 
where  the  rector,  the  incumbent  of  the  combined 
churches,  resides. 

The  Public  Elementary  School  (mixed)  was  built 
about  1845  by  Lady  Lilford,  and  enlarged  in  1866  by 
Lord  Lilford  to  hold  90  children.  The  children 
attend  from  the  adjoining  parishes  of  Pilton  and 
Tliorpe  Achurch.  Barnwell  Station,  on  the  London 
Midland  and  Scottish  Railway,  is  just  within  the  parish 
boundary. 

In  the  time  of  King  Edward  the 
MANOR  Confessor,  5  hides  in  LILFORD  were  the 
property  of  Thurchil,  who  held  them 
freely.  They  had  probably  been  afterwards  granted 
to  Walthcof,  Earl  of  Huntingdon,  who  married 
Judith,  the  Conqueror's  niece.  Judith  continued  to 
liold  in  I086'''  after  the  execution  of  her  husband  in 
1075.  Their  eldest  daughter  and  coheir  Maud  was  given 
in  marriage  by  William  to  his  Norman  follower 
Simon  de  St.  Lis  or  Senliz,  who  was  made  Earl  of 
Northampton  and  Huntingdon,  and  after  his  death 
she  was  married  to  David,  later  king  of  Scotland,  who 
became  Earl  of  Huntingdon.' 

The  overlordship  followed  the  descent  of  the 
earldom  and  honour  of  Huntingdon  {see  Fothering- 
hay). 

The  tenants  in  demesne  were  the  Oliphants 
(Olifard,  Holyfard)  who  from  being  holders  of  land 
in  England  under  the  kings  of  Scotland  transferred 
their  allegiance  to  Scotland,  becoming  magnates  and 
peers  there.^  Three  branches  of  the  family  appar- 
ently held  lands  within  the  counties  of  which  the 
King  of  Scotland  was  earl.  The  earliest  member  of 
the  family  as  yet  found  is  Roger  Oliphant  who 
witnessed  a  charter  of  Simon  de  St.  Liz  to  St.  Andrew's 
Priory,  Northampton,  not  later  than  1108.^  In  the 
survey  of  the  reign  of  Henry  I  (l  100-35)  William 
Oliphant  was  holder  of  5  hides  in  Lilford  of  the  king 
of  Scotland  and  was  living  about  1147.'  He  was 
probably  succeeded  by  David  Oliphant  godson  of 
King  David  of  Scotland,  who  assisted  at  King  David's 
escape  after  the  rout  at  Winchester  in  1141.'  It  was 
he  probably  who  was  attesting  charters  to  1 167.* 
His  successor  was  possibly  William  whose  name 
appears  in  these  counties  about  this  time.'  Walter 
Oliphant  was  given  as  a  hostage  by  William  of  Scotland 
in  1174'"  and  a  William  and  his  sister  Agatha  were 


'  The  poll  books  show  there  was  one 
freeholder  in  the  paiish  in  1705,  Richard 
Bailey,  and  that  in  1831  the  vicar,  the 
Hon.  Fredk.  Powys,  clerk,  the  one  free- 
holder, resided  at  Achurch. 


*  V.C.II.  A'erihanii,  i,  354J. 

■  Farrcr,  Honours  and  Kntgbts'  Fees^  ii, 
296. 

♦  V.C.H.  NoTlbants.  i,  291. 
'  Round,  Feuil.  Engl.  223-4. 

227 


"  V.C.II.  Norlhanis,  i,   365*;    ste  ah 
ibid.  291. 

'  Farrcr,  op.  cit.  354. 

'  Ibid.  '  Ibid. 

'»  Ibid.  355. 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Oliphant.     Guhs  three 
crescents  argent. 


connected  with  Northamptonshire  in  1 201.^1  It  was 
another  Walter,  probably,  whose  land  in  Lilford  was 
in  1216  committed  to  Ralf  de  Trubleville.'''*  This 
Walter  was  a  man  of  considerable  importance  in 
Scotland,  holding  the  office  of  justice  of  Lothian  and 
being  constantly  in  attendance  on  the  king."  He 
presented  to  the  church  of  Lilford  in  1228"  and 
he^^  and  William'^  Oliphant  were  dealing  with  lands 
in  Lilford  and  Wigsthorpe  in  1 232.  In  1 242-3  the  heir 
of  Walter  Oliphant  (as  though  Walter  were  dead)  is 
said  to  hold  one  fee  in  Lilford 
of  the  Earl  of  Albemarle  of 
the  Honour  of  Huntingdon." 
This  heir  was  apparently  David 
Oliphant,  one  of  the  magnates 
of  Scotland,  who  in  1244  was 
returned  as  holding  one  fee  in 
Northamptonshire  of  William 
de  Forz,  Earl  of  Albemarle, 
and  Christine  his  wife.'*  It 
would  seem  that  this  David 
was  dead  without  issue  before 
1266  when  Walter  de  Moray 

(Moravia),  apparently  one  of  his  heirs,  presented  to 
the  church  of  Lilford.'*  Divorgilla  his  widow, 
described  as  Lady  of  Lilford,  held  the  manor  of 
Lilford  for  life  by  gift  of  Walter  de  Moray,  who 
reserved  the  advowson  of  the  church.*"  Divorgilla 
Oliphant  gave  to  Divorgilla  daughter  of  Sir  Walter 
Montfichet  (Montefi.xo)  all  the  lands  in  Armiston 
which  she  held  by  gift  of  Roger  Wallenger,  with  re- 
mainders to  Divorgilla  Montfichet's  brothers  Laurence 
and  John.2'  In  1287  William  Montfichet,  Lord  of 
Kirgill  (Kirkhill)  in  Scotland,  and  heir  of  the  Lady 
Divorgilla  Oliphant,  Lady  of  Lilford,  granted  the 
lands  he  had  received  from  her  to  Laurence  son 
of  Sir  Walter  de  Montfichet,  his  kinsman,  with  rever- 
sion to  John  son  of  the  said  Laurence.^^  Jn  1296 
Divorgilla  claimed  the  advowson  of  the  cliurch  of 
Lilford  against  William  son  of  Walter  de  Moray,  and 
the  King  presented  because  the  lands  of  Scottish 
magnates  iiad  been  taken  into  his  hands.*'  However, 
in  1299,  the  presentation  was  quashed  as  having  been 
made  in  error,  the  patronage  belonging  to  William  de 
Moray.**  In  1300  the  manor  and  advowson  of 
Lilford  were  conveyed  by  William  de  Moray  to 
Anthony  Bek,  the  famous  Bishop  of  Durham,*^  and 
he  bequeathed  them  at  his  death  in  1 3 10  to  his  great 
nephew  Sir  Robert  de  Willoughby,  first  Lord 
Willoughby  of  Eresby,  and  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter 
of  Edmund  Lord  Deyncourt,*'  Sir  Robert  being  son 
of  Alice  wife  of  Sir  William  de  Willoughby  and 
daughter  of  John  Bek  of  Eresby,  brother  of  the  bishop.*' 
Sir  Robert  de  Willoughby  obtained  confirmation  of 
his  title**  and  in  1316  was  returned  as  holding  Lilford 


Willoughby.   Or  a  fret 
azure. 


and  its  members.*'  He  died  in  the  same  year  seised, 
jointly  with  his  wife  Margaret,  of  the  manor  and 
advo\vson  held  of  John  de  Britanny  as  of  the  Honour 
of  Huntingdon  by  the  service  of  one  knight's  fee,  his 
heir  being  his  son  John  aged  15  years.^  John  de 
Willoughby  confirmed  a  grant  of  the  manor  for  life 
to  William  de  Willoughby  and  in  1330  was  called 
upon  to  justify  his  claim  to  soc  and  sac,  tol  and  theam, 
infangenthef  and  outfangenthcf,  free  warren,  view 
of  frank-pledge,  freedom  from 
pontage,  tolls,  sheriff's  aids, 
etc.,  in  Lilford.^'  John  de 
Willoughby  was  returned  as 
holding  half  a  knight's  fee  in 
Lilford  in  1346.**  He  was 
present  at  the  battle  of  Crecy 
in  that  year  and  died  in  1 349.^ 
He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Sir  John  de  Willoughby,  tliird 
Lord  Willoughby,  who  settled 
the  manor  of  Lilford  and  its 
member  Hockington  in  1361.^ 

He  took  part  in  the  battle  of  Poitiers  and  died 
in  1372,  having  settled  the  manor  on  his  son 
Robert,  fourth  Lord  Willoughby,  and  Robert's  second 
wife  Margaret,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Zouche 
of  Haringworth.^  He  re-settled  the  manor  and 
advowson  in  1376**  and  in  J384  he  and  his  wife 
Margaret  granted  the  advowson  to  Sir  John  Holt  and 
others.^'  He  died  seised  of  the  manor  in  1396  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  William,  fifth  Lord  Willough- 
j,y_38  William  died  in  1409  leaving  a  son  Robert, 
sixth  Lord  Willoughby.^  The  manor  of  Lilford 
had,  however,  been  settled  for  life  on  Joan  widow  of 
William,  who  after  his  death  married  Henry,  Lord 
Scrope  of  Masham,  and  later  Sir  Henry  Brounflete. 
She  died  in  1434,**  when  Robert  sixth  Lord 
Willoughby  succeeded.  He  was  engaged  in  the  wars 
in  France,  being  present  at  Agincourt,  and  died  in 
1452.  His  heir  was  his  daugliter  Joan,  the  wife  of 
Richard  de  Welles,'"  seventh  Lord  Welles,  who  was 
summoned  to  Parliament  in  her  right  as  Lord 
Willoughby,  retaining  this  title  apparently  after  her 
death  in  1460.  The  paternal  estates  of  her  husband, 
forfeited  by  the  attainder  of  his  father  Lyon  or  Leo, 
Lord  Welles,  slain  at  the  battle  of  Towton,  where  he 
fought  on  the  Lancastrian  side,  were  restored  to  him 
in  1464-5,  and  in  1468  he  obtained  full  restitution 
in  blood  and  honours.  But  in  1469  he,  his  son-in-law 
Sir  Thomas  Dymock,  and  his  son  and  heir,  Sir  Robert 
de  Welles,  were  all  beheaded  near  Stamford,  in 
consequence  of  the  latter's  participation  in  the 
Lincolnshire  rebellion.**  The  heir  of  Sir  Robert  de 
Welles  (whose  execution  followed  that  of  his  father) 
was  his   sister  Joan,  who,  being  then  the  childless 


"  Curia  Reg.  R.  ii,  73. 

"  Farrer,  !oc.  cit. 

'*  Bain,  Cat.  Doc.  Seoll.  144,  139. 

"  Bridgci,  Hill.  Northanli.  ii,  242. 

"  Feet  uf  F.  Northanti.  caie   171,  file 
15,  no.  285. 

'•  Ibid.  no.  284. 

"  Bk.  of  Fees,  938.        "  Farrer,  loc.  cit. 

"  Bridgei,  loc.  cit. 

"  Farrer,  loc.  cit. 

"  Buccleuch  Deedi,  F.  1,  2,  4,  5. 

"  Ibid. 

••Bain,   Cal.   Doc.  Scoll.   ii,  725;   Cal. 
I'ai   1292-1301,  p.  184. 


"  Ibid.  444;  Bain,  op.  cit.  1104. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  28  Edw.  I, 
c«ie  175,  file  58,  no.  3S6. 

"  Cal.I'al.  1307-13,  p.  375. 

"  G.E.C.  Ciimflfie  I'etrage,  viii,  141. 

"Chart.  R.  4  I'dw.  II,  m.  1,  no.  10; 
Cal.  Chan.  1300-26,  p.  iSi;  Cal.  Pat. 
'3°7"'3i  P-  375  )  cf.  I'lac.  /Ibbrev.  (Rec. 
Com.),  31 1. 

■•  Feud.  /liJi,  iv,  28. 

•"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  10  Edw.  II,  no.  78  ; 
Cal.  Ing.  Ed.  II,  vi,  no.  60. 

•'  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.), 
575-6- 

228 


'•  Feud.  /liJs,  iv,  449. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  241. 

•'  Marl.  Ch.irt.  58,  A.  48. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  46  Edw.  Ill  (iit 
noi.),78. 

••  Harl.Chart.  58,0.9,  20. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  7  Ric.  II,  caie 
178,  flic  87,  no.  60. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  20  Ric.  II,  no.  54. 

•'  Ibid.  II  lien.  IV,  no.  29. 

«"  Ibid.  12  Hen.  VI,  no.  43. 

*'  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Ibid  ;  Rolls  of  Pari,  vi,  14511,  287a. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


widow  of  Richard  Piggott  of  London,  married  as  her 
second  husband  Richard  Hastings,  brother  to  VV'iUiam, 
Lord  Hastings,  Chamberlain  of  the  Household  to 
Edward  IV.''*  A  faithful  Yorkist,  he  obtained  a  grant 
in  1470  of  the  lands  his  wife  would  tiave  inherited 
but  for  the  attainder  of  her  father  and  brother. 
Lilford  and  its  member,  as  conveyed  to  himself  and 
his  wife  Joan  by  grant  of  Thomas  Fitzwilliam,  senior, 
and  Thomas  Fitzwilliam,  junior,**  were  expressly 
excepted  from  the  act  of  attainder  and  forfeiture 
against  Richard  Lord  Welles,  his  son  Lord  Robert, 
and  his  sons-in-law  Thomas  de  la  Laund  and  Sir 
Thomas  Dymock  and  others,  and  from  the  petitioa 
for  its  repeal  presented  in  1485**  by  the  heirs  of 
Lord  Welles.  In  1473  Lilford  was  conveyed  by 
Sir  Richard  Hastings,  kt.,  and  Joan  his  wife,  daughter 
and  heir  of  Sir  Richard  Welles,  kt.,  sometime  Lord 
de  Welles  and  Willoughby,  to  William  Brown  of 
Stamford,  John  Brown  of  Stamford,  Sir  William 
Stoke,  kt.,  Thomas  Stoke,  clerk,  John  Elmes  of 
Henley-on-Thames,  and  William  Est.*'  In  1475 
an  exemplification  was  obtained  at  the  request  of 
William  Brown  of  Stamford,  merchant,  of  the  article 
in  the  act  of  attainder  exempting  Lilford  from  its 
operation,  as  being  at  the  date  of  the  passing  of  the 
act  in  tlie  hands  of  the  Fitzwilliams,  by  whom  it 
had  been  conveyed  as  above  to  Sir  Richard  Hastings 
and  his  wife,  who  afterwards  sold  it  to  the  said 
William.*' 

William  Brown  settled  the  manors  of  Lilford  and 
Papley  on  himself  and  his  wife  Margaret,  with 
remainder  to  John  Elmes  and  his  wife  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  William  and  Margaret,  for  the  life  of 
Elizabeth,  to  William  Elmes,  the  son  and  heir  of 
John  Elmes  and  Elizabeth,  to  John  brother  of  the 
said  William,  and  to  the  heirs  of  Elizabeth,  and  the 
heirs  of  each  successively.  Both  William  and 
Margaret  died  in  1489.**  From  this  date  the  manor 
of  Lilford  follows  the  descent  of  Warmington  and 
Papley  (q.v.)  to  the  death  of  Arthur  Elmes  in  1663. 
Jane,  widow  of  Arthur  Elmes,  seems  to  have  married 
Sir  Francis  Compton,  kt.  and  had  a  life  interest  in 
the  manor  which  she  and  her  husband  conveyed  to 
Sir  John  Langham,  kt.  and  bart.  in  1666.*'  Arthur 
Elmes  evidently  died  without  issue  and  was  succeeded 
by  his  cousin  Thomas  Elmes,  the  youngest  son  of 
Anthony  Elmes  of  Greens  Norton.  He  was  knighted 
as  Thomas  Elmes  of  Lilford  in  1688''  and  died  in 
1690.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  William 
Elmes,  who  made  various  settlements  of  the  manor  of 
Lilford  cum  Wigsthorpe  and  the  advowson,'*  He 
died  in  1699, '  the  last  male  branch  of  that  ancient  and 
honourable  family  of  the  Elmes. '^^  John  Adams 
and  other  trustees  under  the  abovementioned  settle- 
ments conveyed  the  manors  of  Lilford  and  Wigs- 
thorpe, the  rectory  and  advowson,  to  Sir  Thomas 
Powys  in  171 1,  who  took  a  fine  of  them  in  1713." 

Sir  Thomas   Powys,   the   second    son   of  Thomas 


LILFORD-WITH- 
WIGSTHORPE 

Powys  of  Henley  (co.  Salop)  and  of  Anne  daughter 
of  Sir  Adam  Littleton,  was  the  judge  who  conducted 
the  trial  of  the  Seven  Bishops  in  1688.  He  died  in  1 719, 
and  was  buried  at  Lilford.^  Thomas,  his  eldest  son  by 
his   first  wife  Sarah,  daughter  of  Ambrose  Holbech 


*  * 

«' 

** 

0 

4 

0 

*   ♦ 

* 

■♦■  4 

V£_ 

0 

MJ 

Elmes.  Ermine  two  ban 
iMe  chargtd  with  elm 
leaves. 


Powys,  Lord  Lilford. 
Or  a  lion's  leg  razed 
set  bendwise  between  itvo 
crussleis  Jitchy  gules. 


(co.  Warwick),  who  succeeded  him,  married  Catherine, 
daughter  and  heir  of  Thomas  Ravenscroft  of  Broadlane 
(co.  Flint),  and  died  in  1720.  His  son  and  heir,  also 
named  Thomas,  married  Henrietta  daughter  of 
Thomas  Spence,  Serjeant  of  the  House  of  Commons.^ 
He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Thomas,  who  was  M. P. 
for  the  county  from  1774-97.  A  man  of  great 
parliamentary  talents  and  distinguished  integrity, 
lie  was  one  of  the  batch  of  peers  created  during  the 
ministry  of  William  Pitt  in  1797,  being  created 
Baron  Lilford  on  26  October.  He  married  Mary, 
the  daughter  of  Galfridus  Mann,  and  died  in  1800. 
His  son  Thomas  succeeded  him  at  Lilford,  as  second 
baron.  Thomas  Atherton  Powys,  third  baron, 
inherited  Lilford  at  his  father's  death  in  1825." 
The  Lilford  estates,  increased  by  a  succession  of 
inheritances,  to  which  the  eventual  inheritance  from 
Sir  Littleton  Powys,  elder  brother  of  its  purchaser 
Sir  Thomas,  must  be  added,  were,  after  the  death  of 
Thomas  Powys,  third  Baron  Lilford,  at  Lilford  Park 
in  1861,  dealt  with  by  the  Lilford  Estate  Act,  passed 
on  29  July  1864,^'  as  the  result  of  a  Chancery  suit 
instituted  by  his  son  Thomas  Littleton  Powys,  the 
fourth  baron,  for  the  purpose  of  amending  the  will 
of  his  father,  dated  24  February,  1 84 1.  From  the 
operation  of  this  Act,  Lilford,  with  its  chief  messuage, 
park  and  pleasure  grounds,  was  expressly  excluded. 
It  was  as  an  ornithologist  that  the  fourth  baron,  one 
of  the  founders  of  the  Ornithologists'  Union,  left  his 
mark  on  Lilford,^*  the  valuable  collections  he  made 
being  housed  there.  He  travelled  much,  and  wrote 
on  his  subject.  After  being  twice  married  he  died  in 
1896,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  John,  the  present 
and  fifth  baron. 

The  Hospital  of  St.  John  of  Jerusalem  near  Clerken- 
well  had  a  preceptory  at  Dingley  as  early  as  the  reign 
of  King  Stephen,  with  lands  valued  in  1535  at 
/[108  13/.  5}ii."  In  1330  the  prior  of  the  Hospital  of 
St.  John  of  Jerusalem  claimed   view  of   frankpledge 


*«G.E.C.  op.  cit.  viii,78. 

"  Rolls  of  Pari.  v\,  145a. 

"  Ibid.  287a. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Co..  Hil.  12  Ed.  IV, 
file  76,  no.  90.  Wm.  Brown  had  m.irricd 
the  daughter  and  heir  of  John  Stoke  of 
Warmington,  by  which  marriage  Warming- 
ton  became  hii. 

*'  Cal.  Pat.  1467-77,  p.  508.  Joan  died 
• P  'i°i-S- 


**  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  VII,  i,  nos.  476,  478, 

525.533- 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  18 
Chai.  11;    Recov.  R.  Mich.  iS  Chaj.  II, 

ro.   2q. 

'°  Bridge),  op.  cit.  ii,  243,  cit.  M.I.  ; 
Harl.  MS.  1553,  fol.  41  ;  Shaw,  Knights  of 
Engl,  ii,  264. 

"  Recov.  R.  Mich.  3  Wm.  &  M.  ro. 
7,  286  ;  Trin.  5  Wm.  &  Miry,  ro.  7. 


"  M.  I. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Hil.  1 1  Anne. 
'«  Di  t.  \al.  Biog. 
"  G. '■.<".  Complete  Peerage,  v,  80. 
"  G.I..C.  loc.cit. 
'"  Priv.  Stat.  27-8  Vict.  c.  10. 
»"  Lord  Lilford,  F.Z.S.  Memoir  by  hii 
Bislcr,  Mr«.  Drewitt. 

"  Dugdalc,  Mon.  Angl.  vi,  801. 


229 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


in  Glapthorn  from  his  tenants  in  Fotheringhay, 
Lilford,  etc.  f  and  on  1 8  August  154.2  a  messuage  in 
the  tenure  of  WiUiam  W'hyte  of  Lilford,  which  had 
belonged  to  the  preceptory  at  Dingley,  was  granted 
to  Robert  Tyrwhitt,  the  king's  Serjeant,  with  meadow 
lands,  rent,  etc.''' 

The  church  of  ST.  PETER  was  taken 
CHURCH  down  in  1778,  and  no  part  of  it  remains 
on  the  site."-  Three  arches  from  the 
nave  arcade  were,  however,  set  up  in  The  Lynch, 
below  Achurch,  close  to  the  river,  and  the  monument 
to  Sir  Thomas  Povvys  was  removed  to  Achurch  church. 
According  to  Bridges,^  the  church  of  Lilford  consisted 


.>iLFORD  Church  Ruin 


of  chancel,  nave,  north  and  south  aisles,  and  west 
tower  and  spire,  but  part  of  the  south  aisle  appears 
to  have  been  taken  down  before  his  time.®*  There 
were  four  bells  in  the  tower.  The  registers  began  in 
1560,  the  first  volume  containing  all  entries  to  1778, 
together  with  a  long  list  of  briefs  (1712-54),  and 
accounts  of  perambulations  of  the  parish  in  1718, 
1722  and  1726.  A  vicarage  house  was  built  in  1714. 
The  communion  plate  is  now  at  Achurch. 

The  presentation  to  the  church 
ADFOIVSON  was  made  in  1 228  by  Walter  Oliphant, 
and  the  early  liistory  of  the  advowson 
is  to  be  found  with  that  of  the  manor  (q.v.),  with  which 
it  was  held  until,  in  1383-4,  Robert  de  Willoughby  of 
Eresby  and  his  wife  Margaret  made  a  conveyance 
of  land  in   Lilford  and  of  the  advowson  to  Sir  John 


Holt,  kt.,  and  others,  from  whom  they  were  acquired 
in  1387  by  John  de  Buckingham,  Bishop  of  Lincoln.*' 
The  bishop  bestowed  them  as  '  bought  and  acquired 
with  the  goods  bestowed  on  him  by  God,'  on  the 
dean  and  chapter  of  Lincoln,  for  the  endowment  of 
a  chantrey  called  Buckingham's  or  Burghersh  (Burg- 
hervvahas)  Chantrey  in  the  cathedral,  of  two  chaplains 
and  two  clerks,  to  pray  for  the  good  estate  of  Pope 
Urban  \'I,  the  King  (Richard  II),  Queen,  bishop, 
etc.,  and  the  souls  of  Edward  III,  Queen  Philippa, 
the  bishop's  parents,  etc.'""  In  1398  a  vicarage  was 
ordained  by  the  Bishop  of  Coventry  and  Lichfield" 
and  in  1535  Thomas  Palfreman  was  receiving  iod.  for 
the  church  of  Lilford  as  chantrist  of  Bishop  John 
Buckingham.^  On  26  September  1552,  among  much 
monastic  property  then  granted  to  Thomas  Cecill 
and  Philip  Bold,  the  rectory,  church,  and  advowson 
of  the  vicarage  of  Lilford,  late  belonging  to  this 
chantry,  were  included.'''  Before  1558  they  had  been 
acquired  by  Edmund  Elmes,  who  was  then  holding 
them  with  the  manor  (q.v.)  with  wliich  since  then 
they  have  again  been  held. 

Lilford  was  one  of  the  parishes  wliich  received  an 
augmentation  of  its  living  under  the  Commonwealth."" 
About  1755  Thomas  Powys,  father  of  the  first 
Lord  Lilford  (see  above),  pulled  down  such  of  his 
tenants'  houses  as  were  in  Lilford,  and  built  others  in 
their  place  in  Wigsthorpe;  he  then  petitioned  the 
Bishop  of  Peterborough  (alleging  as  his  reason  that 
it  was  now  necessary  for  the  vicar  to  reside  at  Wigs- 
thorpe in  consequence  of  the  removal  thither  of  the 
inhabitants)  for  leave  to  obtain  a  conveyance  to 
himself  of  the  old  vicarage  house  in  Lilford,  and  to 
erect  instead,  before  I  January  1757,  a  substantial 
house  of  stone  for  a  new  vicarage  upon  a  certain  piece 
of  land  in  Wigsthorpe.  The  bishop  gave  his  consent 
in  an  instrument  dated  27  March  1756,"  but  when 
Thomas  Powys  died  on  2  April  1767,  the  old  vicarage 
house  and  lands  had  not  been  conveyed  to  him.  By 
indenture  of  21  August  1767  the  ground  on  which  the 
old  vicarage  formerly  stood  was  conveyed  by  the 
vicar  and  churchwardens  of  Lilford  to  his  son,  the 
fourth  Thomas  Powys  of  Lilford.'-  He  completed 
the  work  his  father  had  begun,  by  obtaining  in  1778 
an  Act  of  Parliament"  authorising  the  consolidation 
of  the  rectory  of  Achurch  and  vicarage  of  Lilford 
(he  was  lord  of  both  manors  and  owner  of  the  advow- 
son in  each  parisii),  and  the  removal  out  of  Lilford 
parish  of  both  church  and  vicarage  into  Acliurch. 
Lilford  church  was  to  be  pulled  down  and  the  materials 
used  for  the  repair  of  that  of  Achurch,  the  vicarage 
newly  erected  in  Wigsthorpe  to  be  exchanged  for  a 
house  and  2  acres  of  land  near  the  rectory  lands  in 
Achurch,  and  an  acre  added  by  him  for  a  graveyard 
there  ;  this  was  accordingly  done.  In  this  Act  it 
was    stated    that    the   parish    church    of    Lilford   was 


">  Plac.    de    Quo    ll'arr.    (Rcc.    Com.), 

"  Pat.  R.  34  Men.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m,  30; 
/..  and  I'.  Urn.  /'///,  xvii,  g.  714  (1  5). 

"  An  cngr:iving  of  '  Lilford,  ncir 
Oundlc,  taken  from  Ay  Church  '  dated 
1757,  ihowt  the  church  Handing  3  ihort 
distance  to  the  louth-eait  of  Lilford  Hall. 
The  tower  wai  of  three  itagei,  lurmounted 
by  a  ipirc.  In  1310  an  indulgence  wai 
granted  to  thoic  viiiting  the  altar  of 
the  Blcned  Virgin  Mary  in  the  pariih 
church  of  Lilford  and  giving  to  the  fabric 


of  the  church  or  maintenance  of  the 
chaplain  lerving  that  altar  (Line.  Epii. 
Reg.  Memo  Dalderby,  161.) 

••  Ilist.  Northonis.  ii,  242. 

•*  Among  the  monumenti  were  a 
frecjtone  figure  of  a  prieit  on  a  tomb  in 
the  chancel,  a  bran  tablet--to  Arllnir 
Devenshyre  (1573)  and  Oicth  hii  wife 
(1574) — a  itone  with  a  bran  inscription 
torn  off,  and  otheri  to  members  of  the 
Elmci  and  Powyi  familiei  j  Bridge), 
op.  cit.  243-3^  The  dimeniioni  of  the 
bmlding    are    given    ai    follow!  ;     church 


and  chancel  102  ft.  2  in.  long,  body  and 
aislei  48  ft.  broad,  tower  12  ft.  by 
9  ft.  10  in. 

•'  Chan.  Ini|.  p.m.  S  Ric.  II,  no.  42. 

•«  Cal.  Pal.  13S.S-9.PP-  3'2,  SyS- 

"  Line.  Epi«.  Reg.  Memo.  Buckingham, 
iii,4S2. 

"'  I'alor  Kill.  (Rcc.  Com),  iv,  9. 

•"  Pal.  R.  6Ed.  Vl.pt.  9. 

'»  Cal.  S.I'.  Don,.  i'>58-5(),  p.  274. 

"  Close  R.  7  Geo.  Ill,  pt.  23,  no.  17. 

"  Ibid. 

'•  I'M.  Stal.  18  Geo.  III.c.  9. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


falling  into  decay,  and  would  be  an  expense  to  repair,''' 
and  it  was  enacted  tliat  as  niucli  of  the  building  as 
Thomas  Powys  might  require  should  be  left  as  a 
private  chapel  to  his  mansion  house,  in  which  tlie 
rector  of  Lilford  cum  Achurch  was  to  perform  divine 
service,  and  the  rest  sold  or  otherwise  applied  to 
repairing  Achurch  church  :  the  inhabitants  of  W'igs- 
tliorpe  and  Lilford  to  be  in  future  rated  for  repairs 
with  tiiose  of  Achurch. 

Before  the  passing  of  the  Act  the  profits  of  the 
vicarage  of  Lilford,  exclusive  of  the  vicarage  house 
and  a  small  homestead  thereto  belonging,  consisted  in 
some  small  tithes  and  a  right  of  common  belonging  to 
the  vicarage  house,  for  which  the  lord  of  the  manor 
paid  in  '  nature  of  a  composition  '  ^^65  yearly.  Under 
tile  Act  of  1778  it  was  agreed  that  65  acres 
called  \\  igsthorpc  Little  Wold,  and  46  acres,  tlic 
east  part  of  a  piece  of  ground  called  W  igstliorpe 
Great  Wold  contiguous,  siiould  be  vested  in  the 
rector  of  Achurch  in  lieu  of  all  tithes.     An  exchange 


was  also  effected  of  the  vicarage  and  land  in  Wigs- 
thorpe  already  referred  to  for  a  house  and  lands  in 
Achurch.'* 

A  chapel  was  at  one  time  in  existence  at  W  igsthorpe, 
the  presentation  in  1347  being  made  to  '  tlie  church 
of  Lilford  with  tlie  chapel  of  Wygesthorp.'  In 
Bridges'  time  no  trace  of  this  cliapel  remained."' 

Ricliard  Ragsdale  by  his  will 
CHARITIES  dated  30  Jan.  171 1  charged  his  land 
and  hereditaments  in  Bythorne  and 
Thorpe  Achurch  with  20s.  yearly  for  tiic  poor  of 
Lilford.  20s.  is  received  yearly  in  respect  of  this 
charge  and  distributed  by  the  cliurchwardcns  to  the 
poor  on  St.  Thomas's  Day. 

V\'illiam  Lassells  by  will  dated  9  Sept.  1770  gave 
/^loo,  owing  to  him  on  a  mortgage  of  the  tolls  of  the 
turnpike  road  between  Market  Harborough  and  Bramp- 
ton to  be  applied  in  'putting  apprentice'  poor  children 
of  VVigsthorpe.  Tlie  principal  sum  has  increased  to 
/164  9;.  Cjd. 


LOWICK 


Lolwyc,  Lufwyc  (xi,  xii  cent.)  ;  Lufwik  (xiii  cent.)  ; 
Lufwyk,  Luffewyk  (xiv  cent.)  ;    Luffwyke  (xvi  cent.). 

The  area  of  the  parish  is  2,028  acres.  The  soil  is 
clay,  limestone  and  ironstone,  and  produces  wheat, 
barley  and  turnips.  Harper's  Brook  flows  in  a  south- 
easterly direction  through  the  village  and  parish, 
eventually  falling  into  tlie  Nene,  and  the  land  rises 
from  50  ft.  to  100  ft.  on  each  side.  From  the  high 
land  here  are  striking  views  down  the  valley  of  the 
Nene.  In  a  field  to  the  south  of  the  village  is  '  the 
Lowick  oak,'  one  of  the  largest  in  the  country  and  a 
survival  of  Rockingham  Forest.  Bridges  states  that 
about  half  a  mile  south-east  of  the  church  in  the  open 
fields  are  Huxlow  Furlong  and  Huxlow  Cross  where 
the  statutes  have  been  kept  within  the  memory  of 
persons  now  living.'  This  probably  indicates  the 
place  v\here  the  hundred  court  was  held. 

The  village  lies  along  the  road  from  Tlirapston  to 
Brigstock.  Leland  about  154S  described  it  as  '  the 
pratiest  place  in  these  quarters'-  and  it  still  retains 
its  beautiful  surroundings.  The  church  stands  at 
the  north  end  of  the  village;  south  of  it  are  the  White 
Horse  Inn  and  a  stone  14th-century  barn  belonging  to 
a  once  important  grange  where  Jones  of  Nayland 
(1726-1800),  the  well-known  divine,  was  born.  The 
barn  has  a  thatched  roof  and  good  end  gables.  It  is 
of  five  bays  measuring  internally  60  ft.  by  21  ft.,  and 
has  four  original  loops  on  the  east  side  and  one  in  the 
south  gable;  two  in  the  west  wall  are  blocked.  There 
is  a  wide  modern  opening  on  the  west  side.  Near  the 
corner  of  the  road  to  .^Idwinkle  is  a  house  bearing  the 
date  1731.  The  rectory  house,  standing  to  the 
south-west  of  the  church,  a  substantial  stone  build- 
ing in  Elizabethan  style,  was  erected  in  1855-6. 
To  the  east  of  the  rectory  is  the  Manor  Farm,  which 


lies  south  of  St.  Peter's  Church  and,  like  it,  east  of 
the  main  road.  The  school,  formerly  called  from  the 
costume  ordained  for  it  by  its  founders  tlie  Green 
Coat  School,  lies  further  south  still. 

In  the  south  of  the  paris-li  is  the  house  known  as 
Lowick  Lodge,  with  an  old  quarry  to  the  west  of  it, 
and  another  to  the  east.  In  the  north  of  the  parish 
is  Glebe  Farm. 

About  a  mile  south-west  of  the  village  is  Drayton 
House  standing  in  gardens  of  remarkable  beauty 
and  surrounded  by  a  park  of  about  200  acres.  The 
house  consists  of  a  main  block,  substantially  of 
I4tli-century  date,  with  its  longer  axis  from  north-east 
to  south-west,  which  is  covered  on  the  north  side  by 
a  range  of  buildings  added  in  the  15th  century.  Its 
main  entrance  is  from  a  courtyard  on  the  south  side, 
inclosed  by  buildings  of  different  dates,  and  bounded 
on  the  south  by  a  14th-century  wall,  in  which  is  an 
arched  gateway  of  much  later  date  in  a  line  with  the 
principal  doorway  of  the  house.  On  the  east  side 
of  the  court  the  buildings,  chiefly  Elizabethan,  are 
continued  along  the  end  of  the  main  block  to  a  tower 
at  the  north-east  corner,  beyond  which  they  are 
prolonged  by  a  wing  projecting  northwards.  Those 
on  the  west  side,  of  various  dates,  are  carried  across 
the  end  of  the  main  block  as  far  as  the  north-west 
tower,  which  stands  above  this  end  of  the  15th-century 
addition  already  mentioned. 

The  main  block,  containing  the  hall  and  present 
dining-room,  together  with  a  smaller  block  at  the  east 
end,  which  projected  a  bay  northward  and  contained 
the  vaulted  cellar  with  the  solar  or  great  chamber 
above,  was  the  dwelling-house  of  the  Draytons  and 
the  Greens,  and  is  probably  rather  earlier  than  1328, 
when  Simon  de  Drayton  obtained  licence  to  crenellate 


'*  Before  the  increase  of  their  ettatei 
recorded  in  the  history  of  the  manor,  the 
Powyi  lords  of  Lilford  had  not  only  felt 
equal  to  meeting  this  expense  but  had 
in  the  case  of  '■  Mr.  Powys '  (by  his 
executors)  paved  the  chancel  with  Ketton 
square      stones,     cornered     with     black 


marble ;  and  Sir  Thomas  Powys,  kt., 
before  his  death  in  1719,  hadin  I7i4with 
his  I.ady  Elizabeth  bestowed  on  it  'a 
new  altar  piece,  written  and  painted  by 
Mrs.  Creed,  daughter  of  Sir  Gilbert 
Pickering,  in  the  seventieth  year  of  her 
age,  with  the  communion  table,  railing, 

231 


a  piece  of  plate,  a  pulpit  cloth  and  table 
cloth  of  green  tabby':  Bridges,  Hist. 
Nortbants,  ii,  246. 

'^  Then  in  the  occupation  of  Joseph 
Weed. 

"  Bridges,  Ills!.  Norihanis.  ii,  241. 

'  Ibid.  246.  •  l.cland,  /itnerary,  i,  8. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


the  house.'  The  building  thus  followed  the  usual 
plan  of  the  medieval  manor-house,  with  a  hall  between 
the  solar  block  at  one  end  and  the  kitchen  and  its 
offices  on  the  other.  The  crenellated  wall  of  1328 
inclosed  the  court  on  three  sides  :  a  considerable 
length  of  it  remains  on  the  south,  and  there  are  por- 
tions of  it  in  the  lower  parts  of  the  east  wall.  The 
house  thus  stood  across  the  middle  of  a  walled 
inclosure,  with  another  court  upon  the  north  side. 

The  arrangement  of  the  buttresses  in  the  south 
wall  of  the  courtyard  indicates  that  there  was  originally 
a  gateway  on  the  site  of  the  present  one,  and  it  is 
probable  that  the  screens  of  the  hall  were  entered 
at  the  position  of  the  present  doorway.^  Henry 
Green,  how-ever,  who  died  in  1467-8,  appears  to  have 
made  an  entrance-porch  upon  the  north  side  of  the 
hall,  which  he  covered  with  a  range  of  buildings, 
continued  westward  and  returned  southward  as  a 
south-west  wing  nearly  as  far  as  the  boundary-wall. 
The  old  building  was  thus  inclosed  on  the  north  and 
west  sides  by  these  additions ;  and  about  the  same 
time  a  two-floored  building  was  added  at  the  south- 
east corner  of  the  house,  communicating  with  the 
cellar  and  great  chamber. 

In  1584  the  north-east  wing,  which  bears  the  date 
upon  its  west  front,  was  added  by  the  second  Lord 
Mordaunt  of  Turvey.  At  the  south-east  end  of  it  a 
tower  was  built,  and  was  joined  to  the  15th-century 
projection  at  the  other  end  of  the  solar  block.  The 
whole  of  the  east  side  of  the  house  was  thus  covered, 
and,  beyond  these  buildings,  a  lower  range  was  con- 
structed as  far  as  the  boundary  wall,  forming  a  south- 
east wing  and  inclosing  the  east  side  of  the  court. 
Lord  Mordaunt  appears  also  to  have  heightened  the 
north-west  angle  of  the  house  into  a  tower  corre- 
sponding to  that  at  the  opposite  end  of  the  building. 

Some  important  alterations  were  made  by  Henry 
Mordaunt,  second  earl  of  Peterborough,  towards  the 
close  of  the  17th  century.  The  main  entrance  to 
the  house,  w'hich,  at  any  rate  since  1468,  had  been  on 
the  north,  was  shifted  from  north  to  south,  what  had 
been  the  basecourt  now  becoming  the  entrance  court- 
yard. A  new  gateway  was  made  in  the  boundary 
wall.  The  gardens  were  laid  out,  the  small  ban- 
queting houses  at  the  corners  of  the  east  garden  were 
built,  and  the  work  of  refurnishing  the  interior  of 
the  house  was  begun.  These  works  were  continued 
and  completed  on  a  lavish  scale  after  the  marriage 
of  Lord  Peterborough's  daughter  and  heiress,  Mary, 
Duchess  of  Norfolk,  to  Sir  John  Germain.  The  whole 
south  front  of  the  main  block,  now  the  principal 
front  of  the  house,  was  refaced  and  transformed  ; 
sash-windows  were  freely  inserted  in  place  of  the  old 
mullioned  windows  in  other  parts  of  the  building  ; 
and  the  fine  scries  of  iron  gates  and  stone  gateposts 
was  made  for  the  approaches  to  house  and  gardens. 
The  interior  of  the  building  was  greatly  altered  by  the 
insertion  of  new  staircases,  and  the  hall  and  great 
chamber  received  their  present  form. 

During  the  long  tenure  of  Drayton  by  Sir  John 
Germain's  widow,  Lady  Betty  (Elizabeth  Berkeley), 
the    entrance    courtyard    received    some    additions. 


The  buildings  adjoining  the  east  and  west  sides  of 
the  gateway,  behind  the  I4th-centur>'  wall,  are  earlier 
than  her  time  ;  but  she  fitted  up  the  chapel  east  of 
the  gateway,  and  added  the  colonnades  on  the  east 
and  west  sides  of  the  court.  Towards  the  close  of 
the  1 8th  century.  Lord  George  Germain  (Sackville) 
decorated  the  dining-room  on  the  west  side  of  the 
house  and  the  drawing-room  in  the  Elizabethan 
north-east  wing.  Subsequently,  in  the  time  of  Mr. 
W.  B.  Stopford-Sackville,  new  kitchen  offices  were 
built  west  of  the  dining-room,  and  various  minor 
works  of  restoration  and  repair  were  effected  by  him 
and  his  son,  the  late  Mr.  S.  G.  Stopford-Sackville. 

The  house  stands  in  a  hollow,  and  the  best  general 
view  is  obtained  from  the  rising  ground  at  some 
distance  to  the  south,  by  the  gate,  now  standing 
isolated  at  the  head  of  a  grass  slope,  which  formed 
the  main  outer  approach.  From  this  point,  at  a 
level  higher  than  the  roofs,  it  is  possible  to  distinguish 
clearly  the  component  parts  of  the  building  and  trace 
the  additions  which  have  inclosed  and  transformed 
the  main  block  :  the  view  is  one  of  remarkable  interest 
and  beauty,  and  from  this  point  alone  the  symmetrical 
balance  of  the  towers  at  the  further  corners  of  the 
main  block  can  be  fully  appreciated. 

The  present  south  front,  through  which  the  court- 
yard is  entered,  measures  approximately  240  ft.  from 
east  to  west.  At  the  west  end,  on  the  site  of  the  old 
brewhouse,  is  a  modern  building,  projecting  westwards 
and  southwards,  the  space  between  which  and  the 
line  of  the  14th-century  wall  of  inclosure  is  filled  by 
an  Elizabethan  addition  at  the  end  of  the  south-west 
wing.  The  14th-century  wall,  which  slopes  slightly 
south  of  east,  is  continued  for  65  ft.  with  three 
buttresses  to  the  point  where,  beyond  the  third 
buttress,  it  is  broken  by  the  gateway.  This,  18  ft. 
wide,  with  a  round  arch  between  two  curved  niches, 
and  with  a  pediment  in  which  is  the  shield  of  Mor- 
daunt with  an  earl's  coronet,  apparently  occupies  the 
site  of  an  earlier  gateway.  East  of  this  is  a  fourth 
buttress,  and  the  old  wall  is  continued  for  another 
65  ft.,  with  an  intermediate  buttress,  to  the  end  of 
the  south-east  wing,  which  is  20  ft.  broad.  The 
face  of  the  lower  part  of  this  end,  with  an  inserted 
16th-century  window,  is  still  part  of  the  old  wall, 
whicli  is  slightly  gathered  in  at  this  point. 

The  east  or  garden  front  of  the  house  is  235  ft. 
long  from  north  to  south,  and  consists  of  four  portions. 
For  some  80  ft.  from  the  south  end,  tlie  Elizabethan 
south-east  wing,  a  low  building  of  two  stories,  incor- 
porates, as  on  the  south  side,  portions  of  the  boundary 
wall  in  its  lower  part.  North  of  this  is  a  three 
storied  block,  the  south  part  of  which  is  the  15th- 
century  projection  from  the  great  chamber  and  cellar, 
while  the  north  part  belongs  to  the  Elizabethan 
additions,  but  was  largely  refaced  in  the  l8th  century. 
This  is  followed  by  the  north-east  tower,  which  rises 
a  story  above  the  roofs,  witii  tall  angle-turrets,  and  is 
crowned  by  an  elegant  leaded  cupola  on  wooden 
pillars,  added  in  the  1 8th  century.  The  front  is 
completed  by  the  north-east  wing,  100  ft.  from  north 
to  south,  with  three  doors  above  a  vaulted  basement. 


•  The  late  Mr.  G.  F.  Dodley,  who  viiiicd 
Drayton  in  1900,  thought  that  the  dctalli 
of  the  cellar  pointed  to  a  date  ai  early  ai 
1270  J  but,  compared  with  other  local 
work   of   a    limilar  kind,    they    ihow   no 


ch.iractcriitici      which      are     ncccuarily 
earlier  th.in  c.  1300. 

*  It  icrmB  that  the  north  porch,  added 
in  the  15th  century,  tlien  became  the 
principal    entrance;     but    there    arc    no 

232 


signs  of  an  earlier  entrance  in  connection 
with  it,  and  the  opening  from  it  into  the 
hall  ii  an  oblii|ue  cut,  which  secmt  to 
have  been  made  ai  part  of  a  new  arrange- 
ment. 


">S 


I 

s 


S 


5 


I 


3< 


•N 


^ 


s 


IS 


S 


O 


V-" 


.m^. 


Ijii^ 


^"^382=^ 


LowicK  :    Dr.wion    UoisE 


Loun  K  :    Dkwion    IloUii. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


The  lowest  floor,  on  a  higher  level  than  those  in  the 
rest  of  the  house,  is  entered  from  the  garden  by  a 
stone  stair  parallel  with  the  wall  of  the  tower,  and 
an  excellently  proportioned  doorway,  inserted  by 
Sir  John  Germain,  whose  shield  is  carved  above 
it.  The  style  of  this  wing  is  tlie  local  variety  of 
Elizabethan  stonework,  without  any  mixture  of 
foreign  influence  :  the  gables  and  their  kncelers,  at 
the  north  end  of  the  block,  are  ornamented  with  stone 
balls,  but  otherwise  the  work  is  simple  and  severe. 
The  garden  front  has  three  projecting  chimney- 
blocks,  rising  into  massive  stacks,  with  moulded  tops 
and  shafted  angles.  As  already  mentioned,  this  com- 
posite east  front  was  much  altered  by  the  substitution 
of  sasli-windows  in  the  1 8th  century  for  the  earlier 
mullioned  windows  ;  but  in  recent  times  some  of  the 
muUioned  openings  have  been  restored. 

The  north-east  wing  is  returned  eastwards  at  its 
north  end,  and  there  is  a  similar,  but  wider  projection 
on  the  west  side,  which  gives  it  a  T  shape.  The  north 
front,  60  ft.  long  from  east  to  west,  rises  from  the 
ground  without  any  projection,  and  was  somewhat 
altered  in  the  18th  century  by  the  insertion  of  a  row 
of  alcoves  at  the  ground  level  and  of  a  large  Venetian 
window,  now  removed,  on  the  top  floor.  The  north- 
west projection  is  externally  20  ft.  east  to  west  and 
18  ft.  north  to  south.  The  west  front  of  the  range  is 
well  lighted,  as  the  fireplaces  and  chimney-blocks 
are  all  on  the  opposite  side  ;  and  mid-way  in  the  wall 
between  the  north-west  projection  and  the  return 
which  covers  the  junction  of  the  building  with  the 
older  part  of  the  house,  a  rectangular  projection  with 
mullioned  windows  lights  the  north  end  of  the 
drawing-room  and  the  rooms  on  the  upper  floors. 

At  its  south  end  this  wing  was  returned  20  ft. 
westward  along  the  north  face  of  the  cellar  at  the  end 
of  the  main  block,  the  first  floor  being  added  to  the 
area  of  the  great  chamber.  The  return,  with  a  small 
18th-century  addition  on  the  west,  projects  about 
10  ft.  from  the  north  front.  This,  though  somewhat 
modernised,  is  mainly  of  the  15th  century.  The  main 
portion,  95  ft.  from  east  to  west,  forms  a  range  covering 
the  hall  and  dining-room  in  the  principal  block,  and 
has  an  inserted  doorway  approximately  in  the  middle, 
the  story  above  which  is  crowned  by  battlements  with 
a  high  half-octagon  centrepiece,  entirely  different  in 
design  from  the  battlements  of  the  rest  of  the  building. 
It  is  clear,  as  stated  already,  that  this  part  of  the  front 
originally  formed  a  projecting  porch  with  a  room 
above,  and  that  the  spaces  on  either  side  were  filled 
in  later,  so  that  their  outer  walls  were  flush  with  the 
north  waU  of  the  porch.  There  are  signs  of  a  break  in 
the  masonry  east  of  the  porch  which  point  to  this. 
..  If  these  additions  were  originally  batllemented,  the 
battlements  were  removed  and  wooden  dormer 
windows  with  square  pediments  substituted,  pro- 
bably by  Lord  Peterborough.  The  mullioned  windows 
of  this  part  of  the  front  have  been  very  thoroughly 
restored.  To  the  west  is  a  modern  projecting  block 
with  a  front  of  20  ft.,  and  to  the  west  again  the  15th- 
century  work,  slightly  recessed  from  the  rest,  con- 
tinues for  32  ft.  to  the  angle  of  the  building,  this 
portion  forming  the  base  of  the  north-west  tower, 
which,  like  the  other,  is  finished  with  battlements  and 
an  added  cupola. 

The   west    front   retains   considerable   portions   of 
iSth-century  walling,  and  the  wing  added  to  the  house 


at  that  period  had  a  frontage  of  118  ft.  The  modern 
kitchen,  which  projects  westward,  occupies  most  of 
the  north  part  of  this  front.  At  the  south-west  angle  is 
a  large  modern  projecting  building,  which,  as  pre- 
viously stated,  is  connected  with  the  rest  of  the 
entrance  front  by  an  addition  of  Elizabethan  date. 

Returning  to  the  gateway  in  the  south  front,  we 
pass  beneath  its  vault  into  the  paved  courtyard,  which 
is  an  oblong  measuring  50  ft.  from  north  to  south  by 
108  ft.  between  the  colonnades  from  east  to  west,  the 
latter  measurement  being  slightly  reduced,  owing 
to  the  inward,  though  not  exactly  parallel  slope  of 
the  colonnades,  on  the  north  side.  The  vaulted 
gateway-passage  measures  25  ft.  from  north  to  south, 
including  the  archways  at  either  end.  East  of  the 
passage  is  the  chapel,  internally  48  ft.  from  east  to 
west  by  18  ft.  from  north  to  south,  and  on  the  west 
side  a  line  of  offices  connects  the  gateway  with  the 
kitchen.  These  belong  to  Lord  Peterborough's 
buildings,  but  the  furniture  of  the  chapel  was  added 
by  Lady  Betty  Germain.'  The  colonnades  which 
form  covered  passages  on  the  east  and  west  sides  of 
the  court  were  also  added  by  her.  They  are  of  rather 
poor  Tuscan  Doric  design  :  the  columns,  six  on  each 
side  with  pilasters  against  the  end-walls,  are  set  at 
somewhat  wide  intervals.  The  entablature  is  heavy  : 
in  the  middle  on  each  side  is  the  shield  of  Germain 
impaling  Berkeley.  The  friezes,  instead  of  being 
composed  of  triglyphs  alternating  with  metopes, 
have  the  awkward  arrangement  of  a  single  triglyph 
above  each  column. 

The  buildings  on  either  side  of  the  court,  at  the 
back  of  the  colonnades,  contain  a  number  of  rooms, 
but  nothing  worthy  of  special  remark  :  their  date  and 
relation  to  the  plan  have  been  noticed  already.  On 
the  north  side  rises  the  principal  front  of  the  house,  the 
core  of  the  wall  being  of  the  14th  century,  but  entirely 
hidden  by  the  Palladian  casing  added  by  Sir  John 
Germain  after  1701.  The  name  of  the  architect 
whom  he  employed  is  not  known,  but  the  design  is 
so  unlike  the  ordinary  English  work  of  the  age  that 
he  may  have  been  a  foreigner,  probably  a  Frenchman. 
The  doorway,  approached  by  a  flight  of  steps,  the 
sides  of  which  curve  inwards  as  they  ascend,  is  in  the 
middle  of  the  fafade,  and  is  flanked  by  Corinthian 
columns  supporting  a  pediment.  This  rather  over- 
whelming composition,  which  fiOs  the  whole  height 
of  the  front,  is  treated  with  much  liveliness  and 
originality  of  detail  :  in  the  capitals  figures  of 
hawks,  in  allusion  to  Sir  John  Germain's  crest, 
take  the  place  of  the  conventional  volutes.  Above 
the  doorway  is  Sir  John's  shield,  charged  with 
the  escutcheon  of  Mordaunt.  On  either  side  the 
wall  is  pierced  by  three  tall  windows,  which  light  the 
hall  on  the  east  and  the  dining-room  on  the  west. 
Each  of  the  windows  next  the  doorway  is  finished  at 
the  top  by  curious  scrolled  ornaments :  the  rest  have 
pediments,  one  on  each  side  round,  and  the  other 
triangular.  There  is  no  order  between  the  windows, 
but  the  angles  are  finished  with  flat  pilasters.  The 
design  as  a  whole  is  unorthodox  and  restless ;  but 
the  general  effect  is  sumptuous,  and  the  omission  of 
pediments  from  the  windows  next  the  doorway  gives 
relief   to   the    imposing   central   composition.    The 

»  Some  of  its  hangings,  representing  chisical  temples  in  the 
Pompeian  style,  tre  preserved  in  various  parts  of  the  house. 


233 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


building  has   a   low   attic,   almost   hidden   by   a   tall 
parapet. 

The  doonvay  gives  access  to  the  south  end  of  the 
hall,  which  measures  53  ft.  east  to  west  by  32  ft. 
north  to  south.  The  inner  walls  were  cased  at  the 
same  time  as  the  facade,  and  all  medieval  features, 
including  the  screens,  were  removed.  The  timber 
roof,  however,  remains  above  the  flat  plaster  ceiling. 
The  fireplace  is  in  the  middle  of  the  north  wall. 
In  1850  the  walls  were  painted  in  imitation  of  marble 
by  an  artist  named  Roos.  Apart  from  its  fine  pro- 
portions, the  room  has  no  striking  architectur.il 
features,  and  its  general  plainness  is  in  strong  contrast 
to  the  elaborate  decoration  of  the  fa9ade. 

On  the  west  side  of  the  hall  are  two  doorways,  one 
at  either  end.  That  on  the  south  opens  into  the  dining- 
room,  which  occupies  the  site  of  the  original  kitchen 
and  buttery,  and  measures  nearly  40  ft.  east  to  west 
by  22  ft.  north  to  south.  This  room  was  magni- 
ficently decorated  by  Lord  George  Germain  in  1771 
and  1772  :  his  crest  appears  above  the  doorway  on  the 
inner  side.  The  ceiling  is  ornamented  with  coloured 
plaster  reliefs,  executed  with  great  delicacy  and  repre- 
senting patterns  of  fruit  and  flowers  :  festoons  of 
vine-leaves  and  bunches  of  grapes  decorate  the  coved 
cornice.  The  walls  and  window  recesses  have 
white  plaster  reliefs  of  classical  figures,  foliage  and 
vases  on  a  buff  ground  ;  while  long  moulded  panels 
on  the  walls  frame  portraits.  The  general  character 
of  the  work,  including  the  ornamentation  of  the  fire- 
place, is  very  like  that  of  the  brothers  Adam  ;  but 
the  plaster-work  is  in  much  bolder  relief  than  their 
usual  designs,  and  wa'  long  attributed  to  Italian 
artists.  An  examination,  however,  of  the  household 
books  of  Lord  George's  steward,  Henry  Gladwcll, 
the  results  of  which  were  published  by  the  late  Mr. 
Stopford-SackviUe  in  1915,*  showed  that  the  plaster- 
work  was  designed  by  William  Rhodes,  the  carving 
by  one  FoxhaU,  and  the  painting  by  one  Hakewill, 
and  that  workmen  from  London  were  employed  in  the 
execution. 

North  of  the  dining-room,  a  passage,  on  the  pro- 
bable site  of  the  pantry  and  part  of  the  old  kitchen 
offices,  leads  to  the  present  kitchen  and  the  south- 
west wing.  About  half  way  down  this  passage  on 
the  right  hand  is  a  wide  opening  to  a  hall  in  the 
15th-century  block,  from  which  a  wooden  staircase 
of  rectangular  plan,  with  elegant  newels  and  balusters, 
simple  in  design,  ascends  to  the  first-floor  rooms  of 
this  part  of  the  house.  This  is  of  early  17th-century 
character,  contemporary  with  the  chimney-pieces  of 
the  rooms  to  which  it  leads.  The  rooms  at  the  end 
of  the  passage  are  entered  from  lobbies  in  and 
adjoining  the  ground  floor  of  the  tower  at  this  end  of 
the  building,  in  the  north-east  corner  of  which  is  a 
vice  belonging  to  the  15th-century  work. 

At  the  west  end  of  the  north  side  of  the  hall,  a 
doorway,  cut  obliquely  in  the  wall,  opens  into  the 
ground  floor  of  the  15th-century  porch,  which  gives 
access  to  the  garden  and  to  two  rooms,  one  on  cither 
side.  These  contain  no  features  of  interest.  The  two 
bedrooms,  however,  on  the  first  floor  of  this  block, 
approached  by  the  staircase  which  has  been  mentioned, 
have  good  chimney-pieces  of  the  beginning  of  the 
17th  century,  and  in  the  south  wall  of  one  of  them  .1 

•  Allot.  Archil.  Soc.  Rtpi,  &•  Papen,  xxxii,  yi-gi. 


blocked  window  opening  has  been  uncovered,  with 
a  cusped  head  and  hollow  chamfer,  which  was 
formerly  one  of  the  outer  windows  of  the  hall. 

The  second  doorway  on  the  north  side  of  the  hall 
at  the  east  end,  opens  to  the  foot  of  the  grand  stair- 
case which  leads  to  the  great  chamber  on  the  first 
floor  at  the  east  end  of  the  hall.  This  staircase, 
rectangular  in  plan,  was  added  by  Sir  John  Germain, 
and  probably  took  the  place  of  an  earlier  stair.  It  has 
a  wrought-iron  baluster,  similar  to  the  fine  ironwork 
of  the  outer  gates  and  railings,  which  may  have  been 
designed  by  Tijou.  The  walls  are  painted,  in  the 
sumptuous  but  rather  tasteless  fashion  of  the  period, 
with  representations  of  Olympus  and  Hades  by 
Lanscroon,  a  Dutch  disciple  of  Verrio. 

Opposite  the  foot  of  the  stair,  a  doorway  leads  into 
the  cellar  beneath  the  great  chamber,  which  is  also 
entered  by  two  doorways  in  the  east  wall  of  the  hall. 
This,  structurally  unaltered  since  the  14th  century, 
measures  internally  45  ft.  north  to  south  by  20  ft. 
east  to  west,  and  is  divided  by  three  octagonal  pillars 
on  the  centre  of  the  longer  axis  into  eight  bays  of 
vaulting  with  chamfered  ribs.  The  work,  like  much 
local  work  of  the  period,  is  plain,  and,  as  has  been 
noted  above,  is  probably  some  years  earlier  than  the 
fortification  of  the  house  by  Simon  de  Drayton  in 
1328.  The  capitals  and  bases  of  the  pillars  have 
convex  mouldings.  The  pair  of  bays  at  the  north 
end  project  beyond  the  north  wall  of  the  hall,  and 
so  communicate  directly,  as  already  noticed,  with  the 
grand  staircase.  In  the  north  part  of  the  west  wall  is 
a  two-light  window  of  the  15th  century,  now  opening 
into  an  adjoining  room.  On  this  side  also  there  is  a 
doorway  into  the  colonnade  on  the  east  side  of  the 
courtyard,  which  communicates  with  the  rooms  in  the 
south-east  wing.  There  are  two  doorways  in  the  east 
wall,  the  southern  one  of  which  leads  into  the  ground 
floor  room  of  the  small  building  added  to  this  corner 
of  the  house  in  the  15th  century. 

From  the  north-east  bay  of  the  cellar  a  stair  descends 
to  the  vaulted  basement  which  occupies  the  whole 
length  of  the  Elizabethan  north-east  wing.  This  has  a 
middle  row  of  pillars,  dividing  it  into  ribbed  compart- 
ments, the  details  of  which  have  been  modelled 
upon  those  of  the  medieval  cellar.  The  bosses  are 
carved  with  the  arms  of  Northamptonshire  families. 
From  the  south-east  bay,  in  which  is  the  doorway  from 
the  grand  staircase,  a  short  flight  of  steps  leads  to  a 
lobby,  from  which  two  steps  ascend  eastward  to 
the  passage  which  forms  the  vestibule  of  the  Eliza- 
bethan wing.  At  the  farther  end  of  this  passage 
is  the  doorway  to  the  east  garden,  and  on  the 
right  hand  at  this  end,  in  the  tower,  is  the  geo- 
metrical stair  to  the  upper  floors  on  the  east  side  of„ 
the  house. 

The  geometrical  staircase,  a  wooden  spiral  without 
supports,  was  part  of  the  additions  made  by  Sir 
John  Germain,  and  gives  access  to  the  whole  of  the 
upper  part  of  the  east  range,  including  the  great 
cliamber,  which  is  entered  by  a  doorway  directly 
opposite  the  doorway  from  the  head  of  the  grand 
staircase.  This  room,  as  has  been  said,  occupies  tiie 
site  of  the  medieval  solar,  which  corresponded  in 
dimensions  to  tiie  cellar  below,  but  was  enlarged 
northward  by  Sir  John  Germain.  It  is  now  called  the 
King's  dining-chamber,  a  name  given  to  the  solar  after 
the  visit  of  James  1  to  Drayton  in  1605.    It  is  liglitcd 


234 


ui  -rs  ^:  2  ^ 
^  S  u  o  u 
s  -s  -s  o^-s 

^  tnsO  O  oo 


z 


U 

o 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


by  pairs  of  long  sash  windows  in  the  east  and  west 
walls,  and  is  wainscoted  with  tall  oblong  panels  of 
handsome  proportions  with  bolcction  mouldings,  in 
which  are  hung  a  series  of  portraits  of  the  Mordaunt 
owners  of  Drayton.  There  is  a  good  plaster  ceiling, 
contemporary  with  the  panelling  :  the  cabinets  and 
other  furniture  belong  for  the  most  part  to  the  time 
of  the  second  Lord  Peterborough.  A  doorway  at  the 
south-east  corner  communicates  with  the  rooms  in  the 
south-east  wing,  which  contain  much  tapestry. 
From  the  southernmost  of  these,  in  which  the  Eliza- 
bethan panelling  remains,  a  doonvay  leads  into 
the  private  gallery  at  the  east  end  of  the  chapel. 

Above  the  entrance  to  the  great  chamber,  doorways 
from  the  geometrical  stair  open  into  the  upper  floors 
of  the  north-east  wing,  which  remains  to  be  described. 
The  lowest  floor,  entered  from  the  passage  which 
leads  to  the  geometrical  stair,  contains  three  rooms 
which  open  into  one  another.  The  south  room, 
38  ft.  north  to  south  by  21  ft.  east  to  west,  is  the 
drawing-room,  with  a  projecting  bay  in  the  north- 
west corner.  It  was  redecorated  by  Lord  George 
Germain  in  1 773-4,  whose  portrait  by  Romney  is 
above  the  handsome  marble  fireplace.  William  Rhodes 
was  employed  for  the  plaster  work.  The  ceiling  has  a 
formal  and  elaborate  pattern  ;  but  the  beautiful 
relief-work  which  has  been  noticed  in  the  dining- 
room  appears  again  in  the  frieze.  North  of  the 
drawing-room  is  a  smaller  drawing-room,  and  beyond 
this  is  the  state  room,  fitted  up  as  a  bedroom  by  Lord 
Peterborough,  whose  arras  are  on  the  chimney-piece, 
attributed  with  high  probability  to  John  Webb. 
Side  doors  at  the  end  of  this  room  open  into  the 
projections  which  give  the  wing  its  T  shape.  That 
on  the  east  side  is  a  powdering  closet,  with  panels  of 
Chinese  work.  From  the  room  on  the  west  there  is  a 
stair  to  the  upper  floors,  at  the  foot  of  which  is  a  door- 
way to  the  terrace  along  the  west  front  of  the  wing. 

These  rooms  contain  much  fine  furniture  and 
china,  to  describe  which  would  require  a  detailed 
inventory.  The  furniture  of  the  state  room,  including 
a  handsome  four-post  bed  and  Mortlake  tapestry 
hangings,  is  practically  left  as  it  was  in  the  time  of 
Lord  Peterborough  and  his  daughter,  the  duchess  of 
Norfolk,  while  the  other  rooms  chiefly  reflect  the  taste 
of  Lady  Betty  Germain  and  her  heir.  Lord  George. 

The  suite  of  guest-chambers  on  the  first  floor  calls 
for  no  special  description,  their  most  interesting 
feature  being  the  small  concealed  chamber  or  hiding- 
place  between  the  floor  of  the  powdcring-closet  which 
leads  out  of  the  northernmost  room  and  the  ceiling  of 
the  one  below.  The  whole  length  of  the  top  floor  is 
occupied  by  the  long  gallery  or  library,  which  was  fitted 
with  book-shelves  by  Sir  John  Germain,  who  also,  as 
already  said,  inserted  a  Venetian  window  at  the  north 
end.  This  was  removed  by  the  late  owner  and  a 
raullioned  window  substituted  ;  at  the  same  time  a 
new  coved  plaster  ceiling  was  made  in  place  of  the 
plain  ceiling  which  had  been  put  in  during  the  1 8th 
century.  This  is  relieved  witii  shields  bearing  the  arms 
of  Mordaunt,  Germain,  Berkeley,  and  Sackville.  Here, 
as  in  the  rooms  below,  a  powdering-closet  projects 
from  the  wall  near  the  north-east  corner.     This  was 


fitted  up  as  a  boudoir  for  the  duchess  of  Norfolk  with 
inlaid  Ciiinese  panelling,  a  mirrored  ceiling,  and  par- 
queted floor. 

Between  the  doorways  from  the  geometrical  stair  to 
the  first-floor  bedrooms  and  the  gallery,  there  is  a  door 
to  the  two  rooms  upon  the  top  floor  of  the  building 
upon  the  south  side  of  the  tower,  the  lower  rooms  of 
which  are  entered  from  the  great  chamber  and  cellar 
respectively.  Of  these,  the  nortliern,  known  as  the 
Norfolk  room,  is  hung  with  p.inels  of  Mortlake 
tapestry. 

Of  the  numerous  portraits  in  the  house  the  most 
interesting  are  the  Mordaunt  portraits  in  the  great 
chamber,  the  series  of  portraits  of  the  Berkeley  family, 
to  which  Lady  Betty  Germain  belonged,  in  the  first- 
floor  rooms  of  the  Elizabethan  wing,  and  the  two  por- 
traits of  Lord  George  Germain,  of  which  that  in  the 
drawing-room,  by  Romney,  has  been  mentioned.  The 
other,  by  Reynolds,  is  in  the  sitting-room  on  the  east 
side  of  the  15th-century  porch.  A  portrait  of  Lady 
Betty,  by  Kneller,  was  added  some  years  ago  to  the 
Berkeley  series.  The  large  portraits  of  royal  and  noble 
persons  in  the  hall,  and  of  Louis  XIV  and  William  and 
Mary  in  the  dining-room,  were  placed  in  the  house  by 
Sir  John  Germain. 

The  fine  lay-out  of  the  gardens  and  approaches 
has  been  referred  to.  The  iron  gates  are  of  great 
beauty.  The  finest  of  these  afford  access  to  the  wide 
open  space  in  front  of  the  entrance  gateway.  On  each 
side  of  the  middle  gate,  in  the  head  of  which  is  wrought 
the  shield  of  Howard  impaling  Mordaunt,  are  stone 
gateposts  crowned  with  figures  of  birds  in  allusion  to 
the  crest  of  Mordaunt  ;  while  Sir  John  Germain's 
hawks  crown  the  posts  of  the  lateral  gates.  The  date 
MDCci  is  worked  as  a  monogram  into  the  heads  of 
some  of  the  gates,  and  occurs  elsewhere  in  the  house. 
Other  gates  were  placed  at  the  extremity  of  the  east 
garden,  and  at  the  top  of  the  long  incline  of  park  in 
front  of  the  house.  The  iron  railings  of  the  stair  to  the 
doorway  of  the  hall,  and  of  the  stair  from  the  east 
front  to  the  garden,  are  also  of  the  same  period.  All 
this  work  was  probably  designed  by  Tijou,  to  whom 
the  iron  gates  at  Hampton  Court  are  due.  The  east 
garden  is  ornamented  with  a  great  profusion  of  lead 
statues  and  vases,  which  form  one  of  the  largest  col- 
lections of  the  kind  remaining ;  these,  like  most 
similar  work  of  the  day,  probably  came  from  the  work- 
shop of  Van  Noodt  in  London. 

LOfVICK  formed  part  of  the  great  fief 
MANORS  of  the  Bishop  of  Coutancesin  1086/ and 
the  overlordship  passed  after  his  for- 
feiture to  the  Clares,  later  earls  of  Gloucester,*  and 
followed  the  descent  of  the  overlordship  of  Thrapston 
(q.v.). 

The  under-tenants  holding  of  the  Bishop  in  1086 
were  Edwin  and  Algar,  who  held  2  hides  less  one  virgate, 
which  had  increased  in  value  from  the  time  of  Edward 
the  Confessor  from  10s.  to  25^.'  Edwin's  holding 
possibly  represented  that  of  the  Nowers  (de  Nodariis), 
as  he  also  held  Stanion,  which  went  with  this  holding, 
while  Algar  also  held  Islip  which  went  with  Drayton 
manor.  In  1 2 17  Robert  de  Nowers  presented  to  the 
church.^"     His  successor  Almaric  was  dealing  with  an 


'  V.C.H.  Norihanls.  i,  3116. 

•  Cal.   Inq.  iv,  no.  435  ;    Plae.  de  Quo 
Warr.  (Rec.  Com.).  543. 

*  y.C.H.  Nortbanls.  i,  311*. 


'»  Rol.  Hug.  di  Wtlles  (Cant.  &■  York 
Soc),  i,  13;  Almaric,  son  of  Ralph  dc 
Noweri,  was  holding  landt  in  Nortbanti 
in  1198-9,  1209  {Abhrev.  Plac.  Rec.  Com. 


9,  61).  Robert  may  have  been  son  of 
Ralph  de  Nowers,  living  1211  [V.C.H. 
Bucks,  iv,  345,  where  the  Noweri  pedigree 
is  let  out). 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


eighth  part  of  a  knight's  fee  here  in  1240'^  and  held 
three  parts  of  half  a  fee  of  the  honour  of  Clare  in 
1242-3.^'-  He  presented  to  the  church  in  1247^^  and 
was  succeeded  before  1261  b_\'  Robert  deNowers,*'' who 
may  be  the  Sir  Robert  son  of  Sir  Ralph  de  Xowers  who 
in  1 285  granted  lands  here  to Thorney  Abbey,  reserving 


Drayton  and  Robert  le  Lord'"  were  returned  as  holding 
Lowick  apparently  as  feolTees.  John  de  Nowers,  who 
died  in  1327,  was  succeeded  b)  his  grandson  John,  son 
of  his  son  John.^'  Grace,  widow  of  John  de  Nowers, 
the  grandfather,  was  holding  an  eighth  of  a  fee  in  1346,'^''' 
and  presented  to  the  church  in  1349.^^     In  1357,  Roger 


<^?^/' 

>£ 


H^0^^{iii^^%^^ 


^^i- 


Lowick  :   Drayton  House  Gates 


to  himself  6  '  stikkes  '  of  eels  yearly.'^  Robert  was 
followed  by  William  de  Nowers,  who  married  Isabella, 
daughter  and  co-heiress  of  Peter  de  Goldington,  in  the 
time  of  Henry  HI.'*  Robert  de  Nowers,  possibly  as 
trustee,  granted  the  advowson  and  land  in  Lowick  to 
Almaric  son  of  William  and  Isabella,  in  1303."  John, 
son  of  Almaric, in  l3l3conveyed, possibly  in  settlement, 
the  manor  and  advowson  to  John  de  Chetyngdon  and 
Elizabeth  his  wife,'"  who  in  the  following  year  were 
returned  as  holding  with  Henry  de  Dccn  half  a  fee  in 
Lowick  and  Stanion.'"  In  1316  Robert  de  Verc, 
Robert  de  Ardcrne,  Jolin  de  Tychmarsh,  Simon  de 


Tony,  evidently  a  trustee,  granted  to  John  de  Nowers 
and  Maud  his  wife  an  acre  of  land  in  Lowick  called 
Lolesacrc,  the  advowson  of  the  church,  and  the 
reversion  of  the  manor  of  Lowick.-'  John  de  Nowers 
in  1364  granted  to  John  Barker  a  rent  of  8  marks  from 
tenements  in  Cliestcr  and  Lowick.^"'  Hctwecn  this 
last  date  and  1367  the  manor  and  advowson  had  passed 
to  Sir  Henry  Green  of  Boughton,  and  from  this  date  it 
followed  the  manor  of  Drayton  (q.v.). 

This  manor  of  DRAT'TON  passed,  after  the  for- 
feiture by  the  Bishop  of  Coutancc  in  1088,  to  cither 
Aubrey  dc  Vere,  senior,  or  his  son  Aubrey  the  Cham- 


"  Fcft  of  F.  Northanti.  caie  173, 
file  29,  no.  395. 

"  nk.  of  Ftei,  ii,  937. 

'*  Bridget,  op.  cit.  ii,  247. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northantt.  caic  174,  file 
^f>,  no.  802. 

"Red  Bk.  of  Thorney,  pt.  iv,  fol.  23 ; 
L>nid.  MS.   1029,  fol.  86b. 

'•  /Ihbrn.  I'lac.  (Rec.  Com.),  187. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  32  F.dw.  I, 
caie  175,  file  60,  no.  457. 


"  Ibid.  ca«c  175,  file  64,  no.  134  ;  John 
died  in  1 327  ;  he  married  Grace,  daughter 
of  Robert  FitzNicl.  Other  members  of 
the  Noweri  family  were  granting  lands  to 
Chetyngdon,  Inq.  a.q.d.  10  Edw.  II,  cxx, 
14;  Cat.  Pal.  1317-21,  p.  238  J  1354-8, 
p.  284. 

'•  Ca/.  Inq.  Edw.  II,  v,  no.  538; 
Chin.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  Ixviii,  62  ; 
Pytchley,  Bk.  0/  Ftti  (Northanti  Rec. 
Soc),  93. 


">  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  29. 

"  I'.C.U.  Buiks.  iv,  345;  Wrotteiley 
I'ed.  from  Vlea  R.  2;,  126;  Agnei, 
widow  apparently  of  John  de  Noweri, 
who  died  v. p.,  was  holding  in  1344.  Feet 
of  F.  Northanls.  case  177,  file  77,  no.  261. 

"  Frud.  Aids,  iv,  449. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"Col.  Close,  1354-60,  p.  407;  Close 
R.  31  Edw.  Ill,  m.  15. 

"Co/.  Close,  1364-8,  p.  54. 


236 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


berlain  and  was  held  by  the  latter  in  the  reign  of  Henry 
I.''*  On  his  death  in  1 141,  this  manor  passed  to 
Robert  his  younger  son,  who  undertook  to  keep  to  the 
agreement  made  by  his  father  as  to  the  tithes  of 
certain  lands  in  Drayton.-'  As  shown  under  Great 
Addington  (q.v.),  Robert  married  twice  and  had  a 
family  by  each  wife,  Drayton  passing  on  his  death  to 
Henry,  his  son  by  the  second  wife  Maud,  daughter  of 
Robert  de  Furnell.  Henry  died  about  1 193-4,  •''"'^  ''■' 
son,  who  was  known  as  Walter  son  of  Henry  son  of 
Robert,  succeeded  him.  Walter  married  Lucy  daughter 
of  Gilbert  Basset  of  VVeldon,  and  either  he  or  his  son 
Henry  discarded  the  name  of  Vere  and  took  that  of 
Drayton.  Walter-**  died  in  1210-11,  leaving  a  son.  Sir 
Henr)'  de  Drayton,  who  granted  lands  to  the  Hospital 
of  St.  John  the  Baptist,  Northampton.-'  He  died  in 
1253  seised  of  2  carucates  and  3  acres  of  land  in 
Drayton  and  Islip  held  of  the  king  in  chief,  and  a  toft 
held  of  Robert  son  of  William  de  Lowick  by  the  rent  of 
iJ.  yearly.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Baldwin, 
then  aged  30  years.^  Baldwin  died  in  1278,  seised  of 
a  capital  messuage,  fishpond,  2  dovecots,  a  mill,  6  vir- 
gates  of  land,  £^  4J.  yd.  rent  of  freeman  at  Drayton 
and  Islip,  perquisites  of  court  and  19  acres  of  land  at 
Lowick,  all  held  of  the  king  in  chief,  by  the  service  of 
finding  a  Serjeant  at  his  own  cost  when  the  king  was 
with  his  army.^*  His  son  John,  aged  24  years  and 
more  at  his  father's  death,  did  homage  for  his  father's 
lands  before  14  August  1278,^  and  in  1284  he  was 
returned  as  holding  4  J  hides  in  I  slip  and  Drayton  of  the 
king  in  chief  by  serjeanty.'' 

John  died  in  1 291,  seised  of  the  manor  of  Drayton, 
held  of  the  king  as  half  a  knight's  fee,  doing  suit  at  the 
court  at  Gcddington.**  Simon  his  son  was  a  minor  in 
1299,^  but  in  1302  he  had  done  homage  without  prov- 
ing his  age,  and  he  had  seisin.^'  Simon  settled  Drayton 
Manor  on  his  wife  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  John 
Lindsey,  in  1321-2.^'  He  was  frequently  engaged  in 
public  aflfairs.^  He  served  on  a  mission  to  the  abbey 
of  Cluny  in  1323,''  and  attended  the  king  witli  men  at 
arms  for  service  against  Roger  de  Mortimer  and  other 
rebels  in  1326,'"'  and  for  an  expedition  to  Gascony  in 
1 331,'"  and  represented  Northamptonshire  in  the  par- 
liaments of  1322,  1329^-  and  1336."  He  had  licence 
to  impark  30  acres  at  Drayton  and  in  1327  had  received 
3  grant  of  free  warren  in  Drayton,  Islip,  Lowick  and 
Irthlingborough."  In  1331  he  was  appointed  forester 
of  Brigstock  and  Geddington  in  Rockingham  Forest.^ 


In  1338  Simon  settled  the  manor,^'  and  was  returned 
in  1346  as  holding  half  a  fee  in  Drayton,  Islip,  Adding- 
ton and  Twywell."  He  made  a  further  settlement 
of  lands  in  Brigstock  and  Lowick  in  1355  on  his  wife 
Margaret,  with  remainder  to  his  grandson  Baldwin 
son  of  John  de  Drayton  and  his  wife  Alice  in  tail,  and 
then  to  Gilbert,  brother  of  the  said  Baldwin.'"*  Earlier 
in  the  same  year  he  had  been  indicted  for  the  death  of 
Sir  Ralf  Darcy,'*'  but  on  3  May  1355  received  the 
king's  pardon.*""  He  died  on  31  May  1357,^'  and  on 
4  August  following  the  manor  of  Drayton  held  of  the 
king  in  chief,  and  messuages,  land  and  rent  in  Lowick 
held  of  the  Earl  of  Gloucester,^-  were  delivered  to  Mar- 
garet his  widow.  Margaret  died  in  1358,-^^  and  was 
succeeded  by  her  son  John  in  the  manor  of  Drayton, 
the  messuages,  land,  etc.,  slie  had  held  in  Lowick 
being  delivered  in  1359  to  Baldwin,  son  of  John  de 
Drayton  and  Alice  his  wife.^''  In  the  same  year  John 
de  Drayton  settled  the  manor  of  Drayton,  held  of  the 
king  in  chief,  on  Baldwin  and  Alice.^*  From  John 
and  Baldwin  de  Drayton  the  manor  passed  in  1362  to 
Henry  Green,*"  son  of  Thomas  Green  of  Boughton, 
who  married  Katherine,  the  sister  of  John  and 
daughter  of  Sir  Simon  de  Drayton.*'     He  was  Lord 


Drayton.       Argent    a 
cross  engrailed  gules. 


Green.       Azure    three 
harts  tripping  or. 


Chief  Justice  of  England  and  the  father  of  two  sons, 
Thomas  his  heir,  and  a  younger  son  Henry,  described 
by  Halstead  as  '  the  delight  and  hopes  of  his  old 
father,'  who  endowed  him  with  Drayton,  Lowick, 
Islip  and  Slipton,  and  procured  his  marriage  with 
Maud,  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Thomas  Mauduit,  lord 
of  Warminster  and  other  manors.  Sir  Henry  Green 
settled  the  manor  and  advowson  of  Lowick  on  the 
younger  Henry  in  1367,*'  and  died  in  1369.*"  Thomas 
the  son  succeeded,  but  his  homage  was  respited 
because  he  was  fighting  in  France.^  Drayton  was  fur- 


••  V.C.H.  Nortbanli.  i,  365a. 

"Dugdale,  Man.  Angt.  ii,  603. 

"  He  wai  probably  the  Waher  de 
Drayton  who  held  half  a  fee  in  Northanti 
in  1 194-5:  Red  Bk.  oj  Excheq.  (RoUi 
Ser.),  81. 

"  Drayton  Chart.  63,  96,  105,  106. 
Among  the  Drayton  charter!  of  about 
thit  date  there  are  reference*  to  Henry, 
•on  of  Thomas  de  Drayton  (105) ;  William 
de  Drayton  and  Geoffrey  his  brother  (105); 
Henry  ion  of  Walter  de  Drayton  (63). 

»  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  HI,  i,  no.  284. 

"  Ibid.  Edw.  I,  vol.  ii,  no.  260;  Cal. 
Fine,  i,  97. 

"  Ibid,  i,  99. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12. 

**  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  I,  iii,  10. 

"  Cal.  Close,  1302-7,  p.  396. 

■•  Ibid.  1296-1302,  pp.  567,  609. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  Ill,  X,  no».  369,446. 

'•  Cal.  Close,  1318-23,  p.  556. 

••Ibid.  716. 


"Ibid.  1323-7,  p.  651. 

*'  Ibid.  1330-3,  p.  267. 

*'  Ibid.   1327-30,  p.   527. 

*'Ibid.  1335-7,  P-  66i- 

*•  Ca/.  Pat.  1327-30,  p.  319;  Cal. 
Chart.  1327-41,  p.  13  ;  Chart.  R.  I  Edw. 
Ill,  m.  29,  no.  51  ;  Plac.  de  Quo  If'arr. 
(Rec.  Com.),  543. 

*^  Cal.  Pat.   1330-34,  p.   53. 

"  Ihid.  1338-40,  p.  128  ;  inq.  a.q.d. 
f.  ccxlvi,  16. 

*'  Feud,  .lids,  iv,  449. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1354-8,  p.  284. 

"Ibid.   236. 

•^  Ibid.  210.  In  hit  earlier  days  he,  as 
also  Henry  de  Drayton,  Oliver  de  Nowers, 
and  William  le  Deen  of  Lowick,  had  ap- 
peared ai  guilty  of  deeds  of  great  violence. 
Cal.  Pat.  1313-17,  p.  582  ;  1317-21,  pp. 
82,  177,  192;   Cal.  Close,  1318-23,  p.  71. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  Ill,  x,  no.  369. 

"Cal.  Close,   1354-60,  p.  369. 

••  Cat.  Inq.  Edw.  Ill,  vol.  x,  no.  446. 

237 


**  Cal.  Closej  1354-60,  p.  553.  She  wai 
probably  the  daughter  of  William  Cran- 
ford. 

**  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  33  Edw.  Ill  (2nd 
nos.).  68. 

"  Bk.  of  Deeds  belonging  to  I»ham« 
of  Lamport,  p.   17. 

^'  Halstead,  Succinct  Genealogiei,  151. 
(An  account  of  the  owncri  of  Drayton 
manor,  printed  in  1685  by  Henry,  Earl 
of  Peterborough.  Only  about  24.  copiet 
arc  said  to  have  been  printed,  but  the 
volume  was  reproduced  in  facsimile  .is  far 
as  the  Greens  of  Drayton  are  concerned, 
fnr  private  distribution  by  Francis  \'inton 
Green  of  New  York  in  1895.  ^"^  ^^py 
of  the  original  is  at  Drayton  and  two  are 
in  the  B.M.) 

**  Halstead,  op.  cit.  153-4. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  43  Edw.  Ill  (pt.  i), 
48. 

*"  Cal.  Close,  1 369-74,  p.  48  ;  see  also 
P-  53- 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


ther  settled  on  Henry  Green  by  John  de  Drayton  and 
his  son  Baldwin  in  1372-3.*'  In  1385  he  received  the 
grant  of  a  market  every  Thursday  in  his  town  of 
Lowick,  and  of  a  fair  there  yearly  at  Whitsuntide, 
together  with  free  warren  in  his  lands  in  Lowick  and 
Islip.*'-  His  faithful  service  to  Richard,  by  whom  he 
was  knighted,  won  him  various  rewards,  including  the 
house  of  the  Lord  Cobham  in  London  with  all  its 
furniture.  He  shared  the  king's  downfall,  and  was 
executed  with  the  Earl  of  Wiltshire  and  Sir  John 
Bushey  on  29  July  1399  after  the  treacherous  surrender 
of  Bristol  Castle.*^  He  left  two  sons,  Ralf  and  John, 
and  upon  the  petition  of  Ralf  his  forfeited  property 
was  restored  to  his  family  by  Act  of  Parliament  in 
1400."  In  the  same  year  he  was  returned  as  seised  of 
the  manor  and  advowson  of  Lowick,  held  of  the  Earl  of 
Stafford,  and  of  the  manor  of  Drayton  held  in  chief.^ 
His  heir  Ralf  complained  in  1401  that  his  houses  at 
Lowick  had  been  broken  into  and  his  property 
damaged.*"  After  his  brother  John  had  in  141 5  released 
his  right,  he  settled  Drayton  and  Lowick  and  the  ad- 
vowson of  Lowick  on  his  wife  Katherine,  daughter  of 
Anketill  Mallory,*'  who  survived  him.  At  his  death  in 
141 7  she  was  holding  the  manor  of  Drayton  of  Joan 
Queen  of  England  as  of  her  manor  of  Geddington,  and 
the  manor  of  Lowick  of  Sir  Thomas  Green,  kt.,  by 
knight  service.**  She  married  as  her  second  husband 
Simon  Felbrigge,  who  in  1428  was  holding  of  the  honor 
of  Gloucester  the  half- fee  in  I  slip,  Drayton,  Great  Ad- 
dington  and  Twywell  which  had  formerly  belonged  to 
Simon  de  Drayton.*'  Ralf  was  succeeded  by  his 
brother  John,  who  inherited  all  the  lands  his  father 
Henry  had  held  except  those  which  fell  to  Ralf's 
widow  Katherine  in  dower.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Walter  Green  of  Bridgnorth,  and  died  in 
1432-3,  leaving  issue  Ralf,  wlio  died  young,  Henry 
afterwards  lord  of  Drayton,  Margaret  wife  of  Sir 
Henry  Huddlestone,  and  Isobel  the  wife  of  Sir 
Richard  Vere  of  Thrapston  and  Addington.'"  Henry, 
son  of  John  Green,  who  was  sheriff  of  Northamptonshire 
in  1455, was  dealing  with  the  manor  in  1454."  In  1457 
he  settled  the  manor  on  the  marriage  of  his  daughter 
and  heir  Constance,  one  of  the  richest  heiresses  of 
England,  with  John  Stafford,  younger  son  of 
Humphrey  Duke  of  Buckingham,  who  was  afterwards 
created  Earl  of  Wiltshire.'-  By  his  will  dated  3  Sep- 
tember 1467  Henry  Green  directed  that  the  feoffees 
of  his  lands  and  tenements  in  Lowick  called  Coles 
Thynge  and  Bcsviles  Thynge  should  grant  them 
tf)  Sir  John  Stafford  and  his  wife  on  condition  they 
did  not  hinder  the  performance  of  his  will,  and 
also  his  woods  of  Langliill,  Farthingshaw,  and  Tolke- 
thorp.  He  left  directions  for  the  disposal  of  his  pro- 
perty and  of  a  chantry  for  two  chaplains  in  the  parish 
church  of  Lowick.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son-in- 
law,  John  Stafford,  who  though  a  Lancastrian  was 
made  Earl  of  Wiltshire  in  1469-70.  The  earl  died  in 
1473  leaving  a  son  and  heir  Edward,  aged  three  years. 


Edward  Earl  of  Wiltshire  married  Margaret  daughter 
of  John  Viscount  Lisle,  on  whom  he  settled  Lowick, 
I  slip,  Sudborough,  Ringstead,  and  other  manors 
and  died  without  issue  on  24  March  1498-9,  follow- 
ing on  a  sickness  said  to  have  been  contracted  when 
on  his  way  to  fight  for  the  king  (Henry  VII)  at 
Blackheath  Field  against  the  Cornish  rebels."  The 
succession  after  his  death  was  the  subject  of  a 
long  dispute  between  the  Earl  of  Shrewsbury,  his 
cousin,  and  the  heirs  of  his  grandfather,  Henry  Green.'* 
His  heirs  were  Elizabeth  Clieney,  late  wife  of  Sir 
Thomas  Cheney,  kt.,  and  daughter  and  heir  of  Mar- 
garet (who  had  married  Sir  Henry  Huddlestone),  a 
sister  and  heir  of  Henry  Green,  father  of  his  mother, 
Constance  Green,  and  the  four  daughters  of  her  sister, 
the  other  sister  and  co-heir  of  Henry  Green,  Isobel, 
who  had  married  Sir  Richard  Vere  of  Addington. 
These  last  were  Elizabeth,  wife  of  John  Mordaunt, 
serjeant-at-law  ;  Amy  or  Anne,  late  the  wife  of  Hum- 
phrey Browne  ;  Constance,  late  the  wife  of  John  Parr  ; 
and  Audrey  or  Etheldreda  Vere,  who  married  John 
Browne.'^ 

In  consequence  of  the  death  s.p.  on  3  April  1502  of 
Elizabeth  Cheney,  and  in  August  1502  of  Constance 
Parr,  followed  on  5  September  1506  by  that  of  Anne 
wife  of  Humphrey  Browne,  who  left  a  son  George,  an 
inquisition  as  to  the  property  held  by  the  Earl  of 
Wiltshire  at  his  death  was  held  in  1513-14,'*  in  which 
it  was  returned  that  the  manor  of  Drayton  was  held 
in  chief,  and  the  manor  and  advowson  of  Lowick  of 
the  abbot  of  Peterborough  ;  and  that  Thomas  Mon- 
tagu, William  Pembcrton  and  others  had  been  en- 
feoffed of  these  manors  to  the  uses  of  the  Earl's  will. 
After  judgment  for  John  Mordaunt  and  Elizabeth  his 
wife,  George  Browne,  John  Browne  and  Audrey 
his  wife,"  an  award  by  Robert  Brudenell  and  Richard 
Elliott  assigned  the  lands  of  the  Earl  of  Wiltshire  to 
John  Mordaunt,  Esq.,  and  his  wife  Elizabeth  ; 
Humphrey  Browne,  Esq.,  husband  of  the  late  Amy 
Browne,  and  George  Browne,  his  son  and  heir  ;  Sir 
Wistan  Browne,  kt.,  and  John  Browne,  his  son  and  heir, 
and  Audrey  his  wife,  on  the  ground  that  deeds  had 
been  produced  giving  thein  in  tail  to  the  ancestors 
of  Constance,  mother  of  the  Earl  of  Wiltshire,  and 
that  no  will  had  been  produced  devising  them  to  the 
Earl  of  Shrewsbury.  The  Earl  of  Slircwsbury  was  to 
receive  200  marks  to  be  paid  to  him  at  St.  Paul's  in 
London.'*  In  1515  he  released  to  the  successful 
claimants  all  his  right  in  the  manor  of  Drayton.'*  John 
Browne  and  Audrey  his  wife  were  dealing  with  one- 
third  of  the  manor  and  park  of  Drayton,  and  of  the 
manor  and  advowson  of  Lowick  in  1526,*"  and  in  1537 
a  conveyance  of  these  manors  was  made  by  George 
Browne  to  Humphrey  Browne.*'  In  Easter  term  of 
1544  Sir  Humphrey  Browne  and  Elizabeth  his  wife 
and  their  son  George  Browne  with  Mary  liis  wife 
conveyed  their  third  of  this  property  to  Sir  John 
Mordaunt,  Lord  Mordaunt,*^  the  husband  of  Eliza- 


*'  Book  of  Dccdi  belonging  to  Ishams 
of  Lamport,  p.  17;  Halitcail,  op.  cit. 
p.   170. 

••Chart.  R.  9  6-  10  Ric.  II,  m.  14, 
DO.  21. 

"  Ilalitrad,  op.  cit.  154,  183. 

•"■  Ibid.  i85,cit. /nj/>«imi(j,  13  Hen.  IV. 

•*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  file  155,  no.  15. 

"Cat.   Pal.   i3<)q-i4oi,  p.  551. 

"Cloic   R.    3   Hen.   V,  m.   24;     ibid. 


4  Hen.  V_  m.  20;  Feet  of  F.   Div,  Cos. 
4  Hen.  V,  no.  4;. 

*'  Chan.  Ini).  p.m.  5  Hen.  V,  no.  41. 

'"  Frud.  Atdi^  iv,  49. 

'"  Haljtead,  op.  cit.   154. 

"  Ibid.  193-5. 

"  Ibid.    197,   201. 

"  llridgcn,  lliit.  Norlhanli.  ii,  250. 

"  Halitead,  op.  cit.  210-21 1,  217,  <S-c. 

"Ibid.  223. 


"Ibid. 

"  Ibid.   225. 

"  Ibid.   225-7. 

'•  Ibid.   227. 

""  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  18 
Hen.  VIII. 

"Com.  Pleai  D.Enr.Trin.  29  Hen.  VIII. 

"•  Feet  of  I'.  Norlhanti.  Ea»t. 
35  Hen.  VIII  ;  Recov.  R.  Trin.  35 
lien.  VllI,  ro.  149. 


238 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


MoRDAUNT.  Argent  a 
cbeveron  between  three 
stars  sable. 


beth  Vere,  who  had  been  created  a  baron  by  Henry  VIII 
in    1529.     Lord    Mordaunt    was    dealing   with    the 
manors  of  Lowick  and  Drayton  in  1560,**  and  died 
in   1561.*'     His   son  and  heir  John,  who  had   been 
created  K.B.  at  the  coronation  of  Anne  Boleyn,  and 
who   was   a    Privy   Councillor   under   Queen   Mary, 
married  as  his  first  wife  a   great   heiress,  Elizabeth 
sister  and   heir  of  John,  and  only  daughter  of  Sir 
Richard   Fitzlewis  of  Thorndon.     He  died  in   1571. 
His  son  Lewis  Lord  Mordaunt,  who  succeeded  him, 
was  one  of  the  24  noblemen  who  tried  Mary  Queen 
of  Scots  at  Fotheringhay  ;  and  he  added  considerably 
to  Drayton  House.     He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter 
of  Sir  Arthur  Darcy,  by  Mary,  daughter  and  co-heir 
of  Sir  Nicholas  Carew,  and  died  at  Drayton  in  1601.** 
His  son  Henry,  who  succeeded  him  as  Lord  Mordaunt, 
and  who  in  the  year  previous 
to  the  Gunpowder  Plot  enter- 
tained  James    I    at    Drayton 
House,  came  under  suspicion 
of  having  been  engaged  in  the 
plot,  and  spent  a  long  term  of 
imprisonment  in   the  Tower. 
He  married  Margaret,  daugh- 
ter of  Henry,  first  Lord  Comp- 
ton,  and  died  on  13  February 
1610  seised  of  the  manors  of 
Lowick  and  Drayton,  Lowick 
Mill,  etc.**     His  heir,  his  son 
John,  later  received  pardon  of 
the  fine  of  j^io.ooo  which  had  been  imposed  on  him.*' 
John,   Lord    Mordaunt,  was  created  Earl  of  Peter- 
borough  in   1627.     In  1640  he  settled  his  manors  of 
Lowick,  Drayton,  Slipton,  I  slip,  Grafton,  and  Adding- 
ton  Magna,  parcel  of  the  forest  of  Rockingham  dis- 
afforested,** and  died  in  1642  seised  of  these  manors, 
the  mansion  house  and  park  of  Drayton,  etc.*'     His 
wife  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  heir   of    William,  Lord 
Howard  of  Effingham,   a   zealous  Puritan  and  great 
beauty,   survived  him   until   1671.     His   son  Henry, 
who  succeeded  him,  died  in  1697,^  his  property  then 
passing  to  his  daughter  Mary,  the  wife  of  Henry, 
later  Duke  of  Norfolk.**     The  Duchess  of  Norfolk 
was  divorced  from  her  husband  in  1700,'^  and  married 
a    Dutchman,    Sir    John    Germain,    bart,    in     1701. 
She  died  without  issue  in  1705    and   was   buried   at 
Lowick.     She  had  settled  the  family  estates  on  her 
second    husband,  who   married   as   his   second   wife 
Elizabeth  daughter  of  Charles,  Earl  of  Berkeley,  and 
died  without  issue  in   1718.'^     He  bequeathed   the 
estates  left  to  him  by  his  first  wife  to  her  successor, 
Lady  Elizabeth  Germain,  who  in  accordance  with  his 
wishes  left  them  at  her  death  to  Lord  George  Sackville. 
He  was  the  third  son  of  Lionel  Cranfield,  the  Earl 
of  Dorset  and  Middlesex,  to  whom  she  had  made  a 
conveyance  of  the  manors  of  Drayton,  Lowick,  Islip 
and  Slipton  in  1719,'*  the  year  after  her  husband's 
death.     It  was  not  until  1769  that  "  the  divine  old 
mistress    of    Drayton,"    as    Horace    Walpole    called 
the    aged    Lady   Betty   Germain,  died.      In   accord- 


ance with  her  will.  Lord  George  Sackville  (whose 
succession  was  disputed  by  the  family  from  whom 
Drayton  had  been  willed  away)  look  the  name  of 
Germain  by  Act  of  Parliament  of  1770,*''  and  was 
seised  of  the  manor  and  advowson  of  Lowick  at  the 
inclosure  of  the  parish  in  1771,'*  when  about  1,150 
acres  were  inclosed.  By  this  Act  an  allotment  was 
made  for  tithes  due  from  several  homesteads,  gardens, 
orchards,  home  closes,  ancient  inclosures  and  woods, 
Drayton  Park,  and  certain  old  inclosures  called  Drayton 
Old  Park,  and  there  was  a  saving  of  rights  of  the 
lord  of  the  manor  of  Lowick,  and  of  the  paramount 
lord,  the  lord  of  the  honour  of  Gloucester.  Charles 
Germain,  Viscount  Sackville,  the  son  and  heir  of  Lord 


^>**>»0   6^^/s^ 


Germain.     Azure  a 
cross  engrailed  or. 


Sackville.       Quarterly 
or  and  gules  a  bend  vair. 


George  Sackville,  succeeded  in  1785,  and  was  dealing 
with  the  manors  of  Drayton,  Lowick,  Islip,  Slipton 
and  Sudborcugh  by  recovery  in  1788"  and  1 791.**  In 
1815  he  succeeded  his  cousin  in  the  dukedom  of 
Dorset.  At  his  death  unmarried  in  1843  Drayton  House 
and  the  above  manors  descended  to  his  niece  Caroline 
Harriet,  daughter  of  the  Hon.  George  Germain  and 
wife  of  William  Bruce  Stopford,**  J. P.,  D.L.,  who  in 
1870  assumed  the  additional  name  and  arms  of 
Sackville.  Mr.  Stopford-Sackville  was  the  third 
son  of  the  Rev.  the  Hon.  Richard  Bruce  Stopford, 
fourth  son  of  the  second  Earl  of  Courtown.  He  was 
high  sherifT  in  1850  and  died  in  1872,  his  widow 
surviving  him  until  1908.  Their  son  Sackville  George 
Stopford-Sackville  succeeded  them  and  died  in  1926, 
when  the  estate  passed  to  his  nephew,  Mr.  Nigel  V. 
Stopford-Sackville,  the  present  owner. 

One  and  a  half  virgates  in 
Lowick  which  had  been  held 
freely  by  Lefsi  in  King  Ed- 
ward's time  was  entered  in 
the  Domesday  Survey  as  held 
by  Sibbold  of  the  Conqueror. 
Its  value  had  risen  from  4J.  to 
loj.i  This  seems  to  be  the  I J 
virgates  held  in  the  12th  cen- 
tury Northamptonshire  Survey 
by  Ralf  Fleming  of  the  fee  of 
David,  Earl  of  Huntingdon,^ 
and  at  a  later  date  by  the 
family  of  Lowick  of  the  honour 

of  Huntingdon.  Ralf,  son  of  Sibbold  de  Lowick, 
on  becoming  a  member  of  the  fraternity,  gave  his 


David,  Earl  of  Hun- 
tingdon. Or  three  ptlcs 
gules. 


••Feet  of  F.  Northanta.  Mich.  1560, 
ro.  1095. 

•*  G.  E.  C.  Complete  Peerage  (Mor- 
daunt). »5  Ibid. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cccix,  200. 

"'  O.  E.  C.  op.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  14  Chai.  I, 
ii;  Pat.  R.  15  Chai.  I,  pt.  10. 


"'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  20  Chas.  I,  no. 
64. 

">  G.  E.  C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Mich.  32 
Chas.  II. 

"  G.  E.  C.  op.  cit. 

"  C.  E.  C.  Baronetage,  It,  173. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  5  Geo.  I. 


"  G.  E.  C.  op.  cit. 
»«  Priv.  Stat.  II  Geo.  Ill,  cap.  2. 
"  Recov.  R.   Mich.   29  Geo.  Ill, 
287. 

»«Ibid.  31  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  41. 
"G.  E.  C.  op  cit. 
'  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  34v<'f 
"Ibid.  365. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


land  to  the  abbey,  confirming  the  gift  in  the  presence 
of  his  elder  brother,  Guy.*  In  1227-8  Maud,  widow 
of  Ralf  de  Lowick,''  was  dealing  with  a  messuage 
which  apparently  Richard,  son  of  Ralf  de  Lowick, 
granted  to  U'alter  de  Denford  of  the  fee  of  Earl 
John^  Ump.  Hen.  III.  It  was  returned  in  1275-6 
that  Hugh,  son  of  Alan  of  Lowick,  had  for  18  years 
withdrawn  21.  yearly  from  2  assarts  in  Lowick,*  and 
in  1284  that  Hugh  son  of  Alan  held  half-a-hide  of 
land  in  Lowick  of  the  honour  of  Huntingdon  of  the 
heirs  of  Denford,  and  these  heirs  of  Robert  de  Brus, 
who  was  holding  it  of  the  king.'     In  the  nest  year 


The  church  of  ST.  PETER  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  30  ft.  by  17  ft.,  north  chapel 
29  ft.  by  14  ft.,  clearstoricd  nave  of 
four  b>.ys  53  ft.  by  16  ft.,  north  and  south  aisles, 
south  transeptal  chapel  19  ft.  by  13  ft.,  south  porch, 
and  west  tower  14  ft.  square,  all  these  measurements 
being  internal.  The  south  aisle  is  8  ft.  3  in.  wide 
and  the  north  aisle  11  ft.  4  in.,  the  width  across  nave 
and  aisles  being  40  ft.  5  in. 

The  building  stands  on  high  ground  at  the  north 
end  of  the  village  and,  with  the  exception  of  the  tower, 
is  faced  with  rubble.     It  has  plain  parapets  and  flat- 


!:^131!iCENT 

□  14  S!  Century 

c.  1375-1400 

EZD 1 5 in  Century  A 

C3 Modern  blocking  of  N. Doorway 

JO 5  ^)         10        20 


Tombs 
I  Rplpb  Greece  (I4l51t Wife 
2JHenr^  Greeoe  (WbgjtWife 
iElorl  of  Wiltsl)ire(l500) 
♦  DucJjess  of  NorfblKOTOJ? 
.SSir  Jobn  Germon(l7l^ 
fe  DuKe  of  Dorset  (1543) 

50 


Scale  of  Feet 

Plan  of  Lowick  Church 


Robert,  son  of  Hugh  Aleyn  of  Lowick,  was  dealing 
with  land  in  Lowick,*  and  in  the  same  year  Robert 
son  of  Robert  de  Lowick,  possibly  the  grandson  of 
Hugh,  with  Robert,  son  of  William,  settled  a 
messuage  and  land  in  Lowick.' 

Robert,  son  of  Robert  de  Lowick,  and  William, 
son  of  Robert  de  Lowick,  were  dealing  with  lands  in 
Lowick  in  1 295-1 303,  and  Robert,  son  of  John, 
and  Letticc  his  wife  from  1 330-1 343  with  lands 
which  Robert  Aleyn  senior  gave  them  and  which 
Thomas,  son  of  Robert  the  clerk  of  Lowick, 
held  in   1370,  John,  son  of  John   de    Lowick    being 


a  witness 


10 


In  1443  Ralf  Lowick  of  Lowick  appeared  in  a 
plea  of  debt  of  ^11  61.  8J.  to  Sir  Simon  Felbriggc, 
kt.'> 

The  name  of  Anthony  Lowick  appears  as  respon- 
sible for  a  return  of  musters  in  1539.^^  It  seems 
possible  that  the  property  of  the  Lowicks  is  repre- 
sented by  a  manor  of  Lowick  with  which  Thomas 
Pyckeringe,  Gent.,  and  Margaret  )iis  wife  were  dealing 
in  1585." 


pitched  leaded  roofs.  Internally  all  the  walls  are 
plastered.   There  were  restorations  in  1869  and  1887. 

The  church  was  almost  entirely  rebuilt  at  the  end 
of  the  14th  century,  but  on  the  north  side  of  the 
chancel  are  an  aumbry  and  a  small  blocked  doorway 
of  the  13th  century,  while  the  two-stepped  sedilia 
and  the  piscina  on  the  south  side  arc  14th  century 
work  earlier  than  the  general  rebuilding.  Of  the  plan 
of  the  church  before  this  rebuilding  nothing  definite 
can  be  said,  but  the  trefoiled  piscina  in  the  south 
chapel  appears  to  be  of  the  13th  century,  and  altliough 
the  chapel  itself  was  rebuilt  there  was  probably 
little  alteration  in  the  fabric  of  the  adjacent  south 
aisle. 

The  rebuilding  is  clearly  due  to  Sir  Henry  Green, 
who  succeeded  his  father  as  lord  of  Drayton  in  1369. 
The  shields  of  himself  and  his  wife,  a  member  of 
the  Wiltshire  family  of  Mauduit,  occur  on  the  roof 
of  t!ic  north  aisle  and  in  the  windows  of  the  chancel. 
The  first  work  taken  in  hand  was  the  reconstruction 
of  the  nave  and  aisles.  The  nave  arcades  have  plain 
octagonal  piers  with    moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and 


•  Red  Bk.   o(  Thorncy  Abbey,  I.anid. 
MS.  1029,  (ol.  7jb. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Norlhanti,  12  Hen.   Ill, 
CJle  172,  file  23,  no.  236. 

Ml.irl.  Chart.  53B,  51  J,  b. 

•  Roi.   Ilund.  (Rcc.   Com.),  4   Edw.   I, 
p.  7. 


'  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  13. 
'  Cal.  Close,  1307-13,  p.  433- 
•Feet  of  F.  Northantn.  13  F.dw.  I 
caic  174,  file  54,  no.  158.  llrnry  dr 
Drayton  held  a  toft  in  Dr.iyton  of  Rolnrl, 
•on  of  William  de  Lowick  in  1252-3. 
Cal.  Iftij.  lien.  lll,i,  284. 

240 


'"  Drayliin  Chart.  35,  49,  61  ;  Buc- 
clcuch  Coll.  J  II,  13,  16,  22. 

"  Cal.   Pal.    I44i-'i,  p.    120. 

"/..  an,/  /'.  Urn.  Ill  I,  xlv  (I),  p. 
2S3. 

"  Rccov.  R.  Mich.  27  Eliz.  ro.  3; 
Feet  of  F.  Northani»,  Ea«t.  27  Elir,. 


LowicK  Church  from  the  Souni-wtsT 


Li.uuK  Chlrcii  :    ScKi;t.\    lo  South   CiuptL 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


LOWICK 


the  arclics  arc  of  two  clumfcred  orders,  the  outer 
order  being  considerably  stilted.  The  clearstory 
is  of  the  same  date  as  the  work  below.  The  masonry 
of  the  aisle  walls  is  very  rough,  and  it  is  probable 
that  here  and  elsewhere  in  the  body  of  the  church 
the  materials  of  the  earlier  building  were  re-used. 
The  narrower  south  aisle,  as  already  mentioned,  was 
probably  left  without  much  alteration,  a  new  doorway 
being  made  and,  at  a  later  date,  new  windows  inserted. 
The  blocked  doorway  of  the  north  aisle  has  excellent 
mouldings  of  two  orders  divided  by  a  casement ; 
the  four-centred  four-light  windows  arc  divided  by 
battleniented  transoms  but  have  tracery  of  a  very  late 
Decorated  character.  There  is  a  window  with  similar 
tracery  in  the  west  wall  of  the  south  chapel.  The 
character  of  all  this  work  points  to  the  end  of  the  third 
quarter  of  the  14th  century  as  its  date.  The  south 
chapel  appears  to  have  been  finished  last  :  its  south 
window  is  of  six  lights  with  two  battlemented  tran- 
soms and  fully  developed  Perpendicular  tracery,  and 
below  the  sill  is  a  string-course  similar  in  character 
to  that  of  the  north  chapel  of  the  chancel. 

The  chancel  and  north  chapel  followed,  the  chapel 
being  the  full  length  of  the  chancel  and  wider  than 
the  north  aisle,  from  which  it  is  divided  by  an  arch  of 
two  chamfered  orders  on  half-octagonal  responds.  The 
wide  single  arch  between  the  chancel  and  chapel  may 
be  a  later  reconstruction  of  an  arcade  of  two  bays,  but 
the  eastern  part  of  the  north  wall  was  left  unpierced, 
and  in  this  are  the  two  sedilia  of  the  chapel,  with 
ogee  gabled  heads,  which  seem  to  be  rather  earlier 
than  the  rest  of  the  work.  The  east  windows  of 
both  chancel  and  chapel  are  of  five  cinqucfoiled  lights 
with  Perpendicular  tracery  and  traceried  transoms, 
and  the  other  windows  north  and  south  are  of  similar 
type  but  of  four  lights.  Those  in  the  north  wall 
of  the  chapel,  however,  were  altered  to  three  lights 
as  the  work  proceeded,  it  being  found  advisable  to 
make  a  buttress  in  the  middle  of  the  wall,  and  the 
lights  next  to  the  buttress  were  left  out.  There  is  a 
very  massive  contemporary  buttress  covering  the 
south-east  angle  of  the  chancel,  the  walls  of  which 
were  weakened  by  the  large  window  openings.  The 
double  sedilia  of  the  chancel  are  at  two  levels,  with 
ogee  heads  and  crocketed  canopies,  and  further  west 
below  the  window  of  the  first  bay  is  a  moulded  priest's 
doorway.  The  chancel  arch  is  of  rather  later  character 
than  the  rest  of  the  arches  in  the  church  and  was 
evidently  left  for  reconstruction  to  the  last.  The 
rebuilding  of  the  chancel  seems  to  have  been  under- 
taken as  part  ot  the  work  due  to  Sir  Henry  Green, 
but  was  probably  not  completed  at  the  time  of  his 
death  in  1399. 

The  clearstory  windows  are  four-centred  and  of 
three  cinqucfoiled  lights  without  tracery.  The  east 
window  of  the  south  chapel  diflters  considerably  from 
.  the  other  windows  of  the  church,  being  of  four  lights 
with  transom  and  thick  central  mullion  dividing  it 
into  two  pointed  openings  with  quatrefoil  tracery  and 
a  large  pointed  trefoil  in  the  spandrel.  The  two- 
light  west  window  of  the  south  aisle  is  of  the  same 
character  as  those  of  the  clearstory,  but  that  in  the 
south  wall  is  a  late  insertion  with  Perpendicular  tracery 
and  dropped  labels.  The  porch  has  an  outer  con- 
tinuous moulded  doorway  and  trefoiled  openings  in 


the  side  walls.  At  the  east  end  of  the  north  aisle 
is  a  cusped  wall  recess  close  to  the  ground,  intended 
for  a  tomb,  but  too  small  for  a  full-sized  eftigy. 

'I'he  beautiful  west  tower  is  built  of  dressed  stone 
and  belongs  to  the  early  part  of  the  15th  century. 
It  is  of  four  stages,  with  a  vice  in  the  north-west 
angle,  and  is  surmounted  by  a  lofty  lantern.*^  Above 
the  moulded  plinth  is  a  band  of  quatrefoils,  and 
another  at  the  top  of  the  second  stage,  level  with  the 
top  of  the  clearstory,  and  a  third  of  quatrefoiled 
circles  below  tlie  battlemented  parapet.  The  moulded 
west  doorway  is  set  in  a  rectangular  frame  with  quatre- 
foiled circles  and  blank  shields  in  the  spandrels,  and 
about  it  is  a  three-light  traceried  window.  The  two- 
light  bell-chamber  windows  have  tracery  of  distinctly 
14th-century  character,  but  this  must  have  been  the 
result  of  conservative  feeling  on  the  part  of  the  builders. 
The  lantern  rises  from  behind  the  parapet  and  is 
supported  by  flying  buttresses  from  the  four  great 
angle  pinnacles  which  are  raised  so  as  to  be  nearly  as 
liigh  as  those  of  the  lantern.  All  twelve  pinnacles 
are  finished  off  by  weathercocks.  The  three  lower 
stages  of  the  tower  arc  blank  on  the  north  and  south, 
except  for  a  small  square-headed  two-light  window 
in  the  third  stage  facing  south.  The  lofty  arch  to 
the  nave  is  of  three  chamfered  orders,  the  innermost 
on  half-round  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases. 

Of  the  old  woodwork  of  the  church  the  chief 
remains  arc  the  roof  of  the  north  aisle,  which  is  of 
five  bays  with  moulded  beams  and  carved  bosses, 
and  seven  bench  ends  with  poppy-heads  in  the  south 
aisle.  The  roofs  of  the  cliancel,  north  chapel  and 
porch  were  renewed  in  1887  ;  the  roof  of  the  south 
chapel  is  also  modern  and  that  of  the  south  aisle 
much  restored.  The  south  chapel  is  inclosed  by  a 
modern  stone  screen. 

The  font  is  of  the  13th  century  and  consists  of  a 
plain  octagonal  bowl  on  a  pedestal  of  clustered  keel- 
shaped  shafts. 

An  entry  in  the  churchwardens'  accounts  records 
the  taking  down  of  the  rood-loft  and  the  filling  of 
the  holes  in  May  1644,  and  in  the  following  July 
payment  was  made  for  the  '  glazing  of  the  windows 
when  the  crucifixion  and  scandalous  pictures  were 
taken  down.' 

The  pulpit  and  other  fittings  are  modern. 
The  church  contains  a  considerable  amount  of 
ancient  stained  glass.  The  upper  halves  of  the  four 
windows  of  the  north  aisle  are  filled  with  14th-century 
figure  glass  of  extreme  beauty.  The  figures,  with 
one  exception,  originally  formed  part  of  a  large  Tree 
of  Jesse,  which  may  have  been  in  the  east  window 
of  the  chancel,  and  each  is  surrounded  by  vine 
branches.  The  figures  in  the  westernmost  window 
are,  in  the  centre  lights,  David  and  Solomon,  and  in 
the  side  lights,  Rehoboam  and  Asa.  The  remaining 
eleven  figures  from  west  to  cast  are  Jacob,  Isaiah, 
Elijah,  Habakkuk,  Daniel,  Ezckiel,  Jeremiah,  Isaac, 
Joseph,  Zacharias,  and  Micah.  The  glass  has  been 
rearranged  and  portions  of  a  broken  inscription  in 
Norman-French  occur  at  intervals.  This  inscription 
seems  to  have  come  from  an  earlier  window,  one  figure 
of  which,  with  the  word  '  drayton  '  below,  is  preserved 
in  the  easternmost  light  of  this  series,  and  represents 


**  It  may  have  •uggcsted  the  lantern  at        i»  the  crown  of  the  tower,  while  at  Fothcr-        the  tower  becomes  the  pedestal  of   thi» 
Fotheringhay,  but  at  Lowick  the  lantern       inghay  the  proportions   are   altered   and       lantern. 

241 


A  HISTORY  OF    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


a  knight  in  armour  kneeling  and  holding  a  church. 
The  figure  appears  to  belong  to  the  early  part  of  the 
14th  century,  and  may  represent  one  of  the  Veres 
from  whom  the  manor  passed  to  the  elder  Sir  Henry 
Green.  His  shield  displays  the  arms  of  Drayton 
and  his  sword  has  IHS  upon  the  pommel.^^  In  the 
traceries  are  numerous  small  figures  of  saints,  amongst 
whom  are  St.  John  Baptist,  St.  Andrew  and  St. 
Michael,  and  two  female  figures,  perhaps  the  Blessed 
Virgin  and  St.  Margaret.  The  order  in  which  the 
figures  are  placed  is  arbitrary  and  unnatural,  and  the 
borders  and  other  accessories  have  been  destroyed, 
but  the  glass  is  nevertheless  of  very  great  interest  and 
value. 

The  tracery  of  the  lower  halves  of  the  windows  in 
the  chancel  and  north  chapel  was  originally  filled  with 
a  series  of  shields  representing  the  alliances  of  the 
Greens,*'  but  the  royal  shields  of  the  east  window 
are  gone,  and  new  shields  have  been  inserted  in  this 
window  and  in  one  of  the  north  windows  of  the 
chapel.  In  the  remaining  north  window  of  the  chapel 
and  the  two  south  windows  of  the  chapel  the  old 
shields  remain." 

In  the  middle  of  the  chancel  floor  is  the  gravestone 
of  John  Heton,  rector  of  l.owick  1406-15,  who  died 
in  the  same  year  as  Ralph  Green.  Tlie  slab  is  plain 
except  for  a  border  inscription  which  reads  'Hie 
jacet  Dominus  Johannes  de  Heton  quondam  rector 
ccclesiedebenyfeldeet  nuper  de  Lufwyck  cujus  aninic 
propicietur  Deus  Amen.  Credo  quod  Rcdemptor 
mcus  vivit  et  in  novissimo  die  de  terra  surrectus 
sum  et  in  came  mea  videbo  deum  salvatorem.' 

It  remains  to  notice  the  series  of  monuments  to 
the  lords  of  Drayton.  The  magnificent  alabaster 
table-tomb  of  Ralph  Green  (d.  1417),  son  of  the 
rebuilder  of  the  church,  and  his  wife  Katharine 
Mallory,  stands  under  the  arch  between  the  chancel 
and  north  chapel,  and  is  one  of  the  finest  works  of  the 
Chellaston  school  of  carvers.  The  monument,  as 
agreed  upon  by  indenture,'*  was  completed  by  1420. 
The  sides  of  the  tomb  are  panelled  and  contain 
'  images  of  angels  with  tabernacles  bearing  shields ' 
and  standing  on  small  pedestals.  The  tabernacle- 
work  is  now  much  mutilated  and  the  shields  blank. 
The  inscription  is  gone.  The  effigies  have  already 
been  described." 

On  the  north  side  of  the  south  chapel  is  a  marble 
table-tomb  with  brasses  of  Henry  Green,  who  died 
22  February  ('  in  fcsto  Sancti  Petri  in  Cathedra  ') 
1467-8,  and  his  wife  Margaret.  He  wears  an  elaborate 
suit  of  armour,  witli  spurs,  andhis  wife  has  a  head-dress 
with  horns.  The  shield  of  arms  bears  a  chequered 
coat  quartering  an  engrailed  cross  :  small  brass 
scrolls  repeat  the  motto  '  Da  gloriam  Deo.' 


The  monument  of  Edward  Stafford,  second  earl 
of  Wiltshire,  who  died  24  March  1498-9,  is  in  the 
middle  of  the  south  chapel.  It  consists  of  a  high 
tomb  of  alabaster  with  elaborate  efiigy,^"  and  round 
the  edge  is  an  inscription  formed  by  letters  knotted 
in  allusion  to  the  badge  of  the  house  of  Stafford.^' 

Tlicre  are  two  memorials  of  the  family  of  Mordaunt. 
One  of  these  is  a  tablet  of  Raunds  stone  in  the  eastern 
sedilc  of  the  north  ch.ipel  (which  was  mutilated  to  re- 
ceive it),  with  a  much  abbreviated  and  ungrammatical 
Latin  inscription  commemorating  William,  second 
son  of  John,  first  earl  of  Peterborough,  wlio  died  at 
the  age  of  eight  in  1625.  The  other  monument  is 
that  of  Mary,  daughter  of  the  second  earl  of  Peter- 
borough, who  married  first  the  seventh  duke  of 
Norfolk  and  secondly  Sir  John  Germain.  The 
duchess  of  Norfolk,  who  died  17  November  1705,  is 
buried  against  the  east  wall  of  the  north  chapel,  and 
her  monument  bears  a  recumbent  statue,^^  and  the 
shield  of  Mordaunt  as  an  escutcheon  of  pretence  on 
the  shield  of  Germain.  Sir  John  Germain  married  as 
his  second  wife  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Charles,  earl 
of  Berkeley.  He  died  11  December  1 718,  and  his 
monument,  with  a  recumbent  statue,^*  is  against  the 
north  wall  of  the  chapel.  There  is  a  small  brass  to 
his  widow  (d.  1769)  in  the  western  sedile  of  the  cliapel. 

Against  the  east  wall  of  the  south  chapel  is  a  monu- 
ment commemorating  Charles  Sackville,  fifth  duke  of 
Dorset  (d.  1843),  and  his  brother  the  Hon.  George 
Sackville  Germain  (d.  1836),  wlio  are  there  buried. 

There  are  six  bells,  the  treble  by  J.  Tajlor  and  Co. 
of  Loughborough,  1896,  the  second  and  third  undated 
by  Hugh  Watts  II  of  Leicester  (1615-43),  ^1'*=  fourth 
recast  by  Taylor  in  1884,  the  fifth  inscribed  '  Richarde 
Woode  made  me,'  and  tlie  tenor  by  Hugh  Watts, 
1619." 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup,  paten,  flagon,  and 
almsdish  of  1723-4,  each  inscribed  '  Loffwick  Church 
1724,'  the  cup  in  addition  having  the  arms  of  Lady 
Elizabeth  Germain  :  tliere  are  also  a  plated  cup  and 
breadholder.2* 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows:  (i)  bap- 
tisms 1542-1794,  marriages  1557-1649  and  1665- 
1744,  burials  1557-1692;  (ii)  marriages  1746-1753, 
burials  1694-1812  ;  (iii)  baptisms  1795-1812  ;  (iv) 
marriages  1754-1811. 

The  advowson  of  St.  Peter's, 
ADVOWSON  Lowick,  was  held  with  the  manor, 
but  has  been  occasionally  settled  or 
leased  separately.  In  1303-4  Robert  de  Nowers 
granted  it  with  a  wood  in  Lowick  by  fine  to 
Amery  or  Almaric  de  Nowers,"'  who  recovered 
it  in  the  same  year  against  Thomas  Curzoun 
and    Margery    liis    wife."'     John     de     Nowers,    the 


"  The  knight  is  figured  in  .Issoe.  Arch. 
Sac.  Kcpori$,  xvii,  ■;(,.  The  fi(;urc  h.i3 
been  ascribed  to  Sir  W.iltcr  dc  V'lrc,  who 
aiiumcd  the  armi  <>(  Drayton,  but  the 
Rev.  (',.  A.  Poole  al  I  ributcd  it  to  the  second 
Sir  Henry  Green,  the  restorer  of  the 
church  ;  see  '  Stained  Glass  in  Lowick 
Church'  (1861)  in  ibid,  vi,  53-64. 

"  They  are  figured  and  described  in 
Halslead's  Snccmri  Ceiicnlofirt  (ilS;). 

"  The  existing  shields  are  described  in 
^itoc.  Arch.  Sic.  Re/ii.  ivii,  71-73. 

'•The  indenture  is  dated  14  February, 
141S-19;  the  cost  was  to  be  'forty 
pounds  slcriing.' 


"  f'.C.H.  Noribiinn.  i,  401). 

"The  cfTigy  is  described  in  I'.V.H. 
XorthiiHts,  i,  413. 

"  On  part  of  the  edge  a  schoolmaslir 
of  l.owick  has  scr.TtcIicd  his  inilials  and 
the  lf>;cnd  '  quondam  lutlim.i.qistrr  luiius 
opidi.'  'f'here  were  two  chantries  in  the 
church,  that  to  Edward  Stafford,  I'.arl  of 
Wiltshire,  was  probably  in  the  south 
chapel.  (I, inc.  F.pis.  Reg.  Inst.  Smith,  218; 
Memo  Smith,  i6fi).  In  I4')7  Henry  Green 
by  his  will  founded  a  chantry  of  two 
priests  to  pray  for  the  soul  of  Sir  Henry 
(ireen,  the  (Ihief  Justice, and  his  ancestors 
(Halstead,  .S'urciffc/  Gfncalortci^  '99-) 


'=  Described  in  I'.C.II.  Nortlxinii.  i, 
412. 

"Ibid. 

"  North,  Ch.  Hells  of  Northants.  329. 
The  ttfth  bell  has  the  stamp  and  cross  of 
the  early  Leicester  founders  as  used  by 
Robert  Newconibc.  Richard  Wood  may 
have  been  a  foreman  in  the  Newconif>c 
foundry.  The  treble  was  an  ad<fition  to 
a  former  ring  of  five.  The  clock  and 
chimes  date  from  1891. 

"  Markham   Ch.  Plate  of  Norlhanli.  180. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  32  Edw.  I, 
case  175,  file  60,  no.  4117, 

■'  DeBanco.  R.  Mich.32Edw.  I,m.  158. 


242 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


SLIPTON 


son  of  Alniaric,  granted  tlic  wood  and  advovv- 
son  in  1313  to  John  de  Chctyngdon  and  liis 
wife  Elizabeth,  lessees  of  the  manor.-*  In  13^7-8 
Thomas  Daundelyn  of  Brigstock  and  Margaret  his 
wife  conveyed  it  with  a  messuage,  land,  rent,  and  a 
mill  to  Margaret,  widow  of  William  de  Ros  of 
Hamelak,*'  from  whom  it  had  passed  before  1 349  to 
Grace  Nowers,  Lady  of  Saldcne,  who  then  presented.* 
With  the  said  messuage,  etc.,  it  was  held  in  1357  by 
Gilbert  de  Bristowe  and  Margaret  his  wife,  who  in 
that  year  conveyed  the  advowson,  etc.,  by  fine  to 
John  Baskervyle.*'  It  was  held  by  Sir  Thomas 
Bridges,  Kt.,  in  1692.*^ 

A  chapel  in  Drayton  was  attached  to  the  mother 
church  of  I  slip  (q.v.),  and  was  referred  to  by  Halstead 
apparently  as  still  in  existence.^  It  was  probably  the 
cliurcii  in  Drayton  which  was  granted  by  Stephen  dc 
Ecton  to  the  priory  of  St.  Mary  of  Northampton,  to 
which  church  Stephen,  son  of  Stephen  de  Ecton, 
Beatrice  de  Blokeville,  and  Peter  Pocr  made  grants 
of  land  in  Drayton. 

A  chantry  chapel,  called  the  chapel  of  St.  Mary,  in 
the  parish  church,  was  in  existence  in  1 317,  when 
Simon  Drayton  received  licence  at  the  request  of 
Queen  Isabella  to  alienate  in  mortmain  100  /.  of  land 
and  rents  in  his  manor  of  Drayton  to  a  chaplain  to 
celebrate  divine  service  there  daily .^  At  the  petition 
of  Henry,  Lord  Wentworth,  son  and  heir  of  Thomas, 
Lord  Wentv\'orth,  this  chantry  was  granted  in  1584-5 
to  Theophilus  Adams  and  Thomas  Butler  of  London.^ 

Another  chantry,  for  two  chaplains,  was  founded 
under  the  will  of  Edward,  Earl  of  Wiltshire,**  licence 
being  obtained  in  1498  for  its  endowment  with  lands 
to  the  yearly  value  of  £fi  61.  8</.*'  The  manor  of 
Culworth  was  acquired  for  the  purpose  by  Robert 


Wliittk-l)ury,William  Marbury,  and  Thomas  Montagu, 
gent,  in  the  same  year,  with  a  messuage  and  8  acres  of 
wood  in  Lowick  held  of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough.** 
A  commission  was  issued  for  this  to  be  taken  into  the 
king's  possession  in  1 546,  when  the  chantry,  with 
the  mansion  in  Lowick  called  the  Chantrey  House, 
was  granted  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu,  chief  justice.^" 
The  sum  of  j^l  10,  being  the  amount 
CIIARITIES  of  benefactions  formerly  given  to  the 
poor,  was  laid  out  in  1729  in  the 
purchase  of  land  in  the  parish  of  Oundle.  Upon  the 
inclosure  of  that  parish  7  acres  of  land  at  Oundle  were 
given  in  lieu  of  original  land.  This  land  is  let  for  £\i 
yearly  which  is  distributed  by  two  trustees  appointed 
by  the  Parish  Council  in  money  to  about  14  poor. 

An  allotment  of  20  acres  was  set  out  on  the  Lowick 
inclosure  to  the  churchwardens  in  lieu  of  land 
aiuicntly  appropriated  to  the  repairs  of  tiie  church. 
Tlie  land  was  let  to  S.  G.  Stopford-Sackville,  Esq.,  at  a 
yearly  rent  of  £\%.  The  OfHcial  Trustees  of  Charit- 
able Funds  hold  a  sum  of  ;{;2,50l  12/.  5^.,  Consols 
representing  the  investment  of  royalties  received  from 
the  Islip  Iron  Co.,  Ltd.,  and  producing  £i>2  \os.  Sd. 
yearly  in  dividends.  The  income  is  applied  to 
church  expenses. 

Mrs.  Nlary  Wheat  in  1 77 1  gave  /30  to  the  poor. 
This  legacy  is  now  represented  by  £43  15J.  lod. 
Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees,  producing^^l  is.  id. 
yearly  in  dividends,  which  is  distributed  by  the 
churchwardens  in  money  to  three  poor  persons. 

The  recreation  ground  was  conveyed  by  deed 
dated  25  October,  1921,  which  is  enrolled  in  the 
books  of  the  Charity  Commissioners,  pursuant  to 
the  provisions  of  the  Mortmain  Charitable  Uses 
Act  1888  and  Amendment  Act  1892. 


SLIPTON 


Sliptone  (xii  cent.)  ;  Sclipton  (xiv  cent.)  ;  Slypton 
(xvi  cent.). 

The  small  parish  of  Slipton  formerly  comprised 
only  768  acres,  but  in  1885  a  detached  part  of  Twywell, 
called  Curtley,  was  added  to  it,  bringing  up  the  area 
to  825  acres.'  The  ground  rises  east  and  west  from 
a  stream  flowing  through  the  parish  to  the  Nene. 
The  soil  is  clay  and  the  subsoil  ironstone  and  lias. 
The  crops  are  chiefly  corn  and  roots.  There  is  a 
considerable  amount  of  scattered  woodland  in  the 
northern  part  of  the  parish.  Between  Long  Lown 
Wood  and  Ekins  Copse  is  a  moat,  probably  repre- 
senting the  site  of  a  manor  house.  The  Islip  Iron 
Company  have  extensive  mines  of  ironstone,  and 
tramways  connect  the  quarries  with  the  London 
Midland  and  Scottish  Railway. 

The  village  stands  on  rising  ground  along  the  branch 
road  to  Sudborough,  the  church  being  on  the  east 


side.    An  Inclosure  Act  was  passed  for  the  parish  in 
1770,  when  560  acres  were  inclosed.'' 
The  population  was  85  in  1921. 

In  1086  the  abbey  of  Peterborough 
MANORS  held  one  hide  and  one  virgate  in  Slipton.* 
In  the  survey  of  the  time  of  Henry  I 
a  hide  and  a  virgate  in  Slipton  was  of  the  fee  of  William 
de  Curcy,  Richard  Fitz  Hugh  had  two-thirds  of  a  hide 
of  the  abbot  of  Peterborough,  and  Roger,  nephew 
of  the  abbot,  held  one-third  of  a  hide.''  The  Curcy 
honour  extended  into  many  counties,  and  was  held 
by  four  successive  tenants  of  the  name  of  William 
de  Curcy,  the  last  of  whom  died  in  1 194.  His  sistei 
Alice  married  firstly  Hugh  de  Nevill,  the  forester, 
and  secondly  Warin  Fitz  Ceroid.  John,  son  of  Hugh 
Nevill,  died  in  1235,  leaving  a  son  Hugh.  The  honour 
passed  later  to  the  Lisles.'  The  Curcy  manor  in  Slipton, 
a  member  of  Brixworth,  the  head  of  the  honour  in 


••  Ftet  of  F.  Northant*.  6  Edw.  II, 
caic  17;,  file  64,  no.  13;. 

"Ibid.  21  Edw.  Ill,  case  177,  file  78, 
no.  342. 

•"'  Bridges,  Hisi.  Nortbanii.  ii,  247. 

•'Feet  of  F.  NorthanH.  31  Edw.  Ill, 
caie  177,  file  80,  no.  449. 

•■  Initit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.). 

■'  tlalstead,  op.  cit.    160. 

•'  Cal.  Pat.   I  3 17-21,  p.  27. 

•»  Pat.  R.  27  Eliz.  pt.  4. 


'"  For  the  souls  of  Henry  VII  and  Queen 
Elizabeth,  Edward  Stafford;  late  Earl  of 
Wiltshire,  his  parents,  John  Stafford, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire,  and  his  wife  Constance, 
John  Whittlebury,  Esq.,  Humfrcy  Stafford, 
Duke  of  Buckingham,  Humphrey  Stafford, 
Earl  of  Stafford,  Sir  Henry  Green,  kt., 
and  Mabel  his  wife.  Sir  Henry  Greene, 
kt.,  and  Maud  his  wife,  and  other  relatives 
(spcciBed),  friends,  and  benefactors. 

•'  Cal.  Pal.  1494-1509,  pp.  162,  173. 


"  Ibid  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  zziii, 

39- 

»"  Pat.  R.  3S  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  7  ;  L.  and 
P.  Hen.  Vlll,  xxi  (ii),  g.  648,  nos.  39,  52. 

'  Local  Gov.  Bd.  Order,  25  Mar.  1885. 

'  Priv.  Stat.  1 1  Ceo.  Ill,  cap.  4. 

>  y.C.U.  Northanu.  i,  314  b. 

*  Ibid.  365. 

'  The  descent  of  the  Curcy  honour  will 
be  found  in  TiiTCT,  Honours  and  Knigbti* 
Feti,  i,  103  ct  leq. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Northampton,  was,  it  would  appear,  held  in  demesne 
by  Simon,  son  of  Simon  of  Brixworth  and  Cranford 
(q.v.),  who  held  the  advowson  of  the  church  of 
Slipton.  There  were  five  successive  Simons  son  of 
Simon,  the  last  of  whom  died  in  1280  without  issue. 
In  the  early  part  of  the  13th  century,  however,  the 
Simon  son  of  Simon  interest  seems  to  have  passed 
to  the  Veres,  when  William,  son  of  Robert,  son  of 
Aubrey  [de  Vere]  gave  to  the  Master  of  the  Hospital 
of  St.  John  of  Northampton  3  virgates  of  land  in 
Slipton  which  Ralph  de  Stanhern  and  l.eza  his  wife, 
who  was  the  daughter  of  Wyberd,  had  held.  This 
gift  was  confirmed  by  Baldwin  de  Vere,  brother  of 
William,  and  Hawise,his  wife,  and  in  1227  by  Walter  de 
Drayton.' 

In  1235-6,  the  Hospital  of  St.  John  of  Northampton 
was  holding  a  quarter  of  a  fee  in  Slipton  direct  of 
Margery  de  Rivers,  heir  of  the  Curcy  honour.'  From 
Walter  de  Drayton  the  principal  manor  of  Slipton 
passed  with  the  manor  of  Drayton  in  Lowick  (q.v.) 
to  the  present  day. 

Richard  Fitz  Hugh,  who  held  two-thirds  of  a  hide 
of  Peterborough,  has  been  identified  with  Richard, 
son  of  Hugh  de  Waterville,*  whose  mesne  lordship 
under  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  went  to  the  Bassing- 
bournes  of  Benefield  (q.v.).  The  Daundelyns,  of 
Cranford  St.  Andrew  (q.v.),  held  under  the  Bassing- 
bournes  seven-eighths  of  a  fee  in  Addington,  and  one- 
eighth  in  Slipton.*  In  1346  John  Lewkenor  was  the 
sub-tenant  under  John  Daundelyn,'"  and  in  1359 
John  de  Lewkenor  and  Elizabeth  his  wife  conveyed 
lands  herf  to  Simon  Simeon  and  another,^'  which  in 
1380  were  apparently  included  among  the  fees 
formerly  held  by  Geoffrey  Lewkenor,  and  at  that  date 
by  Simon  Simeon.*-  This  holding  is  lost  sight  of, 
but  probably  became  absorbed  by  the  chief  manor. 

The  third  of  a  hide  held  by  Roger,  nephew  of  the 
abbot  of  Peterborough,  ancestor  of  the  Torpel  family, 
has  not  been  identified.  It  may  have  become  the 
small  mesne  fee  held  by  the  Fauvel  family  of  Peter- 
borough Abbey.  In  1167  lands  in  Slipton  are  said 
to  have  belonged  to  the  Fauvel  fee,  and  are  so  returned 
in  1215  and  1346,  the  under-tenant  being  the  Master 
of  the  Hospital  of  St.  John  of  Northampton.*^ 

A  portion  of  the  fee  held  by  the  Veres  of  Addington 
of  the  honour  of  Huntingdon,  in  Twywell,  which 
extended  into  Slipton,  has  been  dealt  with  under 
Twywell  (q.v.). 

The  church  of  ST.  JOHN  THE 
CHURCH  BAPTIST  stands  amongst  fields  on 
the  east  side  of  the  village,  and  is  a 
small  stone  building  consisting  of  chancel  24  ft. 
by  13  ft.  3  in.,  nave  38  ft.  6  in.  by  17  ft.  6  in.,  with 
bell-cote  over  the  west  gable,  and  south  porch  8  ft. 
square,  all  these  measurements  being  internal. 

A  single-light  window  on  the  north  side  of  the 
chancel  and  the  chancel  arch  are  of  13th-century  date, 
and  the  main  part  of  the  fabric  is  probably  of  that 


period,  but  it  appears  to  have  been  largely  recon- 
structed in  the  14th  century,  when  the  porch  was 
added  and  new  windows  inserted.  At  some  time  not 
known  the  chancel  was  shortened  by  about  10  ft., 
but  the  foundations  being  uncovered  in  1910  the  east 
end  was  rebuilt  in  accordance  with  the  original 
plan.*^  The  building  is  of  rubble  throughout,  and 
the  roofs  are  low  pitched.  Both  roofs  are  modern, 
the  chancel  slated,  the  nave  leaded. 

The  modern  east  end  of  the  chancel  reproduces 
no  known  ancient  features,  but  the  windows  are  in  the 
style  of  the  14th  century.  At  the  west  end  of  the 
south  wall  is  an  original  square-headed  window  of 
two  trefoiled  lights,  and  opposite  it  on  the  north 
the  lancet  already  mentioned,  the  head  of  which  is 
in  two  stones,  and  without  a  hoodmould.*'*  The 
chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner 
springing  from  half-round  responds  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases. 

The  nave  has  north  and  south  doorways  opposite 
each  other,  and  two  windows  on  each  side,  those  east 
of  the  doorways  being  of  three  lights,  the  others  of 
two.  The  windows  and  the  south  doorway  are  of 
14th-century  date,  but  the  north  doorway,  now 
blocked,  has  a  four-centred  arch,  and  is  a  15th-century 
insertion  or  replacement.  The  west  wall  is  thickened 
out  in  the  middle  to  carry  the  bell-cote,  and  is  pierced 
at  about  half  height  by  a  restored  quatrefoil  opening 
witliin  a  circle.  The  bell-cote  appears  to  have  been 
rebuilt  in  the  l8th  century,  or  perhaps  later.  Inter- 
nally the  walls  are  plastered,  and  the  floor  is  flagged. 
The  porch  has  diagonal  buttresses,  moulded  outer 
arch,  and  a  niche  in  the  gable  with  a  modern  (1917) 
figure  of  St.  John  the  Baptist. 

The  font  is  ancient,  and  consists  of  a  plain  octagonal 
bowl  and  stem.    The  pulpit  and  fittings  are  modern. 

In  the  chancel  is  a  floor  slab  to  Samuel  Deacon, 
rector  {d.  1 707),  and  a  mural  tablet  to  Thomas 
Scriven,    rector   of   Twywell   and   vicar   of   Slipton 

{'i-  1737)- 

The  bell  was  cast  by  John  Taylor  and  Co.,  of 
Loughborough,  in  1846. 

In  1843  the  church  possessed  a  small  silver  cup, 
a  pewter  flagon,  and  two  pewter  plates,  but  there  is 
now  only  a  modern  silver-plated  paten  and  alms- 
dish." 

The  registers  begin  in  1670  ;  all  the  entries  to  1812 
are  in  one  book." 

The  War  Memorial  cross  in  the  churchyard  is 
fitted  into  the  socket  stone  of  an  ancient  churchyard 
cross. 

The  advowson  probably  belonged, 
ADyOJVSON  in  the  12th  century,  to  Simon,  son  of 
Simon,  lord  of  the  Curcy  fee  of 
Brixworth,  of  which  Slipton  was  a  member.  He  seems 
to  have  granted  it  to  Cirencester  Abbey.  A  dispute 
as  to  the  advowson  arose  between  them  in  1199."* 
In  the  following  year  it  was  held  by  the  abbey  of 


•  DtijUin  Chart,  noi.  40,  41,  93,  96. 
'  I'jrrcr,  op.  cit.  118. 

•  Mellow*  in  PyubUy  Bk.  of  Feti, 
74  n. 

•  Ibid.  77  n. 

'»  Ffud.  Atdi,  iv,  448. 

"  Feet  of  F.  North.inti.  caie  177, 
file  81,  no.  483. 

"  Cal.  Cloir,  1377-8,  p.  443;  Chan. 
In'i   p  m   2  Kich.  II,  no.  ;7. 


"  McUov,,,  PylcbUy  Bk.  oj  Feci,%^,  86, 

87-    , 

'*  The  new  chancel  was  dedicated 
22  February,  1911. 

'*  The  sill  it  4  ft.  6  in.  above  the  ground 
outBide,and  thcupeninRis  the  f>amc  height. 
Whether  it  ihould  be  classed  at  a  lowside 
window  is  n(»t  ceitain.  The  till  of  ihc 
window  on  the  south  side  is  only  3  ft.  6  in. 
above  the  ground,  but  the  opening  cannot 

244 


be  classed  at  a  lowside  window.  In  the 
south-west  angle  of  the  adjoining  buttress, 
close  to  the  ground,  it  the  head  uf  a  small 
blocked   rectangular  opening. 

'*  M.trkhnni,  Cb.  i'late  of  l^ottbants.z^t). 

'"  The  register  book  recordt  the  plant- 
ing of  ash  trees  round  the  churchyard  in 
1740. 

'"  Curia  lUg,  R.  (Rcc.  Com.),  i,  342, 
432- 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


SUDBOROUGH 


Cirencester,"  but  that  abbey,  which  in  1 291  was 
receiving  a  pension  of  10;.  from  the  church,-"  liad 
parted  with  the  advowson  before  1 251  to  the  Hospital 
of  St.  John  of  Northampton,  who  made  the  pre- 
sentation in  that  year.-'  The  hospital  retained  the 
advowson  until  the  Dissolution,  when  it  came  into 
the  hands  of  Francis  Morgan  and  Ann  his  wife, 
by  whom  it  was  conveyed  in  1553  to  John  Lord 
Mordaunt,"  lord  of  the  manor,  since  when  it  has  con- 
tinued to  be  held  witii  the  manor. 

In  1614  the  next  presentation  was  granted  to 
Twyford  Wathe,-'  member  of  a  family  in  Slipton. 
In  1557  Twyford  W'athc,  of  Slipton,  was  dealing 
with  land  here,''*  and  in    1640  Twyford  Wathe,  of 


St.  Alb.ins,  made  a  composition  with  John,  Earl  of 
IVterborougli,  for  afforestation  chargeable  on  lands 
in  Slipton,  Lowick,  Cranford,  and  Twywell,  within 
the  ancient  perambulation  of  the  Forest  of  Rocking- 
ham." In  1705  John  Laughton  was  holding  the 
advowson.-" 

Church  Lands.  By  an  Inclosure 
CHARITIES  Award  in  1771  land  was  set  out  for 
the  church.  The  land  was  sold  and 
the  endowment  now  consists  of  ^^500  10;.  Sd.  India 
3  per  cent.  Stock  with  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charit- 
able Funds  producing  £1$  os.  \d.  yearly  in  dividends, 
which  is  applied  by  tlie  rector  and  churchwardens 
for  church  repairs. 


SUDBOROUGH 


Sutburg  (xi  cent.)  ;  Suburg,  Subburc,  Suthburg, 
Silburk  (xiii  cent.). 

Sudborough  lies  in  the  district  formerly  a  part 
of  Rockingham  Forest,  and  covers  an  area  of  1,819 
acres.  The  land,  which  is  of  clay,  with  a  subsoil 
of  clay  and  limestone,  rises  north-east  and  south-west 
from  Harper's  Brook,  which  flows  in  a  south-easterly 
direction  through  the  parish.  The  principal  crops  are 
wheat,  barley  and  beans.  There  are  considerable 
stretches  of  woodland  on  the  higher  land.  In  the 
north-east  angle  of  the  parish  is  Lady  Wood  Head, 
to  the  west  of  which  is  .'\ssarts  Coppice.  In  the  north- 
west is  Cat's  Head  Wood,  with  Cat's  Head  Lodge 
to  the  south  of  it.  Snapes  Wood,  lower  down  along 
its  western  boundary,  is  a  continuation  of  Long  Lovvn 
Wood,  in  Slipton.  In  the  extreme  south  of  the  parish 
is  Round  Lown  Wood,  with  New  Lodge  at  its  southern 
end.  The  village  lies  in  the  valley  of  Harper's  Brook 
along  a  by-road  leading  from  the  main  road  from 
Thrapston  to  Market  Harborough,  to  the  main 
road  from  Thrapston  to  Kettering.  The  church  is 
on  the  south  side  of  the  road,  with  the  rectory  house, 
a  pleasantly  situated  stone  building  erected  in  1826 
by  the  rector  of  the  day,  on  the  east.  Near  by  is  the 
school  built  in  1 84 1,  by  the  Duke  of  Cleveland. 
The  manor  house  stands  at  the  west  end  of  the 
village. 

The  population  in  1921  was  207.  At  one  time  a 
considerable  number  of  women  of  the  village  were 
employed  in  lace-making,  and  an  extensive  brewery 
was  carried  on.  Stone  is  procured  for  buildings  and 
roads,  and  about  half  a  mile  to  the  north  of  the  village 
there  were  formerly  brickworks  which  have  been 
converted  into  a  poultry  farm. 

There  is  a  tradition  that  at  a  place  called  Money- 
holes  in  the  parish,  where  there  are  large  earthworks 
and  ponds,  once  stood  a  monastic  establishment, 
but  there  is  no  evidence  to  support  it.  Another 
tradition  connects  a  corner  near  Lady  Wood,  now 
ploughed  up  and  long  known  as  the  Soldier's  grave, 
with  the  attempt  of  the  Black  Watch  to  return  to  the 


Highlands  in  1743.  It  is  said  to  be  the  burial  place 
of  one  of  the  regiment  who  died  during  tiicir  sojourn 
in  Lady  Wood. 

In  the  north  of  the  parish  is  Sudborough  Green, 
with  Sudborough  Green  Lodge. 

Land  in  SUDBOROUGH  was  granted 
MANORS  in  1066  by  Edward  the  Confessor  to  the 
abbey  of  Westminster,*  which  in  1086 
held  3  hides  with  a  mill  and  woodland  7  furlongs  in 
length  and  6  in  breadth.^  By  the  reign  of  Henry  I 
this  property  had  diminished 
to  2j  hides.*  In  1276  it  was 
stated  that  the  abbey  had  re- 
turn of  writs  in  Sudborough 
and  Islip,*  and  in  1329-30  the 
abbot  claimed  to  hold  in 
frankalmoin  by  virtue  of  a 
grant  of  King  Henry  III,  in- 
spected and  confirmed  in  1 291 
by  his  son  King  Edward.^  The 
abbey  held  the  manor  until 
the  Dissolution,  when  the  fee 
farm  of  £'J  was  granted  to  the 
dean  and  chapter  of  Westmin- 
ster   by    Henry   VIII,*   fresh 

grants  of  these  manors  being  made  by  Queen  Mary 
in  1556,'  and  by  Queen  Elizabeth  in  1560.* 

The  first  recorded  tenant  of  the  abbey  in  Sud- 
borough was  Bartholomew  de  Sudborough,  who  in 
1225-6  levied  a  fine  with  Richard,  abbot  of  West- 
minster, as  to  his  custom  and  service.*  The  next 
was  Walter  de  Denford  who,  with  Sarah  his  wife, 
wlio  was  probably  the  heir  of  Bartholomew,  levied  a 
fine  with  Henry  de  Drayton  of  common  of  pasture  in 
Sudborough  in  1231-2."'  In  1236  Isabel,  wife  of 
Ralph  de  St.  Sampson  attorned  the  said  Ralph  and 
William  de  St.  Sampson  against  Walter  de  Denford 
for  a  third  part  of  the  pannage  of  his  wood  of  Sud- 
borough." A  fine  was  levied  of  land  in  Sudborough 
between  William  [?  Walter]  de  Denford  and  his  wife 
Sarah,  and  Gilbert  de  Denford  in  1 240-1  ;'^  and  in 


Wf.STMINSTER         AuBEY. 

Gules  the  crossed  keys  of 
Si.  Peler  toilh  the  ring  of 
S;.  Edward  in  the  cbtej 
all  or. 


'•  Curia  Reg.  R.  (Rec.  Com.),  i,  175. 

'•  Pope  Nicb.  Tax  (Rec.  Com.),  39  b. 

"  Roi.  Robl.  Grojj««(c  (Cant,  and  Vork 
Soc),  244. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northantl,  East.  7  Edw. 
VI. 

"Hatl.  Chart,  iii  A.8. 

"  Releaic,  Harl.  Chart.  112  A.7. 

"Ibid.  Ill  H.32. 


«  Initit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.). 

'  Cott.  Chart,  vi,  2. 

'  V.C.H.  Norihanti.  i,  317. 

'  Ibid.  p.  365a. 

«  Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com),  ii,  7. 

'  I'lac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com), 
506. 

'  L.  and  P.  Hen.  I'lII,  xvii,  g.  714  (5 
PP- 394.  396)  J  P"K  34H">  Vlll.pt.  5, 

245 


'  Ibid.  3  and  4  Phil.  &  Mary,  pt.  5. 

Mbid.  2  Eliz.  pt.  II. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  10  Ilcn.  Ill, 
case  172,  file  18,  nu.  124. 

'0  Ibid.  16  Hen.  Ill,  case  172,  file  26, 
no.  304. 

"Cat.  Close,  1234-7,  p.  33+- 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  25  Hen.  Ill, 
case  173,  file  32,  no.  456. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


1249  Sarah,  the  widow  of  Walter  do  Dcnford,  brought 
an  assize  of  novel  disseisin  against  Gilbert,  son  of 
Walter,  and  others  of  a  tenement  in  Sudborough." 
Either  Sarah  herself  or  possibly  a  daughter  of  her 
name  may  be  indicated  in  a  fine  levied  between  Walter 
do  la  Hyde  and  Roger  de  la  Hyde  and  Sarah  his  wife 
of  a  messuage  and  land  in  Sudborough  in  1259-60.** 
Before  1284  Sarah  de  Denford  had  granted  the  manor 
to  Reginald  de  Waterville  and  Extranea  his  wife  when 
Reginald  was  holding  the  vill  of  the  abbot.**  From 
Reginald,  who  survived  his  wife,  it  descended  to  his 
three  daughters,  Joan,  the  wife  of  Robert  de  Vcre, 
Maud,  sometimes  given  as  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of 
Robert  de  Wykeham,  and  Margaret,  the  wife  of  Henry 
de  Tichmarsh.*^ 

Tlie  third  part  which  went  to  Robert  de  Vere  and 
Joan,  his  wife,  passed  to  their  son  Robert,  who 
apparently  forfeited  for  rebellion,*'  and  his  lands  in 
1329-30  were  in  the  hands  of  Henry  de  Percy  and 
Robert  de  Tolthorp,*'  probably  feoffees  in  trust  fur 
Maud  his  wife,  who  had  an  interest  in  the  manor  as 
dower,  witli  reversion  to  Sir  Nicholas  de  la  Beche.'* 
What  Sir  Nicliolas's  interest  was  is  uncertain,  but  he 
and  his  wife  Margery  died  without  issue  and  it  then 
ceased.  Tliis  third  seems  to  have  passed  to  the 
Mallorys.  In  1358  William  Mallory  of  Sudborougli 
granted  a  rent  of  j^20  out  of  his  manor  of  Sudborough 
to  John  Pyel,  citizen  and  merchant  of  London,  and 
Joan  his  wife,-"  and  in  the  same  year  .\nketyn  Mallory 
granted  a  rent  of  20  marks  to  William  de  Sandford. 
John  Pyel's  holding  was  conveyed  by  him  in  1363  to 
Henry  Pyel,  rector  of  Warkton  and  others,-*  and  in 
1376  Henry  Pyel,  then  archdeacon  of  Northampton, 
and  others  conveyed  the  manor  of  Sudborough  to 
John  Pyel  of  Irthlingborough,  Simon  Simeon  and 
others.22  In  1385-6  Simon  Simeon  with  John 
Curtcys  granted  to  Joan,  widow  of  John  Pyel,  a  rent 
of  50  marks  out  of  the  manors  of  Irthlingborough, 
Cranford,  Sudborough  and  elsewhere.^'  It  is  doubt- 
ful if  John  Pyel's  estate  ever  comprised  the  manor  or 
a  part  of  the  manor.  Ankctyn,  who  succeeded  William 
Mallory,  in  1 360,  settled  a  manor  of  Sudborough  on 
his  daughter  Ala  and  her  husband,  Thomas  Green  of 
Isham,  and  their  heirs.-'  Another  daughter,  Kather- 
ine,  also  brought  to  her  husband  Ralph  Green, 
nephew  of  Thomas  Green,  apparently  a  manor  of 
Sudborough.  Sir  John  Dantrc  and  Alice  his  wife, 
daughter  of  Randolph  Boys  and  heir  of  Robert  Vere, 
in  1394  attempted  unsuccessfully  to  obtain  possession 
of  the  manor  from  Thomas  Green.^''  John  Green 
succeeded  his  father  Thomas^"  and  died  heforo  I.)45. 
His  widow  Isabel  is  said  to  have  occupied  with  Richard 
Stacy,  since  the  death  of  Sir  William  Mallory  in  1445, 


lands  in  Sudborough  of  which  Sir  William  had  died 
seised,  and  left  a  son  and  heir  Tliomas.^'  This 
Thomas  Mallory  dispossessed  Thomas,  son  of  John 
and  Isabel  Green,  of  the  manor  of  Sudborough,  held  of 
the  abbey  of  Westminster,^  but  Thomas  Green 
later  recovered  possession.  The  manor  continued  to 
descend  in  the  Green  family,  of  which  Sir  Thomas 
Green,  kt.,  who  witnessed  a  charter  of  Edward, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire,  in  1494,  dealing  with  the  Wykeham 
manor,  was  probably  a  member.^'  In  1529-30  this 
Green  manor  of  Sudborough  was  in  the  hands  of 
Richard  Rayne  and  Joan  his  wife,  daughter  and  heiress 
of  Thomas  Green,  deceased,  who  settled  it  on  their 
son  Thomas.  In  1531  and  again  in  1534,  Thomas 
Rayne,  son  of  Richard  Rayne  and  Joan,  with  Dorothy 
his  wife,  were  dealing  with  this  property,''"  these 
conveyances  being  probably  preparatory  to  a  con- 
veyance of  this  manor  to  the  owners  of  the  other 
manor  of  Sudborough  representing  the  Wykeham 
third,  then  held  with  Drayton  in  Lowick  (q.v.). 

The  third  of  Robert  de  Wykeham  and  Maud  de 
Waterville  was  conveyed  by  Robert,  their  son,  and 
his  wife  Eliz.ibeih,  in  1309-10  and  1311-12,  to  Robert 
de  Ardcrn.^*  The  wife  of  Robert  de  Ardcrn  was 
Nichola,  possibly  the  daugher  or  sister  of  Robert  de 
Wykeham.^  Ardcrn  had  grants  of  free  warren  in 
his  lands  at  Sudborough  in  1317,  1327  and  1328  and 
he  was  holding  them  in  1329-30.^  After  his  death 
Nichola  his  widow  married  Sir  Thomas  de  Wake  or 
Wade,**  to  whom  this  third  of  the  manor  passed.  In 
1345  Sir  Thomas  Wake  and  Nicliola  conveyed  their 
tliird  to  Simon  de  Drayton,^  to  whom  it  was  confirmed 
three  years  later  by  John  de  Wykeham,  grandson  of 
Maud  de  Waterville,  and  Parnel  liis  wife.^  It  passed 
after  the  death  of  Simon  de  Drayton  to  his  son  John 
de  Drayton  and  his  grandson  Baldwin.*'  From  them 
it  went  about  1362  to  Sir  Henry  Green,  who  had 
married  Katherine,  daughter  of  Simon  de  Drayton.'^ 
From  this  time  this  third  part,  and  from  the  middle 
of  the  16th  century  the  Vere  third  part,  passed  with 
the  manor  of  Drayton  in  Lowick  (q.v.)  until  the  end 
of  the  17th  century. 

When  Bridges  wrote  it  was  in  the  hands  of  Lady 
Torrington,  relict  of  Thomas  Newport,  Lord  Tor- 
rington,  by  purchase  from  the  Earl  of  Peterborough, 
and  according  to  him  Lady  Torrington  owned  vvitli 
the  manor  all  the  parish  except  two  or  tluee  small 
freeholds.     Lady  Torrington   died   in    1735.'° 

In  1805  it  was  held  by  William  Henry,  Earl  of 
Darlington,'"'  who  was  created  Duke  of  Cleveland  in 
1833,  and  the  Dukes  of  Cleveland  were  later  in  the 
century  lords  of  the  manor.** 

The  third  of  the  manor  which  went  to  Henry  de 


"  Cal.  Cloit,  1247-;!,  p.  Z27. 

"  Feet  of  r.  Northant«.  44  Hen.  Ill, 
caie  174,  file  43,  no.  732. 

"  Feud.  Aidi,  iv,  12;  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr. 
(Rec.  Com.),  570. 

'•  Ibid  ;    Pyuhley  nk.  of  Fees,  43. 

'' C'j/.  Pal.  1321-4,  p.  156;  Fine  R. 
1;  Edw.  II,  pt,  I,  m.  12. 

"  Plar.  de  Quo  Ifarr.  (Rec.  Com),  570. 

'•  Cal.  Cloie,  133')  4',  P-  129. 

"Clote  R.  32  Edw.  Ill,  mm.  9,  11  ; 
Cal.  Cloie,  1354-60,  p.  521. 

"  Iliid.  I3'>'>-4|  p.  523. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  caic  I78,file8;, 
no.  696. 

'•  Cloie  R.  9 Rich.  If.pt.  i.m.  S. 


"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  and  10  EJw.  IV, 
no.  16;  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  caic  177, 
file  81,  no.  491. 

«'  Cal.  Close,  1392-6,  p.  260  ;  Cal.  Pal. 
i4oi-<;,  p.  443. 

'•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  and  10  Edw.  I\^ 
no.  16. 

"  Ibid.  25  Hen.  VI,  no.  4. 

'"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  9  and  10  Edw.  IV. 
no.  16, 

"  Robert  Ilalilead,  Surcinrl  Geneahgiei, 
10(1. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northanti.  Eait.  22  lien. 
VIII;   Mil.  26  Hon.  VIII. 

"Feet  of  !■'.  Northanti.  caie  175,  file 
62,  no.  50  ;  file  64,  no.  104. 


»«  Wroltcslcy,  /><■,/.  from  Vha  R.  2S. 

"Cal.  Chan.  R.  1300-26,  p.  366; 
Chart.  R.  I  Edw.  Ill,  m.  25,  no.  45; 
2  Edw.  Ill,  m.  10,  no.  33. 

•*  Wroltcslcy,  loc.  cit. 

"  FeetofF.  Northanti. case  177,  file  77, 
no.  298. 

"  Ibid,  file  78,  no.  348. 

•'  Cal.  Pal.  1354-8,  p.  2R4. 

'"  Il.ililead,  op.  cit.  151. 

"  llul.  oj  Norlhatils,  ii,  254;  G.E.C. 
Complrle  Peerage. 

•"  Rccov.   R.    Trin.    45    Geo.    Ill,  ro. 

4r>8, 

•'  Whellan,  llisl.    of  Norlhanli.  (1878 

Ed.),  774- 


246 


SuDBOKOLcii  :    Anglo-Saxon  Cross 


Sldboroh.h   Church   from   thi    Solth-easi 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


SUDBOROUGH 


Tichmarsh  and  Margaret  dc  Waterville  passed  to  their 
son  John  and  from  him  to  his  son  Henry  and  his  wife 
Joan.^'  It  dcscenJoJ  with  the  Tichm.irsii  Manor 
in  Tichmarsh  (qv.),  and  was  represented  by  the  manor 
of  Somercetts  in  Tichmarsh,  Sudborough,  and  I.owicii 
of  which  a  grant  was  made  to  John  and  Cjilbcrt 
Pickering  in  1587-8." 

In  1490-1  a  dispute  arose  about  common  of  pasture 
in  Lowick  Leyse  pertaining  to  Lowick,  and  Brigsy 
Leycs  (Brigstock  Leys)  pertaining  to  Sudborough, 
which  was  referred  by  the  inhabitants  to  Kdward, 
Earl  of  Wiltshire,  as  chief  lord  over  botli  lordships.** 

SUDBOROUGH  P.-IRK,  which  was  originally 
held  with  the  manor,*^  was  in  1670,  with  a  messuage, 
10  acres  of  meadow,  530  acres  of  pasture  and  10  acres 
of  wood  and  appurtenances  in  Sudborough,  Lowick, 
and  Brigstock,  in  the  hands  of  William  Montagu,  and 
Mary  his  wife,  who  conveyed  it  by  fine  to  Montagu 
Lane.« 

SUDBOROUGH  GREEX  was  referred  to  in  1540 
in  a  licence  to  impark  Lyvedcn  Park,  the  westcrri 
side  of  which  was  described  as  abutting  upon  it.*' 
In  1795  an  Inclosure  Act  was  passed  for  Brigstock, 
Stanion,  and  such  part  of  the  parish  of  Sudborough 
as  is  called  Sudborough  Green.  It  was  stated  that 
the  commoners  in  Brigstock  and  Sudborough  inter- 
commoned  with  each  other  in  certain  commons, 
called  Brigstock  Commons  ;  and  the  Great  and  Little 
Green  adjoining  the  same,  and  that  the  cattle  upon 
these  commons  were  liable  to  escape  into  the  Haye 
or  Walk  of  Farming  Woods,  part  of  the  Forest  of 
Rockingham.  An  allotment  of  these  greens  was 
made.** 

The  church  of  JLL  S.IINTS  consists 
CHURCH  of  chancel  33  ft.  4  in.  by  15  ft.,  nave  of 
three  bays  40  ft.  3  in.  by  17  ft.,  north  and 
south  aisles  each  8  ft.  6  in.  wide,  north  and  south 
transcptal  chapels  each  14  ft.  by  13  ft.,  south  porch, 
and  west  tower  9  ft.  by  9  ft.  10  in.  The  width  across 
the  nave  and  aisles  is  38  ft.  8  In.,  and  across  the 
transepts  50  ft.  6  in.  All  these  measurements  are 
interna!.  The  church  was  entirely  rebuilt  in  the 
second  half  of  the  13th  century,  probably  in  place  of 
an  aisleless  cruciform  building,  the  influence  of  which 
is  apparent  in  the  transeptal  plan.  The  tower  and 
nave  with  its  aisles  seem  to  have  been  rebuilt  first, 
followed  by  the  transeptal  chapels  and  chancel, 
which  were  completed  c.  1280-90.  No  substantial 
addition  was  made  subsequently  other  than  the 
porch,  which  was  built  in  the  15th  century,  when 
new  windows  were  also  inserted  in  the  aisles.  Tlie 
building  was  repaired  in  1808,  and  again  in  1830 
when  a  west  gallery  was  erected.  In  185 1  the  gallery 
was  taken  down  and  the  north  aisle  rebuilt ;  the 
porch  was  rebuilt  in  1870,  and  the  chancel  restored  in 
1871-72.  At  a  later  restoration  (1891)  two  stones 
were  found  under  the  north-east  pier,  which  together 
forriied  part  of  a  pre-Conquest  cross.  They  were 
replaced  in  the  position  in  wliich  they  were  found 
but  unfortunately  covered  with  cement  so  that  the 
carving  is  obliterated.*' 

The  chancel  is  divided  externally  into  two  bays  by 


buttresses,  each  of  which  is  finished  by  a  small  pedi- 
ment set  in  the  middle  of  its  upper  slope  and  orna- 
mented on  the  outfr  face  by  a  spherical  triangle  with 
ciisping.  Over  the  pairs  of  buttresses  at  the  eastern 
angles  are  handsome  octagon  pinnacles,  the  tops  of 
which  seem  to  have  disappeared.  There  is  a  plain 
doorway  in  the  south  wall.  Tlie  windows  retain  their 
original  geometrical  tracery,  of  a  very  elegant  type, 
with  applied  cusping  ;  the  lights  have  trcfoiled  heads, 
and  the  mullions  are  moulded.  The  east  window  is 
of  four  lights  with  a  flat  head,  and  has  internally  a 
segmental  rere-arch.  The  lateral  windows  on  either 
side  from  cast  to  west  are  respectively  of  three,  two, 
and  one  light,  the  narrower  openings  having  obtusely 
pointed  rerc-arches.  On  the  north  side  the  single 
light  of  the  western  window  is  lowered  with  a  transom, 
forming  a  low-side  opening.  Tlie  corresponding 
window  on  the  south  has  a  low  sill  and  may  have  been 
planned  in  the  same  way,  but  the  lower  part  was  never 
open.  This  window,  like  all  the  others,  has  a  square 
hood  outside  ;  in  this  case  the  hood  is  finished  with 
very  curious  head-stops,  rudely  carved  with  roughly 
indicated  hair. 

On  the  south  side  of  the  chancel  internally  are  two 
sedilia  with  beautiful  late  13th-century  moulded 
arches  springing  from  dwarf  columns.  In  the  eastern 
seat,  which  is  a  step  higher  than  the  western,  is  a 
piscina  with  fluted  bowl.  Opposite,  in  the  north 
wall,  is  a  tomb-recess  with  a  drop  arch,  containing  an 
efhgy  of  Sir  Robert  de  Vere  (d.  1249),  which  has 
already  been  described.^ 

The  arch  between  the  chancel  and  nave  is  of  the 
same  character  as  the  arches  of  the  nave  arcades,  with 
rather  plain  half-octagon  responds.  The  piers  of  the 
nave  are  cylindrical,  with  bases  which  in  some  cases 
have  water-mouldings.  Tlie  capitals  are  of  two  types 
which  difler  slightly  in  design  as  regards  the  abaci 
and  the  section  of  the  upper  mouldings.  The  arches 
are  of  two  orders,  the  inner  order  having  a  hollow 
chamfer.  From  each  pier  a  transverse  arch  is  carried 
across  the  adjoining  aisle  to  a  respond  ;  the  chamfers 
of  tliese  arches  arc  stopped  by  small  broaches  above 
the  capitals.  Similar  arches  are  carried  across  the 
cast  wall  of  each  transeptal  chapel.  The  transept 
windows  have  good  geometrical  tracery,  which  in  the 
north  chapel  has  been  much  restored  ;  that  in  the 
three-light  soutli  window  of  the  south  chapel  is  a 
remarkably  beautiful  example  of  early  bar-tracery. 
In  this  and  in  the  east  window  are  some  fragments  of 
old  glass  ;^l  and  in  the  south  wall  of  the  south  chapel 
there  is  a  piscina  with  octagonal  bowl,  large  hollow- 
chamfered  arch  and  hood. 

The  windows  of  the  aisles,  as  already  noted,  are 
15th-century  insertions.  The  north  and  south  door- 
ways of  the  nave  are  contemporary  with  the  arcades, 
and  the  north  doorway  has  a  well-preserved  roll  and 
triple  fillet  moulding  in  its  outer  order.  The  porch 
has  a  high  gable  and  outer  arch  of  two  moulded  orders, 
the  inner  springing  from  half-round  responds  with 
moulded  capitals.  The  walling  throughout  is  of  rubble, 
with  plain  parapets  to  chancel  and  aisles,  and  eavcd 
roofs  to  the  transepts.     The  chancel  roof  is  leaded. 


*■  Plot,  de  Qut  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.),  570. 
"Pit.  R.  30  Elij.  pt.  8. 
**  Hililcid,  op.  cit.  205. 
"  Feet  or  F.  Div.  Cot.  Hil.  6  Jii.    I  ; 
Cbao.  loq.  p.m.  (Scr.  ii),  cccix,  aoo. 


"  Feet  of   F.   Northanfs.    Ilil.    21   and 
22  Chas.  II. 

«'  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VI II,  xv,  g.  831  (50). 
"  Priv.  Stat.  35  Geo.  Ill,  cap.  58. 


•"  Norlhants.  N.  and  Q.  (New  Ser.),  i,  26. 
'»  V.C.H.  Noribanls.  i,  394-;. 
^'  15th-century  quarries  with  fleurs  dc 
lii  and  '  Maria  '  in  monogram. 


247 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  arch  between  the  nave  and  tower  is  of  three 
orders,  the  innermost  order  being  set  upon  half- 
octagon  responds  with  hollowed  sides.  The  tower 
itself  is  of  the  same  date  as  the  rest  of  the  church,  and 
is  of  three  stages,  with  plain  parapet,  angle  pinnacles 
and  pyramidal  roof  with  vane.  Below  the  parapet  is 
a  corbel  table  with  large  dog-tooth  alternating  with 
heads  and  other  ornaments  widely  spaced.  There 
are  diagonal  buttresses  of  two  stages  on  the  west  side 
and  a  renewed  three-light  west  window  on  the  ground 
floor.  The  middle  stage  has  a  single  trefoiled  window 
north  and  south,  and  on  the  west  a  circular  sound- 
hole.  The  two-light  belfry  windows  have  early 
bar  tracery.     There  is  no  tower  stair. 

The  font  is  a  plain  octagonal  bowl  with  octagonal 
pedestal  and  a  17th-century  cover.  There  is  a  stone 
bench  along  the  wall  of  the  south  aisle  internally. 
Against  the  east  wall  of  the  north  transept  is  a  bracket 
for  an  image,  and  near  this  are  the  brasses  of  William 
West  (d.  2  Feb.  1 390-1)  and  his  wife  Joan  (d. 
16  Dec.  141 5),  with  a  curious  representation  of  their 
children,  headed  by  a  priest  vested  in  apparelled  alb, 
crossed  stole,  amice  and  maniple.  This  is  inscribed  : 
Orate  p  aiab)  supdcore  Witti  West  W  Jolina  ac  pro 
alab)  dtTi  Johis  West  capetti  Willi  West  marbler  et 
Alicie  qndam  v.xis  Rici  Alasoii.  Necno  W  octo  pilore 
lib'ore  pdcore  Willi  W  lohanne.     Pater  nost  fjf  Aue. 

The  roofs,  pulpit  and  other  fittings  are  modern. 
The  organ  is  in  the  south  transept,  which  also  forms 
a  vestry.     The  interior  of  the  church  is  plastered. 

There  is  a  ring  of  five  bells,  the  treble  being  an 
addition  in  1897  to  a  former  ring  of  four.  It  is  by 
Taylor  of  Loughborough.  The  second  and  tenor  are 
by  Thomas  Norris  of  Stamford,  1647,  the  third  is  a 
blank  bell,  and  the  fourth,  inscribed  'Thomas,'  bears 
the  stamp  of  the  early  Leicester  founders,  but  is 
probably  by  Thomas  Newcombe  II  (1562-80).*^ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  1820,  a  paten  of  1842, 
and  a  flagon  of  1857,  all  London  make,  and  a  silver 
basin  with  the  mark  of  William  Shaw  and  William 
Priest,  of  London.''* 


The  registers  before  1 81 2  are  as  follows  :  (i)  bap- 
tisms 1660-1708,  marriages  1662-1703,  burials 
1660-1707  ;  (ii)  baptisms  and  burials  1704-1812, 
marriages  1708-1753  ;  (iii)  marriages  1754-1812. 
The  first  volume  contains  a  list  of  briefs  1708-64, 
and  a  terrier  of  rectory  lands.  There  are  church- 
wardens' accounts  from  1675  to  1769,  and  a  tithe 
book  1781-1838. 

The  advowson  was  held  by  the 
ADVOWSON  abbey  of  Westminster  with  the 
manor  until  the  Dissolution,^  and 
was  granted  to  Thomas,  bishop  of  Westminster,  in 
1541.*^  Ten  years  later  it  was  granted  to  Nicholas, 
bishop  of  London,  by  Edward  VI,^^  but  was  held  in 
1608-9  with  the  manor  by  Henry  Lord  Mordaunt." 
The  presentation  was  made  alternately  by  the  Crown 
(presumably  during  vacancy  of  the  see),  and  the 
bishop  of  London  from  161 7  to  1648,^  and  since 
then  by  the  bishops  of  London^*  until,  after  1786, 
Sudborough  was  transferred  to  the  bishopric  of  Peter- 
borough, in  whose  gift  it  now  is.  A  vicarage  had  been 
ordained  early  in  the  13th  century,  a  pension  of  one 
gold  piece  (mark)  to  the  perpetual  vicar  being  reserved 
on  presentations  to  the  church  made  c.  1214,^  and 
one  of  zs.  in  a  presentation  made  in  1221-2.*^ 

Tithes  in  Sudborough  were  held  by  Robert,  Earl 
of  Salisbury,  in  1608.*^ 

A  piece  of  grass  land  containing 
CHARITIES  II  acres  appropriated  to  the  repairs 
of  the  church  is  let  by  the  church- 
wardens to  the  Islip  Iron  Co.,  Ltd.,  for  /12  yearly, 
which  is  applied  towards  the  upkeep  of  the  church. 
Henrietta  Laura,  Marchioness  of  Bath,  established  a 
Sunday  School  in  1788,  and  transferred  a  sum  of 
;^666  13/.  ^d.  3  per  cent,  annuities  to  trustees  upon 
trusts  declared  in  a  deed  dated  20  October,  1788,  for 
the  support  of  the  school.  Tlie  stock  is  now 
£666  135.  ^d.  Consols  with  the  Oflicial  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds,  producing  ^^16  13J.  \d.  yearly  in 
dividends.  The  trustees  consist  of  the  rector  and 
three  others. 


TWYWELL 


Tuiwella  (xi  cent.)  ;  Twywclle,  Twiwell  (.\ii  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Twywcll  is  low-lying,  nowhere  rising 
over  300  ft.  above  the  Ordnance  datum.  The  sub- 
soil is  Great  and  Inferior  Oolite.  One  of  the  many 
small  streams  of  the  district  crosses  the  parish  in  the 
south.  Twywell  station,  on  the  Kettering  and 
Huntingdon  branch  of  the  London  Midland  and 
Scottish  Railway,  lies  to  the  south-cast  of  the  village. 
The  parish  was  inclosed  by  private  Act  of  Parliament 
in  1765,*  and  by  a  Local  Government  Order,  dated 
25  March,  1885,  the  detached  portion  of  the  parish, 
called  Curtlcy,  was  joined  to  the  parish  of  Slipton. 
In  1874,  the  ironstone  deposits  in  the  parish  were 
worked  by  the  Newbridge  Iron  Ore  Co.^     A  number 


of  flint  weapons  and  a  few  relics  of  the  Roman  occu- 
pation have  been  found  in  the  parish.  The  manor 
house  stands  in  the  village  and  formerly  the  family 
of  Mulsho  for  several  generations  had  a  house  of 
some  size.'  There  Mrs.  Hester  Chapone,  the  essayist 
and  writer  of  poems  and  pamphlets,  and  daughter  of 
Thomas  Mulsho,  was  born  in  1727.*  The  rectory 
house,  a  large  plain  three-story  stone  building,  erected 
in  1760,  stands  to  the  south-west  of  the  church. 
Here  lived  Horace  Waller,  who  was  rector  of  Twywcll 
from  1874  to  1895,  and  is  known  as  an  explorer  in 
Africa.  On  his  return  to  England  he  look  a  very 
active  part  in  the  movement  against  the  slave  trade 
in  East  Africa,  and  wrote  many  works  on  Africa.* 


"North,  Ch.  Belli  of  Norlhanii. 
410. 

'-'  M.irkham,  Ch.  Plair  of  Norlhantt.ij^. 
The  maxV  on  the  baiin  ii  indiitinct,  but 
imjr  be  that  for  1755. 

"  Epi«c.  ReR.  ;    Cat.  Pal.  etc. 

"  A.  onrf  P.  Urn.  I' 1 1 1 ,  Kvi,  g.  50J  (35, 

P-  »44)- 
"  Pat.  K.  4  Edw.  VI,  pi.  4. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  6  Jas.  I; 
Chan.  Ini|.  p.m.  (.Scr.  ii)  cccix,  200. 

'"  Instil.  Hks.  (P.R.O.)  1617-4S. 

"  Ibid.  i6fio  1786,  etc.  ;  Lewis.  Topof^. 
niii.  (1849).  Ttic  presentation  was  the 
•iibjcct  of  Ch.inccry  Proceedings  in  1623. 
Chan.  Proc.  (Scr.  ii),  bdlc.  338,  no.  12. 

•"  Rot.  l/uro.  dr  ll'elhs  (Cant.  &  York 
Soc),  i,  3,  21,  66. 


»'  Ibid,  ii,  101;. 

"'  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mich.  6  Jas.  I. 

'Act    of    Parliament,    5    Geo.    Ill,   c. 

35- 

'  Whellan,  II11I.  of  Norihanls.  1874. 

"  Bridges,  //ii(.  Norihanls.  ii,  262  ;  cf. 
Chan.  Int^.  p.m.  (Srr.  ii),  dcclxxx,  58. 

*  Did.  Nal.  Wing. 

»  Ibid. 


248 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


TWYWELL 


There  are  a  few  two-story  lytli- century  stone 
houses  in  the  village  ;  one  at  the  south  end  with  a 
mullioncd  bay  window  on  the  ground  floor  has  a 
panel  in  the  gable  inscribed  t  "  a  1663,  and  the 
cottage  now  used  as  the  post  office  is  dated  1660. 
Another  house  with  thatched  roof  has  mullioncd 
windows  and  a  good  four-centered  doorway,  and  west 
of  the  church  is  a  picturoscjuc,  but  much  modernised, 
I7tli-century  farmhouse  with  stone-slated  roof  and 
wooden  dormers  ;  attached  to  it  is  a  rectangular 
dovecote  with  end  gables  and  lantern.  Another 
dovecote  of  the  same  character  stands  in  a  field 
farther  north. 

In  1086  the  abbey  of  Thorney  held 
M.1N0RS  3  hides,  less  it  virgatcs,  of  land  in 
7U"i'li'KLL,*  but  a  few  years  later  their 
holding  was  said  to  consist  of  2  hides  only.'  The 
abbey  obtained  various  additional  grants  of  land  in 
the  following  centuries,'  and 
held  the  manor  of  Twywcli  in 
frankalmoin  of  the  king  in  chief 
until  the  Dissolution  of  the 
Monasteries.'  Abbot  Guntcr 
(1085-1 1 1 2)  granted  it  for  life 
to  Aubrey  dc  V'ere,  the  Cham- 
berlain, and  a  similar  grant 
was  made  to  his  son  Robert.*" 
In  the  13th  century.  Abbot 
Jakesley  (1261-93)  granted  it 
for  life  to  Sir  William  Hay, 
knt.,  in  exchange  for  the  manor 
of  Clapton  ;  Sir  William  as- 
signed the  manor  to  John  Hay,  and  Abbot  Odo  (1293- 
1305)  gave  certain  lands  in  it  to  the  convent,  for  the 
celebration  of  the  anniversary  of  John  Hay,  at  a  rent 
of  2/.  6d.  a  year."  Although  leases  of  the  site  were 
made,  the  manor  seems  usually  to  have  been  held  in 
demesne.^  In  1544,  Henry  VIII  granted  it  to 
William,  Lord  Parr  of  Horton,  but  his  lands  escheated 
to  the  Crown*'  and  the  manor  was  not  alienated, 
although  various  grants  and  leases  were  made  and 
certain  tenements  in  the  parish  were  granted  out.*'* 


A  second  manor  of  TII'l'lt'ELL  can  be  traced  back 
to  an  entry  in  Domesday  Hook.  In  the  reign  of  I'ldward 
the  Confessor,  Earl  Waltlieof 
held  it,  but  in  1086  his  widow 
Countess  Judith  had  I J  hides 
of  land  here.*"  In  the  follow- 
ing century  David,  Earl  of 
Huntingdon,  owned  it,^'  and 
it  was  held  of  tlie  Hono\ir  of 
Huntingdon  for  half  a  knight's 
fec.^^  I'.irt  of  the  land  attached 
to  it  seems  to  have  been  in 
SIipton.23 

This  manor  seems  to  have 
been  a  member  of  the  manor 
of  Harrold  (co.  15eds),  which 
was  held  by  the  Morin  family  of  that  part  of  the 
honour  of  Huntingdon  which  fell  to  Hastings, 
Earl  of  Pcmbroko.2-»  In  the  middle  of  the  13th 
century  Ralpii  Morin  conveyed  his  interest  to  John 

TTTT7T 


Ekins.  Argittt  a  bend 
indcnicd  iable  bclKCen 
Itl'O  crosilcis  Jilchy  gules. 


Thorney  Abdey. 
Azure  three  crozicrs  be- 
ttveen  as  many  crosslets 
or. 


Grey.  Barry  ardent  and 
azure  tvilh  three  roundels 
gules  in  the  chief. 


de  Grey,  and  this  mesne  lordship  continued  with  the 
family  of  Grey  de  Ruthin.^^ 

The  tenants  in  demesne  were  the  Veres.  Aubrey 
de  Vere,  the  chamberlain  {d.  1 141),  held  lands  here  for 
life,  about  which  he  made  an  agreement  with  the 
abbot  of  Thorney.  This  agreement  was  confirmed  to 
Robert,  his  younger  son.^*     Robert  married,  as  his 

cond  wife,  Maud,  daughter  of  Robert  de  Furnell 


After  1574,  the  manor  seems  to  have  been  granted  to      sc(_  ,  ._ 

Sir  William  Cecil,"  later  Lord  Burghley,  but  probably      of  Twywell,  with  whom  he  received  an  addition  to 

he  only  obtained  the  site  of  the  manor  and  the  land      his  property  in  Twywell."    This  manor  passed  with 


that  had  formerly  been  leased  \\'ith  it.  In  1592,  his 
son  Thomas  sold  the  'manor'  to  Robert  Dallyson,'* 
who  in  1595  sold  the  site  with  200  acres  of  land  besides 
meadow,  pasture,  wood,  etc.,  to  Robert  Ekins.*'  This 
property  was  called  the  manor  of  Twywell  and  belonged 
to  the  family  of  Ekins  certainly  until  1720.**     It  was 


the  Vere  manor  in  Great  Addington  (q.v.).'^ 

In  Domesday  Book,  the  Abbey  of  Peterborough  held 
no  land  in  Twywell,  but  probably  one  virgate  of  its 
holding  in  Slipton  lay  in  Tw)'well,29  and  in  the  12th- 
century  survey  of  the  county  one  great  virgate  in 
Twywell  is   assigned   to   Peterborough.*'    Its  subse- 


probably  sold  to  the  Duke  of  Montagu,  since  in  1765      quent  history  is  lost  until  the  close  of  the  14th  cen- 
Mary,  Countess  of  Cardigan,  was  lady  of  the  manor.*»      tury,  when  it  may  possibly  reappear  as  a  manor  of 


•  V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  3iqa. 

'  Ibid.  365a  ;  Dugdjle,  Mon.  Angl.  ii, 
604. 

•  Abhrcv.  Rot.  Orig.  fRec.  Com.),  i,  141  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  32  Edw.  I,  no.  144  ;  Cat. 
Chan.  T,  77. 

•  Cal.  Close,  1234-7,  p.  208  ;  Feud.  Aids, 
iv,  12,  29;   Dugdalc,  op.  cit.  ii,  613. 

'•  Ibid.  603. 
"  Ibid.  604. 

"  Chan.  Proc.  (Scr.  ii),  69  (33) ;  Dug- 
dale,  op.  cit.  ii,  613. 

'•  L.  and  P.  Hen.  nil,  xix  (pt.  i),  g.  141 

(75)- 

'«  Pat.  R.  2  Eliz.  pt.  13  ;  16  Elir..  pt.  8  ; 
17  Elir.  pt.  5  ;  Chan.  Inij.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii), 
dccUuz,  5S.  In  1635  Francis  Mulsbo  died 


leised  of  12}  virgatcs  of  land  in  Twywell, 
some  of  which  had  been  parcel  of  Lord 
Parr's  manor,  and  all  were  held  of  the 
king  a«  of  the  manor  of  East  Greenwich. 

"  Hist.  MSS.  Com.  Kcp.  (Salisbury 
MSS.),  ii,  42. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  34 
Eliz. 

"  Ibid.  Mich.  37  &  38  Eliz. 

"Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  1658; 
Recov.  R.  Mich.  7  Geo.  I,  ro.  127; 
Bridges,  //ill.  Northants.  ii,  262. 

"  Act.  of  Pari.  5  Geo.  Ill,  c.  35. 

'■■  y.C.II.  Northants.  i,  351-2- 

"  Ibid.  365a. 

==  Dk.  of  Fees,  i,  494  ;  ii,  937' 

"  Ibid. 

249 


"  Farrcr,  Honors  and  Knights'  Fees,  ii 
3^7,  39<^-  "'  V.C.H.  Beds,  ii,  65. 

'«  Dugdale,  Mon.  Angl.  ii,  603. 

"  Drayton  Chart,  104. 

"  Bk.  of  Fees,  ii,  937 ;  Feud.  Aids, 
iv,  12  ;  Abbrev.  Rot.  Ong.  (Rec.  Com.),  i, 
222  ;  Cal.  Inq.  vi,  no.  517  (^the  statement 
here  made  that  Robert  de  Vere,  Earl  of 
Oxford,  held  under  John  de  Hastings,  is 
probably  due  to  a  confusion  of  names); 
ibid.  no.  612  ;  ix,  no.  118  ;  Plac.  de  Quo 
H'arr.  (Rec.  Com.),  569  i  ^''^'^^  °'  ^■ 
Northants.  Mil.  31  Hen.  VIII;  Com. 
Pleas,  Deeds  Enr.  Hil.  2  &  3  Edw.  VI, 
m.  8d.  ;   Pat.  R.  i  •;  Chas.  I,  pt.  10. 

"  V.C.H.  Northants.  1,314^,  3<'5''  ("-S)- 

•»  Ibid.  365a. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Waldtgrave.    Party  ar- 
gent and  gules. 


TJVriVELL  licid  before  1384  by  Sir  Richard  Walde- 
grave,  knt.^'  He  or  a  later  Richard  made  a  settlement 
of  the  manor  in  1437,'-  and  two  years  later  his  trustees 
granted  it  to  his  son  Ricliard  and  his  wife  Alice  and 
their  heirs.'-'  The  younger  Richard  died  in  1453,** 
but  Alice  held  the  manor  until  her  death  in  I473, 
when  it  passed  to  Richard's 
nephew  William.^  The  latter 
died  in  1528,^  but  his  son 
and  heir  George  only  survived 
him  a  few  months,  and  the 
manor  passed  to  his  grandson 
William,^^  who  dealt  with  it 
in  1532.^  No  further  men- 
tion of  the  manor  apparently 
occurs.  In  1453  and  1473  the 
manor  was  said  to  have  been 
held  of  the  Abbot  of  Ramsey 
for  the  service  of  paying  one 
rose  yearly,^  but  in  1528  the  overlord  was  stated  to 
be  the  Abbot  of  Peterborough.'"'  It  seems  possible 
that  this  may  have  been  described  as  the  manor  of 
Slipton,  which  in  1562  George  Lane  held  and  in  1564 
conveyed  to  John  Bedell,  who  in  1576  granted  it  to 
Lewis  Lord  Mordaunt.^' 

Two  mills  are  mentioned  in  Domesday  Book  on  the 
manor  of  the  Abbey  of  Thorney,payinga  rent  oijj.^d. 
a  year,''^  but  only  one  mill  is  mentioned  in  a  buU 
of  Pope  .Mexander  III.'"  In  1330,  Hugh  de  Walmes- 
ford  claimed  that  the  \'eres  had  held  a  view  of  frank- 
pledge in  their  manor  time  out  of  mind  ;  the  royal 
officials  denied  his  right,  but  Hugh  was  able  to 
recover  it  on  payment  of  a  fine.  He  also  successfully 
claimed  the  right  of  toll  of  salt  in  his  demesne  lands.'*^ 
In  1720  Thomas  Ekins  had  a  court  leet,  court  baron 
a!id  view  of  frankpledge  in  Twywell.^* 

The  church  of  ST.  NICHOLAS  con- 
CHURCH  sists  of  chancel  35  ft.  by  14  ft.  10  in., 
with  south  vestry  and  organ  chamber, 
clcarstoried  nave  of  three  bays  38  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft.  3  in., 
south  aisle  13  ft.  9  in.  wide,  south  porch,  and  west 
tower  8  ft.  6  in.  square,  all  these  measurements  being 
internal. 

The  church  is  built  throughout  of  rubble,  and  has 
plain  parapets  and  flat-pitched  leaded  roofs  to  nave 
and  aisle  and  a  slated  eaved  roof  to  the  chancel. 
Internally  the  walls  are  plastered.  The  building  was 
re-roofed  in  181 1  and  underwent  an  extensive  re- 
storation in  1867,  wliich  included  the  removal  of  a 
west  gallery  and  the  rebuilding  of  the  tower  arch, 
then  in  a  ruinous  condition. 

The  main  part  of  the  fabric,  comprising  the  tower, 
nave  and  the  west  portion  of  the  chancel,  is  of  the 
middle  of  the  12th  century,  but  there  is  some  reason 
for  believing  that  the  first  church  was  of  earlier  date, 
to  which  short  north  and  south  transeptal  chapels 
were  added  at  the  cast  end  of  the  nave  walls  about 


1140-50.  To  this  cross  church  the  aisle  was  added 
about  fifty  years  later,  and  towards  the  end  of  the 
13th  century  the  chancel  was  extended  eastward  and 
windows  inserted  in  the  aisle.  The  porch  and  clear- 
story are  of  the  15th  century.  At  some  subsequent 
period  the  western  portion  of  the  aisle  was  demo- 
lished, probably  in  order  to  save  the  cost  of  repair, 
and  was  rebuilt  only  in  1867.^* 

The  composition  of  the  south  arcade  is  unusual. 
The  broad  semicircular  eastern  arch,  which  probably 
marked  the  entrance  to  the  former  transept,  is  of  two 
plain  chamfered  orders  and  springs  at  the  east  end, 
at  a  height  of  5  ft.,  from  a  flat  respond  with  scalloped 
impost  and  chamfered  abacus.  The  two  western 
arches  are  also  semicircular  and  appear  to  have  been 
cut  through  the  nave  wall  about  1 190,  beginning 
from  the  west  end.  The  western  arch  springs  from 
a  half-octagonal  respond  set  against  the  old  wall,  and 
was  made  narrower  but  much  higher  than  the  older 
existing  arch  at  the  east  end,  the  new  middle  arch 
filling  the  space  between.  The  arches  are  of  two 
chamfered  orders  springing  at  a  height  of  about 
7  ft.  from  octagonal  piers  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases.  To  allow  of  its  meeting  the  older  eastern  arch 
the  middle  arch  had  to  be  stilted  on  that  side,  its 
outer  order  being  made  to  spring  from  the  new  pier, 
while  the  inner  order  springs  from  a  corbel  above 
the  capital ;  the  corbel  is  decorated  with  nail-head 
ornament. 

The  chancel  has  a  late  13th-century  east  window 
of  three  lights  with  intersecting  tracery,  and  in  the 
south  wall  arc  two  windows  of  the  same  period  with 
forked  mullions  and  a  trefoiled  piscina  with  fluted 
bowl.  North  of  the  altar  in  the  east  wall  is  an 
image-bracket.  In  the  north  wall,  about  15  ft.  from 
the  west,  is  a  round-headed  12th  century  window 
with  wide  inner  splay,  and  further  west  again  a 
rectangular  low-side  window  with  external  chamfered 
opening  and  flat  sill  inside,  perhaps  a  14th-century 
insertion.^'  There  was  originally  a  sacristy  on  the 
north  side  of  the  chancel  at  its  east  end,  the  blocked 
pointed  doorway  of  which  remains,  together  with  a 
piscina  and  rectangular  aumbry  now  on  the  outside 
of  the  building.  The  blank  wall  space  on  the  inside 
is  filled  by  a  curious  and  highly  interesting  stone 
structure  of  late  13th-century  date  consisting  in  the 
lower  stage  of  a  broad  segmental  tomb-recess,  the 
arch  springing  from  short  attached  shafts,  above 
which  is  a  double  aumbry,  probably  used  also  as  an 
Easter  sepulchre,  and  above  this  again  a  sloping  stone 
desk  with  a  book-rest  for  the  reader  of  the  Gospel.** 
The  south  wall  of  the  chancel  is  pierced  at  its  west 
end  by  a  wide  two-centred  segment  arch  of  two 
chamfered  orders,  the  inner  order  on  moulded  corbels 
supported  by  heads.  The  arch  is  of  late  13th-century 
character  and  apparently  opened  originally  to  a  chapel 
afterwards   destroyed  ;     before    tlic    erection    of    the 


•'  Chart.  R.  7  &  8  Ric.  II,   111.  13,    no. 

'5- 

"Feet  o(  F.  Northanti.  Mich.  16  Men. 
VI. 

"Chan.  Inc).  p.m.  32  Ilcn.  VI,  no.  36. 

»  Ibid. 

»» Ibid.  18  Edw.  IV,  no.  ii. 

"  Ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  jlviii,  79. 

•'  Ibid.  85. 

"Recov.  R.  Trin.  24  Hen.  VIII,  ro. 
123. 


'"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  32  Ilcn.  VI,  no.  36; 
18  F.dw.  IV,  no  22. 

"Ibid.  (.Scr.  ii),  xlviii,  79,  85. 

"  Recov.  R,  nil.  1562,  ro.  340;  Feet 
of  V.  Nortli.mts.  Mil.  7  Elii.  ;  Cal.Ftnf, 
Eait.  18  Eli7.. 

"  y.C.II.  Norihanti.  i,  31911. 

"  Dllgdale,  Mon.  Anej.  ii,  604. 

"  riar.  it  Quo  H'urr.  (Rec.  Com.),  569. 

*'  Recov.  R.  Mich.  7  Geo.  I,  ro.  127. 

"  Norlbampl.   Mercury,   2   Nov.   1867, 

250 


where  an  .iccount  of  the  rcttorntion  i« 
given.  The  church  was  reopened  30 
October. 

*'  It  i>  3  ft.  8  in.  high  by  12  in.  wide, 
and  2  ft.  6  in.  above  the  ground  outside. 
An'JC.  Arch.  Soe.  Rrps.  jxii,  4<;i. 

*"  The  lower  stage,  or  tomb  recess,  is 
6  ft.  lo  in.  wide  by  3  ft.  3  in.  high  ;  the 
structure  above  in  4  ft.  4  in.  wide  and 
4  ft.  high  to  the  top  of  the  slope  of  the 
deik. 


TwYvvhLL  Church  from  Tiit  Sou  in 


TwYWhLL  Church  :    Kaster  Sipulchrk 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


•IWYVVELL 


organ  chamber  and  vestry  in  1)595  ''  ''-'J  '""K  been 
blocked.  The  chancel  arch  is  apparently  of  the  same 
period  and  consists  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the 
inner  springing  from  half-octagonal  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases. 

The  north  wall  of  the  nave  retains  near  its  west  end 
a  widely  splayed  round-headed  12th-century  window 
and  a  contemporary  doorway,  now  blocked,  which 
externally  has  a  shouldered  head  with  cabled  lintel 
and  roundel  cusps,  hatched  tympanum,  and  sunk- 
star  hood  mould.  The  round  arch  to  the  northern 
transcptal  chapel  has  long  been  blocked,  and  now 
contains  a  two-light  window 
with  forked  mullion,  the 
tracery  of  which,  however, 
is  modern.'"  When  the  arch 
was  made  there  was  an  earlier 
round-headed  window  high 
in  the  wall,  part  of  the  head 
of  which  is  still  visible  with 
a  course  of  herring-bone 
work  to  the  east  of  it. 

At  the  west  end  of  the 
aisle  is  a  small  restored 
12th-century  window  with 
modern  round  head,  and  in 
the  south  wall  two  late 
13th-century  windows  with 
forked  muUions.  A  three- 
light  window  with  intersect- 
ing tracery  in  the  east  wall 
now  opens  on  to  the  vestry, 
to  which  a  doorway  has  been 
cut  through  the  middle  light. 

The  12th-century  soutli  doorway  has  a  semi-circular 
arch  of  two  orders,  the  inner  with  a  continuous 
round  moulding,  the  outer  with  cheverons  on  nook- 
shafts  with  capitals  of  very  conventional  foliage  and 
moulded  bases.  The  middle  cheveron,  or  keystone,  is 
carved  with  a  head  on  the  upper  part,  and  the  hood 
has  a  billet  and  indented  moulding.  On  the  east 
side  of  the  doorway  inside  is  a  stoup  with  projecting 
moulded  bowl. 

The  porch  is  of  local  type,  with  stone  bench  tables, 
diagonal  buttresses  and  outer  doorway  of  two  moulded 
orders,  the  inner  on  h.nlf-round  responds  with  moulded 
capitals  and  high  bases  :  the  roof  is  covered  with  red 
tiles.  The  15th-century  clearstory  windows  are 
square-headed  and  of  two  lights. 

The  tower  is  of  three  slightly  receding  stages,  and 
seems  to  be  of  12th-century  date  to  the  corbel  table, 
though  the  large  two-light  bell-chamber  windows  are 
probably  c.  1 190,  and  contemporary  with  the  nave 
arcade.  The  west  window  is  a  single  round-headed 
opening,  but  the  north  and  south  sides  are  blank  in 
the  lower  stage.  In  the  middle  stage  the  head  of  a 
14th  century  window  is  inserted  on  the  south  side, 
and  the  string  between  this  and  the  upper  story 
has  a  species  of  large  nail-head  moulding.  The  bell- 
chamber  windows  are  of  two  lights  under  semi- 
circular arches,  but  their  heads  have  been  cither 
blocked, or,  as  on  the  north  side,  opened  out  with  early 
Perpendicular  tracery.  Above  the  windows  is  a 
corbel  tabic  of  grotesque  masks  and  notch  heads,  and 


over  tliis  again  a  b.md  of  quatrcfnils  and  I5tli-century 
battlementcd  parapet  with  angle  pinnacles.  The  tower 
is  without  buttresses  and  there  is  no  vice. 

The  font  consists  of  a  plain  unmounted  octagonal 
bowl  of  late  12th  or  early  13th  century  date,  on 
a  circular  moulded  plinth,  and  has  a  good  flat 
Jacobean  wood  cover  with  central  post  and  curved 
side  pieces. 

The  pulpit  and  fittings  are  modern.  The  present 
chancel  roof  dates  from  1867,  and  the  stalls  were 
erected  in  1898  to  commemorate  the  work  of  the  Rev. 
Horace  Waller  (rector   1874-95),  one  of  the  original 


2  Centurv 
□  cII90 
cl290 

S 1 51iJ  Century 
CZl  Modern 


Scale  ofPeet 
Plan  of  Twywell  Church 


members  of  the  Universities'  Mission  to  Central 
Africa  :  thev  are  characteristically  carved  to  represent 
his  labours  in  that  region.  Set  within  tlie  rercdos  are 
three  small  stones  from  Calvary  given  to  Mr.  Waller 
by  General  Gordon  in  1880. 

In  the  chancel  floor  are  the  grave  slabs  of  Thomas 
Ekins,  gent.  (d.  1713),  and  of  Dorothy  Ekins  (d.  1720), 
daughter  of  Arthur  Brooke  of  Great  Oakley. 

In  the  top  light  of  one  of  the  aisle  windows  is  the 
shield  of  England  (l  and  4  France,  2  and  3  England) 
with  a  label  of  five  points. 

On  the  jambs  of  the  south  doorway,  now  within 
the  porch,  are  eight  scratch  dials — four  on  each 
side. 

There  arc  five  bells,  the  first  and  second  by  J. 
Taylor  and  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  1907,  and  the 
third  a  recasting  by  Taylor  in  1867.  The  fourth 
and  fifth  are  15th-century  bells  cast  in  London,  the 
former  inscribed  '  In  multis  annis  resonet  Campana 
Johannis,'  and  the  tenor  '\'ox  Augustini  sonet  in  aure 
Deo.'™ 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  c.  1570,  a  flagon 
of  1887,  and  a  modern  plated  cup,  paten  and 
bread-holder.  There  are  also  a  pewter  flagon  and 
plate." 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  1586-1667,  marriages  and  burials  1577-1667; 
(ii)  baptisms,  marriages  and  burials  1668-1754  ; 
(iii)  baptisms  and  burials  1755-1812;  (iv)  marriages 
1755-1812. 


"  The  window  may  have  btcn  originally       Both    the    old    belli    have   one    of    the 

at  the  end  of  the  transept.  floriated  croisei  introduced  by  John  Wal- 

'°  North,  Cb.  Belli  of  Norihanls.  423.       grave  (1418-40),  and  the  tenor  hat  alio 

251 


Walgrave'j  trade  mark.    The  fourth  bears 
the  mark  of  Robert  Crowch  (i43i)-5o). 
"  Markham,  Ch.  Plate  oJNorthanti.  lU. 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


The  advovvson  of  the  church  of 
JDI'Oll'SOy  Twyvvell  was  held  hy  the  Abbey  of 
Thorncy '-  and  afterwards  passed 
with  the  manor  to  Robert  Dallyson,*'  w-ho  sold  it  to 
John  Richardson,  clerk,  in  1592."  In  1628,^  the 
archdeacon  of  Northampton  and  John  Gage  presented, 
and  in  1637^*  William  Gardner,  the  vicar  of  Slipton, 
possibly  as  trustee,  as  the  advowson  seems  in  the 
same  year  to  have  passed  to  Nicholas  Richardson." 
In  1660  it  was  in  the  possession  of  Agnes  Webb, 
widow,  who  seems  to  have  sold  it  in  1664.**  Presen- 
tations were  made  in  1665  by  Edward  Trott,  clerk,  in 
1668  by  the  Earl  of  Exeter,  in  1705  by  Thomas 
Ekins,  and  in  1737  by  William  Smith,  who  presented 
William  Scriven,  who  was  patron  and  rector  in  1765.^' 
In  1769  John  Scriven  was  patron  and  incumbent,^ 
and  in  1793  Elizabeth  Scriven,  spinster,  probably 
his  daughter,  presented  to  the  benefice.*'-  In  1794 
Henry  Leete  and  William  York  appear,*-  but  in  1795 
Elizabeth  Scriven,  together  with  Benjamin  White- 
house  and  his  wife  Ann,  sold  it  to  John  \\  illiamson.*^ 
In  1799  the  latter  presented  tlie  Rev.  William  Aling- 
ton,**  who  had  married  his  daughter  Sarah.  The 
advowson  passed  to  Rev.  John  Alington,  son  of 
William  and  Sarah,  who  died  in  1863.  His  son  William 
died  in  1874''*  and  was  succeeded  by  his  brother 
Julius,  whose  son,  Mr.  Charles  Alington,  is  the  present 


owner.**  A  pension  of  20/.  was  payable  from  the 
rectory  to  the  Abbey  of  Thorney  in  1291*'  and  was 
recorded  among  its  possessions  at  the  Dissolution.** 
It  Was  granted  by  Henry  VIII  to  Lord  Parr*'  and 
was  sold  with  the  advowson  by  Robert  Dallyson  in 
1592.™ 

Thomas     Ekins    by    will    dated 

CHARITIES      26    May    1709  gave  20s.  yearly  to 

trustees  out  of  his  house  and  close 

in  Twywell  to  the  poor.    This  rent-charge  is  now  paid 

by  the  Islip  Iron  Co.,  Ltd. 

John  Harris  in  1753  gave  ^^lo  to  the  poor.  A  piece 
of  land  in  Ringstead  now  let  for  ^^l  4.1.  yearly  was 
purchased  with   this  gift. 

The  Charity  of  Thomas  Archer  founded  by  will 
dated  I  Dec.  1829  is  now  represented  by  a  sum  of 
£36  14J.  id.  Consols  producing  i8.f.  4d.  yearly  in 
dividends. 

The  income  from  these  three  charities  is  distributed 
by  the  rector  and  churchwardens  in  bread  to  about 
12   recipients. 

The  Bell  Rope  Charity.  A  sum  of  %s.  is  payable  to 
the  churchwardens  by  an  Inclosure  Award  out  of  a 
piece  of  land  in  Twywell.  The  payment  was  awarded 
in  lieu  of  land  formerly  appropriated  to  the  use  of  the 
church,  and  the  money  is  carried  to  churcii  expenses 
account. 


WARKTON 


Werchinetone  (xi  cent.)  ;  Werketon  (xii  cent.)  ; 
Werkenetone  (xiii  cent.)  ;  Warkyngton  (xvi  cent.)  ; 
Wotton  (xvii  cent.). 

Warkton  parish,  covering  an  area  of  1,921  acres, 
rises  from  the  eastern  bank  of  the  River  Ise  to  a  hciglit 
of  338  ft.  above  ordnance  datum.  Tiic  soil  is  of 
limestone,  clay  and  red  loam,  and  is,  and  in  mcdia-val 
time  was,  for  the  greater  part  under  pasture.  The 
village  stands  on  the  brow  of  a  hill  and  from  it  fine 
avenues  of  trees  run  in  the  direction  of  Weekley  and 
Grafton  Underwood.  These  avenues  the  parish  owes 
to  John,  Duke  of  Montagu,  known  as  Duke  John  the 
Planter,  from  the  miles  of  sucli  avenues  he  planted 
in  this  and  adjoining  parishes.  Buried  beneath  the 
road  at  the  east  end  of  the  bridge  over  the  Ise,  is  a 
medieval  arch  (?  14th  century)  wliichoriginally  crossed 
the  stream,  the  old  course  of  which  can  still  be  seen 
in  the  field  to  the  south  of  the  road. 

The  church  lies  in  the  centre  of  the  village,  and 
the  houses  are  grouped  for  the  most  part  in  its 
vicinity.  Opposite  the  church,  on  the  other  side  of 
the  main  road,  is  the  rectory,  which  was  built  by  the 
Duke  of  Buccleuch  in  the  middle  of  the  19th  century 
to  replace  the  old  thatched  rectory  house  then  pulled 
down,  which  occupied  a  lower  and  less  favourable 
position.    In  1922  the  ecclesiastical  parish  of  Warkton 


was  united  to  that  of  Weekley  under  the  name  of 
Warkton-cum-Weekley.  The  incumbent  of  the 
united  benefices  resides  at  Weekley,  and  the  rectory 
house  at  Warkton  with  part  of  the  glebe  was  in  the 
same  year  sold  to  Mr.  Charles  Edward  Lamb,  who 
has  since  occupied  the  house.  To  the  north  of 
the  church  is  the  school  built  in  1S67  by  the  Duke 
of  Buccleuch.  Even  in  this  somewhat  remote 
spot  the  effects  of  the  Civil  War  were  being  felt 
in  1643.  Nicholas  Estwick,  rector  of  Warkton,  in  a 
letter  to  Edward  Montagu  prays  that  peace  may 
come,  adding  '  We  do  already  taste  the  miseries  of 
Civil  War.'i 

Bridges  writes  of  a  close  with  a  petrifying  spring, 
where  a  petrified  human  skull  was  found,  and  of  two 
quarries  of  excellent  stone.  In  the  west  of  the  parish 
is  a  long  and  deep  trench.  Just  over  the  southern 
boundary  is  Warkton  Spinney,  and  in  the  south  is 
Warkton  Lodge,  while  Cinquefoil  Lodge  is  in  the  east. 

The  population  in  1921  was  192. 

An  Inclosure  Act  was  passed  in  1807,  and  an  award 
made  in  1810,  when  an  allotment  was  made  for  tithes. 
The  common  and  open  fields  in  the  parish  and  manor 
were  then  about  1,300  acres  in  extent.  The  glebe 
lands  were  34  acres  ;  the  inclosed  glebe  land,  including 
the  churchyard,  was  3  acres  in  extent.^ 


"  Rm.  Rob.  Groiieleile  (Cant,  and  VotV 
Soc),  182  ;  Cal.  I'al.  1301-7,  p.  381. 

"Pat.  R.  17  Ellz.  pt.  5  ;  Iict  o(  F. 
Northanti.  Mich.  34  &  35  Elii. 

"  Ibid. 

"  Initil.  Bit.  (P.R.O.). 

M  Ibid. 

*'  Rccov.  U.  llil.  13  Cbai.  I,  ro.  6. 

"  Iniiil.  nkt.  (P.K.O.),  1660,  Ififii  ; 
Rfcov.  R.  Eail.  16  t'hai.  II,  ro.  37. 


"  Inilit.  Ilki.  (P.R.O.);  U.icon,  Litirr 
Rfgii,  828. 

•"  Inilit.  Bin.  (P.R.O.). 

•'  Ibid. 

•»  Ibid. 

""  Feet  o(  F.  North.mti.  Mich.  35 
Geo  III. 

"  Initit.  Bk..  (P.R.O.). 

"*  llurke,  LanJrJ  Grnlry,  1925. 

"  Imp    from  ihr  Riv.  I'.  11.  \,-M\f,. 


"  Pope  Nich.  Tax.  (Rcc.  Com.),  39b. 
•"  I'ulor  litdn.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  291. 
"  I.,  and  1:  Hen.  VIll,  xix,  pt.  i,  g.  141 

(75)- 

'»  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  34  &  35 
VXtr. 

<  lliu.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  (Lord  Montagu 
of  Hc-au)icn),  160. 

■  Priv.  Slat.  47  Geo.  Ill,  Sees.  II, 
cap.  (>. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


WARKTON 


Bury  St.  Edmunds 
AliDKV.  Azure  ibrrf 
crotvus  each  surrounding 
a  pair  of  crossed  arroivs 
all  or. 


Before  the  Conqiicu  lf'.-IRKTO.\'  was 
M.^NOR  the  property  of  i'Elgifu,  wife  of  Earl 
iElfgjr  and  mother  of  Karl  Morcar.  It 
was  given  to  the  abbey  of  Bury  St.  Edmund  by  Queen 
Maud,  wife  of  the  Conqueror,*  and  continued  to  be 
held  with  other  possessions  of  .Elfgar  which  the  abbey 
acquired  in  Scaldwell,  Boughton  and  East  Earndon.* 
In  the  Domosday  Survey  it  was 
entered  in  Navisland  hundred 
among  the  lands  of  St.  Ed- 
mund, held  by  tiie  abbot  him- 
self of  the  king,  and  it  had 
risen  in  value  from  £y  to  £S. 
There  were  3 J  hides  there,  a 
mill  and  woodlands  3  furlongs 
in  length  and  2  in  breadth.' 
In  the  12th  century  North- 
amptonshire Survey  4  hides 
in  Warkton  were  entered  in 
Northnavisland  as  held  of  the 
fee  of  St.  Edmund.*  At  the 
end  of  the   12th  century  the 

abbot  of  St.  Edmundsbury  conveyed  the  manor  to 
Ernald  de  Herlaw,  who  in  1 201  reconveved  it  to 
Samson  abbot  of  St.  Edmundsbury  for  60  marks, 
giving  an  undertaking  to  burn  the  charter  made  to 
liim  by  the  abbot.' 

The  soke  of  Warkton  comprised  the  lands  of  the 
abbot  of  St.  Edmundsbury  in  the  district,  perhaps 
those  which  had  been  held  by  ^^Llfgar.  It  was  divided 
into  the  In-Soke  and  the  Foreign-Soke.  The  In-Soke 
included  Warkton,  Boughton  and  Geddington,  and 
the  Forcign-Soke  Scaldwell,  Houghton  next  Scaldwell 
(Hanging  Houghton),  Lamport,  Kilmarsh  and  Maid- 
well,  Clipston,  Braybrook,  Ugthorp,  East  Farndon 
and  .Arthingworth.*  All  the  tenants  owed  suit  at  the 
abbot's  court  of  Warkton,  but  the  tenants  of  the 
In-Soke  paid  a  rent  and  had  many  services  to  perform, 
particularly  when  the  abbot  visited  the  manor. 
The  tenants  of  the  Foreign  Soke  mostly  paid  a  rent 
for  all  services.*  The  abbot  had  his  hall  here  as 
early  as  the  12th  century,  at  which  his  steward  lived, 
and  here  the  abbot  had  a  miraculous  preservation  from 
lire  in  Ii86.>» 

In  the  early  part  of  the  13th  century  a  dispute  arose 
between  the  abbot  of  Peterborough  and  the  abbot  of 
St.  Edmundsbury  regarding  the  manor  of  Warkton, 
wliich  the  former  claimed  to  be  within  his  seven  hun- 
dreds. It  was  agreed  that  the  bailiff  of  the  seven 
hundreds  should  have  supervision  of  the  view  of 
frankpledge  and  St.  Edmundsbury  should  pay  a  marl: 
yearly  for  quittance  of  all  claims  by  Peterborough. '^ 
There  were  courts  and  halimotes  at  Warkton.  The 
native  tenants  had  to  pay  the  usual  fines  for  marrying 
their  daughters  or  for  their  sons  frequenting  the  schools 
and  also  for  Icyrwite.     The  abbot  of  St.  Edmundsbury 


was  quit  of  reg.ird  of  the  forest  by  charter  of  II71, 
confirmed  at  later  dates. '^  There  seems  to  have  been 
a  flourishing  community  of  tradesmen  in  the  13th 
century  at  Warkton.  We  have  mention  of  William 
the  Carpenter,  who  paid  a  capon  for  his  shop ; 
Richard  de  Pit  for  two  salt  pans,  three  capons  ; 
Richard  the  Smith  for  his  smithy,  two  capons ; 
Robert  le  Iremongcr  izd;  Richard  at  the  Bridge  over 
the  Ise,  61/.  ;  and  John  Confort  who  held  a  messuage 
near  the  Cross." 

Warkton  was  included  in  a  list  of  manors  appro- 
priated to  the  cellarers  of  the  abbey  for  which  cus- 
todians were  appointed  in  1215.'* 

In  1284  the  abbot  of  St.  Edmund  held  Warkton  in 
pure  alms  of  the  king  in  chief,*' and  in  1 291  he  received 
from  it  the  considerable  sum  of  ^^22  15J.  5{(^.**  The 
abbot  was  having  difhculties  with  his  tenants  about 
rights  of  common  and  other  matters  early  in  the 
14th  century,  and  possibly  as  a  result  of  these  disputes 
he  leased  the  manor,  excepting  the  advowson  of  the 
church  and  view  of  frankpledge,  in  1312  to  the  homage 
of  the  court  of  Warkton  for  12  years  at  a  rent  of 
£&o  a  year.*'"  The  abbot  obtained  a  grant  of  free 
warren  in  1330*'  and  proved  his  claim  to  view  of 
frankpledge  and  weyf  in  the  Manor**  from  time 
immemorial. 

In  1414  William  Cratefeld,  abbot  of  St.  Edmunds- 
bury, leased  the  manor  for  ten  years  to  Thomas,  Earl 
of  Dorchester,  at  a  rent  of  ^25  a  year,andin  1417  the 
Earl,  who  had  been  created  Duke  of  Exeter,  wrote 
complaining  that  the  abbot  had  arrested  his  farmer 
of  the  lands  for  arrears  of  rent  due  from  him.'* 

The  abbey  of  Bury  St.  Edmunds  continued  to  hold 
the  manor  until  the  Dissolution,  when  in  1535  it 
was  in  lease  to  Thomas  Lane  for  a  rent  of  ^^32. 
On  20  March  1541,  the  manor  and  advowson  of  the 
rectory  of  Warkton,  together  with  its  soke,  as  part  of 
the  late  possessions  of  the  abbey,  with  all  the  lands  of 
the  abbey  in  Warkton,  were  granted  for  life  to  Sir 
Edward  Montagu,  Chief  Justice  of  the  King's  Bench,"* 
to  whom  on  surrender  of  this  patent  a  fresh  grant  was 
made  in  fee  on  l8  March  1542.^*  Lands  in  Warkton 
were  granted  with  tlie  manors  of  Holwell,  Brlxworth, 
Lamport,  Hanging  Houghton,  etc.,  by  Robert 
Burdon  of  Hanging  Houghton  and  his  wife  Joan,  and 
Robert  Burdon,  junior,  to  Sir  Edward  Montagu  in 
1541.21^ 

The  manor  seems  to  have  been  settled  on  Ellen 
the  third  wife  of  Sir  Edward  Montagu,  Lord  Chief 
Justice,  who  in  1557  leased  it  to  her  son  Edward.^"" 
It  descended  to  Sir  Walter  Montagu,  kt.,  younger  son 
of  Sir  Edward  Montagu  and  grandson  of  the  Lord 
Chief  Justice,  who  in  1604  settled  it  on  his  second 
wife  Ann.  He  died  without  issue  in  1616,  his  wife 
Ann  surviving  him,  and  his  heir  being  his  brother, 
Sir   Edward  Montagu,^^  created    Lord  Montagu  of 


•  Memorials  of  S.  Edmund's  Abbey  (Rolls 
Ser.),Ui,  4. 

•  V.C.II.  fforibanti.  i,  285,  318. 
•Ibid,  i,  318.  •  Ibid.  389A. 

'  Bucclcuch  MSS.  Warkton  Bk.  pp.  1,4. 

•  Ibid.  21  et  scq.  In  one  list '  Lulcham,' 
poisibly  Lolham  in  Maxcy  parish,  is 
added.  A  dispute  as  to  reliefs  payable  in 
the  soke  arose  in  164S  ;  Excheq.  Dcponi. 
Trin.  24  Chas.  I,  no.  1. 

•  Ibid.  21. 

"  Ibid.  5,  7  ;  Mem.  of  St.  Edmund't 
Abb.  (Rolls  Scr.),  i,  268  j  ii,  125  ;  iii,  22. 


"  Bucclcuch  MSS.  Warkton  Bk.  8  ;  Reg. 
Robt.  Swaffham,  cxlv,  5d.  ;  cf.  Lansd. 
MS.  1029,  21  lb. 

"  Bucclcuch  MSS.  op.  cit.  34  ;  Chart. 
R.  17  John,  m.  7;  Cal.  Close,  1227-31,  p.  41; 
1247-51,  p.  281.  "  Ibid.  42. 

'«  Chart.  R.  17  John,  m.  7. 

''  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12. 

"  Po/ie  Nicb.  Tax.  (Rec.  Com.),  54*. 

"•Bucdeuch  MSS.  Warkton  Bk. 
pp.  6,  10. 

"  Chart.  R.  4  Edw.  Ill,  ni.  18,  no.  43; 
Cal.  Chart.  1327-41,  p.  189. 


"  Plac.  de  Quo  ll'arr.  (Rcc.  Com.), 
560. 

'»  Bucdeuch  MSS.  Warkton  Bk.  p.  33. 

•0  L.  and  P.  Ilcn.  VIII,  xvi,  g.  C78  (56)  ; 
Pat.   R.   32  Hen.  VIII,  pt.  6,  m.  5. 

"  L.  and  P.  Hen.  VIII,  xvii,  g.  220 
(63);  Pat.  R.  33Hen.  VIII,pt.  7. 

»!•  Com.  Pleas,  D.  Enr.  Mich.  32  Hen. 
VIII,  m.  7d. 

"b  U,st.  MSS.  Com. Rep.  (Lord  Montagu 
of  Beaulieu),  6. 

"  Chan.    Inq.    p.m.     (Ser.    ii),    ccclxv, 

'54- 


A  HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


Scott,  Duke  of  Buc- 
clcuch.  Ot  a  bend  azure 
charged  with  a  motet  of 
six  points  betu^een  ttoo 
crescents  or. 


Boughton  in  1621.  His  grandson  Ralph  was  created 
Duke  of  Montagu  in  1 705, and  his  son,  the  second  Duke, 
died  in  1749,  leaving  two  daughters,  Isabel  and  Mary. 
W'arkton  went  to  the  latter,  who  married  George 
Brudenell,  who  was  created  Duke  of  Montagu  in 
1766,  with  special  remainder  to  his  grandson  Henry 
James  Scott,  son  of  Henry 
Scott,  Duke  of  Buccleuch,  and 
Elizabeth,  daughter  of  the  first 
Duke  of  Montagu.  He  suc- 
ceeded as  Duke  of  Buccleuch 
in  1812  and  the  manor  has 
descended  with  the  dukedom 
to  the  present  day.^^ 

The  church  of 
CHURCH  ST.  ED.MUND 
consists  of  chan- 
cel 36  ft.  8  in.  by  18  ft.  6  in., 
clearstoried  nave  35  ft.  8  in.  by 
14  ft.  9  in.,  north  and  south 
aisles  15  ft.  wide,  south  porch, 
and  west  tower  II  ft.  square,  all  these  measurements 
being  internal.  The  width  across  nave  and  aisles  is 
51  ft.  6in. 

The  nave  arcades  are  of  two  bays :  they  appear  to 
have  been  originally  of  the  latter  part  of  the  12th 
century,  but  have  been  very  much  restored.  The  two 
semicircular  arches  on  each  side  are  of  a  single  square 
order  and  spring  from  a  cylindrical  pier  with  moulded 
base  and  square  abacus,  and  from  plain  imposts  at 
either  end  :  the  eastern  respond  on  the  north  side 
has  a  roll  moulding  at  the  angles,  but  the  others  are 
square.  The  arches,  however,  in  their  present  form 
m.iy  date  only  from  the  1 8th  century,  at  the  lime  of 
the  rebuilding  of  the  chancel.  In  Bridges'  time  the 
old  chancel  was  standing  :  it  had  buttresses  at  the 
east  end  and  '  four  stone  seats'  in  the  south  wall  near 
the  altar."  On  the  north  side  the  first  Duke  of 
Montagu,  who  died  in  1709,  had  built  a  'place  of 
sepulture  for  himself  and  family,'^^  and  some  forty 
years  later,  after  the  death  of  the  second  duke  in 
1749,  the  cliancel  was  entirely  rebuilt  in  the  style  of 
the  day.  It  has  four  large  recesses  for  monuments, 
two  on  each  side,  and  a  wide  round-headed  east 
window  :  externally  it  is  faced  with  ashlar,  and  has  a 
high  parapet  and  a  pediment  at  the  east  end.  The 
burial  place  is  entered  from  the  east  end  of  the  north 
aisle,  and  covers  the  cliancel  about  half  its  lengtli. 

The  aisles  were  rebuilt  and  the  clearstory  added  in 
the  14th  century,  but  were  completely  restored  in 
1867-8.  They  have  plain  parapets  and  leaded  roofs, 
but  all  the  aisle  windows  arc  modern,  and  those  of  the 
clearstory,  which  are  square-headed  and  of  two  trefoiled 
lights,  extensively  renewed.  The  moulded  south 
doorway,  however,  is  original,  and  a  buttress  with 
triangular  head  remains  at  the  north-west  angle. 
In  the  south  aisle  is  a  14th-century  piscina  with 
fluted  bowl.  The  pointed  chancel  arch  dates  from 
1867.  In  1872  a  vestry  was  added  at  the  cast  end  of 
the  south  aisle,  partly  covering  the  chancel.  The 
15th-century    porch  has  been  rebuilt  :    it   has  plain 


parapets,  leaded  roof  and  outer  moulded  doorway 
with  hood. 

The  tower  was  built  in  the  middle  of  the  I5ih 
century,  and  is  of  four  stages,  with  broad  angle 
buttress  of  square  section  and  vertical  outline,  and  a 
vice  in  the  south-west  angle.  At  the  foot  of  the 
buttresses  above  the  plinth  is  a  band  of  quatrefoils, 
as  at  Kettering,  and  another  band  above  the  west 
doorway.  The  doorway  has  continuous  mouldings, 
and  is  set  within  a  rectangular  frame  with  traceried 
spandrels  :  over  it  is  a  three-light  pointed  window 
with  embattled  transom.  The  three  lower  stages 
are  blank  on  the  north  and  south  sides,  but  in  the  third 
stage  facing  west  is  a  square-headed  loop,  and  on  the 
east  a  doorway  formerly  opening  on  to  the  nave  roof. 
The  bell-chamber  windows  are  of  two-lights  with 
embattled  transom  and  a  quatrefoil  in  the  head,  and 
the  tower  finishes  with  a  band  of  quatrefoils  and 
battlemented  parapet  with  tall  angle  pu.nacles.  The 
height  to  the  top  of  the  pinnacles  is  70  ft.  The 
arch  to  the  nave  is  of  three  chamfered  orders,  the 
inner  springing  from  half-round  responds. 

The  font  consists  of  a  shallow  octagonal  bowl 
shaped  from  the  square,  set  on  a  modern  stem. 

I'he  monuments  in  the  chancel  are  of  more  than 
local  interest,  and  of  their  kind  are  fine  examples  of 
the  sculptural  art  of  the  period.  In  the  western 
recess  of  the  north  wall  is  that  of  John,  2nd  Duke  of 
Montagu  (d.  1749),  by  Roubiliac,  with  an  allegorical 
group  of  Charity  and  her  nurslings  exhibiting  a 
medallion  of  the  duke  to  the  mourning  duchess.  Op- 
posite, in  the  south  wall,  is  a  group  of  the  three  Fates, 
also  by  Roubiliac,  commemorating  the  duke's  widow 
Mary  Churchill  (d.  1751),  fourth  daughter  of  the  first 
Duke  of  Marlborough.  The  second  monument  on  the 
north  side  is  to  the  memory  of  Mary,  Duchess  of 
Montagu  (d.  1775),  youngest  daughter  and  co-heir 
of  the  second  duke,  and  takes  the  form  of  an  allegorical 
group  within  an  architectural  setting  designed  by 
Robert  Adam,  the  sculpture  executed  by  Peter 
Matthias  Van  Gclder.  It  was  erected  by  her  husband 
George,  Duke  of  Montagu  and  4th  Earl  of  Cardigan, 
who  survived  her  15  years,  dying  in  1790,  when  the 
dukedom  became  extinct.  The  remaining  recess  on 
the  south  side  is  filled  by  a  seated  statue,  by  Thomas 
Campbell,  of  Elizabeth  Montagu,  widow  of  Henry, 
3rd  Duke  of  Buccleuch,  who  died  1827,  erected  by  her 
grandson  Walter  Francis,  5lh  Duke  of  Buccleuch. 

At  the  cast  end  of  the  south  arcade,  below  the  arch, 
is  a  wall  monument,  with  shield  of  arms  and  rhyming 
inscription,  to  Thomas  Johnson,  1657.^* 

There  are  five  bells,  the  first  and  second  by  J. 
Taylor  and  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  1887  ;  the  third  by 
T.  and  J.  K.ayre,  of  Kettering,  1718;  the  fourth  by 
Thomas  Eayre,  1761,  and  the  tenor  by  Hugh  Watts  II, 
of  Leicester,  1638.''' 

The  plate  consists  of  a  paten  without  marks 
inscribed  '  Given  to  the  parish  of  Warckton,  Nortliton- 
shcir  An.  dom.  1683,'  and  a  modern  medixval  cup 
and  paten  of  1868,  given  in  1876.  There  are  also  a 
pewter  Hagon  and  breadholder.^* 


"  Rccov.  R.  Trin.  9  Chai.  I,  ro.  40; 
Mil.  3  Anne,  ro.  223  ;  Eait.  33  Gen.  II,  ro. 
1I2  ;  8  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  ijc) ;  Feel  of  F.  Div. 
Cot  Trin.  i)  Clian.  I  ;  Mich.  1O58  ; 
Nortlianlt.  EaU.  33  Geo.  II  j  16  Geo.  Ill  ; 
Priv.  Slat.  47  Geo.  Ill  (Sen.  II,  cap.  6) ; 


G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  (Montagu  of 
Boughton). 

•*  llriJgr'R,  //ii/.  Nerthatits.  ii,  264. 

"■  IM.I.  263. 

'"  The  iiiHcription  it  given  in  Hii(If,'rs, 
op.  cil.  ii,  264. 


"  North,  Ch.  ItfUt  of  Sorthanls.  42S, 
whore  thr  itiBcrlptions  nii  the  old  belli 
air  given.     Thrir  wrri-  fiMir  lu-IUin  1700. 

'**  Markham,  Ch.  Vluf  of  Nortbanti. 
Z97.  In  1K43  there  were  also  an  Elixa- 
bethan  cup  and  cover  paten. 


W    =o 


s" 


\. 


^^,5^'  4^ 


a:    :j 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


WOODFORD 


The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows  :  (i) 
baptisms  and  burials  1559-174.1,  marriages  1559-1740; 
(ii)  baptisms  1742-1812,  marriages  1742-1756,  burials 
174I-1812;  (iii)  marriages  1756-1812.  The  church- 
wardens' accounts  begin  in  1769. 

The    church    was    held    with    the 

ADfOlf'SOX     manor   by   the   abbey   of    Bury    St. 

Edmunds,  and  appears  before   1191 

in   a   list   of   churches   of   manors   belonging   to   the 

abbey  as  worth  10  marks  yearly.-* 

In  1291  it  was  valued  at  ^^ll  61.  SJ.  yearly."  At 
the  Dissolution,  the  profits  of  the  rectory,  then  leased 
to  I.eo  Kyng,  were/[l9  6/.  8</.  yearly." 

The  advowson  has  always  been  held  with  the 
manor,  and  the  Duke  of  Buccleuch  is  the  present 
patron. 

Edw.ird  Hunt,  by  his  will  proved 
CHARITIES  at  Northampton  7  Dec.  1674,  8^^'^' 
land  in  the  parish  of  Broughton  for 
the  benefit  of  the  poor  of  certain  parishes.  The  land, 
which  consisted  of  a  farm  of  64  acres,  was  sold  in  1921 
and  the  proceeds  invested  in  stock  with  the  OfHcial 
Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds.     The  stock  has  now 


been  apportioned  in  the  OlTui.d  Trustees'  books  be- 
tween the  parishcsintcrestcd  and  the  sumsof  £19  \s.\d. 
Derby  Corporation  6  per  cent.  Redeemable  Stock  and 
£19  %s.  id.  Middlesbrough  Corporation  6  per  cent. 
Stock,  producing  together  £2  6s.  ^d.  yearly,  represent 
the  endowment  of  the  ciiarity  for  this  parish.  The 
income  is  distributed  in  money  by  the  minister, 
cliurchwardcns  and  overseers  to  about  12  poor. 

The  Cliurcli  Land  consists  of  5  a.  3  r.  of  pasture  l.ind 
which  has  long  been  appropriated  to  the  church.  It  is 
let  for  £S  15;.  yearly,  which  is  expended  by  the 
churchwardens  in  church  expenses. 

By  a  Deed  of  Trust  dated  28  Dec.  1922,  Mrs. 
Elizabeth  Panther  established  a  charity  comprising 
a  sum  of  ^^178  OS.  Sd.  2^  per  cent.  Consols  vested  in 
the  Peterborough  Diocesan  Board  of  Finance.  The 
income  is  applicable  by  the  rector  and  church- 
wardens for  the  maintenance  of  the  Sunday  school, 
and,  subject  thereto,  for  the  mainten.ince  of  the 
fabric   of  the  church. 

The  parishes  of  Wcckley  and  Warkton  participate 
in  the  Lathom  and  Bigley  Edu' ational  Foundation 
(Ringstead)  Endowment. 


WOODFORD 


Wodeford  (xi,  xii,  xiv  cent.) ;  Wudeford  (xiii  cent.)  ; 
Woodforde  (xvi  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Woodford  contains  2,264  ^c<^s  of 
land,  which  lies  under  300  ft.  above  the  ordnance 
datum.  The  sub-soil  is  Upper  Lias,  Great  Oolite  and 
Cornbrash.  The  river  Nene  forms  tl;e  eastern 
boundary  of  the  parish  and  the  village  lies  on  the  slope 
of  the  hill  rising  from  the  river  along  the  by-ro.id  from 
Irthlingborough.  Tlie  church  stands  on  tlic  east  of 
the  road  near  the  river.  The  rectory  house  was  built 
in  I S20 ;  some  portions  of  the  medieval  rectory  remain 
in  a  farm  house  immediately  north  of  the  church  and 
include  three  buttresses  and  a  late  13th  century 
pointed  doorway.  A  two-story  thatched  cottage  in 
the  Old  Town  to  the  north-west  of  the  church  has  a 
panel  inscribed  '  F.B.  1687,'  and  on  the  west  side  of 
the  Green  in  the  upper  part  of  the  village  is  a  gabled 
house  dated  1654.  The  upper  part  of  the  village  is 
known  as  New  Town.  The  Northampton  and 
Peterborough  branch  of  the  London  Midland  and 
Scottish  Railway  crosses  the  parish  for  a  short  distance, 
but  the  nearest  station  is  at  Twywell  on  the  Kettering 
and  Huntingdon  branch.  There  were  formerly 
brickworks  near  the  village  and  in  1874  the  large  beds 
of  ironstone  in  the  parish  were  extensively  worked.^ 

John  Cole,  the  bookseller  and  antiquary,  lived  at 
Woodford  at  the  end  of  his  life  and  died  there  in  1848. 
Continually  unsuccessful  both  as  a  bookseller  and 
schoolmaster,  his  real  interests  lay  in  antiquarian 
pursuits  and  natural  history.  He  published  many 
books  on  local  history  and  also  left  manuscript  collec- 


tions for  the  history  of  many  places  in  Northampton- 
shire.^ The  parish  was  inclosed  by  private  Act  of 
Parliament  in  1768.^ 

The  manor  of  WOODFORD  at  the 
MANORS  time  of  the  Domesday  Survey,  and 
probably  in  pre-Conquest  times,  be- 
longed to  the  fee  of  Peterborough  Abbey,*  which 
remained  the  overlord  of  the  manor  till  the  dissolu- 
tion of  the  abbey,*  the  last  mention  of  the  overlordship 
being  in  1515.* 

In  1086,  Roger  held  7  hides  of  the  abbey  and  he, 
Hugh  and  Siward  held  a  further  3  virgates.'  He  may 
be  identified  with  Roger  Maufe,  the  first  knight 
enfeoffed  by  the  abbey  at  Woodford.'*  In  the  North- 
amptonshire Survey  no  under-tenant  is  mentioned 
and  more  land  is  assigned  to  the  abbey,  so  that 
Roger's  holding  was  presumably  included  in  a  holding 
of  8  hides  and  J  a  virgate  belonging  to  the  fee  of  Peter- 
borough, while  the  J  hide  held  by  William  dc  Houton 
and  the  J  virgate  held  by  Reginald  de  la  Bataille 
represented  part  of  the  holding  of  3  virgates.*  A 
Guy  Maufe  in  the  same  survey  held  land  at  Heming- 
ton  '  which  was  part  of  the  Maufe  fee,  and  he  may  have 
been  Roger's  successor  at  Woodford.  He  certainly 
granted  land  there  to  the  abbey,  as  the  grant  was 
confirmed  by  Henry  I  in  a  charter  of  1 1 14.  Guy  was 
living  in  1117,*"  but  the  tenant  in  1 125-8  was  another 
Roger  Maufe,  whose  holding  had  been  reduced  to 
5  hides  and  3  virgates,  together  \\'ith  the  soke  of 
3  hides  of  land  of  which  Gislebert,  son  of  Richard, 
was  the  tenant.     His  Northamptonshire  lands  were 


••  Mtm.    0}  St.    Edmund'i   Abb.    (Rolli 
S«r.),  i,  267-8. 
"  Op.  cit.  (Rec.  Com.),  40  b. 
"  Valor  Ecctti.  (Rec.  Com.),  iv,  311. 
'  Whelljn,  WiK.  of  Norihanls.  1874. 

•  Did.  Nal.  Biof. 

•  Act  of  Pjrit.  3  Ceo.  Ill,  c.  8  ;  RecoT. 
R.  Trin.  6  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  275  (deedi  and 
writings). 


«  y.C.lI.  Northams.  i,  317*. 

'  Cbron.  Pelrob.  (Camden  Soc),  p.  23  j 
Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12;  Cott.  MS.  (B.M.) 
Clcop.  C  i,  fol.  146  ;  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  VI  I,  i, 
no.  297. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxi,  117. 

'  V.C.H.  Nortbanis.  i,  317a. 

'a  Cbron.  Pelrob.  (Camden  Soc),  173'r. 

'  V.C.H.  Nortbanis.  3886.     In  the  notes 


to  the  survey  these  two  holdings  are  said 
to  represent  the  i  hide  and  i  virgate  held 
of  the  Bishop  of  Coutances  in  io^6  by 
one  Ralph.  The  i^  hides  assigned  to 
Guy  Trailly  may,  however,  represent  the 
Coutance  lands,  and  are  mistakenly 
assigned  to  the  abbey.        *  Ibid.  366-7. 

»"  Pytchley,    Bk.    of  Fees    (Northants. 
Rec.  Soc),  ()0n. 


A   HISTORY  OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


in  Woodford  and  Kingstliorpe  and  probably  Heming- 
ton,  held  by  the  service  of  two  knights'  fees  and 
castle  guard  at  Rockingham. ^^  Roger  was  succeeded 
by  Guy  Maufe,  who,  with  his  wife  Adeliza,  gave  a 
portion  of  his  tithes  to  Peterborough  in  1 141. *'* 

Simon  IMaufe  was  holding  the  two  fees  in  1 179  and 
I !  89.^  Before  1 196  Lucas  Maufe  had  succeeded  him*' 
and  in  1211-12  William  Maufe  appears. l''  William 
died  before  1224,  when  his  heir  Oliver  was  a  minor. 
He  was  succeeded  by  Robert  Maufe,  who  held  the  two 
fees  but  granted  the  abbot  of  Thorney  certain  lands 
in  Kingsthorpe.l^  Robert  died  before  1254,  leaving 
four  daughters  as  his  heirs,  amongst  whom  his  fees 
were  divided. *'  In  a  lawsuit  of  1346,  John  de  Wood- 
ford is  said  to  have  been  the  last  tenant  of  the  un- 
divided manor  and  to  have  left  two  daughters  and 
heirs.  Presumably  John  is  a  mistake  for  Robert,  while 
the  other  daughters  are  not  mentioned  in  1 346,  as  their 
families  no  longer  had  any  interest  in  the  Woodford 
manor.l'  There  seems  no  doubt  that  the  eldest 
daughter  married  Thomas  Deyville."  Alice  married 
John  de  Bois,  and  Joan  married,  but  the  name  of  her 
husband  does  not  appear.*'  The  fourth  daughter 
married  Roger  de  Kirkton*'"  but  does  not  seem  to  have 
had  any  share  in  Woodford.  Another  Thomas  Deyville 
did  homage  for  his  lands  there  in  1275,-"  but  ten  years 
later  John  de  Bois  and  his  wife  bought  the  Deyville's 
share  in  Woodford  and  so  came  into  possession  of 
half  the  manor,-'  which  was  held  as  a  half  and  a 
quarter  of  a  knight's  fee.-^ 

Their  holding  was  known  as  t'ne  manor  of 
WOODFORD,  PIELL'S  or  FAUX.  John  de  Bois 
did  homage  for  it  in  1289.  Roger  de  Bois  was 
holding  in  1316  and  did  homage  in  1322,  and 
John  de  Bois  was  tenant  in  1346.-'  In  1369  Sir 
Roger  de  Bois,  knt.,  sold  it  to  John  Pyel  of  London,^'' 
who  died  before  1385,  when  his  executors  assigned  a 
rent  of  50  marks  to  his  widow,  but  his  lieir  is  not 
mentioned."^  The  manor,  however,  came  to  Nicholas 
Pyel,  who  before  1 394  made  a  settlement  of  the  manor 
on  Roger  Lichefeld  and  others  in  anticipation  of  his 
marriage  with  Elizabeth  Gorge,  sister  of  Roger 
Lichefeld.2'  Whether  the  marriage  took  place  docs 
not  appear,  but  the  terms  of  the  settlement  were  not 
carried   out,   and   Nicholas   died   seised   of   it   about 


1402.-'  lie  is  said  to  have  been  poisoned,  but  tlie 
Register  of  Abbot  Genge  of  Peterborough  gives  two 
different  accounts  of  the  descent  of  the  manor. 
In  one,  Nicholas  is  said  to  have  died  without 
heir  and  except  for  the  life  interest  of  an  un- 
named tenant  (probably  Nicholas's  widow)  it 
had  escheated  to  the  abbey.  In  the  other, 
John,  son  of  Nicholas,  was  said  in  1406  to  be  a  minor 
in  the  abbot's  custody.^  The  manor,  however, 
seems  to  have  passed  before  1417"'  to  an  Elizabeth 
Pyel,  probably  a  daughter  or  sister  of  John  P)cl  and 
the  wife  of  Sir  William  Huddlestone.'"  In  1426 
it  had  passed  to  William  Braunspath  and  his  wife 
Elizabeth,  in  her  right.'*  She  presumably  was  the 
widow  of  Huddlestone  and  was  living  in  1445.'^ 
Before  145 1,  her  son  Henry  Huddlestone  had  suc- 
ceeded her''  and  died  seised  before  1488,  when  his 
heir  was  his  daughter  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of  Sir 
Thomas  Cheyney.**  In  1514,  the  manor  passed  to 
their  daughter  Elizabeth,  a  minor,  who  afterwards 
married  Thomas  Vaux,  the  first  Lord  V^aux  of  Harrow- 
den.*''  Their  son  William  in  1585  granted  a  rent  of 
£10  per  annum  out  of  the  manor  to  Joan,  the  wife  of 
William  Goddard."  He  sold  the  manor,  however, 
in  1592,  to  Simon  Mallory,"  whose  son,  Simon,  sold 
it  in  162 1  to  Sir  Rowland  St.  John,'*  the  younger  son 
of  the  third  Baron  St.  John  of 
Bletso.  His  son  Oliver  was 
created  a  baronet  and  his 
descendants  owned  the  manor 
until  the  early  19th  century," 
when  it  was  sold,  probably  by 
Henry,  the  12th  Baron  St. 
John,  to  the  Duke  of  Dorset.^" 
On  the  death  of  the  last  duke 
in  1843,  it  passed  to  liis  niece 
Mrs.  Stopford  Sackville,""*  and 
is  now  the  property  of  Mr. 
Nigel  v.  Stopford  Sackvillc. 

Joan,  presumably  the  third 
of  the  Maufe  heiresses,  left  two  daughters  between 
whom  her  share  of  Woodford  manor  was  divided  on  her 
death  about  1275.''^  In  that  year,  Richard  Trailly,  hus- 
band of  her  eldest  daughter  Alice,  did  homage  to  the 
Abbot  of  Peterborough.'"   Their  lands  were  afterwards 


[^^ 


St.    John. 
chief    gutes 


Argent    a 
with     two 


motets  or  ibercin. 


"  Chron.  Petrol.  (Camden  Soc),  p.  173  ; 
Pytchliy,  loc.  cit.  ;  S.  Guntnn,  Hiit. 
Peterborough^  131  ;  Sparke,  Hut.  Angl. 
Script  Var.  59;Egcrion  MS.  (B.M.),  2733. 

"•  Pytchlcy,  loc.  cit. 

"  Ibid  ;  Cat.  Chart.  1226-57,  20. 

"Cat.  Curta  Reg.  i,  27;  Cott.  MS. 
Vcsp.  E  xxii,  fol.  100. 

■'  Red  Bk.  ofExcheq.  (Roll.  Scr.),  6iq. 

'*  Pytchley,  loc.  cit.  quoting  the  I.ibcr 
Niger  of  Peterborough  .ind  Hugh  C.Tn- 
didui. 

"  Rot.  Robt.  Groiieleile  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc),  225  ;  Cott.  MS.  (U.M.)  Clcop.  C  i, 
(ol.  146  ;  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  fol.  248  d. 

"  De  Banco  R.  no.  395,  m.  270. 

"  Soc.  Antiq.  MS.  60,  fol.  24S  d  ;  F.gcr- 
tonMS.  (B.M.)  2733,  fol   148. 

'•  De  Banco  R.  no.  395,  m.  270  ;  Feet 
of  F.  Norlhanti.  Mil.  36  Hen.  III. 

"•  I'ylchley  Dk.  of  Feet,  p.  1 57.  Here 
the  fourth  daughter  of  Robert  de  Maufe 
(by  mistake  cillcd  Vcre)  is  laid  to  have 
married  Roger  de  Kirkton  ;  Rot.  Ilunj. 
(Rcc.  Com.),  ii,  7. 

"  Chron.  Pttrob.  23. 

"  Feel  til  F.  Norlhanti.  12  Edw.  I,  cue 


174,  file  53,  no.  113;  ibid.  Mich.  13 
Edw.  I  i  Cott.  MS.  Clcop.  C.  i,  fol.    146. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vcjp.  E  xxi,  fol.  78. 

*'  Pytchley  lik.  of  fees,  60  n  ;  Feud. 
Aids,\t,  12,  29  ;  Chron.  Petrol.  144  ;  Cott. 
MS.  Vcsp.  E  xxii,  fols.  47  d,  88  d.  The 
lands  of  Nicholas  dc  Bois  of  Woodford, 
deed,  were  taken  into  the  King's  hands  in 
1307  [Cal.  Fine,  ii,  3) ;  Cott.  MS.  Clcop. 
C  i,  fol.  146. 

"  Cal.  Close.  1 369-74,  p.  68. 

"Ibid.  i38i;-89,  p.  143. 

"  Add.  MS.  (B.M.)  252S8  fols.  8  b,  44d  •, 
Bridges,  Hist.  Northants.  ii,  p.  267,  cit. 
Episc.  Reg. 

"  Add.  MS.  (B.M.)  252S8,  fol..  10, 
44d. 

•"  Ibid.  ;  fols.  10,  44  d. 

"  Bridget,  op.  cit.  268  ;  cf.  Irthling- 
borough. 

'°  Bridges,  loc.  cil ;  Early  Chan.  Proc. 
bdle.  587,  no.  40. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northant..  Trin.  4  Men. VI; 
Feud,  .lids,  iv,  p.  49. 

"  Bridget,  loc.  cit. 

••  Ibid. ;  Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle  587, 
no.  40. 


"  Cal.  Inq.  Hen.  VII,  i,  no.  297. 

■'^  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxix,  3  ; 
G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Hil.  2  Elii.  j 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  ccxiiv,  115; 
Feet  of  I".  Northants.  East.  27  Eliz. 

"  Ibid.  Hil.  34  Elir..  ;  lUst.  MRS.  Com. 
Rep.  (Var.  Coll.)  iii,  66-71  ;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cclxxxviii,  119.  In  this 
inquisition  on  the  death  of  Simon  Mallory, 
no  mcntinn  is  made  of  any  manor  in  Wood- 
ford, only  of  very  considerable  holdings  of 
lands,  etc. 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northant..  Mich.  19  Jas.  I ; 
Recov.  R.  Hil.  19  Jai.  I,  ro.  17. 

"'  O.E.C.  Complete  Peerage ;  Feet  of 
F.  Northant!.  Hil.  22  Chas.  I  j  Recov. 
R.  Trin.  4  Geo  I,  ro.  128  ;  ibid.  Mich. 
21  Geo.  Ill,  ro.  427. 

*"  Whcllan,  op.  cit. 

*'  G.E.C.  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.); 
Whcllan,  op.  cit.  p.  77,  cf.  Dr.iyton  in 
I.owick  parish. 

*'  Dc  Banco  R.  no.  395,  m.  270. 

"  Ibid. ;  Chron.  Petrol.  22 ;  Feui.  Aids, 
iv,  12. 


256 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


WOODFORD 


known  as  TIIORLET'S  MANOR.  They  had  both 
died  by  1289,  when  Roger  Bozoun  did  lionuige  for  the 
lands  of  his  wife  Alice,  daughter  and  heir  of  Richard  and 
Alice  Trailly.'"  In  1298  John  Spigurncl  did  homage 
for  these  lands,  presumably  in  right  of  his  wife  Alice, 
the  widow  of  Bozoun.**  In  1322,  however,  her  son 
John  Bozoun  succeeded  to  the  manor.*'  Thomas 
Bozoun,  probably  his  brother,  was  the  tenant  in 
1348*'  and  died  seised  in  1361,  leaving  his  son  Henry 
a  minor,  whose  wardsiiip  was  granted  to  Sir  Richard 
la  Zouche,  knt.,  and  Richard  de  Tissington,  one  of 
the  king's  clerks.**  Henry  died  before  1393,  his 
heir  being  his  sister  Alice,  the  wife  of  Walter  Ilger.** 
Before  1443,  the  manor  had  passed,  presumably  by 
marriage,  to  the  Thorlcy  family,  as  at  that  time  it  was 
apparently  held  by  Isabel  Thorley.''*  She  was  suc- 
ceeded before  1453  by  John  Thorley,'*  who  died  in  or 
before  1508  when  his  son  William  did  homage.*^ 
William  died  in  1515  leaving  a  son  and  heir  named 
Richard.'^  By  sale  or  inheritance  it  came  into  the 
possession  of  Anthony  Muscott  and  his  wife  Eleanor, 
the  daughter  and  heir  of  William  Burton.**  Anthony 
died  before  1605,  when  William  Muscott  and  his 
wife  and  Eleanor  Muscott,  widow,  sold  Thorley's 
manor  to  Thomas  Abbott.**  In  1652,  John  Abbott 
sold  it  to  Oliver  St.  John,  the  lord  of  Woodford 
manor  (q.v.).** 

Joan,  the  younger  daughter  of  Joan  Maufe,  married 
Geoffrey  Trailly,  who  did  homage  in  1275.*^  They 
were  succeeded  in  1292  by  their  son  William,*" 
whose  heir  William  was  holding  in  1315.*^  In  1 3 16, 
the  tenant  of  this  fourth  part  of  the  manor  was 
Alice  Trailly,  presumably  the  widow  or  daughter  of 
William,**'  but  in  the  same  year  his  brother  Henry 
did  homage  for  tenements  in  Woodford.''^  In  1322, 
when  Henry  did  homage  to  the  new  abbot,  Adam  de 
Boothby,  for  a  quarter  fee,  he  was  said  to  be  the 
brother  and  heir  of  William  Trailly.'-  In  1332,  he 
settled  the  fourth  part  of  the  manor  on  himself  and 
his  wife  .Aubrey  for  their  lives  with  remainder  to 
William,  son  of  Miles  de  la  Hay,  and  his  wife,  Emma, 
possibly  Henry's  daughter.*^  In  1348,  John  de  Walde- 
grave  was  holding  one  share  of  the  Maufe  inheritance, 
but  only  in  right  of  his  wife,  while  William  de  la 
Hay  held  land  in  Woodford  by  charter.**  It  passed 
to  John  de  la  Hay,  who  died  in  or  before  1365,  leaving 
his  heir  a  minor.**  The  latter  was  probably  Hugh  de 
la  Hay,  whose  daughter  a"^,'  heir  married  William 
Rockingham.**    The  latter  did  homage  in  1415,*'  but 


there  were  possibly  other  daughters,  as  the  property 
was  subdivided  at  this  time.*"  Rokingiiam's  share 
seems  to  have  passed  before  1437  to  William  Farn- 
ham.**  Another  William  Farnham,  probably  his 
grandson,  succeeded  in  1507  or  1508,'"  and  it 
seems  possible  that  it  was  this  land  which  Robert 
Barley  sold  in  1 562  to  Simon  Mallory  as  a  fourth  of 
a  fourth  of  the  manor  of  Woodford."  If  so  it  was 
presumably  afterwards  held  with  the  main  manor 
of  Woodford  (q.v.). 

Another  part  of  the  de  la  Hay  share  of  Woodford 
was  known  as  LEN'TON'S  MANOR.  It  may  pro- 
bably be  identified  with  the  tenements,  consisting  of 
a  messuage  and  a  carucate  of  land  which  passed  before 
1332  from  Bartholomew  de  Datchingham  to  John 
Lenton.'*  In  1428,  Lenton's  Manor  was  held  by 
Roger  J^enton,'^  and  he  still 
seems  to  have  been  the  tenant 
in  1455.'*  Thomas,  probably 
his  grandson,  died  seised  in 
1505  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son  John.'*  Robert  suc- 
ceeded his  father  John  in  1558 
and  John,  son  of  Robert,  was 
followed  by  his  son  Simon 
Lenton,  who  was  holding  in 
1616.  His  heir  was  his  sister 
Anne,  wife  of  Sir  Miles  Fleet- 
wood, and  either  her  daughter 
Anne  or  she  in  her  widowhood 
may  have  married  John  Shaw,  who,  with  Anne  his 
wife,  was  holding  the  manor  in  1641."  It  was  sold 
in  1657  by  Simon  Shaw  and  Anne  Shaw,  widow, 
to  Oliver  St.  John,  lord  of  the  chief  manor  of  Wood- 
ford (q.v.)." 

A  third  share  of  Hugh  de  la  Hay's  lands  came  into 
the  possession  of  a  family  named  Holt,"  and  its  sub- 
sequent history  presumably  followed  that  of  their 
other  holding  in  Woodford,  called  Trailly  Place 
(q.v.). 

In  1622,  when  Simon  Mallory  sold  his  manors  in 
Woodford  to  Sir  Rowland  St.  John,  a  manor  called 
CLEMENTS  MANOR  was  included  in  the  sale,'» 
but  it  does  not  seem  possible  to  trace  its  previous 
history.  In  1 369,  however,  John  Clement  of  Woodford 
and  his  wife  Beatrice  granted  seven  acres  and  one 
rood  of  land  of  her  inheritance  to  Richard  de  Tissing- 
ton, clerk,  but  this  is  apparently  the  only  mention  of 
the  family."" 


Lenton.  Azure  a  bend 
ermine  between  ttvo  dol- 
phins or. 


"  CbroH.  Petrob.  144 ;  De  Banco  R. 
no.  395,  m.  270. 

«»  Cott.  MS.Vesp.  Exxii.fols.  38,  46  d, 
112  d;  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  29;  >ee  Thrap- 
iton. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vcjp.  E  xxi,  fol  78  d. 

«'  Ibid.  Cleop.  C  i,  fol.  146 ;  Cal. 
Close,  1354-60,  p.  659. 

*'  Cal.  Fine,vV\,  p.  200,  212;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  36  Edw.  Ill  (pt.  i),  no.  36. 

♦»  Add.  MS.  25288,  fols.  8,  15  ;  Feud. 
Aids,  iv,  49. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

'■  Ibid. 

"  Ibid.  p.  266. 

*•  Chan.  Inq.  p  m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxx,   117. 

'•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  9  Eliz. 

"  Ibid.  Mich.  2  Jas.  I  ;  Recov.  R.  East. 
]  Jai.  I,  ro.  loi. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  1652. 

"  De  Banco  R.  no.  395,  m.  270  ;  Cbron. 
Petrob.  22. 


"  Ibid.  150. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  Exxii.fol.  1121/. 

•"  Feud,  .lids,  iv,  p.  29. 

•'  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  Exxii.fol.  wod. 

"  Ibid,  xxi,  fol.  791/.  In  1346,  John  dc 
Drayton  sued  Robert  de  Bois  for  the  pre- 
sentation to  the  mediety  of  the  advowson 
of  the  church,  as  having  the  custody  of 
John  Trailly,  a  grandson  of  William.  The 
result  does  not  appear,  but  neither  John 
de  Drayton  nor  his  father,  who  was  said  to 
have  died  seised  of  i  of  the  manor,  ap- 
pears to  have  done  homage  to  the  abbot ; 
cf.  De  Banco  R.  no.  395,  m.  270. 

"Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fols.  i^xd, 
liid. 

"  Ibid,  i,  fols.  146,  133. 

•'  Cal.  Pal.  1364-7,  p.  124;  Cal.  Close, 
1364-68,  p.  III. 

"Add.  MS.  25288,  fol.  15. 

•'  Ibid. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  49. 

257 


"  Bridges,  op.  cit,  ii.  267,  cit.  Episc. 
Reg. 

'"  Ibid.  266. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  4  &  5 
Eliz. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Cleop.  C  ii,  fol.  151^. 

"  Feud.   'Itds,  iv,  49. 

"*  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Close  R.  II  Edw.  IV,  m.  5  ;  Chan. 
Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xviii,  95. 

'^  For  descent  sec  Aldwinkle  All  Saints ; 
Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  25  and  26 
Eliz.;  Hil.  39Eliz.  ;Hil.  i6Chas.  I. 

"  Ibid.  Hil.  1657. 

"  Feud.  Aids,  iv.  49  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
Hen.  V.  nos.  ^^&  103. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  19 
Jas.  I. 

'»  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  East.  43 
Edw.  III.  Tissington  had  the  wardship 
of  Henry  Bozoun,  who  came  of  age  in  1369 
(see  ante.) 


A   HISTORY  OF    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


A  second  holding  in  Woodford,  which  appears  later 
to  have  been  called  JRJILLT  PLACE  or  NOR- 
WICWS  MAXOR,  belonged  in  the  reign  of  Edward 
the  Confessor  to  the  soke  of  Peterborough  Abbey.** 
It  consisted  of  a  hide  and  a  virgate  of  land,  which  were 
held  by  Burred,  but  in  1086  it  had  been  granted  to 
the  Bishop  of  Coutances  who  held  it  in  chief  of  the 
king.^  In  the  12th  century  survey,  it  appears  as  a 
holding  of  li-  hides  belonging  to  the  fee  of  Peter- 
borough,*^ but  this  probably  represented  an  attempt 
by  the  abbey  to  recover  the  land  after  the  bishop's 
forfeiture.  It  was  unsuccessful  and  at  some  subse- 
quent date  the  land  was  granted  to  the  Clares  and  was 
held  of  the  honour  of  Gloucester  as  half  a  knight's 

In  10S6,  the  bishop's  tenant  was  named  Ralph,** 
but  early  in  the  12th  century  Guy  de  Trailly  was  the 
sub-tenant.*^  Either  the  name  Guy  is  a  mistake  for 
Geoffrey,  or  else  the  mesne  tenant's  name  is  omitted 
and  Guy  was  the  tenant  in  demesne  and  the  ancestor 
of  the  Trailly s  of  Woodford.  The  mesne  tenants 
under  the  Clares  were  undoubtedly  the  Traillys, 
who  held  the  manor  of  Yelden  in  Bedfordshire,*' 
and  Sir  John  Trailly  was  holding  the  half-fee  in  1398,** 
but  after  this  date  the  mesne  lordship  disappears. 
The  tenants  in  demesne  be- 
longed to  another  branch  of 
the  family,  of  which  Guy  may 
have  been  the  first.  In  1241, 
William  de  Trailly  seems  to 
have  been  the  tenant,*'  and  he 
was  probably  the  father  of 
Richard  and  Geoffrey  Trailly, 
who  obtained  by  marriage  two 
shares  of  the  manor  of  Wood- 
ford (q.v.).  Certainly  the  half- 
fee  passed  to  Richard  Trailly 
and  his  heirs,  represented  in 
1403  by  Walter  Ilger.*"  It 
passed  shortly  afterwards  to  Sir  Jolin  Holt,  who  died 
seised  of  Trailly  Place  in  1419,'*  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  two  sons  Hugh*^  and  Richard.  The  latter  died  in 
1429,  when  his  heir  was  his  cousin  Simon  Norwich.*^ 
John  Norwich  died  seised  in  1504,  when  the  manor 
was  said  to  be  held  in  chief  of  the  king.*^  His  great- 
grandson,  Simon,  sold  it  in  1570  to  Simon 
Mallory,'*  who  was  lord  of  the  chief  manor  of  Wood- 
ford (q.v.). 

All  the  tenants  in  Woodford  did  suit  of  court  at 
the  abbot's  court  for  tlie  Hundred  of  Huxloc  and 
were  geldable,  but  Richard  de  Clare,  Earl  of  Glou- 
cester, withdrew  the  suit  of  his  Woodford  tenants 
to  his  Icet  at  Denford.**  He  also  claimed  certain 
privileges  that  were  held  by  the  Abbey  in  the  Hundred, 


Trailly.  Or 
between  four 
gules. 


a    cross 
marllets 


namely,  the  return  of  writs,  pleas  de  vaviio  vetito, 
view  of  frank-pledge,  gallows  and  the  assizes  of  bread 
and  ale."  In  the  l8th  century.  Lord  St.  John 
of  Bletsoe  had  a  court  leet  and  court  baron  in  the 
manor  of  Woodford.'* 

A  mill  was  attached  to  Roger  Maufe's  manor  in 
Woodford  in  1086,  when  it  paid  2s.  a  year,*'  and  a 
water-mill  was  attached  to  the  manor  in  1718.^  When 
Simon  Mallory  sold  his  Woodford  possessions  to 
Sir  Rowland  St.  John  in  1621,  three  water-mills  were 
included  in  the  sale.*  These  were  probably  the  three 
mills  of  which  his  father  died  seised,  called  Dodcs 
Mills.^  Two  other  water-mills,  called  WiUicoat  mills, 
seem  to  have  been  in  the  Crown  in  the  reign  of  Henry 
VIII,  and  were  granted  in  1544  to  William,  Lord  Parr 
of  Horton.*  They  had  reverted  to  the  Crown  before 
1560,  when  Elizabeth  granted  them  to  William 
Garrard  and  others,  but  this  grant  was  surrendered 
two  years  later.*  They  were  afterwards  granted  to 
Sir  Robert  Lane  and  Anthony  Throckmorton,  who 
sold  them  to  Henry  Gierke  of  Stanwick.  He  died 
seised  of  them  in  1574,  when  his  heir  was  his  son 
William.'  They  passed,  however,  to  Gabriel,  the 
brother  of  William,  and  on  his  death  in  1623  he 
was  succeeded  by  their  nephew  Christopher,  a 
minor.' 

A  free  fishery  is  mentioned  as  appurtenant  to  the 
manor  of  Woodford,  after  its  division  amongst  the 
daughters  of  Robert  Maufe.  Thus  in  1332  a  quarter 
part  of  a  fishery  in  the  Nene  worth  4/.  a  year  was 
included  in  the  settlement  made  by  Henry  Trailly 
of  his  share  of  the  manor.*  Again  in  1592,  a  free 
fishery  was  sold  with  Woodford  or  Pycl's  manor  by 
Lord  Vaux  to  Simon  Mallory,®  and  is  frequently 
mentioned  after  the  manors  had  passed  to  the  St. 
Johns." 

The  church  of  ST.  MART-THE- 
CHURCH  VIRGIN  consists  of  chancel  40  ft. 
by  17  ft.  6  in.,  clearstoried  nave  79  ft. 
by  14  ft.  3  in.,  north  and  south  aisles  12  ft.  6  in.  wide, 
north  and  south  porches,  and  west  tower  11  ft.  by 
12  ft.  surmounted  by  a  spire.  The  width  across 
nave  and  aisles  is  44  ft.  10  in.,  and  the  total  length  of 
the  church  138  ft.  6  in.,  all  these  measurements 
being  internal.  There  is  a  modern  vestry  and 
organ  chamber  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel. 

The  church,  which  is  of  rubble  throughout,  was 
restored  in  1867.  The  chancel  was  then  partly  rebuilt, 
and  has  a  modern  high-pitched  tiled  roof,  but  all  the 
other  roofs  are  leaded  and  of  flat-pitch  behind  plain 
parapets.  Internally,  with  the  exception  of  the  tower, 
all  the  walls  are  plastered. 

The  architectural  history  of  the  building  appears  to 
be  briefly  as  follows  :    the  original  structure  was  an 


••  V.C.U.  Norlhants.  i,  311. 

"  Ibid. 

••  Ibid.  388A. 

'*  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12;  Chroti.  Pelrob. 
p.  114;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  8  Edv/.  II,  no.  68  ; 
36  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  i,  no.  36;  46  Edw.  Ill 
(ut  nos),  no.  6i  ;  16  Ric.  II,  no.  27; 
22  Ric.  II,  no.  46  ;  4  Hen.  IV,  no.  41. 

"  V.C.II.  Sorihanii.  i,  p.  311. 

••  Ibid.  338ft. 

•'  y.C.II.  Brdi.  iii,  176;  Feud.  Aids, 
iv,  12;  Cat.  Fine,  vii,  212;  Chan.  Inq. 
p.m.  4'i  F.dw.  Ill  (lit  not.),  no.  62. 

"  Ibid.  22  Ric.  II,  no.  46. 

"  Rol.  Rob.  C'rosirleiie  (Cant,  and  York 
Soc.)  203  ;  Bh.  of  Fees,  ii,  937. 


""  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  12  ;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m. 
36  Edw.  Ill,  pt.  i,  no.  36  ;  4  Hen.  IV,  no. 
41  ;  Crt/.  Ftnr,  vii,  212. 

•'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  6  Ilcn.  V,  no.  43. 

"  Ibid.  8  Hen.  V,  no.  103. 

"  Ibid.  30  Hen.  VI,  no.  13. 

"  Ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  xviii,  ;ii. 

■"  Ibid.  (Ser.  ii),  Ixxxix,  99  ;  cxii,  111;; 
Feet  of  F.  NorthanU.  Hil.  12  Eli/.  ; 
W.  C.  Metcalfe,  ^111/.  of  Norlhanls.  pp. 
35,  112. 

■*  Kol.  Hund.  (Rcc.  Com.),  ii,  7  j  Cbron. 
Pelrob.  p.  114. 

"  Rol.  Hund.  (Rcc.  Com.)  ii,  7. 

•"  Recov.  R.  Trin.  4  Ceo.  I,  ro.  1 28  j 
Mich.  21  Ceo.  Ill,  ro.  372. 

258 


»»  y.C.II.  Korlhanls.  i,  317*. 
'  Rccov.  R.  Trin.  4  Geo.  1,  ro.  128. 
"  Ibid.  nil.  19  Jas.  I,  ro.  17. 

*  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  cclxxxviii^ 
109. 

*  L.  and  P.  lien.  VIII,  xix,  pt.  i,  g.  141 

(75)- 

»  Pat.  R.  2  Klir,.  pt.  13. 

•  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  clxxi,  loi. 
'  Ibiil.  ccccvi,  4. 

"  Colt.MS.  Cleop.  Cii,fol.  ijirf. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  34  Eliz. 

'"  Ibid.  Hil.  22  Elir..  ;  Recov.  R.  Trin. 
4  Geo.  I,  ro.  128  ;  Mich.  29  Ceo.  HI.  ro. 
564. 


Woodford  Church  from  thf.   South-east 


Woodford  Church  ;    The  Interior,  looking  East 


HUXLOE  HUNDRED 


WOODFORD 


aisleless  early  I2th  century  church  vvitli  nave  and 
chancel  of  equal  breadth,  to  which  about  1200  a 
north  aisle  and  chancel  chapel  were  added.  The  tower 
also  is  of  this  period.  In  the  1 3th  century  a  new  chan- 
cel of  great  length  was  built  east  of  the  older  chancel, 
which  was  thrown  into  the  nave,  the  old  chancel  arch 
being  replaced  by  a  new  one  ;  at  the  same  time 
the  north  aisle  was  widened  and  a  south  aisle  with 
porch  of  two  stories  added.  A  lateral  chapel,  witli 
narrow  east  and  west  aisles,  was  also  planned  just 
east  of  the  porch  projecting  from  tlie  soutli  wall  of 
the  church.  This  was  probably  completed,  but  only 
its  west  aisle  remains,  the  rest  having  been  taken 
down  in  the   15th  century  when    the  aisle  walls  on 


imposts,  but  that  at  the  east  end  has  been  cut  away. 
The  arcade  prob.ibly  occupied  the  whole  extent  of 
the  north  wall  of  the  early  cliantcl,  wliich  was  after- 
wards joined  up  to  the  new  work  built  from  the  east. 
The  chancel  is  of  three  bays  with  coupled  angle 
buttresses  of  two  stages  and  a  modern  east  window 
of  tiiree  lancets."  The  nortli  and  south  windows  of 
the  eastern  bay  in  tlieir  present  form*-  are  also  modern, 
dating  only  from  the  restoration,  but  the  chancel  is 
substantially  of  13th-century  date,  the  south  wall 
retaining  a  keel-shaped  string  at  sill  level  and  a 
priest's  doorway  in  the  middle  bay  with  continuous 
moulded  head  and  jambs.  The  piscina  and  triple 
sedilia  are  also  original.    They  form  a  single  compo- 


I2ffl  Century 

C.I200 

C1250-80 

C3 142!  Century 
H(I5I!J  Century 
□  Modern 


Plan  of  Woodford  Church 


both  sides  were  largely  rebuilt  or  new  windows 
inserted.  The  spire  and  north  porch  are  additions  of 
the  early  14th  century. 

The  original  nave  was  46  ft.  long,  and  its  eastern 
limit  is  still  marked  by  compound  piers  in  both 
arcades  and  by  the  13th-century  transverse  arch 
between  them.  The  north  arcade  is  of  four  bays,  with 
three  round  arches  and  a  narrow  pointed  one  at  the 
west  end,  all  of  a  single  square  order,  springing  from 
cylindrical  piers  with  moulded  bases  and  sculptured 
capitals,  and  from  moulded  imposts  at  either  end. 
The  capitals  differ  in  character  ;  that  of  the  western 
pier  has  on  two  sides  a  face  with  foliage  issuing  from 
the  mouth,  but  on  the  others  the  foliage  is  of  con- 
ventional stiff-leaf  character.  The  eastern  arch  is 
considerably  wider  than  the  others,  the  spacing  of 
the  arcade  being  thus  very  irregular.  Beyond  the 
compound  pier,  which  has  half-round  responds  on  its 
north  and  south  faces,  is  the  arcade  of  the  old  chancel, 
which  consists  of  two  round  arches  similar  to  the 
others  springing  from  a  cylindrical  pier  with  moulded 
capital  and  base  ;  the  work  is  rather  later  than  that 
just  described,  the  capital  having  nail-head  ornament, 
but  followed  closely  on  it.  The  responds  have  moulded 


sition  of  four  uncusped  pointed  arches,  the  seats 
being  on  one  level  and  divided  by  detached  shafts 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The  piscina  has  a 
plain  bowl  and  hollow-chamfered  recess,  with  a  small 
shaft  in  its  east  jamb.  The  north  wall  below  the 
window  is  blank,  but  farther  west,  in  the  middle  bay, 
is  a  pointed  doorway  now  opening  to  the  modern 
vestry.*^  The  western  bay  is  occupied  by  a  13th- 
century  wall  arcade  of  three  uncusped  hollow-cham- 
fered arches  on  clustered  shafts  of  quatrefoil  section 
with  moulded  capitals  and  bases  and  single  jamb 
shafts.  In  the  south  wall  opposite  is  a  similar  arcade 
of  four  arches  opened  out  and  restored  in  1867,  the 
arch  next  the  priests'  doorway  being  very  narrow,  but 
there  is  no  indication  that  the  arcading  extended 
farther  east  on  either  side.  Within  the  western  arch 
of  the  north  arcade  is  a  trefoil  headed  low-side  window, 
originally  fitted  with  one  vertical  and  four  horizontal 
iron  bars,  one  of  which  remains.'''  The  western  window 
in  the  south  wall  is  a  15th-century  insertion  of  four 
lights  with  Perpendicular  tracery.  The  13th-century 
chancel  arch  is  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner 
springing  from  half-round  responds  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases.    The  ritual  chancel  extends  about 


**  The  former  window  was  of  four  lighti 
with  interiecting  mullions. 

"  They  are  of  two  trefoiled  lighti 
•imilar  to  the  west  window  of  the  north 
aisle.    Formerly  the  north  window  was  of 


two  lights  with  forked  mullion  and  that  on 
the  south  a  three  light  perpendicular 
insertion  :   Cbi.  Arcbd.  Nortbampt.  85. 

*'  It  probably  opened  originally   to  a 
sacristy  covering  the  middle  bay. 

259 


^*  Assoc.  Arcb.  Sac.  Reps,  xxix,  457. 
The  window  is  now  blocked  on  the  out- 
side by  the  organ  :  the  opening  is  3  ft.  5  in. 
high  by  18  in.  wide, and  the  sill  is  z ft.  Sin. 
above  the  floor. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


8  ft.  west  of  the  chancel  into  the  nave :  there  is  a 
dwarf  wall,  but  no  screen. 

Tlie  south  arcade  of  the  original  nave  has  three 
wide  pointed  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders  dying 
into  the  wall  at  the  west  end  and  at  the  east  resting 
on  a  half-octagonal  respond.  The  piers  and  the 
respond  have  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  but  the 
western  pier  is  octagonal  and  the  other  cylindrical 
with  an  octagonal  capital.  Transverse  arches  are 
carried  over  the  aisle  from  both  piers  as  well  as 
from  the  compound  pier  farther  east,  all  similar  to 
those  of  the  arcades.  The  western  arch  rests  on  a 
moulded  corbel  in  the  south  wall,  but  the  other  two 
spring  from  13th-century  piers  of  four  clustered  shafts 
which  originally  marked  the  entrance  to  the  lateral 
chapel  but  are  now  built  into  the  later  walling  ;  of 
these  piers  the  capital  of  the  western  is  carved  with 
stiff-leaf  foliage,  but  the  other  is  simply  moulded, 
and  both  have  moulded  bases.**  The  extended 
arcade,  on  the  south  side  of  the  old  chancel,  is  of 
two  bays  with  pointed  arches  of  two  hollow  chamfers 
and  deep  moulded  hood,  springing  from  a  cylindrical 
pier**  with  circular  moulded  capital  and  base  and  from 
a  half-octagonal  respond  at  the  east  end.  At  the 
west  the  arch  dies  out.  The  13th-century  arch  across 
the  nave,  which  was  substituted  for  the  original 
chancel  arch,  is  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the  inner 
on  half-round  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases,  and  north  of  it  a  transverse  arch  is  carried  over 
the  aisle,  as  on  the  suuth  side.*' 

The  south  doorway  and  porch  are  very  beautiful 
examples  of  13th  century  work,  with  elaborate 
mouldings  and  richly  decorated.  The  inner  doorway 
is  of  two  main  orders,  the  inner  forming  a  trefoiled 
arch  and  the  outer  a  moulded  round  arch  with 
delicate  foliage  on  both  planes,  and  label  over  ;  in 
the  space  above  formed  by  the  pointed  wall-arch  is 
a  trefoiled  niche  containing  a  modern  statue  of  the 
Blessed  Virgin,  with  a  moulded  and  cuspcd  trefoil  on 
each  side.  The  jambs  have  three  major  shafts  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases,  and  smaller  attached 
shafts  between  ;  the  outer  shaft  on  each  side  carries 
the  diagonal  ribs  of  the  porch  vault,  which  is  of  simple 
quadripartite  form.**  The  outer  doorway  has  an 
acutely  pointed  arch  of  three  orders  elaborately 
moulded  with  rolls  and  hollows,  on  clustered  jamb- 
shafts  with  moulded  capitals,  bases  and  mid-bands. 
The  hoodmould  terminates  in  masks. 

The  chamber  over  the  porch  was  approached  by  a 
stairway  in  the  west  wall,  which  still  remains,  opening 
from  the  sill  of  a  later  window  in  the  aisle,  but  the 
porch  is  now  finished  with  a  plain  parapet.  Of  the 
building  eastward  only  the  narrow  west  aisle  remains ; 
it  is  5  ft.  8  in.  wide,  opening  to  the  church  by  a 
pointed  arch,  and  was  covered  by  an  oblong  quadri- 
partite vault,  the  springing  of  which  remains  in  three 
of  the  angles.  The  position  of  the  corresponding 
cast  aisle  is  marked  by  the  clustered  pier  and  a  blocked 
arch  to  the  aisle,  but  there  has  been  so  much  rebuilding 
and  alteration  in  later  times  that  the  original  arrange- 


ment must  remain  in  some  measure  uncertain.  The 
wide  middle  bay  was  apparently  vaulted  and  open  to 
the  church  and  probably  was  used  as  a  chapel.  An 
upper  story  forming  part  of  the  porch  chamber  may 
also  be  assumed,  but  whether  this,  too,  was  used  as 
a  chapel  or  for  some  other  purpose  it  is  impossible 
to  say.*** 

All  the  windows  of  the  south  aisle  are  15th-century 
insertions,  those  east  of  the  porch  being  of  four 
cinquefoiled  lights  with  vertical  tracery  and  four- 
centred  heads.  The  end  windows  are  of  three  lights, 
that  in  the  west  wall  and  a  three-light  window  west 
of  the  porch  being  without  tracery.  The  west 
window  of  the  north  aisle  and  one  in  the  north  wall 
are  of  the  early  14th  century,  of  two  trefoiled  lights, 
with  pointed  trefoils  and  quatrefoil  over,^"  but  all 
the  others  are  15th-century  insertions  of  three  lights ; 
that  at  the  east  end  is  now  blocked  by  the  organ 
chamber.  The  13th-century  north  doorway  is  of 
two  moulded  orders,  the  inner  continuous,  the  outer 
on  jambshafts  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  The 
porch  has  a  modern  slated  roof  without  gable  coping 
and  an  outer  doorway  of  two  moulded  orders,  the 
inner  springing  from  half-round  responds  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases.  It  has  single  trefoiled 
windows  in  the  side  walls,  but  no  benches. 

The  east  end  of  the  north  aisle  is  used  as  a  morning 
chapel;  in  the  south  wall  is  a  13th-century  piscina 
and  remains  of  sedilia  destroyed  in  the  making  of  a 
tomb  recess  cut  through  the  wall  to  the  west  of  the 
new  chancel  arch  c.  1 290.  In  the  north  wall,  between 
the  windows,  there  are  two  plain  four-centred  15th- 
century  niches. 

The  stairs  to  the  rood  loft  remain  in  an  almost 
perfect  condition  on  the  south  side  of  the  chancel 
arch,  entered  from  the  east  end  of  the  aisle  by  a 
plain  four-centred  doorway.  The  staircase  was  made 
in  the  15th  century  and  projects  into  the  aisle,  from 
which  it  was  lighted  by  small  windows,  now  blocked, 
in  the  south  and  west.^*  There  is  a  small  recess,'^ 
perhaps  for  a  piscina,  in  the  south  wall  of  the  aisle, 
and  farther  west  a  low  wall-recess  with  two-centred 
moulded  segmental  arch.  North  of  the  east  window 
is  a  niche  with  image  bracket. 

The  clearstory  windows  are  square  headed  and  of 
two  trefoiled  lights ;  there  are  two  on  each  side  of 
the  extended  nave  and  three  of  plainer  character 
to  the  old  nave  spaced  to  the  bays  of  the  south 
arcade. 

The  tower  is  of  four  main  stages  with  coupled 
buttresses  about  half  its  height,  so  placed  as  to  cut 
off  the  square  angles  of  the  lower  part ;  the  angles 
of  the  upper  story  thus  overhang  and  arc  supported 
by  corbels  in  the  form  of  heads.  The  buttresses  are 
of  two  stages.  On  the  west  side  in  the  second  stage 
is  a  single  hooded  lancet  with  wide  internal  splay, 
and  another  smaller  one  on  the  north  side.  The  bell- 
chamber  windows  are  of  two  plain  lancets  divided 
by  a  square  shaft  and  set  within  a  pointed  arch  on 
shafted  jambs  with  cushion  capitals ;   the  tympanum 


**  Three  ihafti  of  the  wcitcrn  and 
two  of  the  eaitorn  pier  alone  arc 
viiible. 

*•  The  pier  i>  of  greater  diameter  than 
that  oppoiite  in  the  north  arcade. 

*'  The  north  aiilc  arch  ii  new.  In 
1849  the  reipondi  alone  remained : 
Chi.  Ar(bd.  Norlhampl.  87. 


**  The  plan  of  the  porch  is  an  oblong 
measuring  8  ft.  6  in.  from  west  to 
east  by  5  ft.  j  the  vaulting  ribs  arc 
chamfered. 

"  The  tlicor)'  that  it  constituted  a 
dwelling  house  above  a  vaulted  under- 
croft used  for  no  special  purpose  is  not 
convincing  and  seems  only  to  have  been 

260 


advanced  to  account  for  an  unusual 
feature. 

■"  The  new  windows  in  the  cast  bay  of 
the  chancel  arc  copied  from  these. 

"  'i'lu-re  is  no  indication  of  the  doorway 
to  tljc  loft,  but  it  may  be  hidden  by  the 
plaster. 

"  It  ii  61  in.  wide  by  7]  in.  high. 


HUXLOE   HUNDRED 


WOODFORD 


is  plain.  The  tower  terminates  with  a  trefoiled 
corbel  table  and  plain  parapet  with  elaborate  angle 
pinnacles.**  The  pointed  tower  arch  has  been  rebuilt ; 
it  is  of  three**  chamfered  orders,  the  innermost  on 
half-octagonal  responds  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases.  The  line  of  the  high-pitched  I3tl>-century 
nave  roof  rcm.iins  above  the  arcii.  There  is  no 
vice. 

The  spire  belongs  to  the  same  category  as  those  of 
Denford  and  Grafton  Underwood,  with  '  broaches  ' 
behind  the  parapet,  and  has  ribbed  angles  and  three 
sets  of  lights  on  the  cardinal  faces.  The  lights  are 
of  early  '  Decorated  '  character  and  the  lower  lights 
are  t ransomed. 

The  13th-century  font  has  a  plain  hexagonal  bowl 
on  si.x  detached  sliafts  with  moulded  capitals  and 
bases  grouped  round  a  central  cylindrical  stem,  and 
mounted  on  two  hexagonal  steps.  On  the  underside 
of  the  bowl  at  the  angles  arc  small  sculptured  faces. 

The  roofs  have  been  extensively  restored,  but  the 
moulded  tie-beams  of  tiie  nave  are  old  and  the  ridge 
and  purlins  in  the  western  portion  ;  there  arc  also 
some  old  timbers  in  the  south  aisle  roof  and  at  the 
east  end  of  the  north  aisle. 

The  wooden  effigies  of  Sir  Walter  Trailly  (d.  1290) 
and  his  wife  have  already  been  described.*^  They  lie 
under  a  two-centred  segmental  moulded  arch  cut 
through  the  wall  between  the  north  chapel  and  the 
extended  nave.*' 

In  the  chancel  is  a  grave  slab  with  brass  of  Simon 
Mallory  the  elder  (d.  1580),  who  is  represented  in 
armour,  with  shield  of  arms  and  inscription,*'  and  on 
another  slab  a  brass  plate  with  inscription  to  Dorothy 
wife  of  Simon  Mallorv  the  younger,  of  Woodford, 
'  whoe  had  15  sonnes  and  daughters  '  and  was  buried 
5  June  1639. 

There  is  some  old  glass  in  the  top  lights  of  the 
easternmost  window  of  the  north  aisle  ;  it  is  mostly 
yellow  and  white  and  comprises  six  figures,  including 
a  king  and  two  saints. 

In  the  west  face  of  the  northern  compound  pier 
is  a  heart-burial  niche  discovered  during  the  restora- 
tion of  1867.** 

A  chest  in  the  nave  is  dated  1686. 

The  pulpit  and  all  the  fittings  are  modern. 

There  are  six  bells,  the  treble  and  third  by  J. 
Taylor  and  Co.,  of  Loughborough,  1913  ;  the  second 
and  tenor,  dated  1616;  the  fourth  by  Thomas  Norris 
of  Stamford,  1662 ;  and  the  fifth  by  W.  and  J.  Taylor 
of  Oxford,  1839.** 

The  plate  consists  of  a  cup  of  c.   1570  with  the 


maker's  initials  i  m  linked,  a  paten  inscribed  '  W. 
Yates,  rector,  W.  Wootton,  J.  Mollis  Eccl.  Guard. 
1683,'  without  date-letter,  but  with  the  mark  e  b 
thrice  repeated;  a  jug-shaped  flagon  of  1863,  and  a 
silver  gilt  cup  and  paten  of  1872  ;  there  is  also  a 
pewter  tlagon  with  tlic  maker's  mark  r  b.*" 

The  registers  before  1812  are  as  follows*  (i)  bap- 
tisms and  burials  16S0-1K00,  marriages  1680-1753  ; 
(ii)  marriages  1754-1812;  (iii)  baptisms  1806-1812, 
burials  1801-1812.  The  first  pages  of  the  third 
volume  are  cut  out. 

The  church  of  All  Saints  or  St. 
ADl'OjySON  Mary'i  probably  existed  at  the  time 
of  the  Domesday  survey,  when  the 
priest  appears  amongst  the  tenants  of  the  Bishop  of 
Coutances.^  To  which  holding  in  Woodford  the 
advowson  belonged  at  that  time  is  not  apparent,  but 
probably  the  Maufcs  claimed  it.  In  1 205  an  agree- 
ment was  made  between  Walter  Trailly  and  Lucas 
Maufe,  the  tenants  of  the  two  holdings,  that  each 
should  hold  a  mediety  of  the  advowson,'^  and  this 
division  remained.  TheTraillys'  mediety  was  known 
as  the  northern,  or  later  as  Cock's  mediety,**  and  was 
held  by  Walter's  descendants  until  1400,^  when  Sir 
John  Trailly,  knt.,  died  seised  of  it.  He  seems, 
however,  to  have  granted  it  to  Sir  Gerald  Braybrook, 
knt.,  and  Edmund  Hampden,  who  presented  in  1411.^' 
Thomas  Hampden  and  Richard  Restwold  presented 
in  1461,  and  John  Hampden  in  1511.^'  John  Hampden 
appears  to  have  granted  the  presentation  to  different 
people  in  1524,  1526  and  1549,  and  finally  to  Simon 
Mallory,  who  presented  in  1558.^  In  1622,  his 
nephew  Simon  Mallory  sold  a  mediety  of  the  advowson 
to  Sir  Rowland  St.  John,^'  but  he  had  also  inherited 
part  at  least  of  the  other  mediety,  so  that  it  is  not  certain 
what  was  included  in  the  sale.^"  By  1648,  however, 
the  St.  Johns  had  acquired  both  medieties,^!  and 
Lord  St.  John  is  the  present  patron  of  the  living. 

The  other  mediety,  which  was  assigned  in  1205  to 
Lucas  Maufe  and  his  heirs,  was  known  as  the  southern 
or  Style's  mediety,**  and  was  divided  like  the  manor 
(q.v.)  among  the  heiresses  of  Robert  Maufe.  In  1286 
an  arrangement  was  made  by  which  John  de  Bois 
and  his  wife  Alice  and  their  heirs,  as  tenants  of  two 
parts  of  the  manor,  should  make  the  first  and  third 
of  every  four  presentations  to  the  mediety,  while 
Richard  de  Trailly,  Roger  de  Bozoun,  his  wife  Alice 
and  their  heirs,  as  tenants  of  a  quarter  of  the  manor, 
should  make  the  fourth  presentation,  and  Geoffrey 
Trailly,  his  son  William  and  their  heirs,  the  second 
presentation,  as  tenants  of  the  last  quarter  of  the 


*'  The  pinnacles  were  probably  added 
when  the  spire  was  built ;  their  plan  '  con- 
sists of  eight  alternate  rounds  and  hollows, 
the  top  is  a  composition  of  heads  and 
croclceted  canopies  and  is  crowned  by 
a  finial ' :  Chs.  Archd.  Northampi.  82. 

**  There  arc  four  orders  on  the  west  side, 
the  two  outer  dying  out. 

•*  y.C.II.  Norlhanls.  i.  401. 

••  '  For  upwards  of  twenty  years  the 
effigies  were  reposing  at  the  west  end  of 
the  church,  having  been  removed  from 
their  arch,  but  on  paving  the  north  aisle 
in  1845  they  were  placed  near  their  original 
situation  at  the  east  end  of  the  aisle'  (Cole, 
MS.  Hat.  oj  Woodford).  They  were  subse- 
quently replaced  under  the  arch. 

•'  The  inscription  reads  ;  *  Here  lyethe 
Sjrmon  Malory  the  elder  esquyer  who  dyed 


the  daye  of  in  the  yere  of  our  Lordc 
God  McccccLxxx  and  whos  soule  is  in 
the  greate  mercye  of  Jesus  Christ  our 
Savyor.' 

'**  It  contained  a  box  in  which  a  human 
heart  was  found  wrapped  in  a  piece  of 
cloth  :     Northampt.    N.    &■    Q.    1K84-5, 

P-  75- 

*"  The  treble  was  added  in  1913  to  a  ring 
of  five,  and  all  the  bells  rehung.  The  old 
second  (now  third)  was  by  Tobie  Norris 
1673.  The  inscriptions  on  the  old  bells  are 
given  in  North,  Cb.  Bells  of  Northann. 
450. 

•"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  NorthanH. 
321. 

"  De  Banco  R.  537,  m.  222;  Recov. 
R.  Hil.  19  Ja«.  I,  ro.  17  ;  Bacon,  Liber 
Regit,  p.  823. 

261 


"  V.C.H  Nortbants.  i,  311. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants,  Trin.  7  John. 
The  name  Tilly  in  the  fine  seems  an 
obvious  error  for  Trailly. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  267;  Bacon,  loc. 
cit. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  ;  Rot.  Rob.  Grosse- 
tesle  (Cant,  and  York  Soc),  pp.  203,  226  ; 
Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  1  Hen.  IV,  pt.  1,  no.  42. 

"'  Bridg's,  loc.  cit. 

"  Ibid. 

««  IbiJ 

'"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  19 
Jas.  I. 

«»  Ibid.  Hil.  34  Elli.  ;  W.  C.  Metcalfe, 
Viiit.  of  Nortbants.  pp.  25,  112. 

♦■  Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.)  1629,  1638, 
1648. 

*'  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  \  Bacon,  loc.  cit. 


A  HISTORY  OF    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


manor.'"  The  reversal  of  the  order  of  presentation 
by  the  two  Traillys  was  due  to  the  fact  that  Richard 
de  Trailly  was  to  make  the  first  presentation  and  in 
fact  had  already  done  so  in  1285.*'  This  arrangement 
is  recited  in  a  lawsuit  of  1 346  and  can  be  traced  in 
the  presentations  down  to  the  16th  century.**  The 
share  of  the  Bois  passed  with  their  manor  (q.v.)  to 
Lord  Vaux  of  Harrowden,  who  sold  it  in  1592  to 
Simon  Mallory,**  and  it  presumably  passed  with  the 
other  property  of  the  Mallorys  in  Woodford  to  Sir 
Rowland  St.  John,  who  first  presented  to  one  of  the 
medieties  of  the  church  in  1629.'"  Richard  de 
Trailly's  share  passed  with  his  manor  (q.v.)  to  the 
Thorleys,  and  William  Thorley  presented  in  1494,''* 
but  it  is  not  mentioned  amongst  his  possessions  at 
his  death  in  1515,'"  nor  in  subsequent  sales  of 
Thorley's  Manor.*"  Geoffrey  de  Trailly's  share  in  the 
mediety  of  the  church  also  followed  the  descent  of 
his  quarter  share  in  the  manor  (q.v.).  After  the  sub- 
division of  this  holding  on  the  death  of  Hugh  de  la 
Hay,  William  Rockingham  presented  in  1400,  William 
Farnham  and  John  Welles  in  1437,  Roger  Lenton  and 
John  Welles  in  1446,  VV'illiam  Aldwinkle  and  Roger 
Lenton  in  1455.**  In  none  of  the  later  conveyances 
of  Lenton's,  however,  is  any  share  of  the  advowson 
mentioned,*-  but  in  1562  Robert  Barley  sold  a  quarter 
of  a  quarter  of  the  mediety  of  the  advowson  to  Simon 
Mallory,*'  who  presumably  also  acquired  in  some  way 
the  remaining  shares  in  this  mediety  of  the  advowson. 
The  abbot  of  Peterborough  received,  in  the  13th 
century,  5  marks  a  year  from  the  rectory  of  Wood- 
ford.** After  the  dissolution  of  the  abbey,  this  portion 
was  granted  in  1 541  to  the  Dean  and  Chapter  of 
Peterborough.** 


The  Woodford  Charity  Estate, 
CHARITIES  administered  by  nine  trustees  in  con- 
formity with  the  provisions  of  a 
scheme  of  the  Charity  Commissioners  dated  12  July 
1896,  comprises  the  charity  of  Peter  Gray  (deed 
7  May  1577),  endowment  39  a.  3  r.  of  land  and  4 
cottages  and  barn  in  Woodford  and  a  sum  of 
^35  js.  lod.  Consols  with  the  Official  Trustees  of 
Charitable  Funds,  produced  by  the  sale  in  1916  of  a 
small  piece  of  land  known  as  the  Schoolmaster's 
Garden  and  the  charity  of  Susannah  Louisa  Baroness 
St.  John — will  proved  in  Prerogative  Court  29 
Nov.  1805— endowment  of  ^^129  os.  ild.  Consols 
with  the  Official  Trustees.  The  land  is  let  in  allot- 
ments, and  with  the  cottages  produced  £qo  8s.  \d. 
in  1924.  The  dividends  on  the  stock  amount  to 
£^  2s.  yearly.  The  income  is  applied  in  subscriptions 
to  hospitals  and  in  the  distribution  of  coal. 

Whaley's  Money.  A  rentcharge  or  customary 
payment  of  I3.r.  \d.  has  long  been  received  by 
the  churchwardens  out  of  land  and  distributed 
yearly  among  five  poor  widows.  This  charity  is 
ascribed  to  donations  by  persons  named  Wales  and 
Forscott. 

The  Church  Land  was  awarded  by  the  Com- 
missioners upon  inclosures  in  Woodford  and  Denford 
to  the  churchwardens  of  Woodford.  The  Denford 
inclosure  took  place  in  1766.  The  property  consists  of 
14  a.  3  r.  5  p.  of  land  in  Woodford  let  for  ^18  17/. 
yearly  and  3  r.  of  land  in  Denford  let  for  £2  yearly. 
The  Official  Trustees  hold  a  sum  of  £1,997  '5^-  '°'^- 
Consols  arising  from  investments  of  rents  and  royalties 
and  producing  ^^49  18/.  ?,d.  yearly.  The  income  is 
applied  towards  general  church  expenses. 


"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  14 
Edw.  I. 

**  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  ;  Feet  of  F.  North- 
ant«.  Trin.  14  Edw.  I. 

*'  De  Banco  R.  395,  m.  270  ;  Bridges, 
loc.  cit. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  34  Eliz. 

♦'  Instit.  Bks.  (P.R.O.). 


*'  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),  xxx,  1 17. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Trin.  9  Eliz.  ; 
East.  40  Eliz. ;  Mich.  2  Jas.  I ;  Mich.  1652. 

"  Bridges,  op.  cit.  268  (\Vm.  Bukyng- 
ham  is  given  probably  in  error  for  Wm. 
Rockingham.) 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii),xviii,95, 511; 


Feet  of  F.  North.-ints.  Hil.  12  Eliz. ;  Mich. 
25  &  26  Eliz.  ;  Hil.  16  Chas.  I  ;  Hil. 
1657. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Mich.  4  &  5 
Eliz. 

"  Cott.  MS.  Vesp.  E  xxii,  fol.  60  d ; 
Pope  Nub.  Tax  (Rcc.  Com.),  40. 

"  L.  andP.  Hen.  yill,xv\,g.  1226(10). 


262 


I 


I 

I 


.? 


>  4  -^  ^  ^  )  h- 


o 
O 


< 

X 

o 


BOROUGH    OF   HIGHAM   FERRERS 


Hecham  (xi  cent.)  ;  Hehham,  Hcicham,  Hckham 
(xii  cent.)  ;  Hcgham,  Hcighani,  Hetham,  Hecham 
Fereres,  Hegham  Ferrers,  Hcgham  Fcrrars  (xiii  cent.) ; 
Hecham  Ferres,  Higham  Ferres,  Hcgham  Fercrs, 
Higham  Ferrers  (xiv  cent.). 

The  parish  of  Higham  Ferrers  lies  between  Stan- 
wick  on  the  north,  Chelveston  cum  Caldecote  on 
the  east,  and  Rushdcn  on  the  south,  the  river  Nene 
separating  it  from  the  parish  of  Irthlingborough  on 
the  west.  It  has  an  area  of  1,945  ^cres,  696  of  which 
are  arable  land,  wheat,  barley,  beans  being  the  chief 
crops,  810  acres  of  permanent  grass  and  13  acres  of 
woods  and  plantations.  The  soil  is  mixed,  the  sub- 
soil for  the  most  part  Great  Oolite  with  streaks  of 
Cornbrash  on  the  east  and  I'pper  Lias  on  the 
west. 

The  parish  is  generally  200  ft.  above  the  ordnance 
datum,  rising  in  the  south-east  to  300  ft.  Open 
fields  called  '  The  Buscotts '  and  '  No  Man's  Leys ' 
were  inclosed  in  1800  and  other  waste  lands  in  1838.* 
In  1921  the  population  was  2,850. 

The  town  stands  on  rising  ground  on  the  main 
road  from  Bedford  to  Kettering ;  the  road  from 
Wellingborough  to  Kimbolton  crosses  it  here,  enter- 
ing at  the  south  end  of  the  town  and  leaving  at 
the  north  end,  in  order  to  bring  all  the  traffic 
through  the  market  place  to  pay  toll.  The  southern 
part  of  the  main  road  is  called  the  High  Street,  the 
middle  part  College  Street  and  northward  Station 
Road.  Running  parallel  to  this  road  on  the  west  side 
is  a  lane  called  Back  Lane.  The  church  is  in  the 
middle  of  the  town  on  the  east  side.  South-west  of 
it  is  the  Market  Place  or  Market  Stead,  around  which 
and  northward  of  it  are  the  more  important  buildings. 

The  late  13th-century  market  cross  in  the  Market 
Place  consists  of  a  stone  shaft  with  foliated  capital 
surmounted  by  a  modern  square  abacus  and  iron 
weather  vane.  The  shaft  is  octagonal  for  the  greater 
part  of  its  height,  but  becomes  circular  near  the  top  ; 
it  is  now  stayed  up  by  three  iron  struts,  which  also 
serve  as  supports  for  lamps,  and  the  base  consists  of  a 
conical  pile  of  masonry,  probably  formed  by  casing 
round  the  original  steps.  The  total  height  of  the 
cross  is  14  ft.  In  Bridges'  time  the  shaft  terminated 
in  a  small  stone  cube  carved  with  a  Crucifixion.* 

The  cross  in  the  churchyard,  known  in  1463  as 
'  the  VVardeyn  Cross,'  was  restored  in  1919  as  a  war 
memorial.  The  Stump  Cross  and  Spittle  Cross, 
which  once  marked  the  northern  and  southern 
boundaries  of  the  borough,  have  now  long  disappeared. 
The  town  hall,  a  small  plain  detached  building  of 
two  stories  in  the  Market  Square,  was  erected  in 
1808,  probably  on  the  site  of  the  Hall  of  the  Burgesses 
repaired  in  1395.** 


On  the  south  of  the  town  hall  and  adjoining  it, 
there  stood  in  the  17th  century  the  town  bakehouse 
where  leaseholders  of  the  manor  of  Higliam  Ferrers 
were  bound  to  bake  all  their  bread,  the  custom  of  the 
house  being  to  '  backe  ye  bread  well  for  Twoe 
pence  the  bushell.'*  The  old  manor  house  on  the 
east  of  the  market,  rebuilt  before  1838,  is  supposed 
to  have  been  the  dwelling  place  of  the  Rudd 
family.* 

A  few  old  stone  houses  remain  in  the  town  :  No.  5 
Market  Square,  with  two-story  muUioned  bay  win- 
dows and  four-centred  middle  doorway,  is  probably 
of  late  16th-century  date,  but  has  a  modern  eaved 
roof  in  the  place  of  former  gables.  Nos.  3  and  4 
Wood  Street,  south  of  the  church,  now  occupied  by 
the  Post  Office  and  a  coflee  tavern,  is  a  building 
apparently  of  17th-century  date,  on  the  front  of 
which  is  a  long  strapwork  plaster  panel ;  at  the 
north  end  of  the  town  is  a  modernised  block  of 
cottages  with  a  panel  inscribed  '  N.K.  Ano  1603,'  and 
another  building  at  North  End  is  dated  1728.  On 
the  east  side  of  College  Street  is  a  house  with  panel 
inscribed  't^E  '7°9>'  ^"'J  ^°5.  7  and  8  Market 
Square  is  a  well-designed  18th-century  stone  building 
of  two  stories  with  drafted  quoins,  cornice  and  slightly 
advanced  pedimented  centre. 

The  Bedehouse,  standing  on  the  south  side  of  and 
parallel  with  the  church,  at  a  distance  of  about 
28  yds.,  is  a  15th-century  structure  consisting  of  a 
hall  65  ft.  9  in.  long  by  24  ft.  wide  internally,  with  a 
chapel  18  ft.  6  in.  square  at  its  east  end.  The  build- 
ing, which  was  restored  in  1923,  is  faced  on  the  north 
and  west  sides  with  alternate  courses  of  light  free- 
stone and  red  ironstone,  but  on  the  south  and  east 
with  rubble,  and  the  hall  is  divided  into  six  bays  by 
buttresses  of  two  stages.  There  is  a  bell-cote  over 
the  west  gable  and  the  eaved  roof  is  covered  with 
modern  tiles.  The  hall  has  a  large  projecting  stone 
fireplace  in  the  middle  of  the  south  wall,  with  moulded 
four-centred  arch,  and  a  pointed  doorway  with 
crocketed  hood  at  the  west  end  ;  there  are  also  door- 
ways at  each  end  of  the  south  wall,  and  one  on  the 
north  side  in  the  third  bay  from  the  west.  Above 
the  west  doorway  is  a  large  window^  of  five  cinque- 
foiled  lights  with  slightly  ogee  head,  crocketed  label 
with  finial  andheadstops,  and  modern  vertical  tracery, 
and  in  the  north  and  south  walls  two  square-headed 
windows  of  two  cinquefoiled  lights  with  transoms 
and  pointed  rear  arches.  The  hall  was  formerly 
divided  by  screens  and  no  doubt  had  a  western 
vestibule  and  space  round  the  fire ;  it  contained 
thirteen  cubicles  arranged  round  the  walls,  the 
positions  of  which  are  indicated  by  lockers,  five  of 
which  in  the  north  wall  east  of  the  doorway,  long 


'  /leu,  Priv.  and  Lot.  40  Geo.  Ill, 
cap.  36  ;    I  Vict.  cap.  11. 

•  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Reft,  xxiii,  179. 

••  Hut.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  lii,  App.  ix, 
p.  551.  •  Pari.  Surr.  Northanti.  33. 


*  Colt,  Hisl.  of  Higham  Ferrtrl,  91-3. 

*  Some  ttained  glass  remained  in  the 
window  in  Bridges*  time — in  the  southern 
division  the  arms  of  the  see  of  Canterbury, 
in     the     middle     France    and     England 


263 


quarterly,  and  in  the  northern  division 
the  arms  of  Chichclcy.  Above  the  arms 
were  '  miniature  portraits  of  our  Saviour, 
the  Virgin,  and  leveral  bishops  mitred.'  : 
Hilt,  oj  Northanti.  ii,  178. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


filled  up  and  plastered  over,  have  been  opened  out 
and  restored.'  The  fine  open  timbered  roof  is  of 
six  bays  and  has  curved  moulded  principals  carried 
down  as  wall  pieces  and  resting  on  moulded  and 
battlemented  corbels  ;  the  wall  plate  is  also  battle- 
mented.  The  bell-cote  has  a  trefoiled  opening,  and 
canopied  niches  facing  north  and  south ;  it  contains 
a  bell  by  Thomas  Eayre,  of  Kettering,  1737.'  The 
chapel  is  divided  from  the  hall  by  a  pointed  arch 


on  the  soutli-west,^''  seems  to  be  in  part  contemporary 
with  it,  and  although  large  alterations  obscure  any 
real  evidence  of  date,  the  thick  walls  point  to  a  corrobo- 
ration of  this  idea.  A  room  at  the  north  end,  now  the 
study,  has  a  ceiling  with  good  moulded  oak  beams 
and  cornice  together  with  indications  of  a  large  open 
fireplace. 

About  18  ft.  west  uf  the  north-west  angle  of  the 
church   tower   stands   the  School  House,  a  beautiful 


HiGHAM   FrRHhRs:  The  Squark 


of  two  moulded  orders,  the  inner  on  half-round 
responds  with  battlemented  capitals,  and  by  a  modern 
wooden  screen.  The  floor  of  the  chapel  is  raised 
2  ft.'io  in.  above  that  of  the  hall,  to  allow  for  a  vaulted 
crvpt  or  bonc-house,access  to  which  was  by  an  external 
doorway  on  the  north  side.  The  chapel  was  for  long 
in  a  ruinous  condition,*  and  in  its  present  state  is 
largely  a  restoration.  The  cast  window  is  of  three 
lights  with  moulded  jambs  and  elaborate  modern 
tracery  ;  the  north  and  south  windows'  arc  of  two 
lights  with  vertical  tracery  and  ogee  crnckctcd  hood- 
moulds.  The  piscina  has  a  square  bowl  and  trefoiled 
head  with  crocketed  hoodmould. 
The  vicarage  house,  which  adjoins  the  Bcdchouse 


15th-century  structure.  It  is  of  three  bays  divided 
by  buttresses,  with  a  window  of  three  lights  in  each 
bay  and  one  of  five  lights  at  the  east  and  west  ends. 
The  cast  window  and  those  on  the  north  side  have 
long  been  blocked.  The  building,  which  measures 
internally  36  ft.  6  in.  by  16  ft.  6  in.,  is  faced  with 
ashlar,  and  has  a  moulded  plinth,  string  at  sill  level, 
and  pierced  battlemented  parapet  above  a  cornice 
ornamented  with  roses  and  other  flowers.  The 
buttresses,  which  at  the  angles  are  set  diagonally, 
are  of  three  stages  and  arc  carried  up  above  the  flat- 
pitched  leaded  roof  as  crocketed  pinnacles.  The 
windows  arc  all  four-ccntrod,  with  hoodmoulds  and 
cincjuefoilcd  lights,  those  at  the  east  and  west  having 


•  The  lockcri  arc  z  ft.  wide  by  .ibout 
3  ft.  high  and  itand  18  in.  above  the  floor. 
'  Cbuichti^  /Ircbd.  Noribamfit.  26. 
'  An  engraving  of  181 1  ihowi  it  tooflcii, 


the  e.iit  window  without  tracery  and  the 
•ill  broken.     It  wai  *  unroofed  and  quite 
ruinoui  '  in  1849  :   ibid.  27. 
•  In     Bridget'     time     *  the     imperfect 


264 


portrait!  of  »aint«  and  kings'  remained 
in  thcBe  windows  :   op.  cit.  ii,  178. 

*"  It«  north-east  anple  is  joined  to  the 
louth-weit  angle  of  the  Bedehouie. 


BOROUGH  OF   HICHAM   FERRERS 


vertical  tracery.     The  sills  are  about  8  ft.  above  the 
floor,  allowing  room  beneath  for  a  doorway  in  each 
of  the  end  bays  on  the  south  side.     The  easternmost 
doorway    has    a    continuous     moulded    four-centred 
head,  but  the  other  is  set  within  a  rectangular  frame 
with    carved    spandrels.     Below    the    west    window, 
which  is  more  elaborate  than  that  at  the  east,  are 
four  small  cinqucfoiled  openings, l*  originally  ligiiting 
a  vestibule  formed  by  a  screen  which  may  have  had  a 
gallery  above.     In  the  south  wall,  about  lo  ft.  from 
the  east  end,  is  a  newel  stair  leading  to  the  rood-loft, 
the  lower  and   upper  doorways  of  which   remain. ^^ 
The  original  flat-pitched  roof  is  of  three  bays  with 
moulded  principals,  each  bay  divided  into  eight  com- 
partments by  moulded  ribs.     There  are  remains  of 
colour  in  the  eastern  bay.  Covering 
the  south-west  doorway  inside  is  a 
small  oak  screen  dated  1636.    The 
floor   is    boarded    and    the    walls 
plastered.     Tlie    building  was  re- 
stored in  1914-15  and  is  now  used 
as    a    choir    vestry    and    practice 
room. 

The    remains    of     the    College 
buildings,  which    have   long  been 
in  a  ruinous  condition,*'  stand  in 
the  main  street,  now  called  College 
Street,  some  little  distance  north- 
west of  the  church.   The  buildings 
formed  a  closed  quadrangle  of  the 
usual    collegiate    type,    but    little 
remains  beyond  the  front   of    the 
gatehouse  in  the  east  range  facing 
the  street,   and  a  portion  of   the 
south  range,  still  roofed,  in  which      L_-""_r_"Z] 
the  chapel  was  situated;    the  other      13  151!!  CENTURY 
ranges    have    disappeared.*''     The 
buildings  were  of  two  stories,  faced 
with  rubble,  and  what  remains  is 
of  15th-century  date.     The  south 
range,  which  face*  on  to  a  narrow 
lane,  is  in  use  as  a  farm  house,  but  it  has  been  much 
altered  from  lime  to  time  and  many  of  its  architectural 
features  destroyed.**     It  has  an  eaved  roof  with  coped 
end  gables,  the  original  one  at  the  east  end  forming 
part  of  the  main  elevation  of  the  college  towards  the 
street,  in   the   same  plane  with  the  gatehouse.     In 
Bridges'  time  the  ruins  of  the  north  range  were  still 
visible,**  and    Buck's   view   (1729)    shows   the   walls 
standing  to  a  height  of  some  6  ft.  or  7  ft.  ;*'  it  also 
shows  the  east  front  extending  its  full  length  and 
considerable  remains  of  the  west  range,  which  appears 
to  have  contained  the  hall.**    The  quadrangle  was 
about  15  yds.  square,*'  and  was  entered  from  the  east 
through  a  moulded  four-centred  archway  still   stand- 
ing, with  square  label  and  quatrefoiled  circles  con- 
taining blank  shields  in  the   spandrels.     Above  the 


arch  are  three  tall  canopied  niches,  now  empty,  but 
which  probably  contained  statues  of  the  three  patron 
saints  of  the  college,  and  a  square-lieadcd  window  of 
three  cinqucfoiled  lights  with  moulded  jambs  and  label. 
The  canopies  of  the  niches  break  through  a  string 
at  sill-level,  now  carried  along  the  whole  elevation, 
but  originally  stopping  at  the  junction  of  the  east 
and  south  ranges.  The  outer  wall  of  the  east  range 
stands  its  full  height  and  contains  also  a  two-light 
square-headed  window'^"  in  the  upper  story,  and  a 
single-light  window  in  the  ground  floor.''*  The 
extent  of  the  existing  east  wall  north  of  the  south 
range  is  36  ft.,  and  the  whole  length  of  the  clevalioa 
to  College  Street  59  ft.  The  chapel  was  in  the  eastern 
portion  of  the  south  range  and  was  probably  about 


illj  Entrance 

II  ?■  ^-'ATEWAy 


IT 

1(3 


EiHl  Subsequent 
□  Modern 


Scale  of  Feet 
Plan  of  Hicham  Ferrers  College 

46  ft.  long,  with  a  width  of  17  ft.  6  in.,  entered  from 
the  quadrangle  at  the  north-west  through  a  pointed 
doorway  with  square  label,  which  still  exists.  It  was 
lighted  at  the  east  end  by  a  large  five-light  window 
now  blocked,  part  of  the  crockcted  hoodmould  of 
which,  with  its  linial,  still  remains  above  a  recon- 
structed two-light  window  afterwards  inserted  in  the 
gable.  Two  large  heads,  or  corbels,  which  flanked 
the  window  outside  are  still  in  their  original  positions, 
as  are  also  two  carved  image-brackets  inside.  The 
window  appears  to  have  been  about  12  ft.  wide  and 
its  sill  about  7  ft.  above  the  floor,  but  it  had  been 
blocked  before  Bridges'  time  and  a  large  fireplace  and 
chimney  built  in  front  of  it,  the  chapel  having  been 
converted  into  a  kitchen.^*  At  the  time  this  was 
done  the  east  end  of  the  south  range  assumed  its 


**  These  windows,  long  blocked,  have 
been  reopened  and  glazed,  with  wooden 
shutters  behind  the  glass. 

*'  The  doorways  arc  four-centred  with 
continuous  mouldings.  The  sill  of  the 
upper  doorway  is  8  ft.  above  the  floor. 

"They  were  so  described  by  Bridges 
at  the  beginning  of  the  fSth  century, 
when  the  building  was  an  inn  with  the 
sign  of  the  Saracen's  Head  :  Hiit. 
Noribanii.  ii,  17S. 

"  The  south  end  of  the  east  range,  as 


far  as  the  gateway,  is  shown  roofed  in 
Bucli's  drawing,  1729. 

"  It  was  restored  in  1914,  when  the 
west  wall  and  part  of  the  south  wall 
adjoining  were  rebuilt  and  the  thatched 
roof  replaced  by  one  of  Colleyweston 
slates.  The  south  range  originally  ex- 
tended further  westward. 

"  Op.  cit.  ii,  178. 

"  The  doorways  stood  their  full 
height. 

^*  The  drawing  shows  the  lower  part  of 


three  large  windows  high  above  the  ground 
in  the  west  wall.    "  Bridges,  op.  cit.  ii,  178. 

'°  Buck's  drawing  shows  a  corresponding 
two-light  window,  now  destroyed,  north 
of  the  entrance. 

■'  A  modern  lintel  doorway  has  been 
inserted  between  this  window  and  the 
entrance. 

"  Op.  cit.  ii,  178.  This  may  have 
been  done  in  the  17th  century.  "The  top 
of  the  chimney  was  removed  from  the 
apex  of  the  gable  in  1914. 


265 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


present  aspect,  the  gatehouse  stringcourse  being 
continued  to  the  angle  of  the  building.  The  north 
wall  of  the  chapel  has  been  so  much  repaired  that  the 
positions  of  any  windows  or  other  features  which  it 
may  have  contained  cannot  now  be  traced.  High  in 
the  south  wall  is  a  reconstructed  two-light  window, 
and  another  at  the  west  end  of  the  north  wall  beyond 
the  chapel,  with  two  single-light  windows  below  on 
the  ground  floor.  The  position  of  the  eastern  wall 
of  the  west  range  can  be  traced,  but  no  portion  of 
the  structure  itself  remains.^'  A  fragment  of  walling 
containing  a  15th-century  doorway  forms  the  inner 
dividing  wall  of  a  cow-shed  to  the  north-west  of  the 
college  buildings.^ 

The  names  of  Newland,  St.  Botolph's  Street  and 
Botolph  End  survived  from  the  14th  and  15th  cen- 
turies^ to  the  l8th,2*  and  the  town  records  of  1488 
mention  '  Le  Shoprowe,'^  where  more  than  160  years 
earlier  the  eight  butchers'  stalls,  valued  at  100;.  and  the 
eight  shops  leased  to  the  linen  merchants  for  48/., 
probably  stood.^*  Shops  and  stalls  situated  in  the 
market  place  of  Higham  Ferrers  were  leased  to  the 
mayor  by  Richard  III  in  1485,  when  the  King  under- 
took to  provide  flags  or  sedges  for  their  roofing  from 
his  meadow  called  '  le  Middell  Wroo.'^  The  ap- 
pointment of  an  examiner  of  leather  about  seventy 
years  later*'  shows  the  burgesses  already  engaged  in 
one  of  their  two  chief  trades  of  the  present  day,'i  the 
other  the  manufacture  of  boots  and  shoes,  well  estab- 
lished by  the  middle  of  the  last  century'^  and  now 
employing  a  still  larger  proportion  of  the  working 
population.^  In  the  reign  of  Elizabeth  a  meadow, 
known  as  the  Tradesmen's  or  Craftsmen's  meadow, 
was  let  by  the  reeve  of  the  manor  to  the  poor  crafts- 
men of  Higham  Ferrers  for  [j  8j.  dd.  a  year,^  a  rent 
which  before  the  middle  of  the  following  century  had 
been  increased  to  £zi.^ 

The  London  Midland  and  Scottish  Railway  has 
two  stations  in  the  parish,  one  in  the  town,  the 
terminus  of  the  Higham  Ferrers  branch,  the  other, 
called  Irthlingborough,  a  mile  to  the  north  on  the 
Northampton  and  Peterborough  branch. 

Amongst  the  many  other  place  names  of  the  town 
and  parish  which  have  vanished  from  present-day 
maps  are  Britwinescote  of  the  13th,  the  '  litill,' 
'  mydill '  and  '  grete  Wroo,'  '  Chapcllhyll,  '  Thwert- 
lond '  of  the  15th,  the  '  neastcs  pasture,' '  St.  Edeses- 
waie,'  '  Northbury  close  '  of  the  l6th,  '  Every  yearcs 
land,'  'Gunsticks,'  '  Hancrosse  field,'  '  Buric  close,' 
'  le  Gore  '  by  '  Skinners  close,'  '  Buscot,'^  '  Flcxland  ' 
of  the  17th  century,  whilst  '  W'armanshill  '  survives 
from  1649  as  Warmonds  Hill  in  the  south-west  of  the 
town. 

In  1556  the  men  of  Higham  Ferrers  were  especially 


commended  for  their  loyalty  displayed  in   the  late 
rebellion.^' 

Higham  Ferrers  has  gained  renown  as  the  birth- 
place Oi  Henry  Chicheley,  Archbishop  of  Canterbury 
from  1414  to  1443,  who  was  born  about  the  year 
1362^  and  probably  educated  at  the  grammar  school 
under   Henry    Barton.     Of   his    benefactions    to   his 


Chicheley.      Or    a 

cheveron    benveen    three 
citujfoils  guUs. 


RuDD.       Azure    a   lion 
argent  and  a  quarter  or. 


native  town  a  full  account  has  been  given  in  an 
earlier  volume  with  details  of  his  family^  which  was 
of  considerable  importance  in  the  parish  from  the  14th 
to  the  17th  century.''* 

Less  general  but  perhaps  more  personal  interest 
is  attached  to  the  best  known  member  of  another 
old  and  well-reputed  family  of  this  town,  Captain 
Thomas  Rudd,  a  distinguished  engineer  and  mathe- 
matician, whose  memorial  tablet  in  the  parish  church 
describes  him  as  the  sixth  of  that  name  by  descent 
since  his  ancestors  came  to  Higham  Ferrers  to  dwell.*^ 
It  was  perhaps  on  account  of  his  loyalty  to  Charles  I, 
whose  chief  engineer  he  became  in  i640,''2  that  his 
election  as  mayor  that  year  was  strongly  opposed  by 
some  of  his  fellow  burgesses'*'  and  in  the  days  of 
the  Commonwealth  he  was  sequestered  and  heavily 
fined.'*'  Later  in  the  17th  century  Bunyan  is  said 
to  have  been  accustomed  to  preach  in  a  small  Bap- 
tist chapel  afterwards  used  as  a  coal  house.**  The 
town  has  now  both  Baptist  and  Wesle)an  chapels. 
Higham  Ferrers  Castle  was  one  of  the 
CASTLE  baronial  castles  built  shortly  after  the 
Conquest,  probably  by  one  of  the  two 
Peverels.  Little  is  known  of  its  history  apart  from  its 
connexion  with  a  series  of  distinguished  owners 
whose  succession  followed  that  of  the  manor  (q.v.). 
It  is  referred  to  in  1298  and  1327**  as  the  capital 
messuage  and  passed  as  the  castle  in  the  grant  to 
Aylmer  de  \'alcnce  in  1322.*'  Payments  for  castle 
guard  were  made  as  late  as  1694.*'  It  stood  north 
of  the  parish  church.  Leland  describes  it  as  '  now 
of  late  clenc  fallen  and  taken  down,'*'  and  in  1610 
John  Norden  found  it  'altogether  ruinate.'*"  The  three 


'•  Buclc'i  view  ihowt  the  lower  part  of 
three  window*  in  what  wai  then  an 
incloiing  wall  on  thii  tide. 

•♦  Poiiibly  belonging  to  a  dovehouie 
ihown  in  Buck's  view  in  this  position. 

»//i«.   MSS.   Com.   Rfp.   xii,   App.    9, 

PP-  5T,33- 

•♦  Bridges,  loc.  cif. 
"  Ibid. 


••  Chan 

Inq 

p.m.   Edw. 

in,   file 

m.  24. 

••Misc. 

Bks. 

(Duchr 

of 

Lane.) 

(ol.  lood. 

«>  //«(. 

MSS. 

Com. 

loc. 

cit 

P-  534- 

"  Census  iryi 

. 

"V.C.II.  Norihanli.  a,  326. 
•'  Census  1921. 

"  Pari.  Surv.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  55. 
"  Ibid.  54.     P.Trl.  Surv.  Norlhants.  33. 
'•  '  The  BuBcotts  '  was  one  of  the  open 
fields  of  Higham  I*"crrers  inclosed  in  1800. 
•'  Pat.  R.  2  and  3  Phil,  and  M.  pt.  8,  m. 

17- 

'•  Dean  Hook,  L$vet  of  the  Archbishops 
of  Canterbury,  i,  129. 

"  y.C.H.  Northanls.  ii,  177-79,  218-19. 

"  Ihst.   MSS.    Com.   Rep.   xii,   App.   9, 

PP-  53'>-3'  i  P"'-  R-  *  ""d  3  ''•''I-  '"J  M. 
pt.  8,  m.  27 ;  Northanls.  N.  and  Q. 
i,  142. 

266 


"  Cole,  Hist,  of  Higham  Ferrers, 
58-60  i  D.  N.  B. 

"  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1640-41,  pp.  Ii6, 
329. 

"  S.  P.  Dom.  Chas.  I,  ccccUx,  38. 

"  Cal.  Com.  for  Comp.  i,  88  j    ii,  1534, 

"  Cole,  op.  cit.  94. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  I,  file  81  ; 
Edw.  Ill,  file  6,  m.  24. 

"  Pat.  R.  k;  Edw.  II,  pt.  2,  m.  23. 

"  Ibid.  7  Will,  and  M.  pt.  3,  m.  2. 

*•  /(in.  V,  94. 

'"  A  Delineation  of  Norihamplonshiri  : 
'  the  foundations  and  ruyns  doe  declare 
that  it  halh  bin  a  place  of  some  accompt.' 


IIiGHAM  Fkrrlks  :    The  Bedi;  House 


Hicham  Ferrers  :    The  College 


BOROUGH  OF  HICHAM   FERRERS 


wards  covered  practically  the  whole  of  the  area  lying 
between  the  church  and  tiie  Kimbolton  road,^*  the 
site  measuring  about  380  yards  from  north  to  south, 
and  in  breadth  varying  from  180  yards  at  the  north 
end  to  140  yards  near  the  church.  On  the  east  it  was 
bounded  by  the  Bury  Close.  The  early  castle  stood  at 
the  north  end  of  this  area,  but  no  trace  of  a  motte  or  its 
defending  ditch  having  been  found,  it  has  been  sur- 
mised that  the  llth  century  stronghold  was  of  the 
'  keep-and-bailev  '  type.'-  Two  arms  of  the  ditch  and 
the  corresponding  ramparts  still  remain,  the  eastern 
arm  in  its  entirety,  about  485  feet  long,  and  the 
southern  arm  in  part,'*  but  of  the  keep  or  other  build- 
ings nothing  has  survived.  There  is  reason  to  believe 
that  the  buildings  mentioned  in  the  bailiff's  account 
of  1313-14  and  in  later  manorial  accounts  of  the 
same  century,  were  at  the  south  end  of  the  sitc,'^  but 
the  location  of  the  various  places  named  cannot  be 
determined.  There  is  occasional  mention  of  the  draw- 
bridge, and  the  House  of  the  Drawbridge  is  also 
referred  to.**  There  were  two  outer  gates,  that  on  the 
west  known  also  as  the  Town  gate,  and  that  on  the  cast 
as  the  Field  gate.  There  is  also  mention  of  the  Middle 
gate,  the  Great  gate  under  the  Lord's  Chamber,  and 
the  small  postern  gate  near  the  churchyard.  The 
chapel  is  referred  to  in  1375,"  and  early  in  the  ne.xt 
century  its  roof  was  releaded  and  the  floor  repaired. 
Extensive  repairs  of  the  buildings  were  going  on  from 
1429  to  1432,  when  the  '  turret  at  the  north  end  of 
the  chapel '  is  mentioned."  One  of  the  chapel 
windows  contained  the  king's  and  queen's  arms  and 
an  image  of  St.  Edmund.**  The  Great  Hall  was 
destroyed  by  fire  in  1409-10,  but  was  rebuilt  a  year 
or  two  later."  In  143 1  the  stairs  from  the  door  of  the 
Hall  to  the  chapel  were  repaired,  and  in  1433  the  Town 
gate  was  partly  rebuilt.  The  Lord's  Chamber,  '  Lady 
Philippa's  Chamber,'  the  Young  Lord's  Chamber,*" 
and  several  other  places  are  named  in  1376,  and  in  a 
later  account  '  Lord  Derby's  Chamber.'*'  There  are 
also  frequent  references  to  the  knights'  chamber, 
the  friars'  chamber,  the  steward's,  receiver's,  and 
auditor's  chambers,  tlie  treasury  chamber,'^  and  the 
kitchen,  larder,  buttery,  pantry  and  other  offices.*'  In 
1462-3  the  kitchen  was  re-roofed  and  partly  rebuilt. 
Other  references  are  to  the  stables,**  the  great  barn, 
the  granary,  the  hay-house,  ox-house,  cattle-sheds, 
sheep-house,  and  kiln-house.*'  During  the  last  decade 
of  the  15th  century  and  the  early  years  of  the  l6th,  the 
castle  buildings  suffered  from  neglect  and  were  de- 


scribed as  'all  rased  and  in  great  ruin  and  decay' 
in  1523,  when  Sir  Richard  W'ingfield  was  licensed  by 
the  King  to  take  down  and  carry  away  as  much  stone 
from  the  site  as  he  thought  sufficient  for  the  re- 
building of  the  castle  of  Kimbolton.**  In  1591  it  was 
reported  that  the  manor-house,  long  since  in  decay, 
had  been  in  ancient  times  a  castle  standing  in  a  place 
called  the  Castle  Yard.*'  This  appears  to  have  been 
the  capital  messuage  or  manor  place  commonly  called 
the  Castle  Yard  which  the  Parliamentary  Commis- 
sioners found  in  the  tenure  of  Thomas  Rudd  in 
1649.** 

In  the  garden  of  the  Green  Dragon  Inn,  formerly 
within  the  area  of  the  outer  ward  of  the  castle,  are  the 
remains  of  a  rectangular  dove-house.*' 

The  Lordship  of  Higham  existed 
LORDSHIP  as  a  territorial  entity  before  the  Con- 
quest. We  learn  from  the  Domesday 
Survey  (1086)  that  Gitda  had  held  the  manor  and  its 
appendages  in  1066.  Possibly  at  one  time  the  whole 
hundred  belonged  to  Gitda's  predecessors  in  title,  but 
in  1086  William  Pevcrel  held  in  Higham  Ferrers 
6  hides  and  as  members  of  the  manor  he  had  in 
Rushden  6  hides,  in  Chelveston  and  Caldecote  I  hide 
and  3  virgates,  in  Knuston  I  hide  and  ij  virgate,  in 
Irchester  I  hide  and  3  virgates  of  soke  [land],  in 
Farndish  3  virgates  of  soke  [land],  in  Poddington  (co. 
Beds.)  i  hide  of  soke  [land],  in  Easton  Mauduit  ij- 
virgate  and  in  Raunds  7J  hides  and  J  virgate  of  soke 
[land].'"  There  were  also  in  Bozeat  ij  virgate  and 
in  Hargrave  J  hide,  the  soke  of  which  belonged  to 
Higham  Ferrers.'*  Fractions  of  knights'  fees  were 
held  of  the  manor  of  Higham  Ferrers  in  the  following 
places:  Bozeat,  Irchester,  Raunds,  Blisworth,  Rush- 
den, Quinton,  Denton,  Ditchford,  Caldecote  and 
Chelveston,  Ringstead,  Stanwick,  Chester  near 
Irchester,  Hargrave,  and  Farndish.'* 

Higham  Ferrers  was  held  in  the  time 
MANOR  of  Edward  the  Confessor  by  Gitda  or 
Githa,  whom  Mr.  Round  has  identified 
as  the  wife  of  Earl  Ralf  of  Hereford,  a  nephew  of 
Edward  the  Confessor.  It  passed  after  the  Conquest 
to  William  Peverel,"  said,  but  with  little  authority, 
to  have  been  an  illegitimate  son  of  the  Conqueror.  He 
was  a  baron  of  the  Cotentin  and  a  famous  general  and 
trusted  minister  of  King  William.  In  1086  Peverel 
had  in  Higham  Ferrers  6  hides,  whereof  two  were  in 
demesne,  a  market,  a  mill  and  a  considerable  quantity 
of  woodland.    There  was  then  a  priest,  indicative  of  a 


"  Rev.  W.  J.  B.  Kerr,  Higbam  Ferren 
and  III  Ducal  and  Royal  Caslle  and  Park 
(1925),  100. 

"Ibid.  102.  Mr.  Kerr  wa>  of  opinion 
that  the  lile  of  the  keep  was  where  there 
ii  now  '  a  deep  annular  depretsion,' 
about  60  ft.  in  diameter,  the  appearance 
of  which  luggeitcd  to  him  that  it  was 
'  caused  by  the  removal  of  the  foundations 
of  a  massive  round  tower  '  :   ibid.  115. 

"  Ibid.  102.  A  length  of  about  340  ft. 
remains  open  :  the  original  length  cannot 
have  been  more  than  420  ft.  The  width 
of  the  east  arm  at  mean  w-inter  water 
level  is  about  42  ft.,  and  at  the  surface 
level  of  the  counterscarp  72  ft.  The 
height  of  the  rampart  above  the  natural 
surface  level  does  not  exceed  10  ft.,  but 
it  has  been  flattened  out  into  a  broad 
terrace  or  platform. 

"  Ibid.  103. 

•'  '  The   new  tower  beside  the  draw- 


bridge '  is  mentioned  in  an  early  account 
of  the  reign  of  Edward  IV  :   ibid.  104. 

*•  The  windows,  which  had  been  broken 
by  a  great  wind,  were  then  repaired  : 
ibid.  107. 

"  Ibid.  108. 

"  Ibid. 

"  The  auditor's  accounts  show  that 
a  sum  of  ,^204  IIS.  3d.  was  expended  on 
the  rebuilding  of  the  Hall  in  1410,  ,^56 
in  141 1,  and  ^65  15*.  \d.  in  1412.  A  stone 
tower  was  erected  over  the  great  gate 
of  the  Hall  :  ibid.  108-9 ;  ^a/.  Pat. 
1408-13,  p.  108. 

•°  After  the  passing  of  the  Duchy  of 
Lancaster  to  the  Crown  the  Lord's 
Great  Chamber  and  the  Lady's  Chamber 
became  respectively  the  King's  and 
Queen's  Chambers  :   ibid.  III. 

•'  Ibid.  no. 

"  Probably  identical  with  the  '  checour- 
hous '  mentioned  in  1416  :   ibid.  112. 


"  Scullery,  sauccry,  chaunderye,  ewery, 
cellar,  wine-cellar,  storehouse,  and  bake- 
house :   ibid.  112. 

"  The  steed  stable,  the  long  stable 
beside  the  east  gate,  the  long  stable  near 
the  town,  the  steward's  stable,  the 
receiver's  stable,  the  auditor's  stable,  and 
the  friars'  stable:   ibid.  118. 

"Ibid.  119. 

"  Ibid.  122  ;  Duchy  of  Lane.  Misc. 
Bks.  22,  fol.  62b. 

•'  Ibid.  117,  fol.  190. 

•'  Pari.  Surv.  Northants.  no.  32. 

••  Alloc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep!,  xxxiii,  369. 
The  internal  dimensions  are  36  ft.  by 
16  ft.  10  in.  :  the  west  and  two  end  walls 
stand  about  1 1  ft.  high. 

'•  y.C.H.  Northanti.  i,  336-7. 

"  Ibid.  338. 

"  See  Farrer,  Honors  and  Knigbis'  Fees, 
i,  201-6. 

'»  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  289,  336A. 


267 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


church.''*  William  Peverel  died  in  1114'^  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  William,  who  was  a  strong  sup- 
porter of  King  Stephen.  He  was  taken  prisoner  at 
the  Battle  of  Lincoln  in  1 141,  when  his  lands  were 
forfeited  but  were  restored  to  him  in  1 143.  In  1 153 
Henry  Fitz  Empress  granted  to  Ranulf  Earl  of  Chester, 
on  condition  of  his  support,  great  possessions,  in- 
cluding aU  the  fee  of  William  Peverel,  except 
Higham."  The  grant  never  took  effect,  but  some 
nine  months  later  Ranulf  Earl  of  Chester  died,  poi- 
soned, it  is  said,  by  WiUiam  Peverel.  On  the  accession 
of  Henry  to  the  throne  as  Henry  H,  Peverel,  to  avoid 
punishment,  became  a  monk,  probably  at  Lenton 
(co.  Notts.).  His  lands  were  seized  by  Henry  H  in 
1 155"  and  Higham  Ferrers  was  for  a  year  and  a  half 
farmed  by  Froger,  archdeacon  of  Derby.'*  In  1157  it 
was  granted,  probably  for  life,  to  Robert  de  Ferrers, 
second  Earl  of  Derby,  who  had  married  Margaret, 
daughter  and  heir  of  William  Peverel,  her  brother 
Henry  being  then  apparently  dead.'^  After  the 
death  of  Robert  in  or  about  1159,  Higham  Ferrers 
was  granted  in  1 161  to  WiUiam,  the  King's  brother, 
who  died  in  1164.**  The  manor  remained  in  the 
King's  hands  until  1 189,  when  King  Richard  I 
granted  it  to  his  brother,  John  Count  of  Mortain.^i 
John  farmed  it  to  William  de  Sancte  Marie 
Ecclesia,*-  later  Bishop  of  London,*'  and  after- 
wards to  WiUiam  Briwerre.**  In  1199  WiUiam  de 
Ferrers,  fourth  Earl  of  Derby,  son  of  WiUiam 
and  grandson  of  Robert,  second  Earl  of  Derby, 
purchased  for  2,000  marks  from  King  John  the 
manor,  hundred  and  park  of  Higham  Ferrers  and  cer- 
tain other  lands,  at  the  same  time  relinquishing  what 
claim  he  had  through  his  grandmother,  Margaret 
Peverel,  to  the  other  lands  of  WiUiam  Peverel.** 
William  de  Ferrers  died  in  1247  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son  William  fifth  Earl  of  Derby.  As  a  favourite 
at  the  Court  of  Henry  III  he  received  many  grants 
of  privileges,  including  the  right  to  free  warren  in 
Higham  Ferrers  in  124S,  a  yearly  fair  in  1250  and  the 
erection  of  a  borough  in  1251.** 

He  died  in  1254  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
Robert  sixth  Earl  of  Derby,  then  under  age  and  in  the 
custody  of  Edward,  the  King's  son.  He  came  of  age 
in  1260,  when  he  joined  the  Baronial  party.  In  1264 
he  was  sent  to  the  Tower  and  his  lands  were  seized  by 
the  King,  but  in  the  following  year  he  was  pardoned 
on  paying  a  heavy  fine.  A  few  months  later,  how- 
ever, he  again  joined  the  rebel  forces  and  was  taken 
prisoner  at  Chesterfield  in  1266  and  his  lands  were 
a  second  time  taken  into  the  King's  hands.*'  In 
the  same  year  Henry  III  granted  all  the  Earl's  pos- 
sessions to  his  son,  Edmund  Earl  of  Chester,  who 
was  created  Earl  of  Lancaster  in  the  following  year.** 
Under  the  Dictum  of  Kenilworth  Robert  de  Ferrers 


could  redeem  his  lands  on  payment  of  seven  years'  pur- 
chase, and  he  evidently  made  an  attempt  to  regain 
them,  for  in  1269  Edmund  was  ordered  to  restore 
them.*'  An  .igreement  was  reached  whereby  Edmund 
and  his  heirs  were  to  hold  the  estates  until  Robert 
should  pay  the  sum  of  ^^50,000  for  their  redemption.'*' 
Although  Robert  and  his  son  John  de  Ferrers  made 
several  attempts  to  obtain  possession  of  their  patri- 
mony they  never  succeeded. 

Edmund  Earl  of  Lancaster  died  seised  of  Higham 
Ferrers  in  1296.*!  His  son  and  heir  Thomas  Earl  of 
Lancaster,  being  taken  prisoner  at  the  Battle  of 
Boroughbridge,  was  beheaded  in  1322  when  his  lands 


mm 


\A7T7 


Ferrers,     fairy  or  and 
gules. 


Lancaster.        Enghiiid 
with  a  label  of  France. 


were  seized  by  tlie  Crown.*^  Higham  Ferrers  was  then 
granted  to  Aylmer  de  Valence  Earl  of  Pembroke'* 
who  died  in  1324'''  and  his  widow,  Mary  de  St.  Pol, 
exchanged  her  rights  here  for  other  lands.'*  On  the 
accession  of  Edward  III  in  1327  Henry,  brother  and 
heir  of  Thomas  Earl  of  Lancaster,  was  restored  and 
was  succeeded  in  1 345  by  his  son  Henry  who  was 
created  Duke  of  Lancaster  in  1 35 1.  He  died  on  24 
March,  1360-1,  leaving  two  daughters,  Maud,  the 
elder,  who  married  firstly,  Ralf  Earl  of  Stafford,  and 
secondly,  William  Duke  of  Bavaria,  but  died  child- 
less in  1362  ;  Blanche,  the  younger  daughter,  at  the 
age  of  eleven  became  the  first  wife  of  John  of  Gaunt 
son  of  Edward  III.  The  manor  of  Higham  Ferrers 
seems  to  have  been  settled  on  Blanche,"  who  at  her 
sister's  death  became  sole  heir  to  her  father's  great 
estates.  In  1362  John  of  Gaunt  was  created  Duke  of 
Lancaster.  Blanche  died  in  1369  and  John  in  1399 
when  he  was  succeeded  by  their  son  Henry  of  Boling- 
broke  who  later  in  that  year  ascended  the  throne  as 
Henry  IV  when  the  lands  of  the  Duchy  of  Lan- 
caster, including  Higham  Ferrers,  merged  in  the 
Crown.  Higham  Ferrers  is  still  part  of  the  Duchy  of 
Lancaster,"  although  it  was  included  in  the  jointures 
of  the  Queens  Consort  of  Edward  IV,  Charles  I, 
Charles  II  and  James  II.'* 

Lands  in  Higham  Ferrers  forfeited  to  the  Crown 
on  the  attainder  of  Francis  Lord  Lovel  of  Tichmersh, 
after    the    battle   of    Bosworth    were    granted    by 


"  y.C.H.  Nortbanti.  i,  336A. 

'*  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iv,  762. 

'*  Cott.  Chart,  xvii,  2. 

"  Ibid. 

'•  Hunter,  Great  Roll  of  the  Pipe 
(Rec.  Com.),  42 ;  Red  Ull.  of  Excheq. 
(Rolli  Scr.)ii,  681. 

'•  Complete  Peerage^  loc.  clt. 

'°  Farrcr,  op.  cit.  i,  203. 

"  Hunter,  Great  Roll  of  the  Pipe 
(Rec.  Com.),  p.  97. 

••  Fjrrcr,  loc.  cit. 

•■  D.  N.  B. 

"  Farrer,  loc.  cit. 


"  Fine  R.  i  John,  m.  23  ;  Hardy, 
Rot.  de  Oblal.  et  Fm.  p.  3  ;  Pipe  R. 
I  John,  m.  2d. 

"•  Cal.    Chart.    1226-57,   pp.   332,    350, 

"  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  iv,  198, 
203. 

"'  Cal.  Pat.  1266-72,  p.  22,  127. 

"  Ibid.  p.  336. 

•°  Coram  Rcge  R.  Mich.  2  and  3  Edw.  I, 
m.  6.  Tiic  Countcia  of  Derby  »ccnii  to 
have  held  Higham  in  1275,  probably  ai 
dower  ;    Rot.  Hund.  (Rec.  Com.)  il,  4,  10. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  I,  iii,  no.  423. 

268 


"  Abhrev.  Rot.  Orii>.  i,  264  j  Cal. 
Fine  R.  iii,  105. 

"  Cal.  Pat.  1321-4,  pp.  87,  113. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  vi,  no.  518. 

"■Cal.  Pal.  1327-30,  p.  37;  1334-8, 
p.  250;  1338-40,  p.  242;  Cal.  Clou, 
1327-30,  p.  109. 

w  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Coi.  V.:iU.  35  Edw.  Ill, 
no.  78  j  Ca/. /'<«.  1361-4,  p.  118. 

•'  /hti  Priv.  and  I.or.  1  Vict.  cap.  II. 

•"  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Co«.  Trin.  15  Edw.  IV, 
no.  102,  ;  I'at.  R.  5  Chas.  I,  pt.  15,  no.  6j 
24  Cha>.  II,  pt.  9,  no.  I  ;  I  Jaa.  II,  pt.  17, 
no.  I. 


BOROUGH  OF   HIGHAM   FERRERS 


Henry  VII  to  Sir  Charles  Somerset,  afterwards  Lord 
Herbert  and  Earl  of  Worcester,"*  in  i486,'  and  in- 
cluded by  him  in  a  settlement  of  ISH-'*  Ten  years 
later  he  left  them  to  his  son  George'  who  in  1553 
joined  liis  grandson  William  third  Earl  of  Worcester 
in  obtaining  licence  to  alienate  them  to  Gilbert 
Pykering  and  others.'' 

A  payment  of  one  mark  to   F.lias   the    doorkeeper 
for  the  carriage  of  summonses  in  the  years  1166-67 


AAAA 
AATLA 

a/wi 

Vuny 


LovEL  of  Tichmersh. 
Barry  tvavy  or  and 
gtdes. 


S  o  M  I  R  s  E  T.  France 
quartered  zutth  England 
i«  a  border  goboiiy  argrnt 
and  azure. 


and  1169-70*  had  developed  at  the  close  of  the  cen- 
tury into  the  serjeanty  of  Ascelin  and  Andrew  of 
Higham  who  then  held  three  virgates  of  land,  valued 
at  lis.,  for  the  service  of  carrying  the  writs  of  the 
honour  of  Higham.  In  1235-36  their  successor 
Nicholas  the  Serjeant  collected  scutage  from  the  fee 
of  Earl  Ferrers  in  Northamptonshire.'  Four  acres 
'in  every  yeareland  called  Serjeants  peece,'  which 
belonged  to  the  manor  of  Higham  in  1 691  were 
probably  once  part  of  this  fee.' 

The  land  in  Higham  Ferrers  which  formed  part  of 
the  endowment  of  the  college'  was  included  in  the 
grant  of  the  advowson  (q.v.)  to  Robert  Dacres  but 
the  college  house  itself  remained  in  the  Crown  until 
1564  when  Elizabeth  granted  to  John  Smith  and 
FJchard  Dufiield  the  site  of  the  college  with  all 
buildings,  etc.,  within  the  site  and  the  orchard  or 
close  called  SafTron  Yard  containing  2\  acres.  The 
bells  and  all  lead  of  the  gutters  and  windows  were 
reserved  to  the  Queen.' 

A  mill,  rendering  las.  on  William  Peverel's  manor 
in  1086,*"  was  possibly  the  mill  of  Dichford,  for 
which  as  the  third  of  a  knight's  fee  scutage  was  paid 
in  1235-36I'  and  was  on  the  site  of  the  mill  in  which 
Simon  de  Cotes  held  the  twenty-fifth  part  of  a  knight's 
fee  of  Prince  Edmund,'^  who  at  his  death  in  1298 
was  seised  of  three  watermills  in  Higham  Ferrers.'' 
The  mill  or  mills  of  Dichford  and  the  '  mill  by  Higham  ' 
of  the  14th  and  15th  centuries"  had  been  replaced 
before  1505  by  three  watermills  under  one  roof 
called  Dichford  mills  and  three  others  also    under 


one  roof  called  Higham  mills.'"'  The  '  Higham  and 
Dichford  mills '  were  an  appurtenance  of  the  royal 
manor  of  Higham  Ferrers  when  it  was  settled  in 
trust  for  the  Queen  in  1672.'° 

A  fishery  which  belonged  to  the  three  watermills  of 
1298  was  called  thirty  years  later  a  fishery  in  the 
Nene.  In  the  reign  of  Charles  I  the  fishing  of  Stan- 
wick  Mcer  in  the  None  was  one  of  the  appurtenances 
of  the  manor."  Free  warren,  granted  to  William 
de  Ferrers  in  1248"*  and  enjoyed  by  his  successors," 
was  amongst  the  libenies  for  which  Henry  Earl  of 
Lancaster  was  called  upon  to  produce  his  warrant 
in  1329.  At  the  same  time  he  had  to  make  good  his 
claim  to  use  gallows,  pillory  and  tumbrel  and  hold 
the  assize  of  bread  and  ale  as  his  predecessors  had 
done.-" 

Courts,  leet  and  baron,  pleas  and  perquisites  of 
court  and  view  of  frank-pledge  are  amongst  the 
appurtenances  of  the  manor  of  Higham  Ferrers 
recorded  from  the  13th  to  the  latter  part  of  the  17th 
century.-' 

As  early  as  1086  Higham  was  an 
BOROUGH  important  town  with  its  market 
valued  at  20/.  a  year.'^^  It  thus  re- 
mained until  the  middle  of  the  13th  century,  when 
William  de  Ferrers  fifth  Earl  of  Derby  took  an 
interest  in  developing  its  prosperity.  We  are  told 
that  when  crossing  St.  Neots  Bridge  he  had  a  fall 
from  his  litter  in  which  he  usually  travelled,  being  a 
sufferer  from  gout.-'  It  may  be  possible  that  he  was  on 
his  way  to  or  from  Higham  Ferrers,  where  he  seems 
to  have  resided  occasionally,  and  in  which  he  had  a 
special  interest.  In  1248  he  acquired  the  right  of 
free  warren  over  his  lands  there,  and  in  1250  he  ob- 
tained a  grant  of  a  fair  there  on  the  vigil,  day  and 
morrow  of  the  feast  of  St.  Botolph  (17  June).^^  On 
the  feast  of  St.  Gregory  (12  March)  1251  the  earl 
manumitted  92  of  his  villein  tenants  of  Higham 
Ferrers^^  and  enfranchised  their  offspring  {sequeles) 
lands,  tenements  and  chattels,  granting  that  their 
lands  in  future  should  be  held  in  free  burgage.^* 
Thus  Higham  became  a  free  borough.  This  charter, 
which  was  confirmed  by  Henry  HI  in  the  same  year, 
is  interesting  and  unusual  in  giving  the  names  of 
those  who  became  the  first  burgesses  and  were  pro- 
moted from  a  servile  status  to  the  freedom  of  bur- 
gesses. 

This  charter  had  disappeared  from  the  borough 
archives  when  in  1556  Philip  and  Mary  bestowed 
another  on  the  town,  and  in  their  preamble  spoke  of 
its  loss  through  lack  of  safe  custody  or  by  ill  chance. 
All  former  liberties  were  confirmed  and  Higham 
Ferrers  was  declared  a  free  borough  which  with 
mayor,  seven  aldermen  and  thirteen  chief  burgesses 


••  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.),  viii,  200. 
'  Cat.  Pal.  1485-1494,  p.  100. 

•  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  East.  5  Hen.  VIII, 
no.  4. 

•  Coll.  Top.  et  Gen.  v,  305. 

•  Pat.  R.  7  Edw.  VI,  pt.  6,  mm.  8,  9  ; 
Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mich,  i  Mary ; 
Recov.  R.  Trin.  7  Edw.  VI,  ro.  516. 
In  the  two  latter  documents  these  lands 
are  called  a  manor. 

^  Ptpe  Roll,  13  Hen.  II,  p.  114;  15 
Hen.  II,  p.  73  (Pipe  R.  Soc). 

•  Book  of  Fees,  i,  9,  495. 
'  Add.  Chart.  13593. 

•  V.C.H.  Nertbanu.  ii,  177-179. 


»P.it.  R.  6  Ellz.  pt.  7,  no.  II. 

'»  y.C.n.  Northann.  i,  336A. 

"  Ilk.  oj  Fees,  i,  495. 

**  Feud.  Aids,  iv,  14. 

"  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  I,  file  81. 

'«  Ct.  R.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  bdle.  10;, 
no.  1496,  m.  6;  Pat.  R.  3  Hen.  V, 
pt.  2,  m.  36. 

"Misc.    Bks.    (Duchy    of    Lane.)    21, 

fol.    157. 

'«  Pat.  R.  24  Chas.  II,  pt.  9. 
"  Rent,   and    Surv.    (Duchy   of   Lane.) 
bdlc.  8,  no.  4. 

"  Cat.  Chart.  1226-1257,  p.  332. 
"  Pat.  R.  31  Chas.  II,  pt.  3,  no.  13. 

269 


'»  Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.), 
580. 

"  Cal.  Inq.  Edw.  I,  iii,  no.  423 ; 
Plac.  de  Quo  Warr.  (Rec.  Com.)  580 ; 
Pari.  Surv.  Northants.  5  ;  Pat.  R. 
31  Chas.  II,  pt.  3,  no.  13  ;  7  Will,  and  M. 
pt.  3,  no.  2. 

"  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  337. 

"  Matth.  Paris,  Chron.  Mag.  (Rolls 
Ser.)  V,  431-2. 

"  Cal.  Chart.  1226-1257,  pp.  332,  350. 

'^  That  they  were  of  servile  tenure  is 
shown  by  the  use  of  the  word  sequeles, 
which  is  not  used  in  the  case  of  freemen, 

"  Chart.  R.  36  lien.  Ill,  m.  25. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


was  to  form  a  body  corporate  and  politic  for  ever. 
The  corporation  thus  constituted  was  empowered 
to  plead  and  be  impleaded,  make  statutes  and  ordi- 
nances, use  their  own  seal  and  make  perambulations 
in  the  borough  of  which  the  boundaries  already 
existing  were  confirmed.  Regulations  for  the  elec- 
tion of  the  mayor  and  his  associates  were  followed  by 
nomination  of  the  first  body  of  these  officers  under 
this  charter.  By  the  grant  of  markets  and  fairs  with 
their  profits  and  court  of  pie-powder,  the  sovereigns 
relinquished  ancient  appurtenances  of  the  manor,  as 
probably  they  also  did  by  the  establishment  of  a 
court   of  record  for   pleas  within  the  borough   not 


Seal  of  the 
Borough  of  Higham  Ferrers. 

A  device  of  a  hand  stretched  horizon- 
tally   in  blessing   above    nine   human 
beads  all  looking  inwards. 


exceeding  ^5,  to  be  held  every  Monday  in  a  common 
hall,  and  by  giving  '  lawedaies  '  and  view  of  frank- 
pledge. The  nomination  of  the  chaplain,  school- 
master and  beadsmen  of  the  college  of  Higham 
Ferrers  was  now  transferred  from  the  Crown  to  the 
corporation.^ 

A  fresh  charter  granted  by  James  I  in  1604  em- 
powered every  mayor  of  Higham  Ferrers  for  the  time 
being  to  be  justice  of  the  peace  and  also  justice  for 
the  preservation  of  the  statutes  of  artificers  and 
labourers,  and  weights  and  measures,  and  freed 
mayor,  aldermen  and  burgesses  from  service  on  assize, 
jury  or  inquisition  whilst  resident  in  the  borough. 
They  were  besides  to  have  return  of  assizes  and  all 
other  royal  writs  and  no  sheriff,  bailiff  or  other  foreign 
minister  of  the  Crown  was  allowed  to  enter  the 
borough  for  the  return  or  execution  of  writs.  A 
general  confirmation  of  all  privileges,  liberties  and 
franchises  accorded  by  former  incorporations  fol- 
lowed.^ 

In  1664  the  mayor  and  corporation  of  Higham 
Ferrers  petitioned  the  king  for  the  renewal  of  their 
charter  with  certain  alterations    of  which  the  most 


important  was  the  extension  of  the  money  limit  of 
their  power  to  hold  pleas  from  ^5  to  £\o.''^  This 
and  other  proposed  changes  which  concerned  the 
fairs  and  markets  were  embodied  in  the  new  charter 
of  -August  1664  after  a  confirmation  in  general  terms 
of  the  ancient  liberties  of  the  borough.  It  was  also 
provided  that  the  court  of  record  should  be  held 
before  the  mayor,  two  aldermen,  two  chief  burgesses 
and  the  steward  of  the  borough  and  parish  of  Higham 
Ferrers.*" 

Within  twenty  years  Higham  Ferrers  had  followed 
the  example  of  other  boroughs  by  surrendering  its 
charters  to  the  Crown,  and  obtained  their  renewal  in 
letters  patent  issued  in  February  1684.  This 
charter  also  was  confirmatory,  embodying  the  early 
clauses  of  the  charter  of  1556,  and  in  it  too  the 
mayor,  aldermen  and  burgesses  were  nominated. 
Henceforth  the  corporation  was  to  have  its  own 
recorder,  the  Earl  of  Peterborough  being  appointed 
to  this  new  office  for  life.  Another  change  was  the 
nomination,  also  for  life,  of  Goddard  Pemberton,  who 
headed  the  list  of  aldermen,  as  justice  of  the  peace. 
The  election  of  the  successors  of  both  these  officers 
was  vested  in  the  mayor  and  corporation,  and  the 
number  of  fairs  was  reduced  to  one.** 

The  old  corporation  of  Higham  Ferrers  was  ex- 
tinguished by  the  Municipal  Corporation  Act  of  1882 
which  at  the  same  time  provided  for  the  grant  of 
new  charters  of  incorporation.  Accordingly,  on  the 
petition  of  certain  inhabitant  householders  of  the 
parish  of  Higham  Ferrers,  the  Committee  of  the  Privy 
Council  formulated  a  scheme  called  '  The  Borough 
of  Higham  Ferrers  Scheme  '  by  which  a  municipal 
borough  was  created  in  place  of  the  old  corporation. 
All  property  which  had  been  vested  in  the  mayor 
and  his  fellow  burgesses  by  right  of  their  office  was 
now  transferred  to  the  new  governing  body,  which 
became  the  sanitary  authority  in  place  of  the  Welling- 
borough Union,  with  charge  of  the  town  well,  town 
pump  and  sewers.  The  new  charter  was  granted  on 
16  July  1887.32 

The  burgesses  held  Higham  Ferrers  of  the  Crown 
as  of  the  Duchy  of  Lancaster  at  a  fee-farm  rent, 
which  between  1504  and  1515  amounted  to 
j^l8  12;.  I (/.,**  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Elizabeth  to 
X'5  '9'-  5J'/-,*'and  in  1649  to_^i6  a  year.**  '  Borough 
rents '  of  the  annual  value  of  ^^19  %s.  2^d.  were  referred 
to  in  the  settlement  of  the  manor  on  Queen  Catherine 
wife  of  Charles  II.**  From  a  suit  brought  early  in 
the  i6th  century  by  one  Thomas  Giles  of  Higham 
Ferrers  against  Robert  Pypwell,  then  mayor,  it  appears 
that  this  tax  was  collected  from  the  king's  tenants 
of  the  Duchy  of  Lancaster  in  the  town  who  were 
responsible  for  the  good  repair  of  their  tenements.*^ 
Any  man  failing  in  this  duty  after  due  warning  by 
the  mayor  was  liable  to  ejection  by  his  successor 
should  twelve  lawful  burgesses  of  the  town  testify 
that  his  tenement  was  still  in  decay.  The  descendants 
of  William  dc  Ferrers'  enfranchised  tenants  enjoyed 
free  burgage  as  an  hereditary  right,  and  the  earliest 
record  preserved  in  the  Town  Hall  of  Higham  Ferrers, 


•'  Pat.  R.  2  and  3  Phil,  and  M.  pi.  8, 
m.  27.  In  connexion  with  the  laat 
cUuie  it  ii  noteworthy  that  about  eighty 
ytari  later  Laud'i  vicar-general  found  the 
poiieiiioni  of  the  College  much  improved 
•ince  they  came  into  the  handi  of  the  cor- 
poration [S.  P.  Oom.  Chai.  I,  cccx,  ijj. 


'"  Pat.  R.  I  Jai.  I,  pt.  4,  ra.  25  ;  Col. 
S.  P.  Dom.  1^03-10,  p.  129. 

"  S.  P.  Dom.  Chai.  II,  «cix,  46,  46  (1) ; 
Entry  Bk.  i6,  p.  172  ;    18,  p.  62. 

•»  Pat.  R.  16  Chai.  II,  pt.  14,  no.  I. 

"  Ibid.  36  Chai.  II,  pt.  6,  no.  24. 

"Act  Fnv.  and  Lcc.  49  and  50  Vict., 

270 


cap.     58  ;     Hist.    MSS.    Com.    Rep.    xii, 

App-  9,  p.  S3''- 

"Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdlc.  317,  no.  57. 
"  Rent,  and  .Surv.  porlf.  13,  no.  33. 
"  Pari.  Surv.  Northanti.  no.  32. 
••  Pat,  R.  24Chal.  II,  pt.  9. 
"  Early  Chan.  Proc.  loc.  cit. 


.:'  "^, 


3 


t 


F 


mmmX) 


^.v-'v 


'^mrn^. 


u 


X 


BOROUGH  OF  HIGHAM   FERRERS 


the  roll  of  the  borough  court,  '  Curia  Burgi '  or 
'  Halmote  '  for  4  Edward  I  [1275-6]  shows  that  their 
survivors  and  heirs  were  already  occupied  with  the 
admission  of  new  burgesses.  At  tlie  same  time  they 
were  dealing  with  surrender  of  and  admission  to 
property  and  ple.is  of  debt  and  trespass,  and  issuing 
licences  to  brew.^  Jurisdiction  in  cases  of  breach 
of  the  king's  standard  of  weights  and  measures  was 
exercised  here  by  the  king's  chief  steward  of  the 
Duchy  of  Lancaster  in  northern  parts,  by  whom 
in  1426  certain  offenders  were  fined  '  for  the  abuse 
of  their  bushels,'  the  mayor  being  merely  entrusted 
with  the  custody  of  the  faulty  vessels  until  they  were 
rectified.'* 

In  1 591  commissioners  of  the  Duchy  of  Lancaster 
found  that  the  mayor  and  corporation  of  Higham 
Ferrershad  felons'  goods  and  toll  of  passengersthrough 
the  town  and  other  places  in  the  Hundred,*"  liberties 
presumably  of  earlier  date  than  1556."  A  minor 
privilege  which  the  mayor  and  his  associates  claimed 
to  enjoy  by  charter  in  1618  was  that  of  having  two 
persons  in  the  town  to  draw  wine.^ 

Higham  Ferrers  had  a  mayor  as  early  as  1377,  from 
which  year  a  fairly  complete  list  of  these  officers 
might  be  drawn  up  from  the  borough  rolls.*'  The 
15th  century  records  of  the  Duchy  of  Lancaster 
show  the  king  and  his  servants  dealing  with  the 
mayor  alone  as  the  representative  of  the  corpora- 
tion,** and  in  the  early  years  of  the  next  century 
Robert  Pypwell,  mayor,  described  the  town  as 
incorporated  '  by  the  name  of  Mayre  and  Com- 
monalty'  time  out  of  mind.**  The  charter  of  1556 
fixed  the  Monday  following  St.  Luke's  day  for  the 
annual  election  by  the  aldermen  and  chief  burgesses 
of  an  alderman  as  mayor,  and  entrusted  the  choice  of 
the  thirteen  chief  burgesses  to  the  seven  aldermen.  It 
empowered  the  mayor  to  appoint  a  serjeant-at-mace 
for  the  execution  of  processes,  mandates  and  other 
business  of  the  borough,  and,  together  with  the 
aldermen,  to  elect  from  year  to  year  a  Serjeant  of  the 
borough,  a  bailiff,  two  constables  and  all  other  ser- 
vants necessary  to  the  corporation.**  There  was 
already  a  steward  of  the  borough,  before  whom  a 
new  mayor  was  sworn  upon  his  entrance  into  office.*' 
To  this  body  of  officers,  as  has  been  stated  above,  a 
recorder  was  added  in  1684.**  In  15QI,  the  mayor 
was  also  serving  as  clerk  of  the  market,  coroner  and 
escheator.** 

The  incorporation  of  the  borough  in  1556  was 
followed  within  two  years  by  its  representation  in 
the  House  of  Commons,  and  from  1557-8  until  its 
disfranchisement  in  1832  Higham  Ferrers  sent  one 
member  to  Parliament.'"  The  right  of  election 
belonged  to  all  inhabitants  of  the  town  who  were 
not  receiving  alms.** 


From  time  to  time  Higham  Ferrers,  doubtless  on 
account  of  its  connexion  with  the  royal  household 
and  the  Duchy  of  Lancaster,  was  represented  in 
Parliament  by  men  of  rank  and  of  importance  in 
political  life.  Such  were  Sir  Christopher  Hatton, 
member  in  1571,  through  whose  influence  when  Lord 
Chancellor,  Richard,  afterwards  Sir  Richard  Swale, 
president  of  Caius  and  a  master  in  chancery,  was 
returned  for  Higham  Ferrers  to  the  Parliament  of 
1589.  A  later  Sir  Christopher,  afterwards  Baron, 
Hatton,*''  steward  of  the  manor  of  Higham  Ferrers 
in  1636,  was  representative  of  the  borough  in  the 
Long  Parliament.  He  was  one  of  those  who  were 
returned  in  consequence  of  the  exertions  of  Queen 
Henrietta  Maria  to  bring  in  her  nominees  as  the 
burgesses  of  the  towns  of  her  jointure.*'  Other  mem- 
bers of  parliament  for  this  town  distinguished  as 
statesmen  and  lawyers  were,  in  1601 ,  Henry  Montagu, 
afterwards  Earl  of  Manchester,  who  succeeded  Coke 
as  Chief  Justice  of  the  King's  Bench  and  later  became 
Lord  High  Treasurer.  In  1741  Henry  Seymour 
Conway  was  returned  as  member  at  the  beginning  of  a 
long  career  as  soldier  and  politician  ;  Frederick 
Montagu,  member  from  1768  to  1 790,  became  lord 
of  the  treasury  under  the  Marquis  of  Rockingham  in 
1782.**  He  was  succeeded  by  John  Lee,  solicitor- 
general  in  the  same  ministry.**  Windham,  secretary  of 
state  and  afterwards  secretary  for  war  under  Pitt,  was 
returned  for  Higham  Ferrers  in  1807,  and  held  the 
seat  until  his  death  three  years  later.  Names  of 
more  local  interest  are  those  of  Sir  Thomas  Dacres, 
member  in  the  parliament  of  1625-26,  and  Sir  Rice 
Rudd,  who  represented  Higham  Ferrers  from  1678  to 
1681,  and  again  in  1688-89.  He  was  the  grandson, 
through  his  mother  Judith,  of  Captain  Thomas  Rudd 
and  a  native  of  Higham  Ferrers.** 

A  manor  called  'BOROUGH-HOLD'  in  the 
l8th  century*'  was  still  in  the  possession  of  the  mayor 
and  corporation  in  1838,  when  its  boundaries  were 
determined  by  Act  of  Parliament.**  In  1874  this 
property,  which  was  vested  in  the  new  corporation 
by  the  Act  of  1886,  was  said  to  consist  of  53  acres, 
3  roods  and  27  poles  of  land.*® 

A  market  which  had  belonged  to  William  PeverePs 
manor  in  1086,  when  it  rendered  20/.  a  year,*"  was 
held  weekly  on  Saturday  in  the  13th*!  and  14th  cen- 
turies.*^ 

In  1485,  Richard  III  leased  the  issues  of  the  tolls 
of  the  market  and  fairs  of  Higham  Ferrers  with  all 
shops  and  stalls  situated  in  the  market  place,*'  to 
the  Mayor  and  his  successors  for  twenty  years.** 
The  fair  on  the  vigil,  day  and  morrow  of  St.  Botulph 
(17  June)  granted  to  William  de  Ferrers  at  his  manor 
of  Higham  Ferrers  in  1250**  and  an  appurtenance  in 
1298,**  continued  to  be  held  in  the  following  century 


••  Hiit.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  xii,  a  pp.  9, 
p.  530. 

"Ct.  R.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  bdlc.  105, 
nos.  1496,  1498A. 

«•  Mi«c.  Bk».  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  117, 
fol.  188. 

"  Thty  are  not  mentioned  in  the 
charter  of  Philip  and  Mary. 

"  Hisl.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  iv,  314. 

"Ibid,  xii,  app.  9,  p.  531, 

««  Ct.  R.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  bdle.  105, 
no.i498A;  Miic.  Bk«.  (Duchy  of  Lane.) 
10,  fol.  locxl. 

•'Early  Chan.  Proc.  bdle.  317,  no.  57. 


"  Pat.  R.  2  &  3  Phil,  and  M.  pt.  8,  no.  27. 

"  Ibid  ;  ef.  S.  P.  Dom.  cccclxx,  no.  38. 

<»  Pat.  R.  36  Chai.  II,  pt.  6,  no.  24. 

"Misc.  Bks.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  117, 
fol.  188. 

"  V.C.H.  Northanls.  Genealosical  Vol. 
ii,  380. 

"  Bridgei,  Hist.  Nortbanti.  ii,  170. 

"  D.  N.B. 

"  S.  P.  Dom.  Chaj.  I,  cccclxix,  11. 

"  n.  N.  B.  "  Ibid. 

"  Ibid  ;    Complete  Baronetage^  ii,  64. 

"  Bridges,  loc.  cit. 

"  Priv.  Act,  I  Vict.  cap.  11. 

271 


'»  Whellan,  Hist.  Norlbartts.  914. 

"•V.C.H.  Northants.  i,  336*. 

"Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  I,  file  81. 
The  form  of  the  stalls  in  the  market  also 
belonged  to  the  manor  at  this  date. 

•'  Plac.  de  Quo  H'arr.  (Rec.  Com.)  580. 

•'These  were  probably  on  the  sites  of 
the  butchers'  stalls  and  the  eight  shops 
leased  to  merchants  of  linen  in  1327 
(Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  Ill,  file  6,  m.  24). 

"  Misc.  Bks.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  20, 
fol.  lood. 

•'  Chart.  R.  35  Hen.  Ill,  m.  13. 

••  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  26  Edw.  I,  file  81. 


A  HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


after  Thomas  Earl  of  Lancaster  had  received  the 
grant  of  asecond  at  Michaelmas."  Both  were  claimed 
by  his  brother  in  1327®*  and  their  issues  included  in 
the  lease  of  Richard  III.  The  markets  granted  by 
Philip  and  Mary  were  held  weekly  on  Monday  and 
Saturday.**  In  1664  the  Monday  market,  which  had 
fallen  into  disuse  before  1649,'"  was  transferred  to 
Thursday  and  the  Saturday  market  appropriated  to 
the  sale  of  horses  and  cattle.'^  In  the  latter  part 
of  the  1 8th  centur)',  the  county  historian  wrote  that 
there  were  three  weekly  markets,  on  Monday,  Thurs- 
day and  Saturday,  the  two  former  disused  and  the 
third  much  decayed.'- 

Four  fairs  granted  in  1556  included  the  old-estab- 
lished fairs  of  St.  Michael  and  St.  Botolph  and  two 
newly  appointed  for  the  feasts  of  St.  Katharine  and 
St.  Matthias.'^  By  the  first  charter  of  Charles  II, 
these  were  reduced  to  two,  held  on  the  Thursdays 
next  before  the  feasts  of  St.  Philip  and  St.  James 
and  of  St.  James  the  Apostle  ;'*  by  the  second  to 
one,  for  the  sale  of  cattle  and  merchandise  on  the 
Thursday  before  the  feast  of  the  Conversion  of  St. 
Paul.'^  It  is  likely,  however,  that  other  fairs,  not 
authorised  by  this  charter,  continued  to  be  held  in 
the  town.  In  the  1 8th  century  there  were  seven, 
described  by  the  historian  of  Northamptonshire  as 
'  all  well  accustomed,'  on  the  Thursdays  before  the 
feasts  of  the  conversion  of  St.  Paul,  of  St.  Matthias, 
of  St.  Philip  and  St.  James,  and  of  St.  James  the 
Apostle,  on  the  17  June,  at  Michaelmas  and  on  the 
feast  of  St.  Catherine.'*  Five  were  held  in  1838,  on 
the  Thursdays  before  12  May  and  5  August,  on 
7  March,  28  June  and  6  December,"  and  also  in  1874, 
when  the  dates  in  March,  August  and  December 
remained  unaltered,  but  the  other  two  fairs  had  been 
transferred  to  the  Wednesday  before  5  February  and 
the  Thursday  before  1 1  October.'^ 

The  church  of  ST.  MART  THE 
CHURCH  VIRGIN  consists  of  chancel,  46  ft.  by 
20  ft.,  clearstoried  nave  of  four  bays, 
72  ft.  by  19  ft.  6  in.,  north  and  south  aisles,  the 
former  terminating  in  a  Lady  Chapel  and  vestry  on 
the  north  side  of  the  chancel,  an  additional  north 
aisle,  10  ft.  6  in.  wide,  south  porch,  and  west  tower, 
15  ft.  square,  with  lofty  spire.  The  width  of  the 
north  aisle  is  the  same  as  that  of  the  nave,  and  the 
chapel  and  vestry  being  equal  in  size  to  the  chancel, 
the  plan  of  the  building  is  somewhat  unusual,  the 
internal  effect  being  that  of  two  naves  of  equal  size 
with  corresponding  chancels.  The  south  aisle  is 
10  ft.  6  in.  wide  and  the  total  width  across  nave  and 
aisles  69  ft.  3  in.     All  these  measurements  are  internal. 

No  part  of  the  church  is  earlier  than  the  13th  cen- 
tury, but  a  considerable  portion  of  tlie  building  erected 
in  that  period  still  remains,  though  altered  in  the 
following  century  and  later. 

The  existing  chancel,  nave,  south  aisle  and  tower 
are  substantially  those  of  the  13th  century  fabric, 
the  aisles  of  which  were  equal  in  width,  and  though 


later  windows  have  been  inserted  and  the  aisle  wall 
rebuilt,  the  doorways,  south  nave  arcade  and  other 
architectural  features  remain  unaltered.  All  this 
work  belongs  to  the  first  half  of  the  13th  century 
and  was  probably  begun  at  the  east  end  about  1220-25, 
the  tower  being  completed  about  1 250.  The  first 
change  in  the  plan  was  about  1325-30,  when  the 
north  aisle  was  widened  and  the  Lady  chapel  built  in 
its  present  form,  the  north  nave  arcade  being  then 
taken  down  and  the  present  one  erected.  The  chapel 
was  probably  built  first  and  the  aisle  afterwards  made 
of  the  same  width.  The  two  arches  which  divide  the 
chapel  from  the  chancel  were  cut  through  the  13th- 
century  wall,  and  at  the  same  time  new  windows 
were  inserted  in  the  chancel  and  south  aisle  and  other 
alterations  made.  With  the  exception  of  the  priests' 
doorway,  the  south  nave  arcade  and  the  south  door- 
way, there  is  thus  little  original  architectural  work 
recognisable  east  of  the  tower,  though  the  plan 
of  the  nave  and  chancel  remains  unchanged.  The 
alterations  in  the  chancel  were  probably  due  to  Law- 
rence St.  Maur,  canon  of  Hereford  (d.  1 338),  whose 
brass  is  now  on  the  table  tomb  between  the  chancel 
and  chapel,  but  the  tomb  was  constructed  for  a  mem- 
ber of  the  House  of  Lancaster  as  indicated  by  the 
heraldry  on  the  lower  part ;  a  powdering  of  bees  is 
painted  upon  the  canopy.  Whether  it  was  ever  used 
for  its  intended  purpose  is  doubtful,  as  the  actual 
table  tomb  is  of  later  date,  but  it  is  not  unlikely  that 
the  monument  was  erected  by  Henry,  Earl  of  Lan- 
caster (d.  1345)  for  himself,  and  that  the  Lady  chapel 
was  added  and  the  north  aisle  reconstructed  at  his 
charges,  he  being  the  lord  of  the  manor.'^ 

There  is  little  difference  in  date  between  the  north 
arcade  of  the  nave  and  that  of  the  outer  aisle  :  the 
latter  may  be  an  addition  a  few  years  after  the  work 
of  reconstruction  was  completed,  or  it  may  have 
merely  been  left  until  the  end  of  the  enlargement, 
while  the  arcade  may  belong  to  its  beginning.  The 
whole  of  the  north  side  of  the  church,  however, 
appears  to  have  been  completed  in  its  present  form 
by  about  1 340,  and  may  be  considered  as  of  one 
build,  the  same  plinth  and  stringcourse  and  the  same 
kind  of  dressed  masonry  being  used  both  in  the  Lady 
Chapel  and  the  north  aisle.  The  spire,  as  originally 
built,  was  added  about  the  same  time,  but  the 
clearstory  belongs  to  thi;  first  half  of  the  15th  century, 
when  low-pitclicd  roofs  behind  parapets  were  erected 
and  two  windows  were  inserted,  one  at  the  east  end 
of  the  south  aisle,  and  the  other  at  the  west  end  of 
the  outer  north  aisle.  In  the  15th  century,  also, 
Archbishop  Chicheley  no  doubt  erected  the  rood 
screen  and  stalls,  one  of  which  bears  his  arms  and 
another  those  of  the  see  of  Canterbury.  Other 
screen  work  is  of  the  same  period. 

In  1631-32  the  spire  and  part  of  the  tower  were 
rebuilt,  following  a  collapse  of  the  former,  which 
did  great  damage  to  the  tower,  since  which  time, 
apart  from  restoration,  the  fabric  has  remained  un- 


•'  Chart.  R.  18  F.dw.  I,  m.  ro. 

•"  /'/<?<-.  de  Quo  irarr.  fRcc.  Com),  580. 

"  Pat.  R.  2  &  3  Phil,  and  M.  pt.  8, 
m.  17. 

'"Pari.  Surv.  Northant*.  31,  m.  z. 

"  Pat.  R.  ifi  Chai.  11,  pi.  14,  no.  i. 

"  liridic',  "p.  cit.  ii,  170. 

"Pal.  R.  2  &  3  Phil,  and  M.  pi,  S, 
m.  27. 


"  Ibid.  16  Ch-.tt.  II,  pt.  14,  no.  i. 

"  Ibid.  36  cli.!!.  Il.pt.  6,  no.  24. 

'"  MridRcs,  loc.  cit. 

"  John  Cole,  l/ist.  and  Anliq.  of  Iligham 
Ferrrn,  119,  131,  136,  143,  158. 

'*  Whrll.in,  Norlhnttts.  914. 

"*  If  thi«  theory,  put  forw.nrd  by  Prof. 
Il.imilion  'I'hompflon,  be  ri^ht,  the  date 
of  the  building  of  the  ch.Tpcl  and  rccon- 

272 


Btnictlon  of  the  .lisle  would  f.ill  between 
the  dc.ith  of  'riinni;i»  I'..irl  of  Lancaster 
in  1322  and  the  time  when  K.irl  Henry 
began  to  found  the  hoBpital  at  Leicester, 
where  he  is  buried.  Ilis  death  would 
check  further  work  at  Iligham  Ferrers. 
.Sir  William  Hope  .ngrccd  with  this  theory 
about  the  date  and  purpose  of  the  monu- 
ment and  chapel. 


BOROUGH  OF   HIGHAM   FERRERS 


changed.  A  partial  restoration  in  1829  was  followed 
in  1857  by  one  of  more  general  character,  extending 
over  a  period  of  years,  during  which  time  the  south 
arcade,  porch  and  south  aisle  walls  were  rebuilt  and 
the  roofs  renewed.***  The  rood  loft  and  rood  were 
added  to  the  screen  in  1920  and  an  organ  loft  erected 
in  the  Lady  chapel." 

The  church,  which  is  justly  claimed  as  one  of  the 
finest  in  the  county,  is  set  in  very  picturesque  sur- 
roundings, forming  with  the  schoolliouse  on  the  west, 
churchyard  cross,  and  vicar.age  and  bcdehousc  on  the 
south  side,  an  architectural  group  of  more  than  usual 
interest.  The  older  walling  is  of  rubble,  the  later 
in  coursed  dressed  stone,  and  all  the  roofs  are  of  low 
pitch,  leaded,  behind  battlementcd"-  parapets.  Inter- 
nally all  the  wall  surfaces,  e.xccpt  tiiose  of  the  tower, 
are  plastered.     The  roofs  are  modern. 

The  chancel    has  a   14th-century  east  window  of 
five  trefoilcJ  lights  with  reticulated  tracery  set  within 
13th-century  shafted  jambs,  the  greater  part  of  the 
original  masonry  remaining  in  the  east  wall.     The 
muUions*'  and  tracery  are  moulded  and  the  arch  has 
a   slight  ogee  with  elaborate  canopied  niche  above 
breaking  the  battlemented  parapet  of  the  gable.     In 
the  south  wall  are  three  tall  ogee-!ieaded  windows  of 
three  trefoilcd  lights  with  reticulated  tracery,  moulded 
jambs,  and  labels  with  headstops,  the  chancel  being 
divided  into    three  bays  by  two-stage   14th-century 
buttresses  added  when  the  windows  were  inserted. 
The  13th-century  priests'  doorway  has  a  chamfered 
trefoiled   head   beneath   a   pointed   hoodmould,   the 
spandrels  filled  with  a  si.x-leaf  flower,  and  moulded 
rear  arch.     There  is  a  rounded  stringcourse  at   sill 
level  inside,  and  in  the  usual  position  in  the  south 
wall  a  double  piscina  consisting  of  two  fluted  bowls 
in  plain  rectangular  recesses,  the  heads  of  which  are 
formed  by  the   string.     A  projecting    stone    bench 
6  ft.  long,  with  shaped  arms,  at  the  west  end  takes 
the  place  of  the  more  usual  individual  sedilia,  and  in 
the  north  wall  is  a  plain  triangular-headed  aumbry. 
The  sanctuary  floor,  which  had  been  unduly  raised 
in  1880,  was  lowered  to  its  original  level  in  1923  :*■'  the 
space  immediately  east  of  the  altar  rail  is  paved  with 
medieval  encaustic  tiles  of  various  patterns.''     The 
western  portion  of  the  chancel  is  occupied  by  the 
stalls  and  its  floor  is  level  with  that  of  the  nave.     Of 
the  two  14th-century  arches  in  the  north  wall,  the 
wider  one  at  the  west  end  is  of  two  chamfered  orders 
and     springs    from    half-octagonal    responds     with 
moulded  capitals ;    the  other,  which  is  only  about 
8  ft.  wide,  forms  the  canopy  of  the  tomb  already 
mentioned  and  is  of  three  elaborately  moulded  orders 
and  embattled  label  on  attached  shafts  with  moulded 
capitals  and   bases.     The   short   length  of  masonry 
between  the  arches  is  part  of  the  original  work  and 
retains  the  rounded  string  corresponding  with  that 
opposite,  but  it  is  pierced  by  a  small  doorway  to  the 


chapel.'*  Further  east  is  a  second  14th-century 
doorway  opening  to  the  vestry.  There  is  no  chancel 
arch,  nor  arch  between  the  north  aisle  and  chapel, 
both  roofs  being  continuous. 

The  13th-century  south  nave  arcade  is  mostly  of 
dark  ironstone,  the  arches  of  two  chamfered  orders 
with  labels  on  both  sides,  springing  from  piers  com- 
posed of  four  clustered  shafts  with  moulded  capitals 
and  bases,"  and  from  half-octagonal  responds. 
The  14th-century  north  arcade  is  of  freestone  with 
ironstone  intermingled,  and  has  octagonal  piers  with 
moulded  capitals  and  bases  :  the  bases  stand  on  big 
square  plintlis  and  the  capitals  difTer  only  slightly 
in  detail.  The  loftier  outer  arcade*'  is  also  of  four 
bays,  with  octagonal  piers"  whose  capitals  exhibit 
considerable  variety  of  moulding  :  in  that  of  the 
westernmost  pier  the  nail-head  ornament  occurs,  but 
it  is  probably  old  work  re-used.  The  arches  of  both 
the  north  arcades  are  of  two  chamfered  orders. 
The  clearstory  over  the  outer  arcades  has  square- 
headed  windows  of  two  trefoiled  lights,  four  on  the 
north  side  and  five  on  the  south.'" 

The  south  aisle  wall,  though  rebuilt,  retains  its 
13th-century  doorway,  much  restored,  with  arch  of 
three  orders,  the  innermost  moulded,  and  the  others 
with  hollow  chamfers  stopped  above  quirked  imposts. 
The  jambs  below  the  tv/o  outer  orders  have  shafts 
with  foliated  capitals  and  moulded  bases,  with  smaller 
attached  shafts  between,  the  inner  jambs  being  simply 
rounded.  The  15th-century  east  window  of  the 
aisle  is  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights,  with  vertical 
tracery,  and  the  14th-century  easternmost  window 
of  the  south  wall  of  four  trefoiled  lights  and  geo- 
metrical tracery  ;  three  other  windows  in  this  wall  are 
of  three  lights  with  ogee  heads  and  reticulated 
tracery  ;  but  the  two-light  west  window  of  the  aisle 
appears  to  be  of  late  13th-century  date,  with  forked 
mullion  and  quatrefoil  in  the  head.  The  porch  has 
been  entirely  rebuilt,  but  retains  a  restored  13th- 
century  outer  doorway  of  two  chamfered  orders,  the 
inner  on  half-round  responds  with  moulded  capitals 
and  label  terminating  in  pretty  carved  stops.  The 
porch  has  side  windows  of  two  lights  and  battlemented 
parapets. 

The  15th-century  west  window  of  the  outer  north 
aisle  is  of  three  cinquefoiled  lights  with  four-centred 
head  and  vertical  tracery  ;  it  is  flanked  externally  by 
niches,  that  on  the  south  with  cusping  and  finial, 
the  other  with  a  plain  pointed  head.  The  other 
windows  of  the  aisle  are  square-headed,  of  three 
trefoiled  lights,  with  double  chamfered  jambs  and 
rounded  rear  arches.  The  pointed  north  doorway 
has  continuous  hollow  and  sunk  chamfers  divided  by 
a  casement. 

The  eastern  bays  of  the  outer  aisles  have  been 
restored  as  chapels,  that  on  the  north,  known  as  the 
Chapel  of  Remembrance,  contains  memorials  of  the 


•°  The  windows  were  rc-used  and  as 
much  of  the  old  masonry  as  possible. 
'  At  this  time  all  woodwork,  other  than 
Gothic,  was  turned  out,  most  of  the  old 
paving  was  replaced  by  modern  tiles, 
and  the  memorial  stones  placed  in  the 
Lady  chapel '  :  H.  K.  Fry,  Highant 
Ffrreri  Church,   1 1. 

"  The  organ  wat  finally  transferred  to 
the  loft  in  192$. 


*'  Except  to  the  north  aisle,  where  the 
parapet  is  plain. 

*'  The  mullions  have  flat,  foliated  capi- 
tals. •*  Fry,  op.  cit.  12. 

**  Churches  of  Archd.  of  Northampt.  1 1  : 
Bloxam,  Coihic  Arch,  (nth  ed.),  ii,  230. 

^"^  This  doorway  forms  the  only  means 
of  access  to  the  clinpcl  from  the  (juirc  as 
the  arches  arc  filled,  one  by  the  tomb  and 
the  other  with  the  stalls  and  screen  work, 
Churches  of  Archd.  of  Northampt.  13. 


^'  The  bases  of  the  middle  and  eastern- 
most piers  are  new  ;  elsewhere  all  the 
old  stones  were  re-used. 

^*  The  height  to  the  underside  of  the 
capitals  is  nearly  8  ft.  :  in  the  middle 
arcade  the  corresponding  height  is  about 
6  ft.  6  in. 

*"  The  diameter  of  tlie  piers  is  21  in., 
those  of  the  middle  arcade  22  in. 

^^  The  roof  in  each  case  is  spaced  to 
five  bays. 


p 
o 

>j 
o 
o 
n 
o 
CO 

o 

z 
< 

o 

OS 

» 

a: 
U 


o 

o 

< 

P4 


«=»  — —  SIlcOo 


if 


liD 


Hicham   Ffrrers  Church  from  the  North-east 


T 


^ 


Hicham  Firrers  Chlkch  :    'I'hl   Interior,  showing  Screen  of  Chancel  from  Chapel 


BOROUGH   OF   HIGHAM    FERRERS 


war  of  1914-18,  wliile  the  Cliapcl  of  the  Kingdom,  in 
the  south  aisle,  is  set  apart  for  intercession  for  work 
overseas."  In  the  latter  is  a  trcfoil-lieaded  piscina 
with  beautiful  foliated  cusping  and  label  terminations 
and  fluted  bowl.  Below  the  eastern  portion  of  the 
aisle  is  a  small  ijth-century  crypt,  or  bonc^hole, 
10  ft.  10  in.  square,  originally  vaulted  in  four  compart- 
ments, but  now  covered  with  a  modern  brick  barrel 
roof,  access  to  wiiich  is  by  a  doorway  and  stair  in 
the  south  wall."- 

The  west  window  of  the  main  north  aisle  is  of 
five  cinquefoiled  lights,  with  plain  intersecting  tracery 
and  pointed  trefoils  above  the  cusping. 

The  Lady  chapel  has  a  tall  ogee-headed  east 
window  of  five  trcfoiled  lights,  with  reticulated 
tracery  and  canopied  niche  over,  similar  in  type  to 
the  east  window  of  tlie  chancel,  but  less  elaborate 
in  character."''  Tiie  two  contemporary  north  windows 
are  respectively  of  tiiree  and  five  lights,  the  larger  one, 
towards  the  east,  being  similar  to  tiiat  at  the  west  end 
of  the  inner  north  aisle,  and  the  other  like  those  in 
the  south  aisle.  The  east  wall  of  the  chapel  is  flush 
with  that  of  the  chancel,  with  a  buttress  of  two  stages 
between  the  windows,  the  eastern  end  of  the  church 
thus  consisting  of  two  equal  low-pitched  gables.  The 
chapel  retains  at  its  east  end  the  original  sacristry, 
formed  by  screening  off  a  portion,  8  ft.  wide,  with  a 
solid  wall  against  which  the  chapel  altar  w.is  placed. 
A  trefoil-headed  ogee  piscina,  with  plain  bowl, 
remains  in  the  usual  position  immediately  west  of  the 
screen  wall.  The  organ  loft  is  over  the  west  portion 
of  the  chapel. 

The  tower  is  of  three  main  stages,  with  moulded 
plinth,  pierced  parapet  and  angle  pinnacles.  The 
whole  of  the  south  side,  the  south-west  and  south- 
east buttresses  and  the  upper  stage  were  rebuilt  in 
I63I-32,'''  and  though  much  of  the  old  masonry  was 
re-used  and  the  chief  architectural  features  retained, 
the  work  shows  unmistakable  signs  of  its  late  origin. 
The  south  buttresses,  which  were  rebuilt  on  a  larger 
scale  and  carried  up  four  stages  to  the  spring  of  the 
arches  of  the  bell-chamber  windows,  are  asthetically 
detrimental  to  the  otherwise  graceful  lines  of  the 
tower,  the  appearance  of  which,  as  left  by  the  13th- 
century  builders,  must  have  been  of  exceptional 
beauty.  The  original  work,  however,  survives 
uninjured  in  the  lower  stages  on  the  west  and  north 
sides. 

The  double  west  doorway  is  covered  by  a  shallow 
recessed  porch  (1 1  ft.  6  in.  by  4  ft.  6  in.),  with  pointed 
outer  arch  of  two  richly  moulded  orders  on  shafts 
with  foliated  capitals.  The  heads  of  the  two  inner 
doorways  are  low  segmental  arches,  the  moulding  of 
which  is  continued  down  the  jambs,  and  round  each 
opening  are  carved  the  foliage  and  half-figures  of  a 
Tree  of  Jesse,  the  main  stem  of  which,  rising  between 
them,  blossoms  into  a  rich  foliated  capital,  supporting 
an  ornamental  bracket  and  housing  for  a  lost  image  of 
Our  Lady  and  Child.     The  sides  of  the  porch,  which 


is  recessed  in  the  thickness  of  the  wall,  have  arcades 
of  two  trefoilcd  arches  on  shafts  with  moulded 
capitals  and  bases,  above  which  a  chamfered  mid-arch 
springs  from  moulded  corbels  supported  by  heads. 
The  surface  of  the  pointed  barrel  vault  on  either  side 
of  the  mid-arch  is  completely  covered  with  a  rich 
diaper,  except  at  the  bottom  of  tiie  outer  compart- 
ment on  tlic  north  side,  where  there  is  a  sculptured 
figure  of  a  man  in  the  stocks  playing  a  musical 
instrument.  Above  the  heads  of  tiie  inner  doorways 
is  a  moulded  stringcourse,  which,  breaking  round  the 
bracket,  forms  the  base  of  a  pointed  tympanum,  the 
middle  part  of  which  was  occupied  by  tiie  Virgin's 
statue.  The  space  behind  the  statue  is  plain  for  about 
two-thirds  of  its  height,  above  which  the  surface  is 
diapered,  the  trefoilcd  head  inclosing  a  sun  and  moon. 
Tiie  remainder  of  the  tympanum  on  either  side  of  the 
central  figure  is  carved  in  low  relief,  with  a  scries  of 
roundels,  or  medallions,  five  on  each  side,  in  which 
the  following  subjects  are  represented  :  North  side 
(rt)  the  Visitation,  (A)  the  Annunciation,  (c)  the 
Adoration  of  the  Three  Kings,  {d)  our  Lord  among  the 
Doctors,  (c)  our  Lord's  baptism  ;  South  side  {a)  the 
Adoration  of  the  Shepherds,  (h)  the  Crucifixion, 
(f)  the  Vision  of  Zacharias,  (d)  the  three  Marys  at 
the  Tomb,  {e)  the  harrowing  of  Hell."^ 

The  13th-century  window  above  the  porch  is  of 
two  trefoilcd  lights  within  an  arch  of  two  chamfered 
orders  on  shafted  jambs ;  in  the  spandrel  is  a  seated 
figure  of  our  Lord  in  glory.  The  window  may  have 
been  originally  higher  in  the  wall,  and  the  porch 
probably  had  a  gable  over  it. 

Between  the  porch  and  the  north-west  buttress 
are  two  trefoilcd  wall  arches  on  banded  shafts,  one 
over  the  other,  but  the  corresponding  treatment  on 
the  south  side  was  destroyed  in  the  17th  century, 
though  an  image  bracket,  together  with  one  on  the 
north  side,  remains.  The  original  coupled  north- 
west buttresses  are  of  two  stages  with  gabled  heads 
terminating  in  grotesque  figures.  In  the  lower  stage 
of  the  tower  on  the  north  side  is  a  13th-century 
trefoilcd  wall  arcade  and  a  window  of  two  plain 
lancet  lights  within  a  containing  arch,  the  spandrel 
carved  with  the  figure  of  a  man  playing  on  a  pipe  and 
tabor.  The  shafts  of  the  arcade  and  window  are 
banded  and  have  moulded  capitals  and  bases.  Re- 
mains of  a  similar  arcading  survive  in  the  reconstructed 
lower  stage  on  the  south  side.  In  the  middle  stage 
facing  north  is  a  13th-century  window  of  two  plain 
lancets  within  a  trefoilcd  chamfered  arch  on  shafts 
with  foliated  capitals,  but  on  the  south  side  the  wall 
is  blank. 

The  bell-chamber  windows  are  the  old  ones  re- 
used :  they  consist  of  two  lancet  lights  with  transoms, 
set  within  a  pointed  arch  of  two  moulded  orders  on 
shafts  with  carved  capitals  and  moulded  bases.  The 
lancets  have  shafted  jambs  and  a  triple  mid-shaft,  and 
from  the  hoodmould  a  string  runs  round  the  tower. 
The   14th-century  parapet  rests  on  an  older  corbel 


•'  Fry,  op.  cit.  12. 

•■  The  crypt  is  lighted  by  a  window  on 
the  cast  side  :  the  short  vaulting  shafts 
remain. 

*'  The  mullions  and  tracery  arc  un- 
moulded.  E.  A.  Freeman,  writing  in 
1849,  says  '  the  lower  part,  apparently 
at  a  later  date,   has   been   cut   off   by  a 


transom/  Churches  oj  Archd.  Northampt. 
8.     The  transom  has  been  removed. 

"*  Two  panels,  formerly  on  the  west 
face  of  the  tower,  are  now  inside  the 
church.  The  first  records  that  the 
'  steeple  was  begun  to  be  builded  '  20 
April  1631  :  it  was  one  of  two  panels 
flanking  the  clock.  The  inscription  in- 
tended for  a  second  panel  was  forgotten, 

275 


but  later  was  engraved  on  a  stone,  for 
some  time  lodged  in  one  of  the  niche* 
lower  down  ;  it  records  the  completion 
of  the  tower  in  November  1632  :      Fry, 

op.  cit.  5. 

*^  The  last  is  shown  in  the  usual  con- 
ventional way  by  the  open  jaws  of  a 
monster,  and  in  the  angle  is  a  very  tmall 
figure  holding  a  hatchet. 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


table  and  consists  of  a  series  of  pierced  quatrefoils. 
From  the  pinnacles  pierced  flying  buttresses  are 
carried  to  the  spire,  the  angles  of  which  are  ribbed 
and  crocketed.  There  are  three  sets  of  gabled  spire 
lights  on  the  cardinal  faces,  the  bottom  one  tran- 
somed  and  of  two  lights  with  14th-century  tracery: 
on  the  east  side  is  an  ogee-headed  doorway  behind  the 
parapet.  The  whole  of  this  work,  in  its  present  form, 
dates  from  1632,  though  the  old  wrought  stones  have 
been  re-used. 

The  13th-century  tower  arch  to  the  nave  is  of  four 
chamfered  orders  springing  from  attached  shafts  on 
each  side  with  moulded  capitals  and  bases,  the  larger 
of  the  shafts  having  a  fillet  at  the  apex.  Above  the 
arch  is  a  shouldered  opening,  and  the  line  of  the 
original  high-pitched  roof  remains  on  the  east  side. 
Between   the  tower  arch  and  the  north  arcade,  at 


HicirA>.r  Ff.rkexs  Church  :  Tun  Font 


ground  level,  is  a  13th-century  wall  arch  on  shafts 
with  moulded  bases  and  capitals,  in  one  of  which  tlie 
nail-head  ornament  occurs.'"  Tiie  vice  was  originally 
in  the  south-west  angle  of  the  tower,  with  communica- 
tion over  the  west  doorwav  to  another  in  the  north- 
west angle,  but  access  to  this  is  now  obtained  by  a 
modern  stairway"  with  external  doorway  in  the 
angle  of  the  north  aisle. 

The  fine  early  15th-century  rood  screen  has  four 
traceried  openings  on  eacli  side  of  the  entrance,  with 
solid  lower  panels,  battlemented  cornice  and  moulded 
stiles  and  rails.  The  modern  cove,  traceried  loft 
and  the  rood  with  attendant  figures  were  designed 
by  Mr.  J.  N.  Comper.  There  is  no  original  rood-loft 
stair  or  doorway.  In  the  west  bay  of  tlic  chancel  are 
seven  stalls  on  each  side  and  three  return  stalls. 
The  return  stalls  and  three  on  the  south  side  have 


original  traceried  fronts,  but  the  other  fronts  are 
modern.  There  are  also  four  original  standards 
with  moulded  and  carved  tops.  All  the  stalls  retain 
their  misericords,  the  centrepieces  and  supporters 
of  which  are  carved  in  a  variety  of  subjects  ;  among 
these  are  an  angel  holding  a  shield  with  the  arms  of 
Archbishop  Chicheley,  a  pelican,  the  heads  of  a  king, 
a  bishop  and  others,  a  lion,  pelican,  phoenix-winged 
serpent,  foliage,  etc.  The  arms  of  the  see  of  Canter- 
bury are  on  one  of  the  supporters. 

Behind  the  north  range  of  stalls  a   15th-century 
traceried  screen  of  seven  openings  fills  the  arch  to 
the  Lady  chapel,  but  the  enclosing  screen  at  the  west 
end  of  the  chapel  is  modern.     There  are  also  parclose 
screens  round  the  chapels  at  the  east  end  of  the  outer 
aisles:    that    to   the    north    chapel    is    modern"    at 
the  west  end,  but  its  south  side  is  of  15th-century 
date,  with  doorway  and  traceried  openings,  carved 
cornice  and  solid  lower  panels.     The  south  chapel 
screen   is  rather  later,  with  two  tiers  of   panels 
below  the   traceried  openings,   the    bottom    tier 
having    linen    pattern    ornament.      Both    these 
screens  have  been  restored  to  their  places  after 
having  been  mutilated  and  converted  into  pews." 
The  pulpit  and  seating  are  modern. ^   The  15th- 
century  font  has  an  octagonal  bowl  with  carving 
on  tlie  four  major  faces,  on  attached  sliafts  with 
moulded  bases,  and  chamfered  plinth. 

In    the    tower   window    recess    are    four    13th- 
century  coffin  lids. 

The  monument  on  the  north  side  of  the  chancel 

mentioned   as   probably  having  been  erected  by 

Henry  Earl  of  Lancaster  includes  the  battlemented 

arch  already  described  as  forming  the  canopy  of 

the  tomb,  its  end  buttresses  being  taken  up  as 

pinnacles.     The  canopy  preserves  a  considerable 

amount  of  its  original  colour,-  but  the  tomb  itself 

was  altered  in  the  17th  century,  probably  when 

Lawrence    St.    Maur's    brass    was   placed    there. 

Two  of  the  four  shields  of  arms'  on  each   side 

may  be  reproductions  in  stone  of  the  four  brass 

shields    now    missing    from    the    slab,    and    the 

pilasters   between  are  clearly  of  the    17th  century. 

The  stone  containing  St.  Maur's  brass  was  no  doubt 

originally  in  the  chancel  floor  but  was  placed  in  its 

present  position  in  1633.*     The  brass  is  that    of    a 

priest  in   mass  vestments  below  a  canopy,  but  the 

border  is  imperfect  :    above  the  figure  is  our  Lord 

and  four  Apostles,  and  the  inscription  below  reads : 

'  Hie  jacet   Lawren'  de   Sni  ISLiuro    quonda    rector 

istius  ecre  cui'  an'  ppiciet'  dns'.^ 

In  the  chancel,  north  of  the  altar,  is  the  brass  of 
Richard  W'ylleys  (1523.O,  warden  of  the  college,  in 
cope,  and  soutli  of  the  altar  that  of  another  ecclesiastic 
the  inscription  of  wliich  is  lost.  There  are  several 
brasses  in  the  Lady  chapel ;  the  oldest  commemorates 
Thomas  Chicheley  (d.  1400)  and  Agnes  his  wife, 
parents  of  the  Archbishop,  on  which  is  a  floriated 
Latin  cross  with  the  figure  of  our  Lord  in  the  centre 


•*  There  it  a  larger  nail  head  in  the  ab.ici. 

•'  The  projecting  itairway  bccomei 
octagonal  above  and  ia  carried  up  .ns  a 
turret,  with  a  figure  of  Archbiihop 
Chichclc  on  top. 

"  It  datci  from  1923  and  ii  in  mcrriorjr 
of  Cecil  Crew,  lomciime  Native  Com- 
miiiioner  in  Southern  Khodriia.  It  wai 
deiigncd  by  .Mr.  W.  Talbot  Brown. 


"  Fry,  op.  cit.  12. 

'  Freeman  in  1S49  recorded  th.it  there 
were  '  a  few  remains  of  open  scats  in  the 
north  aisle,'  but  with  this  exception  the 
church  w.is  pcwcd  throughout.  There 
was  a  west  gallery,  which  completely  hid 
the  tower  arch  :  Churchn  of  Archd. 
Sorthftmpi.  17. 

'  The  beci  have  been  .nlready  noted. 


"The  shields  are  (1)  Engl.md,  (2)  Lan- 
caster, (3)  Two  chcvronels  and  label  of 
three  points,  (4)  chequy  with  a  canton 
chetjuy. 

*  I-'ry,  op.  cit.  10. 

*  This  and  the  other  brasses  in  the 
church  are  figured  and  described  in 
Franklin  Hudson's  Mon,  Braises  0/ 
Northanls.  1853. 


276 


BOROUGH  OF  HICHAM   FERRERS 


and  the  emblems  of  the  four  Evangelists  at  the 
extremities  of  the  arms.  Another,  with  double  canopy, 
represents  thearchbisliop's  brother,  William  Chicheley 
(d.  1425)  and  Beatrice  his  wife,  tlie  man  in  civilian 
dress :  it  has  a  long  border  inscription  in  English 
and  the  emblems  of  the  Evangelists  at  the  corners." 
Near  to  it  is  the  brass  of  William  Thorpe,  merchant 
(d.  1504)  and  Marion  his  wife,  two  small  figures, 
the  man  in  civilian  dress,  with  scrolls,  groups  of  six 
sons  and  six  daughters  and  the  Evangelists'  symbols. 
Other  brasses  in  the  Lady  chapel  without  date  or 
inscription  comprise  a  civilian,  a  woman  (imperfect) 
and  a  child ;  there  is  also  the  indent  of  a  female  figure. 
In  the  south  aisle  chapel,  near  the  altar,  is  the  brass 
of  Henry  Denton,  chaplain  of  Chelveston  (d.  1498), 
who  is  represented  in  mass  vestments. 

There  is  no  medieval  glass. 

At  tlie  west  end  of  the  north  aisle  are  two  suits  of 
17th-century  town  armour  suspended  from  iron 
stanchions  fixed  to  the  wall.  Each  suit  consists  of 
breast  and  back  plates,  to  which  are  attached  a  pair  of 
broad  taces.  There  is  also  a  pikeman's  steel  cap,  with 
low  comb  and  broad  flat  brim.' 

In  the  chapel  at  the  east  end  of  the  outer  north 
aisle  is  a  16th-century  iron  chest  with  an  elaborate 
lock  and  two  large  siiields  of  arms  painted  on  the 
front,  one  with  the  double-headed  eagle  of  the  Empire.* 

There  is  a  scratch  dial  on  one  of  the  buttresses  of 
the  soutli  wall  of  the  chancel. 

Tiiere  are  eight  bells,  two  trebles  by  Taylor  of 
Loughborough  having  been  added  in  1 892  to  a 
former  ring  of  six.  The  third  is  by  Robert  Taylor  & 
Co.,  of  St.  Neots,  1820,  the  fourth  and  sixtii  re- 
castings  by  Taylor  in  1892,  the  fifth  an  alphabet 
bell  dated  161 1,  the  seventh  dated  1636,  and  the 
tenor  1633.° 

The  plate  consists  of  two  silver  cups  and  cover 
patens  of  1653  given  to  the  church  in  that  year  by 
John  Boughton  ;  there  is  also  a  pewter  flagon,  and 
brass  alms  dish.i" 

The  registers  begin  in  1589  :  the  first  volume  con- 
tains entries  to  1641,  the  second  1653-1693,  the  third 
1694-1742,  and  the  fourth  1742-1801. 

To  the  west  of  the  tower  is  a  14th-century  church- 
yard cross  II  ft.  high  on  a  Calvary  of  four  circular 
steps  ;  the  shaft,  square  below  and  above,  is  splayed 
for  the  greater  part  of  its  length  so  as  to  form  an 
irregular  octagon,  with  sliglitly  hollowed  sides,  orna- 
mented on  the  broader  faces  with  oak-leaf  foliage 
and  on  the  narrower  with  ball  flowers,  leaves,  and 


crockets.  The  head  was  restored  in  1919,  and  a 
Calvary  group  (west)  and  figure  of  our  Lady  and 
Child  (east)  added  to  the  capital." 

The  church  of  Higham  Ferrers  is 
ADVOWSON  dedicated  to  the  honour  of  St.  Mary 
the  Virgin.'-  It  may  be  assumed 
tliat  there  was  a  church  here  in  1086,  when  there 
was  a  priest  in  the  manor  of  William  Pevcrel.*' 
He  gave  the  church  to  the  priory  of  his  own  foundation 
at  I.enton*''  before  1113,'"  but  thougli  tliis  grant  was 
confirmed  by  Henry  I  and  later  kings,"  as  also  by 
Innocent  111,"  the  church  formed  part  of  the  forfeited 
possessions  of  the  younger  William  Peverel.  Richard  I 
presented  to  it,  and  when  in  1 237  William  de  Ferrers 
claimed  the  advowson  as  an  appurtenance  of  his 
manor  of  Higham  Ferrers  he  won  his  suit.'* 

The  plea  and  judgment  in  the  suit  are  interesting. 
The  earl  pleaded  tliat  King  John  had  given  to  William 
de  Ferrers,  Earl  of  Derby,  Higliam  with  the  hundred 
and  a  half  and  otlier  their  appurtenances,  and  the 
carl  quitclaimed  the  rest  of  the  lands  formerly  of 
William  Peverel  to  the  king.  The  judgment  in  the 
earl's  favour  was  based  on  the  points  that  the  manor 
was  in  the  hands  of  King  Richard  when  he  presented, 
and  King  John  afterwards  gave  the  manor  to  the  earl 
with  all  its  appurtenances  and  the  advowson  was  an 
appurtenance  of  the  manor.  The  church  descended 
with  the  manor  (q.v.)  until  in  1354  Henry  Duke  of 
Lancaster  obtained  licence  to  make  it  part  of  the 
endowment  of  and  appropriate  it  to  the  Hospital  of 
the  Annunciation  which  his  father  had  founded  at 
Leicester,"  and  he  was  about  to  convert  into  a  college.-" 
It  belonged  to  that  house  when  in  1422  Archbishop 
Chicheley  obtained  licence  to  found  his  college  at 
Higham  Ferrers,^'  which  he  described  nine  years 
later  as  established  on  condition  that  for  all  future 
times  its  master  or  warden  should  be  presented  to 
the  perpetual  vicarage  of  the  parish  church  of  Higham 
Ferrers  by  the  dean  and  chapter  of  the  Newark 
college  and  bound  to  continual  residence  and  the 
cure  of  souls  there.--  In  1535  the  church  of  Higham 
Ferrers  was  amongst  the  spiritualities  of  the  College 
of  Newark,  Leicester,-'  and  eight  years  later  Henry 
VIII  granted  it  to  Robert  Dacres,  of  Cheshunt,^ 
Master  of  the  Requests  and  one  of  his  Privy 
Councillors. 

From  Robert,  who  died  that  year,  the  advowson 
of  Higham  Ferrers  descended  through  his  son  George, 
and  grandson,  Sir  Thomas  Dacres,  of  Cheshunt,  to 
his  great-grandson  Thomas,^^  whose  right  of  presenta- 


•  This  brass  was  rep.iircd  and  parts 
renewtd  in  igzj  :  the  date  of  death  is 
recorded  by  a  modern  inscription. 

'  Assoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep.  xxxvi,  qj,  where 
the  armo-jr  is  figured  and  described.  It 
was  brought  to  the  church  from  the  old 
Town  Hall  at  its  demolition.  The  date 
of  the  armour  is  c.  1650. 

'  The  chest  was  the  gift  of  Mrs.  Mack- 
worth  Dolben. 

•  North,  Ch.  Bells  of  Northaius.  305, 
where  the  inscriptions  on  the  old  bells 
are  given.  There  is  also  a  priest's  bell  of 
1660. 

'"  Markham,  Cb.  Plate  of  Korthants. 
158. 

"  Assoc.  Arch.  Soc.  Rep.  xxiii,  178. 
The  capital  is  square  and  deep,  with 
plain  moulded  members  below  and  tri- 
angular   ornaments    on    the    four    facet. 


The  shaft  is  S  ft.  high,  of  Wcldon  stone, 
the  steps  of  local  ironstone. 

*^  Iltst.  MSS.  Com.  Rep.  xii,  app.  9, 
p.  532  ;  Bridges,  His:.  Sorihanis.  ii,  173  ; 
Bacon,  Lih.  Re^.  824. 

■>  y.C.H.  Northants.  i,  336*. 

"  Chart.  R.  141,  m.  9,  no.  7. 

*^  He  died  in  June,  11 13.  Complete 
Veera^e  (New  Ed.),  iv,  771. 

'»  Ch.nrt.  R.  loc.  cit. 

"  Cal.  Pap.  Reg.  Letters,  i,  18. 

"  Bracton's  Note  Bk.  1236;  Rot.  Rob. 
Crossetesle  (Cant,  and  York  Soc),  178, 
196. 

"•  Inq.  a.q.d.  file  313,  no.   1  ;    Pat.  R. 

29  Edw.   in,   pt.    I,  m.   22;    Close    R. 

30  Edw.  Ill,  m.  I2d. 

"  Dugdale,  .l/on.  Angl.  vi,  1397. 
"VClI.  .\orthanis.  ii,   177-79;    Cal. 
Pat.  1422-29,  p.  472. 

277 


*2  Cal.  Pap.  Re^.  Letters^  viii,  330-31  ; 
Stowe  MS.  m.  59-62. 

23  Valor  F.ccles.  (Rcc.  Com.),  iv,  169-70. 

"  Pat.  R.  34  Hen.  MH,  pt.  7,  no.  10. 
In  this  grant,  which  included  the  rever- 
sion of  certain  messuages  and  lands  in 
Higham  Ferrers,  formerly  of  Archbishop 
Chichelcy's  college  and  leased  by  the  last 
master  and  two  of  his  predecessors,  and 
which  was  accompanied  with  the  condition 
of  tiie  maintenance  of  two  chaplains  in 
the  parish  church  and  a  schoolmaster  in 
the  town  {see  above)  :  the  advowson  ii 
described  as  one  of  the  possessions  of 
the  Higham  Ferrers  college. 

'*  Clutterbuclc,  Herts,  ii,  loi  ;  Berry, 
Cotintv  Genealogies^  Hens,  66  ;  Cussans, 
Herts,  i,  pt.  iii,  188  ;  Feet  of  F.  Div.  Cos. 
Hil.  7  Jas.  I;  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  (Ser.  ii) 
ccclix,  119  ;   Ct.  of  Wards,  file  54,  no.  I18. 


A   HISTORY   OF   NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


tion  was  usurped,  in  1631  by  Archbishop  Abbot  and 
in  1635  by  Laud.-*  In  1662,  however,  this  second 
Sir  Thomas  Dacres  had  recovered  the  patronage,-' 
and  two  years  later,  with  his  son  Thomas  and  grand- 
son Robert,  made  a  settlement  in  which  the  church 
of  Higham  Ferrers  was  included.-*  Robert  was 
seised  of  it  in  1670,-'  1676  and  1691.'"  A  petition 
dated  12  February  1725-6,  was  presented  to  his  son 
and  heir  Thomas,  then  patron,  by  the  townsfolk  of 
Higham  Ferrers,  in  which  they  claimed  fulfilment  of 
his  promise  to  allow  them  the  choice  of  the  next 
vicar,^^  which  he  did  by  presenting  the  candidate  of 
their  recommendation.^-  Within  the  next  ten  years 
he  seems  to  have  sold  the  advowson  to  the  Earl  of 
Malton,  afterwards  Marquis  of  Rockingham,^  patron 
in  1735  and  1745.*^'  From  his  son  and  heir,  Charles 
Marquis  of  Rockingham,  Prime  Minister  of  England, 
who  died  without  issue  in  1782,  the  advowson  came 
to  the  grandson  of  the  first  Marquis,  William  Went- 
worth,  fourth  Earl  Fitzwilliam,'^  patron  in  1800. 
His  son,  Charles  William,  Earl  Fitzwilliam,  patron  in 
1838,'*  was  succeeded  by  his  third  son,  the  Honourable 
George    Wentworth    Fitzwilliam    of   Milton,    Peter- 


Dacru  of  Cheshunt. 
Or  a  chei'fron  sable 
bel-uweti  jbri-e  roundels 
gules  eaeh  charged  tvitb 
a  scallop  argent. 


Watson,  Marquis  of 
Rockinghnm.  Argent  a 
cbeveron  azure  bcKveen 
three  martlets  sable  wtth 
three  crescents  or  upon 
the  cbeveron. 


Fitzwilliam.    Lozengy 
argent  and  gules. 

borough,  since  whose  death  in  1874.  his  son,  George 
Charles  Wentworth  Fitzwilliam,  of  Milton,  has  been 
patron.^' 

The  rectory  of  Higham  Ferrers  followed  the  descent 
of  the  advowson  (q.v.)  down  to  the  dissolution  of  the 
college  of  Newark.  It  had  been  leased  with  a  burgage 
lying  to  the  south  of  the  rectory  house  and  also  tlie 
rectories  of  Caldecote  and  Chelveston  by  the  dean  of 


the  college  in  1 5 30  for  40  years  to  Laurence  Washing- 
ton and  Elizabeth  his  wife.  In  1567  Queen  Elizabeth 
granted  a  lease  to  John  Jones  for  a  term  of  21  years 
from  the  expiration  of  the  lease  to  Washington. 
Further  leases  in  reversion  were  granted  by  the  Crown 
in  1570  to  Nicholas  Stere  for  31  years,  and  in  1574 
to  John  Jones  for  21  years.  The  interests  under  these 
leases  seem  to  have  been  acquired  by  Christopher 
Freeman,  who  in  1602  obtained  a  lease  for  his  life  and 
the  lives  of  Martha  his  wife  and  his  sons  Ralph  and 
George.**  In  1606  he  had  a  grant  of  the  chapels, 
messuages,  mills,  glebe  lands,  tithes,  etc.,  in  the 
parishes  of  Higham  Ferrers,  Chelveston  and  Calde- 
cote, parcel  of  the  said  rectory.^  An  action  was 
brought  in  the  Court  of  Chancery  by  Henry,  son  of 
Christopher  Freeman,  regarding  the  liability  to 
repair  the  chancel  of  Higham  Ferrers  church.  The 
plaintiff,  Henry  Freeman,  admitted  his  liability  as 
owner  of  the  rectory,  but  claimed  that  Christopher 
Rudd  and  i\Iartin  Creake  as  lessees  had  allowed  the 
chancel  to  fall  into  decay  and  ruin.  It  appears  that 
Christopher  Freeman,  by  his  will  dated  in  1610,  left 
the  parsonage  house,  tithes,  etc.,  to  his  wife  Martha, 
for  life,  with  remainder  to  Ralph  his  son  and  heir. 
Martha  afterwards  married  Anthony  Herenden,  and 
then  neglected  to  repair  the  chancel,  but  being 
threatened  with  proceedings  in  the  Ecclesiastical 
Court,  leased  the  tithes  to  Christopher  Rudd  and 
Martin  Creake.  The  lessees  held  them  for  some  ten 
years  before  the  death  of  Martha  in  1621.  Ralph 
Freeman  having  predeceased  Martha  without  issue, 
he  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  Henry,  the  plaintiff, 
who  had  to  disburse  200  marks  on  repairs  to  the 
chancel,  for  which  he  sued  the  lessees  Rudd  and 
Creake.'"'  Another  Henry  Freeman  owned  the  rectory 
in  l68i.''i  In  1696  one  moiety  belonged  to  James 
Johnson  and  his  wife  Judith,  and  this  or  the  other 
moiety  was  held  by  Susan  Wickham,  widow,  in  1714.*^ 
Both  belonged  to  Thomas  Dacres  in  1731,  and  have 
since  descended  with  the  advowson  (q.v.). 

The  chapel  of  Jesus  in  Higham  Ferrers  was  included 
in  the  grant  to  Robert  Dacres  and  still  owned  by  his 
heirs  in  1731. 

The  following  charities  are  ad- 
CHJRITIES  ministered  by  the  Mayor  of  Fligham 
Ferrers  and  11  other  trustees  in 
conformity  with  a  scheme  of  the  Charity  Commis- 
sioners dated  3  April  1914,  under  the  title  of  the 
United  Charities : — 

Charity  of  Archbishop  Henry  Chicheley  for  Bedes- 
men founded  under  a  licence  from  the  Crown  in  1422, 
originally  consisted  of  the  Bedehouse  and  Garden 
Ground  and  an  annual  charge  of  ^^24  10;.  out  of  land 
belonging  to  Robert  Dacres.  The  endowment  is  now 
represented  by  ^^890  8s.  %d.  New  Zealand  4  per  cent. 
Inscribed  Stock,  ^^239  zs.  id.  India  3  per  cent.  Stock 
and  a  yearly  payment  of  j^4  by  the  Corporation  of 
Higham  Ferrers. 


"  Init.  Bki.  (P.R.O.).  Bolh  prclatci 
held  that  the  advowson  belonged  to 
Canterbury  (S.  P.  Uom.  Chai.  I,  ccxriii, 
128). 

"  In.t.  Bki.  (P.R.O.). 

«•  Feet  of  I',  Uiv.  Coi.  Trin.  16  Cha..  II. 

"Ibid.  Mich.  12  Chai.  II. 

•«  Init.  Bki.  (PRO.). 

"  Norihanis.  N.  and  Q.  i,  34-5. 

"  In.t.  Bk..  (P.R.O.). 


"See  Rccov.  R.  Hil.  5  Geo.  II,  ro.  135. 
He  is  said  to  have  sold  the  college  estates, 
included  in  the  grant  of  the  advowson  to 
Robert  Dacres,  to  the  Earl  in  1734- 
Whellan,  Hist.  Northants.  ()|6. 

'*  Bacon,  Lib.  Regis.  824-25. 

•^  Complete  Peerage  (New  Ed.)  luc.  cil  ; 
Burke,  Peerage,  1927. 

*•  Act  Priv.  and  Loc.  40  Geo.  Ill,  cap. 
36  i  I  Vict,  cap    II. 


"  Cler.  Guide ;  Clergy  List ;  Burke, 
loc.  cit. 

'»  Pat.  R.  44  Eliz.  pt.  33,  m.  17. 

"  Ibid.  4  J.ii.  I,  pt.  iq. 

*"  C'han.  Prnc.  (Scr.  ii),  cccxiviii,  14. 

«■  Ibid. 

*'  Kccov.  R.  E,ist.  33  C'has.  II,  ro.  169. 
Feet  of  V.  Northants.  Trin.  8  Will,  and 
Mary  ;  Trin.  I  Geo.  I. 


278 


BOROUGH  OF   HICHAM   FERRERS 


Nicholas  Latham's  Dole  consists  of  a  yearly  pay- 
ment of  j^3,  paid  by  the  bailiff  of  Parson  Latham's 
Hospital  in  Barnwell.  Nicholas  Latham  died  about 
1620. 

The  Honourable  Lewis  Watson  about  the  year  1708 
gave  £50. 

Elizabeth  Frei-man,  by  her  will  dated  18  Tcbruary 
'7'5.  g-i^'-'^^o. 

Richard  W'aijstaff,  who  died  in  August  1 747,  by 
his  will  gave  20/.  a  year  to  the  poor  and  10/.  yearly  to 
the  minister  for  a  sermon.  The  endowments  of  the 
three  last  mentioned  charities  consist  of  2  acres  of 
land  known  as  Thorp  End  Close,  which  produced 
£7  i6s.  6d.  in  1924. 

John  Dewberry's  charity  originally  consisted  of  a 
yearly  sum  of  j^i  which  had  long  been  paid  as  a  rent- 
charge  issuing  out  of  land  belonging  to  Earl  Fitz- 
william.  This  charge  was  redeemed  in  1914  by  the 
transfer  of  £^0  Consols  to  the  Official  Trustees. 

.Ann  Sanders,  who  died  in  July  1804,  gave  ^^50  to 
the  poor,  and 

Mrs.  Maskell,  by  her  will  dated  about  1819,  gave 
;£20.  These  two  gifts  are  now  represented  by 
£6()  lis.  gJ.  India  3  per  cent.  Stock. 

George  Newman,  by  his  will  proved  in  the  Preroga- 
tive Court  of  Canterbury  3  November  1855,  gave 
such  part  of  his  personal  estate  as  he  could  lawfully 
b'^queath  for  charitable  purposes  for  the  support  of 
six  poor  almswomen.  The  legacy,  together  with 
accumulations,  was  invested  in  ^^5,834  12^.  c)d.  India 
3  per  cent.  Stock. 

Selina  Dennis  Pressland,  by  her  will  proved  in  the 
Peterborough  Registry,  3  June  1891,  gave  ^^3,000  for 
the  benefit  of  poor  widows.  The  legacy  was  invested 
in  ;^3,030  6s.  id.  Consols. 

The  gross  income  of  the  charities  amounted  to 
;^3i3  is.  6d.  in  1924. 

The  yearly  income  of  the  charity  of  Archbishop 
Cliicheley  is  applied  in  stipends  to  13  bcdespeople, 
being  12  men  and  one  woman.  ^^33  13/.  was  so  ap- 
plied in  1924. 

There  are  six  almswomen  who  receive  a  stipend  at 
the  rate  of  8/.  per  week.  They  occupy  almshouses 
which  are  held  on  a  yearly  tenancy  from  the  Cor- 
poration at  a  rent  of  ^51. 

A  stipend  of  not  less  than  ^^5  yearly  is  paid  to  each 
of  not  more  than  15  poor  widows  called  the  Pressland 
Widows. 


The  residue  of  the  income  of  tlie  charities  is  applied 
for  the  benefit  of  the  poor  generally  at  tlie  discretion 
of  the  trustees. 

.Archbishop  Chichclcy  before-mentioned  also  pro- 
vided for  the  maintenance  of  two  chaplains.  In 
respect  of  this  a  sum  oi  £1$  a  year  is  paid  to  the  vicar 
in  augmentation  of  the  vicarage  out  of  the  estates  of 
Earl  Eitzwilliam. 

By  her  will  Mrs.  Wilde,  who  died  about  1814,  gave 
£'}o  to  the  poor.  .\  sum  of  ,^27  was  received  by  the 
vicar  in  respect  of  this  legacy  and  the  interest  amount- 
ing to  ^l  js.  was  distributed  in  bread  during  winter. 
Owing  to  the  insolvency  of  the  holder  this  charity 
has  been  lost. 

By  an  award,  dated  27  December  1839,  of  the  In- 
closure  Commissioners  9  a.  I  r.  31  p.  of  land  situate 
in  the  beast  pasture  was  allotted  to  six  trustees  for 
the  use  of  the  inhabitants  as  a  recreation  ground. 

In  1910  the  trust  was  transferred  to  the  Town 
Council  of  Higham  Ferrers.  The  land  is  let  for 
grazing  at  a  rent  of  £j  per  annum,  which  is  applied 
in  the  upkeep  of  the  gates  and  fences. 

The  Church  Land.  By  the  award  above-mentioned 
6  a.  I  r.  1 1  p.  of  land  in  the  beast  pasture  was  allotted 
to  the  churchwardens  for  the  benefit  of  the  church. 
The  land  is  let  in  allotments  to  about  50  tenants  and 
produced  ^16  6j.  8d.  in  rent  in  1924.  The  income 
is  applied  to  church  maintenance. 

By  declaration  of  trust  dated  13  July  1910  a  sum 
of  ;^2oo  India  2j  per  cent.  Stock  was  transferred  to 
the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds  by  John 
Crew,  of  the  Manor  House,  upon  trust  that  the  divi- 
dends should  be  applied  by  the  vicar  and  church- 
wardens towards  the  repair  of  the  church.  The 
dividends  amount  to  £^  per  annum. 

By  an  indenture  dated  20  March  1866  it  was 
declared  that  the  interest  to  arise  from  a  sum  of  £100 
given  by  Mrs.  Ann  Burgess  should  be  applied  in  pro- 
viding clothing  for  one  or  more  needy  local  preacher  or 
preacliers  of  the  Wesleyan  Society  in  Higham  Ferrers 
Circuit.  The  gift  was  invested  in  ^{^88  gs.  lid. 
Consols  and  the  income  amounting  to  £2  4J.  is 
applied  in  the  purchase  of  suits  of  clothes  every  few 
years.  The  last  distribution  took  place  in  1893, 
when  three  suits  costing  ^^lo  101.  were  distributed  to 
three  recipients. 

The  several  sums  of  stock  are  standing  in  the  name 
of  the  Official  Trustees  of  Charitable  Funds. 


HIGHAM    PARK 


Park  of  Hecham  (xii  cent.).  Park  of  Hegham  Ferrers 
(xiv  cent.). 

Higham  Park,  the  park  attached  to  Higham  Ferrers 
Castle,  was  formerly  extra-parochial  and  included  in 
the  liberty  of  Rushden,  but  is  now  an  independent 
parish.  It  lies  in  the  south-east  of  Higham  Hundred, 
on  the  borders  of  Bedfordshire  and  covers  600  acres, 
of  which  167  acres  are  in  the  parish  of  Knotting  in 
Bedfordshire.  About  half  the  total  area  is  arable  land 
where  wheat,  oats,  barley  beans  and  turnips  are  grown 
and  the  remainder  permanent  grass.     The  surface  is 


friable  clay,  the  subsoil  Oxford  clay  witli  streaks  of 
cornbrash.  In  1921  the  population  numbered  thirteen 
persons. 

There  has  never  been  a  parish  church,  but  there  was 
a  chapel  attached  to  the  Great  Lodge  of  the  Park  which 
fell  into  decay  with  the  house. 

The  park  was  at  one  time  surrounded  by  a  ditch. 
The  principal  entrance  was  on  its  north-west  side  by 
the  road  leading  indirectly  from  Rushden.  A  moated 
inclosure,  now  partially  destroyed,  marks  the  site  of 
the  Great  Lodge,  where  the  keeper  of  the  park  lived. 


279 


A   HISTORY  OF  NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 


It  was  described  as  in  Rushden  in  1327*  and  consisted 
in  the  15th  century  of  a  hall,  chapel,  chamber,  kitchen, 
brewhouse  and  bakehouse.^  There  were  a  dovecot^ 
and  two  fishponds*  in  the  grounds.  Besides  the  Great 
Lodge  there  was  a  Little  Lodge  or  New  I,odge  which 
stood  in  the  i6th  century  at  the  south  end  of  the 
park.*  The  present  Old  Hall,  now  a  farm  house,  was 
possibly  built  on  a  new  site  when  the  Great  Lodge 
fell  into  decay  in  the  time  of  the  Commonwealth.^  At 
the  end  of  the  i8th  century  the  Great  Lodge  was 
known  as  Higham  Park  House.  The  park  was  said  in 
1649  to  be  well  wooded  and  to  contain  many  valuable 
trees.  It  was,  however,  disparked  by  1671'  and  the 
land  converted  into  arable  and  pasture. 

The  earliest  mention  of  the  park  seems  to  belong  to 
the  I2th  year  of  Henry  II  (1166),  when  tlie  sheriff  of 
Northamptonshire  owed  ^15  16^.  lojW.  for  the  ex- 
change of  the  park  of  Higham.* 

King  John's  grant  of  Higham  Ferrers  to  the  Earl  of 
Derby  shows,  however,  that  the  King's  great-grand- 
father, Henry  I,  had  acquired  the  park  from  the  elder 
William  Peverel  and  that  it  remained  part  of  the  royal 
demesne  until  1199.^  It  was  enlarged  in  or  before 
1 166  by  Henry  II,  who  inclosed  within  it  certain  lands 
for  which  he  gave  in  exchange  to  tlie  tenants,  Ricliard 
and  William  de  Newton  and  Aleswas  or  Halenod 
Bochard,  land  elsewhere  in  the  same  fee.'"  Thence- 
forward payment  on  this  account  was  made  yearly 
into  the  Exchequer.^'  After  the  grant  of  11 99  these 
three  knights  redeemed  their  old  inheritance  and  the 
lands  they  had  held  in  exchange  were  absorbed  in  the 
manor  of  Earl  Ferrers. '^  Higham  Park,  thus  reduced 
to  its  earlier  dimensions,  followed  the  descent  of  the 
manor  of  Higham  Ferrers  (q.v.)  until  1672.  In  1298 
and  again  in  1327  it  is  called  the  park  of  Rushden,  of 
which  parish  it  formed  part  until  the  latter  part  of  the 
last  century,  but  later  in  the  14th  and  throughout 
most  of  the  17th  century  it  was  generally  known  as 
Higham  Ferrers  Park.  In  1406,  Henry  IV  leased  its 
herbage  and  pannage  to  Thomas  Beston  and  the  parker 
was  charged  to  provide  him  with  a  key  of  the  gate  of 
the  park  that  he  might  have  free  entry  with  ins  cattle. l' 
Two  leases  of  the  same  for  twenly-one  years  were 
made  by  James  I  in  1604,  first  to  William  Purvey 
and  afterwards  to  Sir  John  Stanhope,  vice-cham- 
berlain of  his  household.  These  leases  included 
the  warren  of  the  park,  all  buildings  there  and  the 


office  of  keeper.  These  were  followed,  early  in  the 
next  year,  by  a  grant  in  socage  of  Higham  Ferrers  Park 
to  Sir  George  Hume,  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer.^* 
In  16:0  Sir  John  Stanhope,  now  Lord  Stanhope, 
surrendered  his  claim  to  the  park  of  Higham  Ferrers  in 
Northamptonsliire  and  Bedfordshire  to  the  king  for 
j^400.**  William  Purvey  was  dead,  but  his  lease  was 
still  in  force  when  a  fresh  one  was  granted  in  1618  to 
John  Levingston,  groom  of  the  bedchamber,  for  life 
and  twenty-one  years  beyond. 1®  This  was  to  come 
into  force  in  March  1624,  and  in  this  month  instruc- 
tions given  a  year  before  were  renewed  to  Sir  Thomas 
Tresham,  verderer  of  Rockingham  Forest,  to  report 
on  the  game  and  woods  in  Higham  Ferrers  Park.  He 
found  great  disorder  prevailing,  and  the  new  keeper 
refused  to  take  charge  until  a  survey  had  been  made." 
In  the  following  November  Sir  Robert  Osborne  was 
ordered  to  examine  the  deer-stealers  from  Higham 
Ferrers  Park,  and  three  weeks  later  steps  were  taken 
to  arrest  Edward  Ekins  who  was  chiefly  responsible 
for  the  outrages  there.'*  The  park  formed  part  of  the 
jointure  of  Queen  Henrietta  Maria  in  1630."  Sir 
John  Levingston  had  died  more  than  three  years 
bcforCj^"  and  in  or  about  1632  his  widov/,  who  then 
held  the  remainder  of  his 
lease,  petitioned  Charles  I  to 
renew  it  to  her  son,^'  presum- 
ably the  James  Levingston, 
groom  of  the  bedchamber,  in 
1625,^2  who  leased  the  keeper- 
ship  of  the  park  to  Francis 
Dyn  in  1649.^' 

A  later  lessee.  Sir  Robert 
Long,  bart.,  Auditor  of  the 
Exchequer,  exchanged  his  in- 
terest for  permanent  posses- 
sion in   1672,  when   he    paid 

j{j8oo  for  the  grant  in  free  socage  of  Higham  Ferrers 
Park  with  its  appurtenances.'''*  In  the  following 
year  he  was  succeeded  by  his  nephew  and  heir  Sir 
James  Long,  bart.,  of  Draycot  Cerne,^*  whose  great- 
grandson,  the  third  Sir  Robert  I-ong,  was  seised  in 
the  latter  part  of  the  1 8th  century .'•^^ 

The  Parliamentary  Commissioners  of  1649  declared 
Higham  Park  to  be  tithe  frc\-,2' but  about  60  years  later 
tithes  from  this  estate  belonged  to  the  rectory  of 
Rushden.-* 


Long  of  Drnycnt.  SahU 
crusily  and  a  lion  ardent. 


'  Chan.  Inq.  p.m.  Edw.  Ill,  file  6,  m.  27. 
'  Rev.  W.  J.  I!.  Kerr,  Higham  Ferrers, 
165-9. 

•  Ibid.  164. 

'  Ibid.     163  :     Pari.    Surv.   Nortliants. 
no.  34. 
'  Kerr,  op.  cit.  169. 

•  Pari.  Surv.  NorthanU.  no.  34. 
'  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1671-72,  25. 

•  r,pe  Roll  12  Hen.  II  (Pipe  R.  Soc.)  64. 

•  I'inc  R,  1  John,  rn.  23  ;  Pipe  Roll,  i 
John,  m.  2d  ;  Royal  Charter*  (Duchy  of 
Lane.)  49. 


'»  Pipe  Roll,  2  John,  m.  4d  ;  Il.irdy,  Rot. 
dc  Ohlal.  el  Ftn.  61. 

"  Pipe  Roll,  13  Hen.  II  (Pipe  R.  Soc.) 
1 13  ct  scq. 

"  Pipe  R.  2  John,  m.  4d. 

"  Misc.  Bks.  (Duchy  of  Lane.)  16, 
fol.  52,  65. 

'*  Pat.  R.  I  Jas.  I,  pt.  7,  m.  29. 

>'  Feet,  of  F.  Div.  Cos.  Mil.  8  Ja>.  I. 

'•  Pat.  R.  ifi  Jas  I,  pt.  1 1,  no.  4  ;  Cal. 
S.  P.  Dom.  1611-18,  p.  597. 

"  Ibid.  1619-23,  p.  539  i  1623-25,  pp. 
195,  202. 


'"  Ibid.  p.  388  ;    1623-25,  p.  407. 

'»  Pat.  R.  5  Chas.  I,  pt.  15,  no.  6. 

"  Pari.  Surv.  Northants.  no.  34. 

"'  Cal.  S.  P.  Dom.  1631-33,  pp.  476-77. 

"  Ibid.  1625-26,  pp.  23,  195. 

"  Feet  of  F.  Northants.  Hil.  1649. 

"  Pat.  24  Chas.  II,  pt.  3,  no.  14;  Cal. 
S.  P.  Dom.,  1671-72,  p.  25. 

"  Complete  Baronetage,  iii,  257-59. 

"'  Brid,:;os,  Xorthiinis.  ii,  194. 

*'  Pari.  Surv.  Northants.  no.  34. 

•»  Bridges,  loc.  cit.  ;  Hist.  MSS.  Com. 
Rep.  MSS.  of  Mrs.  Sackville,  i,  4?. 


280 


CENTRAL  UNIVERSITY  LIBRARY 

University  of  California,  San  Diego 


DATE  DUE 

T]tQ,^i^nm 

/\\' 

a  39 


UCSD  Libr. 


UC  SOllTHfRN  RrniONAL  I IPRARY  f  ACIl  ITY 


D    001  047  326    2 


Univ 

Sc 

I 

! 


I